FAQs Regarding brainout's LordPages

Index:

A product from questions that were asked to 'brainout' (who passed away in 2023). I suggest you either read the Summary below, or the longer "Surprising Webpage Theses, Conclusions in brainout's LordPages" to get an overview of 'Brainout's' theses; that is, if God even wants you to read what's written here. (God can and did use a donkey to communicate, so maybe he'll use this 'donkey', too.)

Gerber pictane

Here are the FAQs. Click on a question, to go to its answer.

  1. Why are you writing these webpages? Can I quote you?
  2. What Christian denomination are you?
    1. Can I have a “doctrinal statement” from you to save me reading time?
  3. Why the Bible?
  4. Why are you so critical of Christianity?
  5. Why so much emphasis on the Angelic Conflict, on Satan’s strategy and tactics?
  6. Why so much emphasis on God designing time in 490‑year increments? Is that like Bible Codes?
    1. How did you come up with the BC/AD dates in GeneYrs.xls? Based on what Bible verses? And how did you get 490+70+490?
    2. Do you believe in the Books of Enoch, Jubilees, or the Talmud? The 490+70+490=1000+50 resembles Talmudic timelines for Messiah.
    3. Why did you get this “information” about how God orchestrates time? Why not a pastor, scholar, or the Jews? What makes you so special?
  7. Why are you anti‑Muslim?
  8. You criticize Bible translations a lot. Isn’t that unfair? What right do you have to say they’re mistranslated?
  9. What Bible translation do you recommend?
  10. Why should I read what you write instead of someone respectable who disagrees with you?
  11. You use many Greek terms associated with Gnosticism. Are you Gnostic? 🤣
  12. Why don’t you use your real name? Who are you? Isn’t anonymity disrespectful?
  13. The Bible is a corrupted book of myths. How can you believe in it?
  14. What do you mean by Scripture verses having “multistoried meanings”? Are you an allegorist?
  15. Aren’t you just parroting your pastor or imposing presuppositions like everyone else?
  16. There’s a lot of new and unproven theology on your site. Shouldn’t you stick with what’s established?
  17. What you write here will revolutionize Christianity!
  18. I hear your pastor is a false teacher!
  19. Why don’t you quote your sources?
  20. What are your credentials?

Summary, how these webpages are 'Different'

All webpages and associated videos focus on accounting for any doctrine. This is my internal purpose. This is not a ministry. I am not selling anything, and I don't even agree with myself, much less expect anyone to agree with 'me'. This is not about what I think, or what someone else thinks, because the only thing that matters, is bible. Not, human opinion, sentiment, etc. Can't prove a thing true or false, until you can account for it.

Look: we all read Bible and make claims of it. So: if a claimed doctrine is valid, it can be accounted sans contradiction, and balance. So: I really don't care which doctrine is true, whether that doctrine comes from someone I know, someone I like or dislike, or even if it's my own sense of a passage — so long as I can prove it in Bible.

So 'my' material is not an apologetic. It's an audit. As a result, many of the doctrines Christendom holds near and dear, don't stand up under audit, and many previously unknown 'doctrines', are shown.

Frankly, it doesn't matter to me which beliefs are correct, so long as I know what they are. And I never know as much 'today', as I can learn 'tomorrow'. Moreover, what I think true today might be proven UNtrue tomorrow. Okay, then tomorrow I'll know better. So it's no threat, to have a belief change or be unseated. It's called learning, and that's always a joy.

Bible has proven itself to be from God: more on why, is in #3 of the FAQs, below. Do I know that Bible as well as I should? No. So ever learning, to ever understand it better, is the quest.

Sadly, the Bible seems suspect, because Fuzzball Theology characterizes Churchinanity today. Bible scholarship remains abysmal. There's no real audit of Christian tenets, nor of any other religion, for that matter; you're just expected to accept what the 'experts' tell you. Yeah, and guess what? Many of these 'experts' prove to be liars or incompetent. So they hedge, because they don't really know the answers, and don't want to offend! It's painful to say so. And documented, so that any 'scholar' can privately read. If God wants someone to find these pages, He will cause that, not me.

Documented: scan the internet.

Thus the Bible is disrespected, in favor of respecting mere people. Therefore the 'respectable' standard wins over proper hermeneutics, teaching. Daily. Centuries-old mistranslations in Bibles endure, because pastors and 'scholars' are afraid to correct them. Centuries-old false doctrines endure, because someone 'respectable' in the past, espoused those falsehoods. So we ape the Pharisees of the Lord's day. And, for the same reasons. God's Own Word doesn't matter anymore: only the 'respectability' of the 'scholar' is held to be determinative. God help you if you dissent!

This was and remains precisely the problem Israel had. And we Christians are just like her.

Now, one shouldn't become iconoclastic and hate teachers, scholars, etc. If you knew what they had to put up with just to get through a single day, you'd want to worship them, instead. That's the problem. Neither worship nor warring, is warranted. Instead, they need to be freed from their political chains by us laymen. The "publish or perish" standard, the idolizing of degrees, of past teachers, needs toning down. Past teachers and scholars made mistakes. We'd have made more mistakes, had we been them. So it's no shame to admit the past mistakes, correct them and move on: that's what you're taught at West Point. We need to admit that for our Bible people, too.

Thus auditing is vital and must be pan-Bible, before you can provably 'balance' meaning. You read just a verse usually in translation, and of course some idea of its meaning, strikes you. But if it's mistranslated, the meaning you think you see, is not there. Even if properly translated, you still might take it out of context. Even if in context, what about the fit of that context with all other contexts, before you can safely say the interpretation is valid? It's like balancing a portfolio of assets. Painstaking work, but if you don't do it all, then you get — fuzzball theology. Or worse, lies masquerading as truth. With fatal results.

It's vital to account for what someone else gets wrong. First, you better test whether you yourself get something wrong: it's not about fingerpointing, but about auditing. For when you see someone else get something wrong, the natural question should be, "what errors might I be making — too?" So it's never about blaming the one who got it wrong. It's only about auditing.

Second, you find vital added information as you do this auditing. I've learned vast amounts of Bible doctrine I didn't know, simply by tracking how someone else's interpretation went wrong. For when you balance a checkbook, two errors might cancel out other checks and deposits — thus by auditing everything, you can detect what otherwise would be hidden.

Bible Doctrine accounting works the same way. So always account for how someone gets a thing wrong, as well as how it is right: you get a goldmine of Bible data, when you do this.

Here's a Bible auditing example. In Aramaic, גֵּיהִנּוֹם (Gehenna) was the name for a noxious trash dump which all Jerusalem used. The word is Aramaic, not Greek, but is transliterated to γέεννα, in the New Testament. If you are a bad scholar, you'll just assume that the name only means the trash dump, and ignore the metaphor it represents pan-Bible: that metaphor is a literal, everlasting hell which is also known as "the Lake of Fire", moniker for the new universe all unbelievers go into, when eternity future begins. So: if you don't audit the Bible from Genesis to Revelation to get all the context surrounding the use of "Gehenna" in the Gospels, you'll misread it and misinterpret an extremely important doctrine. With fatal results (i.e., believing there is no such thing as hell). God executes believers for misrepresenting His Word, 1 John 5:16, Acts 5 (AKA the sin "face-to-face with death"). You get time to correct it, since of course we are all wrong on something. But you had better keep auditing, or you will find yourself in deep doo-doo 💩. And then, embarrassed at the Bema, though forever saved and mighty glad to be there.

Longer example. In Luke 2:1-2, reference is made to "Quirinius". If you are a bad scholar, you'll restrict your research to what 'proves' your point, just as a bad lawyer will do in a courtroom. So you'll ignore the Bible and isagogical facts that:

For Augustus and Herod, were close. So close, Augustus used to visit Herod about every five years, and at great personal expense, Herod created the town of Caesarea expressly for Augustus; the area was known for its Games, one of the best places for the Games outside Rome itself. So if Quirinius was despatched on business related to Augustus and Judaea, he'd go to Herod.

Luke 1:26 Ἐν δὲ τῷ1 μηνὶ τῷ2 ἕκτῳ ἀπεστάλη ὁ ἄγγελος Γαβριὴλ ἀπὸ τοῦ θεοῦ εἰς πόλιν τῆς Γαλιλαίας ᾗ ὄνομα Ναζαρὲθ

So Christ was born about three months before Herod died. At the time Luke wrote, that fact would be common knowledge, so Luke wouldn't have to reference the date: he's using the census to show prophecy was fulfilled, and everyone knew what that prophecy was, from Matthew's account. Luke is playing off Matthew to add more information in writing. That's what a new Bible book is supposed to do, thread prior Divine Writ into itself, to establish itself as coming from God. You then audit what it says, compared to prior proven Writ. So you don't need Councils of Nicaea, etc. You need 1 John 1:9 and thus get the Holy Spirit's Brains, as you read. Of course, if you refuse to be under a pastor also, then you'll learn little. Again, the scholarship is bad, but God is the God of authority. So He works within authority, to correct it. So it was His work on the people at Nicaea, to alert them to what was His Word. His work. Not, theirs.

So notice the centuries of bad scholarship, just blithely passing over the doubled (τῷ) articles in Luke 1:26, and blame the Bible for not telling us when Christ was born? 🤦 Oh, it's "inscrutable"? Or, "the Bible doesn't say"? Or, "tradition says", as if the Bible did not? How Disgusting! Blaming the Bible for our lack of homework?! If you read commentaries disputing a winter birthdate for Christ, please take Pepto-Bismol beforehand. Sloppy stuff!

Do you know, many a Bible scholar or pastor in history has 'lost his faith', or even committed suicide, because he caves into bad scholarship? For these people became so trusting of the wrong answers pandered for centuries, they couldn't even read the Bible properly anymore. Today, you'll hear them sing the same lament as in centuries past. In every case, it's because No Proper Homework Was Done In Bible. The 'respected' hedging, false, pusillanimous views won over the plain Bible text.

Time to get rid of the fuzzballs, huh. So 'my' webpages focus on what the bible says: Bible, not the scholars. The only one Who's Right, is God. For scholars tend to become enmeshed with each other; Bible becomes a casualty in their debates. Ergo all the dissension over when Christ came, the Exodus, whether Bible is "inspired", and other inter-denominational quarrels. For Bible isn't consulted for Its Own Answers, but rather people consult other people: scholars, pastors, 'respected' people of yesteryear. Blind leading blind results, and of course it's entirely unintended. And often, fatal.

Now, you should be able to find proof of those points above without too much trouble even on the internet. Look up "Augustan tax reform", "Quirinius", "Herod the Great", "Augustus", "SPQR taxation", etc. ISBE Encyclopedia and even the History Channel have articles on this topic.

Thus a bad scholar will leave out the information which disputes his position (like the Skeptics Bible people do), in order to make the Bible look bad. It's all over the internet, bad scholarship. Don't be a bad scholar, but instead audit both sides, and carefully. For you alone are responsible for what beliefs you 'buy', and you have the God-given right to change your mind.


Hence website (and video) content differs from the internet norm, mostly in the following categories:

Even Isaiah knew and foretold, the exact year Messiah would be born, embedding the chronology in his Hebrew meter. For he 'answers' the same meter in Moses' Psalm 90; in Judaism even today, that's the foundational Psalm on God's Construct for Time. Jews misread the Psalm, but God preserved the words and hence the meter, so you can see how Isaiah 53 plays off Moses. See also Mirroring Timeline — demonstrate this live from the unaltered BHS Hebrew text. Very easy to see and count the syllables, which are parsed onscreen so you can audit the video claims, yourself.

For Bible's Hebrew Meter was used as a memory aid, not 'Bible codes'. (🤣 nothing in Bible is ever hidden, just forever misread.) That way when you remembered Isaiah 53, you'd automatically remember the timeline as well (in Hebrew you test verse memory and accuracy by use of meter). So it's a prosaic, handy way of seeing that the Birth and Death of Messiah was long forecast. His Death Day was enshrined in the Passover, as you probably know: Passover was an update on Abel's memorial sacrifice depicting Savior To Come. However, the year of His birth was not known until David died. Like Moses, Isaiah made a chronology of and memorialized His Death in Isaiah 53. Then, about 191 years after Isaiah wrote, His Exact Birthday was told to Zerubbabel via Haggai 2. That date, 24-25 Chislev, which initially was the Second Temple's foundation-laying day (cute) — would become known as Chanukah, owing to the yet-future desecration of the Temple, by the prototype of Antichrist, Antiochus IV 'Epiphanes'.

Philippians 2:5 (Get) this mind (thinking) in you which (was) also in Christ Jesus.

Philippians 2:5 τοῦτο φρονεῖτε ἐν ὑμῖν ὃ καὶ ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ

Videos, Flow Chart of the Spiritual Maturation Process, and the Lord vs. Satan Part 3 will walk you through that. The latter is very long, so suggest you view the videos first.

Note well: Christ was age 30 before He even began to have a ministry. So look at our Christian lying incompetence: the minute you are saved, you're told to run around spouting a Gospel you don't even understand. That's like giving an infant a Mauser, and telling him to shoot. So we Kill The Word by our ignorance. Christ was Perfect and it still took Him, 30 years to train! Do we realize that? Oh no. Do we notice how Christ was put into situations? He waited for God to thrust Him into the situation with the Samaritan woman, the demons were brought to Him; He didn't go crusading, but just walked around, waiting for situations to come to Him. Do we wait on the Lord? Oh no. We play Madison Avenue gimmicks, advertise ourselves. It's disgusting, how we do the opposite of what the Bible says!

So no wonder, then, we Christians are ridiculed. We blaspheme God with our good deeds, our ignorant lies against a Bible we can't read, for we don't know we need to use 1 John 1:9 like breathing and train Like Christ Did, before we even open up our mouths. Guns kill. Guns save lives. Better know how to shoot and what to shoot, before you shoot anything... like your mouth. Lest you kill the very thing you were trying to save!

Satan's not stupid. He mingles lies with truth so to sell the lie (and loves to hypnotise opposing 'teams' with truths they don't understand). If the truth is mingled, you won't know its context. Like, good deeds. Good deeds are used by every religion, to sell the religion. So people see the good deeds, and consider the good-deeder, must be representing God. Not so. Ego is the motive of the good-deeder, fancying he can do something for God. That's what 'jihad' means. A real God needs no 'jihad', but ego makes God small, to make the human big, and so of course even murder and suicide then are deemed good deeds. All good deeds, murder — unless you are thinking properly at the time you do them. Well, you can't be thinking properly until and unless you first learn Scripture. But no one does. So we Christians are just as disgusting as all Muslims, all unbelievers, all name-your-most-hated-group-here. For we hate the Word, and instead shoot our Mausers blindly.

So we misrepresent what God says. So we sell, what Satan says. And the demons all laugh their heads off, watching our disgusting 'Christian' TV programs with the whirling globes — because we are obeying Satan's Third Temptation to Christ, falling for the kingdoms of the world, preening over 'all the world', screaming how we are doing great things for God, and always ending with 'praise the Lord' because His name ought to be slapped on, at the end. End, not beginning. So we end our lives, blaspheming Him, and when He then punishes us with sickness, adversity and death, we wonder why. Or miscount ourselves holy martyrs, just like the Muslims do.

But Christ, became the Truth. By means of learning the Truth, Matthew 4:4. So He waited, listened, learned. Therefore, could hear and know what God wanted, each second, in each situation, before responding. Can you do that? Can I? Do you do that? Do I? If we are honest, we must say 'no'. We don't know the Word well enough, to hear God through it, most of the time. So the good deed, is God's Deed, which only He can perform: John 14:26, recalling to our minds the relevant Scripture for each situation. After it's been Audited. Not, fly-by-your-ego-emotion-idea-of-Bible, slapping God's name on your deed, at the end.

For Royal Training takes years, before you can rule. Royalty means learning to rule the self, before you are qualified to rule or rule on, anyone or anything else. We blaspheme Christ, therefore, when we call our working working working, spiritual. Just like the Jews and Muslims do.

For your life is but a becoming, a seed, 1 Corinthians 15. A pregnancy, Romans 8. Your real life and real deeds, come after the seed dies. Seed of the Seed, is your God-given agenda down here, contract of Isaiah 53:10, theme of James 1-2. Once you are born from above, the Word gets implanted in you, James 1:21. Then grows in you, and only then do you become mature. Seeds don't bear fruit. Must first be birthed as a seed, then become a branch of the Tree. That takes a lifetime, theme of James 2:26, 2 Timothy 4:7-8. 'Faith' is doctrine in your head you believe. Not, the act of your believing. God's Deed, His putting the Doctrine in your head. Not, your huffing and puffing and "how proud I am of my faith" garbage.

For you got Saved To Heaven when you first believed in Christ for your salvation. But your soul is still all trashed up with Satan's good-deedism. So it needs to be rescued, AKA 'saved', from that bad thinking.

Whole Bible is centered on that topic. So what you do down here, is a product of what you learn down here, so you must get stuff to do from God directing you; and you can't get His Direction, until you know His Book. That takes years of training. Just as Christ did. And the world is blessed for you merely learning Christ (conduit): main theme of all my webpages and videos, is to demonstrate that 'blessing by association', as my pastor termed it. (That theme is the impetus for all webpages and videos, auditing how and why God set it up that way, rather than Satan's do-goodism of Matthew 4.)

Think about it: when you do a good deed, do you know in advance why you are supposed to do it? Do you know in advance what its effects will be? Do you know what you're selling with the good deed you do? You better know, or you better not, do that deed. For Satan sells his agenda via good deeds, reflected everywhere: advertising, politics, romance — all over the place it's a tit-for-tat, negotiation of "I do for you, you do for me, and we call that good so we can be proud." God doesn't do that stuff. But we do, and slap His Name on it, violating the third commandment.

So better to do nothing, just learn, than have your efforts and good deeds sell Satan. So how can you know all this in advance? You gotta train. For years, learning Bible. Period. Then, as you are ready, count on it — God will put in your path, something to do. In my case, with these webpages, it was a janitor named Jesús who gave me a Windows PC someone threw in the trash, at the very moment I silently determined no woman should write webpages, so I must have been disobeying God. (I was then using WebTV since I hate Microsoft Windows.) So I got my marching orders, and God saved me $1,000 per month in phone bills, to boot (WebTV required composition online, and at that time it was expensive in my area). Even so, it's not a ministry, no woman is the head of anything — but anyone can audit. That's all I do. In secular life, and here in Bible. Each believer has that responsibility. To God, the Head of us all.

See? You wait for Him to thrust you into situations; meanwhile, soldier, you train in His Thinking. Christ was thrust on the Cross. Get the parallel?

You were thrust into this world. You didn't birth, yourself. You were thrust into the Angelic Trial. You are on trial every day, for the Doctrine in you. To Angels. The result of your use of Doctrine, is a ruled thing. So God rules to bless or curse the world, due to what you are learning or not learning, theme of Hebrews 11. That is what does good or bad for the world, not what you do with your body, itself. So all of what's bad down here, is our fault. Not the Jews' fault. Not the Muslims' fault, not the unbelievers' fault. For God blesses the world for the sake of the believers on it, theme of the Old Testament, and now those believers, are... us. Church. Whether Jew or Gentile.

So what does for God, is God doing for God, putting His Word in us. So on trial, is whether God does the doing... or we do. In the latter case, Satan 'helps' every time, to fool us into thinking we do something for God. If you find yourself imagining you do anything for anyone, let alone God — you're buying into Satan's plan. Not, God's. So you aid Satan's Plan. Not, God's. So you curse the world, for by opting out of God doing it to you, under Trial rules He must curse, just as Satan bid Him do to Job. But for quite different reasons, see Leviticus 26. Israel is cursed for refusing Christ, same passage. We are grafted in, so 'inherit' the Bride role (not the other covenants), and thus too are cursed when we alike reject Him, theme of Romans 9-11. Yikes.

So — and I don't mean to offend — I'm not doing the webpages and videos for you, for God, for anyone. I'm doing them, to learn Him better. By auditing, having to explain, I end up seeing where I know and don't know well enough, God's Word. And now I know that's okay to do, since Jesus the Janitor gave me my first Windows computer, to enable doing it at less expense. So if you get something from this audit, great. God had to make that happen. So I'm not involved, it's between Him and you.

For we're all on Divine Television. Even in the bathroom. Whoops. Not quite the idea of the spiritual life you hear pandered in pulpits, huh.

Or, start with "How God Orchestrates Time", Mirroring Timeline. You don't need to be a Hebrew or Greek expert to vet this. You only need to go through the many Bible verses which deal with dates or time. Webpage will show you how, and there's an associated spreadsheet which only uses Bible to create dates. After you get done with it, you'll never mistake the Rapture as being an invention of the 19th century, or mid-Tribulation, post-Tribulation, etc. The reason for the confusion is that scholars misdate Daniel 9, the Exodus, etc. For, they don't either believe or understand what Bible says. Big mistake. Questions #6 on this webpage further explain their mistakes.

So, the true Rapture's legal precedence in the First And Last Adam, is altogether missed. Knowing this Precedence radically alters how you read Bible, and suddenly the many Rapture verses in the New Testament, become clear. So proving it valid, required a good 400 printed pages or so, mostly in Part 4 of the Lord vs. Satan. It's a lot of reading, requires much vetting in Bible. Sorry. On the other hand, this accounting is what would distinguish 'my' webpages from all other material 'out there', because so far, nothing else 'out there' covers this topic. So I keep on searching for errors in the accounting, as I've got nothing else to compare.


Thus a Eschatological Reconciliation between Preterism and Dispensationalism, results.

"Dispensation" is solely the period to which a covenant belongs. Book of Hebrews outlines this, explaining why

  • The covenant of Israel is not Church,
  • As the latter derives from a different and pre-Israel kingship of Christ, "κατὰ Μελχισεδέκ".

But the problem was, Christ's Jewish Kingship was also won on the Cross (He was born King, but as King had to die for sins of all mankind) — with no kingdom. Because, Israel rejected Him when He came. Isaiah forecasted this whole show in his Hebrew meter.

So now, Time-wise, we are stuck in the bubble of Daniel 9:26c, so it's a dual 'tribulation, AKA "Times of the Gentiles" in Luke 21': that's where preterism gets its punch.

  • See, Israel was supposed to have accepted Him, but didn't,
  • So time for Israel ran out.
  • But Christ inserted 'Church' in Matthew 16:18, to bridge back to the timeline for Israel.
  • Hence the second of the dual Tribulation, namely the official one of the Old Testament, begins after Church.
  • As Hebrews 11:39-40 puts it, "apart from us )being completed), they (the Old Testament covenantal people) will not be completed." Verb is τελειόω, and it means to finish — ties back to Daniel 9:24's συντελέω (the completion of all things in the Trial, ties again to Ephesians 1:10).

So the preterists are partly right and the dispensationalists are partly right. It's just a question of patching their rightnesses together:

  • Yes, pre-Tribulation Rapture is real, but for legal and Time-accounting reasons which pre-date Church, precedented in Adam's Fall.
  • Yes, Millennium is real, it's also based on Time accounting which dates from Adam's Fall. Basic time accounting unit for the world is 1000 + 50 (the 50 is represented by Jubilee). Lord had to come when He did to renew time --1000th anniversary of David's United Kingship Start and die by the 1000th anniversary of David's Death.
  • Yes, because the Jews rejected Him an archetypal Tribulation pattern of history, began. Rejecting caused Him to die 7 years ahead of schedule, which schedule already debited 7 years for Temple Destruction if they had accepted Him, because their acceptance would have triggered world war. For the 50 years for harvesting the Gentiles were supposed to precede Daniel 9:27, it's part of the calendar every Jew once knew since David died (forecast in the Jewish calendar under Moses).

So notice how the preterists have only the first part of the answer. Problem is, they don't know God's rules for Time so they misdefine that hanging seven as belonging to Daniel 9:27, playing it in 64-70 AD. Nope, it's a different 7. And it played out during Church, fulfilling Joel 2.

So notice the duality of a real and future Tribulation, due to the fact that there are two sevens to play, and only one of them has played. So this part, the dispensationalists get right.

Two covenants, when there should have only been one. Two Kingships, two kingdoms, two covenants, two 'tribulations': ours is the longer and tougher one. Ephesians 4:13 criterion for completion, no time promised, since only Israel was promised time, and prior to Israel time was always contingent on voting (ergo the Flood, due to so many negative votes). All this is the theme of Book of Hebrews. Just keep reading it over and over, even in translation, and you should see the duality.

"Covenant Properties" traces the origin of this duality from the Old Testament Covenant 'properties' forward through what Christ invented, and what He legated to Church; what thus the Tribulation and Millennium people 'inherit' as their covenants. It's a long section, with 30 sub-points. Material should be familiar enough that you can think through the analysis as you read.

So the problem is, both preterists and dispensationalists don't recognize: a) Bible's Time Accounting System, and therefore b) the duality of 'tribulation'.


Along the way, other conundra in Christianity are handled, accounted, so you can vet what's said. This is not about selling a particular Bible interpretation. It's about auditing. For you can only mature spiritually, if you do your homework. So even if you end up disagreeing, you still grow by going through the auditing process. You only take to heaven, your Soul. Fill it with Bible Thinking. ☺️


The FAQs

1. Why are you writing these pages? Can I quote you? I write to test myself, really. To audit what I've come to believe for errors, and then correct those errors as I find them. I'm always finding some error, so I'm always correcting my beliefs. The initial impetus for the webpages was to save keystrokes in chatrooms. That reason still remains helpful. Most people ask big questions but want short answers. There are no short answers, hence the pages are needed.

As for quoting me, don't do it if you are trying to justify a position in the name of 'brainout', because 'brainout' is a nobody. Do your own homework. Sure, use any material you find here, but the goal of these pages is to stimulate thinking, not slavish quoting of someone. Sadly, Christianity is infected with 'scholars' quoting other 'scholars', few doing de novo research in the Bible, anymore. It's disgusting that for 2000 years, we've called it 'Good Friday', for example. Bible says it's Good Wednesday, for crying out loud, Matthew 12:40-41 and Mark 16:2, Mark 16:9; Luke 24:1; John 20:1! So the Church Fathers couldn't even count to three, and the fool 'scholars' have been making up really stupid lies, ever since. They should be shot. Can't go from night to day, without passing the full night; can't go from day to night without passing the full day. So you have to lie to claim that from Friday to Sunday, is three days and three nights! Sheesh. But that doesn't stop Catholic apologists from manufacturing lies about the three's being partial. Even if you lied like the Catholics do, and claim the threes-count as partial, you don't have three nights by Sunday at dawn. Oops. Liars always get caught.

So, the Church Fathers were stupid about the Mosaic Law, because they were antisemitic and didn't want to accept any instruction from Jews. So they forgot or never knew the difference between a high sabbath, and a regular one, so in their ignorance called it Good Friday. Okay, that's a mistake. No big deal. Just admit it, correct it, and move on. But oh no, Mother Apostate Church can't admit mistakes. So they lie for 2000 years. And people still want to be Catholic? But hey: the Protestants are no better. Liars all, instead of fessing up and correcting, learning God for a change, they'd rather fight their petty turf wars.

So Christ's Death Day is lied about. It was on the day that was supposed to be Passover, per John 19's Greek. So anyone lying about His Death day, calling themselves Christian, should be shot as a traitor. We humans don't like it when our own important dates are deliberately masked or forgotten, so it's suddenly okay that our Savior's, is lied about? To mask the fact that it was a Jewish holiday that ran four days late? So that, as per Exodus 12, He was timely arrested on what should have been the Lamb Set Aside Date? 2000 years of scholarship, and still all our Bible movies about Passion Week, Protestant or Catholic — miss this fact? Shameful!

Please understand: making a mistake is normal, and nothing shameful. Covering it up is shameful. I'm dead sure many scholars know about the crappy scholarship, but are afraid to speak up. That is even more shameful, and will be made public, at the Judgment Seat of Christ, 1 Corinthians 3, Revelation 4:1. We should be more afraid of seeing Christ, than of admitting past or current error. I know I am.

So that's another reason why I have to write so much. I have to document where the ideas come from, since you cannot find deep theological research, anymore; and the typical crappy Christian and Jewish scholarship is deemed 'holy', for crying out loud. Would save me time if I could find competence, but since I can't, I have to just do stuff from scratch. So I expect the reader to be skeptical, and do his own homework. So if you find the material true, then you know it for yourself and don't need to quote, anyone. But you can, if you feel you should. It's up to you. Nothing's copyrighted, and I need no credit. This is stuff about God, not humans fighting turf wars.

So God really should get the credit. How else could you have found 'brainout'? So ask Him why you did. I have nothing to do with that. My big worry is that I must do this stuff publicly in order to rein in my sin nature and do my homework, since the material is public; I'd not work so hard at it, if the material were private. And since public, the punishment is greater; I will be judged by God, for what I say, just like anyone else. That scares me, which is a good thing.


2. What Christian denomination are you? No denomination. It doesn't matter. The spiritual life is not lived in accordance with some denomination, but rather as a personal and private matter between God and you. Anyone who 'does' all five of the pan-denominational Elements of God's System is living the spiritual life. Same elements have been true since Adam. Sure, we'll all be wrong on some doctrines. But you know — even if I were 100% right (and we know I'm not), if I'm not doing those Elements my spiritual life is worthless garbage, a lie. See 1 Corinthians 13:1-3. Spiritual life is to learn and live with God, a vertical thing. Whatever needs correcting in a belief en route, only God can do to you anyway. So it's not about what church you go to, what denomination you are, or even whether you call yourself a Christian.

About the most arrogant thing a person can do is think himself good or bad due to his religion, ethnicity, nationality, or culture. People who do that are terminally insecure, and the cause of all wars. We are all wrong on something. So splitting ourselves into nationalities, cultures, ethnic types, denominations and faiths is perhaps of value like one distinguishes colors or plant types; thank God we're not all the same, thank God we don't have one world government or culture! On the other hand, we're all human and that's the connection we all share. Relationship with God is not religion, so let's stop using religion to bludgeon God's Name.


2a. Can I have a 'doctrinal statement' from you to save me reading time? If you must. Here it is, and bear in mind I can change my beliefs at any time, with no warning. If the Bible corrects me on something, I'll change! The following tenets I can thoroughly account from Bible, as well as account why any conflicting claims are not in Bible.

If you learn nothing else from 'my' website, learn this:
Think before God 24/7 using Bible.
That alone is rewardable, for that's how Christ paid for sins.

2 Corinthians 10:5 is the criterion, and Ephesians 4:13 is the maturation goal. Christendom is woefully ignorant of this fact, and will be embarrassed at the Bema. Don't be like them.

2 Corinthians 10:5 καὶ πᾶν ὕψωμα ἐπαιρόμενον κατὰ τῆς γνώσεως τοῦ θεοῦ, καὶ αἰχμαλωτίζοντες πᾶν νόημα εἰς τὴν ὑπακοὴν τοῦ Χριστοῦ

Ephesians 4:13 μέχρι καταντήσωμεν οἱ πάντες εἰς τὴν ἑνότητα τῆς πίστεως καὶ τῆς ἐπιγνώσεως τοῦ υἱοῦ τοῦ θεοῦ, εἰς ἄνδρα τέλειον, εἰς μέτρον ἡλικίας τοῦ πληρώματος τοῦ Χριστοῦ

This is the hardest doctrine for me to accept, but the most provable one. We all know it's about becoming "Christlike". Well, what was Christ like? King. Ruler. Ruling Himself to the point of death, but with thinking. You can't find any good deeds He did, in the Gospels. But you can sure find Satan tempting Him to do good deeds, starting with Matthew 4!

He fattened up on the Word and thus became something, not did deeds. Became, the "WH" in "YHWH". Get it? Became "the Way". Became "the Truth". Became "The Life", then that Life was cut off for our sins, Isaiah 53:8. So all life comes through Him, Isaiah 53:12. It wasn't magic, and it wasn't because He was (and of course still is), God. It wasn't because He was sinless, either. It was because the spirit grew HIM. That's why if you don't use 1 John 1:9 you are committing the worst sin — refusing the Spirit's Power to grow you. Hitler will fare better than you do when judgement comes, if you refuse 1 John 1:9. Guaranteed.

