Videos and Descriptions Archive

(YouTube & Vimeo)

Notice: the YouTube embedded videos may time awhile to sync (as there are a lot which are embedded). It also slows down the page slightly, but nothing I can really do about that.

YouTube:

Vimeo:

An archive & consolidation of brainout's YouTube and Vimeo videos. The descriptions are preserved on the pages along with remastered and consolidated videos.

This about-me section is long, to save you time in deciding whether and where to watch 'my' stuff. Main theme of 'my' stuff: reporting (NOT teaching) about Bible's proof on How God Orchestrates Time, i.e., Bible METERS its text from Genesis 1 onward to show that doctrine; pre-Church; the meter also tracked the future as a countdown to Christ and Millennium. The NT uses the same pre-Church doctrine but Paul 'loops' it at the 62nd week of Daniel 9:26, in Eph1:3-14 (structure vids, GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14 and Church future History 'map' to Odovacer, GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History). For a shorter intro, click on the video titles at right, to see full video and its description, which has doc links to prove the video's statements.

So inter alia, Rapture is pre-Trib yet unpredictable, BECAUSE God Orchestrates Time. Israel had set dates, but we have set BODIES, Matt 16:18, John 17, Eph4:13. But the underlying doctrine of Time's RULES, hasn't changed. Time is LOANED in 490+70+490 increments, based on VOTING to be saved or learn God. (Voting is based on the merit of the person/thing you vote for, never on you, duh.) Genesis videos show how to discern the doctrine in Bible's numbers starting at Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof). Ending that playlist, are Gen 1 meter videos with those very numbers, wryly 'matched' as 'balance sheet' to the literal 7 days of RESTORATION (not initial creation). So of course, the METER is a sevening (haha).

Meter also datelines (tells you WHEN a book/chapter written). For example, even though you have to be insane to claim Mark's Gospel is first or that there's some preceding Quelle, since Mark's text surgically weaves to incorporate both Matthew and Luke by reference (shown line by line in the Synoptics channel) — Mark's Gospel meter DATELINE first tags both Matthew's and Luke's, to set up that surgical style. Oh: and he does it in Greek, as do they, proving the Gospels are all originally written IN Greek. Whew. Saves a lot of money, needless argument, and time to see all this right in the TEXT.

Meter also interacts with text as a historical/prophetical interpreter and concordance. All of these functions are vital to hermeneutics and textual criticism. See https://vimeo.com/channels/bibledatelinemeters for overview.

So videos focus on METHODOLOGY, as no one person gets the material 100% right. So, once you see the method, you can derive your own results. Full listing of 'my' meter and related channels/playlists: https://vimeo.com/brainout/channels ,

The meter is unknown in Christendom. The Jews now garble its meaning, so neither their forefathers nor ours, passed its structure down to the kids. But it's forensically detectable in Bible, hence the videos show how you can see it for yourself. So many conundra re Bible would be resolved using meter, which we already know the ancients used in other writings. However, scholars try to shoehorn BIBLE meters into the secular patterns; they miss Bible's own doctrines and its own meter to FIT those doctrines. So the debate about Bible HAVING meter goes back to Robert Lowth and before.

But until now, no one has found its obvious SEVENING style. That, is provable. What content is thus elucidated, my conclusions about its meaning, are wholly debatable. But the fact of the meter, the fact it interrelates with the text, is demonstrably valid. Hence the videos.

So please be skeptical and TEST the shown 'proof', asking God the meanwhile. I too will repeatedly rework and retest. So far, I've shown this meter in all NT books and some OT books, and will keep on doing the OT; for every Bible Book and sometimes every chapter, has meter at its beginning. So think of me as a reporter, NOT a teacher.

NAVIGATION: for so long as vimeo allows us to have channels, use this link: https://vimeo.com/brainout/channels . Due to their changes and deletion of groups which cost me hundreds of hours, I will not post videos in vimeo after 4/11/17. Will eventually migrate these videos to Youtube.

DOWNLOADS: Vimeo lets you download in up to four formats; click the Download button on any video's own watch page; channel access to the video's own page, is just below the player; link is a hash tag with a vimeo number in lower right corner. If by contrast you want my original file, just ask me; I can upload it to brainout.net for free anonymous download.

ABOUT ME: my public name has been brainout' on the internet, since the late 1990's. The avatar is a kind of trademark. So I'm 'brainouty' in Youtube, domain is brainout.net. Anonymity is necessary, as my family doesn't share my interest in Scripture, so they should be protected. Nickname derives from Ephesians 4:23; its Greek says (sotto voce), that once you believe in Christ, you have no brains, and need the Holy Spirit's. So, using 1John1:9 puts His Brains back in you (see also Psalm 32:5, 66:18, 2Peter1:9's Greek, verse is mistranslated). So my nickname reminds me to use 1John1:9. Often.

VID AND WEB CONTENT remains focused on big-picture stuff you can't find elsewhere in Christendom. Some Bible basics are covered (see Bible Basics Album, Why Only Believe channel); focus is on the heavy stuff, and largely exegetical. The authority is in the Bible text shown, pas moi. So you can't take 'my' word for it.. ask God.

Often a vid must correct rampant Bible mistranslation using BibleWorks. The older ones remain in Youtube. Just Google on the verse and my nickname, as search within Youtube (or vimeo) is horrific. Vimeo vids originally done prior to 11/07/13, are also in Youtube; you'll find the 'File Name' with the date, at the end of each video description.

Another specialty is to focus on Bible's rhetorical styles, as most mistranslation comes from misreading the text, not seeing the style. METER, is a hugely important 'style' which remains undetected by scholars. For folks MEMORIZED the text, and counted syllables to verify their memorization. So God provided more 'bang for the buck', turning a necessary audit function into a pleasurable bonus lesson via the meter counts, on how to read the upcoming text. Miss that lesson, and you will misread the text. Proof also via the meter, is what ORIGINAL LANGUAGE the author used: translations can't be metered the same way, so throw out all those dippy claims the NT was originally in Hebrew or Aramaic. I did videos showing metered translations of Isaiah 53, the Magnificat, Ephesians 1:3-14, so you can see how metering a translation is problemmatic. So you can prove WHAT LANGUAGE was the original: the one that's deftly METERED.

Of course you should be skeptical and test. For the Authority is the Bible; its Content proves true with God witnessing to it. Whoever mouths that content, is irrelevant.

Today, it's fashionable to assert that someone is not allowed to display/comment on Bible unless a 'scholar'. God never set that rule. Au contraire: 'he who has an ear, let him hear', and 'without faith it is impossible to please Him', Matt 13:8, Heb11:6 ('faith' means Bible Believed). We are REQUIRED to do this, Matt 4:4. And we are liable, too. I take my liability seriously, Ezekiel 3:17ff. So, I must speak up. What you do with that, is between God and you.

Doesn't mean scholars should be disrespected, just the opposite. There are good and bad scholars. Good scholars profit when the bad ones, are exposed. Further, we aren't to just trust what some 'authority' says, but are to examine Scriptures, ourselves. But, we don't. So important doctrines go missed, and many errant 'doctrines' remain taught.

So the authority is the material, pas moi. So you don't need to credit me. Anyone can observe the sun is in the sky. However, BibleWorks is copyrighted, so don't paste its text without acknowledging its source. (All my text comes from the BibleWorks databases for the Hebrew and Greek, UNALTERED.) My pastor is dead ( http://www.rbthieme.org ), but his material became copyrighted by the church, after he died. Ergo I paraphrase what my pastor said, when required. By contrast, whatever I say, you can use without attribution. For I just report what's already IN the Bible.

Finally, MY BELIEFS. Many think beliefs create bias, so want a doctrinal statement:

1. Faith Alone in Christ Alone, but anti-Catholicism and Calvinism, both of which are Replacement Theology: anti-semitic, denying the Future of the Jews. For Christ King of the Jews did all the Work, Isaiah 53:10-11, Hebrew. The childish and errant theology in both major denominations miss 50% of more of Bible meaning, and skew the 50% they think they know. They don't even UNDERSTAND 'faith alone' or 'Christ alone' (which Catholicism teaches also, but in its own 'flavor').

Yes, you simply believe Christ paid for all your sins, and you are forever saved. That salvation cannot be lost, but one must mature in Christ by death, lest one MERELY be saved, 1Cor3, Rev 3. Since only the Holy Spirit can produce maturation, it's not wrong to seek the reward HE is due. Then you have more, to spend on Christ. Forever. You get that maturation ONLY by learning and living on Bible (see my God's System video), with 1John1:9 used as needed, to stay between sins. Else, you end up a spiritual retard, happy like a baby, in heaven. Forever.

2. Trinitarian. I've done videos proving how you can spot Trinity in OT and New, see http://www.brainout.net/TrinityCites.htm . But the Westminster Confession is horribly worded, makes God into a hydra-headed monster. Catholic 'unicity' definition is even worse. So scrap those always-retarded denominations and go to BIBLE, instead.

3. Dispensationalist, pre-Trib Rapture. But unlike 'traditional' Dispensationalist teaching, Bible has its own definition, proven in my How God Orchestrates Time videos ( https://vimeo.com/channels/howgodorchestratestime ): 2100 years for the Gentiles, 2100 years for the Jews, and then Church (for Israel rejected Christ), which Christ established POST MORTEM, in Matthew 16:18. The Jews know this as 2000 each, but they mistake Bible's accounting: time was supposed to end 5250 from Adam's FALL (not initial creation). Because Israel rejected Christ when He came AS SCHEDULED, Church is inserted and now you can't say if it will be 2100 more years, 2 more days, etc.

I'm therefore a 'mainstream' pre-Trib Christian, yet controversial in these respects:

A. Bible says NO SOUL LIFE IN WOMB. Very plainly. That doesn't mean you should be pro-abortion, but it does mean that GOD ALONE AUTHORS LIFE AT BIRTH, and that's the key reason we're not evolved. So my Prolife Blasphemy series ( https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL144D716E521647D1 in Youtube, plus an 'album' here) is dedicated to proving BIBLE says no soul life until BORN, pattern of Gen 2:7. To say otherwise is to play politics and blaspheme God Who says HE ALONE creates life, not biology.

My pastor taught the same doctrine for 50 years, and so do a few others. Ironically, this doctrine of life ONLY beginning at BIRTH tells you WHY we are not evolved; all other Bible doctrines are thus consistently validated, especially salvation (Christ couldn't be born sinless if soul life were in the womb).

B. GOD ORCHESTRATES TIME. This is a doctrine Jews know in garbled form, but Christians don't know at all. We know the 'salt' doctrine vaguely, but have no idea it's TIMED. My pastor also taught this doctrine of believers being used to buy time for the world, but I couldn't find proof of his claim, excepting in Col 4:5 and Eph 5:16, which he cited often. So I asked God back in 2000 for the proof, and have been documenting it ever since.

VAST CHANGES IN HERMENEUTICS would occur if anyone vetted and learned what Bible says here. Jews are partly vindicated, as is every denomination. And, each one is tweaked as too the Jews, for certain errors, esp. with regard to Daniel 9. John Hagee, for example, has a completely convoluted idea of how the 490 works. Calvin, Hippolytus, and other so-called 'fathers' of modern Christendom, either couldn't add 1+1, or were so anti-semitic they didn't want to. Preterism is anti-semitic (denies the Jews have a future God promised, aka Replacement Theology); so no preterist understands Daniel 9 at all.

The Dispies are no better, trying to shoehorn Daniel 9 by using lunar years: the numbers don't add up to Jesus' death, unless you violate Bible's SOLAR YEAR convention. Solar accounting balances perfectly to Christ's death, if you do the math right. For the Bible's point is that He was SCHEDULED to die AD 37 but due to Israel's negativity died SEVEN YEARS EARLIER.

All NT books track SHOULDA BEEN vs. ACTUAL for both His Birth and death (4106 vs. 4103 from Adam's Fall Birth, and 4143 vs. 4136 for His Death) in their meters, see my http://www.vimeo.com/channels/bibledatelinemeters for their formulas. For the sevening accounting meter in Bible, connects text and the dates it gives, to provide proof of how the math works. Balances to history too. Billions of dollars of inept 'scholarship' on Bible dates have been wasted, simply because we're NOT using Bible's own conventions and dates, instead opting for Josephus or Dear Dr So and So or some non-Bible idea of time which is inevitably WRONG. So JUST THE BIBLE, please. And you will be pleased to see how it all perfectly fits and even corrects, many of our historical estimates.

C. 'Christian' is a spiritual lifestyle, not works. You're saved by merely believing, and you learn and live on Bible to be spiritual, Heb 11:6, Matt 4:4. Spirituality is never what you do with the body. It's all and only in the Head, and it's about what Christ's Head getting into your head, does TO you, Romans 12:1-3. Due to many mistranslations in Bible which 'spin' what Bible says into works, 99% of Christians live in carnality. So false doctrines abound and remain.

Instead, we are to use 1John 1:9, learn Bible under whomever God appointed as one's right teacher. So while we are between sins — theme of 1John — the Spirit gradually creates from that Bible Learned and Believed, a refurbished soul Tested and Approved By God (Rom 12:1-3). Not, you testing and approving (passage is mistranslated, see my http://www.brainout.net/Rom121-3.htm ).

This, my pastor (among others) also taught for 50 years. Yet 'mainstream' Christendom is subdivided into the Repentance Crowd, the Lordship Salvation Crowd, the Ecumenical Crowd, the Dour God factions (most Reform groups); or, the holy rollers with their gibberish, as if the Holy Spirit were a dog doing pet tricks to make the body feel good. So this vital doctrine of SPIRITUAL MATURATION, theme and criterion for Rapture, Eph 4:13 — goes unrecognized.

D. THE ANGELIC TRIAL. Again, many denominations have at least some inkling that there's an Angelic Trial we're here to resolve, but they vaguely describe how this Trial works. Satan contends that DIVORCED-FROM-GOD MORALITY is better. God shows that only MARRIED WITH GOD, works. That's the trial. In short, even if you were an axe murderer, if you believed in Christ, you'd be better than the most moral person who depends on his own morality or abilities, and demands God 'reward' them. So, the Bible heroes are all pretty much losers, by the world's standards: Abram who was a pappa's boy and lied about his wife all the time, Moses who ran away after abdicating, David who committed adultery and then tried to murder the woman's husband when she got pregnant, Paul who was on his way to Damascus with an order to capture and murder Christians. Anti-heroes made into Bible heroes, because they wanted GOD, not 'good'.

The above ABCs are the heart of the Trial. A is the cause, B is the timing (and legal precedence for pre-Trib Rapture), C is how Trial is won or lost in the Witness Box. We are each a witness to the ANGELS first, 1 Peter 1:12, 1 Cor 4:9, etc. So now you know why 2000 years have transpired yet no Rapture. We're not maturing. Just as Paul warns in his meter (see GGS 10 and GGS 11 channels for the Bible proof of his meter).

Else, you will find much of what I say pretty 'normal' and 'familiar'.

Should I find any of these beliefs incorrect, I'll just change them to whatever Bible says. I don't need to be 'loyal' to a belief. I do need to keep on AUDITING belief against Bible, and the Latter is Always Right.



YouTube Videos

Bible Meter obsession proof

Watch in HD. Bible meter I've been showing for 8 years WAS INDEED KNOWN during the Reformation. But scholars just ignored its import. So in this and the next video, I'll show how to prove it WAS known.

Links:

Master thread on this topic, with full links (more than shown here): frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512&p=3252#p3252

Link on the 1640AD book itself which uses same meter I'm showing in my vids since 2008, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_Psalm_Book#Extant_copies

Same book listed with a different name in a catalogue from 19th century which you can DOWNLOAD FREE, https://books.google.ca/books?id=fZAIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA177&lpg=PA177&redir_esc=y

That same book contains a reprint of the 1640 book in its Appendix (shown in both videos) where you can see the METERED TRANSLATION counting syllables you can vet yourself from the Hebrew, Ps1 and Ps19(on p371), https://books.google.ca/books?id=fZAIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA372&lpg=PA372&redir_esc=y

John Knox also did a metered translation of the Song of Moses (Deut32) but I can't find a reprint to tell if he meters from the Hebrew, https://books.google.ca/books?id=QIdMAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA143&lpg=PA143&redir_esc=y

IF YOU KNOW WHERE I CAN FIND A REPRINT OF KNOX Liturgy, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. THANK YOU.

The alleged complete works are here, https://archive.org/details/worksofjohnkn01knox but there is no Liturgy or Song of Moses in it nor in ccel.org.

Watch in HD (Part 1 and 1a). Here we look at an old doc on the book of Job, proving the translator COUNTED THE HEBREW SYLLABLES AND TRIED TO MAKE HIS ENGLISH FIT THAT COUNT. I tell you how to get it in the video, don't want to put the email link in the video description. You can use that same name on ebay, or search on Dixie Rose in Ebay, http://www.ebay.com/usr/gdixierose?_t...

Or, download it from archive, https://archive.org/details/bookofjobessaysa01raym

AMAZING HOW BAD TODAY'S SCHOLARSHIP IS. BUT WE HAVE YESTERDAY'S. Yay.

OH and wait until you see the TRANSLATIONS in Part 1a!

See for yourself the fact meter is intentional and doctrinally significant ESPECIALLY in John, JohnDatelineMeters.pdf or htm.

Vids I did on John (for he LINKS his meters in all his letters), https://vimeo.com/channels/johnmeter. You can download those videos in original 720/1080p format, within vimeo.

Watch in HD. Now to shorts demonstrating from that same book that metrical translation was sought after and POPULAR since at least 1549.

This vid covers 1640-42, predicted in Matt24:50 for ho kurios, get the pun? Details are in frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512&p=3254#p3252

.. yet not only the Psalms, but Song of Solomon, Job, Isaiah.. and that you can even BUY at least one of these in Amazon today, so still popular now tho done hundreds of years ago.

Link (it's a free download): https://books.google.ca/books?id=fZAIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&redir_esc=y

Here's another link to same book, might be easier to search but is a pain to read, https://archive.org/stream/cu31924029617010/cu31924029617010_djvu.txt

There are 8 parts, but I'll combine some of them, with each segment being about 10 mins long so you don't gag.

This Part 7-8 shows the 1749 LAST WORDS OF DAVID is actually still sold in AMAZON! Video closes proving slipshod scholarship which deems David dead at age 70 per Josephus, but BIBLE says 77, i.e., in THE HEBREW of 2Sam23:1-3. Ooops.

There are other passages saying this also, but if you don't know the meter, you can't see the proof. Ooops. Video mentions some of them, most notably Isaiah 53, meter demo here: Isaiah 53 Meter of Time: 1st David's Birth to Last David's Scheduled Death

Just today, Anonynomenon metered Ps1 also to see David's dateline, lookie here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512

See, counting the syllables MATTERS.

For via the 'numphios' (Bridegroom) keyword, in Matt25:1ff, Christ predicted THE EXISTENCE of METER being published, get the pun? Details are in frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512

.. yet not only the Psalms, but Song of Solomon, Job, Isaiah.. and as we see here, you can even BUY at least one of these in Amazon today, so still popular now tho done hundreds of years ago.

Way back in the 1700's, there was a 'bishop' named Robert Lowth. He was certain that Bible meter was used even in PROPHECY (duh), but the hoary heads who deemed it unscholarly to count syllables, disagreed.. then and ever since.

So this video is on how Lowth, instead of actually COUNTING the syllables to prove his point for Isaiah 53, where it demonstrably is intended to be prophetic.. he fizzles out under pressure to the hoary heads.

Oh well.

It's his Isaiah to Malachi book, which is on Disk 2 of the '250 Rare Bibles' CD.

I don't know if you can get it online, downloadable. I can't find it. Closest is a 1836 edition, https://books.google.ca/books?id=dSZdAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA103&lpg=PA103&redir_esc=y

Book doesn't say when Lowth contributed. He died in 1787. If you download the pdf, its page 422 has notes for the translation. Not helpful, really, but shows he didn't really pay attention to syllable counts, thereby shooting down the most important proof he was right.

Oh well. He's vindicated now. Witness God's definition of 'poetry': symmetrically ORCHESTRATING THE TIME from 1st to Last David, a 'map' of Isaiah 53's meter: Isa53Map.pdf

Awesome how those paragraphs (which Isaiah halved from Psalm 90, lol).. pair up. MATING, get it? Now note how the CONTENT of the paired paragraphs interrelates antiphonally. Yeah, that's a whole lot more sophisticated than spondees and strophes, huh.

To see what a difference it makes to count the syllables, here's a whole channel I made on Isaiah 53, https://vimeo.com/channels/isaiah53

Perfection of its meter is shown briefly then more at leisure, starting here: https://vimeo.com/channels/isaiah53/79997259

Next video will have a copy of the longer video showing the ANNUAL PROPHECY of Christ's Birth to the EXACT YEAR He was born and was SCHEDULED to die. He ends up dying seven years early, which is why CHURCH was inserted, and we cannot predict our Rapture, as the video's end, will show (next video after this one).

That was the first passage in which I found the meter. Didn't know of Lowth, back then. Found out about the debate on mater afterwards, which is summed up here with links to the scholars then and now debating, http://www.brainout.net/BibleHebrewMe...

How I learned the meter is the theme of the Isaiah 53 Meter playlist, only here in Youtube (very boring videos, took me several years to learn the meter, videos originally were in bliptv then Google video): • Isaiah 53 Hebrew Meter Hypotheses, Ov...

This is the full original 9/20-23/2008 video, when I was shocked to discover Isaiah 53's Meter functioned as a calendar. You can download the original (or at least see it better), here: vimeo-isa-53-meter.htm

My life hasn't been the same, since. Of course, since that time, I've found a lot more proof of the meter, elsewhere in Bible...

Backdrop, Daniel 9: God used Isaiah 53's meter to reaffirm to Jeremiah and Daniel, the timeline for Temple destruction and reconstruction. Isaiah tells it first, in 712BC. Isaiah's meter was designed to remind Jewish believers of the future just as you'd use a calendar. This was done by SYLLABLE COUNTS, since the Jews already had to count them, to test memorization and copying.

So God made this housekeeping task perform an eschatological duty, too: the entire future through Messiah is tracked. Isaiah tells you when he wrote Isaiah 53, in verse 1 — 126 years prior to Temple's Fall, 712BC, during his ministry to Hezekiah — by parallelling with the future Destruction of the Temple which will also be 126 years short of its promised 490-year time grant from back in 950BC. Then Isaiah parses his meter to show Temple and Jerusalem reconstruction timeline, to show how to balance to Messiah. For he'd been predicting it since Isaiah 39. So now, he tags meter to Psalm 90 and his own verse content in deft dual-entendre, near-and-far-prophetical manner as is the style for all OT prophecy.

God thus needn't say much to Daniel, but to parse the timeline; so Daniel isn't surprised by the numbers and asks no questions. To us in English, Daniel 9's numbers seem to jump from nowhere, so we don't understand WHY those numbers are used. But in Hebrew and NT Greek, it's referenced all over: for Temple depicts Messiah.

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 thus play on Isaiah's meter to explain the prophecied generations (42) and descendants (77) count down to Christ. Luke lists from Adam (including Gentiles); Matthew, from Abraham, naming legitimate kings of Judah, resulting in a 42-generation count. ALL these also draw on Psalm 90's meter. Even and especially, Daniel. For his prayer is metered based on Isa53 and Ps90, as is God's reply in Dan9:24-25. So too, is Paul's Greek(!), in Eph1:3-14 (covered in my GGS series).

Thus Daniel 9:24-27 is not new information. For Daniel 9 is an APPLICATION of Isaiah 53. So meter as mnemonic to remind one of future dates, is a major rhetorical style in Scripture. It is not Bible codes, but a CALENDAR.

Back in 2008 when I made this video, I didn't know about Psalm 90, Daniel, and Paul. Kinda like fingerprints, when you have a lot of matching rhetorical points that 'talk' to each other in content too, you know you've got a reliable style for testing. Yeah, and that's the point of Hebrew Meter. Again, because they had to count the syllables, anyway.

So when you review a Messianic passage in the OT, Count The Meter. Once you see the pattern here, you ought to find it often. Isa53Map.pdf is a map of the Isaiah passage in the video. The chronology worksheet, is GeneYrs.xls.

This material on a Bible rhetorical style in Hebrew has never been documented, so far as I can find. Not even my own pastor seemed to know about it. Hence the need to thoroughly document in video and webpage, so that any claims can be tested with the TEXT. Scholars have debated whether Bible has meter for centuries; since the 1830's, even the most-respected Hebrew scholars doubted whether Isaiah is genuinely from ONE real Isaiah, since he changes writing style (beginning in Chapter 40) and is so accurate, they think the text must be wrong (same stupid objections are raised against Daniel, lol). So establishing the meter resolves many interpretational and text-crit issues, especially for those of much education, but oh so little faith. One can empathize. People tend to ASSume faith must mean being uneducated, too.

See: if the Bible is accurate, it's doubted; if it's unclear to the dummies who can't read it, it's doubted; if it seems to have wrong info, it's of course doubted. See the pattern? Okay, so God gave us little-faiths a way to have a bit more faith by encoding the dating via syllable counts all Jews had to know, anyway. Prosaic, easy, and profound. So of course the meter will be doubted, so Bible can stay nicely obtuse! Meanwhile, you can prove Bible accurate and clear, just by counting the syllables yourself. That's all I had to do. So test using 1John1:9 and ask Our Mutual Dad. If you find any mistakes, yell at me. I can't have gotten this thing fully right, lol.

Webpages on God's Orchestration of Time, replete with Bible verses you can vet, are important adjuncts, to grasp the material. See the "God's Orchestration of Time" video for important related website links (click here for that video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRviBXZjYBM&t=0s


Arguing With God

This audio series demos daily arguments I actually have w God.. but it turns out, arguing w God is a quintessential proof that the God of the Bible is real.

That's a pretty spectacular claim; so this series goes through how you can prove it valid, in your own life.

These are genuine arguments I have with God, and probably you do, too. If not, someday you will.

Satan has these arguments, the most.

This 1 introduces the basis for the arguments: if God exists & directly made you AT BIRTH, as Gen2:7 & 100s of Bible verses attest..then why the hell did He make you The Way You Are?


b-out BibleMeter101

Section of the Matt 24 playlist which just focuses on Bible meter 101 introduction. We go verse by verse in English so you can easily prove relevance & value. Best of all, you should be able to see the face of God 😍
Sorry about the voice; I have breast cancer & it spit into my throat. I'm on chemo, so my throat is getting gradually better. I'm still bedridden & blinded by cataracts, so I can't do this on PC, yet. Thank you for your patience!

Simpler, short approach to understanding Bible Meter, which scholars have known existed, since the Reformation.. but haven't figured out. This series goes slowly and uses English first; so it will be easier to grasp. You will be able to proof the interp, with real history. The purpose, is to see the face of God in the text, how much God loves you; but you can't see that, until you know text is TIMED for your benefit. What benefit? To protect you. To tell you how people in the world are thinking during your time, so you won't be fooled. So we start with Matthew 24:1 in any Bible you choose. You need the Greek, to know what time the words cover: Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf

Still Matt24:1, now talking about stuff the Greek, Roman or Jewish reader, would have wryly noticed in this witty verse:

WHEW. So much meaning packed into one verse? And we don't know any of it. Scholars weren't taught it, so they did not teach us.
Related:
Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf
vimeo-how-god-orchestrates-time.htm
LukeDatelineMeters.pdf

Matt24:1: witness God's biting satire, against arrogant rulers..still on role of ANAPHORA interacting w meter, to give precise interp. Here in v1, the results are dramatic: God mocks the future deaths of Caligula and Nero, using ιε in ιερου for each. Get the pun? They each die in the middle of the word! So they do not get their apotheosis! DISTANCE between each ιερου is 28, ÷7, stresses Divine Timing. Anaphora distances always ÷7, see notes in Matt24-25's pdf, below. (Paul Luke Mark & John practice the same truncated mocking prophecy style w different keywords.) Again, the Greek, Roman or Jewish reader would have wryly noticed this wit: famous plays used the same literary techniques.

God prophetically mocks the deaths of Caligula and Nero by TIMING the genitive (= belong-to case ending -ou) of Temple=ιερου, such that their deaths occur in the MIDDLE of the word: meaning, they didn't BELONG as gods, tho they told everyone they would. Greek and Roman playwrights often did this kind of sotto voce joke, to avoid being arrested for insulting the State: maiestas (look it up). Example: ter-ter-tullus is a line in a play, to mock Marcus Aurelius as a cuckold (look it up). This biting satire by God against rulers is a very common feature in the New Testament; but you can't know, absent the meter. So of course Satan made sure we don't know. Until 2009, when I'd asked GOD about Isa53's meter, knowing nothing. LESSON: ALWAYS ASK GOD, capisce? In 2010, I 1st learned Paul used η in θεληματος to tag death yrs of Trajan Macrinus & Diocletian, 3 Emperors whose Wills were undone (haha) by their successors. He metered Eph1:3-14 to Varro=our AD Paul cuts Constantine's AD337 death in the middle of προηλπικοτας, Eph1:12, to show Constantine died as a firstfruit of Antichrist: see the GGS11 playlist for verse-by-verse meter review. John tags Eph1:12, in Rev17:5. See my Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour videos. Luke21 & Mark13 bite many rulers & Church Fathers, in parallel to Matthew 24. John in Revelation 17 does it so much, I had to mark it in purple. See them in my Matt24 playlist https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1bv_xPIih3fs-vKfMgiVbt4fmi3Xs3Yf


Lying Trump Prophets' Words

Book read aloud: You can buy it, in Amazon. The content I read, is now in Appendix II of https://read.amazon.com/litb/B086FWTQ44?f=2&l=en_US&ref_=look_inside Use 1Jn1:9 as you listen, for best comprehension. 'Hands-On evidence you can test, to show 'prophets' claiming 'visions' of Trump either lie to you, or are demon-run. Vids demo a live diagnostic, while reading, how these people obviously do not speak for God; so anyone heeding them, spits on Christ & refuses Bible. Sadly, 99% of Christians care nothing for Bible. It's just a cultural icon, to them. So they get ensnared w politics & these false prophets, lose money, time & will be embarrassed at Judgement Seat of Christ. They will not lose their salvation. Series is temporarily paused, while I wait for chemo to fully restore my voice. So read the book.

Yeah, Rev17:9 Seven Mountains harlots lie for profit. Joke's on you, gullible Trumper! James A Beverley wrote a handy survey of what these prophets claim about Trump: (OLD VERSION, used in video: https://books.google.ca/books/about/Donald_Trump_God_and_Christian_Prophecy.html?id=IlfpxQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y Video shows his free book sample for Kindle. Beverley replaced it, link below.) Select Appendix II, then keep hitting back button until you see '2005' in the header: (link is now dead) Whoever made the Kindle version, was inept. Don't blame the author or Kindle. Book's lone valuable feature, is its Appendix II of these 'prophets' & their 'prophecies', w links to their own text. (I want you to see source material for yourself. You cannot grow spiritually, on someone else's knowledge!) In later vids, I trace when Christians & Putin started collaborating & what they plan, to 'fulfill' their 'prophecies' re Trump being God's man, their #SevenMountains #ThirdRome world takeover strategy, which they pretend as God's. Back in the Cold War, CIA trained intelligence agents to read between the lines. That's all I do, as Putin is classic Russian propagandist; so too, are these 'prophecies'.

Now we go into more detail, reading directly from the verbatim quote of liar 'prophet' Kim Clement, to show how a demon runs him. I know that is a spectacular claim, but there are seven signature characteristics demons always use, to advertise they run somebody or something. The person they run, may or may not know. But you need to know. This is part of the Angelic Trial due diligence Disclosure by both sides; that's why you are guilty, if you fall for the devil's gambits. It's not Secret. Having read this, you might think I'm wacko, & that's fine; you still need to be apprised; at which point, decide for yourself whether to investigate further, blow it off, or believe it. My job is simply to disclose, not to sell you.

Amazing that a Trump 'prophet' made a 'prophecy' in favor of her, which at the same time mocks her & God. Yet no Trump voter notices how fake, this prophecy? It claims that God has 'dealt with her heart', idea being she will not run for president.. but of course she DOES run. Jer28 explains that if a 'prophet' says ANYthing that doesn't come true, that 'prophet' does NOT speak for God. It has to be 100% correct. Demons do stuff like this, to advertise the stupidity of their objects. So they advertise you should not listen, to Kim Clement. Thus they are not liable for lying to you, because they made the LIE obvious. Yes, demons. Here we start to see why we know, a demon feeds Kim Clement.

Again, continuing with the diagnostic that a demon gives Clement the information; it's not something he makes up on his own. Christians are supposed to tell the difference. But you can't tell the difference, unless you know Bible really well. Because the demons know it well; they always make Greek/Hebrew subtle plays on Bible, through either Book of Mormon, the Koran or some other so-called holy book. They are obsessed with it. See LTP1 for the link to the Beverley book I read aloud, in this video.

Trumpers are so beguiled, they don't notice the official Kim Clement website DIFFERS from his doctored videos, in Youtube. Russia is famous for faking evidence. So here we see not only demon involvement, but Russia. I don't mention it in the video, cuz I didn't know until after the video was recorded, that Kim Clement videos differ from his official website. This 'prophecy' is about a Praying president who is not a Praying president who has hot blood and becomes POTUS for the next two terms after 2007. Which are, 2008 & 2012. It isn't Trump... Again, continues diagnostic that a demon gives Clement the info. Demons would know SOME of the future. Christians are supposed to discern between demon vs mere human falsehood. Demons always make Greek/Hebrew subtle plays on Bible, thru Book of Mormon, Koran, or some other so-called holy book. They are obsessed with it. .@jimbeverley has replaced this book w a new one, & what I read in these vids is now in his Appendix Ii: (amazon link now dead) Buy the Kindle edition of his book, so you can access the links easily. I will do videos on them, once God finishes making the chemo restore my throat. LTP5 follows next. It was made before the breast cancer took my throat.


Ukraine/Russia in NT prophecy

How New Testament tracks key Ukraine & Russia dates in (then-future) history, AD 30+. The granddaddy NT Church prophecy passage is Matt24; all others tag it. So Yes there is Church prophecy, cuz Church BECOMES SOURCE of the Antichrist. Pre-Trib Rapture is true, but its date is never predicted. You don't need to know when, cuz you won't be here! Kingdom of Antichrist to come, is Russia, aka Gog Magog. But what is 'Russia'? Turns out, the history of what we call 'Russia' is just as much disputed, as the history of what we call 'Israel'. I had no idea that was true. God tracks the RUS people, from the beginning. So I've had to learn Ukraine & Russia history, to see the prophecy. Part of that learning, is in these videos. They are live, unedited, so of course are subject to dispute. I'm sorry the vids are made on my cell phone. If God makes me get well enuf to stand, I'll do them on PC again. Original recording is in 1080p; I don't know why YouTube renders at 720. If you need 1080p download, I'll upload original to my domain brainout.net . Just let me know. DownlTips.htm will be the address.

First in new series on how prophecy covers Ukraine v Russia. Follow along using your favorite Bible translation + Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf, the doc I use in this video. The Wikipedia entry is in Russian, for Ivan Kalita Иван калита These are preliminary comments. Main vid purpose is to show methodology of finding a meter interpretation, not be dogmatic. Feel free to disagree or correct, unless you are a troll paid by Putin. I never censor and will not block you, except if you stalk or spam.

Matthew 24:38 shows how the birth of Ivan Kalita is depicted in Prophecy. It's pretty remarkable. I didn't know until I made this video, how apt it was. Follow along using your favorite Bible translation + Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf, the doc I use in this video. The Wikipedia entry is in Russian, for Ivan Kalita Иван калита Again: these are live, unedited, journaling/auditing videos. I do not know the outcome, until I see it; everything is subject to revision. Purpose is to show methodology, not necessarily to get the right answer. Because, Bible scholars don't know anything about this. They don't know, because they are really bad at BIBLE math, for over 500 yrs. Be skeptical & feel free to dispute, because all results are preliminary. You can't grow spiritually until you analyze the information yourself, using 1 John 1:9 as needed.

Follow along using your favorite Bible translation + Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf, the doc I use in this video. The Wikipedia entry is in Russian, for Ivan Kalita Иван калита. Be sure to use Chrome, which auto-translates. Here, we find GOD divides Ivan Kalita's life into the period from his birth to age 15 (when under Roman custom he becomes a man, 1303/4); then, until 1322; then until his death, all in Matt24:39. Why Bible does that, we won't know.. until we look at history. Okay: but how do we know BIBLE tags THIS guy? What if I'm reading into the text & what if these AD 1303 & 1322 benchmarks.. are artificial? In RUS4, we'll explore these questions.

TAKE 1. Video's Doc Download link: Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf This will be a slog, going over the text to show how it poignantly marks Ivan Kalita's life as the poster boy for world history from 1288 to 1340+ Then in future episodes, we go back over it from diff angles, so you see the hermeneutic methodology. That way, if you think I'm wrong, you'll know how to fix my mistakes. Because I'm dying soon, & don't know who God will hire to carry the guidon.

TAKE 2. Video's Doc Download link: Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf Now we go over the same info but more slowly: Bible annual prophecy tracks history of whole world; and separately, each country, using the same words for the same time period. In NT Greek, this Time is broken up into clauses, which function as important historical benchmarks, especially when the syllable counts are divisible by 7. So although the text covers the world and each country individually, there will be at least one highlighted as posterboy above the others, in any clause. Clauses benchmark who is highlighted: the ruler for a particular country, or group of Christians going salty or saltless. For the doctrine traced, is Deut32:8.. as goes the believer, so goes history. Video ends introducing the concept of anaphora=refrain: repeated historical trend. Quintessential proof, to whom the words, first apply. Ukraine/Russia in NT prophecy: • Ukraine/Russia in NT prophecy

TAKE 3. Video's Doc Download link: Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf Unlike Take 1&2, here we see features in Greek language help us pinpoint who the text refs. We also begin to see parousia anaphora as definitive proof. Bible annual prophecy tracks history of whole world; and separately, each country, using the same words for the same time period. In NT Greek, this Time is broken up into clauses, which function as important historical benchmarks, esp when the syllable counts are divisible by 7. So although text covers the world and each country individually, there will be at least one highlighted as posterboy above the others, in any clause. Clauses benchmark who is highlighted: the ruler for a particular country, or group of Christians going salty or saltless. For the doctrine traced, is Deut32:8.. as goes the believer, so goes history. Video ends still introducing the concept of anaphora=refrain: repeated historical trend. Quintessential proof, to whom the words, first apply.


Russia & Ukraine

Putin's manifesto & Bucket List = 'Lesson of Byzantium', based on #ThirdRome myth created by Ivan III in 1472. So you need to know the history of Russia, also included here. The Scott Palmer lectures are very good. Ukrainians will tell you that the (really Turkic) Russians, stole Ukraine's history; there is much evidence for that. So what videos on it, I could find, are in this list. Bible prophetically tracks both the Russian & Ukrainian claims, starting AD 165, Matt24:3. (Maybe earlier in Mark 13 or Luke 21, I'm still checking.) See my 'Ukraine Russia in Bible prophecy' playlist.


Ancient Rome

Those who don't know history are condemned to repeat it. REVIVE ROME is a trend of history, and as I type, RUSSIA claims to REVIVE ROME. But not the 'Rome' of Italy; rather, 'New Rome' of CONSTANTINE, which Russia claims to 'inherit' (a 16th century claim aka Last Emperor, pseudo-Methodius) as THIRD ROME. I'll add vids which explain this topic both Byz and now, as I find them. THIS IS WHAT YOU MUST LEARN TO AVOID ANOTHER CRUSADES by 2030.


b-out Peter's Meter

NOTE: Episodes after 11/06/13 are uploaded in vimeo, http://vimeo.com/channels/petermeter . I will no longer upload to Youtube, owing to its invasive insistence on 'joining' Google Plus.

Series shows you how to use Bible METER to get more out of the TEXT. Ancients all knew this; they used METER as

For in the ancient world, though literacy YES was common, it was a pain to carry the scrolls and parchments; so folks instead, just memorized the stuff, using SYLLABLE COUNTS to verify the material. Then, in their low-tech age, it was fun to play with the meter and the words, while walking to Ephesus or spinning flax, etc. This was their entertainment, as well as their learning method. So it's very sophisticated, way above even today's 'geniuses'.

Sadly, modern 'scholarship' has no clue as to this rhetorical style, in the Bible. They've been arguing whether Bible Hebrew/Greek even HAS meter, for over 300 years! So all this meaning is missed, and Bible interpretations — especially the prophecies — are fuzzy, contradictory, even puerile. For centuries.

How then to fix the problem? Well, it's best to just show the meter technique live, so you can proof the above bullet uses for yourself. For above all, the meter, is a TIME ACCOUNTING style, giving the reader a 'calendar' of Time Past or Future, so you know how to live TODAY.

So this subset of the RFG series, which focuses on the BIBLE WRITING DATES for the four books coming out in the Year of the Four Emperors (Peter, Jude, Mark, Hebrews) — shows how Peter's Meter plays on Paul's meter in Ephesians, to demonstrate the new CHURCH 490; for his letter is about 'living stones' and 'new priesthood', to replace the 2nd Temple, which in 68 AD was known to soon be destroyed.

Peter's metrical theme is TEMPLE REBUILDING; here, for Church, playing off Ephesians 2 as well as Paul's meter in Eph1:3-14. So Peter prophetically SYNCOPATES his meter in antiphonal fashion, much like Psalm 90's structure — doing that especially at syllable=year 350, when Moses cut off Psalm90 to signify TEMPLE REBUILDING (prophesied 1st) IN DANGER! Very clever. No way a Greek reader could miss that, since people MEMORIZED SCRIPTURE using syllable counts.

Peter also uses a BIFURCATED timeline like Daniel did, in Daniel 9 (both Psalm 90 and Dan 9, are shown live in the Psalm 90 playlist, with Word docs you can dowload and test). Like Daniel, Peter does a year-by-year DUAL timeline that circles on key syllable=year segments in Paul (prophetically), and on the timeline FORWARD from Peter's own writing (10 years after Paul wrote Ephesians 1:3-14).

So Peter's DATELINE use of the meter is patterned on Psalm 90's '84', which Isaiah 53 had cut into bookends of 42 each (played on in Matthew's genealogy 42s, and Luke's 77 to cover the Gentiles).

The Petrine 84, however, is also 84 'sevens' from the date God declared Christ's birthdate and the order to REBUILD THE TEMPLE to Zerubbabel, in Haggai 2; but simultaneously, Peter dates his writing to 84 years after Herod began REBUILDING the 2nd Temple (called by Jews today, '3rd Temple', which entailed replacing the 2nd Temple with Herod's stonework (18 BC). So we definitively know when Peter wrote: late in 66 AD, aka 'our' 68 AD, which would become the 'Year of the Four Emperors'

Jude will write even later in the year, weaving around 2 Peter. His meter is trebled, as explained in the RFG series Episode 5d.

Yes, it's complicated. But the meter tells you how to interpret the words, so this is vital to hermeneutics. It's all original research, sorry; but if you can count syllables and read Bible Greek in BibleWorks, also history books/articles by established Roman historians, you can understand what Peter means.

Download Peter's meter: 1Peter1meter.pdf

To get the most out of this play on Paul, you need to read Paul's meter, replete with university and other websites explaining the relevant historical references: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. PDF version: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf

PopeMyth webpage (which has the PopeM video playlist below): PopeMyth.htm. First of the Bishop's Lists videos: • GGS11t9a Bishop Lists (apostolic succ...

Playlist in which they reside (the book starts with the 13th video in the list): • b-out PopeMyth (aka PopeM )

To see how the 49 years were missed, not 70 (as mistakenly claimed by Eusebius, who scholars have blindly followed ever since), see brainoutFAQ.htm#6a; then search on 'Master Accountant', to read the accounting.

Since Isaiah and Daniel started this rhetorical style of meter-mapping-to-kings tradition, watch videos on Daniel 9, beginning here: • 23Ps90 Daniel's Prayer Meter proves P... . It's faster and easier to instead download the Daniel document in that video's description, then read through it to see his style. Both Paul and Peter talk back to Daniel 9 VIA its style — which I call 'tagging' — as Mary had done, in the Magnificat.

Very shocking stuff, very technical. And very unknown to Christendom, who is always on life support, always fancying itself holy, always on the verge of God having to pull the plug, fig tree not bearing any fruit, Mark 11-14. Which maybe accounts for why Mark stops using euthus during that section (see my Mark 3d6-7 videos, starting at • Mark3d6 Why Mark OMITs euthus from Ch... ).

Download Peter's meter (only the Greek, all of 1Pet1:1-12): 1Peter1meter.pdf. Download the interleaved (Paul's Eph 1:3-14 with 1Peter1:1-12) song with its metered translation, here: PeterMeterSongWithTrans.pdf. It's only two pages, currently. Since 1Peter 1:1-12 is metered, the final version will be much longer.

One of the reasons the NEVER-secure salvation apostates think they are right, is that they rely on Bible Mistranslations, to make their case. They are abetted in this, by the fact that PAST mistranslations in KJV and elsewhere, are 'revered'. So future editions or allegedly 'new' Bible translations, typically preserve the OLD mistakes, rather than be courageous and admit the past error. That's the case here, in 1Peter 1:2.

When you see how evil the mistranslation, you'll want to write the Bible publishers. Seriously, folks, it's time we stopped stomping on the Word of God in order to walk with people!

So ask yourself: is it worthwhile to tell yourself you're revering God, when you rely on Bible translations which are clearly motivated by political correctness, rather than Bible accuracy? Now you know why I harp on the Hebrew and Greek so much. So should you.

So duh: you CANNOT LOSE Salvation! I'm so sick of retarded, carnal Christians who run around on Youtube telling everyone they can lose their salvation. So this is a rant video, but it proves the FIRST reason why you cannot lose your salvation: YOU ARE THE PROPERTY OF CHRIST.

Only the Property Owner has a say over you. YOU have no say over yourself, so you cannot cause yourself to be disowned. You have NO say in the matter, after you 'married' him by believing He paid for your sins. There is no such thing as 'divorce' from God. The most you can lose, are the rewards atop salvation like Kingship, 1Cor3.

Really, there are 1000s of verses on the fact you can't lose your salvation. So many, my pastor once quipped that there should be a warning label attached to any gospel tract: 'WARNING YOU CANNOT RESCIND YOUR BELIEF IN CHRIST.' Yeah, because you can't turn back TIME. Can't turn back the time of the Cross 2000 years ago. Can't turn back to before the time you FIRST believed Christ paid for your sins. So you can become an axe murderer, an atheist, a nice person who works works works — and it doesn't matter. You can't undo your salvation anymore than your couch can walk out of the room.

Good couch, bad couch, any couch, HIS couch. Do you own a couch? Can your couch run away from you? Can your couch get the money to ransom itself away from YOUR OWNERSHIP, no matter how good or bad it is? NO. Why? Because it's just a COUCH! Yeah, and YOU are property also. Owned, by Christ.

Now, hopefully, you know the root reason why. So if anyone claims you can lose your salvation, just refer them to me. I'll ream them out with Bible verses. :)

Continued from • 5e1, RFG : Hebrews On Peter . Now we have DEFINITIVE proof of when Peter writes, and as usual, the meter conforms to the earlier 'scholar' dates for Bible books. Heh. Parts 1-3 introduce you to why I know that, but of course the rest of 5e (very long!) will illustrate more testing via Hebrews and Mark textual links. My, the Quelle 'scholars' are inept!

Quick video showing the Greek of 1Peter1:1-3, how Peter plays off both Psalm 90:1-4, and PAUL's meter. I still need to do a lot more work on this, so treat this video as a mere heads-up. Kill me now. Why am I allowed to live?

Will be several weeks before I can come back to this. Meanwhile, try Googling on 'Herod's Temple 18 BC', and pick the first pdf you see (though it gets Christ's birthdate completely wrong), plus https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/14304-temple-of-herod . See also https://bible-history.com/jewishtemple/rebuilding-the-temple Scholarship is very uniform, here, but there are some nutters. Wasn't God thoughtful, to invent a dateline meter convention so we can have better certitude about our Bible books and Bible's own timeline? Heh.

So look at Haggai 2, and realize that 84 x 7 = 588, so 66 (Bible's AUC for its anno domini version, per Paul's meter) - 588 = 522 BC (end), when God commands Zerubbabel, on the anniversary of the FOUNDATION being laid for 2nd Temple, to REBUILD. Yeah, and that's when Zerubbabel is told he is Seed of Christ, so to set up Christ's birthday on what WILL BECOME Chanukah, in 4 BC (2BC per Paul's own anno domini accounting in Eph 1). Yikes!

Yeah, because the 2nd Temple is about to go DOWN, when Peter writes; the 40 years' credit remaining on Abraham maturing 54 years early — 14 of which was overtime spent on REBUILDING the 2nd Temple, shown in Isaiah 53's meter — the remaining 40-year credit for the TEMPLE (cuz it was 40 years late getting built due to Israel's wandering in the wilderness) — is almost UP.

See the import of learning the meter, and it's all DOCTRINAL, baby. Syrupy text in translation alerts you to metered translation, as it is here, in Peter.

Kill me now.

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 1 of 7 , how I know the meter is accurate, so you can see something of the methodology. A fuller explanation of how you spot Bible Hebrew Meter, even if using Greek language, is in the first video's description (Word doc you can download), here: • Bible Hebrew TIME Meter, 30 Testing C... . That way you can spot the passages yourself.

You have to know or learn the history and the relevant doctrinal references, to do this metering. The keywords in the Bible text tell you what DOCTRINES are referenced, so you know what HISTORY will relate, to reinforce the DOCTRINAL message given.

Here, it's about TEMPLE DOWN, and TEMPLE BUILDING, which is the focus of Peter and later Hebrews, the CHANGE IN PRIESTHOOD owing to Christ's Resurrection Victory. Change priesthood means change covenant, which Paul had introduced in Galatians, Colossians, and especially Ephesians, where his Eph 1:3-14 plotted prophetically, Roman FUTURE history to the rise of Odovacer; and satirically, the rise of what we now call Roman Catholicism, under Constantine.

Paul equates that to extreme apostasy which makes the Rapture so unlikely, by Constantine's death. I showed all that in detail beginning in Episode 11a of my GGS 10-11 playlist. The Word doc linked in the video descriptions of that series, is huge, replete with links to ancient Roman historian sources, so you can check both history and meter.

See also my Mary Magnificat playlist, for Peter plays on Mary, just as Paul did.

So Peter, is playing on Paul. This video helps explain how, covering verses 1-2 of 1Peter. In Part 3 we'll briefly go through 1Peter 1:3, to see more on how Peter plays on Paul.

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 2 of 7 , now 1Peter1:3, which directly refers the reader to Ephesians 1:3 by quote and by METER. This helps you see how ancient readers used meter as a CONCORDANCE (cross-reference), since they orally memorized Scripture, by counting syllables.

So obviously I'll have to parse out the rest of the passage, to see a) why he's doing this, b) what 'future' he's updating relative to Paul, c) where the meter ends. That will take me several months. Meanwhile, with this tripartite heads-up on the method, you can decide if you want to do it yourself.

Sorry, I'm the only one who knows this meter, so it's all original research; the 'authority' is the Scripture itself, and thus is independently verifiable. But if you can count syllables, read Bible and history books, you can independently VET the material.

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 3 of 7 . Sleuthing proof that Peter 'maps' his meter to Paul and Daniel 9:24-27, theme of TEMPLE 490; this shocks me, so I apologize for not being able to control myself.

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 4 of 7 . Here, the focus is on WHY Peter's tracking the 140-year parallel between the time Herod started rebuilding the 2nd Temple and its imminent demise, and the initial rebuilding OF the 2nd Temple, back in Zerubbabel's day (Haggai 2, 84 'sevens' before Peter writes).

For 122AD (onscreen, left timeline, mimicking Daniel 9's bifurcated timeline meter) is the former's 140th anniversary. Peter, like Paul, and on Paul, plays to the upcoming destruction of Temple and then Jerusalem 70 years later, parallelling the time from 586-446BC. So the text, is a) what believers should be thinking during that time, and b) a satirical commentary on how Church is also failing (just as Paul is saying) because Church is NOT thinking as directed, for the time.

Ouch.

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 5 of 7 . Now we'll see the whole of 1Peter's meter, which runs to verse 12. He's playing on Paul, alright, but straight from Daniel 9.

See, God orchestrates Time using three overlapping time-grant criteria:

  1. Did someone on earth SUPERMATURE during a HISTORICAL 490-year time period, starting at Adam's fall? If yes, the world is granted 490 years longer, to live. If no, Time ends and so does the world (root idea behind the Flood).
  2. That someone granted the 490, is PERSONAL, so before that PERSON's 490 ends, someone ELSE must supermature, too.
  3. Beginning with Israel, and undergirded by the Davidic Time Grants, which were the basis for God's Grant of Time in Daniel 9 — would Israel CORPORATE mature enough? This was signified by the TEMPLE STANDING, hence Daniel's prayer. If the Temple was down, Time would end with the latest grant in #2, above. That, was 37 AD, David's outside 1000-year grant, dated from his death. But the Temple would have to be rebuilt by positive believers, else the world would be at war (which, it was).

So now for Church, the same tripartite TIME rules remain, even though Rapture can occur at any moment, when (Eph 4:13), Church CORPORATE is mature. But if Church is apostate, like #3, times get really bad, and she goes into a kind of DIASPORA.

Paul addressed #1 and #2, with a what-if-the-Rapture occurs in syllable aka year X, in his meter.

#3 for Church, is what Peter covers. So his is a DIASPORA WINDOW timeline, telling believers in advance, when to LEAVE ROME: leave due to upcoming pagan persecutions, or leave due to what Paul had already forecast as the rise of Political Church (later enshrined in Rev 17), which today we know as Roman Catholicism (and all the other political denominations since the Reformation). For Christians who are really living on Bible, will be persecuted by both groups. So the question is, WHEN to leave, so to preserve the BIBLE which both groups will be routinely trying to sequester and burn?

Peter's orange (divisible by seven) clauses, tell you when. The parents were supposed to pass the knowledge onto their kids, even as those reading Paul were supposed to pass these prophetic calendars onto their kids, to protect both kids and Word. Sadly, by now this rhetorical style of calendared prophecy underlying timeless (syrupy) text, is unknown in both today's Judaism (for the meter style dates back to Psalm 90) — and has been lost to Christianity, ever since the first century.

So here and in Part 7, we'll see the structure. You are to link the words in a given segment of text, to the YEARS signified by the syllable pattern, to know when and what to think, while you flee, both groups.

The Pauline and Petrine text both intertwine to give you advance SATIRICAL historical information which we in retrospect, can prove. However, I don't have time now, to show how both sets of text within the same historical segment, interrelate. Ask God, and He'll show you. Then when I'm able to make videos on this antiphonal relationship between the texts for the same syllable/TIME segment, maybe you and I can compare notes.

Bible meter is meant to further explain, cross-reference, elucidate the interpretation of Bible text. Pity this Meter is unknown to scholars. So here, we take a simple example of how Bible meter elucidates otherwise-snoring text, in 1Peter1:1-2.

Folks who got this letter at the time, memorized Scripture by means of syllable counts. So God gives them extra bang for the buck — using a rhetorical style since Moses — of turning the METER (syllable counts in groups of sevens or threes) into a CALENDAR. So it becomes a drama play about specific segments of time, with the words known to be 'lines' spoken by 'actors' telling you ABOUT that time.

Moses started this style in Psalm 90 (see my Psalm 90 playlist), with God's Decree re TIME in the first 84 syllables: a promise of TIME for those who took 'refuge' in God.

This, is Peter's jumping-off point for his letter; you know that, because he too uses 84 syllables. So the syllables act as a concordance, a pointer, cross-reference. Text refers to Psalm 90 content several times, which all scholars know. But what they don't know, is how the meter tells you MUCH MORE INFO — as well as when Peter writes — than you could discern, from the text alone.

Always need to know CONTEXT, with Scripture. Here, vital TIME CONTEXT is missing from theology, and hence this valuable method of interpreting Bible, goes unlearned. So to show you the difference in the meaning you get — which is all doctrinal, as well as telling you WHAT TIME Peter writes (which scholars still dispute) — to show you this difference, I dramatize the text by reading it, and showing how the METER gives you added meaning FROM THE SAME WORDS, which you'd otherwise not know.

Continued from • 5e3, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Pet... . Now we get into verses 4-5 of Paul's Eph1:3-14, to show how the CURRENT and parallel section of Peter, INTERLEAVES with the then-current section of Paul. It's truly amazing.

Important: in LEGAL documents, a technique called 'incorporation by reference' is a kind of cross-reference to another legal document OUTSIDE the current one being read, to INCORPORATE the OTHER document's TEXT into the CURRENT one being read. Thus you know how to interpret the CURRENT text. Thus, legal documents quote or sometimes use NUMBER CITATIONS, to point the reader to the outside text which is thus incorporated. You are to read the total text WITH the incorporation to get the meaning, scope, parameters, conditions, etc. of the CURRENT text.

Example: if I said, 'the participant's benefits from this Plan will be subject to Code Section 415 of the Code', the lawyer reading the document knows that the TERMS AND CONDITIONS of that 'section' in US tax law, will LIMIT the retirement benefits of some employee covered by the particular plan whose document he's reading. He then looks OUTSIDE the document he's reading (i.e., looking outside Peter to Paul), to INCORPORATE the terms of that cited law, into the text he's reading. Thus he knows, for example, that if the participant in the plan was otherwise entitled by plan terms to a million-dollar annual payment from the plan, Code Section 415 REDUCES the payment to its OWN current maximums for each year (generally, around 205K in 2013).

Back in Peter's day, they didn't have named sections of Bible, but instead had syllable counts. So, Peter matches SYLLABLES so the reader can track what in Paul, Peter's incorporating into his letter. This technique was started by Moses, to quote his own material, since he wrote the first five Bible books. His style has been emulated, ever since. And it is unknown, today, to Christian scholars.

Since I do legal documents for a living, and all law in any age is written this way, it was easy for me to understand this rhetorical technique. Especially here, since the Bible is a LEGAL CONTRACT of INHERITANCE, and of course we saw already from 1Peter1:2, that INHERITANCE is the topic. So you'd expect Peter, who was far more astute in Classical Greek than scholars give him credit for, to use this sophisticated legal technique.

Talk to any lawyer you like, especially one in tax law, and you'll find confirmation of this style in both contract law and in tax law, though we don't use syllable counts anymore, to incorporate by reference. So why don't the Bible scholars realize its use in Bible? Why, when even a brainout can count syllables, has this very interactive and definitively-interpretative technique, been so unknown to those in hermeneutics? Oh well.

I realize that I'm supposed to be nice about this, but I just can't. The GOLDMINE of Scripture is going undug, and Christians are dying inside from doubt, misinformation, and false doctrine, instead. For centuries. It's unfair. It's time we got nasty, therefore, and stop compromising God's Gorgeous Word, for the sake of being nice to each other.

Continued from • 5e4, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Pet...

Now covering Peter's meter-and-text interaction with Paul's, in each verse 3-4. This is a killer interaction. If ever you had doubts about Eternal Security, you won't doubt it after going through this video. Bible is very precise in its doctrines, and here we see another example of how the ancients would know they can't lose salvation.

Continued from • 5e5, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Pet... . Now we see how Peter ties in Daniel 9 and Rapture (which was then expected) in light of the KNOWN imminent destruction of 2nd Temple (then under siege; remember, he datelined 1Peter 1:1-2, based on 84 sevens, which takes you back to Haggai 2).

So Peter's theme is, Yes Temple Will Be Destroyed but will Resurrect as Church at Rapture (tying to Eph 2's two walls, 2nd covenant separate for Church). For they didn't actually call it Rapture (though the term is derived from Latin rapto in 1Thess 4:17) — they called it the EXIT RESURRECTION (exanastasis, used in Philippians 3:11) of the Church. Since the word is misunderstood by the translators, you can't tell what Paul means, in English.

Very clever technique, since Peter 'ropes' his text to the yet-future prophecy in Paul, which to us moderns is known as the Bar Kochba rebellion and the destruction of Jerusalem under Hadrian, who built Aeolia Capitolina atop the razed city, with a pig temple to Zeus (Jupiter) standing over the Temple Mount. Jews were no longer allowed in the city, except on Tish B'Av (the date Titus would destroy the Temple in 70AD, same date as when it was destroyed the first time, per Jeremiah 52:12, remembering that the new day begins piggybacked on the sundown of the PRIOR day).

Continued from: • 5e6a, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Pe...

Fun video to follow up on 5e6, to 'sing out' how Peter's meter interactively creates an antiphonal marching song by interacting with Paul's text. Maybe you'll come up with other configurations. Oh: add Paul's 'en oi echomen' in verse 6 (taking you to Paul's syllable=year 151AD) at the end of the song; or just before the last refrain. Funny how its meaning changes when just left open like that. I forgot to 'sing' it in the video.

Greek drama, use of repetition, search: https://www.google.com/search?q=the+use+of+repetition+in+classical+Greek+plays. Useful is a 1999 dissertation by a guy named Pickering, 313718.pdf . I've not yet gone through it.

I don't know if Peter's deliberately matching cadence for some well-known pattern then common in Greek or Roman culture. Paul patterned Ephesians after Ion by Euripides, so maybe something by that playwright is used by Peter, too; but I'm not familiar enough with Greek drama cadence, to know.

~ with extra cadence details I didn't notice, the first time. Golly, this is exciting. Could revolutionize hermeneutics. There must be hundreds of passages like this in Bible. And you know what else? I bet at least some of what we might think of as 'corrupted' texts, are really someone's REPENNING of the interleaved verses, as songs/chants/marches. Like this one. Really, this would make a great text crit dissertation by one of you seminiarians...

Video starts with a quick review of the Greek to refresh your mind on the cleverness of the cadence, and then launches into key hermeneutical points to illustrate the extreme value of the meter, for interpreting the text. If we all learned to memorize Scripture as did our ancient forebears, this would be very easy. Since we didn't learn it as kids, going through this analysis will be something of a slog.

This video is continued from: • 5e6d, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pet...

Continued from • 5e7, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete... , to show a different possible interleaved 'song' cadence, using Paul's meter as the 'beat', rather than what I showed in 5e7 RFG.

To get the most out of this play on Paul, read Paul's meter, replete with Roman contemporary writings, university websites explaining the relevant historical references:

To see how the 49 years were missed, not 70 (as mistakenly claimed by Eusebius, who scholars have blindly followed ever since), see http://www.brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.h... ; then search on 'Master Accountant', to read the accounting.

Also watch videos on Daniel 9, beginning here: • 23Ps90 Daniel's Prayer Meter proves P... . It's faster and easier to instead download the Daniel document in the video description, then read through it to see his style. Both Paul and Peter talk back to Daniel 9 VIA its style — which I call 'tagging' — as Mary had done, in the Magnificat.

Continued from • 5e7, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete... , still on the hermeneutics offered by the meter. Here, more deeply into the nature of Paul's anaphora, to know why Peter adopts his interleaving technique.

Essentially, Peter adopts the technique as a SINGING REMINDER to the reader, to take Paul's warning seriously. Turning the interactive text into a marching song, will make it easier to use and remember, teach your kids, etc.

For beneath the syrupy text, is a message of progressive war and degeneration in a) the Roman Empire in general, and b) in Christianity, in particular; so the Rapture becomes LESS LIKELY with each passing year. So it's a warning of Christian apostasy, which can ALSO cause the Rapture, but for the wrong reason (Church too apostate to be allowed to keep living on earth). Paul basically tells you that from Constantine onward (end Eph1:12), Church goes into the toilet, with only a few 'proelpikotas' individuals maturing, no mass growth.

So you used this prophetic calendar even as you did the ones in the OT, to know What Time It Is, and how to orient to that Time, when you are IN it.

Very different meaning, therefore, versus the pablum teaching re both passages, today!

Now, my pastor taught this meaning from text only, not knowing the meter, for maybe 50 years. His main teaching THEME was, how God uses the Believer to BUY TIME, often saying 'as goes the believer (in Church), so goes history.' Wow. I asked God for proof IN BIBLE for how this BUYING TIME doctrine, worked. That was back in 2000, and I've been posting the documentation, ever since (first in the web, now in Youtube as well). Other pastors call this, 'salt' doctrine, but they know almost nothing about it.

So get my pastor's 1985 Ephesians series, which is 12 whopping years long (if you play an hour every day), at http://www.rbthieme.org. They don't ask for money, and you can order the free mp3 or DVD at the rate of maybe 30-36 lessons per month (1 per day, don't overdo it).

Continued from • 5e8, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete... . IMPORTANT: Now we see the different CRITERIA for timeline charting, between Peter and Paul:

  1. Paul charts LIKELIHOOD OF RAPTURE due to enough MATURATION, theme of Ephesians, climactic Eph 4:13, Rapture Occurs when Body Corporate Has the Maturity of Christ. That's what you also need, to become a KING. So will enough KINGS develop, and will the KINGDOM develop? That's the play, and its success becomes ever less likely, from Constantine forward. That's the story, Paul's meter tells.
  2. Peter, by contrast, focuses on the 1Kings 9 criterion, Will Temple (Church, second wall of Eph 2, not Israel, but Bridge To Israel's future time) — remain STANDING? The criterion for the Temple to Remain Standing, is enough positive volition for any growth to keep going, analogous to Sodom and Gomorrah. Just one Noah and family...

So over the same period, Peter charts whether believer CORPORATE growth is sufficient for God to allow Church to REMAIN on earth. John later echoes this criterion in Revelation 1-3: 'lampstand' (local church) remains or is removed. Both tag Paul's Romans 11.

This is the NEGATIVE criterion for Rapture: Church must be recalled (diplomatic term, think 2Cor5:20) due to its APOSTASY. Of course, if that became true, then Time Ends, Satan wins. So Peter reassures readers, warns them at the same time: yes, Church will remain, but the growth is so low after 350 AD, Church BARELY remains. Ouch.

Hence both writers use Daniel's 62 weeks (434 years), since we're stuck in the 'time bubble' of Daniel 9:26c, wars and rumors of wars until Christ comes (Rapture for us, Trib for the world). For as always true since Adam, Time still must be Justified by a) one person supermaturing during a 490 year period, and b) mass voting during the sandwiched 70 years (490+70+490, so two believers must supermature per 1050, and enough mass votes to learn God during the 70).

Peter's four quarters thus play on Paul's four quarters, in wry ways. Later videos will focus on these differences. For example, Peter's 2nd quarter of Church reverses the order of Paul's meter for Paul's own 2nd quarter; Peter's 3rd quarter replicates and reverses the order of Paul's 1st quarter (so Church growth sufficient to continue Time itself mimics in reverse time order, the 1st quarter in Paul). In between, Vote Critical Time known to modern historians as Decius-Gallienus (SPQR Emperors), is under Peter's chronology elongated; meaning, growth way too low, behind schedule. That schedule is made up, from the rise of Gallienus in the West (when Roman Empire newly splits), to end of the first two Constantine kids (who die trying to kill each other over whether God is 1 or 3, lol).

Paul's 4th quarter shows no group maturation at all. Only individuals. Peter echoes this, playing on Psalm 90 (the outer timline in Peter): instead of 91, 84. For like Israel at Temple Down to Purim (focus of Psalm 90:16-17), Church MIGHT NOT continue.

After Q4, from 434-483 AD, known in history as Fall of the West, Peter ends with the pregnant '49', Church apostasy analogous to Israel in Diaspora, Missed Sabbaths, TEMPLE DOWN. So that theme characterizes our time from Constantine's sons, forward. We might not make it, always on Edge of Being Too Apostate to Live. Rev 1-3, echoes this theme.

Continued from • 5e9, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete... . Still on the different CRITERIA for timeline charting, between Peter and Paul, more detail; but repeated vid desc, follows.

In testing the meter of 1 Peter 1:1-12, I'm finding what seems to be a three-syllable lacuna somewhere between 1 Peter 1:10, and the end of 1 Peter 1:11. Does anyone know of any extra words (or a verb) in any of the manuscripts? My BibleWorks only lists the major text families, not all the textual variants. I tried searching on Google for any variants (other than the modernized spelling of the first verb in the BYZ family mss), and come up with nothing.

HELP? This could be really important, as 1Peter 1:11 is also fought over, regarding its meaning. Even more importantly, it shows the value of METER to Text Crit. In the video, I show why.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME!

Continued from • HELP? Lacuna in 1 Peter 1:10-11? . Now we review the 'panorama' of Peter's meter in the newly UPGRADED VERSION of 1Peter1meter.pdf, presuming that the prior video's 'lacuna' issue can be resolved. Focus here is on the DOCTRINAL MEANING of the orange (sevened) meters, which serves to elucidate and ground the text. Else you don't get what Peter's saying, and much misinterpretation of his letter, results.

1Peter1:3 prophetically covers Nero to Hadrian's first five years. So this video continues from • 5e11, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pet... , but also is in tandem with Paul's charting the same time, beginning in GGS Episode 11i, • GGS11i Paul maps Future up to Domitia... . Remember, Peter's writing on top of Paul, so starts with the CURRENT emperor: Nero, just before he died, but just after Paul's execution. Else, Peter's meter themes are the same as Paul's, both overlaying (updating) and interleaving, with Paul's meter and text.

Continued from • 5e12 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete... , now into 1 Peter 1:4, showing how Peter plays on Paul's What If The Rapture Occurs in the remaining years of Hadrian through A. Pius. Church apostacy had begun back in the 90's, and it ramps up, here. Christians were very obnoxious, and Peter's text (as too Paul's) wryly ties to that rise in apostacy.

Hence the persecutions which occurred, were largely instigated by the locals, and the Government turned a blind eye. Christians really WERE seditious, as any reading of the bilious 'Church Fathers' will show you. You can read them easily by clicking on the links in the Word doc showing onscreen in the video, or by going to Ephesians1REPARSED.htm.

They are listed in chrono order, and the website is Calvin College, which just stores the original Church Father documents, and thinks those guys were good guys. You'll disagree, when you read the writings. You can also read them at earlywritings.com , and in BibleWorks.

Continued from • 5e13 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete... ; how Peter's wry wording characterizes the time of both the Roman Emperors Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, AND the warring apostate Christians claimed today, as part of the 'Catholic Church'.

Continued from • 5e14 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete...

Shocking stuff. 1 Peter 1:5b, on Aurelius' reign. Peter's wry satire, SYLLABLE BY SYLLABLE! on this period, is heartbreaking, too: for he's characterizing what Roman historians call a 'golden age'; so too, the 'Church Fathers' turned philosophical — sending Christianity into the tank, to make it look like every other religion.

Christendom never recovers from this denouement. We think it's OUR golden age, how stupid can we be! (see the bilious praise of uniting Christianity with philosophy by a MODERN idiot, in https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf02.v.i.html!)

Just as Israel wanted to be like other nations and rejected God as King in 1050 BC; in 160-186 AD, Church rejects Him. In favor of, scholasticism: emulating Aurelius. That trend has continued, ever since. They were hot on how intellectual they were. Bible gets twisted more than ever. In favor of, philosophical ingratiation. Rev17, baby.

So the warring apostate Christians, claimed today as part of the 'Catholic Church', were destroying Bible meaning right and left. But so too, were their opponents. Very much like today.

So what did God do, the very year the Philosopher everyone praises, got into power? God sent one plague outbreak after another, to Rome. And it kept on going, for well over 100 years! And, military incursions! See Leviticus 26, Deut 28! Warning, Bill Robinson!

Why not? Everyone put his 'faith' (pistews, in the verse) and his custody (phrouroumenous) under the power (dunamei) of POLITICS and PHILOSOPHY — but not, under God. By contrast, God took them all into custody with the plagues, since they were plaguing Christianity, 1John5:16: Hegesippus, Martyr, Hermas, Tatian, and especially Irenaus, Athenagoras, Tertullian. All anti-semitic, twisters, liars, gossipers, with total disregard for Scripture or even a modicum of desire to tell the truth. So God cleans house. For the next 100+ years, four generation curse.

Really wry, here, Peter's language: salvation being REVEALED — yeah, you're DYING! Since you're dying, you're kept under GUARD due to FAITH (yeah, in what, and with what results when REVEALED, lol).

Paul's text for the same period, is on DEBT CANCELLATION through His Blood, yielding RICHES (get the pun? Riches of bleeding for the world or riches of Christ bleeding for you, you bleeding for the Word instead) — at which point, Aurelius dies!

Every emperor afterwards, will claim lineage from him. The loopy Christians too, claim Christianity is like Aurelius' philosophy. To sell it. So ask: why should anyone believe in Christ?!?!

Meanwhile, the FEW believers faithful in Word, reading these Petrine and Pauline antiphonal verses, know to LEAVE; so to be kept under guard AWAY from Rome and her sicknesses. See how the verse applies in both positive and negative directions? Oh, this is SO classical Greek drama of sotto voce political commentary, in every great play of the golden age of Greece, 500's BC!


b-out Malista key to Bible Writing Dates

This playlist started out as a reprimand of Xoroaster's bad scholarship on Josephus (first video in playlist), but ended up being about Greek keyword 'malista', given how Josephus uses it as a superlative.

This is odd, because Greek didn't use superlatives. By contrast, malista has been used as a keyword to rubric, since Homer.

So most of the playlist ends up being about the usage of malista, because you can trace a huge change in the word's usage, starting in the 50's AD. This helps demonstrate that the Gospels are older than often surmised, versus later Bible books.

This keyword alone is not conclusive, of course. But tracing it helps demonstrate 'textual criticism', the art-science of establishing what words are genuine to a text, or when a text was written by the author. Hence this playlist.

Video in question: • E5 Josephus on Jesus - Early Christi... . TruthCeeker333 made a nicer reply (than I do) to Xoroaster's video, here: • Response to Xoroaster Christianity 5.0 . By contrast, I ream Xoroaster out, because he should be censured by every atheist on the planet — for DISHONESTY. Or, stupidity. Take your pick. Video explains why he's a SHAME to atheism.

He's not good at proper citations, either. If you have the Works of Josephus in hardback, the proper reference is Wars of the Jews, Book 6, line 300 and following. If you're using BibleWorks to read Josephus, select JOE for English, JOS for the original Greek, and then '6' and then '300', to get to the same place (BW aligns the books as chapters). That text is in Josephus' Book 5, but in many copies of Josephus the Chapters aren't separated out. So Xoroaster is also ignorant of the citation convention of using the LINE NUMBER for the starting place. Shameful. If you're going to pretend to be a scholar, then do your citations properly!

CONTEXT shows that Josephus is on the topic of the war culminating in Masada, which was thirty years AFTER Jesus the Christ, had DIED. So it cannot be the same Jesus as in the Bible. Which Josephus makes plain in his own text, but apparently Xoroaster, even when reading aloud, doesn't know what he's reading! My video here, explains why.

Xoroaster tries to jerryrig a claim that the Bible is somehow based on Josephus' account, because 'Jesus' and 'Stone' and 'killed' are used in the latter. PULEESE. First, Xoroaster is ignorant of Greek, so can't tell that the Greek of Matthew is a full generation OLDER than the Greek of Josephus. Just as, the way people spoke English in the 1960's is very different from today. We know this, because most of the Roman world spoke Greek in the first century (if you were cultured), so we have a LOT of that Greek outside the Bible, for comparison. It changed every decade.

So Josephus, writing in the last 30 years of the 1st century, uses the later idiom — more like Mark's Gospel, which is demonstrably THIRD, not first; it came out just after Paul died. Luke's is in the middle, written a decade before. All this, you can tell if you COMPARE THE GREEK of the Gospels, relative to the Greek outside the Bible written at the time. NEVER date a language by the age of what it's written on. Shakespeare is still olde English, even if in a newly-published paper text!

So our boy Xoroaster FLUNKS the 'scholarship' test, by not knowing any of this, instead shooting his mouth off by manufacturing three similar words in the Gospels and in Josephus: 'Jesus', 'stone', and 'killed'. Sheesh.

Then, later in his video, Xoroaster proves ignorant of the Old Testament, which all Jews referenced in their daily speech, since forever, and of course even still today. So just because some Jew named Jesus (of which there must have been 100s, if not 1000s) runs around quoting the Old Testament, which Josephus briefly recounts, doesn't mean he's the same 'Jesus' as in the Bible.

Finally, If you have William Whiston's paperback of Josephus' Works, the text in question is on page 742, right-hand column, January 1995 edition (Tenth printing, which is extremely common). That matters, as the text is very much the same as Xoroaster uses in his video. So at least he's using a common translation, whew.

I've never had to make a video like this before, and I hope I never have to, again. Too much fake scholarship in atheism AND in Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc. It should be censured. If we let it go, we partake in its evil, 2John9-11.

Vid shows the Josephus passage in Greek (Wars of the Jews, Book Six, Chapter 5, Line 300), and makes some corrections which Xoroaster SHOULD have annotated. But oh he can't read English, let alone the Greek!

Seriously, if you'll claim to use source material, GET IT RIGHT.

Important PS: notice how Josephus uses 'malista' (mistranslated great). That is a Romanism which became commonly used in the 50's AD. By the time of Hadrian, the term had become 'educated', but it didn't start out that way. There are no superlatives in early, educated Greek. To make superlatives, like 2Peter does in 60's AD with megista and malista, indicates that Greek is less cultured or learned as a second language — or, slang. Homer did use the term, in The Iliad Book VI ll. line 355, but even then it was merely adverbial (sorta like French 'surtout'): informal, as you'll see in that passage.

Matthew's Gospel doesn't use the term at all, because in the 30's AD, 'kai' or 'kai de' was ascensively used, instead. So you won't find the term used AT ALL, in the Gospels. Why? Because they're writing either using the language of the time (i.e., Matthew's language is 30AD-ish), or they're quoting folks using the language of that time: malista was not used (at least not by Jews), in the 30's AD.

Paul's early letters use the traditional 'kai' or 'mallon' instead of 'malista', and it isn't until the late 50's AD that both Luke and Paul use malista when talking to Gentiles (in Acts, Galatians, Philippians, Timothy, Titus, Philemon), though he prefers to use a version of perisseuw, most of the time. Josephus' usage by contrast, is fawning.

So you see, you can date the Bible's text by the word's usage. Xoroaster didn't bother to do that, or he'd never have made his claims. Shows he doesn't a) know what he's talking about, and b) doesn't bother to do his homework, first.

Atheism is fine. Slipshod 'scholarship', is not fine.

This is a followup video to Xoroaster 2. Lest I prove to be a bad scholar too, this video simply explains why 'malista' is an important key to dating Greek text. It by no means is the only key, but it's important: for in early Greek, it was considered 'gauche' to use superlatives (like saying 'bestest', in English). Only the uneducated, used superlatives.

Check this with tenneral, an atheist who is a retired classical Greek teacher: / tenneral . He doesn't know I'm making this video, so if you ask him, you'll have to fill him in on the backstory, or just ask the question without referencing me. You can also Google; but as I show briefly in this video, the Google listing is pretty bad. If you want, you can register in B-Greek and ask the scholars there. (I'm registered there, but cannot post because I won't use my real name.) Not everyone there is a scholar, but there should be at least one who will authoratively answer you.

Why this matters: in the middle or late 50's AD, it became more common to use superlatives, and was considered educated, by Hadrian's time. Thus it becomes easier to tell that Matthew's Gospel is early, etc. For you date a language's age by the way it uses the words, not by the media on which the words are penned/imprinted, etc.

Now, 'malista' had been used ever since Homer, Herodotus, Aristotle, Demosthenes, etc.: Josephus, by contrast, is using it as a superlative (well, really a combination of traditional and superlative, to stress irony).

Josephus' usage of Malista is NEW Greek, which helps prove that 'malista' usage in the NT, is older. Much older. So this video and the next, will show its usage in Bible.

As we just saw in Episode 4, 'malista' in the NT came to be used sometime during the middle or late 50's AD. But what was the equivalent usage, PRIOR? Here we see samples of the EARLIER mallon.de, mallon, de, and especially (pun intended), ascensive kai.

In other words, malista was used rarely in classical Greek and even koine (search on 'malista' and 'Homer', or 'Aristotle', 'Demosthenes' to see classical Greek examples). But the other words denoted above, were commonly used. Thus you know more about the EARLY dating of Bible books, especially Matthew (which never uses malista).

Again, this isn't a conclusive proof of the early dating, but is one of the linguistic tools 'textual criticism' uses, to prove when text was written. For language changes. Language patterns change. When you have enough text, you can determine the pattern changes, as shown here.

Josephus doesn't use 'malista' as the Bible does, which proves a change in its usage. This change continues in Greek at least from his time, forward. Which means, the Bible which never uses the term this way, is earlier.

This is only an introduction to the idea. I cannot search in the Greek of Josephus yet, until I install BibleWorks 9. So we're only looking at Line 300 here. In a future video, after I've installed BW 9 on one of my machines, I'll do another video showing the full search. Meanwhile, you can do your own search on 'ta malista' (which won't yield all the occurrences, since you're typing Roman letters in Google).

Short video with a chart showing comparative versus superlative, sans explanation of the change in usage, plus a snippet in a piece about philosophical inquiry during Hadrian's time, incidentally showing how malista was used.

The chart can be downloaded, here: http://charism.info/docs/GrammarBasic.pdf. The guy is not a scholar, but compiled the list, as the video explains.

The Greco-Roman book can be downloaded, here: https://www.obinfonet.ro/docs/herm/hermes/aune-nt-gklit.pdf. Or, paperback can be purchased at Amazon, here: https://www.amazon.com/Greco-Roman-Literature-Testament-Sources-Biblical/dp/1555402097


b-out Pauline Anaphora Timeline Update (PATU) in Eph1:3-14

This playlist is also in vimeo, http://www.vimeo.com/channels/patu. Vids are downloadable in several formats. This playlist is updated by the http://vimeo.com/channels/johnmeter channel/playlist, because John converts BC/AD for us. See: back then, the Varro Roman AUC was overstated by four years. There's more to that story too, as the johnmeter channel will explain.

This PATU is a subset of GGS 10-11 playlist to show how Paul uses his anaphora meter, to balance time back to Adam. Which thus balances to our BC/AD, and shows how Rapture what-ifs were then calculated. What a surprise. Really shocking stuff.

What's more shocking: the fact that scholars haven't read the Bible right for 2000 years, so they don't realize that it had TWO DEADLINE timetracks for Christ's birth to the very DAY — which are THREE YEARS APART? Or, the fact that the Romans had the same problem, so even the Roman AUC system has a three-year spread? Or, the fact that due TO that three-year BIBLE spread, the Rapture dates are plotted by Paul in his satirical here's-the-bad-future-of-Rome-and-Church, meter?

You know, don't you, that Paul would eventually die in Rome?

So this playlist begins with the anaphora videos so you can see them, then shows how the '78 sevens' meter (sum of eudokian and epainon anaphora meters) display how Church unites history on behalf of Israel, now that all the OT promises are VESTED IN CHRIST. Because HE won at the Cross, the Son of David is owed the remaining JEWISH time, whereas Church is newly and severally founded in His Kata Melchizedek Kingship, theme of Book of Hebrews and Psalm 110.

TWO WALLS, Ephesians 2. Book of Ephesians is designed to show the 'siring' of Church which has a tandem purpose of wrapping up all history FOR the King of the Jews, and hence for Israel. It's an update on Romans and Colossians. Hebrews will elaborate on both books in the Year of the Four Emperors, when the Temple was about to go down as Paul had METERED, here in Eph1:5.

See also the Magnificat playlist. Word doc containing all the relevant material is Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. This same REPARSED is also an htm. The pdf version is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. The download is likely the FINAL version of page 134; so the interim videos show the interim versions.

Trinity Anaphora and Hebrew Meter on how God uses Church to Bridge Time Back to Israel, to Glorify Christ. Video is only on the Anaphora, which I learned thanks to Bucklehairy (I owe him forever)!

Doc in this video: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc; as pdf: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf

It provides extensive proof of Paul's meter mapping to Ps90, Isa53, Daniel 9, +metered translation

Related Links:

Docs

On Camping: CampingTimelineGaffes1.doc and CampingTimelineGaffes2.doc

Psalm 90

Isaiah 53

Daniel 9

Ephesians 1: see first 2 links, near top.

Paul also tags Noah, uses LXX in Gen7-8, not BHS. See my Noahic Precedence video.

Video playlists

Webpages and worksheets

Upshot: simple scholar mistakes mask Bible's own story of dates, leaving us confused. Solve those errors, and Bible proves clear and reliable. So let's go back to the Bible.

Technical video on Trinity anaphora. Paul so focuses on the apostasy due to Constantine, that he not only maps the years, but creates THREE SETS of trebled anaphorae, to all converge on the Constantinian period. I guess it has something to do with the fact that 490 years after Antiochus IV Epiphanes, is initial Nicaea, as well as the razing of Byzantium (which Paul parallels to the razing of Jerusalem, in meter)? Adjust for number of months and difference in calendars, so 166+324=490.

Analogy to desecration history repeating itself? Mary based her meter on Chanukah, and again Paul apes her.

He apes her clever hubbing of meter in her dateline to a whole slew of dates going all the way back to David at Hebron yet forward to Millennium, see http://www.brainout.net/MagnificatMet... (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy) pages 11-20, for the CHARTS of the many number convergences she used. The Mary Magnificat playlist takes you through her meter in detail: • b-out Mary's Magnificat Meter of Time

Paul's use of the same hubbing technique, is far more complex. Until I saw the Mary Meter, I couldn't understand why Paul was doing this. Both he and Mary START TIME OVER with Messiah's birth, their own version of Anno Domini; oddly, it is close to our modern AD accounting, which implies the Roman AUC system is overvalued by three years. But I'm still checking into that.

(They would have mapped their own A.D. to the Roman AUC; but there were three different AUC styles operative, in Mary's day. Varro's, which later became the 'official' system, was criticised as inflated by three years. Augustan Romans, debated its accuracy. Augustus finally accepted it; under Claudius, it became law. Paul seems to use the AUC version 'corrected' to subtract those three years, resulting in an eerily similar tally to what we use.)

Took me months to analyze, and I'm still not done. But the idea has to be introduced now, so that when you see the actual history of Constantine in the straightforward meter, you'll know a deeper set of PARALLEL TIME RELATIONSHIPS is depicted via the connected anaphorae. The full story is in Appendix I, of the JUST UPDATED http://www.brainout.net/Ephesians1REP... . It's 150 pages long in Word, so it may take awhile to load online.

Doc is maybe easier to read, http://www.brainout.net/Ephesians1REP... ; select Appendix I, Anaphora Mates History. PDF is http://www.brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyl... .

This video but highlights the anaphora locations and time parallels, so you can get a quick overview of their relationships and nature. The above links provide detailed analysis, including all the relevant history. It's a slog, I'm sorry; Paul's anaphora parallel metering math, is awesome. Took me 37 pages to plot it out, and I'm still not done with all its structures. Christendom has NO IDEA this style exists in Bible.

Be sure you know God wants YOU to spend time on it, before you start. I had to spend time on it, but that doesn't mean you should. My videos are my own due-diligence; I don't feel I have the right to keep this provable Bible information private, or to sell it. So I have no idea who else should watch the videos. Point is merely to make the material available, and God will decide who gets it.

I can't yet reconcile the factors of the '78 sevens' to what Paul means. I'm having a brain fart or something. Maybe there is some other metered passage in OT or NT I need to parse to see the connections. So the answers are right, essentially; but the math I'm using, isn't. I don't think I can solve the problem during 2013, have too much secular work to do. Maybe God will throw the answer at me like He's done before, but He's not doing that, now.

ERRATUM: at 6:29ff I say 'Stephen Lee Williams', but meant 'Robert Lee Williams', the author of 'Bishop Lists', which you'll find extensively reviewed in the GGS playlist, beginning here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db_cnNq1O4I&t=0s. He reworked his dissertation to show the bogus origin of the Pope list, and published it as a book you can buy from Gorgias Press or at Amazon. I bought it, and got written permission from the publisher to show the list in my videos.

Doc in video is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. All the intra-doc links work now. So if you downloaded the pdf before and the links didn't all work, download it again. (And if you want to do the same kind of conversion, do what I did and buy SmartPDF Creator Pro for I think $100, which is much faster and cheaper than Adobe Acrobat; it also works on MACs.)

The counterparts are Ephesians1REPARSED.doc and Ephesians1REPARSED.htm.

Real shock, new info on how God accounts the 1050's. If you're not already involved in this topic, skip this video and Part 3/3.

Spreadsheet in video: GeneYrs.xls. Verses used to get those results: brainoutFAQ.htm#6a. Sorry that material is so long, but accounting the 1500 years via the 490s is lengthy, especially since no one's done it. If you see errors, holler.

Doc in video is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. All the intra-doc links work now. So if you downloaded the pdf before and the links didn't all work, download it again. (And if you want to do the same kind of conversion, do what I did and buy SmartPDF Creator Pro for I think $100, which is much faster and cheaper than Adobe Acrobat; it also works on MACs.)

Continued from PATU2, God's 1050-year TIME BALANCING from Noah to Christ at Trib/Mill, with Paul using what-if-Rapture scenario at syllable=AD year=Christ's Age.. 105? Why 105? That question bugged me for TWO YEARS! You'll hear me talk about it, when I get to the '105' (covering the Adoptive Emperors) in the GGS video series (two playlists, same videos on Eph1:3-14).

What a shocker. Someone please kill me. But God won't let that happen YET, no!

See 2/3 for the worksheet and Word doc/pdf/htm material shown in this video.

More on God's is BALANCING the 1050's, via Paul's meter. Really shocking stuff. Here, video simply shows that the Tribulation was supposed to begin 1050 years after David's DEATH. Because scholars — including Dispies — get David's age at death wrong, using Josephus instead of Bible — they missed this crucial connection. 1Kings 6:1 is routinely misread by 'scholars', so they always get befuddled (ignoring Hebraic date tracking from 1Kings 2:39, third year after David's death, and the 7 years he spent AFTER RETIRING, providing for the Temple in 1Chron 22 et seq).

Ooops. So now notice why Paul uses the 105: to balance to the 1050th anniversary of the Temple! More on this will follow in parts 5-7. Sorry for all the many uploads, but this is too good to miss!

So now we get into EQUIDISTANCE, a rhetorical accounting technique to demonstrate how God 'mirrors' (reimburses) Time. It opens and closes each Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, the Magnificat, and Eph1:3-14: a Biblically-significant span of years opening and closing a metered passage. Defined in terms of, years-from or years-to significant dates in ISRAEL's history. The years-to, always balance to the end of the Millennium.

Example of this style is plotted out in the first charted pages of http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9... . It's a way of telling you when the author WROTE, and where in TIME his text 'fits' in the scheme of history. Mary, for example, ends her meter at Christ age 56, which is 40 years before the Mill was to begin — long after He'd die. Paul picks up there, and ends his meter 56 years short of the end of the new 490 wrought in Christ (dated from His birth); so Paul is also writing 40 years before the Millennium was supposed to begin.

So why would Paul do that? Interlaced with such 'mirroring' is another 'mirroring' based on Isaiah's meter, that of 1077=1078. (1077th year anniversaries all commence 1078 year beginnings). So here we start to get into that 'equidistance' accounting.

BTW, this 1077 is what got me into the whole timeline thing in the first place; I'd made a 1077 'mirror' math error re David, back in 2004; haven't been the same since. Eusebius made the same error, I later learned; but he didn't notice he'd erred (backslapping 490 years onto the Temple to guess at David's reign). Maybe he asked God to fix it, back in 2004?

Now we see how Paul hubs Israel's history to Church. Remember, the timeline is in BIBLE, but Paul's meter interacts with the text to tell you RELATIONSHIP between text and time, expecting you to already know Bible's dates. That's what's been done with meter since Psalm 90. Here, he piggybacks on Mary's meter, and newly hubs to interrelate Israel and Church via what-if-Trib-occurs-each-year scenarios. We saw in the GGS series 11, how Paul plots both Roman emperors and gradually-corrupting Church, culminating in Constantine. But the anaphora ALSO have interwoven, time-tracking meter counts: 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, 94 sevens — here we analyze the 78 sevens. Thus Paul hubs past to Israel, forward to Trib, Mill. For, he's setting up Ephesians 2's 'walls' (separate covenants).

Key to his meter hubbing, is a clever convergence of significant past Bible dates in 1000's, 1050's, and here 1077's = Isaiah 53's meter = 'theme' of the 78 sevens sum in eudokian+epainon anaphora. So we get a panoramic 'yes, God STILL orchestrates Time to save Israel' — via Church.

This video shows a temporary page 134 in Ephesians 1 REPARSED (links below). You can't download it; I will repost it in later videos in this subseries on Pauline Anaphoric Timeline. By the way, this charting is typical Hebraic style, used for centuries and used also in Bible. Jews still use this style today, but of course since they use lunar years, their accountings are all wrong. Here's a link to download their calendar, so you can see today's version of the style: http://www.kaluach.com/?page_id=22

If you have trouble grasping these videos, start with GGS playlist Episode 10 or 11. The meter is quite simple, but it's unknown in Christendom, so requires a lot of explanation. Of course, do be skeptical, let me know if you see errors.

How God uses 1050's from Adam, to show whether Time is 'on schedule' or late, has more layers to its accounting than I knew; for Paul's Ephesians 1 anaphora accounting, reveals these other layers. So this material WAS common knowledge when he wrote; which was since garbled in Judaism; and completely lost, in Christendom.

So here we start to go through SOME of those additional accounting layers. You can't yet download this video's page 134 from Ephesians1REPARSED: it's not uploaded, not finished. Revised temporary version is here: Ephesians1REPARSEDp134.pdf. Its links don't work. Meanwhile, you can use GeneYrs.xls to track the events depicted, and brainoutFAQ.htm#6a, to see what Bible verses generated the numbers.

The results are shocking, and embarrassing: if even a brainout can plot these numbers from Bible, why couldn't the scholars/pastors/leaders in either Judaism or Christianity? It's not for lack of trying. But it is for lack of diligence. Everyone gives up tracing, because it's too easy to rely on some dead guy like Josephus, Eusebius, Bishop Ussher, who ALL messed up the numbers. See: when we trash Bible in the name of Christian fellowship and 'being nice', we spit on Christ. NOT ACCEPTABLE.

Also not acceptable, is the error I made at circa 3:30 in the video, citing 'Lamech' as the one who matured: it was Jared father of Enoch. Lamech was the father of Noah, so it really was Lamech who matured 7 years late, but he wasn't the father of Enoch.

Quick proof Jews still account time as YEARS FROM; Paul does this via his anaphora, and of course his accounting is right and manifold, versus the garbled idea of accounting time which survives in Judaism today. They misaccount everything: God accounts from Adam's FALL, Genesis 3:22; not the Jewish accounting from creation of the world; God uses only solar years (BIRTHDAYS cannot be tallied except on a solar basis), Genesis 5, 7, 8, 11 and Exodus 12 (when Israel is born); so God counts ALL years, doesn't cut any out like Jews now do, in their 'Kaluach', which was a wrong calendar compiled based on the Seder Olam Rabbah, which leaves out the Persian years, and other things, made sometime in the 1st century BC. God counts the Omer (for Pentecost) starting on the LAST day of Passover, not the first, Numbers 28:26 see my sarshalomin videos. But Jews misread the verse and count the Omer from the 1st Passover (which is the next day, at sundown).

So you see: it is still common to count YEARS FROM, days from, etc. But they're doing it wrong. Paul's using BIBLE so is doing it right, and you can discern his accounting from the meter, but you can discern the right years and dates, FROM BIBLE. Even a brainout can do it. But no one's doing it! for 2000 years???!!!!

Still on How God uses 1050's from Adam, to show whether Time is 'on schedule' or late. This material WAS common knowledge when he wrote; which was since garbled in Judaism; and completely lost, in Christendom.

Look: if you were Dear Dr. So-and-So and you messed up but are in heaven now, wouldn't you pray Father FIX what you got wrong? Wouldn't you cringe at the millions of baby Christians who won't look at Bible and instead repeat YOUR mistakes because you were 'respectable'? So wouldn't you do all 'respectable' folk who ERRED a favor — if you now do YOUR OWN Bible homework, and correct their errors?

I'm sorry, I don't want to die without having done my homework. I really empathize with the hoary heads of the past, who wrestled with candlewax and uncial script and the inevitable Church politics which ate into their STUDY time, precisely because they were respectable. So why should they linger now in grief over mistakes they made? It's not a shame that they made mistakes. It's a shame, that we don't CORRECT those mistakes. We still claim 'Good Friday', despite Bible clearly proving it was Wednesday? All because the guy who came up with 'friday', didn't know the difference between a high sabbath and a regular one, John 19? Puleese. We can't get the Lord's Death or Birthday right after 2000 years, because we won't read Haggai 2 and get the 'signet ring' wordplay on Zerubabbel? And of course, we don't add up the Gen 5 begats properly, to see all this 1000, 1050, 1077 CONVERGENCE?

Let's do the dead scholars a favor, and FIX what they got wrong. When I'm dead — and even while still alive — I sure want someone to fix my mistakes, though I'm a mere brainout. Wouldn't you feel the same?

Here we get into Paul's derivation of his metered and highlighted potential Rapture dates, based on 'mirroring' equidistance: a Bible rhetorical style for God's 'doubling' rule of restitution; here, of TIME. Paul, like Mary Daniel Isaiah and Moses, brackets both 'sides' of the time he writes, with Biblically significant 'mirrors' to show potential scenarios for the Rapture, Trib, Mill.

At issue: how will the 54 years owed due to Abraham's EARLY maturation, get 'paid'? And, the extra 3.5 years tacked on to make 50+7. I thought the 3.5 extra years was rooted in balancing Time relative to Solomon's late Temple dedication; maybe that's still true; but in the 1050 accounting, we've only the same 7-year overage since Noah. As if God had Solomon WAIT until the 490th anniversary of the Exodus, to dedicate the Temple? So that WAIT does add the 3.5, relative to the 490, as an extra 'credit' to balance THAT kind of time. Okay, then why isn't the 1050 off by 3.5 years more.. too?

In any event, Paul balances only to the last seven, adds it to close of the 4200 (end Trib), thus balancing to Jacob and Noah: so the 2100 and 3150 balance, respectively. The other 3.5 years Paul balances to other events, as you'll see in this video and the next.

So the 'scholars' are having brain farts, sorry. All the dates in Bible are provable IN Bible, don't need no astronomy or guesses based on errors like lunar years, Josephus, Dear Dr. So and So who didn't do his math right, etc.!

Continued from PATU10, God the Master Accountant: video ends with year 5257 From Adam's Fall (aka 1144AD), showing how Paul adds the extra seven due to the Lord dying seven years EARLY, to balance time back to Adam. The three-year problem becomes obvious, and might actually reflect a true three year variance in the BIBLE that God wants to stress.

John's use of the 3-year variance is in Revelation1.pdf; it's only in Greek. Verses are Rev 1:1-3, showing the meter, so if you can't read Greek just read the numbers and grab any translation. Point is that John uses TWO dating systems there: Christ age 33 at death plus 58, end verse 1 = 'our' 94 but His age 91; or, verse 2's sum (1+2) becomes 84 years after Judaea became a province, which is also 'our' 91 (Judaea became a province in 6 AD, just Google to prove that). Finally, verse 3 (1+2+3 syllables' sum) = 126, the number of years since Mary's birth, and including a) Julius Caesar's CHANGE of Roman calendar, since he was in the Levant just after beating Pompei (both happened the same year). So, that's also 91 (Mary who should have been Queen of Israel, datelined her Magnificat when she was 35 years old, and benchmarked to Herod and Caesar). Clever, huh.

At 23:33, when I say that 33+58 is '94', I meant AD. Christ is then age 91 by all three of John's measures; but is that 'our' 91 AD, or 94 AD? The math of Him being age 33 at death only works in 'our' 94 AD, because we cut off 3 years (Dionysius in 6th century invented the BC/AD, but he made a math error re Augustus' reign, cutting off three years of it.) Complicating this problem is the fact that Romans were disputing with Varro over his Roman AUC calendar, saying he'd padded three years which didn't belong there. You can Google on that, to see more info: livius.org has an article on it, as do others. So the query: is John CORRECTING the calendar, and did Paul's use of 94 in his meter of Eph 1:5 play to the 3-year Varronic variance, thus ironically matching our BC/AD? Enquiring minds, want to know!

Really exciting stuff. We can correct 'our' BC/AD if we just follow Bible. Presented here in three versions: this 12a is the long version. 12b is half again as long, and 12c is only 8 minutes. So by the time you get to 12c, the material ought to gel. I know everyone's eyes glaze over with numbers, but if you've been annoyed at our 3-year BC/AD problem, you'll want to absorb this material.

Master writeup on ALL the related video and web material as well as for the Pauline anaphora is here: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) or Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf; its page 134 is undergoing reconstruction. Meanwhile, you can find that page here: Ephesians1REPARSEDp134.pdf.

The Flood Chronology is here: FloodChronoREVISED.pdf.

I'm sorry this is so long, but there have been many scholar mistakes re Daniel 9 accounting and re David's years, which gave rise to the BC/AD 3-year problem we have today. No excuse for that: just look at page 135 of that Ephesians1REPARSED and you'll see the Bible's own BC/AD conversion. Very simple. Why it's been messed up for 2000 years, can only mean LAZINESS by 'scholars'. Bible is not obtuse: we are, and then we call the Bible 'inscrutable' to mask our lazy ineptitude!

Oh: and if you see me being lazy or making a mistake, yell at me. I don't want to die without having been corrected. :)

This is the 'short' version. Hopefully by now it will be easy to understand. See 12 for the full video description. Re Roman dating problems, see https://tyndalehouse.com/egypt/ptolemies/chron/roman/chron_rom_cal.htm On the three-year AUC problem, see https://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/consuls.html.

As for the 750 BC being the more-common ROMAN usage as alternative date for AUC 1, see Europe: A History, page 152.

So notice: if Paul uses 750 BC as his alternative AUC1, then his '56' is our '58-59' scholars traditionally ascribe to the date of Ephesians. BALANCES!

Better still, it highlights the OVERLAP in a way that people in the ROMAN empire to whom Paul wrote, would know! Remember, Varro's AUC calculation based on 753BC wasn't made legal until Claudius.

More Roman sources and the Fasti, are linked in the 'ChronoChart' section of the master doc on all this, Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) , since Paul's meter essentially creates an Anno Domini accounting for then-future downfall of Rome and the rise of apostate Church, as shown in the GGS Episode 11 playlist. I'm now revising page 134 of that doc: its temporary standalone page is Ephesians1REPARSEDp134.pdf. The pre-revision full pdf is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

To prove how the BC/AD conversion problem we have today is in reality a BIBLE TIMELINE overlap, I must walk you through the 'Time Poem' rhetorical style and meter of Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, Magnificat, and Ephesians 1. So a series of short summaries of these meters will be in the next four videos. Each one has already been extensively documented in these video playlists: 'Psalm 90', for Psalm90-Daniel 9, 'Magnificat', for the Magnificat, and 'GGS 11' for Ephesians 1.

Psalm 90 meter docs help you see the pattern: Psalm90inHebrew.pdf (aka Ps90Parsed.pdf) and Judges.pdf, Ps90Palindrome.pdf; Psalm 90ParsedTrilingual and Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf all complement to show the interactive 'fit' of meter and text. The latter shows how the writers all play on each other's text, their commonalities of style. I didn't know the Magnificat was metered, back then. For the Magnificat, download MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf. Sorry about the weird doc names.

To find any passage meter yourself, use BibleHebMeterCharacs.pdf, which is a master meter detection document about Bible Hebrew meter style and principles found in the OT. So far I've found 30 characteristics of Time Poem meter. There may be many more.

Master document on the entire Time Poem meter collection, is in Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) or Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf (pdf copy). Page 134 of all these copies, is undergoing reconstruction. You'll see that page done over again, beginning in Episode 13.

Sorry for so much detail, but this Bible doctrine is unknown in Christendom, How God Orchestrates Time; the Jewish version of it surviving today, is very garbled. So we have to start de novo with the ultimate Authority Everyone Agrees on: Scripture.

Now we see the sophisticated 1078-syllable 'time poem' in Isaiah 53, that Paul will meter back to via his anaphora in Ephesians 1:3-14. Download here: Isa53Map.pdf.

Isaiah uses a straight chronology of 'actors' saying 'lines' from the birth of first David — 10 years after Moses left off in Psalm 90 — to the then-scheduled death of the LAST David, in 37 AD. The chapter starts in Hebrew in 52:13, ending at 53:12, and ostensibly runs 462 syllables, which is 350+112=(70x5)+56+56.

Just as Moses put syllables=years in ellipsis, so does Isaiah. From David's death at the end of 52:15, Isaiah puts 252 years in ellipsis, resuming the text in 53:1, at either 714 or 712 BC, when he was ministering to Hezekiah during the first time Sennacharib was attacking. It's one syllable per year again at that point, so goes in order to cover all Israel's kings down to the destruction of the Temple which was then-future, in 586 BC, TO THE VERY DAY. That's at the end of Isaiah 53:4, and the text reads, 'God, Violated'. You can see more of this in my Yapping Most High Episode 10, and in the Psalm 90 playlist.

The second ellipsis is a 'reimbursement' for the time the first Temple was standing, and is 364 years long, between Isaiah 53:11-12. Scholars call this the 'intertestamental period', since Malachai was completed by 397BC, when this 'hiatus' in Isaiah's Messiah Time poem, begins. So Isaiah 53:12 picks up at 5BC in 'our' calendar, which is the Annunciation, taking place per Luke 1:26, in the month of Adar (double definite articles means a calendar month — not referring to Elizabeth's six month, which instead is noted in Luke 1:36, not here). Nine months later, is Chanukah.

That's a lot of meaning to absorb, so this video merely highlights the structure of the passage to show the mirroring; so you realize a TIME POEM is given, to add specific TIMING to the words. Text is still about Messiah, but this TIMING re Israel's history, runs sotto voce beneath the words, and the SAME WORDS have another layer of historical meaning, with each actor represented by the words for the syllable=year in question. Wry stuff.

In order to understand Paul's sophisticated time-poem-metered accounting, you have to know Daniel's. Fortunately it was easy to document Daniel's satirical review of Israel's Kings by mapping his words and syllables to Bible verses. But the document doing this is long: DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf. Only the Hebrew is one page; the doc itself is 30 pages, sorry. But it will be easy to follow Daniel's style: the notes pair up the syllables=years to Bible verses and specific kings he references — starting with David at Hebron — to the end of Time.

Since the Man of Time is given him as a vision since Daniel 2, he incorporates that data into his petition to God, with 742 'sevens' being represented: 742 x 7 +56 = 5250 years, balancing to Moses' Psalm 90. You can see more about that in the Daniel videos within the Psalm 90 playlist. God's reply follows Daniel's meter and that's where the 49 and the 62 weeks come from. You can't know that from the English. So you can't read Daniel 9 correctly without knowing the meter. So no one in Christendom is reading Daniel 9 correctly, and that's why the debate still rages over its meaning. Ineptitude, since even a brainout can count syllables, as every Hebrew schoolchild was taught to do!

Notice Daniel stops 56 years short (742 sevens rather than 750). Mary sure noticed. On the fly, when (probably Purim 5 BC) Elizabeth tells Mary she's pregnant, Mary's impromtu METERED reply piggybacks on Daniel's 56, ending her own Magnificat Time Poem at a future of CHRIST being age 56, long dead — which then would be, 40 years before the expected Millennium. (See, He was scheduled to live for 40 years, and 40+16 is 56, get the pun, He's the 56 of history, the one completing the Vote to 56+14=70).

So we'll see the Magnificat, next.

Daniel leaves off his Time Poem's 2nd Time track at the toes-of-clay-mixed-with-iron aka Rise of Rome during the Punic Wars, 238 BC. Daniel's second dateline was 73 sevens after Moses left off in Psalm 90, and 49 years after the Temple went down, both = end 538 BC.

So, 73 years after 238 BC, is CHANUKAH. Where Mary picks up the chronology. For full details, see my Magnificat playlist. This video is just a quick summary of her chronology via text and meter. I don't cover how the text interacts with the meter, here. I did that already, in the playlist.

Point of this video is how she balances to the Millennium using the same 56 as Moses, Isaiah, and Daniel used, creating a number pun of 40+16, Christ's Age FUTURE, at which point there would only be 40 years left to the Millennium. Paul in Ephesians 1:3-14 thus picks up where Mary leaves off, as we'll review again, in Episode 19.

Our BC/AD problem is sourced in the way the Roman AUC is calculated; and in a mistake made by a guy in the 6th century AD — but also, in the fact TWO DIFFERENT BIBLE TIMELINES overlap between David's death, and Temple Construction Start. Here we'll see how Paul's timeline and Mary's intersect to tell Future Roman and Church History, and how they dealt with the Roman AUC controversy raging in their day — by intersecting the 3-year variance the ROMANS were arguing about re their own founding.. at Christ's Birth!

For more on this, see the video descriptions to 12a-c, where links to Roman AUC disputes were provided. See also the 'ChronoChart' page in Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. The Word doc is Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm).

NOTE: page 134 of the above Ephesians pdf/doc/htm hasn't yet been revised as it will be in Episode 13. That page will show the ties in history Paul maps via his anaphora meter, going all the way back to Adam in units of 1000, 1050, and 1077.. and forward to the old-Scheduled Millennium (following the Mosaic Psalm 90 accounting standard).

If you want to be sure you're reading Bible dates correctly — and especially, if you want to prove whether pre-Trib Rapture is valid — you need an audit technique. For the ancients, it was METER. Paul uses his anaphora meter sums in Ephesians 1:3-14, to act as an 'audit trail', so that the reader can see how God uses Church to wrap up all history, and deliver the OT promises made to Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David.. Christ. So here we go into how this audit trail works.

Along the way, we'll see more on how our '4BC' problem is actually sourced in a BIBLE CHANGE OF TIMELINE due to the 3-year delay between David's death, and Temple Construction Start, 1Kings 6:1. It's this delay, which gives rise to the 7-year count for the Tribulation; specifically, the 'time of Jacob's trouble', the last 3.5 years of the Tribulation.

Once you master the Time Tracks, you'll see how deliciously God has actually managed Time — so that even today, we can use these tracks to know what time it is.

Page 134 of the Ephesians1REPARSED document shown has been revised again, and you can't yet download its revision. Hope to have it ready for download by the weekend.

Key to understanding Rapture provenance, is to know when Christ was born and WHY He was born then. Satan's not stupid. If he allows this info to be clear, it will become obvious that pre-Trib Rapture is valid as a promise to CHRIST, through Whom Israel inherits, Galatians 3:16 and especially 4:4.

So, much disinformation is on the internet; and for a good 200 years, scholars have been using Josephus rather than Bible, to decide if the Lord was born 4BC or 1BC, based on.. get this.. ECLIPSES near Herod's death. The fact that any Roman would automatically say an eclipse occurred to augur the death of a great man, goes unheeded. The fact that there are three eclipses a year also goes unheeded. In other words, they hang their decisions about the Lord's birth based on when they think some eclipse happened, rather than based on Bible. Ooops.

Even so, there really is a three-year variance, and in three ways, lol!

  1. Romans disputed the age of Rome at the time we call '1AD'. That year, most Romans deemed Rome herself to have been born 750 years prior. But a guy named Varro got the ear of Augustus, and convinced him that Rome's age that year, was 753. By the time Paul wrote Ephesians, the Varronic 'calendar' had become law, under Claudius.
  2. We've been using the Varronic calendar, ever since. Question: is Paul using the Varronic calendar? Maybe. His Anno Domini satire on Rome, Church is well-matched to the meter (each syllable = 1 year AD). Complicating this story, is the fact that in the sixth century AD, a guy named Dionysius under Pope Gregory, inexplicably cut four years from the Roman calendar, resulting in our present BC/AD structure; with the result that to balance, we must say Christ was born in 4BC. So notice: Dionysius' error changed the calendar back to the 'popular' idea that Rome was 750 years old, not 753 years old, in '1AD'. Aha.
  3. Bible's timeline actually did schedule Christ's birth to be three years LATER than actually occurred, to balance to the DEADLINE for His Birth which pertained prior to David's United Kingship. Moses even timed Psalm 90 to that schedule. But the actual years of David's Kingship SHORTENED the allowable deadline for Messiah's birth. So in the Bible you see two time tracks for His Birth, each three years apart!

Clever of God to allow the Romans and Dionysius to have three-year variances in their own calendars, don't you think?

Most importantly, this 3-year variance is the accounting origin for the Tribulation. For until David died, the credit owed the Gentiles was right on time, 54-years early. But when Solomon DELAYED STARTING THE TEMPLE after David died, the credit owed lengthened.. by 3.5 years. Thus what was a 53.5 year credit owing to Abraham supermaturing early, became 57.

Moses was given the ultimate differential to code into the Law: expressed by Pentecost plus Passover, Jubilee plus Tribulation, each a 57 (days between Passover and Pentecost and a like amount between Pentecost and 9th Av). Expressed as 56, because 56th birthday is 57th year and 56 is divisible by 7; so this '56' is a common metrical theme. Ultimately, it became the sum of 49+7, meaning 49 missed sabbatical years plus the seven extra due ON them, giving rise to a shortfall of 14; so the 62nd week was to be for Messiah, after that the Tribulation. But He died at the end of the 61st week. The fact goes unnoticed, since scholars use lunar years, and mistake David's age at death. Ooops.

REVISED doc links (updated for this video): Ephesians1REPARSED.doc or htm. I can't get the hyperlinks to convert into pdf, again. Am working on it. The htm for page 134 looks awful, and I can't fix that either. Best to just download the Word doc.

pdf, Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

UPDATED doc links below! GIST: Christ's Death was scheduled in varying scenarios, in order to balance to the Time Promise, without coercion. Thus humans remained free to reject Him, and He was still free to execute Father's Will, On Time. So this video shows the interaction of the OT Time tracks re the deadlines, versus the Promise, versus what ended up occurring.

This structure is a precedence for the Rapture's terms: Will Determines, John 17. Paul will use that precedence to set up a series of what-if-Rapture schedules as his meter theme for Ephesians 1:3-14, expecting the reader to already know Israel's history and dates well enough, to see the convergence. Since we don't know her dates and history well enough; since we don't know Bible Hebrew Meter and its rhetorical tradition from Moses, all this information is unknown. But provable, by the very Bible text God preserved.

The math is self-auditing, as you'll see in the balance of this PATU series.

In particular, the Ephesians1REPARSED.doc Note to Verse 4, explains the 'what if Rapture' theme. The idea is to read the text and meter interactively, so that for years n1-n2 covered by the meter, the text is a 'testimony' of what that time is like, and serves as wry irony of what the believer's testimony would be, if he were Raptured up during that period.

Try this experiment: put any of the clauses in any order within Eph1:3-14, and notice that the overall surface meaning of the text is the same. It has a circular resonance. Therefore the order in which actually spoken (for Paul used an amanuensis) — is very important.

All Time Poems have the same quality. Try the above experiment on Psalm 90, the Magnificat, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9:6-14. So the order in which the words are written, demonstrates WHAT TIME IT IS, and amplifies the meter.

Thus again you know that proper accounting for a Bible timeline requires you distinguish a) the time tracks, and b) deadlines versus promise time versus historical time. Mix them up, and you'll get a 'Bible timeline' which doesn't balance to history. Fortunately, the Bible is self-auditing, so when you make a mistake, the timeline you get, won't balance.

Now we're ready for how Paul tracks the Rapture in his meter for Ephesians 1:3-14. Basically, he plays what-if based on Israel's history, same accounting method as Moses forward, 'balancing' to the pre-Church Millennium. Then he does one more revealing thing: he adds seven years. Meaning, he didn't expect Rapture to happen for a very long time. Which of course you notice, in verses 13-14, since there are no submeters. The 'winter' of Church began within the first 490, and remains until we are so apostate, God calls us home. Any day, or 1000 years from now. Because, 99% of Christians ARE apostate, just as the meter tells you we would be, beginning at Constantine.

John tags the meter here, by dating Revelation 1:1-3 as a '91'. Heh: playing on the four quarters of Ephesians! To wit, John's Greek dateline meter is:

58 years after Christ age 33 (at death), verse 1; 84 years after Judaea a province (verse 2 meter sum), 126 years after Mary's birth (verse 3 sum).

UPDATED Ephesians 1 REPARSED now in three flavors: pdf, with hyperlinks (yay): Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf

Ephesians1REPARSED.doc, or (not as pretty)

Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. For the latter, I have to turn page 134 into a table. It looks awful on anything but a wide-angle, 16:9 screen.

But now the docs reflect the video. And I was able to reconcile the 78 sevens. Finally! So the upshot is 'our AD' corresponds to the anciently popular Roman AUC system, dating Rome's age as 750, when we switch to AD; and the other common ancient system which we still use today, is Varro's AUC: it dated Rome as age 753, in the year we call 1AD. So, that three year spread is indicative of the Bible's spread. How nice of God to foreknow we'd have the Roman time spread just like His Two Time Tracks, so to see what time it WAS.

And now, the Rapture time is ANYTIME.

Whew. Took me over a year to know the answer on these 78 sevens. Thank you guys who wrote to me about it; I didn't know the answers, until you wrote! Major Thank You!

Conclusion of how Paul tracks the Rapture in his meter for Ephesians 1:3-14. Basically, he plays what-if based on Israel's history, same accounting method as Moses forward, 'balancing' to the pre-Church Millennium. Then he does one more revealing thing: he adds seven years. Meaning, he didn't really expect the Rapture to happen for a very long time. Which of course you notice, in verses 13-14, since there are no submeters. The 'winter' of Church began within the first 490, and remains until we are so apostate, God calls us home. Any day, or 1000 years from now. Because, 99% of Christians ARE apostate, just as the meter tells you we would be, beginning at Constantine.

I'm having a brain fart here, and need your help — if you want to give it. At issue: we know from Bible that Christ died on what should have been Passover, 30 AD; which day of the week, was WEDNESDAY. The only way Matthew 12:40-41 can come true is if Passover Week officially ran a) four days fast, b) from Saturday to Saturday that year. Then true Passover would have been Wednesday, the day He was crucified; yet because the priests set the official Jewish calendar four days fast (didn't intercalate that year), He'd be EATING the Passover (early), too. The last day of Passover week is Firstfruits, Numbers 28:26. So Christ is our Passover (His Death), and Firstfruits (His Resurrection). Verses thus balance to titles.

So why can't we test how many years have passed since the Crucifixion?

We saw in the closing Episode 24 PATU, that Paul's timeline aligns with the Roman AUC: but the Romans used two AUC dates. One presumed Rome was 750 years old at the time we call end 1BC, and another claimed age 753 for that same 1BC. Paul seems to use the 753 AUC, as does John, in Rev 1:1. That calendar was law in their day (put into law by Claudius). For their dates tally to 'our' AD dates. But they might also be reckoning by both calendars at once, as we are now, essentially treating Christ as born in what we'd call end 4BC, too. That's the challenge.

So how to resolve it? Tally how many years since the Crucifixion, for we know what day of the week that was. So it seems we could look at eighths — every eighth day is the same day of the week, as 8 days prior. So if this year began the 6119th after Adam (remembering that it's Jewish time, so we are really at the end of the 6118th year) — THIS year's anniversary of the Crucifixion — defined as 14 days after the vernal equinox — this year's anniversary, should be a Tuesday; NEXT year's anniversary should be Wednesday (1984+4136 from Adam = 6120, and 1984/8=248).

But the vernal equinox has a three day drift, plus we have leap years. But wouldn't all that automatically resolve itself, so we could do the simple calculation above? Or am I having a brain fart? I do have brain farts with this calculation, and with 'should I buy decaf or regular'. So if you want to help me out of my brain fart, I'd be grateful. Thank you!

Thinking out loud about whether we're in the right year. Can the calculation be this simple? Do you see something wrong? PLEASE TELL ME what I'm missing, if you're in the mood, because my brain is OUT on this topic! Meaning, whether a straight day-of-the-week comparison from WEDNESDAY of His Crucifixion to now or 2014, is enough to establish whether we have any missing years between His Crucifixion and 'now'. Or, too many years. The thing is, it seems like if this year's Equinox is Wednesday, then the anniversary of the Crucifixion would be two weeks later, and Tuesday. So why isn't the 1983-year interval, evenly divisible by seven? And why does it seem spot-on in 2014, with the interval evenly divisible by 8? What am I missing, here?

There are 103470.107 weeks between AD 30-2013 (presuming both are BOY). The .107 = almost 1/7. One day. (365.25x1983/7.) By contrast, 1984x365.25/7= 103522.285 weeks. Remainder=Two days. So with the fractional days, you end up with 1989 and 1990 52-week years, each with almost 6 days' remainder. So? Okay, that's it, I can't think this out anymore.

Website in video: https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/seasons.html?year=2000&n=110.

1984 x .25 = 496. That would be the number of days to factor in due to leap years, but I wonder if they are even an issue, since we're going by anniversaries of equinoxes?

A BETTER REPLACEMENT VERSION of this video, is now at vimeo-how-god-orchestrates-time.htm. You can anonymously download and comment there, too. It was newly remastered on 11/26/13; runs at half speed, with better music and clearer charts.

Download original worksheet, GeneYrs.xls.

Gist: God orchestrates time, which can always end abruptly due to negative volition. This video overviews the import of that Bible truth. Video requires you download the Excel spreadsheet GeneYrs.xls in "C" below. Recommend that you FIRST download it before watching the video. To read its cell A2 note, put your mouse on A2; note will pop up.

God orchestrates time in 490-year increments since Adam's Fall. That and other claims made in this video were extensively audited during 4 years of intensive research. There is nothing like this on the internet. I learned all this by mistake in May 2004, when trying to balance Daniel 9 so to grasp something my pastor taught; I was caused to realize God there REINSTATED time from the 1st Temple, to justify granting time to the 2nd. Which meant, He had a time-grant system He was using like debits and credits. Scholars don't know of this system, for they keep making the wrong assumptions, and instead of using Bible, went OUTSIDE Bible to get dates. Bible has its own dating system; if you follow it exclusively, you balance from Adam forward. It's self-auditing, so you can tell if and where you miscalculate or misread. So you only need BIBLE. (You can use extra-Biblical sources to corroborate later.)

God begins Time accounting not at creation, but at the FALL, in Genesis 5:1. Criterion for granting Time to the entire world: due to the Angelic Appeal Trial Adam was created to resolve, AT LEAST 1 BELIEVER MUST SUPERMATURE EVERY 490 YEARS, OR TIME ITSELF ENDS. So Time is a Contingent Justice Issue, a baton-passing relay race, and can always end abruptly.

But when Israel left at the Exodus, she was PROMISED time. So when she rejected God as King, the promise went to David. So Time Grants to David controlled when Time would end — and from David forward, only MESSIAH could 'pick up the baton'. Messiah was rejected when He came. So Messiah ELECTED to pay a FAR higher price on the Cross, for a future "Church" as Bride, as Father might choose in His Discretion. So Israel ran out of time, but Messiah won at the Cross.

Hence the PROMISED time remaining, was the 1007 years for Israel, and Church operates on the old rules precedented in Adam.

Which means, the Rapture must occur, must be pre-Trib, and cannot be predicted in any way. For Rapture is not related to historical events or prophecy; but is solely dependent on believer maturation, criterion of Ephesians 4:13.

The associated webpages below are long, complex, with many Bible citations. Generally you do not need to know Hebrew or Greek to vet the data. You must be patient, though, as there are 100s of date verses to vet.

A. 30-page Summary of how God Orchestrates Time: TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc. Suggest you read it in full screen Print Preview, Two-Pages. You can easily scroll from one page to the next with your mouse. If you'll study this material in depth, start with this Word doc, esp. its last two pages (which reproduce the cell A2 summary note of the spreadsheet). This doc also covers mistakes scholars make which prevent them from seeing Bible's dating system.

B. Doctrine of God's Time Units and Mirroring: Mirroring.htm. Here, all time accounting units are explained (i.e., 1 year, 7 years, 40 years, etc.) but focus is to show the Justice Accounting Doctrine of Time itself. There is an in-depth tracing of each person granted time from Adam through Christ, with Bible verses showing how the numbers in the spreadsheet below, were derived. Mirroring is a redemptive 'reimbursement' of time well spent. Time lost is debited, but regained if certain conditions are met (hence Daniel 9). Again, all this is exhaustively explained in Mirroring.htm.

C. Timeline Spreadsheet from Adam through 2007 (entries post-Cross are often sparse): GeneYrs.xls. You need the worksheet to productively view the video. Suggest you view it wide-screen, but half-deep. Use Excel's "View" then "Custom View" to access Time subsections (i.e., "David", "1st Temple", etc). Use Freeze Titles on cell B14 for best results.

D. The Lord's Birth and Death dates, chronology of Jewish Calendar to see God's Macro Orchestration of Time and Passion Week: PassPlot.htm.

E. All the above is contained now within Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

Paul's Time Accounting slightly changes my GeneYrs.xls worksheet on the 490 and 1000-year time grants: he starts them at Christ's BIRTH. Mary used His Birth, too. Paul 'tags' Mary where her meter ends, at Christ's (then future) age 56: that's 40 years before the End of Time, pre-Church.

This change means our current 490 and 1000 year grants, both historical and qualifying, end 30 years EARLIER, at 2100 (vs. 2130 AD in GeneYrs.xls).

Even so, God measures Time in 490 and 1000-year units from His Death; even as, He gave Time Grants to David based on both birth and death of his kingships; so the outer limit of Messiah's Time to Arrive and Die in Dan9:25-26, became 1000 years after David's DEATH at age 77. (Not age 70; scholars misread 1Kings 6:1, so use Josephus for the errant age 70; in Bible, that's David's RETIREMENT age.)

There are six related playlists:

The newest is on Peter's meter, in 1Peter1:1-12. He plays on Paul's meter. In Youtube, the Episodes only go through RFG5e16; so just watch the vimeo channel. Future episodes will only be in vimeo.

Paul's meter is Eph 1:3-14; http://www.vimeo.com/channels/paulmet... and http://www.vimeo.com/channels/paulmet.... In Youtube, the link is • b-out GGS God Meters Time, Epi.10-11 . Episode 10 is background on the metrical style, and Episode 11 documents the meter, syllable by year by Caesar, through Odovacer. As of today (12/29/12), I've only completed the videos up through Constantine. Will resume this series in 2014. Future Episodes will only post in vimeo.

Mary's meter, is the Magnificat. This series is complete in vimeo: http://www.vimeo.com/channels/magnifi.... In Youtube, link is • b-out Mary's Magnificat Meter of Time . Mary picks up after Daniel's terminus in his timeline (playing on his 73 meter): starting from initial Chanukah to her own age and then her Son Who'll be born on Chanukah; until His age 56, which is 40 years before the Millennium was to start.

Psalm 90 playlist. Series is incomplete (i.e., Episode 23h crashed and I must rebuild it). Videos cover the precedenting meter of Psalm 90, then Isaiah 53, then Daniel 9 meter schemes; including, time-plot meanings, translations, so you can vet the material. In vimeo, go to http://www.vimeo.com/psalm90 . In Youtube, • b-out Psalm 90 Meter of Time, Exegesis . Future Episodes will only post in vimeo.

Yapping Most High starting at Episode 10, is a primer on the MATH of these Time Rules. If you're not familiar with the rules, start in vimeo, http://www.vimeo.com/channels/howgodo.... In Youtube, • b-out God's TIME Rules, YMH Epi10 and • b-out God Orchestrates Time . The vimeo set is easier to absorb.

Master webpage is Mirroring.htm, written in 2004. By contrast, the latest written master set is Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. Replace 'doc' with 'htm' to solely read online. Or, download the pdf, Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

The Jews call these TIME rules, "Age of Desolation" and "Age of Torah". Google on those terms. However, they garbled the math soon after the Cross (i.e., Josephus' numbers are mostly wrong). Also, garbled remnants are in Sanhedrin 97a-99b in Talmud. Their idea is right; their math, is wrong. They know they're living on Promise Time; the Seder Olam Rabbah, tracks it. Sadly, its math is all messed up too; so Jews think it's year 5773, though it's 346 years later! This problem is well known: Google on Seder Olam Rabbah, to read about it.

Christianity has no clue about these rules. John Hagee, using someone else's errant math, came up with his own version, sometime in 2007 or 2008. He just invents 1948 as a key date and backs into the 490s from it. That's not Biblical, so of course his numbers are all wrong, too. At least he knows there IS a 490-year tracking system! He just accounts it incorrectly.

Else, I can't find anyone else knowing about this all-important topic. So I must extensively document it, so you can proof the material yourself. It's vital to textual criticism, hermeneutics, eschatology, and proving Bible's dates are historically accurate, especially the dates when Bible books were written. So much contention would end, if we just learned this meter. So to find it yourself, use http://www.brainout.net/BibleHebMeter... (or htm or pdf) . Bon appétit...

2015 He died on April 3 per BIBLE (everyone else is incompetent); Per BIBLE, Easter begins April 7, videos on it and prior, here: https://vimeo.com/brainout/patu31 and https://vimeo.com/brainout/patu30 . This Youtube video is also in vimeo, link here (so you can comment): https://vimeo.com/brainout/patu29

In 2014, Passover begins today, April 3. So tonight plus two more nights equals 5th as His last night, anniversary. So tomorrow plus two more days equals April 6, so the TRUE Easter day is after sundown, April 6. We get it perpetually wrong, ignoring Bible verses in this video.

Comment here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/patu29 . Noah's Flood Precedence channel (still in draft form): https://vimeo.com/channels/noahicfloo... . It will be more than a year before I finish it.

Both video and exhaustive Bible backup are here: PassPlot.htm. Audio audit of Vernal Equinox: VEconfirms30AD.WMA. You can see the VE yourself, here: https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/seasons.html?year=1&n=0

Took me over 2 years to research; you can prove it all yourself IN the Bible, within a month or two.

So why are we so confused about his Death Date? ANTI-SEMITISM, which disdained learning the details regarding Passover, in the Mosaic Law! So because the anti-semitic 'Church Fathers' didn't BOTHER to learn the details, they screwed up the dating of His Death! Disgraceful!

No problem. It's not hard to prove what BIBLE says, if one but reads it. Sometimes you need to be a Greek geek to catch John 19's sarcasm (which all the scholars know about, read ISBE), alerting us to the fact that TRUE Passover occurred when the Lord was crucified (so the formal Passover He ate, was due to the calendar not being updated for the new year). Those verses are covered in the above webpage.

God begins tracking Christ's Birth and Death dates in Genesis 5. Exactly. And based on His Death date, you can exactly know what days of the week are any year forward or backwards of that date. This is the only timeline in history which is 100% consistent and provable. So why don't we use it?

How did we EVER come up with the goofball 'Good Friday' nonsense, which requires 1+1+1=1.5? Sheesh! Spitting on the Cross! Spitting on Bible! Spitting even on common sense!

It's not really RoshHaShanah 2016 today, folks. That began on autumnal equinox, 9/22. But you can FIX the calendar to make it right next time, video shows how, with TALMUD LINKS to show that Jews USED TO KNOW all this.

The whole fix shows in the onscreen icon for the video: so you don't have to play it; download link follows below. Video goes through the fix, as I created it during the video process. For, thanks to an email I just got from someone else who's also doing the meters in other Bible books, I now know an error I'd been making for some years: my error, was to listen to the 'scholars' and the Jewish calendar practice of intercalating an Adar sheni, instead of doing the math myself; well, the guy writing me the email did the math and informed me of my error, hooray! So now you can see the correction: Adar is the WRONG MONTH for intercalation. Bible uses ELUL, and so did Israel, prior to the Exile, per the Talmud. So, this video shows the fix.

Frankly, there's no need to intercalate, just always have Elul=35 or 36 days. Autumnal equinox 'naturally' occurs on its last day, in that design. And I bet money, that's how God designed it. Only later when Israel got hung up on being 'different', did she revert to the pagan practice of lunar years, and hence needed to intercalate.

Related links:
To the corrected calendar in the last segment of the video: Intercal.xls. If you'd rather just look at the picture you see onscreen before video starts, CorrectedforBIBLEIntercalated2015-2016.jpg or pdf, if you prefer pdf. The xls has the same data, which was corrected after video done (I mistyped the dates after May 2016,in the video).

If you also want to correct the Adamic years, 6122 begins on the autumnal equinox 2015. For the complete Adamic calendar going back to Adam which the Bible actually uses in the NT meters (because I derived it SOLELY FROM the Bible), download GeneYrs.xls.

Also, HebCal.htm is useful, and the site explaining it (both now corrected to say 'Elul' instead of 'Adar' for intercalation), is PassPlot.htm.

Book citing Talmud (footnote 66 on page 254) as source for the PAST PRACTICE of Elul not Adar, intercalation (Elul intercalation always makes the equinoxes 'fit'): https://books.google.com/books?id=FI9pAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA254&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false. You can also view it in Amazon (but not page 254), https://www.amazon.com/Calendars-Antiquity-Empires-States-Societies/dp/0199589445/

Click on 'Look inside' then search on 'intercalary Elul' to get to page 254, but you can't actually read that page. You can read pp249 and 255, though.

Babylonian Talmud ONLINE: https://juchre.org/talmud/talmud.htm. The citations in the video are in Order Mo'ed: at bRosh Ha Shana 19a and 19b, 32a, https://juchre.org/talmud/rosh/rosh2.htm#19a, https://juchre.org/talmud/rosh/rosh2.htm#32a, and bBeitzah 6a and 22b, https://juchre.org/talmud/beitzah/beitzah1.htm#6a and https://juchre.org/talmud/beitzah/beitzah2.htm#22b.

Book citing POLITICS over intercalation (page 772, but you have to view the book for three pages prior, which maybe you can't do in Google) — so we know why the Jewish calendar is wrong, and has been wrong, for centuries: https://books.google.ca/books?id=M0wUKoMJeccC&pg=PA772&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false. You can also read the page here in Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/History-Palestine-634-1099-Moshe-Gil/dp/0521599849

Click on 'Look inside' then search on 'creation of the world on 25 Elul' to get to page 772.

Of course, due to our own anti-semitic politicking, to cover up the fact Christ is JEWISH — all our calendars are messed up with respect to Easter, as the earlier PATU videos (29-31) showed. So our political gambits are to blame, NOT Bible!

Yeah, and God made it possible to easily correct RIGHT NOW, as the xls and video, show. Whew. Remember, upcoming anniversary of His Crucifixion, is really April 3; upcoming real Easter (really First Fruits) date is post-sundown April 6, which is 'our' April 7. EASY. No politics, no slovenly 'scholarship', just BIBLE.

I tried to summarize the links etc. on how you can tell from the Hebrew and Greek meters, in the Bibleworks forum, thread here: Bible has its own method of ANNO DOMINI display, The LukeDatelineMeters.pdf has the links as well, so just download it, if you prefer. It does not yet have the Intercal.xls, but will.


b-out Preterism Retards: quick proof why

Quick proof why Preterism and mid-Trib, post-Trib no-Trib eschatological positions are all spiritually retarded. This matters, because when choosing a teacher, you can't afford to pick one who denies pre-Trib Rapture. Anti-semitism is behind denial of pre-Trib Rapture. So you will be in effect under God's Genesis 12 curse, if you deny pre-Trib Rapture.

Granted, there are thousands of related verses, and the doctrine is very complex. So understandably you won't 'buy' a doctrine absent study. But you also shouldn't deny a doctrine absent study.

So there are many BALD passages on a FUTURE FOR THE JEWS which are clear in any translation. So you have zero excuse to hold to preterist, mid-Trib, post-Trib, or no-Trib positions. At most you can only say, 'I don't know, until I study more'.

So if you deny pre-Trib Rapture despite these obvious passages — seven of which are depicted in the videos, and very well known — your brain is unable to read Bible, so you are carnal and in need of 1John1:9, prontito.

For Daniel 9:27 bluntly says SEVEN YEARS in the future for the JEWS, and in the middle of that seven years, the Temple is OVERRUN by the Gentiles, as confirmed in Rev11. Overrun. Not, destroyed.

Um, there's no Temple now. Rev 11 says there WILL BE one. If as the stupid preterists claim, John was writing in 70AD, then the Temple was down already, so the event depicted in Rev 11 is yet FUTURE.

So it's not happened yet, and preterism, mid-Trib, post-Trib, and anything BUT pre-Trib Rapture, is all retarded as an eschatological position. SEVEN SOLAR YEARS. You can't get the count right if you don't use Exodus 12 SOLAR accounting, so even the Dispies who are pre-Trib Rapture, flunk here. Because their math is so bad, using lunar years, the others who reject pre-Trib Rapture mock pre-Trib Rapture.

As a result, I had to go all the way back to Genesis 5 and do the BIBLE's timeline, independent of the 'scholars' and those who use astrology or astronomy or GUESSWORK. And you know what? The BIBLE is right, and shows exactly what the 490 means: a TIME PLAN dating from Adam. Head document on that plan is Ephesians1REPARSED.doc, since Paul uses the 490 to plot his meter for Ephesians 1:3-14, a prophecy of the first 490 years of Church history beginning at Christ's birth. Substitute the 'doc' extension with 'htm' if you'd rather use the htm. By contrast, the pdf version: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. All the associated webpages and video playlists — I've done many of both — are in the first five pages of that doc/htm/pdf file.

Underlying doctrine is How God Orchestrates Time, which is on that doc's page 3. Larger writeup of it on the web, is Mirroring.htm, which also links to some (not all) of the related videos etc. The calendar from Adam forward using ONLY the Bible's OWN dating system (not anything of man's), is plotted in GeneYrs.xls. You can vet all the material ONLY using the Bible. Which will take you a long time (heh): but it's do-able, even by a brainout.

SO DO YOUR HOMEWORK, so you won't be retarded. Use 1John1:9 and find a PASTOR who at least knows the pre-Trib doctrine, because if he denies or distorts it, you wll become retarded like he is.

New series of shorts quickly proving the anti-semitic nature of preterism and any non-pre-Trib 'rapture' position. Clear Bible passages showing the FUTURE PROMISE to the Jews. Anyone not pre-Trib Rapture is therefore anti-semitic, even if he doesn't realize that, and is therefore under discipline from God.

This is one of the doctrines you can't afford to reject. To prove how BLUNT Bible is about it — hence how retarded is the Christian who rejects it — we start in Genesis 17.

Important: it's normal and even okay to be unsure about a doctrine, and on some doctrines, even be wrong about them, for a good while. But some false doctrines will poison you more quickly than others. So you can't afford to accept them outright, but always hold open to alternatives. Eschatology is entirely bound up with the promise to Abraham, so NEVER assume that Church replaces Israel. That is, unless you want to slowly become insane, and more slowly lose your body function one painful day at a time.

Dead serious about this. Believe what you want, but always be asking God for BOTH SIDES of the argument, lest you poison yourself. The anti-semite will not do this, because he's jealous of the Jews. Don't emulate him. Just watch this short series to see how obvious it is, that God HAS a plan for the Jews which is IN TIME, and is YET FUTURE.

JEWS are mentioned in Revelation 7. Not 'church'. If you can't even read the plain translation, you're retarded and need 1John1:9 desperately.

Origen was retarded. He read Rev 7 as if it meant Church, because he like all the other bilious 'church fathers' was anti-semitic. So, per Genesis 17 he had to be cursed with DARKNESS, no ability to read Bible in his pet area of rejecting it. The RCC and Calvinism has followed in his blind footsteps, resulting in Church being CLUELESS about what Bible says.

Harold Camping was anti-semitic, and so are those who listen to him; even though, he had his own convoluted idea of 'rapture'. Just like the RCC and Calvinism, JW, SDA and a wide variety of typical anti-semitic apostate sects, Camping believed 'church' replaced Israel.

So, God struck him down after first embarrassing him the many times his convoluted math and predictions, proved famously wrong. So now look at one of his key passages for his claims, and notice how all the other Christian 'theologians' also screw up the very clear Revelation 9.

Then just use 1John1:9 and truck on, realizing here how much we all need that verse to be protected from satanic clouding. Anti-semitism is the worst cancer you can get, spiritually. It kills the KJVO, RCC, Calvinists, and most other denominations. Ouch.

It's okay to get a doctrine wrong. It's NOT okay to call incompetence, right; or, sweep it under 'Christian love' or 'fellowship'. Unless, of course, you want to be cursed along with them, Genesis 12 and 2 John 9, 2Tim2:26-3:7, Philippians 3:18, Titus 1:12-14.

John datelines Revelation 58 years after Christ died, 84 years after Judaea became a province, and 126 years after Caesar revised the calendar using the same meter style as Paul, in Rev 1:1-3. To see it in Greek: http://www.brainout.net/Revelation1.pdf . I've not yet made videos on this. So John is saying that the 3-year problem we now have, is rooted in the change of calendar under Caesar. I've got to examine that more.

Do you see the Temple Rebuilt in Jerusalem? NO? Gee, maybe that's a BIG HINT that the Tribulation hasn't begun yet? But to the anti-semite, Revelation 11's BIG TIE BACK to Daniel 9:27 is missed. Whoa.

For more on John's sarcasm in Rev 11 which even Dispies get wrong, see RBTnote.htm and then search on 'creeping falsehoods'.

In the video at 9:50-60, I made a blooper saying John dates Revelation 58 years after Paul, but John datelines Rev 58 years after Christ died, 84 years after Judaea became a province, and 126 yars after Caesar revised the calendar — using the same meter style as Paul, in Rev 1:1-3. To see it in Greek: http://www.brainout.net/Revelation1.pdf . I've not yet made videos on this. So John is saying that the 3-year problem we now have, is rooted in the change of calendar under Caesar. I've got to examine that more.

6/7 will be on Daniel 9:27, which is the most obvious verse in the Bible that the Tribulation ONLY BEGINS AFTER CHURCH DIES.

As we saw Revelation 11 says there WILL BE one, and God didn't authorize it. But God authorized the Temple which was standing until 70AD, books of Ezra and Nehemiah, Haggai and Zechariah, report its REBUILDING. Just as God promised, in Jeremiah 25 and 29, which Daniel was reading, and timed for his prayer.

So its post-70 AD rebuilding, has not happened yet. So preterism, mid-Trib, post-Trib, are all retarded. 7 SOLAR YEARS. You can't get the count right if you don't use Exodus 12 SOLAR accounting, so even Dispies who are pre-Trib Rapture, flunk here. Because their math is so bad, using lunar years, others mock pre-Trib Rapture.

End series. Scholar brain-fart on the math in Daniel 9 is manifold, but here we see how bald is the fact that God only uses solar accounting for years. There is a lot of other evidence, such as the fact God always accounts time by BIRTHDAYS, which require solar year accounting; and, the 1Chron 24 priestly courses are based on a 24 hour day, so it's 30-day months until Adar, else the calendar will not BE a solar year (so not soli-lunar, which is only 360 days that scholars use). Thus all the priests have equal time, 7.5 days (really 15.21875 days, two weeks per year per course).

You can read about the priestly courses in Robertson's and elsewhere, 7.5 days per course twice a year. So they were counting HOURS, and would then complete four courses a month, with the hourly drift by Adar, keeping them current by end-year. That's why Luke mentions the priestly course of Zecharias, in Luke 1. To the educated Jew back then, that's all he needs to say: you know John the Baptist was born on Pentecost, and Christ was born on CHANUKAH.

Scholars also make a mistake in misreading 1Kings 6:1, not noticing that David had to be age 77 when he died, which they would know, if they properly read 1Kings 1:1-2:39, which takes you up to the third year after David DIED, with Solomon being crowned 11 years before, see 1Chron 22 and following. So the 'fourth year' is the fourth year after David DIED, duh.

Jeremiah wrote Chronicles. Daniel is reading Jeremiah, times his prayer to the two time tracks of SEVENTY YEARS EACH, in Jeremiah 25 (which track began with Daniel's own captivity during the first deportation which began just before Nebuchadnezzar became king, necessitating his return to Babylon because his dad died); and the other 70 years in Jer 29:10, is measured from Temple Down, 586 BC.

GOD is decreeing it in both Jeremiah passages, and in Daniel 9:24. No human king. So that means an entirely DIFFERENT ACCOUNTING BASE, measured dually, from 607 and 586, respectively. Daniel does this dual accounting by counting the syllables as he speaks to God, as I show here: DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf. God's reply is metered to 'play' to Daniel's, and the explicit text in God's reply uses the meter pattern as well, Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or Ephesians1REPARSED.doc; replace 'doc' with 'htm' if you'd rather use the webpage.

John datelines Revelation 58 years after Christ died, 84 years after Judaea became a province, 126 years after Caesar revised the calendar — using the same meter style as Paul, in Rev 1:1-3. To see it in Greek: Revelation1.pdf. I've not yet made videos on this. So John is saying the 3-year problem we now have, is rooted in the change of calendar under Caesar. I've got to examine that more.

However, if you just did the math in Daniel 9 based on SOLAR year, as you should, given Exodus 12 — you'd know that there are SEVEN EXTRA YEARS to account. And playing games with BC/AD and lunar/solar don't absolve the 'discrepancy'. So you can either be lazy and conclude the Bible wrong or a 'mystery', 'inscrutable', or you can do your homework and learn the above. Your choice.

But in no event should you be a preterist or anything but pre-Trib, unless you want God to spank you. For this is time promised to the JEWS. God help the person who won't accept that.

Replacement theology is the basis for preterism, largely using Romans 9. Last five videos in this series show how and why both are so retarded. Much more can be said, but I'm trying to keep it simple, here. So this simple video and the next three, focus on Romans 9-11 versus Ephesians 2. Last in series shows how Book of Hebrews, blows Replacement Theology outta da water.

I did a huge writeup on the difference between the Old and New Covenants which will take you a month to read, in LordvSatan2.htm#CovG. Took me years to compile and distill, so it isn't simple. But it does work with what you know, and you'll have to mull it all over, if you're even supposed to read it.

A shorter, pithier version of the difference in OUR Bridal contract, is here: LvS4b.htm#FitBride. That whole page demonstrates the difference between OT and NT provisions, as well. Part IV is on the TRIAL IMPACT of Bride down here, and is summarized in my SatStrat playlist. In short, I've spent from 2000 until now documenting the role of Church and why Rapture, so there is a lot of material. On the other hand, you have to be deaf dumb and blind to miss the fact that a) Church does NOT replace Israel, but the DEMONS, and b) to think that God would abandon His Promise to CHRIST as King of the Jews. But, that's precisely what replacement theology and its anti-semitic kant, does. Ooops.

Continued from 11/12, see description to 8/12 for links. Here the biggest proof Replacement theology is retarded, is baldly shown in the Book of Hebrews. Basically, the Replacement people ignore the whole book. Just as, they ignore most of Romans, Colossians, all of Ephesians, which are on the same topics. For Paul was the apostle of the NEW COVENANT, and stridently taught how the covenant changed NOT replacing Israel, but the demons. He extensively mapped out the history of Church in the meter of Ephesians 1:3-14, which of course the DAFT 'church fathers' and everyone ever since, never learned. So, when you don't know history presented in advance, you are condemned to fulfill it. So Paul, using Ephesians as a 'map' to Ion by Euripides for his Greek readers, showed the begetting of Church FOUNDED ON CHRIST (not the Mosaic Law), Ephesians 2:10. Duh.

That was preceded by a very satirical interaction of text and meter to show the first 62 'weeks' of Church, playing on Daniel 9, to show that Church would fail even as Israel had failed — which was the topic of Daniel's prayer and his meter. Ooops.

Church doesn't even know this meter, and Israel forgot it. Yeah, we learn from history that we never learn from history, so are condemned to repeat it. So now you can learn from history and not repeat it. Starting here, with the bald proof that most Christian denominations — which alike hold to some version of Replacement theology — are all RETARDED.

So that's why the Rapture hasn't happened, until yet. We are hardened just as Pharaoh and Israel was, via anti-semitism. Cute.

Replacement Theology Retards and God Deeds videos reference Hebrews 7:28, but it's mistranslated in all Bibles. Here, the mistranslation is demonstrated and the meaning of the verse is thus much clearer. Text very plainly says that WE CHURCH DERIVE FROM CHRIST'S PSALM 110 KINGSHIP, NOT from Israel. Can't miss it, even in translation, if you keep reading Hebrews 7 and 8 over and over. But best to start at Hebrews 1, and note how Psalm 110 is threaded at each point where the author of Hebrews explains the CHANGE OF COVENANT. Here in Chapter 7, he stresses how Christ could not be a priest under Israel, wrong tribe. The mistranslation is 'which came' or 'which was'; STRIKE THOSE WORDS FROM THE TEXT. For the translators are stumbling over what they deem a 'double accusative', how to translate it. Best to read the text literally, to get the drama intended.

Author stresses how Christ, Who has TWO KINGSHIPS BEFORE He is born, is born post-Law, but appointed SON (of God, get it?) before time began, to beat Satan. Church covenant thus derives from that pre-Israel contract in Psalm 110, NOT from Israel.

So there is no excuse for thinking Church replaces Israel. But, that's exactly what the Roman Catholics and Calvinists all claim, and they claim it, because of a dingdong named Hegesippus and those who copied him among the bilious 'church fathers'. I show how that happened, in my RCC video series within my PopeMyth video series, starting at the 'Bishop's Lists' book by Robert Lee Williams, which you can buy at Amazon for about $100. The book is a revamping of his dissertation tracing how the bogus 'pope list' came to exist. So I reviewed the book and quote it as much as I'm allowed, by express written permission from the publisher (in my possession). What I can't quote, I summarize in the videos, starting here: • 7a PopeM Fathers of Apostasy: Holy He... . The next 13 videos are in order after that one, all on the same topic.

Satan doesn't want us to see that Psalm 110:3 means Christ replaces him, so every Bible mistranslates Psalm 110:3. So of course the translation, doesn't fit the passage! So here we go through the Hebrew and Greek. If you read them as written, you see the meaning clearly: Satan is used to BIRTH the children of Christ's YOUTH, which He bought on the Cross.

Isaiah 53 will use every word in the Hebrew of this verse. John will use the Greek text for John 1. Paul will harp on BEGETTING, again playing on Greek text of Psalm 110:3. So THEY knew its meaning; but if you can't see it in translation, you don't see their ties!

See also Ps. 2:7; Acts 13:33; Heb. 1:5; 5:5

~ which link the Greek in Psalm 110:3 to Psalm 2:7, on 'today I have begotten thee'. So Jews translating from Hebrew into the LXX knew the verse was about defeating Satan, and knew the tie to Isaiah 53. So that's why their translation is interpretative, for the sake of their Jewish readers who only spoke Greek.

Again, there is no way to claim Church is born from Israel. Church is born of CHRIST, and HE is the beneficiary of the kata-Melchizedek SEPARATE KINGSHIP, which is PRE-EMINENT in both time and quality, over Satan. Just as it says here, in Psalm 110.

Note: last word in Hebrew is translated 'your youth', but it MEANS the CHILDREN BORN from His Youth. 'Dew' refers to semen. He BIRTHED salvation on the Cross, Isaiah 53:12, during His Own Youth (age 33, full strength of manhood), so the 'dew' (children, result of semen, here spiritually on the Cross) 'of your youth' is 'your people, freewill offerings' at the start of the verse in Hebrew. It's a causal parallelism.

And for added measure, 'from the womb of the morning star to you' (literal Hebrew), idea that He thus beat Satan: so Satan is used to birth Children for Christ, Isaiah 53:10 contract in eternity past, 'the beginning'.

So Hebrew translation, in its word order:

Your people: Freewill Offerings in the Day of Your Valor

In (Your) Glory, Holy

Born from the Womb of the MorningStar.. to YOU,

the 'dew' of Your Youth!

Greek translation, in its word order:

With You, The Beginning, in the Day of Your Dominion;
With the radiance of the holy ones,
Born from the womb pre-eminent over Daystar,
I (Father) begot You (Son).

I tried to put this other poem in the comments, but Youtube won't accept carriage returns:

We all were born, on Calvary;
Last Adam, Noah — set us free.
The MorningStar beat MorningStar;
So makes us One and Near, though far.

Satan won when Adam sinned,
But Christ beat Satan; so we're pinned
To Christ at Cross; and so we're born
In Him forever, to Adorn
His Glory Day; which Dad begot
A Body prepped; for Satan's not
Coming to the Wedding.

Poor guy elected other bedding.

So he divorced, but we are joined,
his former kingdom now purloined --
Our old sin nature shedding.

Final Note: some scholars scoff at the use of DayStar to mean Satan in Isa14, which is playing off Psalm 110. Book of Hebrews proves them wrong, using Psalm 110 as its rhetorical base, plainly with reference to beating Satan and taking over the Title Morningstar as the raison d'etre for Church. Ooops.

Laziness: everyone quoting some other human with initials after his name, instead of consulting BIBLE de novo. That's why the Rapture hasn't happened yet. No one is looking at the Bible, but instead they look at other 'scholars' who are in their sects, long in the past, never critical of what they say. So those 'scholars' or 'reverends' or other hoary heads, whether the bilious 'church fathers' or their anti-semitic cousins the Calvinists and Lutherans, JWs and SDAs, all puerile, think they replace the Jews. Century after century. Spitting on Christ.

For they don't pay attention to what Paul noted: the promises are to the SEED, not 'seeds' (Gal3:16). So the future promises to Abraham, Moses, David, Israel — all vested in CHRIST as KING OF THE JEWS. So the Trib and Mill are all owed HIM, around whom the DISPENSATIONS (not 'worlds', for crying out loud) are designed, Heb 1:2, 11:3 (Greek aiwn — say 'eye-own' — means TIME PERIODS, EPOCHS, never 'worlds'.) Ooops.

We share in a different kingdom He won at the Cross, POST-MORTEM, which He asked be formed at Father's Discretion, kata Melchizedek, Psalm 2:7 and 110. Double-Ooops.

All OT Covenants given to CHRIST, not to retards who think they are the true Jews or true Israel. Baldly proven, in 2Sam7 and Gal3:16.

So to all you anti-semites who call yourselves the 'true Jews', you are spitting on Christ, and God will discipline you for that, per Gen 12, 15, 17.


Textual Criticism: AUDITING God's Words, to verify them!

Survey of TC stuff on the web. Textual Criticism is the AUDIT SCIENCE of proving the Bible's authenticity. For like Elihu told Job, 'the ear tastes truth'. Taste is a kind of testing. Tastes good, or bad? Tastes right, or wrong? Obviously sometimes your assessment is personal, but there is such a thing objectively, as good or bad taste. We see that, in fashion, thinking, politics, etc. So auditing, is good. 'test Me in this thing', God told the audience of Malachi. Yeah, pay the tithes (taxes) you owe. So it's taxing, to audit. And GOD IS IN IT.

Very technical, dramatic BIBLE KIDNAPPING story, Bibles fought over, made easier or harder to read or get, in 200-year cycles. For a long time, there was debate over WHAT was 'Bible', and that fight did not begin nor end with, the Council of Nicaea. It's ALWAYS been argued. Why? Well, the debate centers on two ideas: a) what people ACCEPTED as canon, and b) the TEXT. Out of a) and b), there grew an astonishing and complex history of what WE call 'Bible', all sorta lumped under the rubric of 'textual criticism'. That's what this series, is about.

TextCrit2-7d have valuable links, so you can orient to TC. It's the most vital and dramatic story of all time, 'hidden' due to the tedious forensic work God employs armies of scholars to do. Satan employs some of them too, all designed to make you DOUBT you have God's Word. So TC is vital to your life. The stuff is often hard to read; but ALL of it proves the WAR over Bible — ever since Moses wrote Genesis.

At times the web material disagrees with what I say in videos, so you can examine 'both sides'. (LOL even I disagree with me, all the time!)

For example, TextCrit2 is on an independent TC site I have the privilege to webhost. Its author thinks the pericope adulterae doesn't belong in John 8 or anywhere in Bible; that view is mainstream, among scholars. (In my Great I AM John 8 (LXX series) videos I show why the mainstream is wrong; basically, scholars give internal evidence, too little weight.)

That TC site, http://waltzmn.brainout.net, is most helpful; sadly, most TC sites Googled, have broken links; or, you must read forever, to get their gist. So in this web series, I'll highlight the better TC sites in videos; and link even more sites, in video descriptions. Will keep updating the links.

Last five videos are a simple primer on TC, from my KJVOB playlist; they show why KJVO are the laughingstock of Christianity. It's time you saw how preciously this HEBREW AND GREEK Word, is preserved by God, never man!

So TC is important, as Bible's in many COPIES, none of them whole, none of them wholly right. Why? Bible's been attacked and copied and lost and found, ever since Moses. So the question is, do we really have God's Word? Yes, but no one copy of it is perfect, just as all of us are one Body in Christ, yet none of us are perfect.

So what makes TC so compelling, is that it shows the WAR over us, the WAR over God's Word. All history hangs on this story. But technically, TC is an AUDIT SCIENCE of 'recovering' the real Word of God Who has employed an army of hundreds of thousands over the centuries, to PRESERVE His Word despite all Satan's many attacks.

Blockbuster movie could be made from this history, were it properly told. But it's not told. Instead, thousands of people RIGHT NOW are toiling away, AUDITING to see what mistakes might remain, so you can be sure of your BIBLE. Your pastor has then good TEXT from which to teach you.

And of course thousands are busy arguing we have a corrupted Bible, like Wellhausen in 19th century; Ehrman, KJVO, Mormons and Muslims, today.

So how do we know we really have God's Word? That's what 'textual criticism', is designed to verify. It is a 3000 year old science, employing thousands. Just as, Bible itself is a COLLECTION of books over 1500 years by 44 people. Not one copy. Not one human writer. God always does things COLLECTIVELY and over a long time, so you know HE preserves the Word, not man.

This is the more studious version of an Introduction to my Textual Criticism playlist, which itself is a survey of TC materials on the web, plus some simple videos showing how TC is conceptually simple.

Conceptually simple, but the devil is in the details. Those details are fought over, every century.. since Moses. Every little jot and tittle of Bible is fought over by someone claiming it valid or invalid. What words, what punctuation, what abbreviations, what uncial or margin note or spelling or other 'variant' — usually, like obvious typos (as in 'teh email').

AN ARMY of people in any generation, are completely OBSESSED about the validity of the text; to disprove, or prove it. MANY ARMIES have fought over it, died. Today's King James Only movement is one of the enemy armies; but so too, the Mormons and Muslims; all of these claim our Bible is corrupted.

WAR, baby. Over this book, like no other. Yet we have 24,000 or so 'witnesses' (parts of original-language Bibles) which astoundingly reinforce each other.

WAR, baby; aka, policing. Keeping the faithful on their toes. Yeah, and don't you think God foreknew that? Isn't it better to have a constantly-tested Bible, than a lone 'perfect' copy which could be faked — so you could never know? That's what happened to the Koran. Othman destroyed all copies and rewrote it, per ahadith (Muslim tradition). Ooops, he missed some. Seven 'variant' old copies exist. Only seven. See how it would be easy to fabricate?

Your Bible is not like that; God made lots of backups! Which everyone fights over. So to demonstrate that WAR, 1b is the Mork version to introduce the series. :)

This topic excites me more than any other, so I get Mork-y, carried away, introducing it. Skip the video if you don't like antics. Or, the tonsure effect on the hair. :)

I just can't control myself on this. Every person involved in Textual Criticism should get a billion dollar salary. It's due to THEM, that you can trust your Bible. Even though, about half of them don't believe it's God's Word! Yeah, but God uses them to PRESERVE His Word, and they fight over it, as you'll see if you examine the rest of the TC playlist. The playlist is just a survey (with vital and extensive links in the video descriptions) of the better TC stuff and arguing, on the web.

If I were a billionaire, I'd spend it ALL on TC. First seek ye the kingdom of God, see. So I prayed for it. So if someday I make a video saying I got the billion (but I suspect God will give it straight to THEM, since that's the purpose) — you'll know why.

PRAY FOR ALL THESE PEOPLE, YOUR BIBLE IS PROVED VALID, DUE TO THEM.

New Series, adjunctive to GGS. This series will not be 'my' material, but rather surveys TC stuff on the web. A Youtuber asked me to do this series a year (?) ago. Seems like God agreed. :)

Why is TC important? Bible's in many pieces, because it's been attacked and copied and lost and found, ever since Moses. Here's a dramatic account, Tischendorf finds Codex Sinaiticus, in his own words: http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/extras/discovery.html. The 'home' page: http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/extras/discovery.html

So the question is, do we really have God's Word? Yes, but no one copy of it is perfect. So how do we know we really have God's Word? That's what 'textual criticism', is designed to verify. It is a 3000 year old science, employing thousands. Just as, Bible itself is a COLLECTION of books over 1500 years by 44 people. Not one copy. Not one human writer. God always does things COLLECTIVELY and over a long time, so you know HE preserves the Word, not man.

Very technical, dramatic BIBLE KIDNAPPING story, worthy of a blockbuster movie, if it could be rightly told. Christopher DeHamel, who wrote The Book: A History of the Bible (link in Amazon, https://www.amazon.com/The-Book-A-History-Bible/dp/0714837741) didn't claim that, but when I read his book, that's what I got from it. Here's one of his videos on Youtube: • Medieval manuscripts of Corpus Christ... .

Bibles fought over, made easier or harder to read or get, in 200-year cycles. For a long time, there was debate over WHAT was 'Bible', and that fight did not begin nor end with, the Council of Nicaea. It's ALWAYS been argued. Why? Well, the debate centers on two ideas: a) what people ACCEPTED as canon, and b) the TEXT. Out of a) and b), there grew an astonishing and complex history of what WE call 'Bible', all sorta lumped under the rubric of 'textual criticism'. That's what this series, is about. The fight, is unbelievable, just cruise through these alpha entries: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tc-list/message/848&v=9V4SIETZ-dA.

A good primer on the meaning and history of TC, is here: https://books.google.com/books?id=ZvpW1QkTk1sC&pg=PR7. You can freely download it via the gear icon; but you can't search it, except while online at Google. Here's another free primer, https://books.google.com/books?id=RRdVAAAAMAAJ&pg=PR3&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.

The Dan Wallace video I mentioned, is here: https://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2012/05/dan-wallace-video-on-new-manuscript.html

Errata: in the video, I was talking off the top of my head, and mistakenly said the Bible was written by 66 people over 1500 years. I meant '44', thinking of 66 BOOKS instead. Sorry!

New (2012) book by Emmanuel Tov, 'Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible', is here spotlighted: https://books.google.com/books?id=5Sh7dBDD7ykC&pg=PR5&q=&redir_esc=y. It includes interesting stuff on the LXX, too, but you have to buy the book, to read all that.

Note the different approach in Jewish TC, versus the exaggerated fractiousness of Christian TC. Very interesting read, far less padded with academic hedgings, than you find in Christian TC.

Lack of fractiousness is a bad thing, too: it means AUDITING a text is harder, more reason to doubt; for are the fewer texts you have.. genuine? This is the problem with the Koran: per its own ahadith, Othman collected and then destroyed all the copies made during Muhammed's lifetime, replacing that text with his own. So do you have the words given Muhammed? Who knows?

See also Ellis Brotzman's 'Old Testament Textual Criticism: A Practical Introduction' explains that very problem, here: https://books.google.com/books?id=Dg86WeszmtAC&pg=PA1&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false/a>

A 19th-century layman's analysis you can freely dowload: https://books.google.com/books?id=QRIaAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR3&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false. Just ignore his writing style, he covers important stuff which is hard to find, today. Convert it to searchable? Read vid desc to 'Google Books' video here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/googlebooksocrconversion

Here's another analysis, which deftly exposes the anti-semitic nature of many in Christendom who want to denigrate God's OT in order to strike at the Jews: https://www.aishdas.org/toratemet/en_cardozo.html. Note well the comment made by Walter Kaufmann, analogizing Wellhausen's anti-semitic approach to someone analyzing the origin of Faust. Yeah. So no 'oral torah', either. GOD's Word, never man's emendations — and God will TELL you Himself, where there's a problem.

Want Proof? Read Wellhausen idiot ideas for yourself: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4732. Longer list: https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3Awellhausen+%28j+OR+julius%29. Shame on us Christians, for ever listening to that guy.

Per the Mosaic Law (Deut 6-30), from the time Israel entered the Land, and especially after the Temple was constructed by Solomon: every village had to have a synagogue, Scrolls of the OT (as then revealed), an altar and Levitical priests for local sacrifices (for sins, freewill offerings, etc., as distinct from the mandatory pilgrimages to Jerusalem 3-5 times a year). So this meant probably a million+ scrolls of Bible existed. So just imagine how much devastation must have occurred — or how much some one sect among the Jews triumphed — for Israel to be reduced to ONE MAIN TEXT by 70AD — or, even 200 years earlier, read the book. That is the story told by Emmanuel Tov, and his reason for advocating textual criticism.

Of course, another reason is that as the Hebrew text became standardized, 'lesser' copies were destroyed or written over, unlike our modern 'Christian' practice of preserving ANY Scripture 'relic', however much defective. The ancient Christians also destroyed or wrote over Bible copies — that's how we got Sinaiticus.

Not that you must assume the fewer texts are bad; bear in mind that the Jews are the most persecuted people on earth, and in 70AD were nearly wiped out. So too, their many copies of the Hebrew. Were it not for God dispersing the Jews periodically from 722 BC forward, we might not have anything to compare. See: textual variation is good and bad; so too, a paucity of copies.

That is why it's important to consult the translations (aka Targums) in Aramaic and of course, the LXX. Thus you see more corroboration than remains, in the Hebrew.

By the way, 'Masorah' is the name for the now-accepted critical apparatus, in Jewish textual criticism, and 'masoretic text', comes from that term.

Book overview 'New Testament Textual Criticism and Exegesis: Festschrift J. Delobel' (https://books.google.com/books?id=HuqgadCCrvMC&pg=PAix&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false, this time of major writers in the TC NT field. For a succinct overview, see also 'Dictionary of Biblical Criticism', https://books.google.com/books?id=EV5x-fX79dQC&pg=PA353&q=&redir_esc=y.

Here's an interesting primer from 1876 — just after Codices A and B were found — which you can download: https://books.google.com/books?id=6rACAAAAQAAJ&pg=PP7&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false. Another old goodie, esp. Chaps V et seq.: http://books.google.com/books?id=lQIX...

Metzger's: https://books.google.com/books?id=2pYDsAhUOxAC&pg=PR9&q=&redir_esc=y

A simple book on TC, which explains stuff the scholars take for granted: https://books.google.com/books?id=XRyex1WWc2wC&pg=PA11&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Less simple but more comprehensive: https://books.google.com/books?id=thXUHM5udTcC&pg=PA41&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Here's another good one, 'Studies in the Theory and Method of New Testament Textual Criticism' By Eldon J. Epp, Gordon D. Fee: http://books.google.com/books?id=XCCf...

Kenyon's (downloadable!) 1901 book: https://books.google.com/books?id=XCCfBCdQT3wC&pg=PR7&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

And another collection of essays on recent TC issues, mostly in German, some English: https://books.google.com/books?id=M57qY4iPYHYC&pg=PP9&q=&redir_esc=y

I ramble in this video, to summarize the TC 'camps', which split between those who BELIEVE God wrote Bible, and those who do not. Many do not. God uses them anyway.

Upshot: arguments over Bible text are on minor things, which folks argue as if big things: whether a text says 'Lord Jesus Christ' versus 'Christ' versus 'Lord', for example. Most of Gail Riplinger's arguments are of this type; thus she proves unable to read Greek or Hebrew mss, because she can't tell errors in GRAMMAR, STYLE and SYNTAX if her KJV Greek edition, were used.

See how wonderfully anal (and political!) scholars get, even about scribal habits: https://books.google.com/books?id=oWyej_jGSGYC&lpg=PR21&pg=PA1&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false. Bible is vehemently tested EVERY DAY; a political football, even at the jot-and-tittle level!

See also here: http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/v03/Wachtel1998.html. The book in question was published in 2006, here: https://www.amazon.com/Testamentum-Graecum-Critica-Catholic-Letters/dp/1598562037

And why be anal? INERRANCY is at stake: https://books.google.com/books?id=wWDSR8y911kC&pg=PR6&q=&redir_esc=y

KJVO draw their arguments from 3rd century TC collation, see Chaps V and VI here: https://books.google.com/books?id=3VgXAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR2&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Textual Criticism employs two basic testing mechanisms: 1) EXTERNAL EVIDENCE, how many 'witnesses' (copies) carry the same or similar readings in a verse, and 2) INTERNAL EVIDENCE, how the words 'fit' the verse/passage when present or absent. Or, lacunae. Example: text which says 'Lord Jesus one no'. Other verses are consulted to see if they have the missing words, and whether those words make the passage, make sense.

Encountering the Manuscripts: An Introduction to New Testament Paleography ... By Philip Comfort: https://books.google.com/books?id=nPVHbSscCwYC&pg=PR5&q=&redir_esc=y

My video rambling also covers the VERY FEW big arguments about Bible textual validity which remain, such as pericope adulterae (John 8:1-11, see my Great I AM videos in the LXX series), Mark 16:9-20, passage differences in Gen 5, Ezekiel, Ruth, Esther. None of these big arguments, affect doctrine, but all affect how you read the passages, and sometimes historical timing God conveys. But again, it's often easy to know what fits or not, i.e., the guy mangling LXX Genesis 5 tired of reversing the Hebrew, so his numbers don't balance (someone aped him, in Luke 1).

What makes TC so exciting: a) people argue over SMALL STUFF, which tells you we've GOT the Words God Intended; and b) they've been fighting whether they believe in God or not, for 3000 years. You could add c), that fighting STILL CONTINUES, so baby, if there were new manuscripts found which contradicted what we have, WE WILL BE TOLD. So again, more proof you can trust we have God's Words preserved.

The Dan Wallace video I mentioned, is here: https://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2012/05/dan-wallace-video-on-new-manuscript.html

At issue, is how TC ought to work, in OT versus NT. An attempt to explain and solve the problems of TC methodology, is here: http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/v01/Adair1996.html

See also Dan Wallace's article on the revived state of the TC discipline, thanks to Bart Ehrman's books (lol): http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/52/52-1/JETS%2052-1%2079-100%20Wallace.pdf


b-out FIGHT vids

Videos on when and why fighting with other Christians, is right. It's a sickness in the Body of Christ, that we compromise the Word in the name of Christian Unity. It's also a sickness, that we fight over doctrines which frankly take a long time to rightly learn. So in the middle, fighting is a good thing; it's practice in thinking, debating, and is supposed to be IMPERSONAL, even when name-calling. Christ did it that way. So we must also. Hence these videos explore that 'middle'.

Playlist starts with why people misread Bible: they don't use 1John1:9. For Bible requires GOD's power, so a GOD DEED must occur, rather than 'good deeds'. All the degrees on earth won't help you correctly discern Bible. Conversely, sloven attention to Bible results if you don't use 1John 1:9, no matter how smart you are; so there's no excuse for not studying Bible like an academe; but also if an academe, there's no excuse for not using the verse. Either lapse, and God will not be in, your study.

1John1:9 gives you the Holy Spirit's MENTORSHIP, and He won't tolerate slovenly attention to His Word. You end up hallucinating meaning, if you don't respect Matthew 4:4. Out from the mouth of GOD, not merely translators, k?

Next, generic videos that go through the issues we face, starting with the Gospel, and on the generic topic of fighting versus being nice.

Playlist continues with specific cases of apostacy, like Calvinism and KJVO, but that's only to provide illustration of the issues. Every sect in Christianity is poisoned with false doctrine, and the false idea that you must be 'nice' or you're not 'loving'. How about loving the Word of God more than the world, more than getting-along (aka 'mammon', in the Bible)?

Okay, but that doesn't mean being feisty all the time, either. Kingship training: there's a time to be nice, and a time to be nasty, and part of the reason we don't immediately go to heaven when saved, is that we need to GROW UP in Christ. So there's a royal training to learn, since we'll be RULING forever, under Him. Ooops. Best to find out now, therefore, whether and how to fight! Then do it!

Doing God Deeds?

This is the setup video for the God Deeds subseries inside of SatStrat. the God Deeds videos all begin with GD prefix, followed by the Episode number. Its playlist starts here: God Deeds, GD1 Why Evil God deeds, not good deeds, is the spiritual life. Spiritual life is a supernatural way of life and demands a supernatural means of execution through the Spirit. FAR SUPERIOR to mere morality which any unbeliever can do. How Christians who claim that morality is spirituality, will never mature and instead retard, remaining spiritual babies until death.

Video is an experiment using Xtranormal.com software.

Related webpages: On God deeds via Spirit building Bible in your head aka DDNA: DDNA.htm

On how Bible proves Christ's THINKING paid for sins, He as the ORIGINAL DDNA prototype: Grail.htm

On how Christians childishly interpret God and hence mistake morality for spirituality: godnotmag.htm

Carnality: Detection and Correction

Carnal Christians cannot process information, so misread Bible, make mistakes, hear incorrectly. Conversely, if you have used 1 John 1:9 and are between sins, you cannot even make a typographical error. So when you make errors, you know to use 1 John 1:9. When you see others who misread, make mistakes, you know they are carnal.

Prolonged carnality is like Lady McBeth, always trying to remove its damned spot. Always the person must condemn others, keep telling himself how right he is, just as 1 John 1:6,8,10 (etc.) explain. So when you encounter these people in Youtube, they will not correctly understand your videos, they will not correctly read your comments — so you must repeat yourself. They will try to bog you down in endless debates. So you walk away.

Most of all, you learn to spot these same carnal traits in yourself, and thus use 1John1:9. For again, you CANNOT make a mistake WHILE you are filled with the Spirit. And the Spirit fills no one, during a state of sin.

True vs. False Gospels

Gist: "BELIEVE" Christ paid for all your sins, and you are saved. No other verb is used by God to save you. This video contrasts the BELIEVE verses in Bible with all the false gospel verbs out there, like 'repent', 'pray the sinner's prayer', 'invite', 'accept', 'be baptised'; and my favorite fake gospel lie, 'call on the Lord' — MISREADING Acts 2:21 & Romans 10:13 even in translation, can NO ONE read the CONTEXT? Sheesh, how Christians lie against God's Word. So, you're NOT saved if you listen to them. Listen to the Bible, instead!

All other verbs are works & do NOT save you. You'd think we'd at least listen to what Our Lord said, in John 3! But instead we mangle the Gospel, saving no one.

So are YOU really saved? Yes, if you merely BELIEVE Christ paid for all your sins — don't add any other verb to it. My pastor harangued on "believe ONLY" for 53 years, and I was wrong to be annoyed with him! Ask yourself why is it even famous pastors & evangelists get the Gospel so very wrong. So who are they saving? NO ONE!

This is my litmus test for a Christian or a pastor. If he adds ANY OTHER verb besides BELIEVE to the Gospel — and most do — I disregard everything he says. He cannot be filled with the Spirit & add verbs. Bible is too plain — ONLY BELIEVE. Gen15:6=John 3:16. So I silently walk away from these people. God is not in them.

So persons alleging you must repent of your sins, say with your mouth you believe, make Christ Lord — and mind you, these people are generally attractive folks — they are false spirits, sorry. They might not even be saved!

Don't you be like them? BELIEVE Christ paid for your sins and you're FOREVER saved just like Abram was, Gen15:6+John 3:16!

Carnal Gospel

Proof Carnality rots the brain, in Christians, and why Carnal Christians spout false Gospels: they lose the ability to even read SIMPLE WORDS in the Word. Without the Spirit's Brains, you have none: that's why I call myself 'brainout', to remind me to use 1John1:9.

1 John is on fellowship, not salvation. But the carnal Christian, cannot read that simple word, 'fellowship'. Carnal Christians cannot read even the simple 'we' in 1 John, so mistake 1 John as being about salvation, so mistake 1John1:9 as a command you must repent of your sins to be saved; so mistake 1 John 2 as meaning you must stop sinning to be saved. See how easily you can disprove what they say?

Similar false gospels are based on misreading very simple words in James. I did a whole video playlist called 'James 2 Exegesis' with color coding, so you can follow what James says. But just open your Bible to James 2:1 — see the word 'brethren'? So James is writing to ALREADY SAVED PEOPLE (his spiritual brethren). So he is not writing about salvation, but about something AFTER salvation, namely the 'crown of life' (James 1:12) — something ON TOP of salvation (reward, compare to 1Corinthian 3's gold silver precious stones). That's why he mentions Abraham as 'friend of God' — something Abraham was awarded AFTER he was saved merely by believing, Genesis 15:6. Parallel passage is in Romans 4.

So, see? If you are carnal, you can't even read the word 'brethren'. Just as, the carnal Christian cannot even read the simple words 'we' and 'fellowship', in 1 John 1. So he cannot read the simple words 'believe' and 'have eternal life', in 1 John 5:13. So what's the EVIDENCE you are saved? YOU BELIEVED, per 1John5:13!

But the carnal Christian is in the dark. So he gives you a dark lie Gospel.

Christian Apostasy

How to recognize and deal with Christian apostacy. This video also answers recent queries on why I am deliberately mean to some believers, but nice to those who are not believers. (BTW: pre-20th century and English spelling is 'apostacy', post and modern spelling is apostasy. You can prove that by googling on 'apostacy' and 'Google Books'. I was raised with the older spelling.)

Every nation has its share of internal traitors. The Kingdom of God is not a nation on earth, but a developing body of believers all over the globe — and sadly, most of us are traitors to the very Lord Who Bought us. Therefore, those who can spot the traitors, must say so, Galatians 5. Takes a lot of spiritual growth before you have discernment to spot the wily traitors; the baby Christian cannot tell right from wrong. Using 1John1:9, is a must. Absent using it, you will have no discernment, even if you had the Bible perfectly memorized in Hebrew and Greek, and had been a believer for decades!

So pity the new believer or atheist who sees all the fighting, because to him it makes no sense. Pray AGAINST the Christian traitor, who makes all the fighting necessary. Bible never blames the atheist or unbeliever. It blames the traitor: Leviticus 26, Deut 28, Philippians 3:18-19, 2Tim2:26-3:7, Hebrews 5:11-6:6, 10:29, Jude 12, 1John 2:19. (The legalistic believer is traced throughout 1 John, as that believer casts doubt on salvation; so John traces that evil, beginning in 1John1:6.) See also 2 John 9-11, Titus 3:10, 2Peter 2 (whole chapter).

The remedy for apostacy? Use 1John1:9 like breathing, and ask God to hook you up with a GOOD pastor, and then study under him (him, never 'her'). If you refuse to do these things, you yourself are apostate, an 'enemy of the cross', Philippians 3:18-19.

Apostacy evidences itself in two obvious ways: 1) the person cannot read even simple Bible words properly, even using verses which PROVE HIM WRONG, as if they proved him right; 2) the person keeps stressing body works. Bible says the WORD does the work — else it's dead — main theme in James.

James' letter is on THE faith and ITS works in you, not on your faith and your works on yourself. You can't see this witty distinction in English, the Greek insertion or removal of 'the' accomplishes that fine wit. THE WORD WORKS is his theme. See my James 2 Exegesis playlist to see James' own meaning for yourself (video series is very simple): http://www.youtube.com/user/brainouty#grid/user/B2D36A5F17A7ABB4

Now, you have options in how to deal with these people; it's not a black-and-white question of severing all contact, for then you would have to die, 1Cor5:10. More importantly, you must learn to RULE ON what contact to have, sever, partly have, etc. For you are in training to become a king, 2Tim4:8 (end of verse).

Kingship sometimes means being stern, nasty, turning away. It's a hard thing to learn to do, but for the sake of the baby believer and the atheist, you must do it. Else they will mistake all that fake lovey-dovey 'fellowship' as vindicating the apostate. At which point, you are responsible, principle behind Ezekiel 3:18-21.

That is the worst crime, to misrepresent Bible. And the apostate are 99% of Christianity, so much arguing continues. Trick is to get out from them, and instead get into the Word, just hunker down and study under your own pastor; don't argue with them unless you need the practice, Titus 3:10, 1 Tim. 1:4; 6:4; 2 Tim. 2:23!

1/2 Rebuke, Dissension in the Royal Body of Christ?

This pair of videos constitutes a thinking-out-loud about how to handle rebuking one's fellow believer, plus the dissension in Christendom. While this is technically a response to TheEdge012's "Weigh the Cost", he also did "ButAlso" & other videos on dissension, rebuke which you might want to review. Youtuber emperachio did some videos ("body" & "read Bible"); see also GospoJazz & christoferL. After watching & pondering Youtubers' perspectives, & integrating them with Bible I learned via 1Jn1:9 & my own right pastor, I get the following:

I. Since we are in training to be Kings, the most important doctrine bearing on these issues, is our Royal Training Purpose. The Royal Priesthood is covered at length in http://www.brainout.net/LordvSatan3.htm ; so its import is only sketched in the videos. Relevant passages springing to mind are: 1Peter 2:5,9, Rev1:6, 5:10, 1Cor4:8 (sarcastic), Book of Hebrews (dedicated to Our kata-Melchizedek office, new covenant via His Battlefield Royalty from eternity past, Psalm 110, which He invoked in Matt16:18 & ratified in John 17). 1Cor is on Body & Head (1Cor1:5 in Greek is punny, His Head in our heads, & 1Cor13 is His Head, wordplay on huperbole in 1Cor12:31). Ephesians wryly patterns the true Divine Superior Begetting 'answer' to Euripedes' famous play of the Greek peoples' origin, "Ion". Of course, the Originator of Our So-Great Office invented & explained it first Himself, in John 14-17.

II. Royal Rebuke, Dissension? On the one hand, it doesn't seem right, per Romans 14:1-15:14. Crown Prince "A" shouldn't rebuke Crown Prince "B"; our King of Kings has that authority, not us. God & Word rebuke, Phili3:15 (not mentioned in the video), plus other verses (samples mentioned in the 2nd video). On the other hand, what if "the other guy" is spouting heresy? Shouldn't a king-in-training, say so? Royals are expected to self-police, since they are RULERS. Yikes!

Thorny stuff! We don't all spiritually mature in the same way at the same time, & it takes decades before a seed becomes a tree bearing spiritual fruit: until then, all we bear is doo-doo, costing Our Husbandman. Even the Lord took 30 years before He began a ministry. Lambs, almost uniquely in the animal kingdom, can't be made into work animals. Lambs can only get fat & die, for the table. Someone else has to shear & then work their wool; & even that can't happen, for a long time. Sheep uniquely cannot find food or water; ISBE has this interesting article about Syrian sheep who in winter starved because they didn't know the grass was beneath the snow. (Pasturing outside in winter was always common, so the pastor had to clear any snow.)

III. Last 3 minutes of 2nd video review policy decisions I've made in light of these issues, in case they help someone else. Basically I draw the line in the sand at Gospel heresies, since that's a matter of life & death for the one hearing the false gospels, i.e., Abraham didn't have to confess Christ is Lord, invite Him, accept Him, mouth aloud he believed to be saved: Genesis 15:6 says he BELIEVED & was made instantly righteous (to which Romans 4 & 10:10 refer). False-gospel claims are based on bad translations (i.e., Romans 10:10 is mistranslated, Luke 23:42 & Mark 16:16 contain words which were added to the original-language text centuries later, so aren't true Bible).

The Lord didn't say you had to repent of sins to be saved in John 3:16, but merely Believe & in that instant you get Eternal Life; of course, neither did Abraham have to repent. Paul doesn't say we are justified by Lordship salvation in Romans 5:1 or Eph2:8-9, but rather by Faith Alone. Nowhere in Bible is "believe" anything but mental assent, as only your SOUL has the ability to believe.

Hmmm. So all these people misusing Scripture & adding verbs, works, rituals to be saved are Saving Precisely No One. So people are dying due to the false-gospel-panderers. Which is, 99.9% of Christianity. My pastor harangued about false gospels so often we the congregation thought we would puke. We were wrong!

Ok, this king-to-be will take a stand. Doctrinally. Impersonally. Not naming names of specific persons who are heretical. And, with Scriptural backup as to why a heresy is a heresy, as briefly exampled above & at length, in ponderous webpages. :)

Rebuke, Run.. or Research?

EDIT See mp3 update link at end of this description. Gist: Should we Christians, as Royal Priests in Training to be Kings under Our Dread Lord Who is King Over Kings, rebuke false doctrine, false teachers.. or, run away? Or, research? This is a Kingship conundrum, a Diplomatic Issue, which has been addressed by many in Youtube. Three videos below are of instant relevance to my response video here:

by blueridge08865 (to which this video is posted as response, since "b" precedes "c"): • Video

by ChristoferL: • Video

by CajunPunk: • Video

My previous videos on this topic were posted in response to TheEdge012, whose "Weigh the Cost" video is here (but he's done several on the topic): • Video

My response video to Edge, 1st link is here: • 1/2 Rebuke, Dissension in the Royal B...

I ran across this video by mistake (yeah, no mistake by God!): • Video

Think it over carefully before you go calling someone a heretic or wrong.

There is a direct correlation between those who accuse others of being bad or heretical, and spiritual degeneration. That is to say, when denominations frequently target those disagreeing with them (i.e., Catholic persecution of non-Catholics in the Middle Ages), the targeters end up declining spiritually more than the heretics they pursued. So too, individuals who spend their time lambasting other believers or doctrines, rather than learning God themselves — decline spiritually.

By contrast, we aren't to just sit silent and let falsehood flourish, are we? Isn't that what the Germans did, leading to WWII? The analogy is apt.

So this question is of vital importance to us all. Spiritual minefield!

I'm still thinking all this doctrine over; so this video in response to blueridge et al. is but temporary. Doctrine on this question in Bible is huge, a complex set of formulas. Many parameters in it, which sometimes counsel one to be silent, sometimes to be loud, sometimes to be gentle or harsh. It's not a simple doctrine. But then, Kingship training is not simple. So I need more time to formulate a more detailed video response.

Meanwhile, I did talk to God about it, recording live the brainstorming session (aka "prayer", the conversation-with-God version), here: RebukeOrRunOrWhat2.mp3.

Reference in the audio to Romans 12:2 should be Romans 12:3. See also 1Cor12, which ties to Isa53:12, the hub of the answer to this question on rebuking. Relevant webpage on it is RightPT.htm.

What's 'Dividing the Body'?

You have to war to build a meal, a house, a business, or even your body or your day. But warring seems like dividing, causing trouble. So how to know if you're building or tearing down, since the ACTIVITY is the same? Video offers a conceptual answer. Bible verses which tie are many, and some of them are listed below. If you think of others I didn't list, please put them in the comments.

I've made a number of these videos, so now they're in a playlist called 'brainout FIGHT'. This is the header video for them. The playlist goes through the context in which our fighting must or must not occur, to assist in brainstorming the issues.

It's real important we Christians 'fight'. To not fight leads to the false idea that you ENDORSE what you know is wrong, so Bible is compromised. Too much of that going on, in Christendom. Our Bibles have been mistranslated for centuries because scholars are afraid to GO AGAINST past errors. So much of our confusion today is due to the teachers and scholars and denominations, not fessing up. It's okay that they get it wrong: their job is hard, they're human, so doo-doo happens, no big deal. It's not okay to COVER UP or excuse what's wrong. Just fix it like a broken window, and move on!

So fight, yes — but do it well. How? Takes constant practice, and yes we constantly fail, too: like painting, piano, ballet, writing. Over and over again. Breathe 1John1:9 and practice, don't be afraid!

General principles of fighting: Ezekiel 3:18-22, 2Cor11:4, Gal1:6, 2:1-16 (really, all of Galatians), Titus 1:12-14, 3:10, Jude 1:3, 2 Tim 4:2, 1Pet3:15, 1John 4:1-6 (really, all of 1John), 1Cor15:1-10. Gospel of Mark is used also to condemn believers in the Year of the Four Emperors, for being just as miracle-hungry as were the Pharisees in Jesus' day.

Notice that LOVE means FIGHTING, just as much as being nice.

General principle of unity: Ephesians 4:5-16 (macro goal, which when reached causes the Rapture), 1Cor12. Wrong fighting: 1Cor1:12-31, because 1Cor2:16 isn't happening when people make an issue of MAN'S words rather than GOD's Word. See whole context through 1Cor3. Unfortunately 1Cor1:5 is mistranslated, so you can't tell Paul's theme for Corinthians is God's Word in YOUR words (Greek wordplay).

Variety in fighting: 1Thess 5:1-17.

The Lord's fighting: John 6-9, notice how He varies how He debates, between being nasty and nice. Open the OT on almost any page and notice that God ARGUES all the time.

Fighting versus judging: Romans 14 and Matthew 7:1-5. It's one thing to say someone is wrong, but quite different to judge them. Repeating the Bible's judgment isn't the same as judging them yourself. Example of the latter (which Paul was REQUIRED to do): 1 Cor 5:5. Notice the distinctions the Lord makes in these verses: John 5:30, 7:23-24, 8:15-26, John 12:47-48. Notice that the proper parameters are always WITHIN the Word, never outside it. This is a thorny area! The only resolution I can recommend is to always use 1John1:9 and ask Father in Son's name IF and WHAT you should say. Litmus test I use: would I demand Dad punish the person? If 'yes', then I need to use 1John1:9. If 'no', then I'm either sinning some other type of sin or am not in a state of sin on that topic.

And keep fighting against yourself, Romans 7-9, 1Cor9:27!

Links on Calvin, as promised in the video.

His anti-semitism shows in his commentary on Daniel. The following Calvin College texts have many typos, but you can search them offline: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom24.txt covers the first six chapters of Calvin's commentary on Daniel; https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom25.txt covers chapters 7 onward. Search on 'Jews' 'rabbi', 'Barbinel'. Search on 'God's Wish to cut off' and 'continual shower' in the 25.txt to quickly see Calvin projected his own anti-semitism onto God, claiming God wanted to exterminate all the Jews. Of course, that would negate God's OT promises to the Jews! So, Calvin got all his eschatology wrong, as well as most of what he thought of salvation and the spiritual life! Anti-semitism rots the brain.

I might make a future video on Calvin's anti-semitism for my Satan's Strategy series, to show his misinterpretation follows close on his anti-semitic remarks, each time. God even sent him a rabbi to alert him to the real meaning of the 490!

Calvin's last words: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc8.iv.xviii.ii.html. Search on 'pure doctrine' when you load the page. Read the whole page; my video remark relates to his 'pure doctrine' quote.

This is scary stuff. So I gotta ask Dad, 'where am I also getting it wrong?' For the biggest punishment is that God lets you wallow in your own self-generated delusions, never KNOWING Him. Boiling in oil would be better!

Battle Lines

Why and where I'll fight: anti-semitism, false Gospels, those objecting to Learning Bible As GOD WROTE IT.

These three threaten the extinction of the human race, every 490 years. We are in such a threat period, now. It's a scheduled thing, by God. I introduce that schedule in my Pass the Salt videos, here • Pass the Salt, Bypass the Flood! and in longer version, here (via vid desc): • Pass the Salt Companion Videos . Thus you can know where you are, in history. My How God Constructs Time, 10 GGS, and 10 YMH, and Psalm 90 playlists go through the Bible backup for these trends, and their vid descriptions have extensive webpage links. For I've been documenting this topic for 11 years, from Bible. So you can vet it yourself.

Anti-semitism threatens, because God predicates history on the Jews, Deuteronomy 32:8.

False Gospels threaten, because then the unbeliever doesn't have the right information on which to vote.

Refusing to learn Bible in the original language threatens, because God commanded you learn Word as HE wrote it, Deuteronomy 31. ChristKeep here on Youtube is learning it as God Wrote it, and in 16 months he learned more MEANING from the Hebrew and Greek than most people EVER learn from a translation! He's a teenager, studying on his own, from the free Bible software, e-sword; so don't tell me learning Bible in the mss is elitist or hard!

World history descends into war each time one of these threats becomes too high, as promised in Leviticus 26 and Deut 28. We are entering such a period, as is routine for the time — to clean us losers OUT — the last 120 years of a 490-year period. Ours, ends 2130 AD, as I've documented in Pass the Salt Companion video (description has the links).

Church is thus responsible for ALL the trouble in the world, just as Israel was, since Christ is risen now and Church is to carry TIME ITSELF to the Promise Destination of the Tribulation: I'm slowly documenting that fact in the GGS and Ps90 series, but have already documented it over the last 11 years, as shown in the links to my How God Constructs Time playlist.

So here I must fight 'you', if you are anti-semitic, selling a false Gospel, or refusing to learn Bible as God Wrote It. I won't pursue you: I'll only fight you within my videos, aside from an occasional one- or two-shot warning, if I'm 'travelling' to another poster's videos. Sometimes more than two shots, when someone sent me the video wanting me to comment, or clarification is needed. Idea is due diligence: warn and move on, that's the command, Titus 3:10. It's never personal, but an OFFICE, Ezekiel 3:18-21. (Judging is personal and prohibited, Matt7:1-5.)

When Integrity Demands Insult

Answering Critics. No More Munichs. Links on Titus 1:13 command to insult, follow below. There are many such verses all over OT & NT. Some NT verses are listed under my INSULT POLICY on my channel page.

Upshot: we Christians must be honest and self-policing. People must know they can DEPEND on what we say. They don't have to like us, nor we them. We don't have to like each other. We DO have to be honest, and fess up if we are not, or if we make a mistake. We DO have to declare when a thing is wrong, but we do NOT have to harangue. In a law court, you state the case and move on. In an audit, you state the balance or imbalance, and you move on. It's not personal, it's an OFFICE we have, under Christ.

