GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time

An archive of brainout's vimeo video descriptions and playlists (to go along with the dumped videos in the event vimeo pulls them down with all of the playlists and text).


This series has three parts: GGS11s is the subseries showing how Mary's meter works, in order to better explain Paul's. But the 'Synoptics' and 'Jim3' (and later) videos, demonstrate ties between her meter, and how James and Luke both use her meter. The 'Jim' series of videos is also housed in the James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis channel, if you'd rather watch them solo. They Synoptic videos are separately housed in Synoptics.

Click to play this channels' videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Ever since Psalm 90 was penned, it was known that Christ's death was Scheduled to occur NO LATER than 'our' 37AD. Ever since David was crowned King over All Israel, it was known from 1Kings 6:1 that Christ had to be born ON the 1000th anniversary of that crowning. For The Day of the Lord had to be 1000 years, Psalm 90:4. The first 'day' started with the First David; so the last 'day', would culminate with the Last David. So He had to be born ON TIME, or else God would break His 2Sam7 Promise to David (and through him to Israel, since she lost out by electing Saul, 1Sam8-13, compared with 2Sam7). Ouch.

In case someone forgot that rule, God reminded Zerubabbel of it, in Haggai 2, coming TWICE (heh, God-man, two natures in one person) on 25 Chislev -- 2nd Temple's founding anniversary, which 357 years later would be known also as Chanukah. And the 1000th anniversary was what? 4BC, by our calendars.

Hence the moniker '11s'. One Birthdate Deadline, One Christ, One Salvation, One Specific Schedule that He come in the 11th hour (Gal4:4); and then Pay, just before 'midnight'.

Mary knew that. So Mary Meter Maps from 1st Chanukah to Messiah, to future Millennium, just as Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel had done. Here, she uses Daniel's 73-meter dateline to begin her own, piggybacking on his ending meter at Rome's Rise -- to begin at first Chanukah, 73 years LATER. Then she 'balances' Time at her future Son's age 56, as that would be 40 years before the Millennium was then SCHEDULED to start. Paul picks up his meter where Mary leaves off, in Eph 1:3-14. What a shock.

So, starting here with 11s2 GGS -- for 11s1 is now outdated, I got it wrong the first time -- this 'channel' (playlist) replicates all videos in the Youtube Magnificat playlist (http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8E0CA478D2DE276F). For the Magnificat functions as an OT-to-NT intermission or even 'Act', between Daniel 9's prophetic meter 'play' in Daniel 9, and Paul's later metered NT 'reply' to Mary's meter, in his Ephesians 1:3-14.

For Mary, as soon as she alights from her donkey on visiting her cousin Elizabeth, launches into a metered prophecy which was immediately recognized as Divine. Zecharias will, when he recovers speech, play to her meter with his own metered prophetic 'reply'. Luke thus records both speeches in Luke 1, which by then had long been regarded as Canon.

So what is the importance of Mary's meter? Well, as Moses did in Psalm 90, Mary's Magnificat Time Poem outlines Time backward and forward from her day of speaking: centering on, the Chanukah birthdate for Christ.

No one in Christendom knows about this. So, I'm documenting it; so, you can vet the Greek yourself. This is a separate subplaylist (11s GGS). If you're having trouble following my Bible Hebrew Meter playlists, start here: for in this subseries, I also show how you VET text for meter.

Paul TAGS her meter, Ephesians 1:3-14. He even derives his meter pattern, from hers (and Zecharias'). No wonder he uses the pregnancy metaphors: she did. Shocks me. Master doc on it, is MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc. If you don't have BibleWorks fonts, the PDF version is MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf.

See also Lord Born on Chanukah 4 BC playlist in Youtube, and the Psalm 90 'channel' (playlist), here in Vimeo (or Youtube); for Mary plays on all those meters.

She also plays deftly on many OT passages, as does Isaiah. So to show that, Episodes 10-21 of my vimeo 'synoptics' channel (playlist) are here added. View them in tandem with MaryMagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf's 'ZakarChart' (page 21), to get a quick view of how the two soliloquies, interrelate with the OT verses. Very obvious CHANUKAH meaning, but in classical sotto voce GREEK style. Later episodes in the Synoptics (after Epi.21) will also show that ZakarChart section, to lead back to Luke's tracking of Matthew.

Again, this Bible meter is unknown to Christendom. Hence I must show the evidence live onscreen, so you can vet it.