מֵעֹ֤צֶר וּמִמִּשְׁפָּט֙ לֻקָּ֔ח וְאֶת־דּוֹר֖וֹ מִ֣י יְשׂוֹחֵ֑חַ כִּ֤י נִגְזַר֙ מֵאֶ֣רֶץ חַיִּ֔ים מִפֶּ֥שַׁע עַמִּ֖י נֶ֥גַע לָֽמוֹ׃ Isaiah 53:8

לָכֵ֞ן אֲחַלֶּק־ל֣וֹ בָרַבִּ֗ים וְאֶת־עֲצוּמִים֘ יְחַלֵּ֣ק שָׁלָל֒ תַּ֗חַת אֲשֶׁ֙ר הֶעֱרָ֤ה לַמָּ֙וֶת֙ נַפְשׁ֔וֹ וְאֶת־פֹּשְׁעִ֖ים נִמְנָ֑ה וְהוּא֙ חֵטְא־רַבִּ֣ים נָשָׂ֔א וְלַפֹּשְׁעִ֖ים יַפְגִּֽיעַ׃ ס Isaiah 53:13

So the training in Thinking Like Christ is what you are to undergo, and you must be crowned if you grow up. King-sized, for Rapport. Not, to preen. It's scary, it's a killer thought life, and it's the big stumbling block, to have that much responsibility. "As goes the believer, so goes the nation"... and the world. Was true for Israel, more true now, for Church. So obviously you cannot do this training in your own power. Ergo the constant need for 1 John 1:9, learning and living on Bible. Just like He did (sans the 1 John 1:9, since He never sinned).

Morality, murders. All murders are committed in the name of some moral code, whether revenge, to get back something claimed to be wrongly lost, you-name-it. Morality claims a crusading value to justify whatever it does. So that's why Hitler got away with murdering millions of Jews and other 'untermenschen'. That's why so many religious sects are murderous. We don't even need to look but five seconds in Google, to find political causes of one type or another, justifying murder in God's or some other 'noble' name.

Satan is the supreme murderer, and that for a moral reason: He thinks God is unfair. And so God seems unfair, as He murdered His Own Son for our sins. The Son agreed to that, Isaiah 53:10-12. So notice how spirituality is above morality: the former, requires God's Power to enact, and also receives all evil. But is not stupid. Satan would spin self-sacrifice as noble absent reason, so we stupidly do it, thinking ourselves moral. Aha, so still not doing it for god, but for ego. So then we're not spiritual, but fancy we are.

Christ died on the Cross to achieve union in His Humanity with Father. It was the only category of knowledge Christ did not have, as He was required to stay sinless. Ergo 2 Corinthians 5:21, He was made sin — thus getting the knowledge from Father. So it wasn't stupid, what He agreed to do. We were secondary. Father was Primary. John 17, I in you and you in Me. So now He in us so we can be in Him. So the spiritual life is light-years beyond morality, yet outperforms morality, and even seems immoral. That's the paradox, and that's why most people won't believe in Christ or won't stick with the spiritual life, instead bastardizing it into a moral code. Thus, themselves becoming most immoral, for they belittle and thus malign, Father's Plan for Christ.

The Old Testament covenant was for children, theme of Galatians (especially Galatians 3). You did the rituals to associate your body with what metaphors the rituals taught about God, His Nature, Christ's Nature, to celebrate His then-future Payment. So you weren't deprived by the fact He was yet future, on a specific timeline you learned as a child, so knew when He would come. As that time passed, the Jews became jaded, and became tired. They were supposed to learn meaning from the motions, but it became צַו לָצָו (tsav, latsav), as Isaiah puts it in Isaiah 28: movement sans meaning, and they prided themselves on the meaninglessness, how good they were for going through the motions. So, when Christ did come, they forgot the meaning. So, when He came, they couldn't understand the meaning of His Coming. So, they rejected Him.

We Christians, have done the same thing. We pride ourselves on our songs, our works, and have no idea what the Christian life, really is. The Catholics, to compete with the Jews, developed a harried system of rituals, and Christians bought into it; other sects, alike apostate, to compete with the Catholics, came up with their own garbage, and it all came about rapidly, as soon as Canon was completed. Mark's Gospel warned of that, in 68 AD when he wrote it, accusing Christians sotto voce with his εὐθύς and ἐγγύς Rapture-keywords — of being no more ready and discerning, than the blind Pharisees, whose story was highlighted in Mark's account as a parallelism. Pharisees and demons, both highlighted, miracles demanding, miracles abounding, Meaning Never Learned. So by 96 AD when Canon completed, no one wanted it anymore. So, it ended. Just as the Old Testament ended, amidst legalistic apostasy, theme of the Book of Malachi, the last Old Testament book.

So now we wait the Rapture, which of course was trashed along with all other Bible Doctrine, when Canon was completed. And it too, has thus been long in coming, since no one is learning the book, to be made King-Sized in the soul. Now, since Christ has come, there is no timeline, since the goal is Ephesians 4:13, corporate Church maturation — so no rituals, nothing at all like the Old Testament system, even though the goal is the same — for Christ forged an upgraded spiritual life which is wholly internal, for His Soul to become Truth, King-Sized. Same idea, maturation, as in Old Testament. Far higher level, which no set of rituals can properly depict. His Thinking in Writing, instead, that's the New Testament, which of course is founded upon the Old, part and parcel of the Old, yet beyond it. For Christ had to grow beyond the Mosaic Law, which after all was only designed to teach about Christ, never saved anyone, theme of Hebrews 10 and John 6-10.

So the covenant we get, is not the Mosaic Law, theme of Hebrews 5-10, especially Hebrews 7. So the Messianic Jews aren't living the new covenant, but are still saved. So the Christians are trying to live the Mosaic Law as well, and are not living the new covenant, either. Because, they are still trying to compete with the Jews, "crucifying the Son afresh" rather than learning Him, taut sarcasm in Hebrews 5:11-6:6. No one is looking at God's Word. So, the Rapture hasn't happened yet. Like Paul in Ephesians 1:3-14's meter, the writer of Hebrews — writing just after or before Mark's Gospel in 68-69 AD — expected Rapture to happen in 70 AD, when the old Jewish timeline including Temple Time on the Land, ended. At that point, the 54-year, too-early maturation time of Abraham, would have been 'repaid' the Gentiles: except, for the Tribulation.

But Rapture's occurrence no longer depends on enough bodies to fill a federated kingdom. Kings under the King of Kings. That's why Paul and James talk of crowns, why 1 Corinthians 3, Revelation 1-3 are about rewards and privileges: the elite are few, and not finished. Yet.

Many have been saved, so there are enough 'ruled' per kingdom. Bear in mind, anyone dying too young to have rejected the Gospel, is saved. So billions of saved people, exist by now. But there are not enough kings, to rule them. So those kings, only need to be few. So the Rapture occurs when the last of those kings has been internally developed: which can be in the next five minutes, or five thousand years from now, who knows what the 'perfect' configuration of the heavenly kingdom, needs to be. But God knows. And really, Christ prayed that Father decide the matter, in John 17.

So, that's why He told the apostles in Acts 1 that no one knows: He prayed that Father decide it. Deity knows everything, but Deity is free. So even though Christ's Deity knows, it's still for Father to decide, and that decision is yet future, and can be changed. So He knows and doesn't 'know', since Father is free to change His Decision. That He won't change it, does not mean He cannot change it.

For the Bride, is Father's Gift to Christ. So the Bride, is still getting kitted out, theme of Ephesians 4:12-16. And anyone who believes in Christ is part of the Bride, whether ready or not, when the last trumpet of the Church Age, blows, 1 Thessalonians 4:17. By an archangel in Revelation 4:1, not any angel in Revelation after that. So the Tribulation begins when Church is matured. Period. We aren't supposed to be here: Romans 11, because Israel failed, we exist, so let's not get fat-headed — see also Deuteronomy 6 and Deuteronomy 30 — nor antisemitic, as the Romans were and still remain, today.

Israel was fat-headed, so was punished. Because, she was to train in knowledge of God. To learn God, know His Nature, learn and know what He knows. Corporately. That was the purpose of the Mosaic Law. The Mosaic Law taught humiliation, precision, patience, endurance, mostly by doing the small meaningless thing, how to see big God in the little menial stuff. God used a flying oven, not something pretty and fancy, to make contract with Abraham, Genesis 15:17. God used the dead skin on a phallus, "so every time Abraham peed" — as my pastor was fond of saying — Abraham would remember the covenant of sons. Takes a sense of humor, to make the organ of procreation, also the organ of elimination. And frankly, both activities have quite a bit of humiliation one endures to get the payoff, at the end.

Small stuff. Humiliating stuff. War is humiliating, boring, frustrating, terrorizing. Nothing glorious in any of it. So you learn not to be fat-headed, over all the honor and glory you get which God earned, not you. Which other people don't have.

God has everything. Experiences everything. All at once. So how can you get fellowship with God, if you don't learn to live as God does? And how the blazes can you do that, if you don't learn how God thinks? When your sorrows hit Christ, He knew them 2000 years beforehand. As God, He knew them from eternity past. Plus, everyone else's sorrows. Forever. Okay, so don't you have to learn sorrows? To know what it's like for Him to know them, Philippians 3:7-14?

See, it's about learning, not earning. You learn fellowship by the togetherness. In all the high, and all the low. So each moment you live, you suffer something and you get something too good for you. What are you learning from it? What are you learning about God, what is the Holy Spirit teaching you, what practice in what doctrinal skill, are you to receive? These are the test questions, and they are all internal. No bragamonies (bragging testimonies). Half the time, you won't even know what the heck is going on, so have no answers. But now at least, you know the questions. So ask God. And grow up to the Royal Crown appointed to you unless you reject it, theme of Revelation 1-3, 1 Corinthians 3, 2 Timothy 4, James 1.

Mosaic law was a cookie-cutter set of rules, and had the same goal. But now, kings are to be developed, so no more cookie-cutter, it's all individual. Learning to rule. To set the rules for your future kingdom. This is the process Christ went through, and is His Spiritual Legacy to us. Light-years beyond the Mosaic Law, as Paul explains, in Galatians 3-5. As the writer of Hebrews explained, in Hebrews 5-12. As John explained, in John 14-17. As will actually happen, in Revelation 4, which fulfills the 'great ones' clause of Isaiah 53:12. Learning to be a King, requires learning the Thinking of The King. It hurts, all the time; a kind of cross. And there's nothing else you'll want, once you see Him in it. Fellowship. With Him. Not sadism, not masochism, but the same seeking of oneness as Christ Himself sought with Father, which only the Cross could satisfy.

People classify dispensations in different ways, but in all of them the idea of a period for a specific post-salvation contract AKA 'covenant' obtains. The operative covenant "now" (Bible keyword for Church Age), is ours, due to Christ's Victory on the Cross; this covenant began at Pentecost 30 AD, and will continue until the Rapture. It's a complete upgrade versus what Israel had. Upgrade means the old Mosaic Law being fulfilled in Christ, requires a "new covenant". Again, this is the main topic of the Book of Hebrews. Lord vs. Satan Part 2 addresses that legal changeover in huge detail, as it's due to the Angelic Trial.

Anything beyond these basics will become clear as you read these FAQs or webpages. So you'll notice that I'm not any denomination, nor is there any prohibition against being in any set denomination. There are no set rituals, dressings, days, behavioral rules, and no set prohibitions against them, either. Like Paul said, everything is lawful, but not all things are helpful (1 Corinthians 6:12, 1 Corinthians 10:23). Romans 14 says you must determine these for yourself, before God. To your own Master you stand or fall. Everyone else, too.

How much you mature will depend on how you use the Bible you learn and live on, and when we are all assembled at the Revelation 4:1 Rapture trumpet, we'll be graded. Graded on Bible, not on what teacher we listened to, what ritual we followed, what good deeds we did. Graded with results that last forever. We'll all be happy, and we'll all be unequal. For, we each had equal opportunity to grow in Christ. So Fear That Day; it can happen in the next five minutes, five thousand years from now, no one knows. New Testament always thus warns us: Grow up.


3. Why the Bible? First, because it's obvious God exists, so there must be some book which explains Him. All I have to do is look up at the sky, and I know "God" in some definition, lives. This God won't force Himself upon creation, hence you don't see a blimp flying overhead advertising Him. So you can choose to know Him, or not. I choose to know Him, as millions of other humans, because, honey — if this life down here is all there is, it would be better never to be born. If I had no proof of God's existence via even that very daily sky, then I'd commit suicide. Period. Mankind is too puny, to warrant even breathing.

So: of all the alleged holy books out there, only the Bible explains how God gets paid for sin. God being paid, not humans being punished or rewarded. God should be paid, or there's no justice, hence no God. Since the universe clearly did not get here on its own, and since the biggest "set" has to be Infinite Stasis and personal (else there would be no persons), God must exist. Don't need a Bible to see that. Do need something, to explain how this Biggest person gets paid for sin. Bible alone does that, in its 66 books (not 72, no apocryphal book passes the Divine Inspirer test). Find me some other book which shows how God gets paid for sin (and please don't insult intelligence by saying He doesn't need to be paid, justice is due anyone, however Great). Then I might consider some other book.


4. Why are you so critical of Christianity? Because Christianity isn't looking at Bible, but at 'respectable' people, to claim what Bible says. That has always been the problem: parroting what some 'respectable' person said, rather than looking in bible to see what it says. It's really embarrassing, how we prefer something or someone between Bible and ourselves. Now, I didn't know all that, initially; these pages were intended to merely audit what Bible says versus what is 'out there'. So I didn't intend these webpages to have so much criticism in them, but there is so much false doctrine out there, and particularly, inattention to what the Bible says in the original language texts, I have to say what's wrong, to account for it. After all, if "x" has been taught for centuries and it's wrong, one should say how it became wrong, or at least why it's wrong, so a reader can account for that. Hearsay is of no value. Accounting is of value, even if you don't agree with the answer. Really, the criticism is just to alert. It's amazing that with all the candle wax, uncials or fraktur type, impossible-to-read vowel points and other difficulties scholars have faced — it's a miracle, that they got so much right. Had we been in their place, we'd probably have screwed up more than they did.

The big gripe isn't the errors. It's that the errors are covered up, even repeated, and now there's no excuse for that. We've had computer technology for over 50 years. We've had very good and complete original language texts for about 150 years. So why the teaching emphasis on translations, still? If you want to know God, don't you want to know the real words He empowered the Bible writers to write? Do you know, for millennia people couldn't get what you can get for free even on the internet? God the Holy Spirit enables you to understand these the real tongues He used: just use 1 John 1:9 and study under a pastor who exegetes verse by verse. It's not your IQ, but His you get when you use 1 John 1:9 (filling the Temple in Old Testament, filling your body with perspicacity in the New Testament). You don't roll in the aisle spouting gibberish and pretending it's holy. You Learn The Book in those 'tongues', now. That's the real gift you get by filling. So it's not elitist.

So why are the newer Bible translations in English still as bad as the old ones, if not worse? Why do foreign-language translations copy the English mistakes, rather than true de novo re-translation from the original language texts? No excuse for that. No excuse for the same ol' lies being passed on by alleged scholars and pastors when the truth is now so easy. I swear, if I hear one more History Channel 'documentary' blasphemously state that Peter is the head of the Church, I'll break my TV, then use 1 John 1:9 and be punished by God for my anger (cuz I know better than to get mad, 🤣). (Πέτρα is Christ in the LXX, and in the New Testament, with "πέτρος" being a chip, everyone sane knows that now, so why isn't Matthew 16:18 corrected, 🤬. Refer to Pope Myth.)

I had no idea how blessed I was to get a pastor who taught only from the original language texts. Like every other Christian, for decades I just learned and learned, not realizing that most of Christendom for centuries didn't get what I got to learn. I took it for granted. I also didn't realize how incompetent current Christian scholarship has been, though my pastor warned us of it frequently. How hard is it to read John 3:16 or 1 John 1:9 in translation? They're not wrong, so why is it no one realizes it's believe only to be permanently saved? Why is it no one knows you cannot be filled with the Spirit while in a state of sin? Is not 1 John 1:6-10 clear enough, even in translation? I guess not!

So it's been a real eye-opener, to see how incompetent Christians have been, at teaching and understanding. Worse, a lot of them are sheer liars, using their personality or degrees to rope people. Always there will be a money reason. Catering to those who have money, or trying to get yours. It's positively disgusting, and the lies are easily proven within five minutes of Bible study.

But no one consults the Bible. Oh no. The Bible's own plain text isn't good enough — gotta have some 'expert' bless it with a meaning. Never mind, only the Holy Spirit is the Expert and the human 'experts' don't consult Him. That's why we can't count to three. That's why respectable scholars using their credentials, get away with ignoring the "nights" term in both Matthew 12:40 and Jonah 1:17, blithely saying that oh the three days are partial. Oh yeah? How are you going to get to the third day, until two nights have fully passed? And until that third day has fully passed, how you gonna get to the third night? Of course, if you did the count properly, you begin Nights First, and then you get the Truth as God told it to you: Wednesday Night, Thursday Night, Friday Night — thus now Thursday and Friday have passed, so now Saturday can occur. Thus ends the three days, and on that Saturday after sundown, begins the Jewish first day of the week. So aha! Now all those "on the third day" verses are consistent with Matthew 12:40, since after all it's Jewish Time you're measuring! For when you measure as the Bible tells you, then the third day occurs after the third night, and now it all makes sense! End dispute! But the 'experts' don't care about Bible; they care about human approbation. So they sell their souls to chop down the Word the Word gave us — so not to offend any of their fellow apostate humans. Humans have money, see. God's currency doesn't count down here.

Or how about this gem: to excuse the refusal to truly translate Bible from the original language texts, the extant translations are looked at for their alleged 'expertise' — and then of course slavishly obeyed. Yet called a "new and fresh translation" from the "Autograph"? Liars! So you just shelled out another $50 for yet another Bible translation, only to find out it's the same as the translations you had. And instead of smelling foul play, you are told the smell is "vindication" of the previous translation. Oh? Then why do a new one? 🤦

See the scam? Bible publishers need to make money. Bibles tend to stay around for decades, centuries, so in order to sell more Bibles, well — gotta come up with a gimmick. If indeed the 'new' translation were good, then it's money well spent, to buy it. But the new translations preserve most all of the errors in the old ones, and additionally make many more errors; all the while, claiming to be 'new' and 'fresh', "from the original language texts". Rubbish.

Then when caught in the lie, the lame excuse is given: Oh, the congregation is used to hearing the old translation! Yeah, so if the old is wrong, then you keep on teaching it wrong? Do these people have no conscience? And yet they are teachers? You realize, I hope, that thousands of 'scholars' and 'pastors' use this line of logic. God is not important, see. Only one's reputation.

Or how about this elitist gem: oh, better to rely on past experts! Oh, and what is the Holy Spirit — chopped liver? Is He inferior to those mere men of the past? Most 'scholars' are busy consulting everyone but God. Listen to them talk. Subscribe to their blogs, their newsletters. It's all about patting each other on the back. God is nowhere in sight.

See: this is how Bible comes to stay mistranslated for centuries. Perpetuated Errors. Never mind that the old translations reverse God's Word in the original language texts in thousands of verses. Ahhh, always bending to man, never to God. Makes you want to puke.

Good thing God put his Original Word in writing, huh. Free. Consistent. Preserved. Just learn it as He wrote it. As time passes the real Word will come to circulate in your soul, and the translation will only be adjunctive. That's how God intended it. After all, doesn't He know what Words He commissioned? Why should you settle for less? He won't settle for less: you know that, because He preserved the original language texts. Guaranteed.

And because the Holy Spirit is the Expert, when you use 1 John 1:9 and study under a pastor brave enough to teach you those original language texts, you can see what Bible says for yourself. Thus you come to see many of the scholars and teachers are liars. Just as warned by Paul, Peter, Jude, John. Wolves dressed in wool with big smiles and wallets, beguiling everyone with their degrees and glad handing. Just like Laodiceans. See: Bible warned us in advance. We see the same garbage games played by 'scholars' as had always been played with respect to Bible, ever since Moses warned about it, beginning in Deuteronomy 1.

You're stuck with these 'scholars'. They sold out to human approbation alleging it was 'scholarly' to do so. God still uses them, even as He used the Pharisees. Like the Lord said, listen to them, learn from them, but don't do what they do — instead, go to God for the real answer. He'll always show you where they are right and where they're wrong. So they end up being used to save your time in research. He gives you, what He wanted to give them, had they not copped out. That way in heaven they can breathe a sigh of relief their lives weren't wasted. God deployed someone else to pick up the baton.

Consequently, all this white-lie 'scholarship' makes for long detours in my webpages. For I must account for the mistakes which are correctible, and the lies which are not. One must document: show how the mistakes got made and perpetuated, versus what the Bible actually says. Hence the webpages and the exegetical videos focus on tracing out what is popularly said, versus what Bible says in those original language texts. That way you see directly for yourself what it says. If you're using 1 John 1:9 while you read, Holy Spirit will attest. So if I too screwed up somewhere, He'll attest to that. And if not, then you know I got it from Him, so it's never any merit of my own. Else I'd have no courage to write or make videos!

Just as in West Point: see where the 'experts' blundered in the past, so you don't repeat those mistakes. Then the baton is passed, instead of dropped. We all make mistakes. No shame in that. Big shame though at the Bema, if we don't wake up to those mistakes. Covering up mistakes is bad. Lying is bad, especially since many of these people make money by lying against the Word of God. He doesn't believe in Crusades, else He'd not have entrusted His Word to a sliver of ground connecting three continents. So Accounting, not crusading, is the way to 'criticize'.

In sum, be skeptical but stay open. Skeptical of your own understanding, and of anyone else's (mine included, obviously). Always use 1 John 1:9 and ask God about whatever you are studying. Study hard. Learn from the Very Words God Preserved Which Christ Learned. Christ's Thinking as Humanity is the New Testament, so others writing those books attest to Him. God will always Vindicate His Word, no matter how many nice people spread their misunderstandings or white lies. Trust God: everyone else has to pay cash upfront.


5. Why so much emphasis on the Angelic Conflict, on Satan's strategy and tactics? Because that was one of the many beliefs which changed as I wrote these pages. I was testing what I'd learned about the panoramic meaning for our creation by God in the first place. While doing that, I kept on finding empirical data proving satanic involvement in a set of recurring patterns, be they in history (historical trends), mistranslation and misinformation, etc. While I realize some people find the topic of angels and demons titillating, I don't get excited about it. Humans just can't be the topmost intelligent life. So to me the existence of unseen demons and angels is not exciting. I can't see the mitochondria in my own body cells, either. Science can't test supernatural activity, but like the wind, you can. You can see the effects of the wind, and then know the wind caused them. You can see the effects of supernatural activity and know supernatural beings caused them. Authors like to sign their work. Demons are nothing, if not egotistical, attesting to their involvement everywhere. Satan's Counter to God: 'Script' Strategies and Tactics summarizes how they sign their work, shorter summary is also below.

Seven 'signature' characteristics pervade demon-sponsored stuff, whether it's the Mothman thingy (which really happened in 1967, a mass hallucination), UFO / ghost stuff, Bible mistranslation, or any fake holy book:

    1. Some verse or doctrine or concept in the Bible is satirized in a very pointed way. Thus you are mocked for not knowing the Bible and getting the joke.
    2. The satire always plays on Greco-Roman pantheonic culture with emphasis on sex, emotionality, and above all (in writing) a studied ambiguity like the Delphic Oracles. Of course, the standard 'religion' throughout history is some variant of this model, and "Greco-Roman" is the morphing.
    3. The character of God and the prescribed worship of Him is always portrayed in a silly, Benny Hill-like (or Three Stooges) slapstick manner, and then called 'holy'. Idea that if you don't behave stupidly, you're unfaithful.
    4. The satire always mocks those who believe in #3's prescriptions, especially in the wordplay of the holy book. God is mocked, his alleged faithful of the past are mocked, and the ones believing in the holy book's claims are mocked. Real God wouldn't author a book like that, obviously.
    5. All the above is subtle, all at once. You have to know Bible's doctrines and keywords, to 'get' the joke.
    6. Strong emotionality is used (i.e., the beauty of the recitation's sound), with appeals to culture, tribe, people, rituals — to hook you into the tenets.
    7. The satire always blatantly contradicts common sense. Thus if you believe in the tenet, you are rightly mocked.

So it does matter to show the supernatural strategies and data demons provide, so the reader can make his own decisions. It also matters, because these tactics are practiced on all humanity, so it helps to notice them. You can't 'fight' them. But you can become wise about them. None of us is exempt from their influence; we all are pawns in this thing. Their tricks play differently on the Muslim versus the Jew versus the Christian versus the Buddhist versus the UFO enthusiast, atheist (etc.), but there's a common set of characteristics much like a fingerprint, in all events.

Again, to me this is dull work, not at all sensationalistic. The supernatural is natural to a supernatural being. I'm quite certain that a spider thinks I'm god by his standards (so to speak): but my superior ability versus that spider's, is normal for me. So I'm not interested in proving to people that God and angels/demons exist. If you don't know that already, anything people write will not convince you. Most people believe a devil of some kind exists. Ok, then: what's being done? On whom? Why? For what goal? Etc. The reader is free to reject or accept what he wants. I'm only interested in accounting for it, so that my own beliefs can keep on refining, get corrected. Truth is what it is. I want to know it better, that's all.


6. Why so much emphasis on God designing time in 490-year increments? Is that Bible codes? Does it prove God's Existence? No, because if you don't want to believe in God, no amount of miracles or other stuff will be valid or useful to you. Don't believe or disbelieve in God because you think you see some miracle. Then you want a circus clown, not God. So no, this isn't Bible codes, either. It's a structure of Time itself, the criteria God discloses in Bible. God set up time in 490-year increments as a kind of schedule, and His Promises are timed to that schedule. A believer on earth must be awarded time in order for the world to go on breathing. Bible discloses who these people are, discloses the 490-year structure and its tandem 1000-year civilization unit, just as it discloses a calation, growing seasons, etc. It's not meant to be titillating, and only has prophetic value in some instances i.e., God accounts in Daniel 9 for the First Temple's 490-year shortfall, reprising Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter.

We really must admit this centuries' long error in reading Daniel 9 — because we make God out to be a liar, if we do not. Graciously, God still caused the 'scholars' to come up with approximately the right conclusions; but arguments over Daniel 9 still show how bad, the scholarship of those rightly concluding Daniel 9 depicts Messiah's arrival date. Once you correct that scholarship, no one can dispute it anymore. So that's what Mirroring, God's Orchestration of Time, and Ten Ways this Timeline differs are intended to prove. "Mirroring" explains the principle and play of God's Construct for Time; "God's Orchestration of Time" demonstrates it using only Bible's dating system in the same order as Bible presents the data; "Ten Ways this Timeline differs" presents an analysis of that data, and how the scholars got it wrong. So you can decide whether to even read the foregoing links, the following bullets summarize the bigger 'scholar' gaffes.

How embarrassing, the Bible refutation of this Palm Sunday notion. We have a decree from Cyrus and a few from Darius, in the Bible. But none, from this Xerxes, for Nehemiah. Hmmm. Something's fishy in Denmark. If God meant to date from this decree, why is it not mentioned, but the others are rather pointedly mentioned, whole chapters of the Bible spent on them? You realize, of course, that the entire Book of Esther is there to prove how God kept his Daniel 9 promise. So if this Xerxes is the 'decree' from which we are to date Daniel 9, then why the sudden silence?

Of course one wants to assume Xerxes, due to the 'coincidence' of the year: but the Bible already tells you Jerusalem was rebuilt — after it was rebuilt, the walls were burned down again, see Nehemiah 1:1-3. Bear in mind, this situation occurs a good 70 years after the Temple was rebuilt. So there had to already be a city, to service the Temple.

Now, because we want Palm Sunday to be the ending answer, we'll read into Bible what's not there. And when we need further corroboration for this lie we're creating, we'll have to manipulate what "year" means. That's why we mis-measure based on lunar calendar, to 'fit' the desired result for Palm Sunday. 483 × 360 = 173,880, then count backwards from Palm Sunday, and deem that the day of Xerxes' decree! Magic! Or, estimate when this non-recorded non-existent decree 'happened' then do the same calculation, then find what Bible-significant date it might reference, and voila! Bible proved right!

Um... but no king ever used a lunar calendar for civil administration. Civil calendars had to be intercalated, always. So if a human king's decree, then the measurement should be solar, not lunar. Bible only uses solar accounting for multiple years: for like kings do, Bible bases its dating on people. People have birthdays. Birthdays are only measured in solar terms. Oops.

Wow, many internet sites claim that His Ride on Palm Sunday was 483 years "to the day" of Xerxes' decree. And all of them are based on a one hundred year old book which was an estimate by a nice guy in Britain. So for 100 years+, no actual Bible research has been done. Instead, this guy who was only guessing, is touted as if he were the Bible. That's unfair to the guy who wrote the book, to make him the Book. He's probably screaming from heaven now, "Stop treating my book as if it were Holy Writ!" Calvinists treat Calvin as if he were a pope, and we see how bad their scholarship becomes. We Dispensationalists have our own popes; when we put them on pedestals, our scholarship also tanks. As here: our "Palm Sunday" claim is provably manipulated, what bad scholarship.

Okay, so where in the Bible do you get that Palm Sunday justification? Nowhere. By the time Nehemiah even heard about the walls, Jerusalem had long been rebuilt. So the story furnishes an anecdotal statement that hey, God's Decree for Daniel 9:25 got met because here's this Nehemiah person rebuilding again what was already rebuilt. So you can't do the countdown in days from Nehemiah's arrival. That's not the reference point. So it can't conclude at Palm Sunday. So this Palm Sunday nonsense is not in Bible, but is fabricated by people who can't read Nehemiah very well, to make the Bible Look Good. It's called "cooking the books" in modern accountancy, which is why Enron fell. Get that? Don't Cook the Bible's books! Hey, honey — Bible looks just fine without your claimed cosmetics. Κόσμος-etics. Emetics. Okay?

So in Nehemiah, we find another threat, just before the Daniel 9:25 timeline was to begin. Different kind of Bible proof that the "rebuild" promise God decreed got met. Overlooked, because people think Daniel 9:25 is a human king's decree, and straining to find such a king, mis-measure the years to make 'em 'fit'. How sad.

446 BC = 586 - 70 - 70, which is God's Accounting System. So that's why Nehemiah 6:15 matters. To show that rule in Daniel 9:25 is met. And your big clue is, that Nehemiah repeats and then summarizes, Daniel's own prayer (compare Nehemiah 1:5 to Daniel 9:4ff).

This is a second threat. Nehemiah knows that the 49 years of Daniel 9:25 are to begin at the end of that year (the end of 446 BC, specifically in Chislev). So he's in a position to rebuild the suddenly-down walls, in the very year that the 49 years are supposed to start counting, beginning three months later. So Nehemiah 1 tells you that a last-minute attack by Satan was employed to stop Daniel 9:25's countdown, from beginning.

And that countdown doesn't tie to Palm Sunday, but to the Cross, just like Daniel 9:26 says (Messiah being cut off, not riding in on a donkey). Ties to the very day of the initial Passover which Depicts Messiah's Payment.

My pastor spent a lot of time on "Palm Sunday Politics" (his term). Now I know why. Notice how the exact prediction of the cross gets erased in favor of a flashy kingship entry. That's exactly what my pastor warned against. Naturally, he (and others) kept on saying that Daniel 9 ended at the Cross, never on Palm Sunday, and that the Lord died on true Passover. Yeah. So this new 'fad' from an old book which mis-measures Daniel 9, should be squashed. Don't need its assumptions to validate Daniel 9 to the very day, as you'll see if you keep reading.

When a scholar or pastor admits he made a mistake, it's refreshing. You thus know you can trust the person. For you know that mistakes will be admitted. I must confess, I got used to that, for whenever my pastor found what he considered a past error he made, he'd tell us the error, and what Bible verses corrected it. It took him seven years to teach Ephesians; in part, because he felt he'd missed key information in the prior exegetical 'pass' on a verse. He came to regard all that he'd taught before 1985, as too inferior, by comparison. Fortunately, he was dissuaded from pitching all that prior sterling exegesis and insight.