No Christian needs anyone BUT God. We don't need mutual support, we don't need Madison Avenue sales gimmicks or human 'niceness' tricks; we only Need God & His Word. The world will not hear that Real Message if we are wimpy, like the proverbial too-nice priest/pastor in a TV sitcom or movie.

Consequently, feel free to criticize me, too. I don't take offense to criticism or insults. Substance, however, is the essence of good criticism. BE SPECIFIC, and then any insults will have proper context.

Finally, there are many mentally-ill people on Youtube. You do not serve Christ by reasoning with them. Many commands like Titus 3:10, 2Tim2:26-3:7, warn you to reprimand and WALK AWAY. There's even a school of secular psychology which also warns against catering to a person's self-willed delusions, by conversing.

See 'Shattered Illusions' here in Youtube. (My SpirPath.htm helps one detect spiritually-induced mental illness.) Mental illness exhibits itself within Youtube comments in at least the following ways:

Protect yourself, and either ignore or be nasty to these people. Do NOT cater to them by talking to them. Don't use a Youtube nickname revealing real name, birthyear. These people might stalk you. Women and men both get their fair share of the Fatal Attraction crowd. Be smart. Be rude. Or be badgered.

Your time is valuable. You don't spend it on nutters. They refuse to listen to God, so won't be listening to you, either. I block these people, sometimes without warning. Now you know why there must be an Armageddon, or a wipeout of Canaanites. People become infected, and contagious. AVOID THEM, says 2Tim3:5. BE RUDE, say 2John9-11, Titus 1:12-13.

Links below are raw scans of my July notes from R.B. Thieme's 1970 lessons on Titus 1:9-16. Hear them yourself: order L.26 and 27 of 1970 Daniel series, from http://www.rbthieme.org. They never ask for money or put you on a mailing list. To protect privacy you must order by phone or mail. All lessons are live recorded classes. (Thieme died 8/16/2009.)

I'm sorry for the notes' mess: Thieme talks fast, it's hard to keep up. Green streaks help you locate Greek words he mentioned.

Links below from p4 thru p8 cover Titus 1:12 (exegesis starts at 1:9, in p1).

How To Debate? Follow John 8!

Christ shows us how to argue. It's not a black-white thing, Ambassadorship.

You represent His Majesty's Government here on earth, and the earth is at war with Him. So you are not here to win a popularity contest. You are not here to 'win' people. You are here to declare His Majesty's policy, and people have to KNOW they can TRUST what you say.

So you need to learn His Majesty's BOOK, and rather well, lest you misrepresent Him! Proper ambassadorship is a harder job, than being a nuclear physicist; and it takes longer to learn. We know that, because even Christ didn't start His Ministry, until He was 30 years old!

We are graded at the Bema on how well we REPRESENT Him, how well we thus LEARNED Him, not not not on our rituals or good deeds. God-deeds are gold silver precious stones — gems in your mouth and in your head which only God can make, Romans 12:1-3, 1Cor2-3, 1Cor13. So some of us, having proven bad representatives, will be very far away from Him in eternity. Because, we didn't learn and live on THE BOOK, Hebrews 11:1-6, Hebrews 6, end Hebrews 10. Christ paid for sins with His THINKING, not with His Physical death, Isaiah 53:10's 'me amal naphesho' (=from the labor of His Soul) plus 53:11's 'bedato yatsdiq' (=by means of His Mastery of Truth Knowledge He Makes Righteous) clauses. So too, all 'work' is solely a product of thinking Bible under the Spirit, Philippians 2:7-10 plus the above verses. Nothing else counts, Romans 4, 1Cor3.

So you end up debating. Sometimes you must be nasty, sometimes nice; but always you must be honest. John 8 shows us how Christ does it. I try to use the same principles when I reply to comments (well or badly, I'm not always sure)!

An ambassador should never 'affect' a behavior, but should always key his words to the needs of the hearer, and ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS should be HONEST. That way the hearer knows he can trust you.

That's why sometimes it's very right to be nasty, especially since people who are hypocritical, are often nice. You want to make clear the points made, not 'win'. God does the winning. Your job is to declare as best you know Bible, in the moment.

Disclosure, not selling, is what ambassadors are supposed to do. The minute you try to 'win', you will become dishonest and once thus discovered, it's almost impossible to regain trust. That garbage about 'soul winning' is pure satanic arrogance. The objective is to give the person enough INFORMATION so he can make an informed decision. Never more than that.

No Christian should EVER be a liar. Worst sin you can commit.

For the secular counterpart, read Sir Harold Nicolson's 'Diplomacy'. He was a Brit who wrote this classic for foreign ambassadors. Worth reading. It was part of my college course, 30+ years ago. (In college, I was training to become a foreign ambassador, but God had different ideas.)

Shun Be Nasty Be Nice Be Silent — Which?

A test of the spiritual life is to know WHEN and HOW to respond. Here we look at two antithetical statements by John, and see that sometimes we are to be nasty. Other Bible verses are cited in the video, so you can test the parameters of the commands. Then you have to practice them in real life. It's a TEST of your learning Word! And when you flunk, you are to ADMIT it! And when others flunk, maybe you have to call them out!

I forgot to mention James 3 through 5 in the video. Those are flagship chapters on the topic, along with 1 John 2-4, 2Tim2:26-3:2, 1Cor15:1-10, 1Cor1, 6-7, 11-12, Galatians, Jude, Titus 3, 2nd half of 2Peter, John 8 (Our Role Model varies His Response), etc.

Last year, Youtuber byefigleaves also spent a lot of time thinking out this topic, usually under the rubric of 'the DNA of Words'.

Matthew 7 and Christian Swine

In John 8, Christ strongly insults the Pharisees. Why it is sometimes necessary to be stern with Christian swine? To defend the Word they are trashing. If you allow the Word to be compromised, YOU are just as guilty, Ezekiel 3:16-21.

Okay, but how FAR should you take that injunction? Soldiering and policing? With what right, authority, and even if both, to what extent should you use it? Parenting. Friendship. Being honest. Dicey thing to do, since you will be judged if you screw up, Matt 7:1-5; yet you also must judge, Matt7:6, 7:15-20, Phili3:18-19, 2Tim2:26-3:7, Titus 1:12-14, many other passages.

So Christians who are immature, who think you must always be nice or you're a bad Christian, are disobeying Christ. If you befriend a liar, you become one, 2John9-11, inter alia. So in the name of 'Christian unity', many lies against Bible are promulgated, preserved; and many started in the first place. So if you are nice to certain Christians at the expense of telling the Truth of God's Word, what do you think Christ will say to you, but Eze 3:16-21?

Not that it's easy to obey the injunction to be stern. It's not natural to want to be stern with people. None of us like to hear or say, strong words. But a bully will go on being a bully, if you don't stand up to him. The liar will go on being a liar, if you don't call him out. But that doesn't mean you follow the bully around, and bully him. Nor do you crusade, against the liars. So what are the parameters? ASK GOD. Matthew 7 here, lays out the ground rules.

So now we can better understand when Christ is nice OR nasty, and why. For our job, is to BECOME like Him. Not works. Not rituals. But THINKING. Which, like piano, must be daily learned in WORD, and practiced. Every day always failing, but always a little success too, with 1John1:9 breathed often. Fail, get up again, re-practice.

We are all swine, sometimes. Rescued, so we can now TRAIN to THINK like Christ.

Matthew 7 and Christian Swine, Addenda

Added stuff left out of 'Matthew 7 and Christian Swine': Greek Geek stuff on Matt 7:22, to show WHY the verse is on SAVED BELIEVERS angry with God for not crediting their works; how 7:13-14 compares loss of rewards (1 Cor 3) with hell; and other miscellany about how to diagram Bible's textual flow.

WHY THE WORDS ARE WHERE THEY ARE, is a vital component of hermeneutics. The words written, also tell you what thought flow is BEHIND the words written, so you get a full picture. For example, if verses 13-14 were on salvation-from-hell, then why does verse 15 talk about false prophets? Well, their popularity = the 'wide' (meaning 'crowd, throng') way. So verses 13-14 can't be on salvation to heaven, since 'prophetes' in Greek means a wandering teacher about God. So this must be about something post-salvation.

So the 'narrow', is about RESCUE from one's false ideas of what Bible means. Not, about going to hell. Yet easily as bad as going to hell, given how our own natures will be like Christ's, post-death. For He chose to go to hell, rather than skip the Cross. Yikes. So what does He know about the pain of NOT learning Bible, that we don't know? For He defeated sin by means of Bible, Isaiah 53:11.

Very different idea of what the passage in Matt7 means, therefore. So account for why the words are WHERE they are, to get saved from time-wasting, false ideas.

Reference to the 'scholar' who lost his faith. It's Bart Ehrman, here is his own explanation: https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/blogalogue/2008/04/why-suffering-is-gods-problem.html. So you see, knowing the language doesn't mean learning Bible from it. False doctrine is not necessarily avoided by reading from the original — depends on whether you ASK GOD about the meaning. So Ehrman believed falsely, so lost his faith in his false beliefs, and blamed God like the believers in 7:22. Saved, but bitter.

Matthew 7 and Christian Swine, Addenda 2

More on how Matthew 7:13-14 and 7:22 are about BELIEVERS, not unbelievers, with comparison to Luke 6 and Luke 13. The audio was made with closed eyes. Video is just a static picture of Matt7, so you can page in your Bible between Luke 6 and Luke 13, as I comment on all three passages.

Hebrew tsur is used in OT to mean the BEDROCK you hide in, famously in 'Lord Rock of Salvation' passages. It is frequently translated with Greek stenos, which in Matt 7:13-14 is translated 'narrow', so you miss the Lord's reference to Himself as the Word you take refuge in. He will parallel verse 24 with verse 13, so that's another big clue He's not talking about salvation, but about INTERPRETATION. Thus verse 15 logically is about false prophets (lit., wandering teachers).

Luke 13's audience who rejected the narrow gate, are not the same audience as Matt 7:22: the objections are different. Also, Luke 6 is addressed to believers, which includes the whole of Matt 7, whereas Luke 13's 'narrow' is specifically another instance in response to a believer's question about the unsaved. So the quote about 'narrow' was used in different ways for different applications.

Next upload after this one, will return to John 8.

Bible Believer Bloopers

False Doctrine originates from false definitions. False definitions originate from people imposing their ideas of the definitions, on the Bible.

Bible often uses the same term in many different ways, to denote different KINDS of a thing. More than one kind of salvation, because you are more than one kind of nature, life: so your LOCATION is saved immediately to heaven the first nanosecond you believe in Christ, hence you are 'saved', alright.

But what about your soul's thinking? It needs saving too: so you get 1John1:9 and Bible to learn and live on, while down here. You have no fellowship with God apart from naming sins to Him, even as the OT people didn't. They had to bring an animal too, but Christ now has Paid, so we don't bring animals. So that's a 'salvation': of your fellowship, maturation in thinking like Christ does, 1Cor2.

Then 1Cor3, at the end your body is saved, in the sense that you get a new one, 1Cor15. So three types of salvation, to go with the three parts of the believer: body, soul, spirit: 3 types of 'life'. For God is Spiritual Life, and that's why salvation to HEAVEN is permanent.

So too, seven kinds of baptism, several types of doors, seven ministries of the Spirit, etc. Just as there are many kinds of fish. But they aren't the SAME fish.

False doctrine is always derived from ASSuming only ONE kind of a thing. For example, the Calvinists ASSume only one kind of election, but Bible lists four different kinds, all of which are housed IN CHRIST. So Calvinism is flat wrong on everything it says, due to this misdefinition. Calvinism borrows from Augustine just like Catholicism does, and therefore shares in its falsehoods.

Same with KJVO: they ASSume only one Bible manuscript and translation (ignoring even the fact that the KJV is famously mistranslated in many verses, that's why new English translations keep on being made). So their false doctrine alike comes from an extra-Biblical ASSumption proved erroneous, which they won't give up, even as the Calvinists won't give up their slavish insistence on Calvin, even where he was wrong. And Calvin, was addicted to Augustine, not Bible.

Same too, with the idiotic young-earth crowd. They use Bishop Ussher's misreading of Genesis 5 (like the Jews before him), rather than Bible's Genesis 1:1, 1:2, Isaiah 45:7, 18-19. More than one creation, per Bible.

Popism takes many forms, and in every case, it's an insistence on ONE HUMAN source OUTSIDE BIBLE, for definition. So don't make that mistake, when you read Bible. God is the ONE to tell you what HE says. Use 1John1:9 and ASK HIM what His Word means. Or, you'll be like a goldfish attached to a fake shark fin. :)

Production Note: the original upload of this video was on the HateYourSinNow channel, of which I am a member. But in light of the upcoming series on RFG Book of Hebrews, this video should also be posted here. For the misreading of Hebrews, stems from people imposing their false ideas onto it.

10 Signs of False Teacher

Our teachers are not perfect, even as neither our parents nor we are perfect. So they, like we, fall prey to falsehood. It is harder on those in authority when they fall, so pray for them, Romans 13. Meanwhile, it is also incumbent on the believer to TEST anyone who claims something is Biblical, especially if a teacher. And you test, with the Word. If you find out a teaching is false, ASK GOD if you should do anything about it. Often, the answer is "no", but of course the meanwhile, you don't believe what is false, yourself.

This video shows some of the most-common categories of false teaching 'out there'. Some of it is merely mistaken, and as the teacher grows in the Word, he will grow out of his mistakes (just as we should). But the majority will be false teachers: that has been true since Adam. People prefer falsehood, and man being vulnerable to mass approval, will mostly cater to that approval. That too, has been true since Adam. So it is up to you, whether before the Lord you accept or reject, absent homework in the Word.

This video, with the other Lie Detection videos, is designed to facilitate that homework. Obviously, then, you test the videos themselves, before the Lord. For that's how you grow, spiritually, by testing using the Word of God — with God! Be sure to breathe 1Jn1:9 as needed, or you're wasting your time, no Spirit in you.

The 10 Signs of False Teacher:

  1. He sells false gospels, saves No One.
  2. He calls himself a 'prophet' who gets 'revelation from the Lord'.
  3. He childishly 'reads' spirituality as body stuff and/or ritual, miracles.
  4. He claims you do NOT need to name your sins to God.
  5. He claims God is NOT Trinity, or that Christ was NOT God (i.e., Angel or not God 'til after the Cross).
  6. He claims Rapture is invalid, or is not pre-Trib.
  7. He claims Church began in Abraham's tent, Church REPLACED, or Jews not true Israelites.
  8. He claims 'respectability'.
  9. He claims he's teaching 'the one true faith' or similar exclusive claim.
  10. He advocates political activism.

Falsehood stubbornly believed rots the brain. Literally. As time progresses, the individual clinging to falsehood will buy ever more of it in wider categories, and his ability to process information declines. The soul becomes narrow and prickly, taking offense when none is given; legalism increases, as does pettiness. God is no longer of interest, but only His Name, like a badge of ego preening. These are the hallmarks of spiritual decline, "earthly things" of Romans 8 and Philippians 3. Mental decline follows, to the point that even PLAIN BIBLE LANGUAGE on the topic one refuses to believe, cannot be read. The falsehood is loved too much. No point reasoning with the person, even the Bible itself, is now unintelligible to him.

Referenced Links:

False Doctrine: 10 Ways to Detect the Lie

Falsehood has at least 10 major characteristics you can test for and prove, whether it's a falsehood in politics, science, religion or.. Bible. False Doctrine always:

  1. Maligns God's Character.
  2. Stresses or glorifies man.
  3. Betrays incompetent (Bible) 'scholarship'.
  4. Obeys the 3 Temptations of Matt4, REVERSING what Bible actually says in the verse(s) claimed for support.
  5. Claims to be the 'one true faith' version — and you're bad, if you're not in it.
  6. Appeals to the 'respectability' of the human claimant (i.e., how popular, charismatic or how many degrees the person has).
  7. Justifies itself by appeal to other PEOPLE who are likewise respectable, rather than to Bible (hearsay/ ex cathedra claims).
  8. Is POPULAR. This discourages checking the claims via Bible.
  9. Appeals to emotion or intellect, in lieu of Bible in context.
  10. Fails Common Sense.

Bible mistranslation, misinterpretation, and misteaching also follows these 10 characteristics, every time.

YOU are responsible to audit what you believe, before the Lord — Who you ASK, for Proof, and then You Study Bible To Find the Answers. Else, you won't get them. Else, you'll hallucinate the answers and call them 'from God.' Fooling, only yourself.

Satan is behind all falsehood, whether secular or spiritual, and the amazing thing is he advertises it. Satan's way of advertising his involvement is summarized in SatStrat.htm.

Satan can't afford for us to know the truth, that's why Bible's been persecuted its entire life (i.e., torn to shreds, missing, lost, confiscated and sequestered within a generation or two of the books being written).

Belief depends on learning, so of course we'll all be wrong about something, no big deal. So God will correct us, If We Ask. But if we don't, He won't. Your self-worth is neither increased nor diminished due to what you believe. But your happiness is sure affected. And, your ability to comprehend, read, speak. Falsehood rots the brain. Just read some of the reactionary comments to this video or the Islam videos.

By contrast, you grow Spiritually If You Audit Everything, using 1Jn1:9 (if needed) as you do it.. so get cracking!

10 Ways to Wreck Your Spiritual Life (Spiritual Pathology)

Comment here: frankforum/viewforum.php?f=42

Dark side of Spiritual Maturation is degeneration, if believer rejects certain truths for too long: it is 1st mental, then physical. It mimics false doctrine you believe, or true doctrine you reject. The soul shrinks. Moralistic petty-mindedness (Philippians 3:19, Romans 8:5ff) is the main attribute of soul shrinkage.

Spiritual growth means gradual replacement of falsehood. Refusal to learn brings with it spiritual illness you can diagnose. Over the years I've seen such illness, 10 categories of refusal seem to speed degeneracy most. They are:

  1. Stop talking to God. Talking to God speeds spiritual maturation most, as you will recall Bible & know if you are at odds with God. So if you stop talking to Him, you become quickly agitated; or, sublimate, lie to yourself. Mental decline is rapid: hypersensitivity is hallmark.
  2. Stop using 1Jn1:9 (or don't begin, or name your sins to someone not God). People I know are dying due to this. Paul almost died from it, see his speech in Acts 22. David too, Psalm 32:5 +66:18, 1Kings1 (he named Solomon as God said, but didn't transfer kingship; 1Chron29 is his repentance).
    • Not using 1Jn1:9 kills your spiritual perception; what you THINK you know about Bible is merely academic, like anything else. Telltale signs of spiritual retrogression: inability to read plainly-stated truth. For example, people who don't use 1Jn1:9 can't read the fact that 1John is addressed to BELIEVERS, not unbelievers, so say you must repent of your sins to be saved. (So the person IS NOT SAVED, as the verse can't apply to unbelievers.) Such persons can't read the fact that all the OT sacrifices etc. were by BELIEVERS; that's how they admitted their sins to God. Bible misuse will multiply if you don't name your sins to God regularly. Test the difference: use 1Jn1:9 many times a day for a month, see the huge growth in your Bible perception!
  3. Stop learning & living on Bible or never start. Decline is gradual if one never started, rapid if he did. High bitterness, if the latter. The one who never started can't grasp why he is punished.
  4. Believe you don't need to study Bible under a male pastor. These folks decline slowly, unless they rejected a pastor. In the latter case, they decline quickly. Included are folks who listen to multiple pastors, only watch TV pastors. You must sit under 1 guy, for some years. It can be long-distance. Greek "haphe" in Ephesians 4:16 means it's God's Will that you mainly study under 1 person at a time — whom HE picks for you.
  5. Mistake morality as 'spiritual'. Decline here is slow, but often permanent. So you are intimate with works and people, but never God. This is the main problem in Christianity.
  6. Make Christian issues, political issues. Here, the Christian rapidly becomes unable to read Bible, reverses key doctrines, no matter how plain even in translation. This is another main problem in Christianity.
  7. Believe salvation can be lost or needs something you 'add' to it (like baptism, works). Legalism +roteness invade you. Ability to read Bible tanks like in #6. You might not even be saved. BELIEVE ONLY, John 3:16.
  8. Disparage Israel or your home nation. Physical +mental degeneration is sudden-onset after years of no symptoms. Or eerily like "rotting" analogy at 2nd Advent (Zech 14:12), one body part at a time. Anti-semitism guarantees insanity. That's why Muslims can't see how Islam is CRAZY.
  9. Disbelieve in pre-Trib Rapture. #9 is a bellweather of degeneracy. The stronger disbelief, the more decline. Proper belief in Rapture is vital. For it's akin to anti-semitism, to disbelieve it. Rapture is a direct result of Matt16:18, the reason you even breathe; it's proof that God keeps His Time promises to Israel. Col 3:25!
  10. Disbelieve in Trinity. Decline here is like mold. Trinity is depicted in almost every OT verse re God Himself. Decline also occurs if you disbelieve Christ is God, or that He 'became' God, lost His Godness, etc., as these are subsets of disbelief in Trinity.

Related webpages:

3 SatStrat Warning Anti Semites

May all anti-semites and their doctrines die in great, slow, suffering and pain; and may all the wackos who think 9/11 was an 'inside job' or helped/ done by 'Zionists' also die as miserably as God has promised in the Old Testament and the New. Or, ideally — may they wake up and smell the coffee of their jealous notions.

DEATH TO YOU SWINE. Do you hear me clearly? Just because I must say the Jews did some things wrong, doesn't mean you can count me on your disgusting, despicable, PATHETIC swinish 'side'. I HATE YOU FOREVER and God hates you more. Never ever write me or comment on my videos unless you want me to petition God to hurt you so bad you won't ever recover. Because He'll answer that, 'YES'. Promised, in the Bible.

Some people don't ask God for stuff thinking their puny-ness makes the petition invalid or wrong to ask. Just the opposite, with me: BECAUSE I'm no good, God must answer my prayers. And He always has, since I was a child. I ask Him for nearly everything, even what I should wear or eat.

Am I making myself clear? Death to you, and LONG LIVE ISRAEL, Gen 12, 15, 17 assures it!

54/72, KJVOB : Trump/Christian Taqqiya

Donald Trump, his spox, and Muslim practice of lying to make their lies/religion look good, isn't restricted to Muslims. Christians in every denomination, do it too. Here, you'll see the five tactics Christians (and shyster lawyers) use, to lie. Once you learn these tactics, you can spot them in Youtube comments or anywhere.

The first Taqqiya in history was Adam's, how he lies to the Lord in Genesis 3 after he fell. So that's the pattern of all lies.

The poster boys for this video are Calvinists and KJV-onlyists, since their taqqiya is easily seen in their comments, videos, and on the internet. But whenever a believer is unable to substantiate his faith — especially in the light of contradicting BIBLE evidence — he will resort to these tactics. So the video shows you how to handle them — generally, you do nothing, standing ONLY on Bible proof. It will be hard to do that, but worth it. GOD always defends His Word.

All taqqiya seeks to divert attention away from the uncomfortable truth that one's tenets are proven invalid. So the taqqiya takes five primary forms:

  1. Denial of evidence, no matter how overwhelming.
  2. Divert by irrelevancy — especially, by focusing on the REFUTER so that the evidence he presented, is sidelined.
  3. Play the Victim (in order to keep attacking).
  4. Blame the Enemy (i.e., of 'dividing the Body of Christ').
  5. Exploit Cognitive Dissonance (fancy term for 'double-talk').

LXX4a Scholar Insanity in Acts15

Anatomy of scholar ineptness over the fact the NT 'threads' the LXX — which every scholar even knows, it's required study in seminary!

Honestly, just when I think Christian scholarship can't get any worse, I find something like this. So, this video (sorry) is something of a tirade against 'scholarship' which accuses Bible to hide its own incompetence. Here, Acts 15. This is one sample of many I've seen over the last few months, and many more over the last year. Scholarship is valuable, we need it, and this is not against the scholars in general. But it is against the tolerance of the bad apples, which today are many. Sometimes, the gloves should come off!

Link referenced in the video: The Church in Antioch in the First Century CE: Communion and Conflict

Why Gun Control Equals Slavery

Gun Control means you can't learn to defend yourself; can't learn the true value of human life; will be at the mercy of anyone who has the gun you aren't permitted to have. There's a reason for the 2nd Amendment: FREEDOM. It must be fought for. If everyone in the US were required to learn how to shoot, as was true in the 17th through 19th centuries, we'd be very much less likely to go shooting at each other in school.

I'll never forget the day my dad first took me shooting, and I had to learn how to shoot, and then I saw him kill a deer. Never wanted to hold a gun, after that. See? Freedom to learn the CONSEQUENCES early, and then to train for them.

Bible is all about fighting, and the King from whom Messiah is born, killed more people than any other king. So think carefully about that: if you take away guns, you take away preparedness, and you don't do what God did.

Warrior God to Warrior David: I'll Build Your Bloodline, My House.. Via Sons!

God of the Armies to David Warrior King at God's Command, tells Nathan David's son — when David complains he has a nice house, but God doesn't, 2Sam7 — God bids Nathan tell David, 'I WILL BUILD THE HOUSE'. House of Stones and Blood(line), to depict Blood Shed On The Cross. God never says anything negative about Blood to Nathan, 2Sam7 (= 1Chron17). But David and Solomon both focus on 'Blood', in 1Chron 22:8, 28:3, 1Kings 5:3. Yeah, David's the Man of Blood at God's Command! Bloodline promised since Gen12, 15, 17 to Abram! So Man of Salvation will be Davidic, 2Sam7!

As Solomon explains in 1Kings 5:3: David had to spend all his time warring, so God awarded Temple building to Solomon. Aha. So God is NOT punishing David for warring.

Yeah, the Blood. Blood on the lintel at 1st Passover, so Death Angel won't kill firstborn in the House. Blood from foreskin shed to signify Blood Covenant made with Abraham. Blood shed to defend Israel from her enemies. Blood of those enemies shed from Dan to Beersheba, at God's Command. God, Lord of the Armies, Adonai Tsabaoth. Hosts of armies. His Hosts at 2nd Advent, Rev20, when we Church return with Him. So to rescue Israel from hosts then assembled against her at Har-Megiddo. But only the Lord Himself does the killing, Isa63:1-10. Blood as high as a horse's bridle, from Dan to Beersheba (length of Israel, 180 miles).

But isn't Christ the God of Peace, Isa9? Yeah. Peace comes from successful warring: so gun control is bad. You must learn how to war, to GET peace. War even with your own soul wanting to do the wrong thing, war with other souls who would take your property or family or nation. So you must TRAIN, to do that warring well. God Lord of the Armies (not 'hosts', Hebrew tsabaoth means ARMIES, just as Book of 'Numbers' means numbers of troops), awards David Warrior King, a BLOODLINE: for at God's Order, unlike Saul — David WOULD kill the enemy as God ordered via the high priest's Urim and Thummim (supernatural stones on his robes).

God made David fight 14 years, having first told him as a teenager, that he would be king. Then, 14 years later, he was crowned at Hebron. But in between, he had to fight Goliath and Saul; for Saul got jealous, so David avoided Saul but fought Philistines — for other Philistines hired David as a mercenary against their rivals. Thus David fought for Israel's freedom, NOT fighting Saul. Note that distinction: there's a boundary where you do NOT fight enemies.

Finally, Saul dies at the Battle of Mt. Gilboa on his own sword, and David becomes King at Hebron, 1050 years from the birth of Isaac. So God timed all that. Paul stresses this timing in his meter of Ephesians 1:3-14 (see my PATU video playlist). Yeah, the world would have ended 4 years later, had David not fought and won in time!

So gun control seems like a small thing by comparison. But think: you can't prepare for heaven if you don't have a Bible. You can't prepare to defend yourself, if you don't have a weapon. In Judges, the Philistines and other Greek sea peoples PREVENTED the Jews from having the right materials to make weapons; so they were perpetually prey to domination. So you see: Bible says gun control is bad.

House of The Man Of Blood. Bloodline. Shedding Blood. Warring. Oh, so God is playing on the Exodus and the Cross, when He says to David, 'you shall not build my House because you are a man OF BLOOD — your SON will do it.' Yeah, Son of God builds a house for Father, Matt16:18. Spiritual Blood now. Shed for our sake. So we are His 'blood', 2Cor5:21; when we believe, John 14 takes effect, Royal House Of God Gets Built. Church. Christ Royal House of David, the other Kingdom He owns, built by means of Blood Shed to Fight For Freedom for Israel to exist, so that Temple Can Be Built To Signify Peace by King Peace aka 'Solomon' (= reconciliation, peace, prosperity). Get the puns?

So this video pair explains that backdrop, which ties back to Moses and Psalm 90, Deut32, book of Judges; for 2Sam7 is God's promise to DAVID, owing to Israel's rejecting Christ as King of Israel, 1Sam8 through 12. So the video pair summarizes 'flow' of Psalm 90, Deut32, 1Sam until 2Sam7, plus their tandem passages in 1Chron17, 22, 28, 1Kings 1-9; for those chapters 'explain' what David and Solomon meant, in 1Chron 22:8, 1Chron 28:3, 1Kings 5:3.

Yeah, Man of the Bloodline Now Rests While His Son Does the Work. God of War awards his king of war with a HOUSE OF STONES AND SONS, culminating with the Son of God, from whom Living Stones will be built, Matt16:18, John 14, John 17:20-23, 1Pet2:5 and 9, Eph1:3-14, Eph2. All to fulfill His Eternity Past promise to Christ in Isa53:10; to Abram, in Gen12, 15, 17; to Moses, in Numb14 (offering to start bloodline over, with him); most of all, His Promise to Warrior David, 2Sam7, repeated in 1Chron Chaps 17,22, 28, 1Kings 5. Heh.

Warrior God to Warrior David: I'll Build Your Bloodline, My House.. Via Sons! (end)

Conclusion. The video description with its extensive Bible backup, was formatted into pdf and can be downloaded from 2Samuel7Promise.pdf. It's just one page.

FYI: at 3:11, when I talk about Urim and Thummim meaning Yes and NO, really they were BOUNDARIES of God's order. Urim meant start, yes, and Thummim meant 'complete', an end. So you'd know when the 'no' began.

God's Word specifies boundaries for everything. So there is a 'yes' and 'no' boundary to violence, too. Trick is to learn His Boundaries, because if you always say no in the name of God like Ahaz did in Isaiah 7, then God will punish you.

FIGHT sometimes, FLIGHT sometimes. Know when, from Bible.

If you want much more detail on David's story in Bible, my pastor walked the congregation through all the pasages and exegeted them: order his 'David' series on mp3 at http://www.rbthieme.org. They never ask for money, or give out your name, or even write you. In 40 years I only got stuff from them when I asked for the monthly lesson orders, or when they changed the format of the lessons from reels to cassettes then to mp3.

Christ says BUY A SWORD, and TWO are NOT 'enough'!

At issue: did Christ say two swords are enough? Those who would deny God's Doctrine to make war and be prepared — hence gun control, being in the military, etc. are all wrong for the Christian — those who claim such things, grab onto Luke 22:38's 'it is enough', to justify their position. Pity they don't do their Bible homework beforehand.

Believe whatever you like, but DO YOUR HOMEWORK. You are Royal Family of God, and slipshod scholarship will not be permitted in MY channel. I won't chastise you in your videos or your channel, but if you come on mine and get on your high horse — but THEN prove you care so little about God's Word you didn't AUDIT what you claim true.. then honey, I'll ream you out. I don't tolerate disrespect for God's Word, in MY channel. If I too show I didn't do my homework, then please ream me out, too.

Here's the thing about getting nasty: it takes away the shame. Duking it out is a time-honored way of showing respect. If you care about God's Word, you fight for it. Else, you couldn't be bothered. So if I care about you, I'll fight for and with you. Else, I'll go spend my time on something else. You spend time on what you care about. You avoid spending time on what you don't care about. So never mistake nastiness as something demeaning. The person is paying ATTENTION to you enough to say something. So you are not demeaned.

On another level, if you aren't reamed out, then you don't know you screwed up. It is NOT love, to walk away from something wrong; you thus condemn the other person to repeat that wrong: so the Lord explained to Ezekiel, in Ezekiel 3:16-21. You spank your kids because you love them, right?

Now, in adult interaction you don't go spanking each other, but out of respect you also don't let a serious wrong go unanswered. What does Scripture repeatedly say? Warn, be nice at first, then firmer and firmer and finally walk away if the person won't listen (Titus 3, James 5, Luke 17, Ephesians 5, 1Thess 5, 1 Tim 5, 2 Tim 2-3, 2 John 9, each in its own context).

Differences of belief are fine, part of the growing process. Many doctrines take a long time to learn. Most cannot be properly or wholly understood from translation, like Trinity, pre-Trib Rapture, Dispensations, and all prophecy. Translations are ambiguous, even contradictory. But the original-languages text is far more precise and nuanced; text is often metered, which serves as a kind of proof of Divine Writ, as well as a concordance to other Bible verses — because they indexed Bible by syllable counts, not by 'verses' — so you get a precise understanding of the Bible's doctrines only from the Autograph.

With good exegetical Bible software you can even get free; with the Holy Spirit as your Teacher IF IF IF IF you are in God's System — then you can learn. But only while in God's System: see my 'God's System' video for what that means. (Greek term is henotes, in Eph4:5, mistranslated 'unity'; it is a technical term for being in union with God's SYSTEM of fellowship with HIM. Has nothing to do with people.)

So, poor scholarship is NOT fine. There must be self-policing in the Royal Family. The non-Christian needs good ambassadors, and you spit on Christ if you don't do your homework before making some claim about His Word, sorry.

So, as followup to comments in my 'Warrior God to Warrior David' video, re the meaning of 'enough' in Luke 22:38, this video shows that if one did his HOMEWORK, it would become very clear very quickly that the Lord did NOT say that 'two swords' are 'enough'. Ooops.

Video goes through the Greek and the lexical entry so you know 'brainout' didn't make this up. Now you know why I make so many boring videos focusing on what BIBLE not brainout, says. Lest I too be guilty of not doing my own homework!

Christ says Buy the Word Sword, first!

Wouldn't want the hawks to use Luke 22:38 as an excuse to just go beating people up, either; so in this last video on the verse, we look at the whole Chapter's context.

WORD SWORD FIRST. The disciples didn't get His meaning in 22:38, so He face-palmed, and stopped the discussion. There, they were too pacifist, but then after hearing Him talk, they go to the other end of misinterpretation, thinking they should just FIGHT FIERCELY HARVARD — verses 49-50. Clearly that's wrong too, for a slave is not a combatant, wasn't a threat, hadn't laid a hand on anyone. So that wasn't a lawful use of the sword. You don't fight against duly constituted authority, even when that authority is wrong. So Christ said, 'all who take up the sword' (to rebel against their government, for example) 'shall perish by the sword'.

Dicey question, that: at what point do you rise up against a sea of troubles, and by opposing, end them? Well, rightly dividing the Machaira of Truth, Hebrews 4:12, means you do what King David did — ASK GOD. Not, just take it into your head that fighting is suddenly bad, and also not to deem it always good. 'Neither to the left, nor to the right'. Yeah, right in the middle where the opposites meet, that thin Red Line of Truth Rightly Divided.

Time to fight, time to not fight. It's our job to prepare, Luke 22:36; and to not go off half-cocked like Peter did in Luke 22:50. So that's the ultimate reason why Gun Control is bad. Need weapons to train, else will be overrun, Judges 1:19, 1Sam13:19.

Nice versus Nasty, Revisited (end Gun Control subseries)

The ultimate point about Gun Control isn't about Gun Control, but about when a Christian should be nasty or nice, before God. It's flat wrong to think that one must be nice to be a Good Christian. Christ wasn't nice; Paul wasn't nice; David wasn't nice; Moses wasn't nice; God Himself is frequently quite nasty, as every atheist will droolingly remind you.

So then it MUST mean that there is a time to be nice and a time to be nasty.. all the way to the point of killing the enemy. So that means asking God when to play the judge, and when not to do so. For Bible commands both, Ezekiel 3 AND Matthew 7. Not just one or the other.

We are all Crown Princes in Training. Christ is King, and to become like Him, we too must master Kingship. We can only do that by living in God's System. See my 'God's System' video.

Rant against NonThinkers | Dawkins' Delusion (God Delusion book review)

First 20 mins, against atheist non-thinkers; last 20, against Christian non-thinkers. I'm sick of the non-thinkers dominating the God Question debate. There ARE valid reasons for atheism, but few advance the right arguments; so I try to do that, here.

First Illogic: a) when you found out your parents taught you some wrong stuff, you throw out God with what they taught you wrong ABOUT Him, as if He's to blame. So b) you grab onto 'evolution' you were also taught by adults in school, and ILLOGICALLY CLAIM that it proves God doesn't exist. Oh really? So how did 'evolution' even come to exist? And oh, Genesis 1:23-25 says God authored some flavor (but not Darwin's) of evolution, so now where is your claim? See: you can't prove THE STARTING ORIGIN, so anything else you say, is inconclusive.

Second Illogic: that SUPERnatural God, should be provable by NATURAL means. So God is only God, if NOT God? That's Dawkins argument, in his 'God Delusion' book, pages 41 compared to 51, compared to Chapter 4. Handy illogic with sleight-of-hand, just like Darwinian evolution depicted a PURPOSEFUL nature which is at the same time, mindless? Oh yeah. MAGICAL 'nature', that does what a 'god' would do? LOL! Takes too much 'faith' in what has ZERO proof behind it, to believe...

Both the non-thinking atheists and Christians, exercise both illogics in a bewildering variety of ways. They end up caterwalling and messing up the VALID debate questions, with reasonable voices going unheard. Ergo this rant. They are too proud of their hallucinated ideas. Waste of time, to talk with them.

As to my criticism of Dawkins, you can read my full review of his book, be sure to read the others' comments, they are very interesting*.

*"Amazon retired the Comments Feature for product reviews on its platform in December 2020. This change removed the ability for brands or sellers to directly respond to reviews on the Amazon marketplace with public comments."

Was easier to write it up, than talk about it. Basically, Dawkins isn't thinking clearly. But String Theory might change the 'evolution' description entirely, and maybe Darwin will end up proving right for entirely different reasons. Again, see the comments to the review in the above link. And see that Harvard video lecture on String Theory, in the video description here: • brainout defends Darwin?

source: https://www.amazon.com/review/R1G1XZOHZFEEEB/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm

Customer Review
brainout
1.0 out of 5 stars Puerile, yet a Tale of Two Atheists
Reviewed in the United States on September 22, 2013
Verified Purchase

Long Review Ahead, sorry. I'm pro-atheist, so should explain why the one star.

Kindle Edition: TOC lacks page numbers and Chapter Titles; though each chapter's linked. Amazon Prime Members can borrow the book. I bought mine.

So: pretend you're an atheist. Pretend further, you wish to account for being an atheist. Even though, until YOU see proof God exists, you're right to be an atheist. So here in Amazon, are 2 books each for $8, by 2 atheists: David Berlinski's Devil's Delusion, which refutes Dawkins, and Dawkins' own God Delusion. Which better justifies an atheist position? Hands-down, it's Berlinski's book, which I also reviewed as 'brainouty' in Youtube. The Berlinski $8 was the best I've spent. God Delusion? Fracaso.

For Dawkins writes like a 13-year old, ignorant and defensive. Belligerent, parroting stuff 'adults' say, no discernment, insecure. See his Preface to the Paperback Edition, via the 'Look Inside' option here in Amazon. He proves puerile in his first paragraph. Why begin that preface with a need to badmouth reviewers who disagree with him? Why rant even against atheists who disagree? Is that how a 2nd preface, should begin?

Where the humility, the corrections? For his 'scholarship' is abysmal, as others have long noted. Instead he launches into a tirade, from first paragraph. Dawkins' book goes downhill from there: a bundle of assertions heaped on prejudices, piled on rantings, all absent homework.

(Peter Ruckman is a leader in the King James Only movement. Read his stuff, and you'll note an astonishing similarity of belligerent, defensive, ranting style. Try his 'Bible Believers Bulletins' (read them online). If you want to be shocked, read the first few pages of Hitler's Mein Kampf. All 3 men are obsessed with praise, putting down critics.)

So let's make more appropriate titles per Chapter in Dawkins' book.

CHAPTER ONE (p.31, 'A deeply religious non-believer'), should be: "Watch Me Name Drop Einstein and Sagan to make Me Look Good; Watch Me Conflate God with Religion" — that's all his chapter 'achieves'.

For if God exists, religion is NOT what God wants, but what man wants. Bible, for example, says Satan invented religion, in Genesis 3 (tempting the woman to make herself like God), Isaiah 45:7, 18-19, 'Pharisees, scribes, hypocrites!' verses, Hebrews 5:11-6:12, etc. God decrees evolution of some kind for fauna in Genesis 1:23-25. So if Dawkins 'proves' evolution, then he 'proves' Bible right? Didn't he notice that gaffe?

Then he fatally maims his book, writing (page 41) 'In the rest of this book I am talking only about SUPERNATURAL gods...' Does he know what 'supernatural' means? ABOVE Nature. So NOT 'Nature'. So CREATING 'Nature'. Which, 'Nature' cannot prove, as Above nature is BEYOND nature, so 'nature' can't detect a SUPERnatural God. (Dawkins later claims God is only God if NOT God, Chapter 4.)

CHAPTER TWO (p.51, 'the God Hypothesis'), should be titled, 'Watch Me Flaunt My Prejudiced Ignorance of Old Testament, Google, and 'Watch Me transfer My Flaws, onto God'.

Defense mechanism of projection, here. No research into Bible's construction, scholarly analysis, nor any of 3000+ years' work available to Dawkins, was used to write this chapter. No, instead he spews his 13-year-old's ideas of God as Petty Judge (dour-God depiction to make adolescents behave). He was schooled in infancy, he says. So, has an infant's ideas. Did he analyze passages? No. Did he check the Hebrew and Greek to see if the translation was accurate? No.

What does he do, instead? Present irrelevancies: what Churchill, Waugh, Jefferson said (name dropping in lieu of solid argument); and oh — let's swear like adolescents, proud of being old enough to get away with it, Dawkins quoting 'God is s***'. What, he couldn't find a more useful quote? Ironically, Paul uses that same word for religious works, in Greek of Philippians 3:8. Dawkins doesn't know that. Not good, to admit Bible is against religion.

For useful info, is not Dawkins' goal. He rants, like Hitler. Is it scientific, to name drop and use swear words of famous people with nasty things to say re God? Is that how a chapter on The God Hypothesis — a scientific title — should flow? Worse, Dawkins won't present the definition of God per Bible, yet claims to speak OF that God. Bad science: a scientist must first describe a target in its OWN terms, which requires doing his homework ON that target: here, Bible. Yet in Dawkins' later chapters, we'll see he never does his Bible homework.

Yet Dawkins says (page 51), 'It is unfair to attack such an easy target.' So, he makes clear his motive is to ATTACK. Now, if you don't do your homework but hallucinate a victory, you'll think the target 'easy' to defeat. So is Dawkins is a true scientist? No. So I don't fault him for atheism or nastiness; rather, for dishonesty, not doing his homework.

Compare how neatly the more erudite David Berlinski, explains The God Problem in his Devil's Delusion book (pp.34-38, 132ff): origins are postulated as 'God, Logic, or Nothing' (p.37, with pages 132ff devoted to that quote). Berlinski concludes all three as 'inadequate' (ibid). In a few sentences, he deftly shows why inadequate, from moral principle.

Do you see Dawkins engage in the same rational discourse? No.

Rather, Dawkins' page 51 continues, quote: 'any creative intelligence, of sufficient complexity to design anything, comes into existence only as the end product of an extended process of gradual evolution.' So God is only God if He is not God, for 'god' can only be the END product of a gradually-evolved process that created him. Then God cannot be Supernatural, so A is never equal to A? Ergo, W. V. Quine (who wrote Methods of Logic) — would have to flunk Dawkins?

Since the rest of Chapter 2 becomes seriously anti-Semitic (Monotheism section), replete with utter ignorance of the Old Testament — Berlinski faulted Dawkins on that, too — I'll skip the rest of Dawkins' Chapter Two. For anti-Semites experience mental degeneration when talking about anything even indirectly related to the Jews.

CHAPTER THREE (page 100, 'Arguments for God's Existence'), should be titled, 'Watch Me show I'm ignorant re Philosophy, Math, and the New Testament'. Aristotle, not Aquinas, talked about the Unmoved Mover. Yet Dawkins defaces himself further, proving no grasp of the arguments, to wit:

1. 'Unmoved mover' is foundational to mathematics and cosmology, from which we get INFINITY (sideways 8 symbol) and the maxim, 'no information can be lost'; hence matter into energy, and vice versa. Mathematically, that means the largest UNcontainable set of ALL attributes (existence, deviation, variables, constants, sequence, potentialities, impossibilities) — is UNMOVING. Stasis. Does Dawkins 'get' this? No. He talks of regress and progress, which only apply to FINITY; which can only go on, if contained by the INfinite; so there is always room for finity to regress or progress. Flunk Logic, again.

2. and 3., Uncaused Cause and Cosmological Arguments are corollary to #1, which math proves. Dawkins also shows no grasp of the Law of Opposites reflected in math, physics, biology, nature: if A then -A, all balancing to zero, hence STASIS, no info outside the Ultimate Set. So too, if the material exists, the immaterial must exist like math laws, themselves neither matter nor energy but acting on matter and energy. So 'by indirections, find directions out'.

So I'll skip his tirades on the remaining theological arguments.

Next, his 'Argument from Scripture' section (starting on page 117). Dawkins used kindergarten atheist websites, for his sources? For he writes, 'the historical evidence that Jesus claimed any sort of Divine Status, is minimal'. Really? Christ calls Himself Son of Man many times — see my boring 'Son of Man' videos in Youtube showing them all in Bible — it's a GOD Title in Daniel 7:13. Messiah=Christ in Greek, also a God title in Daniel: Messiah by definition is God-Man SAVIOR, hence the refrain in the NT that folks must believe IN 'Messiah'. Ooops.

Christ was crucified, for claiming to BE Christ. For back then, Jews could appeal to Rome for crucifixion, only for blasphemy or a capital crime. Dawkins might claim Bible books are much later than they are, as he can't read the Greek to know better. Yet just as Shakespeare today is obviously 500-year-old English, someone who reads Greek can tell how old and in what century or even what decade, Bible verses were written. The language changed that much and fast. We have a lot of Greek text outside Bible, for comparison. But Dawkins didn't do his homework on textual-criticism facts, either.

Worse (p.118): 'Ever since the 19th century, scholarly theologians have made an overwhelming case that the gospels are not reliable accounts'. Really? WHO? J-boy Wellhausen? He was joke, even then. Or the (sing Twilight Zone wooey-wooey here) Quellies? Who would cut and paste valid Gospels we have, to concoct a shorter 'original' that never existed? The Q folk are so daft, they don't even grasp 'incorporation by reference', a literary practice by which a later (Bible) book textually 'hooks back to' its predecessor, so we KNOW Matthew first, 2nd Luke, 3rd Mark, 4th John? (See my Synoptics playlist, on that style.)

Okay, what about other 1000s of Bible scholars in every denomination who tirelessly compiled, collated and corrected with 1000s of suddenly-FOUND Bible mss, so that for the first time, in the 19th century — we had real PROOF Gospels and all other Bible books, were 98% the SAME text? Even catching a kauTHesomai, a one-letter misspelling of kauCHesomai, the former not used until centuries post-Paul (1Cor13:3, Tischendorf THCH vs. A, B, and Byz texts)?

Didn't Dawkins know, we can DATE CHANGES IN WORD USAGE even within 10 years, based on many Greek texts from SPQR back to Attica; i.e., Greek 'malista' from LXX, to Matthew to Luke and later Paul's writings, to Josephus and then Hadrian? So inter alia, we can prove Matthew wrote in 30's AD (see my 'malista' playlist in Youtube)? So instead, the 'overwhelmingly case' is that Gospels are RELIABLE. What was Dawkins smoking? Aren't 'scientists' supposed to check their data beforehand? Ooops.

So when he decries 'religious agendas' (p.118), he instead proves to have his own. Disregarding massive facts — one of the biggest events in 1800's, proof of Bible accuracy — is not scientific. It's a shell game.

So when Dawkins writes 'Luke screws up his dating' (p.118), Dawkins parrots kiddie atheists, again. He could have Googled to find how wrong his text would be, in advance: Jewish custom, you must register for taxes in your TRIBAL hometown; HEROD collected taxes for Rome; but the year Jesus was born, Herod was dying, had Augustus as executor for the kingdom; Quirinius, close friend of Augustus, was then in charge over the latter's grandson in Syria (the boy was in a garrison). Dawkins didn't know Roman practice of ad-hoc titles for duties like tax collection, which a garrison in nearby Syria could readily support; nor did Dawkins know Luke 2:2's Greek 'hegemoneuontos' means (a participle, lit.) 'ruling', not strictly 'governor' as a fixed office. Acting officer gets same RANK to justify his ad-hoc duty; that was required, in SPQR.

So Quirinius was in Syria in 1 or 2BC. We have a BC/AD dating issue, for a Catholic scribe cut off 3 years from Augustus' reign to create AD; so 2BC (end) is close enough, pending refinement. Dawkins didn't know this, either.

Dawkins also didn't know end of Luke 1, Magnificat then Zecharias metered play ON Magnificat, both being Time Meters. Mary tells you WHEN she speaks. Jewish kids learned this syllable metering as a mnemonic game — so to avoid carrying, heavy scrolls. Meter begins with a dateline, first 7-syllable-factoring, and the style goes back to Psalm 90 (my Psalm 90 playlist shows that style also in Isaiah 53, Daniel 9; 'GGS 10-11' and Magnificat playlists show Mary's, Zecharias', Paul and John's Hebrew meters, yet Greek words).

So Luke begins his Chap2 after quoting Mary and Zecharias. Every Greek reader would know the dates, esp. since Christ was prophesied to be born by the 1000th anniversary of David's Kingship START (since Adam; see my Genesis Epi.8c1ff videos and Psalm 90 playlist), on Chanukah (Haggai 2). Luke 1:26 and :36 tell you Gabriel came to Mary, in Adar. But Dawkins didn't know that, either.

Now you might counter, 'brainout, Dawkins is no Bible expert'. Yeah, so whence his inept chutzpah? I can prove all this stuff with only BibleWorks and good university sites. So why didn't he do even that homework?

FLUNK Chapter 3.

Alas, CHAPTER FOUR (p.137, 'Why There Almost Certainly Is No God'), is even more illogical and unstudied. Title it 'Watch Me reverse math and logic, so A never equals A, and I Refute Myself'. He goes from arbitrary to baffling, to contradicting, to delusional, as follows.

a. He starts again with arbitrary, adolescent name-dropping, using Jefferson the DEIST, writer of our Declaration of Independence. America was founded as Freedom From Religion. 1000s of persecuted believers, Deists included, fled to the Colonies to be free of 'the priests'; Europe was largely Catholic, Calvinist, Anglican, all full of their own popes and pogroms. Jefferson, like most Founding Fathers, was into Masonic culture, an eclectic mix of 'all religions', including 'sacred geometry'.

So ask: would you use a Deist to claim no God? Would you AGAIN conflate God and religion, by quoting a Deist? How does that help your points? For Deism says God DID IT ALL, then sits back and watches. Ooops.

b. Now the baffling fun begins. Having misused Jefferson, Dawkins next misappropriates Hoyle; Berlinski takes Dawkins to task for this, in Berlinski's Chapter 7 (of Devil's Delusion). Watch how Dawkins refutes himself (page 137): 'This, in a nutshell, is the creationists' favorite argument' (that a hurricane going through a scrapyard can't build a Boeing 747, so life on earth didn't begin by chance)..'somebody who thinks natural selection is a theory of chance whereas — IN THE RELEVANT SENSE OF CHANCE — it is the opposite.'

What is the opposite of 'chance'? Well, in Roget's Thesaurus (Google on 'chance antonym'), 'opposite' (antonym) means 'designed', 'planned', 'foreseeable' and 'understood'. Note all those antonymal terms require MIND. Minds design, Minds plan, Minds 'foresee', Minds 'understand'. Mindless nature doesn't see, design, plan, grasp anything, hence 'chance' belongs to 'nature'. But for Dawkins, Nature is the Planner, the All-Seeing Mind. To Dawkins, OPPOSITE is somehow a 'relevant sense of chance' — in what universe? It's no sense, and he makes no sense, either. See, he uses religious double-talk: Peace is War, Love is Hate, Big Brother Loves You.

c. So now adolescent, arbitrary, baffling confusion, becomes Contradicting. For he writes: 'In fact, as I shall show in this chapter, Darwinian natural selection is the only known solution to the otherwise unanswerable riddle of where the information comes from. It turns out to be the God Hypothesis that tries to get something for nothing.' Huh?

Dawkins goes down the rabbit hole, for what did he claim earlier? 'I am only talking of SUPERnatural gods' (p.41) — hello? If God is SUPERnatural, then nature is subject to Him, not vice versa. If God is SUPERnatural, He's NOT natural, so not matter nor energy, nor Time, nor even math, but Immaterial Infinite Mind Creating All — just as Jefferson and other Deists stridently say. Coming from NOTHING natural, is SUPERnatural God, Who Dawkins claims to refute? Bible stresses SUPER. Dawkins turns SUPER into SUB, then gets SMUG.

So paired whoopsies — Dawkins shoots himself in one foot via Jefferson; then in the other foot, by making God SUBnatural (take THAT, God)! Voila, someone NATURAL (God) coming from something NATURAL (nature via natural selection, deus ex machina in Dawkins). Yeah, God is but END PRODUCT of an evolutionary sequence (page 51). Again, God is only God if He's NOT God! So A never equals A!

PT Barnum was right, and there is no joy in Mudville.

d. So having adolescently, arbitrarily, bafflingly, Confusingly Contradicted himself, Dawkins now shows his Delusion, after 13 more pages of irrelevancies (name dropping and tirades), page 150:

'In any case, even though genuinely irreducible complexity would wreck Darwin's theory if it were ever found, who is to say that it wouldn't wreck the intelligent design theory as well? Indeed, it already has wrecked the intelligent design theory, for, as I keep saying and will say again, however little we know about God, the one thing we can be sure of is that he would have to be very very complex and presumably irreducibly so!'

Doesn't Dawkins see he shrank God to SUBnatural, so God is no longer God, so Dawkins invalidated his own thesis? Or is this more bamboozling double-talk to hide the gaffe...

For irreducible complexity isn't key to the God question. Key, is that we CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR ORIGINS any other way, whether simple or complex. A dishonest person will pick the wrong argument to mask the right one, which is WHAT CAUSED 'NATURAL SELECTION' to begin to exist? If as Dawkins describes (and no evidence confirms), 'natural selection' is a mindless minded process of benevolent, incremental only-improving succession, HOW DID IT GET HERE? No answer. It just always was. Yeah? Yet it's illogical to conclude God birthed the thing, just as Genesis 1:23-25 decrees?

Ahh, but Dawkins uses the non-sequitur of irreducible complexity, to mask his REDUCING God as subject to Nature. Then having REDUCED God to that finite complexity, if life arises on earth NOT by chance, then God cannot arise by chance, as God is never God unless He's NOT God! Yay! Irreducible Obfuscation Complexity Complete (IOCC, io non vidi niente)!

Yeah, Darwin posited a MINDLESS DESIGNER in 'natural selection', but of course there is zero evidence of such a minded mindless process, which magically 'selects' to improve. Fake Speciation Monster is Born, but we don't even get meat sauce.

THINK: were Darwin's/Dawkin's FSM real, we'd have no death or disease, no mutations that in five successions routinely become cancers, etc. Else our 'natural selection' god is even more cruel than The Real One Dawkins Decries; Who at least, provides an afterlife 'with no more sorrow, no more tears' to make up for all the pain.

Dawkins cannot prove that God does NOT exist. Even his title says 'almost certainly'. Yet the 'god' he debunked, is NOT SuperNatural! So he DIDN'T debunk God, at all. Ooops.

Let's pass over Dawkins' ranting about 'gaps' (pp.151-161). He uses ad hominems, calling those who point out the problem of evolutionary gaps, 'worshipers'. After he just worshiped 'natural selection' as a mindless yet benevolent 'god' for which/whom there is no evidence anywhere in any biological record past or present?

Sigh: CHAPTER FIVE (p. 190, 'The Roots of Religion'), should be titled, 'Watch Me betray My Own Agenda, then Pretend it's God's'. Dawkins must again conflate God with religion, to mask the obvious flaw in his already-deficient, logic: WHERE DID THE AUTONOMIC PROCESS COME FROM? See, his theme is that religion creates automatons. Who, he intends to retrofit just as Lenin did, with a mindless nature needing to be extolled, as Darwin did in Origin of Species. So the bell tolls.

Oh, we won't notice, an autonomic process can never 'disprove' God or even render the idea of His Existence, unlikely. Don't you automate things? So why wouldn't God automate processes, Genesis 1:23-25? Oh, gotta hide the fact autonomic processes are but MIDDLE DATA; accounting for origins, not at all. Santa Claus bringing home a newborn and telling the other children, 'the stork did it'. Finding 4 of 100 checks written from your checkbook, then claiming the other 96 are the same as, those 4.

Yeah, a key gambit is to decry other religions, to replace them with one's own. We dare not recall Hitler's 'master race', or how Lenin, Stalin, and later Mao, all used Darwin to advance atheism, force-feeding it to children. Hitler destroyed his millions, Stalin upwards of 30 million, Mao maybe twice that many, all in the name of The State, which Replaced Religion and thus became the new opiate everyone had to snort. Faster kill rate, than theistic religions. Goose and gander...

THAT is why it's so 'natural' to claim evolution true, why young people have trouble believing in God: 'evolution' was drilled into our baby minds over and over — here, but more so to kids in Russia and China. Carl Jung quipped, science is the new religion...

Thinly veiled, too, for Dawkins labels Chapter Five's first section, 'The Darwinian Imperative'. Yeah, Imperative. Not, 'inquiry'. Fahrenheit 451. Not, hypothesis (as no evidence supports it). So it must BE imposed, on all us tykes from age 5 onward. Imprimatur. Catholic. The Only Answer. If we take our Darwin Dummy Pills, we'll feel better (page 195). God forbid, another definition of 'evolution' might fit the data better. Our Ford forbid, that string theory might better VERTICALLY account for the origins and variations in life (sudden OR slow) vs. those pesky horizontally-mutating genes; for strings might reveal underlying 'blueprints' in math formulas playing as fractals (sans need to invoke 'God', gaps or no). Oh, but all competition must be ruthlessly extirpated, just as Dawkins did in his Preface; dissenters are faith-heads, packed off to 'Siberia' to be 're-educated' by the smarmy peasants. Dawkins memes should alone rule supreme.

Hitler, Stalin and Mao must be smiling down on Dawkins. Or, grimacing up.

CHAPTER SIX, (p.241 'Why Are We Good'), should be titled, 'Watch Me Deflect The Real Issue As I Cant Refute It'. Here Dawkins again displays total ignorance of Bible. Its #1 theme is that man is NOT good, so needs a Savior. Again, the Real God is SUPERnatural, so all of nature's goodness, is not even in the same universe. So there had to be a God-man, not merely a man, not merely God (man sinned, so in humanity sins must be SUPERnaturally paid). Obvious, from Genesis 15:6, to Revelation 20.

Worse: no amount of knowledge the woman in the Garden could get, would make her as good as God, even BEFORE sin (Genesis 3). For God is SUPERnatural, Unlimited. So having cut God down to an END process of mindless magical nature, Dawkins must cut God down to 'good'.

Which Bible refutes, naturlich. Romans 3:23 in New Testament, Isaiah 64:6 in Old, David's bad yet gets a Greater Son (2 Samuel 7 and Psalm 110:1, God-Man Messiah). Else none of us could be born the first time.

Now, intellectual sleight-of-hand demands substituting relevancy you cannot refute, with irrelevancy you can refute, ergo Chapter Six. Even so, Christians who can't think properly, have long made this same argument, and response is required. Dawkins did it badly. Berlinski did it well (pp.34-38 of Devil's Delusion).

Yet note how The Real Issue is rather, WHY IS IT IMPORTANT 'to be good'? Bible tells us we got that idea, from SIN. Adam didn't know what 'good' was. Satan tempted religiously, with a real tree's fruit (=doctrine) named Good-and-Evil (a hendiadys in Hebrew, two sides of a coin). Oh, she'd be AS GOOD as God if she ate it (magic). As a result, the urge to BE GOOD got into our DNA (Romans 5:12), and manifests religiously, starting with the itchy fig-leaves thingy.

So we've been anal about being good, ever since. Even, religifying hair gel or 'oh, I'm a vegan'. Everything is pitched in terms of you're a good person if you buy into it, and a bad person if you don't.

So all those evils Bible depicts, the harsh rules under the Law, were to CURB the religifying impulse. Sodom and Gomorrah was a mass raping, as the Bible story makes clear. The Canaanites loved to skin people alive, rape, plunder, roast their own children in the arms of Baal/Chemosh/Molech/you-name-it, then have sex while the kids burned alive. So the right question to ask of God, is this: why did He wait so LONG before wiping these people out? Do you know, revenge was inculcated even into five year olds? Many have rebutted Dawkins parroted accusations many times over the centuries. Dawkins didn't do his homework here, either.

Notice Berlinski, never argues in the same way. He knows many of the arguments were properly rebutted years ago. He did his homework.

So now let's unmask The Real Issue. The human post-sin mind, unlike animals, creates ABSTRACT 'good', is obsessive about it. Animals must be TRAINED to have that idea. Many puppy-wetting newspaper sessions transpire, before the puppy knows he must 'hold it' to get Master's approval. That's not a natural value, in the wild.

End Chapter Six, it just gets worse. SOS, same old stuff, long since eaten and regurgitated.

CHAPTER SEVEN (page 265, 'The 'Good' Book and the Changing Moral Zeitgeist') is worse. Should be Titled, 'Watch Me Flood You with my Bible ignorance.' I guess Dawkins doesn't know the Zeitgeist crowd are repeatedly proven fake scholars (they make up 'evidence' ex nihilo like Gail Riplinger does): see labarum312 in Youtube, he's writing a new book on ZG you can buy here in Amazon?

We already saw enough of Dawkins' ignorance, in Chapters 1-3, 6, but page 268 is a doozie: Dawkins writes 'God took a dim view of humans'. So he didn't study the history of that time (2450 BC and up to 120 years prior), blithely ignoring that was one of the most violent times in history. Per Bible there were only eight HUMANS left. Everyone else, was a demon hybrid. Dawkins of course also ignores the portion of the story we can prove, extra-Bible. So he doesn't notice the sexual prohibitions in the Law, were designed to curb a culture worldwide, of violent and rampant 'sex', even long after the Flood. Oh well. Maybe someday he'll do some ancient cultural history homework.

So how scientific is it, to ignore the history, the cultural context? Even were we explaining the Epic of Gilgamesh, we'd have to gauge that story in its own terms.

So of course Dawkins finds the nuttiest, most apostate Christians' obsessions (i.e., with sex) and ascribes all their foibles, to God. Dawkins treats these nutters as the True Voice of Christianity, for it suits his agenda. Then picks another nutter, Lot (who Bible uses to PROVE an idiot), as if GOD approved of rape? Thus Dawkins cherry-picks whatever he can spin, to blame it all on God.

Yet all the stories of bad behavior in Bible show PEOPLE ARE NO GOOD, hence we need a Savior. Dawkins can't permit that clear meaning. Chapter ends with a kind of defense (page 308ff) re Hitler and Stalin, for only theists can be evil. Hitler, like Dawkins, was born into a Catholic family. But oh no, Hitler cannot become an atheist invoking German Master Race as 'god'? MASTER RACE was cornerstone for Nazism, newly re-founded ON Darwin. That doesn't make Darwinism untrue; but its abuse as a religious gambit, is real.

And it's Dawkins' gambit, too: CHAPTER EIGHT (p.317, 'What's Wrong with Religion'), should be titled, 'Watch Me keep betraying My Real Goal of Replacing God with Darwin's Faith'. In taqqiyah, you play victim of an enemy you brand guilty of what YOU do. For Dawkins aims to SUBVERT SCIENCE to atheism. That's why he won't do his Bible homework, and instead picked the wackos of Christianity in Chapter 7. So here, he picks Prolifers and other nutters, to justify IGNORING Bible which contradicts him and them.

As every Jew knows, Bible says fetus is not a legal person, Exodus 21:22 (see my Prolife Blasphemy videos for that and more verses). 'Human' isn't even biological, Genesis 2:7. So Dawkins needs to mask that, by using anti-Bible Prolifers, who like him, also claim 'human' is biological, so shriek 'abortion is murder'. So Dawkins thinks he smears God and masks Bible's SOUL definition of 'man' (Gen 2:7), all the while reaming out the anti-Bible Prolifers as enemies to 'science'. Cute! End Chapter Eight, no more value here.

CHAPTER NINE (p.349, 'Childhood, Abuse, and the Escape From Religion') should be titled, 'Watch me replace My Brand of Abuse, for other religious kinds'. No one wanted to escape from any atheist-controlled country like Russia, China, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia? When Dawkins talks of mental abuse (page 354) as criminal — may we now sue him and his co-Darwinists, for the abuse we've suffered these last 150 years? For Darwinism is but endless assertion, claiming we cannot SEE the past evidence, as it's too slow. So the difference between a God we can't see but can account for, vs. Dawkins' Flying Speciation Monster we can neither see nor account for.. is what? Are the priests of Darwin gifted like the fake psychics who claim to 'see the other side'? WE can't see it. Glass houses, thrown stones, go both ways.

For millions of kids have been INDOCTRINATED with these 'evolution' lies, too. Billions of dollars in wasted time, production costs; meeting hall rentals, endless refutations wash rinse repeat. Will Dawkins take responsibility for the fact no Darwinian has ever ONCE produced a shred of hard evidence? Talk about scam artists; this is worse than Piltdown Man. If Dawkins were a woman and a Christian, his name would be Gail Riplinger. She claimed 'visions' of the Titanic holes, proved the KJV infallible. Dawkins claims visions too small in the past for us to see as 'holy', too.

One last proof Dawkins is dishonest or inept: page 378, and Chapter 10, re 'gaps'. Dawkins, who did no research into 'the gap theory' re Genesis 1, though there are many scholarly versions over the last 100 years — Dawkins ignores all that, instead quotes an ignorant Christian saying Earth is 6000 years old. Live Hebrew refutation of that nutty idea is in my Genesis playlist, to prove Bible never says Earth is 6000 years old; which I learned, forty years prior. So why didn't Dawkins know?

So his CHAPTER TEN (p.388, 'A Much Needed Gap') should be titled, 'see My Gap in Scholarship' — quipping his book fills a gap. Yeah, it does. Until reading it, I didn't fully see how irrational neo-Darwinism was: God is only God if He's not God, but evolved? Wow. So I didn't know, how seriously in peril, objective science has become. Now I know. Thank you, Mr. Dawkins.

Berlinski already long refuted Dawkins 'evidence' claims, and so too did many others. Daily. Darwinists merely chirp 'Evolution is True Because Evolution is True', then 'conclude' their mere claim PROVES evolution true. Yeah, ex cathedra. They're our new popes, now. With ugly clay feet.

The book allows you to read parts of it, within Amazon; so hopefully you can read my citations and quotes, within his book.

Finally: from now on, a non-thinker won't get a reply from me in the comments. Sick of wasting time on replies.


b-out Spiritual Maturation Process

1/13b, Spiritual Maturation, Intro

New Debate thread, here: frankforum/viewforum.php?f=42

Whole Intro series is viewable in consecutive order, on-screen in LordvSatan3.htm.

Christian Spiritual Maturation is a lifelong process. This Introduction Part 1 of 13, explains how one spiritually matures. You'll need to download the Word doc chart, since Youtube can't display it well. Video displays page 1 of the Word doc. Download it here: SMP.doc.

If your version of Word precedes 2002, try this link: SMPdocforOlderWordprograms.doc. If that doesn't work, please message me.

I can't fix the scratchy sound. RealPlayer's 3-band Equalizer set at max Bass, 0 Mid, and near-top Treble, helps.

1/3 Spiritual Childhood

WARNING: There's a typo re the htm in the 3rd screen. The right address is: LordvSatan3.htm#SpirChild.

Spiritual Childhood characterises most of Christianity historically, so its traits are easy to diagnose and explain. Its childish focus on body do's, singing, morality-as-spirituality (NOT what Bible says), on legalism, charted and explained.

1/5 Spiritual Adolescence

Spiritual Adolescence is the watershed that most Christians don't cross, because it is so tumultuous. Basically, the Spiritual Adolescent crosses over from emotionally-childish ideas of God and spirituality, to wanting more: and he begins to question, to seek INTELLIGENT answers from the Word itself. So in this 1/5, the inner soul change, threats to it, and what graduates him to Spiritual Adulthood, are explored.

The tumult arises as he realizes the childish focus on body do's, singing, morality-as-spirituality are NOT what Bible says; that these things do NOT buy him a nice life.

So that denouement (really discernment) will either catapult him into serious learning of Bible, or will carom him off into apostacy (i.e., sticking to rah-rah Christianity, becoming legalistic, or 'losing faith' and switching to some other belief entirely). Need to habitually learn to use 1Jn1:9 and learn/live on Bible, to grow up to the next stage.

Underlined portions in the 3rd and 4th row of boxes are most important in the transition. Divine Discipline will warn the Adolescent of his REVERSING retardation, Colossians 3:25 and Hebrews 12:5ff.

1/5, Spiritual Adulthood

If you fully understand this antipasto introduction to Spiritual Adulthood, you already are one. Parts 2-3 follow on Youtube; Part 3's video description has download links to Parts 4-5, each of which span over 45 minutes (too long for Youtube).

So if you actually survive hearing all that material yet your eyes don't glaze over — yeah you must be in or on the verge of, Spiritual Adulthood. Anyone younger, can't comprehend and enjoy, that much information.

For Bible is thesauretically and metaphorically dense; the Spiritual Adult has learned to think like a thesaurus, so he quickly graps, enjoys the wordplay on Word-in-Head being gold, silver, precious stones, being seed, clothing, 'fruit' of his life. This video only displays a few of these Divine Genius verses to signify the above; the Spiritual Adult is constantly using 1Jn1:9 throughout his day, he 'gets' all that meaning, quickly, as he studies or thinks. For THINKING is the 'fruit' of the spiritual life, not do's (after all, any unbeliever can do good deeds). "The Spiritual life is a supernatural way of life, demanding a supernatural means of execution", as my pastor liked to quip.

Human maturity & academic prowess can find & correctly interpret doctrines in the Bible, but that's not done on the Holy Spirit's power, so will be burned up at the Bema. You can tell if it's human power, since some parts of Bible are actually REVERSED by such people. Example: even smart Calvinists all REVERSE what Bible says re free will, regeneration, faith, total depravity; so they are not filled with the Spirit, & therefore cannot be spiritual adults, since these doctrines are basic & essential to Bible.

That Christianity uses FAKE VERBS as if they saved you (proper verb is ONLY BELIEVE); that Christianity REVERSES the PLAIN TEXT of 1Jn1:9, alerts you to the fact that Christianity has typically NOT grown up anywhere near Spiritual Adulthood, historically. So if they get some parts of Bible right, it's not from the Spirit, & it won't count at the Bema held in Rev4:1 (the two "meta tauta" clauses tell you that's the Rapture, after which follows SEVEN years of Tribulation).

Historically, it's very rare for a Christian to grow this far. If even 10% of Christians did, the world would have unheard-of prosperity.

Again, if you fully grasp this video, then you've grown that far. Phili 3:14!

3 thru 5/5 Spiritual Adulthood

It will be awhile before I can do the final set of videos on Spiritual Maturity (olive green, last maturation stage in SMP.doc). Meanwhile, you can read all about it in the above webpage; the Trial application is covered in even more detail, in LvS4d.htm.


b-out Refuting Anti-Paulinists (RAP)

NOTE: Episodes posted from 11/07/13 onward will be in vimeo ( http://www.vimeo.com/brainout ), not Youtube. However, the series postings will not resume until maybe late 2015. The vimeo videos will be moderated, to block trolls but allow folks to post without being stalked by prolifers, nor having to join Google Plus.

Rebutting today's version of Pharisees, Saduccees, and 'Judaizers', who prove ignorant of the Mosaic Law, which in reality was a POST-SALVATION covenant from God. But back in Jesus day, such folks used the Law as a TEST of whether you were saved (like Calvinism does, today). Post-1st century 'reincarnations' of their perverted ideas resulted in anti-Paul movements through the centuries, going by such names as Ebionites, Tzadokites (not all versions of that name), etc. So these videos introduct you to rebuttals you can use.

So of course, Christianity has come to be infected, too. Many of these goofy Christians are on Youtube, and this video series will largely address their goofy arguments, and sometimes target them by name.

First and last videos — in their descriptions — contain a collection of audio tracks to show the background: what the Mosaic Law really WAS, versus how it became twisted by some Jews. So a) the anti-Paul crowd can't read Bible, b) they LIE about what Bible says in order to advance their false doctrines, c) what Paul actually says, lines up perfectly with the OT he's always quoting; but d) what the OT says, is that you are ONLY saved by believing in Christ like Abram did, Gen 15:6; that the Mosaic Law was a POST-SALVATION spiritual maturation and witness covenant. Paul will explain how Christ's Success at the Cross and the rejection of Him by the Jews, resulted in a NEW GROUP — Church — which has its own covenant. That topic is covered in many of my playlists: most notably, Satan's Strategy and the (yet unfinished) RFG series.

The RFG playlist thus ties to this one, as the Book of Hebrews is the flagship book on WHY and HOW the covenant changed. It was not written by Paul, who had died — that's why the Book was written (Heb 13:23, compare to end 2Tim).

My Romans 10:10 playlist (here: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=71461DD619466B1F) shows how sophisticated is Paul's threading from the OT. Paul takes many OT verses AT ONCE and thickly threads them into just a few keywords. Awesome, deft, Divine 'incorporation by reference' any attorney who drafts legal documents would DIE to emulate!

1-7 RAP, Refuting Anti-Paulinists: Intro, Mosaic Law's Role

Series header. Audio links below show how the to-die-for, gorgeous Mosaic Law was always anti-works, for ONLY GOD DOES THE WORK. You 'obeyed' by NOT working!

Mosaic Law was and remains the most witty, gorgeous, sensible system of worship ever on earth. The only way it could be bested, was by Christ Who Fulfilled it. And we Church thus get an UPGRADE on the Mosaic Law.

That message is lost, to Christians. Lost, to anti-Paulinists, the 'Judaizers' of Paul's time, who twist Mosaic Law's meaning into an ego preening. You see that in Acts 15-22, Galatians, Corinthians, Colossians. Folks then and now, don't grasp Paul's proof that Mosaic Law was UPGRADED in Christ (i.e., Romans 10, playlist: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list... — Gal 3, 2Cor5). James finally 'got' what Paul meant, so wrote his Book, tying to Corinthians. So too, Peter. Fact is, Christ & ALL NT writers say the SAME THING as Paul. Which is, how Christ FULFILLED the Law. That's the OT promise. So all NT & OT, seamlessly fit together. You can't throw out any part of NT, w/o trashing the OT, too.

But you won't see that, until you first grasp Mosaic Law itself: it was a way to observe a POST-SALVATION spiritual life. It was NEVER a way to be saved. To be saved, you did what Abram did, Gen15:6. So Christ called the Pharisees who refused the One Who Abram believed, sons of the devil in John 8 (etc). Deut 6, 30, Lev26, Deut28 show Mosaic Law is about POST-salvation blessing ON EARTH; is witness to the world, of the prosperity of BEING saved; is witness to Messiah's PAYMENT, which alone CAUSES salvation.

So the audios review the Mosaic Law, keeping to simple concepts you already know & can verify in any translation:

My (very heavy) associated webpage on M.L.: LordvSatan2.htm#BeginJews. Keep reading until your eyes glaze over, then rest. Then start again. It's vital to grasp the M.L.'s precedence for our SEPARATE Church 'covenant'.

This series ties to my RFG vids on Book of Hebrews, which I've only begun. Will exegete Hebrews in future videos to show Covenant Upgrade for Church, in 2011.

For today's version of the SAME anti-Paul debate as during NT days, here are a few links I found. Focus on the issues, not their correctness: notice how everyone IGNORES Bible. Heh: Satan sidetracks debate to a WRITER of Bible, to sideline Bible's actual TEXT! Thus he cleverly admits Paul is appointed by God, yet sidelines what Paul was given to WRITE! Christian Taqqiya (video) Tactic #2! So the anti-Paulinists qualify as '666', along with KJVO & Prolifers: all 3 are clever anti-semitic ploys.

Links on the anti-Paul movement:

Better still, study the OT alongside Paul's own words, using 1John1:9 as needed, and hear GOD tell you the facts. :)

8 RAP, Anti-Paul weirdoes

I rebut this video: • Apostle Paul - Contradictions You need only watch the 1st minute of it, to see how he misuses Bible in Rom 14:9 and Luke 20:38. Pitiful scholarship, Lie Characteristic #3, below. I didn't watch the rest of his video, due to his twisting these verses. Lying is not the same as 'interpretation difference': audio addendum on that distinction, is here: http://www.brainout.net/wma/AntiPaulA... .

2nd audio, on how NT writers all QUOTE Paul: http://www.brainout.net/wma/AntiPaulA... . So you'll see, to cut out Paul is to cut out the entire NT, except for Matthew.

Now, there's been a lot of gossip about Matthew's origin, known to scholars as 'Q', a mythical 'proto' Hebrew text from which the NT Gospel writers derived their Greek text. Here's how you can tell the gossip is untrue: the wordplay in the Gospels is solely possible in Greek. Audio on that: http://www.brainout.net/wma/QGospelFa... . See my LXX and 'Mark's Q Gospel Proves Scholars Wrong' playlists to see the Greek wordplay and quoting.

Actually, all the NT is an elaboration of the Lord's statements in Matthew Chaps 16-25. There, He announces the TERMINATION of the Bridal Contract with Israel, because she plays Vashti when the Groom Came, Matt22; so, He will call out a new Bride, Church (Matt16:18), which will be built on HIMSELF (tautei in Greek, pointing to His chest).

So everyone wanted to know what was Israel's future as a result, which He reassures everyone will still fulfill Jeremiah 3 and 31, via His explanation in Matt24:9ff — AFTER Church is 'born' (fully formed, Matt24:8), the Trib will occur — and during that same 'week' Church celebrates as Bride of Christ, Matt25:1-13. (In the ancient world, the marriage banqueting lasted a week.)

Then comes Mill, when all the promises to Abraham forward will be fulfilled, just as Moses said in Psalm 90.

I wrote huge webpages based on these Bible chapters. Start with LordvSatan3.htm and just keep reading for months, until you're exhausted. :)

So the anti-Pauline crowd who believe in Matthew's Gospel, don't know how to read it. :) Frankly, neither do the pro-Pauline people, or no one would ever be preterist. Book of Hebrews is dedicated to explaining the TWO WALLS (of contracts) Christ made in Matt 16-24, which Paul talks about in Eph 2. All Catholics, and all Calvinists, don't get it, either.

The goofy claim Matthew was first in Hebrew depends on ignorance of what Church Fathers wrote. Go to https://www.ccel.org/fathers.html; search on 'Matthew written in Hebrew'. Notice all claims of Hebraic origin for Matthew admit a) there is NO Hebrew Gospel extant, & b) their claim is based on 'tradition' — yeah, like their 'tradition' Mary never sinned?! For the only Matthew TEXT is Greek; you'll also find many verbatim quotes of LXX in it — with unique Greek wordplay! Any ancient Aramaic or Hebrew NT mss we have, are all TRANSLATED from that same Greek!

So ask: were Matthew originally in Hebrew, why didn't God preserve it? Yet He did preserve it in Greek with wordplay and verbatim quotes from the LXX — so DUH what was the 'original Matthew'?

In sum:

'Falsehood has at least 10 major characteristics you can test for and prove, whether it's a falsehood in politics, science, religion or.. Bible. False Doctrine always:

  1. Maligns God's Character.
  2. Stresses or glorifies man.
  3. Betrays incompetent (Bible) 'scholarship'.
  4. Obeys the 3 Temptations of Matt4, REVERSING what Bible actually says in the verse(s) claimed for support.
  5. Claims to be the 'one true faith' version — and you're bad, if you're not in it.
  6. Appeals to the 'respectability' of the human claimant (i.e., how popular, charismatic or how many degrees the person has).
  7. Justifies itself by appeal to other PEOPLE who are likewise respectable, rather than to Bible (hearsay/ ex cathedra claims).
  8. Is POPULAR. This discourages checking the claims via Bible.
  9. Appeals to emotion or intellect, in lieu of Bible in context.
  10. Fails Common Sense.'

ProofYou'reLying

By request. Watch in HD, fullscreen to see the live Hebrew and Greek yourself. Reprimanding Response to ProveYourFaith, whose video is here: • John 3:13 Jesus descended from Heaven...

It's really sad when people lie in videos, with the very Bible text they claim as support, DISPROVING them. That's what ProveYourFaith did in his video, which I prove from the live Hebrew and Greek, here. John 3:13 is one of hundreds of times the Lord claimed to be God, but PYF doesn't believe that, so TWISTS the text to make his lying claim. It's real obvious — if you know the Hebrew and Greek. Which, PYF pretends to know. But as you'll see, like edwardpf123 who pretends to know Hebrew and Greek yet doesn't even know what 'declension' means, PYF is a liar, and doesn't even know basic grammar — like, the difference between active and passive voice.

BTW: People complained to me about this guy, and after trying to explain things to him directly, he steadfastly stuck to his lying. So I had to make this video, Luke 17:3, 1Tim5:20, Titus 3:10, Eph4:14.

But it's never pleasant to say someone else is wrong, for we ALL are wrong on something. I hate this part of my job, sorry — so I can't disguise that distaste from my voice. (I'm not against PYF himself, but against the 'job' of exposing someone.) Maybe with more practice I'll sound less irritated, in videos. :)

GD7e Church Covenant Properties (see description)

31-part audio conclusion to Episode 7 (links below): God's Covenants are of ASSOCIATION. Trial terms affect how His Covenants with mankind a) are structured, and b) change. Trial ARGUMENTS are learned by means of tracking the changes. Moreover, a covenant which is broken thus leaves unresolved provisions which didn't complete; so the incomplete parts carry over into each successor covenant (jurisprudence requirement of consistency). By tracing the flow of the changes, therefore, one learns much about both the trial and about the covenants themselves.

As you'd expect, the real explanation of these covenants and their changing properties, would be lengthy. Explanation begins in writing at LordvSatan2.htm, and runs maybe 1000 printed pages, ending at LordvSatan5.htm; analysis of covenant 'flow' and hence change is summarized beginning at LordvSatan2.htm#CovG. Took me years to compile and distill, so it isn't simple. But it does work with what you know, and you'll have to mull it all over, if you're even supposed to read it.

A shorter, pithier version of the difference in OUR Bridal contract, is here: LvS4aContinued.htm#Bridal.

So I tried to condense all this material into mere highlights that focus on COMMUNICATION — for the covenants are of ASSOCIATION — in the audio below. But still it took me 30 more parts to say! Frankly I prefer the written material, but maybe you'll like the audio below...

God's Design of Soul-throughput brainstorming audios might not interest you: I'm trying to determine how 2Cor5:17 applies in light of Eph4:13, what was the design of Christ's own Soul, given Cross onslaught in only 3 hours, and whether His Soul Design is why Paul says kaine ktsis for us:

Thread on Covenantal Differences continue, here:


b-out Romans 10:10 videos

Romans 10:10 means the OPPOSITE of what people say it means. Romans 10:10 says that MOUTHING doesn't save you, BELIEVING saves you. For, the Jews were always MOUTHING, but not BELIEVING. So Paul is tweaking them for their unbelief.

This playlist is a subset of GOSPEL playlist, showing only the Romans 10:10 videos. You end up learning a little Greek, the real original words God gave Paul to write. So it's fun.

Use 1John1:9 as you watch it. That way the Holy Spirit will make you learn MUCH FASTER. You don't have to work at it (in Part 10b, I'm seeing the words for the first time myself, in Greek, and learned them while DOING the video, so I'm proof it's easy to learn).

The whole chapter is reviewed, so you yourself can prove Romans 10:10 is Paul's chiding people for mouthing, but not believing. Thus you won't fall for the LIE that claims you must say aloud you believe, to be saved.

Why Only Believe Pt10a: Intro to Romans 10:10

Quick proof via exegesis on 'eis chaining', that Romans 10:10 says it's ONLY BELIEVE to be saved. For in Greek, multiple parallelling use of the preposition eis denotes Cause (1st eis) and then Effect (2nd+ use of eis). In Romans 10:10, the "mouth" clause is an EFFECT (2nd eis) not a cause. So it's mistranslated in modern Bibles. Of course, you can see that even in a mistranslation, IF YOU JUST READ THE BIBLE, especially what Paul says PRIOR TO Romans 10:9 — for Paul is chiding people like Moses did back in Deut 30, for having the Word in their mouth but NOT in their belief. Context Context Context!

The rest of this Part 10 will follow: Parts 10b-g will go through Romans 10 plus Deut 30, and Matthew 7 which Paul is referencing, in Romans 10. By the end of 10g, you'll see clearly Paul proves how you CANNOT be saved by mouthing Jesus is Lord — that's Paul's point, in Romans 10:9-10. Which point, is clear from Romans 10:1-8, but (ahem) no one ever reads the CONTEXT! How embarrassing.

Finally, Parts 10h et seq. function like a technical appendix, proving raw Bible use of eis cause-and-effect chaining throughout the NT, which you should watch fullscreen — you need to see this syntax, for it proves that the eis chaining in Romans 10:10 is a cause (believe) and effect (confession). So you ADMIT TO salvation with your mouth: as you'll see in THIS video, Bible's Greek literally says that, stomati de homologeitai EIS soterian. You admit something you already HAVE, get it?

These technical appendage videos will be labelled Part 10h, etc. Don't know how many future parts, yet.

Why Only Believe Pt10b1: Proof #1 from Romans 10:9-10 that ONLY Believe, saves

First of three proofs that Romans 10 says you CANNOT be saved by mouthing. That was the problem the Jews had, which is the backdrop to the chapter. They MOUTH the Law, they APE the Law but they don't BELIEVE in Christ — so are NOT saved. Read the Chapter for yourself.

Here in 10b, we go through the very verses where Paul stresses that you are NOT saved by mouthing, but by BELIEVING. Exact opposite of what 'Christians' say the verses mean! So are they saved, or are they just like the Jews, mouthing "Lord, Lord" — but not believing IN Him?

Very embarrassing, that those who use these verses to claim you must say you believe aloud to be saved, CANNOT READ Bible.

This 10b is 14 minutes long, so I split it into 10b1 and 10b2. In 10b2 you yourself will learn the Greek of Romans 10:10, and see how it's mistranslated in modern Bibles. Related webpage is Rom1010.htm.

Makes you wonder if all those 'Christians' saying you must say you believe aloud, are even saved. Same problem as the Jews have — they bob up and down at the Wailing Wall, they bob every sabbath, mouthing the words SAYING them — but not BELIEVING in them. That's Paul's point in Romans 10, that SAYING it is NOT enough — which you'll see, if you just read the chapter!

Why Only Believe Pt10b2: Proof #1 (cont.) Rom10:10 in Greek

Very embarrassing proof from Romans 10:10 itself, that those who claim you must say ALOUD you believe to be saved, cannot read Bible. So are THEY saved? And, what about all the translators since 1900? How come they mistranslate Romans 10:10b? See the Greek here for yourself. By the time you finish this video, you will know all the 10 Greek words of Romans 10:10; and you will know to pray for those maybe-unsaved people, who mistranslate and misuse the verse.

Why Only Believe Pt10c: Proof #2, Romans 10:1-8

Proof #2. How Romans 10:1-8 proves you CANNOT be saved by confessing faith. That's the problem the Jews had, all mouth and no belief, Deut 30:10-14, Matt7:19-22, to which Romans 10:8-9, tie. As you'll see, from the context.

Why Only Believe Pt10f1: Proof #2, cont.

Parts 10f1,f2, and g demonstrate from the NIV translation how since Romans 9, Paul's always been saying that ONLY BELIEVE saves, to demonstrate Romans 10:9-10 in the larger context of the Book of Romans.

Why Only Believe Pt10g: Proof #2, conclusion

By the time you finish this Part 10g you should have no doubt from the PROPER CONTEXT of Romans 9-10, that Paul constantly stresses the BELIEVE CHRIST PAID FOR YOUR SINS is alone used by God to save you. Same as Genesis 15:6, Romans 4, 5 themes. See other verses in the Tags section.

Part 10h and following begin Proof #3, a pan-NT demonstration of "eis chaining" to show how Romans 10:10 uses the same syntax, to prove that what you say with your mouth is a RESULT, not a cause, of salvation.

Why Only Believe Pt10h (Romans 10:10 Proof #3, Eis 'chaining')

Beginning of Live BibleWorks tracing of chained eis prepositions in the New Testament (here, beginning in Matthew), showing its cause-and-effect usage, so you can see that same 'syntax' is followed in Romans 10:10 — therefore the second "mouth" eis clause is an EFFECT, not a cause of salvation. (BTW, in this video I mistakenly say Romans 10:9, but you can see onscreen both uses of the preposition are in Romans 10:10.)

Eis chaining parallelling, cause-and-effect construction in Matthew: 6:26, 8:28, 8:32, 9:1, 9:17, 10:5, 10:41, 13:30, 14:22, 15:17 (very important, ties to Rom10:10), 15:39, 17:15, 18:8, etc.

Why Only Believe Pt10i (Romans 10:10 Proof #3, Eis 'chaining')

Continuing Live BibleWorks demonstration of eis cause-and-effect chaining in Matthew (Matt9:1 through 14:22), so you can see how the doubled use of eis in Romans 10:10, shows that the "mouth" clause is an EFFECT of salvation from BELIEF, not a cause of salvation. For you say it, because you already BELIEVED it.

In this video's 2:15-2:20, I missed counting Matt10:5, which also shows a paralleling doubled use of eis. So look at that verse, too.

It will take awhile to show all the eis chainings in the NT, because there are so many verses. Idea is to prove this is a syntax in Greek that the modern translators of Romans 10:10 MISSED. Good thing we have the original-language texts, huh. :)

Why Only Believe Pt10j (Romans 10:10 Proof #3, Eis 'chaining')

Continuing demonstration of eis chaining in Matthew (stopping at Matt18:8), to show that the second (and subsequent) uses of eis in a chain demonstrate EFFECTS, RESULTS. So the second eis ("mouth" clause) in Romans 10:10 is a RESULT of being saved, never a cause.

Here, eis chains in Matt14:22 through 18:8 are reviewed.

Future videos of this Part 10 will pick up after Matt18:8 but will be more concise, showing ONLY the eis-chained verses; for now that you know I'm looking at EVERY verse which has eis in it. That's how you're supposed to learn what Bible says, by looking at ALL of it, context context context! This is a pastor's job. My pastor did this already, you can get his exegesis of Romans verse by verse (series is four years of almost daily Bible classes, recorded live), from rbthieme.org.


b-out Prayer and Fellowship Royalty

We are Royal Family of God, but don't use our EXTREMELY POWERFUL office as we should. As James 4 explains, because we won't use 1John1:9, we cause the world's problems and our prayers aren't heard; David said the same thing, back in Psalm 32 and 66. It's never the peasant's fault. We are ROYAL in Christ. James stresses that. But we don't care!

So ALL the world's problems are due to our not using our office properly. Selected videos here, explain that office, and are part of Bible101 and the Angelic Conflict playlists.

YOU ARE RULER. Prayer is how you make rules which affect the world. Do you know how to pray? Chances are, you don't! Fellowship with God is what HE uses to bless the world, and if you aren't in fellowship (not using 1John1:9), the world is being cursed due to you! Do you stay in fellowship? Probably not!

So blame yourself, not someone else, if there are problems in the world...

5 Pillars of Christianity

GodSystem.htm is the associated webpage for this video on God's "henotes" Spiritual Blessing System. Much longer discourse is LordvSatan3.htm which covers Our Royal Priesthood in excruciating detail.

If you miss one of these pillars, your life is straw, worthless. The 5 Pillars of Christianity were also the 5 pillars of Judaism, and the 5 pillars of spirituality since Adam.

Don't do these, and you're trying to live the spiritual life on your own power, which is merely human and not spiritual.

People who are not spiritual mistake spirituality for "earthly things", so will deem spirituality to be morality, emotion (i.e., fancying you are filled with the Spirit because you feel something), how well they know Bible, etc. All these, are the human IDEAS of spirituality, and since the Holy Spirit is not empowering the life, they don't know the difference.

Spirituality is God making HIS OWN THOUGHTS become the matrix of your soul. Because, you are to live with Him forever. Hence Christ BECAME the Truth as He ate [believed and lived on] the Truth. His Soul was transformed from human viewpoint, to Divine Viewpoint, the goal of Isaiah 55:8-9. It is not seen, felt, or even physical. It's solely internal, and solely the produce of the Holy Spirit.

So, at the Bema, anything manmade is our trying to be 'Christian' on human power; it will all be burned up, 1 Cor3's "wood hay stubble" and 2 Peter's "the world and its works".

For after all, the unbeliever can get the rosy glow, roll in the aisles speaking gibberish, and do good deeds. Satan tempted Christ to do good deeds, in Matt4.

LOL then what's the real spiritual life? Live the 5 Pillars in the video, and you'll know.

They are:

  1. Believe Christ paid for your sins. That enters you into God's Spiritual Blessing System.. FOREVER. You cannot lose salvation. So this first Pillar is permanently 'on' the very nanosecond you first believed Christ died for your sins. You don't need to be re-evangelised, even if you stop believing in Christ later on. Salvation depends on the efficacy of CHRIST, not on you.
  2. Use 1John1:9 every time you sin. Fail to do this, and you're only filled with your own power, which of course you'll overvalue. You will misread Scripture. If you get an interpretation right, it's still from your power, not the Spirit's, so your interp will be limited, and will not count.
  3. Learn and live on Bible daily. It's your spiritual food. Substitute 'food' like ritual and emotion, will leave you starving. Don't substitute for learning and living on Bible.
  4. Learn Bible under a MALE pastor God appoints for you. You must find out from HIM who that is. It's a spiritual gift you get at salvation, and if you refuse it, you will be soundly spanked.
  5. Talk to God ALL the time (aka 'prayer'). Jesus' Humanity was always online with God the Father. So should you be. The five subelements of effective prayer are also listed here. Fail to do them, and you're praying to yourself. Prayer is Royal Legal Protocol. So it's not chanted stuff, but YOUR THINKING before God.

All the foregoing is TESTABLE in your own life. JUST DO THESE THINGS, see for yourself the effects.

1/4 Fellowship w/God vs Salvation

Post-salvation spiritual growth (and hence the 1Cor 3 rewards) depends on Fellowship with God. It is distinct from salvation, but in many ways, more devastating if you don't take advantage of it. Here, you'll see the commonality of post-salvation fellowship in the OT, compared to the NT. You'll probably have to watch these three videos several times, even though I tried to keep it simple. Use 1John1:9 to get the Spirit's Brains and thus learn faster — just like they had to do, in the OT.

More: God depicts salvation as a birth (John 3:16, Gal3:26, Titus 3:5, Hebrews 2, John 14); as a citizenship (John 14, Ephesians 2, esp. v.16, Hebrews 12:23); as an inheritance (Jn. 13:8; Acts 7:5; 13:19; 20:32; 26:18; Rom. 4:14; Gal. 3:18; 4:30; Eph. 1:11, 14, 18; 3:6; 5:5; Col. 1:12; 3:24; Heb. 1:2, 4, 14; 9:15; 11:8; 12:16; 1 Pet. 1:4); as a marriage to Christ, replacing one's former 'marriage' to the sin nature, theme of Romans 6 through 8, 1 Cor 6, etc.

A person born, can die. A citizen can commit treason and be executed for it. A person due an inheritance can later refuse the conditions of the inheritance. A spouse can divorce. But notice: once born, you cannot turn back time to BEFORE birth; you cannot turn back time to BEFORE you became a citizen; you cannot turn back time to BEFORE you became a beneficiary of an inheritance; you cannot turn back time to BEFORE you married. Even so, you cannot turn back salvation.

But once born, you can refuse to know your father; once a citizen, you can refuse to be loyal to your country; once a beneficiary, you can refuse to COLLECT your full inheritance; once married, you can refuse to have intimacy with your spouse. So all those refusals, still have effects. So too, your refusal to have fellowship with God, has effects in time, and especially in eternity.

You refuse to have fellowship with God if you refuse 1John1:9. Thus you refuse to grow up spiritually, so remain merely 'born again', a baby. Thus you refuse to collect on your inheritance, so you are merely IN the Kingdom, rather than inheriting rewards FOR the kingdom. Thus you refuse to be a good citizen of heaven, but are rather a traitor to it, Jude 12, 1John1:8, 10, Philippians 3:18-19, 2Tim2:26-3:7, last half of 2nd Peter. So you can be executed for that, Acts 5 and 1John5:16. For your refusal, is to refuse intimacy with your Husband, Who is Christ, Romans 6 — and you refused to become intimate with His Thinking, which only the Holy Spirit can produce, John 4:23-24.

So you see, there is MUCH to lose if you refuse fellowship with God. You enter heaven a sanctified, holy yet charred soul, still saved but with no rewards, 1Cor3:15-17. Don't refuse 1John1:9! Or, as the video shows, you will be sick and miserable down here, your prayers will go no higher than the ceiling, and all your Scripture study will be bombast — the Holy Spirit won't be in you. And you'll die the sin 'face to face' with death, 1John 5:16.

Your choice, Colossians 3:25, Gal 6:7.

2/4 Fellowship w/God vs Salvation

Post-salvation spiritual growth (and hence the 1Cor 3 rewards) depends on Fellowship with God. It is distinct from salvation, but in many ways, more devastating if you don't take advantage of it. Here, you'll see the commonality of post-salvation fellowship in the OT, compared to the NT. You'll probably have to watch these three videos several times, even though I tried to keep it simple. Use 1John1:9 to get the Spirit's Brains and thus learn faster — just like they had to do, in the OT.

4/4 Fellowship w/God vs Salvation

Conclusion. See 1/4 for more info.

Just so that you know: what passes for 'Christianity' has always been Churchinanity or Churchinsanity, and bears little resemblance to what Bible actually says. I started the spiritual life at that end, as goofball a Christian as you can imagine. All the pointy-hat goofball rituals of ecumenical religion, or the foot-stomping, rolling-on-the-floor emotionalism garbage; or, the legalistic tabooism so common among Christians (dour God being a longtime favorite since the Reformation trashed us all).

But there is a very different, real Christianity, the one which made Paul willing to keep on going; which made Moses turn down being Pharaoh of Egypt; which made David willing to be king (a job no sane person would want). It's SEEING GOD. Daily. Nightly. When you want to see Him, and when you don't want to, also.

Eventually you mature. At that point, living really is Christ, and dying really is profit. Philippians 1:21. Takes a lifetime to get there. So if you want to know God, just keep on wanting to know Him, and you WILL get there. HE will take you there. Guaranteed.

1/3 Prayer

The minute you believe in Christ, you are Royal Family of God, so have certain Royal offices. You'll be punished if you misuse them. One of these offices, is prayer: LEGAL REPRESENTATION to God. It's more powerful and valuable than all the works on this planet. So this video introduces you to that office. 2/3 and 3/3 are on how to pray, what to avoid, so you can be sure of an answer.

Prayer mechanics webpage: PrayProc.htm

1/2 Prayer vs Fellowship

Praying to God versus talking with God on a daily basis. Prayer is OFFICIAL, whereas the daily talking is part of fellowship. So if you are not Trinitarian, your OFFICE as priest will never function, even if you are saved. So even if you are Trinitarian, your OFFICE as royal priest will never function, unless you pray to FATHER. Video displays the relevant verses proving this.

Of course, if like millions of other people you'd memorized the misnamed 'Lord's Prayer', you'd automatically know this. After all, Christ taught the format began with, 'Our Father who art in heaven' (Luke 11:2), not 'Our Son' or 'Our Christ' or 'Our Holy Ghost'! Of course, CHRIST prays to FATHER, not to the Spirit, nor to (duh) Himself, in John 17!

Fellowship, on the other hand, is with ALL of Them, so you can talk with ANY of Them, as you'll see believers do, in both OT and NT. Fellowship verbs are different. OFFICIAL PRAYER verb is "ask", Greek verb aitew; or 'pray', Greek verb proseuchomai (compound verb literally means 'come face-to-face with').

Other verbs are used for fellowship, especially kalew, usually translated 'call', which stresses your IDENTITY as One of the Elect — God called you, so now you can call upon Him. Your ELIGIBILITY TO PRAY is stressed by kalew. But the FUNCTION of praying, is aitew. Bible is very precise in its wording.

So too, 1John is about fellowship with God, that's why you have to name sins to God. You're not filled with the Spirit unless using 1John1:9. If not filled, then neither any conversation NOR your official prayer role, will function. You'll just be filled with hallucinative hot air, instead.

This is why so many Christians misread Bible; why apostacy is so bad; why plain translations are twisted by believers. For, they don't use 1John1:9. WARNING LABEL: THE MOMENT YOU BELIEVED IN CHRIST YOU LOST YOUR OWN MIND. You cannot function rationally apart from the Spirit's Brains, Ephesians 4:23. That's why I call myself 'brainout', to remind me to use 1John1:9.

TRY THE VERSE YOURSELF for a month, remembering it many times during a day. See what a difference it makes in your ability to perceive, and in your prayer life. I use it like breathing, that's why people mistake me for being smart. NOT MY BRAINS, but His, Ephesians 4:23!

2/2 Prayer vs Fellowship

Continuation from Part 1. Videos on the Romans 10 passage (Part 10f1 — you'll need to see 10f1, 2, and g, which are linked): • Why Only Believe Pt10f1: Proof #2, cont.

See, the unbeliever has no contact with God. So YOU are 'it'. See, since you have an intimate relationship with God, one of the ways to know what it's like to BE God, is to have the Power of Prayer. And it's a RULING Power. The more you use it, the more you learn why God doesn't solve all the problems of the world, why He ordains Freedom, instead. Because you really CAN get whatever you ask for, in that sense you are given the same right as God has, so you can learn what it's like for Him to BE God. Christ isn't kidding when He says that you can ask ANYTHING in His Name (verses are in the video).

So you learn to be JUDICIOUS in what you ask. Just as, God can SPEAK a thing and it is, so too you can SPEAK to Father in prayer, and it is. Careful what you ask! Yet, never stop asking! Contradiction? Paradox? Or the RULING issue in JUSTICE? :)))

By contrast, informal conversation with Any Member of the Godhead doesn't carry the responsibility of Official Prayer. That's why Bible uses different verbs for fellowship, like menw (abide), kalew (call — you can call on someone for many reasons), homologew (confess, really means to cite as a court case, and there it's like prayer, official, yet is only about yourself, private). Learn the different verbs. Use 1John1:9 like breathing, ask Our Mutual Dad about this!

Of course, if you don't believe God is Three Persons of the SAME Co-Infinite Nature (not polytheism, because all polytheistic formulations are of UNequal persons) — if you don't know Trinity, then your spiritual life will never progress beyond infancy. Saved, yes: if you ever ONLY ONCE ONLY BELIEVED in Christ. But after that, no growth. For you can't use 1John1:9 unless you name your sins to FATHER as you remember them. (If you don't remember, just say something like 'I think I've been arrogant, Dad!' and that will work, too. Idea is to admit you sinned, even if you're not sure what kind it was.)

1 John 1:9 Revisited

"Forgiveness of sins" applied pre-salvation. All pre-salvation sins blotted out the moment you believe in Christ. Post-salvation, you must name them, since now you are going to live with God forever, and it's up to you whether you want to be CLEANED UP. For the soul is saved, but post-salv, you can dirty it again. Sure, those sins were paid for also, but post-salvation it's YOUR choice whether you want the payment GOD got, to be used ON you.

The above interpretation takes into account ALL the Scripture, especially the fact that in the OT, BELIEVERS were the only ones offering sacrifices. Duh, if you didn't believe in God, you didn't go. Also accounts for all the commands in the NT to name your sins, the most bald of which is in 1Jn1:9 which flat tells you that you do NOT get forgiveness, if you don't name/admit the sins to God.

Doesn't say you always have to be specific, because the word is homologew, which means admit. Idea is to admit it, even if you don't exactly remember what the sins were. I do this as follows: "I've been arrogant, Dad!" or similar thought, many times a day. Then move on, like Paul counsels in Philippians 3:12-14. Never dwell on the sins, they were paid for on the Cross.

So I've been remiss in not clarifying that post-salvation sins are NOT forgiven. My pastor taught that too. If you're interested, my pastor's website is www.rbthieme.org and the subseries on this topic is called "The Law of Double Punishment". They never ask for money and they don't sell your name, or even write you, except in response to you.

1/3 Our Royal Responsibility: Cross Mechanics God101 series

Theme: God can just think a thing, and it exists. So He gives us that power too, in Christ. So He wants to say Isaiah 54:1 to everything, and He wants to make us into gods post-death, John 10:34-35. How? By replicating His Son's THINKING into us, line by line, precept by precept. For how you think, is the real you. Not what you look like to others. What you think is how you become, so you program yourself. So the idea is to become "Christ-like", as we all know. That means THINKING as He does.

So this video is about how Cross Mechanics birthed a Royal Thinking Pattern for Church to inherit, which has huge implications for us, His Body, His Church. Every thought we think is before Father, even as every thought He thinks on Cross is ever Before Father. So the bad thought of our sins, paired with the good thoughts of His in Juridical Response (a la Matthew 4:4), resulted in the bad thought being the occasion for the Good One. Sweet savor, as the KJV puts it. Blessing by association. Association is how you learn things, which is really you BELIEVING a certain meaning. If you BELIEVE 1+1=2, then to you that's reality. Of course, it's also objectively true. For since God can just think a thing and it exists, He gave to us humans the privilege of thinking whatever we want in association with our lives, and bing! That is the meaning it has to us until we change our minds. Now you see why we must believe in Christ to be saved: GOD made it true that He paid for sins, but if we don't want that payment to APPLY to us, it won't.

So our thoughts are our "priestly service", as Romans 12:1 puts it in the Greek (logikos is wordplay on Ho Logos, just like in 1Cor1:5). For when thing "A" occurs & you REPLY with thought "B", the "B" BAPTISES, BONDS, BEGETS a meaning to "A" which forms in your soul. Which begetting, is the same process as happened on the Cross. Which begetting, Father forever hears. That moment of begetting, is forever alive to Him Who is Omniscient. Now you know why Isaiah 54:1 reads as it does, playing on the birth pangs of Isaiah 53:10's "me amal naphesho", birthed-out-from-His-Soul's-Labor. As the Lord said, once giving birth, the labor pains are all forgotten due to the joy of seeing someone BORN. Again and again and again and again and again. Circle closed, Romans 8:11ff, all creation personified in birthpangs, awaiting the birth of eternity with God. So every moment you think, you birth. If that thinking is God's Thinking, you are birthing sweet savor for Father, and your soul "enlarges" (lit. grows, Greek verb auxanw).

So my informal reaction to all this legacy is this triad of videos. It is 'occasioned' by many Youtuber videos I've watched, and especially:

That Christ's Human Thinking (not physical death) paid for sins, has been stressed and exegetically proven by my pastor for over 53 years. But you can see it baldly in Isaiah 53's Hebrew or LXX text. Why theology still doesn't recognize this fact, is quite beyond me. It's a Juridical Matching of Thought, pattern of Matt4:4, Hebrews 5-10, Psalm110, Jeremiah 31:31-34 tied to Hebrews 8:8-10:17, Cross Mechanics Isa53:10-11 Romans 12:1-3 logikos sumorphologew Hupostasis, union of opposites: meaning of YH+WH in OT (wordplay on God-man promise), and wryly used as a moniker for Christ by the writer of Hebrews in Hebrews 1:3, 3:14, and 11:1 always mistranslated. A few years back I wrote a "DDNA" webseries on this, DDNA.htm. It's centered on Isaiah 53's contract to make sons, so that chapter is exegeted and translated in three ways, one of which apes Isaiah's poetic meter, in Isa53trans.htm. All my webpages are dedicated to this theme, as true spirituality is what you THINK, never mind what you do. (As James stressed in James 2:18-26 which Christians routinely abuse, it's the Word Working In You Which Does All The Work. You can't see that meaning in English, since Bible translations routinely wash God out and stress man's works, instead. "Book of James" video introduces you to key Greek things to look for in James. If you follow those suggestions, your view of the book entirely reverses.)

This video mentions other vids as well. Here are the links:

God's System

NEW debate thread, here: frankforum/viewforum.php?f=42

EVERY BELIEVER SHOULD CARE TO BE IN GOD's SYSTEM. So if you want to have a happy 2013, resolve to do the following.

Of course, to be in God's System, you first need to be in God. So if you're not sure you're saved, then simply Believe Jesus Christ Paid For Your Sins, and you are forever saved. That puts you IN GOD: see all the 'in Him' and 'in Christ' verses in the NT. This is a one-shot belief, which you do in your head. You don't have to TELL anyone about it, nor do you have to understand it, to be saved. JUST DO IT. ONCE is enough.

So now that you are in God, you need to be in God's System, which involves things you do every day, not merely once; just as, you don't eat only once and then never eat again. So just as you can't grow physically and mentally without eating every day and doing stuff with your body, even so you can't grow spiritually without certain daily 'eating' and 'activity'.

There's not a denomination on this planet which will disagree with what follows, which is the BIBLE's pan-denominational system, true in OT and NT.

Fail to do these, and you are out of the system, no matter how right you might be about Bible doctrines. So you and all around you will be punished BIGTIME, per Leviticus 26, Deut 28, 2Chron7:14. To avoid cursing, then do the following, so that you and all around you will be blessed, instead!

  1. Use 1John1:9 every time you think you sinned. NAME THE SIN TO GOD, or just say 'I sinned', if you don't know or don't remember what kind of sin it was. TO GOD, not to people. (Don't give people an excuse to sin, by telling them your own.)
    • See also 2Peter1:9, same topic, 1Cor11:31, Psalm 32:5, 66:18, Exodus 9:27, Joshua 7:20, 1Sam15:24, 30, 26:21, 2 Sam 12:13, 19:20, 24:10, 24:17, 1Chron21:8, Neh 1:6, Job 7:20, 9:21, 10:14, 19:4, 33:27, 34:31-2, Psalm 41:4, 51:4, Micah 7:9. Many other verses in the Levitical rules required you to name your sin ON the animal to the priest as he cut its throat. Those are highlighted in my 'Why we need 1John1:9' video.
  2. FIND YOUR RIGHT TEACHER, male only: 1Chron 25:8, Matt. 10:24f; 13:52; Lk. 6:40, Eph 4:12-16, especially verse 16 which says a pastor has his SHARE of the booty of Christ (playing off Isaiah 53:12 in the LXX), to TEACH his sheep. His Sheep, as in Isa. 49:9; Jer. 23:1f; Ezek. 34:3, 5f, 8, 10ff, 15, 17, 19, 22, 31; Lk. 15:6; Jn. 10:14f, 26f; 21:16f.
  3. LEARN AND LIVE ON BIBLE taught by that teacher. Doesn't matter if he's wrong or right, so long as he's right for YOU. See also Romans 13-15, and especially Romans 14:4, which says each believer has the sovereign right to determine his own beliefs and worship before God.
  4. Talk with God all the time. If you are reticent to do that, it means there's a problem in the relationship. See also 1 Thess 5:17, and any of the Psalms. Notice how familiarly Abraham, Moses, Gideon talk to God: they were obviously USED TO conversation with Him.
  5. Optionally, talk with believers. You need to practice what you learned in #3, but there are significant warnings, like 2John9, 2Tim2:26-3:7, Philippians 3:18-19, Titus 3:10, James 3-5. So you should ask God whether you should associate and how much, with given believers. Association implies agreement, and that might compromise doctrine. Debating Scripture comes in here, practicing #3. How much you should even do that, is also something to ask God.

Notice: it doesn't matter what denomination or how right or wrong you or someone else is. GOD DOES ALL THE CORRECTING. So yeah debate, but the objective is to TRAIN, not to convince the other guy. God will do that. Anyone IN the system is IN the right place; and at the right time, whatever you said he needed to hear, God will recall to his mind, John 14:26. Anyone not in the system won't hear, can't process what you say, 1John1:8, 10. So get out of those conversations quickly, as you're wasting time.

Your job, by contrast, is to rightly talk Bible since God hears YOU. You will be liable for screwing it up, so practice and keep using 1John1:9 so you won't screw up as much.

Master webpage on this topic, if you want more info: GodSystem.htm.


b-out No Female Pastors!

Avoid anyone claiming female pastors are valid Biblically. You'll see quick proof of that in the video descriptions of the first two videos, with extensive detailed proof beginning in the third. Any believer can read, research, comment on Scripture; in fact, it's a duty of every believer. But the authority to teach a congregation, has always and only belonged to males, by Divine Decree.

So what can women do? ASSIST! We can assist in research, in librarian functions, in many capacities. But to be in charge of a congregation, systematically teaching them, is not on the list of women's roles. See the video descriptions to the first two videos for an overview of the difference between being a PASTOR, versus an assistant. (I'm in the latter category, for example.)

Don't be fooled. Learn what BIBLE says, not hearsay!

NFP intro, Womens' Roles in Body of Christ

Header video in NO FEMALE PASTORS playlist. Please view the playlist's 1 NFP to see important Bible citations which back up what's said in this video. This shouldn't have to be said: talking about Bible is not teaching. If you talk about the weather, you're not teaching weather. If you talk about a computer, you're not teaching computer. So talking about the Bible is NOT teaching it. Teaching is a specific professional office held by someone who has a specific congregation/group which PAYS him to do his job. He does it for the same group on a regular basis, and his job is to teach them an entire body of material. His job involves repeating information and watching the students to see if they are learning what he teaches. They are assigned to him, and he is assigned to them. He even sets rules for their behavior while they are in his class, but never outside his class.

Pastor-teachers have a 'flock' assigned by God to them for purposes of sharing out the booty of Christ's Thinking, Greek verb merizw used in Isaiah 53:12, and by Paul in Ephesians 4:16, Romans 12:1-3 (esp. verse 3), cognate noun meros and metron. Teacher is assigned his own PORTION to teach other adults within his 'flock', a congregation God sends him. So they underwrite his financial existence, so he can afford to spend all his time teaching them. That's the ideal as Bible provides it, from time immemorial.

Women never get that role. They never had it in the OT and they never get it in the NT. Women do have other roles. This video highlights those roles.

1 NFP: No Female Pastors!

Tentative outline for the series (last revised 2/25/10): NoFemalePastors.doc.

Upshot: women have many roles, but teaching a congregation is not one of them. Everyone learns something from everyone else. A pastor, by contrast, is the PROVIDER for his sheep. The food comes FROM him. God gives it to him, and he feeds HIS (not someone else's) sheep. So this is not a female role.

Eph4:16's Greek is rather crudely specific about it, using two marital-HUSBANDING verbs which translators blush & cover up. These verbs are only used of men; dare I say why?

So only a male can do the 'husbanding' job of 'metron.. merous', sharing out the booty of Christ. YOUR SPIRITUAL GROWTH IS LIMITED TO THE PASTOR'S OWN LEVEL OF GROWTH. So if you're not under a pastor, you aren't growing. So if you're not under a MALE pastor, you're retrogressing.

Full exegesis of the passage is here: Eph41216.htm. When I can figure out how to translate the verbs to avoid flagging, I'll make a video on verse 16.

By contrast, we woman can be good reporters (a form of witness); librarians; accountants; research assistants; cheerleaders. But not, teachers of congregations. By Divine Decree.

Some women hate the Bible fact that only males are given authority as pastors. Scheming men & women cater to that hatred, just as Paul warned in Eph4:14, 2Tim2:26-3:7. Their gambit:

  1. They play gender games with Greek or Hebrew, despite immediate context (i.e, Rom 16:2 disproves what's claimed of Phoebe, in Rom 16:1).
  2. They lie about Greek, claiming generic terms specific, or specific terms, generic. Example: 'servant' (diakonos) has wide semantic range, either janitor or pastor — but the huckster twists 'servant', to mean only 'pastor'.
    • The word for 'wives' FIRST means 'woman' in nearly every language on earth. Greek is no exception. But the huckster ignores etymology, claims gunaikes only means 'wives'. So I guess the Lord only meant 'wives' in Matt11:11, since an unmarried woman can have babies, too? LOL!
  3. Hucksters take UNALIKE roles/verses, but claim them alike. Here, calling women named in the Bible, teachers. Huldah was a prophetess, yet only kept clothes, not teach, 2Kings 22:14. Deborah settled disputes, not teach, Judges 4. Phoebe spent money on the church at Kegchreia, Romans 16:2's prostatis. Not, teach. Acts 21:9, the four prophetesses were silent, but v.10, Agabus (a man) was sent to their house, to warn Paul! The only woman teacher in Bible, is Jezebel, Rev 2:20 — whoops!
    • So notice: those who pander the lie that females can be pastors, conveniently omit such facts!
  4. Hucksters IGNORE THE OBVIOUS, and hope you will, too. Like, the fact every teacher in the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, is MALE. Oh my! Of the 176 didaskw (to teach) verses in the Bible, NOT ONE authorizes or shows a woman appointed teacher over a congregation!
  5. These panderers therefore conveniently IGNORE CONTRADICTING VERSES. Like, the fact any rabbi in OT or church official or pastor in the NT, can have but one WIFE. Or, how Barak lost out, because he insisted on Deborah as co-leader, Judges 4. Or, how Miriam (but not Aaron) got leprosy, Num12; so Moses had to pray the shocking Num12:12!

All false doctrine peedlers play these word games to be popular, make money, honey! Fleecing you from your hard-earned cash with their books & videos, halleloh yeah!

So the series will expose them, but not by name.

2 NFP: I'm no pastor!

PLEASE READ. Yours truly is a Bible REPORTER, not a pastor. No woman is ever a pastor. Doesn't mean you can't learn from a woman. We each learn something daily from each other. So I'm REPORTING at brainout.net (updated since this video was done). I'm on twitter as @brainouty .

Look at the difference. A PASTOR's job is organizational, and two-fold: a) study the WHOLE Bible all day and night, and then b) teach ALL of it regularly (ideally, several times or more per week). The idea is for a congregation to get the WHOLE integrated set of doctrines in the Bible into their heads, so they can live on it ALL. This requires coordination, patience, specialized vocabulary — because Bible is a language you learn to live on. In your head.

What I do is only a small 'helps' part of a). Think of it as reporting. Or, as research on specific topics, presented live onscreen. Or, as accounting or a librarian function.

I like to think of it as a waitress reading what's on the (Bible!) menu, describing the food there. That is not a pastoral role. It's just a 'help', at most. Encouragement, sometimes, research or explanation, other times. But never, teaching. See the difference?

So we women have valuable roles. But to be a pastor-teacher requires AUTHORITY which people will accept to teach ALL the Bible comprehensively. Ideally the pastor establishes his authority by competent teaching, proving what he says from Bible. But he doesn't have to. He has authority, and if you accept what he says and he says Bible correctly, you grow spiritually.

You will never grow beyond your teacher, the Lord said, using the MALE gender, Matt. 10:24f; 13:52; Lk. 6:40. Again the MALE gender is only used in Ephesians 4:11-16. It's not generic. Timothy, Titus, and other epistles clearly explain that the teacher is a HE (i.e., of only one wife). Why? Frankly, because the male is given the authority, and because people don't respect females as having spiritual authority. Every society in which females are given spiritual authority, dies within a generation or two. You can test it in history.

You will not grow spiritually if you use a woman as your pastor. You will not grow spiritually until and unless you get under ONE male pastor. You might later outgrow him, at which point God will 'graduate' you to someone stronger. But spiritual growth is not accomplished cafeteria style, and it's not done via women as pastors.

So we women are spiritual assistants, but never in charge. So Deborah was not a rabbi, but a judge. Rabbis are always males, in the Bible. So the prophetesses were occasional speakers of God's Word before Canon was completed, but were never teachers (i.e., Hulda, the women in Acts 21, etc). Nowhere in the Bible is a Bible teacher, female. Nowhere. Bible is precise!

Related Webpages:

So yeah, you can use what a female reports as a study-buddy, as material to turn over and gain insight — but it's all ADJUNCTIVE to being under a pastor God personally selected for you from eternity past. ASK HIM who that MALE is. He'll show you.

3 NFP: Why only MALE Pastors?

Video shows mankind's preference for male dominance, which is based on equating power with respect. God of course foreknew that. So how to insure that His Word would be heard? By giving the PUBLIC teaching job to men. Women teach at home, men teach publicly. Women are accepted as reporters, narrators, encouragers — because our mothers had those roles. But the dad was always in charge, so therefore it's natural that a pastor should be a 'dad', never a 'mother'. Human nature, requires it.

Flagship passage on this is Ephesians 4:16, but it's mistranslated. A full exegesis is needed to see that MALES are solely intended for the pastorate. That exegesis is here: Eph41216.htm. You can also access it from RightPT.htm, which covers the male-only topic in exhaustive detail.

So Bible's verses reflect all this. A comprehensive listing of the verses is in the video description for 1 NFP (which began this series on No Female Pastors).

4 NFP: Deborah was judge, never pastor

Judges 4 proves (even in translation!) that Deborah never ever ever had a pastor's role. So anyone claiming her to be a pastor — or that since she was a judge she CAN BE a pastor — is a liar.

Shun liars. Shun any woman or man who claims women are set up by God also to be pastors. Else you'll be punished with sickness and death just like Jezebel, as we'll see in 5 NFP, next episode!

5a NFP: Jezebel, the only female pastor in Bible

How God excoriates the idea of women pastors. Jezebel is the ONLY woman the Bible names as a 'teacher' — yeah, of apostacy!

Easy exegesis of Revelation 2:23 and Romans 16:17 (in 5c) shown live, onscreen. You can also get the exegesis from Lesson 28 of my pastor's 1975 Armageddon series for free from rbthieme.org. Later updates of both verses are in the 1981 Revelation series and 1977 Romans series, where the pastor goes through each book's exegesis line by line, taking you all over the Bible to prove the interpretation, so you can SEE IT FOR YOURSELF. I don't know any other pastor who has taught so comprehensively.

6 NFP I am Not An Authority, God is!

God, never brainout, is the Authority. So don't use brainout as an authority. You are free to use, distribute, copy, etc. my videos, but the authority is the BIBLE CONTENT, not the 'brainout' mouthing it.

So don't try to use me as an authority. I am not one in any sense of the word. If my REPORTING on what God says in His Word is right, then HE will witness to its accuracy, and the issue then is between HIM and you, never me and you.

Sorry this video had to be made, but I get emails treating me as someone 'spiritual' and 'special', trying to get me to join in one thing or another, as a result — this has to STOP. This is why I spend so much time posting BIBLE VIDEOS, so that the proper AUTHORITY is seen, pas moi.

Too many Christians mistake the message transmitted, with self-worth; they think that if God GAVE a message to someone, that someone must have been WORTHY to justify God's granting it. This false idea is born from legalistic Jews and legalistic Christians who WANT to take credit for what God Alone, does.

Bible proves otherwise. A drunk in Calcutta can be made by God to accurately state the Gospel at the top of his drunken lungs. An ass was made able to properly advise Balaam from God. So this ass might have something from God given to her, too. That does not make HER, less of an ass. At best you can say it's God's Sense of Humor.

Got that?


b-out Lord Born on Chanukah 4BC!

Bible says Lord born on Chanukah; this series is but an overview, with the proof more extensively provided in associated webpages (linked, in video descriptions).

Also proof from Bible that it was an ANGEL, not a 'star', over Bethlehem.

Catholic anti-semitism masks His Death Day, though RCC got the birthday, right. So that's why we moderns don't know either day.

1/11 Bible says Lord Born on Chanukah 4BC!

Bible proof on the fact the Lord was born on Chanukah 4BC is extensive and explicit. Bible backup (and these videos) is shown and explained, at PassPlot.htm#HisBday. For Chanukah is part of an overall PLAN OF TIME which the Hebrew calendar, represents. So Bible wasn't ever secretive about the date.

We don't read Bible well, that's why we get the date wrong. The Catholics got it right maybe from census, maybe accidentally: https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03724b.htm. Internet parrots claim Pope Julius I ordained it by fiat in 350, but I find ZERO proof of of their claims.

Neither, is there any 'star of Bethlehem': Matthew 2's Greek verbs depict an ANGEL's movements, not some star. So Luke 2's depiction of angels in concert, ties back to Matthew. For exegetical details, see LvS4a.htm#Star. My pastor always contended there was no star, see his 1965 Matthew series. Little wonder, then, that Matthew records no one in Jerusalem where the magi were (they were NEVER in Bethlehem) — seeing any star. Duh.

Related webpages with more proof of the Bible's OWN definition of its OWN timeline which the scholars do not bother to read properly, thus creating unnecessary disputes:

brainoutFAQ.htm#6 begins the shortest synopsis of how you can prove Bible dating system IN the Bible. It's not at all like the so-called scholars claim. Judaism's calendar is wrong (off by 343-346 years and usually, 10 days). God accounts in solar years, not lunar. That FAQ #6 has a 6a and 6b you'll also need to read to see the way Bible annually tracks time to Christ.

Header webpage on how God structures Time: Mirroring.htm. Time is a JUSTICE question in the Angelic Trial. So the Time Grants are contingent. Mirroring.htm goes through the rules and the people, with an associated worksheet and Word doc. It's a lot of research to read. Took me years to write, so will take you months to vet.

Eph1REPARSED.doc — is about Paul's Greek use of Hebrew meter, and Paul balances something called a 'eudokian anaphora', to Chanukah. Meter acts as a CALENDAR first of the time the writer writes, and it's a convention in Bible to use it, ever since Moses. See my 'GGS 10' video series or just that document, which contains all the related links.

Other important chapters in the Bible on the subject of the Lord's Birth and Death year begin at Genesis 5. Genesis 6-11 shows God accounts by BIRTHDAYS, just as He does in Genesis 5. So it's solar accounting. See also 1Kings Chapters 1-6:1 (and the parallel chapters in Chronicles), which show how David spent his last seven years from age 70 when he retired, to age 77 when he died. Paul balances his meter to this, too. (Scholars don't use Bible for David's death, they use Josephus, so they misread 1Kings 6:1.) See also 2Sam7 and Haggai 2, the latter of which predicts the Lord's actual Birthday of 25 Chislev, which 357 years after Haggai 2, would be Chanukah. Paul balances his meter to this in at least six different ways.

What we call (end of) 4BC, is 1000 years after David became king over all Israel. David ruled 40 years before he retired, so Christ would have 40 years allotted, and since David died 963BC, Christ would have to die by (what we call) 37AD, which is the endpoint in Daniel 9:26. The remaining 57 years (for Moses' accounting in Psalm 90 ends at 94AD) (really 98 AD, in Paul's Anno Domini accounting). In the Mosaic law, these are sum of Jubilee and the Trib, respectively, the latter reimbursing Passover, which depicted the future Passion Week of Messiah. All this is covered in PassPlot.htm in excruciating detail, and in the videos.

2/11 Chanukah: Bible Says Angel, not 'star' over Bethlehem!

Bible says it was an angel, not a 'star' over Bethlehem, then Jerusalem, then Nazareth, from Matthew 2 and Luke 1&2. In his 1965 Matthew exegesis, my pastor taught this as a prophecy, figurative use of 'star'. Jacob Prasch thinks it was literal, but the Shekinah Glory, higher than an angel: http://www.letusreason.org/Biblexp244.htm. Point is, anyone READING Matthew knows it was no stupid star. So a literal 'star' is an invention by people who hate reading Bible, costing us MILLIONS of dollars in ludicrous 'research'. We've all been taught that lie for centuries.

Matthew 2 wittily shows that until the magi believed in Christ (verse 11), they mistook the angel they saw, for a star. Never mind, it kept disappearing and reappearing, lol. Never mind, no one else saw it, lol.

Luke 1& 2 plays to the same theme, showing how Zecharias' disbelief in what Gabriel said, was punished with muteness (Luke 1:20); how by contrast Mary was also visited and spoken to, but SHE believed; how BELIEVING shepherds, see and hear the angels. First they see one, Luke 2:9. Then suddenly they see a 'multitude', Luke 2:13.

So the angels can make themselves visible to a SELECTED audience who BELIEVES. Off, then on. Just as Matthew 2 had shown. Angels, not stars.

Just as the angel talked to Joseph, Matt 1:20, 2:13. Of course Luke parallels this, in Luke 1:26 et seq., with the angel appearing and talking to Mary. Lesson: when you don't believe in God, you don't see His Messengers, and you get punished. But when you do believe, you do see — and hear.

We alleged believers, don't see and hear. We'd rather adhere to the pagan idea of an inanimate star, to the animate angel the Bible depicts. Hence this series. Most of the Bible material is in English, except where the Greek is important. Related chapters in the OT are Leviticus 12, Deut 18, Haggai 2, Daniel 8. Parts 9 thru 11 help you see more of the Chanukah wordplay that Matthew and Luke employ in their narratives, so you can enjoy God's Wit.

Poor Bible scholarship is the reason why we think it was a literal star. No nice excuse can be given. But hey — scholars are human too. And we are to blame also, because even reading Bible in ENGLISH would alert us to God's wordplay on 'star' meaning 'angel', since it's been used as the term for angels in the OT. So let's not blame the scholars or ourselves. Let's just correct our past myth of 'star' to what BIBLE really says — angel! Miracle, just the same, and even better!

But many believers won't. Because, popular myths matter more than God to them, just like the crowd in John 6. Every generation, we Christians prove just as much haters-of-God, as any unbeliever who has ever lived, Philippians 3:18-19.

Christmas Rant

How we sing rah-rah Jesus, but don't do what He says. How we know so much about worldly stuff, yet never even the basics of Bible. Do you know, there's never been a Bible movie or documentary EVER made, which EVER gets even half of the Bible information correct? No, not even the 10 Commandments with Charleton Heston, nor Franco Zeferelli's Jesus of Nazareth, nor even Mel Gibson's The Passion — all multimillion dollar productions with LOTS of effort and time spent. And ALL of them (not to mention all the HIstory Channel stuff) get the facts WRONG! As if they had no Bible to read?!

So, this is a rant about how much we care about everything else, but Him. Which is the OPPOSITE of what we'll be thinking, when we finally SEE Him. And, I'll be just as embarrassed as everyone else. It won't be, 'wow, I could have had a V8!', but 'Wow, why did I waste my time on all this other stuff.. instead of learning CHRIST?!'

Ouch and Merry Christmas.

PATU28 Bible Timeline Update

Paul's Time Accounting slightly changes my GeneYrs.xls worksheet on the 490 and 1000-year time grants: he starts them at Christ's BIRTH. Mary used His Birth, too. Paul 'tags' Mary where her meter ends, at Christ's (then future) age 56: that's 40 years before the End of Time, pre-Church.

This change means our current 490 and 1000 year grants, both historical and qualifying, end 30 years EARLIER, at 2100 (vs. 2130 AD in GeneYrs.xls).

Even so, God measures Time in 490 and 1000-year units from His Death; even as, He gave Time Grants to David based on both birth and death of his kingships; so the outer limit of Messiah's Time to Arrive and Die in Dan9:25-26, became 1000 years after David's DEATH at age 77. (Not age 70; scholars misread 1Kings 6:1, so use Josephus for the errant age 70; in Bible, that's David's RETIREMENT age.)

There are six related playlists:

  1. The newest is on Peter's meter, in 1Peter1:1-12. He plays on Paul's meter, http://www.vimeo.com/channels/petermeter. In Youtube, the Episodes only go through RFG5e16; so just watch the vimeo channel. Future episodes will only be in vimeo.
  2. Paul's meter is Eph 1:3-14; http://www.vimeo.com/channels/paulmet... and http://www.vimeo.com/channels/paulmet... . In Youtube, the link is • b-out GGS God Meters Time, Epi.10-11 . Episode 10 is background on the metrical style, and Episode 11 documents the meter, syllable by year by Caesar, through Odovacer. As of today (12/29/12), I've only completed the videos up through Constantine. Will resume this series in 2014. Future Episodes will only post in vimeo.
  3. Mary's meter, is the Magnificat. This series is complete in vimeo: http://www.vimeo.com/channels/magnifi... . In Youtube, link is • b-out Mary's Magnificat Meter of Time . Mary picks up after Daniel's terminus in his timeline (playing on his 73 meter): starting from initial Chanukah to her own age and then her Son Who'll be born on Chanukah; until His age 56, which is 40 years before the Millennium was to start.
  4. Psalm 90 playlist. Series is incomplete (i.e., Episode 23h crashed and I must rebuild it). Videos cover the precedenting meter of Psalm 90, then Isaiah 53, then Daniel 9 meter schemes; including, time-plot meanings, translations, so you can vet the material. In vimeo, go to http://www.vimeo.com/psalm90 . In Youtube, • b-out Psalm 90 Meter of Time, Exegesis . Future Episodes will only post in vimeo.
  5. Yapping Most High starting at Episode 10, is a primer on the MATH of these Time Rules. If you're not familiar with the rules, start in vimeo, vimeo-how-god-orchestrates-time.htm. In Youtube, • b-out God's TIME Rules, YMH Epi10 and • b-out God Orchestrates Time . The vimeo set is easier to absorb.
  6. Master webpage is Mirroring.htm, written in 2004. By contrast, the latest written master set is Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. Replace 'doc' with 'htm' to solely read online. Or, download the pdf, Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

The Jews call these TIME rules, "Age of Desolation" and "Age of Torah". Google on those terms. However, they garbled the math soon after the Cross (i.e., Josephus' numbers are mostly wrong). Also, garbled remnants are in Sanhedrin 97a-99b in Talmud. Their idea is right; their math, is wrong. They know they're living on Promise Time; the Seder Olam Rabbah, tracks it. Sadly, its math is all messed up too; so Jews think it's year 5773, though it's 346 years later! This problem is well known: Google on Seder Olam Rabbah, to read about it.

Christianity has no clue about these rules. John Hagee, using someone else's errant math, came up with his own version, sometime in 2007 or 2008. He just invents 1948 as a key date and backs into the 490s from it. That's not Biblical, so of course his numbers are all wrong, too. At least he knows there IS a 490-year tracking system! He just accounts it incorrectly.

Else, I can't find anyone else knowing about this all-important topic. So I must extensively document it, so you can proof the material yourself. It's vital to textual criticism, hermeneutics, eschatology, and proving Bible's dates are historically accurate, especially the dates when Bible books were written. So much contention would end, if we just learned this meter. So to find it yourself, use BibleHebMeterCharacs.doc (or htm or pdf) . Bon appétit...


b-out Angelic Conflict Vids

God orchestrates time based on the Angelic Conflict. Rapture's LEGAL basis is precedented on the Angelic Conflict. It's not like what Christians imagine, and the doctrine is extensive, from Genesis to Revelation.

The least-explored doctrine in Christendom is our Royal Role in History. It's appalling, how little we know of what Christ wrought for us on the Cross. These videos try to introduce the viewer to this massive, almost-unknown doctrine — so far as I can prove, ONLY my pastor has taught it — but frankly, you'd be better off reading my webpages or (better still) getting the lessons from him. My huge webpage coverage of this doctrine begins at LordvSatan2.htm#CovProps and continues through the end of Part IV.

My pastor's teaching on the topic spans over 20 years of almost daily Bible classes, starting with his 1977 Romans series, then his 1981 Revelation series, then his 1985 Ephesians series, and culminates in his 1992 Spiritual Dynamics series. No one in Christendom has taught much on the topic.

Rapture is precedented on God's Orchestration of Time rules which began at Adam's Fall. Basically, only Israel was promised time due to David, and when Christ came, Israel rejected Him. Therefore the promised time to her, was FROZEN, because Christ completed His Task, and 'inherited' the time on her behalf. But how could the world go on living? It had to revert back to the old CONTINGENT time rules from Adam's fall. The videos here introduce you to those rules, but their descriptions have links to the huge research underneath.

Rapture, therefore, is precedented in Adam, but the timeline reset to the Last Adam. And for Church, there is no guaranteed Time. Again, due to the Conflict. So these videos explain the conflict, and our role in it.

The whole webseries on this topic starts at Thinking.htm, and runs over 2000 printed pages, so don't print it out!

Shorter "novel" format of this same story, is PDR.doc. Novel is unfinished.


Short subset of Angelic Conflict playlist, which accounts for and reconciles, the dissension among Christian demonations in key doctrines, like salvation and the Rapture.

Christian theology suffers from being one-legged. That's why we all fight with each other: it's annoying to always hop on one leg!

Surprise surprise, the 'other leg' that we're missing, is Bible's 'leg' about the Angelic Conflict. Since we don't understand that BIBLE doctrine, we misread Genesis 1, Salvation, Spirituality, and above all, Eschatology.

No denomination is exempt from this problem, and every denomination has pieces of the second 'leg'. Problem is, they're trying to take those pieces and GRAFT them onto the 'leg' they have. So we are all arguing over one leg.

But these and other Bible doctrines suddenly become clear, once you grasp the INITIATING Doctrine of the Angelic Conflict.

First set of videos in this series covers the legal basis for the Rapture. For it is solidly based on the initial contract to SUPERMATURE the angels. That contract also has two legs: individual maturation, and CORPORATE maturation. It's due to the failure of the angels to CORPORATELY mature, that mankind exists in a TRIAL status. And, the goal remains, CORPORATE maturation. Israel having failed to be the 'corporation' to mature, Church was created. Videos provide the other summary details. From them you can take the Bible you know, and see the fit of the Rapture.

Next, Salvation: two legs to that, too, as there is more than one kind of salvation each human needs: 1) saved TO HEAVEN, but also 2) saved IN THINKING. Christian denominations always mix up Bible's 2) issues, as belonging to 1).

Spirituality is thus two-legged, for there are two spiritual contracts. Church is a separate spiritual contract versus Israel's. Spiritual living is separate from human works. Two legs, because two types of life: your body is never spiritual. Your life is never Israel's. See? Two legs, not just one!

So the first of the RFG series' videos (which is in the Angelic Conflict playlist) is here included. It will cover Book of Hebrews in order, since that Book is on the changeover of covenant, and why Rapture precedes Trib. Two legs!

Finally, the typical Christian misreads Genesis. One-legged proponents only see ONE creation there. But Bible depicts TWO, and the 2nd, is due to the Conflict. So the Bible is talking about the SECOND leg after that, man's creation. Videos take you live through the Bible's verses. By the end of them you should be able to see the two-legged picture, same as the Rapture videos summarily explained.

The Big Picture, why we're here

All my webpages and videos elaborate on this one. Finally was managed to state the whole Bible picture correctly in one video. All our theologies need to be retooled, for we've all forgotten The Big Fact: GOD'S ELECTION IS SOLELY CHRIST, Isaiah 52:13-15, 53:10, Eph 1:3-14, many other verses. That's why Bible says we are elected IN Christ, never in or of ourselves. Calvin screwed up, but the poor guy was only in his 20's when writing the Institutes. But so did everyone else screw up — for 500 years!

Theologies both Jewish and Christian are horribly anthropocentric and legalistic, so we've missed how the Bible ties all doctrines together in THE ELECTION IS CHRIST, theme of Ephesians 1:3-14.

I've been studying this for 11 years, almost nonstop. Main webpage series focusing on this Big Picture is the Thinking series, starting with LordvSatan1.htm. It will take you a year to read and vet, sorry. Took me years to write it up, and still more years to vet it, myself.

God's design of TIME itself, is focused on Christ, Hebrews 1:2-3, Deut 32:8, Acts 17:26. So, God designs Bible in METER to remind us of this doctrine, and over the past five years I've been documenting that. You can, too. Just grab BibleHebMeterCharacs.doc (or use 'pdf' or 'htm' if you prefer), and test its rules on any Hebrew or Greek passage which sounds timeless or generic yet poetic, in translation. Pages 4-5 of Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (again, use 'htm' extension if you prefer htm), list all the webpage and video links to all the meter material, except for the Magnificat series. For that, see the Magnificat video series here in Youtube.

One webpage which focuses solely on the Doctrine of Time, and has most of the relevant videos, is Mirroring.htm. God 'mirrors' (reimburses) Time based on VOTES. That's how He Sovereignly WANTS to do it. This doctrine is unknown in Christendom, and is garbled in Judaism, but is preserved and provable in Bible. We date Bible wrongly, so that's why we don't see it (many scholar mistakes, i.e., wrongly using lunar years).

Finally, we even screw up the Bible's clear definition of when CHRIST CAME AND DIED, because we don't know the Doctrine of Time. I go through all that in PassPlot.htm.

It's a lot of reading and vetting, and I hope you'll be skeptical. The point is, YOU CAN PROVE the contents of the video and what's said here. God made it easy enough for even a brainout, to know. We only don't know, because we aren't looking at the Bible!

My pastor spent 50 years teaching essentially what this video says, but he didn't know the Doctrine of Time; he guessed at it, though. See his 1985 Ephesians and 77 Romans series (seven and four years of daily exegesis classes of both books, respectively) at rbthieme.org. They never ask for money or sell your name.

Self-note: original video was ElectionOriginalUnused.wmv recorded on 92708 on Seagate Da.

Angelic Conflict: Introduction

The Angelic Conflict is the precedence for mankind's creation. Christ is the Decreed Precedence for the angels' creation, Eph1+Heb1. Satan&Co. rebelled against Christ before He took on Humanity, hence He'd have to take on Humanity to show why Satan&Co. deserve to go to the Lake of Fire, Matt25:41. That meant creating Adam and essentially reproducing the Initial Perfect Condition, but in a LOWER life form Satan&Co. could influence.

We know how it turned out. We'd not be here if Adam hadn't failed. We'd not be here if Christ didn't succeed, too.

But this story must play out to show ANGELS, why Satan&Co. were wrong. Meanwhile, REPLACING those who rebelled against God. So man & the woman rebel, & get a replacement covenant. So their progeny rebel, & also must be replaced. So mankind continues, with replacement covenants per corporate failure, as both future heaven AND hell fill up, for each person chooses what 'side' in the Trial he favors — whether he knows it, or not. Meanwhile, the covenants show what TRIAL issues are playing during the time period of the covenants. So forget covenantalism vs. dispensationalism: think in terms of TRIAL phases. Then you'll be thinking as Bible depicts. We're in "the rebuttal phase" (my pastor's term).

God never coerces: you can choose Him, but you can't make GOOD on that choice: HE does that for you, AFTER you choose. You can choose Satan's side, and of course the demon boys are very happy to 'help' you choose them. And so, your future goes with the side you choose. Choose wisely.

Frankly, once you grasp the Angelic Conflict, Bible verses suddenly crystallize into a coherent whole in your mind. For now you have the big picture atop the Bible 'puzzle' box, so to speak. Misinterpretation of Bible will greatly reduce, once you see the big TRIAL 'canvas' background for Genesis through Revelation.

Every Bible verse speaks to this Trial. Trick is to spot the technical Trial language, which is usually mistranslated. So you can't track the Trial from any translation. Pastors who correctly teach the Angelic Conflict, do so from the original-language Bible texts (directly, or via another pastor who studies those texts). There's no other way to know it.

Extensive backup webpage explanation & Bible verses support video content. The other videos in my "brainout-made Angelic Conflict" playlist (on my channel page) have the links. Most vital to this overview video are the following links: a lot of reading, but not stuffy. The underlying Bible stuff should be familiar enough that you can vet ideas without much digging. Task is more how to connect the dots of Bible you know to see the big picture. Bonus: info is largely trans-denominational in scope.

Summary link: SurpConc.htm#SatPlan. It has a copy of this video.

Link Re TRIAL TERMS and PRECEDENCE in covenants: LordvSatan2.htm#CovProps. Also, LvS4a.htm presents a panoramic review of the time prior to Church, accounting for how 'we' got 'here'.

Re the angelic war between Genesis 1:1 & 1:2, +Gen 5 roster: sorry, you'll have watch all 47 Genesis exegesis videos in SatStrat2.htm#GenesisVids.

Re NUMBERS criterion with vital, overlooked Rapture verses +Blessing by Association as we grow in Christ: LvS4b.htm.

Re the TIME RULES precedented in Adam: Mirroring.htm. That page's first white table has a list of links to subpages and the Excel spreadsheet you see in the video. Very heavy stuff, nothing like it on the internet, though the material is fairly easy (albeit time-consuming, lol) to prove in Bible. You rarely need recourse to Hebrew or Greek, so can use any translation you favor. MATH is the focus.

Re panoramic Trial Issues we humans play out: LordvSatan1.htm#Issues. Vital to grasp: freedom includes freedom to FAIL, Satan's bone of contention in the Trial. Read through "Integrity Properties" to get a big-picture view. You should be able to validate the interpretation from whatever Bible you now know. Key is to think OVER what Bible you know.

Or, short 'novel' version: PDR.doc. Pdf file: PDR.pdf. First chapter orients you, is told from Satan&Co.'s point of view. Novel is used to make Trial dynamics easier to see, and is unfinished.

God Elects Sons!

The TRUE Doctrine of Election in the Bible starts and ends with the Election of Christ, and is entirely based on Foreknowledge. For if it were not foreknown Christ would freely succeed at paying for sins, then creation - including, creation of the angels — could never have been justified. So throw out all that Reformation junk about supra and sub- and infra-lapsarianism. All is instead, based on Christ. So all is free to be what it is, good or bad, since Christ was foreknown and thus Decreed, to freely succeed, Isaiah 52:13-15, Isa53:10-12.

As my pastor liked to quip, "The Decree of God is His Holy, Wise, and Sovereign Purpose, comprehending AT ONCE all things in their causes, conditions, successions and relations, and determining their certain futurition." Notice how there's no compromise with freedom, and Foreknowledge is fully online.

For, Love is the Integrity of God, and God Loves Truth — you know how many Bible verses there are on that. Well, Love must be Free, and Truth must be Free, so the Decree is for Free Truth to exist. Which means, if Christ Freely grows IN the Truth (and He was foreknown to do so, to BECOME the Way, Truth and Life) — then 'sons' can be made from Him. Sons if perfect, or imperfect, still the task is the same — grow them in His Thinking.

So sin is rather secondary to the purpose, a glitch to be resolved at an enormous cost, surely — but that same sin only furnishes more opportunity for His THINKING to be bigger, still. That's why He's Bigger than all the angels put together even in His Humanity, theme of Hebrews 1 (which my pastor stressed often). See how sin is but leverage to produce better thinking in Christ and therefore us? See why Paul has to talk as he does, in Romans 6-8? LEVERAGE is God's Decree, Isaiah 54:1. So learn and live on Him!

Worksheet pics come from GeneYrs.xls. The original video is much clearer, and can be downloaded here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/godelectssons

This video summarizes the Thinking Series, starting at http://www.brainout.net/Thinking.htm . It's a comprehensive 'audit' of God's Son-Making Plan from eternity past to eternity future, showing how it balances to Bible.

Shorter novel format (only five chapters finished so far), PDR.doc. It reads most easily in Print Preview fullscreen, 2-page view. Here's the pdf version: PDR.pdf.

Christ solves Infinity-finity Dichotomy via Cross

This is the header concept for the "Spiritual Physics" and "Spiritual Maturation" series of videos. Most folks don't grasp what salvation is and how it works. It's NOT about being good or bad. The first problem is to bridge the gap between Infinite God & finite mankind. Sin complicates the problem, making us negative to God. Hence Son added on Humanity, so to Gift Himself to Father (what else can God give to God but Self), & save us. His Humanity was empowered by Holy Spirit, so Spirit thus gives to both Father & Son. Thus Infinite God can justify INTIMATE fellowship with finite mankind. This short clip lists the flagship verses. All my webpages are on this solution & our post-salv Royal Spiritual Life, if you're interested: index.htm.

God101: Why Jesus is God-Man

Simple analogies help one grasp why and how He would add Humanity to Himself and in that Humanity pay FATHER for all sin. With Bible verses translated directly from the Greek (except John 17 verses are NIV extracts).

The New Covenant: Raison d'etre for Church

Took me 8 years' Bible audit research +writing to make the claims in this video. Links to that writing are at the end of this description.

Gist: You can't talk about "Church" or "New Testament" without "Rapture". These are intertwined doctrines, all sourced in the precedence of how Church came to be. That's why Bible deals with Rapture axiomatically (not droolingly), in every timing verse from Matthew 16's year (29AD) onward. For Church came into existence because Israel's time had run out. It ran out, as she was on a schedule with a 1000-year deadline since David died. On that schedule, time was supposed to END the earlier of 94AD, or when she rejected Messiah. Well, she rejected Him, in 29AD.

We don't know this BIBLE SCHEDULE, since we use extra-Biblical sources to date Bible events, or lunar years, or misread Daniel 9's "decree" as being of some human king. Thus we miss God's carefully explained timeline from Adam, which is constructed in 490+70+490=1000+50 units.

Bible dates in years-from-Adam, a common practice for millennia (date in years from a person, much as we do birthdays, still). If you follow that convention you see how God justifies Time; and He uses this system in Daniel 9 — which actually comes from Isaiah 53's calendaring meter — to justify restoring the Temple.

But just as when the Temple had fallen Time was supposed to end — but for the Davidic time grants protecting the world — so also, when the Jews rejected the One to Restore Time, it was supposed to end.

So He had to INVENT a new entity and hence a new covenant: Church. He does so in Matt16:18, thus upping His Own Pain on the Cross to cover whatever NOT YET BORN souls as Father might choose. He ratifies His Vote in John 17. Hence Church is the 'time bridge' God uses to keep His Promises to Israel — all of them, now housed in Messiah.

We don't realize Christ has TWO Kingships. The Jewish Kingship is a separate contract, in 2 Samuel 7. Christ also has a Battlefield Kingship which depended on His Victory on the Cross, Psalm 110:1. This latter Kingship is explained in Book of Hebrews, to show how Our New Covenant 'bridges' to their own new covenant's TIME for implementation. Ergo we must be Raptured first, Heb11:40.

The 2nd Kingship and its Body, is us. Not Israel. So any Jew who believes in Christ is just as much Church as any goy who in the OT believed in Him as Messiah.

1/2 Salvation for angels?

Possible new series when I return. This time I'm not sure of the answer, and would appreciate whatever input others care to give.

Ten years ago I started the analysis, with the first page here: Thinking.htm. The section specifically focusing on angelic salvation begins here: LordvSatan2.htm.

We know that we're in some kind of conflict between God and the fallen angels. Correctly identifying it is vital, lest we be deceived and either fail to ever believe in Christ, or fail to grow post-salvation. So it becomes extremely important to determine what, if any, salvation angels had.

I don't have a conclusive answer yet. Here I just present both sides. Again, any input you have with Bible verses will be greatly appreciated.

Grafting-in: Divine Numbers Criterion for History

Links in video: LvS4b.htm is on this grafting-in numbers criterion in extreme detail. This video is embedded in that page, so you can just click on the link and resume watching, there.

The NUMBERS issue is "the" forensic issue in the Angelic Trial, is precedented on the terms of the Trial, and the MISTRIAL issue regarding these numbers is first introduced in LordvSatan2.htm (search on "Mistrial" after you load the page). A brief summary of the Mistrial issue is in "H" subpoint near the beginning of LvS4b.htm.

I put this NUMBERS issue in novel form, in Chapter 1 of PDR.doc. The pdf file version is here: PDR.pdf.

Introductory video to that doc is my "Pleroma Day: Rapture!" video: its video description contains a full audio of the novel's "Foreword", which orients you to the timeline, and then Chapter 1 orients you to the body count NUMBERS issue for Church.

For the Ultimate Accountant, is God. He balances people, and He balances the time for the people to freely choose whether they want Him.. or not. So, we've all heard "grafting-in" of Church. But what does it mean? Replacing, the lost. Balancing. For Perfection to exist, and particularly a FREE Perfection, one of the parameters must be a perfection in NUMBER. Here, number of beings. God being Perfect, first foreknew what perfect numbers there would be in any configuration of beings, so when He designed the angels, He made a given NUMBER of them, based on what would freely be a perfect NUMBER.

So when 1/3rd of the angels rebel against Him, He also foreknows how the creation of humanity will BALANCE to their rejection, such that in some configuration at ANY MOMENT IN TIME, a perfect NUMBER will still obtain.

For us humans, the necessary population permutation calculations required, is mind-boggling. But not, for God.

So God's Design for all history is to freely produce that NUMBER. Always a balancing between those who reject and those who believe in Him, since in eternity the beings in heaven remain free, yet will never choose to sin again.

Secular math displays all this in many paradigmal ways. Think of atomic physics, beta coefficients, leverage, differential calculus, vector analysis, equilibrium, price theory, Malthusian population theory, quantum physics versus general relativity, recombinant DNA and other RNA-DNA interactions, even the Sims game. When a NUMBER is too low, there is no or insufficient interaction, the isolation being too great. But when a NUMBER is too high, then the lack of isolation works against, and destruction occurs. So it's kinda like a bell curve, trying to find optimality, where the NUMBER is "just right". Yeah, like Goldilocks and the three bears' porridge!

Pleroma Day: Rapture! Trailer

Download the incomplete novel draft, here: PDR.doc, or the pdf version: PDR.pdf.

Download the full 51-minute mp3 of the novel's "Foreword", here: http://www.brainout.net/PDRaudio.mp3 .

My best friend says I need to dumb down my webpages, so I'm writing a novel to incorporate and summarize all that Bible documentation and explanation. I spent 8 years documenting the Rapture, often in 60-hour weeks, to audit it. That audit spans over 1500 printed pages, and begins at http://www.brainout.net/LordvSatan1.htm . It will take months to vet.

Novel begins in the year 2006. It's told from the demons' point of view, how they're trying to delay the Rapture. The novel's "Foreword" summarizes Bible's real perspective and extensive documentation on Rapture, which is completely different from what you hear Christians say.

You have to know two things to properly spot Bible's extensive documentation, which actually begins in Genesis 3:15:

  1. ~ we humans are used as EVIDENCE in a Legal Divorce Trial between God and Satan; it's a nasty surprise, that most Christians today don't know this fact. My pastor has been teaching about it for over 50 years; of course he learned it, from pastors prior to him. So there's no excuse for Christian ignorance.
  2. This Trial has a TIMELINE which Bible discloses — and that timeline was supposed to end 57 years after Christ was SCHEDULED to die. Yes, scheduled. Because Israel rejected Him when He came, that schedule was changed BY Christ. He changes it, in Matthew 16:18. Since Matthew 16:18 has been so abused over the centuries, Christians don't know what it really means. YOU AND I WOULD NOT BE HERE if Christ didn't change the schedule, because Time (including Millennium) Was Supposed to End, in 1144AD!

God's entire Plan for Time revolves around the Angelic Trial: so its time rules and 490-year countdowns begin with ADAM. Can't see why the Rapture pre-Trib is valid, if you don't know that. The proof in my webpages, starts in http://www.brainout.net/Mirroring.htm

When Christ changed the schedule, Satan had the right to call "MISTRIAL" and win. For there was yet NO EVIDENCE — new people — but Christ was paying for them all instead, IN ADVANCE.

That's essentially why the Rapture has to be pre-Trib, unpredictable. Christ unilaterally changed Trial terms to Pay For FUTURE Humans. So NEW EVIDENCE is claimed — and paid for — but does not YET EXIST. So if that new evidence doesn't COME to exist, it's an abuse of JUSTICE, and Satan wins over God in this Trial.

Trial hinges on NUMBERS of believers, NOT on historical events. For NUMBERS of people were paid for on the Cross. Those NUMBERS have to complete Church, or God is made a liar. That's the issue (pun intended): SONS. That's why you can't predict the Rapture.

So Bible's terms for the Rapture originate in Genesis, and center on the making of SONS to replace the "sons of disobedience", Satan & Co. So you have to track Bible's terms from Genesis forward, as these terms are used in the New Testament. These terms are always mistranslated, so of course it's nearly impossible to tell the Rapture's extensive documentation, from Bible translations.

Briefly, Bible terms are legal, sexual (since the contract in Isaiah 53:10 is to MAKE SONS), military, and above all, TIME-oriented. There are hundreds of these terms. Time terms and sexual terms predominate, in the NT. For the Cross had to occur On Time per the Trial schedule, which it did. Moreover, Cross is depicted as a RAPE of Christ by our sins, in Isaiah 53, which is fuzzed over in translation — so rape and pregnancy keywords are used in the NT, to point back to it. Rapture means "rape" from the Latin of 1 Thessalonians 4:17, Greek verb "harpazw" (which means the same thing). It has NO relationship to the current English meaning of "rapture" as a happy thing. Bible uses no nice terms for Rapture, but only sudden-time words, snatch-up verbs, on-the-verge-of-birthing verbs and nouns, legal courtroom verbs and nouns, adjectives, etc. The "Foreword" of the novel, can only list a few of them. Webpages go into extensive detail.

So all the New Testament uses birthing terminology to depict the any-time-now-Rapture-birthing-can-happen — to point the reader back to Isaiah 53, and especially 54:1. You can't see it in translation. So that's why so many people misapprehend or disbelieve in, the Rapture: insufficient homework. And it does take time. Hopefully the novel, therefore, will help you orient to the idea, and of course you should Ask God to show you the verses. There will be many on every page of the New Testament; each such verse, points to some Trial precedence in the OT. Ask God, test this yourself. For YOU are in this Trial, whether believer or unbeliever.

1/6 Rapture Legal Basis: 2LT Series

2-Legged Theology on Rapture. New Series.

Whenever you have a doctrine which remains hotly contested over a sustained period of time, it's due to both sides in the debate, arguing from only ONE 'leg' of the actual doctrine in the Bible. This series will highlight sample doctrines showing where only one 'leg' has been viewed, but the second 'leg' harmonizes both sides.

Here, the two sides are Covenantalists who are preterists, and Dispensationalists, who generally are futurists. Within each 'side' are many variations, but hopefully by the end of this six-part series, you'll see how the two 'legs' are actually the whole TWO-legged BIBLE doctrine. For, Christ is God-man, so everything in life and in Bible, is depicted as DUAL in nature.

Note to weirdoes: don't confuse this statement about "duality" with goofball gnosticism. Duality is Christ's Nature, so everything must reflect that for Father's Pleasure. Has zippo to do with gnosticism.

Associated webpages:

Re Timeline: Mirroring.htm. Exhaustive treatment with many Bible verses, subpages and an Excel spreadsheet starting with Adam's Fall, so you can see the precedence and fit of Rapture to PRE-ISRAEL Time rules. YOU HAVE TO DO THE ACCOUNTING IN DANIEL 9 PROPERLY, to see the extra seven years. Scholars have not accounted Daniel 9 properly, so that's why there's so much confusion. Daniel 9 is in a context of contiguous 490-year Time grants which begin at Adam's fall. Once you see how that works and how it's self-auditing with respect to ALL Bible dates, it becomes easy to read Daniel 9 properly, and see TWO "sevens", not just one.

Re the Angelic Conflict: LordvSatan1.htm is the overview page. It's extremely long, but you should be able to skim through it. Please don't mistake the folksy writing tone for lack of homework. The goal of such writing is comprehension ease. Religious and formal vocabulary tends to a) put one to sleep, and b) obfuscate meaning. So I try to avoid such vocabulary when possible.

Re Church Body-Completion Numbers Criterion (not prophecy but maturation), Bible cites & explanation: LvS4b.htm

Revelation Outline with "meta tauta" tracking: RevPlay.htm

My associated Youtube videos:

Revelation Outline (Draft)

Revelation is a Greek drama quadrilogy about the final four "times" of history: Church (Chaps 1-3), Trib (Chaps 4-19), Millennium (Chaps 19-20), and Eternity (Chaps 21-22:5). The individual scenes play as "split-screen" TV, so there are always TWO 'stages' on which action occurs. Because people don't understand Greek drama, nor how John uses its rhetoric, there is much disinformation about Revelation's meaning. There's nothing secret about it. We just don't do our homework on Greek drama, that's all.

So you should find Revelation easy to understand and track, once you become familiar with that drama rhetoric. RevMap.doc thus first provides a 'map' of the quadrilogy; then, it lists Revelation's rhetorical terms/styles which were all common in 96AD, when under Domitian this style of drama experienced a revival. So, RevMap.doc next tabulates an outline of Revelation in order by Chapter and verse. The color coding should help you keep track of the split-screen nature of the book's scenes.

RevMap.doc is a draft-in-progress, so it will be revised daily or weekly. Suggest you just read it when and as you're inclined. If you've any intelligent input you care to provide in the video's comments, I would appreciate it! (Silly comments will be removed, sorry.)

Raison d'etre: In order to finish my videos on Isaiah 53, I must re-analyse Revelation. For Isaiah references Babylon beginning in his Chapter 13, which thus ties to Revelation. So, my existing RevPlay.htm needs overhaul, as does LordvSatan5.htm. In particular, the identity of the "beast" in Revelation 13 and 17, will likely change from what I've written prior.

My pastor hedged on the identity, so now I must also review four years of Bible class notes. For he spent that long exegeting Revelation verse by verse, from 1981-1985. That exegesis took us all over the Bible, ergo the four years of daily Bible classes. Now, I can't find any other pastor who has publically done this. Many have summarized Rev, interpreted Rev, but you can't find verse by verse live exegesis in such depth. So if you're interested in my pastor's exegesis (over 1200 lessons), go to http://www.rbthieme.org and order "1981 Revelation" on mp3. There's a limit of 30 lessons a month, I think; current procedure and limits will be on the website. To protect your privacy they only REPLY; so you must do all follow-up.

Truth Be Free!

God Loves Truth; so ordains and PREDESTINES that Truth itself, Always Be Free! So, it really is. So, you really are. By Divine Decree, you are truly free, because TRUTH ITSELF is truly free. God insures it every 'second', too.

For if truth is to be free, it must be free to be whatever is BAD, or DYING or SICK, as well as to be good, living, well. So the 'bad' must be insured, as well as the good, else freedom wouldn't be freedom. So Truth ITSELF, OF ITSELF must be decreed and insured FREE of ITSELF, or it's not really, truth. No shaving.

Knowing is not the same thing as causing. However, once you know, what do you DO about what you know? That's the question, here. God foreknows, so will He ALLOW freedom, or shave it? ALWAYS ALLOW, never shave — that's His answer. That's why a Cross was needed.

So there is no compromise ever between your true freedom, and His. Everything must be FREE to exist, be good, be bad, be whatever IT wants to be. So there is never a compromise to your being TOTALLY free, and God's Freedom. Because, Truth ITSELF is decreed to be FREE to be whatever it will be, and God insures that freedom at every 'point' (juridical, temporal, eternal, you-name-it).

As my pastor liked to quip, 'The Sovereignty of God and the free will of man co-exist by Divine Decree'. So then the 'sovereignty of anything, including evil.

Okay, but what about Justice? Flagship Bible passages are Isaiah 53:10-54:1, Ephesians 1 (esp. verse 23), Isaiah 45:7, 18-19, Colossians:16-27, Romans 8, 2Peter1; these deftly tell you how God resolves everything: it's a God-to-God GIFTING, never-ending process. For Love is the Integrity of God!

This is my foray into the League of Intellectual Bankruptcy started by labarum312. You can access that Group on my channel page. Associated webpage is SatStrat.htm — begin at the top, read until your eyes glaze over. Satan's big contention is that God is WRONG to make Truth be Free. Satan thinks that's immoral. So the webpage starts with the battle between God and Satan, but quickly gets into WHY God wants Truth to be free, why that's righteous (God's Paradox, so to speak). That whole webseries (starting with LordvSatan1.htm) is about this Trial, owing to Satan's objection about God decreeing Truth Be Free.

WHY pre-Trib Rapture?

People take 'sides' on the Rapture, but few grasp WHY it happens. So, they misread Bible's many verses on it — verses which start, in Genesis 5!

So here in five minutes, you can know WHY: Israel was operating on a TIMED PROMISE made ever since Adam fell. Israel rejected Christ, so her Time RAN OUT. Problem was, the WORLD SHOULD HAVE ENDED. Christ rescues it, by founding Church. Church is thus a bridge back to Israel's time, to COMPLETE it, Hebrews 11:39-40, Eph 4:13.

Because Time ran out, there is no set time for Church. Rather, the criterion is BODIES Christ PREpaid on the Cross. We can't know who the bodies are, so we can't know WHEN the Rapture (the joining-back point) will occur.

BTW, 'Rapture' is Anglicized Latin 'rapto', which is in the Vulgate's 1Thess 4:17, translating Greek 'harpazw', meaning to SNATCH UP. It's the ASCENSION of Church, not the 2nd Coming of Christ. WE GO UP; He doesn't yet come down, until Rev 19:11.

The Rapture Event, is Rev 4 (John representing Church), COME UP HERE.

What we can know, we refuse; what we CANNOT know, we drool over. So those who try to date the Rapture or get you drooling over current events (for money, of course) — all betray they don't know WHY Rapture is true. So they give you bad information.

Harold Camping sure doesn't know why; his date-setting has been a money-making scam for 25 years. Here are two Word docs (conversions from posts I made in departout.com) proving the scam: CampingTimelineGaffes1.doc and CampingTimelineGaffes2.doc.

Camping's not alone. Date-setting is pandered by many 'respectable' teachers. By contrast, many other 'respectable' teachers, reacting, claim there's no such thing as Rapture, which is false.

Bible gets almost no respect, here. God doesn't start counting 'days' until Adam FELL. Moreover, God uses solar years, as shown in Exo 12, yet everyone misaccounts the years as lunar? No wonder Bible dates seem wrong!

Second accounting mistake: folks go OUTSIDE Bible to derive dates. Yeah, Bible won't not make sense, if we ignore it!

So let's only use Bible, k? If you do, you learn Rapture is PRECEDENTED on Israel's Promised Time, which itself is predicated on the pre-Israel legal issue of Allotted Trial Time in segments, each with its own VOTING purpose for believers: 490+70+490=1050+1050 (same units, repeated)=2100. Atop this and playing on the same time, is an 'unbeliever' voting, segmented as 1000+50. (So Jews were expecting Messiah to come at the end of the 2nd 2100. He did. )

So Bible ties these segments to the relevant doctrines, pan-Bible. All prophecy is a Warning to Vote, and is TIMED. Voting polls open. Voting polls CLOSE.

Those rules were set up at Adam's Fall. Rapture occurs because ISRAEL's polls closed untimely. So should the world die, due to Israel rejecting Christ? Those were the Trial terms! SO CHRIST INVENTS CHURCH in Matt16:18, to REOPEN the polls, keep the world going until BODIES of Church complete, Hebrews 3, 11:39-40, Eph1:3-14 (in meter, playing on the 'time bubble' of Dan 9:26c), Eph1:10, 3:21 (mistranslated), many other verses (salient ones in LvS4b.htm; search on 'catalog' when you load the page).

Not a set time, but a set of BODIES. So, you CAN'T predict when the polls close on Church, and reopen for Israel. They re-open for her as the Tribulation, followed by the last 1050 of history, the Millennium.

Main webpage on this Accounting for Time (including all related links and videos): Mirroring.htm.

The big-picture explanation — required, for a balanced audit — runs several thousand printed pages, and starts here: LordvSatan1.htm. For to see where we are NOW, we must begin at the beginning.. of Time. Before Adam. When the Angels were created. For, that's why we're here.

The juridical 'fit' of Rapture-specific issues relative to the whole, are covered beginning in LvS4a.htm. For ALL HISTORY is supposed to be a Trial 'wrap up' via Church, Ephesians 1:10. So there are many threads to trace. Not all of the many relevant Bible verses are noted, yet. Every NT page has Rapture keyword allusions to trace.

Alternatively, try this shorter fictional novel draft, for orientation to the topic's relevance: PDR.pdf. Oh: and write a novel chapter on YOURSELF. :)

2 AniM Daily Tribulation Timeline

Zebra asks Giraffe about brainout's Tribulation Timeline, promised over a year ago.

Download the timeline:

'Master' webpage on the Trib, is here: RevPlay.htm. The above two links also have a link to RevPlay, and it links to them.

There's NO WAY any of the stuff depicted in Revelation 4 and following, happened by 70AD. Preterism is insane.


b-out 1 John 1:9 Vids

Use 1John1:9 when you sin, else Spirit is not in you. Absent Him, YOU CANNOT READ BIBLE competently. You need the Spirit's brains, cuz you lost your own, at salvation, Ephesians 4:23. That's why I call myself 'brainout', to remind me to keep using 1John1:9.

Main reason why so many misread Bible: believers do not use 1John1:9 like breathing. So they breathe in hot air, not Scripture. That's why they are so snotty and gullible. So you might be saved, but you can be carnal. If you are carnal, even an unbeliever can read Bible better than you. Because, you have no brains, in a state of sin.

Salvation and Spirit-Filling are two different things. You get permanently saved the nanosecond you believe Christ paid for your sins, John 3:16. But the second you sin AFTER that, you are carnal, see 1John1:6-10. Even if carnal, those verses will be attested to By the Holy Spirit, to alert you to use 1John1:9.

I use it like breathing, especially when dealing with religious types. :)

Try it, see for yourself what regular usage of 1John1:9 does for your Bible PERCEPTION. For 'Filling' means Filling with God's Brains, per Greek of Eph4:23.

Oh: and then Greek or Hebrew in Bible will become very easy to learn. It's not elitist, it's GOD'S DESIGN for your life. Test that claim too, ask God!

Why We Need 1 John 1:9

Your life really depends on using 1John1:9 like breathing. Try doing that every day for 30 days, you'll notice the difference.

Header in 1 John 1:9 playlist: b-out 1 John 1:9 Vids. It's also in vimeo (so you can download it or comment without needing Google Plus), http://vimeopro.com/brainout/biblebasics

IMPORTANT: no Christian can read Bible or grow spiritually, absent using this verse like breathing. There is much controversy over it, because 99% of Christians are CARNAL, and so deny this verse. Video shows that it's ALWAYS been required, since Adam. By BELIEVERS (duh, you won't confess sins to a God you didn't ALREADY believe in)! So do this and grow. Don't do it, and you will stay a spiritual baby. Forever. Original video description, follows below.

=============

Gist: YOU CANNOT COMPETENTLY READ BIBLE IF YOU DO NOT USE 1JOHN1:9. All Bible you read will but inflate the ego, if you don't use this verse. For you need Spirit's Brains, instead, says Greek of Eph 4:23 (hence I call myself 'brainout', to remind me to use the verse).

You won't get His Brains, and you'll never have your own, if you don't habitually use this verse. Every day. I use it like breathing. You can PRAY that God remind you to use the verse. He will.

Why all this? Well, think of 1John 1:9 as a PREPAID VISA GIFT CARD, bought for you BY CHRIST when He was on the Cross. For that's exactly how John describes it, in 1John 1:6-10. It's the ONLY Card accepted in Heaven, as it's based on the CROSS (literal text of 1John 1:7's Greek). So if you don't use it when you sin, your money (i.e., works, prayer) is no good.

Shallow Bible understanding and teaching, bad Bible comprehension and teaching all come from NOT using 1Jn1:9. For post-salvation, the issue is to be filled with the Spirit. In OT and New (i.e., that's why you had all those OT sacrifices by BELIEVERS), you had to name your sins to God, or you were disciplined, and the Spirit didn't fill you with His Brains (OT version was pimplemi, much lower than our Royal Plerow level which Christ had).

So it's worse than sin, to not use 1Jn1:9, and you get clobbered for it, Col 3:25, 1Jn5:16 (capital punishment if refusing to use it too long).

So this issue is POST-salvation fellowship. Yes, Christ paid for all sins. But the desire to be filled with the Spirit — which being in a state of sin abrogates, just as in the OT the person or Temple was defiled — the desire to be filled with the Spirit, is a volitional issue. And sin abrogates it, so one must name his sins to God.

BTW, it doesn't mean agonizing over the sins. I usually say "I confess my arrogance" in thinking a bizillion times a day, often knowing what kind of arrogance it was, but sometimes not. It still works. Try it, see for yourself.

So if you aren't naming your sins to God, you are NOT spiritual, and full of nothing but hot air, fantasizing yourself spiritual like the strawman in 1Jn1:6,8,10. If you're not regularly using 1Jn1:9 but are a Christian, you have NO spiritual life: think of it as spiritual apnea.

So Learn to use 1Jn1:9 instinctively. It will work, even when you sleep, if you start the habit now.

1John1:9, Take 3!

First time was to show the consistency of the need for a believer to name sins to God, whole playlist on that, showing verses in OT tying to 1John1:9. Obviously an unbeliever doesn't believe in God, so never would be naming sins to God; since God is not the God of the unbeliever (in the mind of the unbeliever), then God won't forgive the sins of the unbeliever, since the jurisdiction of God over the unbeliever is not admitted.

But the believer has entered into permanent salvation, so now the issue is FELLOWSHIP, 1John1:5. So if you sin, you are no longer filled with the Holy Spirit (see Ephesians 5 and 1Thess 5, 1Cor 11). So then you can't learn anything spiritual. So to get the light back in you, you must use 1John 1:9 so you can start growing again.

The second video on the topic, '1 John 1:9 Revisited', was a short summary of the fact that you will be SEVERELY punished by God — all the way to death — if you don't use 1John1:9. For, the world depends on your learning Christ, since GOD HEARS EVERY THOUGHT YOU THINK. So He rewards the world if you're learning Christ, and curses the world if you don't: Leviticus 26 and Deut 28, 2 Chron 7:14 are all on this very important topic, as is Colossians 4:5 and Ephesians 5:16. You are here to REDEEM TIME, make it worth God's while to WATCH. Christ paid the funds so that cost of training you, can occur. It won't be spent, if you refuse 1John1:9.

As for any other punishment you need for what you did wrong, it gets converted to remedial TRAINING. Since obviously, if you knew the harm the wrong you did engendered, you'd not have sinned in the first place. This 3rd video on 1John1:9, clarifies this latter point.

YOU NEVER GET AWAY WITH ANYTHING. Samples of how the remedial training works: David, after the sin with Bathsheba and census, 2 Samuel; Moses after 2nd Meribah, Deut 1 and 32; Paul after rejecting God's will he go to Rome (so God sent him there in chains), Acts 18-22 (in 22 he admits God's Will).

1 John1:9 Take 4 : how do you know if you're sinning?

Clarification about what 1 John 1:9 does: justifies the Spirit training you, theme of 1 John. Phrase 'born of God' should really be translated 'sired by God', a progressive state which depends on you first being a believer, hence John uses that phrase. But Greek gennaw really means 'to sire', so has both a instance meaning (birth), and a progressive meaning (raising, training, siring in a job, thought pattern, 'fathering').

So born again, is the prerequisite. Then after that, you must GROW UP. Which, only the Spirit can do.

Fine: but how do you know if you're sinning, since if you believe something incorrectly, it's the same as telling a lie? Answer: you won't know. So suddenly the light goes out but you keep on walking — now, in darkness, 1John1:6. So say you're in the middle of reading Bible, and you have a sin thought, like believing some wrong interpretation of the verse. You've just entered into darkness, and don't know. Whoa. So now you're wood hay stubble, wasting God's Time and your own.

So what to do? KEEP BREATHING 1John1:9. Video here explains all that.

If you don't, you'll get punished. Take 5 will cover that idea.

1 John 1:9 Take5 : Punishment for not using the verse!

Take 5 briefly examines what punishment you get for not using the verse. See also Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, for you are a CURSING to your family and your nation, if you're not in fellowship with God. I've covered that in almost all my other videos, so that aspect of punishment isn't covered here.

Covered here, is the problem of what happens to you when you're in a state of sin: essentially, you're wasting God's Time and yours; no matter how accurately you can state Bible, it's not spiritual. No matter how moral you are, or what good deeds you do, it's all in SATAN's system, not God's. For to be in God's system, you must be BETWEEN SINS. So you have to use 1John1:9 to get filled with the Spirit again, see 1Cor11, Ephesians 5, 1Thess 5, Psalm 32, Psalm 66.

If you don't do this, God can kill you, 1John5:16. That's what happened to Ananias and Sapphira for lying, Acts 5. That's what almost happened to Paul for disobeying God's order he go to Rome NOT Jerusalem, Acts 18-22. My pastor went over that passage and Romans 15 (where you see Paul start to buck God), in his 'Paul's Fall' subseries. You can get that subseries for free on mp3. It was taught daily, lessons 1541 and following (about 90 classes/hours), of 1992 Spiritual Dynamics, approx April through June/July, 1998. Just ask for it by name, 'Paul's Fall'. They never ask for money or sell your name for advertising, etc.


b-out Bible Mistranslation

For MisTrans.htm webpage. Handy collection of some mistranslation videos, though nearly every video I do, focuses somewhat on mistranslation. Almost every Bible verse suffers in translation.

Translation isn't necessarily an issue, since God knows the right meaning you need from a verse, and can alert you to it. First video covers that. So don't pitch your translation, and don't be mad. It's impossible to properly translate Divine Genius. So when you see the original-language texts, immediately know a) yes, God did preserve His Original Words despite all the ignorant, satanic calumny against Him; b) you can learn the same words as Christ learned, spoke, as God commissioned — from the Holy Spirit's ENABLING power as you sit under a pastor who teaches them. That's how I learned it, so obviously you can too.

So mistranslations help you see God better, as you learn more about how Satan tampers with the Word. For no translator EVER means to screw it up. Thus you see hard translation is, and will admire the translator MORE, not less. :)

When Bible Mistranslation is NOT an issue!

God alerts you to Bible mistranslation, IF IF IF a) you use 1John 1:9 regularly; b) already study under a pastor, and c) you ASK God about what you're reading. So do that, and you don't need to worry.

Even so, He won't alert you unless it's relevant to what you need to know at the time. So you don't worry about Bible translation; you worry about whether you hear what God wants you to LEARN.

In short, if you're not already doing those other things, Bible Mistranslation isn't your problem. Your problem is those other things.

For millions of people can read the Bible in Hebrew and Greek but know nothing about what they read. 1John1:8,10 warn that they will imagine themselves spiritual, but will not be.

Witness? The Church Fathers were awful, according to the writings we have (as I'm slowly documenting in my PopeM playlist). They were fluent in Hebrew and Greek, but did NOT use 1John 1:9, as the text plainly shows.

Warning: text by these ancient people might instead be faked, a problem scholars know about and try to correct. In the first six centuries AD many false texts were written with names of famous Christians slapped on. These texts are goofy or obvious contradictions of Bible. The language is many years later than that of the alleged writers; kinda like someone claiming Shakespeare wrote rap lyrics, very obvious lie. :)

So, see: you don't have to worry about Bible Mistranslation, but about using 1John1:9 like breathing. Absent 1John 1:9, we're all cannon fodder for Satan's lies!

Like, the camera lying here, making it look like I'm wearing lipstick. I hate makeup (it smells). LOL!

1/2 Translations Decapitate Christ: Hebrews 11:1 Case Study

Related webpage: Heb111.htm, which also has these videos. You can download the originals, here: http://vimeo.com/album/2589177.

Gist: Hebrews 11:1 is mistranslated throughout the centuries; the mistranslations all ignore the Hypostasis=Christ meaning in this verse, thus decapitating Christ and all believers in Him, as this video shows. Who says Satan isn't smart to promote 'translated' God?

This is only one example of many. It's the quickest way to see how God is cut out of translations. Here, THE GOD-MAN, cut out by pious translators the world over, for centuries. So surely they had 'help' to be so uniformly blind, even though choosing the same "hupostasis" nickname, to signify Christ's God-man nature! Joke's on us!

1/2 Harold Camping's False Gospel EXPOSED by 1 Thessalonians 1:3

Watch fullscreen. EDIT, 5/26/2011: 1 Thessalonians 1:3's 'faith' means BIBLE IN YOU doing the work, not you doing it. Because that verse is mistranslated in KJV, but not in NIV, Camping (who claims to read Greek but uses the KJV) — gets the gospel WRONG.

So this video is pretty important to review. It shows the Greek and why the NIV is right, in this verse — NIV is wrong in many verses, as is every Bible translation. That's why we can AUDIT them via the Words God Preserved in Hebrew and Greek. Whew.

(You can download the jpg's of the video, links below.)

Hence video's Greek also ties to my James 2 exegesis playlist: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?p=PLB... . You'll need to see that, to understand that Bible's use of 'faith' almost always means the Word Believed, not your act of faith itself. WORD WORKS IN YOU, not you doing work! You can't be saved by works, and you can't live the spiritual life by works. The Word in You Alone Does the Work, theme of James. See for yourself.

Camping can't read it, apparently. So Harold Camping's 'gospel' depends on this verse. However, since he uses a MISTRANSLATION, he MISREADS and MISSTATES how you get saved. You can read his misuse here, on page 16 (21 of the pdf file): http://www.familyradio.com/graphical/... . A forum post I made rebutting that and some of his related claims, is here: http://www.departout.com/viewtopic.ph... .

So obviously he doesn't know Greek at all. And sells a false gospel. So think: 50 years of this man's LIFE, is all a waste! 50 years of selling a lie! All because he used a MISTRANSLATION!

JPGs to view video well:

Parting Shot: Satan's not stupid; he knows that we are too damn lazy to study the Word God Preserved; all our protestations of how much we love Jesus are just as bogus as in the 1st century, i.e., Luke's narrative of wacko Christians in Book of Acts, Paul's in 1Cor and Galatians, Peter in 2Peter. Ergo Satan&Co. massively influence bad translation of Bible for centuries; even scholars are too lazy, following past translations, rather than revisit the MSS. de novo. Hence Bible in translation routinely maligns God (#1 sign of false doctrine). Yet there are a few brave souls, like the guy behind NIV translation of 1Thess1:3. Problem is, the arrogant children in Christendom predominate: so you get vile man-glorifying, God-denigrated translations, exemplified here by 1Thess1:3 (except for NIV).

Test this verse with the "False Doctrine: 10 Ways to Detect" video (link: • False Doctrine: 10 Ways to Detect the...). Thus you see how 1Thess1:3 is MADE INTO false doctrine.. via mistranslation! 1000's more verses display the same bad 'scholarship'.

It's appalling how we Christians hate God. We want to sing IN His Name, but not LEARN His Thinking. Bible wasn't easily available in the original-language texts until 150 years ago. Ok, but in this computer age, we have NO excuse for tolerating mistranslations; the Holy Spirit enables anyone to learn those dead 'tongues'via 1Jn1:9 regularly used, k? I learned them enough to start reading those texts in but 18 months under my pastor via 1John1:9; so YOU can, too!


2/2 Harold Camping's False Gospel EXPOSED by 1 Thessalonians 1:3

Continued from 1/2. More on how the Greek text proves the mistranslation, so to avoid misrepresenting God's Word. This is a POST-Salvation passage, about how the WORD works in you to grow you — not, a condition of salvation as Harold Camping has long misstated.

God's Love Integrity thus goes unnoticed! Which, He caused the writers to cleverly depict, using a Greek drama rhetorical device with the genitive case. You can't translate it, in English. I tried to convey its importance with a Power Point demonstration, here: GodsHeadAttribute.ppt. Hit the F5 key once the Power Point program shows on your screen.

Subjective, Objective, & Plenary Genitives are the stuff of Greek Drama. These & other Atticisms were long known to be prominent features of Bible, which is how my own pastor learned them back in the 1930's. Alas, Bible scholarship has declined since then, & now it is fashionable to brand Bible's Greek as wholly koine. Therefore much of the correct translation & interpretation of what Bible says — since after all, its story is pretty dramatic! — has been lost. Ergo, you have the bad translations, such as in 1Thess1:3. So this companion to the "Falsehood Detection: 1Thess1:3 Mistranslation Case Study" video goes through these uses of the genitive in more detail.

My pastor taught these uses for 2 years of almost-daily Bible classes, boring the congregation to tears. Yeah, we Christians don't want to really know God's Word! But if you do, you can get them for free: "1992 Spiritual Dynamics" is the series, get the classes from 2000-2002 (about 700 lessons). They ship them at the rate of one mp3 per month (30 lessons), as I recall. Website is http://www.rbthieme.org .

It's long been debated which of God's Attributes is the 'crown' or 'head'. Calvinists claim Sovereignty, other denominations pick Righteousness, etc. The choice greatly affects one's read on Bible. So it's been long desired to find an attribute which accounts for God's Perfection, since the individual attributes seem to conflict, i.e., Love with Righteousness, etc.

Well, my pastor wanted for 50 years to find that answer. In the year 2000, he got it — via remembering these simple Greek-geek rules about genitives. He learned what I consider the most important theological discovery of the 20th century.

A short, summary Power Point Presentation is here: GodsHeadAttribute.ppt. When it downloads, click yes for Power Point, then maybe turn up the volume, and press F5 key.

If I die now, I will be content. I've spent 8 years vetting his claim about "Love is the Integrity of God!" & the vetting permeates all my webpages. Divine Love is not like human love. It LOVES Righteousness, first. Therefore Sovereignty is never compromised: by Decreeing Christ FIRST (Isaiah 52:13-15, 53:10-12, the TRUE order in the Decree, toss out all the infra- or supra- or other lapsarian nonsense) — by Decreeing Christ First, therefore all other creation can be FREE — by Divine Decree. Love IS the Integrity of God, so no man did not lose free will at the Fall, Christ did not merely pay for the elect, duh! LOVE would never allow such unrighteous results!

Maybe late next century this stuff will be widely understood in Christendom.

8/72, KJVOB : God's Words?

Proof why KJV-only is anti-Bible? ENGLISH was not a language when the Bible writers lived; inspiration goes by WRITER, not the language. See, the point God makes is that HE WRITES HIS WORD IN YOU, Jeremiah 31:31-34. So He wrote in the writers, to show what happens when He writes what He gave THEM, into YOU. Ultimate perfection is demonstrated, when the Perfect can RESIDE INSIDE, the imperfect! So even our original-language texts are imperfect in form (depicting the human and hence human errors), yet Complete Perfect Word exists AMIDST (Hebrew prep: qerev) copying mistakes, etc. So you just read dfefeij avoeijo avjdiojid PAST the errors, STILL SEE the faeifeoi aveijro oidfjaoi Full Real Word, anyway!

Next big point: Christ Himself did not learn Bible in English, so the English you read, is NOT God's Word. Period. But any translated Bible CONTAINS the Real Word. It's like juice at the supermarket: some juices are 100%; that's like the Original texts (in sum, not just any one manuscript); other juices are 60%, 30% real juices, plus water. Those, are the translations. But ALL are good for you!

This video also responds to: • Video

View whole playlist here: SatStrat2.htm#KJVO

Or in Youtube, here: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=9637CFFCF9F62107

Links:

Forum where both sides are free to participate: freewebs.com/kjvonlyresearch/forums.htm.

Origin of the KJV-only claim: kjvonly-genesis.pdf. You can verify the authors' claims by means of the people cited in that link as KJV-only proponents, on the internet.

A kinder, gentler rebuttal to the KJV-only people: geocities.com/Athens/Forum/5951/KJVOnly.html | kjvonlydebate.pdf

This video tries to be kind, by asking a simple question: WHOSE WORDS are in English, if the original Words God gave, were not in English? If God promises to preserve HIS OWN WORD, then that promise MUST BE the words He originally gave. Else you're not learning GOD's Words, but someone else's.

When God gives HIS Word, HE preserves it. Hence translations can't ever be as good. It's not a question of one human language being better than another, it's a question of what language GOD CHOSE to express. And you get the free right UNDER THE SPIRIT to learn those very same words. Same ones Jesus learned, God can empower you to learn. It's not elitist, and frankly it's EASIER than learning a translation. Because, God enables it. So to refuse that, is to refuse God's Power.

Granted, oftentimes the KJV is the best among the translations, but it cannot capture all the meaning of GOD's Words.

For example, much in the original Bible is communicated by wordplay, soundplay, even play on poetic meter — all those are native to the original language, and cannot be replicated in translation. So God preserved HIS ORIGINAL WORDS instead. It's called "Verbal Plenary Inspiration" in theology.

Tribulation, Trinity, the Cross as a kind of rape — all these are stridently communicated in the original Hebrew by using soundplay and meter, as you'll see in my Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 Hebrew videos. The "Son of Man" title in the NT is solely a God-man title, is solely taken from Daniel 7:13, but you can't know that from the translations. (See my "Son of Man" videos in my "brainout-made Exegesis" playlist.) So you can't know how stridently Christ claims He's GOD, in the NT. In translation, the verses are ambiguous. In short, much is lost in translation.

But God preserved the original words given, not translations. Granted, over the years of copying, among the 25,000 or so "witnesses" (copies) of these original words some copies have mistakes — but other copies of the same verse, do not. Moreover, even the mistaken copies read like this: "t is s ntence h s m sing w rds". So you can tell what it means.

Hence the words are still preserved. God's Words. As He originally gave them through inspiring the Bible writers. So it's a trip back in time, and you are just as much in 712BC as Isaiah was, when he wrote Isaiah 53.

Since the Holy Spirit was THERE, He knows what of the words we have, are His. So you can learn those words by HIS Power, too. Science of textual criticism is about this, but the Holy Spirit's testimony will make that textual job competent. So just use 1John1:9 and ask.

God's Words. Testified to BY God, as you read them. Same Words As Jesus Learned. Same Words as the writers themselves wrote. Available to you. NO go-betweens. No 'spin'. Just God and you.

Now, if you refuse the Holy Spirit's Power to give you the ORIGINAL words since those words are AVAILABLE, what do you think will happen to you? Divine Discipline! For the one claiming a translation is as good as the original, is claiming the Holy Spirit a liar. For the original words are preserved, and you can prove that, as you learn them. His Power to your brain...

33/72, KJVOB : KJV's Genesis 3:11 makes God a liar

How KJV text between Gen 2:25-3:11 makes God a liar in 3:11 because that verse is MISTRANSLATED. And oh, how all other Bible translations in English, COPY the King James, including the lexicographers! See, everyone's afraid of admitting the THOUSANDS of translation errors in the KJV, so even in lexicons they softpeddle the errors, just listing what the "AV" (a nickname for KJV) says in its translation for the word.

SATAN would like it very much if you were stuck with the KJV, even as he angled successfully to keep the Old Latin Vulgate front and center so long, even Jerome rebelled against it; then when Jerome translated it into then-contemporary Latin in 400AD or so, the Vatican deep-sixed his translation until about 800AD, when it was so old no one well understood it. So by 1500's Erasmus wanted to update the Vulgate. Clever of Satan to use Erasmus' back-translated compilation from too-far-removed Greek Catholicised manuscripts as the alleged 'inspired' word, and then gut even that out, by the insistence on 400-year old ENGLISH — a language God never inspired, which didn't exist when the REAL Bible was compiled.

Satan's not stupid, k? He knows how lazy people are, and now even a woman can replace a pastor with fake scholarship, to push forward a flawed translation no one now understands. Just as the Catholic Church did, with the Old Vulgate, then Jerome. :)

My pastor spent time exegeting this verse in his 1977 Genesis series. If you want to get that series, click here: http://www.rbthieme.org and then order the Genesis exegesis classes (they never ask you for money).

2 PopeM + 37/72, KJVOB : KJV's Matthew 16:18, makes Peter, Pope

How KJV decapitates Christ and puts Peter's head at top. How only the Codex A family (Siniaticus, Alexandrian-related) preserved the right Greek text. For a better retelling of Codex A's dramatic history than I say in the videos (the way I tell the story might be misleading) — see this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Sinaiticus.

Here's Tischendorf's own account of how he found it: http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/extras/discovery.html

So much for the claim that Textus Receptus is 'less' Catholic! Full playlist on Petra/petros is here: PopeMyth.htm. That webpage has more information about how to prove the pope thingy is a lie invented in the 2nd century AD. The playlist is also here in Youtube, my 'brainout PopeMyth'. The Youtube playlist videos are fewer and longer than those in bliptv, but contain the same material. (Once, bliptv was easy to use and clearer; then it became a nightmare; so I'm porting my bliptv videos here to Youtube.)

Bible better than sex, per Daniel 6:18 — but not in translation!

Just heard my pastor's Lesson 24 of his 1970 Daniel series. At the end of it, he explained that Chaldean word 'dahawan' means 'concubines': really, the Persian equivalent of geishas, per Lesson 25. I mispronounce the word in the video; it should be, de-KhAA-wah — again, per Lesson 25. The etymology of the word is also there explained.

Now you know why the word isn't properly translated!

Principles in the verse include how having Bible in your head is more happiness than even a king's harem pleasures. If you want to order those lessons, you can get them for free and no money-grubbing, at http://www.rbthieme.org . I think they provide 30 lessons at a time on one mp3 now? (I don't use mp3, I have the tapes from 30 years ago.)

But can you see all that meaning in Bible translations? NO! So the video goes through the English translations of Daniel 6:19 (6:18 in English), how they COVER UP what 'dahawan' means — except for two VERY BRAVE translations, the Darby and New Jerusalem Bible. So if you used those two translations to read the verse, you'd learn what GOD is saying — Bible is better than a king's harem. You bet!

But if you read the prudish coverup translations, you'd miss this important Bible principle. See why I won't use translations? See what gets missed? BTW, look up Hebrew dahah (dalet het hey). Sample verses are: Ps. 35:5; 36:13; 62:4; 118:13; 140:5; Prov. 14:32 .