GGS11s15 Magnificat Meter, Revisted

Mary's Magnificat Meter reconciles between the Abrahamic and Davidic deadlines for her newly-announced Son's birth, from the first Chanukah; for she just then knew He'd be born on the 160th anniversary of that first Chanukah. Channel showing the videos on this: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . Doc used in video (latest version): MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or MagnificatMeterDraft2R.doc (now lost), but you need Bibleworks fonts for it, freely downloadable at bibleworks.com/fonts.html).

Turns out that all other NT Bible dateline meter formulas key off her reconciliation. Luke in particular, pads her text with a preface 'k'eipen Miryam' to reconcile between the shoulda-been-born Year 4106 From Adam's Fall to the then-known 4103 FAF, which Mary's tallying. But long prior, starting with Galatians, Paul had been doing the same thing, as you can now see in the paulmeter channel ( Pauline Dateline Meters ).

That flummoxed me, so here I go back to Mary's Magnificat to show the proof of Magnificat setting that accounting precedence. For it matters to know WHY all the NT books find some way to date their books based on the Lord's woulda-been or real age. Especially, since to this day 'scholars' debate when He was born, as if that information wasn't baldly disclosed in Scripture. Which as you'll see from the text interacting with the meter (or from the text alone, if you actually READ it carefully) -- as you'll see, Bible does baldly and repeatedly state WHEN He was born. For, all Bible dates from Genesis to Rev hub around His Birth and Death, as Messiah is the key to history.

To show that, Mary keys off Daniel, starting 73 years after Daniel's timeline ended at 238 BC (rise of the feet of clay and iron, Rome), so 238+73 later = end 165 BC = start 164 BC = 1st Chanukah. Christ is actually born 160th year after that, shoulda-been born 164th year after that relative to Abraham (Luke's padding, left numbers on screen). So then 40 years of life leaves 56/7 years to Mill (57 really, since He's to die at beginning of year at Passover, on either schedule). So Mary was reconciling equidistantly, the payback on Abraham's 54 year credit at the end, like this: 40 when His Life was scheduled to end +16 +40 remaining coundown to Mill.

If you look at all the other NT dateline meters (except Matthew, who dates his book from Malachi), they all follow her same accounting formulas, back-and-forth. Shocking. This also shows the INTENT of the meter, so again you can tell the meter counts are the result of the writers deliberately padding their text to GET TO those meters. So again you can be very assured that God preserved His Word. Pity the stupid 'quelle' people, the horrible KJVO people, the dumb Mormons and Muslims and atheists who all claim that Bible is corrupted or that we don't have the original text. We do. Provably. Better still, we now have a better tool to sort among the variants, to correct the UBS text, at least for these dateline meters. Most of all, this accounting in Magnificat, shows the origin of all those dateline meter formulas. And perhaps most interesting, is the proof that what you should value about MARY, is her knowledge of doctrine, not the cheap trashy pandered claim by the lying Catholics, about her staying a virgin (a lie invented originally to 'compete' with pagan Roman Vestal Virgins; not at all Scriptural, as she would have SINNED not to have children with her husband). Oh well.

File Name: MaryRevisited, 3/14/15.


GGS11s16 Mary Reconciles to Daniel

To show how Mary picks up where Daniel left off, so you can see the precedent for her reconciliation. I've covered this before, but here the reconciliation is clearer. Thus when the entire NT's dateline meters measure from hers, you can see why.

Websites used in the video, to show importance of 238 BC:

Floralia (which was first instituted in the same year, maybe unrelated but doubtless reason for the year to be memorable as well): penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/floralia.html

UNRV: unrv.com/provinces/province-chronology.php

Turns out UNRV does have a chronology from 284-238, here: unrv.com/empire/roman-timeline-3rd-century.php.

Navies of Rome book: books.google.com/books?id=ccHyOlPK4pIC&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&f=false

Eckstein's book: amazon.com/dp/0520259920/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1AC6BCZ98965A&coliid=IJE4KL97PCS2V

The Daniel chrono chart (below) has another link to that time which is more meaty.

284 BC, the earlier point in Daniel's Track 2 chronology, was a different kind of turning point, a settling with the Gauls: books.google.com/books?id=aEfvR1Qcd0gC&pg=PA349&f=false

You can find the same material elsewhere, but that link is a handy summary.