So it's no shame to admit error; no shame in using 1 John 1:9 to God, so less than no shame in admitting an error to other people who also err. Rather, it makes the sheep more secure. For they can trust you to fess up. So let's fess up, here.

Oh no, not clear to those out of fellowship who always cut God's head off and put man's on top! And surely one goes out of fellowship, to prefer a wrong interpretation by some 'scholar' over 100 years ago or currently, versus the Very Clear Bible Words in Daniel 9:24-25! You realize, of course, this proves no one looked at the Bible, but instead just kept quoting that old scholar, over and over. The guy is in heaven now, and I bet you he wants his error, fixed!

I mean, these verses are famous. I must have lost months trying to vet the various 'kings' who made decrees about the Temple or related to Jerusalem, just like the scholars did, relying on those scholars to be 'right'. Instead of, Checking The Bible Myself. So in frustration, at last (!) I gave up and asked God Himself, "Okay, Dad, what does this mean?" And then almost instantly was alerted to the word "decreed" in Daniel 9:24. Oh boy. Could it be plainer? Ouch, and Thank You, Dad!

So Daniel 9:25 simply tells you the order of the accounting pieces, but not all of the accounting pieces are mentioned in that verse. It merely says that the 7 and the 62 'sevens' won't play, until Jerusalem is rebuilt. For the decree that she be rebuilt is in Daniel 9:25b, just after the sevens are mentioned. So yeah, Nehemiah 6:15's important so you know when God kept His Own Decree. Has absolutely nothing to do with Xerxes, except to tell you when this was; so you know God met His own Decree On Time. All prophetical fulfillment verses have the same role.

"But that's a two year variance!" someone will say. Actually, no. Nehemiah 1:1 tells you he gets the word late in 446 BC. So the typical 'scholar' claim of Longiamanus' permission of 445 BC, is fine. Just remember, that a 'year' was measured starting in Nisan 1. And indeed, if you measure from Nisan 1, you mathematically balance to 446, since you're starting 445 at its beginning.

Daniel 9:25 lists only two of the five accounting pieces from 586 BC forward. The last of the five, is in Daniel 9:27, but the first one, the "70" in Daniel 9:2, is a Mirroring AKA Restitution piece — so it plays twice.

So why do we use a human's interpretation from over 100 years ago, rather than God's Clear Text in the very verse? Embarrassing! Okay, it's normal and human to make mistakes. Nothing to be ashamed of. But there is much to be ashamed of at the Bema if we in the 21st century, don't fix those mistakes. Mistakes are inevitable, like adversity; coverups are optional, like stress. Coverups are evil, denigrating God and His Word in order to cover up some 'respectable' person's mistake. So now all those past scholars are yelling from heaven, "Take away my reproach! Fix my errors!" So shouldn't we do that? Wouldn't we want the same favor, done for us?

Same but more true, for balancing God's Books. Event character is the first thing you must audit, if you hope to get a right interpretation. So look: the Exodus is based on what? Killing of the firstborn the night before. And who is the FirstBorn to die on its anniversary, which the holiday depicted? The Lamb Slain From The Foundation Of The World, which Abel depicted in his sacrifices. Okay, then the end of Daniel 9 will be the Cross, not Palm Sunday, just like Daniel 9:26 tells you. Sheesh. So nothing in prophecy will be dated except based on precedence, and every Bible date you'll find is exactly so referenced: birth to birth, death to death, exodus to entry, entry to exodus, salvation to payment, just like Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter tells you. So if anything, Palm Sunday is an archetype for the Second Advent, or an anniversary of David's entering Jerusalem (can't prove that). So Palm Sunday is certainly not dateable, so not to Daniel 9, which is based on the Cross.

Yeah, and all of them claim the political restoration of Israel fulfills God's prophecy — again, Trying to Make The Bible Look Good — oh, and make a little moolah at the same time. Bible proves Israel's being back in the Land rather fulfills Satan's shub goal, not God's, in Matthew 24, Daniel 9-12, Revelation 11. Jews now all huddled together, no longer protected by the Diaspora! We still gladly give our lives for Israel's defense, be she formalized in a nation or no — but let's not aid her enemies by pretending this is the fulfillment of Ezekiel 37, which only happens at the Second Advent. However, the world practically forced them to go back, so if not Israel, persecution would have continued. Duh, dry bones are of dead people. So all the Old Testament people are resurrected at the Second Advent, and come back with us, else it cannot be all Israel. See also Revelation 19:11ff, where the Ezekiel 37 'army' of all resurrected Israel is included, headed by the One On the White Horse. So that naturally leads to Ezekiel 38, which is on Armageddon's last battle that same Day of the Lord, so of course Ezekiel 39ff ties to Isaiah 61ff, with Isaiah 63:1-9 being the bloodbath on that first Day.

So we serve Satan's goal when we arbitrarily count backwards from 1948? To what? To a convoluted matrix of dates we have to make up, since they won't balance to Bible: 1948-490 or 476 = 1458 or 1472, no 'independence' or 'founding' match, etc. When you compare how God matches event character since Adam, you'll see how this 1948 junk advertises itself to be from Satan. Flee it. The purpose is to lull the Jews into thinking they're back in favor with God so they'll disobey Him and rebuild the Temple on their own. That's always been Satan's goal since 70 AD.

And then we have the gall to call ourselves 'faithful' believers. Yuck. Now, the panderers of this garbage include some pretty respectable people. Yeah, and Satan is respectable too. Sorry, when someone makes money from claims which are patently anti-Bible, the scholarship so bad both speaker and hearer should be red in the face — you can't speak kindly. People are being fleeced, and the Bible is being trashed.

Even a brainout can tally up the begats in Genesis 5. Even a brainout can do simple math on the Bible's dates and prove the above to be either errors, or outright chicanery, Ephesians 4:14, Hoshea 4:6! So do yourself a favor: use 1 John 1:9 and ask God if what you're reading is valid. I always look first for Gospel presentation, then the interpretation of Israel, two doctrines Satan works hardest to distort (Rapture's a subset under "Israel", as Tribulation belongs to her). So any Gospel claim other than John 3:16's text, i.e., "heart" belief (🤣 the heart only pumps blood); or, verbs added to "believe" — flee! If the person can't even get Gospel right, nothing he says will be accurate unless parroted from a third party. Likewise, any claim Ezekiel 37 is fulfilled by 1948 founding of Israel, see 2 John 9-11. Ask God, okay? Lie Detection Litmus Test for Anything: if it's popular and sold for money by 'respectable' people, something's radically wrong with the information. Respectability and popularity are Satan's two 'legs'.

So I must spend a lot of text explaining God's Accounting System so you can test it; you don't have any other way to analyze it, as nothing's yet written by anyone else for comparison. Yet this System was well known by the Bible writers (Moses, David, Isaiah, Daniel, the Lord, Matthew, Luke, Paul, writer of Hebrews all provably used it). Somehow its doctrine got so lost, even the Jewish calendar is off by about 200 years. Hopefully now that we have computers and can do the research faster, all these things can be corrected sometime during the 21st century.

There are many mistakes being made currently among those who realize a 490-year trend is depicted. They tie the 490 years to events they consider significant, and track from them. By contrast, Bible uses an absolute scheduling from Adam's fall in 4106 BC (Bible starts numbering his days when he fell, not before). So you first go 490 years from Adam, then add 70, etc.

The timeline resets at the Cross, so 1030 is the 1000th-year anniversary, 2030 will be the 2000th anniversary, etc. Mirroring explains why and how, and its tandem God's Orchestration of Time runs the numbers from Adam through about 2640 AD or so, with color coding for the deadlines versus historical events, who got each time grant (up through Cross), etc.

It's an elaborate thing, so it's self-auditing. It's in the Bible, objectively testable, not something invented by 'brainout'. So the author of it is God, not 'brainout'. If you simply repeat or report what Someone else says, that Someone else is the author, not you. The material merely plots what Bible says. You can then see for yourself, its bald interpretation. So it's not 'brainout', but Bible. Different "B". Now, that Someone Else will testify to His Authorship for anyone reading a mere reporting. Also, there are a bazillion world timelines on the internet, so you can fill in dates you think significant and see how they track to the gold (490-year) or green (1000-year) deadlines in the table.

Repeat: this is self-auditing. So you can tell when you screw up, where some 'scholar' screwed up, or where 'brainout' screwed up. Vet With Bible And You Will Know For Sure. Trouble is, no one's done that. Everyone's copying some past 'scholar' or 'respectable' person. Like all those dippy Christians who think the world is only 6000 years old, are getting that from Bishop Ussher — not, from the Bible. For Ussher assumed that Genesis 5 began with initial creation, misreading Genesis 1:2, Isaiah 45:18-19 (which proves that Genesis 1:3 and following occur after some undefined gap in time); Ussher thus misreads Genesis 5 to think Adam's days began 930 years prior. No, Hebrew text for Adam doesn't tell you that, though it's real easy to miss the wry wording if you're not looking for it. The Bible by contrast does tell you birth-death for everyone else in the roster, so should be read as direct, lineal descent without gaps.

In short, we've screwed up our report of what Genesis 1 means for centuries. But now, some few have had the courage to admit that, and now the "gap theory" in some form or another is at least considered. Proven easily true, from the Bible itself in Genesis 1:2 itself. Okay, the same thing is true about God's True Timeline. Use the Bible itself, not what people say about it, and you'll have more proof of Bible's dating accuracy than you would imagine possible. Of course, those trying to do that will encounter a lot of opposition by those who instead of using Bible, went by wrong scholarship. Sorry. Word is more important.

And for us laymen, we must understand that pastors and Bible scholars have the worst job on earth, always thankless, always having to wrangle over every little thing, as Satan's not slow in masking the truth. So let's cut them some slack when we find errors. Let's not conclude that we 'can never trust scholars again', or crusade against some pastor who got it wildly wrong, etc. They are human, and under far more pressure than we are. Were we in their place, we'd have made the same or worse errors. Just note the error, and pray for God to privately cause them to understand it. That's one reason why you won't see me name names as to who got it wrong. (Frankly, everyone gets it wrong on something, myself included.) Spit happens. So clear away the spit, keep on, Philippians 3:14.

Obviously this masking has to involve a supernatural effort on Satan's part, for thousands of 'scholars' to misread in the very same way, the very same verses. Yes, it's our fault; but, we've had 'help'. That's why The True Timeline could 'hide' in plain sight for centuries. Why, two of the most popular Old Testament verses, Daniel 9:24-25, can be mistaken as calling for a human king's decree, when no human king is even mentioned, and the Only One Decreeing, is God! Why, Daniel 9:24 can be mistaken as referring to 490 lunar years, when God never accounts multiple years that way in Bible: again, He goes by birthdays, anniversaries of events accounted in years of people — hence solar. Oops. Okay, so "ouch, and thank you Dad for the correct answer" Bible gives. Again, the Word is more important, and who cares about the mistakes in the past. That's what 1 John 1:9 is for.

This kind of error is very common throughout Christendom's history: seeing, we don't see; hearing, we don't hear. So the truth always is in plain sight, but we're not seeing it, just as the Jews don't. Same exact reversing pattern of error persists in Bible mistranslation, false doctrines of every type. Because, the primary tactic of Satan & Co. Is reversal. They reverse Bible's original language texts in translation, they reverse the meaning of historical events; they especially reverse the Gospel into works. They enjoy reversing 1 John 1:9 into something an unbeliever does (never mind, John is writing to believers, and only believers in the Old Testament brought sacrifices for sins they had to name to the priest); so, being carnal, we Christians will reverse everything God means.

So the bigger lesson to learn about the reversal of Daniel 9:24-25 from being God's decree into an invented human one, is that Satan & Co. Consider those verses very important. Yeah, they are. Israel misreads them every Chanukah, with the Abomination of a Dumb Dome, staring them in the face. So do we. So our blindness gets satanic 'help'; that's the bigger lesson, here. So we all need to breathe a collective 1 John 1:9 and get cracking on fixing our past mistakes. Only if we keep using 1 John 1:9, do we have Divine Defense against blindness.

שָׁבֻעִ֙ים שִׁבְעִ֜ים נֶחְתַּ֥ךְ עַֽל־עַמְּךָ֣׀ וְעַל־עִ֣יר קָדְשֶׁ֗ךָ לְכַלֵּ֙א הַפֶּ֜שַׁע (וּלַחְתֹּם) [וּלְהָתֵ֤ם] (חַטָּאוֹת) [חַטָּאת֙] וּלְכַפֵּ֣ר עָוֹ֔ן וּלְהָבִ֖יא צֶ֣דֶק עֹֽלָמִ֑ים וְלַחְתֹּם֙ חָז֣וֹן וְנָבִ֔יא וְלִמְשֹׁ֖חַ קֹ֥דֶשׁ קָֽדָשִֽׁים׃ וְתֵדַ֙ע וְתַשְׂכֵּ֜ל מִן־מֹצָ֣א דָבָ֗ר לְהָשִׁיב֙ וְלִבְנ֤וֹת יְרֽוּשָׁ֙לִַם֙ עַד־מָשִׁ֣יחַ נָגִ֔יד שָׁבֻעִ֖ים שִׁבְעָ֑ה וְשָׁבֻעִ֞ים שִׁשִּׁ֣ים וּשְׁנַ֗יִם תָּשׁוּב֙ וְנִבְנְתָה֙ רְח֣וֹב וְחָר֔וּץ וּבְצ֖וֹק הָעִתִּֽים׃ Daniel 9:24-25


6a. Okay, then how did you come up with the BC/AD dates in GeneYrs.xls (God's Orchestration of Time)? Based on what Bible verses? And how did you come up with the 490 + 70 + 490?

Well, I didn't use 'our' BC/AD dates. Rather, Bible dates are derived as functions of x, where x was the Bible verse giving you a formula date in terms of "years from" a person. That was the customary way to date in the ancient world, and even today: your age is measured in terms of "years from" your birth. Becomes a handy method of telling when one person lived, relative to another. So when you have enough persons tallied, only then can you tally BC/AD in our modern terms, because our own calendar has been changed many times (i.e., 10 days chopped out of our calendar by Pope Gregory, and other emendations you can read about in any encyclopedia). The Jewish calendar is even worse, and the Roman calendar is far worse. And let's not even talk about astronomical or astrological calendars. I tried using them all and finally gave up, due to their many internal inconsistencies.

So you can't use anything but the Bible's dating scheme, if you hope to derive a valid timeline. And if you use Bible's dates, you have to use the solar year, because all birthdays are measured in solar terms. So right there you have to throw out any calendar (i.e., the Jewish one) which measures in non-solar years. Bible dates from people, so is always in solar years.

Here's a quick summary on how to find the dates and vet this material in Bible, so you can decide if it's worth your time to do a full proofing.

Exodus is the centerpiece of the Old Testament, so you start there: Bible's dating verses all 'spoke' around the Exodus. So:

  1. When Moses was almost 81 years old (Exodus 7:7 + Exodus 12:1 + the kinds of plagues tell you the seasons so you know the 10 plagues took about a year),
  2. Exodus occurs exactly 430 years to the day that Jacob entered Egypt, Exodus 12:40-41.
  3. Jacob was 130 years old when he entered Egypt, Genesis 47:9.
  4. So the Exodus occurred in what would have been Jacob's 560th year;
  5. So Moses was born about 480 years after Jacob entered Egypt.
  6. The 480th year from the Exodus, 1 Kings 6:1, would have been the 1040th year of Jacob.
  7. Since Jacob left to get a wife when he was 40 (Genesis 28, in context), the Exodus occurs 1040 - 480 - 40 = 520 years after Jacob left to get a wife. Cute.
  8. He got that wife after working 7 years, but it was Leah! So in return for giving Rachel at the same time, Jacob works another seven years to 'pay' for Rachel's dowry (Genesis 29:23-28).
  9. Not until that second seven years ends, does Rachel bear (keep reading in Genesis 29 through Genesis 30:22, count the kids, notice Rachel's complaint and thus you know she married Jacob when Leah did). So at this point Jacob is 54 years old.
  10. Ordered by God, Jacob leaves Laban and Haran six years later, Genesis 30:25 (theme of Genesis 31) compared to Genesis 31:38, Genesis 31:41.
  11. So Jacob is 60, and Joseph is six years old at the time Jacob returns home (ibid). The night before he'll run into Esau (Genesis 32), Jacob wrestles with God, loses, is lamed, and gets his covenant (signified by renaming = adoption, "Israel").
  12. At this point the Exodus is 520 - 20 years away.
  13. When Joseph is age 17, he's sold into slavery, Genesis 37. That's an elapse of another 10-11 years, depending on if Joseph is newly 17 or was nearly 7 when Jacob left. Based on the other numbers, it's likely Joseph was nearly 7 years old when Jacob left, and Jacob is nearly 61 years old upon return (I can't tell which, just yet).
  14. So when Joseph is sold into slavery, Exodus is 490 years away (520 - 20 - 10, taking into account disparate birth months). Aha.
  15. So Jacob was born 560 years prior to the Exodus.
  16. Now Isaac was age 60 when Jacob was born (Genesis 25:26), having married at age 40 like Esau and Jacob would (Genesis 25:20).
  17. So Isaac was born 620 years prior to the Exodus.
  18. We know Isaac was born when Abraham was age 100, Genesis 17:21.
  19. So Abraham was born 720 years prior to the Exodus.
  20. From Abraham backward, the Genesis 5 genealogy takes you sire by sire, all the way to Adam. So now you have a full timeline from Adam through the Exodus, measured beginning at Adam's fall (Genesis 3:22, witty Hebrew birthing preposition מִן min).

Moving forward from the Exodus, which occurs 490 years after Joseph was sold into slavery:

  1. Temple reconstruction begins 480 years later on (2 ?) Ziv, 1 Kings 6:1 + 2 Chronicles 3:1.
  2. That year is the beginning of the 4th year after David's death, per 1 Kings 1:1 - 1 Kings 2:10, 'answered' by 1 Kings 2:39 (3rd year after David died, Shimei is executed). So David lived another seven years, if you do the math (4th year being 480 years after Exodus, means David died in the 477th year after the Exodus).
  3. Since he was 30 years old when he became king at Hebron (2 Samuel 5:4), then he's 70 years old when he retires, but 77 when he dies; end of 1 Chronicles tells you how he spent his retirement years creating the Temple service and related furnishings, architectural design, as does end of 2 Samuel.
  4. So Temple construction begins in the 11th year after David retired, 4th year after he died, 80th year after he was born, which was 400 years after the Exodus; Temple construction completes seven years later, 1 Kings 6.
  5. But Temple's dedicated 3 years after that, 1 Kings 8:1 compared to 2 Chronicles 1-3. So Temple is dedicated 490 years after the Exodus, 480 + 10 = 490. See the pattern?
  6. So Isaiah 53's Divinely-layered Hebrew meter, predicts the early demise of that Temple, by using doubled 126's: first, 126 years after Isaiah writes Isaiah 53:1-4, the Temple will fall; the next 126 syllables (Isaiah 53:5-8) represent Temple's Fall as 126 years short of its own 490 (video demonstration is in the white table, below).
  1. Accounting Adjustment. Temple's Destruction, relative to the Exodus, which occurred 490 years after Joseph's enslavement, is dated + 490 (Exodus) + 490 (Temple Dedication) + 364 (= 490 - 126). So Daniel 9 uses three accounting pieces which also 'balance' to the 126 (70 in Daniel 9:2, 49 in Daniel 9:25, 7 in Daniel 9:27).
  2. Accounting Balance. Thus you know the First Temple lived for 490 - 126 = 364 years. Which you're expected to know in Daniel 9:25, to see the Justice in God's granting 62 weeks (really "sevens", not weeks) for the Second Temple (364 + 70, balances to First Temple time).
  1. Accounting Credit. Note well, it's not New Time until the 62 weeks, hence the 62 weeks is severally accounted. First, the Owed Time is 'paid back'. That's why you know two seventy-year periods play and then the 49, in Daniel 9:25. For both 70's and the 49, are old Time, due the prior time grant to the First Temple, ending 126 years too soon. So those three credits must first play, or the 'time books' won't balance. Problem is, that added 140 years to the amount of Time which must elapse, so there's a net 14-year overage to debit. Daniel 9:27 is thus a reserve, and so is the 62nd week. Chart below walks you through this accounting, which is fully in Isaiah 53, with a summary update, in Daniel 9.

God The Master Accountant:
AKA, How Matching Event character, Makes 70 Buy 140 + 490

Key to Daniel 9's accounting: Owed Time Must Be 'Paid', for Time must 'balance' to its Justice Purpose. Daniel 9 is prophetic, alright, but the important thing to understand is why. Prophecy is always based on Promises, and Promises are always based on Justice. So Daniel 9 is about Justice Accounting. So Daniel times his prayer.

For if no Temple Standing, time stops. So Daniel prays for the Temple to be standing, again. All that comes with the 1 Kings 9 prayer of Solomon and God's Response. Temple represents the contract of 2 Samuel 7. When the contract is in breach, then Time itself is in breach. (Easy to empathize with Israel's negativity, once you realize they knew all Time rested on their shoulders, Deuteronomy 32:8 in Hebrew.)

Watch His Awesome Accounting Genius, so you'll see how man's free will never compromises the Sovereignty or Plan of God. Watch also, for how God repairs and then matches, the character of time spent. He's treating Time like a balance sheet, and He first forecast this 'balancing' treatment, via Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter. Videos below demonstrate this meter. After the videos, you'll see God use the same Isaiah 53 accounting, to craft Daniel 9's numbers.

Isaiah 53 runs 462 syllables total, as you'll see at the end of this video, which shows the raw metering pattern. (Isaiah 53 actually begins in Isaiah 52:13, it was accidentally split due to Stephen Langton's erroneous chapter divisions that everyone now uses.) The big numbers you see in the video show the number of Hebrew syllables for the (gold-)shaded sections. Isaiah Matches The Character and therefore pairs each section by Content (meaning) and (hence) number of syllables (i.e., Isaiah 52:15 is on atonement, and so is Isaiah 53:10, so both sections have the same number of Hebrew syllables, 35). For an explanation of Bible Hebrew meter and how Isaiah 53 derives from Psalm 90's meter, refer here:

Those videos are illustrated by the following two summaries, notice how the same raw meter, functions as a calendar from the time Isaiah writes until the same endpoint as Daniel 9:25:

Here's the accounting. The 70 in Daniel 9:2, is the Condition For Reimbursing Time, paying off the sabbatical years which remained unpaid, though time elapsed. The elapse is overlooked in Christian theology, which dismissively treats the "70" based on the number of sabbatical years within a 490-year period based on the antisemitic Church Fathers' accounting, so of course their conclusions are wrong. Maybe one day we will stop treating those spiritual retards as spiritual giants, and instead look at bible! Don't hold your breath.

Look: the 70 has a different derivation, per bible, as follows.

  • As you just saw in bullet "AA", Israel is her 854th year when Temple is razed: Temple's Destruction relative to the Exodus, which occurred 490 years after Joseph's enslavement, is dated: + 490 (= Exodus) + 490 (= Temple Dedication, a Sabbatical Year) + 364 (= 490 - 126) = 854 years. So the 70 doesn't refer to sabbatical years before the Temple was dedicated, or there could have been no Temple. Obviously, since if now God was razing the Temple due to the unobserved years, He'd never have authorized raising the Temple if there were missed years at its beginning. So we know the 70 is calculated from time missed after the Temple is dedicated.
  • That year, was supposed to be a sabbatical year; specifically, the 122nd Sabbatical Year (854 ÷ 7).
  • During the 364 years the First Temple stood, there were 49 years where Israel worked when she should have been resting, which corresponds to the period from Rehoboam to Temple's demise. So this time elapsed, alright, but it's of the Wrong Character.
  • Additionally, during that same time, per Leviticus 25 another seven jubilee years were due.
  • So that totals 56, which is the prominent paragraph syllabification you just saw in the above videos depicting Moses' Hebrew meter for Psalm 90:16-17, and the videos depicting Hebrew meter of Isaiah 53:1-2, Isaiah 53:5-6, Isaiah 53:9, Isaiah 53:11. Deft way of explaining how the sabbatical years missed caused the Temple's demise, huh.
  • So Time is Out of Balance, a debit playing where there should have been a credit. So what's the solution? Double-credit. Watch:
  • That work time is 'owed' 56 years of no work time, because in effect the work time occurred too early.
  • By the time the first 56 years is up, another seven sabbatical years are due on them.
  • So, due twice, equaling 14: due on both 56's, the one worked too soon, and the one just elapsing to 'reimburse' the 'too soon'.
  • So now, 56 + 14 = 70. Thus you see how Jeremiah 25's decree (echoed in Daniel 9:2) is derived.
  • As Isaiah's meter depicts in Isaiah 53:3 + Isaiah 53:4, Isaiah 53:7 + Isaiah 53:8, Israel must now get 70 years twice, to restore the Character and Relationship of the working years, to the non-working years 'due'. All this, before any new Time can be granted.
  • For 126 years of old time, is still owed on the First Temple.
  • Okay, but if playing twice, then (14 + 56) × 2 = 140 added years, not 126.
  • So that leaves an overage of 14. Hence 14 more years must be debited, so Time will balance again: Isaiah makes a pun out of this by deducting 28 from his total meter for Isaiah 53, even though the meter total is derived by counting backwards from the foreknown future beginning of the Millennium (under the pre-Church accounting, had Israel accepted Christ when He came). Summary video:
  • Seven of these years are 'reserved' in Daniel 9:27, to play later, post-balance. Thus new Time must be awarded post-Messiah, else the seven years can never play. Now you know why it says Messiah purchased salvation for all Time (cute sublayer wordplay), Hebrews 10:10-14. And we Church are the bridge back to that seven, Hebrews 11:39-40.
  • As you'll see later on, the second seven is an implicit reserve, allowing Messiah to have the same 40 years' lifetime, as David ruled; it is the 62nd week in Daniel 9:26. Both Messiah and Israel must be given the right of refusal. Israel is foreknown to refuse, though, so when she freely does, the second seven also plays post-balance (64-70 AD). Again, Messiah won this. It's roughly analogous to Laban's deal with Jacob for Rachel: Jacob got to marry Rachel and then work for her. So if Israel accepted, then all would have hung on Christ paying by the end of that added seven years; so a seven-year overage would have been paid for, by its terminus. It's tantalizing to posit that the double sevens here have something to do with the double sevens between Laban and Jacob, but I can't prove any connection.

Now in practice, there will end up being three 70's to play, as noted in Isaiah's own Hebrew metering, 70-syllable clusters in chronological order of Isaiah 53:3-4, then Isaiah 53:7-8, and finally Isaiah 53:11-12. That third 70 is subsumed at the end of the 62 weeks in Daniel 9:25, after the First Temple's standing time is reimbursed (364 + 70), as just noted before this white table. So again, God is reminding Daniel of both the 'accounting' and the 'chronology' Isaiah furnished via his meter.

Frankly this is your key to knowing a) that the sabbatical years are voting periods (duh, Israel had to vote not to work), and b) that the 50-year voting period for the world is literally purchased by them observing those sabbatical years, 490 ÷ 7 = 70 - 10 more sabbatical years occurring inside that 70 = 60, minus the 10 Jubilee years occurring inside that 560 = 50. Thus you see Time itself is designed to 'play' as: 490 + 70 + 490 = 1000 + 50. Simple. Thus you also see why God picked 120 years for voting, in Genesis 6. This is the upgraded-in-Israel version of that. For more on this 70 versus 50 relationship and the historical impact of the voting periods from Adam forward, see #9 of Ten Ways this Timeline differs.

  • See, Israel started on a 490, the Exodus. Temple was dedicated at the beginning of the 490th year from the Exodus. A 70-year voting period was supposed to follow the expiry of its own 490 year grant. But the Temple was razed. So another reason for the 70 in Daniel 9:2, is to show God's balancing ahead to that future period, so it will still occur at the previously-scheduled time.
  • For they didn't vote not to work, so the world was thus 'shorted' its own voting time, hence that voting time had to be made up by what? Voting To Restore The Temple. Thus you know God's accounting from the day the Temple was razed, not from some human king's future decree. Because, God's been telling us what year and time it is, since Adam's Fall. So this is a continuing chronology from Genesis 5 forward, not an out-from-nowhere reference to 490 years. Hopefully by the end of the 21st century, our calendars will be fixed. Or at least, our Bible chronology.
  • So a Time Credit (the sabbatical years) which should have finished, didn't. So Daniel waits to pray until the 49th year had begun, Daniel 9:1. (I can't yet tell if measured from Nisan, or Ab.) If by the time the whole 70 ends the Temple is rebuilt, then the Three Pieces of Owed Time, can play or be reserved: so another 70, then 49, play; but the 7 must be reserved due to the 14-year overage. So Daniel waits until the 49th year to pray: for by then, seven new sabbatical years are 'owed' on the 49 which elapsed between Temple's razing and Daniel's prayer. For you can't 'reserve', what isn't owed. So notice the genius: now two sevens are available for reserve, and the Time 'books' can balance. Notice also how he's allowing for the time it will take to return to the Land. Pray first, then allow time for prayer answer, so they can return in time.
  • That leaves the same 49 which played, to be reimbursed after the 70. For now the seven sabbatical years due on the current 49 have also been reserved to cover Daniel 9:27 +the 62nd week, these current 49 are 'free' to be reimbursed. Reimbursed, because they technically belong to the prior 490-year grant from 950-460 BC on the First Temple. 70 + 49 = 126, time owed on the First Temple.
  • Therefore the seven new sabbatical years due on the 49 elapsing, can be reserved. And are, in Daniel 9:27. So the last seven years of the prior Temple time become the implicit reserve, and the 'owed' sabbatical years on the 49-just-elapsing, are also reserved. Again, the character matches: real time really owed in both events, the 62nd 'week' contingent on volition, the final 'week' contingent on bridging to that last seven years, post-Messiah.
  • Recap: the 56 were past years before the Temple was razed. Took 140 years to 'balance' them, owing to the sabbatical years owed on those 56 which were mismatched in character. So the first 70 cancels out the character mismatch; the second 70, restores the proper character, owed anyway on the First Temple's remaining time; ergo, the double credit. By contrast, the 49 playing during which Daniel waits, are all current sabbatical years. They play during the same period as the 70 which cancels out the character mismatch.

Now: just as it's okay for priests to work on sabbath, so also it's okay for Temple rebuilding and sacrifices, to go on during sabbatical years. For the 70 years during which there is no Dedicated Temple, are sabbatical years. So these 70 sabbatical years justify 490, which is precedented on the root structure for Time being 490 + 70 (voting period) + 490 = 1000 + 50. For the next 490, can't play until the 70 elapses with enough votes. Here, votes to rebuild the Temple. So God's just following His Own rules, since Adam's Fall.

Balance between Isaiah and Daniel. Subtractions: -7, for years running past the Davidic Deadlines (covered below) = 483 = Daniel 9:25. Then further, -21, for Temple rebuilding = 462, the number of syllables in Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter. Notice how Daniel's 483 is forward from that decree made by God (not by a human king, but at least anyone can tell the 483 plays after the second 70, deadline for Jerusalem to be rebuilt). By comparison Isaiah's 462 syllables represents the net addition, including all adjustments for prior years of: a) mismatched character (working years which should have been sabbatical) and b) owed on the First Temple for dying too early.