71/72, KJVOB : How I use Bible Translations

Humans sin, but God Perfectly Preserved His Word anyhow: In Aggregate! Never just 1 text, but 66 books; never just 1 writer, but 44; never just 1 time, but over 1500 years. So never in but 1 translation or even 1 copy, manuscript, or just 1 person! For if only 1, it could be easily destroyed or replaced with a counterfeit. God thus uses a TEAM, not only one 'player'! For everything Bible, is SELF-AUDITING!

You are always supposed to audit your beliefs, Scripture, teachers, everything. So God DESIGNED Scripture to be self-auditing. If you screw up on reading, interpreting, your 'pieces' won't fit. Same, for the Word itself. Therefore it's NOT in 'one' book, text, translation, original-language copy, else you'd have no way to AUDIT it.

God thus perfectly slotted each original-language copy and translation for an AUDITING purpose, even as God elected all of us, despite our sins. Audio on how: http://www.brainout.net/wma/Translati...

So the original WORDS are all preserved, even long after the material written ON, perished. Many copies insure in aggregate, that we have Perfect AUDITABLE Word Preserved. So no ONE copy need be perfect.

For just as we imperfect humans are still Body of Perfect Christ, so also God's Word is a TEAM, since we all sin! Audio on how: http://www.brainout.net/wma/WhyGodsWo...

Since He preserves His AUDITABLE Word in aggregate, it remains Tamper Proof, even when tampered with! For Satan also tampers with it, kidnapping, ripping it up, denouncing a translated Bible as 'no good'.

Next, there's human tampering, due to sin. If a human sins while copying the original-language text in ancient times, he makes mistakes. No problem: we have 1000s of copies; so at least one copy of a given verse, remains 'pure', and you can AUDIT the copies, to know which one. So in aggregate we can PROVE there is at least one full 'pure' copy of ALL of God's Words! Clever, huh.

Next: a translator sins while translating, so he too makes mistakes. No problem, we still have the original words copied 1000s of times! For the Original Holy Spirit Knows His Words; He will enable you to learn and AUDIT those same Words, just as He gave them to Moses, David, Christ, Paul.

So you get what Christ really said, as if live on TV. What Moses, David, Isaiah, Paul — really said. Recorded. Live. Preserved.

So use 1John1:9 yourself, so you too won't make a mistake when reading Bible!

Next tampering, education: until about 70 years ago, every educated human learned to read Bible in Hebrew and Greek. It was part of the high school curriculum even in American public schools, pulpits. I have high school textbooks and literature in Latin, Greek, Hebrew from that time. You can freely download some of those books from Google Books if you query on Latin or Greek or Hebrew.

Hence, English itself was influenced by Bible Greek and Hebrew. For England's teachers taught those languages to their congregations alongside English meanings; so English words changed meaning due to the Greek and Hebrew. For a sample of how it was taught (since my pastor taught it the same way), go to http://www.rbthieme.org , order an mp3 on an OT or NT book. (They never ask for money.)

Mine was the last generation to get this education. Disinterest in Bible peaked since; we thus have chaos, today.

Today's tampering: Bible is a political football. So you must fight, to learn it. Don't fall for KJVO baloney. They can't ever translate Bible Hebrew and Greek, yet lie and pretend they can, to claim the KJV is a 'perfect' translation! TEST THEM!

You can buy the Bible software shown $350 from http://www.bibleworks.com. Also get the BDAG and HALOT lexicons (add $150). BW provides many free, important add-ons, too.

Finally, I did extensive pan-Bible video proof how Matt16:18 is mistranslated: PopeMyth.htm. That verse is a political toy. Translation committees won't admit what lexicographers all know: that LittleRock ('Peter' to you), is not BEDROCK (Christ's nickname, Petra, term is pan-Bible). For Christ points at Himself as the BEDROCK when He says, 'I will build My Church'. Will build. New Building. Not Israel.

MISTRANSLATION in 1Pet1:2 omits Christ's Obedience

One of the reasons the NEVER-secure salvation apostates think they are right, is that they rely on Bible Mistranslations, to make their case. They are abetted in this, by the fact that PAST mistranslations in KJV and elsewhere, are 'revered'. So future editions or allegedly 'new' Bible translations, typically preserve the OLD mistakes, rather than be courageous and admit the past error. That's the case here, in 1Peter 1:2.

When you see how evil the mistranslation, you'll want to write the Bible publishers. Seriously, folks, it's time we stopped stomping on the Word of God in order to walk with people!

So ask yourself: is it worthwhile to tell yourself you're revering God, when you rely on Bible translations which are clearly motivated by political correctness, rather than Bible accuracy? Now you know why I harp on the Hebrew and Greek so much. So should you.


b-out Atheism Vids

Atheism has some good arguments, so this is a due-diligence-disclosure playlist for brainstorming the issues. Any 'conversion' is a PRIVATE matter, per person!

See also my 'Atheist Youtubers' playlist, which is a collection of Atheist Youtubers' own videos. The atheists who seem to me the most worth hearing, are in my Recommended Channels list on my Channel page. For atheism is a subset of unbelieving mankind. It should not be demonized. We were all unbelievers at some point in our lives.

Topics covered in this playlist, include:

So these videos are designed solely for brainstorming the above and related issues. Feel free to be critical, even abusive, in the comments. Feel free to attach response videos, which will be automatically approved. I never censor; and I only censure bad scholarship or lack of thinking, whether in Christian or non-Christian.

Six Reasons why I support Atheism, video summary:

  1. It's genuinely DIFFICULT to believe that God even exists.
  2. You should NOT believe that God even exists, until you have PROOF.
  3. It's vital to be HONEST.
  4. Atheists sometimes voice good objections that we Christians, should consider.
  5. I too have the freedom to be an atheist, 'tomorrow'.
  6. Doubt is the Key to Sanity.

Invisible versus Visible 'Truth' Proofing

Audio only. It outlines the issue of material reality being inconclusive, the fact that really all of us are dependent on faith in something invisible, whether it be math (for the sciences), or.. 'God'. Math being invisible yet absent matter or energy, yet governing all material reality, begs the question of immateriality governing or causing materiality. So since you exist, then is there a counterpart Ultiimate Person aka 'god' by some definition? 'Yes' is certainly a logical answer. But by itself, also inconclusive.

Fine: but how do you test for the existence of an Immaterial, 'God'? You certainly can't use materiality, since by itself a) it can not prove the actual existence of an Immaterial Person, and b) whatever materiality there is, can be explained in multiple ways.

So then you need a combined testing mechanism, which starts with the immaterial, and if that immateriality is real, then you can TEST the immaterial 'explanation' of that thing (or Person) with respect to the material, for cohesion. This is what a scientist does, especially in math, physics, cosmology: he forms immaterial ideas and connections called hypotheses or theories, then tests materiality for any kind of demonstration of those hypotheses or theories.

So you can do the same thing for the God question, but frankly that's not even enough. For if God exists immaterially and you do also, then why wouldn't this God communicate to you? And how do you distinguish between communication you think you received, versus possible error or even hallucination on your part? Ergo this audio.

How to Prove God's Existence

Bible contends that 'humanness' is immaterial, housed inside a 'soul' that lives forever; that the body, is just a biological house you walk in. Therefore, to prove INVISIBLE God exists, requires an INVISIBLE testing mechanism: your soul. Okay, but do you have a soul? Well, evidence of that would be invisible too, but if you actually have one, it can be tested as well.

Ergo, here are Three Ways to Prove God Exists, VIA your soul:

  1. Ask the Ceiling, 'Hey, God, if you really exist, I need PROOF.' He provides proof directly, through THOUGHT. With repetition, you will be able to distinguish between your own, versus His thoughts, because
  2. Ask the Ceiling while READING BIBLE, 'Hey God, if you really exist, I need answers to this weird [Bible] text.' Bible says God's Thinking Pattern is Scripture, 1 Corinthians 2:16, Hebrews 4:12, all 'Word of God' verses, Matthew 4:4, etc. So God uses BIBLE VERSES and PRINCIPLES to communicate. That last verse explains why we Christians are constantly justifying things using Bible, since we are commanded to LIVE on it. So: is it working? Is this 'command' real? The only way to test it, is to read the Bible and yell at the ceiling, talk about what you are reading, etc. Since you don't know Bible as well as God does, when suddenly you find connections in it you didn't know existed, and they actually MAKE SENSE, then you are getting proof that HE is showing that Bible to you.
    • Wash rinse repeat, as you cannot call a FEW instances of this 'insight', proof. You need it over and over and over and over daily, so you have a statistically-valid sample of occurrences: so YOU know it's not you, but Him. This is what the Christian is SUPPOSED to do, so you're also getting a taste of how the Christian is supposed to live the spiritual life. Take it slowly, if it makes you nervous or angry (as it will, initially). If in the past you ever believed Jesus Christ paid for your sins, you'll learn faster if you use 1John1:9 repeatedly (i.e., name the sin of being angry or disbelieving, doesn't matter how you feel about it). I use that verse a bizillion times a day, to get God's 'brains' (hence my nickname, 'brainout', which is based on the Greek of Ephesians 4:23).
    • The Bible insight He gives can be very sophisticated. See my Psalm 90 playlist, which is about a Bible Hebrew Meter no scholar yet knows. I learned of it, by ASKING GOD. Then, He led me to the passages, and the proof of the meter therein, is in that and the GGS 10-11 playlist. Extremely sophisticated stuff, objectively provable in the text: but I didn't even KNOW about it at all, until ASKING GOD.
  3. God connects the dots of your personal life, to show you how He's Involved, like in the movie 'Signs' (starring Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix). This is very personal, and it will freak you out. Again, wash rinse repeat is the name of the game, so it will be repeated so you can calm down.

As you can imagine, this proof will be conclusive for you, but not transferable to anyone else. Because, God is the God of Freedom, and He's not gonna fly some blimp in the sky advertising Himself, which would then force people to believe. That's what Satan was asking Him to do, in the 2nd Temptation of Matthew 4, and Christ refused. So it's intimate proof in three ways, each time requiring you to WANT to know, before He answers. So if you don't want to know, then you won't. If you DO want to know, then you will, just as much as you want and no more than you want.

Towards a Better Atheism

Vid's audio gist: kudos to the better atheist (see links below), who demands an answer to God's Justice claim. A dumber atheist argues 'evolution'. Don't be a dumb atheist, be smart and stick to the JUSTICE issue, in debates over God's Existence and Identity.

And what is the answer to the Justice issue? A hard answer, one I too am grappling with: God decrees TRUTH BE FREE, Psalm 138:2c. Very hard to want to believe in the God of the Bible, if that is the answer. :)

TheAtheistDebate's video response to Ran Campbell, asks the right atheist question, 'WHERE'S THE JUSTICE', at beginning and end: • Video

Godrollingtoastop's video, satirizing Ran Campbell's claim that atheists are schizophrenic: • Video. I append this video as a response to his, because I think he should get more subscribers.

Rob Lester's video, responding also to Ran Campbell: • Video

I'm not sure which of the Ran Campbell videos is being used, so I don't have a link to Ran Campbell, himself, sorry. His channel is/was here: http://www.youtube.com/user/GodVeiwsu... . Can't access it.

The argument claiming that evolution proves God does NOT exist, is premised on an ERRONEOUS claim that Bible says the universe is 6000 years old. But the Bible DOES NOT say anything about how old the universe is. Oooops. Now you can't use any evolutionary argument. Further, Bible CAN be read to say God decreed evolution, in Genesis 1:23-25. Ooops. Now you can't use any evolutionary argument to claim it proves God doesn't exist!

I go through what the Bible DOES say in the real Hebrew and Greek, in my Genesis Exegesis playlist, starting here: • b-out Genesis w/Exegesis. See the Bible text for yourself. I explain the Hebrew and Greek and show the lexicons, so you can understand it FOR yourself. That way, you'll save a lot of time and angst when arguing with Christians who DO NOT KNOW what the Bible says on the topic.

By contrast, the argument about JUSTICE is primary and VALID: every Christian needs to work through it. I'm still trying to work through it, in the context of the Angelic Trial, which is entirely disclosed in Bible, and is on this very topic of WHY IS GOD JUST to allow bad to exist. First video in the series on the topic, starts here: • God Deeds, GD1 Why Evil. That first video itself isn't the material, but you can access the material via its video description. The description also contains the link to the webseries on the same topic, which took me years to write up (and still needs a lot of editing).

In sum, the issue of GOD IS JUST, is the central focus of the Trial, hence the central focus of any decision to believe in God, and to KEEP believing in Him. It's hard to do that. That's why only BELIEVE CHRIST PAID FOR YOUR SINS is the Gospel. Hardest thing you'll ever do, is BELIEVE. Christianity keeps on faltering over that issue, and so of course should atheists.

So, God bless atheism. We need it, to keep that question, going. So if you are an atheist, what should you do? I cover that, in the last four minutes of the video.

Essentially:

  1. If God exists, He made you.
  2. If God made you, then His motive must be LOVE, as you are smaller than Him.
  3. If God exists and made you due to LOVE, then He wants a relationship with you.
  4. So if God wants a relationship with you, He'll disclose Himself. So you need PROOF.
  5. So then you ASK for the PROOF. It won't be transferable to another person, but must be conclusive for YOU, since God is INVISIBLE.

A person who has proof of God can detect when someone else also has proof, because the same God would WITNESS to the proof inside the other person, through that person's words. But if you don't know God exists, you can't detect it, since you don't yet know God. So, the CONCLUSIVITY of proof is only internal, personalized. That's why we all have unending debates.

So if you want proof, ASK. If not, don't. That's the only way you'll know. If it matters, this video now heads my Atheism playlist, here: • b-out Atheism Vids. The purpose of the playlist is to beg these very JUSTICE questions. The SatStrat playlist linked above, works through the questions from the Bible. Maybe it will help you work through the answers, I don't know. It's horrifically long, because the answer is long. Life-long, in fact. For every day one is a Christian, one is faced with the same issue, IS GOD JUST.. and why? No short, snappy, syrupy answers to that question, exist. Sorry.

Towards A Better Atheism, 2

Follow-on video, since TheAtheistDebate's video posed the Justice Question as his reason for disbelieving in God. In the first 15 minutes of this 2nd video, I pose my own objections to God's Justice. Last half of video then uses math set theory to propose a 'god' definition, but ends up full-circle back to the horrific Justice Conclusion that Truth Must Be Free; which means, Free to Be Unjust; else, it's not Truth or Justice, if not free. For once you start shaving freedom in the name of reducing suffering, where do you stop?

Back at the starting point! No happy answers, sorry.

So if you have better definitions of Justice or 'god', let me know?

Towards A Better Atheism, 3

Atheists are scammed, too, just like Christians are. Whatever your belief, there is someone trying to make money on it. So look at the links below, to see the scams:

  1. Scams against Christians are well-known, but since most atheists like to make fun of the young-earthers (and understandably so), look at the chief among the young-earth sects, the King-James-Onlyists, among whom NephilimFree numbers, to see how the KJVO leaders make buckets of money selling lies. See the video description links to the leaders' scams, in this video: • 18/72, KJVOB : Meet the KJV-only Clowns .
  2. Now compare, if you will, the atheists trying to make money off atheism, here:

Atheist books, yeah! https://www.richarddawkins.com/

Richard Dawkins: https://richarddawkins.net/donate/

Christopher Hitchens (or those around him): https://christopherhitchens.net/

Sam Harris: https://www.samharris.org/

One can go on and on. And why are these, scams? Because Genesis 1:25-27 even in translation, can be easily read as SUPPORTING evolution, so why do all the above alleged 'scientific' and 'rational' folk IGNORE it? Why do they only focus on the recent phenomena of the KJVO young-earthers? I'm not saying Bible does support evolution, but the text in Genesis easily can be interpreted as corroborating evolution, so anyone claiming evolution disproves God, is just flat lying to you. Or is stupid, take your pick!

Imagine: all the KJVO young-earthers are laughed at, because the EVIDENCE flatly contradicts them. So how is it, the atheists buy into the false idea that evolution DISPROVES Bible, when a) Bible never says how old the earth is, and b) Genesis 1:25-27 can be read as God decreeing evolution? And in fact, has been thus interpreted by Jews and Christians alike, for 2000+ years?

Ooops. Someone in the atheist camp, is scamming his fellow atheists, yes?

There are plenty of splendid reasons to be an atheist, but evolution isn't one of them. So you don't need to fork over your hard-earned money to the evolution panderers, to justify your disbelief in any god. You SHOULD get proof of anything, prior to believing in it. Evolution is NOT proof of anything, as just shown: the Christian can use it to 'prove' God exists, too. So don't be scammed, THINK FOR YOURSELF!

Atheist Scam, 1

How Atheists scam other atheists to make money off atheism. Part 1 of 2. Gist: Bible never says how old the universe is, and Genesis 1 is NOT an initial-creation story. So if you don't know that, and you buy some atheist or 'Christian' claiming Bible says the earth is 6000 years old, you are being scammed. Or, the person claiming the Bible says the universe is only 6000 years old, is too dumb to read it.

So more likely, you're being scammed. Don't be scammed, get smart and KNOW what the Bible text actually says. Then, still be an atheist — but at least, a smart one.

For the real Hebrew Bible text on Genesis, I've done a 21-hour playlist called 'Genesis with Exegesis, here: • b-out Genesis w/Exegesis

Atheist Scam, 2

Continued from Part 1, conclusion. This conclusion shows how the Bible TEXT actually SAYS God authored evolution. But which version? Any version you like. In fact, Darwin's idea of evolution doesn't work genetically, but there are other versions which do. Search in Google on 'pre-Darwinian' or 'non-Darwinian' ideas of evolution, see for yourself. These OTHER ideas presuppose that all forms of life were just 'there' at 'the beginning', and correctly reference the genetic fact that a being cannot TRANSMUTE. So, the ancient eohippus is the ancient ancestor of the modern horse, etc. Many atheists hold to that version of evolution. So do many Christians. Bible text can support that, too.

But it doesn't matter what the Bible supports, in 'science', as MEN WROTE the books of the Bible, and human info of this kind has been around as long as humans. So the 'science versus Bible' debate, is completely irrelevant, and there is no 'versus', as this video shows.

So clearly Richard Dawkins and his ilk are either a) scamming you to make money, or b) cannot read Bible even in translation, and c) didn't do their own SCHOLARLY RESEARCH prior to publishing. Because, this text has been known for thousands of years, and many Jews and Christians believe that evolution is decreed by God, per the verses shown in this Part 2.

Ooops. Looks like a lot of dumb atheists have just been scammed, right along with the dumb Christians!

Christians are scammed to think that life begins biologically, in the womb. Here I show how God says otherwise. There are maybe 500 verses I've yet to cover in videos, but the ones done so far proving the point, are here: • b-out Prolife Blasphemy Vids

In sum, DO YOUR HOMEWORK. Be an atheist, but find better reasons for your atheism. Just because one can say here that Bible agrees with science, is NOT enough reason to believe in the Bible.

The only proper way is to get proof of God's existence FOR YOURSELF. Ask the 'ceiling' for proof of God, if He exists. That's the only way to really know.

God's Evolution

Did God Decree Evolution? You bet. Question is, WHAT KIND? Video goes through that. Essentially, two kinds of evolution: indirect, for biology, and direct, for learning and living with God.

For all life depends on INSTRUCTION SETS. Genes are instruction sets. DNA is an instruction set. God speaks, and a thing is. Bible is an instruction set, Heb 4:12. Instruction sets, CREATE and TRANSFORM.

Which indirect form of evolution, is not specified in Genesis 1:24, but we know from science that the 'Darwinian' flavor flat doesn't work, genetically. Too many mutations required, so the species cannot mutate enough to TRANSmute, as Darwin proposed. But Darwin was a dummy about genetics, being as he was a disgruntled clergyman who couldn't even read Genesis 1:24. Apparently the Darwinians like him, can't read the verse, either. :)

See my Godevol.html on why Darwinian evolution, doesn't work. It's kinda windy, so maybe read it when you've nothing better to do. If you're a glutton for punishment, read Evolshort.htm, which has more on the topic.

So God DIRECTLY creates you at birth, and DIRECTLY 'evolves' you after salvation, by the Holy Spirit teaching your human spirit from Bible, which you learn to live on. For Christ's Humanity BECAME 'The Way, THE TRUTH, and The Life', so it's a TRANSMUTATION plan for us, too.

This latter process goes on forever. Many Bible verses support it, but I only show a few key verses in the video. Problem is, the applicable verses are generally mistranslated, especially Romans 12:1-3.

See Rom121-3.htm for the corrected translation of that passage. I don't spend much time showing it, in the video.

How this works is covered at length in my DDNA.htm and its sister pages (which are linked in that main page). Took me years to realize this was what God was doing, so there is a lot of Bible backup, to review. Will take months to read those webpages, sorry.

For the proper derivation of Greek word pistis as a COMMERCIAL CONTRACT term, see TDNT, aka 'Big Kittel'. Also see Bauer Danker. Isaiah 53:10-12 is a COMMERCIAL CONTRACT between God the Father and God the Son, to make 'sons', hence Genesis 1:26-27 is God DIRECTLY making those sons. So yes you are 'evolved', but solely by agency of God.

Yikes. Pity the Darwinians never do their homework in Bible or genetics. For now they only prove to have egg on their faces, and are demonstrably dishonest/incompetent.

God's Fault Gospel

Ultimate reason why you ONLY BELIEVE in Christ's payment on the Cross, to be forever saved. Associated webpage on the topic of freedom and failure: LordvSatan1.htm#Issues

ONLY GOD authors life; your soul at birth, your first breath at birth, your salvation aka 'born again'. So you go to hell, if you never believe in what HE did about sin. Because, if you reject what HE did about it — for God takes responsibility for everything good or bad, Isaiah 45:7 — if you reject what HE did, then you're claiming something YOU do has competing value.

That's Satan's contention. Satan's ticked off because all his beauty doesn't count, before God. Listen to anyone who claims salvation is in someone or something else. They all insist on a competing value (i.e., the insipid 'I'm a good person' claim). Just like Satan.

But you don't even breathe your next breath unless God approves it. You can't sin unless He allows it. You can't even go to the bathroom unless He allows it. He can make you, stop you, keep you going. You are free, solely because GOD ALONE insures your freedom to be free. Free to believe, free to reject, all courtesy of Christ.

Because, GOD PAID for everything on the Cross. So if you say no to His Payment, then you can go to the Hell He created. Your choice.

See, it's not about sin. It's about God.

Detecting God

Inspired by the videos of Cimbolic, MeLoco and MenoftheInfinite. Five unusual 'road' trip tips on how to detect God, using what's called the "first class condition" in "Greek debater's technique".

My version of trip tip #3 is here: Godindex.html#Nature. This video is also embedded there.

My version of trip tip #5b starts here (very long, over 2000 printed pages): LordvSatan1.htm. Idea was to audit the whole 'God story' Bible tells from Genesis to Revelation, in a somewhat user-friendly essay format, to see if the story as a whole makes sense, and tackle the tough questions en route. Essay works like a classical Greek play, starting with and ending 'today', with all of the past and future, in between. Again, you wouldn't want to print it out, way too long.

A more condensed version of this story is in Chapter One of PDR.doc, told in a fictional format from the demons' POV. The novel is yet unfinished.

Worksheet showing God's Orchestration of Time with testable events is: GeneYrs.xls. A short gist of its results, showing how all TIME revolves around the JEWS, is in SatTacExamp.htm, but the main strategies, tactics, and play in history is illustrated passim beginning at LordvSatan1.htm .

"How Satan Deploys Islam" videos here in Youtube complement the discussion, show with real history how Satan 'times' his deployment of Muslims like locusts, to satirize Bible's Exodus (specifically, Exodus 12:40-41), which occurred at a scheduled Time per Bible's rules, 490 years after Joseph was enslaved, and 430 years after Jacob entered Egypt. Satan keys the deployment of Muslims to INVADE Israel, based that latter number (i.e., 638AD, 1073AD, 1517AD, and of course 1948+ AD).

Since no one in Christendom or Islam even knows the Bible teaches a 490-year recurring Time pattern, and the events' timing is provable, obviously you have an objective falsifiable mechanism for testing Bible. As for other alleged holy books' veracity, I don't know what timing mechanism you can use to test them.

A summary of that satirical strategy is in the STOP OMEGA table of LvS4c.htm#MEGA and in SatStrat.htm.

Christians are commanded to test for whether they are HALLUCINATING God's Will and Nature, or whether it's really from God. The test is to be constant, theme of 1 John 4:1-6, epistle of Jude, passim in Corinthians and Galatians. That's why we have to become Bible junkies, spiritual lawyers so to speak. We are punished if we don't do this. So no Christian ever gets away with anything. Salvation is a floor. Post salvation it's a matter of maturation, and the one who won't mature, will be very distant from God even though saved.

Detecting God: The Cimbolic 9, Part A

Shoutout video series to Cimbolic and Veritas48 on their wonderful dialogue entitled 'Presumption of Atheism'. This four-part video is linked as a response to a video in which Cimbolic outlined a genius 9-point plan for detecting

God. His video doing that, is here: • Re The Presumption of Atheism: Absenc...

In this video series, I use those same nine points to demonstrate that God cannot be One Absolute Person, so you can see how effective is Cimbolic's construct, in God detection.

Here are his nine points (text before the colon is my titling for the video):

  1. God's 'Face': 'something you know and can recognize'
  2. Better Contra: 'when evidence present suggest a better explanation'
  3. Anomaly: 'evidence of something else being present.'
  4. Juridical Matching, Exclusivity: 'When the thing being sought is found somewhere else and cannot be in two places at once'.
  5. Evidentiary Mismatch: 'When evidence which is present, is contrary'
  6. No Foundation: 'If the necessary foundation of the evidence is absent'
  7. Communication Break: 'Break in communication'
  8. Affirmative Absence: 'Previously-assigned evidence of absence'
  9. Last One Standing Wins: 'If every other explanation has proven impossible, then the only remaining one, however implausible, is correct.'

Enjoy! This is soooo exciting!

1/2 Why Hell.. forever?

Reply to Third Proverb, whose video is here: • HELL - Eternal Torment ?

Sorry about air conditioner noise.

Webpages mentioned in videos:

On the Freedom and Truth question, start with SatStrat.htm and keep reading until you get bored or get answers.

On the Cross RAISING the cost as well as paying for sin: Fixes.htm then search on 'unlimited crosses' (no quotes)

On Lake of Fire, thinking out Bible on how unbelievers there can STILL be saved: LordvSatan5.htm#Lake.

For those of you interested in No Soul Life in Womb, see Caveat4.htm, which has the Prolife Blasphemy videos here in Youtube, plus the larger Divine Justice Issue explanation for why God chooses to personally create each soul at birth, never before.

Re Hell's Existence, Reply to BenJoiner

Subscribe to this guy? His video, which I suggest you fully watch first, is here: • Why does God send people to Hell?

My video here merely comments on his. I don't know his theology, and it doesn't matter. What matters, is that he is a THINKING Christian, so he demonstrates what constitutes the spiritual life, learning and living on BIBLE.

We all learn to GET it right by means of 'practicing righteousness', 1John's theme. Can't practice righteousness if not practicing Bible. Can't practice righteousness if not using 1John1:9. So whatever your beliefs or denomination, if you are practicing BIBLE, then God will gradually correct you where wrong, and advance you where right, and it's an INTIMATE relationship: just God, just you.

All that, Ben amply demonstrates, here. Hence the shoutout. Thank you, Ben, for sending this video to me.

I only differ with him on whether one CAN get out of hell, based on the Greek of 2Peter 3:9, and his own use of 2Thess 1:9, which Greek never says anyone is STUCK in hell. But yes, hell lasts forever, Matt 25:41. Why? Because people love shaking their fists at God, see last half of Luke 16. So the real danger of never believing, is that you become addicted to shaking your fist at God, even after you are SURE He exists and WHO He is! Yikes!

This is a CONCLUSION, and if you've proof against it, I'd like to hear your proof. The conclusion is threshed out in my LordvSatan5.htm#Lake.

Why unbelievers can GET OUT of Hell, Part 1

Followup exegetical video to Ben Joiner reply video, because I should document from BIBLE, why I conclude the unbeliever can not only get OUT of hell, but out of the Lake of Fire: which thus means God is ONLY loving, if Hell can last forever (so no one is EVER denied the chance to believe). See what you think of the exegesis, k?

Webpage on this topic, if you prefer to read the logical analysis based on GOD'S NATURE, without exegesis: LordvSatan5.htm#Lake. These videos (Parts 1 and 2) will eventually be posted there.

Criticism is always welcome, but DO YOUR HOMEWORK. The only thing I ever censure, is lack of homework. Censure, not censor. :)

Distance from God

My first webcam. Voice inspired by GEERUP's "godless guy"

Gist: as close as you want to be to God, that's how close He'll MAKE you become, even as He MADE the Humanity of Christ become "the Way, the Truth, and the Life". Closeness is a THINKING thing, not works, ritual, being nice to people.

Think of the dutiful wife who prides herself on keeping the house — but doesn't have rapport with her husband. Then how close is she, really? Not at all. Think of "Martha" in the Gospels.

So then, we're all voting how close and to what: if we pick works, we INTERPOSE them between ourselves and God, and are close to our works.. but not, to God. Same with anything else: our rituals, translations, even pride in knowing the original languages — so we are close to those things.. but NOT, to God.

Learning and living on God's Thoughts — aka, the Bible — is how you get close to God. Not, so you can spout off Bible or many geeky facts about the exegesis — but to KNOW Him. Christ knew God totally, and that's what He wanted from Life. Even, to the point of knowing sin by being imputed with it all, since obviously Omniscient God, knows sin, 2Cor5:21. So now He's the Head, Hebrews 1.

So the objective is to get HIS Head in Our Heads, Greek of 1Cor1:5, 1Cor12:31 (oh how witty), which begins 1Cor13. LOVE is His Head, there. Love=Word. Shared thinking. Rapport.

Your choice and my choice, how much of that, we want.

Family is related. You are saved that first nanosecond you believed in Christ. But how DISTANT in the family, will you be? As distant as you choose, by what you INTERPOSE between God and you. First Commandment leaves NO room for anything in between. But you can insert stuff. And to the extent you do, you're electing DISTANCE. Saved, but oh so far away...

Connecting to God

Flipside of "Distance from God": God will connect to YOU in every way. So WHATEVER you believe now, He'll connect to you there. After all, if He doesn't connect to you, you have no way to see Him or get corrected on whatever your beliefs, are.

Flipside of that: even if all your beliefs are correct, if you're not connected to God you're nothing, 1Cor13:3. So use 1Jn1:9 like breathing, and don't worry how you compare to anyone else. As far as God is concerned, you're just as good as His Son, John 3:16+2Cor5:21. Everything else, is HIS work upon you, clever Greek of Ephesians 2:10 (ionic dative of epi, since Paul uses Ephesians to tweak the play "Ion" by Euripides).

Camera's mottled special effect ('posterize') is designed to convey how we are all mottled-up in our ideas of God. :)

God's Inheritance for Atheists

Sorry I'm so upset in this video. Every Christian finds certain Bible doctrines upsetting. This one, gets to me. If I must make videos on how others are negative to God, then I should post this video showing where I'm negative, too.

This doctrine is now impossible for me to deny, but very hard for me to accept. If I don't get past it, I will not complete maturation, and will be embarrassed at the Rapture. So, see: every one of us has a problem with something in Bible. Don't just blame the Catholics, Calvinists, KJV-only people, any-denomination-here. Find your own problems in Word, use 1Jn1:9, and keep on keeping on like Paul counseled, in Philippians 3:13-14.

Paul was negative to not being able to 'share' with the Jews, and it almost killed him, per his own confession in Acts 22. So we're not exempt, either.

Who will deliver us from these bodies of death? Read Romans 7, then Romans 8!

Bible re Atheism

Aren't you tired of the Christian vs. Atheist debates? I sure am. Over the years I've heard both sides. On each side there are rational folks. On each side there are ranters.

Bible is between both sides. So in this video, 26 years of my pastor's teaching on the topic is concisely presented. Sources are listed at video end. His teaching is freely available on MP3 (they never ask for money), and the 1977 (four-year long) Romans exegesis (verse-by-verse) is most on-topic. I went through all 26 years, though now I can read Bible in the original-language texts for myself and see the same thing.

Upshot: 1. Bible depicts unbelievers as MORAL. 2. Bible blames BELIEVERS, not unbelievers, for what goes wrong in the world. 3. Bible depicts sin as a NATURE, an illness of a genetic predisposition to reject God. Sins we commit are but symptoms. So 4. We have A., a Medical Problem and B., a Legal Inheritance Problem, both of which require CONSENT to correct/inherit. For, as beneficiaries of this life to which we did NOT consent, we have the Legal Right to REFUSE. Notice how the true legal issues are unlike what's touted in Christianity. (Bible uses medical and legal inheritance terminology which is generally fuzzed over in translation.)

So Belief in Christ isn't some meanie trying to get you to be his slave. It's a legal CONSENT or REJECTION of Rights unilaterally granted you before you had a say in the matter. So, Unbelief is REFUSAL to take what is granted. So you must take responsibility for your own refusal, since you didn't have to earn becoming a beneficiary. Now you also know why Bible says anyone of insufficient age (below "age of accountability") is automatically SAVED (lives in heaven forever).

Same inheritance rules continue in even secular law, so use that as your analogy to the above, i.e., beneficiaries have the right to "elect against the [testamentary] will.", beneficiary who is incompetent to refuse, gets the inheritance, etc. Here, the Testator is Jesus the Christ, and the beneficiaries are the entire human race, Eph1. (Calvinists are wrong about their doctrine of election; Bible's is TWO-pronged, TWO sets of escrowed beneficiaries, Ephesians 1.)

God took Responsibility for Creating your Freedom: He contracted for the Cross in Eternity Past, and paid for your inheritance, then Willed it to you (theme of Isaiah 53, Ephesians 1 and Hebrews 9). So the question is, do you accept or elect against the Will? Your choice. God already made His.

Why We're Not Atheists

I really like videos put out by ReligionIsACrutch, an atheist Youtuber group. They did one called "The Price of Faith" which raised a lot of good points.

Here's their link: • The Price of Faith: Introduction

In a way, this video was inspired by theirs. It's not a 'response' or an attempt to debate. Yet flipside of the argument coin, maybe...

If we don't AUDIT what we believe, we are being incredibly silly. If atheist, why? If Christian, why? Many choose atheism to rebel against society. So too, many become Christian or convert to Islam, to rebel. Or, one picks a faith to be popular with his group. We will tell ourselves we are objective, of course. But are we?

One big justification we use, is CONSENSUS. Evolution is accepted in the name of so much 'scientific' consensus on it. Ok, by that same premise, one should the more accept theism (which evolution never precludes, as it's based on cause-and-effect).

Ok, um.. theistic consensus way outnumbers atheistic, historically. For 1000s of years, billions have worshipped one idea of 'god' or another. We differ vastly and even violently over what DEFINITION of "god" is true; but we never differ over WHETHER there is "god". Because, WE KNOW "god" exists. That's why we keep believing.

Now, since "god" by definition must be unseen (especially if Infinite in Nature), then evidence of Him would not be see-able to outsiders, since Unseen communicates to unseen: to the soul. Man has a soul. You cannot read thought biologically. So something UNseen controls biology, even as unseen truths (laws) control the universe; unseen math uniquely demonstrates the unseen. Math is immaterial, but real. Truth is immaterial, but real. And the material, is impacted by it. So that's the closest one comes to realizing via what you can see, that there is something you can't see which is likewise real. It warrants investigation.

Now, pretend there is a god — which is logical, as the consensus is overwhelming both in numbers of witnesses and in durability (time length) of that witness — pretend god exists: wouldn't it stand to reason that there is an afterlife? To which one goes, to be with this god? The question warrants investigation.

So Why are We not Atheists? For the simple reason that we all immaterially SEE God. Via our immaterial souls. We clearly don't see Him equally, we differ a lot on particulars; but so do any mass of witnesses to an event. I bet you couldn't get two people to exactly agree on the events of 9/11. But everyone would admit that 2 planes flew into the Twin Towers. They would likely disagree on most everything else, as any purview of the Youtube videos re 9/11, will show. So: the number of witnesses to "god" is billions of times greater, thousands of years LONGER, than witnesses to 9/11. So it will be more varied, especially if "god" reveals himself progressively (as Bible contends).

In a courtroom witnesses establish evidence. We theists are witnesses. Now, what upsets atheists is that they can't validate how this 'seeing' occurs. It is supernatural. But like truth and math, it has visible effects (i.e., we believe).

So here's an example: moi. Christians are SUPPOSED to live supernatural lives 24/7, says John 14:26. That is, Spirit teaches you Bible and recalls to your mind past Bible taught.

This function happens to me 24/7. I don't recall memorizing a verse since childhood (Lord's Prayer, Ps23, etc). So in this video, I wanted to find the "tumbleweed" verse, but couldn't. For I couldn't recall the Hebrew, I only vaguely remembered it was in Jeremiah. So I couldn't search it in BibleWorks. Since no English Bible uses "tumbleweed", I couldn't search it, either. I was about to give up, when "Jeremiah 17:6" sprang to mind. So I checked — and yes, that's the verse. Now for the punchline: I heard that verse taught only once by my pastor, maybe 15-20 years ago. He used "tumbleweed" as the translation (Published Bibles say "bush", typical fuzz job, blecch).

See? That kind of supernaturality happens to me all day; I have no memory and even less patience. Other Christians have their own stories. We will restrict our stories to the prosaic, as we don't want to talk about the rest, the weird stuff we all experience.

So you the atheist, have to hotline it to "God", and ASK for the proof you need. For Unseen God, proves Himself to you individually. Via His Word, and to your soul. That's the best thing to do: just ask, "God, are you 'up there'?" If you want an answer, you'll get one. Else, He will leave you alone until you're ready. Don't wait too long.

Why I'm no Atheist

This is the complement to "Bible re Atheism", personal side. I disbelieve in evolution because it's a stupid theory, not because I'm Christian. (Lots of Christians believe in evolution.) The rest of the story is in the video, and at the end you'll find my top-10 listing of Stupid Atheist Arguments (SAA's), to answer those who wonder why I won't argue with atheists.

I wrote about evolution in my webpages: Godevol.html is the nice and short version about what's wrong with the theory. A more ranty version (which also talks about unified field theory) is Evolshort.htm .

Why I'm no Evolutionist

Elaboration on evolution section in "Why I'm No Atheist" video

  1. Adaptation is NOT Evolution. No Christian has a problem with Adaptation, since God decreed it in Genesis 1:25 (shown in video). Evolution is NOT Adaptation, but a claim that an organism can become a SUPERIOR BEING, like claiming an amoeba can become a fish, rather than staying an amoeba. Amoebas can become superior AMOEBAs, but not a superior being to itself.

    2. Evolution claims man came from ape-like ANIMALS. That's impossible, and in fact back in 1919, some guy who wanted to prove how stupid evilution was, went to considerable expense to find a MEDIEVAL human skull and a MEDIEVAL ape jaw, then forged them together, and presented the 'find' as the 'missing link'. It was known as "Piltdown Man", and fooled the stupid evolutionists until 1953.

    THAT is evolution's claim, of TRANSmutation, not simply mutation.

    Interwoven in I. is a demonstration that what Christians think about the age of the earth and their debates with evolutionists, are ALSO wrong. Bible doesn't say how old the earth is. Might be young, might not be young.

    Pangea is a concept in geology. It posits the breakup of the continents, to get to the explanation of "continental drift". So that the earth could be covered in water is not a concept restricted to the Bible. But how long ago that was, no one can say.

    A potato can be microwaved in nine minutes, and is cooked. Or, it can be baked in an hour. It's cooked, either way. Gestation periods and mechanics are not like the timing of life post-birth. So you cannot look at the universe post-birth and presume that the timing applicable post-birth, applied pre-birth. Maybe it did, but you really don't know, and since nothing else works that way, you have some reason to doubt it. That's why the steady-state universe positors, the multiple-universe positers, and the big-bangers all argue with each other. YOU DON'T KNOW, really, how old the earth is. Might be young. Might be 4.5 billion years old. It's all GUESSING.

    Bible begins dating with the FALL of Adam, not before. Young-earth Christians get that idea not from Bible, but from an ancient bishop named Ussher (you can Google the name for more info). Ussher misread Genesis 5 as beginning with initial creation. (Bible doesn't say Adam died when he was 930 years old, but rather when he had lived POST-FALL for 930 years. God didn't start numbering Adam's days until Genesis 3:22, the Fall.)

    Moreover, Adam was a biologist, not a hunter-gatherer. Cain built a city. So we are talking CIVILIZED MAN, and anything posited prior, had no SOUL. For Bible defines "man" as having a soul. Video covers this stuff in brief, and of course you can read it in the Bible for yourself, if inclined.

    The FALL occurred in 4106BC. I did a timeline on it, in GeneYrs.xls which only uses the Bible for dating (not astronomical charts, not outside sources).

  2. No set can contain itself is NOT Russell's Paradox, which is about multiple subsets. This is different.

    3. In order for existence to occur at all, there must be an INDEPENDENT TRUTH which 'contains' reality. This TRUTH must also 'contain' all potentials and NON-potentials, and for each, have RULES for their occurrence or probability. Else POSSIBILITY could not ever exist. So TRUTH must be INFINITE STASIS, always-existing, never itself changing. What's INSIDE it would be constantly changing according to the 'laws' of that Truth. Else there is no existence. So the largest set is Truth itself, whatever that Truth, is.

    Thus the arguments that Truth can only be relative, are all stupid. For no relative can exist absent some ABSOLUTE which 'contains' the rest.

    Now, whether "God" is Truth, is a separate issue. However, if PERSONHOOD exists, then the TRUTH is that PERSONHOOD is part of Truth itself, so TRUTH must itself BE a Person. Which has to mean, INFINITE Person.

    That still leaves many questions, and of itself doesn't prove the God of the Bible. But at least it accounts for everything. Which after all, is what a theory is supposed to do, ACCOUNT for all it purveys.

    Notice you didn't need any holy book to deduce all this. :)

Drinking Evolution? Try a glass of logic...

NO SET CAN CONTAIN ITSELF. YOU ARE A PERSON. Therefore 'personhood' must be an attribute of WHOever made you. So the ultimate Set has to be a Person, containing all other sets (attributes and their permutations). So there has to be, God.

But which one? Well, to get proof of that, ask the ceiling. It's a personal journey no one can make, but you.

Correcting Evolution

How to fix evolutionary 'theory' so that it begins to make sense, so that it at least holds together as a logical hypothesis. As is, it doesn't hang together. The correction is simple, reinstates an old solution used for millennia by theists and non-theists alike.

Webpages on this topic I wrote about six years ago are: Godevol.html and Evolshort.htm.

PLEASE NOTE: the OLD Darwinian term for "micro evolution" was "Adaptation", and I use that in the video. There is no quarrel with microevolution aka Adaptation, it's been known and used since time began, in agriculture and breeding, and is already stated in Genesis 1:26 (decree) and Genesis 6 (decree of two animals per 'kind').

So the quarrel is with "macro evolution", which used to be termed simply "evolution" or "transmutation" in Darwin's works. So I use the older terms in the video.

Macro evolution aka transmutation or evolution suffers from the same limitations as did Newtonian physics. So you cannot use Adaptation and then just blithely assert it applies across the board from the origin of life onward, no more than you could claim Newtonian physics explains all physics. So evolutionary 'theory' is but a hypothesis and needs an Einstein to fix it.

The video restores the proper three-pronged premise for such a fix, to the original "life", "matter", "energy" tripod of elements which the ancients have long recognized. Notice you don't need to use god words, and you can concede intelligent design (because even a life force would demonstrate intelligence of design). Then everyone can severally define "life", the non-theists as they determine, and the theists as they determine; you don't need to complicate the issue by introducing creationism into the classroom (i.e., to avoid deciding WHICH VERSION of creationism to teach).

Finally, schools and not Federal Law, should determine what should be taught in any given school in the US, since our culture is so widely diverse on this topic.

Apology to Atheists

Thursday Bible class hit me right between the eyes. I've been remiss! I didn't realize that relativism was such a hurdle for atheists. Okay, there is a fast way to cut through all the mess: ask GOD. Obviously if there's no God you'll get no answer. But if there is one, you will, and it will be INTIMATE, a connecting-of-the-dots like in the movie Signs with Mel Gibson (where at the end of the movie he finally notices all the connections God was making, all along).

IT'S OKAY TO DOUBT, BE ANGRY, ETC. YOU NEED DIRECT PROOF FROM GOD HIMSELF. That's what He wants to provide. But if you don't ask for it, then He won't provide it. He won't tread on your volition.

Example: I got pissed off at God and threw my car keys INSIDE my car. Small Ford Escort. Do you think I could find those keys, though nothing else was in the car at the time? NO. For 45 minutes I fumed at God and then finally wore out, and then used 1Jn1:9 (I live on that verse) — and then, immediately found the keys. They were in the passenger seat, between the seatback and the seat. I had already looked there many times during the 45 minutes.

See? The mind has to be READY and want an answer. Then it comes. Welcome to the human race.

Bible re Slavery, 1

Response to this video on slavery in Bible, • Video (video as of 2024 is gone)

This segment deals with the Bible's THEME, that we are all enslaved, whether we consider ourselves our own masters, or not. So quite a bit about slavery is in the Bible, and it's often read out of context. Even so, God DID allow humans to practice slavery, but there were CONDITIONS, i.e., you had to treat the slaves well.

TheAtheistExperience, which is in the linked video above, didn't go through that criterion in Bible, but just decreed that slavery of any kind is wrong. So the chapter referenced in the linked video, shows in this video here, so you can see the context.

Mind you, I'm not trying to advocate slavery. In fact, this issue is a big problem for me in my spiritual life, as this video will explain. So you'll see, I'm not trying to convince you, but instead am interested only in explaining some of the issues involved. We all have to vote on this SLAVERY issue, for it is the main theme of the Bible, the raison d'etre for the Bible's SALVATION message (salvation from SLAVERY, in full context).

The Isaiah 53 passage in corrected translation, short video: • Learn Isaiah 53 in Hebrew. A full explanation takes many hours, and begins with Psalm 90, not Isaiah 53. See my Psalm 90 playlist.

Bible re Slavery, 3 (end) : Is Slavery EVER moral?

Bible condones 'legal' slavery, condemns 'illegal' slavery, and condemns certain practices even in 'legal' slavery, Exodus 21. Here we go through what those types of slavery ARE, and you decide which is and is not, moral. I state my own position at the beginning of this audio, but then set my position aside for the rest of the audio, to explain the issues on both sides. So historically, which you can verify with any sources you like,

  1. 'Legal' slavery is a VOLUNTARY CONTRACT between the person wanting to become a slave, and the putative slave owner, in return for certain things the owner will pay or do. Modern-day equivalent of this, is 'employment contract'. So Bible calls this, 'legal'. Even so, Exodus 21 (Mosaic Law) specifies certain contractural provisions which were NOT legal for Israel to do, and God would punish her for violating. The legal thinking is in the whole chapter, so you have to read it all, to understand how 'legal' slavery was viewed.
  2. Another form of slavery was INVOLUNTARY, but was a contract made between two polities, prior to a war; or, parents selling their children; or, a slaveowner selling his already-owned, slaves. The victorious side would win all the people and property of the vanquished side, and that meant everyone in the vanquished side could be sold as slaves. So it's 'involuntary', in the sense that you aren't making a personal contract, but instead one is made for you, simply because you belong to the vanquished group. This too was regarded as 'legal' in the Bible, and subject to the same rules as in Exodus 21 (and elsewhere), for voluntary contracts.
  3. The third form of slavery was INVOLUNTARY and a crime: Exodus 21:16, a KIDNAPPER sells the person kidnapped, into slavery. This is the kind of slavery we moderns know from the 17th century onward. So instead of reading Bible properly, we ASSume that the ONLY meaning to slavery in the Bible, is this kind. Ooops. Our bad. Our, meaning atheists and Christians alike, proving none of us actually care to STUDY the Bible we so vociferously debate!

Next moral question, is the issue of how you TREAT a slave. If a slave is treated better than if he were free; even if initially involuntary slavery or even if a crime, what are the moral issues then? Video closes with that question.

Cultivating Doubt

Followup video to 'Why We Differ', on how to keep auditing one's beliefs and premises. For the key to sanity, finding truth, is to cultivate doubt, like you would a garden. Just the opposite of what typical APOSTATE Christianity wants: see the videos showing aside this one, for the typical apostate contention that you should fight doubt. What nonsense: doubt isn't a threat, it's an opportunity. So you should CULTIVATE doubt, like you'd want to grow money. For doubt is an agent of growth!

So how do you cultivate doubt? FACE IT. Touch it, taste it, embrace it, wallow in it. Most often, this takes the form of confronting what you hate, which to the apostate mind looks like fighting. But Christ didn't fight sins on the Cross, He RECEIVED them. Ooops. Apostate Christianity doesn't understand the mechanics of the Cross, treating it like a fight. No, just the opposite, Isaiah 53:11.

So here I explain how I do that to myself, but it takes me 17 minutes to even introduce the subject, sorry. So just watch the last 10 minutes, if you only want to know how I cultivate doubt in myself. Or skip the last 10 minutes, if you only want to think about the subject in general.

Why We Differ

over God, Bible, hair gel...

I was just talking with God over this problem, trying to figure it out. Video summarizes what I just learned. Maybe it will help you, too. Basic answer is this: we CHOOSE how to VIEW everything with a hierarchy of values we develop in the crib, irrespective of the facts, and then get to the point where we WON'T be able to READ the facts, due to our highest values. For example, if your highest value you chose to embrace was 'family', EVERYTHING you do, think, read, will be INTERPRETED through that 'lens'. So you eventually become unable to see any facts which contradict that 'lens', because you won't want to change the lens.

So you technically remain forever able to change, but won't. That scares me. That's why AUDITING BELIEFS is the theme of my channel.

Cafeeine, an Agnostic/Atheist you should not emulate.

SOME (but not all) Atheists, like King James Onlyists, resort to some pretty cheeky twisting of what people and Bible say, to make their arguments. Here, it's the old saw that non-thinking atheists use, the FAKE idea that 'faith' is ipse irrational. So Truthdebate did a video about this misdefinition of faith, which two atheists found objectionable (here: http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v... ).

One of them, named Cafeeine, was so dishonest or incompetent, I had to make a video showcasing him. Like the King James Onlyists, he pretends to a competence in Greek he demonstrably lacks. Video shows how. Related playlist where I prove the accuracy of my translation in my comment to him, is • b-out Hebrews 11:1 Exeg. He didn't even watch it, but instead just replied only 11 minutes after my post. (Playlist is 97 minutes long.) So he doesn't do his homework. This too, is typical of the non-thinking atheist or King James Onlyist.

Upshot: If you're an atheist, well and good. You don't need to justify your faith that there is no God. But for God's Sake, DO your homework, and DON'T pretend to knowledge you don't have, and DON'T twist what Bible or others say. For there will be some other brainout around, to catch you.

The Ultimate Reason for Atheism

When the atheist can't say that Bible contradicts science because Bible itself doesn't claim young earth and God decrees evolution (in some form) via Genesis 1:24; when the atheist realizes that all the claims of Bible contradiction have long been answered to prove there are none (in the original-language manuscripts) — what reason remains for atheism? Well, here I answer that question. See what you think.

This video provides the strongest pro-atheism argument I know of. And it's a pistol, based on 2Cor10:5.

Berlinski's 'The Devil's Delusion' read aloud

Page 6 read aloud, on how prominent 'scientist' atheists are dogmatic and religious about 'science'. You gotta get this book, just for the sheer refreshing writing style! I got it for maybe $8 on Kindle for PC at Amazon: The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions Paperback – September 22, 2009

Berlinski's own discussion of his book is thankfully over an hour long, here: • Video (video is gone as of 2024)

I didn't realize 'prominent' atheists were so religious. I didn't know they are on a quest to CLAIM science and religion are antithetical. That's novel, and fallacious. In the first place, all science started with religious people; secondly, no religion talks much about science, certainly not enough to contradict it (i.e., Genesis 1:24 is easily read as God's Decree for evolution).

So this portion of the atheist movement is dangerous, as it seeks to make science INTO a religion, just as Carl Jung warned. Of course, not all atheists buy into this nonsense. At least, not the smart ones. But here we see in print and in their own words, the RELIGIOUS SCAM perpetrated by the leaders. And true science suffers, as a result.

Be an atheist, but don't be like the guys quoted on this page. Be a Christian or whatever, but don't be like the guys quoted on this page. They are fanatics.

My book review is here:

source: https://www.amazon.com/review/R1D3NNLM64ZQCY/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0465019374&linkCode&nodeID&tag

brainout
4.0 out of 5 stars Brilliance that demands you do your homework
Reviewed in the United States on September 11, 2013
Verified Purchase
This review covers the Kindle for PC edition.

Since Dr. Berlinski has an eclectic grasp of many disciplines, his threaded commentary here will either delight or bore you. Delight, if you understand what he's talking about. Bore or annoy, if you don't. And if you don't, you are challenged to look up many of the citations, in order to learn what he means. He doesn't dumb it down. That would ruin thought flow.

Don't get this book if you're looking for a systematic explanation of the rebuttal to neo-Darwinianism: do get it, if you are already familiar enough with both Darwin and the neo-Darwinian religification of science by Dawkins and his ilk. Else, Berlinkski's response and especially his deft satire, will elude you.

Also, don't get this book if you think it will justify your faith in Christianity. It won't. If, however, you're open enough to realize there are significant problems in 'accounting for' the Christian faith, then yes this book will help you ferret out the issues. For Dr. Berlinski is not trying to justify one side or the other; he provides substantial objections to both sides; rather, he fleshes out the issues ON both sides which he feels are inadequately answered. That, is the value of this book: defining the problems; and, offering ideas on how to further instead, true scientific inquiry.

He's a classicist. The book seems to ramble, but only in the sense of hitting at key PREMISE targets across a wide range of disciplines with which he's fluently familiar. His discourse is big-picture. He shoots down the underlying premises of each argument fundamental to the Dawkins crowd, but across a plain of intersecting scientific fields. This approach is taken, for in debate if you can shoot down the PREMISE, you shoot down all the corollary arguments and 'proofs'. (Same structure, in Bible's Matthew 4.)

It helps you follow Berlinski's train of argumentation, if you understand something of cosmology, physics, and probability theory, because he fluidly interweaves these fields to show how the atheist 'cause' has infected them. Yes, infected. For he's trying to demonstrate the danger that science has become religified in an intense effort to deny the existence of God. Not, that he himself believes in God either, but that to bend science to a religious goal, is ipse bad. For the religious goal, stultifies scientific inquiry and discovery.

For that reason, you'll also need to be familiar with Abrahamic religions, because his writing style employs the deft word economy in Bible, Koran. In ancient times, explanations were memorized, so the words were mere SEEDS you watered while picking crops or weaving threads. So Berlinski writes leaving much unsaid, expecting you to finish the thought for yourself.

Finally, it amazes me that the negative reviews on this book expected Dr. Berlinski be on a 'side'. One person was so uninformed, he thought Berlinski a spokesman for Christians, never mind at the book's outset, you find out instead he's a secular Jew. Oh well.

Of course, if anyone bothered to look at it, the Bible never says how old earth is but yes the RESTORATION of it at some non-specified past moment took six literal days, intentionally a miracle; and, it says that God decreed evolution, except that He would make man directly, a daily miracle repeated thousands of times: individually, at birth (Genesis 1:24-25 contrasted with verse 26-27 and elaborated on in Gen 2:7). Ooops.

God after all is supernatural by nature, doing what is natural for Him, by His Own Choosing. Here, a choosing that enables 'creation' to go its own way, but for man, an Individual Sovereign choice to 'father' directly. So 'man' is immaterial, essentially; hence our ability to think, which the rest of creation, does not share. That's the Bible's story, which everyone ignores. So billions of dollars on both sides in the alleged Bible versus evolution debate, have been wasted. Neither the atheists promulgating Darwinianism, nor the Christians trying to combat it, bothered to look at The Book they are debating.

Berlinski did look at Bible, but sauvely avoids mention of these obvious passages. For he's not trying to debate the issue. Rather, the point of his book is stated in the title, about atheism's scientific pretensions — emphasis on pretensions. In quick order he demolishes the pretensions. That's it. He offers no alternative pretensions, but rather argues for the restoration of true scientific inquiry based on evidence, no matter where it might lead. And where that might lead, he doesn't know. Nor does he pretend to know. His candor is refreshing.

For me, his best chapter (and it's hard to pick a favorite, the guy writes so lucidly), is Chapter 7, where in a few words he proves how unscientific and downright stupid, Dawkins is. 'God is improbable', Dawkins says, using as his takeoff point, the mantra that the universe is improbable. Dawkins' logic is sadly lacking: he's claiming that since the universe is improbable, God who allegedly made it, is more improbable. So because God is improbable, He doesn't exist.

Really? This is what passes for Dawkins 'proof'? You realize what he's saying, right? God is only provably God, if he is NOT God. For Dawkins' definition of 'god', is someone SUBJECT to the 'laws of nature' as Dawkins defines them. So unless 'god' proves to be 'subject' to the 'laws of nature' and thus provable BY those same laws, 'god does not exist'. Which, of course, means that 'god' cannot be GOD who is above nature. Which, of course, now cut down to Dawkins' size, would make 'god' require progenitors, himself. So in Dawkins' 'logic', A=NOT A. Ooops.

No sane logician in the world would argue like that, unless he wants to be laughed at. See, the very definition 'God' tells you that the Being is BEYOND NATURAL PHENOMENA. Six-day literal restoration of the earth was a MIRACLE. Your birth, a miracle, for your soul was directly made by God and imputed to what became your body when it exited your mother's womb. So what distinguishes you from the hunters and gatherers (for Bible never says 'man' was anything other than civilized), is that you have a SOUL. So those alleged hunters and gatherers were themselves animals; or, were degenerated humans. Not, 'evolved', but 'devolved'. Bible spends a lot of time on human DEvolution, i.e., 'brute beasts' quote in Peter.

Back to God. To advertise Himself to you, He does miracles, as noted above. So, the Bible records them, for you to mull over. The loaves and fishes, a miracle. The Noahic flood, a miracle (even though God used the waters under the earth, not the rain, to create a Pangea-like bathtub for up to a year). Walls of Jericho, a miracle. Before that the plagues in Egypt, 10 miracles. Because, God is ABOVE NATURE, so can do what He wants, doesn't have to obey any laws. So if Dawkins is this dumb about logic and the definition of 'God' — he's too dumb to live.

See: if God only did stuff you could explain NATURALLY, then you'd not know it was God doing it. So of course He's going to do stuff that defies nature (hence IMPROBABLE), so you know He exists. Isn't that what every atheist is demanding, physical evidence of God? Well, look no further than your ability to think and reason, because it's NOT biological. Brain doesn't generate thought, but is acted on BY thought; which, no one can find under any microscope.

And in point of fact, every miracle in the Bible that leaves a trace in history, has been found. We find sea animal fossils on the tops of mountains (Flood or original restoration evidence); we find the walls of Jericho which shouldn't have fallen down. We found Babylon (which for centuries no one knew existed, outside Scripture). We found evidence of the plagues and the Greeks renamed the Sea, 'Red'. (Some years back, I wrote Exodate.htm to explain the Exodus evidence further.) Every day new archeological evidence tying back to those old times, is found. Some think they've found Sinai, recently.

So the 'evidence of God' in the NATURAL world, would BE the 'improbability', itself. Duh. For if it's 'impossible' to happen naturally, that bespeaks a SUPERNATURAL origin. Duh. For this is true logic: if A exists, then -A exists, as any mathematician can tell you. Law of Opposites. Or as Shakespeare put it, 'by indirections, find directions out.' Yeah.

So OF COURSE it's improbable the universe would NATURALLY exist, no set of proteins or other chemicals can randomly result in it, so far as we can test. Duh. And science cannot explain how the universe came to exist WITHOUT some Supernatural Starter; whether one posits a Landscape always there, or the Big Bang universe of conventional science. That's why the 'God' argument is so compelling to even the simplest logic. Dawkins has no ability to reason, clearly. So of course he's not 'scientific', either. He's an embarrassment, to the scientific community!

Honestly, if you are an atheist, keep your atheism but flee Dawkins like the fool he is. If you are agnostic and want proof of God, 'ask the ceiling', for only if you get DIRECT CONTACT from God, should you believe IN Him. That's the essence of science: empirical testing. Here, for the Supernatural and Immaterial, hence you must 'ask the ceiling' for proof which 'interprets' what you can see and hear, for its origins. No other sane, logical, scientific way to test for the existence of, what's BEYOND nature.

Berlinski thus dimisses Dawkins in very few words, satire dripping from each of them. Well done. Even so, Berlinski doesn't advocate anything I wrote above (paragraphs beginning with 'Really?' to ending with 'BEYOND nature'). His focus is merely to show that Dawkins is not scientific, and neither are the other atheists who are using 'science' to instead promote their agendas.

Enfin, the book is worth much more than four stars, but it's annoying to use the latest version of Kindle for PC: I've made several videos in Youtube on the book (within 10 days of the review, all in my Youtube 'b-out Atheism' playlist toward the end) — so you can see how the Kindle edition works. Hence four stars.

Is God Desirable? Part 1 of 3

Still on Berlinski's book The Devil's Delusion, here page 150. This video is in two parts, with a PostScript. In this part, Dawkins' argument that God does not exist because it's improbable that nature could create Him, is debunked for the nonsense that it is. Berlinkski debunks Dawkins differently from what I'm saying in this video, because I'm introducing a higher logic test for God's existence than I see in either Dawkins or Berlinski's argument. But first Dawkins must be shot down.

Part 2 will cover Berlinski's argument (which begins in his Chapter 4, not Chapter 2; I misstated the beginning point at about 16:00 of Part I, this video) — and the introduction of what should be more debated, the DESIRABILITY of God, as a test for God's Existence. Because, man has moral values for something HIGHER than mere survival. Those values are DESIRES, and they empirically exist, yet non-human existence is not preoccupied with those questions. So where do our DESIRES come from? That too must be tested, and you can't do it from mere facts; you have to use reason ON the facts.

Is God Desirable? Part 2 of 3

I don't think 'necessary' matters, because it's true or not that God (or the universe) exists, whether necessary or not. Even if necessary, that doesn't mean RIGHT or GOOD or DESIRABLE. In short, many things exist which are necessary but unpleasant and even unjust. But if God exists, then Justice must exist. That, is a DESIRABILITY requirement. Only man insists on justice as a motive for LIVING. Nature is demonstrably unjust, so then if God who made nature exists, God's Own Nature comes into question.

The question of God's Nature as an issue, Berlinski notes on page 139 of his book, penultimate paragraph (which I was trying to find, at 15:45 of this video). But he leaves the question for the reader, to ponder. He started using Aquinas' 'necessary' postulate, in Chapter 4 (not Chapter 2 as I misstated at 1:39 or so in this video).

So beginning at 8 minutes, I introduce what should be more debated, the DESIRABILITY of God, as an empirical test for God's Existence. Because, man has moral values for something HIGHER than mere survival. Those values are DESIRES, and they empirically exist, yet non-human existence is not preoccupied with those questions. So where do our DESIRES come from? That too must be tested, and you can't do it from mere facts; you have to use reason ON the facts. I don't propose how to do that, beyond positing that one should list what characteristics in 'God' are DESIRABLE, and then testing those characteristics for their REFLECTION in the natural universe you see. Then you'd adjust either the characteristics or your view of the natural universe, if there are contradictions between the two. For if God exists, there will be NO contradiction between what you can see, and the characteristics of 'God'. Thus ends Part 2.

Back in Part I, Dawkins' argument that God does not exist because it's improbable that nature could create Him, is debunked for the nonsense that it is. Berlinkski debunks Dawkins differently from what I said in that video.

Is God Desirable? Part 3 of 3 (PostScript)

Audio only, finishing off Part 2 (here: • Is God Desirable? Part 2 of 3 ). With picture of this 'taxing' issue of taxonomizing God, from a desirability criterion. The ancients used to argue this way: pick a topic universally accepted as desirable as if true, then prove whether it's true or not. That's what I propose here, except that we have a welter of empirical data from millions of people over thousands of years, about what constitutes 'desirability' in 'god'. What this 'god' desires, and whether and why we desire 'him'. From this welter of facts about how people conceive the character and attractiveness of 'god', you can deduce much.

So you can indeed test for God's Existence, by first discovering God's Desirability or His Own Desires, HYPOTHETICALLY. Same analysis process as theoretical math, but since the topic is God, the process is instead usually classified as philosophical.

So you first determine how God 'should' be, then look out at nature and see if those characteristics are reflected. If God really exists, there should be harmony between the characteristics and the natural world. To the extent disharmony, then either what you think you see is incorrect, or the characteristics are incorrect, so then you can revise either end of the 'hypothesis'.

Again, this is done in math all the time, which is the only science that can hypothesize based on the unseen. Philosophy is supposed to work like math, but often doesn't. So here the objective is to be more scientific, just as you'd want to be more thorough when balancing your checkbook. You won't come up with conclusive answers, but you will come up with valid avenues of inquiry. For conclusivity, you have to get direct contact from God. Just as, to actually conclusively know a city exists, you have to GO there. Same three pronged testing is required for conclusivity, in anything: DIRECT CONTACT, REASON, SUPPORTING FACTS.

Proper Moral Accounting and Berlinski's book

Followup video to Is God Desirable 3 ( • Is God Desirable? Part 3 of 3 (PostSc... ), but back to Berlinski's book (The Devil's Delusion), here pages 34-38: on the gnawing question (for him) of moral relativism versus God-Who-Can-Change-His-Mind. To me, this entire debate, which is hot between atheists and theists alike, is based on the wrong premises entirely — by both sides. So in this video I explain why.

Accounting for a belief, or for the money in your checkbook, is really the same thing. WHY WHENCE HOW WHERE: income, outgo. Until you can account from BEGINNING to END, you don't know what you've got. So you can't account for 'morals' in any definition, until you know WHY there is a universe with you in it; WHENCE that universe (and you) came from, HOW thus you are to live now, and WHERE you are going (i.e., post-death). All issues depend first, on the FACTS from A-Z.

But no atheist or anyone else for that matter, can conclusively ACCOUNT for A-Z. We're all backing into A from the middle of the alphabet, so to speak. Which means, we SUPPOSE (a form of faith) a certain 'beginning' which 'accounts' for where we are now. So to the extent that accounting is incorrect, all we conclude from it (i.e., morals) will be incorrect.

So this whole debate on morals, with the theists claiming no one can be moral unless God exists; with the atheists howling how moral they are; all of them are blind leading the blind into an IRRELEVANCY. For what's the purpose of morals, even? Why should questions of right and wrong, even BE in debate? Here's why: it's DESIRABLE to have good relations with each other. DESIRABILITY leads one to naturally want to know what is right and wrong, good and bad, so to have a happy relationship.

So now you see why the God Question is really quite pressing. God exists or not. That is not a moral question, but merely a factual one. Since God is supernatural, you cannot prove His Existence by natural means, but must 'ask the ceiling'. So pretend you do that; pretend you get the proof you need that YES He exists. Okay, but you still don't know WHAT KIND (until you get that proof too), as there are a bizillion definitions of God out there.

So to avoid wasting time, ask: what SHOULD 'God' be like? Then and only then are you in a position to determine what is right and wrong, good and bad, because now you're talking from the standpoint of DESIRABILITY, which is the foundation for morality. And if you want instead to just conclude no God exists absent 'asking the ceiling', then you'll just flounder around.

In short: the GOD question has to be answered for its factual accuracy or inaccuracy, FIRST. And the only way to get that proof, is 'ask the ceiling'. Until then, eveyrone's just whistling against the wind in all their windy morality accountings, since no one can account for the BEGINNING.

Rational Atheism

Audio only, still keying off Berlinski's 'The Devil's Delusion' book, to derive a definition of Rational Atheism. So this is a followup to the video here ( • Proper Moral Accounting and Berlinski... ).

Berlinski doesn't believe God exists, but calls himself an agnostic, meaning more properly that he doesn't KNOW if God exists. That's typical of the Rational Atheist, who understands or is willing to concede that there are four unexplained IMmaterialities:

  1. Time
  2. Life
  3. Math laws
  4. Human mind/thought/personhood/abstract morality

For centuries, folks have tried to figure out these immaterialities, whether they believed in some form of God or gods, or not. Because if God, then maybe He created these things; if no God, maybe the immaterial properties themselves, did the 'creating' of the universe as we know it. For sure, the material universe was CAUSED by something or someone(s) IMmaterial. So what are the answers?

A Rational Atheist doesn't know, and is not threatened. An irrational atheist doesn't know, but is threatened. Essentially, that's the difference. The problem here is that the latter group of atheists are trying to take over 'science' to squelch scientific inquiry into these four things, i.e., Richard Dawkins' God Delusion book restricts the universe to the material, so therefore God cannot exist (he makes God's own existence subject to the material universe, a tautology).

Science should not be religified. Every true scientist knows that. But those who need 'science' to REPLACE 'god', are trying to drown out valid scientific inquiry into the immaterial. If I understand Berlinski's book properly, it seems that he's trying to argue for science to stop trying to favor ANY side re the God question, but just proceed with the inquiry. That, of course, is a rational argument.

So if you are an atheist, wouldn't you support a return to rationalism, in science? Surely it was wrong for the popes in Galileo's day to squelch his discoveries that the earth orbited the sun in the name of their (anti-Biblical) position that the sun orbited the earth. So isn't it just as wrong, to make a scientist an outcast, if he doesn't support Darwinianism? You decide.

Rational Christianity Part 1

Audio only, still keying off Berlinski's book, 'The Devil's Delusion' (pages 34-38, and 132ff). If the Rational Atheist has the 'immaterial' conundra to admit and account for, the Rational Christian must admit to and faces, more serious accounting problems:

  1. If God is Sovereign, what's to stop Him from being 'arbitrary and capricious'?
  2. If God is merely a 'constable', with right/wrong/truth being independent of Him which He Himself 'obeys', then isn't the independent right/wrong/truth 'god', instead?
  3. If either #1 or #2, why then is evil allowed to exist? If #1, then God is to blame? And if #2 then God is incompetent?
  4. Just how is it, that all mankind's sins can be paid for on the Cross in only three hours by Someone Hanging There.. and we MERELY BELIEVE that happened, to be forever saved, no matter how we sin afterwards?
  5. Concomitant to 1-4, all this is a HUGE amount of work on God's part, to live with all our inferiority and rejection: surely we can't do anything to benefit God, that's the message of #4, in any event. So WHY would God choose to make/live with such a 'creation', essentially shackling Himself to it forever? What does that say about the Character and Competence of God?
  6. And to add insult to injury, the entire spiritual life is lived IN THE HEAD, with God communicating TO the head, unseen, which we are to AUDIT against a seen Bible everyone disputes, misuses and misinterprets? So how do we know WE are rightly interpreting both the 'communication' He directly sends, and this Bible He commands us to learn and live on? All of which, never really serves HIM, but allegedly is to benefit us?

So in this audio I walk through these issues, with only partial answers (to show how hard it is TO answer these things).

What if the neo-Darwinians were Right? Part 1

If the neo-Darwinian version of 'evolution' were actually proven and true, it would have absolutely no impact on the Bible, on the God question, or anything of that sort: because, one still can't account for how 'evolution' got started. The origin of the universe and its processes is still not explained. Birth processes are still not explained. Processes of any kind from either nothingness or an always-there Landscape/SteadyState/Multiverse/Multidimensional 'universe — none of that would be explained. For, even neo-Darwinian 'evolution' is at best explicative of 'middle data', kinda like being able to account for the balance of your checkbook at the middle of the month, but not at the BEGINNING of the month.

However, as I try to explain in this and in Part 2, neo-Darwinian 'evolution' CANNOT be true, because it violates every fundamental law of math, physics, and biology. Unfortunately, other types of propagation are lumped under the Darwinian 'roof' to make the Darwinian portion of the 'theory', seem true or even plausible. So that's why so many sadly misinformed kids in their 20's, think that they are smart to believe into what is essentially, a Peter Pan form of magic, as if scientific fact.

I really wish neo-Darwinism were true, because I've been a sci-fi fan ever since The Time Machine came out in comic book form (I was a kid, back then). Its ideas are elegant, poetic. Cute. Everything starting at one magic moment with one magic set of proteins, like magic beans. But alas, no evidence supports that.

Other ideas of 'evolution' are more supported, but on closer examination they aren't really evolution, but: mere propagation repeated over and over without the phyla really changing, or hybridization (again, phyla stay stable), or limited mutations which never rise to the TRANSmutation Darwin envisaged.

Mind you, Bible has God decreeing what can be seen as ANY kind of 'evolution', in Genesis 1:24-25, at least for sea and then land life. But not, for man. Per Bible, man isn't biological at all, but the SOUL, 'in Our Image' (meaning, God's). The body is just a house man walks in — whether that house (as David explains in Psalm 139's always mistranslated Hebrew) was initially some bent-over apelike structure, who knows. 'Dust of the ground' is poetic for organic, biological material, and only applies to the NOT human, body. The human is not human until the soul is breathed directly BY God, into the body at birth, Genesis 2:7 and about 500 other verses (which I'll eventually cover in the balance of my Prolife Blasphemy playlist).

So what if the Darwinians were right? All math, genetics, and physics would be turned upside down, in which case the underpinning of Darwinianism would have to be revisited de novo. But the God thingy? No effect at all. So don't feel threatened by the atheists who hallucinate that 'evolution' somehow proves the Bible wrong. It proves nothing regarding God, esp. in light of Genesis 1:24-25, versus 26-27 and 2:7. Sigh.

What if the neo-Darwinians were Right? Part 2

Conclusion from • What if the neo-Darwinians were Right.... If you want a longer explanation, I wrote about the problem years ago in Godevol.html.

For if the neo-Darwinian version of 'evolution' were actually proven and true, it would have absolutely no impact on the Bible, on the God question, or anything of that sort: one still can't account for how 'evolution' got started. The origin of the universe and its processes remain unexplained. Birth processes are still not explained. Processes of any kind from either nothingness or an always-there Landscape/SteadyState/Multiverse/Multidimensional 'universe — none of that would be explained. For, even neo-Darwinian 'evolution' is at best explicative of 'middle data', kinda like being able to account for the balance of your checkbook at the middle of the month, but not at the BEGINNING of the month.

So all this debate over evolution between atheists and Christians, is irrelevant to the God question, and is harmful to true and properly-secular, science. Please understand: religion sickens me. I don't want to see it taught in the classroom. Once you open that door, you can't shut it. Which religion's idea of origin do you include? Or, exclude? Yikes!

So as I try to explain, neo-Darwinian 'evolution' CANNOT be true, because it violates every fundamental law of math, physics, and biology. Unfortunately, other types of propagation are lumped under the Darwinian 'roof' to make the Darwinian portion of the 'theory', seem true or even plausible. So that's why so many sadly misinformed kids in their 20's, think that they are smart to believe into what is essentially, a Peter Pan form of magic, as if scientific fact.

I really wish neo-Darwinism were true, because I've been a sci-fi fan ever since The Time Machine came out in comic book form (I was a kid, back then). Its ideas are elegant, poetic. Cute. Everything starting at one magic moment with one magic set of proteins, like magic beans. But alas, no evidence supports that.

Other ideas of 'evolution' are more supported, but on closer examination they aren't really evolution, but: mere propagation repeated over and over without the phyla really changing, or hybridization (again, phyla stay stable), or limited mutations which never rise to the TRANSmutation Darwin envisaged.

Mind you, Bible has God decreeing what can be seen as ANY kind of 'evolution', in Genesis 1:24-25, at least for sea and then land life. But not, for man. Per Bible, man isn't biological at all, but the SOUL, 'in Our Image' (meaning, God's). The body is just a house man walks in — whether that house (as David explains in Psalm 139's always mistranslated Hebrew) was initially some bent-over apelike structure, who knows. 'Dust of the ground' is poetic for organic, biological material, and only applies to the NOT human, body. The human is not human until the soul is breathed directly BY God, into the body at birth, Genesis 2:7 and about 500 other verses (which I'll eventually cover in the balance of my Prolife Blasphemy playlist).

So what if the Darwinians were right? All math, genetics, and physics would be turned upside down, in which case the underpinning of Darwinianism would have to be revisited de novo. But the God thingy? No effect at all. So don't feel threatened by the atheists who hallucinate that 'evolution' somehow proves the Bible wrong. It proves nothing regarding God, esp. in light of Genesis 1:24-25, versus 26-27 and 2:7. Sigh.

Evolution is Not A Threat

Rant about how it's unfair to science, to shackle it with politics or religion. Here, the jumping-off point is the problem of morphological novelty, long a bone of contention in evolutionary inquiry. Video's article is here: https://www.discovery.org/a/2248/. Another article interestingly tries to argue back to Darwin's own position (rather than Dawkins' neo-Darwinist conflation), here: http://www.darwinvsdawkins.com/. Obviously, the truth will be somewhere in the middle.

So back to the question: HOW does a fish fin become, say, a hand? Not that hands necessarily come from fish, but replace 'fish' with whatever other organism you as a neo-Darwinist, want to use. This problem is the heart of the complaint against the neo-Darwinians, who unlike Darwin have created a much more restrictive and untenable hypothesis of 'natural selection' (i.e., eliminating environmental factors as a cause in evolutionary changes).

Okay, that's a thorny set of issues to investigate, already. So why complicate it with the IMPOSSIBLE DEMAND that somehow this information, wherever it leads — will prove or disprove, God? God is supernatural by nature, and Immaterial. He does miracles. Once the miracle is done, you can't tell it was miraculous, if in the past; you'd have to BE there. If in the present, the miracle will be doubted by all who don't see it. In any event, it's interpretative, and debated. So why add some demand of proving or disproving God, to science, which is limited only to the natural and physical?

So evolution in any configuration, with whatever results we discover, is no threat. It doesn't threaten the atheist, as nothing in this theory can ever prove God really exists. It doesn't threaten the theist, for nothing can prove God doesn't exist. It certainly doesn't threaten the Christian, as there is a DECREE for fauna evolution in Genesis 1. God chooses instead to make man directly, and 'human' is an immaterial soul not a body, because man is made in God's image, not biology, Gen 1:26-27, Gen 2:7, many other passages.

In particular, since man is not evolved but is immaterial, then the prolifers are also proven apostate, since they try to claim as the atheists do, that man is material and hence alive in the womb. Ooops.

So let's just leave science alone to do its thing. The data will always 'suggest', and never be conclusive, but will always be illuminating. Then ask the ceiling for proof about God. Can't be simpler than that. If instead you are anal about getting 'scientific' proof, then look to math and physics, as math itself is immaterial, and set theory should help you quickly determine that 'god' in some form or definition, must exist. Then you ask the ceiling, because until and unless you get DIRECT CONTACT from this 'god', you won't have real proof.

The Christian is supposed to be in direct contact with God 24/7, 1Cor2:16, 2Cor10:5, Romans 12:1-3, etc, many other verses. And just how can we prove that INTIMACY is happening, to anyone else? We can't. That's why Hebrews 11 is so important. So as Christians, let's stop feeling threatened by what cannot prove against God. As atheists, let's stop feeling threatened by what cannot prove FOR God.

Yes, Darwinian Evolution hinges on Transmutation!

Answering my critics, who think I falsely invoke Transmutation as core to the theory of Evolution, at least in the Darwinian flavor, old or new. You can Google on 'Transmutation of the Species' to get a bunch of links showing how that term is key to Darwin's own ideas. Download his Origin of Species, here: https://archive.org/details/originofspecies00darwuoft. Or read it online, here: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1228/1228-h/1228-h.htm. See also his 'Descent of Man', which you can download, here: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2300

And, you can read another engaging 1867 book (The Darwinian Theory of the Transmutation of Species By Robert Mackenzie Beverley) which analyzes the ideas, so to see how 'neo-Darwinism' was then just developing in light of Mendl, and thus in a state of flux. Here's the link: The Darwinian Theory of the Transmutation of Species By Robert Mackenzie Beverley .

His satire contra Darwin is exquisite, very like Berlinski's against Dawkins. Beverley takes Darwin to task for being unscientific, not even properly defining 'species'. So you'll forgive his satire re Darwin, I hope. Especially, since the same arguments against Darwin back then, are just as apt today against Dawkins (someone should revoke the guy's degrees in genetics or whatever). 150 years later, still there is no proof of the neo-Darwinian position, despite all our advances in math, physics, and genetics. Wow.

Note that when reading the book, the writer is not threatened by the idea of evolution, even citing the Bible on page 20. So why are Christians so anal about trying to knock down 'evolution' now? Just because some crazy atheist like Dawkins thinks it's only intellectually-fulfilling to BE an atheist if he can shoehorn 'evolution' into a 'proof' that 'god does not exist', doesn't mean that you should be threatened. Nor does it mean that you cannot be an atheist, UNLESS you believe in transmutation and 'evolution'.

Atheism doesn't need to be defended. No faith in or away from god of any kind needs to be defended. You believe or not. That's your free right. However, if you're trying to prove out WHAT to believe, then DO YOUR HOMEWORK.

Evidence of God: you, humanity, set theory, Law of Opposites

This isn't your typical 'evidence' video. Rather, this one offers a TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS, so is objectively falsifiable.

Gist of hypothesis: enough PLAUSIBLE evidence of God exists, to warrant 'asking the ceiling' for DIRECT CONTACT from whoever 'God' might be. Here's why:

  1. YOU exist. Bible says the real you is an immaterial soul made in God's Image, which is why you CAN get communication from, and CAN know God, Genesis 1:26-27, 2:7, 1Cor2, many other verses. Proof Psalm 139 says your body is but a biological house, is demonstrated from the Hebrew, in NoWombLife.htm. You can find the 'Prolife Blasphemy' videos covering many more verses, here in Youtube, but those vids don't fully show Psalm 139, yet.
  2. MANY WITNESSES (observational evidence, a key criterion for 'scientific' analysis) throughout history, in the millions, and for thousands of years, ATTEST that God exists. Like any kind of massive evidence, there are differences in detail, but agreement on the essentials: here, that 'God' in SOME FORM exists. A true scientist or statistician never turns away from mass evidence with an essential agreement, especially when it's over such a massive period of time in such massive numbers. To turn it away, is to be dishonest and unscientific.
  3. SET THEORY: the largest uncontainable set must contain all attributes, one of which is personhood; so the Ultimate Person, Uncontainable, must be 'God'.
  4. LAW OF OPPOSITES: if A, then -A. If material universe, therefore immaterial infinity to run it, therefore 'God'. For universally, the material DEPENDS on the immaterial. Math is immaterial, and we all depend on it. So too does all 'nature'. Time is immaterial, and GOVERNS 'nature'. Thought is immaterial, and GOVERNS the body (called 'Mind' in ancient times by those believing AND not believing in 'God'); Life is immaterial; which scientists all know, because they cannot define it, since the BIOLOGY of a newly-dead thing is exactly the same as just before it died. Those are four immaterialities we see and live with and under, every single day. Law of Opposites creates stasis, cycles, equilibrium, reason why (as physicists are so fond of pointing out) that the primary rule in science is that there be 'no loss of information'.

Notice that the first two, are observational. But the second two, are impersonal 'laws' universally observed and always proving theoretically true as well. So, then: the combination of the two justifies the Evidence of God hypothesis as capable of testing.

But the test, is necessarily individual, since the test is whether God exists. The only sane way to find that, is to ASK THE CEILING for DIRECT CONTACT from God (see my 'Proving God' video). Not just once (for that's not scientific), but many times (to produce a predictable pattern), daily over a month. for until you can establish a pattern, you don't know whether your results are predictable.

Even so, you won't be able to see that pattern as proof, except within yourself. Then again, it won't then matter, as YOU will have the proof YOU need.

If you're unwilling to do this ASK THE CEILING experiment, then you cannot claim God doesn't exist, as the hypothesis is provably sound and is testable, with millions of observations already attesting to it being true, over thousands of years, in thousands of whole societies dedicated to 'the gods' or 'God' by some definition. It's not possible that so much massive attestation is wholly incorrect. Only a dishonest person, would ignore it.

brainout defends Darwin?

Yeah. If I'm going to present Evidence for God in math, why not do the same thing for Darwin? For maybe String Theory accounts for the MIDDLE PROCESS of 'evolution' Darwin was trying to describe. For until you can account for the BEGINNING, you cannot account. Here's the Harvard University wepage containing the videos listed in my video: https://athome.harvard.edu/programs/sst/video/sst1_6.html. Since the video slides are unclear in the video resolution, be sure to click on the 'view slides for this presentation' link, which is underneath the Title in each video's description. You can download the slides from that link.

If you're not familiar with the speaker's explanation, you'll have to do more homework. You might want to look at my Physics Favorites, and Math Favorites playlists, which are just collections of OTHER FOLKS' videos from within Youtube, that deal on these topics. The Math Favorites videos focus on fractals, since the shapes fractals produce, are seen in nature. Fractals, like string theory, are new math discoveries. For sure, math governs universal operation. And best of all, it can be audited, proofed. To get some sense of the issues, try perusing this site: http://www.superstringtheory.com/

To see the inherent parallel in biology, try viewing these videos on cell behavior (especially division), also at Harvard Home: Socks Before Shoes: Unraveling Cell Division. It's in HTML5, so you might not be able to watch it. I couldn't get it to work, in Windows 7. You can only run it, if you download RealPlayer; it won't stream well. So refresh the page after selecting a video, and during the first second or two, hit the play button to PAUSE the video. Wait a few more seconds, then play. You can resize by putting your mouse in the upper left corner of the video, and suddenly the plus sign for theatre mode, will appear. Click on it. (Sorry, stupid programmers pervade now, so operations are never intuitive.)

If you've only time to view ONE of these videos, view this one on mutation, http://athome.harvard.edu/programs/sb.... If you've more time, then view this video on mitosis: http://athome.harvard.edu/programs/sb.... Both will help you to see why Darwinism doesn't work. So the hypothesis needs to be revised from its 'all life has a common source' premise, via PHYSICS.

So what was the beginning? A Big Bang. From, a singularity. Which, contained 'strings', the blueprint of all creation. Which, then can account for the variation in all things, whether planets and stars, or organic life. All from a common origin.

This was what Thomas Aquinas was trying to figure out (in his Treatise on the Six Days), and which David Berlinski was trying to explain: did the universe get here IMmediately (directly created by God), or MEDIATELY (through some autonomic process God ordained).

Berlinkski doesn't believe in God either, so the idea of an autonomic process which causes CHANGE quickly or slowly doesn't require one to believe in God to diagnose it. The problem of neo-Darwinianism, is that it requires all these changes be GENETIC, though we know from observation for centuries, that genetic mutation is too narrow in range, to result in what Darwin termed TRANSmutation, i.e., so that an ape could eventually become human. Since the latter cannot occur genetically, then how did so many varied life forms get here? Well, maybe they were all fractalically (sp?) produced from a SINGLE BLUEPRINT in the strings, at the time of the Big Bang.

Best of all, this idea can be vetted mathematically. The idea of strings is new, so much work remains to be done. But ultimately, if proven, would account better for what Darwin was trying to prove, as it would start at the BEGINNING and would be essentially a VERTICAL process of the blueprints, coming into being.

See what you think.

Salvation Is an Inheritance you can Elect AGAINST

We aren't presenting the Gospel correctly. BIBLE depicts it as an inheritance, Isaiah 53:10-12, and here in Hebrews 9:14-17, this video.

Bible is a CONTRACT containing promises, delivery clauses, depositions, etc. You are a beneficiary of God's. Any beneficiary, under law back when Adam lived or now, can ELECT AGAINST the Inheritance. So here in Hebrews 9, we see that same doctrine explained.

The unbeliever has elected against the WHOLE inheritance, which starts with being saved TO LIVE WITH GOD IN HEAVEN FOREVER, versus hell. But atop that capped phrase, are other assets God has willed for you, namely kingship.

Kingship means the WEALTH of a King (gold silver and precious stones, 1Cor3, to which Hebrews 9 talks back to, as it's playing on 2 Peter's use of the term as well). So, as Paul says in Galatians, you can inherit a kingdom, not merely be in it (Eternal State aka Heaven is a federation of kingdoms both on earth and off-earth, Revelation 21). But you have to LEARN that inheritance, even as any heir to a throne has to learn kingship prior to taking office. Born-again Royalty you are; but learning how to rule, is something you must master, prior to being allowed to officially rule, yourself.

Hence as a believer, you can elect against the Will of God for SOME of your inheritance, as this video briefly explains.

THIS is how Bible presents the salvation inheritance. So we should present it the same way. It's not about how good or bad you are, but about GOD WILLING to give you the INHERITANCE, which you can wholly or partly, elect AGAINST. To the extent you elect AGAINST, you don't get!


b-out Divine Physics

God's 'physics' for salvation, nicely depict the solution needed to construct secular unified field theory, which has always been plagued by misapprehending how QM and GR can fit together. Isaiah 53:10-11 in the LXX, is the key to both how your sins were paid on the Cross, how your spiritual life works; and, to secular cosmological physics. The 'pants' are five VERBS. Bet someone can figure out the needed equations, once he knows the actions!

This playlist is embedded in LordvSatan3.htm#5Infinitives, in SatStrat.htm, and Fixes.htm "physics" sections.

x/5 Spiritual Physics

Spiritual Physics is something I learned by mistake several years ago when exegeting Isaiah 53:10-11 in the LXX versus Hebrew text, which are quite different. So here's the first of 5 parts on the topic. It centers on the Paradox of Truth and Freedom, hence in God, Complete Infinity is not what we think it is. Downloadable in Google. For more info, see index.htm. All my webpages are centered on this same theme (i.e., Thinking series is on Body-of-Christ aka Church in the Angelic Conflict, RESULTING from Isa53:10-11).

Part 2 introduces Isa53:10-11, how the Hypostatic 'Circle' of Christ-on-Cross resolves the Paradox of Truth, fulfilling Truth such that via Omnipotence, God makes GOOD on all the freely-existing bad truth (Isa54:1). Parallel to secular cosmological physics begins in Part 2. This Love circle (subjective +objective genitive, agape tou Theou) is just like math, physics in structure, function: "Love is the Integrity of God!" — quote by my pastor, RB Thieme Jr., in May 7, 2000 Bible class.

Part 3 continues Isa53:10-11, how God uses the 'Circle' of Christ-on-Cross to remake us in exactly the same way, same 5 verbs as happened to Him during 1st Advent. Thus God makes GOOD on all the freely-existing bad truth (Isa54:1). Parallel to secular cosmological physics continues in Part 3

Part 4, how Isa53:10-11 spiritually TRANSFORMS us per Rom12:1-3, Functionally Divine — SOLELY by the Spirit's Power. Divine Physics thus are WAY beyond morality and works, Isa54:1 happening each moment you learn & live on Bible.

Part 5, how secular physics is parallel to Isa53:10-11's daily TRANSFORMATION — by Spirit's Power. Isa54:1, as you learn & live on Bible. Joining of OPPOSITES is the key to solving secular physics conundrums.

Spiritual Physics, Summary

God's TOE: If A, then -A, where "A" is Infinite-Quality, Immaterial God. Result is that -A will have to go on forever, as it can never reach the 'value' of +A. Hence Opposites must Unite for Truth to be Infinite Integrity, in Equilibrium. So everything secular must 1) reflect a uniting of OPPOSITES which 2) PRODUCE stability 3) via a CYCLE which 4) COMPLETES such that 5) WITHIN every point, these opposites unite. Thus goes this concluding summary of the 5-part Spiritual Physics videos, showing secular physics implications which reflect the larger spiritual ones (last half of video), spawned by the five infinitives in Isa53:10-11 (LXX). Downloadable in Google. My main page on the post-Salvation ROYAL spiritual life is http://www.brainout.net/LordvSatan3.htm . Our spiritual growth is made part of the prehistoric Angelic Trial, Heb11:1 in Greek so see Heb111.htm for the videos proving what the Greek says and the translation correction.


b-out Contra Calvinism

NEW Debate Thread for whole series, frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=70&p=233.

Focus: 1) why today's Calvinism is apostate, but also 2) how to fix it. Calvinism is worth saving, but it MUST be reformed to fit Bible. Videos show why and how. This playlist is embedded in TULindex.htm. First three videos clue you into the BIBLE's answer, and the rest critique what's wrong with Calvinism, and how to FIX it. Surprisingly, the fix needed isn't much: keep reading this description for a quick summary. Then decide what videos you'll watch, if any. I'm very sympathetic to Calvinism (except for the anti-semitic Replacement Theology preterism), hence all this material.

The Calve Islam videos in the playlist always get the most attention, but are only a small PART of the series. They are meant as a diagnostic for what's wrong with Calvinism. They focus on how Calvin, infected by anti-semitism 'inherited' from the Church Fathers and RCC, ignored vital OT doctrines the Jews long knew and taught. This resulted in his tangled, RCC-leaning, preterist, theonomic, replacement theology. Big loss, to ignore the OT. Big gain, to fix Calvin's theology in light of OT, but don't hold your breath: Calvinists impose Calvin's ideas ON the Bible, no matter what it takes, so they can claim Calvin right.

Content summary:

TULIP by Calvinism's definition, is totally depraved. Yet, it can be fixed.

Videos address also the very bad Bible Greek scholarship mistakes famous Calvinists make.

Calvin's Poison

Calvin inherited his poison from his idol Augustine and those prior usurpers, the 'Church Fathers', starting with 'Clement' of Rome's power grab when John was newly exiled or dead. Other usurpers quickly infiltrated. Christianity became so bad, they deemed the diarrhetic 1Clement, canon (see https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/1clement-lightfoot.html)!

In their own words: https://staycatholic.com/ecf-on-salvation-outside-the-church/ and https://staycatholic.com/about-the-early-fathers/ and here's their usurpation claim: https://staycatholic.com/ecf-on-apostolic-succession/. Ask: since Canon was still being written by John, why didn't God mention this (ahem) doctrine, but rather 1Cor15 remains unrevised?

Rev 2-3, 17 proved true within 10 years of writing! No wonder its God-breathed text is disputed or allegorized by usurper descendants! Apostacy in Book of Judges, repeats! Doctoring the Vulgate to mask their games. See my PopeMyth playlist, https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE203C618EA743CFF.

So this 'tradition' of usurpation comes in five chief flavors, infects all Calvin writes:

  1. Anti-Semitism (blaming Jews, Replacement Theology, preterism). Quotes to vet: Anti-Semitism of the "Church Fathers". See also Schaff, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc6.iii.xi.v.html, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersessionism
  2. Free Will Loss at Fall ( Calvin's use of Augustine: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.iv.vi.html), vs these quotes: https://www.pfrs.org/calvinism/calvin12.html. (Use only Church Father quotes, investigate context.)
  3. Limited Atonement (corollary of purgatory in Church Fathers: https://staycatholic.com/ecf-on-purgatory/).
  4. Faith as meritorious (corollary of Catholicized mitzwot, but esp. Augustine's On the Free Choice of the Will, linked below).
  5. Behavior as spiritual (pick any 'Church Father' from https://earlychristianwritings.com/).

These poisons account for Christianity's stunted theologies. Just as God warned through Paul and esp. 1John and Rev 17, they never learn Word for itself and God for Himself, 2Tim3:5-7, 2Jn9-11.

Incredible: we know God is INFINITELY PERFECT yet we think God should reward our puny actions toward humans, expecting the Light Company to reward you for paying your phone bill!

More Links to Augustine:

Free Choice of the Will: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=8... and https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02089a.htm or https://www.ccel.org/ccel/augustine?show=worksBy

Augustine's Reply to Faustus section 11, claims Church should curse Israel! Grab Pepto-Bismol; then read from 'God says to Cain,' in https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf104.iv.ix.xiv.html.

Modern-day 'scholar spin' to paper over his own anti-semitic, violating Genesis 12, 15, 17 words: Paul, Faustus, and Augustine’s Evolution toward Anti-anti-Semitism and https://www.bu.edu/bostonia/spring09/fredriksen/

Links to Calvin..

gloating over Servetus: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc8.iv.xvi.ii.html?highlight=calvin%2Cservetus%2Cposterity#highlight

His quote: "posterity owes me a debt of gratitude for having purged the Church of so pernicious a monster."994

Calvin's anti-semitic commentary on Daniel: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom24.txt For Daniel Chaps 1-6; https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom25.txt covers Dan Chaps 7+. Search on 'Jews' 'rabbi', 'Barbinel'. Search on 'God's Wish to cut off' and 'continual shower' in the 25.txt, see Calvin project his own anti-semitism onto God, as if God wanted to exterminate the Jews. Contrast with Gen12, 15, 17. So, like Augustine, Calvin got his eschatology wrong, as well as most of his soteriology and his idea of the spiritual life. For anti-semitism rots the brain.

Live documents from Geneva at that time:

1/12 Contra Calvinism: Introduction

Upshot of series, Word doc: ContraCalvVids.doc

This video Episode 1, opens with the BIBLE's definition of the real purpose of the spiritual life: to train you in the King's THINKING. (It's very fast-paced, so you may need to put the video on pause, to read the many Bible verses shown.)

So if you GET trained in His Thinking, you yourself become a King — and inherit a kingdom of Church believers, which you OWN — forever. Flagship passages on this are in Eph1-4, Hebrews 1-11. It's Paul's main theme (but Hebrews wasn't written by Paul.)

Calvinism completely missed that Bible point, because Calvinism like Catholicism, is stuck on the past, and founded upon anti-semitism; so they don't recognize that Church has its own covenant entirely separate from Israel's. Subsequent videos go through the errors of TULIP.

Webpage on TULIP (I correct it to Bible, redub it "TULIPS?"): TULindex.htm

Video Charts are from GeneYrs.xls, which is a timeline using ONLY the Bible's own dating system, emphasizing how post-Cross history follows God's 490-year time grant rules; how, the denominations' apostacies track to the deadlines, i.e., Schism, Crusades, & Reformation (same 'coincidence' with the rising cycle of Islam).

First-century Christians were apostate. Bible abounds with their many follies: James, Romans, Corinthians, Galatians, Acts all show how goofball 1st-century Christians were. Peter went wacko in Acts 1, James goes wacko in Acts 15, Paul goes wacko in Acts 18 and 21, wakes up to it in Acts 22.

So denominations claiming they are the "original faith", are thus apostate.

You study Napoleon's blunders in West Point to learn how NOT to do a thing. So you study OT apostacy, to learn not to repeat it. So you study NT apostacy, to learn not to repeat it.

So you study denominational blunders, to learn not to repeat them. There's a PATH of DELUSION one wanders on, to become apostate. Important to see that path, lest one imitate it.

Delusion is characterized by persistent and stubborn refusal to listen. By stubborn clinging to one's denomination or position. Standing pat is a sure sign that one is apostate. Truth doesn't need defense. :)

5/12 Contra Calvinism: Total Depravity's Off-White Nature.

Total Depravity is OFF-WHITE: once you understand that, you'll see why God condemns works, religiosity, and why He punishes for Lack of Belief. For if you believe in God, you're trusting in HIS Merit. But if you don't believe, you're claiming YOU have merit. Believers and unbelievers alike are driven by the sin-nature urge to BE GOOD, claim good in the self. THAT, is what's depraved. That, is the quintessential 'signature' of sin. Look anywhere around you, see the urge on display. Welcome to the fallen human race.

Associated webpage: LordvSatan2.htm#Fall covers the Bible's description of the nature of Total Depravity, in excruciating detail.

6/12, Contra Calvinism: "draw" verses

Calvinists misuse Bible "draw" verses, mistaking the helpless resistance of the genetic pull in the sin nature, for a lack of free will. READ THE COMMENTS in this video and the next one, as the 'draw' verses pan-Bible, are listed in the comments. Proper exegesis demands you look up ALL occurrences of a word in Bible, to know how it's used. Calvies don't do that.

In particular, they conveniently ignore that Greek verb 'helkw' (say hell-koh) in John 6:44, is an idiom for 'draw a crowd' — notice that if you leave out the 'a crowd' in translations (which are mostly done by Calvinists), you completely reverse the meaning of the word. So helkw means the CROWD of its OWN FREE WILL is ATTRACTED to the speaker (here, Christ). So 'no one can come to the Father unless ATTRACTED' is the better translation. But of course no Calvinist will admit that. :) And of course, the rest of John 6's context, Calvinists also ignore — the context stresses that the crowd HAD free will, but kept on refusing Christ. Ooops.

Upshot: due to sin nature, volition struggles. But struggle demonstrates free will is retained. Power to overcome the struggle, depends on other attributes, and free will is not less free because it struggles.

Calvies have eye problems with any verse containing "all", if "sin" is in the verse; with substitutionary prepositions huper and peri, if hamartias is the object; with noun gender (leaping Matt16:18!) in Eph 2:8-9. See Calve Islam 5 videos in the Contra Calvinism playlist for an exegesis of Eph 2:8-9, and what Calvin said about the passage.

It's that good ol' total depravity showing, so at least the gaffes prove true, the effects of Adam's original sin. :)

8a/12, Contra Calvinism: Romans 9

You'll probably need to be VERY familiar with the text of Romans 9 (at least in translation), before you'll be able to follow Part 8. It's on how Calvinism misreads Romans 9 despite the blunt statement by Paul in Rom 9:20 that (i.e., resisting-God) humans HAVE FREE WILL. How embarrassing.

9a/12, Contra Calvinism: God is NOT Constrained!

This video was originally done 9/24/2008 as part of the Contra Calvinism series, but I didn't post it. Just found it now, when cleaning my video files. It's one of the few videos I've done, which is succinct!

Word doc Upshot of series, Word doc: ContraCalvVids.doc. Webpage on TULIP (I correct it to Bible, redub it "TULIPS?"): TULindex.htm. It has all the Contra videos, too.

My webpages on God's Attribute of Infinity are many. Here are 3 of the thinkpieces, all very heavy: DueDisclosure.htm, which is Calvinism-specific as well; DDNA.htm, on how God uses His Infinity to 'clone' His Son into us; the daddy of these pages is my Thinking Out Loud series, beginning with LordvSatan1.htm. For that's what's on Trial: God's Infinity.

BIBLE's definition of the spiritual life: to clone the King's THINKING. So if you GET trained in His Thinking, you yourself become a King — and inherit a kingdom of Church believers, which you OWN — forever. Flagship passages on this are in Eph1-4, Hebrews 1-11. It's Paul's main theme (but Hebrews wasn't written by Paul.)

Calvinism missed that Bible point, as Calvinism like Catholicism, is stuck on the past, founded upon anti-semitism; so they don't see Church has its own covenant entirely separate from Israel's.

Video Charts are from GeneYrs.xls, a timeline made ONLY from Bible's own dating system, showing also how post-Cross history follows God's 490-year time grant rules; how, the denominations' apostacies track to the deadlines, i.e., Schism, Crusades, & Reformation (same 'coincidence' with the rising cycle of Islam). Paul uses this very method in Eph1:3-14, see the 11 GGS video playlist.

First-century Christians were apostate. Bible abounds with their many follies: James, Romans, Corinthians, Galatians, Acts all show how goofball 1st-century Christians were. Peter went wacko in Acts 1, James goes wacko in Acts 15, Paul goes wacko in Acts 18 and 21, wakes up to it in Acts 22.

So denominations claiming they are the "original faith", are thus apostate.

You study Napoleon's blunders in West Point to learn how NOT to do a thing. So you study OT apostacy, to learn not to repeat it. So you study NT apostacy, to learn not to repeat it.

So you study denominational blunders, to learn not to repeat them. There's a PATH of DELUSION one wanders on, to become apostate. Important to see that path, lest one imitate it.

Delusion is characterized by persistent and stubborn refusal to listen. By stubborn clinging to one's denomination or position. Standing pat is a sure sign that one is apostate. Truth always requires explanation — but never needs defense. So the Calvies waste their lives defending, what is largely a defamation of God's Character.

Calvinist Plane Tips

What to do if you find yourself trapped on a plane with a Calvinist. I don't know who to credit for the video's jpg, which I use here to demonstrate #7 in Calve Islam video.

Calvinists are famous for their bad arguments and pseudo-intellectuality, their stubborn deafness and belligerence, their bad Bible scholarship but hallucination that they read Bible well. So their 'fruit' is a kind of bullying, in which they cast God Himself as the same kind of Tyrant, yet all the while shouting "Sovereign Grace". Kinda like Pravda during the Soviet Union. :)

How did they get like this? Same way any set of believers goes wildly apostate: they got into Scholasticism. Men's ideas of things, rather than God's. So what happened, is this: they INFUSED the Bible's words with their philosophical ideas of what those words meant, instead of learning the Bible's own meanings. So Bible's definition of free will, no Calvinist knows. For when he reads a passage he imposes CALVIN's ideas on the Bible. So now he cannot read Bible.

So they can't hear, or read, anyone else but Calvin. After five minutes conversation with them, you see that. Ergo these Calvinist Plane Tips might come in handy, especially if you're stuck on a long flight...

Calve Islam

Creepy parallels between Calvinism and Islam: list follows at end of this description. Everything said in the video about Calvinism can be verified in Bible and in Calvinist teachings. Nothing was taken from anti-Calvinist material. You can download Calvin's Institutes, here: Institutes of the Christian Religion, Volume 1. Download only goes thru Book III, Chap XIII.

You can serially read all of the Institutes online: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.toc.html. Calvin College's download isn't the whole book either, and the download only works if you right-click and Save Link As. The edition is also different (earlier), vs. Google.

It's important to investigate Calvinism yourself, since Calvinists like Muslims, prevaricate. For example, Calvin's sick idea that "free will" is meritorious, was derived from Augustine and the philosophers, NOT from Bible, see p.233ff of the Google pdf (Book II Chapter 2 of the Institutes). This obsession with NON-Biblical notions of free will and doctrines, will taint everything Calvin writes. (See also Book II Chap V, p.284ff). This obsession passes on to all who are Calvinists, as you'll easily discover if you are unfortunate enough to have more than five minutes' discourse with them.

So the Bible is less important, huh.

Thus one can account for Calvin's not knowing God creates the soul, and the soul's nature. Instead, he accepts the definitions of other men, and reworks them. You can prove Calvin was totally ignorant of Bible's definition, in his Institutes Book II, Chapter I, esp. beginning at point V (page 225 in the Google download pdf). Thus you can account for Calvin's depraved ideas re the nature of man's depravity, not recognizing that Bible says depravity is genetic in Rom5:12, since ONLY GOD creates the soul at BIRTH, again per Bible (over 300 verses). Calvin's bad reasoning goes downhill from that point.

On p.211 (Book I, Chap. XVIII), Calvin asserts that bad stuff is God's "secret will"! But then Calvin was anti-semitic (though less anti-semitic than Luther), so he's reading and analyzing Bible in a carnal state.

God is not anti-semitic. So God was not in any of the Church Fathers or Reformers to the extent they were anti-semitic. So they shouldn't be idolized. But Calvinists idolize Calvin. Yeah, like the Muslims idolize Muhammed the anti-semite.

So now you know why after 500 years, Calvinists are just as unable to read Bible as their founder, and why TULIP's definitions, though easily fixable — as explained in my Contra Calvinism videos — have instead remained anti-Biblical. And why God continues to be cast by them as a Capricious Tyrant as if that were holy, century after century. For that's how Calvin viewed Him. Bible isn't important, see.

Recap of the Creepy Parallels, follows. First 16 are in the first video. The last seven need more explaining than given here, but the 2nd video covers them:

  1. Both faiths' tenets make God sound capricious.
  2. Both faiths claim man has no free will.
  3. Both faiths claim you must do works to prove faith.
  4. Both allege 'grace' but if you don't stay faithful, you were never saved.
  5. Both allege you must fight for the faith.
  6. Both demand theocratic government.
  7. Both faiths' 'believers' are addicted to endless arguing.
  8. Both faiths' 'believers' think themselves 'superior'.
  9. Both faiths' believers read Bible badly.
  10. Both creeds are anthropocentric.
  11. Both place their 'leader' on par with God.
  12. Both deny pre-Trib Rapture (a form of anti-semitism).
  13. So both think they replace Israel, which is the hallmark characteristic of anti-semitism; that tenet violates the Book of Hebrews.
  14. Both faiths claim God enjoys people burning in hell.
  15. Both faiths effectively negate the Cross.
  16. Both faiths' 'jihads' started at the Reformation.
  17. Both faiths claim Christ didn't pay for all sin.
  18. Both faiths require you SURRENDER to God for salvation.
  19. Both faiths yet call God 'sovereign', though he must force who is saved.
  20. Both faiths call this forcing 'grace', though sane people recognize it as tyranny.
  21. Both faiths treat God's gift of faith/salvation or condemnation as a matter of whim.
  22. Both faiths call 'holy', capriciousness.
  23. Both faiths say God births you before you believe in Him.
  24. So both make Christ a nothing, since sin requires VOLITION. No volition, no sin, hence no need for a Cross.

Associated webpage which has my Contra Calvinism playlist of all the associated videos: TULindex.htm

Calve Islam Addenda A/F

Answering critics. My Calve Islam and Calve Islam 2 videos excite Calvinists inside and outside Youtube, who never view IN CONTEXT, the entire 'brainout Contra Calvinism' (40-video) playlist. So they misrepresent what is said, intentionally or not.

Hence these 'Addendum' videos rehash the 24 points of both Calve Islam and Calve Islam 2. A fuller explanation is in the rest of the playlist, both before and after, this video.

Intro to the human error source in preterism and futurism, is here: • 1/6 Rapture Legal Basis: 2LT Series. That six part '2LT' series is explained with huge Bible backup in my Mirroring.htm; shorter summary is in brainoutFAQ.htm#6. Basic math problem of there being TWO seven's, not one, due to both futurism and preterism accounting 'years' as if lunar (so they missed the 2nd seven in God's accounting, which is solar).

Calvin's Institutes, reading links at ccel.org:

You can also download the whole Institutes from ccel, but don't use the pdf button at upper left of the ccel screen. It will give you a defective copy. Instead, register and use the download icons which will appear in the middle of the ccel.org screen.

My whole video playlist is viewable here, in the webpage 'birthing' it: TULindex.htm.

Calve Islam Addenda B/F

Hence this pair of 'Addendum' videos rehashes the 24 points of both Calve Islam and Calve Islam 2. A fuller explanation is in the rest of the playlist, both before and after, this video. The John 3:16 video referenced at the end of this one, is here: • John 3:16 and Eternally Secure Salvation. It shows the Greek live, proving that faith PRECEDES regeneration, due to the GRAMMAR rules of Greek where present participle (believe) precedes the main verb (have Eternal Life).

MacArthur has since removed the Lordship_Salvation.pdf I mention in this B/B video. The updated version is linked here, in substantially the same wording (i.e., using the word 'surrender'): https://www.gty.org/library/Articles/A114_An-Introduction-to-Lordship-Salvation?q=Lordship+Salvation

Calve Islam Addenda C/F

Wrapping up, with a very pro-Calvinist tone. For my chief complaint against Calvinism is that its formulation of doctrines, belittles God's Sovereignty and Grace while meaning to praise both.

I don't cover preterism, theonomy, or Replacement Theology here; those are pan-denominational evils belonging to the Satan's Strategy series, when I return to video making at the end of 2010 or in 2011.

A just-arising emergency prevents me from making any more videos after Addendum F, for an unpredictable period.

Calve Islam Addenda D/F

Wrapping up, with a very pro-Calvinist tone. For my chief complaint against Calvinism is that its formulation of doctrines, belittles God's Sovereignty and Grace though meaning to praise both.

I don't cover preterism, theonomy, or Replacement Theology here; those are a pan-denominational evils belonging to the Satan's Strategy series, when I return to video making at the end of 2010 or in 2011.

Calve Islam Addenda E/F

Bible versus Augustine, Pelegians, Arminians, Calvin, Luther on Free Will. Now I have finally finished the Addenda with Part F.

Calve Islam 3: Where Calvin went wrong

How Calvin's anti-semitism guarantees his theology will have huge errors. So any Calvinist is full of anti-semitic doctrine and should be avoided.

Contra Calvinism playlist is in my channel page, and in this webpage: TULindex.htm

Thus the audit will end. It's not a happy thing, to say where someone else is wrong, but they teach you to do that at West Point and in accounting. Was finally able to trace the why. You can never prove what's right or wrong about a thing until you can prove the WHY.

Chiefly three 'depravities' infect Calvin's doctrine, resulting in a warped presentation of soteriology and eschatology, such that the words are Biblical, but the DEFINITIONS are not. So when the Calvinist reads the Bible's words, he never actually learns what it says.

What it says, is the reverse of what the Calvinist imagines. So when he reads prophecy, he treats it as allegorical or already-happened, when instead much of prophecy is yet future and is quite literal.

So when he reads salvation passages, he reverses the Bible's order-of-occurrence of each of the Salvation Components (see my "Salvation Components" video for the Bible's own description of the process).

So when he reads Bible on Election,

So what are the three depravities? Anti-semitism, denial-of-Sovereignty (though loudly proclaiming God Sovereign), and anthopocentrism. These three 'presuppositions' color and blind the Calvinist to what the Bible really says.

Calve Islam 4 will end the video series with a quick summary on TULIP, how it's wrong versus Bible. See the first 12 "Contra Calvinism" videos for further details, and associated webpage.

More could be said, but the errors in Calvinism have been well known for centuries. You can Google for more information. Just as with Islam, It's really important to see the information for yourself; for what the adherents CLAIM about the sect, is sugar-coated versus the actual doctrines. Read Calvin's Institutes: links to them were provided in the Calve Islam video.

Calve Islam 4: Where Calvin went wrong

In Calve Islam 3, we saw how anti-semitism resulted in Calvin's misinterpretations. Here in Calve Islam 4, we'll see how TULIP also became infected, though the 'L' is not Calvin's fault. Also, this video shows how to fix TULIP to make it FIT Bible.

(Larger explanation spans my 'brainout Contra Calvinism' video playlist: Anti-semitism, denial-of-Sovereignty, and anthropocentrism all demonstrate how TULIP could go on so long in contravention of Bible.)

No Calvinist will ever listen, of course. 450 years have gone by and they didn't pay attention to all the criticism; so they won't hear it now, either, never mind how easy it is to fix their misdefinitions. Calvin can himself be excused, he only lived 50-some years, was sick with anti-semitism, so didn't mature spiritually. But post-Calvin, what's our excuse? None.

Calve Islam 5a: Ephesians 2:8-9 Epilogue

Calvinists misuse the Greek word "Touto" in Ephesians 2:8 to jam it into their bass-ackwards 'interpretation' that God must GIVE you faith in order for you to believe in Him. So here in Calve Islam Part 5a and 5b, we see from Calvin College how Calvin himself and some of the touted 'Church Fathers' don't share the modern Calvinist 'spin' on that word.

Parts 5c and 5d finish out the Epilogue with live exegesis of the verse in Greek. Several longer versions of this exegesis might be available upon request, which have more details about other words in the verse.

Calve Islam partial RETRACTION

Partial Retraction and thus correction to Calve Islam Video Series, due to MODERATECALVINIST videos on what Jean Calvin actually said about the order of regeneration versus faith in the Gospel, and about unlimited atonement. Please read his profile page: / moderatecalvinist

One of his important videos on the matter is here, showing Calvin's writings live onscreen (view in HD, fullscreen): • Video

His main website is here: https://site.divinesoteriology.com/

RED Annotations on this partial retraction are now in my Calve Islam 2 video, here: • Calve Islam 2

My 'Salvation Components' video on BIBLE's definition of the components of salvation, in its own words you can prove: • Salvation Components: BIBLE's Keywords

Much of the Calve Islam video series is based on the heresies of Limited Atonement and the lie that faith is subsequent to regeneration (that's the basis for the claim that man has no free will, technically) — so later in the year or next year I'll have to redo those videos to reflect what Jean Calvin actually said, VERSUS today's 'Calvinists'. Meanwhile, PLEASE READ what Calvin himself said, as there is much disinformation out there. Go to ccel(dot)org or ask MODERATECALVINIST how to get your hands on that material.

Always do your homework. You have no right to dispute a thing if all you do is parrot what someone else said. That's the error of the KJV-only people: they CANNOT READ the Greek, so DO NOT KNOW if it's right or wrong or how right or wrong. So instead, they parrot, and prove themselves all fools (Riplinger, most of all).

So too, most Calvinists, today: they parrot. Don't be like them. God will hold you responsible for doing your OWN homework, since the Spirit fills anyone who uses 1John1:9. So do it: then KNOW the material yourself before you dispute, so you won't have to make any retractions, lol.

1/2 Rethinking Election

Brainstorming a revision in the popular notions of God's Decree to Elect, in light of exaleipw verses. Word doc displaying those verses is linked here: Accountability.doc.

Idea that God elects EVERYONE to be saved at PHYSICAL birth, and in order to go to hell you must ELECT AGAINST His Will. So in terms of lapsarianism, the Decree is entirely different than conventional theology posits, to wit:

  1. Decree to Create Christ, Isa 52:13-15, 53:10-11, Eph1 (whole chapter), 1Tim2:5 (Christ as God agrees in eternity past), many other verses.
  2. Decree to Create Creation (angels first), and allow that creation to sin, since #1 is first.
  3. Decree to Elect each person Born Be Saved aka inscribe his name in the Book of Life at physical birth. So anyone who dies before being ABLE to reject the Gospel, goes to heaven.
  4. Decree to Allow any person in #3 to Elect against the Will, ONCE ACCOUNTABLE, rules of John 3. So if one EVER believes in Christ AFTER being accountable, God's Election in #3 is affirmed. Else, elected against. Only if always elected against, can one go to hell. It's not about morality, it's a legal option whether you elect for or against, God's PREVIOUSLY DEPOSITED Will for your life.
  5. Decree to Allow any person who elects against the Will to go to hell, John 3:36, 16:9.

There are many verses to support this, but right now I'm just broaching the idea. It puts a whole new face on the nature of salvation, and on evangelism. In short, evangelism reflects widespread negativity to a Gospel which is knowable as per Romans 1, without human agency. So human agency is used, but more reflects the fact of man's negativity.

PS: For the last 50 years, my pastor (and some others) did teach the above doctrine that everyone is in the Book of Life at birth; but I didn't really understand its implications until a few days ago. I can't find any Bible verses opposing the conclusions, so if you can, I'll listen. But I won't listen to the Limited Atonement parrots, for Limited Atonement is a flat lie, already disproven many times over the centuries.


b-out False Doctrine Vids

Samples of my videos which track or explain false doctrines and lies, be they in Bible mistranslation, misteaching, or in secular life. Sometimes, specific Youtubers are targets, but that's only to help identify how a false doctrine gets 'sold', just like you have to show what a particular Jaguar looks like, to spot a different one, the next time.

As you view each video, you should be able to prove out the 10 characteristics of Falsehood described in the second video of this playlist, "False Doctrine: 10 Ways to Detect the Lie". Thus you get practice in lie detecting. For the same 10 characteristics pervade every lie, whether spiritual or secular.

Falsehood, and hence false teaching, always:

  1. Maligns God.
  2. Stresses or glorifies man.
  3. Employs very incompetent Bible 'scholarship'.
  4. 'Obeys' the 3 Temptations of Matthew 4, to REVERSE what Bible actually says.
  5. The one telling you the false doctrine always makes cultic, "one true faith" claims, such that the speaker and/or his sect is as holy as God or His Word. So you are a) discouraged from questionning his authority, b) discouraged from checking Bible for yourself, c) considered a heretic if you dispute, question or test.
  6. 'Respectability' is always used to mask the falsehood, make it seem true. So looks, degrees, popularity, sincerity are all used to sell the lie in question.
  7. Hence to sell the lie, other men are used or cited as authorities, rather than Bible itself.
  8. So Falsehood will always be popular, and people will not check Bible to test the claims.
  9. Falsehood therefore always appeals to one's emotion or intellect, but not, to Bible; since if you did check the Bible, you could prove the falsehood, false.
  10. Above all, Falsehood always FAILS COMMON SENSE.

Quick examples: you know limited atonement is false, because its incompetent tenets require GOD BE CHEATED of payment for ALL sin. Similarly, you know the claim that you must first repent of sins to be saved is a lie, for you cannot repent to a God you don't first believe in. Similarly, other verbs like getting wet, calling on the Lord, etc. don't give you eternal life: only BELIEVE IN CHRIST (not in something YOU do), suffices.

These videos are but highlights of the larger accounting in my webpages.

Fake Holiness, Real Sincerity

This is the flipside to "True Holiness" video. 1st Complication leading to fake holiness: sin nature is religious: man MAKING himself worthy. Satan tempted the Eden couple to eat knowledge to make them as good as God, charging God hid this knowledge from them, to keep His superiority. You see this in Genesis 3. Hence mankind's fallen DNA (per Rom5:12) mutated with a relentless genetic urge to 'be good'. (Topic is covered fully in LordvSatan2.htm#Fall.)

Ever since, the most objectionable idea to humans, & yet the most attractive, is to get worthiness, gratis — if self can claim credit for it. Same urge as the initial temptation. So it's no surprise that pious people call it unfair Christ should pay for all sins — & ANYONE, even a murderer — goes to heaven if he merely believes. Christ said so in John 3:16 (echoes Genesis 15:6)! So people either reject that TRUE Gospel outright, or 'craft' exceptions. Christians have done this for centuries; so FAKE gospels have the patina of respect, i.e., you can lose salvation; if you sinned a big sin, you weren't ever really saved; if you're good enough, you go to heaven anyway.

Ergo historically, the true Only Believe In Christ Gospel goes rejected; instead, barnacled fake gospels are pandered by sincere, pious 'Christians': whether it's Catholic flavor, claiming one must be baptised (+conditions), or Calvinist flavor, restricting Christ to die but for 'the elect'. There might be 40,000 variations on these themes; all false, all popular since time began. And you just know, not one of their proponents got up in the morning & decided, "Gee, I think I'll blaspheme God today."

Rather, the idea one can do squat, but must Only Believe like Abraham did, is to admit self cannot be worthy for God. Ouch. Adam & the woman couldn't take that pressure, pre-Fall. Neither can we, their fallen children.

2nd complication leading to fake holiness: the popular notion that Cross Payment, is for us. Hence if some of 'us' aren't saved, then that payment is 'wasted'. Oh? Says who? For Payment was to GOD. Godward, not manward. This was always taught via sacrifices & began with Abel, memorializing HIS Paying, as Hebrews 11 explains. For God is the Rightful Party to Receive Payment. Fully. Christ wouldn't settle for less, Father wouldn't justify less. So GOD got paid. Fully, per the 3-Way Love Contract of Isaiah 53:10-12.

That leaves the MANWARD side to explain. New question: how much of what GOD got, is spent on us? For that spending to begin, we must CONSENT. 1st Consent, Believe Christ paid for your sins; that opens the Door. You're eternally saved the very moment you believe (per Greek present tenses in John 3:16 & elsewhere). For, you are a new spiritual being, with God's Own Life: it has no beginning, so cannot end. So you cannot lose it. Your LIVING NATURE changed, so to live with God forever, Isa55:8-9, 1Cor15.

Yet that's only a structural change. What about operation? Your soul remains the same trash-heap, tohu wa bohu like Gen1:2! You are 'born again' — but a spiritual BABY. Hence a series of continual consents to SOUL change must commence, so to Rescue Your Soul from its old-nature thinking. Paul threads this theme in Romans 5-12. So to transform, you must be filled with the Spirit, Who then clones Christ's Thinking into you within a corridor of your consent, Romans 12:1-3.

So: though it seems unfair that anyone, even a murderer, can believe in Christ & be saved gratis — will a murderer want to learn & live on Bible? No. So he's saved, alright.. but as a spiritual Epsilon, oh roof! For spiritual persons need spiritual food to grow up, & that's why we have Bible.

On the flipside (per Romans 2,9,11) — will the religious want to learn & live on Bible? No. Rather, he wants to learn & live on works, rituals, songs, miracles. Justify his good deeds as worthy of Divine Intimacy. And that's the problem: one can't have adult intimacy with a baby. So the religious type also enters heaven as a spiritual BABY (Galatians 1,3,5).

God won't tolerate lesser-thans. But He also won't coerce. So you get what you want from God. The intimacy you keep with sin, religion, works, all mean you know THEM.. but not God. So, you will be close to what you chose to be close to, while down here: principle of the elders in Rev 4, +martyrs in Rev14:4.

Colossians 3:25, sin (etc.) has consequences now that you are saved: lost spiritual growth, intimacy with Christ. Can be regained, Phili 3:14.

So look: we need no barnacled Gospels. Sin damages the soul instantly. We need to learn & live on Bible to get the old bad information out, & new DDNA, in. Ergo breathe 1Jn1:9! 'Sinners' won't use it. Won't learn the Book, but rather keep intimate with their own abilities, prowess, things, popularity — remain spiritual retards. You don't have to be one of them.

Strong God, weak Allah

Muslim! You can SECRETLY believe Christ paid for your sins and you ARE RESCUED from hell forever, guaranteed. So if you do believe, don't comment here. Keep it a secret. God will free you to 'go public', later.

It's not disloyal, to believe in secret: it's SALVATION. So for now, you can just think of Christ when you do the Islamic movements. God will free you to later get Bible and learn Him.

God doesn't need your religion, so you don't have to change it or 'give up' anything. Salvation is a RELATIONSHIP, never a religion. Only fake-gods & humans need religion, because they need power. Omnipotent God, already has it. Religion was invented by Iblis, in Genesis 3, & the initial temptation to Adam & the woman was that "you will be like God" — a RELIGIOUS temptation.

For the Real God is STRONG, not weak like 'Allah'. So the Real God doesn't need you to admit you are saved to anyone else — IT'S NO ONE ELSE'S BUSINESS WHAT YOU BELIEVE. Faith is a private matter between God & you. To make it an issue before other humans is EVIL ARROGANCE. Only a sick pretend-god needs you to make an issue of him before other humans.

The Real God paid for you, & His Name is Jesus the Christ, Who Added Humanity to Himself for just that reason. No one killed Him, He laid down His Own Life: verses are in this video to show you that.

Believe just ONCE that Christ paid for your sins, and you are forever saved. Bible is absolute on that: Abraham believed & was immediately saved, Genesis 15:6. So God Who doesn't change, has the same 'deal' for everyone else. Same as for Adam, even.

So go ahead, be secret: believe & be saved, no one need ever know. Besides, God wants to grow you up first before you blabber about what you don't yet understand.

For, Real God does not need your worship or loyalty. (We need it because it makes us happy, but HE doesn't need it.) Does not need you to be a good person, since He foreknew you would not be. PAID FOR YOU, instead of you having to pay Him. Real God above all, doesn't need you to kill, coerce, enslave, in His Name. He does not need you to dress a certain way, abstain or eat certain foods, lift your index finger in prayer or even, pray.

Islam is the opposite of what Real God represents. So it's not from God.

JUST ASK GOD to prove or disprove its veracity. After all, who would better know than God? :)

God would want you to SAVE you from Islam. For God loves you. He made your soul directly AT BIRTH!

Nephilim Free calls God a Liar!

For Buruc, responding per his request in his video, here: • Video . I can't send Nephilim Free this video, so if you can, please do. He is not blocked, will not be censored, and should have the opportunity to reply.

This video proves from the Real Bible Text itself, live before your own eyes, the HADES verses pan-Bible, ending with the Lord's own words on the topic, in Luke 16; where He too says 'Hades' is a REAL PLACE you go after death, if an unbeliever. Tells a story about it, even, a real story of real people, since HE is the one sent at the rich man's request to tell people about Hades, in lieu of the already-dead, Lazarus.

It's not a parable. Parables never use real names and real people; so when the Lord reports what Abraham says, the Lord repeats the exact words — or would be lying, to claim Abraham said something he didn't say!

So who is the liar?

There are many more verses than these. But these verses help you see most quickly, that the liars are those who claim hell doesn't exist, just as John warned carnal believers would, in 1John1:10. So the truth is not in them. Avoid them, says Paul in 2Tim2:26-3:7.

Full list of all the Hades references by name (117 verses): Gen. 37:35; 42:38; 44:29, 31; Num. 16:30, 33; Deut. 32:22; 1 Sam. 2:6; 1 Ki. 2:6, 9, 35; Est. 3:13; Tob. 3:10; 13:2; Tbs. 3:10; 4:19; 13:2; 2 Ma. 6:23; 3 Ma. 4:8; 5:42, 51; 6:31; Ps. 6:6; 9:18; 15:10; 17:6; 29:4; 30:18; 48:15f; 54:16; 85:13; 87:4; 88:49; 93:17; 113:25; 114:3; 138:8; 140:7; Odes 2:22; 3:6; 6:3; 11:10, 18; Prov. 1:12; 2:18; 5:5; 7:27; 9:18; 14:12; 15:11, 24; 16:25; 27:20; 30:16; Eccl. 9:10; Cant. 8:6; Job 7:9; 11:8; 14:13; 17:13, 16; 21:13; 26:6; 33:22; 38:17; Wis. 1:14; 2:1; 16:13; 17:13; Sir. 9:12; 14:12, 16; 17:27; 21:10; 28:21; 41:4; 48:5; 51:5f; Ps. Sol. 4:13; 14:9; 15:10; 16:2; Hos. 13:14; Amos 9:2; Jon. 2:3; Hab. 2:5; Isa. 5:14; 14:9, 11, 15, 19; 28:15, 18; 38:10, 18; 57:9; Bar. 2:17; 3:11, 19; Ezek. 31:15ff; 32:27; Dan. 3:88; Dat. 3:88; Matt. 11:23; 16:18; Lk. 10:15; 16:23; Acts 2:27, 31; 1 Co. 15:55; Rev. 1:18; 6:8; 20:13f

NOTE: inclusion of Apochryphal verses is not a claim of divinity for those books. The Apochrypha is used only to better ascertain how Greek (or Aramaic) words were used at the time the books were written, and for certain historical clues. So inclusion of them here to show HADES is a valid thing to do.

See also my 'Hell Verses' video description for an (unfinished) word search on all Hell references including synonyms, pan-Bible.

NephilimFree calls God 'temporary'?

NephilimFree, in his comments to my claim he calls God a liar video (here: • Nephilim Free calls God a Liar! ), insists that Hebrew olam=Greek aiwn does not mean 'forever'. Of course, he himself cannot read either Hebrew or Greek, but pretends expertise when he quotes. So he doesn't know if what he quotes, is true. But claims it is. That is a form of lying.

I tried sending this video to NephilimFree, did notify him in the comments, but I'm blocked. So if you aren't, please send this video to him so he has the freedom to reply.

Since Bible uses both words to MEAN forever, when describing God's Attributes, His Promises, SALVATION, Hell, etc., then NephilimFree is in essence calling God 'temporary', since olam=aiwn is used to describe GOD Himself. So in this video, we'll get an introduction to how BIBLE uses the terms 'olam' (Hebrew) and 'aiwn' (Greek) to mean FOREVER.

This video doesn't cover all the uses: if you want to see them all, download this 211-page Word doc, listing them all: http://www.brainout.net/aiwnVersesPan...

This video (and its sequel, 'DEFENDING NephilimFree?') gives you a taste of some pretty obvious instances to prove olam=aiwn=forever, in the Bible. I might do more videos as responses to this one, to show some of the verses below, and other important samples of the 700 times the terms are used, pan-Bible. SO YOU SEE FOR YOURSELF what Bible says. Not, a brainout's interp, and certainly not a NephilimFree's! BIBLE, not people!

Below follows one of my video comments to the 'NephilimFree calls God a liar!' video, to list more of the most important proofs that NephilimFree lies. Sorry — I even like this guy — but we Christians are required to police our own, when one of us lies. Personal affection must be set aside.

Here's the comment quote:

'Heads up! Bible REFUTES Neph: aiwna=olam for GOD's ATTRIBUTES, i.e., 1 Chr16:34, 41; 2 Chr5:13; 7:3, 6; 20:21; Ezr3:11; Ps90:2,106:1,107:1, 118:1, 29,13­6:1,138:8,Jer. 33:11, etc.

Aiwna translates olam over 700 times. Context shows if 'age' or FOREVER. Christ used it both ways in Mark 3:29 & 10:30, Luke 18:30, John4:14 (2nd time as ETERNAL, paired wordplay); see also Luk1:33 (parallelism), 1:55, John6:51,58,10:28,11:26,12:34; 8:35, 8:51-52, etc.

Aiwna also denotes God's Attributes in NT.'

Even if you have e-sword, you can search on the word aiwn and look it up in Thayer's, plus the word 'olam' in Brown Driver Briggs. I believe e-sword has available both lexicons for download. Or, you can google for both terms on the internet. USE GOOD SCHOLARSHIP, don't be like lying NephilimFree who is no different from ProfMTH, skewing Bible to fit his 'agenda'. Both of them hate God, clearly, as does anyone else who does the same thing.

Learn not to imitate them! Bible says some stuff we find disturbing. Fine. Admit it, try to learn better what it SAYS, before you run off half-cocked making CLAIMS about what it says, so some brainout won't make a video showing you up for not doing your homework.

If I must, I'll do videos like this one, documenting LIVE BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES, the Original Words God Preserved showing all 700 (or so) occurrences of olam=aiwn, in the Bible. IT is the authority, not lying NephilimFree or any other human being.

As I keep on saying, when I see others get Bible so WRONG, I don't trust myself, either. That's why I focus on EXEGESIS to demonstrate LIVE what BIBLE says. Bible, not brainout — different B!

Hijab HiJinks

Inspired by recent emails: is holiness what's on your head — or IN it?

Related verses: Isaiah 53:11's 'by KNOWLEDGE He makes Righteous', which is the core idea here; also Isaiah 55:1-11, Hosea 4:1-6, Matt 4:4, 15:18-20 (parallel is Mark 7:14-23), 22:37, 23:25-28, Luke 10:38-42, 11:28ff, Rom 9:30-33, 10:3-4, 1Cor2:13-16, Eph 3:15-19, 4:13, 2Cor10:5, Hebrews 11:1, 6 (versus Hebrews 5:11-6:12), etc.

Calvin's gloating: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc8.iv.xvi.ii.html?highlight=calvin%2Cservetus%2Cposterity#highlight

The quote there:

"posterity owes me a debt of gratitude for having purged the Church of so pernicious a monster."994

The actual Latin he wrote reads, "iudicio posteritas mihi gratitudinem debeat, quia tam exitiali monstro ecclesiam purgaverim."

John 15 proves Saved though Fruitless

A little homework goes a long way to end apostates' claims you must 'show fruit' to prove you're saved. For they need a lesson in READING and here, in viticulture. To get yours, download this book, which covers the practice in Christ's time, with relevant verses, ancient history, etc.: Viticulture and brewing in the ancient Orient. Pay close attention to the text beginning on and after page 62, through the end of that chapter (about five pages later).

So in John 15:6, what's translated 'branch' is instead a 'cane-shoot' or 'spur', the leafy portion coming OFF the trunk of the vine. Greek word klema, a PRODUCT OF a vine for wine. The VINE produces the klema. The klema itself, produces nothing, and is burnt up at the end, whether it bears grapes, or not. It's called, 'harvesting', and the entire vine is cut back at the end. Harvesting is analogous to death.

Again, not every klema bears grape clusters; some bear only leaves; every one of them, fruit-bearing or no, is HARVESTED and burned. Only the fruit, if any, remains. Again, analogous to physical death.

Bible verses are many, as the book shows; but for our purposes, note carefully Luke 8, 1Cor 3, 6, 12, mustard seed parable, wheat and tares, wheat and chaff, James (written at same time as 1Cor) and most importantly, all of 1John, whose theme is ABIDING. How to do it.

Here in John 15, CHRIST IS THE VINE, so only saved people are in view. Can't be part of the Vine, if not saved, since the VINE PRODUCES the klema. Yet once MADE BY the Vine, will you 'abide' (stay in fellowship, using 1John1:9 as needed)? That's the issue He's explaining (really, since John 14, in macro context).

Duh. HE IS THE BRANCH, and we are 'partakers' of Him. 2Cor5:17, we are in Christ, the Vine. So, new creation (new-in-species creation, literal meaning of Greek kaine ktsis).

So look: a live branch and a dead branch are STILL branches. A living prince and a dead one are BOTH princes. A sterile wife and a fertile one are still WIVES. We are Bride of Christ, whether sterile or fruitful. You don't stop being what you WERE, by death. You don't stop being IN CHRIST, by death. Duh.

Now, whether you MATURED while you were here, is a different story. A sterile branch and a fruited branch are both branches, still; both are harvested, still; both are burned up, still — wood hay stubble of our dead-in-Adam bodies, die. THAT is the meaning here, as you'll see: for this video is about viticulture, to show what Christ is talking about.

Of course, those claiming you must show 'works' to 'evidence' you're saved (else maybe you're not), ignore context (Chapters 14-17, esp. 17:21-23); they do no homework, too preoccupied with their poop. Or yours.

So the fruitcakes with their fruitless apostate talk about fruit they are NOT bearing (except for Satan), don't look at GOD, but at themselves; and at you, to even make an issue of what YOU do. Mote-picking, ignoring their own fruitless eye-logs. Burnt up, at the Bema. We all will be. And if anything remains, as Paul quipped, guess Who Did it? God. Only God can make gold, silver precious stones, the 'fruit' of HIS Labor.

So no one can see that. Get it?

Christian frauds are many, like Psychic Frauds

Shoutout vid to Rob Lester's Psychic Fraud series, starting here: • Video . My video just asks the question, 'what parallels exist between Christian frauds, and these psychic frauds?' For these folks abound in Christendom, too.

Moreover, almost every denomination in Christendom today, is based on the sect/denomination's leader claiming dreams/visions/revelations from God. Never mind, the leader contradicts Scripture. This phenomenon has gone on for two millennia, now. It was the bane of Israel, in the OT. That's why such folks were executed, under the Law. Pagan culture revered and employed such people for the 'visions', most famous being Pharaoh of the Exodus, the Oracle at Delphi, the magi; but even great houses and common folk would pay for these 'visions'. With devastating results (look up the 'Oracle of Delphi' and 'Halys River', in Google, for a famous example).

For these folks were frauds after fame and money; or, adroitly, were demon-possessed, demon-influenced (since no demon can possess the body of a Christian), wrecking havoc as desired (Judas being a case in point). Larger writeup about this latter, is in SatTacExamp.htm#Mothman, so you can see the link between 'psychic' or 'UFO' stuff, and gullible Christianity. That whole webpage is on Satan's strategy and tactics, with hard data you can test yourself.

So, as you subscribe to and watch Rob Lester's series (which I heartily recommend), you might want to ask the same 'fraud' question of the Christians who, past or present, essentially pose as God's mouthpiece. So to avoid them.

KJVO frauds, in their own words, are linked in the video description, here: • 18/72, KJVOB : Meet the KJV-only Clowns. Also search on Dremias5545's 'Mark of the Beast' video here in Youtube, showing Ruckman's vision claim in writing. Else, look up 'Millerite', 'Mormon', 'Ellen White', 'Rutherford', 'Adventism', 'Aime Semple McPherson' for just a smattering of the many visiion panderers over the last 100+ years, among protestants. Pope of Roman Catholicism is claimed to be infallible in his pronouncements, so that's a vision claim too — the pronouncements usually contradict Bible in some major way. The Church Fathers, of course, pandered vision stories, or claimed to have them. Really, no denomination is without such claims, so it's an infection pan-Christendom.

How to know the frauds? Compare what they say with Scripture. If Bible disagrees, Bible is right and the fraud is exposed. Of course, your reading of Bible might be wrong, so be sure to use 1John1:9 and ask God to show you the relevant verses and their meaning. AUDIT everything, lest you become a fraud, yourself. :)

Second Coming on April 18th,2030 and last 7 years | 큰날재림교회Great day Adventist

@brainoutyakabrainout | 6 years ago
The problem with your presentation, is that the Bible contradicts it. The 1335 and the 1260 are literal days for the people in the tribulation to use to know when to flee. You are supposed to be adding backwards from 1335 to derive the exit window that occurs in Revelation 11.

The Bible says you cannot know when the tribulation will start in Acts 1. However there is a timeline Christ provided for Christians to know what time it is, in case the Rapture does not happen. You can see this timeline yourself in my Matthew 24 playlist. You cannot see it in the English, because ever since Genesis, the Bible writers have used syllable counts in the original Hebrew and Greek to account for time. Daniel 9 does that. You can see my Daniel 9 videos either here or in vimeo.


b-out News & Theses videos

brainout Theses overview videos, videomaking plans and updates, webpage updates, Youtube hints, and personal stuff. My 'job' on the Christian team is to cover stuff you can't find easily elsewhere, especially exegetical stuff and doctrines which you can't find taught in pulpits or seminaries, but which are (or more often WERE) known. I am not a teacher, but just a kind of waitress reading doctrines on the menu which people overlook, and a librarian, showing you how you can PROVE FOR YOURSELF where these doctrines are located, in Bible.

1/3 brainout Theses

Summary of the Theses in my videos, so you can decide if you want to watch any of them. Webpage covering these theses in more detail is SurpConc.htm. If the page loads too slowly, tell me. I can fix that.

The most important section in that page is SurpConc.htm#Mistrial, which explains your REAL role in the world today, whether you are unbeliever or believer. For Satan's angling for a Mistrial Verdict, and he's using you and me to get it. RAPTURE CAN BE MISTIMED . God foretells that He will win, and we know that's true — but factually, Satan CAN win; you and I as individuals, can lose bigtime, even though irrevocably saved, if we cave into his arguments. 99.9% of Christians, cave in (seed parable in Luke 8). So that's why 1Cor3 reads as it does. Cave in, and all your life is burned up, but you alone are saved.

Generally speaking, webpage and video content is very heavy, especially with exegesis; and the topics end up being controversial, since Christendom isn't keen on learning Bible all that well. So what the Bible does say about the Gospel, the spiritual life, abortion and creation, for example, are all largely misrepresented by Christians. And there are certain key Bible doctrines Christians have never known, such as how God Orchestrates Time.

So seven main playlists addressing these and related issues, are summarized in this and the next video. Thus you can decide where — if at all — to spend your precious time, watching.

Bible auditing is crucial. Whether it agrees with what we want it to say, or not. Pity people insist on making the Bible agree with them, rather than learning how to agree with IT.

1/2 Reaction to God: Mine

This video focuses on three observations about the spiritual life which I've covered extensively in my webpages. The video is a shorter, more personal version, because the meaning just blows me away: God's Love is really Absolute. He could just bing! us to make us good little boys & girls, but instead wants to make our spiritual development a matter of our choice, imposing ON HIMSELF. In short, He wants it the hard way. For Love, loves to throw the Self away.

So how is that Fair to Him? What kind of life, results? Video but summarizes; here are the main webpages on the topic.

Macro side: Part III of the Thinking series, LordvSatan3.htm. It's really four webpages, all accessible from the red box links at the pagetop. Shocking stuff. All provable in Bible, you can see the verses for yourself as you read, if you use 1Jn1:9 as needed. Very long.

Micro side, what I call "DDNA" (Divine DNA, moniker for Christ's Thinking), how God internally transforms you: DDNA.htm. There are several webpages linked, all accessible from the top-of-the-page section.

Luigi spills the beans on brainout

True story on God's sense of humor, how I came to be writing webpages and doing videos, told through the mouth of my favorite "Cars" character, "Luigi". I used the character to see if I could animate him. Alas, it didn't work out too well. :)

But the story 'he' tells is true enough. For I am a DOS fanatic, but I had to get email in 1999, and since I absolutely DETEST Windows, I purchased two webtv's, one for my mother, the other for me. That led to the discovery of "chat", and I was hooked. In Christian chat I had so many people peppering me with questions, I started writing webpages so I could refer them to the pages and save my fingers. But with webtv you must compose online. Where I live, and then it was dialup — the phone bills reached $1,000 per month. I felt guilty spending so much time, and why would God want me doing all this? So secretly, I thought God would want me to quit chat and webpages.

Luigi tells you what happens next. Ohhhh, LOL I should say that the event he's talking about took place on or in the same week of, my pastor's birthday (which is April Fool's day, then the year 2000). The irony!

It's a true story 'Luigi' tells, but it's more an experiment in trying to animate him: my favorite character in the movie "Cars" by Pixar Pictures. If you've not rented it or seen it on cable, you should.

Deadbeat Subscribers — how to get rid of them

Spammers have many nicknames, but many of these are probably sock accounts. Here are some of the names which have tried subbing to me in the last few days; I've blocked them, which removed them from my sublist: AdvanceStanding, EjectGame, guaranteedsubback, InsuranceAssociates, isub4love, MitchSubsToYou, PayItDownward, phreesubber, subandtug, subeveryonebackring, Subscribe10000000.

You are Royal Family of God, not a pimp.

GOD LEADS the people to you. You don't have to go looking for people, to witness. Remember the story of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch, the Lord and the Samaritan woman. LEARN BIBLE and HE will send the people TO you.

Same principle as for pastors.

We are ROYAL, not pimps. Sorry to be so rough, but this Madison-Avenue Churchinanity garbage which TBN and others all pander makes Christ look cheap.

Hope you ask God why brainouty was so nasty, and think over what's written here. He'll explain it.

FOR YOU ARE ROYAL, not a commoner, from that first moment you believed in Christ. See you in heaven.


b-out Bible101

Basics on the True Gospel which saves you forever, and what constitutes the post-salvation life. List is unwieldy toward the end, as it's now impossible to order videos properly in Youtube. So just skim the list. First 40 vids constitute a primer of what the spiritual life is. The last 44 are on common glitches, due to believer or Satan's rejection. Of those, the last five summarize the polarization we'll all go through. But the fact remains, GOD LOVES YOU: and that's how the playlist ends. In short, you're free to be negative, and free to use 1John1:9 afterwards. He will never reject you.

Video topics here are basic, ranging from works versus faith-only salvation, to God's Nature, why-hell, suffering, Satan's Strategy, Trinity and Tongues. See 'Adv. Bible Spirituality' playlist for a self-diagnostic set of charts (explained in the videos) so you can test your own spiritual growth.

Diagnostic videos in this list have'10' in their titles, but all videos are meant for diagnostics. How Christians get the basics wrong, are covered in many videos in the list, so just look at the titles.

All my webpages center on these topics from an advanced view, covering the deeper WHYs that have plagued Christendom for centuries. Yes, one can indeed show the Bible perfectly fits together, but it requires one do some digging. :)

These videos merely acquaint the viewer with the basics.

To properly account for a belief, you must not only prove it right, you must also prove why the other answers are wrong. True accounting must also explain wrong answers, as well as the right ones. So these videos merely introduce; associated webpages (in the video descriptions), have more detail.

Wrong answers will ALWAYS emphasize what MAN is or does, and ignore or even malign, the Infinite Nature of God.

So in your analysis of any doctrine or idea, always start top-down, with God's Nature, and trace His nature through the doctrine in question. This tracing will always be productive, if and only if you use 1John1:9 as you do it.

False doctrine shows up reasonably quickly, if you do that: it will jar with God's Nature, i.e., you know salvation is permanent since CHRIST paid IN ADVANCE, and you get eternal life — God's Own Life has no beginning, so cannot end.

So anyone claiming you can lose salvation or were never saved in the first place (see the emphasis on man?) impugns God's Omniscience, Righteousness and Omnipotence. Flee such people.

The second major detection device of false doctrine is supremely bad scholarship. So check the original-language texts versus the teaching, i.e., in John3:16 Greek pistewn and eXei are both in the PRESENT aspect/tense, signifying that the very MOMENT you believe, you FOREVER have eternal life. So salvation cannot possibly be lost.

Hence the false doctrine that you can commit some sin to lose salvation, is proven false due to slipshod scholarship (which of course emphasizes man). Bad scholarship always comes from trying to make Bible fit one's prejudices, and the mistakes made are embarrassing (i.e., aspect/tense matching is taught in Bible Greek101).

Faith is private: decide for YOURSELF what you believe, before God. These videos are designed to inform, NOT convert you. Only GOD converts: for only He made your soul.

Can God Sin? A Question of Omnipotence

To the layman, it's frequently said "God cannot sin". Bible translations often also resort to that formula, giving rise to a lot of confusion about whether a God supposedly Omnipotent, really is. So the debate rages: is God 'constrained' by His Attributes? Can God act, think, be 'beyond' His Own Nature? Of course you realize that if God were constrained by His Attributes, then a) He'd not really be Sovereign, b) He'd not really be FREE, so c) He'd not really be God.

Theologians play all kinds of word games to somehow 'accredit' God as being Infinite, yet CHAIN Him to his other attributes. Bible doesn't do that.

So in this video you'll see three sample verses showing how the Bible handles this topic. When you do, you'll see a quite different story from the standard theological argument above.

Technically, God being TIMELESS, whatever thoughts He has 'today' He has always had, and always will have. So technically, if there was ever GOING to be a time in the 'future' during which God would 'want' to sin, that 'future' would be in Him 'now' and He'd be tainted 'now'. Think that over for a second before continuing to read. Infinity means ONE BIG NOW, no sequencing.

Hence the REASON WHY God will never sin is NOT due to His Other Attributes, but due to His WILL. That's the opposite of what thumbnail theology depicts. More complex to understand, of course.

Bible depicts this ABSOLUTENESS of SOVEREIGNTY by means of a cute particle called an "alpha privative negative". Kinda like how we convert "possible" to "impossible" by sticking an "im" in front, when you front a Greek word with "a", the "a" WHOLLY NEGATES the meaning of the word it fronts.

Which means, NEVER, ALWAYS THE OPPOSITE, CAN'T EVER BE whatever the word without the "a", means. Clever feature of Greek grammar, huh.

So the video will cover the three verses — James 1:13, Hebrews 6:18, Titus 1:2 — showing NOTHING DENTS GOD. Meaning, there is NOTHING that has the power to influence, change, alter, affect God. So not even His Own Attributes, much less sin or any external, can influence Him.

That's a statement of ABSOLUTE Sovereignty, honey. God is never 'constrained' by His Other Attributes or anything else, and the sooner we stop straitjacketing Him by our shorthand expressions of "God cannot", the sooner we will see how Everything Holds Together Solely Because He Wants it so.

The implications are staggering. For one thing, it's not even remotely possible that Foreknowledge 'influences' God's Will. So scrap all that lapsarian nonsense about 'when' did God elect you. It DOESN'T MATTER what you are or will become, GOD WANTS YOU. Else, you'd not even exist. God will never stop wanting you. If there would ever be a future time, you wouldn't even exist NOW. That is Absolute Love. Nothing you ever become can influence it — because again, God is Timeless. So if there would ever be a future time when He would change his mind, you'd never exist in the first place.

So you breathe, because He wants you. You are free, because He wants you. Saved or unsaved, elect or not, He made you at your birth (personally created your soul, and that is why you are not evolved). His Son paid for your sins, so you can immediately and permanently have a relationship with Him if you believe Jesus the Christ (the Son) paid for your sins. If not, you go to hell when you die. Because, God lives forever, so you will also. Question is, WHERE? Again, because He lives forever and He wants you, there CANNOT BE a time when you stop living. You only change bodies.

Stark choice, heaven or hell. God's Choice is that you believe in Christ and live in heaven after this body dies; and He being Timeless, is NEVER WILLING that you should go to hell, 2Pet3:9. But being Absolute Love, He will NEVER coerce you to believe, either.

Is that your choice, to believe? Then DO it. Now, John 3:16.

I also made two similar but silent BibleWorks videos showing these three verses with the Bauer Danker lexicons. (I also made soundtracks, if needed.) If you want, and I'll upload them to my brainout.net domain so you can download anonymously.

God101: Trinity, Part 1 of 3

The meaning of Trinity is Three Persons, EACH being Co-Infinite, Co-Eternal. Sadly, the definition gets distorted into an Egg, because we're afraid to say that means THREE GODS. This Part 1 thus begins with the nature of Infinity, because we humans keep thinking that if more than One, then the Nature is somehow not Infinite. But Infinite Nature is Character, non-spatial. See if this helps.


God101: Trinity, Part 2 of 3

Trinity means Three Gods of Co-Equal, Co-Infinite SAME NATURE, but often mislabeled "one" to confuse everyone. Greek heis and Hebrew echad mean 'united' or 'same-kind' more often than they mean 1 in number, see John 17 prayer, Gen 2:24, Deut 6:4, etc.).


God101: Trinity, Part 3 of 3

How to see "Trinity" verses in Bible, rhetorical styles categories: "Trinity Verses" video will list them. This video merely summarizes the writing styles God uses to disclose Trinity in OT and New.

Any ancient text must be read per its own rhetorical styles. If you don't know Bible's rhetorical styles, you'll not easily see "Trinity" referenced in OT or New. Credits at video end list my webpages on Trinity. Downloadable in Google. More Trinity info is at DueDisclosure.htm

1/2 Why Suffering, God?

Thinking out loud why God allows suffering. Hell is always in God's Face. How can HE stand it? Video has no text, so you can just listen, ponder.

Applicable verses:

Intimacy in all things, Eph1. Good truth, Bad Truth, Any Truth, Because Truth, Psalm 138:2b. To be 'one' with God Who Knows All Suffering. Not, about sin itself.

True Holiness

BELIEVE IN CHRIST just once and you are eternally saved. THAT is the true Gospel, John 3:16. After that, John 14:26, Heb10:15-17, 2Pet3:18, the Spirit GROWS you in Christ's Own Thinking. That and that alone, is true holiness.

For only what GOD does, is holy. Anything YOU do, will be doo-doo. So to become holy, it must be wholly what God does TO you, hence will be gold. Anything you do to yourself.. will be brown.

But the broad world would have you think differently. Would have you grow its vegetables and call that, 'holy'. Just like Cain. So this video is dedicated to Pharisees everywhere who grind Christ into the dust, saying that BELIEVE IN CHRIST is not enough; who trample His Work on the Cross by saying YOU must show evidence of your faith — or you're not saved, let alone spiritual. What liars they are.

Jude 12 applies to these liars. They are twice-dead, plucked up by the roots. They want to ADD to the Cross, just like Catholicism does. They produce lots of fruit, alright: and it's all BROWN. Like, you-know-what.

Ignore them, counsels Paul in 2Tim2:26-3:7. NO ONE COMPETES WITH THE CROSS. So this video, is dedicated to those who are deaf, the add-to-the-Cross wolves in sheep's clothing, who crucify the Son afresh, Hebrews 6:6.

But they can't hear it. So you: please don't be like them. They call their additions holy, but their additions are wholly doo-doo. Paul used the "s" word for these additions, to which he formerly subscribed, in Philippians 3:8.

Childish Christianity divides into two camps: one legalistic, the other lascivious. Both will retard spiritually if they don't discover that True Holiness is to do what Christ did: get the WORD living in your head. That's how He stayed sinless. That's how we GET sin out of our lives.

More than that, the Word makes us have RAPPORT with God, Romans 5:5. I tried to make the explanation simple, this time.

Recommend you see Joeusesamac's short "Distraction" video, as he demonstrates it well: people are distracted by other people, forgetting all about Christ, recalling only His NAME, but never really Him.

That's why they break down into these childish camps. The lascivious obsess over the legalists, and the legalists obsess over the lascivious, and EVERYONE forgets about God...

So it's not Christ we learn, but doo-doo. In His Name, of course! So at the Bema, we'll have doo-doo aka "wood hay stubble" to show for our life down here.

So take the NARROW road: get His Thinking carved into your heart (moniker for soul, in Bible), Heb10:15-17. Carved, by the Spirit via 1Jn1:9 as needed, learning and living on Bible you study under whomever God appointed as a pastor-teacher for you ("poimen kai didaskolos" in Eph4:11, +"haphe" and "henos" in Eph4:16). Then the 'fruit' will be golden, 1Cor3.

The Gay Thing: brainout sounds off

Normally I like to steer clear of politicized topics. But after seeing all the gay-bashing by Christians, I have to sound off.

This video is a quick retort to those claiming that gays must go to hell. I've never heard such nonsense in my life. SHOW ME where that is in the Bible, k? Paul constantly stressed that RELIGIOUS sinning is the worst kind, and he ought to know: he was the most religious guy, ever. His own confession to that effect was in Philippians 3:2-8, 1Cor15:1-10, 1Tim1; it is his main theme in Galatians, Romans 2 (having set up his religious Roman audience for it by mentioning lascivious sins first and then EQUATING them), Romans 9-11. The sarcasm in Romans 12:1-3's Greek drips off the page.

We all cannot get over our own favorite brands of sinning absent learning and living on Bible, theme of Romans 7-8.

Worse, if you misrepresent the BIBLE in order to judge someone, a) you sin against God's Own Word (can you sin worse? NO!) and b) the judgement you render against the other person, is the judgement YOU get, Matt7:1-2.

Now since no believer can ever go to hell (salvation is irrevocable, for you get God's Own Life the moment you believe, per the present tenses in John 3:16's Greek) — guess what? You have to get your 'hell', down here! And, you will be a spiritual retard all your life, until you grow OUT of that need to judge others' sins.

The anti-Biblical prolife movement, the stupid American movement to define "marriage" as solely heterosexual (which is anti-constitutional, but I digress) — all of that is a bunch of spiritual retards marching straight into Divine Discipline.

If you're gay, just ignore these people. They have the MORAL brand of sinning, and just like you they need to grow up on the Word before they can stop it. We all need that.

1John 1:9 is for that purpose. Sin impedes spiritual maturation, because the Holy Spirit won't fill a defiled Temple. Since you can't grow spiritually unless Filled (with His Perception Power), you want to sin as little as possible, of course. But who can stop? Ergo, 1John1:9 used every time you remember you sinned, puts you back online. Your spiritual brain is OUT apart from Filling, per clever Greek wordplay in Ephesians 4:23 (hence my nickname, to remind me to use 1 John 1:9).

We all sin. Getting mad at Windows is a sin. Do you know how many times I get mad at Windows in a day? I must use 1Jn1:9 like breathing! So I can use the Word to eventually Remember Word well enough so that the temptation to get mad at Windows, is instead met with Word. That's how Christ did it in Matt4, and how He stayed sinless even on the Cross (Isa53:11b's bedato clause).

So, um.. if that's what Christ Himself needed to do to avoid sin, we need to do it the more. So it takes time to get past any sin, whatever 'flavor' happens to be your favorite. Gotta get the Word built in you, first. Which means, you first gotta be saved, else you can't get the Holy Spirit to PUT the Word in you whenever you're between sins.

So if you're gay, just believe in Christ, and you're forever saved. After that, learn and live on Bible, using 1Jn1:9 as needed. Yes, homosexual sex is a sin, but so is getting mad at Windows. I promise you, the Lord will not regard me as sinning less than you, just because my 'favorite flavor' is different! God is Holy, we are not! So give it time; first, you need to be convinced that homosexuality isn't a good idea; God will work with you on that. But His First Goal is to build the RELATIONSHIP so that you know Him; for salvation, isn't about sin, but about Relationship, John 16:9.

Along the way, He'll show you how to get past that or whatever sins, via learning and living on Bible. Expect the process to be gradual, don't beat yourself up. We all have our own brands of habitual sins.

Apply the grace of salvation to yourself and take it easy. God will give you the victory. See you in heaven!

Speaking in Tongues

If you can speak in tongues, TRANSLATE this.

People who believe in tongues cannot read Bible. Paul very clearly says in any translation of 1Cor14 — having set up the topic in 1Cor13 — that tongues die when the Temple will. He quotes Isaiah 28, which like all prophecy has dual fulfillment. 1st time, 721BC wipe-out of Samaria. 2nd time, 70AD Temple Destruction.

So Paul includes it in 1Cor14, to ref back also to Joel 2, Acts 2: GIVING GOSPEL IN FOREIGN LANGUAGES to signify the fulfillment of Daniel 9:26. That, was the far fulfillment.

So 1Cor13 was on what 'tongues' will replace then-current ones — the 'tongues' of completed CANON. His Head 'surpassing' (1Cor12:31 wordplay) the Body. That's why 1Cor13 ends by saying tongues CEASE. Cease, when the Temple does; cease, when Canon completed.

But even if you didn't know all that, you could just read 1Cor14 and know something's VERY wrong with tongues today. Paul tells you that the gift was to GIVE THE GOSPEL IN A FOREIGN HUMAN LANGUAGE. The "tongues of angels" phrase in 1Cor13:1 was an IF — IF IF IF Paul could do that — 3rd class condition. NOWHERE IN BIBLE does it say anyone can speak in anything BUT a human language.

In short, tongues is utterly bogus and demonic. There's a special demon called the engastramuthos demon (term is in the OT) who empowered pagan priestesses and celebrants to jabber away in ecstacy. Tongues today stems from THAT, has ZERO to do with Bible. For, the interp of it today was bogus, EVEN WHEN TONGUES EXISTED.

So proof positive, that tongues idiots cannot read Bible. So they will never mature, if even they are saved. They are demon-controlled (influenced, if believers, since no believer can be possessed). Avoid them like the plague; God is just a pet doing tricks, to these dingdongs. They want a high, but not God Himself.

Don't agree? Okay, PROVE ME WRONG — translate this video's speech!

You Are What You Believe

You are what you believe, by Divine Decree. Ultimate proof that all mankind has free will and faith gifted to him by God at birth: everything you are is BASED on your beliefs. So beware what you believe, because you WEAR what you believe!

What you believe determines who you are and it shows up in your resulting character. So WHAT you believe has the merit or demerit, and YOU are affected positively or negatively by it. Try looking at any Bible verse with that definition in mind and see how suddenly many Bible verses we all debate, become unequivocal. The soul is belief DEPENDENT. So free will is like breathing, and WHAT you believe, is inhaled. So beware of what you believe...

The following related verses come to mind, and from them you'll remember others: Proverbs 23:7 (literally "soul", not "heart", in Hebrew); Romans 1:19-21, Isaiah 6:8-10, 32:3, 2 Cor 4:4, 1 John 2:11.

See, you harden your own heart one belief at a time. You tell yourself a thing is true or false, and that programs your soul and your brain. Hence there comes a point when the contradictory truth in front of your eyes, only hardens you the more, just as with Pharaoh, who (like Esau) is Paul's poster boy in Romans 9.

Paul's MAIN POINT in both Romans 9 and 10, is that you harden YOURSELF, because you HAVE free will. So of course if you are self-hardened against that fact, you'll respond like the strawman in Romans 9:19. To which Paul cattily replies, 'where did you get the ability to TALK BACK to God, then?' in Romans 9:20. No Calvinist ever reads that, or John 6:45 through :51. Now you know why.

Now you know why you can't get through to KJVO people, either, even though it's obvious the KJV is not inspired, just look at it malign the Holy Spirit, in James 4:5; just look at the fact that Lucifer='morning star', in Latin! But KJVO can't 'see' that. Now you know why.

So if God lets you keep having that exposure, He takes responsibility, just like He did in Exodus 4.

In other words, debate becomes pointless. In other words, never insist on your own beliefs, lest you harden yourself. For no matter how correct your beliefs might be, they are never as correct as the whole truth. Which truth will be blinded from you, if you refuse to keep your beliefs open.

You and me both! 1John1:9 is a lifeline we can't afford to be without!

1/7 Spiritual Retards (reply to Cimbolic)

Shout-out to Cimbolic my open-minded atheist friend re his courteous reply (• Hate-Speech: YokeUp, Caroline, Sister...) to a video depicting atheists as germs, as you'll see in the ribbon below this video player.

So this reply video explains why BABY RETARDED CHRISTIANS behave like that. It's due to us being literally born-again, but REFUSING TO HEAR GOD after that. It's also a natural stage of spiritual babyhood, so we all go through this very obnoxious phase. It's not supposed to last but about five years. If it goes on longer, we become spiritual retards.

Any other kind of retardation is not the person's fault. But spiritual retardation is ONLY the believer's fault. And God roundly spanks such a person all his life, to warn him to GROW UP. If he won't listen to God, then he won't listen to anyone else, so the Bible warns us to just avoid these people (i.e., Titus 3:10, 2Tim2:26-3:7, 2John, 1John2, Jude, 2nd half of 2nd Peter, Galatians 3, 1Corinthians passim, Acts 15-22 Jerusalem legalists). So just walk away from the obnoxious Christian. God has saved him, but God is not filling him (with perception, spiritual growth). God will deal with him. You just learn not to emulate him.. and walk away.

My pastor is currently teaching about this topic as I type.

I did some 'Spiritual Childhood' videos to demonstrate the stage's characteristics, which are simultaneously sweet as only children can be — but also, cruel and obnoxious, again as only children (and never-maturing adults) can be. Here's the first of them: • 1/3 Spiritual Childhood

So two things are patent:

  1. "Born again" (John 3, in Bible) is LITERAL, and
  2. If you don't learn and live on Bible via 1Jn1:9 and being under a MALE PASTOR, you will end up a spiritual retard.

For you atheists out there, or anyone annoyed by us Christians, I hope this is a helpful explanation of our normally HORRIBLE behavior. I've watched this drama unfold over the last six months and thought "well, it will end" so declined to comment. But it didn't end, and if even Cimbolic has to speak to it, then I must as well. I apologize for my long silence.

2/7 Spiritual Retards: My Retardation

Yikes, confession time! Sequel to "Spiritual Retards", to balance it out. Since anyone who believes Christ paid for the person's sins is LITERALLY born-again, retardation is a problem until death. As one matures, the areas of retardation are slowly removed and replaced with Christ's Own Thinking BY THE HOLY SPIRIT — it's not possible to do this yourself — so that one always remains 'retarded' on ideas which as yet, He's not corrected. So here, I show my own retardation.

The only difference between a mature believer and an immature one, is that the mature believer KNOWS where he is yet retarded. Because, we are all human, and that dingdong Energizer Bunny — our sin nature inherited from Adam — can't be cured, theme of Romans 8:1-10. Again, spirituality is NOT morality. It's being BUILT UP in Christ's Own Thinking, Isaiah 55:8-9, 1Cor2:16, Eph3:15-19, to the 'destination' of Ephesians 4:13 (criterion for the Rapture to occur).

3/7 Spiritual Retards: Our Retardation

Furthering the meaning of "Spiritual Retards". Here, the 'big picture' of Christianity is explored, starting with the first- century retards to whom the author of Hebrews was writing.

Whole books of the Bible are dedicated to dealing with spiritual retards at the time of writing: Corinthians, Galatians, Romans, and above all, Acts. The latter is a meant as a paradigm of Church history, ostensibly dedicated to showing what goofballs we Christians were, beginning with the apostles themselves, in Acts 1 — and ending, with that most-mature believer acting like a retard, Paul (Paul's stuffy, huffy, i'm-a-martyr-for-Christ retardation shows in Romans 15, Acts 15,18,22 — my pastor spent months going through the exegesis in his "Paul's fall" series.)

So you see our retarded foibles all on Bible display: Peter has his bad hair day in Acts 1, dictating to God whom God should appoint as a successor to the BELIEVER Judas — giving God TWO choices, lol. Not to be outdone, the Jerusalem church headed by the former retard, James — went back to the Mosaic Law. That's why they persecuted Paul, who in many ways was the biggest retard of them all by his own confession in 1Cor15:1-10 (Paul was the LAST apostle appointed), Philippians 3, 1Tim1, and of course in Acts 22, where he relates how retarded he was in ignoring the Lord's ORDER that he stay away from the Jews.

Now, the so-called "prison epistles" show that poster boy Paul recovered and finally fully matured (2Tim4:7-8) just before death. So we can, too.

So again: the only difference between a mature believer and an immature one, is that the mature believer KNOWS where he is yet retarded. Because, we are all human, and that dingdong Energizer Bunny — our sin nature inherited from Adam — can't be cured, theme of Romans 8:1-10. Again, spirituality is NOT morality. It's being BUILT UP in Christ's Own Thinking, Isaiah 55:8-9, 1Cor2:16, Eph3:15-19, to the 'destination' of Ephesians 4:13 (criterion for the Rapture to occur).

1/2 Christian Reaction to God

Christians misstate the Gospel with the best intentions. These two videos explore how. The true & only Gospel which saves you is "believe that Jesus the Christ paid for your sins, and you are forever saved." Genesis 15:6, John 3:15-16, John 3:18, 3:36, Acts 4:32, 16:31, Gal2:16, Rom5:1, Eph2:8-9, many other passages all show this. More True Gospel data is in the blue boxes of my home page, http://www.brainout.net/index.html .

Sadly, most Christians add VERBS to the Gospel, thereby negate it, thus save NO one: they add verbs like "repent of sins", "pray the sinner's prayer" or other tripe, "invite Christ into your heart" or life, "accept", "make Christ Lord", "confess aloud" (mistranslation in Romans 10:10), "baptise with water", etc. So you are NOT saved if you did them.

Alternatively, Calvinists & like folk think Christ died only for the elect. They too twist Scripture, thus blaspheme the Holy Spirit's testimony in Bible (i.e., Isaiah 53:10-11, 1John 2:2 which refers back to Isaiah) that ALL SIN was paid for: else Father would be cheated.

A 3rd broad-road class of heresy claims one can lose salvation, or was never saved in the first place, if you sinned some big sin: this claim spits on the Cross, as if Christ's Work could be undone or was less than Total Payment to Father, never mind if any of it ever applies to man; which it won't, unless man solely BELIEVES that Christ paid for all his sins. Just once. For God is competent, so once is all it takes. Christ is competent, so the cost of ALL sin was paid to Father. Period.

So all three heresy classes insert man's doo-doo vegetables as a criterion. Far worse than murder, adultery, as Paul deftly notes in Romans 2: the Gospel itself is murdered, & one commits adultery, fornication with one's works, drugged by them. Such false gospel trumpeters will be ashamed at the Bema judgement, which begins when Rapture occurs.

No one means to blaspheme God. No one gets up in the morning & says, "I'd like to malign God today." So why all this heresy in 99.9% of Christendom, throughout history? Here's why: we react to God's Holiness. We feel guilty or incensed if we are permanently saved for nothing, as that means a murderer or other sinner WE don't like, "gets away with it"...

It's true that the murderer who believes in Christ is saved. The gay person. The atheist. The other-religion person. For Christianity is a relationship, not a religion & above all, not a political system which bludgeons "non-Christians" with its twisted (anti-Biblical) dogma.

Though no one can lose salvation, no one gets away with squat. For the three biggest saved sinners were David (Bathsheba & census), Moses (2nd Meribah), Paul (Nazirite vow, 2x, Acts 18 and 21). For sin damages the soul. That's why we need to be saved, in the 1st place; and only if you use 1Jn1:9 when you sin, will God grow your soul. Else, you shrink: spiritually retarded, though saved. Petty, shallow, eyes-on-world, is symptomatic of a spiritually retarded soul. Eyes on people, ritual, works. Not, on God.

Christ warned of false-gospel "Lord, Lord" people in Matt7:21, a chapter on false teaching. The will of the Father is that everyone believe in His Son, 2Pet3:9. Believe Christ Paid for Your Sins and You Are Forever Saved. Period.

1/2 Reaction to God: Mine

This video focuses on three observations about the spiritual life which I've covered extensively in my webpages. The video is a shorter, more personal version, because the meaning just blows me away: God's Love is really Absolute. He could just bing! us to make us good little boys & girls, but instead wants to make our spiritual development a matter of our choice, imposing ON HIMSELF. In short, He wants it the hard way. For Love, loves to throw the Self away.

So how is that Fair to Him? What kind of life, results? Video but summarizes; here are the main webpages on the topic.


2/2 Reaction to God: Mine

This video focuses on the 3rd observation, about how God intends to just make us into 'gods' (same Divine thinking) at resurrection; for Divine Holiness won't put up with lesser-thans, and will fulfill John 10:34 (+John 17) as the Lord said. Don't get nervous: this is not some goofy doctrine like the Mormon stuff. It's about RAPPORT, so we must become LIKE CHRIST to be big enough to have that rapport.

Video but summarizes the answer; here are the main webpages on the topic.

Macro side: Part III of the Thinking series, LordvSatan3.htm. It's really four webpages, all accessible from the red box links at the pagetop. Shocking stuff. All provable in Bible, you can see the verses for yourself as you read, if you use 1Jn1:9 as needed. Very long.

Micro side, what I call "DDNA" (Divine DNA, moniker for Christ's Thinking), how God internally transforms you: DDNA.htm. There are several webpages linked, all accessible from the top-of-the-page section.

I expect a lot of flak over the video's citing the BIBLE fact that no soul life is in the womb: see my "Prolife Blasphemy" video series in reply. I won't respond to comments on the topic in THIS video for that reason.

YOU CLAIM FORGIVENESS, NOT ASK FOR IT!

Before we had 1John1:9 and 2Pet1:9, there was CLAIMING THE PROMISE that Christ would pay. Donald Trump and other apostate carnal Christians, confuse it with the Catholic Lie that you have to ask for forgiveness, citing the TRANSLATION in the Lord's Prayer.

So now we look at the ACTUAL GREEK, and oh my — all those 'Christians' are proven carnal, for you do NOT ask, and you don't use the Lord's Prayer, either!!

Bible Learning PROCESS

How to grow spiritually? LEARN BIBLE, Hebrews 4:12. Okay, but how? There is a PROCESS of LEARNING, very academic, and objective. The featured teacher in this video, helps you see what's involved. Subscribe to these people, LEARN the process, so you don't waste your time and end up being frustrated by a Bible which seems arcane to those who DO NOT KNOW the process of interpreting it.

Their videos ON the process, are in my 'Bible Teachers On Youtube' playlist. I left out the peripheral stuff and the apologetics debates. First learn the process, before you waste time on periphery and arguments.

The process is pan-denominational. Doesn't matter what your denomination is, you MUST GO THROUGH THE PROCESS. Even if all your beliefs were correct, if you don't STUDY TO SHOW YOURSELF APPROVED BY GOD, you will be a the Bottom of the Eternal Society forever.

God grows you based on your study of Bible, not based on your denomination. So even if your DENOMINATION were correct, because YOU DID NOT STUDY, you are disapproved. And if your denomination isn't correct, you are disapproved for not studying — for if you studied, God would GROW YOU OUT of what you believe incorrectly.

Notice how either way, you are graded on studying Bible. Nothing else!


b-out Islam Videos

Videos on why Islam is bad. Muslims lie about their own faith. They actually don't know what the Koran says. If they actually READ it, they'd stop being Muslim, since the Koran is entirely devoted to anti-semitism and terrorism, teaching a capricious, tyrannical, unfathomable 'allah' who may or may not, save you — even if you are devout. (Muhammed himself said he didn't know if he was saved.)

So I make videos to challenge & correct their bad Bible 'scholarship', categorize their lies. Again, I aim to make videos touching on topical aspects which you can't find elsewhere, to round out the debate.

Islam is Not From God

Poem I originally wrote in faithfreedom.org forum. Muslims generally don't connect the dots as to how the Qu'ran mocks them. For Qu'ran depicts the afterlife as UNDER the earth for all mankind, in over a dozen ayahs. Just search on "paradise" in the Qu'ran, to find them. See for yourself!

Under the earth: where hell is. So the one faithful to Allah, gets a worse afterlife than he has now: forever he will hear the screams of the alleged unbelievers, yet is supposed to enjoy unlimited sex, slaves, food. Yeah, that's EXACTLY what you had to do if you served the pagan god Molech, which gave rise to God's command that the Israelites take over the Land in 1400BC! To wipe out all the TERRORISTS then living there, and make the region safe for travel!

Sound familiar?

Comments are open, and I won't censor them; but I'm so tired of Muslim lying that I generally won't respond. Let them dispute as they desire. The facts are plain to the world, now.


b-out Adv. Bible (Spirituality)

Nature and mechanics of post-salvation spiritual life, for Church is the New Covenant due to Christ's Victory on the Cross, and hence begets Rapture, precedented in ADAM — so now, in the Last Adam. So our spiritual life is way higher than the OT folks'. See also my 'How God Constructs Time' playlist.

Series begins with the need for 1John1:9, without which you have NO functioning spiritual life, even though saved. Series continues with a panoramic review of the switch to the New Covenant; from there, to James explaining how to get CROWNS in that new covenant. Only the first of the James 2 Exegesis playlist videos is shown in THIS playlist; you can get to the James 2 playlist by clicking on each response to the James 2 video (there are 21 of them, total).

Next, underlying Spiritual Maturation Process, which is the way to gauge your maturation in the so-called "Christian walk". For true spirituality is INTERNAL, not external. Those who make an issue of externals are all spiritual babies. You'll be able to prove this, as you go through the Spiritual Maturation Process videos.

I can't find anything like this material in theology except indirectly, via my pastor's 53 years of teaching the mechanics of Christian maturation.

All my webpages focus on these topics, as the post-salvation maturation process is a Royal one, is almost unknown despite Bible being so available, and is vital to each person's future. But the content is pan-denominational.

So it doesn't matter what denomination you are, the process is the same. The material probably won't interfere with your pastor/sect within Christianity.

Detecting Maturity

New debate thread, here: frankforum/viewforum.php?f=42

Human or spiritual maturation observations. Essentially, the more immature the person, the more he focuses on himself. The progressive shift in focus from self to people to principles to God, is the essential progress in maturation.

It's important to assess maturation, because we are so bombarded with information, we need to prioritize what communication we should spend time hearing. It's also important to gauge one's response to another human, based on THAT human's level of maturation.

A more detailed description on how one can diagnose spiritual maturation, is in my Advanced Bible playlist, • b-out Adv. Bible (Spirituality) . 6th video in that list begins an in-depth coverage of the process of spiritual maturation, with a six-page chart you can download, to detect a maturation level in yourself or — to a lesser extent — in someone else.

Detecting maturation in someone else is necessarily restricted to your own level, so if you are immature, the more mature will be a threat and you will tend to denigrate them. The more mature you become, the less you need to denigrate those who differ from you, and the more accurate will be your assessment.

Nashville Statement: Refuting BruceTheMonk

PLEASE READ

This video description refutes the video below.

Bruce's video link: • John 8 and the Nashville incoherency!?

Topic of his video and my refutation: #NashvilleStatement, which you can read here:

https://cbmw.org/nashville-statement/

My refutation: links below were already provided Bruce beforehand. He doesn't understand the material.

Proof John8, Christ took sexual sin out of the Law, • LXX3r Christ says He's God 50+ times ...

Also see John 18:36, which specifically forbids Christian politicking. Gave him that verse, too.

========================

Prophetical fit of the Rev17 harlotry of Nashville Statement for this year, Matt25:11

====================

I also gave him some of the following videos,

Playlist: vids 42, 83-85, 104+ (link starts at 42)

• Matt25:10-12, prophecy re 1960-2041 A...

==============================

Historically, the Nashville Statement is a repeat of Christian politicking apostasy which began circa 200 AD

I did videos on that too, starting here: • GGS11t9a Bishop Lists (apostolic succ...



Vimeo Videos

How God Orchestrates Time

+ Noahic Flood Precedence for God's Orchestration of Time

Also related to this are Psalm 90 Meter of Time Exegesis and Yapping Most High.

A better version of this same playlist is in vimeo now, http://www.vimeo.com/channels/howgodorchestratestime . It will be easier to understand the doctrine, if you just choose the 'couch mode' option on the right of the vimeo page, which will play the videos in order (allowing you to stop or skp at any time, just like the Youtube playlist).

Eclectic sampling of my other playlists on how God uses believers to BUY TIME ITSELF for the whole human race. Use this playlist to familiarize yourself with the basics of the DOCTRINE of how God Orchestrates Time, before delving into the PROOF of it from Bible. The other playlists cover the proof and many details.

Sadly, this doctrine is NOT known in Christendom. Instead, Christendom vaguely knows we are 'salt of the earth'. But Bible tracks believers-buying-time in real grants of 490 or 1000 years, ever since Adam fell. So it's a complex doctrine, provably documented in Bible from Genesis 5 forward, yet still unknown. Survives in garbled form, in Judaism.

Main webpage on this topic (which has these videos in it) is Mirroring.htm. A shorter version is in brainoutFAQ.htm#6a, and might prove better reading, first.

This playlist is a composite of other playlists on this most important, unknown-to-scholars Bible-provable topic for YOUR life. Playlist link: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=32D5DBC20BF4163F

Upshot: God orchestrates time based on the Angelic Conflict. There are regular Trial schedule deadlines during which the 'witness' of man voting for and against God, must play. These deadlines are always mistaken by the masses, as 'the end of the world'.

The last 120 years preceding a deadline, is a peak time of world prosperity AND catastrophe, to enable 'revival' of individual freedom to believe.

Rapture is valid, but as a UNIQUE TYPE of vote failure; it's precedented on God's Orchestration of Time rules which began at Adam's Fall. Basically, only Israel was promised time due to David, and when Christ came, Israel rejected Him. Therefore the promised time to her, was FROZEN, because Christ completed His Task, and 'inherited' the time on her behalf. But how could the world go on living? It had to revert back to the old CONTINGENT time rules from Adam's fall.

The videos here introduce you to those rules, but their descriptions have links to the huge research underneath.

For God designed time since Adam's fall in 4106BC to run in contingent 490-year increments. CRITERION: at least one living supermature believer must be awarded a new 490-year unit before the current one ends, or Time itself ends. Through Cross, Bible tells you who these folks were.

In Daniel 9, God shows how He justifies another 490-year grant (enough time so Messiah can be born and save it, despite apostacy).

Interspersed are 70 and 50-year MASS voting periods to 'intercalate' to a larger time unit of 1000 (+50) years (490+70+490=1000+50).

You can't find this doctrine taught in Christianity, but it is provable from Bible, as you'll see if you are willing to spend the time (pun intended).

The 12th video here, Episode 8c1 of the Genesis exegesis videos, is an important side trip into how to use the Timeline Worksheet, GeneYrs.xls. Just keep clicking on the response videos, to finish 8c. Or, use its vid description to watch off-Youtube.

The 'How Satan deploys Islam' quatrain of videos shows that Satan tries to orchestrate time, too — derisively playing off Exodus 12:40-41, and David's kingship (430 years after Israel was born, 860 years after Jacob entered Egypt). For Satan thus tries to stop time, kill all Jews, by fostering believer apostacy via religion (which Satan invented in Genesis 3).

To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Pre-Trib Rapture is a subset of this unknown Bible Doctrine, which is based on a pre-Adam, Angelic Conflict. So here, we'll see Bible MATH proof of that claim. 'Rapture' controversy would end, if this 'parent' doctrine were known.

Most of my other vimeo channels are on this topic; the other channels focus on live Scriptural proof in Hebrew and Greek texts. They include: Psalm 90, GGS-Magnificat, GGS-Paul, James (which includes Luke), Matthew, Mark and RFG-Peter channels. Vids in this channel are older, and are copies of the Youtube YMH Episode 10 vids at http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB73D9DA02D729857.

By contrast, this channel focuses on the MATH. So you need to get the MATH down first, to easily see the Bible proof.

For Bible essentially documents TIME AS A LOAN from Genesis 5 forward; that is why Bible lays such stress on numbers related to TIME. When that TIME doesn't 'pay back', mass destruction results, i.e., the Flood, Temple Destruction.. or Rapture. People should be afraid of the Rapture. It occurs, just like all exits, due to APOSTASY.

That's why Bible constantly tracks years to and from people, their ages, etc. Pre-Cross, Bible was 'counting down to Messiah', so to speak. Now, all bets are off: Psalm 110:1, He Won, so now a 'second wall' (covenantal group) must be awarded Him for defeating Satan, just as He requested: Matthew 16:18, John 17:20ff, theme of whole book of Hebrews. 'For apart from us, they will not be resurrected', Heb 11:39-40. So we have to complete first, so that the FirstFruits has an administrative 'body' to govern under Him during the Millennium. For then, as King of the Jews, He'll rule the world; but the Gentile nations, need rulers too. That's where we come in (i.e, Rev 5:10).

There's much more to the story, of course, but this much you should glean quickly from the passages cited above. For it's a long story: and its accounting, starts with Adam's Fall (Genesis 5).

All this info is directly provable in Bible, and is often TRACKED like a CALENDAR, in the METER of the Hebrew or Greek. Meter was used by the ancients who got it, to:

  1. Verify when Bible books (and even major chapters) were actually written, among other textual-critical aids to hermeneutics.
  2. Serve as a concordance to other Bible passages (people memorized Scripture orally by syllable counts, rather than dividing it into lines, chapters, and verses).
  3. Serve as a calendar, whether past or future, for tracking Time Past or Future, to learn lessons from that Time.

Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, the Magnificat, Zecharias' reply (also in Luke 1), Ephesians 1:3-14, 1Peter 1:1-12, each Gospel, James, Jude, and Revelation 1, and many briefer instances like Isaiah 1:1 — these dateline meters all fit together like puzzle pieces to show a 'calendar' of history from Adam, forward. Pre-Church, all these meters 'balanced' to the 5250th year from Adam, which was supposed to be the End of Time. Post-Church, that accounting is truncated to a cycle emulating Daniel 9's '62nd week', most lately in John's writings ( John's Meter ). There are hundreds of such passages. I'll document them until I die.

You can prove all this yourself: download BibleHebMeterCharacs.pdf (or .htm). The doc lists 30 major characteristics of a metered passage, how to detect what the meter means (with examples from the above passages). The most comprehensive treatment of this meter, is in Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or .htm); pdf version is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

Note: the Jews still know about #3, but their math went wrong sometime just after the Crucifixion (i.e., nearly all Josephus' Bible numbers are wrong). Their version of the same underlying 'orchestration' of time is in two units of 2000 years (should be 2100 each), called respectively the 'Age of Desolation' and the 'Age of Torah'; at the end of which, Messiah was supposed to come (and He did). You can Google on these terms. Google also on Seder Olam Rabbah.

GIST: Noah's Ark Year is basis for Israel's (and our) solar calendar. For we're alive because Noah was one of the 'lords of time', per Genesis 5; all mankind descends from him. So TIME itself, per Genesis 7 and 8, is based on Noah's Year in the Boat. However, Genesis 7:11 and 8:5 have the wrong date in Hebrew but the correct date in LXX; we have a lot of writing about how ancient Jews knew the Noahic precedence but accounted it incorrectly. One's ability to tie Bible dates together, hinges on whether you use the errant Hebrew text, or the correct LXX text. Many, like Harold Camping, are sloppy scholars, so use the wrong text.

Yet Bible writers used LXX value in Gen 7:11; so they had older (and correct) Hebrew text. We can know that, from their meters. Daniel used a Noahic year of 365 days (which you get, if you correct Gen 7:11 to the LXX date we have); so did Paul, in crafting his 'Year of Church' meter (four quarters of 91).

So the few videos in this group, show the meaning of the Noahic tally. A dissertation by Jack P. Lewis, "A Study of the Interpretation of Noah and the Flood in Jewish and Christian Literature", catalogues what was known by the ancients. You can google for the book (I got mine at Amazon, but it's out of print, now). Most sources are well known, like Book of Jubilees, Talmud, Josephus: but their numbers are all bad. Still the ancient prevalence of the idea, is provable.

I've got to do more study on this topic. What I know so far, is in the videos here.


Genesis 1 Vids, Meter, How God Orchestrates Time

brainout | 09 Sep 2015, 15:01

My Genesis video channel is subdivided into:

  1. showing what the Hebrew text says re universe origin TIMING, i.e., nothing — so you can't say young or old earth, the 'gap' period between initial creation and man's creation is not stated. Instead, you get some very interesting other information. 🙂😡😈😱😜🙂
  2. Next, the channel's remaining videos do go through the Genesis 1 explicit timing from Adam's FALL (not creation, Time Accounting starts in Gen 3:22 hence Gen 5) — with Genesis 1's meter also ending (full circle) to the very day Moses writes, to give you an outline in parallel to, the book's text via syllable-counting, Time Accounting Meter style which scholars haven't yet discovered. I learned this rhetorical meter style by mistake back in 2008, when trying to find what Hebrew words were missing in Chapter 53 of Moeller's Isaiah scroll.

The so-called 'gap theorists' in Christendom and Judaism are yet unaware of the meter, and can't read the Hebrew too well either: for they try to stretch Bible's very literal 'day', into some longer period, to 'tie' with evolution, ignoring the fact that between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, the Hebrew (ergo Greek translation) is disjunctive.*

So there's no timing stated. Could have been 24 hours, or 24 bizillion years. All you know, is that during the unstated gap in time, Satan and his angels rebelled (compare with Isaiah 45:7, 18-19). Some kind of civil war occurred among the angels in heaven, hence their TRIAL, is the juridical genesis of man's creation and hence Bible's own disclosure is about that. Very different topic, huh.

The rest of the Bible writers all use this same TAM style, even in the NT Greek. It's their way of saying when a Bible book or chapter was written, keeping track of the specifically prophesied 2100 years for first the goyim and then the Jews, and to show why Church got inserted, why Jewish Time is incomplete, why you can't predict the Rapture. So its meter operates the same way pan-Bible, and thus can be tested/verified/corrected when one counts syllables incorrectly. This 'meter' focus has been extensively documented in videos: its material is very boring but provable. Here, we see the 'genesis' of the TAM style (pun intended).

For here, the pan-Bible doctrine of How God Orchestrates Time, begins (unknown in Christendom and garbled in Judaism). So many of my vimeo series are dedicated to it. Start sequentially, watching the videos in order, with the math. Then go through Psalm 90 channel's videos. Then the Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9 videos. Then Mary, then Paul's Ephesians 1 style and future-Church-history-timeline (proving why Rapture is unpredictable), then John.

In between are other Bible writers and books, which use the same style; but to see the flow of the meter (and how it stays true to Genesis accounting), that is probably the best order of video watching. Each video's description contains pdfs or Word docs to back up video claims, and the docs are all text in Bible, not hearsay. So you needn't take 'my' word for it, you can count and analyze the syllables/text, yourself.

Master list of all videos and their docs showing this style, re Bible dates and How God Orchestrates Time (still preliminary): LukeDatelineMeters.pdf (or htm or doc). I'll keep auditing the meter for errors until I die, so nothing is final. If you find errors, please let me know?

If you want evolution, it's a decree in Genesis 1:24-25 for flora and fauna but not for man. But hey: let's not pay attention to Bible...

So the meter makes plain that Genesis is not trying at ALL, to say how old earth is. Why people try to use the text that way, is beyond me. Even so, here's the forum for whatever topics and debates you want to create about it, however you use or abuse, Genesis.

=========

* Folks trying to claim in Genesis that 'day' is not literal, literally cannot read it: 'evening, morning, one day' is the text. Repeated, per day. So it's literally a 24-hour period. The later Psalm 90:4 eleph=1000 reference depends on you knowing the Genesis 1 meter, to which Moses deliberately ties back. For he invokes the future Millennium even then known to be scheduled from 4200 post-Adam's Fall to 5250, the last period in human history. For he wrote Genesis in the 1050st year after the Flood, to parallel with his theme on the last 1050 of history.. which depended on Israel being faithful (parallel to with Deut 32, esp. verse 8).

Christ would recall that to people, using 'salt' analogies (salt preserves food, Jews used to preserve history, so then He invents Church in Matt 16:18, ratified in John 17, to preserve Time when not enough Jews to constitute a nation, accept their King).

Psalm 90 thus recaps the Genesis 1 meter, with a panorama of first the 2100 year time grant to Adam through Abraham; it accounts for the fact that there's 53.5 years remaining on the clock, when Israel's time begins. So those who misuse 'day' in Genesis, never understand Ps90:4's significance, so miss the entire timeline of the Bible. So, Bible dates go on being endlessly and incompentely debated. Sigh. Funny how a little syllable counting, can clear it all up.


Bible's Scheduled TIME Trends

How God Constructs Time playlist header: Bible's scheduled historical cycles post-Adam's Fall. These are PSYCHOLOGICAL cycles to clean the human race from religion. So, these cycles are popularly misread as 'end times'. Draft novel showing the issues in 'our' current cycle: PDR.doc. YOU are a character in it, so write a chapter on YOURSELF.

For God tells you His Schedule in writing, in advance — but the Rapture date-setters, Mayan 2012 & goofy KJVO-type NWO 'conspiracy' crowd, never hear Him. My main webpage on this, fully testable (w/all related Youtube playlists embedded): Mirroring.htm.

Note To RBTers: Col. Thieme always taught that believers are used to buy time, in '75 Armaggedon, '77 Genesis, '85 Ephesians, '92 Spiritual Dynamics. But apparently he didn't know (or didn't have time to teach) that the AMOUNT of time is itself a doctrine, of which the 490 in Dan9, is but ONE instance. So what he taught is even more true than we thought!

  1. God awards specific timegrants to supermature believers, of 490 and/or 1000 years, respectively. The Genesis 5 roster begins this accounting. Dan 9 is but one instance of it; ALL Bible dating refers to this timeline.
  2. Historical trends, cycles of discipline/reversionism, etc., are 'cleaned' on a 'schedule' of 200, 120 year cycles at the end of each 490 years since Adam's fall.
  3. 'Dispensations' are fixed segments of time, EXCEPT for 'Church'. Jews still know this today, deriving it from (a miscalculation of) Psalm 90's meter. See my Psalm 90, Isa 53 Hypotheses and YMH Part 10 playlists: each one's video desc. has huge webpage Bible backup.
  4. Even so, all timegrants remain contingent on V+, so can be LOST (doctrinal precedence for the Rapture). If lost, the world ends.
  5. All this can be proven from Gen 5 forward; hence my webpages (linked in video desc's). WARNING: vet the material yourself, before God.

Thank you, Cimbolic, for tolerating my many math queries.