Here's another handy summary about how 284 BC was a turning point which you can download for free, see the middle left column on the page: books.google.com/books?id=mW8NAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&f=false

They often use Polybius' Histories, here free download in both Greek and English, link being the page which talks about the 284 turning point, books.google.com/books?id=ujMjAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA16#v=twopage&q&f=false

No offense, but the dingdongs who claim a late date for Daniel, really have no clue about anything. For it's impossible for anyone to know the CURRENT EFFECT of history, on the future. So this is clearly Divine Prophecy in METER, for crying out loud. No human is this smart.

Docs used in video:

Mary's Magnificat (latest version): MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf Daniel: DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf

You really need to read both, and spend a lot of time vetting, as the proof is extensive and complex. Will take months to vet, sorry. The Daniel piece's 'Footnote E' goes through the verses on the kings Daniel covers per syllable=year, recounting them in light of the Kings and Chronicles verses covering them, intertwining those references as he talks. No wonder God had him rule Babylon. Mary KNEW that too, and she's emulating Daniel's prayer style when she talks. No wonder God had her be the mother, as it would be necessary for Christ to be thoroughly versed in Scripture from birth. As you proof both docs, you'll be amazed at both believers' command of Scripture. For which they are both, underpraised. THIS is what is supposed to happen to the believer, total integrated fluency in KNOWING BIBLE.

BTW, you can substitute 'pdf' for 'doc' ('RTF' for Daniel) to instead download the Word doc originals, but you'll need Bibleworks fonts (because I pasted the text from Bibleworks 5), freely downloadable here: bibleworks.com/fonts.html

File Name: DanRevisited123.avi 3/15/15.


GGS11s17a Magnificat Meter, Again Revisited

This is perhaps a temporary video subseries, revisiting my assumptions about what seems to be the pan-NT foundation for NT Meter: based on, the Magnificat.

That's a shocking idea to me, at least, because I don't expect what she said to be so determinative of meter patterns in the NT. 'Maybe because I'm female and don't want females to get such credit? My prejudice? Well, any prejudice masks facts, so I revisit the notion here. Don't know if I will contradict any other video I've done, am revisiting it de novo.

Her meter is based on years from Abraham's maturation; that was a standard mechanic in the OT, used by Moses in Genesis 1; so you could argue she's not doing anything new, but rather following his standard; still, this is the earliest instance we have, of Greek words applied with Bible Hebrew meter. So it may prove determinative. How, I don't know. Yet.

I did the vid back in March, but am uploading it now. Again, it's tentative and I might end up taking it down, later. There will be more of these ggs11s17 vids to post, if the ideas seem to have validity. So as always with anything I post, BE SKEPTICAL. Thank you!

Docs used in video (latest version): MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf or .doc and for Luke, LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or .htm. As usual, for .doc or .htm, you need Bibleworks fonts, freely downloadable at bibleworks.com/fonts.html ).

File Name: AbeCredit1.avi 3/21/15.


GGS11s17b Magnificat Meter Revisited, cont.

Continuing this perhaps-temporary video subseries, revisiting my assumptions about the pan-NT foundation for NT Meter: based on, the Magnificat. Here, about how to measure the time based on her same FY accounting for Abraham's Time Credit.

Again, that's a shocking idea to me, at least, because I don't expect what she said to be so determinative of meter patterns in the NT. 'Maybe because I'm female and don't want females to get such credit? My prejudice? Well, any prejudice masks facts, so I revisit the notion here. Don't know if I will contradict any other video I've done, am revisiting it de novo.

Her meter is based on years from Abraham's maturation; that was a standard mechanic in the OT, used by Moses in Genesis 1; so you could argue she's not doing anything new, but rather following his standard; still, this is the earliest instance we have, of Greek words applied with Bible Hebrew meter. So it may prove determinative. How, I don't know. Yet.

I did the vid back in March, but am uploading it now. Again, it's tentative and I might end up taking it down, later. There will be more of these ggs11s17 vids to post, if the ideas seem to have validity. So as always with anything I post, BE SKEPTICAL. Thank you!

Docs used in video (latest version): MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf or .doc and for Luke, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or .htm. As usual, for .doc or .htm, you need Bibleworks fonts, freely downloadable at bibleworks.com/fonts.html ).

File Name: AbeCredit2.avi 3/21/15.

Sisyphus