So now Daniel 9:25's endpoint balances to Isaiah 53's. In Isaiah 53, the Temple had not been razed, so its reconstruction was budgeted. Due to Daniel's prayer, that reconstruction could commence. For the decree to rebuild Jerusalem is in immediate answer to his prayer (Daniel 9:23): that's what Daniel 9:24-25 tell you. So that's why Daniel 9:25 is about after Jerusalem is rebuilt, then count the 483 years. So it's a straight chronology from Temple Destruction, 854 (Israel's 'birthday' when Temple razed) + 140 + 483. So that's why Daniel 9:25 still ends at the same point, which is the 1000th anniversary of David's death, if you crunch the math:

  • For David was born 400 years after the Exodus, and died at age 77, which we saw back in points V-W.
  • David became King of all Israel when he was 37 years old, during Israel's 437th year.
  • So Messiah would have to be born by Israel's 1437th year, since He would have to be born a King over all Israel, as Son of David. That's how you know HE is the Messiah. Matching used to identify. If disparate events are matched in character then you know God is 'in' that matching.
  • David died when Israel started her 477th year.
  • So Messiah will have to die when Israel starts her 1477th year, in order to have the same 40 years as David had; the same 33 years of all-Israel rule, as David had. Again, that's how you know He is the Messiah. Matching used to identify.
  • Hence the chronology of Daniel 9, ends with the start of Israel's 1477th year, namely 854 (year of Temple razing) + 140 + 49 + 434 = 1477, the deadline for Messiah to die. He will end up dying 7 years earlier, but the 1477th deadline allows for 40 years, and for Israel's acceptance.
  • All this was known in Isaiah's day, since David had already died 251 years prior. That's why Isaiah 53 could forecast it, and why Daniel 9 balances to Isaiah 53. Above all, that's why Daniel waits the 48 years (to beginning of 49th), and then prays in Daniel 9.

One man's voting is pretty important, huh. So Your Own Voting To Learn God is pretty important, huh.

So that's why you see: 70 (Daniel 9:2), 49 (Daniel 9:25), 7 (Daniel 9:27). God is accounting for how He'll use the old Temple time, to justify new Temple time. That's why Daniel doesn't ask questions about what those numbers mean; he already knows Isaiah 53 in Hebrew, by heart. God likes His Books to Balance. And He's balancing to the 1000th anniversaries of David's Kingship and Death.

For the final balance test is to 126. Only from that point forward, can a new 490 be justified. So the first future 70 years, are free to play owing to the previous 70 years having functioned to cancel out the wrong timing and character of the pre-destruction 56 + the sabbaticals due on them. That next leaves the 49 free to play, the two sevens having been reserved. So now the entire previous Temple standing time plus its next 70, can be credited, which results in the 62 weeks.

So now we balance back to Abraham. As noted earlier, Abraham had to super-mature 54 — really, 53.5 — years before the Gentile 2100 years ended — or Time would have ended. That happened because Noah's 490-year time grant, ran out in the 2046th year from Adam's Fall (see the entry for Abraham in the GeneYrs.xls worksheet). So the Gentiles are 'owed' 53.5 years, since their time ended early. That time is 'paid' them via Israel ending 57 years early, thus:

  • The 50 years are for harvesting the Gentiles, long a part of the Mosaic Law. Jubilee signified the end of that harvesting, when Messiah would come and begin the Millennium. That's why Christ announces himself using Isaiah 61, in Luke 4:19. That's the Hebraic way of announcing He's the Messiah, the 'Son of Man' promised in Daniel 7:13. (Only Messiah can claim that chapter, as every Jew knew; the "Jesus of Nazareth" miniseries memorialized it.)
  • That 50 years was to occur between Daniel 9:26 and Daniel 9:27, since Daniel 9:27 is the last seven years of allotted Jewish time. So the elapse between Daniel 9:26 and Daniel 9:27, was scheduled to be 50 years, Had The Jews Accepted Christ. Notice how it's not part of the 490 allotment, because it's not Jewish time. Now you know why — it's owed the Gentiles, due to Abraham's early super-maturation.
  • That leaves 3.5 years. So, the Jews get the last 3.5 years of the seven-year Tribulation 'piece' in Daniel 9:27, and that's why it reads as it does. Thus all the time 'owed' the Jews, gets paid. Time of Jacob's Trouble.
  • The first 3.5 years are 'owed' to the Gentiles, therefore, Revelation 11:2: year 4143 (from Adam's Fall) when Christ was scheduled to die — with the seven-year Tribulation still reserved — minus year 2046 when Abraham matured, equals 2096.5 years. For it's really a 3.5 year shortfall (I can't yet prove this, but I'd bet money he super-matured on what's the equivalent of Rosh Hashanah, precedent for Rosh Hashanah).
  • So the first 3.5 years is the flee period for the Jews, kicked off by the Rapture.
  • Now again you know why Daniel 9:27 reads as it does, since obviously the Jews will need to know when to begin the Tribulation counting.
  • Hence Daniel 12's 1290, 1335 days' entries are there, counting backwards from the end of the Tribulation. Jews alive then will be counting from them, just as they had to count during Antiochus IV Epiphanes (the 2300 days).
  • Hence Revelation 11 has the Witnesses keeping people away from the Temple during those same first 3.5 years. There is a 45-day exit window at mid-Tribulation just after the Witnesses are killed by Abaddon, in Revelation 11:7 (1335 - 1290) before the effect of setting up the statue, results in closing borders or whatever the antichrists will do, to pogromize believers.
  • Hence Revelation 12's text on how God protects Israel during the last 3.5 years — she's hiding, then.
  • Of course not all the Jews got smart about it in time, so that's why Zechariah 12-14 read as they do, covering the brave Jewish fighting during the same last 3.5 years.
  • So at the end, Israel's completed her 2100 years, the credit from Abraham is used up.
  • So at the end, Gentile Time is used up to the tune of its own 2100 years, the credit from Abraham is used up.
  • Now, because Israel actually rejects Christ and seven years earlier than scheduled, there's a different 54-year accounting balance to apply, since the above accounting was based on her accepting Christ:
    • She was overbudget 14 years, so: 54 - 14 = 40.
    • The 40 plays from 30 AD - 70 AD, which is technically Gentile time, because it's now Church Age; that's why the Temple remained the added 40 years. For she was supposed to enter the Promised Land in Year One of the Exodus, but rebelled so had to spend 40 more years in the Wilderness. So the tabernacle wasn't in the Land, when scheduled.
    • So this 40 also balances for the time she spent in the wilderness, in effect entering the Land 40 years late, so the allotted time for the land is still met (3 × 490). Because, she was supposed to enter the Land in the first year, but was negative so had to be punished by 40 years' wandering, Numbers 14.
    • Notice how the seven years' early crucifixion of Christ, is subsumed inside the 40. Pattern of Pharaoh's dream. So still the ending time, balances back to Abraham.
      • Israel killed her extra seven years, when she killed her Messiah. That extra seven years was contingent on Messiah being alive, as we saw in the "balance between Isaiah and Daniel".
      • So from 64-70 AD, the 62nd 'week' occurs.
      • Clever way to stress both first and Last David. For the first David was king for 40 years, but only king of All Israel, for 33. The Last David dies when He's 33, so is 'owed' 7 more years.
      • This 7 'owed', plays against the Temple, since Messiah has Left the Building and is the Temple depicted by the Temple, Hebrews 9.
      • And this owed seven years play the same way as David's first seven years: in civil war. Coupled, with Israel's enemies all attacking her too, same pattern as 2 Samuel 5. So notice the mirroring? Playing in reverse order!
      • So look: 2046 from Adam, Abraham super-matures. 4136 from Adam, Christ actually dies, and Church begins. That's 2090 years (really 2089.5).
      • But since Messiah is owed the seven years, it plays during gentile Time, simultaneously.
      • So Israel's Temple and the nation, stay intact until the 40 years are up.
      • So she's in effect still 'paid' those seven years, yet the promised time to the Gentiles, is also still met.
      • So now the Time Books balance anyway, leaving the two 3.5-year pieces which sum is the Tribulation — yet to play.

Balance progression among Moses' Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, Matthew 1 — all back to Abraham:

  • Moses Psalm 90 only references a single 14, by reserving it in the first 84 syllables in Psalm 90:1-4, but then debiting the Voting Period (466-397 BC) that depends on the Temple time grant being renewed, in Psalm 90:16-17. This was shown in the Psalm 90 videos. At this point, the 40 years' wandering in the wilderness is treated as a debit against Abraham's early maturation, leaving the 14. So if Israel were to vote on time, she'd have a 14-year 'credit' left available.
  • By the time Isaiah writes, this credit has changed. Isaiah illustrates the change by means of three sets of 56's and 70's, as distinct from Moses' single use of the 56. These are prefaced by a clever reference to David's age 77 at death, within what corresponds to the 'decree' section of Psalm 90:1-4, which is in Isaiah 52:13-15. Seven years short of the 84 syllables of Moses, yet also bookended 42's, Isaiah 52:13-14, + Isaiah 53:12.
    • In Isaiah 53, the four verses of this 'decree' are split: three of them are in Isaiah 52:13-15, and the fourth is Isaiah 53:12. To make sure you know that, he parcels out the 84 syllables balancing to Moses, between verses Isaiah 52:13-14, and Isaiah 53:12.
    • The Gentiles being an insertion, enable him to also severally balance to Moses by adding 35 syllables, such that 42 + 35 = 77, David's Age at death, in Isaiah 52:13-15.
    • This Isaiah 52:13-15 accounting is 7 years (syllables) short of 84, first because David had a 7-year civil war to fight, and because he had to live 7 years longer to make up for that, as you'll see in the "David" section. In effect, the civil war and David's living 7 years longer, uses up the 14-year credit from Abraham, by the time he dies. On the other hand, the 'credit' of good time due to him living longer offsets the 'debit' of the seven years of 'bad' time. In modern accounting lingo, this is called 'a contra account'. Bible does it a lot, most obviously with Pharaoh's dream. But in absolute time, 14 more years have passed.
    • The accounting then skips to Sennacherib invasion, in Isaiah 53:1, at its beginning in 703 BC. Two sabbatical years were observed then, Isaiah 37:30. Because of this, Hezekiah gets an added 15 years to live, and so does Israel. Under Manasseh this time gets cut short, but Manasseh repents while in captivity, and is restored. The net shortage of 14 is reflected in the '56' syllables by the end of verse 2, when he's restored.
    • Manasseh's son only lasts a year or two, and Josiah begins to reign. That buys time, but not enough. The decree to destroy the Temple set in motion under Manasseh (2 Kings 21:11-15), is not evaded by Josiah's faithfulness, but it bought time.
    • So the Temple goes down, razed by Nebuchadnezzar, when you count the syllables to Isaiah 53:4's end; at that point it had 126 years remaining. That's why Isaiah 53:4 reads literally in Hebrew, 'God, Violated!' Dual-entendre, for the passage is about Messiah being Sacrificed, with the precedence of the Temple being Sacrificed, at the end of the verse, which was 586 BC.
    • So notice:
      • You have a 14-year debit under David,
      • Followed by another 15-year debit for Hezekiah (treat this as 14, since the promise was made at the beginning of Hezekiah's 14th year, 2 Kings 20:6).
      • Offset by a 14-year shortfall under Manasseh,
      • Offset with another 126-year shortfall due to early Temple demise.
      • So at this point the remaining credit is: 126 + 14 - 14 - 14 = 112, the number of syllables more in Isaiah 53, than in Psalm 90.
      • So you see: via meter, Isaiah balances to Moses' sabbatically-metered accounting. It's very evident.
    • Isaiah 53:5-6 thus show 56 syllables, to correspond to the true number of missed sabbatical years, as noted above: 49 of them were actually missed. But on those 49, another 7 were due. So the next 56 years span from Temple destruction to Cyrus' death, and also illustrate the 'offset'.
    • So by the beginning of verse 7, the 112 credit is whittled down to 56.
    • But there remained 70 years owed on the original Temple Time grant (950-460 BC). So to balance to the promised time (assuming Temple rebuilt), time goes over by 14 years, at the end of verse 8 (which is 460 BC). That's okay, since there is an initial hanging credit from Abraham of 14. See the precision?
    • Hence Daniel prays at the beginning of year 49 of exile (Cyrus having taken over near the end of 539 BC); the exiles return in year 49, and begin construction at the beginning (Ziv) of year 50, Ezra 1:1, Ezra 3:1, Ezra 3:8. Which means, the extra 7 years due on those 49, haven't elapsed, but the 49 'owed' years have elapsed. So that's why '49' is referenced in Daniel 9:25 as a reimbursement credit. That's also why the remaining 7 is reserved in Daniel 9:27. It can't play. They are rebuilding, now, and they must start rebuilding, since the 49 years are up.
    • So that's why Isaiah 53:5-6 is 56 syllables, and tallies to the endpoint which will be referenced in Daniel 9:25. Of course, the rebuilding is in trouble, so the seven years end up elapsing in the wrong way, due to fighting over whether the Temple will be rebuilt. Still, at this point the 14 years still owed on the First Temple, also haven't played. So it's okay for time to continue that much longer. So that covers the period 530 BC - 14 = 516 BC, when the Temple is finished. Cute, huh. Now you see again, how the '70' is derived.
    • Moreover, since 56 years really elapsed, they can be reimbursed. So now, Isaiah 53:7-8, another 70 years passes from 530 BC. That takes you to 460 BC, and the 'time books' for the First Temple, are balanced. Again, notice: Jeremiah 25 and 29's Decree of 70 does not mean 70 missed sabbatical years. This sum is 56, but the actual missed years is 49.
    • So where stand the credits and debits? Well...
      • At the beginning of Isaiah 53:7, the credit (leaving out Abraham) was 56.
      • That, coupled with the 70 years owed the Temple, raised the credit to 126, which thus balanced to the years owed on the First Temple.
      • Paying off those years would result in absolute time going 14 years over, but then Abraham's remaining early super-maturation credit, balanced.
      • So the remaining credits and debits are 0, by 460 (end of Isaiah 53:8) and 397 BC (end of Isaiah 53:10), respectively.
      • That leaves only the 7 years due on the initial 49 missed-but-now-reimbursed sabbatical years. So Isaiah debits the 7 syllables from Isaiah 53:9.
      • He does this as another contra account. Just as David's living longer generated a 7-year 'good' credit to offset the 'bad' civil war, yet pushed time 14 years over, so also Temple Rebuilding generates a 7-year credit.
      • So instead of Isaiah 53:9-10 equalling 70, it's 63. In real time, that takes you to 397 BC, when the voting period ends, which was the end of Moses' Psalm 90 sabbatical meaning (since Moses measured time from Adam via the 70-year voting periods).
      • So now Isaiah balances to Moses in that second way (the first having been in absolute promise time, 460 BC).
      • So now the non-elapsed 7 years due on the 49, is 'financed' by real Temple rebuilding time. Because, the world gets time to live due to the Temple, standing. That's why Isaiah 53:9 and Isaiah 53:11, sum 56 years, stressing the fact that the actual 7 reserved, can only play after Christ comes to pay (Isaiah 53:11, basis for reserve in Daniel 9:27). So now you know why Daniel 9:25 says '49', not '56'.
    • Thus you have three 56's to reference the 14-year overages on:
      1. Hezekiah credit offset by Manasseh, Isaiah 53:1-2.
      2. The 56 years from Temple Destruction to Cyrus' death, showing the extra 7 years owed (49 missed sabbaticals +7 years owed on them) — won't be paid.
      3. Finally, the two 28's in verses 9 and 11 show the initial 14-year overage on the first David, persists after the last David, dies.
    • Which 14 years is 'made up' by the initial credit from Abraham. So Isaiah's double debits of 7 syllables from the 84 in Psalm 90, and from Isaiah 53:9, show this added 14 years is made up by the time Messiah dies. And also, warns of Him being rejected by the Jews and thus dying earlier. Because, He's successful on the Cross, and hence buys the Time, Galatians 4:4. Buys the Time, at the End of Time, and In Time for Time to continue for All Time, Hebrews 10:10-14.
    • Thus you have three 70's to reference how these overages end up at the 'net' 14:
      • Although Manasseh was bad, he did repent, so the 14 years is reimbursed to him, in Isaiah 53:3; then came 'good' Josiah. The latter's sons were not good, but until the fourth generation they last. So Isaiah 53:3-4 total 70 years.
      • In Isaiah 53:7-8, the Temple gets rebuilt, so the initial Jeremiah 25:12 judgement 'loan' being repaid, the 70 years can be reimbursed — which then balances the Temple time books to Moses' Psalm 90:17, as noted above.
      • The third 70 is Isaiah 53:11-12, to show that the 14-year overage from the First David, remained for the Last David, to successfully Pay for Time. Balanced by, the remaining 14-year credit on Abraham's early super-maturation.
    • So the single 14 which Moses used in Psalm 90, is paralleled with a single (ending) 14 in Isaiah 53. The total added debit was 28, gross, so Isaiah 53 equals 490 - 28 syllables. Offset by the two contra accounts, for David and Temple, you have the same remainder, 14. Offset by, the 'credit' of Abraham.
  • So now Daniel 9's 62 weeks, balances to Isaiah and Moses.
    • For the First Temple stood 364 years (950 BC - 586 BC); it's in ellipsis between Isaiah 53:10 (the Contract to Pay) Isaiah 53:11 (the actual payment on the Cross).
    • So in Isaiah, that takes you to 33 BC, when the extra 70 years (364 + 70 = 434), in Isaiah 53:11-12, begins. That's when Octavian (later Augustus) began to war with Marc Anthony. Stage now set for Empire, which will facilitate travel to see Messiah.
    • The period ends with Messiah's scheduled death of 37 AD, in both Isaiah 53:12 and Daniel 9:26.
    • That endpoint thus reflects the 14 syllable-years reserved as preceding the Millennium, in Psalm 90:1-4.
    • Notice how in both cases, the 50-year allotment for harvesting the gentiles is in ellipsis, since that's a voting period for them, not Jewish time.
    • So that's why Daniel 9:26-27, doesn't add the 50 in. It's not part of the Jewish Time accounting.
    • So 64 years are predicted to precede the Millennium by Moses, not 14. As you can see, it's a fatal mistake to use lunar accounting; that completely ignores (and thus masks) the birthday and solar Accounting God uses from Genesis 5, forward. That's why both Christians and Jews have mistimed Bible, for centuries.
    • Since only 14 of these years belong to the Jews, and they must play post-Messiah: 7 is reserved for after He comes, during this last 70-year piece, Daniel 9:26. And the second 7, is the Tribulation, Daniel 9:27.
    • For Jewish Time runs out, cannot exceed the credit from Abraham.
  • But Messiah is killed seven years early. So there remained 14 years to play. So Matthew 1 uses three 14's as a trenchant rhetorical reminder of Isaiah 53's meter, in crafting his genealogy. He only counts the 42 legitimate generations (i.e., leaving out Athalia's kids). Of course, that weaves in Moses' Psalm 90, especially the two sections which Isaiah 'split' to 'house' the Decree. Since Jews memorized the Old Testament, they'd notice the numbering. Isaiah counted on it. So did Matthew. Luke indirectly does the same thing, crafting 77 generations in Luke 3, playing on Last David via first David's death age. And of course, 77 is visually '14', and visually '490'. Trenchant reminder that the 'generation' of Daniel 9:26 has yet to finish, when Luke writes! Yet one more proof Gospels are written early (except John, being in 77 AD). This rhetoric wouldn't have punch if Matthew and Luke were written any later than 62 AD. Temple still had to be standing for this rhetoric to 'bite' you. Of course Luke weaves his Gospel around Matthew's, so you know Matthew's was first. The 'Q scholars' are incompetent, sorry.
  • So now the Time Credit from Abraham, shifts:
    • The 40-year wilderness wandering had initially been an offset to Abraham's early super-maturation, which explains why Moses only puts the remaining 14 in Psalm 90:1-4's 'decree' (reserve) section.
    • Had Israel timely accepted Christ, there would only be a 7-year remainder and a 50 year remainder, long depicted by Passover and Pentecost, respectively. (Omer should be dated from the end of Passover week, Numbers 28:25-26. So that makes 57 days.)
    • But she didn't. So an anomaly ensues. The time the land should have Jews on it, ends up shorted 40 years. For on the original schedule, the 40 years from Abraham's credit presupposed she'd be in Israel the entire last 57 years; that's why she could wander those 40 years.
    • For she was a covenanted nation without Land, for her first 40 years. So that's like giving the Gentiles 40 years, a duality.
    • On the other hand, her rejection means Church had to be inserted; so there is a added covenantal group during what should be the Times of the Gentiles.
    • So Israel becomes a Land (temporarily) without covenant, so another duality ensues.
    • So to balance Time with respect to the land, the Temple remains standing. But notice how only 40 of the 50 added years could be granted. For that's all the 'bank' she had for the 'duality', balancing to that first wandering period.
    • And now, the Time books balance, except for that hanging extra seven, owing to Christ dying seven years too early.
    • It too must play as a duality, during the above 40 years — mirroring the 'duality' of the period from David's initial Kingship at Hebron to the end of the civil war. It can't extend the time, because she killed Him rather than accepting Him. So she killed her time.
    • So civil war characterizes the last seven years, from 64-70 AD, ending with the Temple's Destruction, just as Daniel 9:26 predicted. That 'pays' her the seven, during a duality, which after all occurs because she killed Him.
    • Leaving only, the Tribulation. Yet Future.
    • Notice how the piggybacking of that first seven, means the Tribulation is funded. For the land gets its remaining seven sabbaths owed on that 49 years missed back during Rehoboam through Temple Destruction, during 64-70 AD.
    • So the Tribulation time, is genuinely owed. To messiah. For it was His Time that was debited, by Israel. And now, that time is funded. So now can be played, prior to His Second Advent. Just as promised, initially. But via a different accounting.

Ultimate, precise, Divine Justice! Awesome accounting by God, isn't it? Could you ask for more proof of Messiah, than this? Why Jews — and we Christians! — miss all this precise balanced accounting, I'll never know. It's been sitting in our mutual Bible for centuries. Unread. Because aw, we are too bored with the begats and ages and all that arcane Temple stuff! Maxima mea culpa, once I was also bored! And spanked for it! 🍑 No doubt that every jot and tittle will be accounted for and balanced, at the Bema!


  1. Accounting Date. Temple Destruction date of 9th Ab (10th, per Jeremiah 52:12), is most commonly depicted as 586 BC, in our dating system. So if you wanted, you could just count backwards from that. Exodus then becomes 1440 BC, and Adam's Fall then becomes 4106 BC, at the beginning of the Genesis 5 roster. Not, the beginning of creation, for just as we saw here with the Temple, days aren't numbered until a fall occurs. Israel's days are numbered from the razing of the Temple, forward.
  2. Accounting Entirety. Entire timeline is thus visible, all the way back to Adam: just add up all the Genesis 5 siring ages through Terah's siring of Abram. GeneYrs.xls already does that for you, in its Column G. You can then plug in the other dates Bible gives, to get the other events. If you choose a different BC/AD date than 586 for Temple destruction, notice how the whole timeline is impacted, so you can self-audit both for the alternative destruction date — or any other BC/AD date you're testing.
  1. Accounting Forward. Forward from Temple Destruction you have an exact chronology from Daniel 9, which mirrors Isaiah 53's meter. Bible's Dating method is: a) from God's decree (Daniel 9:24, quoting from Jeremiah 25:11) not a human king's, b) measured in solar years, which has been the convention since Adam, c) follows the 490 accounting system you now can see play since Adam, i.e., 490 years after Seth is born, Enoch is born; 490 years after Shem is born, Isaac is born, etc.
  1. Accounting Grace. So now the Time Books balance again. Thus we saw in "Accounting Adjustment", Temple's Destruction relative to the Exodus, which occurred 490 years after Joseph's enslavement, is dated + 490 (= Exodus) + 490 (= Temple Dedication) + 364 (= 490 - 126). So going forward, + 70 + 70 + 49, for a total of: 490 + 364 + 140 + 49, 1043 years since the Exodus, which equals 586 BC - 70 - 70 - 49 = 397 BC, when Canon Completed. Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter tallies to this from Isaiah 53:1 through Isaiah 53:10.
  2. Accounting Halt-point. So going forward, + 70 + 70 + 49, for a total of 490 + 364 + 140 + 49, 1043 years since the Exodus, finishing off the " 49" accounting piece in Daniel 9. So next, the '62 weeks', another 434 years. So, 1043 years + 434 = 1477th anniversary of the Exodus, was the scheduled 'end' of Messiah. So 397 BC - 434 = 37 AD, which is the 1000th anniversary of David's death, which we saw was 963 BC. This tallies to Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter, Isaiah 53:1-12, as per above.

Notice that had Israel accepted Him, the Daniel 9:26 forecast of Second Temple Destruction, could have followed either immediately after the Crucifixion, or later. How do you know? Because both events are stated as "after the 62 weeks" (Hebrew and LXX use the same terminology). So you know it's a deadline, a schedule. By that point both things would have happened. So even in the original game plan, the Second Temple was going to be destroyed until the very end, as the rest of Daniel 9:26 notes. So you know that Daniel 9:27's Temple, is fake. So you know there is a hiatus between Daniel 9:26, and Daniel 9:27. Which hiatus wouldn't need to be mentioned, as Pentecost and Jubilee long depicted it; that hiatus, was the time for harvesting the Gentiles. So, Daniel 9:27 lists the final seven years of history before what we know as the Second Advent, thus showing how Daniel 9:24 gets fully done.

  1. Accounting Interpretation. So you know not only that 37 AD is the deadline for Messiah's death, but the all-important, why.Can't prove a prophetical interpretation correct until you know The Why. Now, you do: it had to occur on a schedule, for a new 1000-year grant and a new 490-year grant, to occur. Which, Messiah would purchase, as David's 1000-year time grant deadlines intervened. So only if Messiah came and finished, could the seven-year remainder of the "old" grant — precedent of the First Temple — play. Grafting in!
  1. Seven years prior to David's death, would be 970 BC. Lots of 'scholarly' agreement on that being the ending date of David's kingship, except that everyone uses Josephus rather than Bible, so misinterprets age 70 as David's death age. So all prophetic interpretations 'out there' are wrong, even though 30 AD is the right ending date. They misconclude a wrong why. So that's why everyone scrambles to use lunar years. Else they come up with seven years too many.
  2. For David's rule began with seven years of civil war, and his last seven years of life also were plagued by it, as you'll learn from 2 Samuel + 1 Kings 1-2, and the companion ending of 1 Chronicles (start in 1 Chronicles 1:23) through 2 Chronicles 2. During his last 7 years alive, God had David prepare the Temple service (etc.) which would begin upon his death, fulfilling 2 Samuel 7. Warning, Bill Robinson! David did not die when he was age 70!
  3. Isaiah long beforehand reminds the reader about David dying at 77, crafting that double-promise as the number of Hebrew syllables for 'generating' the 77th son Messiah decree, Isaiah 52:13-15 (true beginning for Chapter 53 in Hebrew). Of course, 70 + 7 = 77, '7 7' is two sevens, and 70 × 7 is 490. "Seven" in Hebrew means "promise" (play on day when God rested, all work over).
  4. Matthew didn't miss it, taking 3 × 14 (14 being 7 + 7), as his genealogy number base (legitimate generations), in Matthew 1: for Isaiah 52:13-14 covers the Jews, and is 42 syllables long. So now you know why Matthew uses the 14's, you know it's not wrong (so all his detractors didn't do their homework).
  5. Luke didn't miss it, keying off the entire 77 syllables in Isaiah 52:13-15, since Isaiah 52:15 covers the Gentiles — to make the 77th-son genealogy (from Mary) listing, Luke 3. So Luke's not wrong, either. (Oh: scratch the second "Cainan" in Luke 3 if you find it, some scribe stuck that in there to tally to a bad copy of an LXX Genesis 5 roster.)
  6. So notice: David did rule 40 years, 2 Samuel 5:4. So Christ must be allotted that lifetime, as well. For Christ must be born a king, and in time to pick up the 1000-year mantle from David as David's Greater Son, Psalm 110:1.
  7. So notice: 963 + 1000 - 40 = 4 BC. In order to have the same 40 years, Christ would have to be born then. Haggai 2's witty play on Zerubbabel's "seed" name (zeru = seed) tells you Christ's Birthday will be 25 Chislev (sundown of the 24th), which is later known as the first day of Chanukah. My pastor explained the Lord's Chanukah 4 BC birthdate in his year 2000 classes.
  8. So notice: 963 + 40 = 1004 BC, when David becomes King of All Israel, 2 Samuel 5:3-5. It must be accounted as late 1004 BC (during the last six months of the year, 2 Samuel 3:5). So treat it as 1003 BC in most calculations.
  9. So notice: Christ is 33 years old when He dies (Luke 3:23 + Luke 13:7 compared to Matthew 21:18-20, among other verses), on what would have been the third Passover since He began His Ministry, John 2:23 + John 6:4 + John 13:1ff. Pretty straightforward.
  10. Thus you know He dies seven years prior to His 37 AD deadline, hence in 30 AD.
  1. So 30 AD is the 1000th anniversary of David's retirement, tying also in Character: both kings lay down their crowns for the sake of the people. Temple can't be built until David dies. Salvation can't be built until Christ dies. Church can't be built until Christ dies. Time can't continue unless Christ dies, Daniel 9:26 — due to, David's 1000th anniversary of death limitation. Temple's second 490 had it never been razed, was also 30 AD, so Christ dies seven years early to Become the Temple Made Without Hands, even as David retired 7 years early to prepare for Him. Notice how the parallels Match In Meaning, are multiple, convergent, and fulfill the promise of 2 Samuel 7.
  1. So further notice: if you plug backwards to the Exodus, you'll find that 30 AD is the 1470th anniversary of the initial Passover, which you can prove occurred in 1440 BC, from the other Bible numbers. And to the very day of that initial Passover, from John's wry Greek sarcasm in John 19 (covered in Passover Plot's "παρασκευή" verse section). Scholars well know this sarcasm. They don't seem to 'remember' that if the Jewish calendar wasn't intercalated, Passover would officially run four days fast, which is how the Lord could eat the Passover and yet be the Passover, which is John's wry point. Odd how 'scholars' use lunar years when God doesn't, but don't recognize lunar years when God does. And repeat that error into a continual travesty called 'Good Friday', for centuries. For Passover's first and last days are treated as 'high sabbaths', no matter on which day of the week they fall. That week, they fell on Sundays (which in Jewish law start Saturday night), so the Lord was crucified on Wednesday, just like the Bible says. Passover Plot provides the golden details. ☺️
  2. So notice: if you plug backwards to Adam, you're in the 4136th year from his Fall.
  3. So notice: the 4200nd year from Adam is the 4th 1050 from his Fall.
  4. So notice: the extra 7 years Christ died short, plus the seven in Daniel 9:27 plus 50 years which always represented the last 50 years prior to the Millennium (i.e., Isaiah 61), equals 64.
  5. So notice: 7 days for Passover plus another 50 days takes you to Pentecost, just like Numbers 28:25-26 tell you. That's 56 days if you start your count after Passover ends like Isaiah does, in his Hebrew meter.
  6. So notice: another 56 days after Pentecost, is 9th Ab, which Isaiah also references (ibid). Each month was 30 days long, to fit the fortnightly priestly courses.
  1. So notice: Titus invested Jerusalem but didn't begin the final takeover until Passover 70 AD, finishing with the destruction of the Temple on what the Jews call 9th Ab of that year (other sources are Josephus, Atlas of Bible and Christianity by Tim Dowley (available at seminaries and Amazon), ISBE, Military History Magazine, December 1995 issue, etc.).
  2. So notice: that completes the famous 40-year judgement period, as well as 'reimburses' the 33 Years Christ Lived, plus the 7-year shortage due to Jewish Rejection. Sure looks like God is orchestrating something, huh.
  1. So next notice, that since the Jubilee signified the Second Advent (that's why Christ quotes it when beginning His Ministry, see Luke 4:19), you now know when the Second Advent was supposed to occur: 94 AD.
  2. 94 AD - 57 = 37 AD - 7 = 30 AD, when Christ died.
  3. Second Advent begins Millennium, so all history was supposed to end 1000 + 50 years later (the 50 as the rebellion/voting period), Revelation 20:7. Hence the end of the world pre-Church, was supposed to be 1144 AD (94 + 1050).
  4. But Church was inserted, so the Daniel 9:26c trend lasts longer, Matthew 16:18.
  5. Replete with Two "Stone Witness" stand-ins for the upcoming Two Witnesses, namely the Wailing Wall and the Dome of the Dome.
  6. Which Dumb Dome, Satan kindly furnished as a reminder of Daniel 9:26c via the Muslims, who have their own 'exodus' (called the "hegira"), 622 AD.
  7. Which year, is 490 years - 7 (!) after the prior abomination, the pig temple atop the Holy of Holies when Jerusalem was rebuilt by Hadrian as Aelia Capitolina,
  8. 70 years after the 70 AD Temple Destruction, mimicking the 586 BC - 70 - 70 years from Daniel 9; this time by our own BC/AD Dating System, which back in 622 AD was newly adopted in some Catholic circles. What a cruel way to lampoon our ignorance of God's Accounting System for Time.
  9. Not to mention, the 'exodus' to Jerusalem — never mind Mecca was the claimed spot of Abraham's sacrifice — which exodus, occurred in 638 AD, culminating in the building of that Dumb Dome of the Rock on the same timetable of the First Temple, namely 7 years (again, 1 Kings 6). Year construction began per my 1985 set of Encyclopedia Britannica was 685 AD, which of course nicely reverses 586 BC. Of course, you'd have to use our BC/AD dating system, to get the 'joke', and our system was brand new at that time.
  10. Not to mention, about every 430 years (Exodus 12:40-41!) after the initial Muslim 'exodus', there's another invasion attempt upon Israel and specifically Jerusalem: 638 AD, 1073 AD, 1517 AD; and of course we're all familiar with 1948+ AD. You can proof the prior dates from the internet or in a good encyclopedia.
  11. So Satan's pretty keen on Bible's Dating System, too. He can't always be on time, though. Elaboration is in Lord vs. Satan Part 4.
  12. So we know God's Dating System still operates. Which we already know from Bible, since Christ is the Last Adam, 1 Corinthians 15:45, coming at the very end of Time, Daniel 9:26 + Galatians 4:4.
  13. So GeneYrs.xls tracks that same System, reset to the Cross, up through about 2600 or so.