So why... 490 years? By its last 70 or 50 years, man realizes his human solutions to political, economic, and social problems, don't work. So finally he looks UP to God. And votes for or against, knowing God. That voting provokes war, migration, and unrest. Worldwide. The previous periods were Reformation, Crusades, and breakup of the Roman Empire (notice Satan deploys the Muslims to swarm Jerusalem each time too). The most famous such parallel period was from 230BC-30AD: rise of Rome, its wars, and consequent still-occurring effects on the world.

You can FORECAST what will happen now, via these past scheduled periods. Not pretty. But God will deliver the positive believer, and kill the negative one.

An audio ONLY on the 490: Why120Detail.WMA. Audio on Historical parallels in past 490s: Why490Addendum.wma.

120 years? The 4 generations which begin within 70 or 50 years of the ending of the 490, and continue for the next 50 or 70 years — these are the people who are affected by and engage in, war, migration, unrest. An audio ONLY on the 120: Why120Detail.WMA.

200 years? The Battle of the Bible (or an idea). This period begins about 80 years prior to the 120, so that the four generations actually HAVE a Bible and teachers, so they can vote competently. An audio ONLY on the 200, tracking it in history: Why200Detail.WMA

Ergo, 'Study or Else' is the warning to the Christian. God will kill you if you don't grow up spiritually, in order to protect the human race from being infected with you. That is covered here: StudyOrElse1.WMA. What happens when a nation has too many infected believers in it (examples from last century), is covered here: StudyOrElse2.WMA. Stern stuff. Scares me to death.

I've already done videos (and webpages) on the 490 and 120 in the How God Constructs Time playlist. I've not yet done videos on the 200-year cycles. Those videos will come later.

Meanwhile, a summary 3-part explanation on the role of the 490, 120, 200 is here:

Part 1: http://www.brainout.net/wma/Why490a.WMA
Part 2: http://www.brainout.net/wma/Why490b.WMA
Part 3 (32 mins): http://www.brainout.net/wma/Why490c.WMA

A condensed (33-min) version of the previous 3 is here, with added insight, but still rambles: Why490.WMA.


Overlooked Salvations

Overlooked Salvation types: the ultimate reason why you must BELIEVE to be saved, and BELIEVE WORD to grow spiritually, after salvation. Freedom must be learned, chosen, even fought for. So God did all that. Does all that, TO us, but only IF we want Him to. For God is the God of Freedom, and never violates FREE WILL. Which free will, HE CREATED as the driver of your soul. Which soul, HE PERSONALLY CREATED. At your body's, birth.

For Truth is nothing, if not FREE. Forever.

So now you exist, are free to learn Him. And if you do, GOD GIVES THE WORLD TIME. Thus 'salvation' is of many types, for many people. One day at a time.

All my videos and webpages, are on this vast topic. Lots of seeming dichotomies to explain, prove their resolution.. from Bible.


WHY pre-Trib Rapture?

People take 'sides' on the Rapture, but few grasp WHY it happens. So, they misread Bible's many verses on it — verses which start, in Genesis 5!

So here in five minutes, you can know WHY: Israel was operating on a TIMED PROMISE made ever since Adam fell. Israel rejected Christ, so her Time RAN OUT. Problem was, the WORLD SHOULD HAVE ENDED. Christ rescues it, by founding Church. Church is thus a bridge back to Israel's time, to COMPLETE it, Hebrews 11:39-40, Eph 4:13.

Because Time ran out, there is no set time for Church. Rather, the criterion is BODIES Christ PREpaid on the Cross. We can't know who the bodies are, so we can't know WHEN the Rapture (the joining-back point) will occur.

BTW, 'Rapture' is Anglicized Latin 'rapto', which is in the Vulgate's 1Thess 4:17, translating Greek 'harpazw', meaning to SNATCH UP. It's the ASCENSION of Church, not the 2nd Coming of Christ. WE GO UP; He doesn't yet come down, until Rev 19:11.

The Rapture Event, is Rev 4 (John representing Church), COME UP HERE.

What we can know, we refuse; what we CANNOT know, we drool over. So those who try to date the Rapture or get you drooling over current events (for money, of course) — all betray they don't know WHY Rapture is true. So they give you bad information.

Harold Camping sure doesn't know why; his date-setting has been a money-making scam for 25 years. Here are two Word docs (conversions from posts I made in departout.com) proving the scam: Camping's Timeline Gaffes.

Camping's not alone. Date-setting is pandered by many 'respectable' teachers. By contrast, many other 'respectable' teachers, reacting, claim there's no such thing as Rapture, which is false.

Bible gets almost no respect, here. God doesn't start counting 'days' until Adam FELL. Moreover, God uses solar years, as shown in Exo 12, yet everyone misaccounts the years as lunar? No wonder Bible dates seem wrong!

Second accounting mistake: folks go OUTSIDE Bible to derive dates. Yeah, Bible won't not make sense, if we ignore it!

So let's only use Bible, k? If you do, you learn Rapture is PRECEDENTED on Israel's Promised Time, which itself is predicated on the pre-Israel legal issue of Allotted Trial Time in segments, each with its own VOTING purpose for believers: 490+70+490=1050+1050 (same units, repeated)=2100. Atop this and playing on the same time, is an 'unbeliever' voting, segmented as 1000+50. (So Jews were expecting Messiah to come at the end of the 2nd 2100. He did.)

So Bible ties these segments to the relevant doctrines, pan-Bible. All prophecy is a Warning to Vote, and is TIMED. Voting polls open. Voting polls CLOSE.

Those rules were set up at Adam's Fall. Rapture occurs because ISRAEL's polls closed untimely. So should the world die, due to Israel rejecting Christ? Those were the Trial terms! SO CHRIST INVENTS CHURCH in Matt16:18, to REOPEN the polls, keep the world going until BODIES of Church complete, Hebrews 3, 11:39-40, Eph1:3-14 (in meter, playing on the 'time bubble' of Dan 9:26c), Eph1:10, 3:21 (mistranslated), many other verses (salient ones in LvS4b.htm; search on 'catalog' when you load the page).

Not a set time, but a set of BODIES. So, you CAN'T predict when the polls close on Church, and reopen for Israel. They re-open for her as the Tribulation, followed by the last 1050 of history, the Millennium.

Main webpage on this Accounting for Time (including all related links and videos): Mirroring.htm.

The big-picture explanation — required, for a balanced audit — runs several thousand printed pages, and starts here: LordvSatan1.htm. For to see where we are NOW, we must begin at the beginning.. of Time. Before Adam. When the Angels were created. For, that's why we're here.

The juridical 'fit' of Rapture-specific issues relative to the whole, are covered beginning in LvS4a.htm. For ALL HISTORY is supposed to be a Trial 'wrap up' via Church, Ephesians 1:10. So there are many threads to trace. Not all of the many relevant Bible verses are noted, yet. Every NT page has Rapture keyword allusions to trace.

Alternatively, try this shorter fictional novel draft, for orientation to the topic's relevance: PDR.doc. Oh: and write a novel chapter on YOURSELF. :)


Noahic Flood Precedence for God's Orchestration of Time

Even a preliminary review of the Flood Account in Genesis 6-8, shows God stressing a SOLAR YEAR: namely, one based on Noah's birthday. So why does God do this, and what IS Noah's Birthday? Complicating the question, is the fact that both the Hebrew and the Greek texts are corrupted in different places; but where one text is corrupt, the other one is accurate. So the quest is to find, which is which. The video didn't yet resolve that, but in the pdf link below, you'll find a reconciliation. For Noah was IN the boat 365 days. On that 365th day (not 375, Genesis 7:11 should read 27th, not 17th, see LXX), he exits. So he ENTERED the Ark 57 days after his 600th birthday, and LEAVES it 57 days after his 601st birthday. So he was born on what we'll end up knowing, as Passover, when Christ was Crucified (the Jewish calendar wasn't intercalated yet for the year, so He eats the Passover four days prior, but IS the Passover just as Bible says, 1Cor5:7). Get the pun? We can sail in the Boat of Life (and Boat to Heaven), because He became Our Ark.

By this we are to know the precedence for our own 'year', post-Flood.

So the video is now outdated, but its sleuthing methodology is still useful. It's linked to the video description in my Youtube 'Pass the Salt' videos (Pass the Salt, Bypass the Flood!). Its CORRECTION (from 375 to 365) is here: FloodChronoREVISED.pdf.

Turns out the math of the Flood dates in Genesis 7 and 8 (corrected for the LXX, since the Hebrew is corrupt in some places also) show Noah's birthdate on the same as what would become PASSOVER.

This Flood Year sets precedence. Israel knew that, too. You can buy a dissertation by Jack P. Lewis on Amazon (search on his name plus 'Noah' and 'Flood'), tracing from extant literature, how the ancient Jews knew the Flood set precedence for the definition of 'Year', and that's why Israel's calendar is constructed as it is IN BIBLE (not in Judaism, which has garbled the dates). His dissertation draws no conclusion; so treat it as a survey of Jewish understanding, during those ancient times.

This 'Year' matters, as it's SOLAR, never lunar. Yet though Jews (and Christians) knew this precedence, they instead reverted to accounting Time in lunar or soli-lunar years, even until today. That's why all scholars get Daniel 9:25-27's accounting, WRONG. There are an extra seven years left out, because they all use lunar years to reconcile, though God never does.

Daniel, Mary, Paul and Peter all use this Noahic SOLAR 'Year' meaning, to construct their Time Meters (in Daniel 9, the Magnificat, Eph1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12). Paul in particular structures his meter to create a 'Year of Church' prophecy about how Church will go apostate, and stay in the Groundhog Day of Daniel 9:26 (434 syllables=years, ending at the rise of Odovacer). Peter plays on that prophecy, updates it; John will also, in Revelation.

So the FLOOD is the precedence for the 200-year and 120-year trends taking place at the end of each 490. For this is how God orchestrates DISASTER Time. For thought, is contagious. Leviticus 26 and Deut 28, play live, in history. Precedented on, Noah and The Flood.

File Name: NoahBday.avi , 8/26/09, in PassSalt folder. Preprod 'Silent' is there, too.


Noahic Flood Precedence for 'our' Church Age

For a quick sense of its huge import for Church, see departout.com/viewtopic.php?p=28756#28756. Harold Camping made his phony Rapture prediction using Genesis 7:11; he used the wrong calendar, wrong text, and of course wrong hermeneutic (FATHER'S DISCRETION controls Rapture date, per John 17:17-23, so no one on earth is ALLOWED to know). So it becomes important to review Flood significance for us. It has a different importance, versus what Camping claimed.

Word doc in the video: FloodChronoREVISED.doc. If you prefer pdf, change 'doc' to 'pdf'.

Video ends with a link to a book you can buy on this same subject, here: A Study of the Interpretation of Noah and the Flood in Jewish and Christian Literature (page 50).

Genesis Midrash Rabbah, 'Noach ' (with space) section: MIDRASH RABBAH TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH . Goofy stuff.

Date benchmarks have more meaning than I cover in the video. Example: the '57' fronts and ends TIME, just as it does for Noah's birthday relative to his entry and exit from the Ark. Example: Christ was scheduled to die 57 years prior to the then-scheduled Millennium, which was supposed to start Year 4200 from Adam's fall, aka 'our' 94AD.

When that schedule didn't occur due to Church Age intervening, both Christians and Jews became disheartened and chucked the idea of a Millennium (well, the Jews postponed it to the end of the newly-invented 'common era'). So Revelation was written to explain the new Trib timeline (post- unpredictable Rapture). The so-called Church Fathers were a-millennial (i.e., Augustine allegorized away, Revelation's meaning). Big mistake.

The '40' is always paired, to front and end an epoch: 40 years in the wilderness, 40 years the Temple remains standing after Church begins. 40 years x 2, for Joseph; 40 x 2, for Saul+David (see Acts 13), 40x2 David and Solomon, 40 years for the prophets (usually back-to-back, with Moses and Samuel fronting and backing — again see Acts 13). Christ's life=reign was supposed to run 40 years. Due to Jewish rejection He dies 7 years early, and so Trib is still FUTURE. (TWO sevens, the first played 64-70AD, and the last one is Dan9:27, yet future.)

Since God MIRRORS time, the mirrored segments in the FloodChrono document above, are highlighted in yellow. Palindromic mirroring is a prominent feature of Hebrew meter: Psalm 90, Isaiah 53 and Eph1:3-14 all stress it. (Daniel 9's palindrome is a pair of poignant 58's.) See Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc for details. These passages are covered at length in my 10 GGS and Psalm 90 playlists. Playlists are unfinished, ongoing.

Quick summary of Meter Style: BibleHebrewAccountingMeter.doc. Or, view it as a blog entry at bloggodsrhetoricalarchive.htm

Oh: the Trinity sevens with dove are the likely precedent for Jacob's time in Haran (he goes there in the 490th year after Flood, age 40). So Jacob's years 'outside the Land', tie.

That leaves the 4 in abeyance; I'm sure it points to 10 Nisan-14 Nisan (Exo12). Also, it's a convenient way to recall leap year, practiced at least since Christ's day. (Julius Caesar put Roman world on a leap year calendar, in 45BC or so.)

Really, it's 3.5, often used in Bible; I'm not sure how to classify it. Bifurcated Trib, days the Lord is in Hades, maybe the last half of the civil war period in 2Sam5 (first half, both sides mutually warred against the Philistines). Maybe Absalom's revolution, or other things.

Noah received his first covenant in 1556 from Adam's Fall, signified by Shem's birth. That's 16 years into the voting window for his epoch, so 53.5 years REMAINED in that window. Abraham supermatures in year 2046 from Adam, which is also 53.5 years PRIOR TO the end of his epoch (year 2100). Coincidence? Hardly. Note the Time segments keep replaying: GeneYrs.xls. Put your mouse on cell A2 and read the note there (unfreeze titles, if needed). Use Views Custom Views to navigate sheet.

Master webpage with all links and vids: Mirroring.htm.

Acknowledgements: thanks to God using TheEdge012's 'Revival' video, plus the Harold Camping fiasco and http://www.departout.com , I was caused to learn this!


Pass the Salt, Bypass the Flood!

Comment and see whole subseries, here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/passthesalt . In vimeo, subsequent vids are passthesalt1, etc. You can download them in various formats from vimeo, or directly in original format (PassSalt), at http://www.brainout.net/downloads/movies .

This video is the first one. It's a primer on How God Orchestrates DISASTER Time:

Re music: I don't know the identity of artist. So if you do, please let me know. Video originally posted in Youtube 8/17/09, but no one has come forward, so presumably there's no copyright violation. Original Description, follows below.

End of the world? Or Beginning of a Voting Period God regularly scheduled? THE LATTER. Rapture is unpredictable, but Bible shows God constructs Time on psychological schedules. Vid recaps cycles since Adam's Fall, provides links showing Bible proof you can TEST. We entered 'our' cycle, March 2010. It ends in 2130. So, nutters date Rapture, and claim 'conspiracy'. All these weirdoes typify the voting period's tumult.

For God uses each period to clean the world's house of its apostate believers, as well as unbelievers, so a new 490 -year unit can begin with the enough freedom for all. Bad (i.e., religious) thinking is very contagious. So those persisting in it, must be cleaned or removed, so that free thinking can resurface. Result is great tumult.

The world's Time ends if not enough people vote to know Word during this 120-year 'housecleaning'. So when people talk of 'the end', as they typically do, they're right: the world ends if the votes are too few. This time, via Rapture.

Bible Proof Links listed in Video Credits:

Related videos: Genesis Episode 8c; Psalm 90, Isa53 Meter Hypothesis, GGS 10 and YMH 10. All but YMH 10 are in vimeo, and better viewed there. Bible documentation is an ongoing project: much more material is in vimeo, now. I stopped posting to Youtube 11/7/14.

See also TheEdge012's 'Revival' video, Revival. It inspired this one.

Now is the right time to be afraid.

More Highlights of the Doctrine:

  1. Jews used to know, but post-96AD Christianity forgot, that God designed Time in VOTING 'cycles', ever since Adam. Mankind's free existence depends on whether enough people vote enough to know God.
  2. Bible discloses this schedule from Genesis 5, forward. Psalm 90 tracks it in Hebrew meter, as does Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, and even Eph 1:3-14. There are 100s of passages using the meter, since Jews had to ORALLY MEMORIZE Scripture.
  3. The message of the period? Trouble Ahead. Vote For God. And yes, the Rapture can occur at any time, as well. Criterion is Eph 4:13 for us, NOT historical events. For it's up to Father's DISCRETION what maturation we get, John 17:17-26. So Rapture can never be predicted.
  4. The cycle is based on a SOLAR year, so Israel would always celebrate her birthday on time, Exodus 12. King David then affixed priestly courses based on a 24-hour day, 1Chron 24. Thus the hour of relief, would always result in a true solar year of equal serving-time per course.
  5. Due to centuries of persecution, Israel forgot How To Tell Time, so her calendar is wrong. She was more accurate back in 30AD, when Passover was only four days off, per the sarcastic Greek in John 19. So the Lord was able to EAT the official Passover. Yet also BE the Passover on its CORRECT date, His Crucifixion.
  6. For Time is solely governed by the Angelic Conflict Trial Terms, a rule since Adam's fall. Believers are always On Trial for how we learn and live on Bible, Hebrews 11:1 (see 1/2 Translations Decapitate Christ: Hebrews 11:1 Case Study on that verse, which every Bible mistranslates). So Rapture is NEVER related to historical events!
  7. So the Gen 6 Flood is precedence for a recurring trend of salting history since Adam: last 120 years of a 490 (or 560) year period, to fulfill Acts 17:26. Moses thus 'datelines' his Psalm 90 based on it (see my Psalm 90 video playlist).

Pass the Salt Companion Videos

This video (of very tired brainout, lol) introduces other videos here linked in this description, which contains added videos showing the Flood account in Genesis 6-8, as a 'due-diligence disclosure' companion to the summary 'Pass the Salt, Bypass the Flood!' video.

These videos (below) trace history onscreen from Adam through 2130AD, so you can see the recurring historical pattern, and empirically test it with any historical data you like. The actual worksheet is here: GeneYrs.xls.

I will have to revise it. Turns out Noah was BORN on Passover. I didn't learn that until 5/28/2011. Corrected timeline is here: FloodChronoREVISED.doc and is still in draft form.

The LXX text has the right dates, but the Hebrew text has the wrong dates in four places. So that's why the Flood chronology in translation, doesn't balance. God foreknew that. Always, He preserves the RIGHT VERSE somewhere amidst the collections we have. God is Faithful.

Here's the old (and now wrong) Flood Chronology of Days showing possible precedence for the later Mosaic Law Calendar (2 pages): FloodChrono.doc

Related Time Grant videos are in the Genesis series, beginning with Episode 8c1. These walk you through Adam's grant all the way through Christ's. You can access that Episode here in Youtube.

Or, off-Youtube: SatStrat2.htm#GenesisVids

How I got the Bible dates is demonstrated here: brainoutFAQ.htm#6a


PATU27 How God Orchestrates Time: aka, the Rapture is precedented.

Download original worksheet, GeneYrs.xls.

Gist: God orchestrates time, which can always end abruptly due to negative volition. This video overviews the import of that Bible truth. Video requires you download the Excel spreadsheet GeneYrs.xls in "C" below. Recommend that you FIRST download it before watching the video. To read its cell A2 note, put your mouse on A2; note will pop up.

God orchestrates time in 490-year increments since Adam's Fall. That and other claims made in this video were extensively audited during 4 years of intensive research. There is nothing like this on the internet. I learned all this by mistake in May 2004, when trying to balance Daniel 9 so to grasp something my pastor taught; I was caused to realize God there REINSTATED time from the 1st Temple, to justify granting time to the 2nd. Which meant, He had a time-grant system He was using like debits and credits. Scholars don't know of this system, for they keep making the wrong assumptions, and instead of using Bible, went OUTSIDE Bible to get dates. Bible has its own dating system; if you follow it exclusively, you balance from Adam forward. It's self-auditing, so you can tell if and where you miscalculate or misread. So you only need BIBLE. (You can use extra-Biblical sources to corroborate later.)

God begins Time accounting not at creation, but at the FALL, in Genesis 5:1. Criterion for granting Time to the entire world: due to the Angelic Appeal Trial Adam was created to resolve, AT LEAST 1 BELIEVER MUST SUPERMATURE EVERY 490 YEARS, OR TIME ITSELF ENDS. So Time is a Contingent Justice Issue, a baton-passing relay race, and can always end abruptly.

But when Israel left at the Exodus, she was PROMISED time. So when she rejected God as King, the promise went to David. So Time Grants to David controlled when Time would end — and from David forward, only MESSIAH could 'pick up the baton'. Messiah was rejected when He came. So Messiah ELECTED to pay a FAR higher price on the Cross, for a future "Church" as Bride, as Father might choose in His Discretion. So Israel ran out of time, but Messiah won at the Cross.

Hence the PROMISED time remaining, was the 1007 years for Israel, and Church operates on the old rules precedented in Adam.

Which means, the Rapture must occur, must be pre-Trib, and cannot be predicted in any way. For Rapture is not related to historical events or prophecy; but is solely dependent on believer maturation, criterion of Ephesians 4:13.

The associated webpages below are long, complex, with many Bible citations. Generally you do not need to know Hebrew or Greek to vet the data. You must be patient, though, as there are 100s of date verses to vet.

  1. 30-page Summary of how God Orchestrates Time: TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc. Suggest you read it in full screen Print Preview, Two-Pages. You can easily scroll from one page to the next with your mouse. If you'll study this material in depth, start with this Word doc, esp. its last two pages (which reproduce the cell A2 summary note of the spreadsheet). This doc also covers mistakes scholars make which prevent them from seeing Bible's dating system.
  2. Doctrine of God's Time Units and Mirroring: Mirroring.htm. Here, all time accounting units are explained (i.e., 1 year, 7 years, 40 years, etc.) but focus is to show the Justice Accounting Doctrine of Time itself. There is an in-depth tracing of each person granted time from Adam through Christ, with Bible verses showing how the numbers in the spreadsheet below, were derived. Mirroring is a redemptive 'reimbursement' of time well spent. Time lost is debited, but regained if certain conditions are met (hence Daniel 9). Again, all this is exhaustively explained in Mirroring.htm.
  3. Timeline Spreadsheet from Adam through 2007 (entries post-Cross are often sparse): GeneYrs.xls. You need the worksheet to productively view the video. Suggest you view it wide-screen, but half-deep. Use Excel's "View" then "Custom View" to access Time subsections (i.e., "David", "1st Temple", etc). Use Freeze Titles on cell B14 for best results.
  4. The Lord's Birth and Death dates, chronology of Jewish Calendar to see God's Macro Orchestration of Time and Passion Week: PassPlot.htm.
  5. All the above is contained now within Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

God Elects Sons!

The TRUE Doctrine of Election in the Bible starts and ends with the Election of Christ, and is entirely based on Foreknowledge. For if it were not foreknown Christ would freely succeed at paying for sins, then creation - including, creation of the angels — could never have been justified. So throw out all that Reformation junk about supra and sub- and infra-lapsarianism. All is instead, based on Christ. So all is free to be what it is, good or bad, since Christ was foreknown and thus Decreed, to freely succeed, Isaiah 52:13-15, Isa53:10-12.

As my pastor liked to quip, "The Decree of God is His Holy, Wise, and Sovereign Purpose, comprehending AT ONCE all things in their causes, conditions, successions and relations, and determining their certain futurition." Notice how there's no compromise with freedom, and Foreknowledge is fully online.

For, Love is the Integrity of God, and God Loves Truth — you know how many Bible verses there are on that. Well, Love must be Free, and Truth must be Free, so the Decree is for Free Truth to exist. Which means, if Christ Freely grows IN the Truth (and He was foreknown to do so, to BECOME the Way, Truth and Life) — then 'sons' can be made from Him. Sons if perfect, or imperfect, still the task is the same — grow them in His Thinking.

So sin is rather secondary to the purpose, a glitch to be resolved at an enormous cost, surely — but that same sin only furnishes more opportunity for His THINKING to be bigger, still. That's why He's Bigger than all the angels put together even in His Humanity, theme of Hebrews 1 (which my pastor stressed often). See how sin is but leverage to produce better thinking in Christ and therefore us? See why Paul has to talk as he does, in Romans 6-8? LEVERAGE is God's Decree, Isaiah 54:1. So learn and live on Him!

Worksheet pics come from GeneYrs.xls. The original video is much clearer, and can be downloaded here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/godelectssons

This video summarizes the Thinking Series, starting at Thinking.htm. It's a comprehensive 'audit' of God's Son-Making Plan from eternity past to eternity future, showing how it balances to Bible.

Shorter novel format (only five chapters finished so far), PDR.doc. It reads most easily in Print Preview fullscreen, 2-page view. Here's the pdf version: PDR.pdf.


8c1-4 Genesis of the Time lords, cont.

Continued from 8ab, which has the worksheet and other links. This 8c1-4 shows you how to use the worksheet to see God's Rules for Time; it is due to these rules that the Rapture exists, and is pre-Trib (a kind of Exodus Ascension for Church as Body of Christ). So these videos are compiled from the bliptv 2008 video subseries (hence the weird video numbering); ALL those sub-episodes are now moved to Youtube, but if you want the clearer original, you can download it at http://vimeo.com/brainout/genexeg8c1-4 .

Note: I didn't know the Psalm 90, Daniel 9 and Eph 1 meter when I made the 8c series in 2008; so the videos don't talk about that added Bible proof.

These videos were originally posted, 9/3/08.


Isaiah 53 Meter: God's Temple Calendar, Trailer

GIST: Daniel 9, God used Isaiah 53's meter to reaffirm to Jeremiah and Daniel, the timeline for Temple destruction and reconstruction. Isaiah tells it first, in 712BC. Isaiah's meter was deliberately designed to remind Jewish believers of the future just as you'd use a calendar.

For the entire calendar of the future through the Advent of Messiah is revealed. Isaiah tells you when he gave Isaiah 53 — 126 years prior to Temple's Fall, 712BC, by parallelling that date with the future Destruction of the Temple which will also be 126 years short of its promised 490-year time grant, which began back in 950BC. From there, Isaiah parses his meter to give you the Temple and Jerusalem reconstruction timeline, to show how it will balance to the arrival of Messiah.

God, therefore, doesn't have to say much to Daniel except to parse the timeline; that's why Daniel isn't surprised by the numbers and asks no questions. To us reading Bible in English, Daniel 9 seems to be the only place where God's 490-year Time Grant system is mentioned. But in the Hebrew (and in the NT), it's referenced all over the place: for it's God's Temple Calendar, since Temple depicts Messiah.

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 play on Isaiah's meter to show that the prophecied generations (42) and descendants (77) counting down to Christ, was met. Luke tells it from Adam (including Gentiles), Matthew tells it from Abraham, listing only the legitimate kings of Judah, resulting in a 42-generation count. And ALL of them, are drawing on Psalm 90's meter. Even, and in some ways, especially, Daniel. For his prayer is metered based on Isa53 and Ps90.

So too, is Paul's GREEK(!), in Eph1:3-14 (covered in my GGS series).

Daniel 9:24-27 is thus not new information. So from Isaiah 53, you know exactly how to interpret Daniel 9. Use of meter to remind the one of future dates is a major rhetorical style in Scripture. It is NOT Bible codes, but a CALENDAR.

So when you review a Messianic passage in the OT, COUNT THE METER. You'll find an exacting chronology. We'll go through the pattern, so you know what to seek in other passages or prophets.

This material on a Bible rhetorical style in Hebrew has never before been documented. So here we first see it in snippet format, so that the rest of the videos will become relevant. You'll find the full version of this video, later in this playlist.

For Bible uses METER as an accounting device; scholars have debated whether Bible has meter for years, and whether Isaiah is genuinely from Isaiah. So establishing the meter resolves many interpretational and text-crit issues.

First video in the Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis series is: Isaiah 53 Hebrew Meter Hypotheses, Ov...

First Hypothesis #4 video is: 1/4 Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis #4 Pro...

Webpages on God's Orchestration of Time — replete with Bible verses you can vet — are important adjuncts, to grasp the material. See the video description to "God's Orchestration of Time" for important related website links. Click here for that video: PATU27 How God Orchestrates Time: aka...


Isaiah 53's Meter Plots God's FUTURE Calendar, Trailer

GIST: Isaiah 53's meter plots time YEAR BY YEAR from 712BC through the end of allotted time pre-Church, which was 37AD. So when God talks to Daniel, He uses Isaiah's meter to reaffirm the Time Allotment. Thus you know how to read Daniel 9, and how to INSERT time: which back then, was the expected 57 years, to complete the fourth millennium from Adam: year 4200 from Adam minus 57, which was the 50-year time for the Gentiles' voting, plus Tribulation =endpoint in Daniel 9:26

This video is the snipped format summarizing that information. The full video is in HD, here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/isa53godsfu... . There's another, longer (43 min) video later in the Isaiah 53 playlist.

Thus you know why the Rapture is INSERTED Time, in Daniel 9:26c, no longer merely the expected 'Jubilee' of 50 years which is in ellipsis since it isn't Jewish 'time'.

Yeah, Church got inserted, so now Daniel 9:26c continues to characterise world history.

Calendars within calendars. Daniel 9 provably derives from Isaiah 53, as Isaiah lays out the future history to Christ in EXACTLY the same way, 126 years prior to Temple Fall. See the Yapping Most High (YMH) videos Part 10 and following, plus the Psalm 90 playlist, for further elaboration and proof from the Hebrew.

I didn't recognize the year-by-year calendaring of Isaiah 53 until July or September 2008; that's why the earlier Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis videos don't have this material.

"God's Temple Calendar" and "How God Orchestrates Time" Youtube video descriptions have links to associated webpages.


YMH10g God’s Timing vs. Jewish Dispensationalism

The Youtube copy of this video streams better, youtube.com/watch?v=eU_ndLPIO44&list=PL40216F6E28F05780&index=24

GIST: Jews expect Messiah to come (or come again, if they believe Christ is Messiah) in their year 6000 (i.e., per Rambam or see Talmud, Order Nezekin, Sanhedrin 97, then search on 'Kattina'). Yet they also retain a garbled recognition of the 4200, see Sanhedrin 97b, search on 'eighty five jubilees'. It was 84, same as the number of syllables in Psalm 90:1-4, from which BOTH of their garbled timelines derive. Sample of their confused reasoning: books.google.com/books?id=xGRDoiK-chsC&pg=PA12&q&f=false

How valid is all that? This video introduces the issue; future videos will document where in the Hebrew (you can't see it in translation) the Bible provides what might be considered 'proof' of a 7000-year timeline for history. But what's the impact of Church, since Rapture is unpredictable? We'll cover that too, in future videos.

To warm up for them, you might want to study my Psalm 90 playlist videos (here in Youtube, but vimeo link is better: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter) ). For the primary source of Jewish Dispensationalism depends on the HEBREW METER in Psalm 90. And the Jews all know this. They just get the meter wrong.

Christian scholars don't recognize Bible Hebrew as having meter. But the Jews all had to memorise orally, so meter is commonly used in the OT, and is a very handy way to be sure you memorize correctly — and know your prophetic timeline, too.


PATU29 True ‘Easter’ Date, per Bible

In 2014, Passover begins today, April 3. So tonight plus two more nights equals 5th as His last night, anniversary. So tomorrow plus two more days equals April 6, so the TRUE Easter day is after sundown, April 6. We get it perpetually wrong, ignoring Bible verses in this video.

Both video and exhaustive Bible backup are here: PassPlot.htm. Audio audit of Vernal Equinox: VEconfirms30AD.WMA. You can see the VE yourself, here: timeanddate.com/calendar/seasons.html?year=1&n=0

Took me over 2 years to research; you can prove it all yourself IN the Bible, within a month or two.

So why are we so confused about his Death Date? ANTI-SEMITISM, which disdained learning the details regarding Passover, in the Mosaic Law! So because the anti-semitic 'Church Fathers' didn't BOTHER to learn the details, they screwed up the dating of His Death! Disgraceful!

No problem. It's not hard to prove what BIBLE says, if one but reads it. Sometimes you need to be a Greek geek to catch John 19's sarcasm (which all the scholars know about, read ISBE), alerting us to the fact that TRUE Passover occurred when the Lord was crucified (so the formal Passover He ate, was due to the calendar not being updated for the new year). Those verses are covered in the above webpage.

God begins tracking Christ's Birth and Death dates in Genesis 5. Exactly. And based on His Death date, you can exactly know what days of the week are any year forward or backwards of that date. This is the only timeline in history which is 100% consistent and provable. So why don't we use it?

How did we EVER come up with the goofball 'Good Friday' nonsense, which requires 1+1+1=1.5? Sheesh! Spitting on the Cross! Spitting on Bible! Spitting even on common sense!


PATU32 How to Fix the Jewish Calendar for 2015 onward

ONLINE TALMUD LINKS ARE IN HERE. The whole fix shows in the onscreen icon for the video: so you don't have to play it; download link follows below. Video goes through the fix, as I created it during the video process. For, thanks to an email I just got from someone else who's also doing the meters in other Bible books, I now know an error I'd been making for some years: my error, was to listen to the 'scholars' and the Jewish calendar practice of intercalating an Adar sheni, instead of doing the math myself; well, the guy writing me the email did the math and informed me of my error, hooray! So now you can see the correction: Adar is the WRONG MONTH for intercalation. Bible uses ELUL, and so did Israel, prior to the Exile, per the Talmud. So, this video shows the fix.

Frankly, there's no need to intercalate, just always have Elul=35 or 36 days. Autumnal equinox 'naturally' occurs on its last day, in that design. And I bet money, that's how God designed it. Only later when Israel got hung up on being 'different', did she revert to the pagan practice of lunar years, and hence needed to intercalate.

Related links:

To the corrected calendar in the last segment of the video: Intercal.xls. If you'd rather just look at the picture you see onscreen before video starts, CorrectedforBIBLEIntercalated2015-2016.jpg or CorrectedforBIBLEIntercalated2015-2016.pdf pdf, if you prefer pdf. The xls has the same data, which was corrected after video done (I mistyped the dates after May 2016,in the video).

If you also want to correct the Adamic years, 6122 begins on the autumnal equinox 2015. For the complete Adamic calendar going back to Adam which the Bible actually uses in the NT meters (because I derived it SOLELY FROM the Bible), download GeneYrs.xls.

Also, HebCal.htm is useful, and the site explaining it (both now corrected to say 'Elul' instead of 'Adar' for intercalation), is PassPlot.htm.

Book citing Talmud (footnote 66 on page 254) as source for the PAST PRACTICE of Elul not Adar, intercalation (Elul intercalation always makes the equinoxes 'fit'): books.google.com/books?id=FI9pAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA254&f=false. You can also view it in Amazon (but not page 254), amazon.com/Calendars-Antiquity-Empires-States-Societies/dp/0199589445/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427579199&sr=1-4&keywords=Sacha+Stern#reader_0199589445

Click on 'Look inside' then search on 'intercalary Elul' to get to page 254, but you can't actually read that page. You can read pp249 and 255, though.

Babylonian Talmud ONLINE: juchre.org/talmud/talmud.htm. The citations in the video are in Order Mo'ed: at bRosh Ha Shana 19a and 19b, 32a, juchre.org/talmud/rosh/rosh2.htm#19a , juchre.org/talmud/rosh/rosh2.htm#32a , and bBeitzah 6a and 22b, juchre.org/talmud/beitzah/beitzah1.htm#6a and juchre.org/talmud/beitzah/beitzah2.htm#22b .

Book citing POLITICS over intercalation (page 772, but you have to view the book for three pages prior, which maybe you can't do in Google) — so we know why the Jewish calendar is wrong, and has been wrong, for centuries: books.google.com/books?id=M0wUKoMJeccC&pg=PA772&f=false . You can also read the page here in Amazon: amazon.com/History-Palestine-634-1099-Moshe-Gil/dp/0521599849

Click on 'Look inside' then search on 'creation of the world on 25 Elul' to get to page 772.

Of course, due to our own anti-semitic politicking, to cover up the fact Christ is JEWISH — all our calendars are messed up with respect to Easter, as the earlier PATU videos (29-31) showed. So our political gambits are to blame, NOT Bible!

Yeah, and God made it possible to easily correct RIGHT NOW, as the xls and video, show. Whew. Remember, upcoming anniversary of His Crucifixion, is really April 3; upcoming real Easter (really First Fruits) date is post-sundown April 6, which is 'our' April 7. EASY. No politics, no slovenly 'scholarship', just BIBLE.

I tried to summarize the links etc. on how you can tell from the Hebrew and Greek meters, in the Bibleworks forum, thread here: Bible has its own method of ANNO DOMINI display , The LukeDatelineMeters.pdf has the links as well, so just download it, if you prefer. It does not yet have the Intercal.xls, but will.

At 8:22 in the video (click that number and look at the bottom), you can see the Babylonian Talmud citation. I couldn't see it when scrolling. Video shows it more slowly, at 19:08. Links to those Talmud passages are in the video description, as the Babylonian Talmud is easily searched ONLINE at juchre.org/talmud/talmud.htm (my usual fav Talmud site, rabbinic traditions, isn't working well).

So you can pause the video and see the Stern citation live, esp. if you can't see it in Google books (which won't now let me see that page 254 in Stern's book). You can't see it in the Amazon link to the book in the video description, but you can see part of the text the video shows for that page.


GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14

You may want to proceed through this series of playlists as such:

  1. GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14
  2. GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History
  3. GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time

Full playlist is embedded below:

NOTE: Episodes posted from 11/07/13 onward will not be in Youtube, but in vimeo: Episode 10, http://www.vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterggs10 ; Episode 11, http://www.vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterggs11.

SERIES GIST: Bible's Rhetorical TIME METER style is vital to hermeneutics, yet is not known (but is suspected) among scholars today. With it you can better proof WHAT words are really God's, WHEN those words were written, and PROPHETICAL or HISTORICAL timelines. For, all those uses of meter, were common practice.

Ancient Greek & Roman literature was predicated on the idea that what happened on Earth, represented events among the gods. So that duality is a constant theme in Scripture; God, invented it. So by the time Moses pens Genesis that duality was well-known.

Now, you can apply what you find in this playlist to any passage in Scripture, and TEST.

In brief: Episodes 10.x are background on the meter structure, a rhetorical style established by Moses in Psalm 90, and furthered by Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, among other OT writers. Episode 11 goes through the NT meter's past and FUTURE historical usage, how Paul, Mary and Zecharias, map history via syllable=year.

To that end, the Ephesians1Reparsed.doc in each video description houses all the many related links so you can learn the style and test it, pan-Bible.

This playlist is a subset of Greek Geek Stuff, which is on Bible Greek rhetorical styles. The styles do much to elucidate interpretation.

This playlist is interlaced with and adjunctive to my Psalm 90 Meter of Time and my YMH Episode 10.

To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'. Uploads are ad hoc, mostly on Daniel.

This channel is a subset of the Youtube GGS 10-11 series. Focus in Episode 10, is on the STRUCTURE of Paul's meter, so that you can see how cleverly he plots the Future History of Church, using the same metering rhetorical style of Bible writers since Moses. A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of meter, which is more classical, http://www.stichometrie.de/text.html and http://www.stichometrie.de/geschichte.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture. For the Bible's own style is demonstrable from the HEBREW, even with Greek words; for the style, goes back to Moses.

Episode 11 will cover the actual future history Paul plots, but we also get foretastes of that style, here in Episode 10. Finally, no one in Christendom has documented this style, or even appears to know it exists. So the material needs to be vetted.

NOTE: Episodes posted from 11/07/13 onward are in vimeo ( http://www.vimeo.com/channels/ggs ). Youtube playlists are a torture to reorder, so videos from the June 2015 resumption of Youtube posting, will have to be at the end, sorry. Youtube programmers hate us, obviously.

How God Words His Word in Greek text, deliciously. Features of the Greek language in specific verses are covered so you can 'taste' these features, instead of learning them in the usual dry (and boring!) teaching style.

JUST THE LANGUAGE is presented, without denominational 'spin'. Of course, as you learn the features, the interpretation just jumps out at you, so occasionally I'll feel compelled to say something which ends up favoring one doctrinal position over another. But you can ignore my comments. JUST LEARN THE LANGUAGE, you'll never regret it!


God's Play of History

Bible's Rhetorical style of Timeline-convergence display. For overview, download: BibleHebrewAccountingMeter.doc. Or, view it as a blog entry at bloggodsrhetoricalarchive.htm#accounting-meter.

I'm doing a comprehensive explanation of this rhetorical ACCOUNTING TIME METER style, (still in draft): Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc (last updated 6/14/2011). It will help you navigate between 10 GGS and Psalm 90 playlists. Pay special attention to the doc's first three pages and the 'E' footnote on Daniel 9's meter-maps to HISTORICAL years of Israel's kings in Chronicles and Kings. Thus you see Daniel is 'reading' the once-future Isaiah 53's TIMELINE USAGE of meter, and 'talking back' to how it was fulfilled, by syllable-count 'tagging'. (See Psalm 90 episode 23b's video description for that rhetorical style.)

For as has been shown in the Psalm 90 videos, Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90 are TIME PROMISES. An accounting of the FUTURE. Isaiah's is a future chronology of the kings' characters and attitudes.

So, Daniel keeps on invoking Isaiah 53 syllable by year, line item by line item, as the legal BASIS for his own petition. Through Dan 9:14, he does that tracking, starting with the 'kings' reference (first being David). He uses the meter to track their sad history, resulting in Temple Down. But Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90 promised a FUTURE. So, Daniel begins verse 15, still referencing that FUTURE part of both past chapters, in the METER. And that same meter is explictly used by Gabriel in Daniel 9:24-27. To GRANT what Daniel asked via his accounting meter. God's answer is metered, too, and the meter is also reflected in the explicit numbers stated (i.e., 49).

They are real numbers for real time, not symbolic. Because, the meter is an ACCOUNTING. Accounting, for TIME. Past, future, anytime.

Preterism is toast. Harold Camping's Black-Widow timelines are toast. This is REAL Bible and any dufus can count the syllables. Which, Daniel had to learn as a child, since he was taken to Babylon while still a TEENAGER. Heh.

1st Moral of the Story: Ain't the Bible grand? Wouldn't it be a pity if you could only learn it in English?

2nd Moral of the Story, as shown in Camping's Failure video: the more boring the Bible text, the more exciting its real meaning. But you have to pay attention. Daniel 9, for example, sounds churchy and boring in English. A canned, repetitive, prayer. Guess again! He meters each line to real past history, ties each meter at specific points to specific sections in Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90. So guess what? WE KNOW WHEN DANIEL 9 was WRITTEN. And it wasn't in 164BC, honey. It was early in 538BC. For the meter first has a DATELINE. As you will see, from the Word doc, above.

Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14 has the same meter function, for beginning in HIS verse 15, Paul apes Daniel's prayer! So just as Daniel did IN his prayer, Paul SETS UP his NON-metered prayer WITH meter. For he already has the answer. :) In other words, Ephesians 1:15-23 is a RESPONSE to the answer, a kind of doxology. So the prayer isn't metered, but the setup IS.

Yeah, baby: a few syllables' likeness between two texts, you can call coincidence. But not a consecutive tracking to 476 of them, referencing the CONTENT of the other passage, each time. :)

Next up, Ps90 23hi video. Sadly, the one-hour video tanked. Have to remake it to fit the audio, what a pain. Hope the above draft doc will help you, the meanwhile.


Ephesians 1:3-14 in Metered Greek, read aloud

Download JUST the verses as shown, here (3-page pdf): Ephesians1v3-14ReadAloud.pdf. Then, practice! Full version with extensive exegesis and Roman-Empire proof of Paul's wry historical underpinning per Greek syllable=AD year: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. Pdf (not navigable): Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf

Paul's vowel pronunciation somewhat differs from Mary's, 57 years prior. Paul's meter assumes almost no elision. During Mary's day, the Greek and Latin rhetoricians were debating the proper pronunciation of their languages — specifically, with reference to elision, which they called 'hiatus' and 'krasis'. Those two terms are philosophical, as well as philological, the idea being to reconcile their philosophy and their language. Rhetoric was THE way to be respected in those days, so the elites spent much time learning it, debating it. A short statement about that, is here: Pronunciation of Ancient Greek

Read the text a few pages before and after the section which you see. You can download that book for free. There are many other books on the topic, but for video purposes that one offers the shortest confirmation of what was happening in rhetorical circles at the time Mary speaks.

I've not read this passage aloud in months, so sometimes my pronunciation rots. I can't stop mixing modern and ancient Greek sounds. I used 16:9 and HD 'high quality video (large)' settings in Windows Movie Maker, but Youtube only gives it 480p, not HD. But the text is readable.


GGS1a (Greek Geek Stuff) Romans 7:24-25 Dramatic Ellipsis

This is the header video for GGS Series. Series focus: the DELICIOUS way God words His Word, without 'spin' on interpretation, denominations, etc. But you will find out how clear an interpretation becomes, when you see how God words His Word. It's a no-brainer — in the original!

So Focus in 1a is on ellipsis; here, of verb eimi, meaning 'to be', how leaving it out STRESSES the BE-ness. It's commonly used pan-Bible, and frankly every language ever spoken has the same 'feature'. When you are excited, you drop words, to stress something. In 1b, we'll see the ellipsis of prepositions. In 1c, we'll see the 'flow' of including or ellipting prepositions, to see the DRAMATIC MEANING such a 'flow' gives to verses 7:24-8:2.

So learn how 'ellipsis' works, and then search on the many Bible verses, which use it! Bible translations unfortunately MASK this excitement and insert the missing words, so you MISS THE POINT made, and the FLAVOR is all blanded out. So misinterpretation results. Here, some dingbats claim Paul is not a sinner because 'eimi' is removed from the verse. Just the opposite is true: BECAUSE Paul eliminates the verb, he's STRESSING that he is still a sinner post-salvation!

More importantly, the ellipsis shows how Christ's PAYMENT is all-inclusive, and why you can't lose your salvation (context runs from verse 24 to Romans 8:10). But you CAN lose spiritual MATURATION, because you can NEVER stop sinning. Hence the need to name sins and get back into the Filling of the Spirit.

See, Bible ignorance of the original-language texts is dangerous. Use 1John1:9 like breathing, so you will be alerted when to look up the Real Word God Preserved!


GGS2a Laconic Writing in Bible

Episode 2 of Greek Geek Stuff (in two subparts), how 'laconic writing' — THE major rhetorical style in Bible — tells you much, by saying little. God's Genius wording takes advantage of terseness, so you are free to see volumes of Love.

Here, the first books of OT and NT are compared, so you can see how Matthew wryly ties back to Genesis 1 and Isaiah 53, laconically. :)

All languages employ laconic style, and the best authors in world literature, specialize in it. Less, is more.


GGS2b Laconic Writing in Bible

See, Scripture had to be MEMORIZED. So word economy is essential. The test of good writing is this: short, memorable, manifold. The test of DIVINE writing is that it be divinely short, tasty, memorable, an endless banquet of analysis. For it's glory to keep seeing Infinite Glory, in the smallest things. Like, a preposition. A noun. Deftly juxtaposed.


GGS10 Paul indexes Isa53 &Ps90 meter to Eph1 Greek! Intro

OUTDATED VIDEO. Its meter was the first-draft, is now REPLACED by 11a+ GGS videos, using the UPDATED pdf of Eph1:3-14 linked in this description (not shown in the video). So comments are disabled. Updated links follow, below.

Upshot: Smoking Gun! Paul 'maps' Isa53&Ps90's meter in Ephesians 1:3-14's Greek! When you compare content, whoa! It's a type of antiphony for which the Levites, Psalms and Isaiah were famous. Bible writers use Meter to REFERENCE verses as a kind of indexing system, as well as to show interpretation. For the Jews had to memorize Bible orally; so Paul takes advantage of that, by referring the reader to the matching SYLLABLE COUNT in what he writes. Thus we have more proof of WHAT Scripture is, and how to read it! Scholars don't know of this tool, and it will revolutionize Christianity (and Judaism) once they become aware of it. Textual criticism, hermeneutics, debated doctrines will all need reformation (heh) in light of this very useful tool which God preserved in Scripture. Proving, by the way, HOW He preserved Scripture. So you can have more assurance, He Keeps His Word!

Updated doc and PDFs: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (more useful for navigating, 148+pages, use 'htm' extension for htm version); and Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. The orange numbers clearly show he maps to Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53. Shocking. Compare to these maps of Ps90 and Isa53: Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf and Ps90Parsed.pdf. Isaiah 53's meter map is clearer, here: Isa53Map.jpg. A trilingual parsed version of Psalm 90: Psalm90ParsedTrilingual.pdf. See Psalm 90 playlist and Part 10 of my Yapping Most High videos, if you want a content comparison of both chapters.

10a GGS provides links to the associated video playlists and webpages.

Meter is doctrinal, so matches by content. Serves as an indexing system for people who memorized the text aurally. Clear evidence of Scripture being compared with Scripture, as well as clear evidence of God's 490-year Time Grant System, being a known and used doctrine.

This video's meter count is wrong until the the 434 syllables=62 weeks (Daniel 9:25, tying back to Psalm 90 and Isa53's meter). Above pdf corrects that. Paul uses it to underscore how legal precedence for Church's insertion, is the same as for Dan9:25's 62 weeks. (434=REIMBURSED time, since 1st Temple stood plus 70 years 'owed' for voting period that its standing justified.) Ergo, Tribulation is kicked off BY the Rapture, since 7 years of 1st-Temple time never got to play, owing to Israel's rejection of Christ.

For Christ died 7 years PRIOR TO His Scheduled Death of 37AD, which was the 1000th anniversary of David's death. Because 'scholars' mistake Bible's year as lunar, these extra 7 years are mistakenly truncated (490 solar years = 483 lunar years, and 483 solar years=476 lunar years, so it's easy to screw up). Now you know why Calvinists claim the 7 years, has already played. They don't realize there are TWO 7s: one played 64-70 AD (as Calvinists claim), but 2nd is yet future: Dan9:27. Dispies also mistake years as lunar, so neither side sees the TWO sevens.

There are TWO, as 1st Temple died 14 years BEFORE its time was up (950BC+490=460BC, but it died 586BC). Moses and Isaiah thus stress 14, as does Matt1, Paul in Acts 13:20, and here in Eph1:3-14.

Paul thus INDEXES Moses, Isaiah, and Daniel 9:25-27. Via, meter. For it's an ACCOUNTING for TIME. Promise Time: Abraham matured 54 years early, 54 year credit; Israel dallied 40 years in wilderness, 14 year credit left; so that's why the Temple remained standing 40 years after Christ died, and Israel remained a nation — to reimburse the LAND for the 40-year delay. During, Gentile Time (40 of the 54 years owed the Gentiles).

But also, Israel lost 28 years due to 1st Temple going down early, so net debit of 14 remained, when Christ came. During, His Time OR Gentile Time (so now 40+14=54, books balance). Problem was, the Jews rejected Him and killed Him 7 years early. So the 14 remains when Paul writes Ephesians.

So Paul EXACTLY copies Isaiah and Moses' meter, alternating between each one's style, to explain this story, line by line (even syllable by syllable, in Eph 1:11)!


GGS10a How I learned Bible's Meter

UPDATE — See 10 GGS's video description for link to the updated parsing pdf of Paul's meter in Eph1:3-14. It's shocking, be warned.

Gist: Scholars involved in 'Textual Criticism' have in part sought to know whether Bible uses meter. This would help prove WHAT WORDS are really Bible's versus scribal errors. It's been a problem for them. I didn't know that, back in 1999 when I was caused to be on this journey. All I knew, was that my pastor taught God uses believers to buy time to BRIDGE BACK TO His Time Promise for the Jews and specifically for Messiah The Lord Jesus Christ — of both Trib and Millennium.

I didn't see how my pastor knew that from Bible. So, I asked God for proof in Bible. That took me on a 10+year ride through Bible, resulting in my webpages and videos which you can now see for yourself.

So in this audio I summarize that ride, and the importance of Bible's rhetorical style of METER. For, both Jews and Christians needed a way to prove they memorized ORALLY-TRANSMITTED Scripture correctly.

So finding Bible's meter helps prove what was given, memorized; and in the bargain, God uses the meter to reinforce doctrine taught. All scholars whether Jewish or Christian alike know Bible numerology, i.e., 7 for perfection, 6 for man, 4 for completeness, etc. Bible uses these well-known meanings to CRAFT its meter, so you'd get more out of each metered verse!

Repeat: Doctrine already taught explicitly in Bible, but also taught by means of the numbering system all theologians know (like 7 for perfection, 6 for man, 5 for profit, etc). Every jot and tittle of the Bible is used to teach God's Thinking to us: including, meter. Only a fool would mistake this useful metering number function for Kabbala junk or Bible codes!


GGS10b Our Christmas Inheritance

Graced Out! Christ is THE ELECT, so He Inherits us, Isa53:12! So our inheritance is IN Him, Eph 1:3-14!

Paul parses the HEBREW syllables in each Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 to show the irony of He Who Inherits, causing us to inherit IN Him! So I rant about that, here. MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERY DAY FOREVER TO YOU!


GGS10c Why Paul apes Ps90/Isa53 Meter in Eph1:3-14

Backstory for Paul's meter, just as for the OT writers, deals with the 'time bank' of the Gentiles, which was short 54 years. Abraham's Maturity On Time meant the 54 years could be repaid.. if Israel herself didn't run short of 'time' funds.

But she did, by 14 years. Moses knew she would. Isaiah knew she would. God told Daniel how that 14 shortage would be made up during Messiah's time and the Trib, were Israel positive.

She wasn't positve. Hence the insertion of Church, just like the insertion of the 70 years between Temples. Paul uses this analogy to explain the legal precedence for Christ's Decision to create Church (per Father's discretion) in Matt16:18, John 17 prayer. But Paul shows it, through the memorized meter pattern every Jew knew to use, to tell what TIME it was in Israel's Time Bank book.

Due largely to longstanding anti-semitism among the Catholics and Calvinists — for they adhere to the false doctrine of Replacement Theology and hence preterism — we Christians don't know this doctrine of God's Time Meter, used ever since Moses.

But we can prove it, right in Bible. Future videos will show how: here is more material, to get you started:

For one 'master' (comprehensive) explanation and set of links, get Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (use 'htm' if you don't care about formatting). PDF: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

That meter is color-coded for easier analysis. So the gold/orange numbers clearly show he's mapping to Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 meter 'paragraphs'. Shocking. Compare to these meter maps of Ps90 and Isa53: Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf and Ps90Parsed.pdf. Isaiah 53's meter map is clearer, here: Isa53Map.jpg. A trilingual parsed version of Psalm 90, is here: Psalm90ParsedTrilingual.pdf.

WEBPAGES.

YOUTUBE (and vimeo) PLAYLISTS.

Their video descriptions contain links to the above webpages. It's a lot of material, since this doctrine is Bible-provable, but unknown in Christendom. The vimeo playlists are easier to navigate from my vimeo home page: http://www.vimeo.com/brainout . Just click on its 'Collections', and then 'Channels'. The Youtube channel/playlist links, are listed individually below.


GGS10d1-2 How Paul apes Ps90 and Isa 53 meter in Eph1:3-14

Sabbatical (7-factor) metering in Hebrew Bible conveys God's doctrine about Time and Israel's (then-prophetical) history. In Greek, Paul (and other NT authors) will use it in exactly the same way as Moses in Psalm 90, Isaiah in Isa53, and many other OT (and NT) passages. So here we focus on HOW that's done, by first revisiting God's Juridical Rules for Time itself.

Scholars would know about these rules had they consulted the Jews, who still know a garbled version of the rules. But scholars from the Church Fathers forward have spurned the Jews. Our historical loss. But can be your gain, if you learn the rules now. Everything you'll see in the videos is provable directly FROM Bible, if you're willing to do your homework.

Part 10 GGS and its10a-b, furnish you with the links you'll need to do that homework.


GGS10d3-5 How Paul apes Ps90 and Isa 53 meter in Eph1:3-14

Continued. Focus now on Israel's (then-prophetical) history. Sabbatical (7-factor) metering in Hebrew Bible conveys God's doctrine about Time AS FULFILLED in world history, so as WILL BE fulfilled in Israel's yet-to-finish history. In Greek, Paul (and other NT authors) will use this meter to convey both meanings, exactly the same way as Moses in Psalm 90, Isaiah in Isa53, and many other OT (and NT) passages. All Bible passages relating to Time (and hence to prophecy about Messiah) will use this meter. For example, Paul uses it again in Philippians 3:14 (clever mix of classical Greek hexameter AND Bible Hebrew sevening meter); writer of Hebrews (who is not Paul, Paul had just died) uses it in Hebrews 11:1, since like Ephesians, Hebrews focuses on the change in 'time' to Church, versus Israel's on-hold covenant. There are other examples, too, in OT and New.

Scholars would know about these rules had they consulted the Bible, which only uses SOLAR years (scholars mistake prophetic years as lunar); had they also consulted the Jews, who still know a garbled version of the Time rules. But scholars from the Church Fathers forward have spurned the Jews. Our historical loss. But can be your gain, if you learn the rules now. Everything you'll see in the videos is provable directly FROM Bible, if you're willing to do your homework.

Part 10 GGS and its10a-b, furnish you with the links you'll need to do that homework. The jpg links for this video are in Part 10 of YMH, which actually draws live, what you end up seeing here; or, just PM me and I'll send you the links.


GGS10d6-7 How Paul apes Ps90 and Isa 53 meter in Eph1:3-14

Preview of Eph 1:3-14's meter, how Paul ties to the time diagrams you just saw.

UP NEXT VIDEO: Psalm 90's updated meter and how it played in Israel's real history. Due to Paul's constant tracking to that Psalm, I was able to correct meter (versus my Psalm 90 playlist videos). See? Bible is self-auditing. When you screw up — like I did on the Psalm 90 meter, in a few of its verses (idea right, count wrong) — when you screw up, God provides a way to aright you. Here, it's from Paul doing the same meter count. Awesome stuff. If God kills me now, I'll be grateful to die!

You'll also see how the same time diagram played out in REAL HISTORY. So all the time (heh) you spent on this 10 GGS, will begin to pay off with proof you can see in both Bible and history you can test!


GGS10e1 God and Adam vote in Psalm 90 Play of History Act 1

Psalm 90 is a DRAMA, 'The Play of History', Act I. That's how Bible writers treat it. Isaiah 53 plays off Psalm 90 to create Act II; God plays off Isaiah 53 to create Act III, in Daniel 9; and God has Paul create Act IV, in Eph 1:3-14. God then has John's Revelation, ape Psalm 90 to emphasize how Act IV ends the play with the rescue of Time and Israel, thus fulfilling what Moses wrote in Psalm 90:1-4. Download links below provide more detail.

Video here goes through the first 8 verses, spanning the first 1050 of history. This video updates and makes minor corrections in the previous Psalm 90 videos (beginning with • 14Ps90 1/5 Psalm 90 Epilogue: Moses c... ) . For due to Paul's meter, I learned how to correct Psalm 90's. Subsequent 10e GGS videos will cover the rest of the corrections, showing how the content pregnantly depicts the historical period referenced.

Scholars have missed this 'fit' between the passages, largely because they didn't consult the Jews' understanding of it; preterists in particular, ignore eschatology related to the Jews. The Dispensationalists also misread the above passages though believing in Israel's restoration — because they don't know about the METER ties, and misread time in the Bible (i.e., mistaking Bible's years as lunar, using Josephus instead of Bible, using the stars instead of Bible, looking at past scholars and not checking what THEY said versus Bible, etc). So everyone's got a little egg on the face, here. But it's easily corrected, once you see the 'fit' of the passages; fit of meter, fit of content, one big PLAY which God is Producing, Directing, and Saving at the End.

So whether you're Dispensational or just curious about Bible's rhetorical styles, it's worth your time (heh) to learn the structure of Psalm 90's Hebrew, which here I've translated to FOLLOW the Hebrew meter. That way you can remember it in English. The tandem video explaining the re-translation itself, is here: • 19Ps90 Psalm 90:1-7 Hebrew-Metered, E... .

There will be a tandem video in the Psalm 90 playlist starting at • 19Ps90 Psalm 90:1-7 Hebrew-Metered, E... , which ONLY explains the translation versus published Bibles. For published translations all miss vital wordplay key to interpreting the 'fit' between Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, Eph1:3-14, and Revelation. That too, partly accounts for why the 'scholars' don't know how these passages 'fit': they spend too much time looking at translations, rather than the original-language texts. Ooops. No big deal, to make a mistake. Only a big deal, if the mistake is denied.

The more you study Psalm 90's meter, the more you'll get out of Eph 1:3-14 and Revelation. Will blow you away, when you see the fit.


GGS10e2 Flood Vote in Psalm 90 Play of History Act 1

Tandem video in the Psalm 90 playlist further explaining the translation, is here: • 20Ps90 Psalm 90:8-11 Hebrew-Metered, ... . Sorry it's so complex, but Paul's meter in Ephesians 1 dramatically impacts how you read it and Bible eschatology — all of which 'hub' to Psalm 90!

The more you study Psalm 90's meter, the more you'll get out of Eph 1:3-14 and Revelation. Will blow you away, when you see the fit. I don't know if I'll ever recover.


GGS10e3 Moses Votes in Psalm 90 Play of History Act 1

Psalm 90:12-15 records the most important pre-Christ vote in Bible: THIS is why we're alive. All other Bible writers 'hub' around this passage in unending wordplay. This is why Isaiah chapter 53 is in evenly- paired paragraphs each divisible by 7. Moses started that rhetorical style, BASED ON the prayer you'll see here.

Paul, of course, does the same thing, using Greek words to create HEBREW meter, in Eph1:3-14 — aping Moses paragraphs, almost exactly. And the scholars still don't know that Bible Hebrew has meter? LOL.

If you learn nothing else, learn what Moses says here, notice the wit. If you do, your life will never be the same again.


GGS10e4 Moses Votes in Psalm 90, cont.

Here Ps90:12-15's translation is analyzed in light of the history you've seen. Tandem video in the Psalm 90 playlist further explains the translation: • 21Ps90 Psalm 90:12-15 Hebrew-Metered,... .

Again, Psalm 90:12-15 records the most important pre-Christ vote in Bible: THIS is why we're alive. All other Bible writers 'hub' around this passage in unending wordplay. This is why Isaiah chapter 53 in evenly- paired paragraphs each divisible by 7. Moses started that rhetorical style, BASED ON the prayer you'll see here.

Paul, of course, does the same thing, using Greek words to create HEBREW meter, in Eph1:3-14 — aping Moses paragraphs, almost exactly. And the scholars still don't know that Bible Hebrew has meter? LOL.

If you learn nothing else, learn what Moses says here, notice the wit. If you do, your life will never be the same again.


GGS10e5 post-Purim Vote in Psalm 90 Play of History Act 1

PAYOFF for time you spent watching these videos, begins! For here, Ps90:16-17's historical backdrop is covered. Tandem video in Psalm 90 playlist further explains translation: • 22Ps90 Psalm 90:16-17 Hebrew-Metered,... . By contrast, here in GGS 10e5-8, we examine (then-future) HISTORY 'underneath' Ps90:16-17, spanning 1400 BC to 397BC; the last 49 years of it are the '49' in Daniel 9:25. Ephesians 1:3-4 centers on both passages: for Church now has the same role, as the 2nd Temple to be built as Body (prelude to Ephesians 2).

What role is that? Well, God USES Psalm 90's and Isaiah 53's updated meter to explain Renewing Temple Time, in Daniel 9! Get this: Daniel 9:24 is metered to Psalm 90:14-16's 63 syllables, AND to Psalm 90:1-3's 63 syllables. Dan 9:24 uses 63 syllables to communicate God's (NOT some human king's) Decree! 63, of course, is 56+7, aka 49+14!

Five 9's and three 6's, in Dan 9:24. There are three 6's in Psalm 90:15. Daniel 9:4, is metered just like Moses 90:1-3, in sevens, TO TELL YOU WHEN HE'S WRITING. Theologians would kill to know that. They would know it for free, if they would COUNT SYLLABLES like the Jews had to do. Oh well.

For Daniel 9's prayer is also metered in huge chunks, to MATCH THE ELLIPSIS in Isaiah 53: this is tantamount to asking God to make good on the past. I just learned it last night (1/14/2011) when parsing the prayer. So in the Episodes for 10e9 we'll review from Moses forward, then segue into Paul, from Daniel's prayer. Will blow you away!

Also, Isaiah chapter 53's parallel passage is the basis for what becomes Daniel 9:24, as a palindrome: 63 syllables from Isaiah 53:9-10, or from 53:10-11, which is the Decree to Pay for Sins and its fulfillment. In actual (then-future) history as Isaiah tracks it (1 syllable=1 year), Isa53:9-10 corresponds to the period from 460BC to 397BC — the last 70-year historical voting window, pre-Christ, covered by Esther, Ezra, Nehemiah, etc.

Paul in Greek words, recreates that Hebrew-style palindromic meter, in Eph1:3-14; compare • 22aPs90 Psalm 90's Palindromic Meter Map of Psalm 90's palindromes, to the now-updated Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

Moses uses 70's, but Paul will use 91=70+14. For the 14 didn't get completed, just as Moses warned in Psalm 90. So Paul will show how it gets completed — through us VOTING — as a Time Bridge. (See also Hebrews 11:39-40, in context since Chapter 10.)

Scholars don't know all this, including even the Dispies. Hence the heavy, time-consuming documentation in videos, and webpages (linked below). You can prove it all in Bible: even a brainout can do it. :)

Bet you didn't know your life was made by God to BUY TIME, huh. Now you know what 'salt of the earth', really means!


GGS10e6 post-Purim Vote in Psalm 90:16-17, cont.

PAYOFF Continues from 10e5 GGS. Now you'll see the dramatic meaning behind Psalm 90:16-17 in history. Theology in Judaism and Christianity will revolutionize, once this meter is known. It will be known (and fought over!) by the end of this century, but is unknown til yet.


GGS10e8 post-Purim Vote in Psalm 90:16-17 and Eph1:3-14

Translation of Ps90:16-17 and how Paul ties to it, introduced (tandem translation video in Ps90 playlist: • 22Ps90 Psalm 90:16-17 Hebrew-Metered,... ). I redid the translation pdf on Ephesians 1:3-14, so you'll need to download it: link is below. For Ephesians is Act IV of the Play of Time. Acts I-III will be presented in in Episode 10e9-11 GGS (will upload them over the weekend, hopefully).

Then we'll be ready for Paul again in Episode 11 GGS; we'll see how the content of Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, and Ephesians 1 constitute a 4-Act Play of Time, via keyword TEMPLE. You can't see that fact in translation, as the crucial keywords are all mistranslated! Satan is clever. God is more clever: He preserved His Real Words from Moses forward: and we can PROVE we have them, i.e., by the METER.

One day theologians will accept the fact Bible uses meter, but don't hold your breath. Get it now, so you don't have to wait 100 years until they stop debating. :) And they will debate that long, because the meter proves preterism toast, that Messiah came on time and Rapture is Pre-Trib; so many Jews and also 'the Church Fathers', were all spiritual retards. Sorry to say that: respecting Bible matters more than hoary heads having a bad hair day=2000 years, with eschatology. I'm sorry, but five-year-old Hebrew kids learn the meter. So even this brainout, can plot it. So why, 2000 years of head-scratching by the theologians? No 1John1:9, that's why.


GGS10e9a Moses counts to Millennium ACT 1

Now we set up the Four-Act Play from Psalm 90, to see why Eph1:3-14 is Act IV. Because, Rapture is something to FEAR, not gloat over; as Paul will stress, in Eph 1:15-23. John's Revelation explains why, and furthers the plot on how Act IV will play. This 10e9a and b will cover Act 1; 10e9c will cover Act II, Isaiah 53; 10e9d will cover Act III, Daniel. Then we'll be ready for Paul.

Hence this Act I video runs tandem with my 23 Ps90 video. It showed how Daniel's prayer is metered, too. So is Daniel 9:24 — based ON Moses' meter. Hence we go back to Act 1, Moses, to set up for Daniel.

If you're not familiar with Book of Daniel, I did extensive audio links in the vid description to my 10a1 YMH video. Episode 10 of the YMH (Yapping Most High) series is also about Jewish Dispensationalism, and ties to 10 GGS series. Sorry, but the doctrine is long and complex .. and awesome.


GGS10e9b Moses counts to the Millennium ACT 1, cont.

Continued from 10e9a GGS, showing how Moses' meter takes into account the foreknown, previously-scheduled END OF TIME, had Israel accepted Christ. For each syllable stands for a year. Question is, what year? Well, there are two time tracks Moses uses:

  1. Comprehensive, with years in ellipsis: from Decree for Messiah and Millennium, through the last voting period for Israel in history (which will be in jeopardy).
  2. Annual (no ellipsis), from when Moses writes in 1400 BC (disclosed by the 63 sevens he uses in Psalm 90:1-3), to 1050 BC when his poem ends (350 syllables later). It will be in 1050 BC that Israel rejects her King-God, and gets a human king as she demands.

So the ending chronology of Psalm 90 warns of BOTH problems. In advance. Year by year, syllable by syllable. So when it comes to pass as it has, we can look back and say God did it right, and we did it wrong.

All this sets up for Isaiah, then Daniel, and finally Paul, the remaining three Acts of the Play of History. They all follow essentially the same sevening, two-time-track 'style' as Moses. Why? Because TIME is a JUSTICE issue, and so must be ACCOUNTED.

Of course, everyone THINKS he understands Daniel. So much garbage is out there, from the quack 'scholars' who claim Daniel was written after the 2nd Temple, to the preterists who can't see the TWO sevens because they use lunar years, to my fellow Dispies who rightly know the Rapture is pre-Trib but also mistake the 490 as being lunar; to the Joe Youtuber who thinks that 2300 days or 1335 days stands for years. Hoo-boy.

Good thing God had Daniel meter his prayer based on Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90, so we can prove by the MATH, what Daniel means, what Daniel 9:24 (also metered to Psalm 90's '63') means! You'll start to see all that in 10e9c, next video.


GGS10e9c1 Isaiah counts to Millennium, ACT 2

Watch in HD. Bible dates vindicated! Bible, Millennium and Rapture debunkers proven slipshod! Setup for Act III (Daniel 9) and Act IV (Ephesians 1)! Anyone can play fancy games with numbers. But only GOD can orchestrate TIME ITSELF to 'balance' to those numbers. Forward, and Backward. So Bible writers use meter as an ACCOUNTING DEVICE for Time, for dates, for how-long-in-the-future a thing will occur.

Example: each Bible writer tells you WHEN he writes and how to CROSS REFERENCE what he writes elsewhere in Bible, via a palindromic, sevening meter system; it tells you how many years FROM a known past event, he's writing; and, the same number of years TO a future event, if he apes Moses' style. So the meter works like dateline, and is self-auditing.

Here's how. The writer creates a series of 'paragraphs' DIVISIBLE BY SEVEN. First such paragraph's syllables signify either the number of 'sevens' or the number of years EQUALLY backward and forward from the date of writing, to several related events. Related, to the content of what's said. That's why you can audit date calculations.

Here we see that audit in both Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53, with awesome converging detail; thus we know Act II is Isaiah 53, for it 'wraps' around Act I, Psalm 90, Play of History to Messiah, to Millennium; which history, due to Israel's rejection, constitutes PRECEDENT for the Rapture. Daniel and Paul use the same style, to constitute Act III and IV. Revelation wraps to them all.

Hence this EQUIDISTANCE rhetorical style helps one interpret, too. For the equidistance stresses relationships of events to what's written. Ergo, when you see the style here, you can find it elsewhere in Bible (i.e., in Isaiah 1:1, telling you when his ministry began). Just count the syllables.

Above all, this style proves only SOLAR years are used by Bible: the accounting is event-anniversary based. Lunar accounting would never yield correct anniversaries of events. All Bible yearly measures are based on a solar year, and all are anniversary-based, as God explained to Moses in Exodus 12. God's been accounting that way, ever since Genesis 5, if we would but pay attention rather than yawn, listening instead to 'respectable' but incompetent scholarship!

Scholars are important and valuable. BIBLE is more important and valuable. So when scholars don't work properly in BIBLE, champion the latter and reform the former. But we won't reform, so perpetuate incompetence!

Thus centuries of inept debate over Bible whens, like Exodus, Daniel, or whether 'Isaiah' was really three people, can be put to rest!

Links:

Exodus: brainout.net/Exodate.htm

Act IV, Eph1:3-14: brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf . Paul clearly maps to Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9 metered 'paragraphs'.

Act III, Daniel 9:4-19 (mapped to Ps90 and Isa53) and Dan9:24-25 (mapped to Psalm 90:1-3, and Dan9:13,16,18): brainout.net/DAN9V4-19.pdf . Hebrew big meter picture: brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf . It has many notes. Unparsed one-pager: brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePager.pdf .

For Act II, Isa53: Hebrew big meter picture: brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.JPG (or brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf ) and brainout.net/Isa53Map.jpg . Hebrew-metered English translation: brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc . See also my Isaiah 53 Meter video playlist, which covers Hebrew and translation (last three videos); See also Episode 10s1 et seq. of my YMH playlist, on how Isa53 meters to Messiah ANNUALLY from 712 BC (yet unfinished).

For Act I, Psalm 90: see my Psalm 90 Meter of Time playlist for background. UPDATED (vs. video) meter: brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc or pdf . That has my English translation mapped to the Hebrew.

Trilingual (Heb, Greek, NASB English), parsed: brainout.net/Psalm90ParsedTrilingual.pdf .

Psalm 90's palindromic meter map is in the description to my 22a Ps90 video; there, palindromes not covered in the videos are listed. Use it to track Acts II through IV. Psalm 90's two time tracks use meter to represent real years: a) sabbatically accounted by 70-year voting period from Adam, and b) straight-line accounted (one syllable per year from when he writes). Isaiah, Daniel, and Paul play off that two-track accounting.

The video's timeline worksheet: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses on derivation of the dates and fuller explanation: brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and brainout.net/Mirroring.htm .

File Name: 10e9c1GGS.avi, 1/20/11.


GGS10e9c2 Isaiah counts to Millennium, ACT 2 (cont.)

Watch in HD. Continued from 10e9c1. See that video's description. Next video will be 10e9d, Act III, how Daniel's meter wraps around Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53's. It will be a week or more before I post it.

File Name: 10e9c2GGS.avi, 1/20/11.


Isaiah 53 Meters History (Trailer)

This is a mnemonic snippet, the climactic ending to the 26--minute Isaiah 53 Meter video on God's Future Calendar, vimeo.com/brainout/isa53godsfuturecalendar .

File Name: Isa53Hypo4Add2Trailer.avi, 9/20/08. Youtube copy: youtube.com/watch?v=0vdbG42EXfw&list=PL8523934356BE4BDC .


GGS10e9d1 Daniel counts to the Millennium, ACT 3

Intro to Act 3 via Psalm 90, comprehensive review of Moses' Two Time Tracks — for Daniel 9's prayer meter, as well as Daniel 9:24 and 25, TAG Psalm 90 at key syllable junctures to MATCH Time Track 1. Tandem video shows how Paul does it also, in the Psalm 90 playlist, here: youtube.com/watch?v=MxP657KmlAw

Relevant other links:
Video worksheet reconciling Psalm 90 and Book of Judges: brainout.net/Judges.xls . If you need it in pdf, here it is: brainout.net/Judges.pdf

Daniel 9's prayer pdf: brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (use 'pdf' as last three letters if you prefer pdf). It is an exhaustive proof how Daniel counts to the Mill. See also my video '24 Ps90', which shows Daniel 9:24-27, with its own doc/pdf.

PDFs of the full meter pattern in Eph1:3-14, Ps90, and Isa53: brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

Compare to these meter maps of Ps90 and Isa53:

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.pdf . Trilingual version is brainout.net/Ps90ParsedTrilingual.pdf See also brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.tif or brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.pdf .

brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf and the translation, which is brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc
Isaiah 53's meter map is clearer, here: brainout.net/Isa53Map.jpg .

The video's timeline worksheet: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses supporting it are shown in

brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and brainout.net/Mirroring.htm .

If you're not familiar with Book of Daniel, I did extensive audio links in the vid description to my 10a1 YMH video. Episode 10 of the YMH (Yapping Most High) series is also about Jewish Dispensationalism, and ties to 10 GGS series. Sorry, but the doctrine is long and complex .. and awesome.

File Name: 10e9d1GGS.avi, 1/30/11.


GGS10e9d2 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53

This video is not in Youtube. I forgot to post it there. Continuing from GGS10e9d1 ( in GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14 ), we now go back through Isaiah's meter, in order to better understand Daniel's.

For Daniel's is very complex: he will create a trifurcated timeline. First timeline starts at his own capture and comes full circle to his date of speaking. Second and related third timelines are developed by 'tagging' Isaiah at his syllable 133 = end Isaiah 53:2; playing on how Manasseh despised God; so, he was punished with capture, by Assyria. So, Manasseh was tagged by God in 2Kings 21:10-15 as the reason for the Temple's downfall.

Manasseh's repentance is thus paralleled with Christ: 'ish makovot, w'idua holi', Isa53:3 (translated, 'The HeartBreak Man, knowing lovesick grief').

From there, Daniel goes forward in the future, tying together all the prophecy God gave him since Daniel 2, in order to plot the sequence of the future rise and subsequent fall, of Greece and Rome. That's why Daniel 10-12, exist. They answer Daniel's METERED sequencing, in Daniel 9!

Mary's meter will pick up where Daniel ends, and Paul's meter will pick up where Mary's, ends. Peter's meter wraps around Paul's, to cover the same future Church History period on a tandem subject, the 'temple' of Church, since the OT Temple had its own 490, Daniel 9!

See: Daniel's metered sophistication (and satire!) sets new precedence for the NT meter style, so it's worth learning. We miss so much meaning in Bible, simply because we don't count the syllables and don't trust the Bible enough to actually be RIGHT in its timelines! But, I digress.

In GGS10e9d3 and 4, we'll see something of Daniel's style.

If you want, you can download the docs used in the video.

brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf for the Hebrew 'map'.

Word docs of the metered translation:
2-Page translation of Chapter, landscape mode (has translation upgrade): brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc

3-Page version, portrait mode (pre-upgrade): brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglish.doc

PS: I apologize for annoying Episode names like 'GGS10e9d2'; but the videos were made in 2011, and had many views. Within Youtube, few see the vids, but for some reason I can't fathom, they were picked up elsewhere, and embedded into other websites. So now, past viewers (and websites using these vids) would become confused, if I change the names. File Name: 10e9d2GGSIsaMill.avi, 1/12/11.


GGS10e9d3 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53, cont.

This video continues from GGS10e9d2 in vimeo, and is also not in Youtube. It presumes you're familiar with Daniel.

GIST: Daniel knew Isaiah 53's meter when he was a teenager. When he's 70 years older in Daniel 9, he prays. So he 'tags' his prayer meter to the very syllables = years in Isa53, which depicted Daniel's deportation (cf. Jer52:28, early 607BC, Nebuchadnezzar not yet sole king). From this Daniel crafts a juridical basis, for his bifurcated and metered, prayer. For the 70 years itself, was bifurcated:

* There was a '70', measured from the first deportation, Zech 1:12, 7:5, Jer52:28. The Zechariah 7 people self-righteously petition God, BECAUSE the 70 ended 2 years prior, when 2nd Temple's foundation was laid, see Zech 1 compared to Haggai 2. But they KEPT weeping and fasting afterwards; thus you know they're self-righteous: Temple's demise was fifth month, Jer 52:12. God never ordered them to do that; hence His Sharp Reply, in Jeremiah 7:6.

* There was next, a separate TEMPLE 70, see Jer25:11, 29:10. God's Metered Reply in Dan9:24-27, 'balances' to this 70. Those verses are long misaccounted by Christendom and Judaism, BECAUSE we don't know the meter! So this video covers the background. Next two videos will cover the Daniel 9:24-27, meter. Mary, Paul and Peter will ape his syllable-by-year, satirical meter; so it's worthwhile to learn Daniel 9's style.

For better understanding of those videos,

* Read brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf. It provides (exhausting!) Bible proof how Daniel counts to the Millennium. It shows how Daniel's prayer is structured, how he tracks Isaiah 53's Timeline Meter, and also what Kings and Chronicles verses he's thinking about, as he talks!

* The last video in this channel, 'Ps90 Epi24', shows GOD's meter in Daniel 9:24-27, has its own doc/pdf, brainout.net/Dan924HebParsed.pdf. That meter is introduced at the end of this video.

PDFs of the full meter pattern in Eph1:3-14, Ps90, and Isa53:

Ephesians brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

Psalm 90 brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.pdf . Trilingual version is brainout.net/Ps90ParsedTrilingual.pdf .
See also brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.tif or brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.pdf .

Isaiah 53 brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf and the translation, which is brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc
Isaiah 53's meter map brainout.net/Isa53Map.jpg .

Timeline worksheet brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses supporting it are shown in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and brainout.net/Mirroring.htm .

Audios on the whole book of Daniel, Yapping Most High Episode 10a1: use its description, to click on and listen to (or download) the audios: youtube.com/watch?v=rq75pw14HIM&list=PL40216F6E28F05780&index=17 .

File Name: 10e9d3DanMill1.avi, 1/12/11.


GGS10e9d4 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53, conclusion

Continued from and concluding, GGS10e9d3 (vimeo.com/brainout/ggs10e9d3 ). This video is not in Youtube. Watch me get egg on my face, for I was VERY LAZY when making this video. I did not WANT Daniel 9:25 to be metered, so at 10:32 in this video, I claim it's not metered. Wrongo! So during the tandem Ps90 Epi24 video (next in this channel), I have to admit I was wrong, and then make even more mistakes during the video, and then have to admit that during the video, since the Holy Spirit keeps warning me that I'm wrong. And I wouldn't listen. Well, not at first.

Aha. Now it's easier to understand why others don't listen, either.

File Name: 10e9d4DanMill2.avi, 1/12/11.


24Ps90 God Trinity-Meters Double Tribulation in Daniel 9:24-27

God's reply to Daniel plays off Daniel's meter, tagging it and Psalm 90, Isaiah 53 Decree sections, thus resolving WHO decreed the Rebuilding of Jerusalem, and other corrections which have long baffled scholars.

For example, '63' is the number of God's Decree, used by Psalm 90:1-3's meter, and repeated with update — but still at 63 syllables — in Isaiah 53:9+10 OR 10+11. When you see the text, you'll notice in each section God is talking. So too, here: the meter of Daniel 9:24, is 63 syllables. Thus you know Who makes the Rebuild-Jerusalem decree, in Daniel 9:25: God, no human king. A decree which matches real then-future, history.

Bible is self-auditing. If you make a mistake, it won't balance. Scholars can't make Daniel 9 balance, so invent all kinds of wacky justifications, i.e., lunar years, claiming His Entry into Jerusalem rather than the TEXT telling you Crucifixion — completes the 62 weeks. Text says the 62 weeks isn't completed until the TEMPLE goes down. Oh well.

Here, you'll see me also make stupid mistakes and how the Bible's self-auditing process, corrected them — alongside the vibrant John 14:26 'reminder' function — all in one very long video. Very short doc was used for it: Dan924HebParsed.pdf

Daniel's prayer meter is extensively covered here (now with a new chronology chart): DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF

Master document with all related links, is Ephesians1REPARSED.doc, for Paul uses God's Meter, to craft Eph1:3-14.

Along the way, you'll see how God via Gabriel, uses Trinity and Hypostatic Meter to convey number-metaphor Doctrines underlying the explicit text. The doctrinal meanings of numbers are well known in theology. So via recourse to meter, one quickly has proof that a) there are TWO tribulational sevens, not one; b) NO human king decrees the rebuilding of Jerusalem, but instead, God; c) how to measure the time listed in the explicit text of Daniel 9:24-27, i.e., there is an interval of 140 years Decreed between Temple Down in 586BC and when Jerusalem is rebuilt; there is a 50 year hiatus between Daniel 9:26 and 9:27; d) the Daniel 9:27 piece is to PAY BACK the too-early maturation of Abraham, and e) HOW LONG it will take for the second Temple to go down. To the very day.

The above two-page Dan924 doc has more spectacular Trinity stuff about the numbers than I knew when making this video. Just learned it now while awaiting the upload.

23hi Ps90 video is still under reconstruction; but meanwhile, this vid helps you see the structure of the former's content.

This video ties to the 10GGS series.


Noahic Flood Precedence for 'our' Church Age

Brainstorming vid, with only some answers. If you have better info, I'd appreciate hearing what you've learned. For a quick sense of its huge import for Church, see http://departout.com/viewtopic.php?p=... . Harold Camping made his phony Rapture prediction using Genesis 7:11; he used the wrong calendar, wrong text, and of course wrong hermeneutic (FATHER'S DISCRETION controls Rapture date, per John 17:17-23, so no one on earth is ALLOWED to know). So it becomes important to review Flood significance for us. It has a different importance, versus what Camping claimed.

Word doc in the video: FloodChronoREVISED.doc (updated 6/14/2011). If you prefer pdf, change 'doc' to 'pdf'.

Video ends with a link to a book you can buy on this same subject, here: A study of the interpretation of Noah and the flood in Jewish and Christian literature.

Genesis Midrash Rabbah, 'Noach ' (with space) section: https://archive.org/details/midrashrabbah0000unse_o7k3/page/n415/mode/2up. Goofy stuff.

Date benchmarks have more meaning than I cover in the video. Example: the '57' fronts and ends TIME, just as it does for Noah's birthday relative to his entry and exit from the Ark. Example: Christ was scheduled to die 57 years prior to the then-scheduled Millennium, which was supposed to start Year 4200 from Adam's fall, aka 'our' 94AD.

When that schedule didn't occur due to Church Age intervening, both Christians and Jews became disheartened and chucked the idea of a Millennium (well, the Jews postponed it to the end of the newly-invented 'common era'). So Revelation was written to explain the new Trib timeline (post- unpredictable Rapture). The so-called Church Fathers were a-millennial (i.e., Augustine allegorized away, Revelation's meaning). Big mistake.

The '40' is always paired, to front and end an epoch: 40 years in the wilderness, 40 years the Temple remains standing after Church begins. 40 years x 2, for Joseph; 40 x 2, for Saul+David (see Acts 13), 40x2 David and Solomon, 40 years for the prophets (usually back-to-back, with Moses and Samuel fronting and backing — again see Acts 13). Christ's life=reign was supposed to run 40 years. Due to Jewish rejection He dies 7 years early, and so Trib is still FUTURE. (TWO sevens, the first played 64-70AD, and the last one is Dan9:27, yet future.)

Since God MIRRORS time, the mirrored segments in the FloodChrono document above, are highlighted in yellow. Palindromic mirroring is a prominent feature of Hebrew meter: Psalm 90, Isaiah 53 and Eph1:3-14 all stress it. (Daniel 9's palindrome is a pair of poignant 58's.) See Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc (updated 6/14/2011) for details. These passages are covered at length in my 10 GGS and Psalm 90 playlists. Playlists are unfinished, ongoing.

Quick summary of Meter Style: BibleHebrewAccountingMeter.doc. Or, view it as a blog entry at bloggodsrhetoricalarchive.htm#accounting-meter

Oh: the Trinity sevens with dove are the likely precedent for Jacob's time in Haran (he goes there in the 490th year after Flood, age 40). So Jacob's years 'outside the Land', tie.

That leaves the 4 in abeyance; I'm sure it points to 10 Nisan-14 Nisan (Exo12). Also, it's a convenient way to recall leap year, practiced at least since Christ's day. (Julius Caesar put Roman world on a leap year calendar, in 45BC or so.)

Really, it's 3.5, often used in Bible; I'm not sure how to classify it. Bifurcated Trib, days the Lord is in Hades, maybe the last half of the civil war period in 2Sam5 (first half, both sides mutually warred against the Philistines). Maybe Absalom's revolution, or other things.

Noah received his first covenant in 1556 from Adam's Fall, signified by Shem's birth. That's 16 years into the voting window for his epoch, so 53.5 years REMAINED in that window. Abraham supermatures in year 2046 from Adam, which is also 53.5 years PRIOR TO the end of his epoch (year 2100). Coincidence? Hardly. Note the Time segments keep replaying: http://.www.brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Put your mouse on cell A2 and read the note there (unfreeze titles, if needed). Use Views Custom Views to navigate sheet.

Master webpage with all links and vids: Mirroring.htm.

Lemme know what you think. :)

Acknowledgements: thanks to God using TheEdge012's 'Revival' video, plus the Harold Camping fiasco and http://www.departout.com, I was caused to learn this!


GGS10e9d5 Daniel Revisited

This video follows up on GGS10e9d4 which is only in vimeo (link to paulmeterggs10, follows below). It continues the sidetrip into Daniel 9's meter to show what DANIEL was thinking when he spoke, for he's talking out loud in meter, and later writes it down. The meter is vital to the interpretation of Daniel, for since childhood he obviously was trained in it (you can't just talk in meter, it must be a habit you learn to do), and without the meter you can't tell he's COUNTING YEARS and keying what he says to the YEARS of the 'kings' he recounts.

THE ORIGIN OF THE 62 WEEKS is in Daniel's prayer: so God is REPLYING to Daniel using the same number. You can't see that unless you know the meter, as shown here. And it means: YEARS ISRAEL WAS UNFAITHFUL. Paul will use that same meter, signifying Church infidelity, in Eph 1:3-14!

The video is fast, sorry; it focuses on how Daniel uses the 49 and 42 bookends, with some added material I didn't cover before. GGS10e9d6 will cover more about the third legal clause (verses 9:15-19).

The content of Daniel's meter has been out four years now; I can't make new videos acquainting people with its beginning. So you'll have to read the document for yourself, to follow along well in this video. If you find your eyes glazing over, just shut the video off. The two main channels are https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterg... and https://vimeo.com/channels/dan9meter (latter has the same videos as the former, plus some related Psalm 90 vids). The Genesis 1 meter, starts here: https://vimeo.com/channels/genesisexe...


GGS10e9d7 Daniel Revisited, cont.

This video follows GGS10e9d6. It continues the sidetrip into Daniel 9's Hebrew meter, now focusing on the '69' bookend (to which God replies with the 69 weeks, heh) — which runs from Daniel 9:7-18. (Video 9d9 will show the textual bookending I found, but it's slim.)

Overall, the 'Revisit' is done to show we can tell what DANIEL was thinking when he spoke, for he's talking out loud in meter, and later writes it down. Any exegete will tell you the goal for Scriptural exegesis "is to apprehend the exact thought of the writer." In Daniel 9, we can do this, because his prayer is metered.

The meter is vital to the interpretation of Daniel, for since childhood he obviously was trained in it (you can't just talk in meter, it must be a habit you learn to do), and without the meter you can't tell he's COUNTING YEARS and keying what he says to the YEARS of the 'kings' he recounts.

THE ORIGIN OF THE 62 WEEKS is in Daniel's prayer: so God is REPLYING to Daniel using the same number. You can't see that unless you know the meter, as shown here. And it means: YEARS ISRAEL WAS UNFAITHFUL. Paul will use that same meter, signifying Church infidelity, in Eph 1:3-14!


GGS10e9d10 Daniel Revisited Corrections

This video follows GGS10e9d9, and makes Corrections to the ending 69 Time Track 2-3 values (Daniel 9:18), which should end 277BC and then v.19's 230 BC, specifically. If you notice, there's a math error in Time Track 2-3, where only 62 is subtracted, instead of 69.

So the benchmarks in Daniel end at the 1st Syrian and the 1st Illyrian War, both pivotal in history to the rise of the Seleucid and Rome's power in the Middle East, respectively. Israel's history wouldn't have transpired as it did.. including the arrival of Messiah and Rome being suzerain — had these two events not occurred. The link to that timeline and the events' import used in the video, is here: http://www.historyofwar.org/periodfra... . It's also in the ChronoChart section of the Daniel piece for verse 9:18, listed below.

That correction matters, as it ties more to what Mary does when she piggybacks on Daniel. In the Mary videos, I'd said she debits 73 years to match Daniel's, but the difference is only 66 years from his end point. That she deliberately matches his end points is visible from her own metering, as shown in the video (page 11 of the http://www.brainout.net/MagnificatMet....

Overall, the 'Revisit' is done to show we can tell what DANIEL was thinking when he spoke, for he's talking out loud in meter, and later writes it down. Any exegete will tell you the goal for Scriptural exegesis "is to apprehend the exact thought of the writer." In Daniel 9, we can do this, because his prayer is metered.

The meter is vital to the interpretation of Daniel, for since childhood he obviously was trained in it (you can't just talk in meter, it must be a habit you learn to do), and without the meter you can't tell he's COUNTING YEARS and keying what he says to the YEARS of the 'kings' he recounts.

THE ORIGIN OF THE 62 WEEKS is in Daniel's prayer: so God is REPLYING to Daniel using the same number. You can't see that unless you know the meter, as shown here. And it means: YEARS ISRAEL WAS UNFAITHFUL. Paul will use that same meter, signifying Church infidelity, in Eph 1:3-14!


GGS10e9d8 Daniel Revisited, cont.

This video follows GGS10e9d7. It continues the sidetrip into Daniel 9's Hebrew meter, now focusing on the '58' bookend, which runs from Daniel 9:11-12, the proximate juridical cause for Temple Down, playing also on Manasseh's capture at the same age as the missed sabbatical years. Notice how Daniel cleverly debits 1 from each the 49 which should be 50, and the 69 which should be 70, to then add to 56 to make 58.. twice. For 50 and 70 are God's assigned 'times', shorted. Because, that time was spent on being late (56 between Passover and Pentecost, between Pentecost and 9th Av, since 30 days per month excepting Elul was the calendar David set up in 1 Chron 24, based on a SOLAR year). Heh.

(Video 9d9 will show the '69' textual bookending I found, but it's slim.)

Overall, the 'Revisit' is done to show we can tell what DANIEL was thinking when he spoke, for he's talking out loud in meter, and later writes it down. Any exegete will tell you the goal for Scriptural exegesis "is to apprehend the exact thought of the writer." In Daniel 9, we can do this, because his prayer is metered.

The meter is vital to the interpretation of Daniel, for since childhood he obviously was trained in it (you can't just talk in meter, it must be a habit you learn to do), and without the meter you can't tell he's COUNTING YEARS and keying what he says to the YEARS of the 'kings' he recounts.

THE ORIGIN OF THE 62 WEEKS is in Daniel's prayer: so God is REPLYING to Daniel using the same number. You can't see that unless you know the meter, as shown here. And it means: YEARS ISRAEL WAS UNFAITHFUL. Paul will use that same meter, signifying Church infidelity, in Eph 1:3-14!


GGS10e9d9 Daniel Revisited, cont.

This video follows GGS10e9d8. It continues the sidetrip into Daniel 9's meter, focusing on the '69' textual bookending I found.. but it's slim. Essentially, Daniel keys off Solomon in verse 18, by invoking 1Kings 9 which Solomon — while he was yet in fellowship with God — had prayed. Very poignant, to couple what Solomon said during his 'good' years, with his reign back in verse 7.


GGS10e9d11 Daniel Revisited Import Summary

This video follows GGS10e9d10, Summarizes Import, replies to frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=82#p512. So if you watch only one of the Daniel Revisited videos, watch THIS one. It proves the origin of God's Reply, since the NUMBERS in Daniel's METER are the same as the numbered TEXT in God's Reply of Dan9:24-27.

Everyone in theology has to go back to square one, now. Seriously. See for yourself. All you gotta do, is count syllables in the BIBLE text. Many mainstream ideas are proven right, many proven wrong, whether in Christendom or Judaism.

Which proves fairly conclusively that God REPLIES to Daniel's meter, in Daniel 9:24-27. Very different origin for the numbers, which all theologies have completely missed for 2000 years!

GGS10e9d10 made Corrections to the 69 Time Track 2-3 values (Daniel 9:18), to end @277BC and v.19's 230 BC. Math error in Time Track 2-3 (only 62 is subtracted).

So the corrected benchmarks end at the 1st Syrian and 1st Illyrian War, both pivotal to the rise of Seleucid and Rome's power in the Middle East. Israel's history wouldn't have transpired as it did.. including the arrival of Messiah and Rome being suzerain — had these two events not occurred. Link to that timeline and events' import, is here: http://www.historyofwar.org/periodframe.html. It's also in the ChronoChart section of the Daniel piece for verse 9:18, listed below.

That correction ties more to Mary's piggyback on Daniel. In the Mary videos, I'd said she debits 73 years to match Daniel's, but the difference is only 66. That she deliberately matches his end points is visible from her own meters, as shown in page 11 of the MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf

Overall, the 'Revisit' is done to show we can tell what DANIEL meant. Goal for Scriptural exegesis "is to apprehend the exact thought of the writer." In Dan9 we can do this, because his prayer is metered.


GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History

You may want to proceed through this series of playlists as such:

  1. GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14
  2. GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History
  3. GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time

Full playlist is embedded below:

New uploads might resume late 2016, after I've finished johnmeter channel. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'. See also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWhe4wg2Q8Q&list=PL1bv_xPIih3fs-vKfMgiVbt4fmi3Xs3Yf

GIST: Paul's Eph1:3-14 METERED Greek, creates a 'calendar' of Future Roman/Church history, to illustrate how Daniel 9:26c's 'time bubble', plays. Vids here are a subset of the Youtube GGS 10-11 playlist ( http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5D3F5A2E85CE65CC ). Episode 10 has its own vimeo channel, GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14 ; this channel covers Episode 11. However, the 12-part GGS11s series on the Magnificat, is in its own 'channel' (playlist), GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . Episode 11t9 covers book reviews on Roman and Church history which help you see how Paul's meter, plots FUTURE history you can vet. Shockingly.

For Paul plots the Roman Empire and rise of the Apostate Church, in Ephesians 1:3-14. Might be faster if you just read the verses and Chrono Chart sections, with many external and independent links by scholars, all illustrating the history covered, in Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

So the Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9 rhetorical style of retrospective or prophetic METERED exposition (plotting syllable-by-year) for each King, with wry words for each year, continues in the NT. No one knows this Bible style. So I'm trying to document it live in Bible, for anyone to vet from the SOURCE.

It would be easy to call the results coincidental or even manufactured, if there were only a few verses or a few passages. It would be easy to call it coincidence, if the writers didn't start with PAST kings, to show the satirical style. But when you have many verses, much history you can vet, and the style for the PAST established before the writer goes prophetical, then you have material you can audit and certify. I submit, that's the case here. I used commonly-available materials for Roman history, like the contemporary writers (in Latin or Greek), and university writeups of the Emperors. Robert Lee Williams' Bishops Lists (Gorgias Press, sold at Amazon and elsewhere) is invaluable for documenting the sudden posting of Peter on a 'bishop list' in order to sell the Severans. Paul's text for that period, is the wry Ephesians 1:9.

Again, as you go through the text and the history, you'll see that it's neither wishful thinking (for who could wish such satire), nor coincidence. This is how Greek plays were written too; for Paul patterns Ephesians after the Greek play 'Ion' by Euripides. Each chapter in Ephesians, 'tracks' that story, since his audience was Greek, and Ion is about the founding of the Greek sea peoples. Yeah, and the Real Founder is not a venomous snake (Ion means 'venom'), but God Himself. With no secret liasons, either. So if you'd read the play first, then Ephesians, you'll see the pattern Paul follows.

This is how Peter tags Paul, too. Awesome stuff, worthy of skepticism; but once proven.. shocking.


Dark Ages

brainout | 26 Oct 2015, 06:21

When Paul finishes Ephesians 1:14, he's at the point where the Dark Ages begin. In the following documentary, the video's definition begins them with Alaric in 410 AD. Killer, for in Paul's meter, the keyword ending at 410 syllables=AD years, is 'inheritance'. Yeah, that's what Alaric wanted, as a reward for his service, especially after his pal Stilicho was disinherited of the honor he deserved for saving Rome from Alaric. 🥷

For a quick view of the period, I charted Paul's annual meter, so you can click here to see how 'inheritance' for the year 410 (towards the link's page bottom), ties to the video below. You can also use the use year 404to412 in the pdf version of Chronochart)

Notice the incredible wit, a comparison of inheritances: the West was about to 'inherit' Jerome's translation, except that it would be squashed; it was to 'inherit' Augustine's City of God in the name of lamenting the sack of Rome by an 'inheriting' Alaric who only 'inherits' death just after he succeeds; all that, because Stilicho who should have inherited all kinds of honor for saving Rome from Alaric (and yet the two became friends), instead only inherited jealousy, being put to death with his son by his rivals. That's what you get for being patriotic, the 'inheritance' a weak Arcadius and Honorious will give you. So of course they soon inherit death, too.

And Alaric preserved the Bible inheritance, not sacking the Bibles, as Augustine would record. Big deal, that, since a century earlier under Diocletian more Bibles had been burnt than we can know, and under Constantine worse persecution of Christians dissenting and Jews would exceed what Diocletian could know.

Not to mention, Alaric's son Ataulf inherits a bride, Honorious' sister, in 412. Heh: 'our' inheritance (kleronomias hemwn, in Paul) is now complete.

Paul takes the timeline to 434, with the understanding that you'll be adding 56 at the end, even as the beginning dateline was 56 (playing on Mary's ending the meter at Christ age 56, but Paul's play is that Christ should have been nearly age 59, and was age 61, which was 'our' 58-59 AD).

So this video is a tad more chilling than normal. The paulmeterggs11 videos go through his meter year by year, so when you get to syllable =AD year 410, maybe turn on the video here.

This video isn't available anymore


GGS11 Trinity Anaphora Ephesians 1:3-14

Trinity Anaphora and Hebrew Meter on how God uses Church to Bridge Time Back to Israel, to Glorify Christ. Video is only on the Anaphora, which I learned thanks to Bucklehairy (I owe him forever)!

Doc in this video: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc or Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf

It provides extensive proof of Paul's meter mapping to Ps90, Isa53, Daniel 9, +metered translation

==Docs==

On Camping: CampingTimelineGaffes1.doc and CampingTimelineGaffes2.doc

Psalm 90

Isaiah 53

Daniel 9

Ephesians 1: see first 2 links, near top.

Paul also tags Noah, uses LXX in Gen7-8, not BHS. See my Noahic Precedence video.

==Video playlists==

==Webpages and worksheets==

Upshot: simple scholar mistakes mask Bible's own story of dates, leaving us confused. Solve those errors, and Bible proves clear and reliable. So let's go back to the Bible.


GGS11a Ephesians 1:3-14, Paul Maps Future Church History

Now we get into Paul's actual meter style: Paul foretells the history of CHURCH via meter, same as Moses used. You can download the onscreen document to examine it in detail: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. Many other docs and webpages, videos are related. In pages 5 and 6 of the doc, the many other links are provided.

Briefly put: by Psalm 90's meter, Moses plotted the past believer voting history of the world and then Israel's future voting history, both annually and sabbatically. Judges was the annual, and it was written to show how Psalm 90 got fulfilled. Isaiah 53 then picked up the sabbatical accounting, converted it to annual, and plotted Israel's future to Messiah's Scheduled Death. Daniel 9:4-14 then used Isaiah 53's meter as a retrospection, plotting out Israel's kings' sad voting history, to form the basis for his petition in verses 15-19. So Paul emulates all three authors' meter, to craft his own annual plotting of the first 490 years of Church, to show how Church will vote. Upshot? Church votes short, God will deliver us anyway.

This is revolutionary material, and should be viewed with skepticism. So first I must show Paul's meter, so you can more easily investigate the vast material, beneath.

So this video begins a panoramic introduction to how we can know Paul's laying out the future history of CHURCH.

In the process, you'll see how Paul shows Rapture doctrine is valid (theme of Ephesians 4, actually), Pre-Trib. So that means preterism, a-millennialism, and Replacement Theology, are all false. So too, the variants of Rapture today, like mid-Trib and post-Trib. The anti-Paulinists are proven dead wrong, since Paul uses MOSES' meter. Many of the Bible debunkers will be proven wrong as well, given a) the perfection of this meter, and b) how real then-FUTURE historical dates, are validated from it.

So this topic will end up in dispute. Every sect of Judaism and Christianity is partly vindicated and partly upbraided, by it. Even Dispies aren't the winners, here, for they use lunar years, and Paul's accounting proves SOLAR, just as Bible has always used.

Flipside, our faith in Bible is strengthened, no matter what our 'denomination'. Everyone will be shocked at how Paul's meter, aligns with post-Cross history we can prove. At least, I am shocked. :)

Later videos will be on this same topic, walking you through Paul's meter. To verify the 'claims' (let's say), you'll have to get into the material linked in pages 5 and 6 of the REPARSED.doc. It won't be an easy task, I'm sorry. I submit it is worthwhile.


GGS11b Paul Maps Future Church History in Eph1:3-14, cont.

Continued from 11a GGS, on Ephesians 1:3-14's meter as a rhetorical style used since Moses, here 'mapped' for Future Church history, even as Moses 'mapped' Israel's future history. Here we go through the expected Rapture dates which still 'fit' the old SCHEDULED MILLENNIUM forecast ever since Moses. Paul first maps his meter to that old expected schedule, to set up readers for the fact that the old schedule, won't occur — due to predicted Christian apostasy. Follow along, using the doc of this video: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. All associated docs, video links are in that Word doc (with pdf versions, too).

In short, Rapture happens for a bad reason, not a good one: Church stops VOTING to know God. Meanwhile, a few still mature, so Church completes anyway.

And that's what happened, too. Christians and Jews alike became very disaffected when these expected OLD dates were not fulfilled. That's why Mark's Gospel is so biting; why 1 and 2 Peter, written to Paul's congregation since Paul had died, is so biting. Why Jude bites. Why Book of Hebrews came out and also bites, warns of upcoming Temple destruction, all during the Year of the Four Emperors, which began maybe six months after Nero executed Paul, in 'our' 68AD.

By John's day, the disaffection, mixed with the persecution Christians suffered during and after Nero — the disaffection was high. For 90AD was the outside EXPECTED Rapture date, and it didn't happen!

Think of how badly the Campingites feel today, when their expected Doomsday didn't occur. It helps you see how believers felt, back in the 90's AD. Jews and Gentiles, alike.

That's why the Rapture became a doctrine in disfavor, from 90AD onward. Next video, 11c GGS, will talk about that future time. Here in 11b, we cover from 66AD up to 90AD.


GGS11c Paul maps Future Church History in Eph1:3-14, cont.

Continued from 11b GGS. Here we see how and why the Rapture doctrine became discredited, in the 90's AD. This is why John wrote his Gospel, 1-3 John, and Revelation — playing off the line in Ephesians 1:5, ending at 94AD (by Paul's A.D. accounting). Everyone had expected the Trib to begin three years earlier, for Christ should have died at age 40; and 50 years was allotted to the Gentiles, so by the time He'd have been 90 (beginning his 91st year), on the OLD Daniel 9 schedule — the Trib should have begun.

You can vet the history of 'Early Christianity' on the internet, esp. 'Jamnia', where disaffected Jews went, starting when the persecutions began under Caligula, et seq, and especially when Domitian came to power. Wikipedia has 'Early Christianity' entries, but you can also look in Mommsen, Gibbon, other sources. Bible records the disaffection beginning with Paul's death, which was the '66' mark in Paul's meter — really six months before Nero died, ticking off the Year of the Four Emperors. Book of Hebrews, 1 and 2 Peter, Jude, Mark's Gospel all came out that year.

By John's day, the Temple had gone, and no Rapture for 20 years afterwards. The Mosaic deadline came and went. So everyone was disaffected. This video covers that, and the resulting apostacy on all sides. Thus began the 'Church Fathers', an apostasy evident in those writings. The retooling of Judaism gave rise to the Mishnah and eventually, the Talmud.

Paul's meter uncannily ties to these historical changes which one can vet in almost any respectable source. The difference is, the sources don't explicitly explain WHY that disaffection occurs. Here we find out: the Rapture didn't happen as Jewish Dispensationalism rightly predicted it should: for it's now CHURCH Time.

Video's doc: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. All related webpage, doc, and video links are in its pages 5-7.


GGS11d Paul maps Future Church History in Eph 1:3-14, cont.

Continued from 11c. Here we get into 2nd century Christianity, Bar Kochba rebellion, and how Paul tells us in advance that Christianity of that century will be bad. How he shows that with meter, tagging relevant passages in Daniel 9, Isaiah 53, and Psalm 90 of the same syllable count. How antiphony works.

Flipside, Paul picks this (then-future) dark time in Christian history to begin telling the reader about the extreme wealth in what my pastor termed 'our portfolio of invisible assets' when he exegeted Ephesians 1.

Video can't cover all this ground, but the document helps you examine it. Here's the video's doc, which has all the related webpage, doc, and video links in its pages 5-7: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc.

Will take awhile for you to see what's said in this video, as valid. (Took me seven years to see it, lol; that's how long it took my pastor to exegete Ephesians, too.) So don't feel bad if this stuff goes over your head. Stick with it if God wants you to do that, else forget about it.


GGS11f Paul maps future Church History, cont.

Continued from 11d. Now we focus on the '14', such a pregnant number since Moses' Psalm 90, to mean just that: pregnancy. Nexus. How, when the Bar Kochba revolution illustrated both Christians and Jews at an all-time low, such that Jerusalem was razed, and a pig temple — reminding them of Daniel 7, okay — now will stand atop the Holy of Holies?

Shocking answer, frankly — and key to Paul's meter. Doc used for video, which also has all the related docs, video and webpage links in it: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (re-edited 7/23/2011).


GGS11e Paul maps future Church History, cont.

Continued from 11e. Now we focus on '91', to further explain why '14' means NEXUS. Generation building, '42', is generated by '14'. New thread of Four-generation curse, and why it occurs, is introduced (completes in 11h).

We also find out where 'year of Church' comes from. Initially, from Noah, which future videos will cover in more detail. Meanwhile, see my Noahic Flood Precedence video. But also, from Daniel 9:14-19, which uses a 'year' accounting, thus:

Syllables from Daniel 9:14-19 are 308 = Noah's time in the boat until his birthday (get the pun), plus 7 years ellipsis for Trib, plus 50 years elipsis for the Gentiles, which also tie to the 57 extra days for Noah from birthday until he leaves the Boat, Genesis 8:13-14.

That's why Paul uses 91 x 4 = 364, not counting the day of exit. So you know where he gets the numbers, and better know what Ephesians means. That is, if you know the meter. Else, you're left with fuzzball churchy language you hallucinate into whatever you want.

Doc used for video, which also has all the related docs, video and webpage links in it: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

You'll also want to compare it with the latest version of the Daniel docs:

This meter is extremely important. Will change how you analyze Scripture, once you become familiar with its characteristics, which of course you can independently test on any passage you like.

That's why I'm spending so much time documenting how the meter works; since this meter is not known to Christendom, you need lots of 'objective evidence' so you can see and thus TEST its structure, yourself. If what's in the videos is true, you should be able to independently prove it. This will have to be empirical-testing proof, as there is no scholarly material on the subject. It is not known in Christendom, and the Jews have forgotten how their meter works (i.e., their recitations are off-meter).

So technically this is 'original research', a high-falutin' term for JUST COUNT THE SYLLABLES, honey. Then you'll see the proof, yourself.


GGS11g Paul maps Future Church and Roman Time, Intro

Continued from 11f GGS. Here we see from the meter, a chillingly-accurate future accounting of Roman and Christian history; with emphasis on, how God dealt with Roman emperors who were either kind to, or persecuted, Jews and Christians. PRINCIPLE taught by this prophecy: how goes Church, goes secular history. So at any time in history (here mapped in the future by Paul so you can get the lesson), you can look at secular affairs and know how BADLY Church is doing. Or — in those rare moments — how well. That's the theme of Ephesians, and that's why Paul maps the future.

Like Daniel's metered chronology of Israel's kings — based on Isaiah 53's metered chronology of them — Paul's chronology runs on two tracks, for the two 490's bought by Christ's death: Track 1, Birth to 434 AD (3-year swing). Track 2, 33AD to 467 AD (again, three year swing), which ends with Rome's demise under Odovacer.

Like the OT authors before him, and like good Greek drama, Paul combines the meter with wry use of keywords in the text, to tell you What Time It Is.

Greek drama was all about how what plays on earth, is a result of what plays in heaven. So Paul takes advantage of that knowledge in his readers, by linking keywords for the reigns of the Emperors he tracks, to the higher Divine meaning of those same words, in what he writes. Of course, if you just carelessly read Bible in translation, you'll miss all this added and decisive meaning, so will shallowly interpret, Ephesians.

Good short set of Emperor bios: http://www.roman-emperors.org/impindex.htm. Timeline from UNRV (seems useful): https://www.unrv.com/empire/timeline-5th-century.php. See also Fordham's Hallsall sites for contemporary docs. M. Cary's History of Rome: A History of Rome: Down to the Reign of Constantine Third Edition.

I think Paul does a back-to-Adam accounting, too — but am still analyzing his math. Then we will be able to know how to correct our AD/BC dates.

Blessing by Association or Cursing by Association: as goes the believer, so goes history. All recorded in advance in history we can test, here in Eph1:3-14.

From 1985-1991, My pastor taught that very theme from Ephesians 1 — he exegeted the book, showiing ties pan-Bible — but he didn't know about this meter, so far as I can tell.

11h GGS will show how this four-generation curse is linked between the believers growing or retrogressing, and the fate of the Roman Empire (comparison of the blue numbers with the orange ones). 11i through 11v will show the wry Greek-Drama-wit textual ties between the years (syllables) and the text FOR those years. Will freak you out, because 'our' dates for these things are the same. I can't explain that; I should get a 3-6 year variance, but don't.

Paul's text furnishes a testimony-of-the-times, with meter telling you WHICH time that testimony covers. Same exact rhetorical style as in Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9. Text is multipurpose, with a central theme about Christ in all cases, and with all the resulting (past or future) history, occurring as a result.

Isaiah had done this same tracing, prophetically, in his Chapter 53; Daniel had 'replied' to the Isaiah timeline, with his prayer, showing how that timeline was fulfilled, and using the remaining future of it, to justify rebuilding the Temple and Jerusalem (Dan 9:18-19) based on the fact both are called by God's Name.

So Paul emulates Daniel, tracing out the future history of Rome, based on those called 'Christians'. Of Christ. Same importance, same chilling effect when we Church — as Paul will demonstrate — don't vote for God. Thus the Rapture will be delayed, and only the few proelpikotas (end Eph1:12) will carry Time. Again, my pastor taught that also, but based solely on text, not knowing how the meter reinforced what he taught. Really surprises me.

In this video I misname the Flavians as Antonines. That error is corrected toward the end of the video and in 11h.

Doc used for the video (has all links to all materials): Ephesians1REPARSED.doc; pdf copy: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. The doc original is easier to navigate.


GGS11h Paul maps Future to show Church carries history, overview

Continued from 11g: historical interplay between four-generation curse, and Church as salt-of-the-earth. Paul deliberately links our increasingly-apostate retardation, to the future disasters of Roman history. He does this by meter, but also by keywords in the text.

So, this video introduces that rhetorical style, which is a major feature in Scripture, and was then also a popular feature of Greek drama: use a keyword in a script, to make a wry aside on then-current history, to the audience. Bible used that drama feature ever since Psalm 90, and the tradition continues in Paul. So here we begin to see how he does it.

11i through 11v GGS will then show clause by clause, the relevance of Paul's keywords to FUTURE history — as we know it today, and can test.

Video's document houses all related links: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc.

IMPORTANT: its last section now sports a detailled chronology of Paul's keywords and syllables=years, matched with Roman history. Links to independent websites OF that history are in the chart, too. Thus you can more readily appreciate this rhetorical style, examine then-FUTURE history God had Paul plot as a play. Just as, God did for Daniel.

John's Revelation maps its opening prologue meter in verses 1-3, to both Psalm 90 and the first 126 syllables of Ephesians 1:3-6. Shocking. (I just learned this on 8/04/2011.)

So you can trace this wry rhetorical style backwards to Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9. For they all use it. Then examine Roman and Greek plays, pick one: my Greek favorites are Ion by Euripides (which Paul uses as his model for Ephesians), and Aristophanes' The Frogs. Then pick anything by Plautinus (bawdy Roman playwright), Terence, and if you can stomach him (I can't) — Seneca. It's important to see the sotto voce drama style in vogue when Paul writes, to prove Paul's imitating it.

Proper Hermeneutics requires apprehending the exact thought of the writer. To do that, you MUST know the cultural loading in the words written and what was going on at the time. We Christians are lousy scholars, so we miss what God says. Our loss!


GGS11i Paul maps Future up to Domitian, review

How verse content wryly tracks Church hence Roman FUTURE History in classical Greco-Roman drama style: Paul's keywords act like titles for each period in (then-future) history, as I try to explain. Follow along using the Roman History chart 'mapped' to this passage, in the 'Chrono Chart' (last) section of Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. Links in the chart take you to independent web writeups (usually by university professors, or to books by scholars) on the period. I will be adding many more, as I keep editing. Doc links also enable you to navigate by syllables=years, to the right place on the chart.

Roman history is something I understand. My pastor was in love with history, and always included its isagogics as he exegeted Scripture almost daily. There is a LOT of good material on the internet; so if you don't like the sources I linked, find your own. This is important stuff. If you see any errors, please let me know?

Latest doc (versus video), is Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. Latest pdf: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. The chrono section starts on p.82 and runs through the end. You can also read it online, Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. The doc, pdf, and htm are all the same, all updated versus what you see in the video. The htm formatting and colors might look funny on your browser.

Neat book on Year of the Four Emperors: 69 A.D.: The Year of Four Emperors 1st Edition, Kindle Edition

Just think: all these years we've had this information in Bible, but ignored it. How much more is there in Bible, which we're ignoring? How much we miss, in translation?


GGS11i Paul maps Future up to Domitian, review

How verse content wryly tracks Church hence Roman FUTURE History in classical Greco-Roman drama style: Paul's keywords act like titles for each period in (then-future) history, as I try to explain. Follow along using the Roman History chart 'mapped' to this passage, in the 'Chrono Chart' (last) section of Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. Links in the chart take you to independent web writeups (usually by university professors, or to books by scholars) on the period. I will be adding many more, as I keep editing. Doc links also enable you to navigate by syllables=years, to the right place on the chart.

Roman history is something I understand. My pastor was in love with history, and always included its isagogics as he exegeted Scripture almost daily. There is a LOT of good material on the internet; so if you don't like the sources I linked, find your own. This is important stuff. If you see any errors, please let me know?


GGS11j Paul maps Time up to Hadrian, review

Continued from 11i, still showing how Paul's Keywords interact with the meter, to prophesy Rome's future history to the demise of the Western Empire. This video begins with a review, until the end of Hadrian.

Follow along with the Chronological Chart (last section) in Ephesians1REPARSED.doc; it maps Paul's keywords and syllables=years, to many internet links of independent sources on each period in Roman history Paul references. Thus you can evaluate the wryness of the keywords Paul uses.

Much more detail is provided in the chart, than can be shown in the videos. The videos are only designed to show how the keywords, meter, and actual history, interact; thus we know Paul's intent in wording Ephesians 1:3-14, as he does.


GGS11k Paul maps SPQR's Adoptive Emperors

Continued from 11j, focus on the Adoptive Emperors (96-180AD) and 'chiasmus', a rhetorical style in Greek which — unknown to scholars — is also true in meter and also true in Hebrew meter. That's a fancy name for 'bookending'. We go through more of how Paul's Keywords interact with the meter, to prophesy Rome's future history to the demise of the Western Empire.

Follow along with the now MUCH REVISED Chronological Chart (last section) in Ephesians1REPARSED.doc, which has a ton of independent links to scholarly sites on Roman history, per period in the chart; it maps Paul's keywords and syllables=years, to each period in Roman history Paul references. Thus you can evaluate the wryness of the keywords Paul uses.

The latest revision in REPARSED is a demonstration of the chiasmic function of the eudokian, epainon, and what I call 'temple trio' anaphora. Turns out the anaphora bitingly 'comment' on the era of Diocletian and Constantine, often by wry use of SYLLABLES. Surprised me. Future videos will cover why.

Once you see the pattern you should find it elsewhere in Bible, especially in prophetic passages, whether Old or New Testament. That's the purpose of these videos, to focus on methodology, so you can test all this for yourself. Look especially in known Messianic passages and the rhythmic sections of Revelation (i.e., Temple scenes). Not sure how long those passages will be. They might be short. Just a guess.

Much more detail is provided in the chart, than can be shown in the videos. The videos are only designed to show how the keywords, meter, and actual history, interact; thus we know Paul's intent in wording Ephesians 1:3-14, as he does.


GGS11L Paul maps Commodus

Continued from 11k. How each of Paul's keywords in Ephesians 1:6-7 tie to the meter=years of Aurelius and Commodus. The truth is not like the movie 'Gladiator', which alleged to cover these people.


GGS11m Paul maps the Severans

Ephesians 1:8-9 keywords constitute wry commentary on the post-Commodus grab for power. By Roman generals, and by Christians. Lead-in to the Crisis of the Third Century. This video covers the post-Commodus period until the murder of Heliogabalus (aka Elagabalus). The guy's name means Sun-Priest (connotation of being the one on earth, representing Sol Invictus). Yeah, and that begins the time when Ireneaus and Tertullian and their cohorts grab for power, by inventing 'Mother Church'. To butcher rival Christians.

Proof of that is extensively linked to independent scholarly sources of (ahem) 'church father' writings, as well as Roman history, in video's doc: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc; its pdf copy: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. The doc original is easier to navigate.


GGS11n Paul maps Crisis of the 3rd Century

Paul's pregnancy references to Rome's 'Crisis of the 3rd Century' (historians' term), via Ephesians 1:9-10 keywords, constitute this episode's review. 'When 'mother church' is invented by Irenaeus and his ilk, to grab power over other Christians.

So, secular history reflects that apostasy. By Roman generals, and especially by mothers using their teenage kids. So while Irenaeus, Tertullian and later Origen try to give birth to an invented 'mother church' — to defeat/murder rival Christians and Jews — real mothers murder their own as well. Pretty pregnant, huh.

Proof of all that is linked to many independent scholarly sources, in the 'Chrono Chart' of the video's doc: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc; its pdf copy: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. The doc original is far easier to use. (Adobe can't read most of its links.)

Video's link displaying the Emperors, is a series of websites written by scholars at universities whose books you can buy at Amazon, etc. Link is: http://www.roman-emperors.org/impindex.htm

Crisis of the Third century Wiki link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_of_the_Third_Century. Search on that term also in REPARSED.doc, for other links to more scholarly stuff on the period.


GGS11o Paul maps Valerian, Gallienus (Crisis 3rd Century, cont.)

Focus: Paul's Eph 1:10 stress on Gallienus, as lead-in to Diocletian and Constantine; parallel to church apostasy occurring during same period. Centers on same topic as 11n, Paul's precision with meter and text interwoven to trace and then castigate, then-future formation of apostate church. So one will be warned to stay away from it. Now you begin to see why Revelation reads as it does.


GGS11pq Paul maps Gallienus to Diocletian

Intro to Diocletian, and Paul's witty satire tracking the origin of that Emperor's regnal policies, which caused 'the catholic church' to form under his successor, Constantine the Great.

Virtually every facet of RCC organization and persecution of other Christians and non-Christians which was institutionalized under Constantine, was structurally original to Diocletian, even to colors and terms like 'diocese'. Couldn't ask for better proof that the RCC is a late development, and is manifestly NOT Biblical. So you don't have to wait for Rev 17's satirical 'seven hills' title (which Constantine also used for his Byzantine replacement). Paul's text here, is the basis for Rev 17's.


GGS11r Paul maps to Diocletian, intro

How Diocletian's reign created the Catholic Church's structure as a copycat of Diocletian's brutal policies, but under Constantine. And, that copycatting was done in self-defense. So it's not a case of demonizing the RCC, but just telling the truth about what happened. (Could have been any denomination, but the RCC is the one which historically formed under Constantine.)

Paul references this creation by means of keywords in verses 10 and 11, especially in syllables 283-308, which corresponds to AD years. Here, we just see a ccel.org overview; 11tGGS videos, will cover details of how Paul's wry wordplay covers both Diocletian's rule.. and legacy.

EXTENSIVE documentation on Diocletian is linked to many websites and books in Ephesians1REPARSED.doc, in the ChronoChart section of that doc, syllables 283-308, and in Appendix II of that same doc.

For Paul focuses on the legacy of Diocletian as the cause of Constantine and the Rise — and therefore Fall of Late Western Rome under Odavacer, as later videos will cover in more detail. 11sGGS takes a sidetrip through the Magnificat, so you can see how Paul derives his meter from Mary. In 11t, we resume with Diocletian.


PATU44 Ephesians 1:3-14 Revisited 5/5

For Masochists Only. Audit video subseries revisits whether I explained the dateline '56' of Ephesians rightly: I hadn't. This is 5/5's corrected answer. Download the two-page audit correction, here: brainout.net/EphDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'. The Romans doc is RomansDatelineMeter.pdf or RomansDatelineMeter.doc.

Turns out Paul used the 'I write you' meter style in Romans (which was precedent), but had to 'pad' 2 years into the text: BECAUSE he writes in ad 58, so can't tag Mary's 56 without some haha math. This 5/5 shows that haha math (rounding tricks on years Christ did or should have died, '37' and '47'); yet all four videos are useful re technique for sleuthing Bible meters. Took me four hours' videos to figure out Paul's haha. Happily, though, I don't have to redo all my past Ephesians videos nor rewrite the video's 150-page doc, Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf aka Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or Ephesians1REPARSED.htm) !

If you're not already familiar with the meter styles, you'll need some background on the Doctrine no one in Christendom yet knows, HOW GOD ORCHESTRATES TIME (channel on its math, is How God Orchestrates Time ). No one knows that doctrine, because no one's ever plotted Bible's dates using ONLY Bible, so all the Bible timelines 'out there' are at least partially wrong and contradictory. I learned that, the hard way, so went BACK TO THE BIBLE and only used it to construct GeneYrs.xls, using the Gen5 and 7, 11 begats (all in the worksheet and visible), plus verses not much used by anyone else. Verse disclosure and method of constructing the worksheet is in brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

You need that worksheet, as the Bible meters measure time in the same way, ADAMIC YEARS. For example, Christ died in 4136 vernal. He was SUPPOSED to die 10 years later, in 4146 vernal. Paul depends on the reader knowing that for his haha math, as the ADAMIC year equivalents are 4136.5 and 4146.5, respectively. Since you can't split a syllable=year, he neatly rounds to get to the shoulda-been age (a meter convention that equals our 'ad') by saying (41)37 and (41)47, in the meter you see onscreen. Heh. But that would mean Christ age 58, not 56, so he backs out the '2' added, to get back to 56, so he can pick up where Mary's Magnificat, left off. Magnificat videos are here: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time .

Thus in Ephesians, Paul reconciles all the way back to Adam. Which I knew, but couldn't figure out how he did it. Until now.

File Name: EphRevisit10.avi, 3/25/15.

GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time

You may want to proceed through this series of playlists as such:

  1. GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14
  2. GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History
  3. GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time

Full playlist is embedded below:

NOTE: this entire playlist is now in vimeo (so you can comment without having to join Google Plus), at http://www.vimeo.com/channels/magnificatmeter . You would have to join Vimeo to comment, but they have a FREE option, and they don't belong to any social network, so you won't be forced to join one, either. In fact, their big thing is privacy. The channel owner moderates (i.e., me for my channels).

As Moses did in Psalm 90, Mary's Magnificat Time Poem outlines Time backward and forward from her day of speaking: centering on, the Chanukah birthdate for Christ. No one in Christendom knows about this. So, I'm documenting it; so, you can vet the Greek yourself. This is a separate subplaylist (of 11s GGS). If you're having trouble following my Bible Hebrew Meter playlists, start here: for in this subseries, I demonstrate how you VET text for meter. At first, I wasn't sure Mary's Magnificat qualified as a 'time poem', so here you see how I test it. So I'm surprised to find this meter, and how it's actually TAGGED BY PAUL in Ephesians 1:3-14. He derives his meter pattern, from hers. No wonder he uses the pregnancy metaphors: she did. Shocks me.

Master doc on it: MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc

See also Lord Born on Chanukah 4 BC playlist, and Psalm 90, Isaiah 53 playlists, because Mary's playing on all those meters. Paul then plays on Mary, which surprises me.

These all use a Hebrew metering rhetorical style unknown to Christendom: so the videos are fun, but heavy. So, I must show the evidence live onscreen, so you can vet it.

This series has three parts: GGS11s is the subseries showing how Mary's meter works, in order to better explain Paul's. But the 'Synoptics' and 'Jim3' (and later) videos, demonstrate ties between her meter, and how James and Luke both use her meter. The 'Jim' series of videos is also housed in the James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis channel, if you'd rather watch them solo. They Synoptic videos are separately housed in Synoptics.

Click to play this channels' videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Ever since Psalm 90 was penned, it was known that Christ's death was Scheduled to occur NO LATER than 'our' 37AD. Ever since David was crowned King over All Israel, it was known from 1Kings 6:1 that Christ had to be born ON the 1000th anniversary of that crowning. For The Day of the Lord had to be 1000 years, Psalm 90:4. The first 'day' started with the First David; so the last 'day', would culminate with the Last David. So He had to be born ON TIME, or else God would break His 2Sam7 Promise to David (and through him to Israel, since she lost out by electing Saul, 1Sam8-13, compared with 2Sam7). Ouch.

In case someone forgot that rule, God reminded Zerubabbel of it, in Haggai 2, coming TWICE (heh, God-man, two natures in one person) on 25 Chislev — 2nd Temple's founding anniversary, which 357 years later would be known also as Chanukah. And the 1000th anniversary was what? 4BC, by our calendars.

Hence the moniker '11s'. One Birthdate Deadline, One Christ, One Salvation, One Specific Schedule that He come in the 11th hour (Gal4:4); and then Pay, just before 'midnight'.

Mary knew that. So Mary Meter Maps from 1st Chanukah to Messiah, to future Millennium, just as Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel had done. Here, she uses Daniel's 73-meter dateline to begin her own, piggybacking on his ending meter at Rome's Rise — to begin at first Chanukah, 73 years LATER. Then she 'balances' Time at her future Son's age 56, as that would be 40 years before the Millennium was then SCHEDULED to start. Paul picks up his meter where Mary leaves off, in Eph 1:3-14. What a shock.

So, starting here with 11s2 GGS — for 11s1 is now outdated, I got it wrong the first time — this 'channel' (playlist) replicates all videos in the Youtube Magnificat playlist (http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8E0CA478D2DE276F). For the Magnificat functions as an OT-to-NT intermission or even 'Act', between Daniel 9's prophetic meter 'play' in Daniel 9, and Paul's later metered NT 'reply' to Mary's meter, in his Ephesians 1:3-14.

For Mary, as soon as she alights from her donkey on visiting her cousin Elizabeth, launches into a metered prophecy which was immediately recognized as Divine. Zecharias will, when he recovers speech, play to her meter with his own metered prophetic 'reply'. Luke thus records both speeches in Luke 1, which by then had long been regarded as Canon.

So what is the importance of Mary's meter? Well, as Moses did in Psalm 90, Mary's Magnificat Time Poem outlines Time backward and forward from her day of speaking: centering on, the Chanukah birthdate for Christ.

No one in Christendom knows about this. So, I'm documenting it; so, you can vet the Greek yourself. This is a separate subplaylist (11s GGS). If you're having trouble following my Bible Hebrew Meter playlists, start here: for in this subseries, I also show how you VET text for meter.

Paul TAGS her meter, Ephesians 1:3-14. He even derives his meter pattern, from hers (and Zecharias'). No wonder he uses the pregnancy metaphors: she did. Shocks me. Master doc on it, is MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc. The PDF version is MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf.

See also Lord Born on Chanukah 4 BC playlist in Youtube, and the Psalm 90 'channel' (playlist), here in Vimeo (or Youtube); for Mary plays on all those meters.

She also plays deftly on many OT passages, as does Isaiah. So to show that, Episodes 10-21 of my vimeo 'synoptics' channel (playlist) are here added. View them in tandem with MaryMagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf's 'ZakarChart' (page 21), to get a quick view of how the two soliloquies, interrelate with the OT verses. Very obvious CHANUKAH meaning, but in classical sotto voce GREEK style. Later episodes in the Synoptics (after Epi.21) will also show that ZakarChart section, to lead back to Luke's tracking of Matthew.

Again, this Bible meter is unknown to Christendom. Hence I must show the evidence live onscreen, so you can vet it.


7 RCC : Catholics got Christmas RIGHT!

Protties flunk, here. December 25 is CHANUKAH, as I've been documenting since 2004; since 2008, in videos. CENTERPIECE OF HISTORY, this date, all Bible dates hub to it, even as they focus to Passover, when He died. Lord's Birth and death dates are the 'hub' around which God designed TIME. Hebrews 1:3 says as much (always mistranslated, should be THE TIMES or 'ages', not 'worlds').

Key to proving the Chanukah 4BC birthdate, are Exodus 12 (SOLAR YEAR accounting should have been Israel's calendar, but she messed it up); Haggai 2:21-23 (which Mary quotes in her Magnificat, a TIME POEM which uses meter to key off first Chanukah), and the fact that both Passover and Chanukah are Israel INDEPENDENCE days, which you miss if you don't value calendar on SOLAR year.

That's why Matthew uses 'star'=light=angel in Matt 2, why Luke uses angels and light in Luke 2, why Zecharias talks about light to the Gentiles, in his soliloquy — keying off, MARY. Her accounting switches to Christ-Birthday accounting, at her syllable 160. Paul picks up on that, and keys off Mary, dating Eph1:3-14, at Christ's age 56, right before His 57th birthday. Anno Domini!

So if you were gonna pick a Rapture or 2nd Advent Date (and you shouldn't), pick CHRISTMAS aka CHANUKAH for His Arrival. For both Paul and Mary START TIME OVER, at His Birth. Exodus was a birthday present to Moses; so I'd bet money Rapture or 2nd Advent will be a birthday present to Christ. Just a guess.

Excepting the videos on Ephesians and Magnificat, all related webpages and videos are organized under PassPlot.htm#HisBday to show this story. That webpage covers how God orchestrated the Jewish calendar to depict the pattern of WORLD HISTORY, which most Jews and many Dispensationalist pastors, kinda know. But they don't know how vast is the proof of this, in Bible. I wouldn't have known either, except my pastor suddenly separated himself from the common Prottie kant that the Lord was born in the spring, since December would be 'too cold'; look up that silly argument in ISBE, k?

My pastor was getting sick with Alzheimer's in year 2000, when he broke with Prottie 'tradition', so couldn't explain why he switched to December 25. That's why I had to go looking in Bible. He said it was Chanukah 4 BC. Upset the congregation, by his insistence.

Yeah, and now I can furnish proof. In six playlists, and very long webpages documenting it all. Where to start? Depends on what angle you prefer. Suggest you use the above webpage link, reading until your eyes glaze over. It shows the comprehensive design 'fit' of the Jewish holidays, and how they depict the 'year' of human history. That's a parallel to the 'year' Noah spent in the boat, which Paul parallels in four 'quarters' (playing of Zecharias playing off Mary, both using '91' meters).

Once you see the big picture, it will be easier to slog through the dates, Bible verses, etc. provided in the page. AFTER that, the next slogging is through the videos. Depends on whether you want to start with the minutiae, or the big picture.

Big-picture playlists are Psalm 90 Meter of Time and YMH Episode 10. Both playlists are featured (in alpha order) on my channel page.

At the other end, the 10-11 GGS series covers Paul and Mary's Magnificat meter. Many videos, and not yet done; for Paul's meter outlines FUTURE CHURCH HISTORY to the end of the Western Roman Empire, which spawned my RCC videos now, here. Currently, I'm on Diocletian-Constantine, Paul's syllables = AD years, 283-337. Like Mary, Paul uses his own A.D. accounting, which is surprisingly like ours. I can't yet explain why.

Mary's Magnificat meter is a GGS subset, and was spun off into a separate playlist. She specifically TAGS to first Chanukah, playing off Daniel 9. Word docs in the video descriptions, give you her live Bible Greek text (UBS4, BGT, pasted from BibleWorks) — so you can vet it; I walk the viewer through that doc.

Both playlists are on my channel page.

Finally, in the Synoptics series, right now the focus is on Chanukah references in Haggai 2 which tie to Matthew 1-2, and Luke 1-2. That's been ongoing for the last ten weeks. Very little Greek used. So if you prefer translations, maybe start there.

The info is vast, testable, and conclusive. It will overwhelm you.


GGS11s1: Paul meter-maps Magnificat? Elision Question

This video is now outdated. See 11s2 GGS for the UPDATED METER: MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf. The other relevant links follow below, in this video description.

To my fellow Greek Geeks: need your feedback on the elision assumptions here shown in the Magnificat. I'm trying to vet the syllable counts to see if a) Paul maps to the Magnificat in Ephesians 1:3-14, and b) whether the Magnificat itself is yet another 'time poem' retrospectively and prospectively (prophetically) measuring Time at one syllable per year, just as Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9 all do. This meter is based on the OT, so is not subject to Greek drama or poetry rules. Just count the syllables. Usually, one consonant and one vowel=one syllable, though combined vowels and combined consonants might also be counted only as one syllable (i.e., 'sha' is one syllable, 'shai' also one, etc.)

There are no syllable adjustments for stress or pronunciation elongation, etc. But elision is recognized, and affects the meter count. Because, you memorized text orally. So now it vitally matters to learn how THEY pronounced words in 1st century — NOT Modern Greek! The meter will tell you that. Catch-22!

Proper 'elegant' elision of either Greek or Latin, was a big debate in Mary's time. Read about five pages before through five pages after this link: Pronunciation of Ancient Greek

So for ancient Bible students, that means ATTIC standards should be used. Alexander would have relied on well-known plays to help advance his goal of a 'common' language, and Mary even uses Atticisms here. So that's the pronunciation key I'll follow.

Syllable counts were to verify accuracy. As a bonus, the syllable counts result in a sevening or trebling meter with prophetic or expository value.

In short, do not impose Western standards of poetry or meter on the Bible text. Instead, count syllables as if you were testing your memory for accuracy. The result is an astonishing accounting for Time: for God treats Time as a loan, given for a purpose, cancelled or changed if that purpose isn't met; reimbursed, if that purpose is met. The reimbursement of Temple Time, is really the theme of Daniel 9. But the topic started, in Psalm 90.

Download the documents shown on-screen:

Ephesians: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc also lists all associated video links, documents, and webpages on the topic of Bible Hebrew meter used in OT and NT Greek. PDF: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf Access all the independent, ancient Roman internet links in the Chronology Chart (last 50+ pages).

Magnificat: MagnificatMeterDraft.doc. PDF: MagnificatMeterDraft.pdf. It's only a few pages, right now.

It is but a first draft. I've not sufficiently proofed its Notes for sense. First I must verify the meter, then will go back and change the notes. Hence this video requesting your feedback on the syllabification and elision. Thank you!

There are about 30 rhetorical-style 'time poem' characteristics to test; central to them all, is the right syllable count. Usually that's not a problem, but here are so many potential elisions to avoid 'hiatus', I'm not sure what to count as elided. So your input is most appreciated, thank you!


GGS11s2: REVISED Meter of Time, with Translation

Magnificat as a Meter of Time, With Metered Translation. Word doc of the METER: MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc. Change the suffix to 'pdf' for the pdf version. Associated Magnificat Calendar: MagnificatCalendar.xls.

Video covers how during Mary's day, the Greek and Latin rhetoricians were debating the proper pronunciation of their languages — specifically, with reference to elision, which they called 'hiatus' and 'krasis'. Those two terms are philosophical, as well as philological, the idea being to reconcile their philosophy and their language. Rhetoric was THE way to be respected in those days, so the elites spent much time learning it, debating it. A short statement about that, is here: https://books.google.com/books?id=SEsTAAAAYAAJ&vq=This+combination+of+vowels&pg=PA128&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q="this combination of vowels"&f=false

Read the text a few pages before and after the section which you see. You can download that book for free. There are many other books on the topic, but for video purposes that one offers the shortest confirmation of what was happening in rhetorical circles at the time Mary speaks.

Mary is an elite. She follows the conventions of her time. So in calculating her syllables, I follow the conventions she was taught. Thus the meter pattern suddenly becomes much more provable, and exhibits the same characteristics as past Bible writers Moses, Isaiah, Daniel.

It becomes obvious why Paul obsesses over pregnancy analogies; obvious, that he's tagging Mary's meter, in Ephesians.

Finally, the Magnificat's syllables are 'wrapped' by the Lukan 'and Mary said', which is an introduction. That 4-syllable addition might serve to tell us how to adjust our BC/AD dates. Will know more, as I study the issue further.


GGS11s3: Mary's Meter of Time Structure, Primer

Doctrinal Meter Precedence for Mary's Magnificat, explained. Meter and meaning are intertwined, enabling better interpretation of a passage. Here we get a simple overview of how they work together. Like the other Bible writers, she ends her metered timeline to balance to the then-scheduled Millennium (year 4200 from Adam's fall, had there been no Church).. minus 14. Then, she subtracts 42, to 'equal' the beginning of Isaiah 53:12, which in Isaiah's meter timeline, represents where SHE IS LOCATED. So she ends with a 'balance' of 40 years to the Millennium. Pregnantly.

This totals Christ Age 56 (long after He was even scheduled to die at age 40), explaining why Paul picks up with 56. Both of them 'tag' the 'sixty two weeks' of Daniel 9 (both God's reply and Daniel's own meter). For '56' represents the pregancy of '14', which was in 'God's Womb' of Psalm 90:1-4.

See, it's not Bible codes, but the meter helps you grasp textual meaning of these otherwise-ambiguous or generic verses.

Associated links (i.e., to stuff shown in the video so you can vet it yourself): MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.

Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.

GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) For the doc (or htm). The pdf is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.


GGS11s4: Mary counts post-Chanukah in Meter, ties to Daniel (intro)

Intro to the 'recount history' requirement of Bible Hebrew Meter time poems, to see what Mary's saying 'beneath' the text; to see if it qualifies AS a Time poem as Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9. Mary ties TO Daniel 9 by means of Chanukah. Proving that, will take the next six hours of videos, starting here. So here, the Book of Maccabees 1 occupies the first half of the video, and a testing intro to how Mary tracks it, occupies the video's last half.

If you downloaded the MagnificatDraft2.doc, download it again: for it has a new last page which shows the historical periods Mary references. Those periods will be covered in the next five hours' videos.


GGS11s5: Mary's post-Chanukah Timeline (Meter) and wry Historical Commentary (Text)

Doc now updated with keyword and OT multi-verse maps between Mary and Zecharias' soliloquies (he plays on what she says). Now has real history mapped. Use the new page 21 to follow the history, Mary's text references; to see her wry wordplay, as covered in the video.

This is the easiest Time Poem in the Bible, to understand. Once you see its pattern, it's far easier to see how Daniel and Paul, craft their meters. Especially, Paul.

The Magnificat meter periods will thus be covered in the next four hours' videos.

Also new: pages 11-12 show how her dateline meters (first 35 and 42) create a separate JURIDICAL timeline going back to David's Kingship at Hebron on the 1050th anniversary of Abraham's supermaturation: the juridical impetus for Temple and thus Chanukah. Thus Mary links His Birth to Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9. Now it's easy (for me, anyway) to understand WHY Paul linked Ephesians 1:3-14, to the Magnificat. As you know, I've had trouble believing he would do that.. until now.


GGS11s6: Mary's post-Chanukah Timeline and wry Commentary, cont.

Mary next accounts Time from Caesar crossing the Rubicon, forward to Millennium, with wry wordplay: intro to her use of Haggai 2:22. For easier viewing, download the newly-revised MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc; it now lists the historical references next to her meter numbers, and how Zecharias plays off Mary's meter. Synoptics series Episodes 12-21, will introduce her use of Haggai 2, in much more detail. (Haggai 2 tells us the Lord was to be born on what we now call, Chanukah. That's why Mary's Magnificat is a timeline of Chanukah.)

Correction re Mary's focus on Tiberius, in her syllable 150 = 13BC, before he even came to power. Due to Augustus' bouts of illness, Tiberius' co-regency periods were several; often unofficial, not merely from 12AD forward. In 13BC, he was consul (see https://books.google.com/books?id=XohfAAAAMAAJ&pg=PR42&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false). Augustus kept preferring other successors to Tiberius; but the others, successively died. Meanwhile, Tiberius was asked to give up everything, including his wife — Augustus had Tiberius divorce Vipsania and marry Augustus' daughter Julia — to be 'eligible' for succession. So Mary wryly tags him with 'lifts the humiliated'. The year before she spoke, Tiberius was compelled to marry Julia: due to Augustus' prior favored folks, all dying. So Mary dates a current scandal, back to when he first became eligible as successor (i.e., due to consulship, when only age 29-30).

Agrippa died the same year: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Vipsanius_Agrippa; but Cambridge says early the following year, https://books.google.com/books?id=JZLW4-wba7UC&pg=PA97&q=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

So did Lepidus. Here's the Res Gestae: https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Augustus/Res_Gestae/2*.html

How ironic. In 13/12BC, Antipater, who in 5BC was disgraced, had been 'lifted' to be Herod's heir: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipater_(son_of_Herod_the_Great)

How ironic. In same year, law passed forbidding lower soldiers to marry: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4135186

Another correction: Christ's Scheduled death is mapped in Luke 1:55's kathos elalEsen pros tous pateras. He would actually die earlier, ending at pros. I kept confusing the two distinctions in the video, sorry.


GGS11s7: Mary's Chanukah Timeline ORIGIN

Mary's Magnificat Meter of Time has ACCOUNTING precedence in the OT, and her ending meter BALANCES to that precedence. If you've been watching my Psalm 90 videos, this will be familiar ground. If not, this will introduce you to the root concepts in Psalm 90's, Isaiah 53's, and Daniel 9's ACCOUNTING meter. For all of them, balance to a scheduled ENDING: the Millennium.

When Church was inserted by Christ in Matthew 16:18 in order to save Time from Ending, this Millennial Schedule was no longer a fixed future. The big question to believers from Christ's Birth onward, though, was based on an awareness that it COULD become fluid, if Israel in aggregate was not sufficiently positive to Messiah when He came. Hence Daniel 9:26c, is about the 2nd Temple going DOWN — yet it is depicted as up and operating, in Daniel 9:27. So Mary ESTIMATES the effect if Israel rejects Christ, on the Schedule. Christ's scheduled lifetime of 40 years is based on Bible's numbers, you won't find it in the text. But you will find a garbled version of it, in Talmud's Sanhedrin 99 at http://www.rabbinictraditions.com , the best website for Talmud research.

Paul will update the Schedule given that Christ WAS rejected; the burning question to believers in Paul's day, was whether the OLD Schedule, would still play. Hence Paul's meter plots what-if-Rapture dates, to show historical events in the future, and how to view Time if the Rapture does not happen — and Paul expected it wouldn't.

CORRECTION: at 14 minutes, I begin to explain Luke 1:55's extra syllables, mistakenly saying Christ was scheduled to die in His 40th year. No, it was His 41st year — you enter year 2, on your 1st birthday. So notice how the Greek syllables take you to pateras: concept play on THE Father of fathers!


GGS11s8: Mary accounts TWO Trib sevens

Now we're ready to see how Mary balances to Daniel 9's meter. Treble dual-entry accounting, here:

To which, Mary balances, including WHAT IF MY SON DOESN'T LIVE BUT 33 years? Awesome stuff. Your eyes will glaze over. Mine always do. But God is very punctiliar in His Time Grants.


GGS11s9: Mary accounts TWO Trib sevens (end)

Finishes demonstration of the two Trib sevens, how Mary ties to Daniel 9:19 and Daniel 9:5, and how Paul in Ephesians 1:4, ties to Mary. All of them play on the 56 which Moses established in Psalm 90:16-17, so that 56 becomes a metaphor of the 'end times', just as enshrined in the Mosaic Law of the Jubilee/Pentecost plus Trib-based-on-Passion/Passover-Week, aka 62nd week (490-56), pan-Bible.

John, in Revelation 1:1-3, builds on the 56 by using Daniel 9:11-12's pregnant 58-syllable pair — signifying LATENESS, missing the HARVEST — using '58' to build in Paul's 56, to create an 84 (Psalm 90:1-4), showing that he writes Rev in what THEY called '91', but we call 94 AD, when the Tribulation was originally scheduled to begin. Like Paul, John writes because the Tribulation did NOT begin, due to Church failure to mature. So Rev is about how the pre-Trib timeline is UNPREDICTABLE, just as Christ had said back in Acts 1, based on John 17. John's meter in Revelation will be covered in future videos, I'm not sure when.

There are three more Magnificat videos: 11s10 will cover how to test Hebrew or Greek for 'Time Poem' status; 11s11 will cover pronunciation, Atticisms, Hebraisms in the Magnificat; and 11s12 will be on Zecharias' meter, which deliberately plays off Mary's. Paul pulls his '91' from Zecharias' meter, what a shock.


GGS11s10: Proving Magnificat, a Time Poem

For Hebrew/Greek Geeks, this video summarizes how you test a swatch of Bible text (here, the Magnificat) for Time Poem Characteristics. As you know if you've watched this series, I was skeptical that the Magnificat WAS a Time Poem. So here I go through some of the tests, and why Magnificat passes them.

Proof of the 35 and 42 passing ACCOUNT-BACK test, is extensive, and begins on page 10 of MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or pdf). Mary's Account-Back method is the most sophisticated of any Time Poem I've yet found. Awesome stuff.

I summarize these 30+ characteristics in a Word doc: BibleHebMeterCharacs.doc — replace the 'doc' extension with 'htm' if you prefer a webpage format, or 'pdf', for pdf.

This video goes through only some of those traits.

Happily, God made Bible study self-auditing, so if you screw up in counting syllables or misinterpret a verse, something else in Bible will jump out and bite you. So it is here, with the characteristics. Episodes 11s11 will cover pronunciation and the NOT SO PURE character of 'koine' Greek; 11s12 will show the Luke 1 Zecharias text as being a PARTIAL Time poem playing on Mary's Magnificat, which Paul uses in Eph 1:3-14 to derive his four 'quarters' (91) meter. That will end, the Magnificat series.

Beginning at 40 mins of this video, you'll need to see my (very messy) notes on Daniel 11's timeline, which were made from my pastor's exegesis classes of Daniel 11. Scanned Notes are here: Dan11Map.pdf. To hear my pastor's exegesis of Daniel 9, you have to order the Daniel series. It's free, on mp3, order limit of 80 lessons a month: http://www.rbthieme.org.

Zecharias' meter in Luke 1 will be in 11s12 Magni 12 . But you can download it now, here: Zecharias.pdf. No English is provided, since you can follow along in translation.


GGS11s11: Mary's Greek and other geeky stuff

This video was fun to make. I practice pronouncing the Magnificat in different ways, play with elision and cadence, then make comments on her Atticisms and Hebraisms. You want to hear the FLOW, so you can tell if you're reading it well. Even, with an American accent, lol. I have to practice more.

The essential difference: in OLDER language, you always have SHORT vowels. Dipthongs arose to create the sounds of what we call 'long' vowels. So 'ei' should be pronounced eh+ee, quickly; 'ai' would be ah+ee, spoken quickly. One syllable. Eventually I'll do another pronunciation video when I get the sounds right, using the foregoing 'short vowel' rule.

By contrast, there's a FAD by today's 'scholars' claiming modern Hebrew/Greek is nearly the same as 2000 years ago. Their argument has gone on forever, and it's political. The people who speak those languages natively, want to claim they speak as the ancients did. How false and childish.

So today, there's a weird argument that sloppy Greek inscriptions misspelled, tell you pronunciation. But they are not Bible inscriptions. So you can't gauge proper BIBLE pronunciation from some stupid cult follower in a cave, writing Dead Sea scrolls in lazy Greek, k? The Ebionites and similar Jewish cults of the 1st century BC-AD were weirdoes, so how competent were they? NOT.

Yet like insisting hillbilly English be treated as standard for Bible English, the fad now, is to use a 300-year span (up to 300AD!) of sloppy Greek writing, as justification for abandoning a 2000 year old standard of how EDUCATED Greek had been pronounced (ever since 500 BC, the rules were known and taught as part of 'rhetoric'). Get Oxford Grammar of Classical Greek by James Morwood, see the difference.

So no true scholar listened to the fad back when Bible scholarship was worthy, 50 years ago. But today, 'scholarship' caters to whoever-pays-the-most, and get-along-with-everyone. Scripture is thus maligned. What will God say to them, at the Judgment Seat of Christ?

For you'll miss the wordplay, soundplay and FLOW with modern Greek, since the latter ELIDES practically every other syllable. Use CLASSICAL Greek pronunciation, if you want to get closer to the original.

These things matter, when parsing text to test it for Bible Hebrew meter — which yes, Virginia, really exists in Bible, and even the NT writers use its meter, with Greek words!

Bible Hebrew Meter Characteristics: (Word doc) BibleHebMeterCharacs.doc or pdf or BibleHebMeterCharacs.htm. Both doc and htm require you to download fonts; link to those fonts will be in their first lines.


GGS11s12: Zecharias meters to Mary (series conclusion)

Zecharias' 42-42-91-42 metered speech, like Mary's, also draws from Hanna's prayer and the same OT verses Mary tagged in her speech. For extra measure, Zecharias pegs to her ending 217 meter, too. This video reviews that Greek, since you can grab any English translation and follow along. Last 30 minutes are pretty dramatic, I'm blown away.

See the Synoptics series for more info on Zecharias' speech.

Links to stuff shown in video:


GGS11t1-2 Paul maps Diocletian in Eph 1:10

It's syllable=year 260 AD. Everyone and his brother is a wannabe Caesar. So Paul characterizes the period as 'bring under one head' — yeah, and the other heads get chopped off. A young man at this time has a dream of growing up to be that head; for a gypsy told him he would become that head, once he killed 'a boar' (Apher, later the father in law of Numerian). His name? Diocles, later known to history as Diocletian, from whom we get diocese. And when? In year 283, when he murders his rivals — per his own dating of his own ascension, annotated by Paul as 'everything on earth'.

Lots of wannabe heads of an emergent church, too. Heads flying everywhere, writing against fellow Christians, making trouble in the Empire, flashing their piety around. History will never be the same.

You think God is trying to tell us something from Paul's writing, 200+ years prior?

This video is thus a shocking, panoramic introduction, updated for Mary's meter and the fact that the Jews in the Talmud, used almost the same metric values for their own estimations of Messiah's arrival, 220 years after Christ. (See Sanhedrin 97-99, but esp. 97 and 99.) So Paul simply uses meter to engage in a long RABBINICAL tradition of timing rules for Messiah's arrival — updated now, due to Church's Arrival. Hence — again in rhetorical tradition since Psalm 90, via meter — Eph1:3-14, predicts Church history yearly as a recurring trend, in order to show the doctrinal theme of Ephesians: How Church Determines History.

And where in history? The Under-One-Head trend, Ephesians 1:10b, which was the dream of the two big counterfactions in Christendom, centered at Alexandria/Antioch and Rome; also, the big dream of one Diocles, who at this point is still a kid. Kids dream dreams that warring believers execute, since The Church Believer Determines History.

Turns out my pastor taught this very doctrine — which he called 'invisible heroes' — FROM Ephesians, for seven whopping years: his '1985 Ephesians' series. You can get it free on mp3 or DVD from http://www.rbthieme.org; about 2100 lessons of exegesis, taking you all over the Bible. Heavy stuff. HE DID NOT KNOW THE METER, so far as I can tell. In 40 years of study under him, I've never heard him talk about it. So this is a major reinforcement of his class content, which I did not expect.

So here, we first review Paul's keyword and meter technique from Eph 1:3 forward, updated to incorporate both Mary's meter value, and the Talmudic Sanhedrin 97-99 recognition of the timeline (though Talmud mentions only values, not the fact they are Bible meters).

This video then covers how Church was engaged in its own 'crisis of the 3rd century', believer against believer, everyone scrambling for religious suzerainty; how its scrapping leadership exercised very anti-Christ policies, mingled in politics and sought power from Caesar, rather than God — just as Rev 17 predicted. Church Father 'Hall of Shame' links in Ephesians1REPARSED are shown, so you can read their own ugly words for yourself, Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (substitute 'htm' if you prefer htm, but the latter is not as well formatted).

Episode 11t3-4 will cover into what world, Diocletian grew up; how that world, shaped his personality and politics. His time is characterized by Ephesians 1:10, the warring Church factions trying to defeat each other in order to consolidate 'under one head' all religious power in heaven and earth; the secular Roman factions thus also trying to do the same. Period corresponds to 252-284 AD, culminating in Diocles' rise to power.

A great book on this guy is here: The Persecution of Diocletian: A Historical Essay. Last half of the video highlights his personality. Convert it to searchable? Read vid desc to 'Google Books' video here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/googlebooksocrconversion

Here's a book you can buy: Galerius and the Will of Diocletian (Roman Imperial Biographies) 1st Edition . Or, this one: Diocletian and the Roman Recovery (Roman Imperial Biographies) 1st Edition

Episode 11t5-6 will cover highlights of his rule, with a focus on policies and politics which fostered the rise of Constantine. It was under Constantine that the Roman Catholic Church actually formed. Constantine continued ALL the repressive policies of Diocletian, merely changing the name of the enemy to Christians, pagans and Jews who would not 'side' with the Christian power elites who curried Constantine's favor. That favor shifted back and forth between the Alexandria-Antioch and Roman axes, as will be shown in later videos.

Constantine was a jerk. To know why he was a jerk, you must first understand Diocles, his mentor. See also the ROME series from HBO, to get a better grasp of the Roman mindset, and why the Catholic Church ended up forming under Constantine, reflecting both that mindset and its stress on both gods (morphed into 'saints' in RCC) and power.


GGS11t3-4 Paul maps Diocletian in Eph1:10-11, cont.

It's syllable=year 283 AD. An ambitious Diocles has found his opportunity to realize a gypsy prophecy given him, and by the end of the following year, will become the ruler of the Roman Empire. But he DATES his accession, not to that future point, but to December 283 — which Paul obviously knew, by breaking his prophetic roster-of-Caesar syntax, here. Why? What makes Diocletian so important? For a long time, I didn't know. Ergo the gap in videos between 11r where we left off with Diocles, and here in 11t, where we've resumed.

Here we'll see why. Into what world — plagued with politicizing Christians — Diocletian grew up; how that world, shaped his personality and politics. His time is characterized by Ephesians 1:10, the warring Church factions trying to defeat each other in order to consolidate 'under one head' all religious power in heaven and earth; the secular Roman factions thus also trying to do the same. Period corresponds to 252-284 AD, aka 'the Crisis of the Third Century', culminating in Diocles' rise to power.


GGS11t3-4 Paul maps Diocletian in Eph1:10-11, cont.

Eph 1:10-11, the idea being that As Goes Church, So Goes Human History.

Video focuses on Diocletian's policies, politics, economics and religion, which fostered the rise of Constantine. It was under Constantine that the Roman Catholic Church actually formed. It's important to see that fact. To the hoi polloi, RCC spins a huge lie about its origins as if noble, which is easily proven untrue. That of itself, tells you to avoid the RCC like a plague. But God DID USE the nascent RCC, and that too is important to see. God was preserving the FEW who wanted BIBLE, which is the theme Paul expounds. It is a continuing trend of history, even today, as Eph1:14, will stress.

Yes, the heroes were Catholic, as that was the only game in town, once Constantine took over. But they were NOT the leaders spinning the lie about a 'universal' beginning of 'apostolic succession'. Instead, they were quiet monks, handmaids and other lowlifes within monasteries, quietly copying and hearing, BIBLE. Many of these people eventually left to form their own groups, or became travellers quietly giving out the Bible information as they travelled. The reform movement against Catholicism always began WITH Catholics, and remained a force in history from 5th century onward. It's no mistake that so many of our extant manuscripts begin to be produced in large numbers, during this time.

For Constantine continued ALL repressive policies of Diocletian, merely changing the name of the enemy to Christians, pagans and Jews who did not 'side' with Christian elites currying Constantine's favor. That favor shifted back and forth between the Alexandria-Antioch-Carthage and Roman axes, as will be shown in later videos. We have extensive proof of this in the LAWS Constantine and his kids passed, viewable online at places like fourth-century.com and Fordham (Halsall's sites — bear in mind, Fordham is Jesuit). RCC preserves all its stuff, warts and all — which must be said, to its credit.


GGS11t7a Diocletian book, by Stephen Williams

Golly, I wish Hollyweird would make a movie about Diocletian. Video briefly reviews Williams' wonderful book 'Diocletian and the Roman Recovery', link here at Google Books for preview: Diocletian and the Roman Recovery. Paul's coverage of the 'Crisis of the Third Century' is elucidated by Williams' Chapter One. I did a review of the book in Amazon, after buying it.

Below are more excerpts from the book, audio only, to avoid violating copyright: 11t8GGSAddP68-69Willliams.WMA and 11t8GGSAddP119-123Williams.WMA.

The other book mentioned in THIS video is also good, and is a free download. It focuses on Diocles' personality: The Persecution of Diocletian: A Historical Essay

You can find more links in the syllables = AD years, here: Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. The doc is better formatted, here: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. PDF version: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

My pastor taught the very doctrine Paul states here, but my pastor didn't know (or didn't tell us he knew) about the meter. You can get his lessons for free on DVD or mp3: 1985 Ephesians series (runs 7 years, 6 classes per week, so 6 hours per week), at http://www.rbthieme.org. You have to call in your order, and they do have distribution centers overseas in Germany, Phillipines, and Australia (and maybe England, Latin America, Canada, I forget). They never ask for money, and never sell your name, either. (In 40 years I've only heard from them three times, each time to announce a change in the recording media from reels to cassettes to mp3.)


11t7b GGS Ephesians 1:10 ties to Stephen Williams' book

CONVERGENCE is what Paul depicts in Ephesians 1:10. Yet I didn't know, until reading Stephen Williams' book 'Diocletian and the Roman Recovery' (Diocletian and the Roman Recovery (Roman Imperial Biographies) 1st Edition) , that there was also a convergence of the idea of 'God' into a ONENESS, going on in Roman society, during the 'Crisis of the Third Century'.

That's a major departure in Roman thinking, which heretofore had been stridently polytheistic.

So Paul's witty wording for that period in Ephesians 1:9-10, is even more pithy than I thought. My quick summary of the period is here, Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. Just keep reading down the page for a synopsis of the history and briefs on how Paul's wry satire, applies to the period. The links are syllables = AD years. It's uncanny, how Paul's meter ties to our AD measure. I still can't explain that. (Possibly the AUC system had three bogus years added which Paul deletes? For surely he's using the AUC in some form, as his is an Anno Domini accounting like Mary's was.)

Better format for Ephesians1REPARSED: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. Then click on 'Chronology Chart' near page 1's bottom, and then select syllables = years 186 to 195, which is the start of the Severan period, and keep reading. Underlined text phrases are links to independent sites by scholars or then-contemporary writers, so you can read more about each emperor, period, action, etc.

So in this video I display and read page 155 of his book, which you can read on Amazon (link above). I really recommend you buy his book; the used copies are far cheaper than new, if money is a problem. It's not available on Kindle, drat.


GGS11t8a Diocletian book by William Leadbetter (on Kindle for PC)

Leadbetter's 'Galerius and the Will of Diocletian' (Galerius and the Will of Diocletian (Roman Imperial Biographies) 1st Edition ) purports to change traditional scholarship re nature, timeline, and conclusions about both Diocletian and Galerius. He thinks Stephen Williams' book is 'unsatisfactory'. I think his book is unsatisfactory, though I bought it (rental applied against purchase, hooray).

Try Rees' book instead: Diocletian and the Tetrarchy (Debates and Documents in Ancient History) 1st Edition . What's great about Rees, is that he provides EXTENSIVE source materials, not just notes. So you can read from many sources directly, at the back of his book. He concludes that everyone's just GUESSES Diocletian details, debating over SPECULATION — and thinks that dangerous.

Leadbetter, by contrast, seeks to further Dr. Barnes' work. Yet Leadbetter's book is fraught with self-contradictions or flat assertions, viz., Diocletian didn't have an inheritance plan yet did, didn't create a Tetrarchy yet did; Constantinius and Galerius married the Augusti daughters 4 years EARLIER than regular scholarship claims; Galerius' daughter was by Diocletian's daughter, not by Galerius' first wife. So what, she was 4 years old when Maxentius married her, in 293? Oh: ancient writers' quad-sphere descriptions, should be ignored. Never mind, writers reference different subperiods, or one classifies an area via regional capitals. Yet Leadbetter buys into the harmony cult, and on p.50 versus its footnote 8, claims Nigrinianus is and is not the son of Magna Urbica and Carinus.

Leadbetter never reconciles the gaps created by his revisions.

So I still disagree with both him and TD Barnes on the date of Diocletian's death; they claim it was 313 AD or so. I contend pre-1930 mainstream Roman historian scholarship: 3 Dec 316 AD. Paul targets 316 for Diocletian's death just as he did the other two Caesars in his eudokian anaphora, via eta in thelEmatos: so Trajan's, Macrinus', then Diocletian's death. Treaty between Constantine and Licinius denoted new Caesar lineup in March 317. So clearly 316 matters. Constantine didn't war with Licinius until Oct 316, reaching Serdica by December. Depends on how you read Latin in Lactantius and Aurelius Victor. In Appendix II of my Ephesians1REPARSED doc ( htm: Ephesians1REPARSED.htm) , I cover it.

Another Pauline tie: Leadbetter's page 55, Mamertinus Panegyric Latini quote from 289 AD, all in heaven and on earth united under the father and son (representing Jove and Hercules). Yeah: that's what God had Paul say, Eph1:10b-11a. Understand: this was the CULT they promulgated, and Leadbetter stresses. Paul wrote syllables 283 (AD) - 301, 230 years prior.

Links to Mamertinus' quote in English (top para): In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini. Latin text: In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini

Again Paul apes Greek or Roman playwrights: play text is on topic A, but beneath it ran a contemporary political satire. You could get exile, if the satire was too pointed, Tullus Tullus Tullus. (Tertullus was Marcus Aurelius' wife's lover; Tullus was a character in a then-current play whose name was stammered three times to make a joke against Marcus' blindness to his wife's infidelity.)

You can find more independent scholarly links (including all of the above) in the syllables = AD years, here: Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. The doc is better formatted: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. PDF version: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. They are frequently updated.

My pastor taught the very doctrine Paul states here — 'as goes the believer, so goes human history' — but my pastor didn't know (or didn't say he knew) Paul's meter. You can get my pastor's lessons free on DVD or mp3: 1985 Ephesians series (exegesis of Ephesians and related Bible runs 7 years, 6 classes per week), at http://www.rbthieme.org. You must call in your order; they have distribution centers overseas in Germany, Philippines, and Australia (maybe England, Latin America, Canada, I forget). They never ask for money or sell your name, either.


GGS11t8b Diocletian book by William Leadbetter, cont.

Shocking stuff. God had Paul anticipate, in Ephesians 1:10-11, the LANGUAGE of the Imperial cult of Diocletian (and hence Constantine), via the Arch of Galerius. Leadbetter covers the latter's meaning, in his book.

Bonus added confirming audio read from pages 68-69, 83-84 of Williams' book, to show the pagan cult so aptly satirized by Paul, and also how Diocletian would view Christianity as a political threat a la Mani: 1t18bGGSAddP68-69Williams.WMA and 11t8bGGSAddP83-84Williams.WMA. Here's Leadbetter's counterpart to Williams p83-84, on Diocletian's position: 11t8bGGSAddLeadbetterP119-123.WMA

Arch of Galerius, picture: http://www.mlahanas.de/Greece/Cities/ArchOfGalerius.html

Wiki article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_of_Galerius_and_Rotunda

Kittel's TDNT reference on oikonomia and oiloumene: Theological Dictionary of the New Testament: Abridged in One Volume

Leadbetter's 'Galerius and the Will of Diocletian' (Galerius and the Will of Diocletian (Roman Imperial Biographies) 1st Edition ) purports to change traditional scholarship re nature, timeline, and conclusions about both Diocletian and Galerius.


GGS11t9a Bishop Lists (apostolic succession) by Robert Lee Williams

Excerpted review. BOOK THEME: how to trace the development of 'apostolic succession' versus Bible and history, from Christ to Constantine. BOOK THESIS: the idea of apostolic succession grew from political needs, not Bible. Bible's doctrine on MISSIONS was essentially hijacked (by mistake or on purpose, who knows) to haphazardly craft the idea of apostolic succession, beginning in the 2nd century. Williams presents this thesis nicely, blaming no one.

This is the most exciting book I've bought in years; the ONLY one on Church History, which actually makes SENSE of that history. You wouldn't think so, from the title, Bishop Lists. Here's its link: Formation of Apostolic Succession of Bishops in Ecclesiastical Crises

My review in Amazon, here:

source: https://www.amazon.com/Bishop-Lists-Succession-Ecclesiastical-Dissertations/product-reviews/1593331940/

brainout
5.0 out of 5 stars Better than a blockbuster movie, yet scholarly verve!
Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2012
Verified Purchase
EDIT, 4/20/14: I've now made a lot of videos related to this book. If you're interested, you can start watching them, see the comments to this review for the links. Frankly, the video descriptions are better than the videos. (I seldom like my videos, sorry.) Original review, follows below. I really think this book should be in every seminary's syllabus.

I ran across this book by mistake when trying to find at least ONE cogent book on Church history, to explain how the house churches were morphed into a claim of ecclesiatical hiearchy, beginning mid second century. Having looked in all the 'conventional' places and at the conventional historical authors like Eusebius, Gibbon and Schaff in Google search, I stumbled onto this gem. It has changed my life. I REALLY wish someone would make a movie from the history charted in this book.

We all grew up on the conventional Church History authors. They provide much detail, but for all that you never get a sense of INTEGRATED FLOW, but rather only of events. But here, 'Bishop Lists', well — you get a hands-on sense of what happened, what went wrong, why it went wrong. Dr. Williams isn't pointing fingers, either. He's DIAGNOSING, and he does it well. For the first time in 40 years of wondering, I now understand WHY it all went so wrong, in 2nd century et seq. So much so, I'm making Youtube videos on his book: search on these three terms: '11t9', 'GGS' and 'brainouty' in Google, to find them. But you could skip the videos and just read what's below, instead. Bet you'll want to buy the book, as a result. If so, let me know if you see me err, in my review?

The title 'bishop list' doesn't do the book justice, but is accurate: the author traces the use of bishop lists, by the church 'fathers'. From it you learn, basically, the following:

1. Hegesippus, allegedly a 'Hebrew' but provably ignorant of OT, NT (esp. Hebrews 7-10) and ignorant of Judaism (per his own writings), gets it into his head that a 'succession' from the 'apostles' stems from the JEWISHNESS of James. He gets that connection, from Clement. Book explains how. So, circa 165AD, Heggy invents a 'succession list' based on who was elected head of the Jerusalem (and I guess Roman) churches. Heggy intends to show Christianity is a corporate entity worthy of respect. He's not claiming popes, but only a prevalence and organization of teachers 'in every city'. Hellenistically, this makes Christianity respectable.

2. This same succession list was either being compiled contemporaneously by Irenaeus in Lyon, or the latter picked up his ideas from Hegesippus (Williams covers both hypotheses), circa AD 170+. Irenaeus institutionalizes the list to argue his brand of Christianity, is older and more founded on the apostles, versus the Valentinians he refutes (Against Heresies, Book 3). Since Irenaeus uses the same rationale as Hegesippus, it's likely the latter is a source of Irenaeus' list.

3. Fast forward to 217 AD or so: Julius Africanus. To help out Demetrius of Alexandria, Africanus crafts a list of successor prelates in Rome, Alexandria and Antioch; but Demetrius has a hidden agenda of wanting to discredit Origen, who then is in ROME, along with #4 next on this review list, Hippolytus. So, Demetrius gets Africanus to invent (inferred, since Africanus' stuff is in fragments) — Demetrius gets Africanus to invent a claim that Peter was in Rome during CLAUDIUS; that Mark (allegedly Peter's protege) then headed Alexandria.

The Peter-in-Rome invention, UPGRADES both nature and use of 'the list'. Prior to Africanus, 'the list' vaguely noted both Peter and Paul in a prefactory manner, as apostles without location, duration, or even as heads of specific churches. The first Roman prelate listed, was Linus. But here under Africanus, suddenly Paul is bumped off the list, Peter is given a time and a place, Claudian Rome; Mark is given Alexandria at the same time. This is done to make Rome look superior to Alexandria. Never mind, Claudius had banished Jews and Christians from Rome; never mind, Acts 8 records Peter being in Samaria then, and Peter's own 1 Peter records him ending his life with the Diaspora community at Babylon.

4. Now the plot thickens. Contemporaneous with Africanus, Hippy baby and Origen, both good friends, seek to convert the Severans, to Christianity. Africanus and Hippolytus then encounter dissension with other Christians who are pre-Trib chiliasts, thinking that the Rapture and hence 2nd Advent, are imminent. This dissension harms their attempt to present a harmonious 'Christian' front to the Royal Family; Christianity won't look Divine, if fractious. For Origen thought Revelation allegorical. After all, Church was the new Israel. His view was shared by Africanus and Hippy.

Thus Demetrius, who wants to get rid of Origen anyway, has an fresh angle of approach: for Africanus derived his Alexandrian 'list', from Demetrius. So now, Demetrius can 'help'; thus get Hippolytus-who-wants-unity-to-sell-Severans, on his side. Enter the bishop list as a tool to a) beat up the chiliasts, b) win over the Imperial family (since Rome must be given primacy, as the family is Roman), and (as if ancillary) c) justify appointing a new 'bishop' of Rome who Demetrius knows will oust Origen. The same self-justifying 'new Israel' logic for the list, as used by Hegesippus and Irenaeus, is employed by Africanus/Hippolytus; hence list 'parentage' through Heggy and/or Ireneaus.

So Peter is suddenly 'promoted' to a status of 'initial bishop' over Rome. Never mind, he was never there; never mind, that per Bible he was an apostle to the Jews, and only Paul was an apostle to the Gentiles. Never mind, it wasn't until after Paul DIED, that Peter even WROTE anything, and even then only wrote to the Diaspora Christians who HAD been under Paul, 1 and 2 Peter. Williams doesn't make these points; rather, he just lets the facts speak for themselves.

Next plot thickener: Williams posits TWO Hippolytuses, or at least a different Hippolytus versus the guy who wrote Refutation of All Heresies (who is considered 'Hippolytus' in Schaff and similar 'church father' collections). The one writing Refutation, is anti-Callistus, one of the guys heading a church in Rome. NOW HEAR THIS: that guy claims HIS church is 'catholic', versus all others, and seeks with partial success, to get other churches OUTSIDE Rome, to recognize him as such. Contra, the Refutation writer claims HIS church is instead 'catholic', and that Callistus is apostate. Aha: now the word 'catholic' (from katharos, Greek) is born.

Meanwhile, the Hippolytus who is in Rome courting the Severans, is pro-Callistus, so puts him on the bishop list, and sponsors Pantianus. Moreover, Hippy II links JEWISH HIGH PRIESTS (lol, guess he never read the son-of-Aaron criterion) with the ROMAN BISHOPS — leaving out, all the others of other locations. Aha: now 'Roman catholic' is born.

With what result? Oh, in AD 231-235 or so, both men are punished (probably 235, really, Williams goes through that math) — when Severus Alexander is executed. Hippy gets exile and Pantianus gets killed. Because, THEY WERE CLOSE to the Royal Family of Alexander. So their list, obviously worked.

5. So enter Eusebius, now AD 303-313+; post-Diocletian persecution, Milvian Bridge, Edict of Milan, Constantine Imperator, in hoc signo mentioribus. Eusebius wants to write his own Grand Epic Play in Four Acts, ending with the Victory of Church under the Head of Rome, Castor and Pollux, Romulus and Remus, Constantine and Church. Well, in reverse order. So the GEP is his Ecclesiastical History, Church Graced by God to triumph through many martyrdoms (fabricated or exaggerated, as to be expected in drama), delivered at long last by a former pagan now the Defender. New Israel has entered her Promised Land.

So Eusebius adopts Africanus/Hippolytus' rationales and lists, crafting an unbroken line FROM ABRAHAM, or so he contends. Aha. Now you can see why the 'roman catholic church' now has to have a 'pope', though at this point even Eusebius isn't making that claim. But it's only a step away.

Pretty dramatic story, huh. See why it should be made into a movie?

Sidebar, my interest in this topic: I've been documenting Bible Hebrew Time Accounting Meter since about 2008, as a hobby; turns out Paul uses that meter to craft a future-Church-history timeline, just as Mary's Magnificat, Daniel 9's prayer and God's response (reason why 490), Isaiah 53, and Moses had done for their own respective periods. (Moses in Psalm 90, is precedence for that rhetorical meter style.) Turns out '490' is a basic Time Accounting unit, resulting in 490+70+490=1050. Hence the Jewish Dispensationalist doctrine of (they say 2000) 2100 years for the Gentiles ('Age of Desolation', in Judaism), 2100 years for the Jews ('Age of Torah' in Judaism); but then Messiah was supposed to come — and He did, but Israel rejected him. So the Jews posited a THIRD 2000 (really 2100, per Bible). This idea was picked up from Hegesippus onward, and it was core to the rebuttal Africanus and Hippolytus were making, to defeat the chiliasts with their 'list'. For at year 6000, the Jews (and many Christians) expected the Millennium to begin.

But Church is inserted instead, Romans 11; in Eph1:3-14, Paul outlined the FUTURE history of Church as a repeating trend, patterned after Daniel's '62 week' meter (you can't see this in English). So, at syllable=year 211AD et. seq, Paul uses 'mystery' to satirically characterize the time of Africanus and Hippolytus 'fathers' trying to make kiddies of the Severan 'mothers'. I couldn't find proof of that in history — until I found this book. (Often in Greek plays, the dialogue is ostensibly on topic 'A', but those words are ALSO a satire on the time covered. This same rhetoric is a Bible Hebrew Meter characteristic from Moses forward.) Now I know why Paul writes as he does: the Severan mothers 'hidden' behind their kiddies; Roman Rev 17 Church mothered through a new 'bishop list', to win over those mothers and their kids, make 'Christianity' triumph, hoorah.

Now I should say that 'Bishop Lists', is a revision of Dr. Williams' own dissertation, so it's scholarly; on the surface, it's perhaps dull; for a scholarly book 'must be' dry, laconic, etc. But as you just saw, it's a GRIPPING READ. He focuses on the 'bishop list' rhetorical device used by the Church fathers, and then traces out the ~

  • cultural,
  • historical,
  • etymological,
  • Bible-doctrinal,
  • logical

~ development of the 'apostolic succession' idea in early Church, starting at Temple Destruction (roughly). He looks at the provenance not only from the Christian ideas, but from the Jewish ideas, and deftly weaves in all the above 'stars' to show a) the early 'fathers' mistook the MISSIONARY STRUCTURES in Bible as evidence of continuity, in order to position themselves POLITICALLY against their Christian adversaries; and b) to justify to Rome, their existence as a valid religion deserving respect of the state. As you'll see, he traces the history to show that the authors of these 'bishop lists' weren't contending popedoms, as their goals were more immediate — to put down local opposition, or garner Imperial acceptance. He traces all this use of 'lists', through Eusebius and Nicaea.

The book has a much wider application, too. Do you ever wonder how the same Bible verses can be read SO DIFFERENTLY by someone else whom you respect? It's too facile just to call someone else wrong, or (sigh) a heretic, especially since people honestly BELIEVE they read the verses correctly. Then by contrast — are YOU reading the verses correctly? If not, why not? If so, why so? AUDITING one's interpretation is vital in any endeavor. And of course if you believe in the Bible, then you believe you must account your beliefs, to God. Well: accounting means also accounting for what went wrong and WHY it went wrong. Else you don't know, why what's right, is right. Williams' book produces an accounting path which is extremely lively and helpful to review, much as a lawyer must plead a case when he himself is at least partly sympathetic, to the opposition. Pro and con a position. Heart of good accounting. So this book offers a path of analysis you can then extrapolate to almost any other topic, from buying a house, to knowing Bible.

My big 'thing' in life is DO YOUR HOMEWORK. It's okay to make mistakes, that's part of being human. But don't turn a blind eye. Don't cover up mistakes, just correct them and MOVE ON. So this book helps one learn the process of doing homework, which I like to call AUDITING belief or knowledge.

I am VERY happy to have bought this book. Money well spent!

Videos excerpt and comment on the book, but I could only access up to page 86 or so in Google. I have express copyright permission from Gorgias Press, in exchange for the FIRST link above, to provide a pdf of pages 146-148, where Dr. Williams SHOWS the Bishop List of Eusebius in a better format than you can read IN Eusebius, here: WilliamsBishListsP146-148.pdf. I scanned it from my hardback.

These videos are in my PopeMyth (PopeM) playlist. So if you want to keep watching the book review, see the response videos, or go to that playlist.

Book is a revision of Dr. Williams' dissertation. It's a gripping read, not like your typical snoozy dissertation which after all, is supposed to prove you can properly do homework and synthesize. The book's salient feature, is its PROCESS of analysis, which can be extrapolated into any topic. So it's worth reading over and over.

I found this book by mistake, when vetting my own videos for 11t (and soon 11u) GGS, to see if I misrepresented anything, etc. Meanwhile, you can read it yourself, up to the limit allowed in Google. Then you too, will want to buy it.

It doesn't come in Kindle form. Yet.

Here's the link to my Church Father Hall of Shame section mentioned in the video. Its links are to the Church Father writings, usually at ccel.org (underlined words): Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#HallofShame. The original Word doc is better formatted, else the same, Ephesians1REPARSED.doc.

Sample shame, Hegesippus, which is not listed in Eph1REPARSED. Which is more shameful, the guy's own LYING about James and others — Heggy clearly knew NOTHING about the Mosaic Law, for his story makes James into a LAWBREAKER — or is our insipid praise of what he says, more shameful? You decide, here's the link: https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/hegesippus.html.


GGS11t9b Bishop Lists (apostolic succession) by Robert Lee Williams, cont.

Excerpted Book Review, continues. This video reviews Greek terminology Williams uses to test whether God ordained apostolic succession; for He would use specific terminology well-known to people then, to communicate any such intent. Contrasted with, that to be an apostle, CHRIST HIMSELF post-mortem, had to appoint you IN PERSON, 1Cor15:1-10. Also Hebrews 9, idea of WRITTEN WILL = Our Bible. It has no clause stipulating, apostolic succession!

Also covered: Jewish Succession, as later in the book Williams will show Clement of Rome misunderstood OT Jewish law about priesthood succession.

BOOK THEME: development of 'apostolic succession' vs. Bible and history, from Christ to Constantine.

BOOK THESIS: the idea of apostolic succession grew from political needs, not Bible. Bible's doctrine on MISSIONS was hijacked (by mistake or on purpose) to haphazardly craft 'apostolic succession' in the 2nd century. Williams presents this thesis sympathetically, blaming no one. (I say 'hijacked', not him. It's obvious that hijacking was merely opportunistic.)

Videos excerpt and comment on what Williams says, but I could only discuss up to p.86 or so in Google. I now have express email permission from Gorgias Press LLC to scan from my hardback copy and upload the book's pages 146-148, which show Eusebius' list (recast in better form by Dr. Williams): WilliamsBishListsP146-148.pdf.

Book is a revision of Dr. Williams' dissertation. It's a gripping read, not like your typical snoozy dissertation which only proves you properly do homework and synthesize. Book's salient feature, is its PROCESS of analysis, which can be extrapolated into any topic. So it's worth reading over and over.

Backstory: I found this book by mistake, when vetting my own videos for 11t (and soon 11u) GGS, to see if I misrepresented facts, etc.

It doesn't come in Kindle form. Yet.


GGS11t9c Bishop Lists (apostolic succession) by Robert Lee Williams

Excerpted Book Review, continues. This video focuses on how 2nd-century 'fathers' began to use an argument of continuity, to beat up other Christians. To do this, they twist the doctrine of MISSIONS in the Bible. Per Bible, the 'apostle' office was to SET UP churches, TEACH their new pastors the doctrines, and when those churches were established, the 'apostle' would move on; his authority, TERMINATES. It was never a permanent hierarchy over established churches. We begin to see Williams show all that, in this video.

BOOK THEME: development of 'apostolic succession' vs. Bible and history, from Christ to Constantine. BOOK THESIS: 'apostolic succession' grew from political needs, not Bible. Bible's doctrine on MISSIONS was hijacked (by mistake or on purpose) to haphazardly craft the idea of apostolic succession, in the 2nd century. Williams presents this thesis sympathetically, blaming no one. (I say 'hijacked', not him. It's obvious that hijacking was merely opportunistic.)

Videos excerpt and comment on what this guy says, but I could only access up to page 86 or so in Google. Gorgias Press LLC granted me express email permission to scan pages 146-148 of the book so you can see the Bishop List of Eusebius, link here: WilliamsBishListsP146-148.pdf. (Dr. Williams' format is easier than reading all of Eusebius and deriving the list, yourself.)

Book is a revision of Dr. Williams' dissertation. It's a gripping read, not like your typical snoozy dissertation which after all, only proves you properly do homework and synthesize. Book's salient feature, is its PROCESS of analysis, which can be extrapolated into any topic. So it's worth reading over and over.

Backstory: I found this book by mistake, when vetting my own videos for 11t (and soon 11u) GGS, to see if I misrepresented facts, etc. Meanwhile, you can read it yourself, up to the limit allowed in Google. Then you too, will want to buy it.


GGS11t9d Bishop Lists (apostolic succession) by Robert Lee Williams

Excerpted Book Review, continues. Bonus audio from book, linked below. Williams now connects the dots, to show that the Bible has no doctrine of succession, but instead a doctrine of MISSIONS. It is this doctrine that the 'fathers' will distort in order to defeat other Christians in a political grab for power; which Christ warned of, in Revelation 1-3, 17.

I read and comment on the video's missing pages 61-62, here: 11t9dGGSBishListAddP61-62.WMA; next, the video's missing pages 84-85, here: 11t9dGGSBishListAddP84-85.WMA

(See also Chapter 8 of 'Diocletian and the Roman Recovery' by Stephen Williams (unrelated to Robert) — to realize that what became the RCC born under Constantine, adopted its own structure, ceremonials, colors, nomenclature — from Diocletian, not Bible. So RCC was a POLITICAL institution, never Biblical. For Diocletian's 'diocese', see Handbook to Life in Ancient Rome, by Adkins and Adkins, pages 112 et seq.)


GGS11t9e Bishop Lists (apostolic succession) by Robert Lee Williams

Gist: Long ago, a spiritual retard named Hegesippus CHOSE who was a good Christian teacher, up through Anicetus. NO ONE questionned his choices. Bingo! Apostolic succession, is born! Well, amended, due to politics.

1. Williams traces origin of 'apostolic succession'. Begins with LEGAL LANGUAGE evidence. What language would a Greek or Roman use?

2. Then checks Bible for that language, finds none. Reviews what's closest, Acts 20, Titus 1, and Luke. No apostolic succession; rather, MISSIONARY succession.

3. What about 'tradition'? None, first century. He reviews closest practices in Pauline, Jerusalem, Johanine churches.

4. 'Tradition' first arises in Ignatius, but no apostolic succession language; rather, obeying 'bishops'.

5. But 1 Clement argues JEWISH succession to rebelling Corinthians who fire their OWN bishops. Clement is big on Church REPLACING Israel. Ooops: Jewish Succession can't match criteria for Church (Jewish succession based on bloodline, was national). So Clement makes a POLITICAL ploy. Read him online (Chapter I.--The salutation. Praise of the Corinthians before the breaking forth of schism among them.) or read pdf of 'Clement of Rome' (ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus )

6. POLITICAL theme basis for alleged continuity of 'bishops'. Oh, but bishop lists don't conform!

7. First list, Hegesippus Memoirs (Chapter 5), 165+ AD. Only listed via Eusebius, Chapter XXII.--Hegesippus and the Events which he mentions.. Hegesippus chose who IN HIS OPINION, was faithful to Bible. His list is aped by Irenaeus and Epiphanius. No proof of succession, how decided, or if names were offices. List is also based on a garbled idea of Jewish priesthood, not NT. Or, on Greek 'schools' concepts, not NT. Worse, his list of 'schools', is inferred from (anti-semitic) Justin Marytr's 'Dialogue with Trypho', and Jewish Succession in 1 Clement. (Jesus in wrong tribe for priesthood, Heb 8:4. Ooops.)

8. Irenaeus' list, next apes Hegesippus, now 170's or so. (Chapter III.--A refutation of the heretics, from the fact that, in the various Churches, a perpetual succession of bishops was kept up.) . Same 1 Clement and Greek 'schools' arguments. Why? Oh, gnostic Valentinians' own list, goes back to apostles! Still, list is not of successor apostles, but teachers deemed loyal, per Irenaeus. (One heretic claims 'back to apostles' vs. another; but Hebrews 7:18 et seq. says OT priesthood is obsolete!)

9. Julius Africanus' list (Introductory Notice to Julius Africanus.). 217 AD. Peter-first-pope idea now invented to beat up Origen (now disgraced); dual list of bishops at Rome, Alexandria, oh! Roman 'church' is better, as suddenly Peter is first bishop in Rome, during CLAUDIUS! The very years Paul was supposed to BE in Rome (Rom 15)! Peter apostle to JEWS, never Gentiles, never in Rome per BIBLE. Mark listed as 1st bishop of Alexandria also during Claudius! How precocious. (Alexandria=Egypt. Where Bible never says either Peter or Mark, went.) Goal: make Origen submit to Roman church. Oh my.

10. Hippolytus' list, 230's AD (Introductory Notice to Hippolytus.). He 'updates' Africanus (borrows also from Irenaeus) to betray Origen, vanquish Callistus, appeal to Severans. So he's exiled and buddy Pantianus martyred, next (during 7-year warning in Paul's meter, Eph 1:9d); Alexander axed, too. (Hippy or Africanus can't count, eschew learning OT. Prefer to refute Greeks, The Refutation of All Heresies.. So never learn the '6000' any rabbi can explain. But lying against Bible a la 1 Clement is fun. Hippy spawns HIGH PRIEST SUPREMACY: https://www.bombaxo.com/hippolytus.html. By his own rule: Chapter VII.--The Personal History of Callistus (page btm). For he was anti-semitic, Expository Treatise Against the Jews..)

11. Eusebius' list is last, copies all prior. He constructs 'unbroken' timeline from Abraham forward, priests of Israel, Church post-Christ, a la CHURCH REPLACES ISRAEL 'doctrine' in 1 Clement. Not Bible. Eusebius' timeline designed to prove Church is old, not new. To silence pagan critics. Gorgias Press LLC granted me permission to scan this list (pp 146-148) to pdf: WilliamsBishListsP146-148.pdf.

Um.. Christ has all keys in Rev 1, talks directly to errant pastors of John's churches, who claim to be apostles but are not, who claim to be Jews but are not, who claim to be conquerors of the people (Nikw-laus), and soon are, Rev 17. HE, never eligible OT priest, Hebrews 7-10. Peter et al. were apostles to JEWS, Paul sent to Gentiles, to Rome, as last appointed apostle. Criterion? SEEING the RISEN CHRIST Who PERSONALLY APPOINTS, 1Cor15:1-10.


GGS11t9f Eph 1:9 shows Bishop Lists birth 'mother church'

Ever wonder why John designates Roman Church as a 'mystery', in Rev 17? He gets it from Ephesians 1:9; Paul designates 'mystery' for Church; but simultaneously in his meter, he wryly tags the ROMAN Church also as 'hidden', born under the Severans. If you've seen my prior 11 GGS videos, you've seen how beneath the doctrinal words, Paul in Greek drama style satire, annually tracks the then-future history of Rome: for as goes Church, so goes History.

I was baffled by his linking the Roman 'fathers' and the Severan 'mothers' in Ephesians 1:9. My Ephesians1REPARSED.doc ( htm: Ephesians1REPARSED.htm) explained that connection in detail, going only by the 'fathers' writings. But I didn't know about the 'succession' of bishop lists, which occurs at precisely the time Paul forecasts for 215+, 'birthing' the idea of Peter as first and ONLY 'bishop' in ROME (Paul is expunged from the list). Peter in Rome during Claudius (AD 41-54)? Paul didn't convert until AD 44. Peter and Paul are talking in JERUSALEM, after that, see Acts 8-15. But never mind. Never mind, Bible records Peter in Samaria and then Jerusalem (ibid); then, Antioch and Babylon (Galatians, 1Cor, end 1 Peter). But not, Rome. For PAUL not Peter, was apostle to the GENTILES.

Never mind, too-young Mark was on a missionary journey with Paul and Barnabas! Never mind, Claudius had BANNED Jews and Christians from Rome!

Now, after reading Dr. Williams' book 'Bishop Lists', I better understand what Paul meant. So for the balance of this Episode 11t9, I tally the book to Paul's wording in Ephesians 1:9. It's awesome, how accurately his satire bites!

Dr. Williams traces five bishop lists in his book: Hegesippus', Irenaeus' (Against Heresies, Book III Chapter III), Julius Africanus (inferred from fragments), Hippolytus (anonymous Chronicle, source of Liber generationis I), and finally Eusebius (Chronicle and Eccles. History). This video goes through Hippolytus. I've got copyright permission to upload pages 146-148 of his book, which show the bishop list by Eusebius, here: WilliamsBishListsP146-148.pdf

See also my Holy Hegesippus videos Parts 1-4 (in PopeM playlist Episode 7), here: • 7a PopeM Fathers of Apostasy: Holy He... . Online link to his writings is in that video's description.