At some point, one must stop calling all this confluence, "coincidence". For the last 2000 years, did:

Again, the beauty of the Bible's dating system is you can posit any BC/AD date for any event, and notice how the entire timeline is impacted. That entireness impact makes everything self-auditing, kinda like a trial balance in accounting, or balancing your checkbook. Especially, since in true accounting you must always match event character to the number you're auditing; especially, since Bible dates in "years from" a person's age, so you know: a) it's solar, and b) God's date must be accurate in Bible. Thus you can correct your dates without that weird 3-4 year gap from our BC/AD. (Somehow when the West converted to BC/AD, we dropped out 3-4 years of the Romans, so Even Christ Was Born Before Christ, 🤣.)

The more difficult thing to demonstrate is the 'intercalation' system God follows, by using 490 + 70 + 490 = 1000 + 50. The chart above demonstrates how I learned of it. GeneYrs.xls tests that construct with real Bible dates, created back in May 2004. In May 2008, Isaiah 53's meter patterns were proven; prior, I'd mistaken the difference in the LXX text (and gap in Isaiah scroll) to signify Hebrew text was missing. It wasn't missing.

The Isaiah 53 surprise is covered in Isaiah 52:13-54:1, Working, Expanded, and Poetic Translations, w/ Exegetical Notes, with videos so you can see for yourself the process of discovery, and also the live Bible Hebrew and Greek. Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter patterns are phenomenal. One of those mathematical convergence marvels. When you go through the videos, you'll notice the careful ties between the content of the words, and the number of syllables; paralleling between different sections of the chapter; Bible numerology carefully deployed. So the meter confirms the entire 490 + 70 + 490 structure.

But that's not all, as I learned in July 2008; the very same meter pattern provides a literal annual calendar from the time Isaiah writes, to the time of Messiah. So God is quoting Isaiah's meter to Daniel, and the 490-year structure was a reminder, not new information. So you also know the Isaiah 53 meter was intended to be a mnemonic, not those goofy, mystic, arcane Bible codes. So when you plot Bible's dates from Adam forward, you see Isaiah 53's meter reflected — all the way back to the first Adam. GeneYrs.xls is a mere plotting of raw Bible Dates. (Post-96 AD, man's dating is used.)

So that begs the question of meter used as a convention for revealing the Dating System, as well as the dates themselves. When you plot the dates and then 'overlay' them with the 490 + 70 + 490 structure, you see who got the 490-year grants, why when and how; you see the huge import of the voting periods (voting history impact is panoramically reviewed in point #9). You clearly see the qualification periods, and the many (at least seven) times in history when the world almost ended due to someone not getting a 490-year time grant until the last minute. But if it's so baldly portrayed by dates, it must be baldly shown in meter, too. Handy way to remember the timeline, if you have a catchy syllabification. Isaiah 53 cannot be the only example of this kind. I don't yet have time to review the rest of the Hebrew metering in the Old Testament (likely in all Messianic passages, or passages about Time itself). Still, that rhetorical style should be elsewhere in the Old Testament. Surely someone else can find it, too. The whole Bible is metered so that it can self-repair itself, which is necessary because copies of copies develop errors over time.

The timeline needs to be refined further, especially for what months a thing occurs. The timeline will be accurate within six months, but since the Bible uses specific dates (i.e., with the Flood, Exodus, Temple construction and Dedication, Christ's Birth and Death dates), it should be possible to refine Bible's major events to exact months, if not exact days. In particular — since Antiochus IV made such a big stink of desolating the Second Temple on an anniversary of its foundation — it looks like David was crowned at Jerusalem on 24-25 Chislev, but I can't prove it yet.


6b. So do you believe in the Books of Enoch, Jubilees? In the Talmud? For the 490 + 70 + 490 = 1000 + 50 is also very similar to what the Talmud has long said about the timing of Messiah. No, I don't believe in any of those books. Enoch isn't preserved in what should have been the original language text, and its own verses are slapstick satire against God. The Bible refutes the so-called "Book of Enoch" at every turn. Skip it. As for the mystical Book of Jubilees, at best you can say it's a corruption of what the Jews used to know of God's calendar for time; lots of goofy stuff in there, too.

Talmud is far less goofy, but some of the rabbis recorded in it misread the Bible, especially Rambam; and that is partly why the Jewish calendar is famous for being short by about 200 years. So all its dates are off. That's why the Jews themselves can't figure out when Exodus happened, and misdate it. So I didn't use the Talmud. In fact, only now in 2009, five years after learning God's Accounting System for Time strictly from the Bible, am I reading what the Talmud also says. I'm reading Talmud now, because I need to account for why the Jews went wrong in their Accounting for Time. Bible is so clear and witty on this, I'm dumbfounded that the Jews themselves, misread it.

Bible is all I need to know God's Time Rules, though. So that's all you need, too: God's Word has the whole story:

What's intriguing about the Talmud, though, is that they did recognize a 4000-year-from-Adam Mark as the beginning of Messiah's own 'time'. They forgot that it's intercalated, though. So the "4000" is really "4103", based on the 1000th anniversary of David's Crowning over all Israel (the second crowning, not the first). That makes me suspect David was crowned King over All Israel on 25 Chislev, but I can't find proof of that, just yet.

So even though the Talmudic interpretation of the Time He Comes is garbled, the rabbis did know when He would come, at the time. Bible is real clear on it, so I'm curious to know when the accounting went bad. One thing I can account: the rabbis forgot how the 70-year periods intercalate, so it's 490 + 70 + 490 = 1000 + 50, not a mere 1000. It's true that for qualifying Time to Continue, there's no intercalation. That is, someone has to super-mature each 490 years, irrespective of the voting periods; each 1000 years, irrespective of the (non-believer) voting period. For the voting periods only get appended if the previous 490 (or 1000) completed with someone super-maturing during that time. Hence like the Jewish calendar, there are two tracks: one is non-intercalated, and the other intercalated (intercalation represents a merge with the unbelieving world). So I'm still researching this and related Talmudic accounting issues, here in 2009.

Repeating from the Summary section: it's vital to account for what someone else gets wrong. First, you better test whether you yourself get something wrong: it's not about finger pointing, but about auditing. For when you see someone else get something wrong, the natural question should be, "what errors might I be making — too?" So it's never about blaming the one who got it wrong. It's only about auditing.

Second, you find vital added information as you do this auditing. I've learned vast amounts of Bible doctrine I didn't know, simply by tracking how someone else's interpretation went wrong. For when you balance a checkbook, two errors might cancel out other checks and deposits — thus by auditing everything, you can detect what otherwise would be hidden.

Bible Doctrine accounting works the same way. So always account for how someone gets a thing wrong, as well as how it is right: you get a goldmine of Bible data, when you do this.

Now, the Rapture is based on the fact that these same rules for Time, continue true post-Cross: every 490 years there is a deadline for someone to super-mature. Moreover, seven major historical trends Mark the last 120 years of each 490 period. But you date the 490 beginning at 30 AD, now. Mirror, Now: God's Post-Cross explains the trends, and GeneYrs.xls tracks them. The latter still lacks enough events post-Cross, so you'll have to interpolate your own. Still, all you can say is that a major epoch in Time ends then, and if someone wasn't awarded a new time grant, you won't be around to question it. So the predictive value of the post-Cross timeline is only general: same trends always end the period, and until the Rapture, all trends have a Daniel 9:26c characteristic.

I'm beginning to suspect that the Rapture's timing represents two simultaneous truths: 1) at that moment, Church has become the spiritual entity God wants to Glorify His Son forever; 2) at that same moment, the requisite super-maturation does not occur, so Time suddenly must end under the pre-Israel 490-Time-Grant rules. So the only reason Time goes on post-Church, is that it matured as God promised it would, meaning #1) happened. That's always been the Rapture promise, with no promise being made that 2) will keep happening. So that's the hypothesis for the Rapture's timing which I use now. Thus you see yet another reason why the Lord said you can't predict the Rapture, in Acts 1.

Having said this, I'm intrigued by Rambam's insistence that the universe will end @ 7000 years, to correspond to a "week", basing his conjecture on Psalm 90:4. As we know, the Church was not predicted in the Old Testament. The conventional rabbinical 'take' on Rambam (who himself got it from prior rabbis) was that the first 2000 years were allotted to "Chaos" (the nomenclature varies), corresponding to the Adam-Noah period; the second 2000 years were for the patriarchs and Israel, called (usually) "Law", but the third 2000 years were allocated to Messiah.

Now, does this third allocation include the Millennium or not? Would the (say) 7000th year begin eternity? Or would the Millennium begin at the 7000th year? Either way, that's a significant departure from what the Bible says, yet might not be contradictory, given that God always foreknew Israel would Vote No when Messiah came, theme of Ephesians 1. We don't know when Rapture will happen. For all we know God is also using a time schedule, but it's Not Promised, anymore. Doesn't mean He won't still accomplish it, but it's not a guarantee, as it was pre-Church. It's important to note that Bible never guaranteed 7000 years, or seven 1050's. That's an idea external to the Bible (i.e., in Jubilees and Enoch). Might have been a plan, but was never guaranteed. Only the 4200 was guaranteed. Of that 4200, the last seven years thus remain reserved, Daniel 9:27. No other time is guaranteed, pre-Millennium.

Even so, it would be a goldmine of data to learn whether the initial schedule told Israel included a hedge for if she rejected Messiah. For, now that He's Left the Building, she can look back on that initial schedule and still see that God will keep His Promise to her, for lo — He warned her of this third allocation potential, way back in Moses' day. So even though Time is not guaranteed Church, the remaining 7 (plus of course the 1050 of the Millennium) is guaranteed. That would be good, for again — it helps her prove Jesus the Christ really is the Messiah.

So I'll further analyze this 7000 (really 7350) 'week' for mankind, in the Bible. I'd bet that if it was communicated to Israel as a 7000, a Bible writer would have constructed a metered poem which includes the prophecy of the Gentiles, into seven 70's. Or, seven 50's, if the prophetic focus is on the Gentiles. The former meter mnemonic ties nicely to 490 as well, but is thesaural for the entire 7350 years, since every 1050 contains a '70'. To qualify as thesaural, the 'paragraphs' in the meter must resolve to 70 each; there must be seven of those 'paragraphs'. (They might be embedded, though, like Moses embedded a fifth 70 inside Psalm 90:1-4, his first 84 syllables; and embedded the 56 inside the 70 syllables of Psalm 90:9-11.)

Finally, it's not a coincidence that: a) Abraham gets his covenant in Year 2046 after Adam's Fall, the same year as Noah's 490, runs out; b) that David is crowned King of Hebron exactly 1050 years later; c) that David is crowned King of all Israel exactly 1057 years later, so that d) Messiah's Birth exactly 1000 years afterwards, would result in Him being able to complete Time such that His scheduled death year per Daniel 9 + 57, would equal the end of the fourth 1050 from Adam's Fall.

See, Abraham had to super-mature by 2046 from Adam's fall or the world would have ended. But that meant the scheduled 2100 years for the Gentiles, didn't complete: it's 54 years earlier. This credit and its 'reimbursement' balancing both the time for the Jews and the time for the Gentiles — hence Daniel 9:24's 'completion' language — was explained, above.

Now you can argue that since Psalm 90 weighs in at 350 syllables, that 50 × 7 factoring implicitly talks about a whole plan of time totalling 7350, thus giving rise to the '7000' as a shorthand, used by the rabbis. For it's perfectly valid in accounting to use benchmarks, since obviously Moses is doing that in Psalm 90. But Moses is emphasizing voting by believers, not unbelievers. So implicitly tying to seven 50's as a result of believer voting, would make some sense, especially since the math of the sabbatical years ends up causing the 50 to be 'purchased' literally, as shown in #9. But if so, then why doesn't Isaiah balance to the 7350? Why doesn't Daniel 9? Or if they do, I'm not yet seeing it.


6c. Okay, so then why did you get this 'information' about how God Orchestrates Time? Why not a pastor or respectable Bible scholar? Why not the Jews? For you make all them out to be wrong. What makes you so special?

  1. This accusation hits me every day. I'm always asking God, "why me? Why a woman???" For I'm as conservative as you can get. Not a woman's libber, k?

And here's the answer: women are used to save men time. Whew. Remember Hulda? She was just a dry cleaning lady (2 Kings 22:14; 2 Chronicles 34:22). But she knew Bible. When Hilkiah went to her rather than to his own son Jeremiah (Jeremiah 1:1) who'd already been instructing Josiah for five years, she said what Jeremiah would have said, thus supporting the man with the authority. Okay, so I can play librarian, research assistant, even secretary; since I've been trained under a man with authority (my pastor, who taught the whole congregation of which I am a part) — to read the Bible. Jeremiah was commissioned by God to go against his family. It's a running theme of Jeremiah, which at times is referenced, i.e., at the end of Jeremiah 5, Jeremiah 7; as a result, his own clan wanted to kill him, Jeremiah 11:19 through 12:6; so God condemned them, (12:10 and passim, like 13:13, 14:13ff), gave Jeremiah to find the lost bible which was in the Temple, Jeremiah 15:16 (context is 15:10, 15-21). He must have given it to his father, who had distanced himself from his son and claimed credit for finding the Bible, 2 Kings 22:8.

Now, if I screw up somewhere, God will alert the reader. And if what this 'brainout' writes is accurate, then it had to come from Him, and He will attest to that, too. Because, He is The Authority. Whew.

So then someone with authority who scans the internet looking for information or ideas, can use what he finds here, under his own authority, since after all, he has to vet the material before God, himself. So, it belongs to him, not to 'brainout'. Double-whew.

Moreover, aside from the wrong sex problem, I'm extremely uncomfortable being 'the only one' who knows this material. That's why it's anonymously published at no cost to anyone. If God is 'in' it, He'll witness to it. If God is not 'in' it, He'll witness to that, too. So my extreme discomfort is allayed, for any mistakes I've made will be clearly witnessed by none other than God Himself. Whew. Else, I'd want to crawl under a rock. Some people like being 'the only one' or the 'first' in a thing. I hate it. To me, "fun" means pointing out how good someone else is. I hate criticising or saying someone else is wrong: totally unpleasant. "Kill me now" is how I really feel, if you must know.

On the other hand, by giving it to someone outside the 'scholarly' circle, then the rabbis, pastors & scholars don't have to fight turf wars with each other. They hate doing that, you know. But we laymen like our football teams. So they are constrained to be politically-correct, and defend whatever denominational turf they occupy. But if on the other hand, this essentially pan-denominational information which vindicates the Jews as well, is given to a mere nobody, me — who's not on anyone's turf — then no turf wars have to be fought. Cute, huh.

I hope you know, that this all started solely because I wanted to better understand a doctrine my own pastor taught, namely that Believers Buy Time (Ephesians 5:16), a subset of his "Blessing by Association" doctrine he's taught since the 1960's. If I knew the proofing and answers would lead to this huge doctrine that requires a (happy) retooling of all we thought we knew was in Bible — I'd have shied away from publishing it. But I didn't know. Accountants are too busy accounting to appreciate the effects, until after the accounting is done. That's their job, for crying out loud.

Only after it was all 'out there' did I begin to understand the import. So just ignore this 'brainout'. The doctrine is provably in the Bible.

Look: if you're a pastor you can just vet the information and then you own it, it's your authority, and "brainout" is completely irrelevant. If it makes you feel nervous to be silent how you stumbled across the material, you can say God led you to this silly 'brainout' but then God caused you to independently prove it true. So then 'brainout' is irrelevant, right? For God did the work, not 'brainout'. He used Balaam's ass, so he also used a 'brainout' to disclose something, that's all.

For look how He works, how He saves us time in vetting Bible, how He advertises His Son: the Dispensational Bible scholars and Jews are vindicated by Bible's information on how God Orchestrates Time — they just misaccount, their own vindication. The Real Messiah Has Already Come — and you know precisely when, going back year by year all the way to Adam's Fall. So far from proving them wrong, God proves to everyone else via His Word, that they are right — but in a different way.

Moreover, everyone in any denomination as well as all Jews, has a vested interest in wanting to prove the Bible's dates. We misaccount the Genesis story. We misaccount when the Exodus happened. Okay, so we can breast beat for five seconds, and then see the gorgeous vindication from the Bible, of what it does say. Lots of money gets made from all that retooling, providing jobs for people. And best of all, our faith in the Bible is vindicated. Sure, it will take a century or more for all that retooling to be done, and there will be a lot of opposition, too. So what? There's always been the time lag between truth and its recognition, and opposition is Satan's goal anyway. Let the arguments play out, that's how God wants it, as we all long know.

  1. Since I'm not special, if I get the information, it proves even any old dippy brainout can understand how Bible's Accounting System for Time works. That, is provably true. Granted, it took two years of studying and plotting the Bible's dates, but that's grunt work. The resulting interpretation just leaps off the page at you, won't require special abilities. Well, any Bible information always requires God's Abilities to enable perception, but you get that if you keep using 1 John 1:9 when you sin. (Holy Spirit won't Fill with His perception, a believer in a state of sin. Any unbeliever can instantly become a believer, the nanosecond he believes Christ paid for his sins.)
  2. If God gives the information to a brainout rather than to a respectable pastor or a Bible scholar, no one has the right to 'trust' it. Therefore the content must be vetted. And, once vetted, the material belongs also to the one who vetted it, for now that person has independent proof. See how elegant a solution that is? You own it once you prove it out. Not, brainout. You, whether you are a brainout yourself, a pastor, a scholar. For because a 'brainout' can prove it, then no one is excluded from owning it. God gives to everyone.
  3. Had God given this information to a Bible scholar or pastor (and maybe He did, but I find none published), then all other pastors would feel politically compelled to comment and take sides. That's a problem in academia, science, etc. So by not giving it to a pastor, this arguing doesn't have to occur, saving them all a lot of time and angst.
  4. Now, as people are caused to run into this material, they are caused by God, not by brainout; so the material is given them by God, not by brainout. So they are not beholding to brainout. So again, had the material been given to a pastor, there would be some obligation to credit the pastor. But no obligation, if given to a brainout, especially since no one can even find this material unless God causes that to happen. Emails I get tell me this — "God sent me to your webpages". Yeah, He did. Which means, the material is not mine, and the person got the information from God, just like I did. Sure, I wrote it out, but that's only a secretarial function. You don't credit the secretary typing the letter, as the author of the letter, do you? So you don't credit someone writing again what's already written in the Bible, as being the author of what's already written, right?
  5. So now as people come to independently vet and thus own the material, no one is competing with anyone else. It's just like personal Bible study. I'm not competing with or siding with you if I independently read Bible and am caused to see the same meaning in it that you do, right? You got it independently from God, and so did I. Again, notice how the religious tendency of man to fuss and fight as if God were a football, is completely bypassed.
  6. Now, I got this information because I asked God. Anyone can ask. But apparently asking God about how He orchestrates Time is not something people have done, going by the lack of information on the topic. The Jewish calendar reflects that they don't ask. Our Christian pulpits reflect that we don't ask. Anyone who asks, gets. But of course we find all those begats, cubits, dates, rather boring.

Now, I wouldn't have asked either, but my own pastor taught that believers are caused to buy time as part of a doctrine he called "Blessing by Association"; I couldn't prove the buying-time claim from Bible. The only information I knew of was Genesis 5 and Daniel 9. So finally I asked God where in Bible the answer was, and how to audit it, so I could even understand what "buying time" meant. That was in May 2004, resulting in the three documents above. In 2008, I was caused to find the meter in Isaiah 53, and that was a huge shock.

  1. Now, it's true there's a lot of bad Bible scholarship by Christians and Jews (and unbelievers for that matter). That's always been true, and Bible is full of explanation on why: seeing we all don't see, and hearing, we don't hear, because seeing we won't see, and hearing we won't hear. Human volition is generally negative. So if negative, then we didn't ask for correction, but wanted to believe whatever we came up with as the 'answer'. And especially never maintain even basic dialogue to God, let alone ask Him anything.

Now, when this happens God does two things: He makes the correction public, but He also makes it private. This, to give those wrong a kind of grace — the information is available, but not slapping them in the face. So they can change their mind. After all, if one person is given the information, then all are the intended recipients. The Jews got Bible, and thus all the human race is to get it. The apostles got the New Testament, and thus the whole human race can get it. Same with any interpretation of the Bible. The type of conduit isn't important: the message is important. Here, we're talking about what's Already In Writing, but we didn't see. We have the same Word, all of us. But yet it's still a volitional option, what we want to see in the same Word.

Now, when a person is faced with the overwhelming majority being wrong, but the Bible being right, he should pick the Bible. So maybe that's another and final reason why this brainout got the information, so it can sit anonymously like a needle in a webbed haystack. Thus someone finding it can privately decide whether to go with the crowd, or with Bible.


7. Why are you anti-Muslim? I'm not anti-Muslim, I'm anti-Islam. I didn't start out that way. Funny how when you actually study a topic, you learn much. Satan uses Islam. The Lord vs. Satan Part 4a covers that, and GeneYrs.xls tracks Satan's use of Islam in history (sparsely, at present). Independently-made historical videos on Youtube which help you see this are in my "timelines" playlist. My Youtube page is partly dedicated to exposing the evil that is Islam, because it provides ready access to both sides, and the real-time commentary by both Muslims and non-Muslims. Muslims themselves are the best proof of Islam's evil, sorry. You should see this for yourself. I didn't believe Islam was itself that evil, until I did the research.

Islam's doctrines are entirely based on antisemitism and rapine. If you'll view my blog entry for 12/16/2007, you can link to a discussion forum which justifies terrorism as a pillar of Islam (Forum has since been taken down and not archived well). Muslims are seriously uninformed about their own religion, its origin. This is odd, since the hadiths are sunnah, meaning every Muslim is obliged to emulate that horrid criminal and pedophile, Muhammed. ("Muhammed" means "Praised One", a title only reserved for deity, elsewhere. Think over carefully what it means, to name a criminal human leader, "Muhammed".) The proof of Muhammed's criminality is attested in the hadiths Muslims are obligated to honor, else they are defamed as kaffir, and not true Muslims. You can find proof of that, at the University of Southern California's website on Islam, which is run by Muslims. You really have to see all this for yourself. You have to read what Muslims write in Youtube commentaries, you have to read what they say in their forums and on their own television programs. Else, you won't believe it. We Christians are so naive, expecting non-Christians to have the same standards of honor that we do. Guess again.

Koran requires Muslims to lie to you if it makes Islam look good: research "taqiyya" on the internet. See for yourself. Else, you will not believe, because Our God commands us to always think well of other people. But this is not other people, principle in Ephesians 6 — this is satanic influence, maybe even possession. How else could so many people mobilize so quickly in the street, burning flags, etc.? Think it over. Took me a month to do the necessary investigation; might take you less time. Internet makes research much easier, now. Trick is to go to the right sources. Here, Muslims themselves prove that every allegation made against Islam is not only true, but that the allegations are diluted. (Again, we Christians are forever trying to be charitable, except when we fight each other over doctrines, 🤣).

You might have questions. You can't ask those questions with safety except in an anti-Islamic forum. I recommend www.faithfreedom.org and its forums. There you get both Muslims defending, and former Muslims countering. Again, it's muslims who are your best source of information. See for yourself, decide for yourself, before the Lord. (No longer online).

We Christians living under and before the Lord are the only effective bulwark against Islam. Islam rose only because Rome and Persia had exhausted each other fighting over the Holy Land. Each resurgence of Islam in history lasts about four generations, then peters out. (See the first and last sections of Arabophile Sir John Glubb's A Short History of the Arab Peoples. My copy of that book was required reading in my college course on Arab history, back in 1974.) In 732 AD, we stopped Islam at the Pyrenees, Charles Martel. That, because there was a revival in Bible interest, demonstrated by the sudden rise of monasteries and monks evangelizing; followed by, Charlemagne's order that Bible be disseminated. Then after him, Europe fell into something of a decline again, so Satan rolled out the Seljuks, who took over Byzantium in 1071, then finally Jerusalem in 1094, which brought about the Crusades. Thank God, at that very time Bible interest was reviving again (it goes in cycles, about every 200 years), so by the time the Mongol hordes came, at Buda and Pest, they were rebuffed (circa 1241). About 200 years later in 1453, interest in Bible had again declined, and this time the Ottomans, who had begun their rise (1299) after the Mongols were checked, took over Constantinople. Are you noticing a pattern, yet? It follows the 490-year deadlines of Time God has set up. Point here: resurgence of Islam now is a trend of history, and it is predictable. The current trend period ends 2030 AD. So Satan's right on time, again. It will take a long time to research this huge subject; but treat this alert as something to take seriously, and get serious about your spiritual life before God. That's always good advice; this current historical crisis just makes it more important than ever. See my "How Satan Deploys Islam" videos.

All this, is the upgraded version of Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, but over the whole planet. When our interest in Bible rises, God blesses us wherever we are, and hence our periphery too. When our interest in Bible declines (i.e., we substitute it with religion), then God curses us wherever we are — and our periphery too. Satan accuses us constantly before God, and when our interest in Bible goes down, then God must enact His Promise to punish. Satan's trying to parlay that promise into Götterdämmerung. What's so odd, is that Islam's very "jihad" definition is Götterdämmerung, centuries before Norse myths and Wagner, existed. So we are to blame for everything which goes wrong. Which of course, the Muslim imams all say! Do you see the satire here?

I'm currently testing the idea many have, that the beast and false prophet of Revelation 13 is that of Muhammed and the false Christ portrayed in Koran and hadiths; I don't know how that will turn out. If you're interested, you can follow the discussion at this FFI forum. As many of you know, Revelation 11-17 are historical trends pre-Rapture, since Satan doesn't know when it will begin. During the official Tribulation, the unholy trinity of fake Temple, Beast, false prophet, fake messiah, and Fake Church, will then control. At present, the attempts to make them, have been ongoing, i.e., fake church was Catholicism, beginning 95 AD or so, consolidating first around the time of Commodus. Today, fake Church is most of Christendom. 9 out of 10 Christians can't give you the Gospel correctly. 9 out of 10 can't define God correctly, or the spiritual life correctly, don't know when Christ was born, how the earth was created — in short, they can't read Bible. So they are carnal or maybe not even saved. Satan messes with us, the most. Time we did some accounting, huh...


8. You spend a lot of time lambasting Bible Translations. Isn't that unfair? What right do you have to say it's mistranslated? Bible mistranslation is a well-known fact. To be silent about that, is wrong. When the Word of God is Murdered, and I know that, I say so. What an audience does with that witness, is none of my business.

A lot of people are invested with their 'positions' on Bible, but I'm not one of them. It's not an ego thing for me, it's a quest for answers. Now, no one can get an interpretation or translation wholly correct. Progressive understanding is the goal, instead. The spiritual life is one of God Teaching You The Meaning He Put In Bible. So whatever you know 'today', is less than you'll ideally know, 'tomorrow'. So to say a translation or interpretation is wrong, is just a statement, no more; if God is in that statement, He'll witness to the fact when someone reads or hears it.

Bible translations include words or phrases that are not in the original language texts. More often, they also omit what is in the Bible. Moreover, some of the words in the original language texts are not Bible, but are treated as if they are. So you must test every single verse as you read. Now, there's this art-science called "textual criticism" which has been constantly trying to ascertain if certain verses are really part of the Bible or not; whether some verses or even whole books, belong to the Bible but are missing. It's a nightmarish exercise, for you often look at a desiccated fragment of papyrus or vellum, the ink barely visible, trying to make out if what you view is an iota or a sigma. So it takes years of hard work by many people. Frankly, they all deserve huge salaries. Anyone working with the original language texts, does.

Now you, the learner of God, have a quicker way to establish whether what you read is valid or not: ask God. Generally, those involved in textual criticism ask others in their own field, for that is expected. However you have the Royal Privilege of asking God directly, as you read. So do you? Or do you rely on dear Dr. So-and-So? You know God wants you to study under a pastor — but pastors, teachers, scholars in Bible are also fallible. God, though, is not.

So you, the learner of God, have an Infallible Method For Establishing Divine Writ: Ask God As You Read. The scholar isn't allowed to use this method; he must use forensic methods which will forever be inconclusive. You, by contrast, can just ask God and He'll show you How The Text threads And fits from Genesis to Revelation. That's the test of Divine Writ. Every Bible verse must pass that test. The ones which do not, become obvious. Example: there's a lot of debate over John 7:53-8:11, many claiming it wasn't originally part of John's Gospel, forensically. So then you go to God and ask Him to show you where and how it fits, if it fits. And, He will. ☺️

Thus you see the Genius of God's Design. Bible is a very difficult Book to understand, even though often it's written in simple language, even in the original. It's difficult, because so much controversy surrounds it; it's difficult, because it's been trashed and mashed and mangled and reconstructed over the centuries — yet for all that, all you have to do is ask God if the verse you're reading, is really His. Ask God for what interpretation, you should get. And God will enable you to understand it. So, see: though centuries of controversy and tons of commentaries rage pro- and con- Bible, you can quickly sift through all that just by asking God.

Now, when you ask God, you still must do a lot of legwork. He gives you the answer, but then wants you to prove it forensically, just like an academe involved in textual criticism must do. The difference is, God will show you Where To Look For The Conclusive Evidence. And where you always look, is to The doctrinal Fit of the disputed passage, words, verse, book, whatever. If it fits doctrinally — meaning, the text threads forward from all prior Divine Writ — then it belongs to God. That's a massive testing exercise, but you learn much in the process, far more than if the Bible were this little catechism no one disputed. Same testing rule applies to translating or interpreting a verse or passage. Ask God. Then, dig, asking God the meanwhile. You'll get the 100% proof. Conclusively. I'm dead serious about this: God intends this process. So the confusion and controversy are training aids in your learning Him. Even the wrath of man, praises God. So learn to revel, in it.

Now, this wrath comes from a 'respectable' source. For a really big problem in Christian 'scholarship' is that people ask other people, rather than asking God. Pathetic, really. If God is the author, I should ask the Author, not people. Sure, God has delegated teaching and scholarship authority to people, and I respect and enjoy their learning — but they are human, so for God's sake, they shouldn't be expected to be as right as God is. So, one looks at the people, what they say — but then goes to God about it all.

Ergo, if I want to know whether 1 John 5:7-8 is really part of Bible — most scholars will tell you it is not — I just ask God. Then, I research. As I do, I'm still asking God as I read the raging controversy over this verse pair, and then draw conclusions before God. There are many disputed passages. Just look up "textual criticism" on the internet, and have fun going through them all — asking God while you do so, since you alone will be standing before Him on Judgement Day for what you conclude.

Remember, this is the devil's world. So the devil must have his day, and all the devilish wrangling over Bible by those for and against it, must play out. "Filling all in all", as God puts it in Ephesians 1. Letting all the arguments play out.

Ephesians 1:23 ἥτις ἐστὶν τὸ σῶμα αὐτοῦ, τὸ πλήρωμα τοῦ τὰ πάντα ἐν πᾶσιν πληρουμένου.

Remember Pharaoh's magicians? They counterfeited the 'signs' of Moses. So too, Satan has his own Bible 'scholars' to counterfeit, so that you mislearn Bible or come to distrust it. These scholars will look just like the real ones, the tares among God's wheat. So the tares will have degrees, fancy language, and above all will be graceless. That is how you detect them. The Word of God doesn't matter to them, but rather they value the world's approval, conventions, etc. Hence they will seem on the surface to be of God, but just scratch that surface a little bit, and you see the wolf underneath.

Thus when it comes to Bible, you must be alert. Always breathe 1 John 1:9 when you read something, scholarly or otherwise, to detect whether God is in it. And understand, the play of Satan's strategy in history, to obfuscate Bible, is deliberately allowed by God, to run its course. For nothing stops God from proving Himself and His Word to you, Isaiah 55. All you need do, is ask Him.

At the end of the day, you stand or fall based on what you believe, so auditing what you believe is a must. Besides, it's really enjoyable. The journey of learning Him. House-to-house battle. So when you come across some doubtful words, just know that the popular or 'respected' opinion of them, will be anti-God. So be sure to ask God what He means, and where He is behind what words. Saves a lot of wear and tear.

Now, only the original words God authored are inspired. The battle is, being sure what those words are. Arrogant denominations claim they determined what was Holy Writ or not, but the truth is, only God is the Infallible Witness. So just keep asking Him, as you read. And learn to read, in the original language texts. There will be a pastor who teaches from those texts, since God's goal is for everyone to be able to read the original language texts for himself.

Reading the Bible in the original language texts is not the domain of the elites. Pastors should be teaching it in those texts, and you can find such pastors. Now, lazy people who don't want to know the Word, would rather have elites; flipside, to be elite appeals to ego. Yet the Holy Spirit's Power unleashed (hence the need for 1 John 1:9 so you stay 'online' with Him) means anyone can learn to read those texts. I did, under my own pastor. So you can, too. It isn't hard, especially now with computers and great Bible software. So get cracking. For many centuries people did not get the Word in all its richness as you can have. So you can learn the Same Words as Christ Got and Spoke. God designed the Bible so everyone could have it, Hebrews 10:15-17, 1 Corinthians 13:13. It became available every time people wanted it, but history shows how we wanted the elites, instead. Now, too many people just want The Real Word, so guess what? Now you can get it on computer!


9. What Bible translation do you recommend? None. Not the ones being developed online now, nor any in the past. I use many translations as I study, but that only to save time. When I want to be sure of what the words are, or what they mean, I always go to the original language texts.

Every Bible translation has a guiding "philosophy" behind it. If you know that "philosophy", you can profit from using translations. For example, the "philosophy" behind the KJV and NASB, is literality. So they will always seek to translate the same Hebrew or Greek word with the same English word, as those Bibles are designed to be studied in conjunction with the original language texts. In short, when the KJV was written, it was deemed inferior to the original language texts; as an aid for pastors and students, it translated words in a predictable manner, so you could more easily follow the original. Thus, when you saw "save" in the New Testament, you'd know that "σῴζω" was usually the Greek word underlying "save". Made it simpler to teach a congregation, and easier for the congregation, to check that what the pastor said was right.

Other Bibles emphasize comprehension of the material as a whole. As a result, they sacrifice exactness of the real Bible words, for words which essentially paraphrase what they think the Bible means in a verse. Bible in Basic English, New Living Translation, English Standard Version are examples. Sometimes, they derive brilliant translations. More often, the translations are flat wrong. For one of the problems in this "philosophy" is to lower the standard for "comprehension" to what they decide the average reader can understand. Dumbed-down Bibles are only good for people who want a dumbed-down relationship with God. And, that's what they'll get.

Still other Bibles try to strike a balance between comprehension, and literality. Among these are the Darby translation, NIV, New Jerusalem, Revised Standard. I find myself using these often, in conjunction with KJV or NASB. The contention of the 'balance' philosophy is that literality leads to confusion and downright mistranslation, which is true. Yet it's recognized that one should always track to the original language texts, so some degree of literality is sought, i.e., trying to translate "save" everywhere "σῴζω" occurs in the original, yet distinguishing it as "rescue" or "deliver" when the salvation of eternity, is not the verse's focus. Again, it's impossible to translate the Word rightly. You do as much as you can.

There's a disturbing trend among Bible translations today to cut out passages which are impolitic. So these new translations (since the 1980's) seek to make God sex-neutral, to bland out violence and other politically-sensitive statements in the Bible. I wouldn't buy one of those Bibles if you put a gun to my head. The biggest problem in Bible collation of the original language texts and in translation has been obscuring what God says, in the name of getting people to like the Bible. Forget that. If you don't want God, then don't pretend you do by settling for some fuzzed-over, made-nice text. The Bible isn't politically-correct. Learn that early. Ask God why. There are really important reasons why the Bible uses nasty language, violent language, etc. Learn what they are, or don't bother to learn Bible at all. Just believe in Christ, that He paid for your sins, and you'll go to heaven. Ignorant, but honest.


10. Why should I read what you write, when I can read what someone respectable says, especially since they disagree with you? I've no clue why you should read what I write, whether I were respectable or not, or whether what I write agreed with anyone. Really, you shouldn't read unless God directs you to do so, as God would have a will about how you use your time. So ask Him, not me, whether you should read.

Frankly, if you use respectability as the criterion for what you decide to read, then respectability matters to you more than truth. You should know by now that respectability is no guarantee of competence, truth-speaking, intent, or anything else. All "respectability" really tells you is that the person deemed "respectable" is approved by his peer group or by people in general. Yeah, Mussolini and Hitler were once popular.

Go by content, not by who says what. Else, you will be fooled. So if the content of my webpages has its own merit — then didn't God make it so? Surely I did not. Gotta tell ya, when I read comments in YouTube, websites, blogs, scholarly treatises, I don't give a flip who says the words, I want to know if the words are: a) something God wants me to know, and b) valid for whatever reasons He wants me to know them. For everything in life is used by God to teach you... His Son. Pro or con, good or bad, silly or smart. So Go By Content, not speaker's approval rating.

If it matters, I almost never like what I write. I almost never like my videos. There's always something wrong with the presentation, in my view. The webpages are too long and wordy; I didn't even know how to make a video until December 2007. So if your question aims to establish whether I'm trying to advocate you believe as I do, rest easy: I'm not. We each turn over what we believe, and audit it. Spiritual growth happens only if you keep thinking over Bible on a daily basis. It doesn't come by works, rituals, believing what dear Dr. So-and-So says. It comes from being online with God, via 1 John 1:9 and learning and living on Bible He commissioned. Now, if reading what someone else says helps you do that, great. Doesn't mean you must agree with what you read. Does mean you better analyze why you believe, agree, disagree. For you only take your own soul, to heaven.


11. You use a lot of Greek terms which are famous in Gnosticism. Are you Gnostic? 🤣 No!!! The terms are Bible terms, and yeah most of them in the New Testament are tweaking the Gnostics for being such dummies. Gnosticism dates back to the Age of Pericles and even earlier. I can't tell if it really originated with the Chinese, or with the Jewish Kabbala goofballs — what we call Kabbalism really started back during the Judges (circa 1350 BC or so), and has morphed many times. So scratch any notion that my use of terms like sophia (σοφία), pistis (πίστις), pleroma (πλήρωμα) are gnostic terms. They are Bible terms, and they go all the way back in the Old Testament, too. Sound hermeneutics: Bible context determines a meaning, and my webpages are on the Bible, not on anything else. For example, Paul, John, and the writer of Hebrews (someone post-Paul, writing just after Paul died) all tweak the Gnostics. Paul uses Πλήρωμα a lot because he's constantly showing God's Superior Begetting — "πλήρωμα" has this internal connotation of being "full" of a god via impregnation. John seems to like to use "φῶς" (Light) a lot, tweaking the Gnostics there. The writer of Hebrews uses τελειόω and πληρόω in tandem to show the change in covenant from Israel to Church (elaborating on the two walls of Ephesians 2). I forget what terms Peter uses, but he gets in some good tweaks, too. So when you see my webpages use these terms, they are the Bible's definitions, never the Gnostics. ☺️


12. Why don't you use your real name? Who are you? Isn't it disrespectful to be anonymous? I don't use my real name because who I am, shouldn't matter. Content matters, not the person saying it. The nickname "brainout" derives from Ephesians 4:23, which is a command to be refreshed, reinvigorated by agency of the Spirit (verse is mistranslated). Now, think about that: if you aren't in the Spirit, your brain is out. Doesn't matter how smart you are, doesn't matter what credentials you have, doesn't matter how respected or approved you are among other humans. So I'm just a "brainout", no matter what people may think of me in real life. So if I respect God, then my own name shouldn't matter.

Ephesians 4:23 ἀνανεοῦσθαι δὲ τῷ πνεύματι τοῦ νοὸς ὑμῶν,

What good does it do for you, to know my name? Will that help you grow spiritually? And, can't you Google on "brainout"? If it ever mattered, wouldn't you know more about 'me' from the videos and webpages, then any name would tell you? What difference should it make to anyone, who anyone else is? We all stand individually to our Master. Frankly, I hope "brainout" is the new name I receive on my pebble in the Eternal State, assuming I mature to the Ephesians 4:13 level God ordained for each believer, per Revelation 2:17. For apart from the Holy Spirit, apart from Christ, I'm nothing, John 14-15.

Revelation 2:17 ὁ ἔχων οὖς ἀκουσάτω τί τὸ πνεῦμα λέγει ταῖς ἐκκλησίαις· τῷ νικοῦντι δώσω αὐτῷ τοῦ μάννα τοῦ κεκρυμμένου, καὶ δώσω αὐτῷ ψῆφον λευκήν, καὶ ἐπὶ τὴν ψῆφον ὄνομα καινὸν γεγραμμένον, ὃ οὐδεὶς οἶδεν εἰ μὴ ὁ λαμβάνων.

There's one more reason for being anonymous, and it's important. Some of the stuff in these pages is controversial. Some, really sophisticated theology, higher than what you can find anywhere in Christendom. So if a reader stumbles onto some idea in here which he wants to then own, he does. For, he can't say who "brainout" is. I want that. I'm not a teacher, but a student; and if I was given important understanding much like a waiter is given a plate to deliver to the customer, then I want the customer to own it. So, he does. You the Customer. I the waiter. I like it that way. God is the Maker of the Food, the Chef, and who needs to care about the delivery system He uses? Again, he used Balaam's donkey, and at best that's all I am. I asked Him over 20 years ago if in the eternal state, I could be a fly on the wall in the Throne Room. Someone no one notices. But it turns out, He made me into a bee. Okay. Then just ignore brainout, and get the content He wants you to get. It belongs to you, not to me. ☺️

And now, you own it, not 'brainout'. For God's Disclosure belongs to everyone. Treasure in earthen vessels.

Since it belongs to you, then you have to vet it. Since it belongs to you and you have to vet it, You Have To Vet It Before God, and In Bible. So you can't claim you read some book by some 'respectable' person, and that is why you believe. Too many books claiming to be about the Bible, being read and believed; but the Bible itself, is not consulted. You realize that's like everyone who wants to know something about you, going to people who don't know you very well, right? Going to anyone but you for confirmation of information claimed about you. In a court of law, it's called "hearsay evidence" and is inadmissible. Yet it's okay to rely on hearsay evidence rather than the Bible which is in every hotel room? Yuck!

Okay, so you can't do that here. I document where I get what I get from bible, so that you can audit it. And after that, since you audited it, it's your material, not mine, since the bible belongs to everyone on the planet. No quoting 'brainout', since you don't know who brainout is. So you have to do your own homework. And then, you own that. ☺️☺️☺️


13. The Bible is a corrupted book of myths. How can you believe in it? The Bible proves itself Divinely true to anyone who reads it carefully. For it takes God's Perspicacity to comprehend the Bible, and He gives that to you, as you read. The Bible is an extremely sophisticated book and requires one study it with care. Few do that, so their ineptitude is blamed on the Bible. See, the Bible is supposed to be the Word of God so it must be written in a manner which displays God in all His facets. That way you know human ability and intelligence aren't corrupting the book. So, it takes time to analyze and vet.

The chief mechanism Bible uses to display Divine Authorship is a rhetorical device today called "parallelism". How things are similar. This parallelism begins in Genesis 1:1 and threads throughout the Bible. Each verse beginning at the beginning, introduces or elaborates on concepts and principles which were covered prior. Thus, for example, when you read the Book of Daniel, everything prior to that Book which was Divine Writ, must be threaded into and through, Daniel. Very precise threading is required. So for example in Daniel, the book is about the end of time, because time was supposed to end with the destruction of the Temple. So the question became, why didn't time end? Revelation is on the same theme as Daniel, and for the same reason.

So, in Daniel, the answer to why Time did not end, is predicated on a promise which gave birth to the Temple's destruction in the first place, a Time promise which is the primary Accounting Piece for voting period, since Adam: 70 years. If that contingency was met (enough voting positive, unlike the Flood), then history would be granted; Daniel is gradually told in parallelism, how that future history would play. He's not given the whole story at once, because it will not play all at once, and because it will play in parallelism. So the beast that was Babylon, is first presented, but it is an archetype, parallel to future beasts to follow it. So thesaural versions of the first beast, are the rest. See the pattern?

In Revelation, these threads from Daniel, are all finalized. That's one way you know Revelation is the last book of the Bible. All the threads, complete. So forget all the goofy nonsense of revelation given after 96 AD. It is finished. Time, threads, everything.

Thus you have parallelism in the sense of a continuing thesaural series of analogies all linked together, and you have parallelism in the sense of further discourse/revelation about the same topics, carrying forward in time and purpose. For, the Bible is a sheaf of legal documents about the Angelic Trial of which we humans are the witnesses. So you have depositional parallelisms, contractual parallelisms, forensic parallelisms, etc. All the material you need to prove God exists, is actually within the text itself. 100% proof, is there.

Think of it as a tapestry. If there's a weaving error in the tapestry, you could say it was of human origin. If no weaving error, then it has to be of divine origin. Now, if the tapestry has no flaws but someone comes in and attacks some of the threads, then those would be visible, a forensic task which alike uncovers when and who and how the attacks, were made. So it is with this woven Word. We can tell where it was attacked, and what was changed. So now you know two things: 1) that the original is Divine, and 2) how someone tried to de-Vine it. That's more information than if you only had 1)! So what some call corruptions, actually prove the Bible more Divine than ever. It also helps to highlight certain doctrines you never once paid much attention to.

A common argument which makes me chuckle is that "perfection" of Bible ought to be defined in terms of form. So if there is a scribal error, then it's not from God. Now, think about the fallacy of that premise. If Bible had to be perfect in form to be from God, how can you learn the Divine Power of perfecting you? Yet if you get from God as you read, the very message He intended from the text, however mangled it seems in form — then you see how God can perfect you, too.

The claim of Bible's Perfection is called "Verbal Plenary Inspiration". Meaning, that God so supernaturally empowered the writers, that without waiving anything in their own personality or nature, He nonetheless transmits His Complete Communication to mankind exactly as He intended, perfectly. So now think: if some scribe miscopied something or left out some portion of that original Divine Writ, God would know that. God would therefore know how to make sure that some other scribe included a correct version of what got messed up. In conjunction with the poetic meter, it adds an extra layer of self-correction. So in aggregate, you have all the same words as God originally intended. We have so many copies, it becomes easy to know where the errors are. Yeah, there are a lot of errors. You just try to type many sentences and see how often you must backspace or correct them later. Moreover, most of the errors are like this: "ths eror n neeeds t b corected." Can't you still tell what the sentence means?

Moreover, the form errors teach you stuff as well:

So I'm glad the text isn't perfect in form: I learn Bible so much better due to those errors!

Clever way for God to prove Himself to you, huh. So it remains true that despite imperfections in form, that the Word of God is indeed inerrant and infallible — which truth, God will gladly prove to you as you read His Word. I see that proof every single day, even when I don't want to see it. The proof is overwhelming. So I can empathize with people who want to run away from God. I just can't do it anymore, that's all.

In sum, the content of the Bible, its perspicacity, prophecy, and myriads of other information, always foils its critics, generation after generation. People misread it, and prove to have been slipshod in their homework. People are stumped by the meanings, and within their lifetimes the stumps are removed. At the very time when people were stumped by some of the words in the Greek text of Bible, Hebrew text was found to prove where the Greek had been ineptly de-vined. When people were stumped by locations in the Bible, there was some archeological discovery which helped them prove the locations. For example, for centuries people had no proof Babylon existed, but weren't stumped by it; so too, many other places cited in the Bible, were buried under tons of rubble. Yet those places were unearthed, during the lifetime of people contesting their Biblical validity.

In short, there's no book like the Bible for coherency and accuracy. And in time, God 'answers' all objections. Right on time, too. In parallelism. Two Witnesses. Two Natures. God-man, get it?

Now, I suppose to someone whose interest in God is nearly zero or negative, the Bible wouldn't make much sense. Neither, would nuclear physics. And, therefore being unable to read it, such a negative person would blame the book for the person's own inability. Thus such a person would call it corrupted, and a 'myth'. Fine. The rest of us will go right on learning and living on it, growing in Him.


14. What do you mean by Scripture verses having "multistoried meanings"? Are you an allegorist?

Not at all. If anything, I think even those among us who recognize that Scripture should be literally interpreted, aren't being literal enough. The multistoried-meaning comments are meant to show God literally means what He says, and in more detail than we give credence. For example, Christ updates Psalm 82:6 in John 10:34-36: note the very clever wording on the upgrade, in John 10:36. Literally. Sons from the Son. Oh, but we don't take Him literally, and deem ourselves 'humble'! What arrogance.

What's the point of getting the "mind of Christ" if it won't transform our thinking, Romans 12:1-3? And if our thinking is transformed to become His, what does that make us, functionally? If the Holy Spirit is God and He is; if He runs our thinking, and He does; then we are "sons of God in Christ Jesus" — literally.

Notice then, the storeys:

Hebrews 1:3 ὃς ὢν ἀπαύγασμα τῆς δόξης καὶ χαρακτὴρ τῆς ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ, φέρων τε τὰ πάντα τῷ ῥήματι τῆς δυνάμεως αὐτοῦ, καθαρισμὸν τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν ποιησάμενος ἐκάθισεν ἐν δεξιᾷ τῆς μεγαλωσύνης ἐν ὑψηλοῖς,

Hebrews 3:14 μέτοχοι γὰρ τοῦ Χριστοῦ γεγόναμεν, ἐάνπερ τὴν ἀρχὴν τῆς ὑποστάσεως μέχρι τέλους βεβαίαν κατάσχωμεν,

Hebrews 11:1 Ἔστιν δὲ πίστις ἐλπιζομένων ὑπόστασις, πραγμάτων ἔλεγχος οὐ βλεπομένων.

We sell God's literal purpose in Christ, quintessentially expressed in Isaiah 53:10-11's five infinitives (with LXX transformatives), quoted endlessly throughout the New Testament — at too low a level, in both pulpits and common conversation. Because, we are uncomfortable interpreting Scripture literally. Hence our anthropocentric teaching and Bible academia is sickening. It's not about sin. It's not about what the usually-retarded Church Fathers or Reformers thought or taught. It's not about the history of Christianity, or its various, always-dinky theologies. It's about christ. Literally. Forget everything else.

Sorry to be so harsh, but it's the sordid printout of Churchinanity's history that we mouth "God" all the time, but learn Him, not at all. We learn the names of scholars, rattling them off like mathematicians have to do (i.e., Planck's Constant, named after a guy rather than a descriptive name). So we endlessly quote other people, rather than going back to the Word directly. So we learn our rituals, our arguments with each other, our theological positions — but not God.

And if we really paid proper attention to our history, we'd realize that about every 200 years since the Cross, interest in Bible turns "dull", νόθρος.

So we learn from history that we learn nothing from history. Just as God literally predicted, and as He faithfully portrayed by giving us His 490-year Accounting for Time Scheme from Adam forward — a scheme very clearly displayed directly in the Bible, but Christendom has yet to learn it. Instead, we seek to date from extra-Biblical sources, we read the Bible wrong, and then blame the Bible for being obtuse. Literally.


15. Oh, you're just parroting your pastor or imposing your presuppositions on Bible like everyone else.

There is a time when that argument can be made: when the person hasn't vetted his beliefs or the pastor's teaching. Most Christians haven't done this, and I'd not have done it either, for I'm as lazy as anyone else: but I didn't understand the "big picture" so I really didn't know what to believe. God, I believe. Everyone else including me, better pay cash upfront. ☺️

Still, I don't know until and unless I can see it in Bible. So a pastor's real job is to teach you how to read Bible yourself. Just like in any other school, the teacher teaches you his own learning, so you then can see for yourself, independently. When it comes to the Bible, you never outgrow a teacher (and frankly that remains true in all other disciplines as well) — but you do reach a point where you don't need to hold to a certain view. Your need changes to "what's really the truth?"

People who tell you they only care about the truth are many. You can tell if their claims are true, by the way they listen, correct themselves, and keep revising what they believe true. That's supposed to be how science works, but in fact it has stuck its heels in the thoroughly-groundless, 'theory' (really, bad hypothesis) of evolution. Same, with many Christians. They claim to only want the truth, but like the evolutionists, don't do their homework.

Seeing how everyone else is biased and gets it wrong, I trust myself, not at all. So I'm writing to test coherence of what I think I know of Bible, from Bible. And if Bible disagrees with me on some point, then I change. No problem. I can't possibly know Truth as well as it truly is, so there's always a correction needed. That's not a flaw, that's called Learning.

Often I'll appear dogmatic, but that's only because I've done everything I know of to disprove or prove a tenet in Bible, and there's no competing conclusion. That still doesn't mean I understand the proven conclusion as well as I should. So the certainty you see in the webpages, doesn't mean anything about me at all — but rather it's certainty about the tenet in question, based usually on the reasons stated (space permitting).

So there's no guarantee that what you see in these pages today, will be here tomorrow. Depends on what 'corrections' I need.


16. Oh, there's a lot of new and unproven theology in your webpages. You should stick with what's proven.

Actually, nothing in the webpages is new. Uncommon, yes. Rarely known today, yes. Not known maybe for 2000 years — the 490-year Accounting for Time Doctrine went lost beginning with those spiritual retards, the 'Church Fathers', rejecting Rapture — yes. But certainly not 'new'. It's all in the Bible, and that's how I learned the 'theology' you see in the webpages. I wasn't trying to develop one. I was trying to see how all the doctrinal pieces fit together, and test. That a 'theology' came out from all this which largely happens to agree with what my pastor taught, was a surprise. I didn't expect it, and it didn't matter. So again, you can't say the information here is unique. For he'd been teaching it for 53 years. I just didn't see the proof. Now, I do. Now, you can too.

Frankly, much of the material flies above our conventional theological divisions, so demonstrates commonalities in all of them. The biggest 'theology' which came out from the writing is a refinement and extreme elaboration on: a) the Nature of God, and b) the nature of His Plan for our lives. You could add a: c), total proof that the Rapture is valid (that surprises me no end, because I was always neutral about the Rapture, and should not have been). You could also add a: d), how the devil messes with us, in more empirically-provable detail than I can find elsewhere. Yet a) - d) is but corollaic to fundamental doctrines we all (at least should) know. So you can prove them. That's the other purpose of the webpages: provability.

Now, that most people don't know of this information is quite beside the point. And, now that the pages exist and the information can be tested, it doesn't matter that I got the information one way, but you another way, because it's all in the Bible and can be proven many ways.

Reiterating: these webpages came about because I did not understand what my pastor taught, so he got it from Bible, but no pastor can sufficiently explain within only one hour's daily class. So, I asked God. Really, it was that simple. Because my pastor taught Bible in the original language texts, I was able to read it to see, asking God the meanwhile, constantly being 'reminded' (principle of John 14:26) of places in Bible to look test, analyze. 60-hour research weeks, 8 years of them. So now, I understand. Anyone else can do the same thing.

That's why you use 1 John 1:9 and ask God for more information. Same as when you go to regular school, you have homework to do; the teacher can't say all that needs to be learned. Since this is God's Word and He knows what He means and what He gave your pastor to teach, He can teach you. He won't do that, if you don't ask. But if you do ask, when you are between sins you can learn, and indeed prove fully what He means. It takes God's Power — after all, God Alone Knows What He Means. So if you ask, then you too can learn. If you don't ask, then you don't learn.

The problem is we don't ask. We think we're supposed to learn on our own power, and we pride ourselves on how much we fantasize we know. Or, we pride ourselves on being unable to know, excusing our ignorance in the name of human limitations — as if God were so incompetent or cruel, He'd not be able to bridge that limitation gap. So if you don't know, ask. Else, go do something else. Most wasted life on the planet, is a religious one. Either study Bible to learn God for Himself, or go do something else.


17. Oh, what you write here will revolutionize Christianity!

No, what God wrote in Bible revolutionizes Christianity. I'm only evidence that any ol' brainout can learn Bible. So now you have the information too, and if you understand it such that you make this comment, then God gave you that information, not me. So, see? You Own It Just As Much As I Do. It's not 'my' writing. It's Bible's, using a donkey mouth. Which, any brainout can know.

That's why I'm anonymous. There are too many 'Christian' books, too many 'authors' being credited, too little Bible being consulted, today. If you don't know who 'brainout' is, then you can't credit me. It's not my material, it's Bible. Which, when you prove it yourself before God, becomes His Gift to you, and I'm not involved.

We get to replace our thinking with His. We don't have to live for ourselves, we don't have to run on the hamster's treadmill of constantly crediting ourselves or other people. We can just live to God, for God, of God, in God, 2 Corinthians 5:14-21. Whew. That's a revolutionary relief, huh.


18. Oh, I hear your pastor is a false teacher!

Jesus the Christ is both admired and hated by millions of people ever since He was here. So millions of people in history speak well and ill of Him. So too, Hitler was admired and hated by millions of people ever since he was living down here. So, many people in history speak well and ill of him. Who do you believe? Well if you're a stupid herd-bound person who doesn't care about truth, you'll just follow your associates, and chirp the same thing. So if you're correct, you're still wrong, because you didn't do your own homework, but went with 'your' crowd.

Now, the crowd aligning with one 'side' or another of a person will be a great testimony to the truth or the falsehood of that side. For when one takes a position on someone else, if the position is false — the falsehood infects. So those anti- a person who is good, will display a growing soul sickness: progressively more petty, progressively more incompetent in comprehension, articulation, progressively more obsessed, judgmental, prone to believing wilder and wilder lies. In a word, childish.

By contrast, when one takes a true position on someone else — the truth 'infects'. Such a one will display a growing soul health: becomes progressively more generous (overlooking slights), more competent in comprehension, articulation; rather than becoming obsessive, the person becomes progressively more relaxed, far less inclined to be judgmental, and is more and more attuned to rationality. In a word, mature.

Granted, both those who believe falsehoods (here, about a person) and those who believe truths, have their articulate spokesmen — and their wackos. Just as fans of a good baseball player can be themselves crazy (i.e., killing someone who didn't like that baseball player, in the name of that player) — so also fans of any teacher can be crazy... or well-composed. So you can't go by behavior to evaluate the accuracy of a person's judgment about someone else. You have to evaluate the 'player', himself.

Hearsay is inadmissible in court. Now you know why. So whatever you hear, ask: is this 'witness' sound of mind? And even if you think 'yes', are you right before God, to just accept that person's hearsay? Would you want that done of you?

Notice I didn't answer the implied accusation in your question. God will; His is the only testimony which matters. God answers for and defends those He sent, beginning with His Son. God also answers for those He did not send, Jeremiah 26-28.


19. Why don't you quote your sources?

I do quote sources, where relevant, and I always provide Bible backup. However, generally this question is directed in reaction to statements which the reader hasn't heard authoritatively stated by some other human. I can't help what the reader doesn't know. And what I write, is generally provable by thinking over what's said, by recourse to Bible, especially in the original language texts, by recourse to lexicons, and by googling. In short, what I write is either rarely discussed, or is downplayed in public. Everyone knows, for example, that translated Bibles are full of errors. The public doesn't like to hear that, so not much about the fact is publicly said.

Thus the horror of a KJV-Only movement, results. Or how about this other common example, which is even older in its pimping: the Calvinist lie that Dispensationalism is an invention by Darby or Plymouth Brethren in the 19th century, or an invention of some woman who used 'Rapture' to mean a thrill. In short, they claim 'Rapture' is "not a Bible term." 🤦

Au Contraire! 'Rapture' is Anglicized from Latin word rapto, and it's used to translate ἁρπάζω in 1 Thessalonians 4:17. That means it is a "Bible word". Since Calvinism is founded on the antisemitic idea that Israel is replaced by Church, the fact that Jews are dispensationalists based on Psalm 90 is shunted aside. So the correct doctrine of Dispensations (and there are many incorrect versions) is denied by a patent lie that the idea was suddenly 'born' in the 1800's. See: respectable Calvinist 'scholars' long pander this lie, along with many garden-variety Lordship Salvationists, proving they hate God's Word. So their niceness, their 'scholarship' is all tainted by a need to defend anti-semitic Calvin.

You have to tell the sheep where the bones are buried, for sooner or later those bones will surface. Scholars and pastors are very reluctant to do that. I can't be reluctant. I know where the bodies are, as do millions of other people conversant with the manuscripts. Maybe they can stay silent, but I cannot.

This creates a dilemma. If I were to individually document all the sources proving how well known are the controversies, those quoted might suffer taint. In fact, that is the primary reason why those 'in the know', don't fess up. Still, you can find much of this material if you dig.

Additionally, the way the material 'adds up' to the conclusions you find in my webpages, is original research. You're given the information, how I got what I got, and then it's up to you if you agree on how I connected the 'dots' of information. You agree or you do not. That is your free right before the Lord. So again, it's not a lack of providing sources, but rather the fact the researched conclusions don't quote some 'respectable' person, in the reader's opinion. Again, that's a matter between God and you.

Bible is meant to be The Authority. So I use it. Any drunk in Calcutta who correctly recites the Gospel is still using an authority. That Authority is not tainted due to the fact that a drunk cites it. Neither is my authority an issue since I'm using the Bible.

Now, a lot of people all claim to be using the Bible, that the Bible proves what they say true, etc., please kneel here. They are trying to advance an agenda, they have something to sell. I don't have an agenda I need you to 'buy'. Instead, I need to document how something in the Bible proves a given contention or disproves it. I'm really interested in the Wording of the Word, because that's the only way you can be sure of what it says. Sadly, people don't pay enough attention to the 'boring' stuff, the articles, prepositions, tenses, idioms, and important rhetorical styles like meter, which even today scholars dispute exists. Okay, then: if you don't look at what the Bible says, you won't know what it says. But you will, hallucinate.

So here's the sad answer: we Christians have gotten away from the Bible. So too, the scholars. Instead, everyone quotes the hearsay of someone else, be he an 'expert' or not. That's a despicable practice which gives rise to non-thinking use of Bible, and many a heresy has resulted. People prefer to believe based on the attractiveness of a person, rather than the Truth of the Bible.

Sorry, I won't cave into that by making long bibliographies of 'sources' I've actually consulted, so you'll think well of me and what I say. That shouldn't be how you analyze. Experts lie. They are paid to lie. Not all experts, surely. But enough of them. Every denomination, every courtroom, has its 'experts' who are paid to agree with whatever the 'employer' wants said. So how do you vet the 'experts'?