Last 11t9 GGS segment is 11t9i . After that, Episode 11u begins, with Constantine.


GGS11t9g Eph 1:9 shows Bishop Lists birth 'mother church', cont.

Continued from 11t9f, how in AD 215-231 Peter suddenly 'becomes' a listed 'bishop' in Rome during Claudius (when it was impossible for him to be there) — and why Paul is kicked off the list, hahaha.

This video finishes summary of Hippolytus' list and 'birth' of Peter as first 'bishop' in Rome (lol during Claudius despite Bible saying he was elsewhere then), and ends with an introduction to Eusebius' list. Gorgias Press LLC gave me permission to scan and upload those pages (146-148), here: WilliamsBishListsP146-148.pdf

To save you time, I built the BIBLE-ONLY chronology from Adam, here: GeneYrs.xls. That worksheet doesn't show the verses or how you use ONLY BIBLE to get the chronology; instead, I show the verses here: brainoutFAQ.htm#6a. It's a slog to read, but you can vet everything yourself using ONLY Bible. Use solar years. Why scholars never use BIBLE ONLY, and never use solar years despite God's injunction that Israel operate ON only the solar year (Exodus 12, else she'll miss her PASSOVER BIRTHDAY each year) — I'll never know.

So right there you know, the so-called 'fathers' NEVER READ BIBLE, because all their timelines are WRONG. Even though, they borrowed from Jewish Dispensationalism (which YES is Biblical, but the Jews garbled Psalm 90, reading it as seven Jubilees instead of five 70's). So the 'fathers' used the same 7,000 year history ASSumption as the Jews adopted after the 2nd Temple fell, and then garbled even that, further. Because, they did not consult BIBLE. Sheesh.

See my Psalm 90 Meter of Time playlist for proof on how Moses' meter works. Jews get the idea FROM that meter, and even today cite Psalm 90:4 as the source of the Millennium doctrine (which is true).


GGS11t9h Eph 1:9 shows Bishop Lists birth 'mother church', cont.

Continued from 11t9g, how Eusebius codifies the newly-invented (AD 215-231) 'bishop list', which for the first time, alleges the Jew Peter, was in Rome during Claudius — who expelled all Jews from Rome?! — so Eusebius, never did his Bible homework. So what 'succession' does Eusebius really represent?

Well, what does he inherit? Video goes through that:

1. Eusebius inherits a series of bishop lists erroneously based on JEWISH OT priesthood, mal-aligned to James, ignoring the fact that James is of the WRONG TRIBE even be a Jewish priest. Here's Eusebius' list, uploaded by permission from Gorgias Press LLC (pages 146-148): WilliamsBishListsP146-148.pdf. Get the whole book, here.

2. Eusebius inherits a ROME FIRST claim via the sudden ousting of Paul from Irenaeus' revision of Hegesippus' list, when Africanus newly puts Peter as 'first bishop' at Rome and Mark as 'first bishop' at Alexandria, plus — due to the arguments between Hippolytus 1 and Callistus over a neologistic claim of 'catholic', for the latter's church.

3. Eusebius inherits from Hippolytus' list, a 'succession' of JEWISH HIGH PRIESTS leading to ROMAN BISHOPS, thus ignoring the son-of--Aaron rule for the former, and all other Christian 'bishops' for the latter. Cute.

Eusebius but thumps Bible, for he ignorantly adopts those three items for his own Chronicle and Eccles. History. Yikes.

Chaps 7 and 8 cover the convoluted history of Africanus and the possibly two, Hippolytuses. My Amazon review of his book, summarizes.

Read the bilious replace-Israel 'church fathers' yourself:

Church Father writings in pdf: Philip Schaff: German-American theologian and church historian. First 10 volumes 'anf' are Anti-Nicene Fathers (pre-Eusebius).

For Nicene Fathers, see page middle: https://www.ccel.org/fathers.html. For Eusebius' Church History only, NPNF2-01. Eusebius Pamphilius: Church History, Life of Constantine, Oration in Praise of Constantine. Don't forget to bring Pepto Bismol.


GGS11t9i Eph 1:9 shows Bishop Lists birth 'mother church' (end)

Continued from 11t9h . Next video begins Constantine episodes, '11u' GGS. Links:

Master Ephesians 1:3-14 doc and htm, which shows how Paul meter-tracks then-future Roman history in the accounting meter 'tradition', established by Moses: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc and Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. The latter htm file's links are parsed like the syllables=AD years, just as for the doc; but the htm is less attractively formatted. PDF version is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

See also my Bible Hebrew Meter Characteristics doc: BibleHebMeterCharacs.doc or pdf or htm — Use it to audit any Bible passage for meter.

Robert Lee Williams' book, 'Bishop Lists'. Chapters 7 and 8 cover the convoluted history of Africanus and the possibly two, Hippolytuses . Better than a blockbuster movie!

The prior lists are 'within' Eusebius'. I can't find the prior lists on the internet, excepting Irenaeus', which is in his Against Heresies, Book III Chap. III, link below. Gorgias Press LLC gave me permission to scan and upload Dr. Williams' summary of Eusebius' List, here: WilliamsBishListsP146-148.pdf

Read the bilious replace-Israel 'church fathers' yourself via free, searchable pdfs!

Church Father writings in pdf: Philip Schaff: German-American theologian and church historian. First 10 volumes 'anf' are Anti-Nicene Fathers (pre-Eusebius). That spans Clement, Justin Martyr, Ignatius, Hegesippus, Irenaeus, Africanus and Hippolytus. Hippolytus' writings aren't necessarily his. Two possible 'Hippolytus', so I can't give you his bishop list. Julius Africanus is in fragments, so his 'list' is largely 'reconstructed' by scholars like Dr. Williams (and over 20 others he mentions in his book).

For Nicene Fathers, see page middle: http://www.ccel.org/fathers.html. Eusebius is a Nicene 'father'. His Eccles. Hist.: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201

So what 'succession' does Eusebius really represent? A succession of liars, from Clement forward.

  1. Eusebius inherits a series of bishop lists erroneously based on JEWISH OT priesthood, mal-aligned to James, ignoring the fact that James is of the WRONG TRIBE to be a Jewish priest.
  2. Eusebius inherits a ROME FIRST claim via the sudden ousting of Paul from Irenaeus' revision of Hegesippus' list, when Africanus newly puts Peter as 'first bishop' at Rome and Mark as 'first bishop' at Alexandria, plus — due to the arguments between Hippolytus 1 and Callistus — a claim of 'catholic' for Roman church.
  3. Eusebius inherits from Hippolytus' list, a 'succession' of JEWISH HIGH PRIESTS leading to ROMAN BISHOPS, thus ignoring the son-of--Aaron rule for the former, and all other Christian 'bishops' for the latter. Cute.

Eusebius obviously knows no Bible, for he adopts those three items for his own Chronicle and Eccles. History. Yikes.


GGS11u1a Paul meter-maps Constantine in Eph1:11-12

Now that we've seen how Romanism got 'impregnated' aka 'hidden' to win over the Severans, and how Diocletian's rule provides the copybook for Romanism's formation: we're ready to see its birth, under Constantine.

For to understand Constantine and Romanism, we had to spend lots of time on Diocletian, who was the true predecessor for both.

To read more via independent internet links, see the syllables 283 et seq. of the 'ChronoChart' link in Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. The htm is Ephesians1REPARSED.htm (less attractive format).

PDF version (only web links work in pdf) is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. These three documents were slightly revised with new links.


GGS11u1b How Paul's Eph1:5-14 Anaphorae, peg Constantine

Technical video on Trinity anaphora. Paul so focuses on the apostasy due to Constantine, that he not only maps the years, but creates THREE SETS of trebled anaphorae, to all converge on the Constantinian period. I guess it has something to do with the fact that 490 years after Antiochus IV Epiphanes, is initial Nicaea, as well as the razing of Byzantium (which Paul parallels to the razing of Jerusalem, in meter)? Adjust for number of months and difference in calendars, so 166+324=490.

Analogy to desecration history repeating itself? Mary based her meter on Chanukah, and again Paul apes her.

He apes her clever hubbing of meter in her dateline to a whole slew of dates going all the way back to David at Hebron yet forward to Millennium, see MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy) pages 11-20, for the CHARTS of the many number convergences she used. The Mary Magnificat playlist takes you through her meter in detail: • b-out Mary's Magnificat Meter of Time

Paul's use of the same hubbing technique, is far more complex. Until I saw the Mary Meter, I couldn't understand why Paul was doing this. Both he and Mary START TIME OVER with Messiah's birth, their own version of Anno Domini; oddly, it is close to our modern AD accounting, which implies the Roman AUC system is overvalued by three years. But I'm still checking into that.

(They would have mapped their own A.D. to the Roman AUC; but there were three different AUC styles operative, in Mary's day. Varro's, which later became the 'official' system, was criticised as inflated by three years. Augustan Romans, debated its accuracy. Augustus finally accepted it; under Claudius, it became law. Paul seems to use the AUC version 'corrected' to subtract those three years, resulting in an eerily similar tally to what we use.)

Took me months to analyze, and I'm still not done. But the idea has to be introduced now, so that when you see the actual history of Constantine in the straightforward meter, you'll know a deeper set of PARALLEL TIME RELATIONSHIPS is depicted via the connected anaphorae. The full story is in Appendix I, of the JUST UPDATED Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#anaphoraMatesHistory. It's 150 pages long in Word, so it may take awhile to load online.

Doc is maybe easier to read, Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

This video but highlights the anaphora locations and time parallels, so you can get a quick overview of their relationships and nature. The above links provide detailed analysis, including all the relevant history. It's a slog, I'm sorry; Paul's anaphora parallel metering math, is awesome. Took me 37 pages to plot it out, and I'm still not done with all its structures. Christendom has NO IDEA this style exists in Bible.

Be sure you know God wants YOU to spend time on it, before you start. I had to spend time on it, but that doesn't mean you should. My videos are my own due-diligence; I don't feel I have the right to keep this provable Bible information private, or to sell it. So I have no idea who else should watch the videos. Point is merely to make the material available, and God will decide who gets it.


GGS11u2 Paul meter-maps Constantine, Eph 1:11-12, cont.

So now we enter the background and development of, Constantine's time, here ending at Carnuntum, 308. There will be eight more videos on it, after this one. Hope you had time to examine the anaphorae in Episode 11u1b GGS.

For to understand Constantine and Romanism, we had to spend lots of time on Diocletian, who was the true predecessor for both.

To read more via independent internet links, see the syllables 283 et seq. of the 'ChronoChart' link in Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. The htm is Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#y283to291 (less attractive format). For Appendix I: Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#anaphoraMatesHistory.

PDF version (only web links work in pdf) is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. These three documents were slightly revised with new links, in June. I will revise them again in July, to add in more material from more Constantine books newly purchased. If you see errors, let me know!


GGS11u3 Paul meter-maps Constantine in Eph1:11-12, cont.

Continued from 11u2 GGS, post-Carnuntum and rise of Constantine's power. How he hypocritically plays the same in hoc signo game as a sign from APOLLO in AD 310, so you know the 312 gambit was a lie. So you learn a lot about Constantine's character, thereby.

Which lie, Lactantius tells and Eusebius doesn't refute; so both are spiritual retards, not to be trusted. Eusebiue lies about Constatine too, as you can read in his own words.

So here, we see how Paul shows all this games-playing.. in advance. In meter, coyly 308-320, according to his good pleasure, end of the eudokian anaphora. Yeah: WHOSE pleasure? Supposed to be, God's. But man, including the bilious 'church fathers', don't care for God's Pleasure — but rather, their own. So, Revelation plays on Ephesians, to craft its own structure; which you'd know, if you knew the meter.

So we go through that meter, here. Extensive review is in the document itself. Online copy of it is Ephesians1REPARSED.htm, so you can read the htm as you watch the video. Or, use the doc (better formatting), Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. The pdf shows the Greek without you needing to download the fonts, here: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. Let me know if you have problems with the links.

Also, sidetrip on why we know Diocletian died in 316 and not earlier. TD Barnes and some scholars following his conclusions, allege that Diocletian died earlier, 313 or 311 or thereabouts. But the facts we have disagree with that, as do the contemporary writers. beginning about 23:30 in this video, I deal with that. The topic is covered in Appendix II of Ephesians1REPARSED, with links.

ERRATA: I misspoke re Constantia as Constantine's daughter; she is his sister. That error is corrected in later videos.


GGS11u4 Paul meter-maps Constantine, cont.

Now we get into Constantine taking over in AD 312+, and how God will craft an escape window for Christians who are positive to learning Bible — away from the fractious Romanizers who waste Constantine's time with their inept and arrogant 'councils', in order to bludgeon each other. Divide and conquer, that's how Constantine came to power. So everyone's doing his own will and pleasure; meanwhile, God uses the fighting to open up a way of escape, since God foreknows how those 'councils' will result in Rev 17 tyranny.

RCC formed as a RESULT of Constantine, not before. If you've heard my RCC series in the PopeMyth playlist, this will be familiar ground, and now you'll see how God had Paul predict it all; why Revelation 17 is really an elaboration, on what God had Paul write. Amazing stuff.

The pattern of satire began with Ephesians 1:3, using past known history; by the time Paul has finished Ephesians 1:4, he's been dealing with history reasonably predictable, including all the what-if Rapture dates, so the readers of these verses at the time, well understood what his satire would mean. The rest of Ephesians 'hubs' around those verses, just as in Euripides play Ion — on which Paul's letter is based — hubs around the beginning events. For that play was about the founding of the Greek sea peoples, from Ion (=venom=semen, spawn of Apollo as a snake and light giver). To show, God's superior Begetting. Once you read the play, Paul's wry satire becomes even more clear. For the letter is structured in the same order, as the play: you grab on the altar like Creusa, barren, bitter, fighting, unknowing; then deus ex machina (Rapture), God comes mid-air to save you and explain Himself. Apres ca, le deluge: flood of the Tribulation, a multiplying. Heh.


GGS11u5 Paul meter-maps Constantine in Eph 1:11-12, cont.

How God uses Paul's wry wordplay to target and deride Church under Constantine, who God also derides via wordplay in the text. Ouch: God will match syllable for syllable, Constantine's life and that of his heirs; in biting sarcasm, just as Daniel used in his metering of Israel's kings, in Daniel 9:6-14.

More detail on the debate over the date of Diocletian's death, is still relevant to the chronology, and is covered here.

Link to the video's ending website re laws showing how evil Constantine's rule became: https://www.fourthcentury.com/imperial-laws-chart/. Look at the bottom of that webpage, pick your period. The laws are excerpts, but you can find the same laws in many places; ironically, in Fordham U. Witness the slow creep of religious tyranny easily as bad as Diocletian's and far broader in scope and time, yourself. The laws are in chrono order. More links are provided in the Ephesians1REPARSED.doc's ChronoChart section above, where relevant.

We should stop praising the 'Church Fathers' and instead make a determined effort NOT to emulate their extremely evil apostasy. But we won't. Tradition and 'old' matters more than God and His Word. So this sordid history will repeat itself in cycles, just as Paul sarcastically depicts, every 490 years. 'Our' 490 ends in 2130 AD (see 'Pass the Salt' videos). The prior 490 was the Reformation, which was indeed evil, itself. Each 490 is preceded by a 120-year warning period, just like the Flood; and its own last 120 years acts as a kind of flood, getting rid of the negative folks, be they Christian or not. We are in that last 120 years, now. So you know what to expect. And we will learn nothing, as usual, from it. Ergo many will war and die, never the wiser for it.

Companion video to this one is coincidentally (?) 19 Synoptic, posted the day after this one. This cycling is referenced by Mary's meter in her Magnificat, so I had to introduce that Luke 1 passage by showing the timeline from Adam. You might want to see that video, or my Episode 10 Yapping Most High playlist, to get your feet wet on the concepts of how God Orchestrates Time. Links to those videos and others documenting (in part) the applicable Bible text, are in pages 4-5 of the Ephesian1REPARSED links above.


GGS11u6 How Paul maps Constantine via anaphora in Eph 1:3-14

Still on How God uses Paul's wry wordplay to target and deride Church under Constantine, who God also derides via wordplay in the text — with ties to Daniel 11 you can notice, if you know both that chapter, and Constantine's history. We go past year 313 up through 324, with some retrospective. At about 24 minutes, I recover the anaphora, following up on 11u1b's introduction.


GGS11u7 How Paul maps Constantine via anaphora in Eph 1:3-14, cont.

The Pauline anaphora usage — with its eventual stress on Constantine — continues. Thus we see the satire and doctrine about the time, provided by means of these anaphora 'nesting' themselves as bookends, to trace out cause and effect. Which cause and effect, culminates during Constantine; with Church going into the toilet, as a result.

Thus we see the bad report card, on him and the Rev-17 Church structure he spawned. John gets that chapter from Paul, in this Constantine section. Revelation is an elaboration on Eph 1:3-14, as hopefully you've begun to see. So now we can better understand, Revelation.

My pastor's site: http://www.rbthieme.org. Get his 1985 Ephesians series. He exegetes every verse, and takes you all over the Bible, to do it. That series is seven years long, 7x per week, 1 hour per class. So the Ephesians 4 section begins some 400+ classes later, in the series.


GGS11u8 How Paul maps Constantine via anaphora in Eph 1:3-14, cont.

Pauline anaphora math focusing on Constantine gets really heavy now, will shock you. Context begins way back in 94AD, for the same apostatizing trend back then, culminates in the apostasy of a Roman Church united with Constantine's state. Video thus retraces that prior path. Appendix I of the Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (link below) provides full details, with real history you can really test with the sarcasm God gave Paul, to write.

Thus we see the satire and doctrine about the time, provided by means of these anaphora 'nesting' themselves as bookends, to trace out cause and effect. Which cause and effect, culminates during Constantine; with Church going into the toilet, as a result.


GGS11u9 How Paul maps Constantine via anaphora in Eph 1:3-14, cont.

Pauline anaphora math continues with the Severans, so you can see the then-future, historical parallels God has Paul draw, in about 120-year increments (four generations, get it) — to focus on the Church-father apostasy that institutionally flowers, under Constantine. Biting wit!


GGS11u10 How Paul maps Constantine via anaphora in Eph 1:3-14, cont.

Now we're in the final phase of the Pauline anaphora math on Constantine, 320-334 (syllables=AD). Note how God has Paul draw the successive nadir of Church via its catholicising under Constantine, in anaphora spaced at 120-year increments (four generations, get it) — to stress Church-father apostasy that institutionally flowers, under Constantine. Biting wit!

My pastor's site: http://www.rbthieme.org. Get his 1985 Ephesians series. He exegetes every verse, and takes you all over the Bible, to do it. That series is seven years long, 7x per week, 1 hour per class. He didn't know this meter (no one does), but the doctrines IN the meter, he taught for over 50 years. So I have to conclude that one reason I learned the Pauline meter by mistake (yeah right) at Christmas 2010, was to illustrate yet one more way you can vet what he taught? You be the judge. My own life is completely changed by this information. Good thing it's so boring, on the surface. :)


GGS10e9d10 Daniel Revisited Corrections

This video follows GGS10e9d9, and makes Corrections to the ending 69 Time Track 2-3 values (Daniel 9:18), which should end 277BC and then v.19's 230 BC, specifically. If you notice, there's a math error in Time Track 2-3, where only 62 is subtracted, instead of 69.

So the benchmarks in Daniel end at the 1st Syrian and the 1st Illyrian War, both pivotal in history to the rise of the Seleucid and Rome's power in the Middle East, respectively. Israel's history wouldn't have transpired as it did.. including the arrival of Messiah and Rome being suzerain — had these two events not occurred. The link to that timeline and the events' import used in the video, is here: http://www.historyofwar.org/periodframe.html. It's also in the ChronoChart section of the Daniel piece for verse 9:18, listed below.

That correction matters, as it ties more to what Mary does when she piggybacks on Daniel. In the Mary videos, I'd said she debits 73 years to match Daniel's, but the difference is only 66 years from his end point. That she deliberately matches his end points is visible from her own metering, as shown in the video (page 11 of the MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf

Overall, the 'Revisit' is done to show we can tell what DANIEL was thinking when he spoke, for he's talking out loud in meter, and later writes it down. Any exegete will tell you the goal for Scriptural exegesis "is to apprehend the exact thought of the writer." In Daniel 9, we can do this, because his prayer is metered.

The meter is vital to the interpretation of Daniel, for since childhood he obviously was trained in it (you can't just talk in meter, it must be a habit you learn to do), and without the meter you can't tell he's COUNTING YEARS and keying what he says to the YEARS of the 'kings' he recounts.

THE ORIGIN OF THE 62 WEEKS is in Daniel's prayer: so God is REPLYING to Daniel using the same number. You can't see that unless you know the meter, as shown here. And it means: YEARS ISRAEL WAS UNFAITHFUL. Paul will use that same meter, signifying Church infidelity, in Eph 1:3-14!

The video is fast, sorry; it focuses on how Daniel uses the 49 and 42 bookends, with some added material I didn't cover before. This GGS10e9d6 covers more about the third legal clause (verses 9:15-19).

The content of Daniel's meter has been out four years now; I can't make new videos acquainting people with its beginning. So you'll have to read the document for yourself, to follow along well in this video. If you find your eyes glazing over, just shut the video off. The two main channels are https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterg... and https://vimeo.com/channels/dan9meter (latter has the same videos as the former, plus some related Psalm 90 vids). The Genesis 1 meter, starts here: https://vimeo.com/channels/genesisexe... The differential of Noah's 308 is covered here: https://vimeo.com/channels/noahicfloo... . You could just download the pdf in that channel's first video and see how the 308 works, yourself, FloodChronoREVISED.pdf. The Mary Magnificat videos are here: https://vimeo.com/channels/magnificat...


GGS10e9d11 Daniel Revisited Import Summary

This video follows GGS10e9d10, Summarizes Import, replies to frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=82#p512. So if you watch only one of the Daniel Revisited videos, watch THIS one. It proves the origin of God's Reply, since the NUMBERS in Daniel's METER are the same as the numbered TEXT in God's Reply of Dan9:24-27.

Everyone in theology has to go back to square one, now. Seriously. See for yourself. All you gotta do, is count syllables in the BIBLE text. Many mainstream ideas are proven right, many proven wrong, whether in Christendom or Judaism.

Which proves fairly conclusively that God REPLIES to Daniel's meter, in Daniel 9:24-27. Very different origin for the numbers, which all theologies have completely missed for 2000 years!

GGS10e9d10 made Corrections to the 69 Time Track 2-3 values (Daniel 9:18), to end @277BC and v.19's 230 BC. Math error in Time Track 2-3 (only 62 is subtracted).

So the corrected benchmarks end at the 1st Syrian and 1st Illyrian War, both pivotal to the rise of Seleucid and Rome's power in the Middle East. Israel's history wouldn't have transpired as it did.. including the arrival of Messiah and Rome being suzerain — had these two events not occurred. Link to that timeline and events' import, is here: http://www.historyofwar.org/periodframe.html. It's also in the ChronoChart section of the Daniel piece for verse 9:18, listed below.

That correction ties more to Mary's piggyback on Daniel. In the Mary videos, I'd said she debits 73 years to match Daniel's, but the difference is only 66. That she deliberately matches his end points is visible from her own meters, as shown in page 11 of the MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf.

Overall, the 'Revisit' is done to show we can tell what DANIEL meant. Goal for Scriptural exegesis "is to apprehend the exact thought of the writer." In Dan9 we can do this, because his prayer is metered.

The meter is vital to the interpretation of Daniel, for since childhood he obviously was trained in it (you can't just talk in meter, it must be a habit you learn to do), and without the meter you can't tell he's COUNTING YEARS and keying what he says to the YEARS of the 'kings' he recounts.

The origin of God's REPLY to Daniel, is now patent. The 62 weeks, for example, means YEARS ISRAEL WAS UNFAITHFUL, which God reimburses. Paul will use that same meter, signifying Church infidelity, in Eph 1:3-14!

So God uses Daniel's 49 and 42 bookends, the 69, and all of that, is based on Daniel using Isaiah 53, who originated the numbers in the first place. So that's why Daniel prays as he does and God answers as He does. Really clear interpretation, once you see the meter. For Isaiah's meter in detail, watch here: https://vimeo.com/channels/isaiah53/7...

The two main Daniel meter channels are https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterg... and https://vimeo.com/channels/dan9meter (latter has the same videos as the former, plus some related Psalm 90 vids). The Genesis 1 meter, starts here: https://vimeo.com/channels/genesisexe... The differential of Noah's 308 is covered here: https://vimeo.com/channels/noahicfloo... . You could just download the pdf in that channel's first video and see how the 308 works, yourself, FloodChronoREVISED.pdf. The Mary Magnificat videos are here: https://vimeo.com/channels/magnificat...


GGS11s15 Magnificat Meter, Revisted

Mary's Magnificat Meter reconciles between the Abrahamic and Davidic deadlines for her newly-announced Son's birth, from the first Chanukah; for she just then knew He'd be born on the 160th anniversary of that first Chanukah. Channel showing the videos on this: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . Doc used in video (latest version): MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or MagnificatMeterDraft2R.doc (now lost).

Turns out that all other NT Bible dateline meter formulas key off her reconciliation. Luke in particular, pads her text with a preface 'k'eipen Miryam' to reconcile between the shoulda-been-born Year 4106 From Adam's Fall to the then-known 4103 FAF, which Mary's tallying. But long prior, starting with Galatians, Paul had been doing the same thing, as you can now see in the paulmeter channel ( Pauline Dateline Meters ).

That flummoxed me, so here I go back to Mary's Magnificat to show the proof of Magnificat setting that accounting precedence. For it matters to know WHY all the NT books find some way to date their books based on the Lord's woulda-been or real age. Especially, since to this day 'scholars' debate when He was born, as if that information wasn't baldly disclosed in Scripture. Which as you'll see from the text interacting with the meter (or from the text alone, if you actually READ it carefully) — as you'll see, Bible does baldly and repeatedly state WHEN He was born. For, all Bible dates from Genesis to Rev hub around His Birth and Death, as Messiah is the key to history.

To show that, Mary keys off Daniel, starting 73 years after Daniel's timeline ended at 238 BC (rise of the feet of clay and iron, Rome), so 238+73 later = end 165 BC = start 164 BC = 1st Chanukah. Christ is actually born 160th year after that, shoulda-been born 164th year after that relative to Abraham (Luke's padding, left numbers on screen). So then 40 years of life leaves 56/7 years to Mill (57 really, since He's to die at beginning of year at Passover, on either schedule). So Mary was reconciling equidistantly, the payback on Abraham's 54 year credit at the end, like this: 40 when His Life was scheduled to end +16 +40 remaining coundown to Mill.

If you look at all the other NT dateline meters (except Matthew, who dates his book from Malachi), they all follow her same accounting formulas, back-and-forth. Shocking. This also shows the INTENT of the meter, so again you can tell the meter counts are the result of the writers deliberately padding their text to GET TO those meters. So again you can be very assured that God preserved His Word. Pity the stupid 'quelle' people, the horrible KJVO people, the dumb Mormons and Muslims and atheists who all claim that Bible is corrupted or that we don't have the original text. We do. Provably. Better still, we now have a better tool to sort among the variants, to correct the UBS text, at least for these dateline meters. Most of all, this accounting in Magnificat, shows the origin of all those dateline meter formulas. And perhaps most interesting, is the proof that what you should value about MARY, is her knowledge of doctrine, not the cheap trashy pandered claim by the lying Catholics, about her staying a virgin (a lie invented originally to 'compete' with pagan Roman Vestal Virgins; not at all Scriptural, as she would have SINNED not to have children with her husband). Oh well.

File Name: MaryRevisited, 3/14/15.


GGS11s16 Mary Reconciles to Daniel

To show how Mary picks up where Daniel left off, so you can see the precedent for her reconciliation. I've covered this before, but here the reconciliation is clearer. Thus when the entire NT's dateline meters measure from hers, you can see why.

Websites used in the video, to show importance of 238 BC:

Floralia (which was first instituted in the same year, maybe unrelated but doubtless reason for the year to be memorable as well): penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/floralia.html

UNRV: unrv.com/provinces/province-chronology.php

Turns out UNRV does have a chronology from 284-238, here: unrv.com/empire/roman-timeline-3rd-century.php.

Navies of Rome book: books.google.com/books?id=ccHyOlPK4pIC&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&f=false

Eckstein's book: amazon.com/dp/0520259920/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1AC6BCZ98965A&coliid=IJE4KL97PCS2V

The Daniel chrono chart (below) has another link to that time which is more meaty.

284 BC, the earlier point in Daniel's Track 2 chronology, was a different kind of turning point, a settling with the Gauls: books.google.com/books?id=aEfvR1Qcd0gC&pg=PA349&f=false

You can find the same material elsewhere, but that link is a handy summary.

Here's another handy summary about how 284 BC was a turning point which you can download for free, see the middle left column on the page: books.google.com/books?id=mW8NAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&f=false

They often use Polybius' Histories, here free download in both Greek and English, link being the page which talks about the 284 turning point, books.google.com/books?id=ujMjAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA16#v=twopage&q&f=false

No offense, but the dingdongs who claim a late date for Daniel, really have no clue about anything. For it's impossible for anyone to know the CURRENT EFFECT of history, on the future. So this is clearly Divine Prophecy in METER, for crying out loud. No human is this smart.

Docs used in video:

Mary's Magnificat (latest version): MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf Daniel: DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf

You really need to read both, and spend a lot of time vetting, as the proof is extensive and complex. Will take months to vet, sorry. The Daniel piece's 'Footnote E' goes through the verses on the kings Daniel covers per syllable=year, recounting them in light of the Kings and Chronicles verses covering them, intertwining those references as he talks. No wonder God had him rule Babylon. Mary KNEW that too, and she's emulating Daniel's prayer style when she talks. No wonder God had her be the mother, as it would be necessary for Christ to be thoroughly versed in Scripture from birth. As you proof both docs, you'll be amazed at both believers' command of Scripture. For which they are both, underpraised. THIS is what is supposed to happen to the believer, total integrated fluency in KNOWING BIBLE.

BTW, you can substitute 'pdf' for 'doc' ('RTF' for Daniel) to instead download the Word doc originals.

File Name: DanRevisited123.avi 3/15/15.


GGS11s17a Magnificat Meter, Again Revisited

This is perhaps a temporary video subseries, revisiting my assumptions about what seems to be the pan-NT foundation for NT Meter: based on, the Magnificat.

That's a shocking idea to me, at least, because I don't expect what she said to be so determinative of meter patterns in the NT. 'Maybe because I'm female and don't want females to get such credit? My prejudice? Well, any prejudice masks facts, so I revisit the notion here. Don't know if I will contradict any other video I've done, am revisiting it de novo.

Her meter is based on years from Abraham's maturation; that was a standard mechanic in the OT, used by Moses in Genesis 1; so you could argue she's not doing anything new, but rather following his standard; still, this is the earliest instance we have, of Greek words applied with Bible Hebrew meter. So it may prove determinative. How, I don't know. Yet.

I did the vid back in March, but am uploading it now. Again, it's tentative and I might end up taking it down, later. There will be more of these ggs11s17 vids to post, if the ideas seem to have validity. So as always with anything I post, BE SKEPTICAL. Thank you!

Docs used in video (latest version): MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf or .doc and for Luke, LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or .htm.

File Name: AbeCredit1.avi 3/21/15.


GGS11s17b Magnificat Meter Revisited, cont.

Continuing this perhaps-temporary video subseries, revisiting my assumptions about the pan-NT foundation for NT Meter: based on, the Magnificat. Here, about how to measure the time based on her same FY accounting for Abraham's Time Credit.

Again, that's a shocking idea to me, at least, because I don't expect what she said to be so determinative of meter patterns in the NT. 'Maybe because I'm female and don't want females to get such credit? My prejudice? Well, any prejudice masks facts, so I revisit the notion here. Don't know if I will contradict any other video I've done, am revisiting it de novo.

Her meter is based on years from Abraham's maturation; that was a standard mechanic in the OT, used by Moses in Genesis 1; so you could argue she's not doing anything new, but rather following his standard; still, this is the earliest instance we have, of Greek words applied with Bible Hebrew meter. So it may prove determinative. How, I don't know. Yet.

I did the vid back in March, but am uploading it now. Again, it's tentative and I might end up taking it down, later. There will be more of these ggs11s17 vids to post, if the ideas seem to have validity. So as always with anything I post, BE SKEPTICAL. Thank you!

Docs used in video (latest version): MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf or .doc and for Luke, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or .htm.

File Name: AbeCredit2.avi 3/21/15.


Peter Meters Time to Paul's Eph 1:3-14

New uploads are ad hoc here in 2015, focusing on the meter proving Peter wrote in 2 Peter in late August or early September, 68 AD. The 2014 videos cover 1 Peter's meter style playing a 'song' on Ephesians 1:3-14, and how Jude knew that and made his text 'fit' that 'song'. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'. Vids are many, so icons are color-coded by subtopic. So just bypass the 'color' if a subtopic doesn't interest you.

GIST: 1Peter1:1-12's metered Greek also creates a 'calendar' that interleaves with Paul's Eph1:3-14. So this 'petermeter' vimeo channel/playlist series is both a subset of, and continues solely in vimeo, Episode 5e17 RFG and following, from the 'Peter's Metered!' Youtube series ( http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1bv_xPIih3dGqw7tJEfz7LUh_mnSDc6q ). So the vimeo 'channel' (playlist) includes selected Peter's Metered! Youtube videos up to Episode 5e16 RFG. All later episodes, will be housed only within vimeo. The Youtube playlist covers related matters (like the 'song' Peter makes from interleaving his text with Paul).

Peter's Meter focus: future Roman history. Peter, like Paul, traces that future to Odovacer. The meter sets the doctrinal tone, of each letter.

When Paul died, Peter knew he'd soon be next; so he writes to folks whom Paul served. He begins 1Peter1:1-12 in meter, to validate his own letter as Divine, and to update Paul's metered timeline in Eph1:3-14. Since Paul's letter was cyclical with a 'blank' in the space where the recipient city would be placed (as most scholars know), Paul's meter didn't begin until verse 3. But Peter states the recipients; so like Moses in Psalm 90, Peter includes his byline as part of the dateline meter. Thus we know when Peter wrote; from the end of the letter, we know he wrote from Babylon, not Rome. Peter will soon die in Babylon.

The ancients all used METER as

For in the ancient world, though literacy was common, it was a pain to carry scrolls and parchments; so folks instead just memorized, using syllable counts to verify the material. Then, in their low-tech age, it was fun to play with the meter and the words, while walking to Ephesus or spinning flax, etc. This was their entertainment, as well as their learning method.

Sadly, modern 'scholarship' has been arguing whether Bible Hebrew/Greek even has meter, for over 300 years! So all this meaning is missed, and Bible interpretations — especially re prophecy — are fuzzy, contradictory, even puerile. For centuries. It's dishonest to be charitable, sorry.

How then to fix the problem? Well, it's best to just show the meter technique, so you can proof the above uses. For above all, the meter is a Time Accounting of Past or Future, so you know How To Live Today.

So this Petrine subset of the RFG series, focuses on Bible Writing Dates re the four books rolled out in the Year of the Four Emperors (Peter, Jude, Mark, Hebrews). Further, it shows how Peter's Meter plays on Paul's in Ephesians, re the new Church 490; for his letter is about 'living stones' and 'new priesthood'. 'To replace the 2nd Temple; which, in 68 AD, was under seige. Its 40-year 'credit' (for starting 40 years late in the Land), was almost spent.

Hence Peter's metrical theme is TEMPLE REBUILDING; here, playing off Ephesians 2 as well as Paul's meter in Eph1:3-14. So Peter prophetically syncopates his meter in antiphonal fashion, much like Psalm 90's structure — doing that especially at syllable=year 350, when Moses cut off Psalm90 to signify Temple Rebuilding (prophesied 1st) In Danger! Very clever. No way a Greek reader could miss that, since people memorized Scripture using syllable counts.

Peter also uses a bifurcated timeline like Daniel did, in Daniel 9 (both Psalm 90 and Dan 9, are shown live in the Psalm 90 playlist, with Word docs you can dowload and test). Like Daniel, Peter does a year-by-year dual timeline that circles on key syllable=year segments in Paul (prophetically), and on the timeline forward from Peter's own writing (10 years after Paul wrote Ephesians 1:3-14).

So Peter's DATELINE use of the meter is patterned on Psalm 90's '84', which Isaiah 53 had cut into bookends of 42 each (played on in Matthew's genealogy 42s, and Luke's 77 to cover the Gentiles).

The Petrine 84, however, is also 84 'sevens' from the date God declared Christ's birthdate and the order to Rebuild The Temple to Zerubbabel, in Haggai 2; but simultaneously, Peter dates his writing to 84 years after Herod began Rebuilding the 2nd Temple (called by Jews today, '3rd Temple'), which entailed replacing the 2nd Temple with Herod's stonework (18 BC). So we definitively know when Peter wrote: late in 66 AD, aka 'our' 68 AD, which would become the 'Year of the Four Emperors'.

When Peter soon after dies, Jude will extensively play on 2 Peter 2, a few months later. His meter is trebled, as explained in the RFG series Episode 5d.

Enfin, the meter tells you how to interpret the words, so is vital to hermeneutics. It's all original research, sorry; but if you can count syllables and read Bible Greek in BibleWorks, also history books/articles by established Roman historians, you can understand what Peter means.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 4/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This video continues the survey with 1Peter through Jude, still showing how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common:

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: GeneYrs.xls.

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainoutFAQ.htm#6a.

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),
2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),
3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),
4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),
5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey8-91Peter-Jude.avi 3/19/15, concatenating MeterSurvey8 and 9 of 3/18/15.


RFG5e2-1a Peter's METERED! Update

Turns out Peter's using the same 'I write you' style as Acts, with each CLAUSE's meter, whether sevened or not, being used in a kind of sotto-voce causal date linkage, with one of the clause numbers, being the year he writes. Aha. Sorry I missed this earlier, I'd not seen the style when first making the earlier videos in 2013.

Revised doc has a new title, 1PeterMeter.pdf or doc .

File Name: 1PetFix1234.avi 3/22/15.


RFG5e19 Peter maps Severans, cont.

Major change in Romanism, whether secular or 'Christian', during this period. Origen would come to court the Severans; Demetrius of Alexandria wanted to undercut Origen, so had Julius Africanus suddenly invent Peter being in Rome during the very years Jews were ousted from Rome by Claudius! By the end of the time Peter covers, persecution would begin. The chiliasts in Rome, who Demetrius and the Romans were trying to shut up, kept yelling it was the end of the world. And so it was, for THEM — given the wry text God has Paul and Peter, use!

See how Paul wryly tracks this pivotal period. in vimeo.com/brainout/ggs11m . Peter wraps his text around Paul's, even as Mark wrapped his text around Matthew and Luke.

Two historical books help us understand this period. First, 'Bishop Lists', on the Origen fiasco. 10 'Bishop Lists' videos are now in GGS11t9. They begin with vimeo.com/brainout/ggs11t9a . Substitute the 'a' with 'b' etc. to go to successive videos on the book, through 'h'. Or better still, just get the book at Amazon. Links to it will be in the video descriptions.

Second, a book on Julia Domna, which I just bought (see my review in Amazon, amazon.com/dp/B000SIUW2K/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1AC6BCZ98965A&coliid=I69MWB70GJQAB). Levick explains that Domna's alleged long-royal (Syrian Arab-related) family, furnished troops to help besiege Jerusalem; some of that family married into the Herods (the Emesenes). Moreover, her family 'orientalized' Roman religion toward monotheism. Those are two of the main historical 'plotlines' in the book.

However, Levick's goal is to make Julia Domna look good, so she dismisses the allegations of Domna seeking political control, made by ancient Roman writers. You can kinda understand why she undertakes to defend Domna, when you read gossip rags treated as scholarship, like this one: books.google.com/books/about/The_Roman_Empresses.html?id=F0czAQAAMAAJ. So the truth must be somewhere in the middle of her position, and that book.

Herodian was alive during that time, as was Cassius Dio. Link to Herodian: livius.org/he-hg/herodian/hre000.html. Link to Cassius Dio: penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/home.html. So-called 'Spartianus' was a fake 'author' in the Augustan History, which scholars universally treat critically. Whatever it says, must be vetted, as the HA (as scholars call it) was written during Constantine, so is not contemporary, and is full of inaccuracies. Not wholly, though.

No wonder Paul so stresses the women via his pregnancy keyword, musterion....

Download pdf on Peter's meter (only the Greek, all of 1Pet1:1-12): 1Peter1meter.pdf. The upgrade now sports links to the historical sections in Ephesians1REPARSED.htm, so you can investigate the university and contemporary Roman history/Church documents of that time, to see why Peter meters as he does.

Download the interleaved (Paul's Eph 1:3-14 with 1Peter1:1-12) song with its metered translation, here: PeterMeterSongWithTrans.pdf. It's only two pages, currently. Since 1Peter 1:1-12 is metered, the final version will be much longer.

To get the most out of this play on Paul, read Paul's meter, replete with Roman contemporary writings, university websites explaining the relevant historical references: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. HTM version: Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. PDF version: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

To see how the 49 years were missed, not 70 (as mistakenly claimed by Eusebius, who scholars have blindly followed ever since), see brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a ; then search on 'Master Accountant', to read the accounting.

Since Isaiah and Daniel started this rhetorical style of meter-mapping-to-kings tradition, watch videos on Daniel 9, beginning here: vimeo.com/brainout/ps90-23 . It's faster and easier to instead download the Daniel document in that video's description and then read, to see his style. Both Paul and Peter talk back to Daniel 9 VIA its style — which I call 'tagging' — as Mary had done, in the Magnificat.


RFG5e21b More on the Severan mothers

Still in 1 Peter 1:7. but side trip to Paul's parallel coverage of the Severan mothers, to flesh out why Paul (in Eph 1:9) and Peter, target this period. Related reference: luc.edu/roman-emperors/sevjulia.htm.

There are many other books you can read. Cambridge Ancient History on this topic, page 137ff: books.google.com/books?id=MNSyT_PuYVMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=Constantine%20306&f=true

Also, see 'Septimius Severus' by Anthony Birley: scribd.com/doc/158796842/Anthony-Birley-Septimius-Severus-Bookos-org or here: scribd.com/doc/121476706/Septimius-Severus. You can rent it on Kindle in Amazon.

The other is by Barbara Levick titled 'Julia Domna'. Her book isn't very helpful about the person, but is very helpful re parallel events in Roman history, with (like Birley), a huge bibliography (including his book, above). Both books are available on Kindle for rent or purchase.

Both books are less accepting of the HA account, compared to Dr. Benario, hence are mentioned here. This is a tangled period with (as usual) many scholars differing over how to read the voluminous and conflicting, data. Given Paul's stress, I'm siding toward Dr. Benario's summation, though it is still too vague.

For the chief characteristic of this period stressed in Scripture, is INVENTION.

A. Fake Pedigree, i.e., that Domna was royal, not merely priestly, and that Church was 'old', based on Peter — newly invented during this period, knocking Paul off the previous Bishops Lists, as covered in GGS 11t9 re Bishops List book by Robert Lee Williams. Idea was to CONVERT the Severan mothers and their kids, to Christianity. But the version of 'Christianity' sold to them, is nothing like the Bible.

B. Fake generation, i.e., the claim that Elagabal and Severus Alexander, were children of incest with Caracalla. Of course, the Church parallel was just cited.

Hence Paul's Ephesians 1:9 anaphoric stress is on

Peter thus wraps to Paul, to add the following satirical keywords:

Please feel free to correct or even lambast me, if you choose.

Download pdf on Peter's meter (only the Greek, all of 1Pet1:1-12): 1Peter1meter.pdf. The upgrade now sports LINKS to the historical sections in Ephesians1REPARSED.htm, so you can investigate the university and contemporary Roman history/Church documents of that time, to see why Peter meters as he does.

Download the interleaved (Paul's Eph 1:3-14 with 1Peter1:1-12) song with its metered translation, here: PeterMeterSongWithTrans.pdf. It's only two pages, currently. Since 1Peter 1:1-12 is metered, the final version will be much longer.

To get the most out of this play on Paul, read Paul's meter, replete with Roman contemporary writings, university websites explaining the relevant historical references: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. HTM version: Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. PDF version: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

File Name: RFG5e21b, 12/2/13.


Jude 6a/6b and 2 Peter's REVISED Meter

Jude Part 6 is subdivided into two parts: this one is a better explanation of 2 Peter's meter versus the prior video, showing how he actually uses ADAMIC YEAR NUMBERS in his meter. Which pattern, Jude tags PER CLAUSE. But Jude doesn't use Adamic year numbers; yet, he expects you to know Peter did, to make puns on Peter's formulas, which Jude actually duplicates. To see Part 6b, click here: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6b

Again, this is clear evidence that the meter is deliberate. I couldn't make this up even if I wanted to. Heck, I didn't even understand it, until redoing the math several times! So if anyone claims the Bible is corrupted or we don't have the original words the writers wrote, or that Bible was written much later.. guess again! The naysayers always prove themselves incompetent, for even a dippy 'brainout' can count syllables and see the provably-Divine, pattern!

Doc Links: you can substitute 'pdf' with 'doc' and edit the (MS Word) docs.

2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, 2PeterMeterR2.pdf. The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs more editing for consistency.

Jude: Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf. Text after page 2 needs to be edited.

File Name: JudePart6Aon2Peter.avi, 3/17/15.


Jude 6b/6b Dateline Meter 'answer'

This Part 6b 'answers' the meter question, 'when was Jude written?' You'll need to first watch Part 6a to see 2 Peter's meter, which Jude apes: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6a . Else, the 'answer'here, won't make much sense.

Since this book is so misused by the denominations (ALL of them), the meter is of unusual hermeneutical value. Time we got back to the BIBLE and stopped treating it like a political football.

Doc link: Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'. Text after page 2 still needs editing for consistency.

For 2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, 2PeterMeterR2.pdf. The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs editing for consistency.

File Name: JudePart6B.avi, redone 3/17/15


Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong

AD69, Mark wrote his Gospel. Provably. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Mark's own Gospel text proves he's THIRD. This channel/playlist continues the Youtube Mark series videos after Episode 4e, and contains all Episodes excluding 5 and 6. Those latter two in Youtube, need revision. Youtube playlist is here: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL358C20D575D1B580 .

Series progressively shows why a) the 'Q' aka 'Quelle' Gospel claim, is a lie; for b) Bible proves Mark is 3rd Gospel. Synoptics playlist (still unfinished) is in tandem; Mark's 'wrapping' style (here, Episode 3) is there covered in more detail.

To their credit, for centuries 'conventional' Christian scholarship didn't buy into 'Quelle' claims. Yet the vocal bad apples have been around since 1800s; for a few of the (ahem) 'Church Fathers' thought there was some original unknown 'gospel' from which the writers 'copied'! Yeah, the Holy Spirit just couldn't give them the info directly?! In short, they didn't believe in Verbal Plenary Inspiration, the Cornerstone of our claim that the Bible is.. the Word of GOD (Hebrews 4:12, 2Peter1:20, etc). Wow.

Too bad the Quelle people, so hot on cutting-and-pasting together an 'original' Gospel which no Gospel writer ever knew, didn't do their homework on how to read serial literature. Like, the Bible. Ooops.

For even today, if you watch some TV series like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, or Grimm; or, if you read any of Dickens' books (which were all serially published per section); or today, 'The Green Mile' by Stephen King; you'd know how each successive 'episode' or 'book' ties BACKWARDS to what went before.

So too, Scripture. Trick is to know WHEN each book was written. You know that in Bible, by two types of text identifiers: 1) a DATELINE in the meter of each book, usually at the beginning, but sometimes in significant chapters, too; and 2) KEYWORDS, quotes, and THEMES of the (usually-latest) books referenced.

Example: if I mentioned Hexenbeist, you wouldn't know what that was, until several episodes into Season One, of 'Grimm'. But after it was introduced, you'd both have a specific idea of the term, and know WHO in the series, was one. Same, for Bible; you'll not see the term 'the Christ' in any OT passage prior to Daniel 7. After Daniel 7, you see much more wordplay; but the phrase is never used again, until the NT. So too, for 'Day' being figurative. It's never figurative in Bible, EXCEPT in the phrase, 'Day of the Lord', which wasn't used until Isaiah (playing off Moses' Psalm 90).

Scholars do know about keywords and thematic ties, but they never think to use those techniques, on the NEW Testament writers quoting each other. Of course, the dippy 'scholars' think the writers borrowed existing material, instead of getting their information (AND how to write it) directly from the Holy Spirit. Yikes!

For scholars know that writers quote prior Bible in their books, yet suddenly are clueless when Mark does that. The shortness of Mark's Gospel is due to the fact a) it's the THIRD one, and b) it's a hurried reminder why God soon (within 18 months) destroys the Temple. It's written in the Year of the 4 Emperors. See Episode 5a and 5b of the 'Royal Family of God' videos for the background.

Scholars also don't know about the meter dateline, because they impose Western standards of poetry meter on Bible text, thereby find nothing; so they conclude Bible has no meter of its own. But everyone in the ancient world memorized Bible and other text by SYLLABLE COUNTS, so it should have been obvious that some kind of ACCOUNTING meter system was used. To demonstrate how that system works, I've compiled playlists; see the 'How God Orchestrates Time' section on my channel pages.

Thus you know there's no such thing as a 'Q' gospel which inept or dishonest 'scholars', promote. 2nd video in this list proves the 'Q' proponents themselves TELL you that Q is a HOAX! Some famous scholars in Christendom, both ancient and modern, endorse this hoax! See: degrees are no guarantee of integrity or competence. Pity the GOOD scholars (they always exist, too) who must contend with the bad! Pray for scholars. Pray on behalf of authority, Romans 13. WE NEED THEM TO BE COMPETENT.

NOTE: videos after 4e Mark in this series, are no longer posted in Youtube. Instead, go to http://vimeo.com/channels/marksgospel . Excepting the now-outdated Episodes 5 and 6, all Youtube videos here are in vimeo, so you can comment there without having to join Google Plus.

This series progressively shows why a) the 'Q' aka 'Quelle' Gospel claim, is a lie; for b) Bible proves Mark is THIRD Gospel. Synoptics playlist (still unfinished) is in tandem, and proves Matthew first, Luke second, Mark 3rd, John 4th. For Mark adds his own testimony in a distinct QUOTING style.

Really exciting stuff. Too bad the Quelle people, so hot on cutting-and-pasting together an 'original' Gospel which no Gospel writer ever knew, didn't do their homework on how to read serial literature. Like, the Bible. Ooops.

For even today, if you watch some TV series like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, or Grimm; or, if you read any of Dickens' books (which were all serially published per section); or today, 'The Green Mile' by Stephen King; you'd know how each successive 'episode' or 'book' ties BACKWARDS to what went before. So too, Scripture. Trick is to know WHEN each book was written. You know that in Bible, by two types of text identifiers: 1) a DATELINE in the meter of each book, usually at the beginning, but sometimes in significant chapters, too; and 2) KEYWORDS, quotes, and THEMES of the (usually-latest) books referenced.

Example: if I mentioned Hexenbeist, you wouldn't know what that was, until several episodes into Season One, of 'Grimm'. But after it was introduced, you'd both have a specific idea of the term, and know WHO in the series, was one. Same, for Bible; if terms, stories, ideas, characters are missing from certain Bible books, but frequent in others, you can tell which books are early, and which later. You'll not see the term 'the Christ' in any OT passage prior to Daniel 7. But you'll see a lot of wordplay on what that title means, prior. And after Daniel 7, you see much more wordplay; but the phrase is never used again, until the New Testament. So it's easy to know, what it means.

Scholars do know about keywords and thematic ties, but they never think to use those techniques, on the NEW Testament writers quoting each other. Of course, the dippy 'scholars' think the writers borrowed existing material, instead of getting their information (AND how to write it) directly from the Holy Spirit. Yikes!

For scholars know that writers quote prior Bible in their books, yet suddenly are clueless when Mark does that. The shortness of Mark's Gospel is due to the fact a) it's the THIRD one, and b) it's a hurried reminder why God soon (within 18 months) destroys the Temple. It's written in the Year of the 4 Emperors. See Episode 5a and 5b of the 'Royal Family of God' videos for the background.

Scholars also don't know about the meter dateline, because they impose Western standards of poetry meter on Bible text, thereby find nothing; so they conclude Bible has no meter of its own. But everyone in the ancient world memorized Bible and other text by SYLLABLE COUNTS, so it should have been obvious that some kind of ACCOUNTING meter system was used. To demonstrate how that system works, I've compiled playlists; see the 'How God Orchestrates Time' section on my channel page.

Thus you know there's no such thing as a 'Q' gospel which inept or dishonest 'scholars', promote. 2nd video in this list proves the 'Q' proponents themselves TELL you that Q is a HOAX! Some famous scholars in Christendom, both ancient and modern, endorse this hoax! See: degrees are no guarantee of integrity or competence. Pity the GOOD scholars (they always exist, too) who must contend with the bad! Pray for scholars. Pray on behalf of authority, Romans 13. WE NEED THEM TO BE COMPETENT.


Luke and Mark's Meter, revised again! 1/3 in Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong

This is the first of three parts CORRECTING my prior videos on Luke and Mark's meters. Better still, the revised Luke doc (link below, and its p.1 is now much better than the videos) — sports a handy chart of METER PATTERNS IN BIBLE BOOKS I've done videos on, so far.

So now, you can readily see how deliberate and deft the tagging concordance use of the meter, among them. If you don't know what tagging concordance is, see the psalm 90 channel, beginning here: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter). Basic idea is that some meter patterns are so famous, they are 'tagged' by repeating the number, similar to how we say '9/11'.

Luke and Mark have to be corrected together, because Mark's meter is based on Luke's, and I had Luke's, wrong. So the three parts begin and end with Luke (new links below), and the correction to Mark is in the middle. TIME WRITTEN is the same. FORMULAS FOR PROVING THAT are different from shown before, and Divinely witty.

Well, this time I finally got my 'smoking gun': Mark proves he's writing circa Passover AD 69. Golly, when you see the genius of Mark's equidistant meter math and his tagging the Magnificat, Matthew and Luke every three seconds, you'll feel even more pity for those claiming Quelle or that Mark is first Gospel. Honestly, can't they even count syllables? What genius are they missing!!

But you could retort, 'but you can't count syllables either, brainout.' Good point, toucher. So notice: when you keep at it, when the count IS right... in this and the next two parts, notice what wit and beauty Scripture resplendently shows. Kill me now.

Newly revised doc (first page is good, rest of it is windy but maybe very helpful re equidistance, needs editing): MarkDatelineMeterR7.pdf or doc. Yes, 7th revision. Mas vale tarde que nunca, better late than never. Figures.

For Luke, LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc.
File Name: MarkR7IntroUSEME.avi, 3/2/15.


Mark1d Mark's Meter Revised AGAIN in Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong

Now I reverse much of what I said in Mark 1a-1c, with surprising results. I've revised this meter four times, and am still testing which version is 'final'. Yet the difference now is so surprising and germane to the 'jim' videos re Luke, I should post these again-revised Mark results, now.

Recap: due to the textual variants huiou theou and emprosthen sou, there are five putative dateline meters one can claim for Mark 1:1-2: 14, 28, 42, 49, 56. The 28 fails the syntactical rule, that a meter never divides by 7 in the wrong syntactical place (i.e., just before a quote but after naming the source of the quote). That's true only if it were the last sevened meter. But it's not, here. So now we have a whole new ballgame.

Elision has much to do with which meter is right, as well. How to tell if my elision assumption is right? Well, the elision assumed here was standard practice among Greek speakers for centuries. Idea that when the same vowel sound ends one word but begins the next, you speak that sound as one syllable. By century's end, folks began to prefer no elision. But here, it was still common and considered good Greek.

Kicker: what's odd about all these alternatives, is that in any event you still come up with 68AD, since each of the alternatives thematically date back to relevant events 'from' 68 AD. We'd know he wrote in 68 AD anyway, from the way Hebrews is crafted, but this added dateline helps us understand what Mark means to say in THAT year, with all the associated isagogics. Better still, we see even more how he's writing the THIRD Gospel, deliberately playing not only on Matthew and Luke's text, but also their meters.

So of course the next step, is to figure out Matthew's dateline meter: see Matthew is Metered! for that.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf. I've NOT yet changed the notes. A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html. By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

File Name: MarkMetered1d,avi, 2/14/14.


Mark1 Mark's Gospel proves Q Scholars Wrong

Some 'scholars' have long contended that the Gospels are all partial 'copies' from one common source they came to call 'Q'. Some think Mark is this source, so erroneously place his Gospel as the earliest. Some others think all of the Synoptics are essentially copied from some earlier source, thus calling the Divine Inspiration of the Gospels, into question.

The egregious liars called the 'Church Fathers' — inventors of the Pope lie — also believed some 'earlier' gospel was the original 'source'. They baldly lie about Peter and Mark, too. Of course, now their OLD lies are respected.

God, foreknowing all this in advance, made sure Mark's own Gospel proved them all wrong. For they neglect a primary principle of hermeneutics, Bible's long rule of incorporation by reference, TO ESTABLISH A BOOK IS PART OF CANON. Introductory audio on that: http://www.brainout.net/wma/QGospelFa... . Relevant chrono backup, audio explaining: http://www.brainout.net/wma/Chrono62-... .

Videos demonstrate what the audio covers, directly from the Bible itself, live before your eyes.

In short, there are internal rules God enjoins on a writer, to prove God inspired his new book. God Proves His Word, word by word, verse by verse, by THREADING in, previous Divine Writ. Forensically, you can thus tell what Bible books were written at the time of the new one. Thus you can better certify the date of each book. Doesn't matter what it's written on, or when copied. The words themselves, serve as your definitive guide.

So Mark, being the 3rd Gospel, QUOTES from both Matthew and Luke. Mark being an eyewitness, as he knew Christ also, adds details.

See also the Synoptics playlist. You'll see how, beginning in Mk1:3, Mark quotes one or the other Gospel writer, and then makes deft changes of such GREEK wit you can only conclude Divine Origin. He manages to preserve the same meaning yet the changes are (usually bitingly) relevant to the time he writes.

You'll also need to order Lesson 1541 et seq (200 lessons) of my pastor's 'Paul's Fall' series at rbthieme.org to get the revised chronology of Paul's death (corrected versus his 1975 analysis), which prompted the immediate issuance of Peter, Jude, Mark's Gospel, and Book of Hebrews. No one in the world has done this timing reconciliation, but him. His organization never asks for money.


Mark1f Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1e. If you're not already familiar with the material, read Mark 1d's video description, for this video continues the same explanation.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter. However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): Luke1RevisedMeter.pdf .

File Name: MarkMetered1f.avi, 2/03/14.


Mark1g Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1f. Focus here is on how Mark plays on Mary's meter. If you're not already familiar with the material, read Mark 1d's video description, for this video continues the same explanation.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter. However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1RevisedMeter.pdf .

For the Daniel notes read beginning at 17:01, download brainout.net/Dan11Map.pdf, which are notes taken from listening to the 49th lesson of the Daniel series you can freely get from rbthieme.org .

File Name: MarkMetered1g.avi, 2/03/14.


Mark1h Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1g. Focus here is on how Mark plays on Mary's meter. If you're not already familiar with the material, read Mark 1d's video description, for this video continues the same explanation.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter. However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf .

File Name: MarkMetered1h.avi, 2/03/14.


Mark1i Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1h. This video shows how Mark plays on Isaiah 53 and Matthew, all at once.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter. However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf .

File Name: MarkMetered1i.avi,2/3/14.


Mark1j Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1i. Still on how Mark plays to Isaiah 53 and Matthew, all at once. I need to figure out how to explain and rewrite the Word doc about Mark's meter, in light of the other NT books' meter, like Jude and 2 Timothy, which Mark also plays on.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter.

However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf .

File Name: MarkMetered1j.avi,2/3/14.


Mark2 'scholar' Quelle Gospel HOAX admitted!

Witness the HOAX origin of the Q Gospel, blatantly admitted yet presented as scholarly, in this tome promoting it! This video merely reads page 2 of the tome, proving in its own words what LIARS these people are! Respectable people, who should be laughed at!

Beware some scholars: they are not at all scholarly, but use their degrees to bash Bible, and trust in their respectability, to make their lies seem objective. Don't listen to them. Other scholars are good; so don't blame all scholars due to the LIARS among them.

A lot of the scholars are in the middle, timid: they are trained to always respect other scholars, no matter how bad, and every scholar is expected to take from other scholars and QUOTE from them. So, this mentality is superimposed on the Bible; so, the ASSumption is that the writers of the Gospels didn't get their material from the Holy Spirit, but were QUOTING from some PRIOR human writer — just like a scholar is supposed to do. See how scholarship can be ABUSED? No original thinking, no consultation in the BIBLE itself, to learn the BIBLE's own rhetorical style of saying what was written when and how. Oh no — IMPOSE A FALSE STANDARD on the Bible's text in order to DESTROY it. That's how Satan wins over the bad scholars. So, these bad scholars then betray their bad scholarship, as shown in this page 2 reading from an alleged scholarly book. Ooops.

Read the book yourself, here: Q, the Earliest Gospel: An Introduction to the Original Stories and Sayings of Jesus

Here's a related blog entry by Mark Goodacre: https://ntweblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/mike-bird-on-lukes-use-of-matthew-and-q.html


Mark2b 'scholar' Quelle HOAX Gospel 2

Another example of scholar brain fart re Mark: they think three of the verses he's quoting, no other NT writer quotes, or don't exist in the OT ?!

Mark 9:48 they don't list as an LXX quote, but you'll see it live, in this video. Quote is associative, 'tagging' Matthew 3:12 and Luke 3:17, Matt 5:29-30, 18:8-9; Mark's CONTEXT begins in verse 43, didn't any of these 'scholars' notice that?

Mark 10:19 they call 'peculiar', but it's a listing of major commandments we all know. And by the way, Mark's POINTING AT Matt 19:17-19, Luke 18:20 when he makes this quote, and quoting LXX at the same time. Which you'd know, if you were looking at the CONTEXT (i.e., verse 18). But the 'scholars' aren't noticing that Mark uses the quotes to quote back to Matthew and Luke. Because, that would destroy their 'Q' hoax!

Next, Mark 12:32 — same problem. CONTEXT tells you it's the First commandment, Mark 12:32-33, which (like Mark 7:10) 'tags' Matthew 15:4, 22:37-40 (which Christ changes versus the LXX), Luke 10:17, AND the LXX. So Mark YELLS that he's the third Gospel, duh.

See: BLAME THE BIBLE is the recourse the inept scholar uses, when he can't explain something, like Mark's wrap-around-Matthew-and-Luke style. Even when the scholars KNOW Mark wrote in the Year of the Four Emperors, they still have to claim it must be earlier, since they have to INVENT A SOURCE (other than the Holy Spirit ! ) for Matthew and Luke's material.

Oh well.


Mark3 Intro to Mark's Wraparound Gospel

Here we interlace with the Synoptic video series, introducing Mark's style. So this series 'wraps around' that one. That one, is still focused on how Luke 1 and 2 wrap to Matthew 1 and 2. I've started a 'wraparound' doc charting the style (no Greek fonts): Wraparound.pdf. I'll update it again after Synoptics episode 22, which is some months off. Wanna see an original manuscript of Mark 1? Here: Gregory-Aland 011 (G) (Codex Seidelianus I / Codex Wolfii A / Codex Harleianus, Harley MS 5684) – British Library – 9th century – Soden ε87 [lacunae: Mk 1:1-13 ; 14:19-25 ; supplement Mk 1:1-8] [e].

Here's a blogpost cautioning that 'Son of God' does appear in some amulets, too: https://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2012/05/amulet-of-mark-11-2_10.html.

Scholarly article on the use of euthus in Mark: https://faculty.bbc.edu/rdecker/euthus.htm. It's highly regarded by the scholars in B-Greek.

The only thing I'd add is that Mark, like every other author, makes double-entendre use of keywords. So while on the one hand he often means 'next-in-sequence', he also stresses imminency: for his Gospel comes out to warn of imminent Temple Downfall. It had been expected to occur in 70AD, ever since Christ died.

Proof: proper Greek wouldn't repeat the term that much, so while the comments are scholarly, they neglect the rhetorical style. Mark thus means Proving this, will take some time.

I don't know Dr. Decker's position on that idea, or on the Rapture, nor does he endorse what I say. I NEVER CITE SOURCES to allege agreement with anything I say in my videos, at any time. Rather, they are furnished only as required, and only so that you have something independent, to compare.


Mark3b Mark's Wraparound Gospel Style Intro, cont.

Here we see Mark slow down and track Matthew VERBATIM in order to ADD material. So anyone claiming Mark's gospel is first, can't read Bible. Anyone claiming the avowed HOAX of a 'Quelle' Gospel, is a fraud. Sadly, that fraudulent claim has many 'respectable' scholars in its lure. Because, they don't really believe Bible is inspired. So they might be useful in other ways (i.e., on grammar points or other basic linguistics) — but they can't interpret what they read; because they don't BELIEVE. So their scholarship goes in the tank, as they were TAUGHT THE RHETORICAL STYLES you'll see in this video. Styles that any good literature OR LAWYER uses in any language and in any century. So they are no longer 'scholars', when it comes to making claims about Bible validity. Instead, they are dumber than a kindergartener.

Don't infer from this that you should reject scholars. They are human, so are you, so they have problems with integrity just as you do. Just ask God when you hear or read anything, whether it's true, and whether you should pay attention. HE WILL LET YOU KNOW, if you use 1John1:9 and WANT to know. The scholars don't ask, don't want to know, so they don't know. So be a scholar, and ASK TO KNOW.


Mark3c Mark's Wraparound Gospel Style Intro, cont.

Here we see Mark slow down and track LUKE verbatim in order to add material. Sample of how he does it. So now you know how to find other instances of Mark quote or track Matthew; and when Mark quotes or tracks, Luke. Proof positive, even in translations (but more pointed in the original Greek), that Mark advertises his Gospel is THIRD, not first.

So anyone claiming Mark's gospel is first, can't read Bible. Anyone claiming the avowed hoax of a 'Quelle' Gospel, is a fraud. Or at very least, beguiled. Scholar credentials are no guarantee of integrity or competence, but don't let that obvious truth beguile you into rejecting scholars or scholarship. Just ASK GOD about anything you read or hear. And pray for the scholars. We need them to be competent. So ask God to keep helping them to wake up to any mistakes, and to bless them. Wouldn't you want someone praying the same, for YOU?


Mark3c1 Hebrews 5:11-6:12 wraps to Mark 4:24-29

Surprising update on • Mark3c Mark's Wraparound Gospel Style.... Hebrews wraps around Matthew, as subsequent videos will show. Here, that story begins, with three specific passages.

As you'll see in later episodes, there is a lot of proof that Mark is 3rd Gospel written in 68 AD, not the first one. In 4 Mark, we'll see how the OUTLINE of Hebrews, 'tracks' to Mark's Gospel. In short, the outline of Mark, becomes the outline for the Book of Hebrews. Very startling. So think: if Mark was the first Gospel, wouldn't earlier NT books track to it as well? Yet we've seen in the Synoptics playlist, the reverse: Mark wraps surgically around Matthew and Luke. So it makes sense, that if Hebrews is written just AFTER Mark, that would be the latest of the Gospels and Hebrews would have to focus on it, to prove the Divine Authenticity of Hebrews.

So again, the Quelle 'scholars' are shown to be inept, for one of the first things you seek in hermeneutics, is what PRIOR SCRIPTURE the current book (here, Hebrews) addresses.

Now, someone will say, 'oh brainout, you're not a scholar, what right do you have to make this contention?' My reply is simple: THE BIBLE has the right. THE BIBLE shows how it tracks. IT is live onscreen for you to see yourself. So I don't need to be a scholar myself. All I need to do, is show the BIBLE, itself.

It's about time we stopped justifying our laziness and avoidance of PLAIN BIBLE TEXT by invoking 'scholar', as if you were only allowed to read Bible if a scholar. For they are human, too; they have political agendas, too; for you can hire any scholar to support any position you want to take. And they obviously didn't do their homework, here, since that wouldn't support the Quelle hoax agenda, which is designed to SPIT ON the Real Word of God we have.

Sorry, not putting up with the liars, anymore. Not when they are out to destroy provably Divine Word!


Mark3c2 Mark wraps Luke on widow-with-two-coppers

Continued from • Mark3c1 Hebrews 5:11-6:12 wraps to Ma..., still proving Mark's Gospel came out in Year of Four Emperors.

Parable of the widow with the two coppers. Yet more proof that all those 'Quelle scholar' folks should be fired. Golly, if even a brainout can find this obvious proof of Mark's Gospel being THIRD, then those people are way overpaid!

For what is the key lame contention of these dolts?! (Yes, dolts, they're trying to DESTORY BIBLE) Oh, that the SHORTER is the ORIGINAL. Okay, well Luke's passage is SHORTER, huh.

Yeah, that was Luke's LACONIC WRITING STYLE, and his theme wasn't like Mark's caustic REMINDER, huh.

Of course by their illogic, a LATER and SHORTER production of Hamlet, would have to be THE original, and Shakespeare's First Folio, would have to be a fake!


Mark3c3 Revisiting 'euthus'

Continued from • Mark3c2 Mark wraps Luke on widow-with.... Searching still for what makes Mark's Gospel unique. Here, we revisit Euthus, to explain what it means and how it sets the tone for his Gospel. Oddly, Hebrews never uses the term.

So the next increment (4 Mark) will start a Mark with Hebrews comparison; we'll find out how Hebrews' OUTLINE 'wraps' to Mark's Gospel. Which tells you, that Mark's Gospel was the LATEST Bible book published, before Hebrews. For the new Bible book must 'thread' to prior known Bible, in order to establish its own Divine Authenticity. Pity, the poor Quelle 'scholars' didn't do their homework on the literary styles.


Mark3d Mark's Rapture Keyword TAXU

Greek Geek Study: because Mark's Gospel came out just after Paul was executed, and just before or when Nero was assassinated, everyone expected the Temple to soon be razed (it was already besieged); and they thought the Rapture would occur by 70AD. Paul had already charted potential Rapture dates (updating Mary's what-if Magnificat schedule), in Ephesians 1:3-14. The dates were 66AD, 73, 77, 84, 91, 98. The last two were the expected dates had Israel accepted Messiah. All of them take into account the 54-year time credit owed due to Abraham's too-early maturity. That issue is a running accounting theme in my Psalm 90 playlist, and is not covered here.

Bear in mind Paul's scenarios were calibrated in terms of Temple Down dates (mid-Trib), meaning the Rapture was expected three years prior. But since Church had to mature first, the dates were all potential. So if the Rapture didn't happen — and Paul didn't expect it — he laid out how Church history would go in each year=syllable then and thereafter. All the way, to the rise of Odovacer.

So when Mark writes his Gospel, he makes use of common OT keywords evocative of the Day of the Lord, just as Matthew and Luke had done. All of which, key off Matthew 24. So here begins a survey of these keywords, pan-Bible.

We start with TAXU, a word Mark does not use in a Rapture context, but the Lord and the NT writers all use it. The video ends with Matthew 24, so you can see how the other two Rapture keywords - euthus, a Markian favorite — and engus, are there used. Similarly used synonyms are declinable TAXOS and verb EGGIZW.

Subsequent Episode 3d videos will cover the OT use of TAXU as a translation for Hebrew maher; then, pan-Bible use of engus and euthus; for as you'll see, Mark makes the latter a rhetorical style to stress Rapture when he STOPS using it. Greek engus means near as in 'beside', a nextness of order; euthus, means 'next' as in 'next-in-line-of-sight'. In the OT, the Tribulation was next after the advent of Messiah. When Church however intervenes, 'next' and 'near' mean the destruction of the fig tree, Israel. And of course, her Temple.

Extensive vetting of the Rapture doctrine starts here: LordvSatan1.htm. Will take you a year to read; took me six+ years to write.

1981-1985 Revelation exegesis can be ordered (telephone only) at rbthieme.org. Goes verse by verse, with backup pan-Bible, 1200 lessons or more (each 70-90 minutes, live recorded classes).

Dr. Decker's survey dissertation on euthus (extract): https://faculty.bbc.edu/rdecker/euthus.htm. It's highly regarded by the scholars in B-Greek. Listing this link does NOT imply that Dr. Decker knows about, or would in any way support, what I say. (I avoid listing sources so that no one can be misread as supporting 'my' stuff, but sometimes links must be provided. My sole support, comes from the Scripture.)


Mark3d2 Mark's Rapture Keyword TAXU (OT usage), cont.

For Greek Geeks. See Mark 3d for description. This finishes out the TAXU usage documentation, pan-Bible. TAXU translates Hebrew adverb and verb maher. A related verb of especial importance is hush, famously used in Isaiah 60:22. Has a connotation of PREGNANCY, Paul's favorite rhetorical 'hub'. Idea of hastening labor pains closer and closer together. But I'm doggoned if I can find the lexicon where I learned that! Will keep on looking. In Greek, verb engizw is also related, meaning something coming nearer and nearer. So now you know where engus comes from. That term will be in 3d3, next video.


Mark3d3 Mark's Rapture Keyword EGGUS

For Greek Geeks. See Mark 3d for description. Not all eggus verses are shown. Here's the full list: Gen. 19:20; 45:10; Exod. 13:17; 32:27; Lev. 21:2; 25:25; Num. 27:11; Deut. 2:19; 4:46; 30:14; 32:35; 34:6; Jdg. 3:20; Ruth 3:12; 1 Ki. 8:46; 2 Chr. 6:36; Est. 1:14; 9:20; Ps. 14:3; 21:12; 33:19; 37:12; 84:10; 118:151; 144:18; Prov. 27:10; Eccl. 4:17; Job 6:15; 13:18; 17:12; 19:14; Joel 1:15; 2:1; 4:14; Obad. 1:15; Zeph. 1:7, 14; Isa. 13:6; 57:19; Jer. 12:2; 31:16, 24; 32:26; 42:4; Ezek. 6:12; 23:12; 30:3; Dan. 9:7; Matt. 24:32f; 26:18; Mk. 13:28f; Lk. 19:11; 21:30f; Jn. 2:13; 3:23; 6:4, 19, 23; 7:2; 11:18, 54f; 19:20, 42; Acts 1:12; 9:38; 27:8; Rom. 10:8; 13:11; Eph. 2:13, 17; Phil. 4:5; Heb. 6:8; 8:13; Rev. 1:3; 22:10

Here we see the pan-Bible usage of Greek eggus, pronounced 'engus'; verb is eggizw, 'to draw near'. This is another pregnant Bible term, also with both common and special usage: to become closer to God, or God closer to you. It's the goal of the spiritual life. BESIDEDNESS. That was the best OT people could hope for, pre-Church: God with us, rather than the upgraded, intimate 'Christ in you', for Church. So this word becomes key in NT discourse, showing the upgrade.

Time-wise, eggus signifies NEXT IN SEQUENCE, so ends up being Rapture, when the next-in-sequence 'Time of the Gentiles' did NOT begin, due to Christ being accepted by Israel. Rejection resulted in Him dying SEVEN YEARS EARLY — a fact 'scholars' miss, since they errantly ignore Exodus 12, and count Daniel 9 in lunar years (490 lunar years = 483 solar, so they miss the extra seven years). So the Time of the Gentiles was converted by Christ, into 'Church', Matt 16:18, ratified as a matter of FATHER'S DISCRETION, in John 17:20ff. That's why the Rapture can't be predicted. It's based on corporate maturation, Ephesians 4:12-13, not on length of time. So the time, is 'groundhog day', perpetual 62nd week playing over and over until Rapture.

Mark only uses eggus, twice; he quotes Matthew, when he uses it. More proof Mark tells you he's the third Gospel, not the first. More about why Mark uses it that way, will be in later 3d episodes. Here, focus is on why you know that eggus should be TRACKED in Bible, and is not merely a common term for 'near'.

Episodes 3d4 through 3d7 will complete Keyword tracking with the biggest Rapture keyword, euthus. That is a Markian favorite, excessively used (42 times). Scholars have debated WHY Mark uses it so much, for decades. 3d7 will demonstrate how Mark surgically extracts and synthesizes both Matthew and Luke in both the Tribulation discourse, and Last Supper — again, showing Mark is the THIRD Gospel, by his own writing style.


Mark3d4 Mark's Rapture Keyword EUTHUS

Use of EUTHUS pan-Bible, through Episode 3d7. Full list of verses: Gen. 15:4; 24:45; 33:12; 38:29; Num. 23:3; Jos. 8:14; Jdg. 14:3; 1 Sam. 12:23; 1 Ki. 21:23, 25; 2 Ki. 10:15; Ezr. 8:21; Neh. 9:13; Ps. 7:11; 10:2; 18:9; 24:21; 26:11; 31:11; 32:1; 35:11; 36:14; 48:15; 57:2; 63:11; 72:1; 77:37; 93:15; 96:11; 106:7, 42; 110:1; 111:2, 4; 124:4; 139:14; 142:10; Prov. 2:13, 16, 19, 21; 20:11; 28:10; 29:10; Job 3:11; Hos. 14:10; Isa. 26:7; 33:15; 40:3-4; 42:16; 45:13; 59:14; Jer. 3:2; Ezek. 23:40; 33:17, 20; 46:9; Dan. 3:27; Matt. 3:3, 16; 13:20-21; 14:27; 21:3; Mk. 1:3, 10, 12, 18, 20f, 23, 28-30, 42-43; 2:8, 12; 3:6; 4:5, 15-17, 29; 5:2, 29-30, 42; 6:25, 27, 45, 50, 54; 7:25; 8:10; 9:15, 20, 24; 10:52; 11:2-3; 14:43, 45, 72; 15:1; Lk. 3:4f; 6:49; Jn. 13:30, 32; 19:34; Acts 8:21; 9:11; 10:16; 13:10; 2 Pet. 2:15

For Greek Geeks. Mark uses this term pregnantly and pointedly, 42 times. It is NOT merely an idiom for 'next', as you'll see. Video's first 10 minutes explain the pregnant meaning of EUTHUS in both Hebrew and in Greek culture. Hebrew terms vary, but the Jewish LXX translators pick EUTHUS; so the cross-pollination of the cultural meaning, is explained. How the Old Sin Nature is referenced, by the term. After that, we go from Genesis through Matthew, seeing how the term is used.

In 3d5 we'll see how Mark and the post-Matthew writers, use the term. In 3d6 and 7, we'll see WHY Mark pointedly LEAVES OUT euthus, in his chapters 11-14; how he surgically quotes both Matthew and Luke re Trib and Last Supper discourses, again proving Mark's is the third Gospel. Pretty exciting stuff, really, when you consider how scholars have debated Mark's placement and meaning, for so long.


Mark3d5 Mark's Rapture Keyword EUTHUS, cont.

For Greek Geeks. Here in 3d5 we see how Mark and the post-Matthew writers, use the term. Mark uses this term pregnantly and pointedly, 42 times. So euthus is NOT merely an idiom for 'next', as you'll see. Old Sin Nature is referenced, by the term.

In 3d6 and 7, we'll see why Mark pointedly LEAVES OUT euthus, in his chapters 11-14; how he surgically quotes both Matthew and Luke re Trib and Last Supper discourses, again proving Mark's is the third Gospel. Pretty exciting stuff, really, when you consider how scholars have debated Mark's placement and meaning, for so long.

Use of EUTHUS pan-Bible, Episodes 3d4-3d7. Full list of verses (not all are covered in the videos): Gen. 15:4; 24:45; 33:12; 38:29; Num. 23:3; Jos. 8:14; Jdg. 14:3; 1 Sam. 12:23; 1 Ki. 21:23, 25; 2 Ki. 10:15; Ezr. 8:21; Neh. 9:13; Ps. 7:11; 10:2; 18:9; 24:21; 26:11; 31:11; 32:1; 35:11; 36:14; 48:15; 57:2; 63:11; 72:1; 77:37; 93:15; 96:11; 106:7, 42; 110:1; 111:2, 4; 124:4; 139:14; 142:10; Prov. 2:13, 16, 19, 21; 20:11; 28:10; 29:10; Job 3:11; Hos. 14:10; Isa. 26:7; 33:15; 40:3-4; 42:16; 45:13; 59:14; Jer. 3:2; Ezek. 23:40; 33:17, 20; 46:9; Dan. 3:27; Matt. 3:3, 16; 13:20-21; 14:27; 21:3; Mk.1:3, 10, 12, 18, 20f, 23, 28-30, 42-43; 2:8, 12; 3:6; 4:5, 15-17, 29; 5:2, 29-30, 42; 6:25, 27, 45, 50, 54; 7:25; 8:10; 9:15, 20, 24; 10:52; 11:2-3; 14:43, 45, 72; 15:1; Lk. 3:4f; 6:49; Jn. 13:30, 32; 19:34; Acts 8:21; 9:11; 10:16; 13:10; 2 Pet. 2:15


Mark3d6 Why Mark OMITs euthus from Chaps 11-14

Here we begin to see why Mark suddenly OMITS euthus, between 11:3 and 14:43. This video focuses on Chapters 11-13. 3d7 will focus on Chapter 14, offer conclusions about Rapture, as expected by believers during Year of the Four Emperors — when Mark wrote.


Mark3d7 Why Mark OMITS euthus in Chaps 13-14

Climactic video on Mark's euthus Rapture style, here by omission. Using BibleWorks 'Synoptic Tool', here we see not only Mark's pregnant omission of euthus, but also his SURGICAL style of concatenating parallel quotations from both Matthew and Luke, again showing Mark as the THIRD Gospel, never the first.

Thus we begin to understand better, what really happened at the Last Supper, and realize that claims of contradiction, are flat wrong.

This will be the last Mark video, for awhile. Will catch up to Mark later on, in the Synoptics series: probably about its Episode 30 or so. In 5a-c RFG of this playlist, are videos illustrating that the Bible Book rollout of 68-69 AD in the wake of Paul's death, were Hebrews, then Peter, then Jude, then Mark. I'm still auditing that hypothesis, but so far it's the most probable, given the Bible's own rhetorical styles and rules for incorporating prior Divine Writ, by reference. Will do update videos on that order, later in 2013 or 2014.

Year of the Four Emperors was either 69AD itself, or began maybe six months earlier, so lasted 18 months. Am still examining which of the two datelines, is the more correct. But whichever it is, that's when Mark's Gospel came out, and his Gospel is the last of the four books (Heb, 1 and 2 Peter, Jude, Mark), with Hebrews likely being the first of the four.


Mark4a Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark!

Continued from • RFG5c Hebrews, Peter, Jude, Mark Book..., correcting that video's contentions on Bible Book order. As you'll see from Episode 4's many vids, it now looks like the proper order of the books issued in Year of the Four Emperors, is Peter, then Jude, then Mark's Gospel, then Hebrews — all of them written due to Paul's execution; that Peter died soon after, occasioning Jude's letter. Then came Mark's Gospel, and finally (not first), Hebrews.

This video starts Episode 4, shows how Hebrews 1 and 2, 'wrap' to Mark 1, thematically. Essentially, Hebrews uses a technique called 'incorporation by reference' to track its own order to the SAME order of points, in Mark's Gospel. Which means, Mark's Gospel is the LATEST of the Bible books, when Hebrews was written.

As this Episode 4 will demonstrate, Book of Hebrews continues to THEMATICALLY wrap to Mark's Gospel. So Hebrews' outline is based on the order of points in Mark.

Big surprise, to me. Disputations with SUBSTANCE are welcome, of course. But if you call me names or say the video is wrong absent SUBSTANCE why, then I cannot benefit from your criticism, and won't reply.


Mark4b Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark, cont.

Continued from • Mark4a Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark! . Here we start to see that what seemed like a coincidence in Episode 3's tie with Hebrews, is actually part of an ongoing pattern: In 4a, we saw how deftly Hebrews 1 tracked to Mark 1; and now we begin to see that tracking isn't a coincidence, after all. For in this video, we find that Hebrews 2-4, keep on tracking to Mark, through Mark 2.

Really exciting stuff. Too bad the Quelle people, so hot on cutting-and-pasting together an 'original' Gospel which no Gospel writer ever knew, didn't do their homework on how to read serial literature. Ooops.

For even today, if you watch some TV series like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, or Grimm; or, if you read 'The Green Mile' by Stephen King; you'd know how each successive 'episode' or 'book' ties BACKWARDS to what went before. So too, Scripture. Trick is to know WHEN each book was written. You know that in BIBLE, by two types of text identifiers: 1) a DATELINE in the meter of each book, usually at the beginning, but sometimes in significant chapters, too; and 2) KEYWORDS and THEMES of the (usually-latest) books referenced.

Scholars don't know about the meter dateline, because they impose Western standards of poetry meter on Bible text, thereby finding nothing, so concluding Bible has no pervasive meter of its own. But everyone in the ancient world MEMORIZED the text by SYLLABLE COUNTS, so it should have been obvious that some kind of ACCOUNTING meter system WAS used. Double-ooops.

Scholars DO know about keywords and thematic ties, but they never think to use those techniques, on the New Testament writers QUOTING EACH OTHER. Triple-ooops!

If you want to know who the famous Quelle contenders are, just look at the tags, after 'Otho'. Or, Google on 'Quelle' and 'Gospel'.


Mark4c Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark, cont.

Continued from • Mark4b Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark, cont. . Now we see how Hebrews 3 continues to trace Mark 2, through Hebrews 6 on Mark 3, coming full circle to Mark 3c1 (which covered Hebrews 5:11-6:6 play on Mark 4).


Mark4d Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark, cont.

Continued from • Mark4c Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark, cont. . Hebrews 5 continues to trace Mark 3, and then goes forward, still tracing to Mark's thematic ORDER. So this rhetorical style is but one of many evidences that Mark is the Third Gospel. For to validate ITSELF as Divine Writ, a new Bible book must tie to the latest Divine book just before it. And then, flawlessly elaborate, on that book.

Thus Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark. So Mark, just preceded Hebrews. But so too, did Hebrews and Jude. So Hebrews threads in the priesthood and imminency-of-Rapture theme in Peter, plus his false-teacher theme, which of course Jude nearly quoted verbatim. Thus we know that just after Paul died, Peter wrote; then, he was killed in Babylon (for in 68 AD, Parthia was a new fan of Nero); so then, Jude wrote, and apparently was soon after killed. Then came Mark, and now, Book of Hebrews.

We know Hebrews came out in the Year of the Four Emperors, just after Paul died, from Hebrews 13:23. We also know the other books came out then, by their text and meter (Jude and Peter show metered datelines at the beginning of their Epistles; I've not yet tested Mark for meter).

For Timothy visited Paul, per Paul's last request, end 2 Tim. Mark came along. Then Nero must have imprisoned Timothy (and maybe Mark), who just got released. He'd not be released, except under a new Emperor (take your pick among the next 3, it was custom for the new Emperor to pardon prisoners whose crimes were deemed political).


Mark4e Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark, cont.

So Episodes after 4e Mark are only in that vimeo link. No more Mark vids will be posted in Youtube.

Continued from • Mark4d Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark, cont. . CLIMACTIC and enjoyable episode, validating the prior ones. IF you have any doubts Bible is from God: those doubts will die, after learning the Scripture depicted here!

For Hebrews 6 now POINTEDLY traces Mark 4, still following Mark's thematic ORDER. Thus you better know what both books MEAN to say! This is the exegete's wet dream come true, to actually see the writers' own THINKING at the time. It's the goal of hermeneutics; and baby, you get it LIVE, here! As if you were there sitting beside them, listening to their heads, back in 69AD when they wrote! Kill me now!

As often happens, I didn't know where this episode was going to go, when recording; so when I suddenly realized how aptly Hebrews traced Mark, I started to cry at the end. Sorry.

Read Hebrews 5:11-6:12 on its own carefully, and ask yourself, 'why does the writer, make THESE points in THIS order?' For he could have said the same thing, in many different ways! Aha. Now you know why. He's tracking to MARK!

How ironic: here we have bald evidence of a writer using Mark to make his own epistle (also directly from God, so God wants the reader to know Mark is being tracked). Isn't that the kind of proof the Q nitwits are looking for? Well, here it is! But oh, Mark does the same tracking, to Matthew and Luke! So Mark PROVES to be the third Gospel AND latest Bible book at the time Hebrews is written! LOL!

For at this point, the writer of Hebrews starts to thread in again more from Peter and Jude, at the same time (which he began to do from Chapter 1, with varying emphasis).

This same rhetorical style is used by John in John 8, tracking thematically to Psalm 18. So all those who claim the pericope adulterae isn't part of Bible or doesn't belong in John 8:1-10, can't read it; or, didn't do their homework, take your pick. See my videos on that, starting here: • LXX3r Christ says He's God 50+ times ... .

Again, this THREADING rhetorical style is but one of many evidences that Mark is the Third Gospel. See also my NT 'threaded' and Synoptics playlists, for other examples. For to validate ITSELF as Divine Writ, a new Bible book must tie to the latest Divine book just before it. And then, flawlessly elaborate, on that book.

Thus Hebrews 'wraps' to Mark. So Mark, just preceded Hebrews. But so too, did Hebrews and Jude 'wrap' (to Mark Jude and Peter, by Hebrews; to Peter, by Jude). So Hebrews threads in the priesthood and imminency-of-Rapture theme in Peter, plus his false-teacher theme, which of course Jude nearly quoted verbatim. Thus we know that just after Paul died, Peter wrote; then, he was killed in Babylon (for in 68 AD, Parthia was a new fan of Nero); so then, Jude wrote, and apparently was soon after killed. Then came Mark, and now, Book of Hebrews.

We know Hebrews came out in the Year of the Four Emperors, just after Paul died, from Hebrews 13:23. We also know the other books came out then, by their text and meter (Jude and Peter show metered datelines at the beginning of their Epistles; I've not yet tested Mark for meter).

For Timothy visited Paul, per Paul's last request, end 2 Tim. Mark came along. Then Nero must have imprisoned Timothy (and maybe Mark), who just got released. He'd not be released, except under a new Emperor (take your pick among the next 3, it was custom for the new Emperor to pardon prisoners whose crimes were deemed political).


Mark4h Heb6 wraps Mark4, cont.

Balance of Mark 4g's content on how Mark surgically cuts Luke's 'come to the light', since the light is going OUT (Temple going Down, under siege when Mark writes), then how Hebrews tracks Mark's own omnious repackaging of that passage, to warn those sluggish, how dark with works they are.

Then, analysis continues on how the balance of Hebrews 6, Promise to Abraham, ties to Mark 4's seed multiplying. Heh. But here's the killer: Mark suddenly switches from seeds, to boats. Hebrews suddenly switches from multiplying Abraham's seed, to oaths and THEN to anchors? With the oath causing the anchoring? Oy vey. So end Mark 4 is on what? How Christ was ANCHORED so well, He was sleeping during the storm, and the little-faiths (having no elpis, Heb6:19), were all stormed up with anger that He sleeping: 'Don't you care that we are perishing????' (Mark 4:38).

LOLOL! This is SO like Aristophanes' play, 'The Frogs' (named after a small boat scene in the play, since frogs in Greek lit often represented demonic cleverness). Doesn't get more deft than this! Shakespeare loved this kind of innuendo writing!

I pity all those 'scholars' who are VERY conversant in Greek lit and drama, but suddenly when it comes to Bible's wit and drama in the Gospels, their brains go out! See: you can't interpret Bible without 1John1:9. Be a scholar, yes; but be in the Spirit, or you waste your time, and everyone else's!

File Name: 4hMarkHebOnMark.avi, posted 11/22/13 but made from HebOnMark17b-18avis of 9/29/13, on 10/25/13.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 5/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This video continues the survey with Mark, which like Jude, proves that significant textual variants are the proper text. PROVING MORE THAN EVER THAT HE'S THE THIRD GOSPEL, NOT A QUELLE OR FIRST. All you have to do is READ to know that, even in translation. But here the meter, still showing how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common, proves it even more:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey10Mark.avi 3/18/15.


Synoptics

NOTE: Episode 21 AND following will be posted in vimeo, here: http://vimeo.com/channels/synoptics. All the videos here are also, there. Due to Google's invasive demand one join Google Plus to comment in Youtube, I will no longer post videos in Youtube, effective 11/07/13.

Gospels WRAP AROUND EACH OTHER to prove that Matthew's Gospel is first, Luke's second, Mark's third, and John's fourth. This same wrapping style is used in the OT, so also in the New. It's used so you know BOOK ORDER and time written.

So, you'll see how so many claims of 'contradiction' or 'error' are provably incompetent. The 'scholars' don't pay attention to the most important element of writing, RHETORICAL STYLE. So they flunk Literature 101, in order to bash Bible.

Frankly, much of the confusion results from 'scholars' paying too much attention to FORM, aka 'external evidence' in 'textual criticism' (see my TextCrit video series), and not enough attention to SUBSTANCE aka CONTENT of the Gospels, aka 'internal evidence' of the WORDS themselves. Here, you'll see the WORDS prove the order of the Gospels, no matter in what FORM (i.e., manuscript age or type), preserved.

Along the way, you'll see how incompetent, the claim that all the writers used some 'Q' Gospel to craft their own, rather than getting the info from the Holy Spirit. And, most importantly, you'll see how provably the Holy Spirit DID provide the info. It's shockingly beautiful: so I apologize in advance for the passion in my voice, as I go through these Gospels and how their styles, interact.

New uploads will resume sometime in 2016. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Bible's TEXT proves Matthew's Gospel is 1st, Luke 2nd, Mark 3rd, John 4th. Sloppy or dishonest reading of the Gospels, results in controversy over them. Ergo, this series shows you how, even in translation, you can tell John 'wraps' Mark, Luke, Matthew; Mark, 'wraps' Luke and Matthew, and Luke 'wraps' Matthew, so Matthew is 1st. If you reviewed the Greek, you'd also know all these Gospels were originally written in Greek; that other languages' versions, are but translated from that Greek (i.e., the Aramaic).

This channel/playlist contains the Synoptics video series from Youtube; beginning at Episode 22, only vimeo will have the balance of the series. Youtube copy is at http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL97D4FC19559B634B.


1 Synoptic Proving Matthew is first Gospel

Series theme: How Bible's fingerprinting rhetorical style, proves Matthew first, Luke second, Mark third, John fourth — and when written. Playlist will take years to complete. Even so, the videos so far demonstrate the 'threading' technique which every movie, book, TV series has used, and of course all the ancients used even more: anything NEW which ties back to a prior 'episode', REFERENCES and UPDATES it. Usually, from different perspectives, to elucidate. So too, the Gospels. All led, by God. The entire Bible is, after all, a serial rollout.

But shallow Gospel reading causes debates, doubts. Some 'scholars' weirdly claim a mysterious 'Q' gospel as the 'source' ('quelle' in German, hence 'Q') — from which, our official Gospels are derived. This series exposes the ineptness, of that claim. Here's a bibliography of their incompetence (search on 'Synoptic' when you load the page): https://library.usml.edu/home. Then compare the videos in my Mark Series, here: • b-out Mark's Gospel proves 'Q' Schola...

So now notice: though every schoolchild knows newly-added information would be shorter than an initial telling, these 'scholars' claim Mark's Gospel is first, BECAUSE it's shortest. LOL! Mark omits over half the typical Gospel information, so clearly it's elaborative, not 'first'.

NT Bible writers all WRAP TO Matthew, like OT writers all wrapped to Genesis. So his Gospel is provably first, Luke 2nd, Mark 3rd, John last. This series traces that wraparound, live. Each Gospel recasts the same info, adds more — around a THEME. Think of a newspaper headline, repeatedly shouted by a 1920's American newsboy, Extra Extra, read all about it...

Matthew's theme: CHRIST SON OF DAVID, FULFILLS 2SAM7 PROMISE! Luke: GENTILES GET SAME LAST ADAM SAVIOR! Mark: CHRISTIANS NOW DEAF TO CHRIST, JUST LIKE PHARISEES! TEMPLE DESTRUCTION SOON FOLLOWS! (Book of Hebrews wraps its outline around Mark's theme, shown later in playlist.) John: CHRIST THE ONLY TEMPLE, NOW BUILDING CHURCH! Same story, successive themes to successive audiences, each updating The Lesson.

Repetition from different angles, also teaches. Wrapping to What Went Before, is Bible rhetorical style from Exodus forward. A Divine STREAM, multiple sources of Water=Word, converging. Divine Authenticity is proven by that weaving, as was each Bible writer's job.

Moreover, they didn't have video games, TV, radio, etc. They had only their holy books and literature to get through long days of boring activity. So they mulled over the text they memorized syllable-by-syllable, for convenience; then, they'd talk about it all day. It was their schooling, culture, entertainment, their mental life. Same is true of written plays, philosophy, etc.

Technically, 'Synoptic' means only three of the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses: Matthew, Mark, John. Luke asserts his info is from THE Eyewitness, the Holy Spirit, in his preamble of Luke 1:1-4. (Parallel: Moses got Genesis from the Holy Spirit.) So in this series, I use 'synoptic' to mean all 4 Gospels.

On Matthew and Luke Chap 1-3, see also my 'Lord Born on Chanukah' videos, which offer a peppier review of how Luke wraps Matthew. Associated webpages are PassPlot.htm and LordvSatan4a.htm. For chronology of Messiah's birth and death, governs why Church exists: Israel ran out of TIME, which was to end 4200 years after Adam's fall. Hence the long pages, replete with many Bible verses you can test. You Must Know The Timeline to grasp the Gospels. Jews have a garbled idea of the timeline (but know there is one); Christendom is ignorant of it. No one bothers to evaluate Bible's rhetorical mechanisms to TELL you both timeline and Gospel order. Hence the needless, incompetent debate over Gospels and the NT.

Finally, inept 'church fathers' claimed Matthew was originally in Hebrew/Aramaic. Today, it is a political football, as if those who speak Hebrew thus become better than others. Instead, Bible proves what's original, from the text: by wordplay between NT and OT. Test it yourself. Review Aramaic NT versus Aramaic or Hebrew OT; then do the same with original Greek NT versus LXX. Test wordplay in many verses, not just a few. Avoid extra-Biblical nonsense like coins: Bible language was chosen by GOD, not politicos. Then, you will see why God originally chose Greek for NT: to communicate to a wide audience, not to give stupid people a false claim of team superiority!

Important Audio addenda:


2 Synoptic How Luke wraps his text around Matthew's Gospel, intro

Continued from 1 Synoptic. See video description to it. This episode (through #11 or so) begins a Luke-to-Matthew comparison of style between Chapters 1-4, showing how Luke employs his own rhetorical style of REVERSAL (Vashti-Esther, to introduce why Church inherits the Bridal role) — to wrap to Matthew. This wrapping is done on many levels, so can only be highlighted on-screen. Once you see the pattern, you can continue annotating the style, yourself.

Reference to the calendar for Luke 1:36 is extensively covered in PassPlot.htm#Bubble. Will take you months to vet the verses and explanation, sorry. (Took me two-three years to write it.)


3 Synoptic Explosive Meaning of 'Messiah'

See 1 Synoptic for series explanation. This video is on How OT proves 'Messiah' is a politically-explosive term ONLY meaning God-man, presaging judgment on all who don't believe in Him. This introduction is needed to show why Matthew begins his Gospel formally, with a genealogy, and why Matthew and all subsequent gospels, focus on the political explosiveness of the Gospel message. This video's focus is on 2 Samuel 7 and Daniel 7, largely using NASB translation for convenience. See also Psalm 110, and all 'angel of the Lord' verses, which tie to 'Ancient of Days' usage by Daniel.

'Gospel' really means Official Good News from a KING. The KINGSHIP issue is explosively political, for it's a claim of world domination. And that King, is God-man. You have to understand that meaning in the OT, to understand why the Gospels are so disputed. No one can be neutral. Both Jews and Christians have sugared over this rather scary and upsetting message. Bible doesn't sugar it over.

Can't understand how to tell which Gospel comes first, until you understand that the MESSAGE is focused on the political explosiveness of the Biblical claims about MESSIAH.

All this is an intro to explain the style of Gospel writing, how you can prove by text 'wrapping' that Matthew is first, why Luke wraps around Matthew using the same themes, verse quotes, keywords, etc.


4 Synoptic Politics of Messiah (Luke 1 wraps Matthew 2)

Birth of Christ was a personal scandal and a political powder keg, threatening Israel's very existence. This is the main theme of the Gospels. Few movies or pulpits pay attention to it. We begin to see why, in this Episode.

About how Luke 'wraps' to Matthew: notice that where Matthew provides little detail, Luke provides much, and vice versa. Notice also, each author goes silent to witness something embarrassing. For example, it's embarrassingly obvious that Rome's most feared enemy, Persia, would seek to marry off someone in its royalty to another 'king of the Jews' — when an old king often lay dying of 'worms'. So would Jerusalem get squished in-between? Or would civil war start? It was already brewing for other reasons.

To get a quick sense of that time, click the link below, select 'Page 103' and start reading from about page 100 through the end of the chapter. Smallwood's book is pretty typical of her scholarly circle, which debunks Bible. So she misses the importance of the magi — which after all, Herod would have to silence, too.

https://books.google.com/books?id=FdQUAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Herod serious&f=false

But as it turns out, this Son of David was of questionable legitimacy. After all, Mary was about 36 when she gave birth, per her own dateline meter in the Magnificat, as a future episode will show. Who's gonna believe He was born of the Holy Spirit? Can't God make a married woman conceive supernaturally, instead? Why expect Israel to believe an OLD virgin — even if she was disposyni, legitimate royalty from the House of David, next-in-line-for-the-throne? What, is God being politically-incorrect?

Yeah, and the fact people thought He was illegitimate, spared Him from kings who'd want to capture or manipulate Him... You don't see the pulpits or movies cover that angle, either. But clearly the Bible DOES cover it. Just the facts, ma'am. Leaving the obvious, in silence...

More detail about the series, is in the video description to 1 Synoptic


5 Synoptic Messiah Politics: how Luke 1-2 wraps Matthew 1-2

Continuing from 4, explosive Messianic politics; next, by employing the rhetorical style of 'reversal', Luke wraps Matthew via the 'plotline' of scandalous birth. Intro to Greek drama principles (very brief) to show that both the Hebraistic rules of rhetorical style and the Greek rules, are 'obeyed', to properly communicate to the audience. Focus is on the 'parallel' (a Hebrew and Greek drama requirement for plots) of the scandalous birth of John the Baptist, with his own father Zacharias (=God Remembers!) from the priestly course (house) of AbiJah (=God is My Father!), committing political suicide at the son's birth.


6 Synoptic Messiah Politics: how Luke 1-2 wraps Matthew 1-2, cont.

In this Episode: Lukan tracking of the political brouhaha of revolution in priesthood for a parallel birth; 'brood of vipers' meaning, Mishnah, how the OT priests didn't inherit land, depended on everyone else; hypocrisy of Elizabeth's and Zecharias' friends; his blessing and meaning of enemies being defeated.

Extensive links to contemporary Latin and Greek sources as well as scholars talking about the period, are in the 'ChronoChart' section of my Ephesians1REPARSED.doc / Eph1DecreeSyllables.pdf. Since Paul's meter is a chronology spanning 0-476AD (continuing the Mosaic tradition of using Hebrew meter as a past and future calendar), just look up the time period by syllable sections, as each syllable=1 year. So look at syllables 1-30 (=AD1-30).


8 Synoptic Messiah Politics, Luke 2 wraps around Matthew 2, cont.

Highlights: Matt2:1-8, and Luke 2:1-7 parallelism, wry wit and Luke's tracking to Matthew's wit. Marbling, Matt's funnelling-to-prophecy technique. Intro to Lukan Reversal Technique due to Church Age reversing yet redeeming Time for Israel to get what's promised her in the Trib and Mill, interpretative retrospective exposition.

Next, Census and taxation to explain Luke 2 and Quirinius. How the chief priests and scribes didn't know what time it was, that Christ would be under their very noses. Not asking WHEN? to the right people. Sotto voce style of silence about what they are doing wrong.

In Episode 9-21 we'll begin to see the textual wordplay on Chanukah as the Lord's Birthdate. If that topic interests you, be sure to view the tandem Magnificat Meter of Time series, which is a subset of the 10-11 GGS series on Paul's meter. Because Paul builds on the Magnificat, to create Ephesians 1:3-14's meter pattern.


9 Synoptic Messiah Politics, Luke 2 wraps around Matthew 2, cont.

Matt2-Luke 2 Joseph/Mary/Zecharias parallel, and how Luke keys off even Matt's Bible quotes. Intro to why we know it's Chanukah when Christ is born. Review of 'Star' when and where and Sanhedrin inability to know what time it is, ellipsis to spare embarrassment, reverse trip. Grave cloths (see links at end of this desc).

Manger and couple's personal attitude thus expressed. Luke 2, shepherds visit, parallel of the magi who had to be led, vs.shepherds who are told to GO LOOK. Political incorrectness and how they would be laughingly rejected when they knock on doors asking to see a newborn who 'angels' told them to find, wrapped mummy-style in a feed trough.. yeah, right, that's believably from God! NOT...

Luke 2:7 and 2:12's sparganow = wrap in DEATH CLOTHS. My pastor is adamant, that sparganon and its verb, come from Hippocrates. Hear him say so yourself, in lessons 1847ff of his (free) 1992 Spiritual Dynamics series, at http://www.rbthieme.org. He there also covers the shepherds, nickname 'Better things for Christmas'; he also explains that the Lord was born on Chanukah 4 BC. Call the church to order (can't order online, to protect your privacy) Lessons 1847ff. Order next 30 lessons to get context, or preferably with 1847 in the middle, so you can get pre-context. They never sell your name or ask for money.

I couldn't find my notes, so did a Word search on sparganon in Big Kittel, etc. Came up with nothing on Hippocrates. Maybe you can find it in Perseus? I talk about the term's putative meaning, here (30 mins): Luke2-7GraveCloths.WMA.

My pastor stressed that the shepherds weren't allowed in Temple. He said it's in the Mishnah. I searched on 'shepherd' and didn't find anything conclusive, only plausible. BibleWorks has Rodkinson, who doesn't reference by folio. This Soncino collection IS organized by folio (but the rest of the site is anti-semitic, lol): http://www.picosearch.com/cgi-bin/ts.pl

This Jewish-friendly Heb-English site 'translates' between folio and Chapters for BOTH Talmuds and related sources: https://instonebrewer.com/RabbinicTraditions/. Example: select 'San' (for Sanhedrin) link at far right; see chapter on left, but associated folio citations on right. Text displays below; copyright restrictions might make you wait a day before you can see (i.e., Jeru) translation.


10 Synoptic Luke 2 tracking Matthew, Chanukah Birth of Christ

We're still on Luke 2 parallel and Messiah politics, but now we begin a side trip to prove how we know it's Chanukah, with intro on how we know Luke 2's 'reversal' rhetoric (anticipating Matt 16-22), plus use of 'Galilee' to subtly incorporate by reference, God's promises to all the Gentiles, and the problem then, of Jewish anti-goyimism.

Luke's deft style is to quote Zecharias quoting Isa 9:2, then Luke 1:71 quote construction of concatenation, going through the TSK list of verses. Intro to Purim and Mary as the archetype for Esther, introduced by Matt at the end of Matt1, via the pregnancy verse. Wit in Luke 1:26. For the next 10 Episodes, we'll visit the relevant OT passages.

In this Synoptic Series, we skip over the Magnificat until Episode 22; but you can see it now in the 11s GGS Mary Magnificat Meter of Time playlist. She starts her meter from the original Chanukah, to create a timeline for the life of her Son to the End of Scheduled Time. Each Time poem must balance to the end of Time, so Luke's use of the Magnificat meaning Chanukah, is very obvious to the Greek reader of his day; kinda like beginning the book with 'Twas the Night before Christmas', for us.

So Luke's Chanukah introduction, was really rather pointed, by quoting Mary. Then there was Zecharias' use of the same Chanukah keywords, and now, the shepherds.


11 Synoptic Messiah Politics of PURIM (intro to Magnificat)

For the next 10 videos, we take a major side-trip into the OT, to introduce background for the Magnificat. You can see it now in the Mary Magnificat video playlist on my channel page. This Synoptics series will not go into its Greek-geek detail, but will rather just summarize, to show Luke makes CHANUKAH BIRTH, playfully obvious to the reader.

The Magnificat itself is a TIME POEM; it measures from Chanukah, keys off Daniel 9:19. Magnificat was already famous when Zecharias spoke; he made his own words a time poem keying off the Magnificat, as will be shown in Episode 11s12 Magni 12 of the Magnificat series. Paul in turn will key off them both, in Ephesians 1:3-14, as shown in my 10-11 GGS video series.

But in THIS video we go in the opposite direction, to see the Tie to Purim, start of book of Esther. Book highlights explained to show origin of Purim and Matt 16-22 tie, Israel playing Vashti. Luke uses this in order to advance his REVERSAL Gospel theme, playing on Matthew 16-22.

Highlights are: Unconditional vs. conditional covenants to Israel, how Mosaic law was the only conditional covenant. Sidebar on how Christians wrongly think they inherit the promises to Israel. Last third of video returns to Luke 1:26ff, to show why God picked Adar for the Annunciation.

Video then goes through Luke 1:35's verbs, query why use 'come upon' and 'overshadow' (which will be answered in Synoptics Episode 14).

Video stops at Luke 1:36 again showing how we know it's Adar and how we know Mary is depicted as Esther. Tie between Pentecost and Chanukah. God fills out the Jewish Calendar of World History!


12 Synoptic Messiah Politics of Chanukah tie Luke 1:26 to Haggai 1 and 2

Smoking gun, Luke 1:26's sixth month and Haggai 1:1, intro to the latter's usage. Luke's reversal rhetoric of the genealogy, and how Magnificat will reference Galilee of Joshua 2:23, and Mary and Zecharias will be quoting Haggai. See the Magnificat video series, which shows how Mary creates a Time Poem based on Chanukah birth of Christ, balancing her timeline to Dan9 and Dan11. Zecharias then plays off Mary's timeline, as will be shown in 11s12 GGS Magni 12 (last video of the Magnificat series).

Bible is precise in its eschatology. Thus it's complicated, and requires MUCH STUDY, to get it right. Get it wrong, and some Bible verse will contradict you. Whew. God created a self-auditing means, of Bible interp! Never stop auditing!

Two other Big Bible Auditing Clues are due to the 'actors', Mary daughter of Zerubabbel and John son of Aaron just as Yeshua son of Jehozadok. Reminder that Matt2 by omission shows the chief priests and scribes don't know what time it is, but Mary and Zecharias DO know. Sidebar on my pastor's switch from claiming a spring birth for Christ, to December 25 as Chanukah, and the discovery via someone else's email, about Zecharias. Haggai 1:1-1:12, with extended sidebar on 8's eudokew and endoxasthesomai, idea that morality doesn't ipse glorify God. He has to approve it. Issue of balance.


13 Synoptic Messiah Politics of Chanukah tie Luke 1:28 to Haggai 1 and 2

Next smoking gun proof of Chanukah birth, Luke 1:28 and 'I am with you" in Haggai 1:13, compared with similar phrases pan-Bible. How God plays with the grammar rules. Frequency of usage in Jeremiah, association with Temple Down disaster.

Last third of video returns to Haggai 1:12 through the end of the chapter, with focus on 24th Elul as probable date of Elizabeth's conception; then begins Haggai 2, introduced by Ezra 1, 3, 4 as background, including period between Cyrus - Darius, the civil war and factions in Persia.

Next Smoking Gun, Ziv beginning of the Temple. Back to Haggai 2, Feast of Booths tie back to Ezra 3's weeping, and the 2nd "I am with you" in Haggai 2:4. Sidebar on discouragement, and parallel to Exodus, mistake about qereb made at the end, and quick comment on how we miss the meaning of Mary's smarts, not yet explained.


14 Synoptic Messiah Politics, Haggai 2, Lord's Chanukah Birth

This series runs in tandem with the Magnificat video series starting here. So here in Episode 14, we take a sidetrip to Haggai 2:22, for Mary and Zecharias will quote that verse; confluence of Gentiles with the characters and the six months, Messiah's birth prediction, in terms of Temple Building and Gentiles supporting it; but also sidetrip to Luke 1:35, showing usage of 'come upon' and 'overshadow'. (See also Episode 11, but in #14 I mistakenly say it's Episode 5 or 6.)

Beginning at about 16 minutes, return to Haggai 2, introducing the timing of days worked, and the 30-day month of the Bible's calendar, meaning of Booths, correcting the qereb error. Beginning at 23 minutes, Sidebar on Haggai 2:6 and Ezra, begins with explanation of why Bible prophecy seems cryptic — because we don't know the background, names, places, and especially wordplay. The latter, as a feature of how to interpret what God says. "Shake Heavens and Earth" explanation starts, introducing the time of Darius the Great and how he came to power. At 30 minutes I err in saying Carpathian Mountains, should be Zagros, but the Carpathians were the northwestern extent (just above Thrace).

Historical background using Ezra 4:6 showing how after the foundation was laid, the enemies of the Jews frustrated continued rebuilding.


15 Synoptic Messiah Politics, Haggai 2 and Ezra tie Luke 1, Matt 2 with Chanukah Birth

Continuation, still explaining Haggai 2:6's 'shake heavens and the earth' via introductory background on the time between Cyrus' first year and Darius the Great's, 2nd year, mostly via Ezra. How stopping Temple rebuilding actually violates Persian law, during the time Daniel was still in power, under a cloud due to the machinations of Daniel 6, bypassing Babylon and going straight to Susa, where Cambyses was (or left, with Cyrus campaigning), but there were factions.

Focus on Ezra 5, and Tattenai's letter, Darius' reply, and how it ties back to Haggai 2:6's shaking the earth. Ezra 6:15's dating terminology as contrast to double-definite articles explained. Estimate of total building time from foundation at 2nd-9th months, and mid-second year Darius the Great, until end of his sixth year in office.

Speculation on whether Mary conceived in Purim or 3 Adar. Beginning at 36 minutes, Jewish calendar picture and structure reviewed, with short Google overlay and summary of the BC late 539 to mid-522 history, and the improper bypassing of Babylon to Susa.

Last 20 minutes spent on the timing of the probable arrival of Tattenai's message to Darius, and the strength of Darius' reply, how he probably believed in Christ. Tieback to the gold and silver prediction by God in Haggai 2:6. Explanation of the sacrifices' volume, as an index of how much wealth they got, tying also to 2:7.


16 Synoptic Messiah Politics Haggai 2 tie to Luke 1 'shake heavens', cont.

Still reviewing the setup for Luke 1 Magnificat use of Haggai 2:21-23, via Haggai 2:7's 'all the nations' and 'earth'; first explained geographically, using map. At 20 minutes, return to Haggai 2, reviewing the timeline of resumption of building on the foundation, Tattenai's letter, and Darius' likely receipt by the time of Haggai 2:1; review also of Cyrus-to-Darius period, prior. Haggai 2:7-23 explained, start of 'shake the heavens', with ending stress on how Zerubbabel (Mary and Joseph's ancestor) will become Seed of Christ.


17 Synoptic Messiah Politics Haggai 2 'Shake Heavens' tie to Luke 1 (intro to Magnificat), cont.

This episode will be a slog, going through so many passages. 'Shake the heavens' bookending technique illustrates near and far fulfillment of prophecy. Review of Haggai 2:6, 21-23, then Daniel's prayer, which saved the world.

At 11:47, Daniel 6 introduced. Background on takeover of Babylon and Cyrus compared to Darius the Mede, to introduce Daniel 9, briefly reviewed.

During that coverage, sidebar intro to meter as a dimension of historical testimony about specific period of time, Daniel doing it retrospectively, then switch to Isaiah 53 to show how Isaiah's doing it from First David's birth to Last David's Death, and that Mary's using Isa53:12 meter (not shown or explained how, here). On Isaiah 53, how by verse 4's end, that's Temple Down. How Daniel tracked to Isa53:5 to determine when to pray; how the next seven syllables cover the Persian civil war, then seven more to Haggai and another seven to Ezra 6:15.

Back to Daniel 9 as a retrospective playing back to Isaiah 53's roster to craft his indictment. Point is that Daniel will only live another four or five years after Daniel 9. Daniel 10 covered near video end, showing Temple in trouble and Darius is dead.

Not covered but related: 2Sam22:8ff, reprised in Psalm 18 (which Christ uses to key off the adulteress being surrounded by legalists in John 8), Isaiah 13:13, 24:18, 64:1.


18 Synoptic Messiah Politics 'Shake Heavens' Related OT verses

Synopsis: still leading into the Luke 1 Magnificat. Since Mary will quote Haggai 2:22, this prologue still reviews other Bible verses illustrating what God means in Haggai 2:6 and 2:21, when He says He will 'shake the heavens'.

Verses are: Deut 32:8 and how it means the TIME ALLOTTED to Israel, with tie to Psalm 90 written at the same time, very brief (at 12 mins I mistakenly say that it's not divisible by 7 until 84 syllables, when in fact it's divisible by 7 at the end of v. 3, at 63 syllables, meaning VOTE SHORT); followed by Psalm 90 meter overview (using translation to block its sections); brief back to Gen1:2 and Angelic Conflict, followed by Isaiah 45 on Cyrus and tohu wa bohu in vv45:18-19.

Next, Isaiah 14 on Satan's fall. Then Psalm 110 on how Satan will be defeated, with tie to Dan 7:9-13; next, the meter pattern outline of Isaiah 53. Next, back to Daniel 9, closing with the reminder that the foregoing is part of what God means when He says in Haggai 2 (shown at the end of the video), by 'shaking the heavens'.


19 Synoptic Messiah Politics 'shake the heavens' Chanukah Meter (Luke 1 and Haggai 2)

Again, we're still introducing Luke 1's Magnificat, since Mary follows the rhetorical tradition of TIME meter when she speaks, as you'll see in my Magnificat playlist. For the Son was to arrive on a SCHEDULE which was annually plotted in the Bible, starting with Moses' meter in Psalm 90. To understand that meter, we gotta go back to Isaiah 53, which Daniel 9's meter had updated; for Mary updates Daniel's meter.

Isaiah 53, had played off Moses' meter in Psalm 90, to update the prophetic timeline of Messiah's arrival and departure. So the flow of the timeline, goes back to Adam:

Moses' Psalm 90 plots time from Adam to David's Advent, and simultaneously to Purim; Isaiah picks up at David's Advent, plotting time to Messiah's scheduled death; Daniel 9's meter then does a retrospective on Isaiah 53's forecast, balancing it to Messiah's scheduled death. Mary then picks up where Daniel left off, cleverly adding 73 years to his ending forecast of the rise of Rome (73 was the meter Daniel used in 9:5). Which 73 years, is the initial Chanukah.

For when newly-pregnant Mary speaks, she knows her Son will be born on the 160th anniversary of that Chanukah. Thus she keys her metered words in the Magnificat, to update the Timeline from Daniel. Paul will then pick up where Mary leaves off, updating the Timeline to show the effect of Church Insertion — which is Luke's rhetorical theme for his Gospel — in Ephesians 1:3-14.

Sophisticated rhetorical Bible style, this metering. Which no one in Christendom knows, and the Jews, have largely forgotten. I'd not know it either, but for a query to God about something my pastor taught, 11 years ago. Been researching the answer, ever since.

So this video explains that TIMELINE connection. See also my 10 YMH video playlist (episode 10 of Yapping Most High is its own separate playlist), or Episode 10-11 GGS playlist (subset of Greek Geek Stuff playlist). This is a complex subject, is unknown to Christianity, so requires a lot of explaining. Since all its material is IN the Bible, you can vet it yourself, once you see the pattern. This is provable directly from the text's own pattern of syllables, not an 'interpretation'.

So it is objectively falsifiable from the source, and it doesn't require an 'expert' to sanction it. Master document containing all relevant webpages, docs, and video links is:

Pity that few will actually study the matter. Bible's accuracy and data here is of extreme importance to hermeneutics, would resolve many debates re TC, Bible's dates, textual preservation, and especially, eschatology. Oh well.


20a Synoptic Messiah Politics 'shake the heavens' Chanukah Meter, cont.

Still showing how Zechariah's speech, metrically interacts with the OT. Psalm 90 and Daniel 9 meter-and-text interaction is reviewed, with focus on the keywords Book of Zechariah will use. For his namesake Zecharias will reference all this in Luke 1, to play on the Magnificat, which plays on Psalm 90, Daniel 9, and Haggai 2's 'shake the heavens'. In short, a 'paper trail' of doctrine formed of a trail of interlocking verse references to show how the prophetical doctrines relate.. and fulfill Time.

We read Daniel 9 wrongly, because we don't know it's metered. Same, for Luke 1. So we only get Christ's birthday nearly right by accident, rather than by Bible. And we don't understand prophecy, at all. For we don't see it's been a SCHEDULE annually tracked in Bible from God, so of course we get Bible's dates wrong, too. Billions of wasted hours, angst and dollars, all because we won't learn God's Meter of Time, via the syllable-counting method which any schoolchild used to learn. Pity.

It might help to see my Magnificat playlist at this point, since these Synoptic videos serve to introduce it, after about Synoptic 12. The biggest proof of Luke's theme and the fact it's the second Gospel around which Mark 'wraps', is the Magnificat. That metered Time Poem sets the theme of Luke's Gospel, and the theme of Ephesians+Revelation, as well. For Chanukah was about freedom from religion, itself a schedule of days, just like the Chanukah of Our Salvation would be born and die according to a schedule. That's the parallel, in the Magnificat. Which parallel, Paul builds on in Ephesians, and John keys off Ephesians, to construct Revelation.

You would do well to read Euripides' play Ion, to better understand Ephesians, since The Seed is born at Chanukah 4BC, to kill the Snake.

Note: this video was made on 3/22/12, but wasn't posted until July. It was on 3/22 that I learned more about how Paul was playing on Mary.


20b Synoptic Messiah Politics 'shake the heavens' Chanukah Meter, cont.

Still focusing on the keywords Book of Zechariah used, to tie to Haggai 2. For his namesake Zecharias will reference all this in Luke 1, to play on the Magnificat, which plays on Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Zechariah 3 and 4, via Haggai 2's 'shake the heavens' RESULT of 'lowering from their thrones' (Luke 1:52). In short, Mary and Zecharias use a 'paper trail' of doctrine formed of interlocking verse references, to show how the prophetical doctrines relate.. and fulfill Time, via Messiah's Timely Birth. Right on Schedule.

We read Daniel 9 wrongly, because we don't know it's metered. Same, for Luke 1. So we only get Christ's birthday nearly right by accident, rather than by Bible. And we don't understand prophecy, at all. For we don't see it's been a SCHEDULE annually tracked in Bible from God, so of course we get Bible's dates wrong, too. Billions of wasted hours, angst and dollars, all because we won't learn God's Meter of Time, via the syllable-counting method which any schoolchild used to learn. Pity.

The proper accounting of Daniel 9:25 dates from 586 BC, not 446 or 444, as most scholars use. 140 years were to elapse before Daniel 9:25 begins. Because the ending result of 446 or 444 is so similar, scholars MISS the actual accounting use, and misread Daniel 9. Their other mistakes self-cancel (they read the TWO sevens as only one because they use lunar years), so when they still end up getting to the year the Lord is to die (well, not all scholars even get that right), they think they rightly interpret, and miss the entire TIMELINE import of the passage. So they miss its CONTEXT. So they argue.

I've covered this 140-year accounting in many places, but perhaps the best place to view it, is in brainoutFAQ.htm#6a. Look for the table on 'God the Master Accountant', once you've clicked on that link, item 'AC' in that section; skip the videos there, and just read the text. It's not too complex to understand. Pity we didn't understand it, sooner.

So the total time is really 140+490, not merely 490. You'd know this, if you paid attention to Daniel 9:2 on the 70 year 'debit'; for then it has to be REIMBURSED; for that's God's Orchestration of Time doctrine, which no one in Christendom, knows; which the Jews still know, but in garbled fashion. So the 70 years debited, have to be credited back. Twice. And the 2nd credit, is in in Daniel 9:25, 364 years 1st Temple stood being REIMBURSED, plus 70 reimbursed again = 62 weeks (because the first reimbursement offset the debit, so now is back to zero).

Mary references this reimbursement in her meter, following on Daniel 9. It might help to see my Magnificat playlist at this point, since these Synoptic videos serve to introduce it, after about Synoptic 12. The biggest proof of Luke's theme and the fact it's the second Gospel around which Mark 'wraps', is the Magnificat. That metered Time Poem sets the theme of Luke's Gospel, and the theme of Ephesians+Revelation, as well. For Chanukah was about freedom from religion, itself a schedule of days, just like the Chanukah of Our Salvation would be born and die according to a schedule. That's the parallel, in the Magnificat. Which parallel, Paul builds on in Ephesians, and John keys off Ephesians, to construct Revelation.

You would do well to read Euripides' play Ion, to better understand Ephesians, since The Seed is born at Chanukah 4BC, to kill the Snake.

Note: this video was made on 3/22/12, but wasn't posted until now. It was on 3/22 that I learned more about how Paul was playing on Mary.


21 Synoptic Messiah Politics Zecharias and Mary 'tag' Zechariah to show Chanukah Birth

NOTE: future videos in the Synoptic series, will be posted to vimeo, so you can comment without having to join Google Plus. This Episode 21 is also in Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/channels/synoptics .

This video still sets up the introduction of Luke 1 on Mary and Zecharias, to show the OT prophecy they reference. This video is in tandem with the Magnificat Meter of Time playlist, here: • b-out Mary's Magnificat Meter of Time . This video also follows on 20b Synoptic, here: • 20b Synoptic Messiah Politics 'shake ... . Video was originally made 3/26/12, but I forgot to post it until now. So what I say in this video, predated the last episode in the Magnificat playlist.

This long Episode 21, thus shows how deftly both Zecharias and Mary before him, 'tag' Zechariah's book to explain the Pentecost birth of John, heralding the Chanukah Birth of Christ. In between, we see Song of Moses (Deut 32) and Haggai 2 referenced via Zechariah, including the prophecy of Esther. Sorry it's so long, but I had to post this in one 'go'.

Point is, no sane reader could miss the Chanukah Birthdate of Christ, given all these deft keyword ties by Mary and Zecharias in Luke 1. EVERY scholar knows that Luke's Greek style is 'finesse', meaning soft, wry wit. He likes you to slowly get the point, and smile. So he doesn't 'explain', but rather merely QUOTES them. For his readers at the time, that's all he HAD to do.

That we don't know Christ's CHANUKAH birth, therefore means we didn't do our homework IN BIBLE. For centuries.

On a positive note, the Catholic designation of December 25 for Christmas, is apt. Those saying the Catholics picked a pagan holiday, are proven wrong. For Chanukah COINCIDED with the pagan holiday of the Saturnalia, which Paul himself jokes about, in Galatians 4:4 (you can't see the joke in English, Greek Chronos=Roman Saturn). So pity all those holier-than-thou Christians who trumpet against the RCC on this topic. THEY TOO, did not do their Bible homework!

Really sad, what hypocrites we Christians are. We don't even bother to STUDY BIBLE, to get his Birth and Death dates correct. For centuries.


JM6 Gospel Meter Review

This video continues to focus on what elements of the analysis are more trustworthy, and which are very speculative, yet resonable, so you can save time in analysis. Here, I quickly go through my 'interpretation' of the meter in John's Gospel. You'd need to read it for a fuller vetting (links below).

Basically, the meters are obvious, very little to dispute. On the other hand, my interpretation of those meters, although reasonable for the most part, would be quite disputable. Talk to God about everything. I sure am, and am very skeptical of whatever I seem to think the meter means, constantly throwing stones at it. Auditing requires such skepticism.

Conversely, so much in the meter's meaning is obvious, given how John clearly plays on Paul, that to just reject it out of hand, is also unwarranted. But again, you'll have to talk to God about that. In all events, it's not about who does the reporting. It's about what the Word actually says.

Documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

JohnDatelineMeters.doc
JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

BEWARE: 1John and Revelation 'Meter Import' sections are very rough drafts; most of the editing in this latest revision are in the sections interpreting the meter. In the other sections, I made a few small revisions to match. For example, now it's clear 1 John was written 4 Chislev, now that I'm sure of how he used his '21'. So Revelation ends up being written 'our' December 88 AD.

File Name: JM6GospMeterReview.avi, 3/02/14.


Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Series is nearly complete, no new uploads for 2015 planned. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Psalm 90 is perhaps the first METERED calendar of Time in Bible, setting the precedence for that rhetorical style. It's also a PLAY with one 'actor' speaking 'lines' for each of five 1050-year periods; two of them, are yet future. So, Psalm 90 'plays' in two ways: a) From Millennium back to Adam and forward to Purim, and b) forward from Moses' dying year, to the end of Judges.

So, this 'channel' is my Psalm 90 playlist from Youtube. It provides Bible proof behind the How God Orchestrates Time, channel/playlist. That proof is also stated elsewhere, within explicit text (i.e., the many begats). However, meter is a major and unknown-to Christendom, rhetorical device for expressing this doctrine. So much Bible debate could be resolved: if we but knew, Bible meter.

For all other Bible writers play on Moses style, and interlink with it, to provide a comprehensive, year-by-year-from-Adam calendar, to teach the doctrine of How God Orchestrates Time, so you can orient to your OWN time, within it. A quick way to see his tracking, is here: http://www.brainout.net/MosesReview.jpg .

Folks have problems proving the Exodus dates. The accounting in Bible, is shown thus: http://www.brainout.net/ProofExodus.jpg . That's why Moses 'sevens' at 63 ('sevens' from Israel's enslavement, 1050 years from the Flood); and then, at 84.

Christendom doesn't even know this meter exists; Jews know it's in Psalm 90, but they account it incorrectly as 7 50's (since Psalm 90 is 350 syllables long). Instead, Moses uses sabbatical accounting, so each 70 stands for an entire 1050-year period, and there are FIVE of them. So how he does this, and why it's important to see and know, are the topics covered in this playlist aka channel, in Vimeo.

NOTE: Episodes posted from 11/07/13 onward will be in vimeo ( http://www.vimeo.com/channels/psalm90 ), not Youtube. However, the series postings will not resume until maybe late 2014. The vimeo videos will be moderated, to block trolls but allow folks to post without having to join Google Plus.

This 1500-year tradition of Bible rhetorical METER style which Christendom denies, will change how scholars and pastors (i.e., Dispensationalists) view Bible; it proves when Bible text was written, helps you prove if any words are missing, provides past and future timelines for Bible's own events, completely disproves preterism and proves Trinity. Such claims are rather hard to believe — especially, if coming from a 'brainout'. So, the LIVE text is shown, with Word docs of the meter so you can test the claims for yourself. So you have a different 'B', the Bible itself.

All I do is count syllables, collate and show the Bible's own (unedited) mss using BibleWorks. The playlist goes with my Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis, Part 10 of Yapping Most High, and '10 GGS' videos, for both Paul and Isaiah employ the meter scheme here in Psalm 90. Starting after 18Ps90, videos here show the latest (minor) corrections in meter, and English metered translation.

Also, the playlist includes the meter in Daniel 9, WHICH IS THE BASIS for the numbers in Daniel 9:25-27. Gabriel's reply is alike metered to match those values. So you know whence the 490, 70, 49, and 7, derive. You then realize God dates from 586BC, and there's an extra 140 years He accounts. So all our Daniel calculations, are wrong, especially since we violate Bible's Exodus 12 SOLAR YEAR CONVENTION, and instead use lunar years. See http://www.brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc, or http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Parsed.pdf (same file but in pdf) for the latest update.

Research is still ongoing, and will take years to complete: yet now you will see that this metering style is pan-Bible, not just in OT. Any passage on prophecy or the nature of Time will probably have a metered section in it. So once you see the style of metering here, you know how to spot it elsewhere in Bible. Someone should do his Th.D on this. I'm too old.

This playlist is also in my Mirroring.htm & Isa53trans.htm webpages at brainout.net.

Related Downloads & Webpages:

The last two links are the shortest summaries. SurpConc.htm is the next shortest. Suggest you read the TenWays doc or the last three links above, before reading the other links' content.


Bible Hebrew TIME Meter, 30 Testing Characteristics (Update)

I've made a ton of Bible Meter videos in vimeo ( http://vimeo.com/brainout/channels ) since freezing my Youtube channel, last November. At this point I've found and am posting videos on the meter in Matthew, Luke, Mark, John, James, Peter (who copies Paul's Ephesians meter), Book of Hebrews, 1John, Revelation. The meter solves our BC/AD problem, proves the Bible's timeline, many other surprising facts you can prove yourself, live onscreen.

Faster than watching my videos: new Word doc summarizes how to diagnose Bible Hebrew TIME meter in any passage. There are at least 30 interlocking characteristics; NT Greek uses these Bible Hebrew meter characteristics, too. Download: BibleHebMeterCharacs.doc. Doc is 16 pages long. USE IT TO TEST ANY BIBLE PASSAGE YOU WANT. The htm copy (not as pretty) is BibleHebMeterCharacs.htm. The links work. Or, replace with 'pdf' for the pdf copy. Latter doesn't require you to download fonts.

The above is an update of and somewhat replaces, my old BibleHebrewMeter.htm. I was just learning the characteristics, in those days.

If unsure where to start, try the Magnificat playlist. Mary's time poem is the simplest to understand. Yeah, it's in Greek, but it uses HEBREW meter style established by and tagging to, Moses' Psalm 90.


God's Play of History

Bible's Rhetorical style of Timeline-convergence display. For overview, download: BibleHebrewAccountingMeter.doc. Or, view it as a blog entry at bloggodsrhetoricalarchive.htm#accounting-meter

I'm doing a comprehensive explanation of this rhetorical ACCOUNTING TIME METER style, (still in draft): http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9... (last updated 6/14/2011). It will help you navigate between 10 GGS and Psalm 90 playlists. Pay special attention to the doc's first three pages and the 'E' footnote on Daniel 9's meter-maps to HISTORICAL years of Israel's kings in Chronicles and Kings. Thus you see Daniel is 'reading' the once-future Isaiah 53's TIMELINE USAGE of meter, and 'talking back' to how it was fulfilled, by syllable-count 'tagging'. (See Psalm 90 episode 23b's video description for that rhetorical style.)

For as has been shown in the Psalm 90 videos, Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90 are TIME PROMISES. An accounting of the FUTURE. Isaiah's is a future chronology of the kings' characters and attitudes.

So, Daniel keeps on invoking Isaiah 53 syllable by year, line item by line item, as the legal BASIS for his own petition. Through Dan 9:14, he does that tracking, starting with the 'kings' reference (first being David). He uses the meter to track their sad history, resulting in Temple Down. But Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90 promised a FUTURE. So, Daniel begins verse 15, still referencing that FUTURE part of both past chapters, in the METER. And that same meter is explictly used by Gabriel in Daniel 9:24-27. To GRANT what Daniel asked via his accounting meter. God's answer is metered, too, and the meter is also reflected in the explicit numbers stated (i.e., 49).

They are real numbers for real time, not symbolic. Because, the meter is an ACCOUNTING. Accounting, for TIME. Past, future, anytime.

Preterism is toast. Harold Camping's Black-Widow timelines are toast. This is REAL Bible and any dufus can count the syllables. Which, Daniel had to learn as a child, since he was taken to Babylon while still a TEENAGER. Heh.

1st Moral of the Story: Ain't the Bible grand? Wouldn't it be a pity if you could only learn it in English?

2nd Moral of the Story, as shown in Camping's Failure video: the more boring the Bible text, the more exciting its real meaning. But you have to pay attention. Daniel 9, for example, sounds churchy and boring in English. A canned, repetitive, prayer. Guess again! He meters each line to real past history, ties each meter at specific points to specific sections in Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90. So guess what? WE KNOW WHEN DANIEL 9 was WRITTEN. And it wasn't in 164BC, honey. It was early in 538BC. For the meter first has a DATELINE. As you will see, from the Word doc, above.

Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14 has the same meter function, for beginning in HIS verse 15, Paul apes Daniel's prayer! So just as Daniel did IN his prayer, Paul SETS UP his NON-metered prayer WITH meter. For he already has the answer. :) In other words, Ephesians 1:15-23 is a RESPONSE to the answer, a kind of doxology. So the prayer isn't metered, but the setup IS.

Yeah, baby: a few syllables' likeness between two texts, you can call coincidence. But not a consecutive tracking to 476 of them, referencing the CONTENT of the other passage, each time. :)

Next up, Ps90 23hi video. Sadly, the one-hour video tanked. Have to remake it to fit the audio, what a pain. Hope the above draft doc will help you, the meanwhile.


1Ps90 God Mirrors Time: Psalm 90 Intro 1 & Hebrew Meter Threading

Mirroring. Restitution. Time plays, and is REIMBURSED. Like, you would pay money. Only God can do this, of course. Moses prayed that He would, in Psalm 90:15. So this series is about How Mirroring Works, and is very technical, spending a lot of time demonstrating the Hebrew Meter.

New series on how Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter, which outlines history from 712BC to Messiah — hence a pre-Tribulation Rapture — is sourced in Psalm 90. For Moses asked that God MIRROR BACK Time to Israel, in Ps90:15. So Isaiah keys off Psalm 90 to construct Isaiah 53; Daniel 9 keys off Isaiah. So to correctly read Daniel 9, read Psalm 90 & Isaiah 53's HEBREW METER.

Meter acts as a FUTURE calendar; just as you need to know in January when December comes, so Israel had to know her SCHEDULE. Hence meter conveys that schedule.

Israel had the Word in the original text — but safely in the Temple. So the Law was, Israel would get the Word READ to her every 7 years: she was to memorize & pass it on to her children.

So the Hebrew would have to be memorable, so that the Israelites could practice it all day long. Meter makes it memorable.

So they would be reminded of their FUTURE when Psalm 90 & Isa53 were recited. Ps90 is crafted in 350 syllables & in 'paragraphs' divisible by 7, to forecast from the time Moses dies in 1400 BC, to the start of the human kings (due to Rejection of God as King, 1050BC). Paul references this accounting in Acts 13:20-21.

Back in 712BC, Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter gave the Jews an UPDATED future calendar, since David had died & they knew exactly when Messiah would come.

So Isaiah uses the SAME methodology as Moses. Thus Isaiah 53's metering scheme 'answers' in both meter & content, each verse in Psalm 90, per its verse 15 prayer for such MIRRORED grants.

Daniel 9 is the final update pre-Messiah.

Christendom does not know this doctrine. But you can prove it via Psalm 90 & Isaiah 53.

This is NOT Bible Codes. Rather, It's vital Bible Doctrine you can't learn from any translation. People would stop disputing Rapture, Trib, Millennium if they saw how the meter is used.


2Ps90 God Mirrors Time: Psalm 90 Hebrew Meter Threading Intro 2a

Overview of how Psalm 90's Hebrew Meter is constructed, and why it's prophetic. Isaiah 53 keys off Psalm 90's rhetorical style. The numbers all have doctrinal meanings, Bible teaching metaphors all scholars (Jewish or Christian) know.


3Ps90 God Mirrors Time: Psalm 90 Hebrew Meter Threading Intro 2b

Overview of how Psalm 90's Hebrew Meter is constructed, and why it's prophetic. Isaiah 53 keys off Psalm 90's rhetorical style. THIS IS NOT BIBLE CODES.


4Ps90 1/6, God Mirrors Time: Psalm 90 Hebrew Meter Threading

Features of Moses' Psalm 90 Hebrew meter which depict BIBLE DOCTRINE (not Bible Codes, lol), and how Isaiah 53's Hebrew meter keys off the Psalm 90 rhetorical style.

The primary doctrines communicated metrically have to do with Israel's calendar and prophecy "years" meanings: 56 represented the Harvesting of the Gentiles (because in Jewish time the 'day' begins piggybacked on the prior evening), and 70 represented how the sabbatical years literally BUY a 50-year evangelical 'voting' period for the world (math of this is covered in #9 of my TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc and is quite shocking).

So when Moses uses 56 and 70 syllable 'paragraphs' THREE TIMES (3 denotes Trinity), Isaiah also will do the same thing. The opening 84 syllables in Psalm 90 are the Decree for Messiah, which is 70+14, with the 14 representing the TWO seven year periods that Israel will reject her king, first David and Last David. As these are LOSS years, they will be mirrored back to her (analogous to Pharaoh's dream), in the yet-future Tribulation and in 64-70AD, respectively. So you're introduced to that numeracy, in Episodes 1-2 of this series.


6Ps90 3a/6, God Mirrors Time: Psalm 90 and Isa53 Threading

Episodes 3a-5c walk you through how Isaiah uses Moses' Psalm 90 keywords, to 'answer' them — demonstrate God's fulfillment. It's shocking, phenomenal. This is a vital rhetorical technique pan-Bible for establishing that a new piece of claimed Divine Writ (here, Isaiah 53, compared to Psalm 90) is truly from God. I call this technique "threading", and you'll find it explained in more detail within my Isaiah 53 Exegesis playlist.

Threading is done by every Bible writer, and from it you know when one book was written compared to another. It's the JOB of the new writer to thread through the themes of ALL prior Bible books into his new one. By doing that, he proves a valid witness from God. Hence you should find in John's letters and Revelation, ALL of the prior Scripture (and you do), since Genesis.

This helps you separate false from true, as well. False verses, false interpretations, etc. For always the Scripture interprets itself. Your job, is to 'listen'. So listen to how Isaiah threads from Moses, in Episodes 3a-5c, and you'll become adept at seeing the threading in other Bible books as you study them. Worth it!


13Ps90 6/6, God Mirrors Time: Proof of the TWO Trib 'sevens'

Dramatic Series Conclusion. Accounting for the TWO Tribulational sevens shown from Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9: 1) the civil war to establish the first David, and 2) Israel's too-early rejection of the Last David When He Came. The latter 'seven' played 64-70AD. The first seven, due since 1010BC, hasn't been 'repaid' yet, and is called "tribulation". Rapture must kick it off, as Church is Not Israel. Trib belongs to the Jews, not us.

Bible plays on "14", from Pharaoh's dream, forward. Here, we focus on the ORIGIN of both 'sevens': Israel's reaction against God. Moses forecast it in Psalm 90, which Isaiah 53 and then Daniel 9, update. Downloads for the video's Hebrew Meter in Psalm 90 and Isa53: Psalm90inHebrew.doc and Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.JPG.

Two Sevens depict The Building of Two Davids. David was age 77 when he died (1Kings 6:1). Christ, the Last David, is the 77th son from Adam (Luke 3). Isaiah thus crafts the Divine Decree of Last David, using 77 syllables (Isa52:13-15). Moses uses 84 syllables in Psalm 90 (verses 1-4), warning the Hebrew reader not to rebel. But Isaiah 52:13-15 debits 7 syllables to update Israel's account, for having rebelled against the first David; the second seven remains reserved, for the yet-future Last David.

For when God gave Israel the Law through Moses, He also gave her a SCHEDULE for Time. Its End — what we moderns call "the Millennium" — was the 4200th year from Adam's fall, the fourth 1050 civilization time unit (Mirroring.htm explains why). The final and fifth 1050 would be ruled by God Himself as God-Man, aka "Messiah", aka "Adonai Elohenu, Adonai ECHAD" in the witty Hebrew of Deut 6:4. Hence Messiah's death was scheduled for precisely 57 years BEFORE the 4200th year. (See PassPlot.htm and #9 of TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc). That 57 years was a 'budget' for 'harvesting' the Gentiles, the greatest period of evangelism in (our yet-future) history.

To remind Israel of this schedule, God gave Moses a calendar which 'answers' Psalm 90:15. This calendar, like everything else He gave Israel, was set up in 'mirrors'; that is, equal values which play contingent on, and opposite to, each other. Thus mirroring God-man, the Messiah.

This calendar depicted the play of time to the End Of Time, as well as depicting the course of a year. Passover Week reminded Israel that God would take on Humanity and pay for sins, just as they were daily reminded by the Levitical Offerings. Booths would be His Second Advent, coming at the End of Time to save Israel. Piggybacked on the LAST day of Passover (Numbers 28:24-26) was "FirstFruits", the day Messiah Rises from the Dead: so you next counted 50 days, to recall 'harvesting the Gentiles'. Ergo the entire 57-year period, is subsumed by Passover through Pentecost, spanning 56 solar days: Jewish 'day' piggybacks on the SUNDOWN of the day prior.

To further remind Israel of her calendar, Moses and the prophets use Hebrew meter constructed in 'paragraphs' which play off the key numbers in the Law. Thus when Israel memorized the Law, the meter would remind her where she was on God's Calendar for Time. Meter was a handy way to test memory, too.

So Moses' Psalm 90, a prayer about Time, uses Hebrew meter to count down to the 1st David; thus Israel would know when to expect Him. From there, you were to count 1000 years, and then Messiah would be born — if Israel remained faithful. (Paul recaps this in Acts 13:20-23, as her Bank Account of Time. See also Gal 4:4.)

She didn't. So her unfaithfulness extended Time beyond the original Mosaic Schedule; so would God become Messiah despite her rebellion? Isaiah 53 updates Psalm 90 to show Messiah would still finish ON TIME, by playing off Moses' meter and keywords, as highlighted in video Episodes 1-5c. So when Israel memorized Isaiah 53 (begins at 'our' Isa52:13), she'd know by the meter as well as the words, to TRAIN as a priest NATION for His Advent, and meanwhile be a light to the Gentiles. Daniel 9 updates Isaiah 53.

Thus the origin of the two 'sevens', is as follows: the "Tribulation" reimburses/mirrors the seven years of civil war to establish the first David as King of All Israel. 2nd seven? Israel rejected Christ when He came: so He dies seven years early, to SAVE TIME. Now you know why Church had to be inserted.

That second 'seven' was 'paid' from 64-70AD, thus leaving the first one, still 'owed'. So Tribulation is literal, future, and owed TO ISRAEL since David's time; hence Church 'dies' (aka Rapture) to kick it off, Hebrews 11:40.


14Ps90 1/5 Psalm 90 Epilogue: Moses counts to Millennium

Shocking Proof in sabbatical-year clothing of the original countdown to the Millennium, had there been no Church. You can't understand the Legal Precedence for the pre-Tribulation Rapture until you know the original schedule under which Israel operated. That schedule was written out in metrical format by Moses to act as a mnemonic, so that Israel could number her days (Psalm 90:12). Every time she sang the Psalm, she was to locate where she was then currently in time, so could number her days to what we call the 2nd Advent.

It was scheduled for 94AD. Moses proves this by using a sabbatical-year accounting system which begins with Adam's Fall. Sadly, the Jews have forgotten this system, and Christendom never learned it. IF you learn it, you'll know the pre-Israel legal precedence for the sabbatical years and God's Judgement in Jeremiah 25:12, 29:10-11, and Dan 9:2. For the sabbatical years represent God's construct for Time: 490 70 490=1000 50, hence Millennium is DEPENDENT on those 70 years all being VOTED.

Actual Bible history shows that during each 70-year period, someone voted: first believers, then Noah, then Moses and then Israel. The five videos in this series thus compare the repeated 70-syllable meter in Psalm 90, to Bible's historical account from Adam; thus you can see the impact of voting. Minor meter and historical observation corrections were made, in the 10e GGS videos, starting here: • GGS10e1 God and Adam vote in Psalm 90...

The voting principles are summarized in #9 of TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc. The worksheet you see in the video can be downloaded from GeneYrs.xls and has a link to the foregoing 'TenWays' doc . The principles of God's Accounting for Time are panoramically explained with many Bible citations, in Mirroring.htm. Psalm 90 in Hebrew, Meter (shown in video) Psalm90inHebrew.doc

Voting. For God. Else Time Ends. Same Legal Precedence as for the Church's Rapture, Hebrews 11:39-40, 1Peter 3:12, Eph3:15-19, 4:13, Romans 11:25, Eph 1:10. For the Bride gets something old (voting precedence), something new (covenant kata Melchizedek), something borrowed (Time Rules pre-Israel), and something Royal Blue (Christ's Own Spiritual Life). Church is NOT Israel. For Israel's own time, had run out — just as Psalm 90 and later Isaiah 53 Daniel 9, long predicted.

Hence TWO Tribulational sevens, the first playing 64-70AD, and the second yet reserved to play post-Church: Daniel's 70th week. All reserved since eternity past, just as Moses reserves the 14 extra syllables in the 'Decree' section of Psalm 90:1-4.

Tags: 2LT Rapture Tribulation Millennium Bible Hebrew Meter Covenant Dispensation pre-Trib Judaism Enoch Jubilees Rambam 1050 490 Daniel9 Isaiah53 sabbatical years How God Orchestrates Time Pentecost Passover Church Gentiles Jews 2nd Advent 1st Revelation prophecy


17Ps90 4/5 Psalm 90 Epilogue: Moses counts to Millennium

Two 2100-year long 'houses' of believers, Gentiles and Jews: that was the original Plan for Time, as Moses recounts in Psalm 90. So here in Parts 4 and 5, you'll see the reconciliation of the resulting TWO Tribulational sevens from Moses through Daniel, showing God's Sabbatical Voting Accounts for Time from first to Last Adam (pre-Church initial schedule). A summary of the Sabbatical Voting Rules is in #9 of TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc.

The Word doc was written prior to knowing Psalm 90's use of the Voting Periods, but the rules are the same. I learned the rules from Daniel 9 five years ago, as a result of asking God what my pastor meant when he taught (for decades!) that God uses Believers To Buy Time.

Christendom does not know this doctrine, and the Jews forgot it: God balances Time, like you do your checkbook.

That's why the Rapture is pre-Trib; it's no trip to Disneyland, but something a believer should FEAR, just as the NT writers warned (i.e., Heb2:1ff, 10:31-39)! Worse than death, to not be ready when the Rapture comes, which NO ONE can predict, because SINCE ADAM, time has always been predicated on VOTING TO KNOW GOD.


19Ps90 Psalm 90:1-7 Hebrew-Metered, English Translation

Due to the same meter in Eph1:3-14, I correct my parsing of Ps90's Hebrew meter and greatly expand the download docs; plus here begins the promised English translation using the metered Hebrew. Video also explains why the translation sometimes differs from published Bibles. Issued in tandem with the 10e GGS videos.

The latter introduces Paul's use of the Hebrew meter but with Greek words, to show the Bible's doctrine of dispensations (which somewhat differs from Judaism or Christianity). Side benefit: Scholars debate Bible Hebrew Meter and Dispensations. Psalm 90 sets a rhetorical standard which all Bible writers follow, thus proving Dispensations, how to read Bible dates, how to read Revelation, etc.

What's great about this meter: a) it's simple enough to prove if you got it right or wrong, and b) its 'flow' pattern is complex enough to catch your errors. For example, if you miscount syllables, you'll see a disjunctive pattern from verse to verse, and you'll know you're off, somewhere. Bible pattern is palindromic and nested, so it's easy to find the verse where you're 'off'.

Example: 7-7-8-7-8-9-6-9 has a 787 adding up to 15 in two directions. 9 and 6 also add up to 15 in two directions. So if you had 3-7-8-7 etc., you know your '3' isn't right.

Of course, you also test for content. There are many elements in testing; it's like a puzzle where every piece fits. If no fit, you can tell where to correct. There will be several dozen convergences in meaning, doctrine, wordplay, meter, etc. so there are a variety of 'criteria' to satisfy, to prove the entire answer. These criteria all stick out. Even a brainout can find the fit, via 1John1:9 and ASKING GOD. :)


CA Sign in 0:00 / 31:58 20Ps90 Psalm 90:8-11 Hebrew-Metered, English Translation

Continued from 19Ps90 . Translation explanation finishes up the Adamic Voting Window Testimony in verse 8, and next shows the Noahic Voting Period Testimony in verses 9-11. Note again how pregnant are the keywords in wordplay, identifying the periods. Awesome stuff, untranslatable!


20Ps90 Psalm 90:8-11 Hebrew-Metered, English Translation

Continued from 20Ps90, this time on Moses' own Vote. All Bible writers, especially Isaiah, will play on the EQUATING prayer of Psalm 90:15, and BY METER, including Paul's own writing in Eph1:3-14. The next video, 22Ps90, will graphically show how Isaiah 53 patterns his meter exactly to Moses, here.

Then when I cover Paul's in the 10e10 GGS series, you'll see just how exactly, he tracks to BOTH Isaiah and Moses, simultaneously. That way you can go on your own journey in the Bible to find other passages.

Then you'll know that those who claim Israel is her own savior, can't read Hebrew. Then you'll know that those who are preterists, can't read Bible. Carnality renders one blind. So use 1John1:9, to avoid their blindness!


22Ps90 Psalm 90:16-17 Hebrew-Metered, English Trans and Mystery 56

Continued from 21 Ps90. Verses 16-17 cover the post-Purim voting period, basis for Isaiah 53:9-11 and Daniel 9:24-25, and finally Ephesians 1:3-4a. Paul will use the '56' as an Anno Domini date, so it's vital to analyze the 56; this is done during the first 20 minutes. Metered translation occupies the last 10 minutes: so just skip to that, if you don't care about the 56.


22aPs90 Psalm 90's Palindromic Meter Map

Cont. from 22Ps90. Revolutionary stuff. Use to spot other Bible passages using the same meter. For Jews had to memorize Scripture orally; hence meter patterns are important, and convey doctrines. They also serve to index a passage in memory. That's one reason the NT quotes of OT are so quick. Just a few keywords of the passage are needed. In special passages like Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, the meter is also used to show the DOCTRINAL interrelationship.

So this video displays the precedenting pattern, so you can see what Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, and Eph1:3-14 address in Psalm 90, the Play of Time. It's probable that the Psalm 90 patterns call attention to pre-Israel precedents, but I've not yet analyzed what they are. Palindromic meter math follows below. I probably missed some combinations, so let me know if you find more.

Download the video picture here, either as Psalm90Palindromes.tif (small file) or Psalm90Palindromes.pdf (1MB file).

By the way, this type of metrical pattern is also a feature of other ancient cultures' writing, but Bible's isn't mystical. Scholars dismiss Bible meter in order to dismiss the other cultures' mystical use of meter. This prejudice has hampered scholarship for over 300 years. See the end of BibleHebrewMeter.htm; read the scholars linked for yourself, in their own words.


23Ps90 Daniel's Prayer Meter proves Preterism, poop toast!

How embarrassing, that preterists can't count syllables. For God's answer in Daniel 9:24-25, is METERED based on the number of syllables in Psalm 90:1-3 (the DECREE, matched by the DECREE in Dan 9:24 by GOD, not a freakin' human king)! And, by the number of syllables DANIEL uses in his prayer. So the 49 and the 62 are literal exact answers to the ACCOUNTING Daniel uses in his prayer, as you'll see in this video; which accounting, is based on Isaiah 53's meter, tracking it; just as, Isaiah 53's meter is based on Psalm 90's.

Paul will then track to all three OT passages, in Ephesians 1:3-14. Because Paul is counting the syllables. Sadly, the preterists are not.

Preview of coming attractions: Daniel's 742-syllable prayer is exactly 252 more than 490; 252 syllables are in ellipsis in Isaiah 53 between Isa52:15 and 53:1 to balance to years from David's birth to when Isaiah writes (a kind of fast-forward often used in metered Hebrew). 742 is also the SUM of 252+364+126; the middle number is the number of years the Temple was standing, and is in ellipsis between Isa53:10 and 11. So Daniel asks for reimbursement, invoking Psalm 90:15 and Isaiah 53's accounting, precedented on the FLOOD, minus the 50 years for harvesting the Gentiles, since that's NOT Jewish 'time'! How so? Well, 266 SEVENS plus 50, are the number of years from the FLOOD, to when Daniel says 'now', in 538BC! Same convention of sevening as Moses used!

Wow. Amazing what you can learn if you just count syllables!

Oh: and Daniel's 476 subtotal (which you'll see in the video) is exactly 14 MORE than Isaiah 53's debit (476-462 in Isa53). Heh: Daniel wants those 14 credited. Yeah, and God does it, in Daniel 9:25's 62 weeks plus Dan 9:27!

252 is also equal to the TWO 126's which Isaiah explictly counts (see my 2-minute Isaiah 53 videos at the beginning of the Psalm 90 playlist). So Daniel's counting BEYOND the time allotment asking for the PURPOSE of the Davidic time to be fulfilled. Paul will pick up on that in Eph 1:3-14, and I'll show how, in 11 GGS (not yet posted).

Dispies got egg on their face too, even though God vindicates pre-Trib Rapture via the meter. For Dispies use lunar years due to the mistaken Jewish practice, rather than using God's SOLAR calendar in Exodus 12 and codified under David in 1Chron 24 (the priestly courses can't have equal time if based on a lunar calendar, hint hint). For, God only accounts by BIRTHDAYS: you can't get the anniversary right if you don't 'stay solar'! Ooops. (Intra-year 'drift' always yields the exact same anniversary on the same day number, so long as the calendar begins anew on EACH vernal equinox, so you don't have to intercalate days until Adar.)

Still, pre-Trib Dispies get even more proof via Psalm 90 forward, of a dispensation-tracking rhetorical style in Bible, which also vindicates what the Jews still sorta know as the 'times', aka Dispensations. All ya gotta do, is learn to COUNT THE SYLLABLES, and you'll see it for yourself! Even a 5-year-old Jewish kid, learns to do that!

To continue in this series, go to my 10e9-13 GGS for this Four Act Play which Moses 'started' and Revelation will end, tying back to Paul. Those videos will be posted the week of January 18, usually one per day.

If you're not familiar with Book of Daniel, I did extensive audio links in the vid description to my 10a1 YMH video. Episode 10 of the YMH (Yapping Most High) series is also about Jewish Dispensationalism, and ties to 10 GGS series. Sorry, but the doctrine is long and complex .. and awesome.


23aPs90 How Paul Indexes Hebrew Meter in Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9

Revolutionizes hermeneutics, kills preterism, vaporizes KJVO: Hebrew meter is used by Paul (in Ephesians 1:3-14) and hence other NT writers — as an INDEXING DEVICE to OT passages; thus you can better interpret what the writer, writes. This same device was used in the OT, since Scripture was memorized aurally and orally, so people COUNTED SYLLABLES to be sure of correct memorization, recitation, etc. So these same syllable counts are used to INDEX passages of Scripture, as well as convey doctrinally-pregnant meanings.

Thus the next 9-18 videos will show Daniel 9's content and meter, so you can better understand how Paul is 'playing Daniel' in Ephesians. That's the rhetorical setting for his epistle. The idea is that the TEMPLE (Christ) is DOWN so must be built. So in Eph1:15-23, Paul emulates Daniel's prayer; that's why he talks about height width depth length; that's why Eph 2 is about a TEMPLE.

Yeah, and so is Paul's other other rhetorical setting, about a Temple; for Paul also patterns Ephesians around a famous Greek myth about the origin of the Greek sea peoples, memorialized in a famous play called 'Ion' by Euripides. You can find it in Greek or in translation at Perseus or other places online. Suggest you read it carefully.

To see how Isaiah 53 uses meter as a future calendar tracking Manasseh, start at Episode 10s6 of my YMH (Yapping Most High) series. That series is not yet complete, as I've not finished mapping all the events Isaiah tracks.


23bPs90 Hebrew Meter As Dateline, Chronology, Concordance

Bible's Meter is gorgeous, vital to eschatology and other hermeneutics, textual criticism; it cannot be translated. So this video begins a comprehensive review of Bible Hebrew Meter usage. This video ties to 10e9c1, 10e9c2, and 10e9d1 in my GGS series, but this Episode 23 series in Psalm 90 playlist, will specialize in the Hebrew Meter, itself.

There are at least three ways Bible Hebrew meter is used in Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, and Ephesians 1:3-14:

  1. TIMESTAMP/DATELINE (covered in this video and in 10e9 GGS series): first 'paragraph' whose syllables are divisible by seven, functions as a dateline telling you WHEN the author writes. Sometimes (as in Daniel 9), there is a second paragraph that functions as a dateline. The dateline will also employ EQUIDISTANCE between two well-known events, in order to certify the date of writing.
  2. CHRONOLOGY (started in this video): the meter functions as an annual calendar of history (future or past or both). This chronology might function on TWO tracks, as in Psalm 90: a) panoramic, for all (or very large sections) of history; if so, time segments that stand for larger units, become the meter basis (i.e., '70' standing for the entire 1050 unit, as in Psalm 90). Next, b) the chronology is annual, with or without years in ellipsis. Future videos will focus on this technique in Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9. Thus you will be enabled to spot the same technique in other Bible passages. Then you will see that preterism is false, and any eschatological position OTHER THAN pre-Trib Rapture, is likewise false.

    3. For the chronology shows Bible keeps track of differing Dispensations (i.e., measuring time from specific epochs and covenants belonging to them). Meter is not the only method used; hundreds of Bible verses expressly differentiate one covenantal period from another. Still, the timing of those different periods is underscored and plotted BY the meter, as well.

  3. CONCORDANCE/CROSS-REFERENCE: when a paragraph's meter is divisible by 7, the number it doctrinally represents EITHER in aggregate sum, or in that paragraph, POINTS BACK at a previous passage of related meaning which has the same meter or aggregate syllable count. The point-back content will tie with keywords or key concepts; it will 'answer' or 'elaborate' on the other passage. Future videos will focus on this technique in Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, and Ephesians 1:3-14. Thus you will be able to spot the same technique in other Bible passages.

I could also classify them as six ways, since there are two subcategories of usage in each of the three main categories above. In this and following videos, I'll classify them in detail so you can decide whether to call the above '3' or '6'. I haven't finished learning the classification system, obviously. Many more Bible passages must be tested to derive a comprehensive classification system. However, these videos prove such a system EXISTS, and is yet unknown to Christendom.


23cPs90 Hebrew Meter As Chronology, cont.

Continued from 23b Ps90, on the 2nd usage of Hebrew Meter as a chronology; here, how the dual-entendre nature of Isaiah 53's text acts as an annual chronology of future history from Hezekiah forward, since the theme of Isaiah 53 is First David's Birth to Last David's death. This topic will continue all the way through 23g.

In 23h we'll see how the writer 'tags' a previous passage by recourse to syllable counts; but its video portion crashed, so I can't remake it until December 2011.


23dePs90 Hebrew Meter As Chronology, cont.

Continued from 23c, still tracking Isaiah 53's annual future chronology of Israel's history, showing the dual-entendre nature of the text which Daniel 9 will keep on referencing from Daniel 9:4-14. So the Daniel 9 ties are now introduced. (You can't yet download the Ps90Isa53DAn9Eph1.doc shown in the video. It will become available in a few weeks.)


23fPs90 Hebrew Meter As Chronology, cont.

23f and g are now (at last!) posted, thank you for your patience! With them we close demonstration #2, use of Hebrew Meter as Chronology, pending a full-fleged analysis of Daniel 9 in later videos. A shorter version of the way Isaiah plots Time is now in the 2nd video of this Psalm90 playlist (my 2008 version, uploaded from glitchy bliptv). Here's the Youtube link to it: • Isaiah 53's Meter Plots History to Me...

So here we finish a longer tracking Isaiah 53's annual future chronology of Israel's history, showing the dual-entendre nature of the text which Daniel 9 references in Daniel 9:4-14. (You can't yet download the Ps90Isa53DAn9Eph1.doc . It will become available in a few weeks.)

TAGGING will be the next demonstration, #3, in 23hi Ps90, as soon as I can reconstruct the video portion (computer crashed, leaving only the audio intact). The 3rd-18th videos in the Psalm 90 playlist also cover content ties between the two chapters, if you can't wait.


23gPs90 Hebrew Meter As Chronology, conclusion

Next video (23hi, to be posted in December 2012 owing to video crash) will cover TAGGING, the 3rd rhetorical technique of Hebrew Meter in Bible, which Daniel and Paul alike use. This 23g finishes up from 23f, tracking Isaiah 53's dual-entendre for Daniel 9:4-14.

NOTE: I've now made separate playlists of 'GGS Episode 10' and 'YMH Episode 10'. I will also embed those playlists in Mirroring.htm and in BibleHebrewMeter.htm.

A much longer version showing how Isaiah ties his Chapter 53 content to Moses will be in 23hi Ps90, as soon as I can reconstruct the video portion (computer crashed, leaving only the audio intact). The 3rd-18th videos in the Psalm 90 playlist also cover content ties between the two chapters, if you can't wait.


24Ps90 God Trinity-Meters Double Tribulation in Daniel 9:24-27

God's reply to Daniel plays off Daniel's meter, tagging it and Psalm 90, Isaiah 53 Decree sections, thus resolving WHO decreed the Rebuilding of Jerusalem, and other corrections which have long baffled scholars.

For example, '63' is the number of God's Decree, used by Psalm 90:1-3's meter, and repeated with update — but still at 63 syllables — in Isaiah 53:9+10 OR 10+11. When you see the text, you'll notice in each section God is talking. So too, here: the meter of Daniel 9:24, is 63 syllables. Thus you know Who makes the Rebuild-Jerusalem decree, in Daniel 9:25: God, no human king. A decree which matches real then-future, history.

Bible is self-auditing. If you make a mistake, it won't balance. Scholars can't make Daniel 9 balance, so invent all kinds of wacky justifications, i.e., lunar years, claiming His Entry into Jerusalem rather than the TEXT telling you Crucifixion — completes the 62 weeks. Text says the 62 weeks isn't completed until the TEMPLE goes down. Oh well.

Here, you'll see me also make stupid mistakes and how the Bible's self-auditing process, corrected them — alongside the vibrant John 14:26 'reminder' function — all in one very long video. Very short doc was used for it: Dan924HebParsed.pdf

Daniel's prayer meter is extensively covered here (now with a new chronology chart): DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf

Master document with all related links, is Ephesians1REPARSED.doc, for Paul uses God's Meter, to craft Eph1:3-14.

Along the way, you'll see how God via Gabriel, uses Trinity and Hypostatic Meter to convey number-metaphor Doctrines underlying the explicit text. The doctrinal meanings of numbers are well known in theology. So via recourse to meter, one quickly has proof that a) there are TWO tribulational sevens, not one; b) NO human king decrees the rebuilding of Jerusalem, but instead, God; c) how to measure the time listed in the explicit text of Daniel 9:24-27, i.e., there is an interval of 140 years Decreed between Temple Down in 586BC and when Jerusalem is rebuilt; there is a 50 year hiatus between Daniel 9:26 and 9:27; d) the Daniel 9:27 piece is to PAY BACK the too-early maturation of Abraham, and e) HOW LONG it will take for the second Temple to go down. To the very day.

The above two-page Dan924 doc has more spectacular Trinity stuff about the numbers than I knew when making this video. Just learned it now while awaiting the upload.

23hi Ps90 video is still under reconstruction; but meanwhile, this vid helps you see the structure of the former's content.

This video ties to the 10GGS series.


Royal Family of God

An archive & consolidation of brainout's YouTube and Vimeo videos. The descriptions are preserved on the pages along with remastered and consolidated videos.


Royal Family of God due to Christ's Royalty:

aka, the New Covenant provided Church
(which is distinct from Israel's)

I provide these Word searches without spin. Read the Book of Hebrews many times over and over again, in your favorite translation. It is mistranslated, but if you keep reading it over and over you'll still get the drift. Keep using 1John1:9 as you read it, and the Spirit will point out the mistranslations so you know when to look up specific verses in e-sword, the internet, etc. There are also pastors teaching this around the world, some from centuries ago. Just search on 'crowns doctrine', 'doctrine of crowns', 'crowns verses', etc. The doctrine gets too little attention, today.

Hebrews is the flagship book on our Royal Position due to Christ winning against Satan, based on these key passages: Isaiah 53:10-12 (well the whole chapter); Psalm 110; Jeremiah 31. You'll see these passages referenced over and over as the writer develops his points. Track the flow of what he says. Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge or a good study Bible with many chain references is important to use as a study guide. Pick one you like.

This is a Dispensational doctrine, but Bible's definition of Dispensations isn't like what's commonly taught. A 'dispensation' is strictly the TIME PERIOD over which a given covenant is operative. Each covenant has certain common features, and certain features which change, and all features are relative to the Angelic Conflict. I tried to summarize the features panoramically in LordvSatan2.htm#CovProps. The description is long and heavy and is a synthesis of all the research I did, so it doesn't wholly disagree or agree with anything else you've heard. I'll have to rewrite it, but the panoramic picture is helpful for brainstorming, even as is.

A longer vetting of this doctrine because it bothers me, begins in LordvSatan3.htm. It bothers me because I don't want the responsibility, but I'm wrong, and Bible is right. Therefore you know in what follows below, I'm not trying to sell you anything. Just documenting. What you do with the information is between God and you.

Crowns keyword: 1 Co. 9:25; Phil. 4:1; 1 Thess. 2:19; 2 Tim. 2:5; 4:8; Heb. 2:7; Jas. 1:12; 1 Pet. 5:4; Rev. 2:10; 3:11; 6:2; 12:1; 14:14

Inheritance keyword (even the seemingly-irrelevant ones are parables about post-salv inheritance): Matt. 5:4; 21:38; 25:34; Mk. 12:7; Lk. 12:13; 15:13; 20:14; Jn. 13:8; Acts 7:5; 13:19; 20:32; 26:18; Rom. 4:14; Gal. 3:18; 4:30; Eph. 1:11, 14, 18; 3:6; 5:5; Col. 1:12; 3:24; Heb. 1:2, 4, 14; 9:15; 11:8; 12:16; 1 Pet. 1:4

'True Riches' verses (also look up synonyms), selection from NT: Lk. 16:11; 18:24; Rom. 2:4; 9:23; 10:12; 11:12, 33; 2 Co. 8:2; Eph. 1:7, 18; 2:7; 3:8, 16; Phil. 4:19; Col. 1:27; 2:2; 1 Tim. 6:17; Heb. 11:26; Jas. 5:2; Rev. 5:12; 18:14, 16f . There are many more, but terms vary.

Promise keyword (it has a special meaning in the NT, upgrade on OT meaning, and particular to Church, beginning in Romans, Greek epaggelia): Matt. 5:37; 20:21; 23:39; Lk. 1:45, 54f; 13:35; 18:8; 24:49; Acts 1:4; 2:33, 39; 7:5, 17; 13:23, 32f; 23:21; 26:6f; Rom. 4:13f, 16, 18, 20; 9:6, 8f, 16; Gal. 3:14, 16ff, 22, 29; 4:23, 28f; Eph. 1:13; 2:12; 3:6; 6:2f; 1 Tim. 4:8; 5:12; 2 Tim. 1:1; Tit. 1:2; Heb. 4:1; 6:13, 15, 17f; 7:28; 9:15; 10:23, 36; 11:9, 11, 39; 12:26; Jas. 1:12; 2 Pet. 2:19; 3:4, 9, 13; 1 Jn. 2:25

Entrusted keyword (Greek means a deposit, something left in your care, but is variantly translated in English): Matt. 5:4; 21:38; 25:34; Mk. 12:7; Lk. 12:13; 15:13; 20:14; Jn. 13:8; Acts 7:5; 13:19; 20:32; 26:18; Rom. 4:14; Gal. 3:18; 4:30; Eph. 1:11, 14, 18; 3:6; 5:5; Col. 1:12; 3:24; Heb. 1:2, 4, 14; 9:15; 11:8; 12:16; 1 Pet. 1:4

Share keyword (root idea is we share in Christ, so it comes to mean one's share of the inheritance in Him, and from there, sharing with others): Matt. 21:34, 41; 25:21, 23; Mk. 12:2; Lk. 3:11; 12:13; 14:1, 15; 15:12; 17:22; 20:10; 22:17; 23:34; Jn. 4:9; 13:8; 17:13; 19:23; Acts 1:17, 25; 8:21; 15:38; 26:7, 18; Rom. 1:11; 4:16; 6:8; 8:17, 21; 11:12, 17, 31; 12:8, 13, 15; 15:26f; 1 Co. 3:9; 4:8; 6:9f; 7:25; 9:4, 10, 12f, 22f; 10:17f, 20f; 12:26; 2 Co. 1:5, 7; 2:3; 4:10; 6:15; 8:4, 6, 14; 9:8; Gal. 1:6; 3:9; 4:30; 6:2, 6; Eph. 3:6; 4:16, 28; Phil. 1:7, 26; 2:17f; 3:10; 4:14; Col. 1:12, 24, 27; 2:10; 3:4; 1 Thess. 2:8, 12; 2 Thess. 2:14; 1 Tim. 5:22; 6:18; 2 Tim. 1:8; 2:3, 6; Tit. 1:4; Heb. 2:14; 3:1, 14; 4:2; 6:4; 11:25; 12:8, 10; 13:3, 16; 1 Pet. 4:9, 13; 5:1, 4; 2 Pet. 1:1, 4; 1 Jn. 1:3, 6f; 4:13; 2 Jn. 1:11; 3 Jn. 1:8; Jude 1:3, 11; Rev. 1:1, 9; 3:20f; 18:4; 20:6; 22:19

Partaker keyword (overlaps with share, above, emphasis on sharing in all): 1 Co. 9:10, 12; 10:17, 21, 30; Heb. 2:14; 5:13; 7:13, Rom. 11:17; 1 Co. 9:23; Phil. 1:7; Rev. 1:9, Lk. 5:7; Heb. 1:9; 3:1, 14; 6:4; 12:8, Matt. 23:30; Lk. 5:10; 1 Co. 10:18, 20; 2 Co. 1:7; 8:23; Phlm. 1:17; Heb. 10:33; 1 Pet. 5:1; 2 Pet. 1:4.

Bible-as-Treasure-Deposit keyword (surprisingly, NIV gets this word right more often, Greek word is paratheke, very important): Matt. 25:27; 27:6; Lk. 12:17f; 19:21ff; 2 Co. 1:22; 5:5; Eph. 1:14; 1 Tim. 6:20; 2 Tim. 1:12, 14.

Then you have the macro inheritance provisions like Ephesians 1, especially 1:15-23, 3:15-19, Eph4:13 (goal of Church maturation), Isa53:12 (basis), which means many more verses tie in, you'll find some on every NT page, but the wording varies.

Use of merizw and Eph4:16's metron merous ('portion' of teaching assigned to a pastor, through whom his congregation grows, idea that it can't grow beyond his own level); tie specifically back to Isa53:12, which uses the term in the LXX. Notice how it ends up having an interesting 'divisive' meaning in the Gospels, too: Matt. 12:25f; Mk. 3:24ff; 6:41; Lk. 12:13; Rom. 12:3; 1 Co. 1:13; 7:17, 34; 2 Co. 10:13; Heb. 7:2, Matt. 7:2; 23:32; Mk. 4:24; Lk. 6:38; Jn. 3:34; Rom. 12:3; 2 Co. 10:13; Eph. 4:7, 13, 16; Rev. 21:15, 17

Use of meros, in NT (usually translated part or portion), showing it's part of a whole: Matt. 2:22; 15:21; 16:13; 24:51; Mk. 8:10; Lk. 11:36; 12:46; 15:12; 24:42; Jn. 13:8; 19:23; 21:6; Acts 2:10; 5:2; 19:1, 27; 20:2; 23:6, 9; Rom. 11:25; 15:15, 24; 1 Co. 11:18; 12:27; 13:9f, 12; 14:27; 2 Co. 1:14; 2:5; 3:10; 9:3; Eph. 4:9, 16; Col. 2:16; Heb. 9:5; Rev. 16:19; 20:6; 21:8; 22:19.

Royal Priesthood verses exclusively referencing Church: 1Pet2:5, 9, Rev1:6, 5:10. But all of Hebrews is on this topic, as you'll see when you get to the climactic chapters 7-10.

Now for some 'spin': root idea here is that since we are unequal, there will always be need of intercession. It isn't just about sin. Christ is perfect yet He prays from His Humanity. Prays for Himself, and for everyone else. So if praying for Himself, even though perfect, the Priestly Office covers issues beyond sin. Idea is God doesn't have to do anything, there is a relationship, and one ASKS.

So after you think over John 17, you'll see how we are Royal Priests in the Royal Priest (theme of Book of Hebrews), and you'll see we have God's Own Power to ask whatever we want in His Name.

Use of 'in My Name', pan-Bible. Verses most relevant to this study are bolded: Deut. 18:19f; 1 Sam. 25:5; Est. 8:8; Ps. 89:24; Isa. 41:25; 65:1; Jer. 14:14f; 23:25; 27:15; 29:9, 21, 23, 25; Zech. 5:4; 13:9; Matt. 18:5, 20; 24:5; Mk. 9:37, 39, 41; 13:6; 16:17; Lk. 9:48; 21:8; Jn. 14:13f, 26; 15:16; 16:23f, 26; 1 Co. 1:15.

New uploads will be ad hoc in 2015, pending resolution of Jude, Mark, Hebrews, and John's meters.. Since this channel's videos are so intertwined with Peter's and Paul's meters, the icons for the subtopics are color-coded. So if a subtopic doesn't interest you, just skip that 'color'.

To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

In case the scattering of my 'RFG' videos drive you crazy, use this channel to see them all in ONE place. The Youtube playlist (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_rSoXEuwxA&list=PL5E39FE2FF6897D30) contains the remaining Episodes. That's confusing, too. So eventually the other videos will be ported here.
=============
Playlist has three related themes:

A. Your ARCHEGOS aka Jesus the Christ, is Royal. So you are, too. This was a theme of my pastor's teaching, for over 50 years. So where is that in Bible? All over the NT, but Book of Hebrews is dedicated to it. Christ, of course, says that very thing, in John 14 (if you know that 'house' isn't talking about a building, but about a Royal upgrade in Isaiah 53:10's contract to make SONS). Aha.

Incomplete summary of Bible backup: RFG.doc (2 pages of related cites).

Hebrews plays off Peter's use of the term 'royal priesthood', to show the change in covenant. Revelation will also play to it, i.e., in Rev 1:6 and 5:10.

B. So the BIBLE's explanation of Hebrews, is folded into this RFG playlist. But not right away, for

C. The CHRONOLOGY of when Hebrews was written, must first be established. It's vital to interpretation, to know WHEN Hebrews was written: for the RAPTURE was 'immediately' expected, as Jerusalem was under seige. If you don't know that, you'll misread the book! Its theme, IS the Rapture's underlying foundation of Christ Won So New Covenant. So, Heb 11:39-40, 'apart from us THEY won't be resurrected'. They, meaning the OT and Trib people. The latter, won't come to EXIST if Church doesn't complete. See? It's key to the whole book!

So the videos begin with simplistic 'overview' material on what 'royal' means, then the Chronology is extensively addressed (again, first simply, then with rigor). To see that chronology, however, ends up providing a lot of insight as to B, what BIBLE says about our Royal Family status.

A full testing of the doctrinal fit of these issues, is here: DueDisclosure.htm. Its 'Diplomatic Brief' intra-page links cover the role of the Angelic Trial on your Royalty in Christ, which itself is a type of hupostasis, your 'position' in Him. Legal and political issue, that. Fought over, by Satan.

The term 'Royal Family of God' is my pastor's. Bible's titles are Royal Priesthood and Kingdom, all of them playing off the royal-house wordplay the Lord used in John 14:2. (He's not talking about physical houses, but Royal family of God branches through Christ, as you'll see in Hebrews 1:3, 3:14, 11:1's Greek, 12:23.)

Do a Web Search on 'angelic conflict', 'crowns doctrine', or 'rewards', or 'spiritual inheritance', 'doctrine of the Kingdom'. Terms vary, but many churches teach some version of this doctrine.

Here's a sample Google search I did on 'angelic conflict'. There's a lot of material available, and you really need to know the Conflict: it's THE way to read the Bible. Amazing how verses all fit together, when you understand the Conflict as the backdrop: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=qsb-win&rlz=1R3GGLL_enUS343US343&q=Angelic+Conflict&start=20&sa=N

Another one, on 'crowns': http://www.google.com/search?client=qsb-win&rlz=1R3GGLL_enUS343&hl=en&q=Kingdom+doctrine+rewards

Wish they taught it more correctly and in more depth. Book of Hebrews, though, outlines it, as the video demonstrates. So go by BIBLE: see ITS explanation, not 'our' denominations.

That's what I'll do in this series, use ONLY Bible. Not, other studies or even my pastor's study. Idea is to furnish independent evidence. If it agrees with someone else, fine. If not, fine. Only after independent study, do I examine what others say. In this series, the viewer is left to do that examination, as he sees fit.

For you are ROYAL, so have all the problems of Royalty — except, the recognition. Just as He had, when down here. It's a very different perspective from what we normally think of as 'Christlike' :)

NOTE: Episodes 5e17 and following, posted from 11/07/13 onward, are in vimeo ( http://www.vimeo.com/channels/petermeter and http://www.vimeo.com/channels/royalfamilyofgod ), not Youtube. For ONLY the latest vimeo postings in the series, see http://www.vimeo.com/channels/latestbrainoutvids . The vimeo videos will be moderated, to block trolls but allow folks to post without having to join Google Plus.

Series will eventually contain exegesis of Book of Hebrews; but so far, focus is only an introduction the TIMING of Book of Hebrews at the same time as Mark's Gospel. Turns out Hebrews patterns its entire outline, ON Mark's Gospel, thus proving that the latest Bible book at time Hebrews was written.

Rest of the series will later go through Hebrews in Greek and in order, to show how the Covenant changed from Israel to Church: TWO WALLS, Eph 2, elaborated. So 'dispensation' only means the applicable PERIOD over which a covenant applies, and Church does NOT take over Israel, nor usurp her. The INSERTION (Romans 11, Matt16:18) of Church Covenant is a BRIDGE to the New Covenant for Israel which will apply at the Millennium, hence the Rapture must precede, Hebrews 11:39-40.

Videos will demonstrate the foregoing, live from the Greek text. Fortunately not a lot of exegesis is needed. Meanwhile, use 1John1:9 and THINK as you read. Pity Christians don't do that, resulting in a lot of unnecessary disputation over the meaning and validity of, the Pre-Trib Rapture. You don't have to be like them. Read the Book of Hebrews over and over even in translation, and you'll see it for yourself. Greek only helps clarify what you'd discern via 1John1:9 and repeated reading in translation.

Why Christians quote Bible

brainout | 14 Nov 2015, 13:16

We're training to be kings. Kings have to be super lawyers. Lawyer means law-giver. Kings determine the rule for the land, in the ancient world, and the King of Kings became the Way the Truth and the Life, Matt 4:4; so we too have to become the Truth by learning Him. So we can be the 'Kings' under The King of...

So we are boring, sorry. Bible is our rule book, and per Romans 14-15 we have to learn to use it in our own lives, determining the rules for our lives, which means talking about those rules, debating and reasoning out those rules.. just like lawyers do. Sorry.

So when we quote Bible to an atheist or non-Christian, like lawyers we are citing LAW to back up our claims. Or, to explain them. Or, to show there is such a LAW. To show there is a God, He wrote This Book, and here's the proof (citation goes here, or quote, or paraphrase). To the atheist or non-Christian, it's not proof. To us, it is.

For the way to find out if God really exists and who He is, you need to look at the ceiling and ask for proof. Book reading after asking, is the fastest and most conclusive way to get it. God Himself witnesses to whatever is true about Him or From Him. So if this Book is about Him and From Him, as you read it, He will make you KNOW that. For sure.

So golly: it's PERSONAL, and DIRECT. So what proves God to 'you' won't be the same phrasing or connections as what proves God to 'me', etc. That's what makes it conclusive, it's EXclusive. So no one can justify believing based on hearsay.

So once 'you' know that Book is really from God, you'll read and live on and cite from it, as it's your direct and intimate proof: for only God can make that Book intelligible. So the practice of using it as a code of law/rules/guidelines/principles, is what lawyers and diplomats all do. We who are immature Christians, don't know that, but we ape those professionals. It's instinctual, since even though we don't know.. we really are born again, Royal Family of God (potential status for any human, mind you), and as newborns we supernaturally want to do what we are destined to do.. learn and rule.

We do it poorly, okay. Most of us are in the spiritual age of 'two'. Terrible Twos. Sorry.

Of course, most Christians just do it because they ENJOY it, they like the meaning, it helps us understand God (else why bother being trained for kingship), and we like knowing what that Book says. Some among us feel real proud of ourselves if we know words in this Book, especially if they are in the original languages. Just like children, the ones priding themselves on knowing the book. It's a phase one grows out of. Kinda like those priding themselves on their looks or economic status or superiority versus someone else, the immature don't yet UNDERSTAND the words, so grab onto something shallow and meaningless (like status) to motivate learning Words they really don't enjoy. Yet.

Growing pains. Sorry.


1 Royal Family Of God RFG : Book of Hebrews

This series is frozen in Youtube. The full series, including Episodes after RFG 5e16, is at http://www.vimeo.com/channels/royalfa... . There, you can download and view, comment absent Google Plus.

Bible Backup: RFG.doc (2 pages of related cites). Series is inspired by the following Youtubers' videos, inter alia: TheEdge012, lovejesusplz, ChristKeep, 25met4, solarisgalrocks, Laras420, Nephtali1981, 0doubt, hinton4jesus, bigwhammyRocks, faithfulword, all military Youtubers, and even XENUTV. Wish GUAM were here.

I can't even watch an Edge video without being reminded of this doctrine by the Spirit; so I'm bucking Him to avoid it, huh. I already wrote extensively about it: links to the associated webpages are in the Word doc.

A full testing of the doctrinal fit of these issues, is here: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=qsb-win&rlz=1R3GGLL_enUS343US343&q=Angelic+Conflict&start=20&sa=N

This one on 'crowns': https://www.google.com/search?client=qsb-win&rlz=1R3GGLL_enUS343&hl=en&q=Kingdom+doctrine+rewards

Wish they taught it more correctly and in more depth. Book of Hebrews, though, outlines it, as the video demonstrates. So go by BIBLE: see how IT describes, not our denominations.

That's what I'll do in this series, use ONLY the Bible. Not, other studies or even my pastor's study. Idea is to furnish independent evidence. If it agrees with someone else, fine. If not, fine. That's my approach in all my webpages and videos. Only after the independent study, do I examine what others say. In this series, the viewer is left to do that examination, as he sees fit.

For you are ROYAL, so have all the problems of Royalty — except, the recognition. Just as He had, when down here. It's a very different perspective from what we normally think of as 'Christlike' :)


2 RFG : Our Royal Problem of WEALTH

Royal Family of God series. Good reason to consider becoming an atheist! Associated webpages: LordvSatan2.htm#CovProps and LordvSatan3.htm#PriestDest

To have wealth but not the ability to use it; to have responsibility but not the ability to fulfill it; to have an impossibly-high standard beyond one's nature to 'obey' — these are Satan's complaints against God.

The angels first had the problem; how can finity 'obey' infinite Righteousness? And one sin, condemns the person? When one can't possibly obey from a finite nature, an Infinite Nature? How fair is that?

Conversely — to be given the ability from God to obey, makes one as responsible as God for everything, when one doesn't choose God's Enabling Power (hence the need for 1John1:9). To have all that power, wealth, responsibility hang on a still-dead-in-Adam body, a trashed up soul which can't even GET enough Bible until some decades have passed — how fair is that?

But that's precisely what Christ went through, sans sin, theme of Hebrews 2 and 4. So here the underlying WEALTH idea is introduced, preparatory to examining the Book of Hebrews, come Episode 5.


3a RFG : Angelic Conflict Legal Precedence

Continued from Episode 2, here explaining the raison d'etre of our position: the Angelic Conflict, which predates Adam, just as Psalm 110 says (explained in the book of Hebrews). Almost every pastor today knows something about this, yet the subject is almost never taught in depth. By contrast, my pastor (and those he trained), made this the centerpiece of his teaching, because the Bible does (beginning in Genesis 1:2, see my Genesis Exegesis videos, starting in Episode 3).

So This RFG series will be something of a slog, as there is so much unfamiliar ground to cover. See the longer Satan's Strategy series, if you'd rather just hear audio. Else, read the links below. Very time-consuming, either way.


4a RFG : Your ROYAL Angelic Trial Witness

Backdrop to Book of Hebrews, this time on the nature of each Believer in Church, why we are On Trial, what for, what is the 'trial witness' and its mechanics. Very different answers from what you'd normally expect. Beginning in Episode 5, we'll go into the Book of Hebrews, and see its 'threads' on these topics. If you can't wait that long, just keep reading the book over and over with the video ideas in mind: you should be able to see something of the threads, even in a translation.


4c RFG : Rank Has Its Privileges/Punishments

Royal Family of God series. Rank Has Its Privileges, and its Punishments. Continued from 4b, still introducing Book of Hebrews.

Associated Webpages mentioned in this video (very heavy)

All this material is an independent audit in Bible, but the audit was prompted by my pastor's longstanding teaching in his 1985 Ephesians series (seven years long of almost daily Bible classes) plus his 1992 Spiritual Dynamics series (12 years long of almost daily Bible classes). So it's a synthesis, as well as an independent audit. Because, I'm responsible for what I believe before God, not my teacher. However, if what is said rings true to you from God, you'll want to probably get those series, or get under a pastor who teaches in a similar manner. Ask God about that, I can't comment further.


4e RFG : How we Church 'Bridge' History

Royal Family of God series. Our Trial Role as Corporate Body of Christ, and its outcome at the end of Time and in Eternity.

Associated webpages about our Kingship role,

in Millennium, LordvSatan5.htm#RoleMill

in eternity: LordvSatan5.htm#Eternity

Our Royal Priestly Role then, and why Royal Priests are forever needed (we are the only priesthood in eternity): DDNA3.htm. This latter is a conclusion based on all the Bible, so whatever Bible you know, should be enough to vet the conclusion.


RFG5a Book of Hebrews, When & Why written?

This video is old, now I've METERED the Greek and know the exact order the books were written, detail is in https://vimeo.com/channels/bibledatel... for the whole NT. For more on the OT when-written, peruse my channels: https://vimeo.com/brainout/channels/s...

Royal Family of God series. Relevant style and chrono notes for 62-68AD, audio: Chrono62-68AD.WMA. You'll also need to order Lesson 1541 et seq (200 lessons) of my pastor's 'Paul's Fall' series at http://www.rbthieme.org to get the revised chronology (corrected versus his 1975 analysis). No one in the world has done this timing reconciliation, but him. They never ask for money.

God gives a Bible book at a specific time for a specific reason, and the Bible itself always tells you when He does it. Bad Bible scholarship always goes outside Bible to date its books, with many 'scholars' doing a very poor job of reading what BIBLE says the dates are, especially lately. Always vet the scholars. There's too much political correctness, too much need to 'go along with the crowd' in academia. Dissenters are not appreciated. So don't ASSume consensus means competence. It ain't so...

Book of Hebrews is no exception. Happily, some older scholarship still 'out there' will corroborate much of what you'll see in this video, but is unaware as to WHY Book of Hebrews came out when it did.

The reason? The Methusaleh Principle: when key believers die on a Divine Schedule, a flood of death happens. (Methu+selah in Hebrew means "when he dies, 'it' happens" — so the Flood occurred when Methusaleh died, Gen 6). Here, the schedule is the 120-year period culminating in 94AD, when history as we know it, was supposed to end (Millennium was supposed to begin 94AD, per Bible, forecast ever since Psalm 90). Nested within this period was the Lord's Death, which itself kicked off the 40-year warning period due to Israel's rejection of her Messiah (forecast also since Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53), which ended 70AD.

So Paul is executed by Nero, and Nero is executed by God (well, he suicides), and that provoked the infamous Year of the Four Emperors, which was a chaotic time in world history. The sudden vacuum of power meant Rome might not survive, as the power blocs around her angled to 'eat' some of her territory. The ensuing struggle resulted in zig zag policy by the Emperors, alternately being nice or nasty to Christians and Jews. As a result, many Christians became apostate, many more went into hiding.

Neat book on the Year of the Four Emperors, when Mark and Hebrews were written: 69 A.D.: The Year of Four Emperors 1st Edition, Kindle Edition

So God rolled out four Bible books (lol): Hebrews, Peter, Mark's Gospel, and Jude. This Part 5a covers the first two; Part 5b will cover the next two. Meanwhile, to get acclimated to the controversy over Mark, skim through some articles in this search, especially the scholastic ones: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=qsb-win&rlz=1R3GGLL_enUS343US343&q=Mark+euthus&start=0&sa=N

I won't use the search material for the videos. My policy is to first use ONLY the Bible. I find that scholars tend to become tangled with other scholars and the Bible gets lost in the shuffle. So to avoid the same dilemma they face, I'll just use Bible first, and then course-correct if needed.


RFG5a Book of Hebrews, When & Why written?

If ever there was bad Bible scholarship, it's among those who advocate Mark as the first Gospel, or Mark as getting his material from Peter.

All you have to do is CROSS REFERENCE what he writes across the NT books and you realize he's updating the Gospel to a parallel generation, deliberately changing well known GOSPEL quotes to apply them to the current imminent=euthus destruction of the Temple. All Bible writers interpretatively quote Scripture. And when Mark writes, 'Scripture' includes both Matthew, James, Luke & Acts, all of Paul's writings, Book of Hebrews, Peter, Jude. You know that, because the other writers also reference the earlier NT books (Paul quotes Matthew and James, for example, and Peter quotes Paul, Jude quotes them both, Hebrews quotes Matt, Luke, Ephesians).

Can't quote passages from books which didn't yet exist. And IF quoting, one can play with the quotes, since the reader would know the original versus the new formulation — that's an important Bible rhetorical style used ever since Exodus. In our modern parlance, it's called 'incorporation by reference', and is vital to LEGAL CONTRACTS and depositions.