Only one way to vet: use 1 John 1:9, ask God while you read, to testify to the accuracy or inaccuracy of what you read. That's what I'm relying on you doing, when I write. That's what I do as I write, and I'm constantly throwing stones at what I write, at my videos, non-stop. It's called auditing, and that's the constant practice John bids us do, in 1 John 4:1-6, a passage every Christian knows. So why aren't we doing it?

See: You Go By Content, and analyze it Before The Lord, Job 34:3. Or, don't. Your call.


20. What are your credentials?

I get this question, often. We sheep are so mindless now, we consider nothing authoritative until and unless the person saying it has some initials after his name. We don't realize how easy it is to get a degree and yet never learn a thing. I can hire an 'expert' with 20 quite respectable-and-valid initials after his name for any position I want to take, at law. Or, Bible interpretation. The expert will hedge if he must, 'the data suggest', or 'it can be argued that', or 'it is possible' or 'scholars concur that' (not telling you how many, how good, how recent, or who). Fudge words.

My 'credentials' are the Bible itself. Its own words. If you can't read them and know what it says, then you have to talk to God. Use 1 John 1:9 like breathing, or you don't get His Perspicacity, so Bible will just be hot air, to you. That's the one Credential everyone needs, no matter how fluent they are with Bible words. Absent the Spirit's brains, your interpretation is toast.

I learned how to read those words under a pastor who was anal about Hebrew and Greek words, syntax, grammar, and taught them daily. After 40 years, that knowledge gets inside even a brainout. And so I'm anal, too. If I find a mistake (and I always do), I fix it.

I read a lot. I throw stones at everything, especially my own interpretations, because I'm always sure they are wrong. And I revise, edit, redo. That's it.

So finally, my credentials aren't mine, but God's. He will testify if He's "in" what you read/watch among 'my' stuff. Or, if I made a mistake. That's the best testimony there is, and even Balaam's ass can correctly interpret Scripture, if God is "in" it.

God will not be "in" it, if you are slovenly about study. You can't just use 1 John 1:9, open the Bible and instantly know all of what a verse means. You have to plod. You have to dig. You have to ask questions. You have to Compare Scripture With Scripture. So it ends up meaning you have to do, all those things which the people who have credentials, learned to do. Research. Doubt. Rethink. Reanalyze. Never Stand Pat On An Interpretation, for whatever you correctly know, you don't know all of it correctly enough. So even though God can make Balaam's ass correctly interpret Scripture, He expects us human donkeys to care about how He words His Word, by Seeking Diligently To Know — from Him. That's Hebrews 11:6.

So notice: too many scholars don't ask God about meaning, but go to other scholars' interpretations, catalog them, decide among them, and then take a position. So too, many an uneducated person goes by the hearsay of his friends, family, pastor, 'spiritual giant' (in his uninformed opinion). Again, eschewing consulting God. Not good.

Does that mean you should therefore reject all you hear by others? No, dummy. It means you ask God. That was in the first sentence. God. First. Ask. Him. So look how you honor your pastor, your friends, your family, if you do that: God can tell you more about what you heard, and what it means. So if those people were right about what they said, God will vindicate what they said to you, since HE would have given it to them to say it rightly, in the first place.

And why? To save you, time. But you save nothing, if you don't ask. In fact, you spit on your friends, your pastor, your family if you don't ask, for what if they had a bad hair day and gave you wrong information? Or, worse: if they gave you right information and you don't question it, then you're disinterested. (That's the norm, too. We agree to fit in, not because we really believe something.) And of course, your non-questioning can be defended as 'loyalty', even though a truly loyal person would pepper questions right and left, in order to be more loyal in his understanding.

See? Not asking God, is disrespecting Him. Not asking God, is disrespecting them. For if they are wrong, they wouldn't want you believing what they believe. And if they are right, they wouldn't want you believing because they are right, but because of God!

So it's a hybrid: you use 1 John 1:9 like breathing and keep on asking God. And, you apply yourself with the discipline and tools of the academic. God will enable that. I can't tell you how many times He caused me to know a grammar or syntax rule instantly while I was going over a passage. Then afterwards, I have to go look it up (due diligence, testing the spirits) and I find it in some academic tome. Then I learn more. In short, God will save you time in learning, but that's not an excuse to avoid learning.

Of course, if you want to know what God means, rather than preen over how smart you are, you will want to learn. Just to know Him. All too often people use Bible and Bible scholarship as a weapon or a preening device. It's not God, they want to know. So, they won't know Him or His Word. No matter how educated they are. No matter how dumb they are.

See: the Content Matters. So if it matters to you, then you go to whatever lengths are needed to learn it. That's what σπουδάζω means, and why translators often mistranslate it as 'be diligent', cutting out the motive behind the motions, turning one's interest in God (the real reason why God enables you to know) into a preening function you do yourself.

So the bottom line, is this. Your Credentials come from God, first. They won't turn on except between sins. Meaning: you had better use 1 John 1:9 like breathing or you will fancy yourself in the light, but be in darkness, 1 John 1:6. And yes you apply yourself with all the discipline of an academic. Which you won't do, even if an academic, if you don't want to know God.

Sadly, many a pastor or Bible scholar has slipped into a worldly routine with God as a Designer Label. Truth to tell, many of them are weary from all the denominational infighting, the masses with their goofy ideas (like the Campingites) who a scholar or pastor is obliged to rebut; they are tired out from the same basic questions, the same childish debates. They have family life and obligations, and it becomes too easy (understandably so) to just cop out, go with the flow.

So Christian theology has been in the playpen for centuries. Degreed, respectable, basic, childish, ever learning and never coming to a buildable knowledge of God (2 Timothy 3:7).

That's why people are leaving churches. That's why God had John the Baptist, a valid Levite priest, stay away from the Temple and go into the wilderness. But even so, you need a teacher, and under that teacher you need to be quite serious about How God Words His Word. Or, you can just spend your life, playing with your diapers. 💩

End Commercial Message.



Site Purpose, My Bias

Initial "excellency of the knowledge" (Philippians 3:8) co-affidavit...

Like David says in Psalms 139:17's Hebrew, only God's Thoughts make life worth living. In fact, so worth living, all else by comparison, is only worth what you can see of HIM, in it. For, God is so gorgeous: knowing Him, seeing Him, that's what 'joy' means (Hebrews 12:2). Emotion? Too small! Cheap substitute! Instead, you end up exulting in His Thinking, even amidst bad circumstances. So gorgeous, in fact, that "all the kingdoms of the world", all blessings of this life you could ever want, even if you had them all forever! Are boring, compared to knowing Him in this body.

Conclusion: Nothing in this life or the Eternal State compares to the amount of Knowing-Him Intimacy which we Church can get with the God and Our Christ through the Spirit, courtesy of the Father, Who from Eternity past thus endowers us for His Own Benefit and to Benefit His Son (Ephesians 1, Romans 8:11-end), beginning while we are still alive down here.

I, "brainout", hereby testify that the foregoing is Absolutely and experientially true, even in this body. You don't have to die to 'go to Heaven', but it does take a lifetime to grow up in Him. Absolutely worth it, too. End affidavit.


Site Purpose

Priest-Kings in training don't rule over each other, but they often learn from watching each other. ☺️ For, we are all now under the Royal Law (James 2:8, see also its Old Testament lower-grade version in Leviticus 19:18). So, my fellow Crown Prince, whatever your social standing, accoutrements, or sex, the real purpose of 'my' sites is a Priest-kingly one: to encourage your own enjoyment in the study of the Lord, as the Holy Spirit enables it, via 1 John 1:9. For, this is a spiritual role, requiring spiritual brains: His. Apart from Him, we are all brained-out! So, then: it's always insightful to compare one's thoughts with another, so to better "audit" one's own thoughts for spiritual accounting flaws. For my #scripture friends who tell me: "why aren't you here more often, brainout", I wish I could be there!

So, my webpages are not intended to 'sell' a particular denominational view, but rather to help brainstorming, and exposure-to-ideas. Because, each prospective king must do his own due diligence, never closing the ears. Frankly, all my webpages are my own due diligence before the Lord, never mind whether anyone else ever reads them. I don't internalize Bible well until and unless I write a report on what I learn. So whether you should even read what's written, is between God and you, wholly unrelated to 'me'.

One of Christendom's biggest evils is that believers consider it 'evil' to hear something they consider 'unscriptural'. Oh, that holy sense of judging someone else! So millions of human beings have been physically or psychically murdered and maimed, as a result. Worse, such believers never grow up spiritually. For if you cannot account for the divergences from your own belief about what's 'scriptural', then a) you don't even understand what you think is right, and b) you can still be wrong. So notice how the very evil they seek to avoid hearing, they themselves end up being! For ability to translate religious vocabulary into other discipline's terms, ability to simply explain, and most of all — ability to analyze what you think you know, are all part of spiritual due diligence. Just read how the Lord talks to people in the Gospels, constantly exhorting them to Think Over what Scripture they know. And He Himself was accounted evil, by them.

This evil has many sources, and we are all to blame. The teachers demean their congregations, thinking the material in Bible must be simplified, as if the Power of the Holy Spirit wasn't specified in John 4:24. The students demean their teachers and God also, by thinking the Bible ought to be some soundbyte-like magic thing you thump, rather than think out. The politicians make use of all the prejudice around God-concepts, rallying whomever they want to their side.. And (cagily) against their opponents'. All in the name of God, of course. Satan laughs his head off. And we dumb-bunny Christians, forever retard in spiritual babyhood. For if you are in training to be a king and you refuse God's System, then you, not those others, are responsible. So you, irrespective of the others, will be forever retarded. Yeah, saved: but as what? A drooling baby? Sure, even a 'baby' then will be light-years smarter than any babyish person down here, but... do you want to settle for that result? I bet not!

Yet we Christians always stay in the sandbox, preferring the nice warm fuzzies of babyhood to the 'pain' of growing up. For Christendom still doesn't account for its beliefs, and our egregious lack of accounting shows us up for the hypocrites we prove ourselves to be. God doesn't matter to us; truth doesn't matter to us; why God chooses, doesn't matter to us: we just use the Bible like a bludgeoning instrument, to beat everyone into 'our' line of interpretation. So why should anyone believe in Him, huh? If 'holy' means to be bludgeoned all the time, why do we have a Bible, rather than a truncheon? So whether or not what's said in 'my' webpages is 'right', it's still helpful for the sake to purview the accounting method. After all, a wrong belief can be easily changed, but the method of fixing it, is still the same: Due Diligence.

The so-called scientific method, all academic research, all accounting and auditing procedures, and all military science, have rigorous self-testing standards. Bible is completely adamant about it, with whole letters like 1 John dedicated to explaining how you test in the Spirit (1 John 1:9, else not in the Truth). If we don't audit our beliefs, we'll not catch the inevitable errors which humanity is prone to. Christianity has not done this, historically, which accounts for the welter of conflicts in translation and interpretation over the centuries. Instead of picking on the other guy's beliefs, then, audit your own. So, that's what I'm doing here. Any ideas you pick up from reviewing the material, are between God and you, so be sure to clear it with God before you do much reading of these sites.

For Our priesthood, which supersedes all other roles and designations in life, has no denomination, except "kata Melchizedek": the name of the Lord's Order of Priesthood, to which we belong. (Read Hebrews 5; whole book is on this topic.) So: "denominations" are merely belief-system monikers people invented to define themselves relative to other people. The spiritual life, by contrast, is solely what you and you alone are thinking "before the Lord": your inner relationship with God, 24 hours-a-day. The inner life has no "denomination", for it is relationship/rapport with God, not religion. For, as it stands written, "One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism." We are all one kingdom-of-priests in Christ, not some man-defined denomination. The much-abused and mistranslated Ephesians 4:13 is not "to a unity of faith", but "because of the system from Doctrine"... which you can also prove, given the rest of the verse: "even by means of believed-knowledge of the Son of God"..L.1603, plus Ephesians 1985 exegesis. The system is Doctrine, His Thinking, not a denomination or every-Christian-has-same-faith, for crying out loud. Why is it people always give Scripture a man-centered spin?

So please don't assume that what I write is either accurate, or some sales gimmick. Instead, Test The Writing For Sense, before the Lord, breathing 1 John 1:9 as necessary, so you won't be Brainless in your reading. It doesn't matter if we have the 'same' faith; it doesn't matter if, person-to-person, we are correct in our doctrines. The Relationship is Vertical, never horizontal: He is Your Lord; He is My Lord. You are not my lord, nor I yours; so, it's not an issue between us whether one is more, or less, 'correct'; this, because each believer is connected in Him, not directly to each other. So: via the writing I'm truly trying to independently 'see' better what I've learned; simultaneously, why alternative interpretations do or don't fit Bible. Then, I write as if it were 'homework', an essay exam. Since these webpages are public, I must also rephrase the explanation in terms of Bible-related concepts the average person should know (rather than the specialized method of my own church). For, it's not about denominations or interpersonal faith differences, It's about our being Royally Trained for Father. Everything else is meaningless and boring.

When we are children, we quite naturally ape what we see and hear. We consider that loyal, too. Children cannot love, but they can be loyal. Love requires maturity, and at this point the child is Learning the underpinnings of thought. So, he apes. So, when we spiritual children are under pastors, denominations, in groups — we think that anything which doesn't ape the superficials of 'our' group, must be wrong. Well, that's not true. So until we grow past such childish definitions of loyalty and love, we will constantly wrangle in the sandbox: my 'daddy'/pastor/denomination/group is better than your 'daddy'/(etc). Historically, the bulk of Christians Remain in This Sandbox, Stultifying the Learning of their church group, their family, their affiliations, and their nation. For no nation is any better than the Christians, in it. God proved that through the story of Israel, and He proves it historically: "Thinking" series (accessible from the Home Page, near top-right) traces out that contention. Because, we really are Crown Princes in training, and all the world is affected by how we either grow up, or... remain in the sandbox.

You Must Think Out What You Learn, To Grow. You must grow past the childish loyalty to friends, parents, teachers — to blossom into True Honor, which is true love: God's. As a king-in-training, this is even more vital, for if you do not grow out of the childish phase, neither will your periphery. Hence these webpages.

Bizarre circumstances gave birth to these webpages. I can't stand Windows, but I needed email, so I got WebTV in August 1999. Then I discovered Christian 'chat'. Then it became necessary to write webpages, because people wanted me to explain what I had learned, but my fingers couldn't keep up with all their questions. Since WebTV requires you be online for all webpage composition, my telephone bills became astronomical (in my area, telephone usage is expensive, per minute even for local calls). So, I had intended in April 2000, to quit WebTV, quit chat and website writing. By 'chance' (yeah, right, no accidents in the Christian's life) at that very time a janitor in my building had found a Windows computer in the trash, which he insisted must be for me. So, he saved it, waiting until he saw me (he didn't know where in the building, I lived, nor did he know my last name, so couldn't learn where I lived). Two weeks later he ran into me, and told me all this. I did not want the computer, thinking that he should have it, instead. He would not take my "no" for an answer. His name was "Jesús" (honest)! He didn't know (and I didn't tell him) about my WebTV, nor what I was doing with it. He didn't know I was thinking of quitting it, either: only God knew that. Ok: what would you do in my place? I took the computer, and guess what — it was chat-ready, internet ready! By the programs on it, I learned what to buy at Office Depot, and... hence these webpages.


So should you read any of 'my' webpages? Here are my 'biases': you decide if you want to read further.

First 'bias', the matzah: the Holy Spirit is the Sovereign Executive for disseminating truth.

He can and does use any human agency. Back in the Old Testament, He even used Balaam's donkey! So, He might use this material. If the Holy Spirit decides to use this material, that's His Decision, and is a private matter between Him and the reader — it has nothing to do with 'me'. So I don't need or want to know who reads these sites. It's none of my business.

For, everyone of any faith is generally positive to at least some small portion of the Truth, and God the Holy Spirit exploits that positive volition. His Truth always "flanks" falsehood, by letting falsehood freely operate. So, while I'm not shy about saying what I understand to be correct or in error (and why), you won't find that these sites vilify 'the heretic', either. Frankly, every belief system, whether Christian or not, has at least a few very beautiful and apt tenets which help an open-minded person better see the True Light that is Bible. The Eastern religions, for example, often recognize what Western Christianity misses: the total harmony of opposites. Western Christianity, by contrast, focuses too much on judging sin, ignoring that sin was nailed to the Cross so it would not be an issue. Each Christian sect also has a few brilliantly-defined doctrines, but.. Unfortunately uses them to compete with other Christian sects, rather than to amalgamate the meanings together to better see the whole.

Granted, there is only one way to be permanently saved (at least once believe Christ paid for all your sins — Faith Alone in Christ Alone); granted, there is also only one way to grow in Christ: God's System and "1 John's Outline of God's Script"). Yet there are many ways to come to the cognitive point where you know these facts. So of course, there is no one "right" Christian denomination, particularly since man is fallible, but the Bible is not. What's "right", is instead the Uppermost Truth: the individual growing up in Christ, For Father! "Christ in you, the Confident Expectation of Glory!" (Colossians 1:25-27.) Truth is a mosaic: Him. So we've all got pieces of the truth, and pieces of falsehood, in our beliefs. The trick is to use 1 John 1:9, stay open, not to stand pat, and to keep refining our understanding.

Now, if He uses something accurate in these pages, and the reader is not ready for that truth at that time, the reader might become hostile... but at least he was exposed. The Holy Spirit will recall it to his mind (John 14:26 principle) later on. That's the Holy Spirit's self-chosen job. My job vis á vis others, to the extent I have one, is to succinctly answer/explain what I've learned. Therefore, I don't list all the verses which back up an interpretation: the Holy Spirit will furnish proof to the reader who wants it, when that reader is ready for such proof. Thus the reader can know of confirmatory verses directly from Him, just as I have. That is part of your privilege and post, as Priest.

Second 'bias', the Cup: God uses everything to teach everyone,
Especially via errors; since teaching makes profit For Father,
Out from error 'costs'. This all happened on the Cross.
So there is no need for shame, guilt, or recrimination.
So there is no need to dwell on the past, Philippians 3:13.
So there is no need to be coy about error.
Rather, need to Drink Word, Isaiah 55, Romans 5:5!

Even the most brilliant of statesmen, generals, scholars, make blunders. It's part and parcel of being human. The bigger the person's role, the bigger he is talent/genius-wise, the bigger his blunders will be. Not, smaller. For, everything in his life is bigger, so more is affected by even the otherwise-smallest mistake he makes. If Hitler had remained an Austrian corporal, history would (well, perhaps) be quite different. If Christ hadn't come, history would be very different. So, for big gains, there must be a Hypostatic Obverse: big losses. You learn this the hard way when you invest. And, hopefully, you learn to learn from the mistakes, the losses, rather than learn to perpetually react to them. For, that would be the biggest loss, of all.

So, as you might know, it has long been a tradition in the historical, economics, and military sciences to study errors made by others in the field. This is particularly true in military training. The point is, an error Napoleon made in the past can easily be repeated by 'me', so I want to see clearly what mistake he made, so to better fortify self against making the same type of error. So too, military history teaches the successes, so that one may emulate them. So too, the Bible deliberately illustrates many errors and successes, so that by means of studying both, the reader may be better enabled to repeat the success, and avoid the failure. So important lessons can be applied to self by seeing doctrinal & other errors in Christian history and in translations: you know, seeing the mote in another's eye to better remove the log in one's own!

All error of any kind in the spiritual life, be it in the doctrines one believes or in the do's, is not really due to sin, but due to Not Looking High Enough. At God, the Uppermost Truth. Analysis of Scripture routinely fails (and failure is the norm, not the exception), because we focus on lesser truths. This focus creates those "logs", because it chops Ὁ ΛΌΓΟΣ, the Word, narrowly. Biblical keywords are royally chopped up/off/down. For example, all too many scholars and students chop out the many uses and tiered-meanings of "salvation", "baptism", "faith" — narrowing these terms to but one meaning, each. Even "door", which obviously swings in and out, is narrowly construed to mean only to-Heaven "salvation".

So, when you come into salvation, You Enter a New Door. Out went the old, in comes the New: "The old things have passed away" (2 Corinthians 5:17, especially in context). So you are Dead to Death (theme of Romans 6-8). So you are now on the Rock, the Floor, the "Foundation" (1 Corinthians 3, "born from above" in John 3, Hebrews 6:8-10:17, etc). New 'doors of opportunity' await: for in His House, there are many mansions. Question is, where will you abide? (confer1 Corinthians 13:1-3, 1 John 1:6-10; really, all of 1 John is on this topic.) So, as verse groups like Hebrews 10:10-17 and Philippians 2:12-13 stress, "salvation" is multiphased, foundation +storeys atop it.

But if you listen to Christians, that fact's chopped out, too. What, does no one recognize in Philippians 2:12, Paul is talking about something on the inside (your spiritual life) working out, too? People misuse this verse like they misuse James 2: oh, brother, if you don't hustle, then you aren't saved, because faith without works is dead! Slobber slobber. So, ask the slobberer: how do you "work out" a salvation you don't first already have, Philippians 2:12? Can one workout a non-existent body? And just Who Empowers the working-out in v.13 (ties to Ephesians 2:10)? So, like Paul quips in Romans 7: who will deliver us from this body-of-dead, chopped thinking! Thanks be to God the Father, the Lord Jesus Christ! We can be 'saved', 'delivered', 'rescued' (all the same Greek verb, σῴζω) from our errors, hooray!

Thus whether Scholar or schoolkid, we all look too low, when we read His Thinking; thus we schism into our bazillion kooky faiths, Christian or no, all stressing a few to-people truths, competing. Persistence in learning His Word grows us out of this fractious, logging stage, which is part of spiritual childhood, as each New Testament writer explains (subtheme of each book). Of course, if we retard in that stage, as 99% of us historically do, we'll just have a lot of chopped wood for burning at the Bema (1 Corinthians 3, function depicted; Revelation 4, the actual future event, described in Greco-Roman drama tableau imagery, with Church as that "sea of glass", reflecting Christ). ["Bema" is a raised platform, like a stage; a governmental/military head sat upon it. Everyone else stood around. Then, the head would announce publicly who got awards or punishments due to some (usually military) endeavor in which those folks were all involved. The awards were shockingly enormous: people today would find these huge-wealth awards extremely offensive. (In theology, this Bible doctrine is called "crowns" after one of the Bible keywords designating it.) Punishments were enormous too: this fact is depicted in 1 Corinthians 3 as burning up your life's 'production', but not you. The "Thinking Out Loud" series has details.]

Therefore "TULIPS?" redoes and enhances the original TULIP to correct what's been wrong with it since 1610. I'm not a Calvinist, but that doesn't matter. Idea is to preserve what's good about an idea, and prune out what's bad. So: once corrected, the acronym serves as a handy mnemonic for both the structure of salvation, and our so-great spiritual life after salvation. The "Salvation Components", "Spiritual..", and the Lord vs. Satan complements "TULIPS?": those webpages elaborate on how salvation and the post-salvation life dynamically operate.

In nearly every one of my webpages, you'll see examples of failures in Biblical scholarship, teaching, etc. This, not to put down anyone, but to show provable patterns Satan uses to beguile us all. Items which you can check so to see the pattern. For, it's not about people making mistakes, but about how vulnerable we all are. Because we are all one in Christ. Teachers and translators are on the front lines of this, the most significant, spiritual war, so need as much prayer as they can get: prayer is voting for them to get the protection, the competence, the courage. These are our best and brightest, so if they prove to be so thoroughly outwitted by Satan & Co. Surely we don't stand a chance; surely they need our prayer, and we need to be breathing 1 John 1:9 and living in God's System as often as possible!

Scholar error samples thus are given in many of my sites, but some to read are: About Bible Mistranslation (which also walks you through some examples of Satan's involvement, so you can prove to yourself it's not mere human fallibility at work) and Why You Need A Pastor: Bible is Severely Mistranslated. Basically translations all cut God's Head out of the original text unless the word "God" is explicitly in the sentence, and otherwise fuzz up or truncate strategically-important doctrines on which your spiritual weal, depends. For example, verbs and nouns only used of God are thus given man's head in translation, instead. So many blasphemous errors, it's shocking to see them, so you'll have to do a lot of legwork here yourself. Don't lose faith in the translators and teachers: know instead that you have proof from these mistranslations that Satan & Co. Are messing with them. Hence it's critical to pray for everyone who has a job related to Bible. Test this claim, k? Find out how bad such centuries-long mistranslations have gone on, so you can see it cannot be of human origin. This isn't rocket science to prove, and it's clearly an objective, empirical proof. But you must test a lot of verses, not just a few. Hence misinterpretation of our vital spiritual food is easy — and devastating. Hence many mistranslation examples are given in each website, with the why-wrong data usually given in small font. In the "Testing" box on the Home page, some webpages are wholly dedicated to showing the corrected translation, since no extant translation looks remotely like what it says in the original language text.

So it's also important to 'lambast' the errors so that God's Word is not covered up, mangled, etc. There's a distinctive and predictable pattern of mistranslating certain types of phrases, words, etc. In English Bibles, and the student who reads in English should be aware of this. [Other-language translations often make the same kinds of mistakes: many of them look like they are translations from an English version rather than the original languages.] Because, these our more-battered comrades routinely become casualties in the spiritual life; they being more on display, given their roles, their falls are public, via mistranslation/misteaching. So: if your comrade falls in battle, wouldn't he want you to carry on? Does it really matter that he fell? Or does it matter more that the war be won, even if only to honor those who fell, whatever the reason? For the First Soldier, is Christ.

Here's a short list of the Bible mistranslation patterns. Every single error pattern has persisted for centuries, and in every Bible translation language I can read.

So also is every verse using Greek αἰών or καιρός, since these are time words to divide between one covenantal period and another. Some fool decided to translate "age" as "worlds" in Hebrews 1:2, and for centuries this isn't fixed, though everyone knows that "αἰών" means a fixed-time-period. So "dispensations" are Biblical, even if the way folks classify them, might not be. Sheesh: you can't imagine how puffed up people get between whether they are "covenantalists" or "dispensationalists". It's the same thing, for crying out loud: one references the group and its provisions, but the other merely references the time span. Sure, there are goofballs in both camps, but why throw out the Bible's handling of "the times", "ages"? Oh well.

Here's a far bigger reason to name errors: God is Ultimate Sovereign. So whatever He says is "official". God's Love is never sloppy, so God's Love does not mean we get sloppy; rather, it means we get serious. For God is first, Ruler. So, His Communication should be regarded as of utmost importance. Not to be treated sloppily. It's no coincidence that all the Bible greats spent a lot of time alone, studying. Jacob was "quiet" (Hebrew means quiet studying); Moses spent 40 years in the wilderness; all those "sons of the prophets" were apprenticing under the "man of God", dedicated. Christ spent 30 years training, and Himself had "μαθητής" ("disciples", but it means dedicated apprentices); Paul spent 14 years in Arabia. See? It's a pattern. If God is First, then you first learn Him. If you seem to have no time for such intense study, lemme tell ya — you'll get it if you want it. I sure did. Just ask Him, then go back to your life, waiting for Him to free you up. Find the time amidst what you have, waiting until you have more. You won't regret it!

Though the humor in Bible is unequaled, Bible is nonetheless quite serious about itself, and all those "I, the Lord" (mistranslated "I am the Lord") affidavits, help the reader to see how seriously he should study the words themselves. For, fundamentally, official communication is interpreted with all the precision of legal documents. Which means, every nuance in a sentence should be deliberate, and convey essential meaning. So you can't afford to gloss over the words. So you can't afford to translate without extreme care.

First, you translate the thought, not merely the words, of the speaker/writer, and not your own opinion about what you're translating. If you have a doubt about whether your opinion is involved in the translation, you must disclose it to the official for whom you are translating. Wars have been started, avoided, or ended due to mistranslation, so this is no small rule.

Secondly, only translate from one idiom, to another idiom. Literal translation is only sometimes helpful, when the etymology has a significant impact on meaning. Idiomatic translation makes all the difference between understanding in your language what someone communicates in 'his' language. It's bad enough that we of the same language have so much trouble understanding each other. Misunderstanding would obviously compound, if you don't follow the rule of idiom-to-idiom translation.

That means, an American expression like "good-bye" should be translated to the foreign language equivalent. So, the equivalent in another language might take 1000 words, but you do it anyway. If the word in one language is culture-dependent, and the culture of the language you are translating to has no equivalent cultural concept, you must note the cultural meaning in the language you are translating from. To not do this, again, leads to potentially fatal misunderstandings, particularly when translating between a Western language, and an Eastern or Middle Eastern one. For example, most non-English languages are way more officially effusive, and so are the cultures. So the terseness of English, which is often considered offensive to a non-English culture, must be adjusted, i.e., Sir, the English shortness of expression here is considered by their culture to be a sign of greater honor bestowed, so that is why this language is used.. Etc.

Bible follows this and all translation rules assiduously. For example, all the ancient cultures were polytheistic. What distinguished the Jews was Absolute God. The "gods", of course, were really demons, which is why, for example, one of the Hebrew words for "god" is a fertility goat-demon (i.e., Pan). So you can't understand and will misinterpret what God is saying if you don't have an Accurate Translation of the Hebrew or Greek polytheistic vocabulary He uses. Like when God uses the Hebrew word davaq, meaning "to have sex" (KJV "cleave") as a running command in the Old Testament: "cleave" to God, not gods. Very witty, very communicative, and whoever chops out that polytheistic/sexual meaning would be shot, were he a diplomatic translator to a king. Because, the first rule in diplomacy and translation is, Accurate Representation. To violate that rule, is treason. [Good treatise on this topic is Sir Harold Nicolson's Diplomacy. It's a slim volume, maybe available from Amazon.] Since we are all "Ambassadors for Christ", charged with translating the message of Christ to encourage each other and to a lost and dying world, we have a very scary post to learn to fulfill. Treason cannot be tolerated, yet we are all treasonous, by nature!

Thirdly, context context context. Just like Daniel Wallace says in the introduction to his seminary textbook, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics, context is everything. So too, diplomatic/secular translation. You always follow the flow of the language you are translating from. This is an aerial, 'big-picture' translation rule, and it's critical. "Flow" includes not only tone, speed, and other attitudinal communicators, but also organization, how the material is structured for communication. Diplomacy, like the Bible itself, is a legal science, because it involves official communication between sovereigns (i.e., one country to another). So, precision is carefully crafted from every nuance in a language, and the organization of the material tells you very important 'stuff' about what the communication is intended to mean. Topics repeated or covered at length tend to be more important than others (though in Communist Russian, the reverse was true); topics coyly linked or brutally linked help the recipient of the translation gauge how much 'wiggle room' there is for discussion, particularly in sensitive areas.

Bible is the most amazing, among all written communication of this type. For example, when a topic is foundational, 99% of the way that fact is expressed, is by use of the language's foundational elements, like case endings, double-entendres, syntactical nuances. Salvation, for example, is the foundation for our having life with God. A good 90% of more of God's Word on this topic uses tenses to convey this fact; tenses which, like the "aorist" have no good modern-language equivalent except (somewhat) in Russian. There are also prepositions, which likewise have a bazillion meanings, and usually God means us to understand that all these meanings are simultaneously true, organized in a hierarchy: a multi-story building, atop salvation. Paul, for example, plays with the Old Testament etymological origin of the word "ἐπίγνωσις" (ἐπί, upon, + γνῶσις, knowledge, pregnant noun) to convey that spiritual life is learning Christ. On top of salvation.

Similarly, when God communicates His Co-Equality, foundational characteristics of the language are used. One of the more common (and apparently more confusing) ways to designate co-Equality is to use just a pronoun, "He". We capitalize the (Ineffable Name!) pronoun, but the original languages did not. You always knew from context that God was the Subject/Object, etc. See? So many deft uses of the Word simultaneously communicate what is meant, and — best of all — God is speaking. For no human is anywhere near this smart in the use of language. In short, to know the King of King's diplomatic communication, study like crazy. Or, commit treason.