Duh. As an eyewitness himself, Mark would have the credibility to do that. The wordplay would be very apt to the time. Mark's use of euthews or euthus (some mss. editors replaced euthews with euthus) is deliberate; sometimes he INSERTS or OMITS the word versus Luke or Matthew, knowing the reader will catch that change. Because what was 'immediate' back a generation prior, isn't now, or vice versa. :)

This style of taking exact words and then changing them slightly to show APPLICATION, is a prominent feature of OT and NT discourse. (Famous example is when the Lord changes 'strength' in His quote of the First Commandment to 'thinking' usu. mistranslated 'mind'. By that you know the Commandment is upgraded to HIS Mind, 1Cor2:16, very witty.)

So the Gospel of Mark is in the context of the Book of Hebrews. Upshot: in the year of the 4 Emperors, 4 Bible Writers write 4 Bible Books to explain why the Temple was about to die along with at least Three Major Believers (Paul, Peter, plus Luke, Timothy, or Jude).


RFG5c Hebrews, Peter, Jude, Mark Book Date Analysis

This 9/16/09 video is now outdated (and sometimes incorrect); but the links below are still valid. For Bible tells you when one of its books was written, and what was Canon prior, by the way it 'threads' the tenets of all prior books, into a new one. So you can tell that Book of Hebrews came out in the Year of the Four Emperors; you can tell that Peter came out before Hebrews, but in the same year; you can tell that Jude followed Peter almost immediately, and 'immediately' then followed Mark.

Whose keywords TIE TOGETHER both Matthew and Luke's Gospel, given the 'immediacy' of Temple destruction.

So the order is Peter (writing upon Paul's death, and because of it), then Jude (because Peter soon died after writing), then Mark, then Hebrews. Collateral series demonstrating this are Peter Meter, Synoptics, and Mark. They all fit together, with many videos each, showing LIVE IN BIBLE ITSELF how you can see the above claims, FOR yourself.

For good Greek writing is rife with wordplay. That's a longstanding 'wit' rule which all Greek and Latin lit follows. Bible is the wittiest of all, and it accomplishes this wit with deft word CHANGES versus known quotes. Thus you know what Bible books preceded, and what NEW points the NEW book, makes. Which means, everyone had memorized the previous Divine Writ, else the wit, would have no punch.

Now, if you want more punch, you can download my earlier, adjunctive brainstorming videos on these Bible book dates, using the links below. See also Episode 5d's video description, for the Year of the Four Emperors' timeline confluence with the INITIAL destruction timeline of the 1st Temple.

NT Book Dates (thrashing out what they were, conclusions aren't all correct), 140MB file, 39 minutes: BibleBookDatesNT.avi. This is also in vimeo, http://vimeo.com/brainout/rfg5cntbibl... , and is in the RFG Channel as Episode 5c , http://www.vimeo.com/channels/royalfa... .

Luke and Acts Book dates in light of Hebrews, Peter etc. (again, not all conclusions were correct), 150 MB, 23 mins: Luke1and2.avi. This video is also in vimeo, http://vimeo.com/brainout/rfg5cadd-lu... , and is in the RFG channel as Episode 5c, http://www.vimeo.com/channels/royalfa... .

Intro to Greek wordplay to show how you prove Mark is the third Gospel, 99MB, 21 mins: MarkEpi1and2.avi. This video is also in vimeo, http://vimeo.com/brainout/mark1a . It's in the Mark channel, http://www.vimeo/channels/marksgospel , as Episode 1a.

Again, these are brainstorming videos, just recording the methodology, and not all the conclusions in them were correct. The final conclusions are in Episode 5 of RFG and the first episode of the Mark series. The latter will be proven conclusively when you see the future exegetical verses, where the text of the Synoptics is compared side-by-side, onscreen.

Criticism is welcome, but if you quote the bilious Church Fathers to me, I'll ignore you. They were 'fathers', alright: of APOSTACY! They sold the pope lie, the mary-is-sinless lie, they sequestered Bible and vaunted themselves as elites, just like the Pharisees did over the Jews.

Their writings have a limited historical importance for establishing how Greek language was used. Else, what they write is mostly trash. Same with the 'Q' people.

BIBLE tells you when it was written. So we should consult IT, not some old liar from the past.


5d RFG : Jude On Peter, 1 of 6

Revisiting 5c RFG video analysis, here: • RFG5c Hebrews, Peter, Jude, Mark Book.... That link has several videos within its description, trying to determine IN WHICH ORDER during the Year of the Four Emperors, the Books of Hebrews, Peter, Jude and Mark came out. Is that the right order? Or was it Peter, Jude, Hebrews, Mark? Or, Peter, Hebrews, Mark.. and later, Jude? If later, how much later?

So in this and the next four videos, I'll try to test Jude for its 'place'. I'm not sure what I'll come up with. The only certainty is, Jude is written after Peter, and Peter is dead at the time. There seem to be references to topics in Hebrews, but one could argue that Hebrews 'tags' to Jude, not vice versa.

No final answer comes out of these videos. But at least they help show what kind of vetting one must do, when studying. A pastor must do this, so he's worth a billion dollar salary!


5d RFG : Jude On Peter, 4 of 6

Continued from • 5d RFG : Jude On Peter, 3 of 6. Now we review, going line by line to see how Jude 'wraps' around Peter, and also maybe refers to Book of Hebrews. Or, Hebrews elaborates on Jude, even as it elaborates on Peter (re priesthood, apostasy in latter days, angels, etc). Then you better understand the mocking tone of Mark's Gospel, which appears to come LAST among these four books.

This analysis matters, for when you see how obvious is this 'wrapping' technique (which today is called 'incorporation by reference', and is especially used with legal documents) — you'll see how easy it is to disprove those Quelle ninnies who claim that Mark 'has priority' or is some kind of 'source' (=quelle, German) for the Synoptics. Just the opposite: even as Jude is wrapping around Peter and as a result is SHORTER than Peter, so too Mark is wrapping around Matthew and Luke, so therefore is SHORTER than either one. Duh.

See also my Synoptics playlist for more proof from within the Gospels themselves.

Honestly, some 'scholars' degrees should be revoked.


5d RFG : Jude On Peter, 6 of 6

Continued from • 5d RFG : Jude On Peter, 5 of 6

Focus here is on Jude's trebled dateline meter in verses 1-2, which is also how he ends the chapter: last two verses are 90 syllables, not covered in this video, so count the syllables yourself. This metering matters, as the opening two verses are 114 syllables, which is a pregnant metric sum in Daniel 9 and in Ephesians 1:3-14. Also, the 'date' results in the earliest scholarly date for Jude, being supported (Bible's own 66 AD = 'our' 68AD, owing to a 2-year variance versus Roman accounting, which the Bible writers appear to use).

Because, God uses the same syllable sum in Daniel 9:25-26; 114 is the number of days from beginning of Passover to 9th Ab, which was the same exact number of days (beginning ON Passover) as actually used by Titus to overrun Jerusalem in 70 AD. Obviously that similarity would have been very pregnant to Jews and Gentiles in Jude's audience. Isaiah 53 used it also.

90, is a 'quarter' of a year. Paul's meter keys 4x to 91, to make a solar year, in Eph 1:3-14. So clearly Jude is playing to that meter. Is Peter doing the same, and the writer of Hebrews, too? I've not yet checked those books for meter, to know.

Video ends with revisiting whether Jude precedes or succeeds the Book of Hebrews. No firm conclusion.


5e1, RFG : Hebrews On Peter

Continued from • 5d RFG : Jude On Peter, 6 of 6, still tracking the order of Bible books rolled out in 68-70 AD. Here, proof that Book of Hebrews thematically 'tracks' to Peter and Jude, despite lacking their keywords. So the order now looks to be Peter, then Jude, then either Mark or Book of Hebrews, all during that 12 months.

Rest of this 5e will be long, for I learned after making this video, that Book of Hebrews is BUILT AROUND Mark's Gospel, line by line. So it's like tapestry: Hebrews weaves together the themes of Peter, Jude, Mark as the foundational outline for the ORDER in which the writer's points are presented, even though the main theme is WHY the change of Covenant to Church (which no previous Bible book covered). Hence WHY the Rapture was imminent (Heb 11:39-40).

So 5e will be quite long, as I'll trace how Hebrews 'talks to' Mark's Gospel, with Mark on the left-hand side of the screen in translation, and Hebrews on the right, line by line. It's so obvious you can even see it in translation. So why didn't those inept Quelle 'scholars' notice? Because they don't use 1John1:9!

But then, I was stupid too, for now it's obvious when I made 5c RFG, I too hadn't done my homework. This will demonstrate why Hebrews is the LAST of the four books coming out in the Year of the Four emperors (NOT first, as 5c had contended). So egg is on my face, too. :)


5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 1 of 7

Continued from • 5e1, RFG : Hebrews On Peter. Now we have DEFINITIVE proof of when Peter writes, and as usual, the meter conforms to the earlier 'scholar' dates for Bible books. Heh. Parts 1-3 introduce you to why I know that, but of course the rest of 5e (very long!) will illustrate more testing via Hebrews and Mark textual links. My, the Quelle 'scholars' are inept!

Quick video showing the Greek of 1Peter1:1-3, how Peter plays off both Psalm 90:1-4, and PAUL's meter. I still need to do a lot more work on this, so treat this video as a mere heads-up. Kill me now. Why am I allowed to live?

Will be several weeks before I can come back to this. Meanwhile, try Googling on 'Herod's Temple 18 BC', and pick the first pdf you see (though it gets Christ's birthdate completely wrong), plus https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/14304-temple-of-herod. See also https://bible-history.com/jewishtemple/rebuilding-the-temple. Scholarship is very uniform, here, but there are some nutters. Wasn't God thoughtful, to invent a dateline meter convention so we can have better certitude about our Bible books and Bible's own timeline? Heh.

So look at Haggai 2, and realize that 84 x 7 = 588, so 66 (Bible's AUC for its anno domini version, per Paul's meter) - 588 = 522 BC (end), when God commands Zerubbabel, on the anniversary of the FOUNDATION being laid for 2nd Temple, to REBUILD. Yeah, and that's when Zerubbabel is told he is Seed of Christ, so to set up Christ's birthday on what WILL BECOME Chanukah, in 4 BC (2BC per Paul's own anno domini accounting in Eph 1). Yikes!

Yeah, because the 2nd Temple is about to go DOWN, when Peter writes; the 40 years' credit remaining on Abraham maturing 54 years early — 14 of which was overtime spent on REBUILDING the 2nd Temple, shown in Isaiah 53's meter — the remaining 40-year credit for the TEMPLE (cuz it was 40 years late getting built due to Israel's wandering in the wilderness) — is almost UP.

See the import of learning the meter, and it's all DOCTRINAL, baby. Syrupy text in translation alerts you to metered translation, as it is here, in Peter.

Kill me now.


5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 2 of 7

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 1 of 7, how I know the meter is accurate, so you can see something of the methodology. A fuller explanation of how you spot Bible Hebrew Meter, even if using Greek language, is in the first video's description (Word doc you can download), here: • Bible Hebrew TIME Meter, 30 Testing C.... That way you can spot the passages yourself.

You have to know or learn the history and the relevant doctrinal references, to do this metering. The keywords in the Bible text tell you what DOCTRINES are referenced, so you know what HISTORY will relate, to reinforce the DOCTRINAL message given.

Here, it's about TEMPLE DOWN, and TEMPLE BUILDING, which is the focus of Peter and later Hebrews, the CHANGE IN PRIESTHOOD owing to Christ's Resurrection Victory. Change priesthood means change covenant, which Paul had introduced in Galatians, Colossians, and especially Ephesians, where his Eph 1:3-14 plotted prophetically, Roman FUTURE history to the rise of Odovacer; and satirically, the rise of what we now call Roman Catholicism, under Constantine.

Paul equates that to extreme apostasy which makes the Rapture so unlikely, by Constantine's death. I showed all that in detail beginning in Episode 11a of my GGS 10-11 playlist. The Word doc linked in the video descriptions of that series, is huge, replete with links to ancient Roman historian sources, so you can check both history and meter.

See also my Mary Magnificat playlist, for Peter plays on Mary, just as Paul did.

So Peter, is playing on Paul. This video helps explain how, covering verses 1-2 of 1Peter. In Part 3 we'll briefly go through 1Peter 1:3, to see more on how Peter plays on Paul.


5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 3 of 7

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 2 of 7, now 1Peter1:3, which directly refers the reader to Ephesians 1:3 by quote and by METER. This helps you see how ancient readers used meter as a CONCORDANCE (cross-reference), since they orally memorized Scripture, by counting syllables.

So obviously I'll have to parse out the rest of the passage, to see a) why he's doing this, b) what 'future' he's updating relative to Paul, c) where the meter ends. That will take me several months. Meanwhile, with this tripartite heads-up on the method, you can decide if you want to do it yourself.

Sorry, I'm the only one who knows this meter, so it's all original research; the 'authority' is the Scripture itself, and thus is independently verifiable. But if you can count syllables, read Bible and history books, you can independently VET the material.


5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 4 of 7

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 3 of 7. Sleuthing proof that Peter 'maps' his meter to Paul and Daniel 9:24-27, theme of TEMPLE 490; this shocks me, so I apologize for not being able to control myself.

Download Peter's meter: 1Peter1meter.pdf.

To get the most out of this play on Paul, you need to read Paul's meter, replete with university and other websites explaining the relevant historical references: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. PDF version: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

PopeMyth webpage (which has the PopeM video playlist below): PopeMyth.htm.


5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 5 of 7

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 4 of 7. Here, the focus is on WHY Peter's tracking the 140-year parallel between the time Herod started rebuilding the 2nd Temple and its imminent demise, and the initial rebuilding OF the 2nd Temple, back in Zerubbabel's day (Haggai 2, 84 'sevens' before Peter writes).

For 122AD (onscreen, left timeline, mimicking Daniel 9's bifurcated timeline meter) is the former's 140th anniversary. Peter, like Paul, and on Paul, plays to the upcoming destruction of Temple and then Jerusalem 70 years later, parallelling the time from 586-446BC. So the text, is a) what believers should be thinking during that time, and b) a satirical commentary on how Church is also failing (just as Paul is saying) because Church is NOT thinking as directed, for the time.

Ouch.


5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 6 of 7

Continued from • 5e2, RFG : Peter's Metered! Part 5 of 7. Now we'll see the whole of 1Peter's meter, which runs to verse 12. He's playing on Paul, alright, but straight from Daniel 9.

See, God orchestrates Time using three overlapping time-grant criteria:

  1. Did someone on earth SUPERMATURE during a HISTORICAL 490-year time period, starting at Adam's fall? If yes, the world is granted 490 years longer, to live. If no, Time ends and so does the world (root idea behind the Flood).
  2. That someone granted the 490, is PERSONAL, so before that PERSON's 490 ends, someone ELSE must supermature, too.
  3. Beginning with Israel, and undergirded by the Davidic Time Grants, which were the basis for God's Grant of Time in Daniel 9 — would Israel CORPORATE mature enough? This was signified by the TEMPLE STANDING, hence Daniel's prayer. If the Temple was down, Time would end with the latest grant in #2, above. That, was 37 AD, David's outside 1000-year grant, dated from his death. But the Temple would have to be rebuilt by positive believers, else the world would be at war (which, it was).

So now for Church, the same tripartite TIME rules remain, even though Rapture can occur at any moment, when (Eph 4:13), Church CORPORATE is mature. But if Church is apostate, like #3, times get really bad, and she goes into a kind of DIASPORA.

Paul addressed #1 and #2, with a what-if-the-Rapture occurs in syllable aka year X, in his meter.

#3 for Church, is what Peter covers. So his is a DIASPORA WINDOW timeline, telling believers in advance, when to LEAVE ROME: leave due to upcoming pagan persecutions, or leave due to what Paul had already forecast as the rise of Political Church (later enshrined in Rev 17), which today we know as Roman Catholicism (and all the other political denominations since the Reformation). For Christians who are really living on Bible, will be persecuted by both groups. So the question is, WHEN to leave, so to preserve the BIBLE which both groups will be routinely trying to sequester and burn?

Peter's orange (divisible by seven) clauses, tell you when. The parents were supposed to pass the knowledge onto their kids, even as those reading Paul were supposed to pass these prophetic calendars onto their kids, to protect both kids and Word. Sadly, by now this rhetorical style of calendared prophecy underlying timeless (syrupy) text, is unknown in both today's Judaism (for the meter style dates back to Psalm 90) — and has been lost to Christianity, ever since the first century.

So here and in Part 7, we'll see the structure. You are to link the words in a given segment of text, to the YEARS signified by the syllable pattern, to know when and what to think, while you flee, both groups.

The Pauline and Petrine text both intertwine to give you advance SATIRICAL historical information which we in retrospect, can prove. However, I don't have time now, to show how both sets of text within the same historical segment, interrelate. Ask God, and He'll show you. Then when I'm able to make videos on this antiphonal relationship between the texts for the same syllable/TIME segment, maybe you and I can compare notes.


5e3, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Peter1:1-2

Bible meter is meant to further explain, cross-reference, elucidate the interpretation of Bible text. Pity this Meter is unknown to scholars. So here, we take a simple example of how Bible meter elucidates otherwise-snoring text, in 1Peter1:1-2.

Folks who got this letter at the time, memorized Scripture by means of syllable counts. So God gives them extra bang for the buck — using a rhetorical style since Moses — of turning the METER (syllable counts in groups of sevens or threes) into a CALENDAR. So it becomes a drama play about specific segments of time, with the words known to be 'lines' spoken by 'actors' telling you ABOUT that time.

Moses started this style in Psalm 90 (see my Psalm 90 playlist), with God's Decree re TIME in the first 84 syllables: a promise of TIME for those who took 'refuge' in God.

This, is Peter's jumping-off point for his letter; you know that, because he too uses 84 syllables. So the syllables act as a concordance, a pointer, cross-reference. Text refers to Psalm 90 content several times, which all scholars know. But what they don't know, is how the meter tells you MUCH MORE INFO — as well as when Peter writes — than you could discern, from the text alone.

Always need to know CONTEXT, with Scripture. Here, vital TIME CONTEXT is missing from theology, and hence this valuable method of interpreting Bible, goes unlearned. So to show you the difference in the meaning you get — which is all doctrinal, as well as telling you WHAT TIME Peter writes (which scholars still dispute) — to show you this difference, I dramatize the text by reading it, and showing how the METER gives you added meaning FROM THE SAME WORDS, which you'd otherwise not know.

Test what I say, as this is all original research. See the 'God Orchestrates Time' section on my Channel page, for the many playlists on this Meter technique. Word docs are in every video description, so you can VET the material yourself. If you can count syllables; if you can read history articles; if you can read Bible Greek with software help like BibleWorks, you can proof this material.

And as always, let me know if you find any mistakes, as I have no one to check me, except myself. If God is in what I say, He'll testify. If not, He'll tell you where I'm wrong. Else I'd have no courage to make videos at all!


5e4, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Peter1:1-3 on Eph1:3-4

Continued from • 5e3, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Pet.... Now we get into verses 4-5 of Paul's Eph1:3-14, to show how the CURRENT and parallel section of Peter, INTERLEAVES with the then-current section of Paul. It's truly amazing.

Important: in LEGAL documents, a technique called 'incorporation by reference' is a kind of cross-reference to another legal document OUTSIDE the current one being read, to INCORPORATE the OTHER document's TEXT into the CURRENT one being read. Thus you know how to interpret the CURRENT text. Thus, legal documents quote or sometimes use NUMBER CITATIONS, to point the reader to the outside text which is thus incorporated. You are to read the total text WITH the incorporation to get the meaning, scope, parameters, conditions, etc. of the CURRENT text.

Example: if I said, 'the participant's benefits from this Plan will be subject to Code Section 415 of the Code', the lawyer reading the document knows that the TERMS AND CONDITIONS of that 'section' in US tax law, will LIMIT the retirement benefits of some employee covered by the particular plan whose document he's reading. He then looks OUTSIDE the document he's reading (i.e., looking outside Peter to Paul), to INCORPORATE the terms of that cited law, into the text he's reading. Thus he knows, for example, that if the participant in the plan was otherwise entitled by plan terms to a million-dollar annual payment from the plan, Code Section 415 REDUCES the payment to its OWN current maximums for each year (generally, around 205K in 2013).

Back in Peter's day, they didn't have named sections of Bible, but instead had syllable counts. So, Peter matches SYLLABLES so the reader can track what in Paul, Peter's incorporating into his letter. This technique was started by Moses, to quote his own material, since he wrote the first five Bible books. His style has been emulated, ever since. And it is unknown, today, to Christian scholars.

Since I do legal documents for a living, and all law in any age is written this way, it was easy for me to understand this rhetorical technique. Especially here, since the Bible is a LEGAL CONTRACT of INHERITANCE, and of course we saw already from 1Peter1:2, that INHERITANCE is the topic. So you'd expect Peter, who was far more astute in Classical Greek than scholars give him credit for, to use this sophisticated legal technique.

Talk to any lawyer you like, especially one in tax law, and you'll find confirmation of this style in both contract law and in tax law, though we don't use syllable counts anymore, to incorporate by reference. So why don't the Bible scholars realize its use in Bible? Why, when even a brainout can count syllables, has this very interactive and definitively-interpretative technique, been so unknown to those in hermeneutics? Oh well.

I realize that I'm supposed to be nice about this, but I just can't. The GOLDMINE of Scripture is going undug, and Christians are dying inside from doubt, misinformation, and false doctrine, instead. For centuries. It's unfair. It's time we got nasty, therefore, and stop compromising God's Gorgeous Word, for the sake of being nice to each other.


5e5, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Peter1:3 on Eph1:4-5

Continued from • 5e4, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Pet...

Now covering Peter's meter-and-text interaction with Paul's, in each verse 3-4. This is a killer interaction. If ever you had doubts about Eternal Security, you won't doubt it after going through this video. Bible is very precise in its doctrines, and here we see another example of how the ancients would know they can't lose salvation.


5e6a, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Peter1:3 on Eph1:6

Continued from • 5e5, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Pet.... Now we see how Peter ties in Daniel 9 and Rapture (which was then expected) in light of the KNOWN imminent destruction of 2nd Temple (then under siege; remember, he datelined 1Peter 1:1-2, based on 84 sevens, which takes you back to Haggai 2).

So Peter's theme is, Yes Temple Will Be Destroyed but will Resurrect as Church at Rapture (tying to Eph 2's two walls, 2nd covenant separate for Church). For they didn't actually call it Rapture (though the term is derived from Latin rapto in 1Thess 4:17) — they called it the EXIT RESURRECTION (exanastasis, used in Philippians 3:11) of the Church. Since the word is misunderstood by the translators, you can't tell what Paul means, in English.

Very clever technique, since Peter 'ropes' his text to the yet-future prophecy in Paul, which to us moderns is known as the Bar Kochba rebellion and the destruction of Jerusalem under Hadrian, who built Aeolia Capitolina atop the razed city, with a pig temple to Zeus (Jupiter) standing over the Temple Mount. Jews were no longer allowed in the city, except on Tish B'Av (the date Titus would destroy the Temple in 70AD, same date as when it was destroyed the first time, per Jeremiah 52:12, remembering that the new day begins piggybacked on the sundown of the PRIOR day).


5e6b, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter's Marching Song read aloud

Continued from: • 5e6a, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, 1Pe...

Fun video to follow up on 5e6, to 'sing out' how Peter's meter interactively creates an antiphonal marching song by interacting with Paul's text. Maybe you'll come up with other configurations. Oh: add Paul's 'en oi echomen' in verse 6 (taking you to Paul's syllable=year 151AD) at the end of the song; or just before the last refrain. Funny how its meaning changes when just left open like that. I forgot to 'sing' it in the video.

Greek drama, use of repetition, search: https://www.google.com/search?q=the+use+of+repetition+in+classical+Greek+plays. Useful is a 1999 dissertation by a guy named Pickering, 313718.pdf . I've not yet gone through it.

I don't know if Peter's deliberately matching cadence for some well-known pattern then common in Greek or Roman culture. Paul patterned Ephesians after Ion by Euripides, so maybe something by that playwright is used by Peter, too; but I'm not familiar enough with Greek drama cadence, to know.


5e6d, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter's Song TRANSLATED

Download the interleaved (Paul's Eph 1:3-14 with 1Peter1:1-12) song with its metered translation, here: PeterMeterSongWithTrans.pdf. It's only two pages, currently. Since 1Peter 1:1-12 is metered, the final version will be much longer.


5e7, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter's Song Analyzed

Video starts with a quick review of the Greek to refresh your mind on the cleverness of the cadence, and then launches into key hermeneutical points to illustrate the extreme value of the meter, for interpreting the text. If we all learned to memorize Scripture as did our ancient forebears, this would be very easy. Since we didn't learn it as kids, going through this analysis will be something of a slog.


5e7b, RFG : Revisiting Paul's meter cadence (Eph 1:3-14)

Continued from • 5e7, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete..., to show a different possible interleaved 'song' cadence, using Paul's meter as the 'beat', rather than what I showed in 5e7 RFG.

Download THE UPGRADED VERSION of Peter's meter (only the Greek, all of 1Pet1:1-12): 1Peter1meter.pdf. The upgrade now sports LINKS to the historical sections in Ephesians1REPARSED.htm, so you can investigate the university and contemporary Roman history/Church documents of that 'time', to see why Peter meters as he does.

Download the interleaved (Paul's Eph 1:3-14 with 1Peter1:1-12) song with its metered translation, here: PeterMeterSongWithTrans.pdf. It's only two pages, currently. Since 1Peter 1:1-12 is metered, the final version will be much longer.

To get the most out of this play on Paul, read Paul's meter, replete with Roman contemporary writings, university websites explaining the relevant historical references: Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. HTM version: Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. PDF version: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

To see how the 49 years were missed, not 70 (as mistakenly claimed by Eusebius, who scholars have blindly followed ever since), see brainoutFAQ.htm#6a; then search on 'Master Accountant', to read the accounting.

Also watch videos on Daniel 9, beginning here: • 23Ps90 Daniel's Prayer Meter proves P.... It's faster and easier to instead download the Daniel document in the video description, then read through it to see his style. Both Paul and Peter talk back to Daniel 9 VIA its style — which I call 'tagging' — as Mary had done, in the Magnificat.


5e8, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter's Song Analyzed, cont.

Continued from • 5e7, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete..., still on the hermeneutics offered by the meter. Here, more deeply into the nature of Paul's anaphora, to know why Peter adopts his interleaving technique.

Essentially, Peter adopts the technique as a SINGING REMINDER to the reader, to take Paul's warning seriously. Turning the interactive text into a marching song, will make it easier to use and remember, teach your kids, etc.

For beneath the syrupy text, is a message of progressive war and degeneration in a) the Roman Empire in general, and b) in Christianity, in particular; so the Rapture becomes LESS LIKELY with each passing year. So it's a warning of Christian apostasy, which can ALSO cause the Rapture, but for the wrong reason (Church too apostate to be allowed to keep living on earth). Paul basically tells you that from Constantine onward (end Eph1:12), Church goes into the toilet, with only a few 'proelpikotas' individuals maturing, no mass growth.

So you used this prophetic calendar even as you did the ones in the OT, to know What Time It Is, and how to orient to that Time, when you are IN it.

Very different meaning, therefore, versus the pablum teaching re both passages, today!

Now, my pastor taught this meaning from text only, not knowing the meter, for maybe 50 years. His main teaching THEME was, how God uses the Believer to BUY TIME, often saying 'as goes the believer (in Church), so goes history.' Wow. I asked God for proof IN BIBLE for how this BUYING TIME doctrine, worked. That was back in 2000, and I've been posting the documentation, ever since (first in the web, now in Youtube as well). Other pastors call this, 'salt' doctrine, but they know almost nothing about it.

So get my pastor's 1985 Ephesians series, which is 12 whopping years long (if you play an hour every day), at https://www.rbthieme.org. They don't ask for money, and you can order the free mp3 or DVD at the rate of maybe 30-36 lessons per month (1 per day, don't overdo it).


5e9, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter's Song Analyzed, cont.

Continued from • 5e8, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete.... IMPORTANT: Now we see the different CRITERIA for timeline charting, between Peter and Paul:

  1. Paul charts LIKELIHOOD OF RAPTURE due to enough MATURATION, theme of Ephesians, climactic Eph 4:13, Rapture Occurs when Body Corporate Has the Maturity of Christ. That's what you also need, to become a KING. So will enough KINGS develop, and will the KINGDOM develop? That's the play, and its success becomes ever less likely, from Constantine forward. That's the story, Paul's meter tells.
  2. Peter, by contrast, focuses on the 1Kings 9 criterion, Will Temple (Church, second wall of Eph 2, not Israel, but Bridge To Israel's future time) — remain STANDING? The criterion for the Temple to Remain Standing, is enough positive volition for any growth to keep going, analogous to Sodom and Gomorrah. Just one Noah and family...

So over the same period, Peter charts whether believer CORPORATE growth is sufficient for God to allow Church to REMAIN on earth. John later echoes this criterion in Revelation 1-3: 'lampstand' (local church) remains or is removed. Both tag Paul's Romans 11.

This is the NEGATIVE criterion for Rapture: Church must be recalled (diplomatic term, think 2Cor5:20) due to its APOSTASY. Of course, if that became true, then Time Ends, Satan wins. So Peter reassures readers, warns them at the same time: yes, Church will remain, but the growth is so low after 350 AD, Church BARELY remains. Ouch.

Hence both writers use Daniel's 62 weeks (434 years), since we're stuck in the 'time bubble' of Daniel 9:26c, wars and rumors of wars until Christ comes (Rapture for us, Trib for the world). For as always true since Adam, Time still must be Justified by a) one person supermaturing during a 490 year period, and b) mass voting during the sandwiched 70 years (490+70+490, so two believers must supermature per 1050, and enough mass votes to learn God during the 70).

Peter's four quarters thus play on Paul's four quarters, in wry ways. Later videos will focus on these differences. For example, Peter's 2nd quarter of Church reverses the order of Paul's meter for Paul's own 2nd quarter; Peter's 3rd quarter replicates and reverses the order of Paul's 1st quarter (so Church growth sufficient to continue Time itself mimics in reverse time order, the 1st quarter in Paul). In between, Vote Critical Time known to modern historians as Decius-Gallienus (SPQR Emperors), is under Peter's chronology elongated; meaning, growth way too low, behind schedule. That schedule is made up, from the rise of Gallienus in the West (when Roman Empire newly splits), to end of the first two Constantine kids (who die trying to kill each other over whether God is 1 or 3, lol).

Paul's 4th quarter shows no group maturation at all. Only individuals. Peter echoes this, playing on Psalm 90 (the outer timline in Peter): instead of 91, 84. For like Israel at Temple Down to Purim (focus of Psalm 90:16-17), Church MIGHT NOT continue.

After Q4, from 434-483 AD, known in history as Fall of the West, Peter ends with the pregnant '49', Church apostasy analogous to Israel in Diaspora, Missed Sabbaths, TEMPLE DOWN. So that theme characterizes our time from Constantine's sons, forward. We might not make it, always on Edge of Being Too Apostate to Live. Rev 1-3, echoes this theme.

Very shocking stuff, very technical. And very unknown to Christendom, who is always on life support, always fancying itself holy, always on the verge of God having to pull the plug, fig tree not bearing any fruit, Mark 11-14. Which maybe accounts for why Mark stops using euthus during that section (see my Mark 3d6-7 videos, starting at • Mark3d6 Why Mark OMITs euthus from Ch...).


5e11, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter's Meter, review intro

Continued from • HELP? Lacuna in 1 Peter 1:10-11?. Now we review the 'panorama' of Peter's meter in the newly UPGRADED VERSION of 1Peter1meter.pdf, presuming that the prior video's 'lacuna' issue can be resolved. Focus here is on the DOCTRINAL MEANING of the orange (sevened) meters, which serves to elucidate and ground the text. Else you don't get what Peter's saying, and much misinterpretation of his letter, results.


5e12 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter maps Future, Nero to Hadrian

1Peter1:3 prophetically covers Nero to Hadrian's first five years. So this video continues from • 5e11, RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pet..., but also is in tandem with Paul's charting the same time, beginning in GGS Episode 11i, • GGS11i Paul maps Future up to Domitia.... Remember, Peter's writing on top of Paul, so starts with the CURRENT emperor: Nero, just before he died, but just after Paul's execution. Else, Peter's meter themes are the same as Paul's, both overlaying (updating) and interleaving, with Paul's meter and text.


5e13 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter maps Future, Hadrian thru A. Pius.

Continued from • 5e12 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete..., now into 1 Peter 1:4, showing how Peter plays on Paul's What If The Rapture Occurs in the remaining years of Hadrian through A. Pius. Church apostacy had begun back in the 90's, and it ramps up, here. Christians were very obnoxious, and Peter's text (as too Paul's) wryly ties to that rise in apostacy.

Hence the persecutions which occurred, were largely instigated by the locals, and the Government turned a blind eye. Christians really WERE seditious, as any reading of the bilious 'Church Fathers' will show you. You can read them easily by clicking on the links in the Word doc showing onscreen in the video, or by going to Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#HallofShame

They are listed in chrono order, and the website is Calvin College, which just stores the original Church Father documents, and thinks those guys were good guys. You'll disagree, when you read the writings. You can also read them at earlywritings.com , and in BibleWorks.


5e14 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter maps Future A. Pius to M.Aurelius

Continued from • 5e13 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete...; how Peter's wry wording characterizes the time of both the Roman Emperors Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, AND the warring apostate Christians claimed today, as part of the 'Catholic Church'.


5e15 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter maps Future M.Aurelius to Commodus

Continued from • 5e14 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete...

Shocking stuff. 1 Peter 1:5b, on Aurelius' reign. Peter's wry satire, SYLLABLE BY SYLLABLE! on this period, is heartbreaking, too: for he's characterizing what Roman historians call a 'golden age'; so too, the 'Church Fathers' turned philosophical — sending Christianity into the tank, to make it look like every other religion.

Christendom never recovers from this denouement. We think it's OUR golden age, how stupid can we be! (see the bilious praise of uniting Christianity with philosophy by a MODERN idiot, in https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf02.v.i.html !)

Just as Israel wanted to be like other nations and rejected God as King in 1050 BC; in 160-186 AD, Church rejects Him. In favor of, scholasticism: emulating Aurelius. That trend has continued, ever since. They were hot on how intellectual they were. Bible gets twisted more than ever. In favor of, philosophical ingratiation. Rev17, baby.

So the warring apostate Christians, claimed today as part of the 'Catholic Church', were destroying Bible meaning right and left. But so too, were their opponents. Very much like today.

So what did God do, the very year the Philosopher everyone praises, got into power? God sent one plague outbreak after another, to Rome. And it kept on going, for well over 100 years! And, military incursions! See Leviticus 26, Deut 28! Warning, Bill Robinson!

Why not? Everyone put his 'faith' (pistews, in the verse) and his custody (phrouroumenous) under the power (dunamei) of POLITICS and PHILOSOPHY — but not, under God. By contrast, God took them all into custody with the plagues, since they were plaguing Christianity, 1John5:16: Hegesippus, Martyr, Hermas, Tatian, and especially Irenaus, Athenagoras, Tertullian. All anti-semitic, twisters, liars, gossipers, with total disregard for Scripture or even a modicum of desire to tell the truth. So God cleans house. For the next 100+ years, four generation curse.

Really wry, here, Peter's language: salvation being REVEALED — yeah, you're DYING! Since you're dying, you're kept under GUARD due to FAITH (yeah, in what, and with what results when REVEALED, lol).

Paul's text for the same period, is on DEBT CANCELLATION through His Blood, yielding RICHES (get the pun? Riches of bleeding for the world or riches of Christ bleeding for you, you bleeding for the Word instead) — at which point, Aurelius dies!

Every emperor afterwards, will claim lineage from him. The loopy Christians too, claim Christianity is like Aurelius' philosophy. To sell it. So ask: why should anyone believe in Christ?!?!

Meanwhile, the FEW believers faithful in Word, reading these Petrine and Pauline antiphonal verses, know to LEAVE; so to be kept under guard AWAY from Rome and her sicknesses. See how the verse applies in both positive and negative directions? Oh, this is SO classical Greek drama of sotto voce political commentary, in every great play of the golden age of Greece, 500's BC!


5e16 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Peter maps Future M.Aurelius to Commodus, cont.

For Episodes after 5e16 RFG, go to http://vimeo.com/channels/petermeter. No more vids will be posted in Youtube.

This video continues from • 5e15 RFG : Meter Explains Bible, Pete..., still on the Aurelian period, and how Christianity became so vocal, political and obnoxious, during this time.

See Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#HallofShame for their writings. See for yourself, how bad they were. So they are a plague on humanity, so Rome is under plagues.

1 Peter 1:5c, on Aurelius' reign. Peter's wry satire, SYLLABLE BY SYLLABLE! on this period, is heartbreaking, too: for he's characterizing what Roman historians call a 'golden age'; so too, the 'Church Fathers' turned philosophical — sending Christianity into the tank, to make it look like every other religion.


RFG5e19 Peter maps Severans, cont.

Major change in Romanism, whether secular or 'Christian', during this period. Origen would come to court the Severans; Demetrius of Alexandria wanted to undercut Origen, so had Julius Africanus suddenly invent Peter being in Rome during the very years Jews were ousted from Rome by Claudius! By the end of the time Peter covers, persecution would begin. The chiliasts in Rome, who Demetrius and the Romans were trying to shut up, kept yelling it was the end of the world. And so it was, for THEM — given the wry text God has Paul and Peter, use!

See how Paul wryly tracks this pivotal period. in vimeo.com/brainout/ggs11m . Peter wraps his text around Paul's, even as Mark wrapped his text around Matthew and Luke.

Two historical books help us understand this period. First, 'Bishop Lists', on the Origen fiasco. 10 'Bishop Lists' videos are now in GGS11t9. They begin with vimeo.com/brainout/ggs11t9a . Substitute the 'a' with 'b' etc. to go to successive videos on the book, through 'h'. Or better still, just get the book at Amazon. Links to it will be in the video descriptions.

Second, a book on Julia Domna, which I just bought (see my review in Amazon, amazon.com/dp/B000SIUW2K/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1AC6BCZ98965A&coliid=I69MWB70GJQAB ). Levick explains that Domna's alleged long-royal (Syrian Arab-related) family, furnished troops to help besiege Jerusalem; some of that family married into the Herods (the Emesenes). Moreover, her family 'orientalized' Roman religion toward monotheism. Those are two of the main historical 'plotlines' in the book.

However, Levick's goal is to make Julia Domna look good, so she dismisses the allegations of Domna seeking political control, made by ancient Roman writers. You can kinda understand why she undertakes to defend Domna, when you read gossip rags treated as scholarship, like this one: books.google.com/books/about/The_Roman_Empresses.html?id=F0czAQAAMAAJ . So the truth must be somewhere in the middle of her position, and that book.

Herodian was alive during that time, as was Cassius Dio. Link to Herodian: livius.org/he-hg/herodian/hre000.html . Link to Cassius Dio: penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/home.html . So-called 'Spartianus' was a fake 'author' in the Augustan History, which scholars universally treat critically. Whatever it says, must be vetted, as the HA (as scholars call it) was written during Constantine, so is not contemporary, and is full of inaccuracies. Not wholly, though.

No wonder Paul so stresses the women via his pregnancy keyword, musterion....

Download pdf on Peter's meter (only the Greek, all of 1Pet1:1-12): brainout.net/1Peter1meter.pdf . The upgrade now sports links to the historical sections in Ephesians1REPARSED.htm, so you can investigate the university and contemporary Roman history/Church documents of that time, to see why Peter meters as he does.

Download the interleaved (Paul's Eph 1:3-14 with 1Peter1:1-12) song with its metered translation, here: brainout.net/PeterMeterSongWithTrans.pdf . It's only two pages, currently. Since 1Peter 1:1-12 is metered, the final version will be much longer.

To get the most out of this play on Paul, read Paul's meter, replete with Roman contemporary writings, university websites explaining the relevant historical references: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. HTM version: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm . PDF version: brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

To see how the 49 years were missed, not 70 (as mistakenly claimed by Eusebius, who scholars have blindly followed ever since), see brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a ; then search on 'Master Accountant', to read the accounting.

Since Isaiah and Daniel started this rhetorical style of meter-mapping-to-kings tradition, watch videos on Daniel 9, beginning here: vimeo.com/brainout/ps90-23 . It's faster and easier to instead download the Daniel document in that video's description and then read, to see his style. Both Paul and Peter talk back to Daniel 9 VIA its style — which I call 'tagging' — as Mary had done, in the Magnificat.


RFG6 Who Wrote Hebrews?

Full RFG playlist: https://vimeo.com/channels/royalfamil... . The videos in Youtube stop at 6, but go on in vimeo.

How Book of Hebrews' own GREEK text tells you who did NOT write it, i.e., Paul. Pity sick KJVO and other people don't read it. That the incompetent CATHOLIC CHURCH 'FATHERS' who couldn't even count to 3 claimed Paul wrote Hebrews, shows you how bad they are. That the incompetent KJVO people who hate the Catholic Church nonetheless repeat the Catholic lie, shows you how dumb the KJVO are. But they cannot read the Greek. For the GREEK style is not at all like Paul's, but rather more like LUKE's, if anyone's.

Yet the most important clue is the writer's constant use of his authority, which is a strong subtheme in the letter. Whoever the writer was, he was a Jew, was respected and probably from Jerusalem, and was regarded as their leader. For he strongly chides the Jerusalem Jewish believers more and more strongly as the letter progresses, for their going back to the Mosaic Law, even though saved.

The vimeo videos will cover the passages where he asserts his authority, but if you can't wait that long, check out the beginning of each chapter, i.e., Heb5:11-6:6's scathing Greek sarcasm (5:11 and 6:12 especially). So this wasn't a Gentile, was someone regarded as a 'pillar' of the Church, but wasn't Mark, John, Jude, or Peter (very different writing style from theirs). And above all, wasn't Paul, who was dead, as you'll see from the video verses here. If you have to pick someone, maybe pick Luke (but that's doubtful, as he was a Gentile).. or Silas. Acts 15 notes the latter was well-regarded, and he travelled extensively with Paul; Peter recommends him, in 1Peter5:12. Just search on his name (aka Silvanus). But it's only a guess.

Moreover, a strong subtheme is GROUP of witnesses. That's how he starts the letter, in Heb1:1. Reasserted, in Heb 2:1, 3:1, 12:1, and of course all of Chapter 11. So he's using the CUMULATIVE WEIGHT of all past witnesses, as the theme — since his letter is about, the Angelic Trial.

So you'd rightfully not expect him to put his own name on the letter. Oh, but the confused scholars all do expect it! Whatever happened to their recognition of Greek literary style? Didn't the formal, high Greek of the letter alert the scholar to the fact the writer WANTS to begin with a flourish? How much more dramatic can it be, that it's the Year of the Four Emperors, Paul has just been executed, and PROPHECY since Abraham matured too EARLY — was now being 'paid' to Israel? For Abraham matured 54 years early. As Psalm 90 reveals and Isaiah 53 updates and Daniel 9 affirms, that 14-year overage would be used up, with Messiah. So that left 40 years. So Messiah dies, and 40 years later is the fulfillment of the REST of Daniel 9:26. Beginning, 7 years prior.

That's in part why Hebrews is so dramatic, opening with the PAST Word of GOD as the 'narrator'. Why, this letter stresses the covenant change. Temple was about to be destroyed, they were to leave but weren't leaving, so like Jeremiah the writer of Hebrews must play that warning role.

God may have also been timing the letter to match exactly, the 1st Temple's siege. I made another video on that idea, too, but it's too long for Youtube. View and/or download it, here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/rfg6ahebwhe... . Download that original vid here: http://www.brainout.net/RFGHebWhenWri... .

A helpful link on the timing (which only seeks to catalogue the Emperors of Rome) is here: http://www.roman-emperors.org/vespasia.htm. If you read it carefully, you'll see the phenomenal 19-month timeline reminiscent of 2Kings 25 (covered in the video link above), so Book of Hebrews likely went out when Otho came to power, if not during Galba, prior. (I find it hard to believe that the letter could have gone out during Vitellius, who aped Nero. Peter was likely executed during Vitellius' time, though I can't prove it. Parthia was a 'fan' of Nero, and Vitellius became one, too.)

If you come up with a better timeline or idea, tell me!

Full Mark playlist is here: • b-out Mark's Gospel proves 'Q' Schola...


RFG6c Revised Hebrews Dateline Meter

Revised Book of Hebrews dateline meter. The ending 133 meter is still the same, but I screwed up the interim parsing when initially done, because back then I didn't recognize the cadence. So this video introduces the corrections, with explanations re variants and parsing methodology.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

Later videos will go through the significance of the meters, and the doc will contain that explanation too. For now, I just introduce some of the connections, not much explaining WHY I know the writer (CLEARLY NOT PAUL) wrote in late 69 or early 70 AD. The Temple was taken down in the final assault which began on Passover and ended on 9th Av, by Titus; this was written before that final assault began, at least by several months, probably the prior fall, so there would be enough time for the letter to circulate. This same close warning was done by Ezekiel for the Diaspora Jews, see his book. And also by Jeremiah, see Jeremiah and Lamentations. So the writer of Hebrews is playing the same God-given role as those two OT prophets.

Vespasian was sent to Jerusalem around 67 AD, so the armies had been surrounding Jerusalem for quite some time before the assault began. They were trying to negotiate a truce with the Jews, to keep Judea a commercial success, and keep invasion costs down. It didn't pan out. You can read Josephus on that, but be aware that Josephus is very bad at numbers: almost all his Bible numbers are perpetually wrong. So use his dates for anything else, also with caution.

File Name: HebDatelineMeterRevPt1.avi, 3/22/14.


RFG6c1 Hebrews 1:3 variant di heautou

Short addendum on why di heautou variant fits the text, and should be included as part of the Autograph. Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

File Name: HebDatelineMeterRevPt2.avi, 3/22/14.


RFG6c2 Hebrews 'tagged' by John's Gospel

How John's Gospel tags Hebrews, Mark, Jude, Peter, Ephesians, etc. I couldn't combine and re-render the videos, so this one's short.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

File Name: RFG6c2.avi, 3/24/14.


RFG6c3 Hebrews 'tagged' by John's Gospel, cont.

How John's Gospel tags Hebrews, Mark, Jude, Peter, Ephesians, etc. I couldn't combine and re-render the videos, so this one completes the pair on John's Gospel tag. Be sure to note how the text ties, too. Next is further testing via 1John.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

File Name: RFG6c3.avi, 3/24/14.


RFG6c4 Hebrews Tagged By 1John

Now we examine the 'tags' made on Hebrews, by 1 John. Just like with fingerprints, the more 'matches' you have, the more definite the 'tag'.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

File Name: RFG6c4HebTaggedBy1John.avi, 3/27/14.


RFG6d Hebrews' Dateline uses Temple Fall as Mid Trib analogy

Numeric puns on 'middle'. John will do the same thing in his meter, clearly getting his pattern from Hebrews. So what's the deal with 'middle'? Daniel 9:27. The idea was, everyone expected the Temple to go down, Daniel 9:26, but due to Church, also expected that to herald the Tribulation's beginning. So downfall=desecration, hence a kind of pun about middle dates. So, the writer of Hebrews (not Paul, he was dead, Hebrews 13:23) uses a dateline which is 21 years from latest mid-Trib on the timeline pre-Church, dated also when the Lord's age was in the 'middle' of Age 70 and 77. All three dates: 70, 73, 77.. were plotted as what-if-Raptures by Paul in Ephesians 1:3-14.

Only this time, the Lord being 73: the Temple really does go down. Our year? 70AD. Get the pun?

Revised doc still has the same name as before, but now with commentary on the numbers covered in the video: brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf. Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc or
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers) or
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf . All the other links to the other docs, including Ephesians, are in these links.

File Name: RFG6d.avi, 4/12/14.


Jude 6a/6b and 2 Peter's REVISED Meter

>Jude Part 6 is subdivided into two parts: this one is a better explanation of 2 Peter's meter versus the prior video, showing how he actually uses ADAMIC YEAR NUMBERS in his meter. Which pattern, Jude tags PER CLAUSE. But Jude doesn't use Adamic year numbers; yet, he expects you to know Peter did, to make puns on Peter's formulas, which Jude actually duplicates. To see Part 6b, click here: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6b

Again, this is clear evidence that the meter is deliberate. I couldn't make this up even if I wanted to. Heck, I didn't even understand it, until redoing the math several times! So if anyone claims the Bible is corrupted or we don't have the original words the writers wrote, or that Bible was written much later.. guess again! The naysayers always prove themselves incompetent, for even a dippy 'brainout' can count syllables and see the provably-Divine, pattern!

Doc Links: you can substitute 'pdf' with 'doc' and edit the (MS Word) docs.

2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, 2PeterMeterR2.pdf. The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs more editing for consistency.

Jude: Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf . Text after page 2 needs to be edited.

File Name: JudePart6Aon2Peter.avi, 3/17/15.


Jude 6b/6b Dateline Meter 'answer'

This Part 6b 'answers' the meter question, 'when was Jude written?' You'll need to first watch Part 6a to see 2 Peter's meter, which Jude apes: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6a . Else, the 'answer'here, won't make much sense.

Since this book is so misused by the denominations (ALL of them), the meter is of unusual hermeneutical value. Time we got back to the BIBLE and stopped treating it like a political football.

Doc link: Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'. Text after page 2 still needs editing for consistency.

For 2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, 2PeterMeterR2.pdf. The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs editing for consistency.

File Name: JudePart6B.avi, redone 3/17/15


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 6/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This rather dramatic video continues the survey with Hebrews, which builds its outline around the Gospel of Mark, thus proving more than ever that Mark's the THIRD Gospel, not Quelle or first. Dramatic, because it almost SCREAMS of Luke and Mark's authorship post Paul's death.

The Royal Family of God channel has those videos. But here, Hebrews also shows how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, not over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in a serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's not merely a dateline, but a plan-of-time passage (i.e., Ps90, Dan9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Pet1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the import of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey11-12bHebrews.avi 3/20/15.


Pauline Anaphora Timeline Update (PATU)

PATU is now somewhat outdated. Its focus was to discern Paul's Anno Domini conversions. Turns out all NT books use ADAMIC years and the Lord's AGE as their datelines. See Bible Dateline Meters for more info. Latest thread is at frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=532&p=2356#p2356

By contrast, Paul's use of the Roman AUC in Ephesians is different. 'Gimmicky, so he can tag Mary. So his usage requires special explanation, which begins at PATU40. Videos prior, furnish background. Frankly they are a slog to watch, kept only because they provide audit material. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

For Paul, like every other NT writer beginning with Matthew, reconciles BC/AD: for Varro's Roman AUC is padded with four years that never existed. Moreover, Christ had to be born earlier than originally scheduled, owing to David's Crowning. So the overage in Varro, and the earlier scheduling of Christ's Birth in Bible, COINCIDE AND OFFSET.

So Bible employs the following conversions: Bible's original date for His Birth, was to be 4106 from Adam's Fall. Call that 'BC' for our Bible calculations, and you'll tally to our usual 'BC' dates. But due to David's becoming king early at Hebron in order to be 'on time' relative to the 1050th anniversary of Abraham's maturation, Christ's Birthdate had to move 'up' 3.5 years, to 1st quarter 4103 in the Adamic fiscal, which runs Sept-Sept (Rosh HaShanah is based on it). Yet also, David's UNITED Kingship occurs 7 years late, owing to civil war (2Sam5); hence Christ has to be born in the 1000th anniversary of David's UNITED kingship crowning, which is 4103.

Roman AUC, however, ends in December; so His Adamic 25 Chislev 4103 Birthday on Roman fiscal, is treated as 4102. One week later, it's 4103 on the Roman fiscal.

So NT writers use His Age as an Adamic date (4106+His Age when they write); that automatically tallies to the official Roman AUC. That's the ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED age, not His Actual age, which is 3 years older. Therefore often their datelines SWITCH between His shoulda-been and His Actual age, to make doctrinal points about BEING ON TIME. Very clever.

So the reader, would just add either a 'base' of Adamic birth year, as described above; or, they'd add the Roman AUC 'base'. Problem is, we moderns don't know what latter 'base' they used.

However, we do know that Claudius made Varro's Roman AUC, the law of measuring Roman time. The ancients knew that schedule overstated Rome's age by 4 years (see the Matthew videos' descriptions in this channel for links on what those ancient Romans knew).

As a result, they too had to contend with the same '4 BC' problem, we do, for His Birth, since they had to append His Age onto a dateline for Rome which they KNEW was 4 years overstated. Aha.

So what to do? Well, we use the same Roman AUC today, as Claudius made law, and all the AD dates Roman historians give us, use that system. So: Roman AUC 750, He's born. End of year. That's standard procedure, so will tally to the commonly-given AD and BC dates you see in scholarly works, unless the writer develops his own adjustments. That's Adamic 4103, first quarter, but Roman end-of-year.

So it now depends on your starting point. If you start with BIBLE's Adamic years, not Ussher's or some other non-Bible person, then 4103 is His Birth Year, 1437 years after the Exodus (originally scheduled to be 1440 years after it, since David wasn't yet alive then). Roman AUC equivalent is 750, end of that year. So, then just add His Age like the NT Bible writers all use, and you get the 'AD' they were thinking of.

In practice, the Adamic year in 'AD' is His Age, +3, +4100. The Roman AUC is 750 + His Age, but add another 1, during Christmas week (since the Roman year increases 1 a week later). A shorthand calc is to subtract three from His Age to get the Roman AUC 'AD' equivalent.

Example: John wrote Revelation sometime after 4 Chislev but before 25 Chislev (Chanukah, the Lord's Birthday), in 4195 from Adam (1st quarter, since Adamic fiscal runs on autumnal equinox). So 4195-3=92, His upcoming age on that birthday, which is really December 15 on the old Julian calendar (under Pope Gregory 10 days were cut from our calendar). That week, you must subtract 4 to get the Roman end of year, 88 AD. A week later, the Roman AD equivalent thus becomes 89.

So you'll notice that the same adjustments we make today, they made.. back then. Simple, huh.

Video materials (same writeup, in three formats): http://www.brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc aka http://www.brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm aka http://www.brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .


PATU1 Pauline anaphora Timeline Update (PATU), Eph 1:3-14

Watch and Comment here: http://www.vimeo.com/channels/patu . All the GGS videos are now in vimeo too. Just type 'http://vimeo.com/brainout/' followed by the GGS episode number, to go straight to the video. Or, just type what's between the quote marks to go to my channel page and then select which of the GGS playlists (which vimeo also calls 'channels') you want.

Youtube playlist is also called 'PATU', and is a fork off the Pauline GGS11 (paulmeterggs11 is also a vimeo channel aka playlist, on which you can comment without Google Plus).

I can't yet reconcile the factors of the '78 sevens' to what Paul means. I'm having a brain fart or something. Maybe there is some other metered passage in OT or NT I need to parse to see the connections. So the answers are right, essentially; but the math I'm using, isn't. I don't think I can solve the problem during 2013, have too much secular work to do. Maybe God will throw the answer at me like He's done before, but He's not doing that, now.

ERRATUM: at 6:29ff I say 'Stephen Lee Williams', but meant 'Robert Lee Williams', the author of 'Bishop Lists', which you'll find extensively reviewed in the GGS playlist, beginning here: • GGS11t9a Bishop Lists (apostolic succ... . He reworked his dissertation to show the bogus origin of the Pope list, and published it as a book you can buy from Gorgias Press or at Amazon. I bought it, and got written permission from the publisher to show the list in my videos.

Doc in video is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf. All the intra-doc links work now. So if you downloaded the pdf before and the links didn't all work, download it again. (And if you want to do the same kind of conversion, do what I did and buy SmartPDF Creator Pro for I think $100, which is much faster and cheaper than Adobe Acrobat; it also works on MACs.)

The counterparts are Ephesians1REPARSED.doc and Ephesians1REPARSED.htm.


PATU32 How to Fix the Jewish Calendar for 2015 onward

ONLINE TALMUD LINKS ARE IN HERE. The whole fix shows in the onscreen icon for the video: so you don't have to play it; download link follows below. Video goes through the fix, as I created it during the video process. For, thanks to an email I just got from someone else who's also doing the meters in other Bible books, I now know an error I'd been making for some years: my error, was to listen to the 'scholars' and the Jewish calendar practice of intercalating an Adar sheni, instead of doing the math myself; well, the guy writing me the email did the math and informed me of my error, hooray! So now you can see the correction: Adar is the WRONG MONTH for intercalation. Bible uses ELUL, and so did Israel, prior to the Exile, per the Talmud. So, this video shows the fix.

Frankly, there's no need to intercalate, just always have Elul=35 or 36 days. Autumnal equinox 'naturally' occurs on its last day, in that design. And I bet money, that's how God designed it. Only later when Israel got hung up on being 'different', did she revert to the pagan practice of lunar years, and hence needed to intercalate.

Related links:
To the corrected calendar in the last segment of the video: brainout.net/Intercal.xls . If you'd rather just look at the picture you see onscreen before video starts, brainout.net/CorrectedforBIBLEIntercalated2015-2016.jpg or pdf, if you prefer pdf. The xls has the same data, which was corrected after video done (I mistyped the dates after May 2016,in the video).

If you also want to correct the Adamic years, 6122 begins on the autumnal equinox 2015. For the complete Adamic calendar going back to Adam which the Bible actually uses in the NT meters (because I derived it SOLELY FROM the Bible), download brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Also, brainout.net/HebCal.htm is useful, and the site explaining it (both now corrected to say 'Elul' instead of 'Adar' for intercalation), is brainout.net/PassPlot.htm .

Book citing Talmud (footnote 66 on page 254) as source for the PAST PRACTICE of Elul not Adar, intercalation (Elul intercalation always makes the equinoxes 'fit'): books.google.com/books?id=FI9pAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA254&f=false . You can also view it in Amazon (but not page 254), amazon.com/Calendars-Antiquity-Empires-States-Societies/dp/0199589445/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427579199&sr=1-4&keywords=Sacha+Stern#reader_0199589445

Click on 'Look inside' then search on 'intercalary Elul' to get to page 254, but you can't actually read that page. You can read pp249 and 255, though.

Babylonian Talmud ONLINE: juchre.org/talmud/talmud.htm . The citations in the video are in Order Mo'ed: at bRosh Ha Shana 19a and 19b, 32a, juchre.org/talmud/rosh/rosh2.htm#19a , juchre.org/talmud/rosh/rosh2.htm#32a , and bBeitzah 6a and 22b, juchre.org/talmud/beitzah/beitzah1.htm#6a and juchre.org/talmud/beitzah/beitzah2.htm#22b .

Book citing POLITICS over intercalation (page 772, but you have to view the book for three pages prior, which maybe you can't do in Google) — so we know why the Jewish calendar is wrong, and has been wrong, for centuries: books.google.com/books?id=M0wUKoMJeccC&pg=PA772&f=false . You can also read the page here in Amazon: amazon.com/History-Palestine-634-1099-Moshe-Gil/dp/0521599849/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427578896&sr=1-1&keywords=Moshe+Gil

Click on 'Look inside' then search on 'creation of the world on 25 Elul' to get to page 772.

Of course, due to our own anti-semitic politicking, to cover up the fact Christ is JEWISH — all our calendars are messed up with respect to Easter, as the earlier PATU videos (29-31) showed. So our political gambits are to blame, NOT Bible!

Yeah, and God made it possible to easily correct RIGHT NOW, as the xls and video, show. Whew. Remember, upcoming anniversary of His Crucifixion, is really April 3; upcoming real Easter (really First Fruits) date is post-sundown April 6, which is 'our' April 7. EASY. No politics, no slovenly 'scholarship', just BIBLE.

I tried to summarize the links etc. on how you can tell from the Hebrew and Greek meters, in the Bibleworks forum, thread here: bibleworks.com/forums/showthread.php?6133-Bible-has-its-own-method-of-ANNO-DOMINI-display , The LukeDatelineMeters.pdf has the links as well, so just download it, if you prefer. It does not yet have the Intercal.xls, but will.

File Name: Cal123.avi, 3/28/15.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 1/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall.

This video introduces the idea, harangues about how obvious Bible's Anno Domni meter would be to anyone COUNTING SYLLABLES PER CLAUSE; then, starts the meter survey with Galatians, the first book written after the first Gospel, which is provably Matthew's. This video ends with James, going in chronological order, through each NT book's meters. They all have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey1-2.avi 3/19/15 concatenated from 1 and 2 of 3/17/15.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 1b/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This 1b corrects last 10 minutes of Part 1 ( vimeo.com/brainout/bibleannodominimetersurvey1 ) to show Romans + Ephesians each use 'Lord's Age at Death +28' as their datelines, just as James will do. For Luke and Paul, tag the Magnificat's ending of Lord Age 56, 40 years prior to Mill.

So these meters all have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation).

That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey1b.avi 3/19/15


Meter Status Update 3-13-15

Now all the NT dateline meters have been documented, both in docs and videos. This video shows the results: the real chronological order of Bible books written, which now is a chart in brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf (or 'doc').

Additionally, that chart shows at a glance, the basic dateline formulas employed; once you get used to the abbreviations, you'll see just how PREDICTABLE are the formulas. You'll also notice that the formulas are x years aft and x years fore (equidistance), and that the 'fore' is a formula based on the pre-Church expected beginning of the Millennium in year 4200 from Adam's fall.

Point is, that kind of sophistication cannot be gerrymandered, so it's actually IN the Bible text by the clever ordering of the words, and its deliberate, and deliberately keeps on referencing God's Doctrine of Time. So here you have comprehensive proof pan-NT, that the doctrine remained referenced and is valid. Except, a new criterion is that Church mature (Eph4:13), at which point the Rapture kicks off the Trib, so all bets are off as to HOW LONG (ad matai, phrase in Psalm 90:12). Because, only God knows who's maturing and at what pace and what mix AMONG BELIEVERS to constitute a fully-integrated eternal POLITY.

So all those Rapture droolers on TBN telling you 'these are the end times brother' couldn't read Bible if it bit them. For the 'end times' have been going on SINCE CHRIST DIED, the 'time bubble' of Daniel 9:26c. Oh well. So grow up, don't drool. THAT is the message. Which you'll see in the meters, which all interact with the text as concordances, since the meter numbers each have DOCTRINAL VALUE that 'colors' how you read the text. Whew.

File Name: MeterStatusUpdate3-13-15.avi, 3/15/15.


Meter Update 3-24-15

Latest status of the meters. Important changes: conversion of all shown dates to Adamic fiscal (autumnal equinox) so you can more easily see the time distance; also, I had to revise Galatians' explanation (meter fine, the 49's explanation was partly wrong, download link below). To read more about the SEVEN 'timeline shifts' Bible uses and I briefly showed, see brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm#TimelineShifts . They are charted in brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance .

Downloads: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf and brainout.net/GalatiansDatelineMeter.pdf . Or, 'htm' for Luke, else 'doc'.

This stuff is important, because it shows vividly how the writers all use an ADAMIC CALENDAR, which long before I even knew these meters existed, I learned solely from the BIBLE's own dates and numbers. Bible's own timeline using ONLY its dates, is here: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it are here: brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a . Worksheet should be intuitive, but I do explain its usage, starting here (through the end of Episode 8): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof) . Noah Flood Precedence channel with the doc and explanation on how we can know Noah's birthday would become Passover: Noahic Flood Precedence for God's Orchestration of Time .

So PassPlot.htm shows the BIBLE's Jewish calendar and how BIBLE tracks and proves His Exact Birth and Death dates, which to this day, we dummies never get right: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm .

File Name: MeterUpdate3-24-15.avi, same date.


PATU29 True 'Easter' Date, per Bible

In 2014, Passover begins today, April 3. So tonight plus two more nights equals 5th as His last night, anniversary. So tomorrow plus two more days equals April 6, so the TRUE Easter day is after sundown, April 6. We get it perpetually wrong, ignoring Bible verses in this video.

Both video and exhaustive Bible backup are here: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm . Audio audit of Vernal Equinox: brainout.net/VEconfirms30AD.WMA . You can see the VE yourself, here: timeanddate.com/calendar/seasons.html?year=1&n=0

Took me over 2 years to research; you can prove it all yourself IN the Bible, within a month or two.

So why are we so confused about his Death Date? ANTI-SEMITISM, which disdained learning the details regarding Passover, in the Mosaic Law! So because the anti-semitic 'Church Fathers' didn't BOTHER to learn the details, they screwed up the dating of His Death! Disgraceful!

No problem. It's not hard to prove what BIBLE says, if one but reads it. Sometimes you need to be a Greek geek to catch John 19's sarcasm (which all the scholars know about, read ISBE), alerting us to the fact that TRUE Passover occurred when the Lord was crucified (so the formal Passover He ate, was due to the calendar not being updated for the new year). Those verses are covered in the above webpage.

God begins tracking Christ's Birth and Death dates in Genesis 5. Exactly. And based on His Death date, you can exactly know what days of the week are any year forward or backwards of that date. This is the only timeline in history which is 100% consistent and provable. So why don't we use it?

How did we EVER come up with the goofball 'Good Friday' nonsense, which requires 1+1+1=1.5? Sheesh! Spitting on the Cross! Spitting on Bible! Spitting even on common sense!

File Name: TrueEaster.wmv, 4/3/10.


PATU30 Easter was April 6! Why don't we read the BIBLE to know the real date?

This is a followup video to PATU29, very short; proof that we don't even read Bible closely enough to get His Date of Death right! How shameful. Verses relevant are Matt12:40-41, 'first day of the week' NT verses on His Resurrection, John 18-19 (how John skips over four days just prior to official passover, and then four again from first day of official passover when He's arrested, to the fourth day LATER which was when Passover SHOULD have occurred, when He dies — because, the Jews didn't intercalate, despite the mandate to use solar year in Exodus 12). And, the verses you see here: for FIRST FRUITS is the Bible's name for what we call, Easter. Get the pun?

The PATU29 video is here: vimeo.com/brainout/patu29 . The underlying webpage is brainout.net/PassPlot.htm ; it is very long, with lots of proof through these and many other related verses, that Bible tells us EXACTLY the day He was Born, and EXACTLY on what Day He died.

BTW, I was testing my new Screen Recorder Gold to see if it would glitch. (For years I've used wisdom-soft's Auto-Screen-Recorder, but due to Windows updates, it's become glitchy to use, and doesn't work at all, in Windows 7. This one does work, capture-screen.com/faq.html . Price is cheaper, too. So let me know if you like the vid's clarity; though I recorded and it plays in 1080p, vimeo only hosts it at 720p. You can download the full 1080p resolution, though.)


PATU31 Passover 2015=April 3, Easter=Apr 7 per BIBLE

REAL PASSOVER begins April 3 at sundown. REAL EASTER (called 'First fruits' per BIBLE, again shown here).. begins on April 7 (technically, anytime after April 6 at sundown). So this April 3 will be the 3455th anniversary of the original Exodus: 'our' 2015, on April 3, is Year 6121.5 from Adam's FALL per Bible, which is Noah's 5065th birthday, too. So this April 3 is the 1985th anniversary of the Lord's Death (4136.5 from Adam's Fall). For He died, 490x3 years after the original Passover to the very DAY. Per, BIBLE.

Updated Youtube video (which allows annotations): youtube.com/watch?v=7hMAkejqK_8

For the YEAR starts on the vernal equinox, which is a SUN measure, not a moon measure, see here: timeanddate.com/calendar/spring-equinox.html . So BIBLE ONLY USES SOLAR YEARS!! It NEVER uses lunar conversions. That was a PAGAN custom, hence Exodus 12 mandated a SOLAR YEAR of 30-day months, which David converted into priestly courses so each priest could serve 365.25 HOURS a year, see 1 Chron 24 (24 courses, heh for 24 hours in a SOLAR day). So the last month (Adar, 35.25 days before the NEXT vernal equinox), got 5.25 days added, to balance. In ancient times they set up specially-placed sticks or sundials to measure it, because at noon ON the day of the equinox, there was almost no shadow. But you can calculate it mathematically for your area, too, google links here: google.com/search?q=How+to+calculate+the+vernal+equinox or here: google.com/search?q=how+ancient+peoples+measured+the+equinoxes .

Sorry to be so harsh, but I'm so sick of the centuries-long incompetent Christian and Jewish 'scholar' dates I could scream. FIRE THEM ALL for disrespecting Christ and His Word so much? Oh I wish. But then I'd have to fire myself, too. So instead, here's how to know when 'Passover' and 'Easter' occur.. PER BIBLE.

God made it so easy to know His Son's Death and Resurrection dates, why don't we LISTEN TO THE BIBLE? Oh, because Dear Confused Dr. So and So or St. Bishop Not-Bible, created some convoluted 'Easter Computus' alleging that it should always fall on Sunday. What rot. God uses BIRTHDAYS in His Bible, and that means ONLY a solar year. Your BIRTHDAY falls on different days each year, but is the same DAY of the same MONTH. So too, for Israel's birthday and for His Death Day, and for His Resurrection Day!

So again (sigh) this video shows you how you can easily know True Passover True Easter Yourself, every year:

1. Look up when is the Vernal Equinox. THAT DAY is the start of the sacred year (which Jews never follow, anymore, so ALL their holidays are dead wrong).

2. Count 10 days from that first day, and you have the very day Christ was ARRESTED, Lamb Set Aside in Exodus 12.

3. Count 4 days from that and by SUNDOWN, He died. THAT begins AT sundown, true Passover, new day on sacred calendar (Jewish time).

4. Count 3 days from that and you get FIRSTFRUITS, when He Rose. So the total number of days you counted, was 17. Because, the Sanhedrin didn't intercalate properly, so Time was out of synch (360-day year, should have added 5.25 to the ending month but they didn't). So the 21st at sundown the year Christ died should have been called the 17th at sundown.

Vernal Equinox link: timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20150320T2245&msg=March%20Equinox%202015

PassPlot.htm shows the BIBLE's Jewish calendar and how BIBLE tracks and proves His Exact Birth and Death dates, which to this day, we dummies never get right: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm . Bible's own timeline using ONLY its dates, is here: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it are here: brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a . Worksheet should be intuitive, but I do explain its usage, starting here (through the end of Episode 8): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof) .

Point is, even a brainout can do this. Only takes use of 1John1:9, ASKING GOD, your BIBLE, and basic skills like syllable counting, basic math with hands and toes. It was MEANT to be easy. Seriously: get His Birth and Death dates wrong, and you'll never balance to Bible, for this is the HUB of all Bible dates. We've never gotten them right, either. Why? Because we use LUNAR years, and LUNAR months rather than BIBLE's rules. Because, dingdongs decided Easter must always fall on a Sunday, totally NOT READING BIBLE. For centuries, and we don't fix this even now? So we spit on Christ's Death and Resurrection! No excuse, for such sloven stupidity!

So this is a 2015 update, Follow up video to

Original Easter video (originally in Youtube, copied here): vimeo.com/brainout/patu29 . Vimeo doesn't allow annotations, so the video is in terms of 2010.

2014 video on True Easter Date, highlights the Christ Our Passover meaning too quickly: vimeo.com/brainout/patu30

File Name: Easter2015.avi, 3/24/15.


GGS11s15 Magnificat Meter, Revisited

Mary's Magnificat Meter reconciles between the Abrahamic and Davidic deadlines for her newly-announced Son's birth, from the first Chanukah; for she just then knew He'd be born on the 160th anniversary of that first Chanukah. Channel showing the videos on this: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . Doc used in video (latest version): brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or 'doc').

Turns out that all other NT Bible dateline meter formulas key off her reconciliation. Luke in particular, pads her text with a preface 'k'eipen Miryam' to reconcile between the shoulda-been-born Year 4106 From Adam's Fall to the then-known 4103 FAF, which Mary's tallying. But long prior, starting with Galatians, Paul had been doing the same thing, as you can now see in the paulmeter channel ( Pauline Dateline Meters ).

That flummoxed me, so here I go back to Mary's Magnificat to show the proof of Magnificat setting that accounting precedence. For it matters to know WHY all the NT books find some way to date their books based on the Lord's woulda-been or real age. Especially, since to this day 'scholars' debate when He was born, as if that information wasn't baldly disclosed in Scripture. Which as you'll see from the text interacting with the meter (or from the text alone, if you actually READ it carefully) — as you'll see, Bible does baldly and repeatedly state WHEN He was born. For, all Bible dates from Genesis to Rev hub around His Birth and Death, as Messiah is the key to history.

To show that, Mary keys off Daniel, starting 73 years after Daniel's timeline ended at 238 BC (rise of the feet of clay and iron, Rome), so 238+73 later = end 165 BC = start 164 BC = 1st Chanukah. Christ is actually born 160th year after that, shoulda-been born 164th year after that relative to Abraham (Luke's padding, left numbers on screen). So then 40 years of life leaves 56/7 years to Mill (57 really, since He's to die at beginning of year at Passover, on either schedule). So Mary was reconciling equidistantly, the payback on Abraham's 54 year credit at the end, like this: 40 when His Life was scheduled to end +16 +40 remaining coundown to Mill.

If you look at all the other NT dateline meters (except Matthew, who dates his book from Malachi), they all follow her same accounting formulas, back-and-forth. Shocking. This also shows the INTENT of the meter, so again you can tell the meter counts are the result of the writers deliberately padding their text to GET TO those meters. So again you can be very assured that God preserved His Word. Pity the stupid 'quelle' people, the horrible KJVO people, the dumb Mormons and Muslims and atheists who all claim that Bible is corrupted or that we don't have the original text. We do. Provably. Better still, we now have a better tool to sort among the variants, to correct the UBS text, at least for these dateline meters. Most of all, this accounting in Magnificat, shows the origin of all those dateline meter formulas. And perhaps most interesting, is the proof that what you should value about MARY, is her knowledge of doctrine, not the cheap trashy pandered claim by the lying Catholics, about her staying a virgin (a lie invented originally to 'compete' with pagan Roman Vestal Virgins; not at all Scriptural, as she would have SINNED not to have children with her husband). Oh well.

File Name: MaryRevisited, 3/14/15.


GGS11s16 Mary Reconciles to Daniel

To show how Mary picks up where Daniel left off, so you can see the precedent for her reconciliation. I've covered this before, but here the reconciliation is clearer. Thus when the entire NT's dateline meters measure from hers, you can see why.

Websites used in the video, to show importance of 238 BC:

Floralia (which was first instituted in the same year, maybe unrelated but doubtless reason for the year to be memorable as well): penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/floralia.html

UNRV: unrv.com/provinces/province-chronology.php

Turns out UNRV does have a chronology from 284-238, here: unrv.com/empire/roman-timeline-3rd-century.php

Navies of Rome book: books.google.com/books?id=ccHyOlPK4pIC&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&f=false

Eckstein's book: amazon.com/dp/0520259920/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1AC6BCZ98965A&coliid=IJE4KL97PCS2V

The Daniel chrono chart (below) has another link to that time which is more meaty.

284 BC, the earlier point in Daniel's Track 2 chronology, was a different kind of turning point, a settling with the Gauls: books.google.com/books?id=aEfvR1Qcd0gC&pg=PA349&f=false
You can find the same material elsewhere, but that link is a handy summary.

Here's another handy summary about how 284 BC was a turning point which you can download for free, see the middle left column on the page: books.google.com/books?id=mW8NAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&f=false

They often use Polybius' Histories, here free download in both Greek and English, link being the page which talks about the 284 turning point, books.google.com/books?id=ujMjAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA16#v=twopage&q&f=false

No offense, but the dingdongs who claim a late date for Daniel, really have no clue about anything. For it's impossible for anyone to know the CURRENT EFFECT of history, on the future. So this is clearly Divine Prophecy in METER, for crying out loud. No human is this smart.

Docs used in video:

Mary's Magnificat (latest version): brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf
Daniel: brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf

You really need to read both, and spend a lot of time vetting, as the proof is extensive and complex. Will take months to vet, sorry. The Daniel piece's 'Footnote E' goes through the verses on the kings Daniel covers per syllable=year, recounting them in light of the Kings and Chronicles verses covering them, intertwining those references as he talks. No wonder God had him rule Babylon. Mary KNEW that too, and she's emulating Daniel's prayer style when she talks. No wonder God had her be the mother, as it would be necessary for Christ to be thoroughly versed in Scripture from birth. As you proof both docs, you'll be amazed at both believers' command of Scripture. For which they are both, underpraised. THIS is what is supposed to happen to the believer, total integrated fluency in KNOWING BIBLE.

BTW, you can substitute 'pdf' for 'doc' ('RTF' for Daniel) to instead download the Word doc originals

File Name: DanRevisited123.avi 3/15/15.


PATU40 Ephesians 1:3-14 Revisited 1/5

For Masochists Only. Audit video subseries revisits whether I explained the dateline '56' of Ephesians rightly: I hadn't. Skip to 5/5's corrected answer if you don't want to see the very boring audit process. Or, download the two-page audit correction, here: brainout.net/EphDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

Turns out Paul used the 'I write you' meter style in Romans (which was precedent), but had to 'pad' 2 years into the text: BECAUSE he writes in ad 58, so can't tag Mary's 56 without some haha math. 5/5 shows that haha math (rounding tricks on years Christ did or should have died, '37' and '47'); yet all four videos are useful re technique for sleuthing Bible meters. Took me four hours' videos to figure out Paul's haha. Happily, though, I don't have to redo all my past Ephesians videos nor rewrite the video's 150-page doc, brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf aka Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) !

If you're not already familiar with the meter styles, you'll need some background on the Doctrine no one in Christendom yet knows, HOW GOD ORCHESTRATES TIME (channel on its math, is How God Orchestrates Time ). No one knows that doctrine, because no one's ever plotted Bible's dates using ONLY Bible, so all the Bible timelines 'out there' are at least partially wrong and contradictory. I learned that, the hard way, so went BACK TO THE BIBLE and only used it to construct brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls, using the Gen5 and 7, 11 begats (all in the worksheet and visible), plus verses not much used by anyone else. Verse disclosure and method of constructing the worksheet is in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

You need that worksheet, as the Bible meters measure time in the same way, ADAMIC YEARS. For example, Christ died in 4136 vernal. He was SUPPOSED to die 10 years later, in 4146 vernal. Paul depends on the reader knowing that for his haha math, as the ADAMIC year equivalents are 4136.5 and 4146.5, respectively. Since you can't split a syllable=year, he neatly rounds to get to the shoulda-been age (a meter convention that equals our 'ad') by saying (41)37 and (41)47, in the meter you see onscreen. Heh. But that would mean Christ age 58, not 56, so he backs out the '2' added, to get back to 56, so he can pick up where Mary's Magnificat, left off. Magnificat videos are here: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time .

Thus in Ephesians, Paul reconciles all the way back to Adam. Which I knew, but couldn't figure out how he did it. Until now.

File Name: EphRev1-2.avi, 3/25/15.


PATU41 Ephesians 1:3-14 Revisited 2/5

For Masochists Only. Audit video subseries revisits whether I explained the dateline '56' of Ephesians rightly: I hadn't. Skip to 5/5's corrected answer if you don't want to see the very boring audit process. Or, download the two-page audit correction, here: brainout.net/EphDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

Turns out Paul used the 'I write you' meter style in Romans (which was precedent), but had to 'pad' 2 years into the text: BECAUSE he writes in ad 58, so can't tag Mary's 56 without some haha math. 5/5 shows that haha math (rounding tricks on years Christ did or should have died, '37' and '47'); yet all four videos are useful re technique for sleuthing Bible meters. Took me four hours' videos to figure out Paul's haha. Happily, though, I don't have to redo all my past Ephesians videos nor rewrite the video's 150-page doc, brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf aka Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) !

If you're not already familiar with the meter styles, you'll need some background on the Doctrine no one in Christendom yet knows, HOW GOD ORCHESTRATES TIME (channel on its math, is How God Orchestrates Time ). No one knows that doctrine, because no one's ever plotted Bible's dates using ONLY Bible, so all the Bible timelines 'out there' are at least partially wrong and contradictory. I learned that, the hard way, so went BACK TO THE BIBLE and only used it to construct brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls, using the Gen5 and 7, 11 begats (all in the worksheet and visible), plus verses not much used by anyone else. Verse disclosure and method of constructing the worksheet is in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

You need that worksheet, as the Bible meters measure time in the same way, ADAMIC YEARS. For example, Christ died in 4136 vernal. He was SUPPOSED to die 10 years later, in 4146 vernal. Paul depends on the reader knowing that for his haha math, as the ADAMIC year equivalents are 4136.5 and 4146.5, respectively. Since you can't split a syllable=year, he neatly rounds to get to the shoulda-been age (a meter convention that equals our 'ad') by saying (41)37 and (41)47, in the meter you see onscreen. Heh. But that would mean Christ age 58, not 56, so he backs out the '2' added, to get back to 56, so he can pick up where Mary's Magnificat, left off. Magnificat videos are here: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time .

Thus in Ephesians, Paul reconciles all the way back to Adam. Which I knew, but couldn't figure out how he did it. Until now.

File Name: EphRev345.avi, 3/25/15.


PATU42 Ephesians 1:3-14 Revisited 3/5

For Masochists Only. Audit video subseries revisits whether I explained the dateline '56' of Ephesians rightly: I hadn't. Skip to 5/5's corrected answer if you don't want to see the very boring audit process. Or, download the two-page audit correction, here: brainout.net/EphDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

Turns out Paul used the 'I write you' meter style in Romans (which was precedent), but had to 'pad' 2 years into the text: BECAUSE he writes in ad 58, so can't tag Mary's 56 without some haha math. 5/5 shows that haha math (rounding tricks on years Christ did or should have died, '37' and '47'); yet all four videos are useful re technique for sleuthing Bible meters. Took me four hours' videos to figure out Paul's haha. Happily, though, I don't have to redo all my past Ephesians videos nor rewrite the video's 150-page doc, brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf aka Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) !

If you're not already familiar with the meter styles, you'll need some background on the Doctrine no one in Christendom yet knows, HOW GOD ORCHESTRATES TIME (channel on its math, is How God Orchestrates Time ). No one knows that doctrine, because no one's ever plotted Bible's dates using ONLY Bible, so all the Bible timelines 'out there' are at least partially wrong and contradictory. I learned that, the hard way, so went BACK TO THE BIBLE and only used it to construct brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls, using the Gen5 and 7, 11 begats (all in the worksheet and visible), plus verses not much used by anyone else. Verse disclosure and method of constructing the worksheet is in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

You need that worksheet, as the Bible meters measure time in the same way, ADAMIC YEARS. For example, Christ died in 4136 vernal. He was SUPPOSED to die 10 years later, in 4146 vernal. Paul depends on the reader knowing that for his haha math, as the ADAMIC year equivalents are 4136.5 and 4146.5, respectively. Since you can't split a syllable=year, he neatly rounds to get to the shoulda-been age (a meter convention that equals our 'ad') by saying (41)37 and (41)47, in the meter you see onscreen. Heh. But that would mean Christ age 58, not 56, so he backs out the '2' added, to get back to 56, so he can pick up where Mary's Magnificat, left off. Magnificat videos are here: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time .

Thus in Ephesians, Paul reconciles all the way back to Adam. Which I knew, but couldn't figure out how he did it. Until now.

File Name: EphRev6-7.avi, 3/25/15.


PATU43 Ephesians 1:3-14 Revisited 4/5

For Masochists Only. Audit video subseries revisits whether I explained the dateline '56' of Ephesians rightly: I hadn't. Skip to 5/5's corrected answer if you don't want to see the very boring audit process. Or, download the two-page audit correction, here: brainout.net/EphDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

Turns out Paul used the 'I write you' meter style in Romans (which was precedent), but had to 'pad' 2 years into the text: BECAUSE he writes in ad 58, so can't tag Mary's 56 without some haha math. 5/5 shows that haha math (rounding tricks on years Christ did or should have died, '37' and '47'); yet all four videos are useful re technique for sleuthing Bible meters. Took me four hours' videos to figure out Paul's haha. Happily, though, I don't have to redo all my past Ephesians videos nor rewrite the video's 150-page doc, brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf aka Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) !

If you're not already familiar with the meter styles, you'll need some background on the Doctrine no one in Christendom yet knows, HOW GOD ORCHESTRATES TIME (channel on its math, is How God Orchestrates Time ). No one knows that doctrine, because no one's ever plotted Bible's dates using ONLY Bible, so all the Bible timelines 'out there' are at least partially wrong and contradictory. I learned that, the hard way, so went BACK TO THE BIBLE and only used it to construct brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls, using the Gen5 and 7, 11 begats (all in the worksheet and visible), plus verses not much used by anyone else. Verse disclosure and method of constructing the worksheet is in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

You need that worksheet, as the Bible meters measure time in the same way, ADAMIC YEARS. For example, Christ died in 4136 vernal. He was SUPPOSED to die 10 years later, in 4146 vernal. Paul depends on the reader knowing that for his haha math, as the ADAMIC year equivalents are 4136.5 and 4146.5, respectively. Since you can't split a syllable=year, he neatly rounds to get to the shoulda-been age (a meter convention that equals our 'ad') by saying (41)37 and (41)47, in the meter you see onscreen. Heh. But that would mean Christ age 58, not 56, so he backs out the '2' added, to get back to 56, so he can pick up where Mary's Magnificat, left off. Magnificat videos are here: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time .

Thus in Ephesians, Paul reconciles all the way back to Adam. Which I knew, but couldn't figure out how he did it. Until now.

File Name: EphRev8-9.avi, 3/25/15.


PATU44 Ephesians 1:3-14 Revisited 5/5

For Masochists Only. Audit video subseries revisits whether I explained the dateline '56' of Ephesians rightly: I hadn't. This is 5/5's corrected answer. Download the two-page audit correction, here: brainout.net/EphDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'. The Romans doc is brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf or doc.

Turns out Paul used the 'I write you' meter style in Romans (which was precedent), but had to 'pad' 2 years into the text: BECAUSE he writes in ad 58, so can't tag Mary's 56 without some haha math. This 5/5 shows that haha math (rounding tricks on years Christ did or should have died, '37' and '47'); yet all four videos are useful re technique for sleuthing Bible meters. Took me four hours' videos to figure out Paul's haha. Happily, though, I don't have to redo all my past Ephesians videos nor rewrite the video's 150-page doc, brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf aka Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) !

If you're not already familiar with the meter styles, you'll need some background on the Doctrine no one in Christendom yet knows, HOW GOD ORCHESTRATES TIME (channel on its math, is How God Orchestrates Time ). No one knows that doctrine, because no one's ever plotted Bible's dates using ONLY Bible, so all the Bible timelines 'out there' are at least partially wrong and contradictory. I learned that, the hard way, so went BACK TO THE BIBLE and only used it to construct brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls, using the Gen5 and 7, 11 begats (all in the worksheet and visible), plus verses not much used by anyone else. Verse disclosure and method of constructing the worksheet is in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

You need that worksheet, as the Bible meters measure time in the same way, ADAMIC YEARS. For example, Christ died in 4136 vernal. He was SUPPOSED to die 10 years later, in 4146 vernal. Paul depends on the reader knowing that for his haha math, as the ADAMIC year equivalents are 4136.5 and 4146.5, respectively. Since you can't split a syllable=year, he neatly rounds to get to the shoulda-been age (a meter convention that equals our 'ad') by saying (41)37 and (41)47, in the meter you see onscreen. Heh. But that would mean Christ age 58, not 56, so he backs out the '2' added, to get back to 56, so he can pick up where Mary's Magnificat, left off. Magnificat videos are here: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time .

Thus in Ephesians, Paul reconciles all the way back to Adam. Which I knew, but couldn't figure out how he did it. Until now.

File Name: EphRevisit10.avi, 3/25/15.


Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

+ Genesis 1 Meter

Channel has two foci: a) Bible NEVER SAYS how old earth is, YES says fauna and flora are to 'evolve' (but not Darwin's flavor), says NO man is not 'evolved', for each human is created directly by God AT BIRTH (so no human life in any womb). Then b) Genesis 5 starts demonstrating the pan-Bible doctrine of How God Orchestrates Time.

For Genesis 1 METER cleverly and satirically interacts with the text to show b) is its main topic — water being used as the metaphor to link Earth's rebirth, Israel's birth, as ties to the Flood rebirth, and of course your own (breaking water physical birth to getting a spiritual life as rebirth). For, the whole purpose of God DAWDLING to restore the Earth in six literal days, was to teach the concept of 'week'. Meaning, a little bit of Bible today, a little tomorrow and tomorrow 4x until you REST one last day, then start over. Showing incrementals, priority, proportionality. So you can order your own thinking, and thus your life.

Genesis is a very campy, witty book. Made snoozy, in translation. Hence this series and each episode, is patterned after Dr. Who. For God really is the Time Lord, and wants to make us like Him. One Day At A Time.

This playlist is also in Youtube, http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAB5BE9F40D2918FB . Any new videos, however, will only be added to this vimeo channel.

Fireworks picture was taken by a friend of mine on the undernet who calls himself 'JohnRR', and is not copyrighted.

This playlist is in vimeo, http://vimeo.com/channels/genesisexeg . The bliptv versions are gone. Vimeo vids are downloadable in several formats.

SERIES GIST: Gen 1:2 says Earth (not universe) was RESTORED in six days, not initially created, due to Angelic Conflict (between probably-instant creation in verse 1, and verse 2). Due to that conflict, TIME ITSELF is a 'loan', which must be 'paid' by some human supermaturing every 490 years. That doctrine begins to be tracked in Bible with the Genesis 5 roster: Adam was the first guy who supermatured. The doctrine continues pan-Bible, but in this series we'll stop after Genesis 5 and just show the timeline. My other playlists in How God Constructs Time, Yapping Most High Part 10 and GGS Part 10, plus root Bible presentation in Psalm 90 Meter of Time playlist, all show you the Time doctrine in much more detail. Underlying webpages with much Bible proof is provided in each video's description.

So both evolutionists and Christians who claim Bible says world created in six days don't know how to read Bible. It was RESTORED in six literal days, can't say when that was. Only thing you can date in Bible is the timeline beginning at Adam's FALL in 4106BC. That's where Bible starts accounting time. Series walks you through all this, as well. Missed, by both sides in the debate.

Along the way, "trichotomy" is covered, which is Bible's doctrine of SPIRITUAL death versus mere physical death: the soul, never dies. That's why hell versus heaven is THE issue for your life. So Episodes 6 and 7, show an accounting of trichotomy from Bible itself. Episode 8 shows the Time Doctrine overview, and how to use the Timeline worksheet you can download to vet video claims.


Gen1, Genesis of the Dingbats

This video heads the vimeo 'Genesis, with Exegesis' Channel: Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof) . Same playlist is also in Youtube, same name. (The bliptv copy, is now gone.)

Gist: Bible is mistranslated in Genesis 1:2, so Christians don't properly interpret Genesis. That, due to Christians using Bishop Ussher's timeline instead of Bible, to date creation. Bible disagrees with BOTH the creationists and evolutionists — how embarrassing for us Christians. Bible plainly says the Earth was RESTORED in six LITERAL days, not initially created over that period; 'day' here is EXPLICITLY 24 hours (Hebrew idiom of evening THEN morning can only be literal, as the Hebrew day began at SUNSET) — not some hallucinated longer period by moderns who have no faith in Bible. Pity we Christians hate God so much we won't even READ what He says.

Secondly, it demonstrates God's Rules for Constructing Time, a doctrine unknown in Christendom which USED to be known in Judaism; the doctrine begins with the begats in Genesis 5. Episode 8 covers that doctrine.

For those of you who saw this series in bliptv, they disabled the players; you can now only view the series via Youtube players or directly here in vimeo. So my chatty insistence (beginning at 2:55) that you look at the Youtube or blip video description's 'download links', are now outdated.

3-page Word.doc summarizing video series content: brainout.net/TimeTravelinGenesisVidSummary.doc

Off-Youtube, view and original videos:
brainout.net/SatStrat2.htm#GenesisVids . You can download them here in vimeo; or if you want the original file (named at the end of each video description), let me know and I'll upload it to my domain for your anonymous download.

Larger context of satanic messing with Bible teaching and translation: brainout.net/SatTacExamp.htm#BibleTrans

Upload File Name: GenesisDingbats.wmv, 8/25/08.


Gen2, Time Begins

Genesis 1:1 exegesis. Here we'll begin to see proof that the typical Christian kant about the universe being created in six days, is NOT what Genesis says, in Hebrew. Ooops. Embarrassing, how obviously we don't do our homework in Bible we allege to believe.

File name: Genesis1v1.avi, 8/25/08.


Gen3, Earth RESTORED

Inspired Hebrew and Greek of Bible says EARTH (not the universe) was RESTORED (not initially created) in six literal (not figurative) days. So EXISTING MATERIAL is restored; that's why vegetation etc. pre-exists the lights — the earth was TRASHED = 'tohu wa bohu' (Hebrew) in Genesis 1:2. Episode 4 will take you through all the 'tohu wa bohu' verses in Bible so you'll see for yourself, it means TRASHED. So Genesis 1:2 et seq. depicts a literal restoration, but the deeper meaning reflects what the Holy Spirit does to you at salvation. That's why Genesis (a GREEK word) = the Origin of THE MAN, Christ — Who restores us from our trashed up state of sin, forever!

So anyone claiming a literal six-day creation, won't read Bible; it's a RESTORATION. How long the initial creation took, is NOT stated in Bible. Probably He did it all in one day (Job 38:4-7), but who knows.

Anyone claiming the six days aren't literal, won't do his homework on Hebrew idiom ('evening then morning' is Hebrew idiom for 24 hours, never means anything else). Sad how we Christians lie against the Word, huh.

Note: this 8/2008 video (originally in three subparts) was transferred to Youtube and vimeo from my bliptv account, same Episode number.

File Name: GenEpi3-1v2abc.avi, 2/10/11, made from originals a,b,c 8/25/08.


Gen3a, Earth RESTORED, Addendum

More on how Genesis 1:7 says the Holy Spirit restored Earth's atmosphere. Sadly it's fuzzed over in translation, but the lexicographers know its meaning (i.e., TWOT lexicon for raq'ia). So in this short video I talk (ramble?) about the implications of that, in light of Bible's disclosure of Angelic Conflict and what 'science' we have.

3-page Word.doc summarizing video series content: brainout.net/TimeTravelinGenesisVidSummary.doc

File Name: Genesis Epi3 Addendum.wmv, 9/1/08.


Gen4a, 'tohu wa bohu' verses

Here we see pan-Bible, how Genesis 1:2's 'tohu wa bohu' means 'chaos and wasteland', as Bible translators well know (and my pastor taught this for 53 years); but due to political correctness, they won't FIX Genesis 1:2's KJV mistranslation! Only the NIV was brave enough to even make a footnote!

So this video is long and technical. Episode 4b will show the ultimate proof, in Isaiah 45. Really sad, how much Christians hate God and His Word!

Note: this 2008 video is transferred from my bliptv account to Youtube and vimeo. Vimeo view/download, vimeo.com/brainout/genesisexegepi4a .

If you want the original, let me know and I'll upload it to brainout.net. File Name: GenEpi4aReMix.avi, 2/10/11, made from original 4a folder 8/26-9/06/08.


Gen4b, Isaiah 45 proves Earth RESTORED

This climactic (and shorter) video demonstrates from both Isaiah 45 and Jeremiah 4 that Genesis 1:2 and following are about Earth's RESTORATION, NOT its initial creation. Christ flat SAYS so in Isaiah 45. So anyone claiming an initial six-day (literal or not) creation is either a) ignorant of Bible, or b) a liar. Take your pick!

Really embarrassing, how Christians hate God and His Word, never even bothering to RESEARCH what they claim of either One!

File Name: GenEpi4bRemixIsa45Add1-2.avi, 2/10/11, made from original Epi4 folder, 8/26/-9/06/08.


Gen5, Evolution of the Dingbats

Here, pondering the sad implications of how for centuries, Bible has been misrepresented in pulpits, seminaries.. and why it keeps going on.

File Name: Gen5ab.avi, 11/13/13, made from original Epi5 folder 8/26/08.


Gen6, Genesis of the Restoration

Episode Gen6 is on Genesis 1:3's exegesis, with a sidetrip into Matthew 4:3, to show God just SPEAKS (wills) a thing into existence, tying back to Genesis 1:1's FINISHED initial creation. So the RESTORATION has the same characteristic, and the story is thus humorous, because God only does one little thing per 'day' as if it tired Him out (sigh, 'Oy Vey!' here) — to teach us His Policy about TIME. Very witty.

Other Hebrew and Greek geek items are covered along the way. Amazing how fast, fun and easy Bible is to learn if you just see it as GOD wrote it — relevant, in context, memorable, meaningful! When you were a kid, you learned by hearing words ASSOCIATED with the things they depicted. You didn't learn dry rules apart from the context. Sure, later in school you learned that rules existed, but by then it was FUN to learn WHY the words worked the way they did. But at first, you just learned what the words were, in a context that interested you.

So, then: what can be more interesting than REAL Bible? Rather than that snoozy, fuzzy, usually-boring-and-anthropocentric-mistranslated ENGLISH, oy vey!

File Name: GenEpi6abcRemix.avi, 2/11/11, from Epi6 folder, 8/29/08.


6def Genesis of the Restoration, hayyim verses

More on the meaning of 'hayyim', proving scholars have overlooked the times when it's literal for MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF LIFE. For you must have spiritual life, to live with God; soul life, to be human; body life, to be physically alive. These types of life are each self-contained, and explain much about why you must be 'born again' to be saved.

So this video continues from 6abc, the tracking of the 83 hayyim verses in Bible, so you can see the distinctions Bible makes.

It matters a bunch, for Christ Died Two Deaths On the Cross, just as Adam died two deaths. The Last Adam's spiritual death, however, was substitutionary, as Isaiah 53:9-12 explicitly says — in Hebrew, not English. So if you don't want to be a dufus, mistaking physical death for spiritual payment (which required a different kind of LIFE to pay, since God is SPIRITUAL), pay close attention to this video's Hebrew. Then you'll see why the Cross is so VAST a payment, NOTHING you do with your dead-in-Adam body, could ever 'contribute' squat!


7abcd Genesis Devolution of Man

How Bible distinguishes between spiritual and physical death is the focus: Hebrew "moth tamuth" verses. Starts in Genesis 2:17. Adam had TWO types of immaterial life, and one type of biological life at creation. 13 verses in Scripture play on this meaning. Here we go over those verses.

For you're not really alive, unless you have life with God, which means you need SPIRITUAL life. You need SOUL life to think and interact with other souled creation (angels, humans), and you need physical life to interact in a finite world and with animals, etc. So three types of "lives" (hayyim, from Episode 6d-f).

Adam loses his SPIRITUAL life when he sins; so a) his days BECOME numbered, because b) he will now die phyisically. That's what "moth tamuth" means in Genesis 2:17, but it's always mistranslated. So we have to spend time on all the "moth tamuth" verses, and the Greek LXX rendering of that key phrase (which in English should be translated, "dying [spiritually], you will die [physically]".

The other Bible verses play on the meaning in Genesis 2:17's judgment, to also mean soul 'death' (when soul departs from the body), and physical death (body being dead because it has no soul to 'run' it). The soul doesn't really die, but it must have a house. So the act of LEAVING the house, is designated by the 'tamuth'.

Hence Last Adam also had THREE types of life, and when He pays for our sins on the Cross, He thus suffers TWO deaths (Isaiah 53:9's Hebrew). The Substitutionary Spiritual Death paid for our sins, not His Physical death.


8ab Genesis of the Time Lords

The Lord of All is the Lord of Time. In the Angelic Trial, which was introduced in Genesis 1:2, the Lord makes a Trial of Mankind to prove to Satan & Co., why their sentence is just. Part of that Trial is the Trial of Time Continuing. Believers are made to BUY TIME — a bigger work than any human can do, obviously — if they vote to be supermatured by God. You VOTE, by learning and living on Bible. That's the history God plots in Bible. Not what you do with your dead-in-Adam body, but what you BELIEVE and LEARN about GOD. That's the whole theme of the Trial, Hebrews 11:1 (see my three videos exegeting that verse).

In short, you are enabled By God to Buy Time for the Human Race. With Time, go the other accoutrements. Christ wasn't kidding when He said, 'seek ye first the kingdom of God and all these things will be added unto you'. Yeah, the believer is to be a 'spiritual atlas', as my pastor once put it. Learn and live on Bible and that's what God will do to you and for the world! Better than money in a collection plate, huh...

This Buying-Time accounting begins in Genesis 5, which is here introduced. We'll see how the 'all the days of your life' clauses in Bible do NOT necessarily mean from BIRTH forward, so do NOT mean from Adam's creation, forward. Thus again we know that Genesis 1:2 is about Earth's Restoration, and doesn't even measure Time UNTIL Adam's fall.

The Genesis 5 roster and God's Rules for Time are the focus of Episode 8, which is quite long (several hours). You'll learn how to use the Excel worksheet I wrote to display this doctrine about Time, and you can vet it IN the Bible. Relevant links to do this, follow.

Worksheet: GeneYrs.xls.

Synopsis of Bible verses showing how to plot the Time rules and read Time in the Bible: brainoutFAQ.htm#6. Keep reading through 6b.

Main webpage on the topic: Mirroring.htm. That webpage's first white table also has many other links allowing full vetting of the material. It's the hub for all the Time doctrines. Document 'hub' for all this God Orchestrates Time information, is Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.


Ep. 8c1, Genesis of the Time 'lords' (old version)

This trailer video is also replaced by the full-version 8c1-4. The purpose of 8c is to show how God creates Rules for Time to be Granted, hence the nickname 'Time lords' in BBC's "Dr. Who" ironically has a Bible meaning. The 14 videos of this 8c walk you through the worksheet and trace out the salient time grants through Christ. Thus this 8c ties to my "How God Orchestrates Time" video as well; after all, the rules originated in Genesis. :)

View whole series in crystal clarity, FULLSCREEN, at SatStrat2.htm#GenesisVids. That page also has download links of the original avi movies per Episode. Be sure to click on the big square at the bottom of the player to view fullscreen, so you can see BibleWorks' Hebrew, Greek, and lexicons well. Below and to the right of the player will be video descriptions per episode; the whole series will automatically play in order.

DOWNLOADS: SatStrat2.htm#GenVidDownl


8c1-4 Genesis of the Time lords, cont.

Continued from 8ab, which has the worksheet and other links. This 8c1-4 shows you how to use the worksheet to see God's Rules for Time; it is due to these rules that the Rapture exists, and is pre-Trib (a kind of Exodus Ascension for Church as Body of Christ). So these videos are compiled from the bliptv 2008 video subseries (hence the weird video numbering); ALL those sub-episodes are now moved to Youtube, but if you want the clearer original, you can download it at http://vimeo.com/brainout/genexeg8c1-4 .

Note: I didn't know the Psalm 90, Daniel 9 and Eph 1 meter when I made the 8c series in 2008; so the videos don't talk about that added Bible proof.

These videos were originally posted, 9/3/08.


8c5-8 Genesis of the Time lords, cont.

Continued from Episode 8c1-4. Worksheet: GeneYrs.xls. Synopsis of Bible verses showing how to plot the Time rules and read Time in the Bible: brainoutFAQ.htm#6. Keep reading through 6b.

Main webpage on the topic: Mirroring.htm. That webpage's first white table also has many other links allowing full vetting of the material. It's the hub for the Time doctrine.

More-current video information already exists in Youtube. See also my Yapping Most High Episode 10, GGS Episode 10, Psalm 90 Meter of Time and How God Constructs Time playlists for much more information on this topic. I've been researching it for 11 years now, so I apologize for the far-flung nature of the info. One day I'll have time (heh) to coalesce it better.

Note: these Episode 8c videos were originally made September 2008 in bliptv, now uploaded to Youtube; but if you want the clearer original, you can download it at http://vimeo.com/brainout/genexeg8c5-8. So they do not include the Psalm 90 and GGS material, because I didn't know that Bible proof until 2009 and 2010, respectively.


9 Genesis Regenesis ! (series end)

Series conclusion. GIST: a) that Christians hate God's Word so misrepresent it, i.e., claiming that the Earth was initially created in six days; b) God grants Time as a LOAN, conditional on someone supermaturing every 490 years; this latter doctrine is completely unknown to Christendom, and begins in Genesis 5.

Original worksheet itself is GeneYrs.xls. If you click on cell A2 of that worksheet you will get a 30-page Word doc which connects to all the webpages I wrote on the topic, so you have plenty of Bible material presented for your vetting pleasure. Or, see my How God Constructs Time, Psalm 90 Meter of Time, Yapping Most High Part 10 and GGS Part 10 playlists here in Youtube, which have extensive webpage links to Bible verses and other proofing material, in their video descriptions.

8c shows how God creates Rules for Time to be Granted, hence the nickname 'Time lords' from BBC's "Dr. Who", for the series.


Genesis 1 Meter (Remix 3/31/15)

REMIX, DATELINES CHANGED. Genesis 1 meter, real shocker. Genesis proves the provenance of the 364, 560 and most importantly, the 1050 BASE UNIT giving rise to the "Millennium" doctrine. Genesis sets doctrinal precedence pan-Bible, as hopefully everyone knows, so this is very strong proof. Download the pdf here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Related material which now has much more relevance.

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: Gen1Meter1-2.avi, 3/31/15 replacing prior video from 3/26.


Genesis 1 Meter Epi 2: TIE TO ABRAHAM (and hence to 1050)

How Genesis 1 metrically ties to Abraham, a real smoking gun killing all preterism, Replacement theology, non-millennialisms and especially, those who deny pre-Trib Rapture. For the Rapture is designed to RETURN TO the original schedule which starts with, Abram.

To show this, Genesis 1 'times' its meter to begin the sixth day Decree at syllable 766, to 'tag' Abraham. The math is exquisite,just like all the other meter math, especially Daniel 9's — which this video covers. The pdf/doc already shows it, so you can just skip the video, read the doc instead. Proves again the provenance of the 364, 560 and most importantly, the 1050 BASE UNIT giving rise to the "Millennium" doctrine, since God 'balances' Time due to Abraham's maturation. Genesis sets doctrinal precedence pan-Bible, as hopefully everyone knows, so this is very strong proof. Download the pdf here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Related material which now has much more relevance.

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time
Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi2.avi, 4/2/15.


Genesis 1 Meter Epi 3: How Old Earth?

Does the Genesis 1 Meter tell us how old Earth is, or how long Adam existed PRIOR TO his fall? Well, to prove that, two steps are required:

a) Meter counting methodology must be the right one, and
b) Scripture elsewhere must expressly reference the age of Earth or Adam PRE Fall, in its text. Genesis 1 does not provide that support. Nor does Genesis 5, since it starts with Adam's fall: days not numbered until Genesis 3:17, and Hebrew joke in Gen 3:22 calls Adam 'born' (birthing preposition min = out from away from separate from).. when he fell. So for Adam in Genesis 5, the '130' is his years AFTER his fall, not his actual age. Maybe it's metered, I didn't check that.

Without b), then a) is useless. However, in this video's last half, I'll go through a). The first half is the METHODOLOGY you follow, which all the other Bible meters use — maybe because Genesis 1 is precedenting. For example, NT Romans, Acts, and all John's stuff use the same meter methodology as you'll see me use here. So you know how to do it, in case Genesis 1 or some other passage meters the age (ideally, with a smoking gun b) textual support) of either Adam pre-Fall, or of Earth.

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis. So the same style, is tested in this video.

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi3.avi, 4/2/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi 4a: Sleuthing Style

>For Masochists Only. Sleuthing video on the rhetorical meter style. Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results.

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis. So the same style, is tested in this video.

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4abBetter.avi 4/14/15 made from 4/12 'Better' vid segments.


Gen 1 Meter Epi 4b: Sleuthing, cont.

For Masochists Only. Sleuthing video on the rhetorical meter style, cont. Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results.

Searching for the 'metaphorical framework' represented by the meter's interaction with the text. Here it becomes clear that the VOTING 70 is a key. But to what? I don't know. So the video comes up with no conclusion, and again only a masochist would want to watch it. Yet I must document the process, so you see it's not random or magical. God TEACHES the brain how to think via the sleuthing, so although you do need HIS answers, He only gives you some of the answer at a time; or, gives you the whole answer and like a geometry teacher, expects you to prove why the answer is true.

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis. So the same style, is tested in this video.

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4cdefBetter.avi 4/14/15 made from 4/12 'Better' vid segments.


Gen 1 Meter Epi 4c: Corrected DATELINES

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Turns out Moses writes Genesis 1 the same year as Psalm 90, which is the year before he dies. That change, has a dramatic effect on how to read the meter throughout. Video's other meter numbers are somewhat changed later on (though the sevenings per 'day' remain the same). It was a question of WHAT the 63 and 119 referenced. Here we'll see how the sleuthing gave rise to understanding the correction.

It gets kinda dramatic in future episodes as a result, though the painstaking process of evaluation, remains ipse boring. Becomes clear that Moses is drawing a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial RESTORATION of the world for man's occupation. Quite a different emphasis from the shallow and generally incompetent 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling of the chapter. Meter helps you see how much we've been missing, so its drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis. So the same style, is tested in this video.

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4c.avi, 4/15/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi 4d: 'Sevens' Redux

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Now we review the other sevened meters in light of the corrected datelines. You can skip this video if you want, and instead download the NEWLY REVISED doc (link below). I didn't yet update the 'Meter Import' section, and won't for some weeks. First, the methodology must be firmed up, and that process begins here.

Meter numbers are somewhat changed versus this video. The sleuthing is still useful as a methodology demonstration. This video begins FIVE HYPOTHESES as to the way Moses wants the reader to account the sevens as a timeline. The meter will end up being changed as a result, but here I am just learning and stating the hypotheses as they occur to me while looking at the meter.

Heads-up: a version of the first hypothesis ends up the right one, and this video covers the first two hypotheses. However, the right version of the 1st, doesn't begin until Episode 4g. So unless you're a glutton for methodology, skip the videos until 4g. (I must document the sleuthing process, but you needn't watch it, very boring.)

Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4d.avi, 4/15/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi 4e: 'Sevens' Redux, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Continuing with Hypotheses 3 and 4, ways to test the meter for what style Moses intended; so far only alternatives are posed, no firm answers. Download the NEWLY REVISED doc (link below), which won't look like the video because I've made many changes which only show in future videos. The answer comes in the future videos, not yet here.

The sleuthing is still useful as a methodology demonstration. Heads-up: the 'fifth' hypothesis is a version of the first and seems to be the right one; and this video covers the 3rd and 4th hypotheses. However, the right version of the 1st, doesn't begin until Episode 4g. So unless you're a glutton for methodology, skip the videos until 4g. (I must document the sleuthing process, but you needn't watch it, very boring.)

Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4e.avi, 4/15/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi 4f: 'Sevens' Redux Review

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Evaluating the implications of Hypotheses 1 through 4, ways to test the meter for what style Moses intended, no firm answers. Download the AGAIN REVISED doc (link below), which won't look like the video: I've made many changes which only show in future videos. The most likely answer comes in the future videos, not yet here.

The sleuthing is still useful as a methodology demonstration. Heads-up: the 'fifth' hypothesis is a version of the first and seems to be the right one, though the others might also be true as well. So unless you're a glutton for methodology, skip the videos until 4g. (I must document the sleuthing process, but you needn't watch it, very boring.)

Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4f1-2.avi, 4/21/15 made from concatenated 4/15/15 videos


Gen 1 Meter Epi 4g: 'Sevens' Hypothesis 5

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Now to Hypothesis 5, a version of 1 yet also the most common meter pattern in Bible: each clause or each sevened clause as YEARS FROM WRITING DATE. Download the AGAIN REVISED doc (link below), which won't yet look like the video: I've made changes which only show in future videos. But the Hypo 5 pattern's sleuthed, starting here.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4g1-2.avi, 4/21/15 made from concatenated 4/15/15 videos


Gen 1 Meter Epi 4h: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Now to Hypothesis 5, a version of 1 yet also the most common meter pattern in Bible: each clause or each sevened clause as YEARS FROM WRITING DATE. Download the AGAIN REVISED doc (link below), which won't yet look like the video: I've made changes which only show in future videos. But the Hypo 5 pattern's sleuthed, starting here.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4g1-2.avi, 4/21/15 made from concatenated 4/15/15 videos


Gen 1 Meter Epi4i: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Still elaborating on at least one of the meter patterns here in Genesis 1, which is also the most common meter pattern in Bible: each sevened clause as YEARS FROM WRITING DATE. Download the doc (link below), which won't yet look like the video: I've made changes which only show in future videos.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4h.avi, 4/15/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4j: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Still elaborating on how each sevened clause tracks to an important YEARS FROM WRITING DATE. Download the doc (link below): starting here, in overview, some changes are explained.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4i.avi, 4/21/15 made from concatenated 4i-1 and 2 of 4/15/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4k: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Still elaborating on how each sevened clause tracks to an important YEARS FROM WRITING DATE, here starting with the 'fourth day' again. Download the doc (link below): it has answers to the questions posed here. Again, these are sleuthing videos. The doc is the result of the sleuthing which, at the time of making the videos, I had not fixed.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4j.avi, 4/15/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4l: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Still elaborating on how each sevened clause tracks to an important YEARS FROM WRITING DATE, here focusing on fourth and fifth days, again. No answers given, just the sleuthing technique. Download the doc (link below): it has answers to the questions posed here.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4k1-3.avi, 4/24/15 concatenated from k1 through 3 of 4/15/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4m: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Still elaborating on Moses' style of retrospective exposition using meter: how each sevened clause tracks to an important YEARS FROM WRITING DATE, here returning to sleuth anew: with egg on my face. Really obvious answers to the calculations, I've been missing! Download the doc (link below): it has answers to the questions posed here.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4l-1-2.avi, 4/24/15 concatenated from l1 - 2 of 4/16/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4m: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Still elaborating on Moses' style of retrospective exposition using meter: how each sevened clause tracks to Years From Writing Date, here resleuthing up to 364. Download the doc (link below): it has answers to the questions posed here.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4m1-4.avi, 4/24/15 concatenated from m1 - 4 of 4/16/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4n: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Still elaborating on Moses' style of retrospective exposition using meter: how each sevened clause tracks to Years From Writing Date, here resleuthing 378. Download the doc (link below): it has answers to the questions posed here.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4n1-4.avi, 4/24/15 concatenated from n1 - 4 of 4/16/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4o: 'Sevens' Hypo 5, cont.

Skip to Epi 4t if you just want to see the results. Still elaborating on Moses' style of retrospective exposition using meter: how each sevened clause tracks to Years From Writing Date, here resleuthing 378 and following. Download the doc (link below): it has answers to the questions posed here.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4o.avi, 4/24/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4p: 'Sevened' Paragraphs

Exploring the 'paragraph' meter patterns, to see how Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14 tags Genesis; again sleuthing them, and again the results won't yet show in the video,which merely documents the process. Download the doc (link below) to see the results, which keep on changing through Epi4s.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc .

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4p.avi, 4/24/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4q: 'Sevened' Paragraphs, cont.

Still exploring the 'paragraph' meter patterns, to see how Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14 tags Genesis; again sleuthing them, and again the results won't yet show in the video,which merely documents the process. Download the doc (link below) to see the results, which keep on changing through Epi4s.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc .

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4q.avi, 4/24/15 concatenated from q1 and 2 of 4/16/15


Gen 1 Meter Epi4r: 'Sevened' Paragraphs, cont.

Still exploring the 'paragraph' meter patterns, to see how Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14 tags Genesis, especially re the 91s; again the results won't yet show in the video, which merely documents the process. Download the doc (link below) to see the results, which keep on changing through Epi4s.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc .

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4r.avi, 4/24/15 concatenated from r1 and 2 of 4/16/15


Gen 1 Meter Epi4s: 'Sevened' Paragraphs, cont.

Still exploring the 'paragraph' meter patterns, to see how Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14 tags Genesis, especially re the 91s. Then, back to what the meters mean. Download the doc (link below) to see the results. This 4s covers the same results, but they might change later.

Pattern and text intertwine to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc .

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4s.avi, 4/24/15 concatenated from s1 and 2 of 4/16/15


Gen 1 Meter Epi4t: Hypo 5 Revisited

Now the drama begins: back to Hypo 5, integrating the previous 'sevened paragraphs' data to see the effect on the meters interfacing with the text. It's a lot more integrated than I recognized, and I don't recognize how dramatic it is, while talking. Haha.

Download the doc (link below) to see the results you see in the video. I'm still not finding the theme represented as I should expect, so sleuthing continues. What should result, is the kind of balancing you see in Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90 patterns, I would think: but, what if I'm wrong? Heh.

So revisit focuses now more, on how pattern and text intertwine, to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text; this video ends at Day Two, but then 4u goes to five, which ties back here, so in v Day Two will be revisited. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc .

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4t.avi, 4/16/15


Gen 1 Meter Epi4u: Hypo 5 revisit, cont.

Drama next focuses on how pattern and text intertwine in FIFTH DAY to help explain Day Two, to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Day Two will be resumed in 4v.

Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc .

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4u1-3.avi, 4/24/15 concatenated from u1-3 of 4/16/15


Gen 1 Meter Epi4v: Hypo 5 revisit, cont.

Revisit now dramatically returns to Day Two thru Four, showing how pattern and text intertwine, to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc .

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4v.avi, 4/16/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4w: Hypo 5 revisit, cont.

Revisit dramatically returns to Day Five and Six, on how pattern and text intertwine, to give you the picture on the puzzle box, so you know for sure how to read the text. Once you see the obvious WATER parallels (restoration, Flood, Exodus, human birth), you realize that Moses' use of Genesis is very different from how we incompetent moderns address it. Far from being a creation story, Moses instead uses the RESTORATION of the Earth to draw a tripartite parallel between the Parting of the Reed/Red Sea, Noah in the Boat, and the initial Restoration of the world for man's occupation. Quite different from the generally inept 'Christian' or 'Jewish' handling. Meter helps show what God means, how much we've been missing; so the meter sleuthing drudgery is WORTH THE TIME SPENT!

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc . To see how Paul parallels then-future Church history, I traced it syllable by year in video (following the doc/pdf/htm): GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . I've not yet gone past the 'Constantine' videos, but you can see the pattern in them starting at GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History , and in the doc/pdf/htm (all copies of each other).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4w.avi, 4/16/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4x: Conclusions

So what are the conclusions, epilogue, implications of this long-winded meter study? Here through Epi 4z, I'll try to state them. No doubt I'll state them badly, so use the ideas as you see fit, to do your own brainstorming. For that's the purpose of this Gen 1 Meter subseries, to facilitate brainstorming, not to force you to any conclusion. Just to show, some methodology.

Conclusions are essentially two-fold: 1) Timeline doctrine, place of Israel in the timeline, and 2) breakpoints of human volition in history which are the reason behind God creating the timeline, so that Time itself can bless man.

Related material:
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc . To see how Paul parallels then-future Church history, I traced it syllable by year in video (following the doc/pdf/htm): GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . I've not yet gone past the 'Constantine' videos, but you can see the pattern in them starting at GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History , and in the doc/pdf/htm (all copies of each other).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4x.avi, 4/16/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4y: Conclusions, cont.

Conclusions (through 4z) are essentially two-fold: 1) Timeline doctrine, place of Israel in the timeline, and 2) breakpoints of human volition in history which are the reason behind God creating the timeline, so that Time itself can bless man.

Related material:
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc . To see how Paul parallels then-future Church history, I traced it syllable by year in video (following the doc/pdf/htm): GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . I've not yet gone past the 'Constantine' videos, but you can see the pattern in them starting at GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History , and in the doc/pdf/htm (all copies of each other).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4y.avi, 4/16/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi4z: Conclusions (end)

Conclusions are essentially two-fold: 1) Timeline doctrine, place of Israel in the timeline, and 2) breakpoints of human volition in history which are the reason behind God creating the timeline, so that Time itself can bless man.

Related material:
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc . To see how Paul parallels then-future Church history, I traced it syllable by year in video (following the doc/pdf/htm): GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . I've not yet gone past the 'Constantine' videos, but you can see the pattern in them starting at GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History , and in the doc/pdf/htm (all copies of each other).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi4z1-3.avi, 4/24/15, concatenated from z1-3 of 4/16/15.


Gen 1 Meter Epi5a: Critique

I'm not altogether happy with the meter results. Episode 5, therefore, is reserved for critiques. This 5a comments on how I've been missing key '1050' benchmarks the Bible tracks, all these years (since 2004, when I did GeneYrs.xls, link below). So what else is missing? I don't yet know. The missing 1050s are more than I show in this video, so there are missing 490s as well. At least it's easy to prove what might be missing (albeit tedious) — since we have Bible's own dates and values, thank God!

One other critique mentioned briefly in Episode 4 passim: now I see why Paul uses the 91s in Eph1:3-14's anaphoric meter structure. He's doing a 'new genesis' for Church. Someday, I'll have to revisit Ephesians meter and redo REPARSED to 'connect' Gen 1, but it will be several years before I will know how to do that. All I know now is, that Paul is definitely tagging Gen 1 to show the 'new genesis'. How he's doing that in light of the meter here in Gen1, I don't yet know. The only obvious pattern in common, is the gradual reduction in sub-sevens to a mass period which doesn't seven until the end. In Paul, it's verses 1:12-14 having the lone 91, which maybe he uses to 'tag' the 315 in Gen 1's sixth day, since 315 also tags Noah waiting 50 more days to exit the boat. Will see.

Conclusions remain intact though, essentially two-fold: 1) Timeline doctrine, place of Israel in the timeline, and 2) breakpoints of human volition in history which are the reason behind God creating the timeline, so that Time itself can bless man.

Related material:
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions). The Ephesians tag on Genesis is also explored ( brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#Palindromes and brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#PaulChrono ), but I didn't know Paul WAS tagging Genesis at the time I wrote the doc. Doc/pdf Version is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf or brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc . To see how Paul parallels then-future Church history, I traced it syllable by year in video (following the doc/pdf/htm): GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . I've not yet gone past the 'Constantine' videos, but you can see the pattern in them starting at GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History , and in the doc/pdf/htm (all copies of each other).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis!

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi5aCritique.avi, 4/27/15.


Isaiah 53 Meter of Time: 1st David's Birth to Last David's Scheduled Death

+ Yapping Most High (YMH)

Video Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'. Or, play all with one click: channel . They will play per the default channel order, here shown.

SERIES GIST: This is a collection of all my Isaiah 53 videos, in six topical sections. They all tie to How God Orchestrates Time, Psalm 90, GGS10, GGS11 RFG5 (Paul's Meter, Peter's Meter, and Magnificat) channels/vids; and, to the Youtube playlists with the same names.

But first, it's necessary to correct translation. So the first four videos, prove KJV (and all other) translations, cut Christ OUT of Isaiah 53 (unintentionally, to be sure).

2nd section: I correct and meter the translation in 7 parts (labelled 6b at the end, for many other sites embedded these videos, when originally posted in Youtube).

3rd and 4th sections go through how Bible Hebrew Meter works. Its style is used in Greek also, so the information will be helpful. The 3rd section is a trio of videos on the overall drama of his meter.

4th section: technical GGS and Ps90 videos (in paulmeterggs10 and psalm90 vimeo channels), showing how Isaiah plays back to Psalm 90's meter and text.

5th section: YMH10 videos show how Isaiah's meter tracks Israel's future history king by year, in detail. I'll post more YMH videos in the future, as soon as I figure out how Isaiah rounds syllables = years for first or last six months. This rounding issue is explained in the funky face video YMH10s14-15. Just skip it, if you're not interested in that issue.

6th section: final two videos function as footnotes, showing how I learned Isaiah 53 was metered, and how I tested for the right meter configuration. If you're also testing for meter in some other passage, these last two videos might prove helpful.

Hopefully this channel's listing, won't be too confusing. If you find it confusing, yell at me!

NOTE: Episodes after 11/06/13 are uploaded in vimeo, http://vimeo.com/channels/howgodorchestratestime . I will no longer upload to Youtube, owing to its invasive insistence on 'joining' Google Plus.

Time videos in Yapping Most High Episode 10. Adjunctive playlist to Psalm 90 and GGS. Last 10 videos show how Isaiah 53 tracks Israel's kings and her history from Hezekiah forward, syllable by year. Videos are ongoing, so more will come later. These will be posted also in vimeo, http://www.vimeo.com/channels/Isaiah53.

NOTE: Episodes posted from 11/07/13 onward will be in vimeo ( http://www.vimeo.com/brainout ), not Youtube. However, the series postings will not resume until maybe late 2014. The vimeo videos will be moderated, to block trolls but allow folks to post without being stalked by prolifers, nor having to join Google Plus.

High Theological commentary on God's Nature and the mechanics of TIME, of the spiritual life: stuff you can't find discussed elsewhere in Christendom for 1000 years or more. A lot of it, the Jews have known for centuries, but we Christians never listen to them. Pity!

Topics will vary. Last 10 videos track Isaiah 53's annual marching Meleks (kings).

Bible uses meter to convey TIME DOCTRINE which interacts with the text, ever since Moses' Psalm 90. Christendom doesn't know about it, but the Jews used to know.

Here, Isaiah 53's very meter tells you a) we indeed have perfect text, b) the outline of history from the time he writes, until Messiah, via a rhetorical METER style he 'replies to', in Psalm 90, which all Jews know is the METER OF TIME (i.e., Rambam).

Isaiah thus follows the meter 'calendar' rules Moses set up in Psalm 90. Daniel 9, too is a REMINDER of those meter calendars. Mary, Paul, and even John in Revelation, use the same style.. but with Greek words (see my GGS series playlists). So this METER is an important, undiscovered tool of hermeneutics. Scholars have debated the meter for years — yet here it is, obvious and easy to count!

Seeing that fact will greatly alter how you read Daniel 9.

The second through 9th videos here, briefly acquaint you with that meter and its import. My Psalm 90 playlist incorporates all the interconnections, in conjunction with the GGS playlist (for Paul and Mary's meter). Both playlists are still in-progress through 2012.

I didn't initially know Isaiah 53 or Psalm 90 were metered. Rather, I thought Hebrew text was missing in Isaiah 53:10-11, so then decided to 'detect' missing words via any meter gaps. That quest took a surprising turn when it became obvious that God had Isaiah use a metrical pattern which displayed God's Orchestration of Time. A year later, I found out Isaiah got it from Psalm 90. At the end of 2010, I was caused to find that Paul uses the same HEBREW meter for his Greek words, in Eph 1:3-14. In May 2011, I learned all of these are patterned to the days' benchmarks in Genesis 7-8's Flood Account. And, based on meter in Genesis 49. (That material will be added to the Psalm 90 playlist.) In March 2012, I learned that the Magnificat is the meter basis for Paul's.

All this started with the 4 Hypotheses about Isaiah's intended meter, here. Hypo#4 turned out to be right. So videos #2-9 here show how I learned that fact. They might be a helpful exercise in textual criticism, especially in viewing God's Genius in the inspired rhetorical styles of His chosen writers. The impact of the meter on interpretation, is covered in 10th video onward in this list, but is covered in more detail in the Psalm 90, 10 YMH, and 10 GGS playlists. The 10 YMH takes you through God's Construct for Time, how it is known within Judaism, but in garbled form. So maybe start there, if you want to orient to this doctrine, which again is unknown to Christendom.

See Ephesians1REPARSED.doc pages 4-5, for a full listing of my material on this vast topic.


Isaiah 53 Hebrew Meter Hypotheses, Overview

Isaiah 53's Hebrew Meter helps one know Bible better: God uses every linguistic nuance to communicate His Will, including meter. So this video's JPG links below provide reading ease. You can download the original HD video (clearer), here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/isa53meterh...

I did a 40-minute video to test Hypotheses #1-#3 on whether Hebrew text was missing: http://vimeo.com/brainout/isa53hypo3 . It also follows in the Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis playlist, but the Youtube copy is fuzzy.

Meter Hypothesis #1 is that 490-14 syllables is deliberately used, and that's why both Matthew 1 and Luke 3 use doubled-7's. It means that Christ died 14 years in advance of the reserved final 50-year period for harvesting the Gentiles that Pentecost represented (Year 4200 from Adam's Fall in 4106BC, minus 50 minus 14=30AD, when Christ died, per Bible). The originally-scheduled date for the Millennium to begin was 94AD (=4200th year after Adam's Fall). This is depicted from Adam forward so you can see it, in GeneYrs.xls, with the underlying Time Grant rules being explained in the Word doc link of cell A2 of that spreadsheet.

Hypothesis #1 means 7 syllables are missing from Isa53:11, which we know from the LXX, so it's easy to back-translate some form (probably a participle or infinitive) of "taher" for "katharisai"; "sur" for "aphelein"; "yatsar" for "plassw"; and "or" for "phws". Could do it in seven syllables within Isa53:11, putting taher (and probably sur) in front of "m'amal", then "yatsar" and "or" after "naphesho".

What's most intriguing about that is the extra seven ends with the 1000th year anniversary of David's death (963BC+1000=37AD, the ending year God uses in Daniel 9:26, which is why the Tribulation is cut out and reserved for later). Don't need Isaiah's meter to see that, but Isaiah COULD have known about it, since David died about 3 centuries prior to Isaiah.

Hypothesis #2 still adds the above text, and I can 'find' 14 extra syllables in verses 53:5-8 if I change ellision assumptions. So in Hypothesis #2, the total syllables would be 490, not the 469 in this video.

Hypothesis #3 is that the 469 syllables you see are deliberate, and therefore the LXX translation in 53:10-11 is explanatory of the poetic ellipsis in 53:10-11. When you say those verses aloud you can feel the dramatic ellipsis, so the argument in favor of the text we have AS we have it, is strong.

But then I have to account for the 'extra' missing seven, doctrinally. That's where I'm stuck: the 14 already includes the Daniel 9:27 Tribulation reserve which was known in Isaiah's day: for it's truncated based on the 1000th anniversary of David's death, which is the deadline for Messiah to come, successfully pay and thus 'renew' the 1000-year time grant. The other 7 is a hedge for Israel's rejection, which Luke 3 and Matthew 1 reference: for in Isaiah's day the 1st Temple had NOT been destroyed, and its own 2nd 490 would have also ended in 30AD, so that set up the 14-year shortfall anyway. That's why God accounts as He does in Daniel 9; it wasn't new information, but a recasting of old information.

I don't know how to account for the third 7, except to say that the words we know are missing, ARE missing. But then words in the Hebrew which should be in the LXX, are not. The 21 years spent rebuilding the Temple might be debited, since technically no 490 was eligible until it was rebuilt, but since it was rebuilt during the 70-year voting period, it could be. Isaiah seems to be debiting for that.

Hypothesis #4 is like #3, but balances internally, and is short 28 syllables, not 21. That's the right answer: its internal meter accounting deliberately mirrors without any syllables missing (so no text is missing in Hebrew). There are four videos on Hypothesis #4.


Isaiah 53 Meter Key, Isaiah 53 series

Isaiah crafts the meter of Chapter 53 (52:13-53:12 in Hebrew) based on God's 490-year Time Grants.

I just stumbled onto Isaiah's Meter Key by mistake (yeah right, no mistake by God!) on 4/24/08.

Given the Promise of Messiah since Genesis 3:15, the Genesis 5 & 11 rosters show how God's 490-year Time Grants were fulfilled to culminate in Abraham, & from there to Christ. Given the foundational need for Time to occur on time, so He can be born on time, God communicates the Time doctrine by using Time itself (i.e., dates) in Bible. Hence, the calendar: Moses was given Passover Holiday & Pentecost to remind Israel of her future history. These two holidays forecast that 57 years prior to the termination of a civilization period, Messiah would have come. That period had a hedge of an added seven years (to 'repay' Passion Week which Passover depicted), but its actual year wasn't known until David died in 963BC at age 77. So the end of time was 963+1000, 37AD. Isaiah plays on this fact.

Scholars are unaware of all this. Mistaken readings of Daniel 9:25 and 9:26, 1Kings 6:1 (which tells you David had been dead for 3 years), plus the normal eyes-glazed-over reaction to Bible's dates & begats, resulted in us not knowing God's Orchestration of Time. I wouldn't have known it either, but for my pastor's lifelong teaching that believers are used by God to BUY time: I didn't know what he meant. So when auditing that claim, God used circumstances in my head & outside by others, to make me 'get' this very prolific doctrine. It's very provable in Bible, but it takes time (heh) to vet all the many verses.

Another way the doctrine is expressed in Bible: via the poetic meter of the prophets. Isaiah is one of them; he crafts Isaiah 53 to BALANCE to the 490-year promise unit of time.


Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis #3, LXX Sleuthing (Trailer)

Textual criticism re Hypothesis #3 (see the "Isaiah 53 Hebrew Meter Hypotheses" video description) would require checking the LXX to see if its translation pattern in 53:10-11 is very different from the rest of its translation pattern for the chapter, to see if text is truly missing in Greek which the Hebrew provides, and vice versa. If text is missing, then Hypothesis #3 is not valid; Isaiah 53:10-11 would need putative correction before the Hebrew meter's doctrinal meaning, can be assessed. So the Google video walks the reader through the LXX pattern, compared to the Hebrew text.

The conclusion at the end is wrong, but you would think it right if you didn't have Isaiah's Meter Key. Hypothesis #4 displays that key, thus invalidating Hypothesis #3 (and the prior two).


Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis #3, Full version: Sleuthing Isaiah 53 in LXX (test for missing text)

This 5/02/2008 video was made before I knew Isaiah's metering scheme. As Google Video will shut down, I now move it to Youtube. It is quite pedantic, examining BHS and LXX to test for missing Hebrew text in Isaiah 53. Not sure it's worth watching; it is but a recording to demonstrate method of discovery. The original is clearer; to download it, click here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/isa53hypo3

Later videos in the Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis series show how I learned the BHS consonantal text for the chapter is perfect. That question has baffled scholars for over 100 years.

Thus I came to learn Bible's Hebrew Meter, which alike is a topic scholars have debated for over 300 years. Related webpage is http://www.brainout.net/Isa53trans.htm . See the Psalm 90 video playlist for a more comprehensive coverage of Bible Hebrew Meter; main webpage explaining how God Orchestrates Time — for the metering scheme is used as timeline, pan-Bible — see Mirroring.htm. All the related video playlists are embedded at the end of that webpage.

This 40-minute video tests Hypothesis #3 for whether 469 syllables was intended by Isaiah; so it follows the textual criticism rule that, to test if syllables are truly missing from the Hebrew or Greek text, one must first establish the pattern of translation the Greek text follows for the Chapter. This is done informally in the video, as the LXX pattern is rather simple and clear.

It concludes with seven missing words which belong in either the Hebrew or Greek text of Isa53:10-11, plus the LXX lacks Hebrew verb yazzeh in Isa52:13 (or the LXX verb is misspelled or used in soundplay, as the fai of thumiaw — to make a sacrifice — could look much like thaumazw). Your feedback is appreciated; maybe you'll derive better answers. Since this is arguably the most important chapter in the Bible, it's worth the time.


1/4 Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis #4 Prophecy Accounts Time

Only Hypothesis #4 is correct on Isaiah 53's Hebrew Meter. It requires you previously know how God orchestrates time.

Gist: God begins Time accounting not at creation, but at the FALL, in Genesis 5:1. Criterion for granting Time to the entire world: due to the Angelic Appeal Trial Adam was created to resolve, at least ONE believer must SUPERMATURE every 490 years, or TIME itself ENDS. So Time is a Contingent Justice Issue, a baton-passing relay race, & can always end abruptly. I did a video on these rules which you might want to review in advance, • PATU27 How God Orchestrates Time: aka....

But when Israel left at the Exodus, she was PROMISED time. So when she rejected God as King, the promise went to David. So Time Grants to David controlled when Time would end — & from David forward, only Messiah could 'pick up the baton'. Messiah was rejected when He came. So Messiah elected to pay a far higher price on the Cross, for a future "Church" as Bride, as Father might choose in His Discretion, in Matt16:18, ratified in John 17: this SAVED Time itself. Else we'd all not be here, and the world would have ended.

So Israel ran out of time, but Messiah won at the Cross. That's why there is a pre-Trib Rapture: the Tribulation doesn't belong to us. Hence the PROMISED time remaining was 1007 years for Israel, now vested in Messiah (His 'Jewish' title); Church instead operates on the old rules precedented in Adam, reset to the Last Adam's death in 30AD, under a separate kingship contract/covenant (kata Melchizedek, main theme in Book of Hebrews).

Isaiah uses ISRAEL's rules to craft his meter, to complement his prophecy of the 1st Temple's future destruction, threading down from Isaiah 44 et seq. So this Hypothesis #4 video requires you download:

  1. Hypothesis 4 jpg file: Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.JPG.
  2. Timeline Spreadsheet from Adam through 2007: GeneYrs.xls. Cell A2 has a popup note summarizing how God grants time. Suggest you view worksheet wide-screen, but half-deep. Use Excel's "View" then "Custom View" to access Time subsections (i.e., "David", "1st Temple", etc). Use Freeze Titles on cell B14 for best results.
  3. Also in Cell A2 is the Word doc covering actual history showing how God orchestrates time using His Rules in the Bible, to preserve mankind; its #9 is most important to this video. Click on Cell A2 in the worksheet to download the doc, or click here: TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc. Suggest you read it in full screen Print Preview, Two Pages. You can easily scroll from one page to the next with your mouse. Its last two pages reproduce the cell A2 summary note of the spreadsheet. The doc also covers mistakes scholars & pastors still make which prevent them from seeing Bible's dating system. (Some pastors are newly working on the idea that the 490 in Daniel illustrates an underlying pattern for Time, but they still don't grasp that God's rules start from Adam; so their teachings are still off. They need more time to independently vet their work before the Lord.)
    • Other material you might need to review to understand the video:
  4. Mirroring.htm. Here, all time accounting units are explained (i.e., 1 year, 7 years, 40 years, etc.) but focus is to show the Justice Accounting Doctrine of Time itself. There is an in-depth tracing of each person granted time from Adam through Christ, with Bible verses on how numbers in the spreadsheet were derived. "Mirroring" is a redemptive 'reimbursement' of Time well spent. Time lost is debited, but regained if certain conditions are met (i.e., Daniel 9).
  5. PassPlot.htm, Lord's Birth & Death dates, chronology of Jewish Calendar to see God's Macro Orchestration of Time & Passion Week: PassPlot.htm. His Birth & Death dates were predicted exactly, but you must know God's Time Accounting system to find them in Bible. God 'balances' Israel's own calendar, in designing those dates.

2/4 Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis #4 Prophecy Accounts Time

Focuses on Isaiah's use of the 70-year Voting Period in God's Accounting Rules for Time, how via 56+70 Isaiah pre-threads & predicts EXACT timeline for 2nd Temple's rebuilding & destruction via use of that meter. You need this to grasp Gospel warning references to Temple destruction (i.e., in Mark 13, Heb2, 10:30ff).


3/4 Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis #4 Prophecy Accounts Time

Chapter Meter visually summarized, stress on pairing, threading balance in meter to God's 490-year accounting: to predict the EXACT timeline for 2nd Temple's rebuilding & destruction via use of meter. You need to know this, to understand Gospel warning references to Temple destruction (i.e., in Mark 13, Heb2, 10:30ff), and why God is so axiomatic, terse, in Daniel 9:24-27.


4/4 Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis #4 Prophecy Accounts Time

Focuses on future 2nd Temple's building & destruction & hence Trib, how 490-28 syllables stress the Timeline of both — while 1st Temple yet stands. Chapter Results are again summarized, along with additional items re the Tribulation in the pairing, threading meter, since Israel would be 7 years behind — that's why David lived those extra seven years, to cover the time via the 1000-year Time Grant God used to bookend His Decree in Daniel 9:25-27. You need to know this, to understand Gospel warning references to Temple destruction (i.e., in Mark 13, Heb2, 10:30ff), and why God is so axiomatic, terse, in Daniel 9:24-27.


God's Play of History

Bible's Rhetorical style of Timeline-convergence display. For overview, download: BibleHebrewAccountingMeter.doc. Or, view it as a blog entry at bloggodsrhetoricalarchive.htm.

I'm doing a comprehensive explanation of this rhetorical ACCOUNTING TIME METER style, (still in draft): Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc. It will help you navigate between 10 GGS and Psalm 90 playlists. Pay special attention to the doc's first three pages and the 'E' footnote on Daniel 9's meter-maps to HISTORICAL years of Israel's kings in Chronicles and Kings. Thus you see Daniel is 'reading' the once-future Isaiah 53's TIMELINE USAGE of meter, and 'talking back' to how it was fulfilled, by syllable-count 'tagging'. (See Psalm 90 episode 23b's video description for that rhetorical style.)

For as has been shown in the Psalm 90 videos, Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90 are TIME PROMISES. An accounting of the FUTURE. Isaiah's is a future chronology of the kings' characters and attitudes.

So, Daniel keeps on invoking Isaiah 53 syllable by year, line item by line item, as the legal BASIS for his own petition. Through Dan 9:14, he does that tracking, starting with the 'kings' reference (first being David). He uses the meter to track their sad history, resulting in Temple Down. But Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90 promised a FUTURE. So, Daniel begins verse 15, still referencing that FUTURE part of both past chapters, in the METER. And that same meter is explictly used by Gabriel in Daniel 9:24-27. To GRANT what Daniel asked via his accounting meter. God's answer is metered, too, and the meter is also reflected in the explicit numbers stated (i.e., 49).

They are real numbers for real time, not symbolic. Because, the meter is an ACCOUNTING. Accounting, for TIME. Past, future, anytime.

Preterism is toast. Harold Camping's Black-Widow timelines are toast. This is REAL Bible and any dufus can count the syllables. Which, Daniel had to learn as a child, since he was taken to Babylon while still a TEENAGER. Heh.

1st Moral of the Story: Ain't the Bible grand? Wouldn't it be a pity if you could only learn it in English?

2nd Moral of the Story, as shown in Camping's Failure video: the more boring the Bible text, the more exciting its real meaning. But you have to pay attention. Daniel 9, for example, sounds churchy and boring in English. A canned, repetitive, prayer. Guess again! He meters each line to real past history, ties each meter at specific points to specific sections in Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90. So guess what? WE KNOW WHEN DANIEL 9 was WRITTEN. And it wasn't in 164BC, honey. It was early in 538BC. For the meter first has a DATELINE. As you will see, from the Word doc, above.

Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14 has the same meter function, for beginning in HIS verse 15, Paul apes Daniel's prayer! So just as Daniel did IN his prayer, Paul SETS UP his NON-metered prayer WITH meter. For he already has the answer. :) In other words, Ephesians 1:15-23 is a RESPONSE to the answer, a kind of doxology. So the prayer isn't metered, but the setup IS.

Yeah, baby: a few syllables' likeness between two texts, you can call coincidence. But not a consecutive tracking to 476 of them, referencing the CONTENT of the other passage, each time. :)

Next up, Ps90 23hi video. Sadly, the one-hour video tanked. Have to remake it to fit the audio, what a pain. Hope the above draft doc will help you, the meanwhile.


KJV's Isaiah 53:12, Disinherits Christ!

Watch in HD, fullscreen. Or view whole playlist here: brainout.net/SatStrat2.htm#KJVO

Or in Youtube, here: youtube.com/view_play_list?p=9637CFFCF9F62107

Another example of how the modern translations all cater to the KJV, instead of caring what the Real Word of God in the original Hebrew and Greek, says. The blasphemy here is a translation which in English makes it look like Christ only inherits "a portion" ALONG WITH others, as if others were ON PAR with Him?! For centuries, no one bothered to fix this glaring error? The Hebrew and the LXX leave NO DOUBT Who inherits ALL — Christ ALONE. Then HE shares out HIS OWN inheritance with "the strong". Unmistakeable in the original INSPIRED text. But hey: if the KJV mistranslates it, as did the Geneva Bible before it, well — everyone else must follow along. The Real Word of God matters not; only public opinion matters.

Oddly, three translations nonetheless have the courage to translate the first part of the verse rightly: Brenton's English (translated from the LXX), 1844; the 1610 Catholic Douhay-Rheims (so there's no excuse for the KJV to mistranslate); and the 1985 (but not later) Jewish Tanakh (only for the first part of the verse).

Proof positive that Christians HATE God — in favor of, fitting in with mere people! Political correctness, exposed!

File Name: Isa5312.avi, in KJV folder, originally posted in Youtube, 7/11/09 as Episode 39/72 KJVOB.


Isaiah 53 Meters History of Temple (Trailer)

This is a short mnemonic snippet, the ending cut from the 43-minute Isaiah 53 Meter Plots History video at vimeo.com/brainout/isa53meterplotshistory .

File Name: Isa53Hypo4AddTrailer.avi, 9/20/08. Youtube copy: youtube.com/watch?v=dJr9PZhlJ9g&list=PL8523934356BE4BDC


Isaiah 53 Meters History (Trailer)

This is a mnemonic snippet, the climactic ending to the 26--minute Isaiah 53 Meter video on God's Future Calendar, vimeo.com/brainout/isa53godsfuturecalendar .

File Name: Isa53Hypo4Add2Trailer.avi, 9/20/08. Youtube copy: youtube.com/watch?v=0vdbG42EXfw&list=PL8523934356BE4BDC .


Isaiah 53 Meter: God's Temple Calendar, Trailer

GIST: Daniel 9, God used Isaiah 53's meter to reaffirm to Jeremiah and Daniel, the timeline for Temple destruction and reconstruction. Isaiah tells it first, in 712BC. Isaiah's meter was deliberately designed to remind Jewish believers of the future just as you'd use a calendar.

For the entire calendar of the future through the Advent of Messiah is revealed. Isaiah tells you when he gave Isaiah 53 — 126 years prior to Temple's Fall, 712BC, by parallelling that date with the future Destruction of the Temple which will also be 126 years short of its promised 490-year time grant, which began back in 950BC. From there, Isaiah parses his meter to give you the Temple and Jerusalem reconstruction timeline, to show how it will balance to the arrival of Messiah.

God, therefore, doesn't have to say much to Daniel except to parse the timeline; that's why Daniel isn't surprised by the numbers and asks no questions. To us reading Bible in English, Daniel 9 seems to be the only place where God's 490-year Time Grant system is mentioned. But in the Hebrew (and in the NT), it's referenced all over the place: for it's God's Temple Calendar, since Temple depicts Messiah.

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 play on Isaiah's meter to show that the prophecied generations (42) and descendants (77) counting down to Christ, was met. Luke tells it from Adam (including Gentiles), Matthew tells it from Abraham, listing only the legitimate kings of Judah, resulting in a 42-generation count. And ALL of them, are drawing on Psalm 90's meter. Even, and in some ways, especially, Daniel. For his prayer is metered based on Isa53 and Ps90.

So too, is Paul's GREEK(!), in Eph1:3-14 (covered in my GGS series).

Daniel 9:24-27 is thus not new information. So from Isaiah 53, you know exactly how to interpret Daniel 9. Use of meter to remind the one of future dates is a major rhetorical style in Scripture. It is NOT Bible codes, but a CALENDAR.

So when you review a Messianic passage in the OT, COUNT THE METER. You'll find an exacting chronology. We'll go through the pattern, so you know what to seek in other passages or prophets.

This material on a Bible rhetorical style in Hebrew has never before been documented. So here we first see it in snippet format, so that the rest of the videos will become relevant. You'll find the full version of this video, later in this playlist.

For Bible uses METER as an accounting device; scholars have debated whether Bible has meter for years, and whether Isaiah is genuinely from Isaiah. So establishing the meter resolves many interpretational and text-crit issues.

First video in the Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis series is • Isaiah 53 Hebrew Meter Hypotheses, Ov...

First Hypothesis #4 video is • 1/4 Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis #4 Pro...

Webpages on God's Orchestration of Time — replete with Bible verses you can vet — are important adjuncts, to grasp the material. See the video description to "God's Orchestration of Time" for important related website links. Click here for that video: • PATU27 How God Orchestrates Time: aka...


Isaiah 53's Meter Plots God's FUTURE Calendar, Trailer

GIST: Isaiah 53's meter plots time YEAR BY YEAR from 712BC through the end of allotted time pre-Church, which was 37AD. So when God talks to Daniel, He uses Isaiah's meter to reaffirm the Time Allotment. Thus you know how to read Daniel 9, and how to INSERT time: which back then, was the expected 57 years, to complete the fourth millennium from Adam: year 4200 from Adam minus 57, which was the 50-year time for the Gentiles' voting, plus Tribulation =endpoint in Daniel 9:26

This video is the snipped format summarizing that information. The full video is in HD, here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/isa53godsfu... . There's another, longer (43 min) video later in the Isaiah 53 playlist.

Thus you know why the Rapture is INSERTED Time, in Daniel 9:26c, no longer merely the expected 'Jubilee' of 50 years which is in ellipsis since it isn't Jewish 'time'.

Yeah, Church got inserted, so now Daniel 9:26c continues to characterise world history.

Calendars within calendars. Daniel 9 provably derives from Isaiah 53, as Isaiah lays out the future history to Christ in EXACTLY the same way, 126 years prior to Temple Fall. See the Yapping Most High (YMH) videos Part 10 and following, plus the Psalm 90 playlist, for further elaboration and proof from the Hebrew.

I didn't recognize the year-by-year calendaring of Isaiah 53 until July or September 2008; that's why the earlier Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis videos don't have this material.

"God's Temple Calendar" and "How God Orchestrates Time" Youtube video descriptions have links to associated webpages.


Isaiah 53's Meter Plots History to Messiah's Scheduled Death

This is the full original 9/20-23/2008 video, when I was shocked to discover Isaiah 53's Meter functioned as a calendar. You can download the original (or at least see it better), here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/isa53meterp...

My life hasn't been the same, since. Of course, since that time, I've found a lot more proof of the meter, elsewhere in Bible...

Backdrop, Daniel 9: God used Isaiah 53's meter to reaffirm to Jeremiah and Daniel, the timeline for Temple destruction and reconstruction. Isaiah tells it first, in 712BC. Isaiah's meter was designed to remind Jewish believers of the future just as you'd use a calendar. This was done by SYLLABLE COUNTS, since the Jews already had to count them, to test memorization and copying.

So God made this housekeeping task perform an eschatological duty, too: the entire future through Messiah is tracked. Isaiah tells you when he wrote Isaiah 53, in verse 1 — 126 years prior to Temple's Fall, 712BC, during his ministry to Hezekiah — by parallelling with the future Destruction of the Temple which will also be 126 years short of its promised 490-year time grant from back in 950BC. Then Isaiah parses his meter to show Temple and Jerusalem reconstruction timeline, to show how to balance to Messiah. For he'd been predicting it since Isaiah 39. So now, he tags meter to Psalm 90 and his own verse content in deft dual-entendre, near-and-far-prophetical manner as is the style for all OT prophecy.

God thus needn't say much to Daniel, but to parse the timeline; so Daniel isn't surprised by the numbers and asks no questions. To us in English, Daniel 9's numbers seem to jump from nowhere, so we don't understand WHY those numbers are used. But in Hebrew and NT Greek, it's referenced all over: for Temple depicts Messiah.

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 thus play on Isaiah's meter to explain the prophecied generations (42) and descendants (77) count down to Christ. Luke lists from Adam (including Gentiles); Matthew, from Abraham, naming legitimate kings of Judah, resulting in a 42-generation count. ALL these also draw on Psalm 90's meter. Even and especially, Daniel. For his prayer is metered based on Isa53 and Ps90, as is God's reply in Dan9:24-25. So too, is Paul's Greek(!), in Eph1:3-14 (covered in my GGS series).

Thus Daniel 9:24-27 is not new information. For Daniel 9 is an APPLICATION of Isaiah 53. So meter as mnemonic to remind one of future dates, is a major rhetorical style in Scripture. It is not Bible codes, but a CALENDAR.

Back in 2008 when I made this video, I didn't know about Psalm 90, Daniel, and Paul. Kinda like fingerprints, when you have a lot of matching rhetorical points that 'talk' to each other in content too, you know you've got a reliable style for testing. Yeah, and that's the point of Hebrew Meter. Again, because they had to count the syllables, anyway.

So when you review a Messianic passage in the OT, Count The Meter. Once you see the pattern here, you ought to find it often. Isa53Map.pdf is a map of the Isaiah passage in the video. The chronology worksheet, is GeneYrs.xls.

This material on a Bible rhetorical style in Hebrew has never been documented, so far as I can find. Not even my own pastor seemed to know about it. Hence the need to thoroughly document in video and webpage, so that any claims can be tested with the TEXT. Scholars have debated whether Bible has meter for centuries; since the 1830's, even the most-respected Hebrew scholars doubted whether Isaiah is genuinely from ONE real Isaiah, since he changes writing style (beginning in Chapter 40) and is so accurate, they think the text must be wrong (same stupid objections are raised against Daniel, lol). So establishing the meter resolves many interpretational and text-crit issues, especially for those of much education, but oh so little faith. One can empathize. People tend to ASSume faith must mean being uneducated, too.

See: if the Bible is accurate, it's doubted; if it's unclear to the dummies who can't read it, it's doubted; if it seems to have wrong info, it's of course doubted. See the pattern? Okay, so God gave us little-faiths a way to have a bit more faith by encoding the dating via syllable counts all Jews had to know, anyway. Prosaic, easy, and profound. So of course the meter will be doubted, so Bible can stay nicely obtuse! Meanwhile, you can prove Bible accurate and clear, just by counting the syllables yourself. That's all I had to do. So test using 1John1:9 and ask Our Mutual Dad. If you find any mistakes, yell at me. I can't have gotten this thing fully right, lol.

Webpages on God's Orchestration of Time, replete with Bible verses you can vet, are important adjuncts, to grasp the material. See the "God's Orchestration of Time" video for important related website links (click here for that video): • PATU27 How God Orchestrates Time: aka...


Isaiah 53 in Hebrew Meter, English Words, Trailer

This translation is the product of 6 years' intensive research. This video is the first 10 minutes' explanation of the translation.

Be sure to watch the response video 'Learn Isaiah 53 in Hebrew', for there I upgraded the translation in Isaiah 52:13, 53:8, and 53:12.

As covered in the Yapping Most High (YMH) video series Part 10s, every syllable in Isaiah 53 corresponds to one year. The idea was for Israel to use it, to track her future and as time went on, her past history. So Isaiah maps out the future from 712 BC to 37AD, to complement his eschatological discourse, so Israel can know HOW LONG each segment will last, as well as what it would be (i.e., Cyrus, Nebuchadnezzar, Temple Rebuilding and Messiah's coming and going). Therefore God uses Isaiah 53's accounting, to apportion the years in Daniel 9:2, Jeremiah 25, and Dan 9:24-27. That's why Daniel asks no questions: he knew the material already. That's why he timed his prayer to be in the 49th year of the exile, just as Isaiah 53 had mapped it.

Obviously this idea is a major surprise to Christians, so there will be future videos showing how each clause in Isaiah 53 ties to a now-past historical event, which at the time of writing, was yet future. Clearly this must be a major rhetorical style in the Old Testament, for both Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 use it. So one can objectively vet also, the existence of the same kind of meter in other prophetical passages, i.e., Ezekiel, the Davidic Psalms, etc.

Hence I've translated Isaiah 53 using that same Hebrew meter, but in English words, so you can see the pattern for yourself, and how well it tracks time — especially since now, all that time is PAST. Thus we see prophecy objectively fulfilled. Very shocking stuff.

Both the Isaiah 53 and the Psalm 90 video playlists are embedded in the Bible Hebrew Meter webpage, here: BibleHebrewMeter.htm.

My Isaiah 53 Meter Hypothesis video playlist documents the discovery of meter, which I tried to find, to see if Isaiah 53 had missing words. It doesn't. A more complete explanation of that search is in Isa53trans.htm, which doesn't include this Yapping Part 10 material.


Learn Isaiah 53 in Hebrew

TRANSLATION UPGRADED versus prior videos, in light blue (52:13,53:8, 53:12). Response video below this one reads Isaiah 53 live in Hebrew. So how can you follow it? Well, in this video, Isaiah 53 is spoken in Hebrew, but highlights the English words at the same time, so you can learn what the words mean. So the actual Hebrew words in order, are spoken slowly enough so you too can learn them. Response video attached to this one, speaks the chapter at its normal pace (well, when I'm not crying, that is).


Yapping Most High YMH1 God's Personality

New series. This 'yapping' is high theology about how God's Personality SOVEREIGNLY determines His Nature, NOT His Attributes determining Him, with a focus on how He Chooses based on Omniscience. Turn off the video if your eyes glaze over.

Other 'yapping' videos will be like this one, or will be on lighter, secular topics.


YMH4a God's Personality, cont.

Series continues: here in Part 4 the focus is on how God WILLS to be the way He is, and is never 'constrained' by His Attributes. For over 1000 years, theologians have misdefined God, straight-jacketing Him. As you'll see this Yapping Part 4 (a-d), they are obviously wrong. Time we stopped constraining God like Satan wants to do!

Related Webpages with much more detail:


YMH4b God's Personality, cont.

Series continues: here in Part 4 the focus is on how God WILLS to be the way He is, and is never 'constrained' by His Attributes. For over 1000 years, theologians have misdefined God, straight-jacketing Him. As you'll see this Yapping Part 4 (a-d), they are obviously wrong. Time we stopped constraining God like Satan wants to do!


YMH5a God's Personality, cont.

The Five P's of God's Personality are the topic here in Part 5(a-c):

  1. Paradoxical
  2. Punctiliar
  3. Punning (a play on mirroring restitution, which is the 'personality' of Justice)
  4. Playful (God is the Consummate Humorist, look how He invented pee and reproduction locations)
  5. Politically-Incorrect!

You'll see these 5 P features all over Bible, especially in the original-language texts, which the translations all bland out. (Translators don't like showing God's Witty Personality. They think He has to be made BORING in order to appear majestic. That's why they still debate whether Bible Hebrew poetry has meter!)

You'll also see these Five P's in your own life, as God orchestrates your life to display Himself intimately and personally to you. Here in Part Five, I illustrate from my own life, some of the ways God will display Himself, but please look for parallels in your own life, since I don't know how He's doing it in your life. He IS doing it — so look for the parallels, ask Him to show them to you!


YMH6 God's Personality, cont.

Parts 6 and 7 focus on the relationship tension creation has with God, Who is UNlimited. Satan's big contention is that Unlimited God should not apply Unlimited Standards, in order to have a pleasant relationship with limited creation, starting with the angels. So Christ in His Humanity demonstrates that the Unlimited Standards do not have to be compromised, and does not object to them, thus trumping Satan's argument in the Trial. (All this is the theme of Hebrews 1-2, 4-10, and will be covered in more detail when I do the Hebrews RFG series videos.)

So Parts 6 and 7 explore the nature of such tension between Unlimited God and limited 'us'.


YMH8b God's Personality, cont.

Paradox of God making of you so that you 'make' of God what Holy Spirit makes, lol.

  1. Paradox.htm — paradoxes of Merit in the Trial
  2. LordvSatan5.htm#Paradox smaller version of the same Trial issues.
  3. SatStrat.htm#Paradox Paradox of God's Nature
  4. LordvSatan5.htm#Lake Paradox of being able to get out of hell, but refusal to do so.

YMH9 God's Motive

Five-part audio, here. 1st Audio (20 mins): http://www.brainout.net/wma/GodsMotive.wma; Right-click your mouse on the link and then 'save.. as' to download.

Takes less than 2 mins to download each audio. Some browsers' players hallucinate that they can't play the audio. Just ignore the hallucination and use the right-click, if your browser claims a playing problem.

2nd part, the 'dimensions' of His Motive and how they impact you (30 mins): http://www.brainout.net/wma/GodsMotive2.wma.

3rd (25 mins), how knowing God's Motive resolves all theological conundra about His Nature: http://www.brainout.net/wma/GodsMotive3.wma. That 3rd part turned out surprisingly well.

So is God a masochist? Or, the Ultimate Lover Who Makes Good, even on Evil? Let's see in the 4th part (50 mins): http://www.brainout.net/wma/GodsMotive4.wma.

Wrapping up, how from Adam through eternity, Love proves to be the Integrity of God, totally resolving the inherently-disproportionate 'disconnect' between life and death, bad and good (46 mins): http://www.brainout.net/wma/GodsMotive5.wma.

For I'm obsessed with this topic, so beginning 10 years ago, wrote webpages and two whole webseries, on it. Those links are at the end of this description.

Oh: I got the May 2000 date wrong in the GodsMotive (first) audio. The actual class date was May 7, 2000. The day that changed my life...

Associated webpages are many, as I've been obsessed even more, since I heard that class. I really 'get it' about God now, as a consequence of that class. Here are the pages:

Short synopsis of Love Determining God's 'Architectural 'Design' to Replicate His Son in us: ArchiDes.htm.

Interplay between Love and Justice, is analysed here: DueDisclosure.htm. Really important to understand Love is the Driver, but the object God uses to 'drive' His Love, is Righteousness and Justice. That's also covered in easier-to-read fashion, in LordvSatan1.htm (start at beginning, read through the Love is Integrity section).

Longer, on the 'paradox' of being God, links follow.

Fixes.htm — first five 'bullets', goes through Divine Physics. Longer on Divine Physics is here: SatStrat.htm; just keep reading until you can't stand it anymore. Then there's the 'DNA' analogy, here: DDNA.htm, a very long series centered on Isaiah 53's five verbs in the LXX, which act as a sort of Grand Central Station for all the NT verses (Christ and the NT authors constantly reference these verbs).

Longest, and again centered on Isaiah 53 (though it didn't start out that way), is the humongous Thinking Series, which is over 2000 printed pages, starting here: LordvSatan1.htm.


YMH10a1 Yapping Book of Daniel

Debate thread, here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=82

Yapping Most High Series, how Daniel shows the 5 P's of YMH Part 5+8, & God's Orchestration of Time.

Audio Links to live reading of (NIV) Book of Daniel, in order:

Clarification: Daniel 5:10 refs the Queen Mother (Nitocris), married to Nabonidus (retired in Tymat, during siege); Belshazzar was their son.

Analysis of ties in Dan7, Rev 11-17, & whether Islam is meant: http://www.brainout.net/wma/Dan7Rev11-17.WMA

Dan7:13 'son of man' is unique (bar enash, not adam): http://www.brainout.net/pics/SonOfMan.jpg. Videos on it begin at: • LXX6a 1/5 'Son of Man' means GOD-Man

NOTE: Chap 7 depicts Chap 2 empires as beasts to stress DEGRADATION (animalistic thinking). L28 of my pastor's 1970 Daniel explains further. The 'actions' depict the 'biography' of each empire, to identify it in history.

For Daniel 10 exegesis, order at least Lesson 49, 1970 Daniel series from my pastor (for free) at http://www.rbthieme.org .

God's Wit video, Gabriel ties Dan10:20-21 to Isa45's prophecy of Cyrus, 143MB, 20 minutes: http://www.brainout.net/wma/Dan10-20thru21andIsa45.avi

BTW, the '3 kings' after Cyrus are Darius I, Xerxes I (of Esther), Artaxerxes I. Gabriel only counts believers.

Related webpages:


YMH10a2 God's Timing, Dan12:11-12's SOLAR Calendar

As we'll see for example in Daniel 12, God uses a SOLAR calendar for Israel, never lunar; it begins on the vernal equinox (usually our March 20-21). That way, Israel would always celebrate its own birthday — the Exodus — on time. That day ties back to Jacob's entry into Egypt on the very same day, Exo 12:40-41. Hence you know for sure that Israel's calendar was converted to solar — for Israel was different from other nations, and the others used a wandering lunar year.

David thus instituted a set of 24 priestly courses to keep that solar convention, with the last one extending the extra 5 days to the next vernal equinox.

Sadly, the Jews forgot how the Bible tells time, and we Christians didn't compare the Bible versus Jewish custom, so we can't tell time, either. But God can tell time, and He tells it CONVERGENTLY, in the Bible.

More videos will follow in this Part 10 as I have time to make them, to show you how God always tells multiple-year TIME, in solar terms. Once you see that, you will be able to revalue Bible dates as the BIBLE depicts them, and find ample historical evidence outside Bible. The Hebrew calendar, moreover, will be demonstrated to have a designed BALANCE between the first six and the last six months, with Chanukah — the Lord's Birthday — opposite Pentecost. Finally, you'll be able to see how Passover week resulted in Him being set aside on nominal Passover — since the Sanhedrin started the new year too early (basing it on lunar, forgetting to adjust for solar) — so the Lord was SET ASIDE on nominal Passover but really the 10th day of the month, just as Exodus 12 required. Executed, therefore, on what should have been the REAL Passover, as John wryly notes in his Greek sarcasm (which scholars all know about), in John 19.

All in a calendar. All predicted since Moses. All misread, because we 'wander' from the Bible, to human (here, Jewish) custom.


YMH10b God's Timing Vernal Equinox Calendar Genius

This short video shows how you can always tell when the Jewish year is supposed to begin, per GOD in the Bible, rather than per humans who have screwed up calendaring, for centuries. Thus you can prove PAST Bible dates IN the Bible, rather than relying on extra-Biblical sources (which are invariably based on other calendars, which have been changed and screwed up many times, in history).

BTW, the BIBLE intercalates in Elul, not Adar. So it should be Elul sheni, and that will align the whole year to our solar year. The Jews forgot that, but the Bible math makes it work and clearly. See my Patu32 video for details, here: https://vimeo.com/brainout/patu32


YMH10e God's Timing, Rant on why we don't know it!

You can trust Bible, its own dating system proves trustworthy — so I yap here and in Part 10f about how we don't trust Bible, but should. Related to this is my 'Pass the Salt' video series.


YMH10g God's Timing vs. Jewish Dispensationalism

Jews expect Messiah to come (or come again, if they believe Christ is Messiah) in their year 6000 (i.e., per Rambam or see Talmud, Order Nezekin, Sanhedrin 97, then search on 'Kattina'). Yet they also retain a garbled recognition of the 4200, see Sanhedrin 97b, search on 'eighty five jubilees'. It was 84, same as the number of syllables in Psalm 90:1-4, from which BOTH of their garbled timelines derive. Sample of their confused reasoning: Lore of the School of Elijah Convert it to searchable? Read vid desc to 'Google Books' video here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/googlebooks...

How valid is all that? This video introduces the issue; future videos will document where in the Hebrew (you can't see it in translation) the Bible provides what might be considered 'proof' of a 7000-year timeline for history. But what's the impact of Church, since Rapture is unpredictable? We'll cover that too, in future videos.

To warm up for them, you might want to study my Psalm 90 playlist videos (link: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FF2856603C945631), for the primary source of Jewish Dispensationalism depends on the HEBREW METER in Psalm 90. Christian scholars don't recognize Bible Hebrew as having meter. But the Jews all had to memorise orally, so meter is commonly used in the OT, and is a very handy way to be sure you memorize correctly — and know your prophetic timeline, too.


YMH10h God's Salt 'House' Timing

Simple video showing how God constructs time based on His foreknowledge of man's psychological oncology, to bless and preserve, the human race. Subsequent videos show where you can prove all this in Bible. Or, visit brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and Mirroring.htm

Adam's fall begot a psychological deterioration in man, which needs to be checked lest the human race become too bestial, as God explains beginning in Genesis 5. So 490 years is the period over which man exhausts all his human solutions, so either resorts to destruction, or to looking UP at God. 120 years (example of Flood in Gen6) characterizes the ending of this period (4 generation curse seen operating), as shown in my Pass the Salt Videos (esp. in the video links of the Companion). The third trend is the transmissal and saturation of exposure to Bible (or any other idea), which runs 200 years (first 80 are setup, training, and dissemination of teachers). This last period isn't yet covered in my videos, but 'our' version of it began in 1830 with the collation of Bible mss by Tregelles and other scholars in Europe. Future videos will explain this 200-year trend in more detail.


YMH10i God's Salt 'House' Timing, cont.

Continued from 10h. This video ends with the idea of mass voting periods. 10j will explain further.

There are really three mass voting periods, each of which determines history: 70 for believers to vote to mature, 50 for unbelievers to vote to believe in Christ, and a combined 120 which spans either of the prior two. Idea is to precede the first 50 or 70 years (70+50=120, and 50+70=120) with a warning to vote. History, then, is the OUTCOME of those votes, for well or ill. Usually, for ill — kinda like, the Flood. Pass the Salt videos explain the 120-year periods; the Pass the Salt Companion video's description has more videos linked, which are off-Youtube and trace live onscreen, these periods since Adam's Fall. Thus you can vet them with whatever history you know or research.

This is Bible-testable, historically-testable stuff. Due to anti-semitic rejection (by the Church Fathers) of Jewish Dispensationalism, all this material was denied, lost, and is not taught in Christendom — with many lives lost, as a result!


10k YMH10k God's Salt 'House' Timing, cont.

Hidden wit and drama in the Genesis 5 'begats' show believers buy the world TIME! Continued from 10j. You can download the 'pristine' jpg file here: 3-house.jpg


YMH10l God's Salt 'House' Timing, cont.

Continued from 10k. You can download the Adam-Abram jpg photo here: Adam-AbramTimeHouse.jpg.

The astonishing math of Israel's sabbatical and Jubilee years buying the last 50 years of the 1050 'house' is reviewed in TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc — see its page 15 and prepare to gasp.


YMH10m God's Salt 'House' Timing, cont.

DRAMATIC demonstration of how time almost ended — but Abram matured in time! Continued from 10l. The full worksheet with all this information plotted from Bible's Genesis 5 through post-Bible time through 2130AD (not all relevant dates are yet listed), is in GeneYrs.xls


YMH10p God's Salt House Timing, cont.

Before we can understand David's timegrants, we need to see the Precedence for Daniel 9 and Rapture, illustrated by Flood. For God's Rules for Time not only require someone supermature to get a 490-year timegrant, but ALSO require the same or another believer supermature enough to receive a 1000-year timegrant.

Thus is the precedence for the Millennium and the sudden-death character of Church Rapture, as you'll begin to see.


YMH10q1 God's Salt House Timing, cont.

Precedence for Daniel 9 and Rapture, illustrated by Flood, cont. For God's Rules for Time not only require someone supermature to get a 490-year timegrant, but ALSO require the same or another believer supermature enough to receive a 1000-year timegrant.

Thus is the precedence for the Millennium and the sudden-death character of Church Rapture, as you'll begin to see.


YMH10r3 God's Salt House Timing, cont.

Dramatic demonstration of David's timegrants, continued. Graph download link (1.3MB): Abraham-Messiah.png

It's because David's timegrants end 7 years LATE (due to civil war in Israel between 1010-1004BC) that the Tribulation is post-Christ, and is a real 7-year period which must yet be 'paid'. In future videos we'll go through Psalm 90, Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9, to show they all reconcile to this 7-year lateness in David's reign. Scholars miss it, because they dismissively treat 1Kings 6:1 as a scribal error, and hence misdate David's age at death. Bible doesn't make that mistake; as you'll see, in future videos.

This timeline is depicted sabbatically in Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53. Those passages will be quickly summarized in future YMH videos. If you want to see the fuller timeline story both chapters convey via their Hebrew meter — which forms the basis for the Daniel 9 numbers — click here for the Psalm 90 Youtube video playlist: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FF2856603C945631

Outside Youtube, you can see the same playlist, plus the associated Isaiah 53 videos, here: BibleHebrewMeter.htm


YMH10s1 God's Salt House Timing, cont.

Further proof how Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 Hebrew meter show God's Basic Time Grant Unit of 490+70+490=1050. All of Yapping (YMH) Part 10 is devoted to explaining this BIBLE CORRECTION to 'Jewish dispensationalism'.

This Yapping Part 10s focuses ONLY on how the meter demonstrates God's Time Grants. For background orientation, see the Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 playlists. Links follow, below.

Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 visual aids used in videos which you can download:


YMH10s2 God's Salt House Timing, cont.

How Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 Hebrew meter prove the 490+70+490=1050 accounting valid. You'll need to view the Psalm 90 playlist, to get the most out of this Part 10s: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FF2856603C945631

This Part 10s focuses ONLY on the meter numbers. Future videos will focus on content matching. For I will translate the meter into English, so you can test both meter and content, yourself.


YMH10s5a God's Salt House Timing, cont.

God's Testimonies of Time, Panoramic Review. Part 10s6, will begin to show you CLAUSE BY CLAUSE in Isaiah, how the syllables depict years of Israel's then-future, history. History we NOW can check. Is there greater proof of God than this?


YMH10s6 how Isaiah predicts Manasseh's Time

Technical video showing how Isaiah 53:1-2's meter, prophetically benchmarks Manasseh. 2-minute Isaiah 53 calendar video benchmarking Manasseh: Isaiah 53's Meter Plots God's FUTURE ...


YMH10s7 How Isaiah predicts Josiah's Time

How Isaiah 53:3's meter prophetically benchmarks Josiah. This topic continues through Part 10s10, and is really important, for God's proving via the METER, how LONG each prophecy segment will last, since Isaiah prophesied what would occur. Thus by remembering the meter orally, Israel would always know what time it was. Has He not told us the end, from the beginning?

And by the way, you can thus know you parsed the Hebrew rightly, when it tallies to real FUTURE HISTORY you can now prove PASSED.


YMH10s8 how Isaiah predicts Josiah's time, cont.

How Isaiah 53:3's meter prophetically benchmarks Josiah, cont.


YMH10s10 how Isaiah predicts Josiah's Time, cont.

How Isaiah 53:3's meter balances to Josiah, 621BC, conclusion. This was why Israel got to go on living, and with her — the world. All because they WHOLEHEARTEDLY observed the Passover! Don't ever think that as a believer, you are not valuable! Your smallest vote for God, has BIG consequences for the world!

The video's Word doc 'Isaiah 53 in English' translation is available from my 'Isaiah 53 in Hebrew meter' video description, here: Isaiah 53 in Hebrew Meter, English Wo...


YMH10s11 Isaiah 53's meter predicts Time per CLAUSE?

Isaiah 53's meter prophetically benchmarks per clause? Yep. In fact, he piggybacks years like Israel piggybacks days, which results in fine-tune adjustments for beginning or end of the year. For example, Isaiah 53:7's second clause 'Yet He opens not his mouth' ends with the END of 516BC, which was when the 2nd Temple was dedicated, 3 Adar (see Ezrah 6:15). That's the end of the Jewish year.

Every major event, including the fact that the Annunciation was also in Adar, is tracked. Very shocking stuff. I will need time to study the months more now. I have to also plot the tracking of David's life (since the parallel is the Last David), in the first 77 syllables. So future videos will address the above claims, so you can vet the astonishing then-future history, for yourself.

Also, ENGLISH retranslation of that meter for Isaiah 53. Download the Isaiah 53 retranslation Word doc here, and view in PrintPreview:

Landscape mode (2 pages): Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc. This Word doc shows the latest upgrade in translation (versus the video). See my 'Isaiah 53 in Hebrew Meter' video description (link here: Isaiah 53 in Hebrew Meter, English Wo...) for more explanation on Isaiah 53, including webpage links.

Portrait mode (3 pages): Isa53MeterTransInEnglish.doc


YMH10s12 how Isaiah balances to Sennacharib

Because Isaiah is predicting how Israel's history will go; because he's presenting God's indictment, Isaiah 53:1 begins 'his report' by balancing from 712 BC when he prophesied, to Sennacharib's failed siege of 703-701 BC.

This is a PAST benchmark, and it serves to illustrate Isaiah's Hebrew meter style of benchmarking to the FUTURE, just like he does the PAST. For Isaiah writes this chapter AFTER Sennacharib, but begins the chapter with the decree about First and Last David (first 77 syllables, will be covered in a future video), and then Isaiah 53:1 is his OWN report, dating back from 712BC, forward to the Cross, to show Israel's voting history between 712BC and the Cross. This is the same thing Moses did in Psalm 90, but Moses did it from Adam forward. So Isaiah is updating the history, in light of Israel's vote thus far (i.e., as a result of Hezekiah voting for God rather than appeasement, when Sennacharib besieged).

So this is a valuable clause to show Isaiah's writing style, so you can tell it's deliberate. Every syllable in Isaiah 53 corresponds to one year. The idea was for Israel to use it, to track her future; and as time went on, her past history. So Isaiah maps out the future from 712 BC to 37AD, to complement his eschatological discourse, so Israel can know HOW LONG each segment will last, as well as what it would be (i.e., Cyrus, Nebuchadnezzar, Temple Rebuilding and Messiah's coming and going). Therefore God uses Isaiah 53's accounting, to apportion the years in Daniel 9:2, Jeremiah 25, and Dan 9:24-27. That's why Daniel asks no questions: he knew the material already. That's why he timed his prayer to be in the 49th year of the exile, just as Isaiah 53 had mapped it.


YMH10s13 how Isaiah balances to Sennacharib, cont.

How Isaiah 53:1 balances to Sennacharib, 703-701 BC, conclusion. Future videos will address the scholarly misreading of 2Chronicles 29, which results in them misdating Hezekiah's reign (same mistake as they make with 1Kings 6:1, ignoring context).

Again, Isaiah 53 maps out the future from 712 BC to 37AD, to complement his eschatological discourse, so Israel can know HOW LONG each segment will last, as well as what it would be (i.e., Cyrus, Nebuchadnezzar, Temple Rebuilding and Messiah's coming and going). Therefore God uses Isaiah 53's accounting, to apportion the years in Daniel 9:2, Jeremiah 25, and Dan 9:24-27. That's why Daniel asks no questions: he knew the material already. That's why he timed his prayer to be in the 49th year of the exile, just as Isaiah 53 had mapped it.


YMH10s10-13 Isa53's Timeline Meter, Revisited

This time, using the Metered Translation and relevant Bible passages, I go through the annual timeline usage of Isaiah 53's meter AND text, to show what he's doing. Focus is mostly on Hezekiah and the TWO times (not just one) he was threatened by Sennacharib. So the words have a lot more meaning when you know WHAT TIME Isaiah links, to the words. This is true of all the metered passages, from Psalm 90, forward. I suspect to find meter in Genesis, too, starting in Genesis 49 (Jacob's blessing) — but haven't had time to look for it.

Download for the translation:

Landscape mode (2 pages): brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc . This Word doc shows the latest upgrade in translation (versus the video). See my 'Isaiah 53 in Hebrew Meter' video description (link here: youtube.com/watch?v=qGm5_TPK33I ) for more explanation on Isaiah 53, including webpage links.

Portrait mode (3 pages): brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglish.doc

File Name: YMH10s10-13.avi, sum of the original Yap10s10,11,12,13 534Josiah and 531Sen avi videos dated 1/16/10. The latter four originals were severally posted in Youtube on the same date.


YMH10s14 How Isaiah 53's Meter Benchmarks Time

Isaiah 53's Meter Timing Methodology:

So notice: 2nd clause in Isaiah 52:15 breaks at a total of 33, at its end (last-birthday convention). Same age as Christ was, when He died. Notice the tie in content!

So notice: last two syllables of sixth clause in Isaiah 53:12 breaks at the beginning of 30AD on the first syllable of 'carried' ("nasa" in Hebrew), which equals when Christ actually died on the Cross. Notice the tie in content, 'carried'! Isaiah balances to that very minute, which was True Passover Erev (the Jews had forgotten to intercalate, per the sarcasm of John in John 19, I show that in PassPlot.htm's 'paraskeue' verses).

So notice: every verse clause benchmarks an important period of history. So I now have to refine what he's benchmarking and why. So this will be the end of the Part 10s videos for awhile.


YMH14-15 Thinking out Isa53's Timeline Meter Implications

This chatty 'journal entry' video, summarizes the annual timeline meter in Isa53; it ends, saying I need to review the history, before doing more videos on that Chapter. Must figure out how he's rounding each syllable aka year. This video was made back in 2010; though it's now 2013, I've not had time to revisit his rounding. So this will be the last YMH video on Isaiah 53's annual prophetic calendar accounting, for at least another year. I might have time again, in 2015. Sorry!

File Name: YMH14-15.avi, sum of the two original face vids of 1/24/10 (posted in Youtube the same day). Just added 'newsprint' special effect to counteract camera brightness problem.


YMH11 How God Times YOUR Life!

God times your life based on your BIRTHDAY, or on someone else's birthday who's important to your life. The dates/events will be DOCTRINALLY significant and tie in event CHARACTER (i.e., birth to birth of something else, death to death of something or someone else); so if you don't know Bible well, you might not detect the convergence. In that case, ask God to 'connect the dots' for you. It might take awhile to understand (took me at least several years). Keep plugging.

Audios below cover this startling topic; first, a brief review of Part 10; then, Bible proof of how God timed believers' lives in the Bible. Theologians generally don't cover this doctrine, though I learned it first under my pastor, who spoke of it only as a sidenote while covering Genesis 5 and 11.

The sons were all birthday presents to the fathers; the Flood beginning and ending was a birthday present to Noah, and doctrinally significant as picture of salvation (look up 'ark' verses); Exodus was a similar birthday present to Moses.

Then, to prove He's doing the same thing to you, I briefly explain how He's done it to me. So you can see the pattern, and start investigating your own life, to learn how He's doing it to you.

Finally, the audio covers why God chooses to do this, so that you won't mistake the timing as flattering you, but rather as a pointed message where God stresses HE is the agent, and personally to YOU.

For again, God times your life based on your BIRTHDAY, or based on the birthday of someone else who's important to your life. Like, Christ's birthday; like, your pastor's birthday! Keyed, to your own!

Audio on how He did it in Bible, from Adam through Christ: HowGodTimesYourLife1.WMA. You'll need to know the BIBLE's real Hebrew calendar, which is NOT like the calendar the Jews use today. (The Jews no longer date the months rightly, partly owing to the persecution they've been under for 3000 years. BIBLE's year is 365 days, each month except Adar of 30 days, and Adar is 35 or 36 days to reach the next vernal equinox.) Here's how to get it, and read about it, webpage: PassPlot.htm#Calendar. The BIBLE Hebrew calendar alone, is here: HebCal.htm. The calendar converter to our 'modern' Western calendar, is here: HEBCalConverter.xls. You'll need to know the vernal (March) equinox date, too. Here's how to get that: https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/seasons.html

Audio on how He did it to me, the overall pattern and two spectacular examples, so you can look in your own life for the same pattern: HowGodTimesYourLife2.WMA

Audio on how He tied what He did to me, timed to Isaiah 53's meter which I'd been RESEARCHING, and which no one yet in Christendom even knows: HowGodTimesYourLife3.WMA

Audio wrapup, conclusions you can test in your own life and in Bible: HowGodTimesYourLife4.WMA


YMH12a Isaiah 53 updated

Yapping Most High series, Isaiah 53 chronology. Major changes are made in this and the next video about how to read it, w mechanics showing how you can do it yourself. That really matters because now I've got cancer, & I don't know how long I'll live.

So try to learn the mechanics, as this is worth a fortune spiritually & materially. For example, in 1752 Robert Lowth tried to meter Isaiah 53 as I show here, but failed. This video corrects what he got wrong.

Bible scholars have tried to find this meter for 500 years. Since in this case it is a timeline from 1st to last David, it is particularly valuable to learn; Bible does this countdown to Messiah starting in Genesis, all the way through Revelation, but never tells you when the Rapture happens.

The meter is consistent in varying patterns, like fractals. Each meter is doctrinally significant & is defined in Scripture, i e 42 is double growth, as Jacob was 21 years getting a wife & he comes back w 2 of them. So Isaiah who began his ministry in the 42nd year of the king, starts writing Isaiah53, 42 years after he's already been a prophet.

This kind of equidistant punning is a frequent feature, to help you know it's deliberate, and to interpret.

But let's go back to basics, syllable by syllable...


YMH 12b Isaiah 53 update cont

In this video I begin to show how Isaiah maps future kings of Israel & Judah up to 37AD, original Mosaic timeline for Christ's death. (NT will revise that SCHEDULE to His actual birth & death; John runs both timelines, to teach lessons alongside the text).

When you see Isaiah's meter for OT FUTURE king regnal yrs line up so perfectly w what we have in the later books of Kings (+ Chronicles by Jeremiah), you will be astounded. Tells you how those books are written: to demo how Isaiah's prophecy was fulfilled.

Rest of Bible incl NT is based on Isa53 & maps to it, so you can know a) interp, & b) you have original divine Writ.

So try to learn the mechanics, as this is worth a fortune spiritually & materially. For example, in 1752 Robert Lowth tried to meter Isaiah 53 as I show here, but failed. This video corrects what he got wrong.

Bible scholars tried to find this meter for 500 years. Since this is a timeline from 1st to last David, it is esp valuable to learn; Bible does this countdown to Messiah, Gen-Rev, but you can't see it in English (btw it never tells you when Rapture happens).

The meter is consistent in varying patterns, like fractals. Each meter is doctrinally significant & is defined in Scripture, i e 42 is 2x growth, as Jacob was 21 years getting a wife & he comes back w 2. So Isaiah who began his ministry in 42nd year of a king, starts Isaiah53, 42 yrs after he's been a prophet.

This kind of equidistant punning is a frequent meter feature, to help you know it's deliberate, & to interpret.

But let's go back to basics, syllable by syllable...


GGS10e9c1 Isaiah counts to Millennium, ACT 2

Watch in HD. Bible dates vindicated! Bible, Millennium and Rapture debunkers proven slipshod! Setup for Act III (Daniel 9) and Act IV (Ephesians 1)! Anyone can play fancy games with numbers. But only GOD can orchestrate TIME ITSELF to 'balance' to those numbers. Forward, and Backward. So Bible writers use meter as an ACCOUNTING DEVICE for Time, for dates, for how-long-in-the-future a thing will occur.

Example: each Bible writer tells you WHEN he writes and how to CROSS REFERENCE what he writes elsewhere in Bible, via a palindromic, sevening meter system; it tells you how many years FROM a known past event, he's writing; and, the same number of years TO a future event, if he apes Moses' style. So the meter works like dateline, and is self-auditing.

Here's how. The writer creates a series of 'paragraphs' DIVISIBLE BY SEVEN. First such paragraph's syllables signify either the number of 'sevens' or the number of years EQUALLY backward and forward from the date of writing, to several related events. Related, to the content of what's said. That's why you can audit date calculations.

Here we see that audit in both Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53, with awesome converging detail; thus we know Act II is Isaiah 53, for it 'wraps' around Act I, Psalm 90, Play of History to Messiah, to Millennium; which history, due to Israel's rejection, constitutes PRECEDENT for the Rapture. Daniel and Paul use the same style, to constitute Act III and IV. Revelation wraps to them all.

Hence this EQUIDISTANCE rhetorical style helps one interpret, too. For the equidistance stresses relationships of events to what's written. Ergo, when you see the style here, you can find it elsewhere in Bible (i.e., in Isaiah 1:1, telling you when his ministry began). Just count the syllables.

Above all, this style proves only SOLAR years are used by Bible: the accounting is event-anniversary based. Lunar accounting would never yield correct anniversaries of events. All Bible yearly measures are based on a solar year, and all are anniversary-based, as God explained to Moses in Exodus 12. God's been accounting that way, ever since Genesis 5, if we would but pay attention rather than yawn, listening instead to 'respectable' but incompetent scholarship!

Scholars are important and valuable. BIBLE is more important and valuable. So when scholars don't work properly in BIBLE, champion the latter and reform the former. But we won't reform, so perpetuate incompetence!

Thus centuries of inept debate over Bible whens, like Exodus, Daniel, or whether 'Isaiah' was really three people, can be put to rest!

Links:

Exodus: Exodate.htm

Act IV, Eph1:3-14: Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf . Paul clearly maps to Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9 metered 'paragraphs'.

Act III, Daniel 9:4-19 (mapped to Ps90 and Isa53) and Dan 9:24-25 (mapped to Psalm 90:1-3, and Dan 9:13,16,18): brainout.net/DAN9V4-19.pdf . Hebrew big meter picture: DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf. It has many notes. Unparsed one-pager: DAN9V4-19HebOnePager.pdf .

For Act II, Isa53: Hebrew big meter picture: Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.JPG (or Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf ) and Isa53Map.jpg . Hebrew-metered English translation: Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc . See also my Isaiah 53 Meter video playlist, which covers Hebrew and translation (last three videos); See also Episode 10s1 et seq. of my YMH playlist, on how Isa53 meters to Messiah ANNUALLY from 712 BC (yet unfinished).

For Act I, Psalm 90: see my Psalm 90 Meter of Time playlist for background. UPDATED (vs. video) meter: Psalm90inHebrew.doc or pdf . That has my English translation mapped to the Hebrew.

Trilingual (Heb, Greek, NASB English), parsed: Psalm90ParsedTrilingual.pdf .

Psalm 90's palindromic meter map is in the description to my 22a Ps90 video; there, palindromes not covered in the videos are listed. Use it to track Acts II through IV. Psalm 90's two time tracks use meter to represent real years: a) sabbatically accounted by 70-year voting period from Adam, and b) straight-line accounted (one syllable per year from when he writes). Isaiah, Daniel, and Paul play off that two-track accounting.

The video's timeline worksheet: GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses on derivation of the dates and fuller explanation: brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and Mirroring.htm .

File Name: 10e9c1GGS.avi, 1/20/11.


GGS10e9c2 Isaiah counts to Millennium, ACT 2 (cont.)

Continued from 10e9c1. See that video's description. Next video will be 10e9d, Act III, how Daniel's meter wraps around Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53's. It will be a week or more before I post it.

File Name: 10e9c2GGS.avi, 1/20/11.


GGS10e9d2 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53

This video is not in Youtube. I forgot to post it there. Continuing from GGS10e9d1 ( in GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14 ), we now go back through Isaiah's meter, in order to better understand Daniel's.

For Daniel's is very complex: he will create a trifurcated timeline. First timeline starts at his own capture and comes full circle to his date of speaking. Second and related third timelines are developed by 'tagging' Isaiah at his syllable 133 = end Isaiah 53:2; playing on how Manasseh despised God; so, he was punished with capture, by Assyria. So, Manasseh was tagged by God in 2Kings 21:10-15 as the reason for the Temple's downfall.

Manasseh's repentance is thus paralleled with Christ: 'ish makovot, w'idua holi', Isa53:3 (translated, 'The HeartBreak Man, knowing lovesick grief').

From there, Daniel goes forward in the future, tying together all the prophecy God gave him since Daniel 2, in order to plot the sequence of the future rise and subsequent fall, of Greece and Rome. That's why Daniel 10-12, exist. They answer Daniel's METERED sequencing, in Daniel 9!

Mary's meter will pick up where Daniel ends, and Paul's meter will pick up where Mary's, ends. Peter's meter wraps around Paul's, to cover the same future Church History period on a tandem subject, the 'temple' of Church, since the OT Temple had its own 490, Daniel 9!

See: Daniel's metered sophistication (and satire!) sets new precedence for the NT meter style, so it's worth learning. We miss so much meaning in Bible, simply because we don't count the syllables and don't trust the Bible enough to actually be RIGHT in its timelines! But, I digress.

In GGS10e9d3 and 4, we'll see something of Daniel's style.

If you want, you can download the docs used in the video.

brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf for the Hebrew 'map'.

Word docs of the metered translation:
2-Page translation of Chapter, landscape mode (has translation upgrade): brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc

3-Page version, portrait mode (pre-upgrade): brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglish.doc

PS: I apologize for annoying Episode names like 'GGS10e9d2'; but the videos were made in 2011, and had many views. Within Youtube, few see the vids, but for some reason I can't fathom, they were picked up elsewhere, and embedded into other websites. So now, past viewers (and websites using these vids) would become confused, if I change the names. File Name: 10e9d2GGSIsaMill.avi, 1/12/11.


GGS10e9d3 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53, cont.

This video continues from GGS10e9d2 in vimeo, and is also not in Youtube. It presumes you're familiar with Daniel.

GIST: Daniel knew Isaiah 53's meter when he was a teenager. When he's 70 years older in Daniel 9, he prays. So he 'tags' his prayer meter to the very syllables = years in Isa53, which depicted Daniel's deportation (cf. Jer52:28, early 607BC, Nebuchadnezzar not yet sole king). From this Daniel crafts a juridical basis, for his bifurcated and metered, prayer. For the 70 years itself, was bifurcated:

* There was a '70', measured from the first deportation, Zech 1:12, 7:5, Jer52:28. The Zechariah 7 people self-righteously petition God, BECAUSE the 70 ended 2 years prior, when 2nd Temple's foundation was laid, see Zech 1 compared to Haggai 2. But they KEPT weeping and fasting afterwards; thus you know they're self-righteous: Temple's demise was fifth month, Jer 52:12. God never ordered them to do that; hence His Sharp Reply, in Jeremiah 7:6.

* There was next, a separate TEMPLE 70, see Jer25:11, 29:10. God's Metered Reply in Dan9:24-27, 'balances' to this 70. Those verses are long misaccounted by Christendom and Judaism, BECAUSE we don't know the meter! So this video covers the background. Next two videos will cover the Daniel 9:24-27, meter. Mary, Paul and Peter will ape his syllable-by-year, satirical meter; so it's worthwhile to learn Daniel 9's style.

For better understanding of those videos,

* Read brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf. It provides (exhausting!) Bible proof how Daniel counts to the Millennium. It shows how Daniel's prayer is structured, how he tracks Isaiah 53's Timeline Meter, and also what Kings and Chronicles verses he's thinking about, as he talks!

* The last video in this channel, 'Ps90 Epi24', shows GOD's meter in Daniel 9:24-27, has its own doc/pdf, brainout.net/Dan924HebParsed.pdf. That meter is introduced at the end of this video.