So, when you translate, again you look for equivalents in the language you are translating to. You pay very close attention to any mismatches due to cultural differences, etc., and try to adjust for them, or annotate the translation to help the recipient of the translation better understand what's meant, and you package the whole to best fit the overall meaning of the intended communication. So, for example, if God chooses to use Greek-phallic-cult words to make analogous wordplay on what real intercourse with real God is about, you must translate that phallic-cult meaning. It's not interpretation, to do this, but translation; after all, they aren't your words which you are translating. It is an egregious interpretation to hide such meanings from the recipient, if the communicator deliberately used them. Wow: so many wars came from this horrible practice, interpreters sticking in their own two cents!

Sadly, Biblical translation practices have always been a travesty in varying degrees, almost never taking even the above cardinal rules into account: even though those rules, as well as the other major rules, are taught in seminary. The inspired languages of Scripture are shallowly taught, and the abysmal graduation requirement to know these languages is generally less than two years — can you imagine only knowing two years of English? It's as if nobody cares. Frankly, a seminary official will tell you there aren't enough students interested in longer and deeper courses, so the seminary can't afford to make a more stringent requirement (this problem began in the late 1930's, in the US).

These egregious impotencies add up to translation screwups like you can't believe.. For centuries. Thus again you know the scholars (etc.) are not to be blamed: but rather, you have a heads-up on how fixated Satan & Co. Are about covering up Our Divine Writ. By far the largest class of mistranslation errors is one which would cause the execution of any diplomatic translator. Look: say the original language Bible verse read, "The Maserati convertible sped down the Autobahn." Now watch the Bible-typical translation: "the vehicle travelled down the path." Yikes! Speed is reduced to slowness, color and flash is washed out, you don't know what kind of transport or what "path" is meant. What if you had to depend on the translation, for your salvation? For your spiritual life! Yet every Bible I can read in BibleWorks (software program of all major Bibles in original-text or translation, plus lexicons and other study aids) — every one, makes this kind of egregious translation error routinely, and in strategic verses!

Kinda like translating "Ella tomó el café" as if she carried off coffee, or a whole restaurant! For example, "ὑπέρ" in Greek means "as a substitute for", and you can't translate it simply "for", without mangling the meaning. So, when you read verses about how Christ died "for" you — what, did He do it as a favor? Don't you have to thus do something in return? But look: Christ died as A substitute for you — well, how can you do anything in return, if you had to have a substitute? See the difference a little preposition, makes? (See 2 Corinthians 5:21.)

Popular Biblical Greek seminary texts like Biblical Greek by Mounce, and Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics by Wallace stress facts like this one about "ὑπέρ". Yet no English translation of the Bible follows even that rule. And, not to start a riot, but: English verses rendered "in" or "from" +"the womb" all mean, in the Hebrew or Greek, "from outside" +"the womb"; which fact is also taught in seminary.

The rules about "ὑπέρ" (etc.), are but a few of literally thousands in the ancient Greek languages. Another impotency is of similar vein: mistranslating the preposition, "εἰς" always as "to" or "unto" or "toward", when its root idea is cause-effect, so often means "with reference to", or "because". So, among other goofy beliefs caused by inaccurate translation, millions of people think that you gotta say out loud you believe in Christ to be saved, 🤣. (Romans 10:10 should end, "because of/due to salvation", not "unto salvation". See how the latter makes one inaccurately conclude you have to say you believe out loud? Despite the logic that God wouldn't need you to speak out loud, to hear you? Or, worse: that you have to admit it to people, for GOD? See how that latter interpretation puts people on par with God? Yikes!)

So try this experiment: look at John 3:16's "whoever believes in Him". Greek for "in" is really, ΕἸΣ. If you look at similar Bible verses, you'll find the usual preposition is "ἐπί" (root meaning of upon, on top of, so the object of the preposition is the foundation).

John 3:16 οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον, ὥστε τὸν υἱὸν τὸν μονογενῆ ἔδωκεν, ἵνα πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων εἰς αὐτὸν μὴ ἀπόληται ἀλλ᾽ ἔχῃ ζωὴν αἰώνιον.

So you can understand that a translation of believing in Him is apt, but it's unusual to use "εἰς" in John 3:16. So God is telling us more than the usual meaning. So, because John nests cause-and-result relationships in almost every word in that verse, and because John writes "εἰς" here rather than the normal "ἐπί", our phrase is perhaps more aptly rendered, "everyone believing because of HIM" will never perish (not 'may not', 🤣, it's a "hina" final purpose clause so takes the subjunctive), etc. See how much clearer it is to see that salvation's permanence, is stressed? For it is stressed, in the Greek syntax: God's purpose of Giving His Son will have its intended (hina!) result. [Actually, "whoever believes" is a fine translation. Participle in Greek can be translated as a finite verb. More importantly, the participle is coterminous or precedes the action of the main verb. Here, the "never perish" is the main verb, climactically placed. In Greek usually the most important thing is at the end of a sentence. Similar rule is in Russian.]

More: Bible was written in maybe 5 types of Greek, not just one, and Attic (classical, drama) Greek is very commonly used in the New Testament to stress importance, or draw cultural analogies to efficiently explain Divine truths: however, people generally translate as if only koine Greek (Alexander's) was used. To not recognize which kind of Greek is being used results in so many confusing translations and misinterpretations, it would take a book to list them all. What's weirder, is that often the lexicons and commentaries recognize a verse is 'problematic', but never ask the first-year seminary question they were taught: which kind of Greek is it? Toward the beginning of his book, Dr. Wallace notes that there's the trend away from recognizing different kinds of Greek, and (if I remember correctly), footnotes that comment with a Dr. Robertson (or other scholar) who vehemently disagrees with that trend. 'Robertson' is right. Provably.

For, in Ephesians 1:7, you have an Attic double-accusative, which means that the first accusative (ἀπολύτρωσιν, usually translation'd "redemption") results in the availability of forgiveness (ἀφῆσιν) of sins, because the second accusative is a resulting judicial structure. So, ties to the mechanic for forgiveness, 1 John 1:9 (naming sins to God). So if you interpreted Ephesians 1:7 as mere koine, you'd think the doubled accusatives were appositional, so would mistakenly believe that all your sins are forgiven on The Cross, so you'd never use 1 John 1:9; so you'd be spiritually comatose and spanked the rest of your life! [Spanked for not using 1 John 1:9, because no Filling of Spirit. Note the verses before and just after v.9. So if God isn't 'abiding' in you (vv8 or 10), you aren't filled with the Spirit, since He is also God. See also KJV of Galatians 5:16. "ἀδικία", in v.9 and elsewhere in Bible, means a state of wrongdoing exists. In the Old Testament they had to purify the Temple. Same verb is used in 1 John 1:9, καθαρίζω. Can the Bible make it plainer? LordvSatan3.htm's "Fourth Reason for Invisibility:" section, explains much more about what constitutes "ἀδικία".]

Worse, what's 1 John 1:9 doing there? Does the Bible contradict itself, 🤣? Never mind, that common sense would look at 1 John 1:9, Psalms 32:5, Psalms 66:18 and conclude you should name your sins to God. Never mind, that another thing you are stridently taught in seminary (really, since Moses), is never make a doctrine out of one verse. Always check Scripture against Scripture. Seriously, this false interpretation of the greek of Ephesians 1:7 is very common in Christendom, now. So who knows how many Christians are running around, spiritually comatose, but thinking they are living the spiritual life! [John 3:16 and Colossians 1:14 also use double accusatives. There are also, of course, other verses which employ this Dramatic (Attic) Greek construction.]

In sum, the errors always 'manage' to spin Bible as ascetically works-oriented, reversing the meanings in Hebrew/Greek); worst of all, the errors 'manage' to maim the believer's understanding. So, the believer cannot grow up spiritually, since he doesn't even know what he's reading is wrong. This was a huge shock for me to discover; until I got that computer for writing these webpages, I honestly didn't know how pervasive and evil are the mistranslations; once I found them, I kept shaking my head in disbelief (shocking truth motivates disbelief). So, until you see how vastly gross are these errors, you won't believe, either. Abominable: a diplomatic translator who was that incompetent would be fired or executed, but.. Oh! It's suddenly okay to violate translation rules, with respect to the Word of the Greatest Sovereign in the Universe? Yikes!

Now, to the flipside: It's impossible to get a verse's translation wholly right. This is God's Word, So God's Infinitely-Layered Genius is in every jot and tittle. There are a bazillion meaning-layers, even in those "begats"!

John 3:16 is probably the most-known verse in the New Testament, but its Greek structure is so unusual. You have three kinds of Greek, doublings all over the place (because the text is about the Hypostatic Union), cause-and-effect nestings. Nearly every word in that sentence is unusually-used, for Greek. Even the length (to demonstrate unbroken causality) is unusual. (A Biblical rhetorical pattern of legal connection is to use long sentences. Ephesians 1:1-18 is another example, all one sentence. But translations break it up, so you miss the legal significance.) A lawyer who can read Greek would understand that an unbroken sentence stresses causal relationships. But how the heck do you convey the many unusual features of John 3:16 in English? You can't. Best you can do, is spend hours teaching the exegesis, like my pastor does (others do also, though few).

So, although much needs to be done to retranslate the Bible; although the translation rules followed are abominable, and should be changed to at least the same rules as used for secular translations — or, for God's sake, obey the rules taught in seminary; the best a translator can do, is to take the words themselves, namely, the sexual ones, and translate them idiomatically. So probably, a retranslation should footnote Greek cultural meanings, too, since the Bible pointedly uses specialized-Greek-culture words. The resultant re-translated meaning 'changes' so much, a reader will get curious and thus search Bible in the original languages. So then he begins to learn the many other layers of God's Treasure for Earthen Vessels just waiting for him, like wrapped Diamonds. True True True Riches Riches Riches! What's said here about the Greek can be equally said about the Hebrew. Stress on Greek matters given the New Testament, which often uses the Septuagint (Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament which the Lord and the New Testament writers used).

Thus you also know you can't blame translators or teachers for your own beliefs, since you have access to the Bible in the original language, God-breathed texts. So woe to you, if you do not learn them. Bible was not available worldwide in the original language texts largely because Satan managed to 'kidnap' those texts beneath the skirts of Christian religions (Catholicism being but one of the kidnappers). So even though everyone post-Cross and pre-Rapture is in training to become a King (potentially, since anyone can become a believer), most folks had no access to Divine Writ. At most they got snippets of Gospel or Psalter in translation. Yet some of them did a lot with that little; those who were interested in God could always become monks or something, to get access to the text. And, many did; they quietly learned, they didn't buck the system, they just wanted God.

But now, anyone can get Him, and it's easier than ever, to learn those texts. Sure, the texts are in dead languages (Hebrew and Greek today are very different from those texts). Sure, these are languages we don't speak. But it's God's Brains teaching us, John 4:24 ("by agency of the Spirit and by means of Truth" should be the translation). So if we refuse, we who are so much potentially richer than our forebears... what must be the punishment due?

You are a king-in-training, and have to take responsibility for your own decisions, before the Lord. So there's a time and a way to be harsh on self or others, makes no difference: Kings Must Rule. Of course, once you are freed-up enough by Doctrine to do that, you can afford to also be more compassionate about yourself: and thus, more compassionate toward others. Love begins with Him: "We Love, because He first loved us", says John.

We believers, however 'small' we are in societal terms, each have an awesome and shocking Royal Authority now due to the Session. We should take it far more seriously than we do. Since we too have this authority which we ourselves misuse constantly, it is of course insanity to blame other authorities, because they, being human and bugged by Satan & Co. Even more than we — because they too, make mistakes. Even, for centuries. Let's merely recognize the errors, the pattern: for, our war is not against people, but instead a defensive war against bad thinking (see Ephesians 6, 2 Corinthians 10:4-5, Romans 12:2-3). (Lord vs. Satan Part 4 covers why we have such a shocking role, but it makes little sense until you're familiar with both concepts and 'flow' in Part 3)

Third 'bias', Cup Stem: use Bible's original language texts.
That exercise has the salutary effect of
Blunting one's bias:
For then one's focus changes
To deciphering what the God-breathed text, actually says.

Furthermore, God the Holy Spirit chose those languages, and He did not choose to make one Bible per language. So those languages must be important to learn. In fact, for this reason my pastor teaches the Bible in its original languages to the whole congregation. Only the Holy Spirit can take spiritual information, put it in your human spirit, and then "move" it along into (and around in) your soul; so, human IQ is totally irrelevant. So, anyone can learn Scripture from the original languages, even if brain-damaged: we had two brain-damaged people in our congregation, that didn't hinder the Holy Spirit's Power to make them comprehend! This, too, is part of the kitting-out of your Unique-for-all-time Priesthood: a spiritual gift you permanently have. His Power makes up for any deficiencies. Just be willing to learn. You must use 1 John 1:9 to be "filled with the Spirit", however. (1 John 1:8-10, Ephesians 5:18, and some "in..Spirit" verses.) Moreover, even though HS makes up for any IQ deficiencies, and in fact over time one does become smarter even in secular areas due to Filling, it's not magic. Learning takes time. So let's look at why He didn't choose to 'inspire' translations, but rather the original language texts. For it was the people He 'hired' to write those texts, who He inspired. So through those same texts, He'll inspire and grow, us. So we too, can get inspired understanding from what are now dead languages, with 1 John 1:9 breathed, under our own right pastors:

'Often, offensively: even, to me. Paradoxically, an insult is more honest, so blunts the hearer's offense and instead encourages: it's political-correctness which is truly demeaning, i.e., to the intelligence of the hearer. In America, some unknown censor deemed the term "used car" not-nice, but come on: "pre-owned car" is not more offensive, pretending to hide the fact that it's used? What, did God make us humans so weak, so insecure, so unaware of life's foibles that we can't 'call a spade a spade'? God doesn't 'believe' in "Time Out" or circumlocution!

Weaving, thesaural writing styles are used in the best literature, too: James Joyce' Ulysses, Shakespeare's plays, classical Greek Drama, all weave their plots. Bible is the best at this: an idea is mentioned, then synonymal/antonymal corollaries, topics are introduced; then, the first idea is woven through all those other topics, so you see how they all connect. Every Bible book uses some version of this type of weaving to communicate. It's a style which many folks find hard to follow, because what they want is a linear, paint-by-numbers recap. Sorry, but Infinite Truth isn't like that; life (e.g., biology) isn't like that; so the Bible isn't like that. Infinite truth is more like fractals, functionally.

So, if you have trouble with the weaving style (and we all do), try converting the material into a linear form. Block off concepts in chunks, then compare how the same concept is referenced/explained in some other passage. Use Bible's keywords to do this blocking off and comparison, or you'll get lost. Bible writers use keywords to 'divide' the text (covered in more detail below): for example, trace how Bible uses the words "baptise", "baptism" and their conceptual roots/siblings, like "unite", "one", marriage. Best translations to use for this are NAS and KJV, because both of those translations tend to take the same Greek or Hebrew word, and translate them with the same English word. Better still, just use the search engine in your original language Bible software, searching on all the morphologies of the keyword in question.

Alternative to the linear method, you could convert the material into math-like formulas, i.e., taking parts of verses in different places and adding, etc. Them together. You'll profit much by either exercise, because then you can spot these structures more easily in Scripture itself. The math-formula method is very common: every Scripture writer uses interpretative quoting and concatenation. An easy example of the former, is Peter's use of Joel 2:28-32 in Acts 2 — note what text Peter changes on purpose. Same, for Hebrews 8:8-12 and Hebrews 10:15-17, which use Jeremiah 31:31-34. These passages also illustrate another spiritual math function, bookending. Concatenation is adding parts of verses together, either via folding in other writers' verses, or in making new text: cool example verse-set is 1 John 1:6-10. Note the three clause setup in each verse; note how a sort of tic-tac-toe is constructed, which tells you a lot about how the variables in each clause integrate vertically.

Greek rhetoric is always couched in personal terms, addressed to an individual, a "you". That's because the Greeks were very into hands-on translation of principles, into real living. The fundamental belief underlying Greek culture was the idea that the "gods" were enacting a conflict among themselves, and that what they did, transferred to the human race; further, that the larger purpose was to have communion with those "gods" in a virtuous manner. Virtue to the Greeks was two-sided, a "ὑπόστασις", therefore: however small a thing you were doing on earth, had epic meaning (usually, honor). This idea had its lascivious side, hence all the phallicism (i.e., Dionysus (Bacchic, in Rome), and Cybele (a reverse-lasciviousness, involving castration)).

The larger meaning of communion and connection therefore permeates all Greek words and all Greek word usage. And frankly (what a surprise this was to discover), the Greek ideas are all derivative from the initial God-breathed concepts, which the Hebrew language more accurately represents. So by the time you get to the New Testament, the genius of using Greek language and style to convey what always was the Hebrew God... is stupendous. Only God is this smart. There are many ways to see proof of God, if you are willing to take the shock (most are not yet willing, and it takes time to get willing)... but seeing His Genius in the very words of Scripture, is more than 100% conclusive. Takes your breath away, every time you study the Word. No lascivious, no ascetic pleasure in life is even a pinprick's joy, by comparison.

And why would God do that? Heh: because the Jews rejected Messiah, and because they were to be the vehicle for transmitting the Word to the goyim (non-Jews), God uses a goyim language to do the job His Chosen People rejected (forever chosen, still)! If you ever see a picture of the Dome of the Rock, or visit it, you have there a mute testimony to God's Faithfulness to Israel: Daniel 9:26, Matthew 24, and (unpredictably-future), Revelation 11:1. God orchestrates everything around the Jews and His Son is foremost among them. That they have abrogated the covenant so that Christ had to put Vashti aside and go find Gentile Esthers, is beside the point. So how else to better communicate His Faithfulness to His erstwhile faithless Betrothed (and also offer her renewed betrothal, if she believes in Christ) — than by switching languages for Holy Writ? See? God misses nothing. Blatantly and softly He always demonstrates His Love: Romans 5:8, John 3:16. Let us not spurn Him, then?

So the personalness of address in rhetorical style, is reflected in these webpages, with the audience being a "you", rather than (the more ascetic, 'Western') "it-ness" style of writing in modern cultures. Bible uses both, but the stress in Bible is the Personalness. You won't be able to see that fact in translation, because the job of Bible translation tends to attract the ascetic.

Thus one can separate the sheep from the goats, and avoid Satan's landmines. Sure, it's a painstaking task to learn all this: the Holy Spirit is not hampered. Should we let our laziness or fear or intimidation over learning prevent us from the glory of seeing Him, even while in this body? You decide.

Fourth 'bias', the Plate: consume all the Word, not just the parts you like. One should "eat" the Word, as Jeremiah puts it.
As the Lord states in Matthew 4:4, John Chapters 6:63-68: turn/think over, rephrase learning under one's pastor, via the Holy Spirit.
For if you believe, then you 'chew' on it, and derive nourishment.

Wow, this spiritual starvation of not chewing on Word has got to be the biggest failure category throughout Christendom. We parrot the Word, rather than ruminate on it. We rah-rah God's Name, rather than learn How He Thinks. That means we hate God, but con ourselves that we love Him. We treat going to church or Bible class like a good luck charm or the laundry, a chore you get done and whew! You don't have to do it again for a few days or even a week, hooray! So we don't turn over or analyze what we are being taught. You realize that if you are disinterested in someone you don't love that person, right? So we are rabidly disinterested in God. I bet you eat every day. So why not be that hungry for the Word, too? Ooops.

We also evidence disinterest and prove we know nothing if we parrot; we flat don't know a thing, unless we take the 'due diligence' step of confirming it independently, kinda like in high school you not only learn the textbook, you have 'labs'. It shows respect for your pastor that you would bother to learn what's behind what he teaches, so you can better understand. It shows respect for those who differ from his teachings that you would bother to examine alternatives so that you understand why a) your pastor arrives at the conclusion he does, and b) the alternatives are what they are. More on this topic is in Scripture Debates, Bumpkinism, and what to do about it. Even way more on this topic is in each of the "Caveats". How Satan uses parroting to lock us all in spiritual childhood, is covered in Satan's Tactical Offensive Plan: Operation MEGA. Pitfalls like parroting are summarized in a bullet list in "Tips for Making Dung out of Your Daily Spiritual Life". Once you see these materials, you can easily test them in life, to see how vast an army is arrayed against us. And how vastly we love hating God. It's a shock, but if you don't see how vast is this problem of spiritual arrest, you too will get sucked into it. We all do, because we all start out as kids.

Furthermore, one doesn't know a thing until one can use it well, but one can't use it well, absent sufficient practice! Then, live on it. Kinda like school. One has 'homework'. One tries to understand what is taught. Then, one needs to practice it, and take 'tests', like essay exams, to see if the material is sufficiently 'eaten', and nourishing the soul. Bible is Christ's God-Man Thinking (Old Testament "Word of the Lord" verses, plus 1 Corinthians 2:15-16, Hebrews 4:12). So, it's like a language.

Father's Goal is for us to learn to become fluent in His Son's Thinking, Ephesians 4:13, one of the most awesome verses in Scripture, and even usually well translated! As with everything in God's Plan, this is impossible! Never say "impossible" around God, heh: He lifted the CornerStone which was too heavy for even God to lift, and He lifted that Rock to the Cross! So, we "Little Stones" (= "Πέτρος", a term Peter plays with in his letters by using other chip-of-the-rock-words) can get this fluency: via the Holy Spirit, even as the Humanity of Christ got this same Impossible Growth!

Fluency only comes with spiritual comprehension... and lots of spiritual practice. After all, the Bible is written "for instruction in Righteousness", which above all is a spiritual thought pattern to rule the body, as 2 Timothy 2:15, and 2 Timothy 3:16-17 explain. Only in this manner is the First Commandment obeyed, for the Son demands that the Father be propitiated, as it were, by our constantly thinking like the Son. We aren't making bricks without straw: this is a real, abiding, and wholly-possible "impossible" command, as 1 John explains in detail. Those who ignore this significance do so at their peril. And we all ignore it, from time to time. Thank God for 1 John 1:9!

Practice depends upon a coalesced understanding, and that understanding, depends on turning over the information. However you need to 'do' that, is a personal matter. Christian Chat channels like #scripture, when folks in them at the time aren't too silly or argumentative, offer an opportunity to practice and test one's understanding. For me, practice requires public speaking or writing, which always disengages my ego (the 'me' goes offstage and the 'character' goes onstage); so my focus is immeasurably aided. Chat can be like that, too. But it's scary, for God is listening: what if I misstate something about God? So my own due diligence is best monitored by writing webpages anonymously but publicly, and (rarely) chatting. Maybe that works for you as well; maybe it doesn't. Whatever makes you most objective in analysis, that you should do. We are Kings in training. We are public persons, but hidden in the world. Doesn't mean you should run around witnessing (often that's a bad decision, serving only Satan). Does mean you should think as if everyone heard your thoughts: because, God does.

So, as always, test what you read. The Holy Spirit is Supreme Teaching Authority; He's appointed a right pastor for you; anything outside what your pastor teaches is but adjunctive 'play'. God is the God of Authority, so whomever He appointed for you as your right pastor is your authority. Commonly, what seems to contradict either Bible or what a pastor teaches, is instead an additional layer of meaning; or, the opposite end of a spectrum of meaning. Of course, sometimes there is a contradiction, which always and only means the Bible is misinterpreted or wrongly taught. Use 1 John 1:9 to be online, then ask Father in Son's Name to grant that the Holy Spirit clarify any seeming-contradiction. Having put that matter to rest via prayer, you can safely continue examining the question. Bear in mind also that pastors must teach whole groups of people, so they often gear what they teach to a lowest-common-denominator-level. Instead, do extra deeper study on your own, besides. Romans 15:4.

Practice is most helpful, when you practice thinking like the Bible. So, how can you test what's written here or anywhere, in 'my' brain or yours? Fortunately, all truth is to be tested the same way: the Holy Spirit teaches everyone when 1 John 1:9 is used, because its use keeps one "online" with Him. That is how I learned what I'm writing, to better explore what I've learned, under my right pastor-teacher. So, that is how He'll enable you to benefit from any material here. Assuming, of course, that you should be reading material on this site at all. That you should or should not do so, is a private, privileged matter between the Holy Spirit, and you. May He cause you much profit, always! Philippians 1:21!


HaShem and other Alerts for Jewish readers

Above are URLs which may have particular relevance to Jewish readers. Like the Mishnah, where you are always in the middle of a conversation, these webpages are streaming: to get the full context you'd have to begin at the beginning, which is Part 1 of the Lord vs. Satan. My goal was to account for how the Old Testament is fulfilled in the New, among other things, because I have always been pro-Jewish. The Real Lord is indeed the lord of the Jews, and the "Timeline for Shub" URL above (which takes months of vetting, in the Old Testament) would, in my opinion, conclusively prove that. Sheer Divine Genius of Time Accounting, Sheer Divine Writ. But so is the New Testament provably Divine — which of course, many Jews dispute. But salvation comes from the Jews, John 4:22. The Savior is Jewish. That, too is disputed, but in any event — no other people's lord is the Lord. And He is the lord of all mankind, no doubt about it, Genesis 2:7 proves that. Frankly, you can prove that the lord is right now 'playing' a historical combination of Daniel 9:26 and the entire Book of Esther, plus the New Testament, all at the same time — in real time. Takes awhile to vet that claim, too ('Church is now Esther' and 'Timeline for Shub' took me about four years to write and vet). In short, no other definition of the Lord but the Bible's, proves true. A two-paragraph summary of why He plays both Daniel 9 and Book of Esther together with the Gospels is in the Lord vs. Satan Part 4a.

Hence these webpages are not here to sell anything, but rather mere due-diligence disclosure: everything is designed to be tested, since (as Elihu told Job) "the ear tests truth". One should never be shy of saying what's true, yet at the same time should furnish the reader with enough information so a reader can vet what's said. So that's what's done in the website. If it matters, I don't know if I am Jewish by bloodline: I am adopted. More importantly, my pastor taught us Bible in from both the original Hebrew and Greek language-texts; so material in the website is not based on translations; as a result, often translations commonly known, must be corrected; this problem makes the website generally long and complex. As you probably know, the LXX, AKA "Septuagint" was done by Alexandrian Jews, and most of the New Testament is written by Jews, i.e., "Χριστός" (and Χρῖσμα, and κύριος), used as the Greek term in translation(s) of מָשִׁיחַ (Mashiach), in Daniel 9:25-26. So again, 'Christian' is really Jewish... now in the Common Era, which in the New Testament is called "the times of the Gentiles", fulfilling that very large group of Old Testament prophecies. Galatians 3, Romans 4 and Romans 9-12 explain that race is not an issue, post-Cross. But then, it never was an issue, since two thirds of the Exodus population, were goyim. To be a son of Abraham, you must do what Abram did, Genesis 15:6. Circumcised hearts, not merely flesh.

No Christian therefore should ever be antisemitic. Satan uses Christians and Muslims to help foster his goal of wiping out the Jews, for he thinks if he can do that, he can prove Adonai is unable to keep His Promises, and thus Satan wins. Guess again: The Lord will always keep His promises to His promised people. Anyone who imagines otherwise is just asking for severe punishment. So obviously 'my' webpages are pro-Jewish. Rabidly so. Christ is Jewish. Some Christians seem to forget that (don't know how, it's patent throughout the Bible).

Satan also uses differences in Jewry to promote Jews to turn against each other. So there are many sects in Judaism, but only a few get all the attention. The others usually are targeted by the main sects for ridicule, etc. Holding "gets" when a Jew believes in Christ, refusing to have anything to do with them, etc. Thus Satan divides and conquers.

Satan also gathers to conquer. Daniel 9:26 warns that when the Temple is destroyed, run away from Jerusalem. Well, we didn't listen, did we*. So now Israel is a gathered target for her enemies. The Lord will defend her anyway, even as He always has... but everyone should be on their guard to avoid salivating if Satan ever manages to motivate someone to rebuild the Temple: see Daniel 9:27, Matthew 24, Revelation 11:1, Ezekiel 38-48. Also Isaiah 53-61. Only the Lord will regather Israel, and only when He comes back, as per the many prophecies.

* snippet from Caveat #5 So here's my error: I haven't noted a) how globally vast was this satanic orchestration within the 1880-1950 voting window (the 490 ended in 1990); and b) my webpages give my erroneous impression that Jews just plain wanted to go there — not true. More often, Jews were forced to go there as the only alternative to the horrific pogroms they were experiencing in exile. This satanic forcing is worldwide from the late 1800's, and it's easy to see historically: but I haven't adequately reflected the forcing nature of it upon the Jews. So Jews were still listening to Ezekiel and Jeremiah, trying to stay away from Jerusalem, though ardently wanting to return. So long as the Land was not a government of its own, they would heed the warning, and stay away. But circumstances forced them to need a place to go, and we who loved them, wanted to find a political entity which they could control, so they could be safe. So we thought. Satan outmaneuvered us all. So: that forcing-ness needs to be reflected in my webpages, but right now is missing.

The purpose of this website is to alert Jewish readers to the fact that "G-d" is not used in any of my writings; rather, I use the full English term. If you are offended by this fact, you should not read what is written here. I don't use that convention because, etymologically, HaShem did not become, in English, "G-d". Rather, the English term comes, not from the Sacred Tetragrammaton, but from "Elohim" (well, via Greek and Latin and German), so it is not wrong to use the full English word. So, you will find the full English spelling here.

Frankly, a lot of Christians I know have trouble saying Our Lord's first personal name in exactly the same manner as you would have trouble reading or pronouncing "G-d", and for exactly the same reasons: awe. The New Testament writers often seem to avoid saying His First Name by just using the pronoun "He" or "Him"; which, to the non-Jewish reader, makes the text seem confusing. I myself must force myself to say His first name. In fact, among the classes of explanation errors in my website is the inexcusable tendency to use "Lord" when describing some aspect attributable to His Humanity (so the proper name to use is His First Name, but I don't do it); or I'll resort to the convoluted construction, "Lord's Humanity" — all this, to avoid typing His First Name. It's a very hard habit to break. As time passes, I will fix these errors, for errors never honor Him.

It is not a good deed to avoid saying (what to me is) His HaShem. Nor is there any 'law' saying I cannot do so; moreover, Christianity has no tradition nor other convention prohibiting it; in fact, first name usage is one of Christianity's hallmark characteristics, as the New Testament writings all prove — which confuses people no end (which Mary, etc). But I personally have a lot of trouble writing or saying anything but "Lord", even when talking about His Humanity. Mostly, I try to just say "Him" when referring (by your convention) to "G-d". So, since I'm trinitarian, you might get confused about which "Him" I'm talking about. Since the New Testament writers as well as the Old Testament writers did the same thing, figure I mean Who they meant, i.e., by the context.

That's all for now. I can't think of anything else in here you might find offensive; except, of course, that Yeshuah Hamashiach is God-Man. Frankly, that issue's a private question between "G-d" and you: whether it would be blasphemous — or, the fulfillment of the Mercy Seat's Promise — to add Humanity to Himself and via that Humanity become the long-promised Redeemer.

For, if it was not blasphemous for Him to make creation separate from Himself, and that creation sins; and He still promises to redeem them; how is it suddenly blasphemous for Him to add never-sinning Humanity to Himself, and fulfill Job's expectations (e.g., in Job 9)? If it was not blasphemous for Abram be accredited for Righteousness by merely believing in Him (Genesis 15:6); not blasphemous either, to see Him face-to-face (as an Angel); if it was not blasphemous for Abraham to be circumcised as a b'rith from Him; if it was not blasphemous for Moses to twice plead that He not destroy Israel; how is it blasphemous if He decides to become the Seed of Abraham, and thus fulfill the b'rith also as Human, thus forever enshrining His Chosen People in a Body He Himself will also always have? See Isaiah 7, Deuteronomy 31:6, Joshua 1:5, Isaiah 43:25, Psalms 103:12, Psalms 40; in New Testament, Hebrews (whole book). If you can read Greek, read Hebrews and the Gospel of John in Greek, for they use the exact same terminology for the tabernacle, the Law, and characteristics of HaShem as does the LXX. You decide.

Meanwhile, I apologize heartily for any offense you find... please understand what I write isn't intended to offend.