PDFs of the full meter pattern in Eph1:3-14, Ps90, and Isa53:

Ephesians brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

Psalm 90 brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.pdf . Trilingual version is brainout.net/Ps90ParsedTrilingual.pdf .
See also brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.tif or brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.pdf .

Isaiah 53 brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf and the translation, which is brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc
Isaiah 53's meter map brainout.net/Isa53Map.jpg .

Timeline worksheet brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses supporting it are shown in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and brainout.net/Mirroring.htm .

Audios on the whole book of Daniel, Yapping Most High Episode 10a1: use its description, to click on and listen to (or download) the audios: youtube.com/watch?v=rq75pw14HIM&list=PL40216F6E28F05780&index=17 .

File Name: 10e9d3DanMill1.avi, 1/12/11.


GGS10e9d4 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53, conclusion

Continued from and concluding, GGS10e9d3 (vimeo.com/brainout/ggs10e9d3 ). This video is not in Youtube. Watch me get egg on my face, for I was VERY LAZY when making this video. I did not WANT Daniel 9:25 to be metered, so at 10:32 in this video, I claim it's not metered. Wrongo! So during the tandem Ps90 Epi24 video (next in this channel), I have to admit I was wrong, and then make even more mistakes during the video, and then have to admit that during the video, since the Holy Spirit keeps warning me that I'm wrong. And I wouldn't listen. Well, not at first.

Aha. Now it's easier to understand why others don't listen, either.

File Name: 10e9d4DanMill2.avi, 1/12/11.


Isaiah 53 Meters 1st to Last David

GIST. To grasp Daniel 9, you must know his meter; it's based on Isaiah 53's. God ALSO uses Isa53's meter in Dan9:24-27, to reaffirm Timeline for Temple reconstruction. For Isaiah tells it first, in 712BC. His meter reminded Jewish believers of that future, just as you'd use a calendar, by SYLLABLE COUNTS. For Jews already had to count them, to test memorization and copying.

So God made this housekeeping task perform an eschatological duty, too: the entire future through Messiah is tracked. Isaiah tells you when he wrote Isaiah 53, in verse 1, 126 years prior to Temple's Fall, 712BC, during his ministry to Hezekiah — parallelling future Temple Destruction, which then will also be 126 years short of its promised 490-year time grant from back in 950BC. So Isaiah parses his meter to FUTURE Temple and Jerusalem reconstruction timeline, to show how to balance to Messiah. For he'd been predicting it since Isaiah 39. So now, he tags meter to Psalm 90 and his own verse content in deft dual-entendre, near-and-far-prophetical manner as is the style for all OT prophecy.

God thus needn't but parse the timeline, in His Reply via Gavriel; so Daniel isn't surprised and asks no questions. To us in English, Daniel 9's numbers jump from nowhere, so we don't know WHY those numbers. But in Hebrew and NT Greek, it's referenced all over: for Temple depicts Messiah.

Matthew 1 and Luke 3 thus play on Isaiah's meter to explain the prophesied generations (42) and descendants (77) count down to Christ. Luke lists from Adam (including Gentiles); Matthew, from Abraham, naming legitimate kings of Judah, resulting in a 42-generation count. ALL these also draw on Psalm 90's meter. Even and especially, Daniel. For his prayer is metered based on Isa53 and Ps90, as is God's reply in Dan9:24-27. So too, is Mary's, Paul's, and even Peter's Greek. See my GGS videos, live onscreen Bible proof.

Thus Daniel 9:24-27 is not new info. For Dan9 is an APPLICATION of Isa53. So meter as mnemonic to remind one of future dates, is a major rhetorical style in Scripture. It is not Bible codes, but a CALENDAR.

Eventually, I'll show how Isaiah 53's meter-and-text, tracks Israel's remaining time to the then-scheduled Death of Messiah (should have been 37 AD, but Christ died seven years early); this tracking will be in the Isaiah 53 channel, Isaiah 53 Meter of Time: 1st David's Birth to Last David's Scheduled Death.

NOTE: back in 2008 when I made this video, I didn't know about Psalm 90, Daniel, Mary, Paul and Peter (well, and Hebrews, plus John in Revelation), also using the meter. Kinda like fingerprints, when you have a lot of matching rhetorical points that 'talk' to each other in content too, you know you've got a reliable style for testing. Yeah, and that's the point of Hebrew Meter. Again, because they had to count the syllables, anyway.

Isa53Map.pdf is a map of Isaiah 53 in the video. The chronology worksheet, is GeneYrs.xls.

This Bible rhetorical style has never been documented, so far as I can find. Not even my own pastor seemed to know about it. Hence the need to thoroughly document in video and docs, so any claims can be tested with the TEXT. Scholars have debated whether Bible has meter for centuries; since the 1830's, even the most-respected Hebrew scholars doubted whether Isaiah is genuinely from ONE real Isaiah, since he changes writing style (beginning in Chapter 40) and is so accurate. They think the text must be wrong (same stupid objections raised against Daniel, lol). So establishing the meter resolves many interpretation and text-crit issues, especially for those of much education, but oh so little faith. One can empathize. People tend to ASSume faith must mean being uneducated, too.

See: if the Bible is accurate, it's doubted; if it's unclear to the dummies who can't read it, it's doubted; if it seems to have wrong info, it's of course doubted. See the pattern? So God gave us little-faiths a way to have a bit more faith by encoding dates via syllable counts all Jews had to memorize anyway. Prosaic, easy, and profound. So of course the meter will be doubted, so Bible can stay nicely obtuse! Meanwhile, you can prove Bible accurate and clear, just by counting the syllables yourself. So test using 1John1:9 and ask Our Mutual Dad. If you find any mistakes, yell at me.

See the "God's Orchestration of Time" channel videos for important related website links.

If you'd rather download the split made from this video, go to Isaiah 53 Meters God’s Temple Calendar for the first part, then to Isaiah 53's Meter Plots God's FUTURE Calendar, Trailer, for the second-and-last part.

NOTE: at 15:35 there's a video overlay typo of '35' + '42' = '70'. It should be '28', not '35'. That typo is corrected in later reprints of that video section.

File Name: Isa53CalendarVids.avi, 2/13/11. It summed the 9/08 split vids, and is in Isa53Hypo4Add folder.


NT 'threads' LXX

Ad-hoc postings of how LXX is used in the NT. Video Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'. Or, play all with one click: channel . They will play per the default channel order, here shown.

SERIES GIST: This channel contains all my Youtube videos of this same channel aka playlist name, plus the full (silent) 'hupakouw' Word Search vids (LXX7abc). This channel/playlist focuses on how often the NT quotes from the LXX. A primary subfocus is to demonstrate how much Christ said He was God, in the NT, because a lot of ignorant people claim He didn't claim to be God. Since they don't know the OT Hebrew or Greek, and since they are lazy and disingenuous, they fool the others who are likewise uninformed. But you don't have to be uninformed.

Similarly, the King James Onlyists claim that the LXX is a hoax invented three centuries after Christ by Origen. They too cannot read either Hebrew or the Greek, so don't know what fools they make of themselves by that claim. For even their Textus Receptus has well over 1000 quotes of the LXX. The KJV translators all knew the LXX was written circa 273 BC by a bunch of Jews, though the translators made fun of the idea that the translation was made in 72 days by as many translators. So again, the KJVO people are liars, and this series helps prove how you can know that. So, the lead video of this series demonstrates what incompetent liars the KJVO are: for if the LXX is a hoax, so too would be the King James Bible, which translated from the Textus Receptus!

Aside from that, the main purpose of this series is to show the richness of deft wordplay the Lord and the writers of the NT make, on the LXX and often, the Hebrew text they had. Helps you learn how to read and interpret, Bible.

Also, the 'threading' resolves many other conundra debated in Christendom: validity of Trinity, Believe-Only-To-Be-Saved, Rapture, and even the longstanding INEPT claim the 'pericope adulterae' shouldn't be in John 8. Rest of the original series video description, follows below.
===========
NT threads (quotes) LXX series. The whole point of the New Testament, is to show a) that the Old Testament prophecies and doctrines are fulfilled in Christ; then b) how the Covenant changed for Church; and will c) change back to Israel for the Trib and Mill; thus d) fulfill the purpose of history to 'birth' eternity (theme of Romans 8).

So to prove Divine Authorship of a given NT book, the writer must 'thread' from OT, showing how his book is 100% compatible; NT authors thus often use LXX for 'threading'. (If you can't read Greek, then Google on 'New Testament', 'LXX' + 'quotes', for a ton of independent info on this rhetorical style, as you can't see it in translation.)

This same 'threading' rule was used pan-OT, to prove each then-'new' OT book came from God. So the rule continues, for NT. That's why you didn't need a Council of Nicaea, to determine what's Divine Writ.

So in this series you'll find a sampling of very important verses, demonstrating what the LXX says, versus the quotation in the NT. That way you can select any quoted OT passage, and yourself test whether it is following the LXX, or the Hebrew. There is a notable difference. So once you see the style, you'll notice the difference and can 'practice' on any verse in the OT.

Again, THREADING is the means by which a new Bible Book integrates itself into all previous Divine Writ, thus proving it too came from God. Don't need councils or popes arrogating to themselves the fiat on what constitutes Divine Writ. Just need Bible. For the Bible, proves itself.

After all, people in ancient times memorized Bible. So if you QUOTED it, but CHANGED small parts of the quote, you'd be making some kind of new, witty statement everyone would understand.

So New Testament writers quote sections of the LXX in nearly every verse; then deliberately CHANGE words in the requote, to teach new truth. So you can see how the new truth, integrates with the old. I call this technique, 'threading'. It's an important legal-document technique, and is still used worldwide, today. In Bible, it shows the LEGAL PRECEDENCE of the OT, carrying forward into the NT. For God is consistent, and His Rules, eternal. So when a covenant changes, continuity and precedence must be addressed. Ergo, threading is needed to show what changes, and what stays the same.

NOTE: Episodes posted from 11/07/13 onward will be in vimeo (http://vimeo.com/channels/ntthreadslxx ), not Youtube. However, series postings are ad hoc, not scheduled. The vimeo videos will be moderated, to block trolls but allow folks to post without having to join Google Plus.

Samples of NT Greek quoting the LXX. When the NT CHANGES the quotes in the LXX, does that mean the NT has mistakes? No: it's a teaching point. Like if you said, 'Give me Christ or give me death!' everyone would know you CHANGED a famous Patrick Henry quote, to equate Christ with Liberty.

So too, NT writers change OT quotes, since back then everyone knew the LXX by heart. Handy way to also introduce the doctrine of Church, how it UPGRADES the OT covenant. So you learn the upgrade, by carefully comparing OT vs NT quotes. So these videos explore such rhetorical styles.

Also, KJVO make the silly claim that LXX was invented by Origen in the 3rd century AD. So they don't know the pre-Origen LXX specimens we have preserved. A partial catalogue is here: http://kjvonlydebate.com/category/incredible-comments/ . General discourse on the history of the LXX and its import: The Septuagint in Context: Introduction to the Greek Version of the Bible

Of course, if the LXX were invented post-Cross, you'd have no valid Bible, either; especially, since many LXX quotes are CONCATENATED: meaning, a group of partial quotes from many LXX verses at once (rhetorical device of Christ's and Paul's).

So KJV's own Textus Receptus would be a lie, as it faithfully records these same quotes. Ooops.

Truth: LXX is in 3rd-century BC Greek, translated by JEWS from an older Hebrew OT. So LXX is sometimes better. NT writers quote from LXX almost exclusively. Thus we can more easily track, what Church changes in the NT, are supposed to be.

So this series provides examples of these rhetorical quotation changes, as an ongoing project: there are maybe 1000-2000 such quotes in the NT.

Related playlists: KJV-only Blasphemy, Royal Family of God (RFG) and Mark's Gospel.


KJVO Trash their own KJV, make it a HOAX (57/72 KJVOB)

This video is 57th in my Youtube KJVOB playlist, here: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9637CFFCF9F62107 . It heads the NT 'threads' LXX playlist (youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDA3CF01F9BA03EB9 ), but this vimeo channel has the same videos, plus any made post 11/7/13. New videos will be ad hoc.

Distinguishing OT quotes in the NT is already vital to hermeneutics. So it also proves the KJVO leaders, lie. The laymen don't know that!

If I quoted a book I knew didn't exist, I'd be a liar, right? Well, KJVO claims LXX (Greek OT) didn't exist in Jesus' day, yet Jesus often quotes from it! KJV's own Textus Receptus, confirms!

Yet KJVO leader Sam Gipp, says LXX is a hoax: pbministries.org/Theology/miscellaneous/what_is_the_lxx.htm

Gipp claims Origen invented LXX in 3rd cent. AD. Oh, did Origen also edit ALL copies of Philo, Josephus, Talmud, 1st-cent & prior Jewish apocrypha which use that same LXX, which Jews created from the Hebrew OT circa 273BC?! Did Origen also time-travel back to Jamnia in 1st century, when rabbis elected to return to Hebrew and stop using LXX?!

Funny, the KJV Translators validated the LXX, so I guess our anti-semites Gipp and Ruckman, never read the 1611 KJV Preface by the Translators! But you can, here: ccel.org/bible/kjv/preface/pref1.htm . My excerpts of it, with commentary: brainout.net/KJVPrefaceExerpts.doc .

Contrasting Truth: since Commodus, the West rejected Real Bible. Instead, the Old Latin was touted as 'inspired': same claim as KJVO's. Back then, Augustine was against 'new' translations. newadvent.org/fathers/1102.htm shows his letters to Jerome, whose replies are here: newadvent.org/fathers/3001.htm

Hebrew & Greek Real Bible was persecuted by anti-semites like Diocletian & Constantine. So folks having Real Bible, left Rome. So Jerome went to Bethlehem, to GET mss.

RCC rose to power partly based on a claim its translation was 'inspired'. For if a translation can be inspired, so too pope & clergy.

Thus Bible's Jewish-inspired origin, is denied. Satan persecutes Bible in cycles: 300 AD (Old Latin**), 600AD (Koran), 700AD+ (Vulgate ***). When interest in Bible's mss declines, Jews suffer. ****
===
** & *** Chap 1, pp. 21-28 Christopher DeHamel's 'The Book. A History of the Bible', Phaidon Press Ltd.

* Chapter 2, op.cit.
**** op. cit., +'Atlas of Bible and Christianity' edited by Tim Dowley
===

KJVO movement thus repeats another pogrom. Bible's Greek (though not media) of 'Alexandrian ' mss were of 1st-century & prior Jewish origin, too. So KJVO cannot read LXX, to know its Greek is 6 centuries prior to Origen's. We have a lot of extra-Biblical Greek text writing from 500BC, on. We know how it changed.

Next, to disable your ability to LEARN those texts, Bible compilers & lexicographers are slandered by a woman 'degreed' in home economics, who doesn't even know 'Lucifer' means 'morning star' in Latin, yet pretends to be a 'scholar', slanders for profit: shop.avpublications.com/product_info.php?products_id=253

KJVO also pretend to read Bible Hebrew, Greek. Yet ask them to translate. They can't! So how can they know if KJV is ok? They can't!

And KJV is not ok, as no translation can be. Just Google on 'KJV mistranslation'. Read the original KJV translators' own caveats, here: ccel.org/bible/kjv/preface/pref1.htm

In sum: Since NT quotes an allegedly-fake LXX over 1000 times — is it a lie? Lord quotes LXX on His Birth Day, & over 100 times, pan-Gospel. So does the Lord lie? Or are KJVO, liars?

KJV Exodus 20:16 "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour."
KJV Exodus 23:1 "Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness."

KJV Matthew 19:18 "He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, 'Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness',"

LXX Greek of Exo 20:16 — ou pseudomartureseis

Textus Receptus Matt 19:18 — same two last words as in the LXX.

What will the Lord say to KJVO on Judgment Day?

===
TechNotes: TR in video is 1894 Scrivener, an updated version of Beza's TR from 1598.

LXX used in video is Alfred Rahlf's, from BibleWorks 5.

Download this video for clearer Greek viewing: brainout.net/KJVOTrash.wmv . Jpg's of Greek: brainout.net/Matt123.jpg

Follow with brainout.net/Matt215.jpg then brainout.net/Matt218.jpg then brainout.net/TRMatt3.jpg then brainout.net/TRquotesLXX.jpg

Google on 'LXX fragments': en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint . Here is a list of provable pre-Origen LXX mss : kjvonlydebate.com/2010/06/02/a-reader-comments-on-manuscript-evidence-for-a-pre-origen-septuagint/comment-page-1/#comment-3035

File Name: KJVOTrash.wmv, 3/5/10 in KJV folder.


LXX1a Matt22:37's First Commandment UPGRADE

NT threads (quotes) LXX series. The whole point of the New Testament, is to show a) that the Old Testament prophecies and doctrines are fulfilled in Christ; then b) how the Covenant changed for Church; and will c) change back to Israel for the Trib and Mill; thus d) fulfill the purpose of history to 'birth' eternity (theme of Romans 8).

So to prove Divine Authorship of a given NT book, the writer must 'thread' from OT, showing how his book is 100% compatible; NT authors thus often use LXX for 'threading'. (If you can't read Greek, then Google on 'New Testament', 'LXX' + 'quotes', for a ton of independent info on this rhetorical style, as you can't see it in translation.)

This same 'threading' rule was used pan-OT, to prove each then-'new' OT book came from God. So the rule continues, for NT. That's why you didn't need a Council of Nicaea, to determine what's Divine Writ.

So in this series you'll find a sampling of very important verses, demonstrating what the LXX says, versus the quotation in the NT. That way you can select any quoted OT passage, and yourself test whether it is following the LXX, or the Hebrew. There is a notable difference. So once you see the style, you'll notice the difference and can 'practice' on any verse in the OT.

Again, THREADING is the means by which a new Bible Book integrates itself into all previous Divine Writ, thus proving it too came from God. Don't need councils or popes arrogating to themselves the fiat on what constitutes Divine Writ. Just need Bible. For the Bible, proves itself.

After all, people in ancient times memorized Bible. So if you QUOTED it, but CHANGED small parts of the quote, you'd be making some kind of new, witty statement everyone would understand.

So New Testament writers quote sections of the LXX in nearly every verse; then deliberately CHANGE words in the requote, to teach new truth. So you can see how the new truth, integrates with the old. I call this technique, 'threading'. It's an important legal-document technique, and is still used worldwide, today. In Bible, it shows the LEGAL PRECEDENCE of the OT, carrying forward into the NT. For God is consistent, and His Rules, eternal. So when a covenant changes, continuity and precedence must be addressed. Ergo, threading is needed to show what changes, and what stays the same.

Here, Jesus the Christ threads in Matt22:37, an UPGRADE on the familiar First Commandment from the LXX. The Lord's Wit in the Greek will blow you away. Watch how deftly He recrafts the First Commandment to make it FAR HIGHER than in the OT. That's our legacy, and it's impossible to fulfill. So God will do it in you. Whole NT is based on this deft change by the Lord.

This series also ties to three of my other playlists.

  1. KJV-only Blasphemy playlist. KJVO claim that the New Testament doesn't quote from the LXX, because the latter was 'invented' by Origen. But anyone who can read Greek, can easily prove that 80% or more of the New Testament quotes from OT, are from the LXX. You can match NT to LXX words. This is how NT Bible concordances are crafted.
    • So anyone KJVO who claims to read the Greek yet claims the NT doesn't quote from the LXX, is a proven liar. For anyone can compare a sequence of letters. :)
  2. Royal Family of God (RFG) playlist. In this and Episode 1b, you'll see how Christ deliberately changes the First Commandment in the LXX to UPGRADE it to Royal Divine Standards. Which Standards, He Himself met while down here. Clever play on Trinity in the comparison, all by means of three prepositions, and a change of one noun in Deut 6:5, compared to His Crafting of the New Higher First Commandment, in Matt22:37.
  3. Mark's Gospel series, which focuses on how Q scholars are all wrong. Mark weaves in all previous NEW Testament books into his Gospel, thus proving his is the THIRD Gospel, and Matthew's is the first and originally in Greek.

LXX1b Matt22:37's 1st Commandment UPGRADE

NT 'threads' (quotes) LXX series. Continued from Episode 1a. See its description. Pretty dramatic stuff. Ties to 2Cor10:5.

The Lord's Wit in the Greek will blow you away. Watch how deftly He recrafts the First Commandment to make it FAR HIGHER than in the OT. That's our legacy, and it's impossible to fulfill. So God will do it in you. Whole NT is based on this deft change by the Lord.

This series will select NT 'threading' from the OT LXX in a wide enough variety so you can see the style. That way you can select any quoted OT passage, and yourself test whether it is following the LXX, or the Hebrew. There is a notable difference. So once you see the style, you'll notice the difference and can 'practice' on any verse in the OT.

For THREADING is the means by which a new Bible Book integrates itself into all previous Divine Writ, thus proving it too came from God. Don't need arrogant Church Fathers claiming they decided what was Divine Writ. Don't need councils or popes arrogating to themselves the fiat of what's Divine Writ. Just need the Bible. For the Bible, proves itself. All this you'll see, as you go through the videos in this and the above three series.


LXX2 1Cor1:19's Cross GENIUS no longer hidden!

NT threads (quotes) LXX series. Yet more proof how the KJVO people are insane. For they claim that the LXX, Greek Old Testament, was an invention of the 3rd century AD. Which would make your entire Bible, a lie.

So let's examine proof that the KJVO are liars, shall we?

Patrick Henry said, 'Give me liberty or give me death!' Suppose I then say, 'give me Christ or give me death!' Wouldn't you know immediately that I was equating Christ with 'liberty', because you knew the original quote?

Witty, to take something well-known, change it slightly in a requote. Bible is the wittiest of books. So it does this requoting a lot — in the NT. From, the LXX.

In 1Cor1:19: Paul cleverly changes only one word in the famous Isaiah 29:14 quote, to show how the upgrade of the Cross, exposes the alleged 'wisdom' of the world, as foolish. So here we see the most common rhetorical style for OT LXX quotations: the 'old' truth is woven into the 'new' truth which Christ bought by means of His Victory on the Cross, for Church.

Thus Isaiah 29:14 is fulfilled! All this, shown by merely quoting Isaiah 29:14, and then changing one word at the end — from the LXX!

Such quotations are never mistakes. They are famous forms of Greek wordplay. The same thing was done in all Greek literature, and was expected. You quoted something already known, and then slightly CHANGED the quote, to demonstrate the new, threaded meaning. So God uses this rhetorical style to show how the OT is fulfilled in Christ, and how Church inherits an UPGRADED spiritual life. This is done thousands of times in the NT.

Every Bible quote in the NT uses this style, so study the pattern. That way you'll laugh when someone tries to claim the Bible contradicts itself, because the NT quote isn't the same as the OT. And then you will prove the scoffer, foolish.

Most foolish of all, are the KJVO people. For they are out to trash the entire Bible (unwittingly, of course) by claiming the LXX was the invention of Origen, in the 3rd century AD. BECAUSE THEY CANNOT READ THE GREEK — but pretend they can — they don't realize how their claim against the LXX, proves them fools. They don't realize how their claim thus trashes their own KJV, which after all is a translation using the Greek NT, which itself quotes FROM the LXX. So their claim that Origen wrote the LXX, is a claim that their own KJV is a fraud.

See: carnal Christians are so dumb, they don't even know when they've proven themselves liars.

File Name: LXX1c, 2/11/10.


LXX3a The Great I AM, John 8

Christ says He's God over 50 times in this chapter; at first, I thought it was only 26 times. So this Episode 3 runs through 3v, to document the proof, live in Bible you can test. A popular subepisode is 3q on how YHWH is 'decoded'.

Full list is at brainout.net/John8on26times.rtf ; brainout.net/John8on26times.pdf is the pdf copy. A color-coded keyword map is here: John8-Psalm18map.pdf

John 8's theme is based on Psalm 18. I didn't know that until 1/24/12, so use the rtf or pdf, to see the interplay. Videos don't cover it. John 8's outline:

* 'Let He who is without sin, cast the first stone'.
* So the Lord's enemies would cast stones on
* He Who is Without Sin.
* So the Temple Stones will be cast down,
* Eventually leaving Two Stone Witnesses,
* Wailing Wall and Dumb Dome,
* Mutely testifying to Daniel 9:26.
* For He Left The Building, hint hint!

Yeah, the 'pericope adulterae' belongs in John 8. The spiritual adulteresses want to stone a physical one, so to stone Israel's Groom, aka Son of God; Who they allege, a child of fornication; yet OUDEIS (no one) ought condemn the God-Man Who Alone Sees and knows Father (OUDEIS, no one else). So who's the real 'adulteress', worthy of Temple stoning, hmmmmmm?

OUDEIS is one of John's keywords throughout his writings, a kind of autograph. (Mark uses euthus, Peter likes hupo-prefixes). For NO ONE but Christ, is Messiah. :)

Starting in verse 12, Christ uses 10-12 types of OT rhetorical titles to stress His Godness. He builds them all around Exodus 3:14, and then 'circles' the dialogue in Chapter 8, to close their arguing with a statement He FOREKNOWS will get Him sent to the Cross: the Great I Am. He patiently walks the audience through their objections, waiting for the lightbulb to go on. It finally goes on, in verse 57. To show them (and us) as spiritual adulteresses, who want to stone God Himself.

Exodus 3:14 in Hebrew is a deft statement of Trinity, a kind of rhetorical triptych, similar to 'anaphora'; that style is prominent in OT Hebrew. And it's all LOST, in translation!

For you often can't see this wordplay in English, as there's no way to translate the wordplay. However, scholars did appreciate the wordplay.

See: I just used anaphora: "wordplay", three times. And, a word picture triptych of three related FUNCTIONS by DIFFERENT entities: seeing by the viewer, translating by translator, appreciating by scholars.

That's how Bible does it: Son chooses to be CEO, so creates, Gen 1:1, Isa45:18-19, Col1:16-18; Dad chooses to be Chm Bd, so gives the orders, the 'let there be' or 'let us make' of Gen 1. Spirit chooses to be COO, hence hovers like a mother hen waiting for Dad's Order, then restores (the world, us at salvation and after), Gen 1:2 etc.

Each One God, choosing to subordinate to EACH OTHER. Is this Love, or what? And no compromise to Righteousness, either!

So too, in Isaiah 63: verses 1-9 (Son), 10-14 (Spirit), 15ff (Father). Verses 15ff are invoked by the Jews in their John 8 claim of God being their 'father'.

So this video starts at John 8:42, where the Lord suddenly changes the 'sent' He's been using, to the LXX of Exodus 3:14, to remind them He's God. (He'd used Greek pempo in previous quotes: 8:16,18, 23, 26. You can't see that difference, in English.)

Thus His 2nd rhetorical technique is shown: He 'ropes' points to a central KEYWORD theme (here, Exo3:14's 'sent' and 'I Am'). You'll see a similar style in Daniel 9, 1John & Romans.

So Christ's deliberate & pointed tweaking of Exo3:14 throughout John 8, flag Him either as God — or one who SHOULD be stoned. Especially, for His shocking Greek @John 8:42's ending, as this Episode 3a-c will show.

So this 3a starts there, with Greek verb apostellw (from which we get English 'apostle'): it means 'to send someone on a mission or to a diplomatic/rulership post'.

3rd technique He uses: He 'deploys' OTHER parallels to Exodus Chaps 3 thru 5, in a circuit, finally shubbing (returning) to Exo3:14, in John 8:58. He does this to wake up the audience, to their adulterous negativity to Him; same negativity, as toward Moses by both their forebears — and, by Pharaoh. Ouch. (Paul reprises that theme in Romans 9; Mark's whole Gospel uses it.)

This video also back ups my claim that the 'Fuzzball' KJV can't prove the Lord claims He's God, stated here: youtube.com/watch?v=A7cI0vBt6BE

File Name: 3aIAMapostellw.avi, 3/26/10.


LXX3b Great I AM Jn8:42's apostellw

Continued on apostellw and prolepsis of Greek accusative me, showing the Lord stresses He's God, in John 8:42.

More info is in 3a's video description.

File Name: 3bIAMapostellw3.avi, 3/26/10.


LXX3c Great I AM Jn 8:42's 'ekeinos'

Here we focus on 'ekeinos', showing the Lord stresses He's God, in John 8:42. For Him to use 'ekeinos' for 'Father' either means the Lord is extremely rude — or extremely INTIMATE. Take your pick.

More info is in 3a's video description.

File Name: 3cIAMapostellw4.avi, 3/26/10.


LXX3d Great I AM Jn8:33 w/Exo3-5, cont.

Trace how the Lord 'ropes' the audience toward the climactic statement in John 8:58, to which He's been deliberately aiming since 8:16, when he first used apostellw. By the way, He claims He's God 10 times between verses 12 and 23, so it's a wonder the audience still doesn't understand Him. So here we begin to see He's patiently TEACHING them, waiting for the lightbulb to go on. How poignant.

To save time, we pick up His manifold repeated affirmations HE IS GOD, from verse 33. You can't see the references in English, as the video will show.

As we'll begin to see here, He also 'deploys' rhetorical parallels to Exodus Chapters 3-5 in a 'circle', until He 'ropes' them all together, with the shocking John 8:58. It's the rhetorical equivalent of a 'double envelopment' in military tactics.

More info is in 3a's video description.

File Name: 3dIAMapostellw5.avi, 3/27/10.


LXX3e Great I AM Jn8 w/Exo3-5, cont.

More on how the Lord 'ropes' the audience toward the climactic statement in John 8:58, to which He's been deliberately aiming, since 8:16, when he first used apostellw. More details on are also in 3a's video description.

Notice how He 'deploys' parallels to Exodus Chapters 3-5 in a 'circle', until He 'ropes' them all together, with the shocking statement in John 8:58. Knowing all the while, they will crucify Him for TELLING THE TRUTH about Who He is.

Talk about Love!

File Name: 3eIAMapostellw6.avi, 3/27/10.


LXX3f Great I AM Jn8:42 w/Exo4, cont.

Here, the tie between John 8:42ff and Exodus 4 (which I hope you read first). Shows how the Lord 'ropes' the John 8 dialogue through Exodus Chaps 3-5 to mirror the crowd's own like-Pharaoh negativity. Awesome stuff.

This demonstration will continue through Episode 3j. Pay close attention to how the Lord goes from the Exodus 3:14's ENDING reference He made in John 8:42 (seen in Episode 3a-c), down through the parallels in Exodus 4, then Exodus 5, then back to the BEGINNING of Exodus 3, to 'circle' back to Exodus 3:14 by the time He says its FIRST HALF, in John 8:58.

See, to know what a passage means we gotta follow ALL of what the author actually SAYS, before we can properly interpret any PART of what he says. We Christians need to stop cherry-picking verses. Then we'd know that the pericope adulterae is a deliberate preamble to John 8, to show how the spiritual adulterers, wanted to stone Him Who Was Without Sin.

John knew his Greek drama. The pericope adulterae introduction is vital, a true story, and explains much. Only religious types hate it. Rev 17 spiritual harlotry is miffed by any competition. So the anti-semitic and legalistic Church Fathers battled over the passage, some deleting it, some including it. But John's own 'oudeis' style is clearly based on the Lord. So we know where the passage belongs. :)

File Name: 3fIAMapostellw7.avi, 3/27/10.


LXX3g Great I AM Jn8 w/Exo4-5

The Lord continues to 'rope' His audience to the parallel opposition situation Moses faced, in order to help them recognize His Claim of Deity, which He keeps on stating ever since verse 12 (well, really since John 3). Here, we see Him go through Exodus 4 and 5, on the 'downswing' of the roping.

File Name: 3gIAMapostellw8.avi, 3/27/10.


LXX3h Great I AM Jn8 w/Exo3

The Lord continues to 'rope' His audience to the parallel opposition situation Moses faced, in order to help them recognize His Claim of Deity, which He keeps on stating ever since verse 12 (well, really since John 3). Here, we see Him go BACK to Exodus 3's BEGINNING, now on the 'upswing' of the roping. Why? Because He's the GOD of Abraham. And that's what Exodus 3's beginning, covers...

File Name: 3hIAMapostellw9.avi, 3/27/10.


LXX3i Great I AM Jn8 w/Exo3, cont.

Still on how the Lord continues to 'rope' His audience to the parallel opposition situation Moses faced, in order to help them recognize His Claim of Deity, which He keeps on stating ever since verse 12 (well, really since John 3). Here, we see Him go BACK to Exodus 3's BEGINNING, now on the 'upswing' of the roping. Why? Because He's the GOD of Abraham. And that's what Exodus 3's beginning, covers...

File Name: 3iIAMapostellw10.avi, 3/27/10.


LXX3j Great I AM Jn8 w/Exo3, cont.

Still on how the Lord continues to 'rope' His audience to the parallel opposition situation Moses faced, in order to help them recognize His Claim of Deity, which He keeps on stating ever since verse 12 (well, really since John 3). Here, we see Him keep circling on the 'upswing' of Exodus 3. Because, He is the GOD of Abraham. Just as He told Moses.

Which He will of course claim, in John 8:58 when He QUOTES Exodus 3:14 as being HIM. That quote, will be covered in video(s) after this Episode 3j, showing from the Hebrew, how deftly He uses both the Masoretic text AND the LXX to show HE is the One Who talked from the Burning Bush, and HE is the 3rd EHYEH in the TRINITY of Exo 3:14.

File Name: 3jIAMapostellw11.avi, 3/27/10.


LXX3k Great I AM, Redeemer

Here we digress for one video on how the Old Testament repeatedly states that ONLY GOD is the Redeemer. And then, how ONLY CHRIST claims to be that Redeemer. So Christ, is God. Simple.

Anyone who won't admit that Christ is God, will never mature spiritually. For, that's what the Jewish unbelievers wouldn't do, as we've seen in John 8. So before we come back to the Great I AM in John 8:58, this detour is necessary. You MUST come to grips with the Fact He is God.

You don't have to understand WHY the Gospel is valid, to be saved. You only have to BELIEVE it; BELIEVE, that Christ paid for your sins. You don't have to understand Christ is God, to be saved. You only have to BELIEVE He paid for your sins. But if, after you are saved, you never believe or understand that He is God, you will retard spiritually, and be forever in heaven just the same — but as a spiritual moron. For you didn't choose to learn.

Spiritual IQ is not dependent on you. It's dependent on God filling you with understanding. But He won't fill you with what you don't want to learn. So if you won't believe, learn, look at the BIBLE, you won't learn it. And if you won't believe, learn, look at the BIBLE verses where Christ proves He's God, then you won't mature.

File Name: 3kIAMapostellw12.avi, 3/28/10.


LXX3l Great I AM Jn 8:58

Now we come to the climax of the Chapter, John 8:58 itself. You've hopefully seen in the prior parts of this Episode 3, how the Lord began the 'journey' to this verse, using Exodus 3:14 when He led them into it, via His first Chapter 8 I-am-God statement in verse 12, 'I am the Light of the World' — a statement only GOD can make. So now that I AM is brought full circle, having taken the audience from Exodus 3:14, down 'south' to Exodus 4 and 5, then 'north' back to where HE first met Moses, in Exodus 3:1-7. Where He told Moses HE was the God of Abraham. And where He now tells His John 8 audience, the same thing. Yet, again.

So now, He says John 8:58. And now, we'll begin to learn how a Trinity Verb is a Trinity Noun, when the Verb is God, the Causer of all nouns. And now, we'll begin to learn what the BIBLE says is the meaning of the Great YHWH... enjoy!

File Name: 3lIAMapostellw13.avi, 3/28/10.


LXX3m Great YHWH Jn8:58+Exo3:14

Climax of the Chapter, John 8:58, continued from 3l. Watch how the Hebrew and Greek verbs function simultaneously as nouns. This is a common feature for infinitives, gerunds, participles in almost every language, but the GENIUS of Christ's language in John 8:58, takes full advantage of this dual-natured feature of BOTH Hebrew and Greek in Exo 3:14. Yeah, because He's God-Man!

Read Gesenius Sections 60, 61, 83, 115, and 145 on the use of Hebrew verbs as nouns, and vice versa. Here's an 1824 edition of Gesenius you can freely download (but it's been corrected, many times since): books.google.com/books?id=He8tAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s#v=onepage&q=&f=false

File Name: 3mIAMapostellw14.avi, 3/28/10.


LXX3n Great YHWH Jn8:58+Exo3:14

Watch how the Hebrew and Greek verbs function simultaneously as nouns. This is a common feature for infinitives, gerunds, participles in almost every language, but the GENIUS of Christ's language in John 8:58, takes full advantage of this dual-natured feature of BOTH Hebrew and Greek in Exo 3:14. Yeah, because He's God-Man!

So now we'll see more about what YHWH, comes to mean, directly from the way Christ uses the Hebrew and LXX of Exo 3:14. Exciting, witty stuff!

File Name: 3nIAMapostellw15.avi, 3/28/10.


LXX3o Great YHWH Jn8:58+Exo3:14, cont.

Here, we'll see how the word ORDER Christ chooses, tells us much about the meaning of YHWH....

File Name: 3oIAMapostellw16.avi, 3/28/10.


LXX3p Great YHWH, Jn8:58+Exo3:14, cont.

Continued from 3o, on the Genius of the Lord's word ORDER. By that order you know much; including, what YHWH means! He tells us, as does Exo 3:14!

Why people have been baffled about its meaning, baffles me!

File Name: 3pIAMapostellw17.avi, 3/28/10.


LXX3q YHWH 'decoded' by Jn8:58+Exo3:14-15

This popular video cutely summarizes what the Lord's talking about in John 8:58. Notice the Hebrew letterplay. He Who Always Was.. Becomes! Yeah, the Way, The Truth, The Life, and apart from Him nothing was made that will ever be made.. and from Him, we are made Sons!

Original Youtube video description, follows below.
=====
God tells you what YHWH means in Exodus 3:14-15, so it's no mystery. Christ in John8:58, merely TRANSLATES the YHWH from the LXX of Exodus 3:14-15, into Greek verbs — with Himself in the middle, of course. We just saw Him do that, in Episode 3p.

So here in 3q, you'll see how Hebrew morphology, wittily created the noun YHWH from two Hebrew verbs, hayah and hawah.

God's Sacred name is variantly spelled in the OT, as follows. I got this by searching in BibleWorks on the vowel points going with YHWH. I didn't catch all the usages, because I don't know all the ways YHWH is spelled with them. The transliterations which follow use the vowel points. The apostrophe is a shewa.

* y'howih=31 times
* y'howah=44 times (closest sound to the later European invention of 'Jehovah')
* yahwih=2 times
* y'hwih=271 times
* y'hwah=5658 times.

So if you want to pick the most common BIBLE pronounciation, you'd say 'Ye-HWAH'. Isaiah uses this two-syllable pronounciation in the Hebrew meter of Isaiah 53, for example.

'Jehovah' was a European invention of the Middle Ages or later, maybe from Germany. That's an educated guess, though.

Two common scholar suppositions about YHWH thus prove perhaps incorrect:

1. The supposition that every consonant must have a vowel between it and the next consonant, isn't true. The 'h' breathing replaces the vowel, as in the vocalized shewa.

2. The supposition that since YHWH ends in H, it's a late invention. Nope, the 'y' sound, is still quickly vocalized at the end of the word. Again, due to the breathy, terminating 'h' (you smile at the end). If you elongated the sound 'y', you'd be saying 'my YHWH', so they'd not do that. (The 'y' sound at the end of a noun generally means 'my'.)

Also: scholars claim the Masoretes vowel-pointed YHWH with the vowels for Adonai — the above examples of Bible's vowel-pointing, don't bear out that claim.

Exodus 3:14 is the origin of The Name, and it's a paranomasia; you know that, from the LXX translation. Hebrew says, 'eh-yeh asher eh-yeh' (phonetic spelling). Two qal imperfects of hayah are used. So the phrase means, "I was and will be, who I was and will be." Talk about Sovereignty!

From that comes YHWH in Exodus 3:15, which I maintain is the contraction of two Hebrew verbs, hayah and hawah, with the ha's removed (for the ha sound is a definite article, too). So that leaves Yah and Wah. Made into a noun, that becomes either Yeh or Yah, plus weh or wah.

So that accounts for why YeHWaH is the most common vowel pointing. It ends up meaning He Who Always was, Becomes (God-Man), I'd bet money. The other vowel points probably came from wit about how verbs are formed in stems.

Production Note: 'ChristKeep', who provided the music, is also known as devonrose, and he does sell his music as well. This clip is not copyrighted. See my profile page's 'About Me' section near the bottom, on how to link to his website.

File Name: 3qYHWH.wmv, 3/29/10.


LXX3r REVISITED: Christ says He's God 50+ times in John 8!

The first 'pass' on how often Christ says He's God in John 8, was in 2010. Someone challenged me to document it more completely, so from 3r to 3v, that's what you'll see. Turns out He says He's God over 50 times, not merely the initial count of 26 (after which I quit counting, my bad). So now we start again, 'REVISITED'.

There's more: the OUTLINE for John 8 is based on Psalm 18. So there's no way anyone sane can claim the pericope adulterae, isn't woven thoroughly into the Chapter. They couldn't sanely claim that anyway, since the Chapter begins and ends with STONING. John cleverly hooked up both incidents to make that point. But hey: some people just love 'tradition' so much, they don't care if Bible is sacrificed in the process. So if some dippy old clerics didn't like John 8:1-10 and excised it, oh that must be RIGHT, what God intended...? And no decent attention to the LANGUAGE in John, is paid.

Scholars are human like anyone else, and they have their political agendas like anyone else. So you be a good scholar, use 1John1:9 and ASK GOD how to do the RIGHT job of assessing these videos. That is, if you're supposed to watch them at all!

Original Youtube description follows below.
=====
50+ times Christ says He's God, PATTERNING HIS DISCOURSE AFTER PSALM 18. Hence this Episode 3r through 3v, revisits the whole chapter, showing how Christ is literally tracking Psalm 18 as He talks. When you see the line-by-line parallel between the two chapters, you'll freak out. I know I did. How many other sections of the Bible, are like this one? Maybe many, and we've missed this important hermeneutic, all these centuries? Yikes!

More: this is yet another way to also prove that the so-called 'pericope adulterae' is validly in Bible exactly where it sits in John 8:1-11. That Bible section has been a political football for centuries, so this 3r covers it as an introduction to the rhetorical style of Bible fingerprinting: the use of keywords in a particular pattern, to 'fingerprint' what other parts of Bible, the speaker is using. Word doc demonstrating the 50+ times He says He's God in John 8, is here: brainout.net/John8on26times.rtf ; brainout.net/John8on26times.pdf is the pdf copy. A color-coded keyword map is here: John8-Psalm18map.pdf . Editable version of map is here: brainout.net/Psalm18-John8parallels.doc . They won't highlight the same: I keep seeing more parallels as I review the material.

Thank you, Super Donster. Your query made me revisit John 8, and through it I learned of this Bible rhetorical technique.

File Name: 3r-LXX.avi, 1/28/12.


LXX3s Christ says He's God 50+ times in John 8, cont.

Bible Fingerprinting rhetorical technique used by Christ. This 3s starts in John 8:12, shows how Christ parallels Psalm 18 in His John 8 discourse, and how the prior 11 verses DEPICTED the Psalm 18 setting. Christ leads His audience verse-by-verse through Psalm 18, as future videos (through 3v) will show. Thus you know how to read John 8. Associated Word doc: brainout.net/John8on26times.rtf . For the pdf copy, just replace 'rtf' with 'pdf'. A color-coded keyword map is here: brainout.net/John8-Psalm18map.pdf .Editable version of map is here: brainout.net/Psalm18-John8parallels.doc . They won't highlight the same: I keep seeing more parallels as I review the material.

Christendom doesn't know of this rhetorical technique. That's one reason John 8 is disputed, is fuzzball in translation and in teaching.. for centuries. When you see how Christ parallells Psalm 18 via His discourse (four hours of future videos, including this 3s), you will KNOW why John 8 in your Bible, properly includes verses 1-11, and what John 8 means. It won't be fuzzball, anymore. No one can claim Christ doesn't say He's God. YOU will know why, and YOU will be able to prove it yourself, to yourself — and to anyone else.

Bible is meant to be understood. But the sad truth is, we don't try to understand it, just as the antagonistic Jews within the Jewish crowd taunting Jesus, didn't want to understand. So as they were then, we are now. Warning to us all, to read Bible more carefully! And I too was guilty, until Super Donster asked me to provide more proof. I owe him, forever.

File Name: 3s-LXX.avi, 1/29/12.


LXX3t Christ says He's God 50+ times in John 8, cont.

Bible 'Fingerprinting' rhetorical style, cont. It gets real exciting, now. New color-coded parallel keyword maps which show full text of both chapters: brainout.net/John8-Psalm18map.pdf (not editable), and brainout.net/Psalm18-John8parallels.doc (editable). The latter includes corrected translations, and its map is not identical with the pdf. I keep revising the color-coding, as I re-study these parallel passages.

Master list of the 50+ times He says He's God, with full text of John 8 verses, brainout.net/John8on26times.rtf ; brainout.net/John8on26times.pdf is the pdf copy.

Again, you can't find this in Christendom, so I have to document the source material, with the result that its own text furnishes the validity; and if the commentary is apt, God will witness to it. GO TO THE SOURCE, never rely on 'experts' who after all are paid to take the positions they do. God will witness to which of the 'experts' are incompetent, lying, or telling the truth competently. ASK HIM.

File Name: 3t-LXX.avi, 1/29/12.


LXX3u Christ says He's God 50+ times in John 8, cont.

Continued from 3t, how Christ in John 8, uses a rhetorical style of 'Bible Fingerprinting' to parallel Psalm 18 for HIs Audience, here with focus on Him saying He's SINLESS (which only Messiah in Psalm 18:20-24, can claim). Understand that to be called 'Messiah' meant to the Jews, that He was God-man. The title means God-man. Only God can save by taking on Humanity, hence 'Son of God' and 'Son of Man' (Daniel 7:13) titles are affirmations of Deity, to fulfill the prophecy of David's Greater Son promised in 2Sam 7.

Christ has been leading the audience down Psalm 18's outline, and now is in a position to talk to the positive among the audience, where He takes the opportunity to equate HIS OWN WORDS as GOD'S WORDS. That's yet another category of Him claiming He's God. By tracking to Psalm 18, He's claiming He fulfills it. And at the end of Psalm 18, is the promise to Abraham about the Jews being the header nation in the Millennium; that's why John 8 ends with the Great I AM.

Word doc demonstrating the 50+ times He says He's God in John 8, is here: brainout.net/John8on26times.rtf ; brainout.net/John8on26times.pdf is the pdf copy. Color-coded maps of the keyword parallels to Psalm 18, are here: brainout.net/John8-Psalm18map.pdf (not editable) and brainout.net/Psalm18-John8parallels.doc (editable).

File Name: 3u-LXX.avi, 1/29/12


LXX3v Christ says He's God 50+ times in John 8, conclusion

How Christ uses the ending Psalm 18 prophecy to the Gentiles, to demonstrate He's God in John 8. Word doc on the 50+ times He says He's God in John 8, is here: brainout.net/John8on26times.rtf ; brainout.net/John8on26times.pdf is the pdf copy. Color-coded maps showing how Christ parallels John 8 to Psalm 18: brainout.net/John8-Psalm18map.pdf (not editable); brainout.net/Psalm18-John8parallels.doc (editable).

Also covered: His sophisticated keyword tracking style to the unique apostellw foursomes in LXX of Exodus, and the unique doxa uses in Isaiah 53, to 'tag' what he says to both Psalm 18, and those two books. Since Jews memorized text, they would be aware of how many times a keyword was repeated in a passage, which count served as a mnemonic and an index. Awesome stuff.

File Name: LXX3vRemix.avi, 11/25/13 made of bundled VidShort and 1/29/12 3v-LXX.avi, no edits. Production note: if you wanted to know the music title, it's 'Men of Harlech'. My pastor turned that into another song named 'Christian Soldier' (same tune, different lyrics).


LXX4a Acts 15 Scholar Insanity!

Anatomy of scholar ineptness over the fact the NT 'threads' the LXX — which every scholar even knows, it's required study in seminary!

Honestly, just when I think Christian scholarship can't get any worse, I find something like this. So, this video (sorry) is something of a tirade against 'scholarship' which accuses Bible to hide its own incompetence. Here, Acts 15. This is one sample of many I've seen over the last few months, and many more over the last year. Scholarship is valuable, we need it, and this is not against the scholars in general. But it is against the tolerance of the bad apples, which today are many. Sometimes, the gloves should come off!

Link referenced in the video: books.google.com/books?id=nlJDcn2YotkC&pg=PA38&dq=Jewish+eschatological+expectations+in+the+first+century+ce&hl=en&sa=X&ei=c0ZpT77SDoeCsAKS9-yQCQ&ved=0CGQQ6AEwCThk#v=onepage&q&f=false

File Name: TiradeScolarInsanityActs15.avi, 3/21/12.


LXX4b Book review on LXX Textual Criticism (TextCrit3)

This video is part of my Youtube 'Textual Criticism' playlist ( youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2B1F4FB49407E364 ), which largely includes independent research materials on the web you can use; the sites are all unrelated to me. This video, is a book review of a text about TC for the LXX.

Video reads from Natalio Marcos' book, The Septuagint in Context: Introduction to the Greek Version of the Bible, Chapter One (link here: books.google.com/books?id=8MbvEZ4bgdwC&pg=PA3&q&f=false ), to show how textual critics are human; why in many ways, TC of the Greek OT, has been lacking. Marcos proposes what to me is the common-sense approach: treat Greek of the OT as then LIVING; so bilingualism and influence from other languages of its time, ought to be a 'lens' through which we should read, the LXX. Duh. So I get a bit testy while reading the text for the first time, on screen. Sorry.

Here's another great link, provided by egwpisteuw: amazon.com/Invitation-Septuagint-Mois%C3%A9s-Silva/dp/080103115X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1338253883&sr=8-1

File Name: TC3LXX.avi, 5/26/12, in TextCrit folder.


LXX5 Heb10:5 proof Prolifers, Pagan (PB5de)

Christ quotes Psalm 40:6 in the LXX the second He is born. Why? What would this tell us? Well first, given the text, He's making it clear that His Body, is NOT Him. 'Prepared' is a body, for the 'Me'. Wow. Pretty bald, huh. Since He's God-man, obviously the body cannot BE Him. So too, for us: pattern of Genesis 2:7, the real person is the SOUL.

Your BODY is not you. It was PREPARED for you though, as this verse proves. 'Prepared' really means first healed and then constructed, due to Adam's sin.

In Christ's case, first Mary's sin-tainted 23 chromosomes had to be 'healed' via meiosis and polar body (a natural biological process); but then the Holy Spirit created an added 23 perfect chromosomes, and added them (rather than the natural process of sperm and egg). THAT is 'the immaculate conception', and it's purely biological. A house being prepared, just like David explains in Psalm 139:13.

Prepared for. NOT, the real you. NOT, alive. Rather, an organic machine. For YOU, are a SOUL. Made alive by God at birth, just as Christ here supernaturally exclaims when He is BORN, quoting from Psalm 40:6 in the LXX. So this video is part of my Prolife Blasphemy playlist ( youtube.com/playlist?list=PL144D716E521647D1 ).

All Bibles translate this verse fairly well. So there is no excuse for believing you are a you, until BORN. We really need to stop aborting Scripture in the name of politics over whether CAESAR will rule rulings we want, because we don't want to PRAY TO GOD about what we want.

6-page Word doc Prolife Blasphemy series Summary: brainout.net/ProlifeBlasphemy.doc

Main webpage on the topic, which has a full exegesis of Psalm 139, to prove how horribly it's mistranslated: brainout.net/Caveat4.htm

File Name: ProlifeBlasph5de.avi, composite before split for Youtube, 2/9/10.


LXX6 'Son of Man'= GOD-Man

Technical Greek Bible proof that when Christ calls Himself "Son of Man" He means GOD-Man. The term is only used for Christ in Daniel 7:13, in the OT, Chaldean bar-enash, meaning ben-enosh, in Hebrew — NOT the 107 times it is used for ben-ADAM. For the latter, means son of Adam, but Christ is the Last Adam, the Son of God, Luke 3.

All 107 uses of ben-adam in OT are translated huios anthropou, no articles. But the 80+ times the Son of Man title is used in the NT, only means Christ, and is rendered HO Huios TOU anthropou, an official Title (the two articles mean official, as in LXX official calendar dates).

The Four NT exceptions to this are covered passim, with no articles, and all of them stress Christ as God. Videos go through all NT uses, since all the LXX uses are the same, no articles for ben-adam. Lone LXX exception is Daniel 7:13, so Christ refers only to that usage, no other, when He speaks of Himself (or when anyone else in NT speaks of Him with the Son of Man title).

So His Son of Man title, means only God-Man. Those disputing this BIBLE FACT, don't read Greek and so seem to get away with their ignorant claims. Chief among these are Muslims and Oneness folks (who disbelieve Trinity), and those other weird sects who think Christ is only Human. Don't they know His clever phrasing in 1Tim2:5, where HE reasons (Paul is quoting Christ), that since He is God, He must be mediator. One Father, One Mediator. It's wordplay. Oh well. Salvation thus couldn't WORK unless the MEDIATOR were both NATURES, capisce? Payment on the Cross would have been too low, if He were only Human. The QUALITY of the THINKING had to be GOD-MAN; that He had to do it VIA His Humanity made it HARDER. Oh well.

File Name: LXX6-SonOfMan, 11/25/13 bundle of the original SonOfMan1-5 5/2/09 vids, no edits.

Technical Greek Bible proof that when Christ calls Himself "Son of Man" He means GOD-Man. Debate forum here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=81


LXX7 hupakouw and VPI: "Obey"=BELIEVE Trailer of Word Search

READ this description for links to the full Word search. Verbal Plenary Inspiration is the theological term given to the truth that the Bible is inspired-of-God only with respect to the original words of the original writers of Bible. Here you'll see why that's valid in only 4 mins, but I traced all the occurrences. You can download them directly, via my album of the originals, here: http://vimeo.com/album/2589265

Briefly, Greek term hupakouw means "to listen, believe, AND AS A RESULT obey" — but is usually truncated to "obey" in English Bibles, which thus leads to a lot of false doctrine out there. We think of something WE do when we hear "obey", and the stress is thus on do's, works, etc.

That's not at all the meaning in Greek: rather, "hupo" means "under", and "akouw" means "to listen, heed" — stress on BELIEVING what you hear — so you stand "under" what you hear, because you BELIEVE.

That makes all the difference in interpretation. For WHAT you believe, is what you obey. So if you're not HEARING the Word of God, then you're not aggregating it in your soul, and what you're obeying instead, is YOUR idea of things. So, you're not obeying God. Lots of folks will be embarrassed at the Judgement Seat of Christ because they didn't listen, live on Bible — and instead, obeyed other stuff. Only the Word works: that's THE theme of Bible, and this tracing of hupakouw proves it.

It's a Hebraism, most common translation for the Hebrew "shemah", which means the same thing, famously used in Deuteronomy 6:4.

So, since you only decide what doctrines are in the Bible by what the Bible tells you through its OWN words — you have to do a word search on hupakouw, to see what GOD means by it. So the first video does that search, in the NT. The others will be searches in the OT, to show how Hebrew shemah is tracked by hupakouw, so when you read the latter in the NT, you should always interpret it in light of its OT usage.

Satan's Strategy

+ God Deeds (GD)

Because vimeo is changing its themes and other policies which make it too hard for me to manage my videos, I went back to Youtube fulltime. The SatStrat/GodDeeds link ending with the sasme video, is here:

Future videos will be after that one. This channel will close sometime around 2020, once I've migrated the videos uniquely here, to Youtube.

NOTE: videos after God Deeds Episode 12b8 and before 13c6 are ONLY in vimeo, here: http://www.vimeo.com/channels/satstrat12 . The master SatStrat series there, is http://www.vimeo.com/channels/satstrat . I'm starting to move existing Youtube videos there. However, there are so many, I have to subdivide the vimeo channels. So for example, Episodes 1-5 of SatStrat is here (and still incomplete): http://vimeo.com/channels/satstrat1to5

Episode 12: https://vimeo.com/channels/satstrat12
Episode 13: https://vimeo.com/channels/satstrat13

Playlist summarizes my Lord v Satan webseries starting at LordvSatan1.htm. Webseries reads something like a novel with extensive Bible documentation, starting with today, going back to creation, then ends at eternity, when the Trial between God and Satan is resolved. We are the courtroom, for that Trial..

So, the videos here, highlight and focus on Satan's strategy versus God's, in that very long series. Anti-semitism and the 3 Temptations of Matt4 constitute the gist of Satan's Strategy. First video in this playlist has an set of webpage links which exhaustively explain how Satan attacks. For example, he used anti-semitism in the 'church fathers' to DESTROY the Lord's Own Birth and Death Dates, since both are JEWISH HOLIDAYS, per Bible (Chanukah and Passover, respectively). It's due to ANTI-SEMITISM that we don't know what YHWH means, that we dispute the Rapture, that over 1.5 billion CHRISTIANS think the Church replaces Israel. Satan's very successful!

So billions of dollars have been spent on LIES!

All this information is in Bible. It's just a question of connecting the right dots.

So this playlist will do that, first going through the ORIGIN of his fall and strategy, then (beginning with 2 SatStrat) using mostly HISTORICAL information you can test yourself. For we're just not connecting the right dots. See also my 'Timelines III: Anti-Semitism' playlist, which is a collection of other Youtubers' videos on anti-semitism.

Again, if you need help brainstorming, try scanning the webpages linked in the first video's description. Lotta stuff there.

Series is complete, for now; Episodes prior to 12b9 are in Youtube, link below. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Sophisticated audio commentary re God's Plan vs. Satan's good-deeds plan. (Video is a static picture.) This is a very long series, so there are multiple channels. This is the channel for Episode 12's videos. Starting with GodDeeds Episode 12b9, this 'SatStrat' Vimeo channel/playlist continues from the Youtube playlist of the same name. Eventually all the Youtube videos will be copied here, so you can comment without having to join Google Plus.

Playlist summarizes my Lord v Satan webseries starting at LordvSatan1.htm. Webseries reads something like a novel with extensive Bible documentation, starting with today, going back to creation, then ends at eternity, when the Trial between God and Satan is resolved. We are the courtroom, for that Trial..

So, the videos here, highlight and focus on Satan's strategy versus God's, in that very long series. Anti-semitism and the 3 Temptations of Matt4 constitute the gist of Satan's Strategy. First video in the Youtube playlist has an set of webpage links which exhaustively explain how Satan attacks.

To the world, Satan's Strategy is one of GOOD DEEDS, so you won't be doing GOD DEEDS. How do you 'do' a God deed? James 1:21-25 tell you how: LEARN AND LIVE ON BIBLE. Can't be a 'doer' of a Word you didn't LEARN. And the 'doing' is God MAKING that Bible 'live' in you. Changing how you think, which as James puts it, 'saves your souls' (verse 21). For yeah, you're forever saved to heaven.. but as what? The same old trashed-up worldly thinking person you were at the moment of salvation? So yeah, you're saved FROM hell, but TO what? Aha. So now being saved FROM something (hell) your soul needs to be saved FOR something: Christ's Thinking, which is Bible. True Riches, baby.

Additionally, since it will stunt Christian growth and Satan doesn't know when the Rapture will happen either, he used anti-semitism in the 'church fathers' to destroy recognition of Israel's future. Even to the petty need to mask the Lord's Own Birth and Death Dates, as both are JEWISH HOLIDAYS (Chanukah and Passover, respectively). It's due to anti-semitism that we don't know what YHWH means, that we dispute the Rapture, that over 1.5 billion Christians think Church replaces Israel.

See also my Youtube 'Timelines III: Anti-Semitism' playlist, which is a collection of other Youtubers' videos on anti-semitism.

Uploads usually near midnight on Sundays. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

Theme: INTEGRATION! of Bible in your head, and your life! This goes beyond the Trial, yet is the point of it. Where His Thinking becomes so woven with your own, that it HOLDS YOU TOGETHER, 2 Cor 5:14. Becomes the integrity of your life, the Love for Christ, which results when you are INTEGRATED with Bible in your head, running throughout your life.

Related, are diagnostic links and an overview of how the Spiritual Maturation Process enables you to integrate CONTRADICTIONS as they 'play' in your life.

You can actually test yourself for growth. My pastor spent 12 years diagramming the Spiritual Maturation process, which I condensed into a six-page chart, SMP.doc . If your version of Word precedes 2002 or is much later and you can't read the doc, try this link: SMPdocforOlderWordprograms.doc.

Videos to explain that chart (sound is scratchy, so you need an equalizer): youtube.com/watch?v=Ibi66ksWPUQ&list=PL69C21C9E8F2DAA21&index=6

Angelic Conflict is about that maturation, explan (very long) starts here: LordvSatan3.htm


God Deeds Series Links

brainout | 25 Aug 2015, 02:09

Initial series in Youtube, from Episode 1 (GD1, also in vimeo), through Episode 12b8 in order. Many of those Episodes have subaudios in the video descriptions, to save space in Youtube, sorry. Comments are still disabled, so you can comment here. I will gradually re-enable the Youtube comments.

Episode 1-5 in vimeo, click here. Episode 12's continuation and completion, in vimeo, click here. Episode 13, in vimeo, click here. This one is still current. Starting with 13c6, the audios are also uploaded to Youtube concurrently: and comments are now enabled, in Youtube as well.

Series began in Youtube over five years ago, mostly audio only, often with audio added in the video descriptions. Idea is to think out loud about what God's nature and design must mean about GOD. In other words, you don't have to believe in God or the Bible, but just think out loud using the facts you have, backing into conclusions. I like to start with the fact that if God exists and pee does too, WHY did God create it? Why would God want to see me pee? Since if Omniscient, that seeing would be constant and forever (Omniscience never turns off)? WHAT DOES THAT FACT SAY about the character of God?

And, about Satan. For if God, then Satan. Opposition, since we are free. Surprisingly, when you come up with an ongoing backing-into-the-nature-of-God via the facts you can see and Bible you can read, you get a whole lot of collateral data about the opposition, which Satan presumably heads.

Along the way, you can test the variant faith claims for sense, the teachers' teachings for accuracy, etc: for if true, then there will emerge a consistent picture which ends up making sense the more you analyze it.

That backing-into, was the impetus for the series, and it's really designed to complement the older Thinking Out Loud webseries, which runs over 1500 pages and took about six years to write (2000-2006, mostly) in first-draft quality (so needs extensive rewriting now), starting here. All other webpages are always linked at the top of each page, with intra-page links in colorful boxes near the top (each one looking somewhat like an altar or building, by design). So you can go from any page in the series to any other page, from the top of any page: your browser's forward or back-buttons can then take you forward or back, most easily.

Re the audio series links (some subepisodes are videos), eventually I'll upload audios so you can download them without the video portion, but it will take a few years to find them all. So if meanwhile you want a particular episode uploaded to brainout.net for download, let me know in this topic, or send me a PM.


God Deeds Playlists, Spiritual Maturation Variables

brainout | 19 Aug 2015, 21:24

Most religions and their denominations have a common definition of spirituality hence spiritual maturation: that you must do good deeds. Well, that's done with a body, so an 'unbeliever' can do them also. So how can something you do with your mere body, be spiritual?

Then if that's not spiritual, what is? What should the term 'spiritual', even mean? Can't be a feeling, because bodies feel (your thoughts aren't feelings), and any 'unbeliever' can have the same feelings. So then what? Thrash this out?

If you seek ideas to brainstorm, well.. I've been thrashing out this question for 15 years. Webpages start at LordvSatan1.htm, which begins the massive Lord v Satan series, which started back in April 2000. Youtube and vimeo videos are many. Chief among them are the Spiritual Maturation videos, and also in vimeo, the God Deeds audio series (which started in Youtube), latest 'Episode 13' subseries, here.

If you want a one-line summary of what I've learned it to be, the answer is Getting His Head into Your Head. Bible learned and lived on, line by line and precept by precept. Basic mechanic of God's System. (Underlying webpage is here, with more videos.)

Oh, and that really does equal 42, a 'generating growth' Bible Hebrew/Greek meter from Genesis forward (click here and here for how Isaiah 53 uses it to play on Moses' usage in Psalm 90, which plays back to Genesis meter), to remind the reader of Jacob's two families for the 21 years he spent working for Laban.

Genesis 1 Meter (Remix 3/31/15). REMIX, DATELINES CHANGED. Genesis 1 meter, real shocker. Genesis proves the provenance of the 364, 560 and most importantly, the 1050 BASE UNIT giving rise to the "Millennium" doctrine. Genesis sets doctrinal precedence pan-Bible, as hopefully everyone knows, so this is very strong proof. Download the pdf (or doc. Related material which now has much more relevance:

That time-grant topic for the multiplication of sons (heh) gets covered at length here. Root webpage on Jacob, is here.

So it's not how right you are, nor how much you compare favorably versus others.. but whether you are growing in God's System. Shock, huh. 😱

brainout | 17 Jul 2017, 06:47

My 'Satan's Strategy', 'God Deeds' playlists focus primarily on how and why we are alive post-salvation, in order to mature spiritually. Main webpage on this is LordvSatan3.htm (2.htm is on OT, 1.htm is overview, 4 is on Angelic Trial and 5 is on eternity; links to all sections are always at the top of each webpage).

Due to temporary Youtube problems, the playlists are bifurcated.

The initial list is here; God Deeds starts at the 16th video, runs through Episode 12b8, and then begins again, at Episode 13c6. It is the current and continuing playlist from that point forward. Sadly, you must click on the link to actually SEE the playlist now, the embed no longer gives you a side list.

Episodes in between, from Episode 12b9-end series 12, are in vimeo: Satan's Strategy Epi.12, Love On Trial : God Deeds 12b9c TOGETHERNESS, FLAT! (The Game, cont.)

Episode 13 in vimeo, goes up to 13j9, and then vimeo started having problems, so I only post now in Youtube. Satan's Strategy Epi. 13, Integration : God Deeds 13a1, Spiritual Integration, Intro

I'm sorry that it's so complicated. Youtube for awhile forced people to join Google Plus, and vimeo now is very arbitrary about many strange things, so I will eventually move its videos back to Youtube. So for now, we're stuck with this bifurcation.

It's now possible to download all YouTube and Vimeo videos in a single archive.


1 SatStrat Satan's Strategy

Satan is the author of evil, but God 'authored' Satan's existence and therefore blames Himself, per Isaiah 45:7's Hebrew. His (i.e., tactical) strategy is exhaustingly displayed in Bible, so you can test a human thing for whether 'satan' is behind it. Chances are, he is. Chances are, the more noble and moral it looks, the more satanic it is.

So how to tell? Well, you can prove anything Satanic (versus merely evil) by two testing devices: A. Is it Anti-semitic? B. Does it Belittle Bible using Matthew 4:3, 6, 9 'tactics'? If 'yes' to both 'A' and 'B', then baby — you're looking at something Satan sponsors.

Satan's use of first Church, then Islam, to herd and kill Jews is traced in 4 video parts. 1st part link: • 1/4 How Satan Deploys Islam . Be sure to view its video description, which links to webpages where a fuller explanation is given.

Test Matt4:3,6,9 on you-name-it popular 'doctrine': and you'll find the verses are actually used to craft the core 'doctrine' which is POPULAR. (True Bible Doctrine is never popular, but instead popularly CONTESTED.)

Also test any translated Bible verse which seems fuzzy, contradictory, 'mean', wrong, etc.: and again, you'll see the same three tactics. It's uncanny.

Then test the same verses with respect to the obviously anti-semitic claims like allegorism, British Israelitism, Christian Identity, Dominionism, Hitler's arguments, Islam, JW claims about Rev 7, KJVO claim LXX didn't exist pre-Church, Mormonism, preterism (common to Catholic & Calvinist doctrine), pre-wrath, mid- post- or 'no Rapture!' claims, Replacement Theology, SDA, theonomy. Notice that in each case the Jews are REPLACED BY the sect's hawked 'doctrine'.

Prolife is also anti-semitic. See my Prolife Blasphemy series to show how Satan uses Temptation #2 to wreck Bible translations; but for the anti-semitic connection, read https://davidduke.com/general/the-abortion-industry-is-led-by-extremist-jews_3618.html. Notice how the notorious anti-semite David Duke CORRECTLY states the Old Testament-and-hence-Jewish doctrine that Life Begins At Birth. And then, he uses it to make prolifers, anti-semitic. Don't kid yourself. If you're prolife, you're a tool of Satan. Not meaning to be, of course!

The unity of 'voice' is uncanny. Yeah, Satan's voice. Flee these doctrines, if you value your sanity at all. I've seen the sanity loss many times, even in my own family: it works like leprosy, but on the soul.

I discovered Satan's strategy by mistake, when trying to write up a comprehensive audit of what I learned under my own pastor, to see if the 'big picture' was coherent and correct. That occurred between 2000-2006.

So key webpage links on what I thus learned of Satan's strategy, follow below. There's nothing like 'em on the internet, sorry.

Seven Characteristics of Satanic Sponsorship: SatStrat.htm#SevenCont

My pastor spent a lot of time analyzing Matthew 4. The latest upgrade in the analysis is in Lessons 933-963 (maybe through 983) in 1992 Spiritual Dynamics (series 376), available for free through rbthieme.org. They never ask for money. There is a limit on how much you can order each month. I hear that the current limit is 36 lessons (on mp3) per month.

Not sure how I can condense all that material into video form.


2 SatStrat Prolife is Anti-Semitic

David Duke's scurrilous website, where he uses the BIBLE FACT that life doesn't begin until birth, to SKEWER the Jews who of course state Bible rightly, here: https://davidduke.com/general/the-abortion-industry-is-led-by-extremist-jews_3618.html.

Because 'golem' means a fetus and is thus UNsouled, a kind of Frankensteinian folklore has arisen from that Bible fact. ('Golem' in Bible means 'fetus', i.e., Psalm 139:16, in Episode 5a of playlist below). Here's a Wiki link on the folklore: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem

Prolife Blasphemy Playlist is an ongoing project demonstrating Live From Bible that God says you don't become human until He Creates Your Soul At Birth; therefore you are not evolved, and therefore you can be saved (since soul and NOT the body, is the real 'you'). Link to Playlist: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list...

How Prolife is used in the larger context of Satan's overall goals, is explored here: SatTacExamp.htm#GeniusExpo. Some of the above Prolife Blasphemy videos are also embedded there, and the analysis is somewhat empathetic to the prolife position.

Roman Catholicism invented the idea that life begins at conception, by cobbling together many pagan 'magic' ideas of blood=life, in order to 'explain' the Virgin Pregnancy. And, to distance themselves from the Jews. Same gambit, as when they ignored BIBLE's statements of the Lord's Chanukah birthday and Passover Death Day — to mask His Jewishness.

Islam claims Mary Immaculate in its Sura 19. RCC then used the Koran to 'declare' Mary Immaculate: see my 'Mary Immaculate Bloopers' video for the visual proof (jpgs of the video's RCC-authored material are in its vid description): • 6b RCC Mary Immaculate Bloopers

Prolifers refuse to do their Bible Homework, and instead prostitute themselves to Caesar, giving the cold shoulder to God's Word. Hence they are satanfodder for anti-semitism. Satan's not stupid; he knows how to use falsehood to advance his agenda.

Problem is, to the extent one persists believing lies, one never matures spiritually. So enters heaven, a spiritual baby.. forever. Anti-semitism guarantees that, as well as a miserable life down here. Small-souled, petty, never to the truth, able (2Tim3:7, last clause is backwards in the Greek, see my blog on that verse).


3 SatStrat Warning Anti Semites

May all anti-semites and their doctrines die in great, slow, suffering and pain; and may all the wackos who think 9/11 was an 'inside job' or helped/ done by 'Zionists' also die as miserably as God has promised in the Old Testament and the New. Or, ideally — may they wake up and smell the coffee of their jealous notions.

DEATH TO YOU SWINE. Do you hear me clearly? Just because I must say the Jews did some things wrong, doesn't mean you can count me on your disgusting, despicable, PATHETIC swinish 'side'. I HATE YOU FOREVER and God hates you more. Never ever write me or comment on my videos unless you want me to petition God to hurt you so bad you won't ever recover. Because He'll answer that, 'YES'. Promised, in the Bible.

Some people don't ask God for stuff thinking their puny-ness makes the petition invalid or wrong to ask. Just the opposite, with me: BECAUSE I'm no good, God must answer my prayers. And He always has, since I was a child. I ask Him for nearly everything, even what I should wear or eat.

Am I making myself clear? Death to you, and LONG LIVE ISRAEL, Gen 12, 15, 17 assures it!


4 SatStrat James 4:5, Satan's Favorite Mistranslation

Satan's constant strategy is to REVERSE. Here, reverse the meaning of the original mss, in translation. This same subtle-yet-obvious, derisive technique is used in everything from commercials to your average conversation to politics. So note carefully the pattern, here. Then you can spot it more easily with respect to any idea — especially, any popular idea, whether related to Bible or not.

Here, for FIVE CENTURIES, professional Bible translators have screwed up reading the Greek of this verse. How is that possible? Satanic tampering with our heads. 1st-year Greek in seminary tells you to ignore capitalization and punctuation, since the original 'Autograph' (inspired text) lacks these. But for 5 centuries the translators disobeyed that cardinal rule of hermeneutics, so for 5 centuries the Holy Spirit has been maligned in translation, as if He were 'jealous'.

When you see how easy it is to correct this verse in translation, you'll be embarrassed for the translators. And they will never admit their error, lest they lose 'face' or 'the people will lose confidence'. Yeah, what excuses! Notice how the Bible is blamed or some other excuse is made, just like Adam made when he fell, Genesis 3:12 and following?

So instead of being embarrassed, be warned: if Satan can cloud professional heads who obviously are more dedicated to God than you are, then his demon boys are clouding your head, too. So use 1John1:9 like breathing, so you won't be trapped as they obviously are. They aren't using 1John1:9, else this verse would have been corrected in translation, centuries ago!

Then after using the verse, pray to Father in Son's name to cause THEM to know 1John 1:9 is needed. We need good scholars and teachers! They are gifted by God, but Spirit won't fill a defiled Temple. So pray for them to become aware of the verse, so they can get the glory of teaching and learning God intended them to have! Our lives depend on it!

Note: This full compiled version of the 8/2008 vids in bliptv, ties to Episode 32/72 of my KJVOB series. I just added those videos together, to make this one. If you prefer, you can hear my pastor exegete it similarly, for it's due to him that I am aware of this mistranslation, and can now read the REAL BIBLE for myself. Order the mp3 of the James 4 series for free at rbthieme.org. Those are live recorded Bible classes, and some are on DVD. You can also get the entire book's exegesis at the same site. They never ask for money or put you on a mailing list.


3/72, KJVOB : KJVO 2000-year Scam History (Remix)

KJVO is a new dress on a strumpet older than Cleopatra! For Satan's gotta trumpet his strumpet to destroy the Word and the Jews. He trumpets her as a Bible REPLACEMENT, ever since Alexander (the Great) died.

See, people are just plain JEALOUS that God Gave His Words through the Jews. So they salivate over the satanic gambit that God ALSO gave 'inspired' words to THEM, whichever 'them' is the target for Satan's wiles. Thus you quickly know where and when major and deep pockets of anti-semitism, have been in history. And today, it's doo-doo deep, with the KJVO, even among those who are Dispensational. THEY want to claim THEY have special 'words' and 'visions', too. Playpen whining!

This video pair (3/72 and 4/72) will summarize how Satan's trumpeting tune played the same notes, repeatedly in the past. (This 3/72 remix, only replaces the last minute of the original, with different background content to introduce the KJVO movement.)

Then you'll see that KJVO arguments today, wear the same blaring message as the earlier, scamming Eph 4:14 'wardrobe', worn (out!) over the past 2000 years.

Notice the pattern: whether a real Bible translation (like Greek OT, Old Latin, Vulgate, or KJV), the satanic gambit is to OVERPRAISE the translation as a REPLACEMENT to the Real Words God Preserved. The fake wanna-replace-Bible books like Koran and Book of Mormon, still vaunt themselves as REPLACEMENTS. That's the key to seeing Satan's gambit — REPLACEMENT.

To make a translation a REPLACEMENT, Satan has to pitch it as 'inspired'. That's what's so evil about KJVO. So notice how the KJV, which is a valid translation of the Bible — becomes tainted and deemed evil, too. NOT FAIR! So the KJVO cause the demise of respect for KJV, by their obvious lies. Those of us who are not KJVO but respect the KJV, should therefore fight for the KJV, since the KJVO are busy trashing it in their slapstick overpraise which defames the Original Words God Preserved.

The videos in my KJVOB playlist (King-James Only Blasphemy) cover many more rebuttals to the KJVO contentions than this pair of videos had time to show.

Miscellaneous credits related to this video pair:


4/72, KJVOB : KJVO 2000-year Scam History

Continued from Episode 3. KJVO is a new dress on a strumpet older than Cleopatra! For Satan's gotta trumpet his strumpet to destroy the Word and the Jews. He trumpets her as a Bible REPLACEMENT, ever since Alexander (the Great) died.

See, people are just plain JEALOUS that God Gave His Words through the Jews. So they salivate over the satanic gambit that God ALSO gave 'inspired' words to THEM, whichever 'them' is the target for Satan's wiles. Thus you quickly know where and when major and deep pockets of anti-semitism, have been in history. And today, it's doo-doo deep, with the KJVO, even among those who are Dispensational. THEY want to claim THEY have special 'words' and 'visions', too. Playpen whining!

This video pair (3/72 and 4/72) summarizes how Satan's trumpeting tune played the same notes, repeatedly in the past. Then you'll see that KJVO arguments today, wear the same blaring message as the earlier, scamming Eph 4:14 'wardrobe', worn (out!) over the past 2000 years.

Notice the pattern: whether a real Bible translation (like Greek OT, Old Latin, Vulgate, or KJV), the satanic gambit is to OVERPRAISE the translation as a REPLACEMENT to the Real Words God Preserved. The fake wanna-replace-Bible books like Koran and Book of Mormon, still vaunt themselves as REPLACEMENTS. That's the key to seeing Satan's gambit — REPLACEMENT.

To make a translation a REPLACEMENT, Satan has to pitch it as 'inspired'. That's what's so evil about KJVO. So notice how the KJV, which is a valid translation of the Bible — becomes tainted and deemed evil, too. NOT FAIR! So the KJVO cause the demise of respect for KJV, by their obvious lies. Those of us who are not KJVO but respect the KJV, should therefore fight for the KJV, since the KJVO are busy trashing it in their slapstick overpraise which defames the Original Words God Preserved.

Original KJ Bible doesn't exist, maybe DESTROYED BY FIRE: KJVO of course claim it's not 'original' unless THE ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPT on which the words were written, is still around. Well, by that standard, there's no original KJV, either. In fact, someone back then accused another 1650's publisher of absconding with the 'last' original in 1655, after which it can't be found, and may have perished in the 1666 (note that year) London fire. Wanna see the accusation yourself, in a document from that time? Here 'tis: Historical Catalogue of the Printed Editions of Holy Scripture in the Library of the British and Foreign Bible Society: English; look at the penultimate sentence on page 134, after reading the context from page 133. You can download this on pdf. Convert it to searchable? Read vid desc to 'Google Books' video here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/googlebooks...

Also downloadable, and for corroboration, lookie here on page 562, mid-page: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com... .

I found the above 'fire' links due to this guy's article: http://www.kjvonly.org/doug/kutilek_final_authority.htm. Check it out.

Ooops. So KJV claims about it not being 'preserved' unless in the original manuscript, well — KJV wasn't preserved, either.

Of course, the truth is that 'original' means the WORDS, not what the words were written on. KJVO like to ignore that, since TRUTH is alien to them. Lies are what they sell to make MONEY.

The videos in my KJVOB playlist (King-James Only Blasphemy) cover many more rebuttals to the KJVO contentions than this pair of videos had time to show. So just access the playlist, pick the videos you want to watch. I assembled them in a kind of logical order, some easy to watch and some very technical.

See the vid description to 3/72 for more details on how this video pair was made.


Terrible Talmud Part 1a

This introduction shows where you can search the Talmud in Hebrew or English on the internet. And you really should study it, to see how legalistic pettiness vaunts man, denigrates God.

The Christian 'apostolic fathers' are provably bilious. Their inability to read Bible, and their self-righteous pomposity makes you need Pepto-Bismol, to read them. But so too, the rabbis yapping in the Talmud, forever arguing over olive bulks. Religion is like that: everyone puffing himself up, no one getting it that the spiritual life is 100% God-powered, 0% human powered. So your good deeds, count for squat unless done UNDER THE SPIRIT (1John1:9 used).

So Talmud is 90% terrible, but also 10% terrific. It's surprisingly difficult to find good software, and frankly the internet sites in the video are better, especially if you want to search ALL the related writings quickly. Ironic, though: two of the sites in here are sponsored by anti-semitic hosts. They do just copy the Talmud, and you can easily search it in English (better organized than all the other sites I found) — but if you read their conclusions from the unadulterated text (well, one of the two sites includes text not in the Talmud) — you know they hate the Jews. So just ignore anything but the Talmudic material in those sites.

The sites are:

The respectable Talmudic sites are:

Understand, I hate the Talmud. It makes a mockery of the Beautimous and Witty, Mosaic Law. But it is NOT guilty of anything but the same martinet pettiness which has also infected Christianity for 2000 years. And if you want to understand what Jesus faced, you MUST read the Talmud; for the Mishnah commentary is by rabbis who lived when He did. Read it to see how most Christian leaders are no better, than those disgusting rabbis who made it a pain to be a Jew.

There's a time to be nasty: when people lie about God for 2000 years, the gloves must come off. Many Jews can't stand the Talmud either, they know how pettifoggingly pompous it is, and how much it VIOLATES the Mosaic Law. So this is not a new complaint. But at the same time, anti-semites have lied about it as well. So this first video shows you where to VET the material, yourself.


Terrible Talmud Part 1b

This Part 1b and 2 focus on a scurrilious lie made a century ago by an anti-semite, to show the anatomy of a convincing lie. For what you'll see onscreen (and in links below), is still SPONSORED 100 years later, as if what the liar said, were true. But that liar was put ON TRIAL to test his Hebrew competency and claims.

So in this video and Part 2, the author's Part One is shot down line by line, showing how he who was later discredited in a public trial, manufactured his lies. Again, that author has been dead now for 100 years, yet even today his lies are being sold. So here you'll find out how to defeat them. For anyone who hates the Jews, hates God. And so the haters, are Satanfodder.

So YES, the Talmud is terrible; but NO, it is not guilty of making inflammatory remarks against Jesus or Christians. Use the Talmud links below to READ and thus prove the YES, since I can't show Talmud text onscreen due to copyright restrictions.

Links:


Terrible Talmud Part 2 (conclusion)

Continued from 1b, now centering on the anatomy of the lie Pranaitis wanted to promote in order to make people hate the Jews. How he invents text not in the Talmud, but perhaps in other writings by Jews or Christians pretending to be Jews, to invent the lie about the Talmud's text.

Hey: Talmud is awful enough, but what this guy says about it, is flat untrue. His bungling quotes, prove how antisemitism rots the brain. Christ is Jewish. God made the covenant with Abraham, Genesis 12, 15, 17. The Jews are the most persecuted people on earth by Divine Design, Leviticus 26, Deut 28. That advertises their God is the Real One, also by Divine Design. And to see why, you need to read the Talmud, to see how far gone, their mainstream theology. Hint hint: our Christendom shares much the same thinking as the Talmudic rabbis who obviously can't read Scripture, turning its gorgeous Mosaic Law into a trash dump full of olive bulks. So the Talmud is terribly important to learn, as an object lesson in what to avoid. Pranaitis didn't ever learn it or the Bible, as this video shows.

PENALTY FOR REJECTING GOD: YOUR BRAIN TURNS TO MUSH. Yet you will fancy yourself holy, Matthew 7:21-23.

Links:


10 Signs of False Teacher

Our teachers are not perfect, even as neither our parents nor we are perfect. So they, like we, fall prey to falsehood. It is harder on those in authority when they fall, so pray for them, Romans 13. Meanwhile, it is also incumbent on the believer to TEST anyone who claims something is Biblical, especially if a teacher. And you test, with the Word. If you find out a teaching is false, ASK GOD if you should do anything about it. Often, the answer is "no", but of course the meanwhile, you don't believe what is false, yourself.

This video shows some of the most-common categories of false teaching 'out there'. Some of it is merely mistaken, and as the teacher grows in the Word, he will grow out of his mistakes (just as we should). But the majority will be false teachers: that has been true since Adam. People prefer falsehood, and man being vulnerable to mass approval, will mostly cater to that approval. That too, has been true since Adam. So it is up to you, whether before the Lord you accept or reject, absent homework in the Word.

This video, with the other Lie Detection videos, is designed to facilitate that homework. Obviously, then, you test the videos themselves, before the Lord. For that's how you grow, spiritually, by testing using the Word of God — with God! Be sure to breathe 1Jn1:9 as needed, or you're wasting your time, no Spirit in you.

The 10 Signs of False Teacher:
I. He sells false gospels, saves No One.
II. He calls himself a 'prophet' who gets 'revelation from the Lord'.
III. He childishly 'reads' spirituality as body stuff and/or ritual, miracles.
IV. He claims you do NOT need to name your sins to God.
V. He claims God is NOT Trinity, or that Christ was NOT God (i.e., Angel or not God 'til after the Cross).
VI. He claims Rapture is invalid, or is not pre-Trib.
VII. He claims Church began in Abraham's tent, Church REPLACED, or Jews not true Israelites.
VIII. He claims 'respectability'.
IX. He claims he's teaching 'the one true faith' or similar exclusive claim.
X. He advocates political activism.

Falsehood stubbornly believed rots the brain. Literally. As time progresses, the individual clinging to falsehood will buy ever more of it in wider categories, and his ability to process information declines. The soul becomes narrow and prickly, taking offense when none is given; legalism increases, as does pettiness. God is no longer of interest, but only His Name, like a badge of ego preening. These are the hallmarks of spiritual decline, "earthly things" of Romans 8 and Philippians 3. Mental decline follows, to the point that even PLAIN BIBLE LANGUAGE on the topic one refuses to believe, cannot be read. The falsehood is loved too much. No point reasoning with the person, even the Bible itself, is now unintelligible to him.

Referenced Links:
True vs. False Gospels video: youtube.com/watch?v=RwF7PIuzR6Q
John 3:16 and Eternally-Secure Salvation video: youtube.com/watch?v=8MBd3IF65co

Why We Need 1 John 1:9 video: youtube.com/watch?v=uezam0yABjk
1 John 1:9 Revisited: youtube.com/watch?v=X5G-FxCCWy8

God101 series: first video in the series is this one: youtube.com/watch?v=plkXfBpFnjw
The other God101 videos should show up as "related" when you look at the one above.
Divine Physics series shows the underlying juridical how-to's of the Cross. First video in the series is: youtube.com/watch?v=2Jfr_hS1WtE , and the others are all 'video responses' to it, in sequence.

The New Covenant: youtube.com/watch?v=Pmr-S8JvKWk
How God Orchestrates Time video: youtube.com/watch?v=HRviBXZjYBM

Related webpages on New Covenant and Rapture are many. Best place to begin is brainout.net/LordvSatan1.htm for an overview. Whole series is very long.
Related webpage on teachers: brainout.net/RightPT.htm

File Name: 10FalseTeachR.wmv, 6/1/08.


10 Ways to Detect the Lie, False Doctrine

Falsehood has at least 10 major characteristics you can test for and prove, whether it's a falsehood in politics, science, religion or.. Bible. False Doctrine always:
1. Maligns God's Character.
2. Stresses or glorifies man.
3. Betrays incompetent (Bible) 'scholarship'.
4. Obeys the 3 Temptations of Matt4, REVERSING what Bible actually says in the verse(s) claimed for support.
5. Claims to be the 'one true faith' version — and you're bad, if you're not in it.
6. Appeals to the 'respectability' of the human claimant (i.e., how popular, charismatic or how many degrees the person has).
7. Justifies itself by appeal to other PEOPLE who are likewise respectable, rather than to Bible (hearsay/ ex cathedra claims).
8. Is POPULAR. This discourages checking the claims via Bible.
9. Appeals to emotion or intellect, in lieu of Bible in context.
10. Fails Common Sense.

Bible mistranslation, misinterpretation, and misteaching also follows these 10 characteristics, every time.

YOU are responsible to audit what you believe, before the Lord — Who you ASK, for Proof, and then You Study Bible To Find the Answers. Else, you won't get them. Else, you'll hallucinate the answers and call them 'from God.' Fooling, only yourself.

Satan is behind all falsehood, whether secular or spiritual, and the amazing thing is he advertises it. Satan's way of advertising his involvement is summarized in brainout.net/SatStrat.htm .

Satan can't afford for us to know the truth, that's why Bible's been persecuted its entire life (i.e., torn to shreds, missing, lost, confiscated and sequestered within a generation or two of the books being written).

Belief depends on learning, so of course we'll all be wrong about something, no big deal. So God will correct us, If We Ask. But if we don't, He won't. Your self-worth is neither increased nor diminished due to what you believe. But your happiness is sure affected. And, your ability to comprehend, read, speak. Falsehood rots the brain. Just read some of the reactionary comments to this video or the Islam videos.

By contrast, you grow Spiritually If You Audit Everything, using 1Jn1:9 (if needed) as you do it.. so get cracking!

File Name: FalseDoctrine.wmv, 4/28/08.


10 Ways to Wreck Your Spiritual Life

Dark side of Spiritual Maturation is degeneration, if believer rejects certain truths for too long: it is 1st mental, then physical. It mimics false doctrine you believe, or true doctrine you reject. The soul shrinks. Moralistic petty-mindedness (Philippians 3:19, Romans 8:5ff) is the main attribute of soul shrinkage.

Spiritual growth means gradual replacement of falsehood. Refusal to learn brings with it spiritual illness you can diagnose. Over the years I've seen such illness, 10 categories of refusal seem to speed degeneracy most. They are:

1. Stop talking to God. Talking to God speeds spiritual maturation most, as you will recall Bible & know if you are at odds with God. So if you stop talking to Him, you become quickly agitated; or, sublimate, lie to yourself. Mental decline is rapid: hypersensitivity is hallmark.

2. Stop using 1Jn1:9 (or don't begin, or name your sins to someone not God). People I know are dying due to this. Paul almost died from it, see his speech in Acts 22. David too, Psalm 32:5 +66:18, 1Kings1 (he named Solomon as God said, but didn't transfer kingship; 1Chron29 is his repentance).

Not using 1Jn1:9 kills your spiritual perception; what you THINK you know about Bible is merely academic, like anything else. Telltale signs of spiritual retrogression: inability to read plainly-stated truth. For example, people who don't use 1Jn1:9 can't read the fact that 1John is addressed to BELIEVERS, not unbelievers, so say you must repent of your sins to be saved. (So the person IS NOT SAVED, as the verse can't apply to unbelievers.) Such persons can't read the fact that all the OT sacrifices etc. were by BELIEVERS; that's how they admitted their sins to God. Bible misuse will multiply if you don't name your sins to God regularly. Test the difference: use 1Jn1:9 many times a day for a month, see the huge growth in your Bible perception!

3. Stop learning & living on Bible or never start. Decline is gradual if one never started, rapid if he did. High bitterness, if the latter. The one who never started can't grasp why he is punished.

4. Believe you don't need to study Bible under a male pastor. These folks decline slowly, unless they rejected a pastor. In the latter case, they decline quickly. Included are folks who listen to multiple pastors, only watch TV pastors. You must sit under 1 guy, for some years. It can be long-distance. Greek "haphe" in Ephesians 4:16 means it's God's Will that you mainly study under 1 person at a time — whom HE picks for you.

5. Mistake morality as 'spiritual'. Decline here is slow, but often permanent. So you are intimate with works and people, but never God. This is the main problem in Christianity.

6. Make Christian issues, political issues. Here, the Christian rapidly becomes unable to read Bible, reverses key doctrines, no matter how plain even in translation. This is another main problem in Christianity.

7. Believe salvation can be lost or needs something you 'add' to it (like baptism, works). Legalism +roteness invade you. Ability to read Bible tanks like in #6. You might not even be saved. BELIEVE ONLY, John 3:16.

8. Disparage Israel or your home nation. Physical +mental degeneration is sudden-onset after years of no symptoms. Or eerily like "rotting" analogy at 2nd Advent (Zech 14:12), one body part at a time. Anti-semitism guarantees insanity. That's why Muslims can't see how Islam is CRAZY.

9. Disbelieve in pre-Trib Rapture. #9 is a bellweather of degeneracy. The stronger disbelief, the more decline. Proper belief in Rapture is vital. For it's akin to anti-semitism, to disbelieve it. Rapture is a direct result of Matt16:18, the reason you even breathe; it's proof that God keeps His Time promises to Israel. Col 3:25!

10. Disbelieve in Trinity. Decline here is like mold. Trinity is depicted in almost every OT verse re God Himself. Decline also occurs if you disbelieve Christ is God, or that He 'became' God, lost His Godness, etc., as these are subsets of disbelief in Trinity.

Related webpages:
brainout.net/SpirPath.htm on Spiritual Pathology. This video is embedded there.
brainout.net/SpirTips.htm covers tips to speed or retard spiritual growth.
brainout.net/RightPT.htm covers Right Pastor, with full exegesis +3 translations of Eph4:11-16.

brainout.net/Mirroring.htm covers the God's LAWS OF TIME since Adam (ergo a pre-Trib Rapture is necessary). All provable from Bible, even in translation.

brainout.net/LvS4a.htm examines the LEGAL PRECEDENCE that also results in pre-Trib Rapture. Some Greek-geek analysis required.

File Name: 10 Ways to Wreck Spiritual Life.wmv, 2/25/08.


Gen1, Genesis of the Dingbats

This video heads the vimeo 'Genesis, with Exegesis' Channel: Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof) . Same playlist is also in Youtube, same name. (The bliptv copy, is now gone.)

Gist: Bible is mistranslated in Genesis 1:2, so Christians don't properly interpret Genesis. That, due to Christians using Bishop Ussher's timeline instead of Bible, to date creation. Bible disagrees with BOTH the creationists and evolutionists — how embarrassing for us Christians. Bible plainly says the Earth was RESTORED in six LITERAL days, not initially created over that period; 'day' here is EXPLICITLY 24 hours (Hebrew idiom of evening THEN morning can only be literal, as the Hebrew day began at SUNSET) — not some hallucinated longer period by moderns who have no faith in Bible. Pity we Christians hate God so much we won't even READ what He says.

Secondly, it demonstrates God's Rules for Constructing Time, a doctrine unknown in Christendom which USED to be known in Judaism; the doctrine begins with the begats in Genesis 5. Episode 8 covers that doctrine.

For those of you who saw this series in bliptv, they disabled the players; you can now only view the series via Youtube players or directly here in vimeo. So my chatty insistence (beginning at 2:55) that you look at the Youtube or blip video description's 'download links', are now outdated.

3-page Word.doc summarizing video series content: brainout.net/TimeTravelinGenesisVidSummary.doc

Off-Youtube, view and original videos:
brainout.net/SatStrat2.htm#GenesisVids . You can download them here in vimeo; or if you want the original file (named at the end of each video description), let me know and I'll upload it to my domain for your anonymous download.

Larger context of satanic messing with Bible teaching and translation: brainout.net/SatTacExamp.htm#BibleTrans

Upload File Name: GenesisDingbats.wmv, 8/25/08.


How Satan Deploys Islam 1/4

Download original worksheet, brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Upshot: Satan wants Christians to deny or distort the Rapture, so he can delay it. Satan wants to use them to wipe out the Jews, & thus (he thinks) hurt God, win in the Angelic Trial. Satan aims for a "Chanukah II", to mock the Lord's Birth (on what became Chanukah 4BC, see my "Lord born on Chanukah" videos).

Satan aims to create a fight to rebuild the Temple, so to get Jews to mass back in Israel, then wipe them out. Took him 2000 years to achieve part of this goal (1948); he did it, by sustained & worldwide pogroms. Having failed to make Christians wholly anti-semitic, he turned to the Arabs; via them, created the anti-semitic religion of Islam.

So these videos track that strategy, sketching actual history since 70AD through today. Satan's really petty: he swarms the Arab Muslims on the Exodus 12:40-41 timetable, every 430 years. Or, as nearly as he can make it happen on that schedule. Thus he mocks Arabs, Christians AND the Jews, for being so unaware of the history. So, these videos go through, that history. We are all pawns in this thing, simply because we won't study Scripture. So I'm not trying to single out the Muslims: we are ALL too dumb to live!

Video's worksheet (based on Bible and history you can vet yourself) brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Use Excel's "Views" +"Custom Views" to easily navigate. "Civilization 4000" Custom View, starts the video.

Only Israel was promised Time; when she rejected Messiah, God's Time Grant Rules reset to the Last Adam (Christ), & reverted to the old rules: Time must be JUSTIFIED, based on someone super-maturing within a 490-year deadline. These deadlines now measure from the Crucifixion. Hence Satan seeks to make the world negative enough (i.e., as at the Flood), or at least to obfuscate Bible enough so that no one supermatures or knows the Rapture: only then, can he can stop Time and win in the Trial.

Or, if too few Jews are alive to constitute a nation when Tribulation begins, Satan still wins; as God would fail to keep His Promises made to Israel as a nation.

To accomplish his goal of killing all the Jews, Satan uses Christianity 1st, Arabs 2nd. He uses the Arabs, to rile up the Christians, since Rev17 is FAKE CHURCH.

1st video covers 30-70AD.
2nd video covers 70AD-600AD, shows his use of Rome (esp. Constantine, which makes the union of religion and state to BE Rev 17), and then Persia. But both empires exhausted.
3rd video covers 600-732AD, Islam's rise to continue Satan's same goal.
4th video covers 732AD through now.

Thus the current conflict with Islam has its proper historical perspective. It's not really about Islam. It's about Satan's long-predicted Rev11-12, strategy to annihilate the Jews. Analysis of ties between Dan7, Rev 11-17, and whether Islam is in view: brainout.net/Dan7Rev11-17.WMA . This link is also provided in the Yapping Book of Daniel video description.

Satan plays games with history, esp. with dates & event character. Like God, Satan aims to 'match' event2 back to event1 using God's own rules, but with petty panache. For Satan loves Derision, Imbalance, Obfuscation, & reversing Substitution: to make God 'foreign' to us. ("DIOS" strategy, in brainout.net/SatStrat.htm .)

Other important links for all 4 videos are as follows:
How God constructs Time: 'hub' webpage (with videos too) is brainout.net/Mirroring.htm . Or see How God Orchestrates Time channel/playlist, and go through those math/history videos in order. Bible is more accurate then we'll want to admit!

Biblicity summary of Time rules: brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6 .

In Part II of my "Thinking Series", Angelic Trial Legal issues resulting in Church: brainout.net/LordvSatan2.htm#LordET .

Two Stone Witnesses (stand-ins for the future live witnesses in Revelation 11): Part IVa of Thinking Series, brainout.net/LvS4a.htm#DomeWall . External links there to university websites cover Temple Mount history from 70AD. Satan's game on that history since 70AD, is summarized in brainout.net/LvS4aContinued.htm#Rev17 . A brief on that strategy is there, + Part I-II, IVc-d, & the Appendix exhaustively cover his strategy, thinking.

Again, their purpose is to show what Satan does to manipulate or forestall the Rapture, so we can all orient to Time. For we are all pawns, not just the Muslims. Pray for Muslims & Jews, & for us Christians to wake up to our oh-so-undeserved Royal Role in this Angelic Trial, the proximate cause for Adam's & hence our, creation (Hebrews 11:1, Greek).


KJV's Isaiah 53:12, Disinherits Christ!

Watch in HD, fullscreen. Or view whole playlist here: brainout.net/SatStrat2.htm#KJVO

Or in Youtube, here: youtube.com/view_play_list?p=9637CFFCF9F62107

Another example of how the modern translations all cater to the KJV, instead of caring what the Real Word of God in the original Hebrew and Greek, says. The blasphemy here is a translation which in English makes it look like Christ only inherits "a portion" ALONG WITH others, as if others were ON PAR with Him?! For centuries, no one bothered to fix this glaring error? The Hebrew and the LXX leave NO DOUBT Who inherits ALL — Christ ALONE. Then HE shares out HIS OWN inheritance with "the strong". Unmistakeable in the original INSPIRED text. But hey: if the KJV mistranslates it, as did the Geneva Bible before it, well — everyone else must follow along. The Real Word of God matters not; only public opinion matters.

Oddly, three translations nonetheless have the courage to translate the first part of the verse rightly: Brenton's English (translated from the LXX), 1844; the 1610 Catholic Douhay-Rheims (so there's no excuse for the KJV to mistranslate); and the 1985 (but not later) Jewish Tanakh (only for the first part of the verse).

Proof positive that Christians HATE God — in favor of, fitting in with mere people! Political correctness, exposed!

File Name: Isa5312.avi, in KJV folder, originally posted in Youtube, 7/11/09 as Episode 39/72 KJVOB.


KJVO Trash their own KJV, make it a HOAX (57/72 KJVOB)

This video is 57th in my Youtube KJVOB playlist, here: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9637CFFCF9F62107 . It heads the NT 'threads' LXX playlist (youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDA3CF01F9BA03EB9 ), but this vimeo channel has the same videos, plus any made post 11/7/13. New videos will be ad hoc.

Distinguishing OT quotes in the NT is already vital to hermeneutics. So it also proves the KJVO leaders, lie. The laymen don't know that!

If I quoted a book I knew didn't exist, I'd be a liar, right? Well, KJVO claims LXX (Greek OT) didn't exist in Jesus' day, yet Jesus often quotes from it! KJV's own Textus Receptus, confirms!

Yet KJVO leader Sam Gipp, says LXX is a hoax: pbministries.org/Theology/miscellaneous/what_is_the_lxx.htm

Gipp claims Origen invented LXX in 3rd cent. AD. Oh, did Origen also edit ALL copies of Philo, Josephus, Talmud, 1st-cent & prior Jewish apocrypha which use that same LXX, which Jews created from the Hebrew OT circa 273BC?! Did Origen also time-travel back to Jamnia in 1st century, when rabbis elected to return to Hebrew and stop using LXX?!

Funny, the KJV Translators validated the LXX, so I guess our anti-semites Gipp and Ruckman, never read the 1611 KJV Preface by the Translators! But you can, here: ccel.org/bible/kjv/preface/pref1.htm . My excerpts of it, with commentary: brainout.net/KJVPrefaceExerpts.doc .

Contrasting Truth: since Commodus, the West rejected Real Bible. Instead, the Old Latin was touted as 'inspired': same claim as KJVO's. Back then, Augustine was against 'new' translations. newadvent.org/fathers/1102.htm shows his letters to Jerome, whose replies are here: newadvent.org/fathers/3001.htm

Hebrew & Greek Real Bible was persecuted by anti-semites like Diocletian & Constantine. So folks having Real Bible, left Rome. So Jerome went to Bethlehem, to GET mss.

RCC rose to power partly based on a claim its translation was 'inspired'. For if a translation can be inspired, so too pope & clergy.

Thus Bible's Jewish-inspired origin, is denied. Satan persecutes Bible in cycles: 300 AD (Old Latin**), 600AD (Koran), 700AD+ (Vulgate ***). When interest in Bible's mss declines, Jews suffer. ****
===
** & *** Chap 1, pp. 21-28 Christopher DeHamel's 'The Book. A History of the Bible', Phaidon Press Ltd.

* Chapter 2, op.cit.
**** op. cit., +'Atlas of Bible and Christianity' edited by Tim Dowley
===

KJVO movement thus repeats another pogrom. Bible's Greek (though not media) of 'Alexandrian ' mss were of 1st-century & prior Jewish origin, too. So KJVO cannot read LXX, to know its Greek is 6 centuries prior to Origen's. We have a lot of extra-Biblical Greek text writing from 500BC, on. We know how it changed.

Next, to disable your ability to LEARN those texts, Bible compilers & lexicographers are slandered by a woman 'degreed' in home economics, who doesn't even know 'Lucifer' means 'morning star' in Latin, yet pretends to be a 'scholar', slanders for profit: shop.avpublications.com/product_info.php?products_id=253

KJVO also pretend to read Bible Hebrew, Greek. Yet ask them to translate. They can't! So how can they know if KJV is ok? They can't!

And KJV is not ok, as no translation can be. Just Google on 'KJV mistranslation'. Read the original KJV translators' own caveats, here: ccel.org/bible/kjv/preface/pref1.htm

In sum: Since NT quotes an allegedly-fake LXX over 1000 times — is it a lie? Lord quotes LXX on His Birth Day, & over 100 times, pan-Gospel. So does the Lord lie? Or are KJVO, liars?

KJV Exodus 20:16 "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour."
KJV Exodus 23:1 "Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness."

KJV Matthew 19:18 "He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, 'Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness',"

LXX Greek of Exo 20:16 — ou pseudomartureseis

Textus Receptus Matt 19:18 — same two last words as in the LXX.

What will the Lord say to KJVO on Judgment Day?

===
TechNotes: TR in video is 1894 Scrivener, an updated version of Beza's TR from 1598.

LXX used in video is Alfred Rahlf's, from BibleWorks 5.

Download this video for clearer Greek viewing: brainout.net/KJVOTrash.wmv . Jpg's of Greek: brainout.net/Matt123.jpg

Follow with brainout.net/Matt215.jpg then brainout.net/Matt218.jpg then brainout.net/TRMatt3.jpg then brainout.net/TRquotesLXX.jpg

Google on 'LXX fragments': en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint . Here is a list of provable pre-Origen LXX mss : kjvonlydebate.com/2010/06/02/a-reader-comments-on-manuscript-evidence-for-a-pre-origen-septuagint/comment-page-1/#comment-3035

File Name: KJVOTrash.wmv, 3/5/10 in KJV folder.


LXX4a Acts 15 Scholar Insanity!

Anatomy of scholar ineptness over the fact the NT 'threads' the LXX — which every scholar even knows, it's required study in seminary!

Honestly, just when I think Christian scholarship can't get any worse, I find something like this. So, this video (sorry) is something of a tirade against 'scholarship' which accuses Bible to hide its own incompetence. Here, Acts 15. This is one sample of many I've seen over the last few months, and many more over the last year. Scholarship is valuable, we need it, and this is not against the scholars in general. But it is against the tolerance of the bad apples, which today are many. Sometimes, the gloves should come off!

Link referenced in the video: The Church in Antioch in the First Century CE: Communion and Conflict

File Name: TiradeScolarInsanityActs15.avi, 3/21/12.


True vs. False Gospels

Associated webpages: all the blue 'boxes' in brainout.net/index.html

Gist: "BELIEVE" Christ paid for all your sins, and you are saved. No other verb is used by God to save you. This video contrasts the BELIEVE verses in Bible with all the false gospel verbs out there, like 'repent', 'pray the sinner's prayer', 'invite', 'accept', 'be baptised'; and my favorite fake gospel lie, 'call on the Lord' — MISREADING Acts 2:21 & Romans 10:13 even in translation, can NO ONE read the CONTEXT? Sheesh, how Christians lie against God's Word. So, you're NOT saved if you listen to them. Listen to the Bible, instead!

All other verbs are works & do NOT save you. You'd think we'd at least listen to what Our Lord said, in John 3! But instead we mangle the Gospel, saving no one.

So are YOU really saved? Yes, if you merely BELIEVE Christ paid for all your sins — don't add any other verb to it. My pastor harangued on "believe ONLY" for 53 years, and I was wrong to be annoyed with him! Ask yourself why is it even famous pastors & evangelists get the Gospel so very wrong. So who are they saving? NO ONE!

This is my litmus test for a Christian or a pastor. If he adds ANY OTHER verb besides BELIEVE to the Gospel — and most do — I disregard everything he says. He cannot be filled with the Spirit & add verbs. Bible is too plain — ONLY BELIEVE. Gen15:6=John 3:16. So I silently walk away from these people. God is not in them.

So persons alleging you must repent of your sins, say with your mouth you believe, make Christ Lord — and mind you, these people are generally attractive folks — they are false spirits, sorry. They might not even be saved!

Don't you be like them? BELIEVE Christ paid for your sins and you're FOREVER saved just like Abram was, Gen15:6+John 3:16!


Doing God Deeds?

This is the setup video for the God Deeds subseries inside of SatStrat. the God Deeds videos all begin with GD prefix, followed by the Episode number. Its playlist starts here: • God Deeds, GD1 Why Evil

God deeds, not good deeds, is the spiritual life. Spiritual life is a supernatural way of life and demands a supernatural means of execution through the Spirit. FAR SUPERIOR to mere morality which any unbeliever can do. How Christians who claim that morality is spirituality, will never mature and instead retard, remaining spiritual babies until death.

Video is an experiment using Xtranormal.com software.


God Deeds, GD1 Why Evil

Audio in this series, and webpages below explain the answer to WHY EVIL in enough detail and simplicity that you can see the stark answer, and see it in Bible.

At that point, you'll have a decision to make: become an atheist, or fall in love with God. There is no middle ground. If you aren't already in one of those camps, it's only because you don't grasp the real issues involved, in CREATING. Which is normal: we aren't God, so we can't know His Perspective. But Bible tells us His Perspective.

The Calvinists and Catholics and all other denominations have His Perspective completely wrong. They focus on human sin and behavior, never understanding God at all. So when asked 'why evil', they harp on human shortfalls, then generally throw up their hands and call God 'mysterious', or 'inscrutable', or some other lame excuse for not answering the question.

But God answers the question, and boldly: Genesis 1:1-2, Isaiah 45:7-19, Isaiah 53:10-11 and 54:1, Matthew 4:3-4, Ephesians 1:15-23, 3:15-19, 4:5-16, Hebrews 1-2 (both chapters), Hebrews 10:10-14, and all of Chapter 11. These verses are never considered in sufficient detail. But they are mostly well-enough translated so you yourself can ponder them.

Whether you do that, is up to you. But if you really do that, you will simultaneously be shocked, upset, and at the same time.. awestruck. At which point, you will have the strongest reasons to be an atheist.. or to fall in love with God.

No middle ground.

The reward comes from learning to think like Him, which only God can do, 1Cor3, Heb11:6, and the foregoing Ephesians verses. Because Matt4:4 is the spiritual life, NOT what you do; instead, what you BECOME, Eph 4:13. So the world is blessed due to LEARNING CHRIST, not good deeds, Lev 26, Deut 28: for the FIRST commandment is to LOVE GOD. You aren't obeying that, if you're not LEARNING God. So then whatever else you do, is evil masquerading as good, just like the Pharisees, John 6-8.

So the whole 'good deeds' thingy, is a satanic scam straight from Genesis 3, preyed upon and by,any Christian near you. Want to see how? Just think over the points in this one-hour (77MB) audio, http://www.brainout.net/downloads/wma... . Not difficult to grasp, but definitely a topic we seldom think through.

So JUST STUDY, learn and live on Bible. Let GOD dictate when and if you do anything at all. He'll make it clear.

Webpages:

For God's definition of perfection is not like ours: the BAD is just as much a part of His Definition of 'perfect', as the good. What???? Yeah, that should make you want to be an atheist.

That's why Satan rebelled. The topic of Satan's rebellion and the foregoing issue of Truth being Free and therefore free to be evil, took me 10 years to research and write up, in the Thinking series (five parts), beginning at LordvSatan1.htm. That first part is the overview. Part II goes back to creation, up until Church is born. Part III and IV cover Church, and will take MONTHS to read, ponder, vet. Part V covers eternity and the Lake of Fire. The Appendix focuses on Satan's mindset and gambits, so you can see the validity of his arguments. A putative 'novel' version of this same story was begun in 2006 (still unfinished), PDR.pdf. If you want to click on the intra-doc links, instead download PDR.doc. (Adobe can't convert the links, I've no idea why this document won't convert.)

Yes, validity. The issue is not good versus bad. It's the difference between Infinite Free Perfection and finite shaved truth. Satan wants the latter, and so do we, whether atheists or Christians. So the choice is stark, and is not adequately presented in pulpits. But you can reason it all out yourself.

And then you too will decide to either become an atheist, or fall in love with God.


GD2 Satan Argues, God Replies

This video is really a followup audio (with static video picture) to 'Why Evil' audio four-parter, at • God Deeds, GD1 Why Evil.

The whole Trial is about God's Competence, not yours. So it's not about your sins, not about your works, but rather how GOD MADE you, and whether HE did a good job. Once you understand Satan's arguments, you'll see that the 'good deeds' promotion by Christians and religion, is a scam, with the promoters totally buying into Satan's Matthew 4 temptations, thinking vainly instead, that they serve God. At the end of their lives, they will come to disbelieve, will be jaded and angry that God didn't reward them as they expected. Yeah, because it was never His Will, in the first place. Ooops.


GD3b God Deeds for Relationship, never religion

For YOU are the product, not what you do. What you BECOME that GOD DOES to you, not what you do yourself. This undercuts all Satan's arguments in the Trial, which is why CHRIST HUNG ON A CROSS rather than 'do' the Three Temptations (all good deeds) in Matthew 4. Christ did nothing, but let it be done TO Him. Hint hint.


GD3c If I die Tonight

The ultimate test of God Deeds versus good deeds, is what happens at death. So, this long audio role-plays those two outcomes. I have to use myself as an example, because I don't know your details. So just substitute yourself, when you hear me talk about myself.

By the way, the passage on the woman with the two coppers is in Mark 12 and Luke 21. I kept on misstating the location as Matthew 7, in earlier audio. Sorry!

Also, the passage about 'did you do it for Me?' wasn't Malachi 3, but Zech 7.

Hebrews 10:5, 'A body You have prepared for Me' is another among hundreds of verses explaining no soul life in the womb. Body is prepared in advance and separately, theme of Psalm 139, which is routinely mistranslated to hide that fact, in all English Bibles. (See my Prolife Blasphemy video series for more details, though I'm not yet done posting videos showing the mistranslation. Its corrected translation, however, is in NoWombLife.htm, the 'Don't Abort My Word' table in that webpage.)

This matters, because the soul made by God is PERFECT at BIRTH, untainted yet by sin. It becomes tainted when the newborn first sins (i.e., cries when he shouldn't). Ignorance of sin doesn't excuse it. So every newborn who dies is automatically saved, etc.

The Job passage about him wishing he'd never been born, is Job 10.


GD3d2 God's Design Philosophy 2

God's full-spectrum, JOINING 'high-low' Perfection Definition and its many ramifications and applications to your life, are covered in this audio.

Corrections to the audio: When I say 'katantanw' for 'kitting out', I meant 'katartizw'. Verb really means to heal up a fracture or other injury and then heal it so well, you're better off than if you didn't have the injury. It's also used in the military sense of providing you with all the support, training and weaponry you need to be the best soldier (theme Paul will again use in Ephesians 6). Usually it's translated too tamely, as 'equipping', in Eph 4:12.

And Yes, it was John 7:39 which says that the OT people couldn't get the fullness of the Spirit because Christ hadn't come. So that's the essential difference: they had a lower Divine Operating System versus what we get, post-Cross. OT 'filling' was pimplemi, a physical-filling like you get from eating a good meal. NT 'filling' is pleroo, big NT keyword for NT spiritual maturation.

Use 1John1:9 and then between sins, trace that Greek verb and its cognate, pleroma, in Bible; you can thus see how it works. KJV translates both verbs 'fill' and 'fulfill', which is kinda unfortunate, since the distinction isn't clear (nor can it be) in translation. All other English translations follow suit, so you miss the import. Thankfully, the KJV almost always translates pleroma as 'fulness', so you can trace pleroma pretty easily, in the KJV. Again, most other translations follow suit.


GD3d3 God's Design Philosophy 3

Ennui: French term made philosophically famous by Albert Camus in his depressing book, L'Etranger. Sad fact is, most of us reach this life-is-meaningless existentialism after age 40, and many long before. Here, the surprise is that God wants the believer to get to that same conclusion, sooner. Paul, for example, expresses it in Philippians 3, Romans 8, 1 Cor15, 1Thess 4. It was a frequent subtheme of his, and is echoed by someone Paul taught, the writer of Hebrews 11.

So: 'let's eat and drink, because tomorrow we die' — 1 Cor 15: 29-32 (corrected citation, versus what I say at 25:21 in the audio).

This ennui, is a watershed in the spriitual life. Most Christians do not survive it. So here I briefly think out loud, about the impact of this stage that every human being will go through: those who USED to believe in God prior to reaching this point, will likely stop believing. Or, will awaken to the real purpose of the spiritual life. No middle ground.


GD3e1 Good Deeds Mindset

God Deeds versus Good deeds: each has its own mindset. The good deeds mindset is hitlerian, just like the old sin nature. For the temptation in the Garden was that you could DO something to become good as God.


GD3e2 Good Deeds Legacy

So what comes of the Good Deeds Mindset, upon death? Just thinking about it, scares me to death. When I think of all the good deeds I did before realizing how EVIL good deeds truly are.. I want to kill myself. But that won't make up for lost time, will it? So forget what's behind, move forward, Philippians 3:8 and :14.

So here I think out loud about what 'legacy' the good-deeder inherits; what Rx one can take now, to get God's legacy, instead. :)


GD3e3 Good Deeds Legacy, cont.

Yes, no good deed goes unpunished while down here, because it's supposed to be a GOD DEED, instead. Good deeds are POISON. Here, we see why. Mind you, I'm just as guilty as anybody else, so this isn't a rant against other Christians. We're ALL stuck with the SIN of good deeds. Only one way out: 1John1:9, find your RIGHT TEACHER, learn under him and then live on Bible, John 14:26, Eph3:15-19, Heb 11:6, because Heb 11:1 — "it's about Confidence in Word! Christ's THINKING, on Trial! Evidence Unseen!" See my http://www.brainout.net/Heb111.htm for the corrected translation of that verse, which all the translators — themselves addicted to the sin of good deeds — mistranslate.

You realize, I hope, that it requires you be carnal, to mistranslate Bible.


GD3e4 Good Deeds Legacy, cont.

So here's the ultimate question: how do YOU define what constitutes a 'good relationship'? Is it based on good deeds? Then that's how you're defining your relationship with God, and how your relationship WILL BE FOREVER.

Because, everyone gets what he wants from God. The atheist wants no God, so he gets no God. The superficial Christian wants a superficial relationship with God, so that's what he gets. The Christian who wants to learn God's Word, gets it. The one who wants to learn God Himself THROUGH that Word, gets that.

Notice how specific: you can want to learn the Word, for many reasons. To be smart, to be admired, etc. So, that's what you'll get. As the Lord said, 'verily, he has his reward'. A cup of water in the Lord's name is a reward. So, is a crown. Which did Christ go for? The latter. So how much are you rejecting Him, if you don't go after the same?

But you can't be crowned by what good deeds you do. He BECAME something: the Way, the Truth and the Life. So you have to BECOME like Him. Not, doing good deeds.

But, if you want the definition of the spiritual life and hence relationship with God to be about good deeds.. that's what you'll get. Forever.

It was not the choice Christ made.


GD3f1 God Deeds Mindset, 2Cor10:5, Intro 1

Audio-only, made with MS Windows 6.0 Movie Maker in HD Widescreen 16:9, 1920 resolution. You can download it for free, and it works in Vista or Win7. Maybe it also works in Win8, not sure. This version of Moviemaker works with Pixelan, who provides the links to the free MS download (in two flavors), here: http://www.pixelan.com/movie-maker/wi...

Theme of this and the next two audios, all just showing the static Bible verse picture: God's DEED is to make you INTO something, for an eternal good deed He will make out of you, POST DEATH. Just as He did, to Christ.

Will radically alter how you think about spirituality, once you see the sense of this. It's FAR HARDER than all the good deeds on the planet, and in fact is impossible to do. For there is NO WAY you yourself can 'bring every thought into captivity to Christ.' Do you ever think about going to the bathroom, or about a hamburger? Well, those thoughts aren't 'into captivity', are they? Yikes! NO ONE CAN DO THIS. Well, except God. See: a God deed is IMPOSSIBLE for humans to do. God-quality work, always is done by God ONLY. Yeah, because the First commandment is to love God with what? ALL YOUR THINKING, which is the upgraded standard Christ created when he revised the First Commandment, in .Matt 22:37.

The video's Bible verses shown to prove this is the real spiritual life and God's Standard, are only two; but you'll think of many others, as you listen. The larger writeup with more verses than you can stomach, is in LordvSatan1.htm. It is the beginning of over 1500 pages of panoramic 'audit' of the 'fit' of the story Bible tells, and was also taught by my pastor, at rbthieme.org. I did the webpages to test what I learened, and its Bible fit. The audios here, complement that prior study and writeup.


GD4c God Deeds Mindset

Audio only, continued from 4b. How the spiritually-mature Christian is wholly focused on God. Immaturity=me-ness, body-definitions of 'spirituality'. Maturity=He-ness, thought-definitions of spirituality, since His Thinking was what paid for sins on the Cross, Isaiah 53:11.

Notice it's a standard change, not a practice change. The body will always be glitchy and sin, Romans 7-8. So maturity is what you LEARN, not what you think you earn, Romans 4, Eph4:12-13. You only take what you LEARN, to heaven, Philippians 3:18-19, 1Cor3. So your reward is based on what you LEARNED, ibid and 2 Tim4:7-8. For what you learned, was the THINKING of Christ, 1Cor2:16, so every thought being brought into captivity is your STANDARD, 2Cor10:5.

Spirituality is a change of STANDARD, not a practice. You practice the standard increasingly, but the tension will always be there and you'll always fail, Romans 7. So the 'test' is whether you QUIT and opt for the lower satanic standard of people and works, just as Adam did in the Garden, Genesis 3.

PS at 10:20, I mention the tie between John 5 and following, and Matthew 16. The text is in the John passage, but the timing is indeed just before Matthew 16. Matthew 16:18 is Christ's reply to Peter, but Peter said both things: 'you have the words of God, where are we gonna go' in the John passage, followed by his confession that He is the Christ.


GD5a1 His Head in Yours, IS 'Love'!

1 Corinthians 13 is not about human emotion of love, but 'Love' is a moniker for Christ, the HEAD of Church. This video briefly shows Paul's wordplay in 1Cor12:31, so you can see that; it also has to correct the frequent mistranslation of 'burned' in 1Cor13:3, to show that the translations MISS Paul's point.

WORD BETTER THAN WORKS is Paul's point, and the WORD OF GOD is Christ's HEAD, theme of His Head in Your Head, which Paul started to introduce in 1Cor1:5's Greek (lit., the Word in your words, very clever). Whole book of 1Cor is on this theme. Clever of Satan to mask its translation, so you WORK at 'love'...

5a2 will explain what the passage means, and 5b and c, will focus on how the God Deeds Mindset IS IS IS IS His Head in Your Head, which Satan himself failed to acquire. That is the substance of the Angelic Trial: Satan wanting good deeds, rather than God's Deeds due to what is in the HEAD, Christ.

So now you can better understand 2Cor10:5, bringing every thought into Captivity to Christ — in your HEAD!


GD5b His Head in Yours, IS Love, cont.

Audio Only, continued from 5a2, the SUPERIOR God-Deed of making you pass the LOVE MATURATION test that Satan failed. This is the heart of the Angelic Trial, the reason why the Cross was structured as it was. Here and in Part 6 we'll see the reason why Christ birthed CHURCH. Introduction to Psalm 110 and Hebrews 1,2,4,5-12.

Latter book explains the change in covenant due to the Trial Success of the Cross, using Psalm 110 and Jeremiah 31 as its doctrinal underpinnings, then culminating with a 'talk back' in 7x3 meter of Hebrews 11:1, to 1Cor13, to show Christ's Head=Hupostasis=Love — On Trial. In your head.

For Satan's head, couldn't take it.


GD5c His Head in Yours, IS Love, cont.

Audio Only, continued from 5b. The extreme tension of High-Low, being higher than others but so much lower than God, felled Satan. Ergo Christ. Ergo the Christian, who in this final stage of the spiritual life WHICH IS THE SAME TYPE as Christ's, goes through the same test which Christ passed and Satan failed. The test? MATURE IN LOVE. Which means, MATURE IN WEAKNESS, 2Cor12:9-10. See the parallel to the Cross?

Passage for the Christian is to 'stay the course', as this is a marathon race, getting to the Finish Line by God doing it to you, 2Cor12:9-10, Phili 3:10-14, 2Tim4:7-8. But it hurts bigtime. In the head. Divergence. High-Low. God doing it to you.


GD5d His Head in Yours, IS Love, cont.

Closing Part 5, how God Deeds mean RECEIVING, but good deeds mean YOU DOING, with the latter resulting in progressive INcompetence. Ooops.

Part 6 begins next, again going back to the panoramic historical picture of what's happening in this God-Deeds versus Good-Deeds TRIAL between God and Satan. Psalm 110 is on that picture, and Book of Hebrews explains it in detail, to show why the OT covenant changed at the Cross, to Church. That the covenant wrought in Christ is 'better' (Attick kreittwn, keyword in the book), so that the OT people cannot be resurrected until Church is completed, Hebrews 11:39-40.

In other words, not only is God-Deed the ONLY 'good', the ONLY way to be happy and competent — but it's the way God fulfills His Promises to Israel, and beats Satan in the Trial: preview of coming attractions in Parts 6-7. Because these sections are so interwoven, starting tomorrow I'll post one subpart per day, and sometimes several, to keep topic 'flow'.


GD6a Operation Footstool, Psalm 110

Audio-only. Now you'll begin to see the Big Picture of the ANGELIC TRIAL Impact of your little life down here, in this Part 6, which runs from subpart a to h. Principal passages are Isaiah 14:12-14, Ezekiel 28:12-15, Psalm 110 and whole Book of Hebrews, but also Colossians, and Ephesians 5-6. Hebrews 11:39-40 is a Rapture verse which is often overlooked; it says that the rest of history cannot continue until Church is completed.

Hebrews — which was written just after Paul died, per Heb 13:23 — is about WHY the Covenant Changed: Christ beat Satan at the Cross, and we are to replace the fallen angels, NOT Israel. Verse on the one-on-one triumphal procession replacement, is Colossians 2:14-15, which is a kind of jumping-off point for the Book; so too, Jeremiah 31, Psalm 110, and 1Cor13. The author is weaving his points back into those older books, so once you see that, the flow of what he says, will become clearer. He does this by playing on the keywords. The most important keyword is a play on Christ=Love in 1Cor13, which in Hebrews is converted to 'hupostasis', i.e., in Heb 11:1. Since all translations missed the wordplay in 1Cor12:31-13:1, they miss it in Hebrews 11:1, as well. So you miss the import of both books.

My pastor taught all this for over 50 years; you can get his classes at rbthieme.org. I audited that material to write up a comprehensive series of webpages, which begin at LordvSatan1.htm. Also began a semi-novel to make the material more 'live', but haven't finished it: PDR.doc. Use 'pdf' extension if you prefer it in pdf format. Oh: and be sure to write a chapter on yourself. After you go through this Part 6 and 7 audios, you should be able to do that.


GD6c YOU in Operation Footstool

Audio Only, continued from 6b, Operation Footstool and how your little life is On Trial, for the Thinking of Christ in you. Imagine: a puny human who votes to know God, thereby beats Satan? Whoa — how can that happen?

Well it happens, because you are part of, Body of, the Firstborn of All Creation Who REPLACES Satan; hence, you are on Divine Television. Flagship books on the Angelic Conflict in the NT are Colossians, Ephesians, Hebrews, Revelation. 2:28 and 22:16 use Bright Morning Star, title Christ WON from Satan's Isaiah 14:12 title, with Psalm 110, the prediction of it. So Rev 3:11 says don't lose your crown — because HE has one, you are SLATED to get one. See also James 1:12, 1Cor4:8, Rev 5:10, 2Pet1:19.

For the demons are lost. Big hole in heaven's population. Church Battlefield Victory fills that hole, replaces the demons one-on-one triumphal procession, cultural metaphor in Colossians 2:15. Whoa.

FIRSTBORN, first used in Colossians, another Angelic Conflict book which Hebrews plays on: Col. 1:15, 18; Heb. 1:6; 11:28; 12:22f . Note: it's a common 'incorporation by reference' technique in Greek and Hebrew to abbreviate a title in some other Bible passage to its key word; hence 'firstborn' in Hebrews means 'firstborn of all creation'.

Now, such a highborn status means TRAINING. Under, a TEACHER, John 14. That TEACHER will direct you to a MALE teacher, Eph 4:16, through whom you learn your allotted share (metron merous, Greek in that verse) of Bible, which is Christ's Head getting into your head, Matt 4:4. So you do not 'forsake assembling' to get that teaching, Heb 10:25, lest you get punished (balance of chapter). It's NOT about 'Christian fellowship'. You are SUMMONED (Greek parakalew, not 'encouragement', lol, mistranslation in the verse) to be UNDER A TEACHER. What you do with Christians outside, is optional. Sometimes you are to AVOID them, 2Tim2:26-3:7.

Naturally, one can object to this highborn status. Naturally, one can be skeptical of this whole story. So how to prove it true? Look at the ceiling, Ask God for the proof YOU need. We each vary in what evidence we need to get, for proof. It's only right to ask for proof. The reason why there is so much debate, is that there is so little, ASKING.


GD6d You in Operation Footstool

Audio Only, continued from 6c, how YOU are On Trial for what Thinking of Christ is developing in You, Heb 11:1. So God's Deed is On Trial, building Christ in You, Colossians 1:16-27. His Head=Love=Hupostasis, with 'hupo' meaning 'under' and stasis meaning 'standing', so your UNDERSTANDING is on Trial, Heb 11:1. Technically, 'hupostasis' comes to mean 'substance', and yeah: the SUBSTANCE of the Trial is Christ in You, the elpis=hope=future confidence of Glory, Colossians 1:25-27. Clever weaving, huh.

So you're on Divine Television. Stadium verses: 1Cor4:9, 1 Pet 1:12. Far bigger deed than anything you can ever do in this body!


GD6f You in Operation Footstool

Audio-only, continued from 6e, more on how to APPLY the fact You're on Divine Television for what you're learning about and in Christ; how all blessing, cursing, world history hangs on your learning Him. Whoa. Episode 6i is an addendum to this video, on the Categories, Elements of Training.

Here, Training focus is on COMMUNICATION, our primary role in heaven, for all eternity.

Verse on 'Longed to see My day': John 8:56


GD6g You in Operation Footstool

Audio Only, continued from 6f, You on Divine Television for learning Christ as Royal Family of God. 6h will end this Part 6. Here, focus is on how the KNOWLEDGE of Bible truth, crushes you.

This was the test Satan couldn't pass; so, he rebelled, claiming God MISDESIGNED Truth. God designed, 'Truth Be Free'. Satan thinks it should be designed, 'Truth Be Shaved', in the name of Reducing Suffering for The Inferior. So Satan thinks he's the proper Messiah, on this glorious quest to beat God Father Son Spirit. Satan considers Them, to be masochistic and sadistic. You can see why.

Preview of coming distractions next week, beginning on December 28: Part 7 revisits the whole story, to solidify what you've heard; but at the end, focuses on the MISTRIAL strategy of Satan, to show how Satan & Co. and all world history, are affected by EACH of us during our little lives down here. The MISTRIAL strategy is covered in Job 1 and Job 2, Matthew 4, 16:18 (Christ INVENTING Church to answer Satan's Mistrial contention), John 17, Ephesians (esp. 1 and 5-6), 1Thessalonians 4 and 5, Romans 9-11, all of Rev 1-3, 9, 12-13. Rev 9-13 is Trib mid-point: Satan thinks he's FINALLY got enough world control, to achieve a decisive Trial victory.

Part 8 will go back into the nitty gritty of our 'now' (Bible keyword for Church Age), how we interact with each other and within our own lives, to flesh out the panoramic picture. So think of life as split-screen TV. You're the star of your own little movie down here with beings watching from above, and you also are watching the live movie in heaven.. via Bible.


GD6h You in Operation Footstool

Audio-only, Conclusion of Part 6 application (here in 6h and 6i): You the King in Training; On Divine Television; Getting His LOVE into Your Head; during Operation Footstool (Psalm 110, synonym for Church Age); Bringing Every Thought Under His Feet, 2 Cor 10:5.

Preview of coming distractions next week: Part 7 revisits the whole story, to solidify what you've heard; but at the end, focuses on the MISTRIAL strategy of Satan, to show how Satan & Co. and all world history, are affected by EACH of us during our little lives down here.

The MISTRIAL strategy is covered in Job 1 and Job 2, Matthew 4, 16:18 (Christ INVENTING Church to answer Satan's Mistrial contention), Matt22-24 (Vashti Israel 'rescued' by Church 'Esther'), John 17 (Church completion is a BODY criterion determined by Father, not a set Time criterion as applied pre-Church), Ephesians (esp. 1 and 5-6, on the battle of Church history), 1Thessalonians 4 and 5 (how to live), Romans 9-11(what's happening to Israel during Church), all of Rev 1-3 (Church now vs. later Trib and Mill, Play #1 in John's quadrilogy), 9, 12-13. Rev 9-13 is Trib mid-point: Satan thinks he's FINALLY got enough world control, to achieve a decisive Trial victory.

Part 7 is very long, for we'll take a trip into the COVENANTS beginning with that of the angels, to show how COVENANTS OF ASSOCIATION make for a very happy relationship, and are never about doing good deeds. The Covenant Change to Church will end that Part. Will probably post only a header video with the other 30 subparts in audio links of that video's description (yes, 30, ouch). Idea is to show how the Covenants demonstrate Trial arguments and provisions, so you can see how Church's Covenant is light-years higher than the OT, and how it reflects Christ, how it defeats Satan in the Trial. Master writeup on this topic is the Lord v Satan series, starting at LordvSatan1.htm. It will take maybe a year to read. Shorter incomplete 'novel' version of the same story, is downloadable at PDR.pdf. Do write a chapter on yourself. :)

Part 8 will go back into the nitty gritty of our 'now' (Bible keyword for Church Age), how we interact with each other and within our own lives, to flesh out the panoramic picture. So think of life as split-screen TV. You're the star of your own little movie down here with beings watching from above, and you also are watching the live movie in heaven.. via Bible.


GD6i Mindset as King!

Conclusion of Part 6, and addendum to Part 6c-6f summary of the Seven Thinking Skills of the Christian as King In Training. This alone glorifies Christ, for it's what HE did. And He did it, not of his own power, but under the Spirit, John 7, 14. So it's GOD DEEDs, never good deeds. Thus you bless the world — again, not of your power, but God blesses the world due to your learning Him VIA the Spirit, Leviticus 26.

But the root and crowning reason for all of this is FELLOWSHIP, Phili3:10-14, and Heb12:2. Togetherness, flat! And Flattened! In Him With Him All Prepositions Him. Which happens, as you grow in Kingly Thinking as He had done. Then you too like Paul (who was crowned, 2Tim4:7-8) will begin to think, 'Living, Christ! Dying, Profit!' (Phili 1:21, corr trans from the Greek). This is the lesson and the happiness Satan never quite learned. So, he's beaten in the Trial, yet again. But God's not out to beat him, but to wake him up to what he's missing. Romans 11:11, writ large. For God is NEVER willing that anyone should perish, 2Pet 3:9.

So it's a better good deed than all the good deeds Satan can even hallucinate accomplishing, on this planet and for all time.

Meanwhile, all those drooling baby Christians so proud of their works, are busy serving Satan, reaping heaps of wood hay and stubble at the Judgment Seat of Christ.


GD7a Church Witness

So how does Church demonstrate Satan's wrong, in the Trial? In this Part 7, we'll begin to see the issues which are central. 7d will show the meaning of MISTRIAL, which is the heart of Satan's contention, that God is manipulating EVIDENCE: it's been his complaint since Genesis, and with the INTRODUCTION of Church By Christ in Matt16:18, that complaint hits a fever pitch. Then in 7e (which is in 30 parts, sorry), we'll see how his trial claim has been demonstrated wrong in the past, and how Church covenant came to be, where it differs from the past .. and, from the future.

Meanwhile, let's start with today. What is our witness today, in what legal context? For we are on Divine Television, just as Job was, whether we are mature.. or not. And if not, Satan demands the Rapture happen TOO EARLY. But he can't win his point, if enough of us are still learning God. Aha.

This was how I started the webpage series this audio covers. If you'd rather read than hear, then start with LordvSatan1.htm, to get an overview of the Trial issues NOW (=keyword for Church Age, in Bible). Part II of that webseries takes you back to the beginning of time and then wends forward back to Church, then forward again to the Mill. Will take a year to read and vet all that material, hence I'm trying to condense its main topics in audio now.

A mock novel about the same story, is in PDR.pdf. If you'd rather Word doc version, just replace the 'pdf' with 'doc'. Novel is unfinished, so you can learn enough from its first five chapters and then write a chapter on yourself. :)

ERRATUM: at 18:20ff I was guessing what chapter in Genesis was the one about Abraham and Isaac. I recalled it as Genesis 22, but rejected that in favor of Genesis 26 or 27. But Genesis 22 was correct, and I should have said so. :)


GD7b Church Witness, cont.

Flipside of the higher spiritual life we get in Christ, is a lower low, if we reject it: theme of Hebrews 2's warning not to 'neglect our so-great salvation'. That's a running thread in the book (repeated in Chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12). Meaning, as Royal Family of God you get far more than Abraham could have had, in knowing Christ. So if you don't get in and stay in God's System (see my 'God's System' video), you will be far more miserable than anyone in the OT could ever be.

RHIP: Rank has its privileges, and also its penalties. Here we learn the penalty side, as well as what 'witness' is afforded to Satan &Co. and to the angels watching us on Divine Television.


GD7c Church Witness, cont.

Still on the dark side of our oh-so-high spiritual life, and being on Divine Television: what we learn about Christ — or not — determines Trial outcome. And oh yes, Satan can win; you'll see why, in 7d.


GD7d Church Witness: RAPTURE MISTRIAL?

Climactic Part of 7, HEART OF THE TRIAL, with added audio links below in this description: for WHY is Rapture pre-Trib? Because ALL HISTORY CAN END if Church doesn't complete, Heb 11:39-40; it won't complete, if Church becomes so apostate, it must be excised from the Earth in order to preserve the Human Race. That's what Paul is talking about, in Romans 11 when he warns the Romans that, just as Israel was cut off, so Church can be. What? Yeah, it's a topic no one covers, but should.

For if Church can get cut out, then History cannot complete, Hebrews 11:39-40. God then would NOT be fulfilling His Promise to Christ; Satan would win. To understand this, we have to go back to Job to see how MISTRIAL (google on that term) is a strategic argument Satan has been making, to claim God unfairly sentenced him and his fallen angels — and by extrapolation, unbelieving humans — to the Lake of Fire. MISTRIAL is a claim that the prosecution has TAMPERED with EVIDENCE (i.e., bribing a witness, as Satan accused God of doing to Job).

How does that problem apply here? Well, Christ in Matthew 16:18, asked for FUTURE souls, who HE WOULD ALSO PAY FOR IN ADVANCE. That's tantamount to saying you have a witness somewhere outside your legal jurisdiction. Well and good: but then you must PRODUCE that witness, or your evidence is bogus or even contrived. This was the theme of the movie 'Fracture' starring Anthony Hopkins and Ryan Gosling; it was the theme of the OJ Simpson Trial, and the reason why OJ was allowed to go free. Whether he was guilty or not.

CHURCH doesn't yet exist wholly. It is in the process of being built. So if the souls paid for 2000 years ago don't come to exist as advertised ON the Cross (which we didn't see, but the angels did, and everyone is in the Book of Life IN ADVANCE) — then Satan wins, the Rapture must happen at the WRONG time, and many other upsets occur. SAME ISSUE as applied pre-Christ, for then the EVIDENCE was PROMISED that He WOULD COME TO EXIST. But didn't exist. Yet. Then HE had to COMPLETE, which He did. But for a long time, history COULD have ended, but for enough believers VOTING TO LEARN GOD. Like, Job.

See the parallel, for Church? Okay, Christ came as Promised, Completed as Promised, but then INTRODUCES A NEW BODY OF EVIDENCE to prolong Time, knowing Israel would reject Him — evidence which also doesn't exist yet? Whoa. Grounds for Mistrial, if this NEW PROMISE, doesn't complete!

So this audio goes through all that. Longer writeup on it is in my Lvs4a.htm — all of Part IV is dedicated to this topic of Mistrial. It was introduced in Part II: just search on 'mistrial' to find it.

Part 7e will follow, to show how this MISTRIAL issue determined the covenants provided, through the Millennium. The actual video portion will be 7e1, and in its video description will be the other 29 (yikes) parts. You can instead read the issues now, in LordvSatan2.htm#CovG. If your eyes glaze over, then start back in LordvSatan2.htm#CovProps. Sorry it's so long, but the issues are many and complex. Not really hard to understand, but yes tedious to read.


GD7e Church Covenant Properties (see description)

31-part audio conclusion to Episode 7 (links below): God's Covenants are of ASSOCIATION. Trial terms affect how His Covenants with mankind a) are structured, and b) change. Trial ARGUMENTS are learned by means of tracking the changes. Moreover, a covenant which is broken thus leaves unresolved provisions which didn't complete; so the incomplete parts carry over into each successor covenant (jurisprudence requirement of consistency). By tracing the flow of the changes, therefore, one learns much about both the trial and about the covenants themselves.

As you'd expect, the real explanation of these covenants and their changing properties, would be lengthy. Explanation begins in writing at LordvSatan2.htm, and runs maybe 1000 printed pages, ending at LordvSatan5.htm; analysis of covenant 'flow' and hence change is summarized beginning at LordvSatan2.htm#CovG. Took me years to compile and distill, so it isn't simple. But it does work with what you know, and you'll have to mull it all over, if you're even supposed to read it.

A shorter, pithier version of the difference in OUR Bridal contract, is here: LvS4aContinued.htm#Bridal.

So I tried to condense all this material into mere highlights that focus on COMMUNICATION — for the covenants are of ASSOCIATION — in the audio below. But still it took me 30 more parts to say! Frankly I prefer the written material, but maybe you'll like the audio below...


GD8a Bible over Body

Audio-only. Now we switch gears into the daily grind: how does the Trial play upon your life? Well, the very nanosecond you first believe in Christ, some demon is deployed to make sure you get off on the wrong foot, into apostate ideas of what 'born again' even means, so to divorce you from the true spiritual life of LEARN AND LIVE ON BIBLE.

The demons are out to substitute out learning and living on Bible; and substitute IN, people-emphasis. Do stuff. But all a baby can do, is doo-doo. Yeah, and you get into doo-doo with God when you go the typical Christian route. So before you die, Christian living HAS BEEN, doo-doo.

So this chatty episode sketches out the Body Over Bible problem new believers face. The problem never goes away. Trick is to reverse that natural inclination, by getting and staying in 'God's System' (see my video with that title). It aint easy!


GD8b Bible Over Body, cont.

Audio-only, continued from 8a. Since Hebrews 10:5 and Matthew 4:4 produce Philippians 2:5-10, and 2Cor10:5, the demon boys don't want us Christians knowing these facts; so Christianity universally gets diverted into works and divorced from the Word, in God's Own Name! Aha!

This daily battle can only be countered by living in God's System, and refusing to 'go along' with the suddenly-many 'Christian friends' who want you to go apostate like they are, 2Tim2:26-3:7. 'Avoid them', warned Paul in 2Tim3:5.

Kinda like Samson and Delilah, actually...


GD8c Bible over Body, cont.

Audio-only, continued from 8b. GOD HEARS, Matthew 4:4, always occurring, to Omniscience! Precious Moments, to Him, lasting forever to Omniscience! Associating Bible with Body to learn God, just like Christ did at Birth, Heb 10:5!


GD8d Bible vs. Body ADDICTION

Audio-only, continued from 8c. Good Deeds are addictive. So is learning God. :) Which addiction makes one happy?


GD9a The Blame Game

Continued from Episode 8's focus on the daily grind: now, focus is on the inner and outer 'blame game' played in your soul; and outwardlly, to and from the world. This repeats the Trial Satan underwent, pre-Fall. Same test Christ faced. Satan lost, Christ won, but uh.. Christ is God-man. So Satan contends we mere sinner humans can't pass the test like Christ did. For us, the issue is not perfection, but staying the course, 2Tim4:7-8, Heb 11 and 12:2, Eph 4:12-16, 3:15-19 being the hardest part of it, as Paul reports in 2 Cor12:9-10. WEAKNESS. MATURATION IN WEAKNESS.

You become 'weak' as you know God more, because your standards change. You begin to see God more and more as He really is, and the more you see, the more you hate yourself. So the test changes: do you cave into false ideas of righteousness like 99.9% of Christianity, with its focus on popularity, being respectable, the 'world' looking at you? Or do you truck on, learning and living on Bible, which no one sees, and less than no one.. values?

Here in 9a, it's mostly an inner battle of you versus you. Will God become even more important than your own shortcomings, as you progressively gain in keen awareness of how great HE is? Will HIS importance 'trump' your own self-loathing? It's the same as Psalm 22:6, 2Cor12:9-10.

In 9b we'll look at the broader picture, because the door swings both ways. Here you are, loathing yourself the more you know Him; but at the same time, the world becomes more obviously PUNY to you, and especially the self-righteous Christians in it, who think they are spiritual giants, instead of the pygmies they really are. So how do you put up with that, too? See: it really is the hardest way to live, you're being put on the mental 'rack', pulled in all directions, with the goal to make you QUIT THE COURSE and CAVE INTO the world's (really Satan's) ideas of 'righteousness'.

God's Deed of PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP, versus (Satan's) your 'good deed' of PERFORMANCE. That's the issue, in the Trial. Fought every moment, in your own soul and with yourself. Conquered only by, Philippians 3:13-14, forgetting it and moving on in favor of SEEING GOD. A kind of KOKO due to focus on Him. For when you're weak, then He's strong: His Power is completed (English legal verb 'perfected') IN YOUR WEAKNESS, 2Cor12:9's Greek.

This is the maturation lesson which Christianity never understands, as it equates spirituality with popularity. So no one 'got it' when Christ went to the Cross. So no one 'gets it' now, that this is the same course of maturation, for the Christian. WWJD! What Word Jesus Dianoia'd!


GD9b The Blame Game, II

Continued from 9a, here with a focus on the other side of the Blame Game: how a growing believer is ever more tempted to be irritated at those spiritually younger; and they, at him. This happens because his standards are changing to become like God's. LIKE, not the same as.

This is where Satan messed up, too. Until one completes in getting God's standards in his head, the irritation at the growing awareness of the difference between God's standards and one's own, between God's standards and the world — magnifies.

It's like a bell curve. The idea is to break you. Each believer hits his breakpoint, and either at that point chooses to stay the course, or to quit. 'Quit' doesn't mean a temporary lapse. It's permanent. A person reaches a point of no return, and quits God's Growth Plan in favor of a substitute. It's a marathon race.


God Deeds, 10a: Impact!

Episode 10 now answers Satan's taunt, just as he made to Job. The real taunt is far wider. ANY growing believer, whether mature or not, is a source of blessing to the world. Why? Why Leviticus 26 and Deut 28, on which the whole world, hangs? How could an African woman living in a thatched hut with a dirt floor, understand Deut 28 well enough to run for political office based on it (PBS or Frontline series from about 6 years ago)?

Salt of the earth, baby. And why? Well, for WHOM are you supposed to do your good deeds? What's the First Commandment? And if HE is pleased (Hebrews 11:6!) — how big is HIS Pleasure? So wouldn't any resultant blessing HE ordains, befit HIS size, never mind yours?

And Whose Good Deeds are better? The impact of just learning and living on Bible versus all the doo-dooers, is again covered here from another Trial perspective. Real impact, really right now.

Ergo, the IMPACT of your learning and living on Bible, is huge. And it's all 100% God's Deed, never yours. Impact, as in asteroid hitting. Impact, as in making an impression on history. Impact, as in how YOU are hit. Impact, as in import. And of course, all the value is imported from to through God.. in your name.

After all, the doo-dooers are doo-dooing in God's Name, so He does stuff with HIS power in your name. For which, you are rewarded at the Judgment Seat, 1Cor 3. For which, you did absolutely NOTHING on your own power. So no doo-doo.


GD10b Impact!

Continued from 10a, the real Trial Impact of your little life just learning and living on Bible, versus all those popular Christians around you with their babyish doo-dooing that the world drools over, constantly giving into the Three Temptations that Christ Refused.

So, they will be refused awards but their works will be burned up, last half 2 Peter, 1Cor3. Ooops.


GD10c Legacy

Audio-only, continued. Now we come full-circle: what is the LEGACY of the God-deeder? The thinking pattern we saw, back in Episode 6. In Episode 7, the covenantal properties were sweepingly covered in the 31 audio segments in that Episode's description. Daily-use application of the Trial doctrine, was highlighted in Episodes 8 and 9. Here in 10, the Battle, Impact and now the Legacy of all that Episode 6 thinking pattern, is answered.

For what God does to you, you will be rewarded. For what you do yourself, you will also be rewarded. So here the rewards are compared, in light of 10a and 10b: those who did works, are rewarded with an eternity of more works. Those who did WORD, are rewarded with Kingship, since Kingship means WORDS. That's what kings do. Think words. Talk words. Live out those Words, like the Word did, when He was down here, Way TRUTH Life, Matthew 4:4 always occurring. Word in your head, His Words in your words, 1Cor1:5, 2Cor10:5, 1Cor2:16, Phili2:5-10, Eph3:15-19, Romans 12:1-3, goal of Eph4:13.

Body gets body rewards; saved, yet all the works are burned up, 1Cor3, 2Pet3, Phili3:18-19. Soul gets soul rewards, 1Cor2:16, Eph3:15-19, 2Tim4:7-8. Souls think, an executive function. Bodies do, a peasant function Satan would very much like us to emulate. So, every religion on the planet proselytizes for morality and works. So when Christians fall for that 3-Temptation ploy as well — feed bellies, be splashy, be political — they look just like every other religion. God therefore is sidelined, and no one looks to HIM for solutions. Zech 7:5, All in His Name, of course!

Ouch.


GD10d Legacy, cont.

Audio-only, cont. Whoa, ETERNAL KINGSHIP? For just studying Bible, not doing anything for the world? God will bless the world, solely because you're learning His Word? HOW FAIR IS THAT?

Yeah, that's WWJD, What Word Jesus Did, Dianoia'd, as shown in Matthew 4:4. Commanded by God back then, in Deut 8:3, which in 4:4, Christ quotes — IN LIEU OF making a world of gingerbread so the world can eat. Different Bread, must come first.

Aha. So Hebrews 11:1 and 11:6: ever since Adam, the Trial was about BELIEVING in WORD. For 'faith' means 'Contract', the CONTENT of a CONTRACT on deposit in a temple, guarded by 'the gods'. That's the Greek meaning of the term 'pistis', which is a commercial word, look it up in TDNT (aka Big Kittel). So the Word of God is a contract, on deposit in Christ from eternity past. That's the contract, to make sons from THE Son, Isaiah 53:11, which becomes the New Covenant, Word Written in Hearts and Minds, then Minds and Hearts, then Hearts and Minds, Hebrews 8:8-10:17 (reversing the order of the Jeremiah 31:31-34 quote, in Hebrews 10:15-17 ON PURPOSE).

Whoa.


GD10e Legacy (end)

Audio-only, continued from 10d, the climactic conclusion to Episode 10. In Episode 11 we'll examine the question, Is God Arbitrary? That brings us full-circle from Episode 6c-e plus 6i, on the Seven Kingly Thinking Skills; for they all come to bear, in Episodes 11-12, which are about God's ARBITRARY LOVE.. On Trial.

Sweetheart Soap Links: https://www.google.com/search?q=Sweetheart+Soap&tbm=isch, and click on the last mini picture at the bottom of the page of this link, to see a sample of the sequins etc. we kids used to put on that soap (well, the picture is after my time, so is more fancy than I had as a kid):

https://www.etsy.com/listing/48212677/vintage-sweetheart-soap-decorating-kit

What I remember, is displayed in this old Google copy of the advertisement: The Spokesman-Review - Oct 26, 1963

I remember pink bars. Yikes.

Life Cereal commercial: • Life Cereal Commercial with Mikey


GD11a Is God's Love Arbitrary, or Absolute?

Introduction to the very long Episode 11, with a frank admission that our God story is VERY WEIRD. Focus starts with a brief review of His Design Philosophy and Part 7's Trial issue, with the heart of it being the Trial of God's Character.

That Character, it must be admitted, is WEIRD. Almighty God, creates pee? Talking reptiles, a naked guy running around a huge park the size of the Middle East for who knows how many years, with billions of angels watching — because, their very fate hangs on this naked guy?

Either this Bible was the invention of people who belong in an insane asylum, or this God is .. well, Absolute, to Whom nothing is too small. And therefore, Who never wanted the creatures to 'do' for Him. But then, why make such low beings?

This topic was the impetus for my Thinking Series webpages, starting with LordvSatan1.htm. So if you prefer reading to hearing, try the webpages instead. They are all well organized to fit together, but the reading will take months!


GD11b Is God Arbitrary?

Arbitrary versus Absolute question now turns to WHO is being Arbitrary, to set up the balance of Episode 11, which is quite long. Here, like Cain with his vegetable sacrifice, the question of who is arbitrary — our idea of what God should accept versus His Own idea — is examined.


GD11c Is God Arbitrary re Bible?

Audio-only, Continued from 11b, with the same static verses (so you don't have to watch the screen). At issue: how FAIR is it, for GOD to make Bible a criterion for pleasing Him, versus what helps the world? This is the heart of the 3 Temptations in Matt4. In other words, why does God count reading a book of far greater value than doing works for mankind?

Years ago, I wrote a deliberately off-beat poem on this topic, mentioned in the video. It encapsulates mankind's and Satan's arguments against learning Bible. Poem is entitled, 'It's All Your Fault, God!' : CapGod-fault.htm. The double-entendres and occasional meter syncopations are deliberate. Whether they are competently placed, well.. you decide.


GD11c Is God Arbitrary re Bible?

Audio-only, continued from 11c: now we get into HOW YOU BECOME BETTER as a result of learning and living on Bible, in terms the world respects. Irony of never becoming a better person, Romans 7; but on the other hand, becoming more competent than a genius human. Whaaa????

For what it's worth, my pastor spent seven whopping years of 7-hours-per-week Bible classes to explain all this, in his 1985 Ephesians series (available for free at rbthieme.org). So you'll forgive me, if it takes this hour and the next (Episode 11e) to explain the idea.. okay?

Massive explanation is in LvS4a.htm. For at Satan's end, the Trial is about PERFORMANCE. So God bests him by showing how, even in our uttermost uselessness and weakness, we 'perform' better than anything Satan can achieve. Yet, remain totally worthless at all times. Yikes!

Warning: people tell me the LordvSatan stuff is addictive. It will take you many months to read; a whole year, if you start at LordvSatan1.htm. The series is about the Trial, took me 10 years to write (four years initial, balance editing and clarifying). So I hope you'll forgive me if I have little patience for folks who insist that there is no Angelic Trial, or that Satan's out to make us sin gross sins, or that the pre-Trib Rapture's invalid. So if you're one of those folks and you spew unstudied nonsense in my videos, I'll just ignore you. DO YOUR HOMEWORK, because these issues are real. If it took my pastor 7 whopping years of almost-daily Bible classes to teach all this, and me 10 years to write it up, there is a LOT of BIBLE material to support the 'interpretation'. All of it, in fact, fits together perfectly, once you understand the Trial.

Like it or lump it, we are in a far more sophisticated Trial about GOOD DEEDS, than any Christian really knows. Don't be clueless like they are, crusading over stuff in the world, like how evil the media is, or politics, etc. ad nauseum. That's the Third Temptation in Matt 4, and Satan just hooked you!


GD11f1 Anti-semitism = Incompetence

Side trip, still subset of 'Is God Arbitrary to make His Standard of 'Good', Learning and Living on Bible?'. The side trip demonstrates how Christianity is fundamentally anti-semitic, hence is incompetent in reading Bible; how Satan grooms the human race to be anti-semitic also, which creates incompetence in everything we do and think, so they have to 'bless' us with a demonic competence, lest their goals go unmet.

This topic will continue through f2, and then the larger picture of the result, will be in f3 and subpart 11g. For the goal Satan wants, is WAR. Specifically, against the Jews. For that's God's Promise, the 1057 years remaining to them (7 years Trib, 1000 years Millennium, 50 years ending history signified in the Law as Jubilee).

Related webseries starts at LordvSatan1.htm, but the WAR and strategy focus start at LvS4a.htm. Very long, will take months to read.


GD11f1 Anti-semitism = Incompetence

Specific Examples of Theological Incompetence produced by embedded doctrinal anti-semitism. I don't know which is more embarrassing: the incompetence of the writers below, or the sickening praise of them, by later so-called 'godly' men. Truly the evidence of Christianity's puerile theology, is here for anyone to see.

Links for further reading, although the anti-semitism is so well known, you can instead merely Google.

Church Fathers: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.i.html

Pick just about anyone in the list, to read the incompetence; but Hegesippus (https://www.ccel.org/ccel/wace/biodict.html?term=Hegesippus%2C+father+of+church+history), Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Trypho (https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.viii.iv.html), John Chrysostom https://www.ccel.org/ccel/chrysostom?show=worksBy and https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/chrysostom-jews6.asp) demonstrate the completeness of both OT ignorance and anti-semitism.

That other 'Church Fathers' and later Christians praise these writings, tells you that the readers are even more incompetent than the writers. What a shame to us Christians, that we laud these vile and utterly Bible-ignorant, people!

For a history of pogroms carried out by the Catholic Church, there are handy mapped-to-time charts in Atlas of Bible and Christianity, edited by Tim Dowley, which you can buy at Amazon or preview in Google Books.

Anti-semitism was part of statecraft under Constantine. Go to https://www.fourthcentury.com/ and query on the laws passed during Constantine's time, just read down the list how anti-semitic those laws become.

John Calvin's Institutes: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.toc.html

His Daniel 9 commentary (https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom25) is rife with anti-semitism. How anyone can praise his extreme incompetence at counting and theology, is quite beyond me. The guy couldn't add 1+1 if you paid him.

My 'Calvin's Poison' video (which is also in this same SatStrat playlist), and the Contra Calvinism playlist (after Episode 12) also have links in the video descriptions which demonstrate Calvin's extreme doctrinal incompetence; he couldn't even get the Gospel right (Institutes, II) . The videos themselves quote from the Institutes and his other writings, to show he cannot read Bible well. That is the penalty, 'strong delusion'.

Luther: there are many internet links, but few to actual source material on Luther's antisemitism you can read yourself in his own words. This seemed the most complete source I could find: http://jdstone.org/cr/pages/sss_mluther.html. If you find a better one, let me know.

11f1 mentioned how David Duke, a public anti-semite, uses the CORRECT Bible Doctrine that there is no human life in the womb, to foment anti-semitism among prolifers: http://www.davidduke.com/?p=3618.

More obvious examples of incompetence and anti-semitism abound, like the so-called Bilderberg conspiracy, the so-called Khazars (which required CONGRESS to get involved to prove it a lie), and many variations on these.

See, if you're anti-semitic, competence goes right out the window, and your brain turns to mush. If you value your sanity at all, do NOT believe in any doctrine which directly or indirectly disparages the Jews.


GD11f3 Antisemitism is Fixation

Roots of Anti-semitism examined, how Satan traps us: take a truth, such as the fact that the Jews are indeed God's Chosen People — and bang the drum on it. So, everyone is a wannabe Jew, or jealous and resentful for not being a Jew.

But uh — what IS a "Jew". Well, the Bible says anyone who has Abraham's genes. Well, who is that? Could be 50% of the world's population, by now! For how many Jews were raped, carried off, pogromized such that they hid their Jewishness, in order to survive?

Second definition: anyone who CONVERTED like Abraham did. For Abraham wasn't a Jew. He BELIEVED in the Lord, signified by circumcision — and thus BECAME the first Jew by God's supernatural act. Even so, anyone in the OT who believed in Messiah also converted. So then circumcised, and is therefore Jewish. Bible is real plain on that. At the Exodus, 'mixed multitudes' left with Jacob's progeny, and they all converted. Obviously. Scholars estimate six million (2 million adults, figuring two kids each, which is conservative) — back THEN, 1440 BC. If you know anything about population science, that could turn into be hundreds of millions, by now. Maybe in the billions, depending on the reproduction rate.

Ooops. So the anti-semite, might himself be Jewish racially, because surely those 'mixed multitudes, intermarried with racial Jews! Yikes! See how stupid it is, to be anti-semitic?

And that's even before we count Abraham's other sons, Ishmael and Esau (grandson, the latter). The promise is to ABRAHAM. So anyone from his loins, or who did what he did, Gen 15:6...

Abraham reference at 4:36 — he was born 'our' 2160 BC, reached supermaturity (age 100) in 2060. Years from Adam, 1946 post-Adam's fall born, 2046 mature.

That's why the 54-year credit giving rise to the Rapture accounting as pre-Trib: Abraham matured before Gentile time had ended. Mary is accounting by the 54 years, and so is Paul, in the NT. Pre-Church, the Millennium was supposed to begin in 'our' 94 AD; that would have made up the 54-year credit (which turned into 57, owing to the 3.5 year delay in building the temple post David's Death, 1Kings 6:1).

So that's why Revelation had to be written, to explain why the Rapture didn't 'dovetail' with the pre-Church schedule, John's meter playing on Paul's. I covered all that in the GGS 10-11 playlist, if you want details and live proof of the meter in the Greek.


GD11f4 Antisemitism's Mass Appeal

Tracing how Satan uses antisemitism to create war; it starts with his appeal to the masses, and the psychology of mass appeal. For to war, you need the masses, as cannon fodder and ballast.

This theme continues through 11g. Antisemitism is a psychological conditioning that must have a willing volition to develop. It takes time, and since Satan can't really control the human race, he's constantly 'seeding' anti-semitism, because his big goal is Revelation 12. Technically, that actually happens at the mid-point in the Tribulation, but Satan's constantly angling for it now.

It revolves around the Temple, so Revelation 11 precedes 12. Satan's been trying to get the Temple rebuilt because it should NOT be rebuilt, even as he tried to tear it down during the time it was standing, because back then, it was SUPPOSED to stand. See the pattern?

This tests everyone's knowledge of Bible. So when we go negative, war happens. And it will, by 2030 or prior. All the psychological underpinnings for war are following the same trends now, as pre-WWI. Remember, just prior to WWI there was an unprecedented world prosperity, relative to recent contemporaneous history. So too, now. That's used to create all kinds of dissatisfactions, which lead to war. Anti-semitism is used to DIRECT the dissatisfactions against the Jews, in order to wipe them out. Centralizing them is key to this, so Temple Rebuilding now, is a centralizing tendency.

The history of Satan trying to get the Temple rebuilt, is well known and surprisingly underanalyzed. I tried to highlight the history in LvS4a.htm#DomeWall; also search on "So Revelation 1-3, 6-17 Run and Reign as Trends, to Depict Dan9:26c' and read that section.


GD11f5 Antisemitism, prelude to WAR

So now let's amalgamate this Part 11f, to see where it leads.. to war. As you listen, see if you can use the information from the prior subepisodes, to detect the whys.

Lead webpage on this is Part IV of my Lord versus Satan series, LvS4a.htm being the start of that section. It runs for about 1000 pages printed, I'm afraid. Part 4A focuses on Antecedents (precedence from the OT), 4B focuses on the BODY criterion for the Rapture (which my pastor tried to quantify during his last 10 years of teaching); Part 4C focuses on the Conflict (relevant to this 11f), and Part 4D relates to the believer's Destiny as a result of growing up in Christ.

It's VERY political. That's the bad news. The good news, is that it's the way to grow in Christ, to really KNOW Him intimately. So God uses this Conflict to make us grow in His Son. So far from being a case of 'Christian unity' with each other, it's really a political war over which 'version' of Christianity, will get mass attention. As always, the APOSTATE versions are popular. So as always, from Genesis to Revelation, it's only the FEW 'invisible heroes' (my pastor's term) who win it for the world.

The Conflict is inevitable. Learning Christ through it, is optional. Most don't want Him, except to splash His Name all over what THEY want to do.


GD11h1 War for Independence

How people become anti-semitic, is rooted in how we live: live on hearsay, never grow up. Live on learning to be independent, and only then grow up. Ahhh, but you have to FIGHT to become independent, because you start out a dependent BABY, living on hearsay. And you are rewarded, for doing it.

Yikes. So throughout 11h, we'll go through the kinds of war that 'life' is, that 'spiritual life' is, because by waging these daily wars, 'the big one' forecast in 11g, can be delayed or diluted or forestalled.

The Christian is the only one who can fight these wars, and it plays like it did with David and Goliath: the battle is the Lord's.

Even so, warring is training, and there are distinct methods you can use to train. But here in h1, we just look at the problem of the War for Independence.


GD11h2 War for Independence, cont.

Battlefields: in yourself, with others, and especially the weight of knowing your importance, makes for weary fighting. Day after Day after Day. Battle of the small, the small-minded, the small sins, the small goods. In the head. Far higher than what Christians think 'fighting for Christ', means.

Master webpages on this fight begin at LvS4c.htm. 4b was on the numbers needed for Church to complete (and why that criterion), 4a was on the Antecedence of the OT being carried on and updated in the NT. 4d is on your Destiny: and Destiny is your chief weapon, a perspective you'll need, to fight. Because this, is a war of ATTRITION, fighting WEAKNESS by allowing it to exist. Just like Christ on the Cross, who did nothing, but allowed it all to Hit Him.

Killer life, for your whole life. 2Cor12:9-10, actually.


GD11h3 War on YOUR Television!

So now the War for Independence, which is fought in the head no one can see: really? Reminder from Episode 8, here, about how the Unseen (Hebrews 11) is on Divine Television. Yours. For whether God's Arbitrariness is Absolute, is played out in your own life.

Why doesn't God interfere to 'save', sometimes? Why, when He does interfere, DOES He interfere? And do you want God when He doesn't interfere? And, when He does? These are the real issues, 'masked' as it were by the physical banalities which dominate our days. The visible part of the war, is just the banal: taking out the trash, drafting an email, sitting in a meeting, stuck in traffic. But what goes on in the head despite those banalities which after all don't need to be there, since God can do anything — what think ye of Christ?

Why didn't Christ rebel at the low life He lived? He too had to eat, pee. Those things even preceded sin. Why did God create life this way? Why didn't Christ rebel at that design? Why, as God, did He CREATE that design, Genesis 1:1 and 45:7-19?

Aha. Now you know why you are on Divine Television.

BTW, the verse mentioned in Peter at minute 4:55, is 1 Peter 1:12: I reversed the digits, in the audio.


GD11i1 War Training

So in your War on Television for Independence, how do you train? The rest of Episode 11's segments, focuses on the training.


GD11i2 War Training Role Play

So now let's get practical and examine ways you can 'role play' how to train for war. Of course, the new even more ugly Youtube channel design being FORCED on us, will give you even more practice in role play of 'worst nightmare', side by side with Microsoft's tyrannical Windows 8...


GD11i3 Role Play, See Thru His Eyes

One of the best ways to win in the War for Independence, is not to fight. After all, the Battle is the Lord's, not yours. So you fight, by learning and living on Bible. Okay, but what does that mean? Well, what are you learning it FOR? To see God.

Okay, then. Using whatever Bible you've learned, PRACTICE seeing things through God's Eyes. How does what YOU see, look to HIM?


GD11i4 War Training Role Play, cont: Your Dream

Role Play your worst nightmare coupled with your dream come true. For that is where God intends to lead you, as you mature.

This happened to every Bible hero, as you'll see if you review their lives, in Bible. Most notably, to Christ: His Dream Come True was total Unity with Father, and to make us one with Them, see John 17. It was also His Worst Nightmare, see Hebrews 12:2 and the verse in Gospels where He says He longed for the Cross just before Passover.

So that's why every Bible hero had an ending which COMBINED the worst nightmare and dream come true; for it's the ultimate High Low "MERGE" (my pastor's term), idea of filling all in all, Eph 1:15-23. All the high, all the low.

Now as any policeman, salesman, pianist, dancer, golfer or actor can tell you, you gotta PRACTICE the hypothetical situations; so that when they actually arise, you are already familiar with the variables. How much more true, in the spiritual life?

So what is YOUR dream come true? Your worst nightmare? How do they JOIN together? Play it out, using Bible!


GD11i5 War Role Play, inside others' heads

Part of War Training is to practice thinking like someone else, be it your patrol commander, the general, even your enemy. Or, the guy next door.

So how do you do that? How to understand how someone else, thinks? I don't provide answers in this segment, but only explore the question.


GD11i6 Daily Tactical Strategy

Since God knows the end from the beginning, He's unlike us: He's in it for the PROCESS, not the goal. Each goal met, sets up the next goal. Like, TODAY: what goal for today, sets the potential for tomorrow. So in the War for Independence, the role play takes on an urgency which of cours the impending Rapture reinforces: what about TODAY?

So notice how heaven is no longer used as an excuse for daydreaming, how the past no longer has the same value, how the future is rooted in TODAY, so TODAY matters the most, Hebrews 3-4.

So how to handle, TODAY?


GD11i7 Grand Strategy

Power versus Love: Satan's all about power, but God is all about Love. So Satan claims God's Love is arbitrary, because Satan projects his power philosophy over God and thinks God is motivated in the same way (same claim as Satan made in Genesis 3).

So here we explore whether power really works, or whether and how Love really works, to see the Grand Strategy toward which your daily tactical strategy of learning and living on Bible, aims.


GD11i8 YOUR Grand Strategy?

So now you know God's Grand Strategy, Love over Power, that the Love of God is the Integrity of God, and so the Love is the Real Power, which LOVES Righteousness and Justice, Psalm 89.

So now, what is YOUR OWN Grand Strategy? We Christians are so often bombarded with God this and God that, we are bombarded with the idea that it's ipse evil to think of self, that we don't self-analyze our own motives, but just cave into the herdbound mantra of 'obey God'.

But WHY do that? Why be a Christian? Why believe in God? Why do YOU — forget what others say — why do YOU want to do that?

Chances are, if you role-play the answer, for at least the first 10 minutes, your answers will but parrot all the things you think you're SUPPOSED TO say as your reasons, rather than the real reasons. So do through that role-play. Write or talk aloud (or to yourself) about YOUR OWN reasons for believing, and for wanting God. After you get past the stereotypical answers your soul will spew up due to hearing others' opinions for so long, you'll eventually find your own real reasons. At that point, you'll have your own, Grand Strategy.

So in this audio I go through mine, as a kind of poster-boy sample. But this audio won't do you any good, unless and until you do the same, in your own soul. For no one grows up in the spiritual life — and indeed, there's no point in even having a spiritual life — without coming to grips with one's own, real motives and goals.

For ultimately, it's not about right and wrong, but about what you want and why you want it. Love is a WILL. So, what's yours?


GD11i9 Grand Oneness?

How the paradoxical nature of Righteousness ends up as the basis for John 17; how God's Arbitrary aka Absolute Love for Righteousness means also absolute Love for all unrighteousness. How the test of the believer, is the 'cross' of having that same Love though perpetually unable to carry it out, 2 Cor 12:9-10, Romans 7, Romans 5:8-12 (and following).

It's one thing to say rah rah God and oh how we should be righteous, but quite another to live that way. Quite another still, when you're unable to actually carry out that standard, and when others, including even God, seemingly or really — abandon you.

God wants to join all the high to all the low, Eph 1:15-23, Isaiah 53:10-54:1. Living through that process, is a killer, but it effects the Grand Oneness — not because of some 'magic' that makes it happen, but solely because God flat DECREES it so. This, is ultimate Sovereignty, and is the hardest thing for anyone to understand.

Paradox of Righteousness is covered in SatStrat.htm#Paradox, first section. Also (shorter), LordvSatan5.htm#Paradox, and also Paradox.htm (much longer, focus is on the Trial arguments pan-Bible).

This is the heart of the Trial.


GD11i11 Grand Oneness, cont.

God Loves Righteousness, but His Definition is Full-Spectrum, so includes loving all unrighteousness, too. Huh? Well, what is Love, but a desire to benefit the object? How do you benefit unrighteousness? By making good on it. Thus all unrighteousness, is made ONE with God, too. So full-spectrum truth, including all truths of UNrighteousness, are unified. :)


GD11i12 Growing Pains

Grand Oneness is the Plan; Growing in that Oneness, means coming to love Righteousness as God does. Not, as Satan or as man does. What's the difference? Beginning here and throughout Episode 12, this question will be explored, as it is the centerpiece Trial Issue, on which all history and eternity, hangs.

Growing means pain. It's easy to mistake growing pains for other types of pain, so the definition of 'growing pains', begins here.


GD11i13 God's Theory of Everything

Spiritual Equivalent of Unified Field Theory, the 'pants' in physics, which eludes cosmologists: 'practice righteousness', theme of 1John.

But what does that mean? What is 'practice', and what is 'righteousness'? Well, when you're a spiritual newborn surrounded by other spiritual babies, you're told a lot of false stuff. But as you grow in Christ, part of the 'growing pains' (Episode 11i12) is that you UNlearn a lot. Then, re-learn the real Bible definitions.

So, basically you mature in what 'practice' means, and in what 'righteousness' means. In your head. So this video covers that.


GD11i14 How God Rescues Time

Now we see how 1 John's 'practicing righteousness' is God's Key to Redeeming Time.


GD11i15 How God Creates, Rescues Sons

God's Plan of Evolution, to make mini-Christs, John 10:34, contract of Isaiah 53:10-12, 1John3:2. Transformation of thinking from one's own into His, Romans 12:1-3, the true 'worship' of His Words in your words, theme of 1Cor (in Greek of 1Cor1:5). Learning and living on the Word of God, via the Holy Spirit, makes this 'renovation of your thinking', Romans 12:2, Eph4:23.

For God deserves EQUALS. So we are imputed with His Own Righteousness, 2Cor5:21, get His Own Life, John 3:16: but what THINKING to go with that new nature? 1Cor2:16, His Thinking. Aha. For every moment is a Singularity to God, Matt 4:4. Sucking in all the past, and thru it, birthing the future.

So all those ideas are explored here, since God's Agenda is far higher than mere good deeds even Satan can do. :)

Webpage exploration of this transformation, starts at DDNA.htm, and is extensive. A more entertaining, putative novel on the topic, is my PDR.pdf. Be sure to write a chapter on yourself. Since the pdf's intra-doc links don't work, if you want to access the links, download PDR.doc. Someday I'll find a way to fix the pdf.


GD11i16 Arbitrary Voting?

Conclusion to Episode 11, God's Arbitrary Standards of Love, Righteousness, Good: what's your vote? First half of audio is on God's Arbitrariness, since whatever is reality, He had to ordain, create, insure. Second half, is on the fact we are all in varying degrees of voting for or against, His Definitions.

So Episode 12 will next examine how His Love, His Definitions, are thus On Trial. In many ways we'll revisit all the topics in Episode 11, but with a focus on the Trial Play of those topics.


GD12a1 Love on Trial, Introduction

Now it's time to see how all this Warring over God's Arbitrary Love (theme of Episode 11) plays out, just as Hebrews 11 covers. Theme is set in Hebrews 11:1 (see my playlist on that verse, here: • b-out Hebrews 11:1 Exeg), with the witnesses in the Chapter, and the principle that only Word Believed pleases God, Hebrews 11:6.

If you pay close attention to the 'By faith' clauses in the Chapter, you'll realize immediately that Word Believed is the theme: WORD, not your faith itself, but what Word believed does to you, strengthening you to withstand all the trials of life. How WORD believed enabled the heroes mentioned in the Chapter. So the Chapter concludes with the fact that unless the Rapture occurs, they (the OT folk) will not be resurrected (Heb 11:39-40). For we have 'better things', and they will not resume 'apart from us' (being completed).

So why then has it taken so long for the Rapture to occur? Because, as Paul forecast in his meter of Ephesians 1:3-14, by Constantine's day, few were growing up in Christ. Such that, only a few believers in the last quarter of Church (Eph 1:13-14, see GGS 11a and following) would be maturing. So then, most are not growing up in Christ, but in their rituals, their works, their need for the world to approve them. So their Love On Trial is zero. Lots of believers, but all dying retarded, not finishing the Hebrews 11 course.

'Rest of this very long Episode 12 will cover those few. If you're trying to guess how many, see LvS4b.htm#Balancing, for various estimating methods.


GD12a2 Love On Trial, Intro, cont.

Flipside of 12a1 (at • GD12a1 Love on Trial, Introduction): since the verdict on Church is Flunk, as Paul so poignantly meters from Constantine forward in Ephesians 1:13-14, there must be kings. The 'kids' gotta have PARENTS, yikes! Forever.

So what if you 'finish the course' (2Tim4:7-8) and become one? What constitutes a successful finish, and kingship itself? Well, I don't know your own circumstances, so here I apply those questions to myself, and toward the end compare it with Bible heroes who, after all, just started out as quirky but ordinary, people. For any of us who vote to learn and live on Bible in God's System, God promises to MAKE a hero; so long as we keep on keepin' on...

So as you listen, replace 'my' data with your own, and then you'll know much more about how God is directing your life.. to a merging of YOUR OWN dream-come-true and worst nightmare.


GD12a3 Peas, then Dessert

LOVE ON TRIAL is essentially about the completion in you, of God's plan to unite your dream come true and worst nightmare; it can be summarized as the old 1950's aphorism Mom used to say at dinner, about cleaning your plate: first eat your veggies, then you get dessert. But does that mean there is any DESERVING of dessert? No. It's a lesson in good eating. :) This video is a continuation of Episode 12a2, here: • GD12a2 Love On Trial, Intro, cont.


GD12b1 LoveOnTrial: Waste! Weakness!

Introducing how Love is demonstrated most when Wasted, in Weakness (2Cor12:9-10). This will be the theme of subEpisode 12b.

Real proof of Love is what makes you weak, where you spend your time, etc. You can say 'I love you' until blue in the face, but if you won't spend TIME ON the alleged Object of your love, you don't love it. That's how I quickly know Christians hate Bible. They spend almost no time on it.

But they love religion, works, being around and getting praise from, people. And know God or Bible, very little. For what you love to spend time on, you learn much about. Versus what you hate spending time on (math, learning how your car works, calculating your taxes).. well, you get the point.

Nodding to God on Sunday means you hate God and only show up to be respectable. Sorry.

By contrast, look at how God made things: ENDLESS WEAKNESS AND LOWNESS HE SEES EVERY SECOND. Over which, He endlessly lingers. What would you call that? Love. Or, says Satan, masochism...


GD12b2 Love On Trial : Weakness! Waste! Cont.

Continued from • GD12b1 LoveOnTrial: Waste! Weakness! . Here we see how this Trial looks to God and the angels (1Peter1:12, ironic since I made the audio months ago, but am now posting vids on 1Peter1:1-12's meter)!

Basically, it's important that we are LOW and WEAK. We become important BECAUSE we are LOW and WEAK. Odd reason to be important, huh. Yet don't we make our children important, because they are low and weak? Aha. Now you understand the perspective of God and the angels (both elect and fallen), toward us!

Learning God makes us even WEAKER and LOWER, because the Love for God, which is supernaturally BUILT by means of Bible you learn and live on (theme of Paul in Ephesians, 1Cor13, and of 1John) — this love for God makes you hate yourself, hate life, despair (Romans 7).

So why DO you still love God? That was the test for Job. For us, it's even worse than what Job faced, for he didn't have the Mind of Christ (1Cor2), a FAR HIGHER STANDARD of Righteousness than Job could even know. So why do we CHURCH, still love God?

That's the Trial, here. Down here, in our puny minds, we are constantly choosing good deeds, the plan of Satan; or God deeds, the Plan of God — BECAUSE we realize how low we are. That's the test, and it's a killer. It's NOT about sin, that's a given. It's about wanting God despite being human — same test as Christ faced, down here.

Now, He went all the way, without sin. We have our own smaller crosses, akin to His, and of course we do sin. But do we GIVE UP? That's the real issue. Because as weak, sinning humans, we SHOULD give up, that's what 99% of humanity naturally and understandably WILL do. So why don't we? That's the intensely interesting question into which angels 'crane their necks' (my pastor's translation of the last word in 1Peter1:12), to watch...


GD12b3-4 Utopian Battle

Continued from • GD12b2 Love On Trial : Weakness! Was...: since the Trial is about whose side you come to love, God's or Satan's, it's no surprise that Satan pitches his plan as whatever 'utopia' you want to believe in. Which of course, leads to war. Always.

Meanwhile, if instead you're voting for God's Plan by learning and living on Bible, Hebrews 11:6, a different utopian battle, ensues: you become more like God in your thinking, and LESS HUMAN as a result. This is what had to occur in Christ's Own Humanity, for functional unity with His Deity. He was born God-man in structural unity, but not with functional unity. To get that latter unity, He had to become the Way, THE TRUTH and The Life — by learning and living on Bible, Matthew 4:4. Thus He could endure the Cross, pay for sins and even deem it happiness, Hebrews 12:2, Isaiah 53:11.

So for our crosses, we also need functional unity with Divine Thinking, which the Holy Spirit ALONE can produce. You just vote to be in God's System, and He runs it all. See my God's System video, • God's System.

Over the years, therefore, you'll change into a new person on the inside; while your dead-in-Adam house aka your body, keeps messing up execution, theme of Romans 7. Satan will 'help' by throwing utopianists in your way, as he knows your spiritual growth hastens his own incarceration. That's Hebrews 11.


GD12b5 Back to Basics

Continued from • GD12b2 Love On Trial : Weakness! Was.... Okay, so if no matter WHAT you do with your life you'll WASTE it, Why Waste It On Christ? So now it's time to better understand the Angelic Trial Issues in YOUR Life: so it's Back To Basics, Baby.

More like Basic Training, lol. WHY did you believe in Christ? WHY do you still believe NOW? This you need to write out, think out, to start focusing on, yourself. For if you don't come to grips with your own motives, you'll not finish the maturation course.

My pastor depicts this final stage of spiritual maturation as having two very basic tests: Relationship to God, and Relationship to Life. YOUR relationship to them both. Matthew 4 is about that. See Lessons 800 and following of rbthieme.org 1992 Spiritual Dynamics, to see how this 'Evidence Testing' (my pastor's term) is to run in your life. Since that series runs 12 whopping years, if you want to see a condensed version of the issues in print, then go to LvS4d.htm, where I plotted it out. Page is long, heavy, but will only take maybe a few months to read and mull over.

This stuff is NOT taught in Christendom, but should be. All you get from Christendom about this phase of the life, is vagueness. We KNOW we are tested, we KNOW we are supposed to be 'Christlike', we KNOW we are supposed to mature in Christ, but NONE of that is at all well-defined, by the mainstream BABY CHRISTIAN TEACHERS. Because, THEY don't know!

Now, some few teachers are mature and DO know; my pastor wasn't the only one. So if this topic interests you, ask God who is your own right MATURE teacher. And get under him. For baby, if you don't grasp the issue here, you'd be better off reverting to atheism.

This is the big league, now. Learn it or get out. You can't lose your salvation, but there's no point going forward as a Christian, if you don't get a grip on the spiritual life. And that grip, takes you full circle back to WHY you want to even BE a Christian, in the first place. Do you 'stay' Christian because you feel you should? WRONG REASON! Do you believe in Christ because you think you should? WRONG REASON!

As my pastor liked to quip, 'a right thing must be done in a right way for a right reason'. Wrong reason (like to feel good about the self), wrecks any other rightness there might be.

So Write Out Your Reasons. Be honest with yourself. Then decide whether you want to finish the course, or just quit and stop pretending you care about God. Way too many pretenders, in the Body of Christ.


GD12b6-7 Eating Peas

Continued from • GD12b5 Back to Basics. Kingship means living on and by, principle, law, etc. But God's idea of Kingship also includes intimacy. For, it's parenting. I have a problem with that. Maybe you don't. Maybe you have a problem with something else. Whatever your problem is, that will be what holds you back from maturation in the spiritual life.

For ya gotta eat your peas, before you can have dessert.


GD12b8 The Game (Overview)

Continued from • GD12b6-7 Eating Peas. So what is 'The Game'? Obviously, as seen in 12b6-7, it's PERSONAL: your personal journey with God. So how does that play? Is there a predictable pattern, diagnostic? Yep. The endgame is whether you keep wanting God though He successively 'marries' your dream-come-true with your worst nightmare, as you learn and live on Bible. But it doesn't start out that way.

How it starts, is childishly: as this video will hopefully explain. Longer version begins here: • 1/13b, Spiritual Maturation, Intro . Its video description contains a spiritual maturation 'chart' you can use to detect where you are in spiritual maturation. That description, follows below:

==============================

Whole Intro series is viewable in consecutive order, on-screen in LordvSatan3.htm.

Christian Spiritual Maturation is a lifelong process. This Introduction Part 1 of 13, explains how one spiritually matures. You'll need to download the Word doc chart, since Youtube can't display it well. Video displays page 1 of the Word doc. Download it here: SMP.doc.

If your version of Word precedes 2002, try this link: SMPdocforOlderWordprograms.doc. If that doesn't work, please message me.

I can't fix the scratchy sound. RealPlayer's 3-band Equalizer set at max Bass, 0 Mid, and near-top Treble, helps.


God Deeds 12b9c TOGETHERNESS, FLAT! (The Game, cont.)

Okay, time to apply all this GAME stuff to the self. I don't know how it applies to you, so I gotta use the 'me'. Just replace the 'me' with YOURSELF, as you listen.

For it's ONLY about Togetherness, John 17:20ff. That's what Christ Prayed For, so That's what Father does! And you just know, that what Christ prayed for, Father always wanted...

Satan is outflanked, huh.


God Deeds 12b21 Weakness Perks = The Game

Weakness is a perk too? Sure! That's the game, to realize it is a perk!

Just think: you do not HAVE to be good; you do not HAVE to be strong; you do not HAVE to be rich, well, good-looking, well-liked. All the pain in the world comes from thinking self or someone else, HAS to be one of those 'popular' things, to be worthy. The whole selfie thing is what makes life miserable. Essence of the old sin nature is to HAVE to focus on the self.

Think: when you watch a movie you enjoy, don't you find it restful? Why? Because for that hour or two, you're not concentrating on your self, your life, your problems, etc. Aha. So who will deliver us from this body of death, Romans 7 and 2Cor12?

File Name: GodDeeds12b21.avi, 03/05/14.


God Deeds 12b22, Weakness Perks, cont.

Weakness Perks and their irony, cont.
File Name: GodDeeds12b22.wmv, 3/13/14.


God Deeds 12b23 False vs. True Weakness Game

One of the dangerous perks of Weakness, is to think that if you're 'suffering for God', you're spiritual. Because, there is indeed a blessing category OF 'suffering for God'. Christ is the Ultimate Example of that. Suffering occurs due to weakness; but weakness can be due to sin, not merely being human. As a result, we tend to view suffering as somehow more 'holy' than if we are enjoying ourselves. That's actually a claim of strength, so abuses the perk of being weak. So then in the GAME of spiritual development, our 'playing piece' of the spiritual life, gets knocked off the board, and we're OUT of the game.

See my God's System video too, for when someone's out of the game, he isn't doing those four elements: vimeo.com/brainout/godssystem

So a big part of the Game is how we REGARD 'weakness', which is indeed a perquisite, root idea that it doesn't matter how small we are, God loves us anyway; it doesn't matter what the world thinks of us, God will make us heroes anyway. So we can easily abuse those facts...


God Deeds 12b24 Tandem Weakness Game

Weakness runs in a tandem, and actually becomes a perk when the tandem operates. Idea is that you get moment-by-moment confirmation and demonstration, of God's Love. Which after all, is really the Love On Trial, with your love for Him, being secondary. It's a wild ride, and even harder than anything Christians can dream up as 'sacrificial'. For the old sin nature gets its rocks off, by sacrificing. So ironically, the biggest sacrifice of all, is not to sacrifice at all. God deeds means you're not doing anything. And that, is the hardest thing of all.

Your motive for going forward is thus taxed the most, by wanting God, since that will excite the sin nature the most. By wanting God, rather than wanting to think well of self for wanting God, that's the tricky surgery going on.. until you die. No work that man can do, is as difficult, as this DIVORCE between those two wants.

So to get those two wants divorced, a new TANDEM (think of 'bicycle' or buddies in a relay race) must be created: tandem of wanting, and knowledge of Bible running in your head. The one motivates the other to keep going, 2Cor5:14, Eph 3:15-19. You'll need to know both of those passages well, for this audio to be meaningful. The 2Cor5:14 passage is mistranslated 'compelled', should be 'holds together', Greek verb 'sunecho' (sun=together, echo means to have hold grasp). My pastor spent time explaining the mistranslation, so maybe your pastor has also. Point is, you can look it up in any lexicon and see that the verb is mistranslated by someone who wanted to think God a tyrant.

File Name: GodDeeds12b24.avi, 3/26/14.


God Deeds 12b25 Thread Weakness Game

Divine DNA is 'threaded' into you by means of learning and living on Bible. THOUGHT threads. The threads build. Like brain dendrites: brainout.net/DDNA.htm . So life down here is also a Thread Game. Whose threads are in your heads? Satan wants his threads 'clothing' your thinking, and he's good at selling that wardrobe. God, on the other hand, wanted a Temple Veil, Hebrews 9, built by His Thinking, Matthew 4:4, line on line, precept on precept, over DECADES.

Not at all what Christians hallucinate as the 'game' of the spiritual life. Ooops.

File Name: GodDeeds12b25.avi, 4/3/14 (real Passover Erev for 2014 per Exodus 12, 14th day after vernal at equinox begins 1st Passover supper, so it's NOW Passover).


God Deeds 12b26 Tree Road Weakness Game

Coming full-circle back to the 'Arbitrary Love' theme of Episode 11, but now the ON Trial Application of it. The Trial of you becoming 'arbitrary' the way Satan accuses God of being 'Arbitrary', is the theme here, and its 'game' is like a Tree or a Road. Many branches of life along the way, to get us off the road, into preoccupations with anything but God. That's the Game, Set, Match.. and Trial.

Bible in your head makes you eventually become single-minded, aka 'Occupation with Christ' (term of my pastor, common term in the 1930's also, used for example also by Watchman Nee) — where HE is on your mind, rather than the 'me' which is your 'normal' human mind. For, if you'll become Christ-like, since He is God-man, you too end up growing out of your very humanity. Bible in your head, learning and living on Bible, does that to you.

So the 'game' is to shunt the growth of this Bible-thinking Trunk, into the side branches (distractions, normal human stuff, evil, good, sin) — so that the trunk, stops growing. That's what this audio, is about. Will be on this topic for awhile. I meant it originally for Episode 11, but frankly it's more germane as THE TRIAL EVIDENCE that Hebrews 11:1, is all about: 'It's about Confidence in Word! Christ's Thinking, On Trial! Evidence, Unseen! See corrected trans and associated videos, in brainout.net/Heb111.htm .

File Name: GodDeeds12b26.avi, 4/9/14.


God Deeds 12b27 Tree Road 'L' Game, cont.

Tandem operation of the I (vertical) and the L (horizontal) is the ultimate integration of His Head into your head, is the goal of the Tree-Road Weakness Game.

Spiritual Maturation Process chart helps you figure out where you are in the Game: brainout.net/SMP.doc . If you want the videos explaining the doc, in context with the associated webpage, brainout.net/LordvSatan3.htm#OverviewSpirMat . If you want to watch the videos rather in Youtube, start here, play in order: youtube.com/watch?v=Ibi66ksWPUQ&list=PL1BD12834E8FB4B41&index=7 .

File Name: GodDeeds12b27.wmv, 4/16/14.


God Deeds 12b28 Tree Road 'L' Game, cont.

Still on the L tandem, more issues to cover.
File Name GodDeeds12b28.wmv, 4/24/14. Audio is 29.


God Deeds 12b29 Tree-Road 'L' Game, Episode 12 conclusion

End of Episode 12, on the nature of God's Love, which is the ultimate answer to ON Trial. That same love, developing in you.
Episode 13 will be posted next week in a new channel, Satan's Strategy Epi. 13, Integration . Theme will be INTEGRATION, which is a beyond-Trial issue, the root purpose for getting into Bible, in the first place.


God Deeds 13a~

New Episode in new channel, Satan's Strategy Epi. 13, Integration . This is the first video for that Episode, and the Episode theme will be INTEGRATION: how to integrate your interest in God, into your life, which is the goal of the Spiritual life. Integration results in Integrity, 2 Cor5:14, Greek verb sunechw. Love for Christ, holds you together. So, one must DE-integrate from the horizontal life of this world, where 'God' is but another word, a mere part of human interaction and mores, and instead RE-integrate into God in Christ, as the EXCLUSIVE focus of your life: First Commandment. All your heart and soul and mind, not just part.

For it's all VERTICAL, never horizontal. The latter just comes along for the ride, and is designed to enhance the vertical with God. Oddly enough, it's this despising of the horizontal, which makes life with people and things, truly Loving, and truly Meaningful. How? Well, that's what this Episode, will explore.

File Name: GodDeeds13a.avi, 4/25/14.

Spiritual Integration's construction, is much like that for a house. Often a lot of stuff must be torn down, first.

File Name: GodDeeds13a4.wmv, 5/29/14.

Highlights on the future effects of integration, whether you integrate with the world's values.. or with God's. Also, reminders on how you can train your brain to integrate God's values into your everyday life, so that it becomes a natural function like breathing, to integrate His Thinking into whatever you're doing or thinking, 24/7.

Early in the audio I mention the link brainout.net/LordvSatan5.htm#Lake to show what kind of 'integration' those who go to hell, will have. That whole series is a thinkpiece, adding up the grand story Bible tells, testing all the ideas for sense and Biblicity, so that link tests the idea that anyone IN hell can get out, even in eternity.. and why.

File Name: GodDeeds13a5.wmv, 6/5/14.

Bible thinking 'devices' (my pastor's term) which speed and develop integration and thus maturation, in the spiritual life. The longer writeup on how these devices work, is in the Spiritual Maturation Process videos starting here ( youtube.com/watch?v=Ibi66ksWPUQ&list=PL1BD12834E8FB4B41&index=7 ), or in the webpage writeup beginning at brainout.net/LordvSatan3.htm#OverviewSpirMat.

File Name: GodDeeds13a6.wmv, 6/12/14.

This audio, is on using your body to integrate the spiritual life by repetition. It's the root mechanic of maturation, similar to practicing piano or other mind-body skill. The hard thing is that your body and your entire horizontal life is forever dead to Invisible God, so there is a constant disconnect between the horizontal life you live, and the vertical invisible spiritual life with God. So your body is a set of tools, as indeed your entire horizontal life, to 'insert' the vertical and invisible spiritual life with God, into the horizontal visible life you have. So it will be post-death, too. For God is invisible. Your body life is visible, and it's 'life' is dependent on your soul, so of itself can detect nothing, so of course can't 'see' God.

The longer writeup on how these tools and devices work, is in the Spiritual Maturation Process videos starting here ( youtube.com/watch?v=Ibi66ksWPUQ&list=PL1BD12834E8FB4B41&index=7 ), or in the webpage writeup beginning at brainout.net/LordvSatan3.htm#OverviewSpirMat.

File Name: GodDeeds13a7.wmv, 6/18/14.

We think we integrate with God but don't, when we misdefine the spiritual life. Going through prescribed behaviors, is not being spiritual. You're only spiritual when between sins, 1John1:9 used, and you're in a state of sin if you're not learning and living on Bible. Yet even if learning and living on Bible, if you're doing that as a behavior, then probably still in a state of sin, having mistaken the BEHAVIOR as spiritual. So this is a thorny problem and easy to be trapped.

Many Christians are trapped; they think that if they ATTEND and speak a certain vocabulary (brother, sister, quoting verses) and observe certain behaviors and taboos, that they are living the spiritual life. Folks at my own church are and were in this trap; took me a long time to realize why they weren't growing, but instead religifying what my pastor taught. So look at your own church also, see the difference between what the pastor TEACHES, versus what the others seem to be learning, see how religious their stance. You will need to know this, to figure out how to distance yourself from those in your own church, who are billed as spiritual but obviously are not. It's a MAJOR way to trap Christians into retardation.

For the point is to LEARN GOD, not outers. Thus many Christians are actually apostate, and will die clueless. For they are IMITATING 'integration', rather than actually integrating with God's Thinking. Even, if they are under that rare pastor who himself is truly integrating (pastors ideally learn via teaching, it's a special growth path for them). In other words, the congregation are using the tools and devices, but for the wrong reason, so are perpetually out-of-fellowship (in a state of sin) while doing it, so they don't notice they aren't growing. But if you are growing, you will notice, and it will be a painful discovery. More painful still, to figure out how to distance yourself from these people, because you cannot help them.

Thus is the seed parable playing live before your eyes, Matt 13:8, 23, Mark 4:8, 20, Luke 8:8.

File Name: GodDeeds13a7b.avi, 6/18/14.

New Episode in new channel, Satan's Strategy Epi. 13, Integration . This is the first video for that Episode, and the Episode theme will be INTEGRATION: how to integrate your interest in God, into your life, which is the goal of the Spiritual life. Integration results in Integrity, 2 Cor5:14, Greek verb sunechw. Love for Christ, holds you together. So, one must DE-integrate from the horizontal life of this world, where 'God' is but another word, a mere part of human interaction and mores, and instead RE-integrate into God in Christ, as the EXCLUSIVE focus of your life: First Commandment. All your heart and soul and mind, not just part.

For it's all VERTICAL, never horizontal. The latter just comes along for the ride, and is designed to enhance the vertical with God. Oddly enough, it's this despising of the horizontal, which makes life with people and things, truly Loving, and truly Meaningful. How? Well, that's what this Episode, will explore.

File Name: GodDeeds13a.avi, 4/25/14.

Highlights on the future effects of integration, whether you integrate with the world's values.. or with God's. Also, reminders on how you can train your brain to integrate God's values into your everyday life, so that it becomes a natural function like breathing, to integrate His Thinking into whatever you're doing or thinking, 24/7.

Early in the audio I mention the link brainout.net/LordvSatan5.htm#Lake to show what kind of 'integration' those who go to hell, will have. That whole series is a thinkpiece, adding up the grand story Bible tells, testing all the ideas for sense and Biblicity, so that link tests the idea that anyone IN hell can get out, even in eternity.. and why.

File Name: GodDeeds13a5.wmv, 6/5/14.

One integrates via failure, because of failure, by the end of one's life. Christ's Death on the Cross is technically a failure, just as Daniel 9:26 said it would be. So, if you are growing in Christ, you should expect your life to be marked by failure, especially at the end of your life. Training therefore in weakness, in failure, is essential to growth. Notice it doesn't matter if the failure is your own, is imposed, or chosen by you or someone else. It is all used as a training device.

By contrast, the world also follows its own pattern which ends in failure. So those two types of integrations, start to be explored here. This theme of failure being used to integrate will be recurring throughout this Episode.

File Name: GodDeeds13a8.wmv, 7/1/14.

'Create the Moment' would be God's motto, the central story the Bible tells, illustrated in many verses, as will be demonstrated in future portions of this Episode 13. We get so caught up in our moralities and self-righteousness, we don't notice, but as you listen to this audio, think of any Bible you know, and see if you can't spot this motto.

The reference to the 'animate map' in weather underground, is illustrated here: classic.wunderground.com/radar/radblast.asp?ID=JAX or here classic.wunderground.com/radar/radblast.asp?ID=OKX or here classic.wunderground.com/radar/radblast.asp?ID=BHX

File Name: GodDeeds13a9c.avi, 7/16/14.

Soul Capacity spiritually, is measured by the amount of 'throughput' of Divine Thinking. Divine Thinking operates like a flow, so think of your soul like a resevoir, fed by a 'piping' from your human spirit. The bigger the pipe, the faster and more the 'throughput' of the Water of theWord. Same idea as for electricity, the capacity is measured in terms of throughput, how much power can flow through. So this audio, covers how integration and creating the moment, result in a soul growth of throughput of Integrated Divine Thinking. This is how Christ was developed, so how you are also to be developed.

File Name: GodDeeds13a9d.wmv, 7/23/14.

Since 'throughput' is the mechanism by which the soul integrates and grows, we gotta spend time on the different types of throughput which fill up the soul: they all conflict with one another. Your 'personality' is essentially a developing profile of choices you make, in how to deal with all these conflicting throughputs.

Goal is for God's Word, which is spiritual throughput, to get into the soul; from there, it will 'organize' the other throughputs for maximum enjoyment. For God's Goal, is to replicate His Own Enjoyment, in each soul. Since we are empty at birth, and since we don't have Bible running in our soul at birth, this process requires the 'tear down' explained in the THROUGHPUT introduction, as well as reorganizing all the elements of living: so that one's own enjoyment can become progressively more, like God's Own.

File Name: GodDeeds13a9e.wmv, 07/30/14.

The three types of throughput which mature you, are body, soul, spirit; and, they conflict. Maturation is essentially a process whereby the soul comes to dominate the body, and spiritual maturation is where the spiritual comes to dominate the soul. Hence, the goal is for the spiritual throughput to come to organize and thus maximize the enjoyment of, body and soul throughput. For the three are self-contained 'life' units, and they don't mesh without constantly-monitored, control. So if you don't mature spiritually, your life is miserable, as your soul starts out empty, dominated by your body. What passes for maturation in the human race is therefore essentially, a mammoth matrix of rationales for body desires, all dressed-up in moral, high-sounding words.

So spiritual maturation, only happens if you repetitively and persistently live in God's System during your lifetime (see my God's System video), is like living in your home while it is thoroughly remodeled. Most believers won't bear that much change, and instead opt for the familiar body-defined ideas which the soul is then shackled to; or, they invent soul ideas which are really little more than rationalized body wants. Such believers then enter heaven as spiritual babies, giving rise to the need for societal 'classes' in the eternal state.

For YOU are the fruit, not what you do, Isaiah 53:10 contract.

More on the nature of the three types of throughput, and how you can diagnose the problems in life, from it. Then, last 34 mins are on why GOD wanted to design life this way, fully knowing all the problems in advance, how the structure better taps you into how His OMNISCIENCE works, so you can have more intimacy with Him.

Why and how God uses the Throughput conflict and its endless eternal variety, to create perfection. For WE are the 'fruit', not what we do. Along the way, we come up with some really fruity ideas of spirituality, and all that craziness — how does God make perfection of it? Eternally? Beginning in this audio, this topic is explored.

Ever notice how long it takes something to 'sink in'? That's a penetration problem. Every advertisement depends thus on repetition, to cause familiarity and hence penetration of the information; be it on your body (exercise and imprint repetition), on your soul (for memory and association learning).. and especially, for the spiritual life. The good news is John 14:26, the Holy Spirit will RECALL TO YOUR MIND what you've learned in Bible class. Yeah, which means you better GO to Bible class, right? And actually LISTEN to what the teacher says, right? And TALK it all over with God, right?

Now, you see the problem. Even if you do go, you need REPETITION to get the spiritual info into your body, so it wil 'imprint' and thus come back to remind you, as well. Because the Spirit won't recall what you don't want to know, and you won't want to know, what you didn't want to remember.. right?

Yikes.

File Name: GodDeeds13a9h.wmv, 8/27/14.

Now we look at where all this is heading, from a personal standpoint. All that intake of the world's thinking versus God's Thinking, leads to a 'throughput' which forms the structures of one's own soul's thinking. So where do we end up, vis a vis God and each other? What is life then like? We all want to know 'destiny', and we all sorta know we make our own 'destiny', yet God is also orchestrating Time to make that Eternal Moment which remains forever perfect for everyone. But what does that mean, and what roles/results do our own choices, create?

File Name: GodDeeds13a9ij.wmv, 9/3/14.

So now we know the Throughput Destiny, let's examine the Design which makes that destiny, possible.

No matter how good the Design, it has to be carried out, to work. But while God has no problem carrying out His Design, He won't do it apart from your consent. So first consent, is to be saved. God BELIEVES in Christ's payment, and accepts it. But do you? You can elect against the Will of God (Hebrews 9) by never believing Jesus the Christ paid for your sins, in which case you don't go to heaven when you die, and go to hell, as that is the only other eternal abode left. Even if you ONCE believe that Christ paid for your sins, then you go to heaven, as CONSENT occurred. It's an inheritance, so you don't have to consent over and over. YES and you inherit. Once.

But post-salvation, you have to consent over and over to being GROWN UP in this inheritance, which requires developing spiritual throughput so a) you know WHAT you inherited, and b) you know HOW to use it. Lifetime training in it, just as with a crown prince. That is the design, but you can elect against the Will of God to GROW you. You elect against Him GROWING you if you sin and refuse to use 1John1:9, naming your sins (even if only generically, since you might forget what they are). So when you admit sin, then you are electing Him to Grow you again, which 1John explains. So too, Psalm 32:5, 66:18, all the Levitical sacrifices (you don't take an animal to a priest and name your sins while he kills it, if you don't ALREADY believe in God). So too, 2Pet1:9, which translators FORGOT to properly translate, 'having forgotten TO TAKE purification for sins' (the 'to take' is FORGOTTEN by the translators of the verse). For in the OT, you got purification, by bringing that animal...

So you are spiritually comatose, not growing, if you don't use 1John 1:9, in which case your throughput spiritually, is being BLOCKED. So you enter heaven a spiritual retard. Since presumably you wish to survive down here and grow instead, you need to use the verse. Ask God to remind you, when you need to use it.

And ask God to make the real Gospel (shown in this video's picture) clear, so that if and when HE decides to put you in someone's path, HE will alert you to EXPLAIN it to them. So too, for 1John1:9. For both of these things are lifelines. We effectively die, without them.

Atheists tell us that we are merely animals, given the biology of our bodies. Well yeah, that's PART of 'being human', the body is the soul's house. At the opposite end is the 'spirit', the aparatus created when you first believe in Christ, so you can have a relationship with God. The soul, which is likewise immaterial, is supposed to be the mediating hub for both body and spirit. So you are in three parts, just as Hebrews 4:12 says. Okay, then those parts need to be INTEGRATED, operating in tandem, in sync. And of course, they don't. Body is always glitchy and 'behind', the last to 'learn'.

So the soul becomes AWARE of the differential, feels inferior.. especially, when contemplating 'God'. So the glitch is compounded, due to the discomfort of the awareness (pain is really always a knowing, never a feeling, even as pleasure is always a knowing, never a feeling, with the body merely sending pre-programmed signals to the brain).

So why did God create it that way? To maximize enjoyment, to connect all the opposites, so that all expressions and types of enjoyment can join, full spectrum. For He's doing that with history, itself (theme of Romans 8). And you, are 'in it'. With Him. In Him. But are you in Him as much as He's in you? Yeah, that's the integration problem, the theme of history.

File Name: GodDeeds13a9L2

Input+Volition=Throughput=the accumulating INTEGRATED structure of your soul. So having looked at Integration as God's Goal, now let's look at the de facto integration of INSANITY the world, daily promulgates.. just like Genesis 3.

File Name: GodDeeds13a9s.wmv, 9/29/14.

So now it gets Intimate, which either resolves the Insanity, or exacerbates it.

File Name: GodDeeds13a9t.wmv

How Divinity works in us: as a throughput flow. That's why Christ could say 'you are gods' in John 10:34. Whaaa?

Filename: GodDeeds13a9u.wmv, 10/13/14.

Now we come full circle back to Throughput Integration (four videos prior), as a matter of TASTE. As one ages, one's tastes change. So then, if one at full maturity has tastes quite unlike childhood, how much more are God's 'tastes', different (see 1Cor 13 and Isaiah 55)? Aha. So in this and the audio next week, we'll delve deeper into that issue...

File Name: GodDeeds13a9v.wmv, 10/20/14.

We come full circle back to Throughput Integration (five videos prior), as a matter of TASTE. As one ages, one's tastes change. So then, if one at full maturity has tastes quite unlike childhood, how much more are God's 'tastes', different (see 1Cor 13 and Isaiah 55)? Aha. So in this and the audio next week, we'll delve deeper into that issue...

File Name: GodDeeds13a9w.wmv, 10/27/14.

So now it's time to put all your knowledge of 'throughput' to use. Can you detect, in this long and meandering 'talk' about how you can prove God from the 'integration' details, the validity of the 'story'? Of course, maybe it's better for you to just skip this audio and talk with God. Yet if you want ideas to talk with Him about, this audio explores some of them.. wandering all over the place. Because, when trying to proof something, the mind wanders, and determining relevancy amidst chaos is the 'game'.

One of the most overlooked proofs of God yet a proof which has VERY WELL KNOWN input and throughput over the centuries: the Jews. So why do we continue to overlook this proof — the history of the Jews themselves — from God directly, i.e., in Lev 26 and Deut 28? Maybe the understory is psychological, for even the Jews have trouble accepting the massive proof...

Obviously you have proof of God if you talk to Him and He answers. But HOW does He answer, and HOW do you prove it's Him, not your hallucination, wishful thinking, or something else? Well, it turns out that during this audio He kept on interrupting me with Hebrews 6:18, but I didn't know that was the verse (only the chapter), and I didn't remember how it was worded in translation — He interrupts me with MY PASTOR'S TRANSLATION FROM OVER 25(?) YEARS AGO — 'by means of two immutable things' — thus demonstrating live what 'talking to God' is like, principle of John 14:26, 'recalling to your mind'. I also didn't know what that Hebrews verse meant, that class baffled me for years.. until this audio. So I'm learning the meaning live, while talking. Ergo, this audio is a bit more dramatic than usual, as I'm very flustered most of the time.

So I guess here you see real-time, what 'talking to God' means. Of course, if you've been listening to these audios already, then you're already experiencing the same thing. Or soon will. So then you'll have live demonstration for yourself. For Hebrews 6:18, is how you prove it's Him. Heh.

Panoramic 'look' at how 'talking to God' is THE cornerstone of spiritual growth. Which explains, why Christians don't grow. They either are in religious carnality and think that 'prayer' is formal with THEM having to do all the work, or they are in emotional carnality and hallucinate voices, dreams, visions, etc. So the former carnal crowd looks at the latter carnal crowd and deems 'talking to God' something a spiritual person shouldn't do, except on formal occasions, prayer being the common example.

Whoa. Bible people weren't like that. Go read Bible yourself. The positive ones really did talk to God all the time, not just as formal prayer, viz. the Psalms, Abraham, Moses. Even the negative ones talked to God, like Gideon, even Cain. And God talked back. He still does, says Book of Hebrews, through His Word, and those two immutable things (Heb 6:18) are the communication base by which you 'hear' God. That is, if you're listening.

If not listening, then not growing. So this rambling audio goes through some of the obvious ways you can TEST the centrality of 'talking to God' as key to your spiritual growth (or retrogression, if you're not doing it). There will be many more audios on this topic, but they will resume after 13a9 (FINALLY!) ends. Idea here is to bring up the subject, then thrash it out, later. The later subepisodes will all have the same 'Talk to God' title in them, so you can search later on, more easily. So for now, let's just get the feet wet on WHY we don't but should, talk to God...

File Name: 13a9x2cTPTalkToGod.wmv, 11/24/14.

So now, having seen that Throughput of God is proved through Jews, talking to God, well.. that means PEOPLE. Yeah, like you. Proof of God. You. The guy next store. Your best friend. Your worst enemy. All of God's enemies, in fact. So in this increment, we begin with God's enemies, and how they prove God right, by attacking Him and/or His Word.

File Name: GodDeeds13a9x2d.wmv, 11/30/14

Summing up Throughput PROOF from the last six audios. It matters to know you know you have proof, since the proof is so universal, shocking, and often, unpleasant. Webpage on how God uses what He's doing in you as proof in the Trial, text of Romans 12:1-3 cited, is demonstrated via the Greek in Rom121-3.htm .

File Name: GodDeeds13a9x4.wmv 12/15/14.

If you were looking down from heaven, what Throughput SUM Christmas story would you see? This and the next four parts present what might be a surprising set of answers to ponder. For there is but one question ever: do you want God, or not?

File Name: GodDeeds13a9x5a.wmv, 12/22/14


God Deeds 13b~

So you integrate with works or Word, tugged always between one and the other. The heart of the tugging is, 'does God LOVE me?' because so much of the time, life hurts. Enter Matthew 4, and the deeper issue of what really constitutes 'hell'. Not to say that no literal hell exists. But rather to explain what makes it 'hell', isn't necessarily the outer discomfort...

File Name: 13b1ab.wmv, 3/16/15.

Continuing from vimeo.com/brainout/gd13b1, how are those IN HELL, integrated? Let's see how what makes it 'hell', isn't necessarily the outer discomfort...
File Name: 13b2ab.wmv, 3/22/15.

Integration hell versus heaven is the story of religion versus intimacy with God. Religion seeks to put itself BETWEEN you and God, to make life a living hell; it does this by being 'nice'. That's what Satan does, in Matthew 4. He's very NICE, tempting Christ to do GOOD deeds of Himself, rather than allow the GOD Deed of Father imputing Him with our sins, on the Cross. So now you see the real goal of religion: to make you work work work for the ego boost of calling yourself Good, just like Satan tempted the woman in Genesis 3. Flee all religion of any type like the satanic plague it is, plaguing pagans, Jews and Christians alike. The mainstream is NEVER spiritual, but ALWAYS satanic. Proof how satanic, is in the 'doctrines' they teach, and in their need to 'convert' you to their ideas of working to make yourself good enough for God. Always. Because, their lives are a living hell and misery loves company. So, seduces to get it.

Only after you've been in religion for awhile, do you realize how satanic it is. So if you've spent your life integrating with religion, welcome to hell. And of course, if you spend your life integrating with God, sooner or later the religious types will try to MAKE your life as hellish as theirs.

File Name: 13b3ab.wmv, 3/30/15.

Well, the road to it, anyway. If you've been listening to this series for awhile, you kinda know the answer anyway. Should be an easy audio, to solidify your grasp of WHY God designed things this way.
File Name 13b4ab.wmv, 4/6/15.

So HOW do you integrate toward Heaven with God, or toward hell with this world?
File Name: 13b5ab.wmv, 4/12/15.

This audio-only Episode 13b6, focuses on the macro 'personality' of integration, both individually and in eternity. Lots of repetition from prior episodes, but to sketch out the ultimate picture of what God's doing, and why. Very different from the stuff pandered in pulpits, sorry: God isn't out to make us obedient little Stepford Wives. He's out to make us enjoy living as HE HE HE does. Shocks me that He'd care to do that, but hey.

Sorry for the late upload, I fell asleep.

File Name: 13b6ab.wmv 4/20/15.

Key to the Integration Process working (and in the right direction), is to integrate your INTEREST — but that involves a war over competing interests.

File Name: 13b7ab.wmv 4/27/15.

1st of six tentative brainstorming videos on the process of integration, drawn using Win7's 'Paint'. The gold represents 'sight' or other tactile inputs the soul receives through the body; red represents feelings (volition's attitude on the inputs), green represents words or sounds, and purple represents stuff learned in Bible or re Bible or in Bible class. Brown is false doctrine learned and used. Gray (or light blue, starting 2nd vid) are volitional 'calls' to access data stored, in order to make a decision. For the soul lives via volition, and volition lives via FAITH: believing is required even to pick up a spoon (you can't want what you don't believe in).

So the video sketches out TENTATIVE ideas on how all these things interrelate.

Not shown yet, is how soul SIZE changes, since Bible says your soul GROWS (Greek verb is auxzanw, Hebrew verbs vary) due to doctrinal input, and Hebrews 2:10 (in Greek, using teleiow meaning to COMPLETE) says that our sins imputed to Him, 'completed' Him (usu. quasi-mistranslated 'perfect', which in English is a LEGAL verb meaning 'to complete a contract', perfect translation for teleiow in Greek).

So your body and soul size, can and do change. Question is, how and what is the process, given that the soul is IMmaterial?

My pastor had experimented with various diagrams and nomenclature for the soul from the 1950's onward, using (Google-able) terms like 'Edification Complex' and 'Stream of Consciousness', and though the diagrams are good, I'm doing something different, here. To access his stuff, look for his Diagrams ( Illustrations.pdf ) at rbthieme.org . Then once you have the pdf, search on the word 'soul' to see some of the many diagrams he used in the live classes over the years. Don't use the books, they don't resemble the live classes at all, and often weren't even written by him.

File Name: SoulChange1.avi, 5/1/15.

2nd of six tentative brainstorming videos on the process of integration, drawn using Win7's 'Paint'. The gold represents 'sight' or other tactile inputs the soul receives through the body; red represents feelings (volition's attitude on the inputs), green represents words or sounds, and purple represents stuff learned in Bible or re Bible or in Bible class. Brown is false doctrine learned and used. Gray (or light blue, starting here) are volitional 'calls' to access data stored, in order to make a decision. For the soul lives via volition, and volition lives via FAITH: believing is required even to pick up a spoon (you can't want what you don't believe in).

So the video sketches out TENTATIVE ideas on how all these things interrelate.

Not shown yet, is how soul SIZE changes, since Bible says your soul GROWS (Greek verb is auxzanw, Hebrew verbs vary) due to doctrinal input, and Hebrews 2:10 (in Greek, using teleiow meaning to COMPLETE) says that our sins imputed to Him, 'completed' Him (usu. quasi-mistranslated 'perfect', which in English is a LEGAL verb meaning 'to complete a contract', perfect translation for teleiow in Greek).

File Name: SoulChange2.avi, 5/1/15.

3rd of six tentative brainstorming videos on the process of integration, here focusing on how the soul 'browns' when it doesn't get Bible Doctrine. Fourth vid will show what happens when the soul 'purples'.

Color legend: gold represents 'sight' or other tactile inputs the soul receives through the body; red represents feelings (volition's attitude on the inputs), green represents words or sounds, and purple represents stuff learned in Bible or re Bible or in Bible class. Brown is false doctrine learned and used. Light blues (and gray, in 1st vid) are volitional 'calls' to access data stored, in order to make a decision. For the soul lives via volition, and volition lives via FAITH: believing is required even to pick up a spoon (you can't want what you don't believe in).

So the video sketches out TENTATIVE ideas on how all these things interrelate.

File Name: SoulChange3.avi, 5/2/15.

4th of six tentative brainstorming videos on the process of integration, here focusing on how the soul 'purples' when it gets Bible Doctrine.

Color legend: gold represents 'sight' or other tactile inputs the soul receives through the body; red represents feelings (volition's attitude on the inputs), green represents words or sounds, and purple represents stuff learned in Bible or re Bible or in Bible class. Brown is false doctrine learned and used. Light blues (and gray, in 1st vid) are volitional 'calls' to access data stored, in order to make a decision. For the soul lives via volition, and volition lives via FAITH: believing is required even to pick up a spoon (you can't want what you don't believe in).

So the video sketches out TENTATIVE ideas on how all these things interrelate.

Production note: the 'car' at the end of the video was 'converted' into what you see prior to video start, by using Microsoft Works Digital Image Editor 2006. They don't make good software like this, anymore.

File Name: SoulChange4.avi, 5/2/15.

5th of six tentative brainstorming videos on the process of integration, here focusing on a young adult soul with both 'browns' (false doctrine) and 'purples' (heard Bible while carnal); how that soul makes decisions based on HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS rather than REASON. Because, the purples aren't connected by the Spirit. So the 'relationships' are wrong. So even if moral, a disconnected morality will 'go brown'. So whatever the human relationships were, they end up bad.

Color legend: gold represents 'sight' or other tactile inputs the soul receives through the body; red represents feelings (volition's attitude on the inputs), green represents words or sounds, and purple represents stuff learned in Bible or re Bible or in Bible class. Brown is false doctrine learned and used. Light blues (and gray, in 1st vid) are volitional 'calls' to access data stored, in order to make a decision. For the soul lives via volition, and volition lives via FAITH: believing is required even to pick up a spoon (you can't want what you don't believe in).

So the video sketches out TENTATIVE ideas on how all these things interrelate.

Further, as shown in 6e, soul SIZE changes, and the purple 'heals' the brownouts: Bible added makes your soul GROW (Bible Greek verb for this, is auxzanw, Hebrew verbs vary) due to doctrinal input, and Hebrews 2:10 (in Greek, using teleiow meaning to COMPLETE) says that our sins imputed to Him, 'completed' Him (usu. quasi-mistranslated 'perfect', which in English is a LEGAL verb meaning 'to complete a contract', perfect translation for teleiow in Greek).

Question is, how and what is the process, given that the soul is IMmaterial?

My pastor had experimented with various diagrams and nomenclature for the soul from the 1950's onward, using (Google-able) terms like 'Edification Complex' and 'Stream of Consciousness', and though the diagrams are good, I'm doing something different, here. To access his stuff, look for his Diagrams ( Illustrations.pdf ) at rbthieme.org . Then once you have the pdf, search on the word 'soul' to see some of the many diagrams he used in the live classes over the years. Don't use the books, they don't resemble the live classes at all, and often weren't even written by him.

Production note: the 'car' at the end of the video was 'converted' into what you see prior to video start, by using Microsoft Works Digital Image Editor 2006. They don't make good software like this, anymore.

File Name: SoulChange5.avi, 5/2/15.

Last vid until May 18th. Finishes Diagram subseries for now, this 6th of six tentative brainstorming videos on the process of integration, still focusing on an adult soul with both 'browns' (false doctrine) and 'purples' (heard Bible while carnal, or while spiritual if 'connected' with purple lines); how the soul's default is to make decisions based on HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS rather than REASON. Because, the purples are only connected by the Spirit, so if not in relationship with Him via 1John1:9, then not processing the purple, but rather a slow/fast browning occurs. So the 'relationships' are wrong. So even if moral, a disconnected morality will 'go brown'. So whatever the human relationships were, they end up bad.

Color legend: gold represents 'sight' or other tactile inputs the soul receives through the body; red represents feelings (volition's attitude on the inputs), green represents words or sounds, and purple represents stuff learned in Bible or re Bible or in Bible class. Brown is false doctrine learned and used. Light blues (and gray, in 1st vid) are volitional 'calls' to access data stored, in order to make a decision. For the soul lives via volition, and volition lives via FAITH: believing is required even to pick up a spoon (you can't want what you don't believe in).

So the video sketches out TENTATIVE ideas on how all these things interrelate.

Further, as shown in 6e, soul SIZE changes, and the purple 'heals' the brownouts: Bible added makes your soul GROW (Bible Greek verb for this, is auxzanw, Hebrew verbs vary) due to doctrinal input, and Hebrews 2:10 (in Greek, using teleiow meaning to COMPLETE) says that our sins imputed to Him, 'completed' Him (usu. quasi-mistranslated 'perfect', which in English is a LEGAL verb meaning 'to complete a contract', perfect translation for teleiow in Greek).

So your body and soul size, can and do change. Question is, how and what is the process, given that the soul is IMmaterial?

My pastor had experimented with various diagrams and nomenclature for the soul from the 1950's onward, using (Google-able) terms like 'Edification Complex' and 'Stream of Consciousness', and though the diagrams are good, I'm doing something different, here. To access his stuff, look for his Diagrams ( Illustrations.pdf ) at rbthieme.org . Then once you have the pdf, search on the word 'soul' to see some of the many diagrams he used in the live classes over the years. Don't use the books, they don't resemble the live classes at all, and often weren't even written by him.

Production note: the 'soul' at the end of the video was 'converted' into what you see prior to video start, by using Microsoft Works Digital Image Editor 2006. They don't make good software like this, anymore.

File Name: SoulChange6.avi, 5/2/15.

Video to illustrate how the key to the Integration Process is to integrate your INTEREST. Subsequent videos won't show the middle circle, but will elaborate on how INTEREST governs what you consider 'reality', so boxes you in, makes change of belief, difficult.

File Name: SoulIntegInterestIntro.wmv 5/10/15.

13b7a showed the soul's 'browning' in the area attached to people relationships. Satan takes advantage of that. Here's how. Frankly, you can just read the stopped video screen rather than play the video. But the video, covers the D I O S in summary fashion, with examples of Satan's gambits against Christians (Catholicism, Calvinism, KJVO ism highlighted).

Webpages in video showing this topic in more detail, Satan's Strategy:

brainout.net/SatStrat.htm is a comprehensive and testable explanation of his strategy and tactics. It's the 'Appendix' of the Thinking series.

brainout.net/PopeMyth.htm is about how Satan engineered the PopeMyth, and how his DIOS strategy works specifically on Catholicism. Video expands that section's meaning to show how the same strategy of making God 'foreign' works with respect to Calvinism, King James Onlyism, evolution, and really any lie he wants to sell.

Humans get it wrong all the time. The trick is to see where SATAN SPONSORS the lies believed, so you can detect his gambits. For by these gambits, he captures, derails, distorts, deflects any real interest in God. So if you then give into the lure, your erstwhile real interest, 'browns'. As a result, the person becomes incompetent, slowly or quickly. This is why the world is so inept. The ineptitude is so pervasive, it seems 'normal' and thereby goes undetected. Like, how Google Youtube or vimeo video descriptions are very light gray on gray or white, the programmers not noticing how that wrecks reading, hurts the eyes, and is rude to the viewer. And if you complain about it, they ignore you. That kind of callousness pervades website design, and is indicative of all man's self-righteous incompetence.

So, inevitably, lives go bad, and wars occur. Yet no one becomes the wiser for it. Solution? PRAY FOR GOD TO WAKE PEOPLE UP, because they need His Intervention, but are not asking for it. Frankly, that ends up meaning He smacks them, or lets their ineptitude smack them, and we end up suffering alongside. But we, profit from it. They won't. WON'T, but can.

File Name: DIOS.avi 5/16/2015.

Keeping DIOS in mind, we now return to the beginning, how VOLITION is made key to the Integration Process. So that's how INTEREST governs what you consider 'reality', boxes you in, makes change of belief, difficult. So for your own freedom, the most important thing you can do daily, is to audit your premises. Especially, premises about God.

File Name: SoulIntegInterest1.avi 5/7/15.

Continuing on how VOLITION is made key to the Integration Process. So that's how INTEREST governs what you consider 'reality', boxes you in, makes change of belief, difficult. So for your own freedom, the most important thing you can do daily, is to audit your premises. Especially, premises about God.

File Name: SoulIntegInterest2.avi 5/7/15.

Still continuing on how VOLITION is made key to the Integration Process, with focus on WHAT IF I GO NEGATIVE. And, what if later positive again, growing after your negative phase. Which phase, will occur often, as you grow. It's always up and down, as Paul explains in Romans 7.

So for your own freedom and opportunity to spot where you might BE negative, the most important thing you can do daily, is AUDIT your premises. Especially, premises about God.

File Name: SoulIntegInterest3.avi 5/8/15.

Sorry for the day-late upload, there were vimeo and Linux glitches, so I overslept. Still continuing on how VOLITION is made key to the Integration Process, with focus on WHAT IF I GO NEGATIVE. And, what if later positive again, growing after your negative phase. Which phase, will occur often, as you grow. It's always up and down, as Paul explains in Romans 7.

So for your own freedom and opportunity to spot where you might BE negative, the most important thing you can do daily, is AUDIT your premises. Especially, premises about God.

File Name: SoulIntegInterest4.avi 5/8/15.

Okay, time to practice what you've learned. Here's a putative Profile of an 'Achiever' soul.
File Name: AchieverSoul1.avi

Now let's look at a putative soul of a Spiritually Mature person. Okay, I can't make it pretty, but the meaning is purple enough. Again, put your thinking cap on as I talk and feel free to call me wrong, for I'm just brainstorming here, not claiming Divine Correctness. :)
File Name: SpirMatSoul1.avi, 5/11/15.

Back now to audio only, general problem of WHERE the interest goes, and HOW the missed interest in God, goes undetected. And, how to recover it.

By the way, I changed the format to Windows WS to make the file size smaller, since this is audio-only. If you prefer some other format, you can download it by clicking 'download' below the video. If you want me to instead make it 1080p I can, but the picture never changes. It's text of Matthew 4, which is the 'theme' for this Integration Interest subseries.

File Name: goddeeds13b8.avi, 7/6/15.

Interest always leads to an outcome. Vertical interest, to a vertical outcome, and horizontal interest, to a horizontal outcome.
File Name: 13b9.avi, 7/12/15.


God Deeds 13c~

Debate forum here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=116&p=281#p281

Audio-only, continued from vimeo series, many videos between last Youtube upload and here. Some vimeo users are complaining of vimeo download and play problems: so now that Google Plus is disconnecting from Youtube, I can resume weekly uploads in Youtube. I try to do these on Sunday or Monday nights.

AT ISSUE in this video: So we're free to get integrated with God or alternative 'loves'. So what proof do we have in the world of how this integration, works? To test, claims and results?

File Name: 13c6.avi, 8/24/15 from mp3 of 4/23/15, which you can download in vimeo, or ask me in the debate forum and I'll upload it to brainout.net. Or, use Youtube downloader addins for your browser (Firefox's Easiest Youtube Downloader is best that I've found so far).

So now it's time to decide where you want to integrate...

AT ISSUE in this video: So we're free to get integrated with God or alternative 'loves'. So what DECISION do we make, in the world of which integration, we'll follow? Here, focus is on a very obvious incompetence by religious types which the world lets go on and on and on without correction, because oh we don't actually CARE about the truth, but only a about fitting in! And then we wonder why God lets bad stuff happen to us? Seriously?

So where do we want to stand? Where do you want to stand? Alone, and seeking the truth — for you WILL be alone — or, in a crowd seeking lies but all warm and fuzzy, fitting in? That's the wide gate, and it feels good in there...

Book mentioned at 8 mins, Easter Computus by Mosshammer, The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era (Oxford Early Christian Studies) 1st Edition . My review is there too, but it needs to be updated.

source: https://www.amazon.com/Easter-Computus-Origins-Christian-Studies/dp/0199543127/#customerReviews

brainout
3.0 out of 5 stars Important analysis of our BC/AD mess-ups; and makes some, too
Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2014
Verified Purchase

EDIT 3/7/16: I just noticed that the claim is my edition is Kindle. NOT TRUE. It's hardback. Cover looks just like the illustration, is sitting on my kitchen bartop right now. My review hasn't changed. This is a great book for seeing how goofball Christianity is at NOT READING BIBLE and sadly Mosshammer, painstaking though he is, can't read Bible either. I've metered many Bible passages now, master is LukeDatelineMeters(dot)pdf , see its first few pages for proof that everyone's getting the calendar wrong.

EDIT 2/14/15: page 41 of his book results in knocking one star off. There, he claims the Bible accounts of the Passion say that Christ died on a Friday. No, it never says that. IT SAYS HIGH SABBATH (i.e., John 19:31, which is even right in translation). It says three days and three nights He's in the Grave (Matt 12:40-41) and then He rises on the first day of the week, in the Bible (Matt. 28:1; Mk. 16:2, 9; Lk. 24:1; Jn. 20:1, 19). So He died on what was SUPPOSED to be the first Day of Passover (i.e., John 19:31); and on Firstfruits He rose (Numbers 28:26, piggybacked at sundown on the last day of 'official' Passover, is First fruits, which due to lack of intercalation that year, ended up being 3.5 days LATER than observed Passover). So John's sarcasm (John 19:31-42, which has puzzled scholars for years), means the calendar WASN'T INTERCALATED by the Sanhedrin the year the Lord died. Else the math of three days and three nights wouldn't work (can't otherwise eat the Passover yet BE the Passover).

The rest of the chapter is horrible in the same way; he didn't compare what Bible actually says with what he claims it says, so he thinks there are 'contradictions' — yeah, if you don't actually read the Hebrew or Greek you'd think so, since translations are awful.

Chapter 3's many statements re Bible are largely inept, just like the repeated lie (ignoring Bible) that 'Friday' was when the Lord was crucified. The chapter just repeats 'tradition', no actual review of BIBLE text de novo. So, repeating other inept scholars rather than looking at Bible itself, he claims no one knows the origin of 'pesach' in Hebrew. Really? It's DEFINED for the first time, in Exodus 12:11, which had also defined (verse 2) the 'year' as SOLAR, never lunar (else Israel couldn't keep the passover, which is her BIRTHDAY). So the Lord is arrested on official not real Passover, LAMB SET ASIDE (10th of the month becomes the 14th, if no intercalation); and then He dies on Real Passover just as memorialized in the Law (purpose of Exodus 12), FOUR DAYS LATER. John deliberately skips four days TWICE between John 18 and 19, to highlight that fact, for the Greek reader. But of course if you only read Bible in translation and you don't do your homework on Exodus 12's own text, you won't get that equidistant pun, in John's Gospel.

Israel would also later not account time properly, adopting pagan lunar methods (not the Egyptian SOLAR accounting they'd known when they left Egypt). Bible shouldn't be lumped with those who misuse it. But Mosshammer goes along with the patently false claim that you wait for the new moon to begin a new month (Passover would NEVER be met on that basis)! So it's a serious lapse of scholarship in Chapter 3, to make claims ABOUT Bible, yet ignore what Bible itself says in the cited verses!

So then his book's value, is reduced. Basic math errors like 'Friday' or catering to Catholic or Jewish 'tradition' which never get corrected lest the hoi pouloi lose faith in the leaders, is unacceptable. Then again, one of the reasons to buy this book is to see how for centuries, no one else consults the Bible either, but rather makes up their own timelines based on idiocies like Olympiads, Sothic cycle, lunar year, etc.; to see how no one bothers to find what Bible accounts as (SOLAR!!) years since Adam, perfectly balancing forward and aft in Time, every time; which, when you go back in time and analyze what history we have, matches! But of course if you don't examine the Bible and make up your own claims about it, then lo! The dates won't fit! So you can lie and say that's the Bible's fault, rather than your own incompetence! No wonder the debates about Bible dates and re when the Lord was born and died, continue!

So then the Easter Computus is a sham calculation; it's only a question of which sham version was used, by whom and when. For we still have to know that. For that is how ancient Christians accounted time. NEVER FIXING IT. So the book is worth buying to see why, and even Mosshamer doesn't consult the Bible. Which, maybe he wasn't supposed to do for his book's purpose, who knows. Fine. But then don't make a claim of 'Bible says' either. Okay? Instead, he should admit he's using what OTHERS SAY about Bible, not claiming the Bible itself says, anything — unless he can back it up. For even this brainout can read the verses cited.

EDIT, 2/13/15: For those of you who are watching my vimeo videos on the Bible's dating system (which no scholar has yet found), this book will prove vital. It traces how early Jews and Christians accounted time. It's very interesting, because modern Judaism appears to be using a 6000-year convention for the (2nd) Advent of Messiah which apparently was invented by 3rd-century Christians? If so, perhaps some of my videos will have to be revised. The Bible still is completely different, as I've tried to demonstrate in my howgodorchestratestime and psalm90 channel videos in vimeo.

So here's a current heads up, if you're watching those videos: I ended up buying the Mosshammer book in hardback, not Kindle. You too can still search via Google books, but no longer can you preview whole pages unless you click on 'About this Book' and then on the 'cover', and then read page by page. Typical Google programming takes away good features and replaces them with bad ones. However, you can still search the book, which will be very important if you get the hardback. Sample search: '5500' is a 'traditional' account of how many years from creation to Christ: how did that accounting start? It's terribly wrong: Bible from the begats forward, demonstrates a timeline which is orchestrated around Abraham's maturation, resulting in a Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's fall, with Christ slated to die at first, 54 years prior, but ended up dying 64 years prior, so ended up dying 2090 years after Abraham matured, rather than 2100.

So what was the chronology used instead of Bible's, by folks claiming to be loyal, but patently were not? Mosshammer traces what WAS done. So this book for me, is vital. Errors have to be accounted, to see when and how those allegedly loyal to Bible, got messed up. Then maybe we can more easily fix our BC/AD system, today. Pretty much all of my vimeo videos (as brainout) are dedicated to finding that solution, inter alia.

Original review (with some editing) follows below, written before I actually bought the book.

Search on 'Dionysius Exiguus' in the Kindle or Google Books editions, or just go to Chapter 15, which is page 339 of the book. (Or, look at the first comment to this review, where I provided the same link.) That chapter contains a key analysis of what kind of mistakes there were in deriving what became our BC/AD system.

(Compounding this issue, is the fact that the Varronic AUC itself, is overstated by at least four years. This was known at the time, and Romans then criticised Varro's calculations. Again, if you look at the first comment to this review, the second link provided will take you to a video containing both the book link, and to another one to livius.org, on the problem of the Varronic AUC being padded four years. I don't know yet if Mosshammer addresses this.)

Our 4BC birthdate for Christ is thus at issue: Christ per Bible, is born on Chanukah, first quarter of Adamic (autumnal equinox fiscal) year 4103 (after Adam's Fall; not initial creation, since the latter is nowhere stated in Bible); which was then, the end of the Roman year (Paul quips about that, using 'Chronos' aka Saturn, in Galatians 4:4's Greek). So the NT Bible writers themselves, adjust between the Varronic AUC and Bible's own timeline. I've been making videos on how they do that, in vimeo.

Why? Bible balances from Adam. There ends up being a 54-year 'credit' owing due to Abraham supermaturing in 2046 from Adam's fall rather than the scheduled 2100; so Bible's timeline SHIFTS. So a new '2100' starts (called by Jews today, the 'Age of Torah', and they count it as 2000, not 2100). Then there are more timeline shifts Bible tracks. The next shift is at Joseph's enslavement, such that 490 years after that, must be (and is) the Exodus. The next shift occurs at David, who was crowned (as a deadline), 1050 years from Abraham's maturation. However, starting with David, there were two delays: 7 years' civil war, 2 Sam 5; then 7 years late in dedicating the Temple — which ended up being 'on time' relative to the Exodus' 490th year, 1Kings 8:1. Offsetting this, is the fact that David became king 3.5 years EARLY, but wasn't king over all Israel. That, didn't happen until 7 years later.

So this last timeline shift ALSO results in our modern '4BC' time problem, since to balance to David, Christ must be 3.5 YEARS EARLY relative to the deadline for Abraham, in order to be 'on time' relative to David (balancing to David's 3.5 year early kingship). So relative to the Temple, He dies 'on time', when it should have been up 980 years (ignoring its 586 BC destruction), and 'on time', 1470 years to the day, that the original Exodus occurred (490x3), and 2090 years from Abraham's maturation.

If you just add up the Bible's numbers, you'll see all this shifting. Christ is born 1437 years after the Exodus, which is 490 years after Joseph was enslaved, which was 70 years after Jacob returned to the Land, which is 21 years after he left, which was 490 years after the Flood. So now you're looking at a timeline which SHOULD HAVE BEEN 4106 for Christ's birth, but due to the Davidic shift, He's born to 'align', at Chanukah 4103 from Adam's fall. Aha. Daniel 9's numbers all reconcile to these shifts, as do all other Bible writers. But you can't see the reconciliations or the shifts unless you plot the Bible's numbers AS SOLAR YEARS, from Adam through Christ.

(Download 'GeneYrs.xls' and 'Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf'. Pages 134-135 of the pdf, show the Bible's 'Time Distance' balancing; the xls (Excel 97-2003 format) shows the entire set of Bible's balancing Time from Adam to Christ and beyond, color coded. I can't put their links in here, but if you Google on those names and 'brainout', you'll find them.)

So, this book matters a bunch. WHO ELSE KNEW about these obvious Bible numbers, which any 12-year old could even plot from the Bible? Did Dionysius also recognize these timelines? The book explains that no one knows how Dionysius GOT his numbers, yet that didn't stop 19th-century 'scholars' from imposing their ideas on how he got his numbers. And from what I've read so far, Mosshammer doesn't know these numbers, nor does he cite anyone else who did.

Jews knew, though in garbled fashion, "2000 years for the goyim, 2000 years for the sons of Abraham, and then Messiah comes." Yes, and He did. Today, they deem the last 2000 years before the Millennium, as belonging to Messiah. Google on 'Age of Desolation' and 'Age of Torah', to see their accounting. It's really 2100, and the end of Time in Bible was originally scheduled as 4200 to the Millennium, 5250 to eternity (all based on the meter in Psalm 90, 350 years=syllables). So Paul, in Ephesians 1:3-14, plots a future history of Church based on this same idea. To see how, just see the 'ggs11' channel in vimeo. Example: each eta in each thelematos corresponds exactly to a year when a Roman Emperor died, but his successor reversed his predecessor's policy (satiric play on 'will').

Okay, but did Dionysius know all that too ? For the Easter 'computus' is hopelessly garbled. How did it get that way? Enquiring minds, want to know! It would be nice to find proof some ancient writer we respect, knew it first.

So that's why this book is so important. It will be vital to understanding why we keep having a 6 AD up to 4 BC variance for the Birth of Christ. Bible's own timelines also create this variance. That we don't know there are different timelines, accounts for our own problems of reconciliation, including maybe that of Dionysius?

File Name: 13c7.avi, 8/24/15 from mp3 of 4/23/15, which you can download in vimeo, or ask me in the debate forum and I'll upload it to brainout.net. Or, use Youtube downloader addins for your browser (Firefox's Easiest Youtube Downloader is best that I've found so far).

Plateau time: when the meaningless of this life really hits you. It's a stage of life whether spiritual or not, but when spiritual, it's even harder to live through. Odd, huh. Not really, for your standards have risen so much, everything starts being substandard, and then you realize.. it always was. Always will be.

A person whose faith hasn't been growing, comes to this point and wants to sublimate or kill himself. So too, the growing believer, unless he REALLY starts looking at God in everything he does and thinks. It's the only motive which can carry you: CREATE ASSOCIATIONS WITH GOD to get through the moment. Any moment. Every moment. And of course, that was God's goal all along, to get you to this place. Huh?

Think about all those personal Bible stories from Adam through David, think about their low times, their frustrations.. how did they get past 'it'? This audio doesn't yet cover that set of parallels, but don't you already know those stories from childhood? So then think about them...

File Name: 13c1.avi, 7/20/15 from mp3 of 4/22/15.

So how does the crisis of WHY AM I HERE begin? Usually too late. For we're integrated with this world, and thus have to face the crisis, before we will be willing to detox.

File Name: 13c2.avi, 7/27/15 from mp3 of 4/22/15.

So how does the crisis of ennui, begin? When we don't detox. Hardest thing is, we harden in our unwillingness to detox, and come to call doo-doo, chocolate.

File Name: 13c3.avi, 8/2/15 from mp3 of 4/22/15.

Decisions decisions decisions make for the integrity of Ennui negativity we bring on ourselves. This is an offensive audio. Blunt. Decisions we make to sow to the wind, reaping the tornado. Examples are very upsetting: the Holocaust, and Da Vinci Code. They seem unrelated, but as the audio goes on, you'll see how they are parallel.

Had half a mind to skip posting this video, and I may yet delete it.


God Deeds 13d~

Summing up the world's 'Integration'. Key is really the same as Adam's fall: he picked the woman over God. And thus we now process EVERY THOUGHT based on me me me and some other human the 'me' wants or needs — God and truth mean absolutely nothing.

Want proof? Bible in clear text says the son is in the sky, and yet we won't accept that until some respected Dear Dr So and So or mommy or daddy or someone we LIKE, says the same thing. The Bible's authority means nothing to us. So we call 'truth' something SOMEONE WE RESPECT/LIKE/POPULAR says, no matter what other evidence there is, no matter how much real evidence contradicts that SOMEONE, and especially, no matter how much the True Someone says ANYTHING. For we choose people we want over God, just as Adam did.

Could you ask for greater objectively-verifiable proof EN MASSE, daily? No. But we won't regard it, for that very reason. So what would it matter what objective proof exists? We won't buy it. We want to believe whatever we want, and whoever agrees or gives us what we want, that we call good and right and true.

Then look inside your own heart and notice how you find a thing hard to believe until someone popular/respected/liked says the same thing, even when the truth stares you in the face. Embarrassing, huh. Maxima mea culpa! So we are indeed, hypocrites, all of us! Like Paul says at the end of Romans 7, who will deliver us from this body of death?

So forget about even trying to be truthful or expect it from anyone else. Only if there is a happy serendipity between objective truth and your likes, will you actually BELIEVE something that's true.

THAT is human integration. No wonder it has to be a simple BELIEVE to be saved!

Follows gd13c9 ( • GD13c9 Integ God's Decisions ; vimeo link is gd13c9),

File Name: 13d1.avi, 9/20/15 made from mp3 13c10 of 4/24/15, downloadable in vimeo, here: https://vimeo.com/brainout/gd13d1

Continued from 13d1: So what is hypocrisy, and why are we so addicted to it? Embarrassingly, hypocrisy is deemed a virtue you are taught to value, from the cradle. This audio explores some highlights of how it works, so you can see how prevalent it is, and how much we value it as a means of 'getting along' as individuals, family, friends, business associates, even nations and empires. Yikes.

File Name: 13d1b.wmv, 9/28/15 made from mp3 13d1b of 9/28/15. Vimeo address (for downloading as well): https://vimeo.com/brainout/gd13d1b . Whole channel aka playlist for Episode 13, is here: https://vimeo.com/channels/satstrat13

Continues to show how hypocrisy is deemed a virtue in mankind, so God creates the Mosaic law as a SATIRE against religion. We being hypocrities, never ANALYZE the Law, so never get that joke! . Yikes.

File Name: 13d2.wmv, 10/05/15 made from mp3 13d2 of 9/21/15.

Continues to show how hypocrisy comes to exist, and we don't even know we're being hypocritical, because we think horizontally (toward people, no matter what we claim of God) — which we think 'right'. Yikes.

File Name: 13d3.wmv, 10/11/15 made from mp3 13d3 of 9/22/15.

Continues to show how hypocrisy comes to exist, back to GOD's DESIGN. So it becomes easier to understand, why God constructs the Mill and Eternity, as He does.

Yeah, free. That's actually the whole point of our staying alive after being saved, down here. To grow spiritually enough so our souls won't have to be SMALL in order to be free. Galatians 5:1. Talk about creating your own destiny.

File Name: 13d5.wmv, 10/26/15 made from mp3 13d5 of 9/23/15.

So how does God integrate all this hypocrisy?

File Name: 13d8.wmv, 11/15/15 made from mp3 13d8IntegGodDecisions of 9/23/15.


God Deeds 13e~

New Segment, on how all the pieces since Episode 1, are being worked together for Good By God, Romans 8:28 to the WHY of it: so you play God to KNOW God better. So this WHY is about WHY God did all this, starting with how you PLAY God so you can KNOW God better.

It's not arrogant to play God, it's your JOB. Video introduces how you can know that, why it's your job, and how to start playing.

Related is the Psalm 82 channel videos showing how that channel's mistranslated, here: https://vimeo.com/channels/psalm82

File Name: 13e1a.wmv, 11/30/15 from MP3 of the same date.

Here, fastforward to eternity, the connection: how all the pieces since Episode 1, are being worked together for Good By God, Romans 8:28 to the WHY of it: so you play God to KNOW God better.

File Name: 13e1b.wmv, 12/07/15 from MP3 of 11/30/15.

Regrouping now, back to the Garden, to revisit that time; so the whys begin to gel..

Filename: 13e2.wmv 12/28/15

Exploring the flipside of Integrated whys, why we don't change our minds despite the evidence (and why we don't sin, in eternity). It's really important to understand that eternity is unequal, due to volition controlling the outcome of your life. Forever.

Opening Example of Windows 10 and its horrific EULA language being denied by those who've even read it, covered in more detail, here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=59

Filename: 13e6.wmv 1/24/16 from audio made last November.

Rethinking why God Integrates Truth versus other options, since He's omnipotent.

Filename: 13e7.wmv 1/31/16.


God Deeds 13f~

Time to play God to see God better...

Filename: 13f1.wmv 02/22/16.

Now to the big reason for Play...

Filename: 13f2.wmv 02/28/16.

View In 720p (text highlight too dark in video, should be light yellow). Integration Body PLAY to answer Christ's Prayer in John 17 (onscreen whole video).

Filename: 13f3.wmv 03/06/16.

BTW, I made the audio months ago, didn't realize until after posting, that it would cover the FALSE Easter date we just had. Real Crucifixion date is ALWAYS 14th day after vernal equinox, so our April 3, upcoming. Real Resurrection=FirstFruits in Bible ('Christ Our Firstfruits', 1Cor15:20-23), is post-sundown on April 6.

Filename: 13f6.wmv 03/28/16.

Continuing on with the implications of pearls before swine — when the swine, is SELF. BTW, the proof we all are swine, is that we don't even know that the Crucifixion anniversary is always the 14th day after the vernal equinox, meaning April 3. Real Easter is April 6 post-sundown.

See: we can't even get His Death Day right.

Filename: 13f7.wmv 04/04/16.

So now, to the 'play' at home. How 'integration' — especially in studying Bible — is like agriculture.

At about 5 mins, I mentioned the 'slavery' verse which is actual slavery. It is in Exo21:16. What we call slavery is THAT kind, in Bible. Other forms mistranslated 'slavery' are really VOLUNTARY employment contracts, as you'll see if you actually READ Exo21's first half.

Filename: 13f7.wmv 04/12/16.

Still on the 'play' at home. How 'integration' — especially in studying Bible — is like agriculture.

Filename: 13f9.wmv 04/18/16.

Heavy stuff ahead. That's what the meter in Matthew 24-25 convey. So how do you NOW integrate your life to prepare for what looks like WAR by 2036, if we parsed that PROPHETIC ANNUAL TIMELINE meter rightly?

Meter videos are in Youtube (vimeo is too much hassle now), • Matt24 Meter. Those videos at start, play a different timing scenario, but still this period is crucial. Later videos there, will show details for what's said here.

The latest rendition of the meter, with EASY to count AD years (just add 30 to the middle number column), is here, still under discussion: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512&start=250#p2304

I didn't do the meter initially, Anonynomenon of Frankforum did it. Upshot is, just like his and my pastor warned that 1998 would be the beginning of the end for the US (speculating, since negative volition to Bible in his congregation was so high), so too the Meter has 'the bridegroom' SHUTTING THE DOOR, the same year (syllable 1968=1998 AD, end Matt25:10 in Greek, is 'door').

Video comment at 24:26 about The FFI forum link about Divorce announced in a grocery store, is here: http://forum09.faithfreedom.org/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=134&p=1426&hilit=Divorce+Bread+Milk#p1426

The actual thread is apparently gone, now. It was 60 pages long. Cat (who's talking in that above link) was there then too, and would maybe have access to it, but I don't.

References to Ted Cruz and Donald Trump being backed by Dominioinists and Seven Mountains people at video's 16:29: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ted+cruz+anointed

and https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Donald+Trump+Wallnau+Seven+Mountains

And/or Google: Dominionism + Jerry Falwell+ Pat Robertson + Oral Roberts + Liberty U + Ted Cruz + Donald Trump

and https://www.google.com/#q=Seven+Mountains+Ted+Cruz+Donald+Trump

The PB (Prolife Blasphemy) series mentioned in video at 12:50 is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgMj9kPFlNg&list=PL144D716E521647D1&index=30. That 30th video begins Episode 9 where God ORDERS abortion. Episode 10 is on Exo 21:22 saying abortion aka miscarriage is not murder.

The video I had in the playlist referred to here at 9:52 is no longer extant. But I found something similar, and put it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVqN4ivQ_TM&index=18&list=PL93059477BBF4929A. The other two parts show up along the side when you watch Part One.

Also, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyemWoc7Cuc and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPLjlEfHxqY

FileName: 13f10.wmv, 04/25/16.


Christ Lambasts Constantine's Rise In Matthew 24

Adjunct to 13f10 in 'God Deeds' series, preview of coming meter changes in Matt 24 series, and example of article reply to Right Scoop, how Christ set the prophetic satire prophecy pattern warning against Political Church, which John will finally 'top off' as Rev 17 harlot.

For historical background, here's a classic by one of the more-renowned ancient Roman historians (who praises Constantine), The Cambridge Medieval History: The Christian Roman empire and the foundation of the Teutonic kingdoms

It's a free download. Just search on the years I cover in the video.


God Deeds 13g~

One of the biggest PLAY problems will be Contradictions, whether they are seeming contradictions in Bible you have to think through or even argue.. or contradictions in yourself, Romans 7 theme. For the biggest contradiction of all is WAR, and that's where the world is headed, as we saw in the last Episode (gdf10).

For again, that's what the meter in Matthew 24-25 convey. So how do you NOW integrate your life to prepare for what looks like WAR by 2036, if we parsed that PROPHETIC ANNUAL TIMELINE meter rightly?

Meter videos are in Youtube (vimeo is too much hassle now), • Matt24 Meter. Those videos at start, play a different timing scenario, but still this period is crucial. Later videos there, will show details for what's said here.

I didn't do the meter initially, Anonynomenon of Frankforum did it. Upshot is, just like his and my pastor warned that 1998 would be the beginning of the end for the US (speculating, since negative volition to Bible in his congregation was so high), so too the Meter has 'the bridegroom' SHUTTING THE DOOR, the same year (syllable 1968=1998 AD, end Matt25:10 in Greek, is 'door').

File Name 13g1.wmv 5/01/16.

Getting a little heavy now. Here, diagnostic links and an overview of how the Spiritual Maturation Process enables you to integrate CONTRADICTIONS as they 'play' in your life.

FileName: gd13g3.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13g3 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

Now to the corollaries.

FileName: gd13g4.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13g4 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

So armed with this information, a 'new year' can begin. How shall you use it?

FileName: gd13g5.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13g5 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

Back to the New Year's resolution theme from gd13g5.

FileName: gd13g6ab.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13g6ab . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

Now the crescendo: you have to outgrow being HUMAN? Yep.

FileName: 13g7.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13g7 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

So now, let's look at this from God's Eye View...

FileName: 13g8.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13g8 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

So now, let's look at how the opposites 'mix'..

FileName: 13g9.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13g9 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

So now, let's go a bit deeper...

FileName: 13g10.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13g10 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.


God Deeds 13h~

Looking at how Contradictions are Coordinated for an Eternal State.
FileName: 13h1.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13h1 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

Still looking at how Contradictions are Coordinated for an Eternal State.
FileName: 13h2.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13h2 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

Still looking at how Contradictions are Coordinated for an Eternal State, this time restricted to BELIEVERS.
FileName: 13h3.wmv , and vimeo alt name, vimeo.com/brainout/gd13h3 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

Now, to the downside... to BELIEVERS.
===
Related, are diagnostic links and an overview of how the Spiritual Maturation Process enables you to integrate CONTRADICTIONS as they 'play' in your life.

Now, to the downside... to BELIEVERS, eternal state.

PostScript on BELIEVERS, eternal state.

'Do it For The Doctrine' PostScript on BELIEVERS NOW, continues.

Christ on Trial in you: His life playing in yours.
BELIEVERS NOW, continues.

Now to politics, NATIONAL TESTING of Integration, its BATTLE. I recorded this before I knew of the Matt24-25 meter.
THINKING is your real spiritual agenda, down here.

So how do you learn to LOVE the Battle, is now a front and center BATTLE issue all its own. The actual MATURE spiritual life and its victory, is to learn to love fighting. Satan failed this.

Note the fine distinction: learning to LOVE the fight is an integration all its own. Some things you'll enjoy fighting, others not. But all must get to the love level. Real love is an insistence, a demand, not a feel-good thing, kinda like addiction. But unlike addiction, the more you learn to love all the fights, the more even the smallest victory, pleases. Addiction, by contrast, requires higher and higher rewards but each time you get less and less pleasure.

God's love is the opposite of that, total pleasure even in the smallest and worst things (viz, the Cross). So that's how the integrating function of the LOVE for the BATTLE, develops.

For THINKING is your real spiritual agenda, down here.

Learning to love the Battle as God does means to love battling as a PROCESS...

For the MATURE spiritual life and its victory, is to learn to love fighting. Satan failed this.

Note the fine distinction: learning to LOVE the fight is an integration all its own. Some things you'll enjoy fighting, others not. But all must get to the love level. Real love is an insistence, a demand, not a feel-good thing, kinda like addiction. But unlike addiction, the more you learn to love all the fights, the more even the smallest victory, pleases. Addiction, by contrast, requires higher and higher rewards but each time you get less and less pleasure.

God's love is the opposite of that, total pleasure even in the smallest and worst things (viz, the Cross). So that's how the integrating function of the LOVE for the BATTLE, develops.

For THINKING is your real spiritual agenda, down here.


God Deeds 13i~

Back to the Big Eternal Picture and why THINKING is your real spiritual agenda, down here.

===

Related, are diagnostic links and an overview of how the Spiritual Maturation Process enables you to integrate CONTRADICTIONS as they 'play' in your life.

You can actually test yourself for growth. My pastor spent 12 years diagramming the Spiritual Maturation process, which I condensed into a six-page chart, SMP.doc. If your version of Word precedes 2002 or is much later and you can't read the doc, try this link: SMPdocforOlderWordprograms.doc. If that doesn't work, please message me. I can turn it into pdf.

Videos to explain that chart (sound is scratchy, so you need an equalizer): • 1/13b, Spiritual Maturation, Intro

Angelic Conflict is about that maturation, explan (very long) starts here: LordvSatan3.htm

FileName: 13i1.wmv , and vimeo alt name, http://vimeo.com/brainout/gd13i1 . All vimeo vids have an alt address which equals the episode number with 'gd' prefix.

Back to prior '4th Objection' re how YOU are the Integrator in the Big Eternal Picture, so THINKING is your real spiritual agenda, down here.

FileName: 13i2.wmv

So now we're fully into the TODAY of Integration, its BATTLE. THINKING is your real spiritual agenda, down here.

FileName: 13i3.wmv

Now to politics, NATIONAL TESTING of Integration, its BATTLE. I recorded this before I knew of the Matt24-25 meter.

The election (2016) proves what Thieme said back then. More importantly, he did say in 1997's New Years eve (12/31/97) and ever after, that we lost the pivot. BIBLE confirms that in Matt 25:9, which Anonynomenon found back in 2011 or so but I wouldn't listen to him. So that's why the Matt24 metering thread exists in frankforum, http://brainout.net/frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512, and you'll see I kept bucking him until February 5.

Link mentioned at about 3 mins in, about Psalm 139's import, is in NoWombLife.htm w actual exegesis. I show the Hebrew of Psalm 139:16 too, here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn8_lhMC_LM&list=PL144D716E521647D1&index=15

FileName: 13i6.wmv


God Deeds 13j~

So how do you learn to LOVE the Battle, is now a front and center BATTLE issue all its own. The actual MATURE spiritual life and its victory, is to learn to love fighting. Satan failed this.

Note the fine distinction: learning to LOVE the fight is an integration all its own. Some things you'll enjoy fighting, others not. But all must get to the love level. Real love is an insistence, a demand, not a feel-good thing, kinda like addiction. But unlike addiction, the more you learn to love all the fights, the more even the smallest victory, pleases. Addiction, by contrast, requires higher and higher rewards but each time you get less and less pleasure.

God's love is the opposite of that, total pleasure even in the smallest and worst things (viz, the Cross). So that's how the integrating function of the LOVE for the BATTLE, develops.

FileName: 13j1.wmv

So how do you TEST that love?

FileName: 13j3.wmv

Time for a little review, so you can see how that TEST is a really big deal, considering we start out as blanks.

FileName: 13j4.wmv

Corollaries on how that TEST is a really big deal.

FileName: 13j5.wmv

Now to the next aspect of the Love Test: besides learning God better, the test helps you learn HIS PLAN better. Which in turn, helps you love God better.

This is one of my better audios. I forgot what it said. God interrupts me so much, it might seem spotty, but ask Him for the verses and meaning if you're having trouble following. For what He did to me, is His Plan of integration for ANYONE. That was the point of His interrupting.

(Too often, Christians regard themselves as special if they know they got some kind of understanding from God. Not so: John 14:26 is playing live, and it's THE STANDARD God wants ALL the time for EVERYONE, as that verse explains. So this audio, inter alia, demonstrates how that verse plays live in a believer: here it happens to be me. Can be you, just use 1Jn1:9 and ASK.)

FileName: 13j8.wmv

Learning to love the Battle as God does means to love battling as a PROCESS...

FileName: 13j10.wmv


God Deeds 13k~

So how do you know you ARE learning to love the Battle as God does? Ever higher appreciation of even the smallest and worst things (viz, the Cross). So that's how the integrating function of the LOVE for the BATTLE, develops.

FileName: 13k1.wmv

Funny how the biggest failures come at the point of success...

FileName: 13k2.wmv

So back to your life NOW, as a King-in-Training.

FileName: 13k3.wmv

Satan's battle for Integration is much like ours: it's a battle over recognition that one is INFERIOR to God...

FileName: 13k4.wmv

Satan's battle for Integration was about RULERSHIP: so our battle, emulates his. First rule of Rulership: whatever decision you make, YOU LOSE something. (Audio recorded 6/16, hence uses election analogy.)

Putative novel I wrote on it back in 2006, including audio conversion: http://brainout.net/frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=706

So that's how the integrating function of the LOVE for the BATTLE, develops.

FileName: 13k5.wmv

Corollaries to First rule of Rulership: whatever decision you make, YOU LOSE something. (Audio recorded 6/16, hence uses election analogy.)

FileName: 13k6-7.wmv

Corollaries to Rulership: you're THE Role Model, like it or not. (Biggest reason Trump is bad POTUS: he's immoral, lie cheat steal defraud — which is a bad ROLE MODEL for US.)

FileName: 13k8.wmv


God Deeds 13l~

So in light of all these facts, Peter closes his life and last letter with this question: 'what sort of person MUST we become, in a dedicated-to-God lifestyle?'

That's what this 'l' section is all about: LOVE. How do you BECOME Love? FOCUS. You focus on what you love. 'Occupation with Christ', Watchman Nee and my pastor (and others of the 1930s theological schools), called it. Focus on Him. 10th Problem Solving Device, Spiritual Maturation final phase, usually after several decades of daily learning and living on Bible under your right (male only) teacher.

Doing that, is focus. Doing that, becomes Love. 1Cor13.

New thread in frankforum contains BOTH SETS of playlists of this God Deeds series from both vimeo and Youtube. Might be easier for you to view from it: Guests and Members can post here. You NEVER have to provide any valid email or id data, to join; there are no ads, no mods, and you're not tracked. http://brainout.net/frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=80&p=3751#p3751

Love is the Integrity of God.. and of you, too. Integrating you in His Love is the spiritual life, FAR ABOVE mere morality. So, 'diagnostic' is easy: how are you growing in LOVE? The Word is Love, 1Cor13. If you're growing in Love, you will progressively think you do NOT love God. So Truth often appears opposite of what it is.

What Role and What Model, you? Dr Jekyl, or Mr Hyde?

FileName: 13l2.wmv

Now back to spiritual growth via doctrinal instincts, the integration battle becoming SEQUENCING, like brushing your teeth or other repeated tasks you learn to do as second-nature...

FileName: 13l3.wmv.

Continuing re spiritual growth via doctrinal instincts, the integration battle becoming SEQUENCING, like brushing your teeth or other repeated tasks you learn to do as second-nature...

Here, macro doctrinal instincts, like.. politics (recorded pre-2016 election). Where should you stand? That's a DOCTRINAL issue, not a political one. Christianity got this wrong for CENTURIES, and is getting it wrong now, Matt25:11.

Continuing re spiritual growth via MACRO doctrinal instincts w focus on macro politics (pre 2016 election), conservative vs liberalism, the Sisyphean integration FIGHT becoming SEQUENCING, like brushing your teeth or other repeated tasks you learn to do as second-nature...

Where should you stand? That's a DOCTRINAL issue, not a political one. Christianity got this wrong for CENTURIES, and is getting it wrong now, Matt25:11.

FileName: 13l5.wmv


ONLY BELIEVE CHRIST PAID for your sins, TO BE FOREVER SAVED!

+ Gospel Videos

Video Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'. Or, play all with one click: channel . They will play per the default channel order, here shown.

Videos demonstrate why ONLY belief in Christ to be saved, is the ONLY way to be saved. If you add some other verb, you're not saved. WOB Part 10 focuses on the mistranslation in Romans 10:10, which gives rise to the false doctrine that you must 'confess' Christ to be saved. Sigh: there are so many ignorant Christians, it's obvious that the ONLY way any could be saved IS by Faith Alone in Christ Alone.

However, this Bible ignorance provides a chance to show how deftly 'eis chaining' makes Bible self-interpreting. So the Part 10 on 'eis chaining' will prove useful for that reason, too. Part 10 is also segregated in Youtube, as http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL71461DD619466B1F .

How to be saved? BELIEVE Jesus the Christ paid for your sins, and you are INSTANTLY and PERMANENTLY SAVED TO HEAVEN forever. But that's only the BEGINNING of salvation, a REPLACEMENT LOCATION forever.

Yet there are three types of salvation, to go with the three parts of 'you'. When you believe in Christ, you are no longer merely soul+body, but soul+body+human spirit. It's the 'human spirit' which makes you PERMANENTLY SAVED TO HEAVEN.


5 Pillars of Christianity

See also GodSystem.htm, which is the associated webpage for this video on God's "henotes" Spiritual Blessing System. Much longer discourse is LordvSatan3.htm which covers Our Royal Priesthood in excruciating detail.

If you miss one of these pillars, your life is straw, worthless. Any replacement pillars are useless, as those at Stonehenge. You know that was a place of astrology worship and human sacrifice, right? Christians do much the same thing, really. Fancied magical works, on which they waste theirs and others' lives. And the difference versus Stonehenge, is what?

The TRUE 5 Pillars of Christianity were also the 5 pillars of Judaism, and the 5 pillars of spirituality since Adam. Don't do them, and you hallucinate a 'spiritual' life on your own power.

Hallucination abounds. People thus mistake spirituality for "earthly things", deem spirituality as mere morality or emotion (i.e., fancying you are filled with the Spirit when you feel something). Or, even how well they know Bible, etc. Since the Holy Spirit is NOT empowering them, they don't know the difference.

Spirituality is God making HIS OWN THOUGHTS become the matrix of your soul. For, you are to live with Him forever. Hence Christ BECAME the Truth as He ate [believed and lived on] the Truth. His Soul was transformed from human viewpoint, to Divine Viewpoint, the goal of Isaiah 55:8-9. It is not seen, felt, or even physical. It's solely internal, and solely the produce of the Holy Spirit.

So, at the Bema, anything manmade is our trying to be 'Christian' on human power; it will all be burned up, 1 Cor3's "wood hay stubble" and 2 Peter3's "the world and its works".

Look: the unbeliever can get the rosy glow, roll in the aisles, speak gibberish, do good deeds. That's what they did at Stonehenge. Satan tempted Christ to do good deeds, in Matt4.

LOL then what's the real spiritual life?

  1. Believe Christ paid for your sins. That enters you into God's Spiritual Blessing System.. FOREVER. You cannot lose salvation. So this first Pillar is permanent the very nanosecond you first believed Christ died for your sins. You don't need to be re-evangelised, even if you stop believing in Christ later on. Salvation depends on the efficacy of CHRIST, not on you.
  2. Use 1John1:9 every time you sin. Fail to do this, and you're only filled with your own power, which of course you'll overvalue. You will misread Scripture. If you get an interpretation right, it's still from your power, not the Spirit's, so your interp will be limited, and will not count.
  3. Learn and live on Bible daily. It's your spiritual food. Substitute 'food' like ritual and emotion, will leave you starving. Don't substitute for learning and living on Bible.
  4. Learn Bible under a MALE pastor God appoints for you. You must find out from HIM who that is. It's a spiritual gift you get at salvation, and if you refuse it, you will be soundly spanked.
  5. Talk to God ALL the time (aka 'prayer'). Jesus' Humanity was always online with God the Father. So should you be. Five subelements of effective prayer, are in the video, too. Fail to do them, and you're praying to yourself. Prayer is Royal Legal Protocol. So it's not chanted stuff, but YOUR THINKING before God.

All the foregoing is TESTABLE in your own life. JUST DO THESE THINGS for 30 days; see for yourself, the effects.

File Name: 5 Pillars of Christianity.wmv, 3/4/08.


Overlooked Salvations

Overlooked Salvation types: the ultimate reason why you must BELIEVE to be saved, and BELIEVE WORD to grow spiritually, after salvation. Freedom must be learned, chosen, even fought for. So God did all that. Does all that, TO us, but only IF we want Him to. For God is the God of Freedom, and never violates FREE WILL. Which free will, HE CREATED as the driver of your soul. Which soul, HE PERSONALLY CREATED. At your body's, birth.

For Truth is nothing, if not FREE. Forever.

So now you exist, are free to learn Him. And if you do, GOD GIVES THE WORLD TIME. Thus 'salvation' is of many types, for many people. One day at a time.

All my videos and webpages, are on this vast topic. Lots of seeming dichotomies to explain, prove their resolution.. from Bible.


How to be Saved

I searched in Youtube on "how to be saved" and could not find even ONE video giving the Gospel correctly. They all added verbs — so their 'gospel' saves NO ONE.

See my "brainout-made GOSPEL" playlist on my channel page for more details and videos backing up with many more Bible verses, what is the ONLY VERB GOD USES TO SAVE YOU: BELIEVE. Along the way, the many false gospel ideas (like you have to say aloud you believe) are proven false by the very texts popularly used. Amazing how carnal Christians reverse the meaning of Bible when they don't like what it says. So how many of them are actually saved? If they believed what they are telling you, then THEY ARE NOT SAVED!

God always warns us that the majority of "Lord, Lord" people are not saved. Well, now you've got proof you can test in Youtube itself. It's appalling. You'd think that Christians flunked kindergarten, their reading skills are so bad.

BELIEVE CHRIST PAID FOR YOUR SINS AND YOU ARE FOREVER SAVED. No other Gospel but that one, Eph2:8-9, Gal 1:7-8.

If you or someone else has a video which tells the truth that it's ONLY BELIEVE to be FOREVER saved, post it as a response. That way this shame-of-Gospel-ignorance among Youtube Christians will be reduced.


Stoplight Gospel

God's Election Decree is like a Stoplight. Believe in Christ, you go into Heaven. Don't believe, & you are STOPPED from Heaven.

Contrary to the Calvinist insanity, Bible says God elected everyone in Christ in Eternity Past, Isa52:13-15, Ephesians 1. So Christ paid for and inherits everyone, Isa53:10-12, Isa45:23, (plus 'depart from me' verses where the Lord is speaking). But some elect against the will, so they don't go to heaven, but instead to hell. To elect against the Compact of God, you must never, during your entire life, believe Christ paid for your sins.

If instead you ever even ONCE believed He paid, you go to Heaven. You can't turn back the time you believed, so no matter how much you might later curse God, disbelieve in Him, become an axe murderer or whatever, you STILL go to Heaven. Because, it's a STOPLIGHT, God's Election. It doesn't depend on who YOU are, it depended on what CHRIST did. Maybe one day the legalistic, stupid, baby Christians will come to appreciate the FINALITY of God's Grace.

Lest you think this free trip to heaven — and yes, it's permanent — is a license to sin, take a gander at Colossians 3:25, Hebrews 10:36-39. You can't go to hell, but you sure can be punished, just the same. And oh by the way: when you GET to heaven, you'll have the same standards God does — even if you spent all your life rejecting Him, down here. And when you GET to heaven, you'll ONLY, FREELY want to think as He does. And yet you'll have to live with knowing what you were like down here, forever.

So see: it's no picnic. Sin is an UNattractive thing. It hurts, too. The more you grow in Word, the more unattracted you'll be to sin. So far from a license to sin, the permanence of salvation is an inheritance to take very seriously, theme of Hebrews 2. So now you have a license to grow up in it, 1John1:9 and live on Bible, 2Pet3:18!


Utility Bill Gospel

Answering critics of Once-Saved-Always-Saved and 'easy-believism', who instead pander Lordship salvation and must-repent-of-sins to be saved, etc. ad nauseam:

Sin is like a utility bill, since you use God's Gift of Life in the wrong way. It's still a gift, but it wasn't meant to be used for sin, which thus turns the gift into an added cost.

So even if you merely got mad when Windows crashed, when you stubbed your toe or were stuck in traffic — you now have a bill to pay. Every sin, big or small, adds to the amount you owe. And you'll sin many times a day, for each day is frustrating.

Problem is, you can't get the RIGHT KIND OF MONEY to pay that bill. Like, the drachma here (closest one I could find to 460BC): https://www.bmimages.com/preview.asp?image=00031097001

Legal tender for Infinite God, can't be paid by finite man, who only has human 'money'. So only GOD can pay this bill, whether it's a small bill, or a big one.

So, His Son Contracted to also become Human and GET Divine Thinking Currency in His Humanity (provided by the Holy Spirit) — which poured out on the Cross when your sins went into Him for payment. So your sins were paid by His Thinking, Hebrew words 'b'daato yatsdiq, tsadiq av'di l'rabbim' (best translated, 'By His Truth Knowledge My Righteous Slaveson Makes the People Righteous') in Isaiah 53:11. That was the contract for paying sin, Isaiah 53:10.

So salvation is a matter of WHAT KIND OF MONEY is acceptable as Legal Tender, in order to have an eternal relationship with God. Only Christ's Thinking is Legal Tender.

Man tries to pay the utility bill with his own money, instead. God refuses man's illegal tender, as shown below.

MAN'S MONEY:
'Oh, I gotta clean up my act to be saved!'
GOD's MONEY:
Impossible and unacceptable, per Isaiah 64:6, Romans 4:1-2, 5:12
MAN'S MONEY:
'Oh, I must repent of sins to be saved!'
GOD's MONEY:
No, you must repent of unbelief, John 16:9, Mark 1:15, all Hebrews 3.
MAN'S MONEY:
'Oh, I must make Christ Lord, surrender my life to Him to be saved!'
GOD's MONEY:
No, God surrendered HIM on the Cross for you, Isaiah 53:10-12, John 3:16.
MAN'S MONEY:
'Oh, if I later sin some big sin or deny Christ after I had believed in Him, I was never saved in the first place/lose my salvation!'
GOD's MONEY:
No, Christ died before you were born, so ALL your sins are prepaid, Isa 53:10-12 and 2Cor 5:21.
No, you cannot turn back TIME, so cannot turn back either His Work on the Cross, nor your own initial faith in Christ, Genesis 15:6, John 3:16, Eph2:8-9, Acts 16:31. (Hebrew and Greek tenses denote permanent salvation effects the moment that initial belief occurred.)
No, you cannot lose salvation, GOD holds you in HIS Hands, John 10:28-29, Isa 49:8, Heb 1:14.
What you can lose instead, is reward atop your salvation: 1 Cor 3:11-15, Galatians 3:22, James 1, Revelation 3, Heb 4:11-13, 5:11-6:15, 10:29-39, many other passages.
MAN'S MONEY:
'Oh, but believing is too easy!'
GOD's MONEY:
It wasn't easy on Christ, Who is the only Legal Tender for Payment, Isaiah 53:5-6, Acts 4:12, 1Tim2:5, Heb 2:9-10, 5:8-9.
Salvation is an inheritance: a Testamentary Will for the sake of the Beneficiary, John 6:27-40, 10:28-29, end Heb 1, 2:9-11, 9:15-18, 10:5-10, Gal 3:13-26. So a Beneficiary can only reject or accept: rejection means the inheritance payment is refused, Heb 3; but the offer stays open as long as you are alive, Heb 4.
MAN'S MONEY:
'Oh, you must have a heart belief, a saving faith, a committed faith!'
GOD's MONEY:
No, you simply believe, which is a mental function, same as any other belief function, meaning of Hebrew verb aman and Greek word pisteuw, both translated 'to believe' everywhere in Bible.

It's the OBJECT of faith, that matters. If you do not believe in Christ alone for salvation, then you claim the OBJECT for salvation is something besides Christ. (To say you must have a certain AMOUNT or KIND of faith ADDS a condition of something YOU do. So you are not saved.)

MAN'S MONEY:
'Oh, you also must believe Christ is God, that He rose from the dead, to be saved!'
GOD's MONEY:
No, you must believe HE PAID for your sins, to be saved, John 3:16, 6:51. That was the contract - payment — Isaiah 53:10-12. Whatever else you believe about Him has other pre or post-salvation import, but is not the inheritance contract of salvation which requires your consent, else you don't inherit.


The LORD's Gospel

BE SURE TO USE 1JN1:9 as you view the video else you're wasting your time. Can't comprehend Bible while in a state of sin...

Doncha think THE LORD would know what ya gotta 'do' to be saved? Wouldn't THE LORD competently explain that? BELIEVE, says THE LORD. No other verbs. You go to hell if you DO NOT believe, as He explains in John 3. You get God's Own Life if you DO believe, John 3:16 here. John 16:9 repeats that fact: "concerning sin, BECAUSE THEY DO NOT BELIEVE". No other verbs. No baptise, no repent, no invite Christ into your heart or life, no walk an aisle, no throwing faggots on the fire, no good deeds — ONLY BELIEVE. IN CHRIST. Same as it was for Abraham, see Genesis 15:6, Romans 4, James 2. See also Acts 16:31, Hebrews 3.

More info is provided in these associated videos:

Look up all "believe" verses in Bible, there are too many to list here. See, "believe" depends on the merit in the OBJECT, not the subject. That's why you must BELIEVE CHRIST PAID FOR YOUR SINS to be saved. In the Lord's OWN Words. Now, AFTER you believe you can do other verbs because AFTER you believe you are BORN AGAIN. Spiritually. So then you have God's Life, as THE LORD explains in John 3:16. So that's when all those other verbs people talk about like repent of sin (which is 1John 1:9, the exclusive provence of the believer), welcome like a little child (which means BORN AGAIN FIRST), etc. all apply. Baptism is AFTER salvation, not before — notice the word order in the baptise verses.

So either accept what THE LORD said or do not, but don't argue with me. I didn't write the Bible, God did.


John 3:16 and Eternally Secure Salvation

Too few "Christians" even say the Gospel correctly anymore, though John 3:16 is clear enough in translation. It's appalling. Most pastors, evangelists, and Christian websites, Youtube videos and chatrooms don't get the Gospel right. So who is saved?

A generation ago — and you can tell, by the J. Vernon McGee radio series — it was common knowledge that you only had to believe in Christ to be saved. Not so common, now. Those posting response videos to this one, thinking they refute the LORD's own words, prove that they can't read Bible. It's really sad.

For the Lord says this: BELIEVE ONCE that Christ paid for all your sins, and you are FOREVER saved. Video goes through why that's true. It begins with my giving John 3:16 in Spanish — which I've not spoken in years, so please forgive the pronunciation — and then launches into the Greek of John 3:16, to show you how the TEXT ITSELF says salvation is eternally secure, in the Lord's Own Words (all the Bible is from God, but I selected John 3:16 for the red-letter Christians, so even they can't dispute this). Much more information on Gospel issues which you can't find elsewhere on the internet, is in http://www.brainout.net/index.html . Just look for the blue boxes on the page, and click the links (if any) inside them.

The video's Greek-geek stuff in John 3:16 is not hard to understand if you use 1John 1:9 as needed; and is very important. Very simple tense-matching rule in Greek grammar shows you that salvation is eternally secure. Of course, this same information is obtainable in hundreds of other Bible verses, but this one makes a good example.

CHRIST IS COMPETENT. So it's All Cross, or No Cross. The Lord would never permit anything less. Lambs eat and die, they never work. Goats, work. So it's time to separate the sheep from the goats. Guess which ones get saved. So all those Matt7:21 "Lord, Lord" Christians who did some OTHER verb in addition to or instead of "believe", aren't saved! Which 'animal' are you?

God Preserved the Original Word: so it's like you are in the same timezone, as the ORIGINAL writer. With the Holy Spirit's Power, you can learn to read those original words super-fast. And see God much more quickly, much more deeply.

Now you know why God commanded teachers. It speeds the process, makes it more systematic (so you don't pull verses out of context), etc.


Salvation Components: BIBLE's Keywords

(When I made this video for Youtube, was limited to 10 mins.) Associated webpage: Salvindex.html.

Amazing how differently the BIBLE explains things, versus man's tangled notions. Here we look at the Bible's own vocabulary from the OT, which the NT references, to show the components of Salvation. Very easy to understand, very different from the tangled ideas in Calvinism, Catholicism, and other isms which men have invented over the centuries.

Time we got back to the Bible. So, that's what the video does. Use 1 John1:9 as you watch it, or you'll not understand it. We all need God's Brains to understand God's Information.


Predestined to FREEDOM

BIBLE's definition of Predestination is DECREED FREEDOM FOR ALL, bad or good. Because TRUTH is Free. Good truth, bad truth, any truth, BECAUSE Truth. You have to be blind, deaf, and dumb not to figure it out. Guess some so-called 'theologians' are too tangled in their sophistic shoestrings, to recall that Truth couldn't be Truth, unless FREE TO OCCUR. Duh.


Only One Sin Sends You to Hell, John 16:9

Liars spread the false gospel you must repent of your sins to be saved, with petty examples: oh, you lied once, so you are not perfect like God! So you must go to hell!

These people should be gagged, and you have to wonder if THEY are saved. For they make God out to be as idiotic and petty as THEY are: sending you to hell for one teeny sin? That's what THEY would do, so they think God is as puny as THEY are.

That is NOT the Gospel. The REAL Gospel is, you CANNOT go to hell for any sin except one: not believing Christ paid for your sins. Bible is plain, John 16:9.

So idiots who chirp about stolen pencils and white lies making you deserve hell, all spit on Christ. THE PRICE IS NOT THE SINS YOU SINNED, BECAUSE CHRIST PAID FOR THEM, WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IN HIM OR NOT. INSTEAD, THE PRICE IS CHRIST. Entirely different juridical issue. Far bigger than your puny sins which after all affect you, but never affect God.

See, the problem in the human mind is how GOOD he is, versus God. So he thinks he can DO something to merit salvation from God, just as the woman in the Garden thought that eating some stupid fruit would make her as good as God. We inherited that same stupid idea, from her. But Christ PAID for all sins, which was the condition of you being allowed to be physically born, in the first place. Whether you ever believe in Him, or not.

So the salvation issue is different. Not your sins, but your belief in Him, is the ONLY issue in salvation. For HIS PAYMENT is of infinite value to Father, your rejecting what He did for you is likewise of infinite value, and since you don't want to live with Him, you get the only kind of 'home alone' where He is not: hell. Your choice, whether you want to go there, John 3:16, 16:9.

Seriously, we should read the Bible for a change!


Faith Plus Repentance Works Rag

Parody of Tom Lehrer's famous "Vatican Rag", on the false-gospel crowd's poopy idea that you must repent of sins and show works, to 'evidence' salvation. Honestly, some people will never learn to read Bible.

This 'evidence' claim is just another wolf-in-sheep's clothing that you must add works to be saved: the Lordship Salvation people vehemently deny that, alleging instead that the "nature of saving faith" is the issue. Bulpucky. They are shyster lawyers. BELIEVE means BELIEVE. It doesn't mean COMMIT. God would have used a different verb in John 3:16 if He meant "commit".

For there will be NO evidence you are saved: it's an INVISIBLE change in your nature — you acquire a human spirit, hence the term "born again". You can't see this, feel it, etc.

When you see a baby in a delivery room, do you ask it to 'commit'? LOL. A spiritual baby can't even SPELL Jesus, let alone 'make Him Lord'. How arrogant, to claim YOU must make Christ ANYTHING, to be saved!

COMMIT is a WORK. BELIEVE is GOD's Work. Not, your own. You believe 1+1=2. You believe Christ paid for your sins. The latter belief SAVES YOU FROM HELL FOREVER. Period. God is no shyster lawyer with clever pilpul, k?

These 'evidence' claimants do not know the distinction Bible makes: you have to BE saved to GET the Spirit to ENABLE you to gradually stop sinning. That's not a guarantee that you will change. It's only AVAILABLE because you are already saved. Get the difference?

So at best, the Lordship Salvation people CONFUSE salvation with post-salvation spiritual growth. If you grow spiritually, using the AVAILABLE power of the Spirit via 1John1:9 and study under your own right pastor, there will come a point in your life where you want to commit. But you still can't do it. Only God can enable that.

Thus you see that the Lordship Salvation people are all spiritual retards. No Spirit in them. The Spirit is never confused. BELIEVE is not "commit".

So those who think that you can't be saved unless you 'manifest' some change, hate God. They really do. Their eyes are full of their own judgements about people. If you love God, you don't think like this. If you hate God, you do.

If anything, works tends to evidence being UNsaved, for that's what the Pharisees and other non-believers do well. It's because they are so works-oriented, they don't think they need a savior. Gospels tell this story plainly.

Think about it: if you see someone habitually doing good deeds and being what you consider a "Christian", you'll think they are saved. So will they! "Lord, Lord" people who Christ says are unsaved, Matt7:15-23!

So people who make an issue of other people's works or sins are carnal or unsaved. Grace never makes an issue of someone else, but only of God. So the popular crying and posturing about how you should STOP SINNING and FOLLOW JESUS and YOUR LIFE MUST SHOW CHANGE — or you are not saved — all that popular posturing, is satanic. So anyone claiming you must 'prove' your salvation has the wrong 'spirit' in him.

Proof: spiritual babies can only poop. But they are saved. Spiritual babies cannot read, but they are still saved. Babies cannot work, obviously — they need years of schooling, first.

So only BABIES think they can lose their salvation, or must 'prove' it. So anyone telling you that you must 'evidence' you are saved, is himself a spiritual baby. Ignore him.

So I will utterly ignore comments by the spiritual babies who want to add their tears and works to 'evidence' how saved they are. They are too poopy to even understand any reply. God will reply, instead: with spankings.

The score is a modified instrumental version of Tom Lehrer's song. It has no copyright that I am aware of.


Forked Tongue: Reformed Devils' 'gospel'

How crying Grace and yet demanding Works 'gospels' speak with forked tongue, never with God's.

You are spiritually DEAD before salvation. ALL you can do is mentally ASSENT to Christ's payment — BELIEVE HE PAID FOR YOUR SINS AND YOU ARE FOREVER SAVED, Acts 16:31.

BELIEVE. That's all a soul can do, that's all you ever do 24/7 (i.e., you must believe in the process of eating, BEFORE you can actually eat). Any other verb besides BELIEVE, will not be used to save you. BELIEVE means the OBJECT has the merit, not you.

But these sneaky repent-to-be-saved or show-evidence-or-not-saved, or surrender-to-be-saved LIARS all want to sneak in something YOU do into the back door of salvation. And if you believe THEM, you will not be saved by their pseudo-Gospel. Instead, you will become like them: legalistic, prickly, argumentative, bitter, sour, lacking in all sense of humor. And above all, unable to read Clear Bible. Like them, you will spout verses which actually prove you wrong, but think those verses prove you right. And everyone else BUT YOU will see your folly.

99% of Christendom is apostate; and it is apostate, largely due to Calvinists, who are the worst false-gospel sellers, as depicted here. This video completes the Contra Calvinism playlist, accessible from my brainout-made playlists, or in the following webpage: Whole 20+ video Contra Calvinism playlist is in my profile page, and in this webpage: TULindex.htm.

I will no longer respond to the Youtube robots who keep coming on my channel contending the lie that you must repent of sins to be saved; who claim you must evidence works to be saved. All of them speak for Satan, who can't STAND it that Christ Alone PAID the whole price and you can't even contribute your TEARS to be saved!

Pox on all false-gospel teachers and sellers, who act just like the Lord Lord liars in Matthew 7:20-23.

Hint in XtraNormal videos: use the Pause function every six words or so, to make speech less robotic. Also use semicolons rather than commas, to slow speech. Use Capital Letters to make a word have the right syllabification or emphasis (i.e., if you don't write HEBrew, it will be wrongly accented in synthesized speech).


Carnal Gospel

Proof Carnality rots the brain, in Christians, and why Carnal Christians spout false Gospels: they lose the ability to even read SIMPLE WORDS in the Word. Without the Spirit's Brains, you have none: that's why I call myself 'brainout', to remind me to use 1John1:9.

1 John is on fellowship, not salvation. But the carnal Christian, cannot read that simple word, 'fellowship'. Carnal Christians cannot read even the simple 'we' in 1 John, so mistake 1 John as being about salvation, so mistake 1John1:9 as a command you must repent of your sins to be saved; so mistake 1 John 2 as meaning you must stop sinning to be saved. See how easily you can disprove what they say?

Similar false gospels are based on misreading very simple words in James. I did a whole video playlist called 'James 2 Exegesis' with color coding, so you can follow what James says. But just open your Bible to James 2:1 — see the word 'brethren'? So James is writing to ALREADY SAVED PEOPLE (his spiritual brethren). So he is not writing about salvation, but about something AFTER salvation, namely the 'crown of life' (James 1:12) — something ON TOP of salvation (reward, compare to 1Corinthian 3's gold silver precious stones). That's why he mentions Abraham as 'friend of God' — something Abraham was awarded AFTER he was saved merely by believing, Genesis 15:6. Parallel passage is in Romans 4.

So, see? If you are carnal, you can't even read the word 'brethren'. Just as, the carnal Christian cannot even read the simple words 'we' and 'fellowship', in 1 John 1. So he cannot read the simple words 'believe' and 'have eternal life', in 1 John 5:13. So what's the EVIDENCE you are saved? YOU BELIEVED, per 1John5:13!

But the carnal Christian is in the dark. So he gives you a dark lie Gospel.


God's Fault Gospel

Ultimate reason why you ONLY BELIEVE in Christ's payment on the Cross, to be forever saved. Associated webpage on the topic of freedom and failure: LordvSatan1.htm#Issues

ONLY GOD authors life; your soul at birth, your first breath at birth, your salvation aka 'born again'. So you go to hell, if you never believe in what HE did about sin. Because, if you reject what HE did about it — for God takes responsibility for everything good or bad, Isaiah 45:7 — if you reject what HE did, then you're claiming something YOU do has competing value.

That's Satan's contention. Satan's ticked off because all his beauty doesn't count, before God. Listen to anyone who claims salvation is in someone or something else. They all insist on a competing value (i.e., the insipid 'I'm a good person' claim). Just like Satan.

But you don't even breathe your next breath unless God approves it. You can't sin unless He allows it. You can't even go to the bathroom unless He allows it. He can make you, stop you, keep you going. You are free, solely because GOD ALONE insures your freedom to be free. Free to believe, free to reject, all courtesy of Christ.

Because, GOD PAID for everything on the Cross. So if you say no to His Payment, then you can go to the Hell He created. Your choice.

See, it's not about sin. It's about God.


Gnat Gospel

Even my pet gnats prove the falsehood of those who claim you must show 'evidence' of salvation, or you're not saved.

Unbelievable, what legalistic hating-God 'Christians' come up with to make themselves feel important! Avoid them, said Paul in 2 Tim2:26-3:7. Don't even give them a greeting, warned John in 2John9-11. 1 John is a treatise against legalistic believers, how to detect and avoid them, because the junk of you having to show 'evidence' of your salvation was pandered even in his day. His letter is therefore about how a) to know you are saved (because you believed), and b) how to know you are spiritual (use 1John1:9).

But those who are carnal, legalistic, fooled by Satan as Paul wrote in 2Tim2:26-3:7, think that 1 John supports them — for they aren't using 1John1:9, but fancy themselves in the light, 1John1:8,10.

Believers who have long been carnal use Bible verses which REFUTE them, as if the verses supported them. Thus you easily know who to avoid, since they make black white, and white black. :)


Grapefruit Gospel

Calvinists contend that you must believe in Trinity, to be saved. Catholics contend you must believe in the Nicene Creed and in Mother Church, and be baptised, to be saved. Yet both correctly state that Christ paid for your sins (well, some Calvinists incorrectly limit Christ's payment, to 'the elect'). So notice: they add belief CONTENT to the simple Gospel that you must believe Christ paid for your sins, to be saved.

So here's the question: HOW MUCH AND WHAT must you believe, to be saved? Listening to Calvinists and Catholics, it sounds like you have to become a theologian, to be saved...

Well, what does the Bible say? John 3:16! Believe He paid! How much? Well, 1 is greater than 0. So you believe more than zero, and that's enough belief to be saved. Does John 3:16 say you have to understand theology to be saved? Or does it say that you have to believe He paid for sins, and the second you do, you HAVE 'eternal life'?

Okay, so that's like a grapefruit. How much do you need to know about GRAPEFRUIT, to believe in it? If you eat it, you believe, right? So how much information did you need to believe about that grapefruit, to be saved?


Pee Gospel

Eternal Inheritance.. or Pee forever?

This video is dedicated to the 16 gnats who were born — and died — in my house, after becoming my pets. They have NO chance to have a better afterlife. But YOU.. do.

Believe ONCE that the Lord Jesus the Christ paid for your sins on the Cross and YOU are forever saved — YOU will thus become like HIM after you die. Not, like the gnats who lived and died and that's it.


Faith Without Works POOP!

This is another rant, sorry. I'm sick of retarded Christians misreading Bible and selling false Gospels. Here, they spread poop all over James 2, and completely REVERSE what James is saying.

Here's a link to my video playlist on James, proving the above true: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list...

Playlist shows from the Greek before your own eyes, with lexicons, how James refuted the original Lordship salvationist, the strawman of James 2:18 — easily proven FROM CONTEXT, beginning at James 1. But of course, the Calvinist aka Lordship salvationist never can read the Bible, because he's carnal, so of course he won't be able to absorb the video proof against him, either.

CONTEXT CONTEXT CONTEXT. Notice how Calvinists always cite verses which IN CONTEXT prove them wrong. Here, the overused, never-properly-read MISTRANSLATED, 'faith without works is dead' garbage, pandered by those VILE VILE VILE 'Lordship salvation' jerks.

RETARDS! You CANNOT 'bear fruit' until you GROW UP from being a seed in Christ, to a TREE in Christ! BORN AGAIN as a seed — but will you grow up before you die? Luke 8 says most will not! So these people are almost as bad as the KJVO. Avoid them.

Another version of that garbage is saying you must show 'evidence' of works to prove you are saved. WHAT GARBAGE — what evidence can a spiritual baby produce? DOO DOO! So you know that all those people pandering you must show evidence are proving they ARE doo-doing in their spiritual diapers, because they CANNOT READ even in English, how James is talking to SAVED BELIEVERS, i.e., in James 1:1 and 2:1! So don't listen to these people. They are carnal, they need 1John1:9 but think themselves holy, so are retards, focusing on the body, and ignoring the Lord.


Faith Without Works Poop II: Luke 8 poops on the poopers!

Refute the jerks who would poop on your salvation with the Lord's Own Words in Luke 8: seeds don't bear fruit, trees do. So salvation doesn't make you fruit-bearing, MATURATION in Bible makes you fruit bearing.

So what fruit is borne by those who poop on your salvation saying you're not saved unless you show 'evidence' of it by some kind of works? Their works are — poop! Babies in diapers, that's their fruit! See for yourself, from Luke 8!

Paul warns us against these people, in 2Tim2:26-3:7. So does John, in 2John9-11. So does Jude, in Jude 12. Avoid them!

NO ONE can compete with the Cross. Your salvation was FINISHED 2000 years ago! So now you CAN grow up in your salvation, 2Pet3:18. Until then, don't expect to bear any fruit.. except poop. And that's OKAY! Why? BECAUSE YOU ARE THE FRUIT, not what you do, per Isaiah 53:10!


Once Saved, Always Saved.. as WHAT?

BE SURE TO USE 1JN1:9 as you view the video, else you're wasting your time. Can't comprehend Bible while in a state of sin...

Many deny Bible, claiming salvation by belief alone (John 3:16), gives you a license to sin. Far from it. Paul spent the better part of Galatians correcting that notion for the terminally-insecure legalists — and also, those who did use their salvation as a license to sin. Galatians 3:25 — sin HAS consequences, post-salvation — YOU DO NOT GROW UP. So you're saved, alright — but as WHAT?

To answer that quickly in this video, I borrow a famous explanation by my pastor, called "X+Y+Z" in his 1977 Romans (verse-by-verse exegesis) series (which you can order from www.rbthieme.org ). I modified his explanation slightly by assigning Bible keywords for this doctrine, to X, Y, Z as mnemonics. See if the video helps you begin to understand that there is MUCH TO LOSE post-salvation — and you don't want to sin. But you will, so that's why you need 1Jn1:9.

Essentially, you only take with you when you die, what you've learned of God. So if you learned nothing, you have nothing, 1Cor3. Nothing substitutes for learning God: not works, not how many people tell you how great you are, not rituals, not feelings, etc. Only GOD can produce the learning in you, and He has a System for doing that. If you don't get in God's System (per Greek of Ephesians 4), you learn nothing, and you die as a nothing.

So, as a baby. With a baby-sized capacity for processing information, for enjoyment. Forever. Hell sounds better to me, than an eternity spent as a happy retard. Down here, retardation is often not the person's fault. But in heaven, all retardation is SOLELY due to the believer who chose to be retarded about God, down here. But you'll be happy, like a child is happy. Whoopee. Far away from God, too. Do you want that as your eternal future? I bet not!

See my "Spiritual Maturation" videos (over 30 of them) to see what the process of spiritual maturation looks like. The videos essentially explain a six-page chart of that process which I developed to better understand my pastor's 12 whopping years of almost-daily Bible classes on the topic. You'll be able to download that Word doc from the first Spiritual Maturation video, here: • 1/13b, Spiritual Maturation, Intro

The full issue of spiritual maturation is covered in DDNA1.htm#Sire. That page is initially very easy to read, so you can easily understand that GOD IS OUT TO CLONE HIS SON'S THINKING in you. So God can HEAR His Son's Thinking in you. He won't do that, apart from your consent each time. Line on line, precept on precept, DDNA, Divine DNA. For God, is Pure Thought.


Once Saved Always Saved .. as WHAT? Take 2

This sequel video covers the 'fruit' question and the Divine Discipline you get for not maturing in Christ after salvation, so you can see there is indeed MUCH to lose, even though you are permanently saved from hell.

The real issue of spiritual maturation is covered in DDNA1.htm#Sire. That page is initially very easy to read, so you can easily understand that GOD IS OUT TO CLONE HIS SON'S THINKING in you. So God can HEAR His Son's Thinking in you. He won't do that, apart from your consent each time. Line on line, precept on precept, DDNA, Divine DNA. For God, is Pure Thought.

Video closes with the steps you need to mature, and these steps are explained in over 30 of my other videos on Spiritual Maturation. You are to know where you are on the "spiritual map" at all times. The Spiritual Maturation process does NOT depend on a particular denomination, but instead on what's in your HEAD. So no matter what denomination you call yourself, the process is the same. And the diagnostics are the same.


2-Legged Salvation: 2LT Series

Salvation has two legs, just as you do. First one gets you in the Door of Heaven, on the FLOOR of eternity. Permanently. ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED. One decision, one consent, births you, John 3:16, Titus 3:5, 2Cor5:17, Rom 5:1, Acts 16:31, many other verses. See my "True versus False Gospels" video for a longer listing, demonstrating from Bible that you MERELY BELIEVE Christ paid for your sins to be forever saved.

But saved as WHAT? At that point, as a spiritual BABY — unless you grow up spiritually. This is the other leg of Bible's doctrine of salvation, which those who dispute OSAS continually MISREAD — for THEY are spiritual babies, so can't read the Bible if it BIT them.

Need to keep using 1Jn1:9 and in a sinless state learn and live on Bible, to get OUT of babyhood. So there are TWO legs to being saved. One saves you from Hell, saves you TO God. The other, saves you from remaining a baby, messing your diapers with all kinds of dead works and drooling misuse of Bible.

For the other 'leg' of this Doctrine in Bible, determines WHERE in Heaven you will be, how close to God. And that, is also a matter of consent. Constantly.

Christian theology generally doesn't recognize the second leg, because it doesn't understand that the FIRST contract was to PERFECT angels, for SUPERMATURATION. That goal hasn't changed. For us, there must be a preceding SALVATION CONTRACT, which is a one-time "door" you enter when you first believe in Christ, John 3:16. But then, you are a NEW person, John 3:16, 2Cor5:17 — needing to GROW UP, 2Pet3:18.

This short video basically covers that issue. My other videos focus on the spiritual maturation, beginning with • 1/13b, Spiritual Maturation, Intro

Read the video description to that video to get the Word doc the video uses, and the larger series of webpages on which the doc is based. The videos for the Spiritual Maturation series are here in Youtube, but also viewable from the webpage links.


1/4 Fellowship w/God vs Salvation

Post-salvation spiritual growth (and hence the 1Cor 3 rewards) depends on Fellowship with God. It is distinct from salvation, but in many ways, more devastating if you don't take advantage of it. Here, you'll see the commonality of post-salvation fellowship in the OT, compared to the NT. You'll probably have to watch these three videos several times, even though I tried to keep it simple. Use 1John1:9 to get the Spirit's Brains and thus learn faster — just like they had to do, in the OT.

More: God depicts salvation as a birth (John 3:16, Gal3:26, Titus 3:5, Hebrews 2, John 14); as a citizenship (John 14, Ephesians 2, esp. v.16, Hebrews 12:23); as an inheritance (Jn. 13:8; Acts 7:5; 13:19; 20:32; 26:18; Rom. 4:14; Gal. 3:18; 4:30; Eph. 1:11, 14, 18; 3:6; 5:5; Col. 1:12; 3:24; Heb. 1:2, 4, 14; 9:15; 11:8; 12:16; 1 Pet. 1:4); as a marriage to Christ, replacing one's former 'marriage' to the sin nature, theme of Romans 6 through 8, 1 Cor 6, etc.

A person born, can die. A citizen can commit treason and be executed for it. A person due an inheritance can later refuse the conditions of the inheritance. A spouse can divorce. But notice: once born, you cannot turn back time to BEFORE birth; you cannot turn back time to BEFORE you became a citizen; you cannot turn back time to BEFORE you became a beneficiary of an inheritance; you cannot turn back time to BEFORE you married. Even so, you cannot turn back salvation.

But once born, you can refuse to know your father; once a citizen, you can refuse to be loyal to your country; once a beneficiary, you can refuse to COLLECT your full inheritance; once married, you can refuse to have intimacy with your spouse. So all those refusals, still have effects. So too, your refusal to have fellowship with God, has effects in time, and especially in eternity.

You refuse to have fellowship with God if you refuse 1John1:9. Thus you refuse to grow up spiritually, so remain merely 'born again', a baby. Thus you refuse to collect on your inheritance, so you are merely IN the Kingdom, rather than inheriting rewards FOR the kingdom. Thus you refuse to be a good citizen of heaven, but are rather a traitor to it, Jude 12, 1John1:8, 10, Philippians 3:18-19, 2Tim2:26-3:7, last half of 2nd Peter. So you can be executed for that, Acts 5 and 1John5:16. For your refusal, is to refuse intimacy with your Husband, Who is Christ, Romans 6 — and you refused to become intimate with His Thinking, which only the Holy Spirit can produce, John 4:23-24.

So you see, there is MUCH to lose if you refuse fellowship with God. You enter heaven a sanctified, holy yet charred soul, still saved but with no rewards, 1Cor3:15-17. Don't refuse 1John1:9! Or, as the video shows, you will be sick and miserable down here, your prayers will go no higher than the ceiling, and all your Scripture study will be bombast — the Holy Spirit won't be in you. And you'll die the sin 'face to face' with death, 1John 5:16.

Your choice, Colossians 3:25, Gal 6:7.


4/4 Fellowship w/God vs Salvation

Conclusion. See 1/4 for more info.

Just so that you know: what passes for 'Christianity' has always been Churchinanity or Churchinsanity, and bears little resemblance to what Bible actually says. I started the spiritual life at that end, as goofball a Christian as you can imagine. All the pointy-hat goofball rituals of ecumenical religion, or the foot-stomping, rolling-on-the-floor emotionalism garbage; or, the legalistic tabooism so common among Christians (dour God being a longtime favorite since the Reformation trashed us all).

But there is a very different, real Christianity, the one which made Paul willing to keep on going; which made Moses turn down being Pharaoh of Egypt; which made David willing to be king (a job no sane person would want). It's SEEING GOD. Daily. Nightly. When you want to see Him, and when you don't want to, also.

Eventually you mature. At that point, living really is Christ, and dying really is profit. Philippians 1:21. Takes a lifetime to get there. So if you want to know God, just keep on wanting to know Him, and you WILL get there. HE will take you there. Guaranteed.


1/2 Rethinking Election

Brainstorming a revision in the popular notions of God's Decree to Elect, in light of exaleipw verses. Word doc displaying those verses is linked here: Accountability.doc.

Idea that God elects EVERYONE to be saved at PHYSICAL birth, and in order to go to hell you must ELECT AGAINST His Will. So in terms of lapsarianism, the Decree is entirely different than conventional theology posits, to wit:

  1. Decree to Create Christ, Isa 52:13-15, 53:10-11, Eph1 (whole chapter), 1Tim2:5 (Christ as God agrees in eternity past), many other verses.
  2. Decree to Create Creation (angels first), and allow that creation to sin, since #1 is first.
  3. Decree to Elect each person Born Be Saved aka inscribe his name in the Book of Life at physical birth. So anyone who dies before being ABLE to reject the Gospel, goes to heaven.
  4. Decree to Allow any person in #3 to Elect against the Will, ONCE ACCOUNTABLE, rules of John 3. So if one EVER believes in Christ AFTER being accountable, God's Election in #3 is affirmed. Else, elected against. Only if always elected against, can one go to hell. It's not about morality, it's a legal option whether you elect for or against, God's PREVIOUSLY DEPOSITED Will for your life.
  5. Decree to Allow any person who elects against the Will to go to hell, John 3:36, 16:9.

There are many verses to support this, but right now I'm just broaching the idea. It puts a whole new face on the nature of salvation, and on evangelism. In short, evangelism reflects widespread negativity to a Gospel which is knowable as per Romans 1, without human agency. So human agency is used, but more reflects the fact of man's negativity.

PS: For the last 50 years, my pastor (and some others) did teach the above doctrine that everyone is in the Book of Life at birth; but I didn't really understand its implications until a few days ago. I can't find any Bible verses opposing the conclusions, so if you can, I'll listen. But I won't listen to the Limited Atonement parrots, for Limited Atonement is a flat lie, already disproven many times over the centuries.


Why Only Believe Pt1

Introduction to a new series of videos. BE SURE TO USE 1JN1:9 as you view the video else you're wasting your time. Can't comprehend Bible while in a state of sin. Short related webpage: index.htm#JustBelieve

Future vids will walk you through the Bible showing how Bible says over and over again that ONLY BELIEVE IN CHRIST, saves. Not admit aloud you believe, not be baptised, not "invite" Christ into your heart/life, NOT 'surrender' (that's Islam, dummy), not "accept", NOT repent of sins — all those fake verbs do NOT save you. Bible is very plain that they do not. The ONLY verb Bible says saves you, is BELIEVE. IN CHRIST. THAT HE PAID FOR YOUR SINS.

For to BELIEVE in Someone, means that SOMEONE has the merit, not you. Belief is always and only the issue.

So in the future videos we'll go through all those verses, so you can see all this for yourself. Some of the verses are mistranslated, but most are not. PEOPLE CANNOT READ, and you'll see that embarrassing fact, too.

This video just summarizes how salvation is in THREE parts, and each is a REPLACEMENT RESCUE ("salvation" really means "rescue" in the Greek).

  1. Replace your future LOCATION: John 3:16, 3:18, Rom5:1, Gen15:6, Acts 16:31, many other verses (in future videos you'll see them) — the second you believe Christ paid for your sins, you are PERMANENTLY saved to HEAVEN, instead of Hell. That's a replacement LOCATION forever.
  2. Replace your thinking with Christ's Thinking: 1Cor2:16, 2Peter3:18, Eph3:15-19, Eph 4:13, Philippians 2:5-10, 3:18-19, etc. — this is a 'saving' of your current thinking, to be rescued into a REPLACEMENT with Christ's Thinking. This 'salvation' you CAN lose, if you don't keep choosing to learn and live on Bible. You go to heaven, but as what? A baby in Christ's Thinking.. or, a mature adult?
  3. Replace your body at death. You get a new one, because this body can't survive Heaven, 1Cor15. This you also cannot lose.

So #1 and #3 "saves" you cannot lose. But you can lose #2, which determines HOW GROWN UP and thus HOW CLOSE TO CHRIST you will be IN Heaven.

Christians who did NOT only believe in Christ are NOT SAVED to Heaven. So many among us who call themselves "Christians" are like the "Lord, Lord" people in Matthew 7:21 — they called His name but NEVER BELIEVED in Him. So they will go to HELL. So don't be among them. BELIEVE. ONLY BELIEVE. And you'll see the proof of this IN BIBLE which you can test for yourself, in future videos.


Hell Verses

By request. Download a quick listing of Hell verses here (last updated, 4/03/10): aiwnVersesPanBible.RTF It shows that those who claim hell is not eternal, are all LIARS, claiming to know the Greek and Hebrew, but provably do not. See also my NephilimFree videos, which have onscreen demonstration of how aiwn means GOD's Life, so ETERNAL.

Honestly, some people hate God, so mangle His Word to satisfy their puny egos. You don't have to be like them!

Sorry, I don't have time right now to do more than this. A longer explanation about hell is at LordvSatan5.htm#Lake.


SAVED = You are Christ's Property

So duh: you CANNOT LOSE Salvation! I'm so sick of retarded, carnal Christians who run around on Youtube telling everyone they can lose their salvation. So this is a rant video, but it proves the FIRST reason why you cannot lose your salvation: YOU ARE THE PROPERTY OF CHRIST.

Only the Property Owner has a say over you. YOU have no say over yourself, so you cannot cause yourself to be disowned. You have NO say in the matter, after you 'married' him by believing He paid for your sins. There is no such thing as 'divorce' from God. The most you can lose, are the rewards atop salvation like Kingship, 1Cor3.

Really, there are 1000s of verses on the fact you can't lose your salvation. So many, my pastor once quipped that there should be a warning label attached to any gospel tract: 'WARNING YOU CANNOT RESCIND YOUR BELIEF IN CHRIST.' Yeah, because you can't turn back TIME. Can't turn back the time of the Cross 2000 years ago. Can't turn back to before the time you FIRST believed Christ paid for your sins. So you can become an axe murderer, an atheist, a nice person who works works works — and it doesn't matter. You can't undo your salvation anymore than your couch can walk out of the room.

Good couch, bad couch, any couch, HIS couch. Do you own a couch? Can your couch run away from you? Can your couch get the money to ransom itself away from YOUR OWNERSHIP, no matter how good or bad it is? NO. Why? Because it's just a COUCH! Yeah, and YOU are property also. Owned, by Christ.

Now, hopefully, you know the root reason why. So if anyone claims you can lose your salvation, just refer them to me. I'll ream them out with Bible verses. :)


True vs. False Gospels

Associated webpages: all the blue 'boxes' in index.htm

Gist: "BELIEVE" Christ paid for all your sins, and you are saved. No other verb is used by God to save you. This video contrasts the BELIEVE verses in Bible with all the false gospel verbs out there, like 'repent', 'pray the sinner's prayer', 'invite', 'accept', 'be baptised'; and my favorite fake gospel lie, 'call on the Lord' — MISREADING Acts 2:21 Romans 10:13 even in translation, can NO ONE read the CONTEXT? Sheesh, how Christians lie against God's Word. So, you're NOT saved if you listen to them. Listen to the Bible, instead!

All other verbs are works & do NOT save you. You'd think we'd at least listen to what Our Lord said, in John 3! But instead we mangle the Gospel, saving no one.

So are YOU really saved? Yes, if you merely BELIEVE Christ paid for all your sins — don't add any other verb to it. My pastor harangued on "believe ONLY" for 53 years, and I was wrong to be annoyed with him! Ask yourself why is it even famous pastors & evangelists get the Gospel so very wrong. So who are they saving? NO ONE!

This is my litmus test for a Christian or a pastor. If he adds ANY OTHER verb besides BELIEVE to the Gospel — and most do — I disregard everything he says. He cannot be filled with the Spirit & add verbs. Bible is too plain — ONLY BELIEVE. Gen15:6=John 3:16. So I silently walk away from these people. God is not in them.

So persons alleging you must repent of your sins, say with your mouth you believe, make Christ Lord — and mind you, these people are generally attractive folks — they are false spirits, sorry. They might not even be saved!

Don't you be like them? BELIEVE Christ paid for your sins and you're FOREVER saved just like Abram was, Gen15:6+John 3:16!


Research Aids

Collection of secular as well as Bible research tips and tricks and research aids I've found. Includes helpful secular or Bible weblinks, book reviews and computer-related stuff, as applicable. My Text Crit playlist of useful TC resources, is here: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2B1F4FB49407E364 . How to use BibleWorks 8 (9 is almost identical), is here: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL941FC149728AE36D . The BW playlist includes vids BY the BibleWorks people, who have their own Youtube channel. Finally, I did some preliminary vids on theWord software (which is free), here: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1bv_xPIih3fm5n3j3LzHJR0CQ7jroJov . I need to redo those vids when I figure out how to obviate mouse-hook problems during onscreen recording.


Accordance Video 1 - Intro to Toolbar

I oversee thebravereviews.com and have partnered with Accordane Bible Software to provide the online community with a summary and review of their software platform. This is all based on the "Essential Collection" (accordancebible.com/Collections-Comparison)
Music: Steppin Intro by Podington Bear (podingtonbear.com/)


Ancient Roman History WebSites, easy way to access the better ones

In order to create Ephesians1REPARSED.doc, I had to collate a list of independent Ancient Roman History Sites on the internet, most of them either original material by the writers during the period, or from universities. So, this video shows you how to access those sites easily, from brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ChronoChart . You don't have to use the document for anything else.

File Name: RomanHistorySites.avi, 4/18/14.


Bad Website Design (here, ZDnet)

Case study on bad Website design, which is all the rage now. Example here, of ZDnet's new website interface, which is pretty typical of all of them, lately: AWFUL. Bad navigation, slow loading, poor sense of proportion, NO sense about readable fonts and backgrounds, horrid ideas about colors, drop down menus, the works. So now we must GUESS and CURSE all the time. And this will win the website's owner, sales? Guess again.

Not shown, because it would take too long, is how comments typed in an input box here in ZDnet, have a total editing allotment of only five minutes. So if you want to comment, you had dang well better compose it offline first, and then review, edit, before pasting it in. By then, you will LOSE YOUR PLACE in the comments, and have to search all over. Which you cannot do, for they keep hiding the comments, so you have to scroll and unhide scroll and unhide scroll and unhide ad nauseam, before you can even SEARCH for the comment which prompted your own. God forbid you made a comment in reply and now want to edit it or at least reply to it, for now you have to repeat scroll and unhide, to even find it. If you find it.

Hard to believe, but even Youtube is better than this.

Also not shown, because I have Ad Blocker and cookie-blockers on, are the horrible ADS which now populate and intrude on reading, and endlessly add cookies to your machine. If I showed that, I'd never be able to finish the video. :)

File Name: BadWebsiteDesign.avi, 7/6/15.


Bible Dictionaries +God Orders Abortion Num5:27 (more proof scholars KNOW this)

Online site shown in video is Fausset's Bible Dictionary, but many other ones are included, here: bible-history.com/faussets/ . Bibleworks has most of the same resources, as briefly shown in the video (using both Bibleworks 9 the latest version, and the earlier Bibleworks 5). The BW version is better if you need to use citations. The online bible-history.com doesn't use the decimal system you need, but the text is the same, as briefly shown in the video.

Fausset's 2887 Entry on 'Priest' shows Fausset, 100 years ago, knew that Numbers 5:27 meant God orders abortion, which the video highlghts, in order to demonstrate the importance of using dictionaries versus the hearsay the dippy prolifers go by. Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT) also shows Numbers 5:27 means God orders abortion, shown at length in Episode 9 of my Prolife Blasphemy series in Youtube, starting here: youtube.com/watch?v=DsGy_E26kQU&list=PL144D716E521647D1&index=27 . LIVE PROOF IN BIBLE and live proof the scholars know it, but cover it up in translation and teaching! So they abort the Bible! Videos left out there but here in vimeo, are housed at Prolife Blasphemy vids for Download . Sorry the album text is unreadable, vimeo (like everyone else) seems to like making its users' pages, hard to read. Use your browser to override webpage colors, and then you can read it more easily.

This is why you need to study the Word YOURSELF. Yes, you need a teacher and God has appointed one for you (maybe sequentially, but only one MALE teacher at a time). The idea is to learn to read it yourself UNDER that teacher. For YOU are held accountable for whether YOU did YOUR homework. So, you need study tools like these dictionaries. So, you need to learn the Bible in the original languages, God having preserved the text — and your right teacher (Eph 4:16 principle) will teach it that way. Refuse to learn under your right teacher, refuse to do your own homework, and you can kiss your happiness in life, goodbye.

File Name: Fausset.avi, 4/2/15.


Firefox Classic Theme Restorer

If you hate Australis, you'll love this. It literally restores and even improves, the classic buttons and interface of Firefox pre-Australis. Video is long to pause and show each screen of options, so you can stop the video after downloading the add-on, and duplicate the settings; that is, if you like the settings you see in my own browser, which is Firefox 38, just updated yesterday.

Not shown, but important: the newtab page now can sport up to 15 pinned sites/images for clicking on. You have to change zoom so it's not text-only, and to 67% to see all 15 options.


Firefox Text2Speech Add-in demo

It calls itself Text To Voice in Firefox, but Text 2 Speech sometimes in its own description. Video demonstrates how it works.

FileName: Text2Speech.avi 6/9/16.


International Standard Bible Encyclopedia is FREE Online!

Download Vol. 1 here: books.google.com/books?id=Ows9AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1&f=false

You can make it searchable, if you have Acrobat 9 or better. In Acrobat, select 'Document', then arrow down to 'OCR Text Recognition' then follow the Arrow to 'Recognize Text Using OCR' (order of selections might be different in later versions of Acrobat). Then Acrobat will take maybe an hour to recognize all the text, first prompting you for whether you want to ignore errors they can't 'recognize' (say 'yes'). After that hour passes, SAVE the document. It will then be searchable.

BTW, I checked this ISBE versus the one embedded in my Bibleworks, and it's the same text for the passage shown.

This applies to all downloadable Google docs, so you can search them apart from using Google docs. Real blessing!

File Name: ISBEVol1Online.avi, 3/24/15.


Jude 2/6b Dateline Meter, Variant 'ethnesin' impact

To show why I plugged in 'ethnesin' in the Jude 1/6 video (at vimeo.com/brainout/jude1 ), and to show off BW9, here's a demonstration of CNTTS apparatus and live facsimiles of mss in Bibleworks 9. This video is in addition to my other demonstrations in my Youtube Bibleworks playlist, at youtube.com/playlist?list=PL941FC149728AE36D . This video, however, shows the two features which make Bibleworks a must-buy, if you're serious about learning Scripture qua Scripture. I figure you are serious, else you'd not be watching my videos at all. :)

Folks wanted me to do more BW9 videos, but my screen recorder still is glitchy. So this will have to do, for now.

File Name: BW9AppMss.avi, 3/29/14.


Linux Mint 17, sample interface

Video's on the Mate desktop, extensively customized. This was my first video using KAZAM, which is a remarkable program. If you do a lot of on-screen videos, and you're willing to try Linux, then KAZAM is for you. I'm totally shocked at how good it is. So that's why this video is so short. I wasn't even sure I was recording!

The color is way off, it's really a camel menu background, but I didn't play with the settings. The rocks are Chesler Park.

With Mint, you can record two screens at once. I didn't do that here, but can. Will do more Mint 17 vids later in the year.

File Name: Mint17sample.mp4


LXX4b Book review on LXX Textual Criticism (TextCrit3)

This video is part of my Youtube 'Textual Criticism' playlist ( youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2B1F4FB49407E364 ), which largely includes independent research materials on the web you can use; the sites are all unrelated to me. This video, is a book review of a text about TC for the LXX.

Video reads from Natalio Marcos' book, The Septuagint in Context: Introduction to the Greek Version of the Bible, Chapter One (link here: books.google.com/books?id=8MbvEZ4bgdwC&pg=PA3&q&f=false ), to show how textual critics are human; why in many ways, TC of the Greek OT, has been lacking. Marcos proposes what to me is the common-sense approach: treat Greek of the OT as then LIVING; so bilingualism and influence from other languages of its time, ought to be a 'lens' through which we should read, the LXX. Duh. So I get a bit testy while reading the text for the first time, on screen. Sorry.

Here's another great link, provided by egwpisteuw: amazon.com/Invitation-Septuagint-Mois%C3%A9s-Silva/dp/080103115X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1338253883&sr=8-1

File Name: TC3LXX.avi, 5/26/12, in TextCrit folder.


PATU32 How to Fix the Jewish Calendar for 2015 onward

ONLINE TALMUD LINKS ARE IN HERE. The whole fix shows in the onscreen icon for the video: so you don't have to play it; download link follows below. Video goes through the fix, as I created it during the video process. For, thanks to an email I just got from someone else who's also doing the meters in other Bible books, I now know an error I'd been making for some years: my error, was to listen to the 'scholars' and the Jewish calendar practice of intercalating an Adar sheni, instead of doing the math myself; well, the guy writing me the email did the math and informed me of my error, hooray! So now you can see the correction: Adar is the WRONG MONTH for intercalation. Bible uses ELUL, and so did Israel, prior to the Exile, per the Talmud. So, this video shows the fix.

Frankly, there's no need to intercalate, just always have Elul=35 or 36 days. Autumnal equinox 'naturally' occurs on its last day, in that design. And I bet money, that's how God designed it. Only later when Israel got hung up on being 'different', did she revert to the pagan practice of lunar years, and hence needed to intercalate.

Related links:
To the corrected calendar in the last segment of the video: brainout.net/Intercal.xls . If you'd rather just look at the picture you see onscreen before video starts, brainout.net/CorrectedforBIBLEIntercalated2015-2016.jpg or pdf, if you prefer pdf. The xls has the same data, which was corrected after video done (I mistyped the dates after May 2016,in the video).

If you also want to correct the Adamic years, 6122 begins on the autumnal equinox 2015. For the complete Adamic calendar going back to Adam which the Bible actually uses in the NT meters (because I derived it SOLELY FROM the Bible), download brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Also, brainout.net/HebCal.htm is useful, and the site explaining it (both now corrected to say 'Elul' instead of 'Adar' for intercalation), is brainout.net/PassPlot.htm .

Book citing Talmud (footnote 66 on page 254) as source for the PAST PRACTICE of Elul not Adar, intercalation (Elul intercalation always makes the equinoxes 'fit'): books.google.com/books?id=FI9pAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA254&f=false . You can also view it in Amazon (but not page 254), amazon.com/Calendars-Antiquity-Empires-States-Societies/dp/0199589445/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427579199&sr=1-4&keywords=Sacha+Stern#reader_0199589445

Click on 'Look inside' then search on 'intercalary Elul' to get to page 254, but you can't actually read that page. You can read pp249 and 255, though.

Babylonian Talmud ONLINE: juchre.org/talmud/talmud.htm . The citations in the video are in Order Mo'ed: at bRosh Ha Shana 19a and 19b, 32a, juchre.org/talmud/rosh/rosh2.htm#19a , juchre.org/talmud/rosh/rosh2.htm#32a , and bBeitzah 6a and 22b, juchre.org/talmud/beitzah/beitzah1.htm#6a and juchre.org/talmud/beitzah/beitzah2.htm#22b .

Book citing POLITICS over intercalation (page 772, but you have to view the book for three pages prior, which maybe you can't do in Google) — so we know why the Jewish calendar is wrong, and has been wrong, for centuries: books.google.com/books?id=M0wUKoMJeccC&pg=PA772&f=false . You can also read the page here in Amazon: amazon.com/History-Palestine-634-1099-Moshe-Gil/dp/0521599849/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427578896&sr=1-1&keywords=Moshe+Gil

Click on 'Look inside' then search on 'creation of the world on 25 Elul' to get to page 772.

Of course, due to our own anti-semitic politicking, to cover up the fact Christ is JEWISH — all our calendars are messed up with respect to Easter, as the earlier PATU videos (29-31) showed. So our political gambits are to blame, NOT Bible!

Yeah, and God made it possible to easily correct RIGHT NOW, as the xls and video, show. Whew. Remember, upcoming anniversary of His Crucifixion, is really April 3; upcoming real Easter (really First Fruits) date is post-sundown April 6, which is 'our' April 7. EASY. No politics, no slovenly 'scholarship', just BIBLE.

I tried to summarize the links etc. on how you can tell from the Hebrew and Greek meters, in the Bibleworks forum, thread here: bibleworks.com/forums/showthread.php?6133-Bible-has-its-own-method-of-ANNO-DOMINI-display , The LukeDatelineMeters.pdf has the links as well, so just download it, if you prefer. It does not yet have the Intercal.xls, but will.

File Name: Cal123.avi, 3/28/15.


RFG5e21b More on the Severan mothers

Still in 1 Peter 1:7. but side trip to Paul's parallel coverage of the Severan mothers, to flesh out why Paul (in Eph 1:9) and Peter, target this period. Related reference: luc.edu/roman-emperors/sevjulia.htm .

There are many other books you can read. Cambridge Ancient History on this topic, page 137ff: books.google.com/books?id=MNSyT_PuYVMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=Constantine%20306&f=true

Also, see 'Septimius Severus' by Anthony Birley: scribd.com/doc/158796842/Anthony-Birley-Septimius-Severus-Bookos-org or here: scribd.com/doc/121476706/Septimius-Severus . You can rent it on Kindle in Amazon.

The other is by Barbara Levick titled 'Julia Domna'. Her book isn't very helpful about the person, but is very helpful re parallel events in Roman history, with (like Birley), a huge bibliography (including his book, above). Both books are available on Kindle for rent or purchase.

Both books are less accepting of the HA account, compared to Dr. Benario, hence are mentioned here. This is a tangled period with (as usual) many scholars differing over how to read the voluminous and conflicting, data. Given Paul's stress, I'm siding toward Dr. Benario's summation, though it is still too vague.

For the chief characteristic of this period stressed in Scripture, is INVENTION.

A. Fake Pedigree, i.e., that Domna was royal, not merely priestly, and that Church was 'old', based on Peter — newly invented during this period, knocking Paul off the previous Bishops Lists, as covered in GGS 11t9 re Bishops List book by Robert Lee Williams. Idea was to CONVERT the Severan mothers and their kids, to Christianity. But the version of 'Christianity' sold to them, is nothing like the Bible.

B. Fake generation, i.e., the claim that Elagabal and Severus Alexander, were children of incest with Caracalla. Of course, the Church parallel was just cited.

Hence Paul's Ephesians 1:9 anaphoric stress is on

* 'mystery'= pregnancy, a theme in all his letters, idea of women behind the throne (meaning apostasy, pan-Bible theme). Here, Paul timed his use of the word to target Caracalla's reign: which we know from history, is marked by his ABSENCE from Rome; so his mom Julia Domna, runs the show.

* 'Will', God's will being done despite all their wills, meaning that everyone's trying to get his own will done in the name of God and virtue; and

* 'set before', what 'meal' is set before ruled humanity to eat, versus what the Real God is doing. Ouch.

Peter thus wraps to Paul, to add the following satirical keywords:

*'suffering in various trials' — yeah, Church's temple of believers, is in civil war. Hence Rome is too (believers control history, principle pan-Bible);

*'for the purpose of testing genuiness of your faith' — yeah, faith in WHAT? People and political power, or God? Church is flunking that test.

*'which is worth more than gold which perishes' — yeah, and the 'golden age' (which Romans then called it) of the Severans, perishes. So too, does any accuracy in Church.

Please feel free to correct or even lambast me, if you choose.

Download pdf on Peter's meter (only the Greek, all of 1Pet1:1-12): brainout.net/1Peter1meter.pdf . The upgrade now sports LINKS to the historical sections in Ephesians1REPARSED.htm, so you can investigate the university and contemporary Roman history/Church documents of that time, to see why Peter meters as he does.

Download the interleaved (Paul's Eph 1:3-14 with 1Peter1:1-12) song with its metered translation, here: brainout.net/PeterMeterSongWithTrans.pdf . It's only two pages, currently. Since 1Peter 1:1-12 is metered, the final version will be much longer.

To get the most out of this play on Paul, read Paul's meter, replete with Roman contemporary writings, university websites explaining the relevant historical references: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc. HTM version: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm . PDF version: brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: RFG5e21b, 12/2/13.


Top 10 Windows Usage Tips (XP thru Win10)

This video is to further explain a post I made in bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/582584/my-top-10-tips/ . The folks there are really savvy, so they will have their own 'top tips', you'll surely want to explore!

Video focuses on workarounds to cope with the removal of customization, in Windows 7-10, but especially Win 8-10, which now allow hardly any customization. So video demonstrates Tip #4 (Desktop Icons Menu), #5 (Changing Icons), and #7 (Plus! themes to force font face changes in Win7-10).

Also some minor stuff is said in connection with the rest. At the end of the video I show #7 live, and it bombs in Win7 onscreen; but it didn't do that before and it won't bomb in Win8.0, 8.1, or 10. So maybe the fact I was recording, interfered with the THEMES.exe program, from Plus!

For I do it routinely in all three, as I can't stand the default UNREADABLE fonts imposed on us by MSFT. So you might find these tips useful? LEMME KNOW. Yell at me here or in bleeping computer!

Be sure to look below the Video watch page player, to see Download Button (in four formats), if you'd rather download the video.

File Name: TopTenTips.avi 7/12/15.


Windows 10 Update support Gotchas! In Microsoft's OWN Words!

Live reading of Microsoft's own Update Support policy, which ZDnet pundits and others, won't tell you. Site shown in the video: windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/lifecycle . I've commented all over the internet about this, for I fear a huge backlash against Microsoft, owing to the pundits, misrepresenting it. The most honest and accurate article, by contrast, is this one: computerworld.com/article/2949230/microsoft-windows/all-editions-of-windows-10-get-10-years-of-updates-support.html .

Here's the second article worth reading, forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2015/07/14/windows-10-unanswered-questions/2/ . Beyond these two, I can't find anything substantive about the issues. The issues are serious, potentially deal-breakers, can hurt many. Ergo this video. I also put it in Youtube, youtube.com/watch?v=EPrOIdcVAiI .

If you want to read my comments, just google on 'brainout' plus 'Windows 10' plus 'ZDnet' or 'Computerworld' or 'bleepingcomputer', to get most of the related comments. This one, attempts to show the import: bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/582415/free-windows-10-now-looks-a-terrible-deal/?p=3765308 .

Or just save yourself time and read the first three links above.

I tried to create a comprehensive summary of all the issues and links in the PC World Alumni forum, here: PC World Alumni

By all means, yell at me if you disagree. I'm not anti-Microsoft. I'm anti, misrepresentation. So if you think I too am guilty of that, feel free to correct me.. please!


Youtube Downloader and GoAnimate changes

Firefox has a great Youtube Downloader add-in, shown live in this video. Which will be important to know, if you use GoAnimate: for its 'Free' option expires in November. You can't download the videos you made, either. You have to PAY for the service now $40 per month, to even download videos you made. So now the role of a Youtube downloader becomes vital. You can only download videos you uploaded elsewhere, usually only to Youtube, with the downloader. So, this video shows how to do it.

File Name: YoutubeDownloader.avi 5/10/15.


James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis

Uploads will resume in 2016. On hold for now, to finish other NT Bible books' meter. Eventually, the James 2 Youtube playlist will be put here ( http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB2D36A5F17A7ABB4 ). Meanwhile, it turns out James uses a METERED dateline like all other Bible writers, to inform the reader of his THEME. The 'jim#' videos are all new, and on James' meter, plus on Luke's. For James ties his meter, to Luke. So we know Luke's Gospel was newly disseminated, when James wrote. This comparison is quite distinct from the German analysis (i.e., at http://www.stichometrie.de/geschichte.html ). That analysis, has nothing to do with the Bible's own meter style here shown. For the Bible's own style is demonstrable from the HEBREW, even with Greek words; for the style, goes back to Moses.

Also, I'll bundle the Youtube videos into longer vimeo versions, and upload them here, as well. This Channel Name is jamesexegesis .

Updated James videos plus the ones below, are (or will be) in vimeo: http://vimeo.com/channels/jamesexegesis. On 1/13/14, I learned that JAMES IS METERED; so there are more videos than included here. When you see the meter meaning, all your ideas about James' meaning, will change: for he's talking to his fellow believing JEWS, about spiritual maturity in light of upcoming Millennium, using Psalm 90's metered timeline, and he's updating that prophecy via the meter, as well as playing on Luke's Gospel, the Magnificat, Zecharias' speech, and Paul's meter in Ephesians. Real shocker.

The vimeo channel leaves out the first vid in this playlist, as the first vid here, is too basic.

Playlist Theme? 'Debunking "faith without works is dead!" crowd, who base their chirping on MISTRANSLATION. So these videos walk you through the Greek of James Chapters 1-2, to prove live before your eyes, how James says THE WORD does the work, never you. THE WORD matures you, and THEN it does works which no human can do.

James uses four rhetorical styles in Greek to communicate this spiritual maturation theme. Most dramatically — and invisible in translation — James cleverly uses or omits the Greek definite article to stridently drive home the point that Only The Word Works.

Greek pistis, translated "faith" means WHAT is believed, the WORD — not, your act of believing. For the RESULT of your believing is that the WORD IN YOU, DOES ALL THE WORK.

So beginning in James 1:3, his deft economy of omission or insertion of the Greek article ("the"), traces the vast difference between human and Divine Word, Works.

Thus in 2:18 the straw man claiming his faith and his works are on par with GOD's Word and Works, is shot down, and the mistranslated "faith without works is dead" is shown to mean "Word believed without DIVINE works, is an idle employee". Kinda different from the common Christian chirping, huh. :)


James, Book of: how to read

OUTDATED video. Watch and comment instead, at: http://vimeo.com/channels/jamesexegesis . This video is replaced by an updated exegesis, word by word, of James Chapters 1-2. (Vid stays in Youtube because others have favorited it, but it is not in the vimeo list.)

Carnal, baby Christians routinely abuse the Book of James by claiming you must show evidence of works to be saved. James' main theme is THE WORD WORKS. In you. IT does the works, never you. But carnal Christians reverse that, because carnality is all about, works!

Watch my playlist of James Exegesis videos, starting with this one, to avoid being like them. For they don't use 1John1:9, so have no Spirit in them, even if saved. So YOU use 1John1:9, so you won't be like them.

For in the playlist, YOU YOURSELF will see in JAMES' OWN GREEK, what he's really saying. You will learn the Greek as you watch, it's not hard. This is now the first video of a playlist proving what's said in the first video, in the next 22: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=B2D36A5F17A7ABB4

Off-Youtube, the playlist is here: SatStrat2.htm#James2.

For the way James uses or omits the Greek (definite) article ('the') is key to grasping what God gave him to write. This video introduces you to his rhetorical style, which is commonly used pan-Bible.

Second, the word "faith" is misconstrued by carnal Christians. Greek word "pistis" means BIBLE BELIEVED, not your act of believing.

But Christian Jews outside Jerusalem, to whom James was writing, were not naming their sins to God, so they were not growing spiritually. So he rips them apart, slowly at first, and then with vigor. They weren't believing in what they learned from their teachers. They were carnal and hence legalistic, eyes-on-people. So they were divisive, even murderous. Just like Christians today.

So his book is on the importance of naming sins to God, in order for the IMPLANTED WORD to GROW in them. (1:21 proves they were saved already, +sower parable +vine and branches analogy which everyone knew but Gospel writers would later pen.)

James was the apostle appointed in lieu of Judas, per Acts 15 and following. Peter had his bad hair day in Acts 1, tried to tell God who to appoint by lots; God ignored Peter and picked James, the Lord's half-brother, as attested by Paul in 1Cor15:1-10. So you'll notice that, like (later on) Jude and Peter, James doesn't use a title for himself — didn't have to. He was one of "The Twelve".

By contrast, God picked Paul for the Gentiles: post-Resurrection Appearance of Christ was what made you an "apostle", 1Cor15:1-10; but the legalistic Jerusalem church headed by Paul's pal James, had to stick their oars in, Acts 15. This led to a rift. It gnawed on Paul, who also wanted to be an apostle to the Jews (as Paul confesses many times, most painfully after his own bad hair day, in Acts 22). But, God didn't want that (ibid).

So James was the head honcho responsible for the Christian Jews, hence this early letter.

Video gets technical with the Greek, so you can see what "faith" means. There's a bad translation in 1:6, "nothing doubting"; Greek says NOT JUDGING. Greek verb diakrinw means to discriminate and judge against, and that's the verb mistranslated "doubting" in 1:6. Again, telling God what He should think. That's James' complaint in the letter, that they are JUDGING; so to mistranslate the verb means you don't get the flow of his sarcasm, and miss the points he makes in the letter.

Instead of learning and living on Word, naming sins to God as needed, people were JUDGING THEMSELVES what was 'Christian' — sound familiar? So James' letter is a prototype of what Christianity is like in any generation: full of itself. Now you know why Chapter 2 lambasts them re their favoritism and works. So James counters that DOCTRINE WORKS the works, not man.

So to see all that, you need to know the meaning of 1) Greek word "pistis" and 2) the uses of the Greek (nee: definite) article "the": both are key to understanding James' discourse.

So this video covers just the essential Greek-geek stuff to see the OVERVIEW of what James means — THE WORD WORKS THE WORKS IN YOU. At video's end is a short pronounciation and display of each Greek letter in the alphabet, so you can read them in the video. Use 1Jn1:9 as you do this, and you'll learn FAST.


1/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Playlist is to dispel a number of false doctrines in Christendom, all of which IGNORE THE INSPIRED GREEK of James 1-2. Link: • 1/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you! . Off-Youtube: SatStrat2.htm#James2

You've often heard, oh, you must do works to be saved, 'faith is not enough', 'easy-believism' is wrong; or worse, you must 'make Christ Lord' to be saved; or, you're not saved unless you 'evidence' salvation by means of works. So, this playlist proves James' original GREEK, disproves all those claims.

In the last 12 videos of the series, we'll see him use a four-fold rhetorical style, which I've color-coded (download the Word doc here: James1-2InGreekR.doc. That doc is used in the last 12 videos of this series.)

  1. "Faith" means WORD BELIEVED, not your act of faith, and begins in James 1:3.
  2. "The" in Greek ("definite article"), he cleverly removes or inserts, to show the difference between GOD's works and your own. This is a common Bible rhetorical style. It begins in James 1:3 & continues thru end of Chap 2.
  3. Question of "True riches" (Lord's phrase in Gospels). James starts this witty parallel to the crown you're tested to receive, with James 1:3's Greek dokimion. It means to test a gem or metal for genuineness (folks counterfeited gems & coins, see). For WHAT word is in you? God's, or your own? Word is gold silver precious stones in 1Cor3, so Paul plays off James.
  4. Favor True Riches of Word over material poverty or wealth: theme of Chapter 2, James began in 1:9-10.

So now you know:

Paul, Peter, Jude, Book of Hebrews and finally John, all frequently allude to or quote, James' themes. Fruit is TEACHING, Matt7, whether good or bad. Fruit is Thinking, Galatians 5 being the Spirit-produced THINKING. For our souls were paid for by Christ's Thinking, "bedato yatsdiq" clause in Isaiah 53:11's Hebrew.

The Word implanted in Christ, made Him BECOME the Truth, by means of which His Soul PAID for us (Isa 53:11); so this Truth is shared out like booty among Church, James 2, Romans 12:1-3, Ephesians 3:15-19, Eph4:13 (the goal for Church maturation & hence Rapture), 2Pet3:18.

So Word Believed, Works. IT works, not you. IT produces, not you. IT is true profit, not worldly wealth or poverty. IT makes you mature, IT makes you 'approved' for king-sized maturation & hence from IT you INHERIT a kingdom (1:12) if you keep abiding in The Word. Learning it. Believing it. Then you are a 'doer' of The Word, James 1:22-23. Then what happened to Abraham, James 2:22, happens to you: for the Word works ON faith. Greek verb sunergew is intransitive. So Abraham cannot do anything. But the Word IN Him, makes the intransitive, fruitful, just as in Romans 8:28 (same verb).


2/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Rhetorical style A "faith" as Word in You, continued. Exegesis from James 1:5 through 1:21, still showing context of post-salvation MATURATION, in order to be crowned.


3/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Rhetorical Style A, cont. Exegesis from James 1:21, Greek verb 'sozw', meaning to rescue, aka 'save' — this time, gradually rescuing your THINKING post-salvation, from the trash it is and remains. Continues through 1:27, to show only the Word GROWING in you which you BELIEVE, makes you 'unstained' between sins (see also James 4:8).


4/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Rhetorical style B) introduced: how removal or insertion of the definite article, distinguishes between what GOD does in you, versus what you do in you. So Exegesis goes back to James 1:3 through 1:23, to show how James inserts or removes "the", to distinguish between what GOD does, and what man does: so you know for sure when he's talking about WORD in you, not your act of faith; WORD IN YOU doing the work, not your own works


5/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Continued from James 1:23 through 2:1, still on B): how James cleverly inserts or removes "the" to distinguish between God's Word Works versus your faith or works. But also, introduction to his rhetorical style C, testing for crowning wealth from Word (begun in 1:3-12), versus physical wealth (1:9-10 threaded into Chapter 2).


6/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Rhetorical style C), continued from James 2:1, goes through 2:14, James begging the question of "true riches" — so you know the proper context for verses 14-26, which is on whether the WORD profits more when believed — due to maturation, example of Abraham. ('Exact opposite of common Christian claims about the passage.)


7/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Exegesis continued from James 2:14. More on his B) and C) rhetorical styles, showing how B) insertion or removal of article in 2:14, accomplishes style C), begging the question of "true riches".


8/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Exegesis continued in James 2:14-16. More on his C) rhetorical style of Invested Word, begging the question of "true riches" — analogy to how Word merely MOUTHED but not believed, is as profitless as merely wishing a poor person well.


9/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Exegesis continued from James 2:16-2:20. More on his C) rhetorical style, begging the question of "true riches", and the LACK of productive value in human works. So the Word is IDLE, not working (KJV mistranslated 'dead' in 2:20) — so the passage is about the Word just sitting there unbelieved and hence unemployed, NOT about salvation.


10/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Exegesis still focuses on James 2:18-2:20, his C) rhetorical style, begging the question of "true riches", and the LACK of productive value in human works. So the Word is IDLE, not working (KJV mistranslated 'dead' in 2:20) — so the passage is about the Word just sitting there unbelieved and hence unemployed, NOT about salvation.


11/22 James 2 says WORD WORKS, never you!

Videos #11-12 cover the 'pink' proof that James is only talking about post-salvation maturation, to prove the 'faith without works' chirpers cannot read James. Videos #12-16's 'green' mapping show the 'true riches' metaphor James tracks, likening spiritual maturation to superior wealth (theme of his letter). Videos 16-22 climactically conclude by tracing James' clever and dramatic use or removal of 'the' to prove God's works in Abraham and the saved person who likewise BELIEVES the Word, versus the saved but carnal worker. Very Shocking.


Jim19 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim18, see Jim7 for vid description. Still on Luke's use of '40', tying the 160th Chanukah anniversary birth of Christ to context of Leviticus 12, Zecharias' prophecy which goes 40 years past the Mill. Focus still on Luke 2, this video, showing how Luke's using Zecharias' 84 and 91 meters to choose what he says next, re Simeon and Anna. Which means, he expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

And James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For I just learned Luke's meter is in TWO parts: the pdf here, is REVISED meter for his real at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; this one, references Matthew's meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James. Still, I must delay videos on Luke's Meter until fleshing out the relationship, further.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim19.avi, 1/18/14.


Jim20 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim19, see Jim7 for vid description. Now we see how the REST of Luke's Gospel tracks to the benchmarks in the Magnificat post-Birth. In this video, focus is on Mary's benchmarking the Lord's age 12 — when both Joseph and she would leave Him behind. So that's the next item in the order of Luke's Gospel! In other words, he's tracking her benchmarks to derive what he says as well as the order of what he says. Wow. Big help to hermeneutics, huh.

Which means, he expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus 7 years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) have its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim20.avi, 1/18/14.


Jim21 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim20, see Jim7 for vid description. Still on how the REST of Luke's Gospel tracks to the benchmarks in the Magnificat post-Birth. In this video, focus is on Mary's benchmarking the Lord's age 30. So that's the next item in the order of Luke's Gospel! In other words, he's tracking her benchmarks to derive what he says as well as the order of what he says. Wow. Big help to hermeneutics, huh.

By the way, at 8:40 or so I say that the 15th year of Tiberius was 29 AD. In 'our' BC/AD system, which Bible writers didn't use, it's 27 AD. This Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference stressed in the video here at 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, he expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus 7 years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim21.avi, 1/18/14.


Jim22 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim21, see Jim7 for vid description. Still on how the REST of Luke's Gospel tracks to the benchmarks in the Magnificat post-Birth. In this video, focus is on Mary's benchmarking the Lord's age 30. So that's the next item in the order of Luke's Gospel! In other words, he's tracking her benchmarks to derive what he says as well as the order of what he says. Wow. Big help to hermeneutics, huh.

By the way, at 8:40 or so I say that the 15th year of Tiberius was 29 AD. In 'our' BC/AD system, which Bible writers didn't use, it's 27 AD. This Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference stressed in the video here at 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, he expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus 7 years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim22.avi, 1/18/14.


Jim23 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim22. Now we come back to why James uses Luke 1:78-79, to craft his own dateline meter. It makes sense to thus argue that James did it that way, to ENDORSE Luke and Paul, given that Paul had just been imprisoned, per James' own dateline. If true as posited, this information would be vital to a) proper dating of the NT books, and b) proper interpretation of James. Again, I'm trying to show something of the value of these dateline meters, to hermeneutics.

Here, the video shows how Luke's own Gospel outline continues all the way to its end, themed upon Zecharias' speech and meter, which was based on Mary's meter; and especially on Luke 1:78-79, which forms the theme for the ending of Luke's Gospel, which 1:78-79, James uses as his meter. Awesome stuff.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus 7 years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim23.avi, 1/20/14.


Jim24 Luke1's dateline meter

Now we get into Luke's meter, proper. This video presents the overview on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and introduces the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this begin here at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim24Luke1MeterStart.avi, 1/21/14.


Jim25 Luke1's dateline meter, cont.

Still on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this began at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim25.avi, 1/21/14.


Jim26 Luke1's dateline meter, cont.

Still on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this began at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim26.avi, 1/21/14.


Jim27 Luke1's dateline meter, cont.

Still on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this began at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim27.avi, 1/21/14.


Jim28 Luke1's dateline meter, cont.

End first pass on the Lukan meter. I'll finish doing the meter, later. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this began at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name Jim28.avi, from 28a and 28b of 1/21/14.


Matthew is Metered!

+Matthew 24 Meter

"I've always said to people, whatever comes out of his (Donald Trump's) mouth, reverse it. And that's the truth. Because he can't tell the truth." - Michael Forbes

Proves Matthew is 1st Gospel. To Sort: go to 'Browse This Channel', then click on 'Videos'. To play all with one click: channel .

This 'mattmeter' channel is a slog, with a LOT of number crunching. So it will be a long journey into how Matthew shows his Gospel was written, in 30AD. That date is key to his Gospel's themes. The themes, are indicated by the METER in his genealogy, which is also his DATELINE.

For he's playing the genealogy off Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53's meter, as a CHRONOLOGY OF TIME. Because scholars don't know this rhetorical style, they misdiagnose Matthew's genealogy as errant. So just ignore those 'scholars'. You'll see ample proof of exactly what Matthew means, in these videos. Hope you have a high tolerance for math!

All Bible writers dateline their books by a preamble, usually in the first chapter but many times in any chapter. When the syllables are first divisible by seven according to some special rules, that's a dateline. I'm discerning the rules as I find these meters; backing into the rules, by watching how the writers use meter. So far, there are 30 rules: see BibleHebMeterCharacs.htm or .doc or .pdf . This style is quite distinct from the hypothesis of 'stoichometrie' in http://www.stichometrie.de/gliederung/matthaeus.html . That site endeavors to prove that the NT books are formally organized, but this channel (and all my meter channels) are about documenting Bible's own meter style from Genesis, forward, which is a DOCTRINAL TEACHING AID.

The first few videos will have mistakes, but the sleuthing methodology will be useful, so the videos will remain. His meter is more complex than other NT writers (excepting Paul), so it will be something of a slog to view the videos and crunch the math.

METER PARSING METHODOLOGY STUDY of Anonynomenon's metering of Matt24, 25 undergoing discussion, here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512#p1972

Associated passages are four: Eph1, Luke21, Mark13, Rev17 in that chronological order. Well, not sure if Luke precedes Eph1, still testing that. These passages are covered passim in this playlist, but it won't be finished for years. Even so, enough info is provided so you can do your own testing.

Luke 21, download here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=521

Pretty shocking stuff, even though tentative, to prove how BIBLE uses METER syllable counts to elucidate the meaning of the text.

IMPORTANT: none of the meters are final. We're playing what-if, in these videos and in the thread. Elision and ellipsis matter a bunch, and we're playing what-if to verify what are the right meters. The METHOD of discerning the meter is the focus of these videos, not so much whether our what-if's are correct.


Epi2b BM101, Matt24:2 is worth million$

README2 Also WORTH MILLION$, IN NEW SEMINARY GRANT$.

Why? Over the centuries, folks have spent millions debating David & Temple dates, when Matthew was written & in what language, etc

They spent even more millions, debating when any Bible book or chapter was written, & whether we have "the original".

Bible meter answers those questions.. for free, as you'll see in this video. Link to associated Twitter thread & syllabus: https://twitter.com/brainouty/status/...

Now it costs $, for scholars to go back to Ground Zero and learn the meter they missed. But oh, the profit to EVERYONE, if they do!

Video shows why: Matt24's meter is easy to grasp, because every reader was taught that meter.. since Moses. Matthew uses the same dateline meter as Moses did, for Genesis 1 and Psalm 90.

He also uses the same '49' DIASPORA dateline meter, as Daniel 9

So for the Jewish reader back then, this is a no-brainer: Matthew writes an End Times prophecy about the Temple, 49 yrs after Herod began to rebuild it, which is also 63 yrs prior to when Millennium was to start, had there been no Church :)

Every Bible chapter, uses clever dateline formulas to tag a well-known past or future event, that thematically ties to the text.

SEE HOW MUCH MONEY, TIME AND ANGST, WE COULD SAVE???

So if you learn this video, you should be able to go to any Bible chapter and find when it was written, like I did at https://www.vimeo.com/brainout/channels

Then you can earn some of those million$, in seminary grants ;)


🍴 Matt24:1-3 Comment, cont 🍴

AD177-30=147=49+14+21+42+21

'WORTH MILLION$ 😍


Matt24 Meter

This is a major 'how to detect/decipher Bible meter' playlist for masochists only; first vid = initial thoughts on meter structure in Matt 24:19ff ongoing thread: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512

At issue is whether Christ is doing the first NT Church Timeline, precedent for Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14, which is online at Ephesians1REPARSED.htm or Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

Master syllabus and summary of Bible Meter found so far from Gen-Rev, fronts the writeup here (excludes Matt24, as that chapter is done by Anonynomenon): LukeDatelineMeters.pdf

Now temporarily finishing the chapter with the pregnant 217 that Mary used in her Magnificat, showing color coding to fit the passage together. Video covers quickly how Christ plays on Daniel 9;24-27, too. Quickly, because I did those videos years ago and presumably anyone watching this video is familiar (as is Anonynomenon) with all that past material.

Obviously Christ is playing on the Magnificat, and it was known and memorized from the time she spoke it, as shown here: https://vimeo.com/channels/magnificat... . Since she's explaining how Time gets fulfilled through her then-future Son, it makes sense that He would 'complete' the Time by tagging what she said, using the same syllable count. That style is used pan-Bible, so would have been familiar to the Lord's hearers.

So again here in Matt24, idea is to see that the METER is used to divide the topics within the chapter, and to cross-reference other Divine Writ, even inclulding two passages not yet in writing when the Lord spoke (Zecharias' and Mary's speeches, which we don't see until Luke, penned 58AD just when Paul was going to jail).


Matt24:1-18 Comment 12c

Re the link mentioned at about 8:00, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars Ad 363-628

You may have to select 'View All' to see the text. Google is nothing if not annoying.

Correction: the mention of 555 AD starts about 6:00. I annotated the video.

If that doesn't work, try this link: https://www.google.com/search?q=Justinian+555+AD+gold

I created a timeline worksheet from the #Bible only (no astrology or astronomy or fake 'scholar' junk), which is in the vid description too, GeneYrs.xls. Bible verses used for it, are delineated at length in brainoutFAQ.htm#6a. It will take you months to vet all the material in Bible, sorry.


Matt24:1-18 Comment 13

@6:41 and some seconds prior, I talk about the problem ancient Romans had, with the VARRO chronology, resulting in the same 4-year problem we have in our BC/AD. Link to that problem is here: http://www.livius.org/articles/concept/varronian-chronology/


Matt24:1-18 Comment 19

Still on how Paul maybe 'sandwiches' his text with Matthew using syllable counts.

For Masochists only, Matt24 490+70 TIMELINE structure and how Paul in Eph1:3-14, 'tags' it. 12a-d were big-picture orientation videos on this topic. Comment 13 and following will show syllable by syllable, how Paul 'overlays' the Matt24 text.

Actually, the meter is part of a prophecy 3-D 'sandwich', examples here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=521&p=2150#p2150

PS: scholars don't even know this literary rhetorical style, exists. So be skeptical, you have the forensic evidence (Bibleworks BGT=UBS mostly, unedited, and there are no variants of importance).

The meter is Anonynomenon's, which you can obtain here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512

He's doing a separate timeline from what I'm saying, and I don't know how much our results agree. Not trying to 'fit' his, nor he 'mine'.


Matt24:1-18 Comment 20

Correction: at 10:09, I said 'Moses' but meant 'Abraham'. Details here: GeneYrs.xls. Look up Abraham, to see he supermatured in the laast year of Noah's 490 time grant, 2046 from Adam's fall.

Verses used to create that xls (ONLY Bible was used): brainoutFAQ.htm#6a.


Luke21 Comment 1

Now we start on the Luke 21 'sandwich' of Matt24. Luke surgically wraps his text, as I showed in the Synoptics series (both here and in Youtube), some years back. But now, we'll see how he matches the SYLLABLE COUNTS in Matt24, again demonstrating that Matthew is the first Gospel. For Luke starts his syllable counting at Matt24:1, but doesn't say the same things in the same order. This is a rhetorical device called 'interpretative quoting', where you ADD information or ELABORATE on information the reader is already presumed to know.

For Luke builds his Gospel outline itself, around the METER of Mary's Magnificat. I did videos showing this in vimeo, starting here: https://vimeo.com/channels/lukemeter/...

So to 'sandwich' Matt24, Luke also plays with the SYLLABLE counts, deliberately matching at certain junctures, then concatenating in other places. To make, a CHURCH timeline, versus the WORLD Timeline Christ originally made. To UPDATE the timeline for CHURCH. Paul, who wrote Eph1:3-14 the same time, had provided even more detail, but only for the first 434 years.

Correction: at 1 min, I misstated the 84-year old as Elizabeth. It was Anna, in Luke 1. The AGE has long perplexed scholars, why mention it. Well, it's because Luke's Gospel outline tracks to Mary's Magnificat meter, since in effect that was the first 'book' of the Bible, hers and Zecharias speeches predated Matthew's Gospel by 35 years. So people had memorized those syllable counts, already. Both of those speeches are covered in https://vimeo.com/channels/magnificatmeter , replete with pdfs you can download to see the Greek meter (and vet it), yourself.

CORRECTION at 30 minutes, where I talk about 469, I make a math error, only adding 20. It's really 30, so is 499 AD.

LOL: at about 26 mins into the video, where I talk about Luke 21:9 meaning 219 AD (189 syllable count plus 30 for when Christ died), with 126 as the interval since last sevening, I didn't CALCULATE what the equidistant 126 (aping Isaiah 53's style) added up to. It's 343, same as PAUL's Eph 1:12 benchmark for Constantine debacle! So Luke IS IS IS tying to Paul!

Think about that parallel: Luke 21:9 is about wars and rumors of wars. Yeah, and it was: that was the prelude for the 'Crisis of the Third Century' (Roman historian term, google it). What kicked it off.

Moreover, 126 years later, 343 AD, Constintine's brutal sons are tearing the Roman empire apart over whether 'God' is One or Three!

Kill me now.


Luke21 Comment 2 re 'Bracketing'

Now we begin to show Luke's 'bracketing' rhetorical style (which he uses pan-Gospel); here, to more demonstrate the Chap 21 'sandwich' upon Matt24.

Like all other Bible writers, Luke surgically wraps his text, as I showed in the Synoptics series (both here and in Youtube), some years back. Here, we'll see how he matches the SYLLABLE COUNTS in Matt24, again demonstrating that Matthew is the first Gospel. For Luke starts his syllable counting at Matt24:1, but doesn't say the same things in the same order. This is a rhetorical device called 'interpretative quoting', where you ADD information or ELABORATE on information the reader is already presumed to know.


Luke21 Comment 4 re 'Bracketing' Advent of ISLAM

Now on the advent of Islam. Tied to this is a playlist on how historically, Satan 'plays' on Exo12:40-41 to roll out Islam/antisemitism out every 430 years (638, 1073, 1517, 1947 ongoing now), until '4 generations' finish (120 years, analogous to Flood). So here we find the first Islam NT prediction occurrence (long before Rev17).

Again, this is Luke's 'bracketing' rhetorical style (which he uses pan-Gospel); here, to more demonstrate the Chap 21 'sandwich' upon Matt24.


Luke21 Comment 5 and '666' (still on Islam 600's AD)

Still on the advent of Islam. Possibly the 666 in Rev 13:18, tags Luke's METER here. I'll have to parse Rev 13, to find out. Or you can.

Tied to this is a playlist on how historically, Satan 'plays' on Exo12:40-41 to roll out Islam/antisemitism out every 430 years (638, 1073, 1517, 1947 ongoing now), until '4 generations' finish (120 years, analogous to Flood). So here we find the first Islam NT prediction occurrence (long before Rev17).

I revised the Matt24-25 meter versus this video, so the 666 reference tags instead, Matt24:22 which ends at 662. Luke's meter pads 4 years elsewhere for Varro's 4 year error in Roma's age, which everyone knew then and Claudius had made law, but still the whole idea needs much more testing, esp. to see if Rev 13 tags Luke 21.


Luke21 Comment 6, cont. to Syllable 840 = 870 AD

Still on the advent of Islam and Charlesmagne, now aftermath, through 870 AD (840 in meter).


Luke21 Comment 9 (vetting)

Now the topic changes to VETTING the meter. For Bible is self-auditing, but you must TEST what you think it means, to see how it 'answers' audit queries.

BTW Possibly the 666 in Rev 13:18, tags Luke's METER here. I'll have to parse Rev 13, to find out. Or you can.

Tied to this is a playlist on how historically, Satan 'plays' on Exo12:40-41 to roll out Islam/antisemitism out every 430 years (638, 1073, 1517, 1947 ongoing now), until '4 generations' finish (120 years, analogous to Flood). So here we find the first Islam NT prediction occurrence (long before Rev17).

Again, this is Luke's 'bracketing' rhetorical style (which he uses pan-Gospel); here, to more demonstrate the Chap 21 'sandwich' upon Matt24.


Luke21 Comment 10 (Vetting, cont.)

Still on VETTING the meter for historical meaning, mostly re Jerome and aftermath of his then-new, Vulgate. Again, this series is about vetting methodology; so IF it were Jerome highlighted in the text, what would the text be saying ABOUT him and his time?


Luke21 Comment 11 (Vetting, cont.)

ERRATA: at about 11 minutes, I talk about Constantine's sons, as if they were still alive. That was a century earlier. In 450 AD or so, both old and new Rome were largely overrun or beholden to the barbarians. So 'civil war' not so much as invasion, and the two Romes were split. By 476 Odovacer would just flat take over the old Rome, leaving the New Rome to linger on, ever paying ransoms to keep the barbarians peaceful.

Kinda interesting, that generation after Jerome completes his then-new translation, how it was split so anyone actually wanting a copy, could get one.


Luke21 Comment 13

Finishing prelim VETTING the meter for historical meaning, Again, this series is about vetting methodology.

ERRATA: Again I confused 337-360 with 460 after about 1 min in this review. The point is still apt, but the text is different. By 460 you're looking at the splitting up of Rome East and West, not the civil war proper of a century earlier.


Matt25:10-12, prophecy re 1960-2041 AD contra Political Christianity

Heavy audio ahead (pic remains static), how BIBLE TIMELINES forecast EACH YEAR, from Gen-Rev. Here, the timeline goes to 3250AD, and verses 10-12 cover 1960-2041, so Christians can be warned what history will be like (here, if Rapture doesn't happen), and what to avoid or do.

The OT is full of these timelines, and you cannot see them in English. I've been posting live Bible videos on them for 8 years, and the videos are organized in 'channels' (playlists) in vimeo, here: https://vimeo.com/brainout/channels

For example, Moses started with Adam in Psalm 90; Isaiah 53 then tacks onto Ps90's end, carries the timeline to 37AD; Daniel 9 then reviews how Isa53 was fulfilled, and petitions God to fulfill the REST of it. Magnificat then tacks onto the end of Dan9's prayer, carrying forward the idea that YES in her future Son, God will fulfill his Promise. So now her Son, continues that timeline to 3250AD (which talks back to Talmud Sanhedrin97-99 about the Messiah 2000).

So this video begins with the sensational idea that 1960-2041 is covered in Matt25:10-12. Future videos will VET that claim by showing how the BIBLE TIMELINE rhetorical style of syllable counting (one syllable per year) works. You don't have to wait for that, but can see the vimeo link above, since all those videos focus on the same subject. But the Matt24-25 videos, are unique to Youtube (vimeo has become a pain to use).

IMPORTANT CORRECTION: When I talk about 1960, I mention Falwell. He wasn't the focus of that year, but rather Billy Graham, who GETS THE GOSPEL WRONG and switches to a social gospel, as far back as 1958, Billy Graham Classic Crusade - The Cross (1958)

1959, he visits RUSSIA for the first time and wants to spread his false gospel THERE. So then does, over the next several decades. THAT is the tie Bible develops, IN ADDITION to the politicizing that Falwell would come to specialize in, and yes starting with Nixon. But GRAHAM was there in 1975 when Francis Schaeffer came up with his false vision of #SevenMountains, and GRAHAM was his friend then. Both his and Schaeffer's sons were pals (q.v., the God in America link in commentsw below).

The #TrumpRussia connection begins way back in the 1960s. A guy on Twitter has been tracing it, replete with legal records he pays to get (so donate to him, if you're inclined): https://twitter.com/patrickLSimpson/status/977974360517509120 (account has since been terminated)

I didn't know ANY of this when making the video here. So that means the full scope of the meaning is not yet presented. SORRY!

PBS did a series called God in America which (unknowingly) helps elucidate what the Bible is saying, here. https://www.pbs.org/godinamerica/view/

Its final two parts (final episode, really, 2 hours) focuses on the time period in Matt25:10, and places Falwell's activism starting AFTER the Seven Mountains vision of Schaeffer, Bright, Cunningham (that vision isn't mentioned in the film), spurred onto it by Schaeffer. So that conflicts with what I said, which is based on other reports. Maybe the film is more correct, in which case that 1975 vision IS KEY to the whole denouement we see today.

LAST HOUR ESPECIALLY PROVES THAT THE ABORTION THINGY WAS TRUMPED UP TO GET VOTES, that evangelicals WERE NOT INTERESTED IN THE ABORTION ISSUE post Roe v Wade UNTIL SCHAEFFER'S SON CONVINCED HIS DAD TO CONVINCE JERRY FALWELL TO CALL IT MURDER. Till then, Falwell only wanted to preach Bible.

THE WHOLE ABORTION PROLIFE THINGY IS A SCAM FROM THE GETGO.

IMPORTANT: when I did this video, I did not yet know how vast and worldwide the connections are. I didn't know the RUSSIAN connection of ThirdRome (a plan to take over the world, Russia's own self-image since 1500s), nor much of the RECONSTRUCTIONIST movement beginning in late 1950s (which this video covers but without mentioning them). My pastor was (back then) screaming against those people, but I didn't think to connect them when making this video. They are a morphing from Replacement Theology, VERY VERY anti-semitic, and SevenMountains is an update on Reconstructionism, which is an update on Replacement Theology (which has been around since Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen). VILE EVIL that gave birth to CONSTANTINE'S ROME in CONSTANTINOPLE, the ROME of Revelation 17.

But I know now, as of this writing. Amazing how learning this prophetical timeline can unveil so much that's hiding in plain sight to prove yeah, the interp is accurate. Whew. Still vetting, tho.

See: Dominionism Rising: A Theocratic Movement Hiding in Plain Sight

ERRATUM: at 54:20 or so I mistakenly said Messiah had to be born 1000 years after David died. I meant Messiah had to DIE by then; it's the outer limit of time in Daniel 9:26, but scholars miss it, because they mistakenly use lunar years when counting Dan 9's years, and they mistakenly use Josephus rather than 1Kings 6:1, to know David died age 77 not age 70.

So look how convenient: if you used solar years as Bible always does, you'd realize the timeline is SEVEN YEARS LONGER (yeah, because David died seven years later). So their two errors self-cancel, and for centuries they don't catch on. Never mind, they also then can't get the whole Bible timeline right from David onward, for the same reason, and still argue over it today.

ERRATUM: at 42:50 I mistakenly said 1960-2041 was 40 years. I meant 1960-2001, but it depends on the fiscal used, as to HOW it's 40 rather than 41. But that's still the point of the period, and it still seems to be analogous to the 80-year rule of Joseph, but I have to analyze that idea more, lest it be a mere time-period coincidence.

How Satan Deploys Islam, playlist mentioned at 46:32 and following, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk-MIH7IvTg&list=PL90D90E03E31E6D55&index=7

At 33:17, I mentioned the Trump blasphemy in a video of his Liberty U speech. Here's that video, and you only have to listen to the first min to hear him REPLACE the Holy Spirit, who in 2Cor3:17 which Trump quotes, is the One protecting your liberty. But DT says HE will do it, instead! God thus advertises Himself as #NeverTrump.

Video: Donald Trump: "Two Corinthians..." (C-SPAN)

I decided to put the 30 characteristics (at 5:10 in video) here: BibleHebMeterCharacs.htm. So now you can take any passage in Bible and test it, in the original mss. Won't work with translations.

The Greek syntax of Matt25:10 tells you what happened, so I translated it live which your own translation will largely confirm. Basically, the apostates then left Christ for politics, illustrated by Falwell senior, Robertson, all the jerk TBN types today. It was THE phenomenon of the 1960s to counter the Dems playing the race card, so you shouldn't have trouble confirming the meaning.

So by 1998, end of Matt25:10b, Christ had arrived (through good advanced Bible teaching, more ms discoveries, etc. — the interim meaning of a prophecy later to be fulfilled literally) and shut the door with those wanting to learn Him rather than politics. In short, that's how long it took for the polarization of wise vs. foolish to occur (trend since 1703 AD when Chapter opens).

You can prove that too, by the wild pulpit changes in the foolish agitating for politics as if it were spiritual, especially the vile prolife crowd. My own pastor, not knowing this meter, went around the country in 1998 warning of this shift, wondering if the US had only 40 years left cuz we'd gone so saltless (violating John 18:36). Which is ironic, as in the older 1960s he too had been caught up in the politics, you can hear him rant in the early classes while exegeting the Greek/Hebrew (he daily taught Bible line by line in the original ms, that's why I can read Bible in Hebrew/Greek).

But all this is just hearsay to you. Better to use 1Jn1:9 and ask God to show you proof as you need to see it. The most important goal of this process is the bi-directional interplay of learning and living on Bible and getting feedback from the Holy Spirit. It's very academic and fulfilling. So do that, see what happens.


How Matt24:2 'tags' Dan 9:4 Meter

Yes, we really do have ORIGINAL Scripture. Proven by, testing syllable counts which are used as indexers, concordances. Here, how 49 and 63 used in Matt24, 'tag' Daniel 9:4, Genesis 1:3, Psalm 90:3, and how 84 tags Psalm 90:4. So you know what verses you are to remember as you read Matthew 24:2-4!

Notice, that if syllable counts are required and we can clearly SEE them, then we must have both a) the ORIGINAL WORDS MATTHEW WROTE (so his Gospel HAS TO BE originally penned in Greek) and b) THE ORIGINAL WORDS in the OT passages being tagged.

So much for all those nutters who claim God couldn't preserve His Word, or for the nutters who claim His Word is inspired in the KJV! LIARS! Proven!


How Matt24:2 'tags' Dan 9:4 Meter, cont.

Continued on how 49 and 63 used in Matt24, 'tag' Daniel 9:4, Genesis 1:3, Psalm 90:3, and how 84 tags Psalm 90:4. So you know what verses you are to remember as you read Matthew 24:2-4!

Here also, how the annual PROPHETIC CALENDAR works, showing how Christ predicted the Temple's fall 40 years after He spoke. Timed by Syllable Count, so no guess work.

Note: at 15:01 in the video, I said that Matt24:1's 'Temple' is the last time the word is used, at syllable=year Christ's Death +40.

It is the last time the term is used throughout the chapter and through Matt25, which ends the timeline (so far as we can certify at the moment) at 3250AD.

See how important meter is?


How Genesis 1 meter sets Precedence

Now, to introduce how 63 and 1050 are used in Matt24, to 'tag' Genesis 1:3, Psalm 90:3, we go through Genesis 1's meter. Notice how very different the focus, versus our usual and wrong, 'how old earth' debates.

Here also, how the annual HISTORICAL CALENDAR works, showing how Moses presents a juridical case for Israel on the verge of entering the Land: WHY ARE WE HERE on the Time map. Timed by Syllable Count, so no guess work. So not about how old the earth is, but why God SENDS Israel into the Land!

Here's the link to the Varro 4-year error which curiously mirrors the Bible's own ADJUSTMENT for what we call BC/AD, https://www.livius.org/articles/concept/varronian-chronology/

So using end 4BC for His Birth is actually rooted in the BIBLE, cuz the scheduled year of His Birth had to be CHANGED due to Temple Construction delay, 1Kings 6:1. So you use 4106 to convert to BC, but still use all other years the same. For balancing some years to David, you have to use 4103.

Correction: about mid-way through the video I start talking about the EQUIDISTANCE rule, saying that 1050 years later, Christ is scheduled to be born.

It's true, but AFTER Psalm90's 350. For Psalm 90, is a) a parallel calendar of ALL time, and b) a specific ANNUAL calendar of the Judges, AFTER which 1050 remain to Messiah's birth. I conflated the two meanings while talking, and didn't mean to do that.

In this video's description you'll find the vimeo channel on Psalm 90, which is extensive. Its videos explain in much more detail, what I wrote above in this comment. Most of its videos are also here in Youtube, but the vimeo channel is better organized, HD is clearer, and all those videos are easily downloadable in the original resolution.


How Acts tags Matt24, Gen1, Ps90, Dan9 with Anno Domini

Now, how LUKE plays on the 49 and 63 in Matt24, to also tag Daniel 9:4 (49), Genesis 1:3 & Psalm 90:3 (63), we go through Acts and Luke1's Gospel meter.

Here, the 49 has another and NEW use: Bible's Anno Domini version, Christ's AGE. It works a bit differently from ours, and is the first instance I can find in NT of its use. Paul uses it a lot, so maybe he used it first, not sure.

WHY ARE WE HERE on the Time map, is thus still the theme. Timed by Syllable Count, so no guess work. So not about how old the earth is, but why God SENDS CHURCH into the Land!

Notice, that if syllable counts are required and we can clearly SEE them, then we must have both a) the ORIGINAL WORDS MOSES WROTE (so 'our' Genesis HAS TO BE THE SAME as Matthew used) since b) THE ORIGINAL WORDS in the OT passages are tagged in Matthew.

What's so clever about the Acts '49' for Acts 1, is that it means Christ would have been in his 49th year, and there were 49 years to the SCHEDULED Millennium at the same time. EQUIDISTANCE is a common haha meter mnemonic used pan-Bible. So Luke is claiming he's writing when Christ was age 48 (49th year) or age 49. THAT chapter, so each chapter is SERIAL, will have its own date formula.

Millions of dollars could be saved if we just parsed the Bible's original language texts. So many debates would end, and so much false doctrine would be proven false, saving EVERYONE time, money and angst. Plus, it's objectively verifiable!


Does Christ call US, the Great Satan? Maybe...

Now we're back to Matt25. You've now seen some of the syllable-counting style and wit, in other Bible passages.

Here, Christ's focus is to help believers spot the Anti-Christ as a historical trend, since Rapture is unpredictable, so whoever is 'trending' toward that status 'now', is to be avoided.

But what if the anti-Christ.. is Christian? Yep, that's the problem He traces, for we 'salt' can indeed hurt history. See, Daniel 2 maps the rest of history, and by Daniel 11 you realize there are TWO anti-christs, one being a Gentile nation based on the Roman model of Government. Geographically, this King of the North moves steadily WESTWARD, so can be any confederation or nation, later on. So Christ maps the history, so you can know who's potential, and avoid becoming caught up in that evil.

Hence this annual PROPHETIC CALENDAR timed by syllable count, so no guess work. Video briefly focuses on what historians deem the beginning of 'modern' Western history.

[2024 comment unrelated to brainout] This could also be related with the "King of the North", demons make a lot of parody of this, even in this bogus experiment a man telling them to "go north", probably demon-induced dreams in relation to that (even if it was a bogus thing, doesn't matter if people perform pranks, they'll capitalise on it). I think this is a demon parody of one of the "four weather angels", presumably the "eagle" one that governs the north; they have a personal vendetta against. Obviously we'll never know why outside of speculation.


Real Bible vs Hokey Blood Moon Apocalypse? Yikes!

Video is related to the Matt24 prophetic meter series, offering a lighthearted break from all this END OF THE WORLD stuff at the same time. Article shown in video, is https://babylonbee.com/news/almighty-scrambles-throw-together-apocalypse-next-blood-moon

It's the Biblical equivalent of The Onion, and is always reliably wry. Just like real Bible.

Docs shown in video are part of the Matt 24 series, the latest video as of posting being this one, whose vid descriptions have all the related docs: • Does Christ call US, the Great Satan?...

Finally, my apologies to beloved Gilbert Gottfried, for my imitation of his signature 'I'm sorry' line. I just love the way he says it.


Matt25 13ff on Future Impact of MILLENNIALS

Now we go to Bible's prophecy re MILLENNIALS and their kids, grandkids, in Matt25:13ff, which spans 2062-2662 AD. Basically, how these three groups will be the best and worst in Christianity, for the whole Church Age. Shocking claim, huh.

So let's investigate it a bit..


Matt24 vs Luke21, LUKE TAGS MATT SYLLABLES 1/18

Now we start over, this time to see how BIBLE ITSELF tells you the authors track syllable counts: here, Luke 21 on Matt24. Results are surprisingly helpful, for Luke moves the Matt text around, and the SYLLABLE COUNTS help you see WHY. There would be no way to discern why Luke changes the text order if you didn't know he's tracking MATT syllable counts, which of course proves Matt is the FIRST GOSPEL (all those Quelle 'scholars' can eat crow now).


Matt24 vs Luke21, LUKE TAGS MATT SYLLABLES 2/18

This should be explosive heremeneutical stuff to revolutionize how we interp Scripture.

I forgot to mention, that 112 is the number of days between 1st day of Passover when Christ died, and Tish b'Av when both 1st and 2nd Temple EACH go down.

So see the consistency of TEMPLE analogy Luke prophetically employs on Matt?

Christ is the Temple the Temple depicts.

He's rejected.

So 40 syllables=years after He talks, the Temple is rejected ON Tish B'Av, by Titus (see December 1995 Military History Magazine for the daily timeline, or pick another source). So Luke forecasts that 70 years after THAT (like Paul does, covering same year, Eph1:6), a pig temple will sit where the then-current 2nd (Herod's rebuilt) Temple does 'now' when Luke writes. And by then, Tish b'Av is the only day of the year Jews are even allowed to visit (to mourn). 112 days after Passover.

Church, of course, becomes the new Temple/Body of Christ, and she is no better, as we see in the original timing of the rebellion in ROME that Christ Himself prophecies for 190 AD et seq., which gives rise to what ancient Roman historians will call the Crisis of the Third Century.

Parallelism throughout: here of apostates who are false christs.

The satire goes on from there. False versus true Christ, the theme of Matt24-25, and Luke 21. THAT is how, by 2016, we get the satire against Trump. More on that tracing, will be in later videos.


Matt24 vs Luke21 w Paul TAG MATT24 SYLLABLES 4/18

Continued proof, now with REVISED DEMO of how Paul's Eph1:3-14 meter uses syllable counting to validate and 'tag' prior Divine writ; here to show where the Matt25:10-12 (42nd video) interp is sourced. This should be explosive hermeneutical stuff to revolutionize how we interp Scripture.


Matt24 ANAPHORA prophecy (starts proof against Trump) 8/18

Climactic proof of why Donald Trump is predicted in Matt25:11 starts here, showing the ANAPHORA amen legw humin from Matt 24 forward. It's an important TIMELINE BENCHMARKING of history which makes it pretty easy to know your future, when your years are covered.

It also hslps you vet your own syllable counts, since after all if you have to count syllables to get the TIMING of prophecy, you need a way to audit your counts. ANAPHORA are always divisible by 3 (Decree) or 7 (promise).

So, to vet it, I had to create an anaphora worksheet for amen legw humin, here: AmenAnaphoraR.xls. If you come up with different syllable counts, you can input them into column A, and see whether the sevening or three-ing works, using Custom Views in Excel.

This isn't the only anaphora or measure, but it's the dramatic one, which always has a historical event, usually involving religious conflict or war.

There are other keys like this in the passage, revolving around the same keywords in the disciples' questions: sign, 'you' (real Christ), 'appearing', which future videos in this subseries will cover. They too are all divisible in their distances from each other.. by seven. Amazing stuff.

Again, all this backstory is to show where the Matt25:10-12 (42nd video) interp is sourced. This should be explosive hermeneutical stuff to revolutionize how we interp Scripture.


Matt24 anaphora satirically morphs to kurios/numphios, 12/18

Coming into the home stretch, how we know apostate Christians backing DT are satirized in Matt25:11. We get that from tracing the anaphora and the keywords in Matt24:1 onward. These are all SEVENED from each other in the syllable counts, so that proves INTENT, much like one would highlight a section or create a section header. Wry and subtle satire is a feature of all ancient literature, and Bible is no exception, so one is LED like in a story, to a conclusion.

For us, that conclusion isn't pretty, but after us, a golden age of Christianity begins. But first, let's see how the morphing of the anaphora from parousia ho huios tou anthropou becomes ho kurios becomes ho numphios (Bridegroom, more intimate).

For in Jesus' day, Scripture was widely known, available, free. After God employed writers of the NT, apostates started kidnapping it, and politicos did too.

So Matt24 is about FREEING UP Bible and YOUR REACTION when you get it. Now do you see why it's relevant to track the syllable counts?

So: 'parousia' usually contains ho huios tou anthropou, the nickname from Daniel 7:13 Christ REVISES to apply only to Himself.

Full listing of the parousia distances (and kurios) starts here; you can post without any ID info or join frankforum: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512&p=3299#p3245

Anaphora worksheet for amen legw humin: AmenAnaphoraR.xls. You can change them in column A, see whether the sevening or three-ing works, using Custom Views in Excel.

The Amen anaphora is the dramatic one, which always has a historical event involving religious conflict or war.

Parousia means God 'appears' through His Word, to a people.

THEME, disciples' questions: sign, 'you' (real Christ), 'appearing'.

All this backstory is to show where the Matt25:10-12 (42nd video) interp is sourced. Should be explosive hermeneutical stuff to revolutionize how we interp Scripture.

If you want to see, by 1818-21, how political, popular, and increasingly polemical Bible translation had become, peruse this book (which you can download for free), The History of the English Bible: Extending from Earliest Saxon Translations ...


Matt24 anaphora satirically morphs to kurios/numphios, 13/18

UPDATE: at 22:01 I ask who's the fake bridegroom, but then I did NOT know that 1975 was when SEVEN MOUNTAINS started, based on a SATANIC simultaneous 'vision' among three apostates: Bill Bright, Loren Cunningham, and Francis Schaeffer. You can find their own testimonies to it right here in Youtube. Search also Gilman Hill, whose DAD testifies to hearing them say so also. THAT 'vision' directly contravenes Rev17:8 which these three getting the 'vision' didn't know? Not to mention, Constantine's claimed 'visions' in 310 and 312 AD,. In 310, it was 'Apollo' promising four victory wreaths (120 years); by 312, he changes the name of the 'god' to Christ, with the famous in hoc signo vinces Chi Rho. Same 'conquer' message as the three guys got. And they didn't see how the demons mocked them?

Also, the numphios in 1747-9 is the First Great Awakening, same basic idea as would later become Seven Mountains. Main guy is George Whitehead. Here are his sermons: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/whitefield/sermons.ii.html

Alongside him, Jonathan Edwards. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Edwards_(theologian)

The two in the 1800s (1819-21 and 1845-7) are 2nd Great Awakening. I can't yet pinpoint names, but there will be some. Still looking. Big other movements during that time too, not just Joseph Smith which this video mentions.

Again, I'm learning as I post these videos; and the meaning is still true, but bigger than I thought when posting the vids. God is tracing PROVENANCE of the fake-christ movements, along with the REALLY IN CHRIST ones.

Also, apparently Joseph Smith was killed in 1844, see that year here: http://www.pbs.org/godinamerica/timeline/

So then maybe the 2nd Awakening is more in view, but I'm still trying to pin down WHICH INDIVIDUALS are highlighted, as there are so many.


Matt24 anaphora morphs to kurios/numphios, 14/18

Review of Matt25 thus far to show proof for the anti-Trump interp in verse 11 is in a consistent historical context of POLITICIZING CHRISTIANITY, a big no-no which violates John 18:36, which Paul burlesques in Eph1:3-14, and eventually John will cover in Rev17's harlot ON the 'Seven Mountains'.. which is the name of the Christians sect, now backing DT. (Search here in Youtube on Cruz, Trump, Anointed and Seven Mountains to prove it to yourself in THEIR own words.)

Ooops, there's ANOTHER anaphora proof that solidifies the interp Matt25:11 is contra Donald Trump and the Seven Mountains 'Christians' backing him — a verb called anakrinw. Really, it means a formal JUDGMENT. Yikes, and it is parallel to Temple fall prophecy in Matt24:2, exact same bookmarking.

Which means, the EFFECT of Donald Trump is that we get into war like happened in Israel in 66-73 AD. Not sure if it's military, but it is Christians fighting.. yet again. Good thing to find that now, huh. So 14a and b will cover that.

Meanwhile, it should be evident Christians backing DT are satirized in Matt25:11. We get that from tracing the anaphora and the keywords in Matt24:1 onward. These are all SEVENED from each other in the syllable counts, so that proves INTENT, much like one would highlight a section or create a section header. Wry and subtle satire is a feature of all ancient literature, and Bible is no exception, so one is LED like in a story, to a conclusion.


Matt24 APOKRINW (judgment) anaphora 15/18

Through part 18 we'll see another anaphora proof that solidifies the interp Matt25:11 is contra Donald Trump and the Seven Mountains 'Christians' backing him — a verb called apokrinw. At heart, it means a formal opinion, ruling, JUDGMENT. Yikes, and it is parallel to Temple fall prophecy in Matt24:2, exact same bookmarking.

I changed the number to 15, since the apokrites takes three more videos to explain.


Matt24 APOKRINW (judgment) anaphora 15/18

Through part 18 we see another anaphora proof that solidifies the interp Matt25:11 is contra Donald Trump and the Seven Mountains 'Christians' backing him — a verb called apokrinw. At heart, it means a formal opinion, ruling, JUDGMENT. Yikes, and it is parallel to Temple fall prophecy in Matt24:2, exact same bookmarking. It portrays the SEQUENCE of judgment.

CORRECTION: Titus dies in FIRST syllable of Blepete (ouch).

So ou (Vespasian is no more, June 23 79 AD, so at the end of the Jewish sacred year, roman-emperors.org/vespasia.htm), then LOOK! No Titus either!

So now look again at the prior phrase, the Lord 'answering speaks to THEM'. Two Emperors, and a volcano in between. This is why I keep harping on the biting wit of meter prophecy. Paul's is just as biting, https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterggs11


Matt24 APOKRINW (judgment) anaphora SUMMARY 18/18

Subseries end (Mark 13 vids come next). Summarizing Matt24-25 anaphora and keyword proof that solidifies interp Matt25:11 is contra DT and Seven Mountains 'Christians' backing him

Sequence key is apokrinw. At heart, it means a formal opinion, ruling, JUDGMENT. Yikes, and it is parallel to Temple fall prophecy in Matt24:2, exact same bookmarking. It portrays the SEQUENCE of judgment.


How Mark13 tags Matt24 and Luke 21, p1

Mark 13 subseries demos how we know interp against Trump true, still; but now, via proof that Mark 13 tags its earlier sister passages in Matthew 24 and Luke 21, respectively.

It's much more technical, because Mark's gospel text has a lot of what are called 'variants', where one copy of what he wrote, differs from another. So first I have to show you how to SEE what MARK wrote versus an errant copy. This is the biggest reason to use syllable counts, to verify Bible text.

Since the Bible writers play on each others' syllable counts, it's not too hard to know what are the writers' own syllable counts.

Aha.

This video's associated doc is: Mark13Meter.pdf and its discussion thread is frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=632

Mark meter videos before Mark 13, are here: https://vimeo.com/channels/marksgospel

CORRECTION: at about 22:20 I say 'Commodus', but it's DOMITIAN. I always get those two emperors mixed up. Sorry!


How Mark13 tags Matt24 and Luke 21, p2

Continuing demo re how syllable counting helps prove which 'variants' are likely Mark's own words. Vital to interp, as well as textual criticism.

NB: download of Mark13Meter.pdf currently includes gar in v.7 and 9 because the manuscripts including it are too many to ignore. However, I still maintain it doesn't belong. I'm testing its inclusion.

Yeah, they shouldn't be there. Mark balances to Matthew and Luke without them better. So just watch these videos but know that the download will be the latest revision, and in the frankforum thread (in vid desc) you can download a 'blank' to make your own counts.


How Mark13 tags Matt24 and Luke 21, p3

FYI Greek and Roman drama used subtle yet pointed satire just like the Bible does (or NT writers use it since readers would be familiar with the style).

Here's an example, where a line in a play is deliberately crafted to mock Emperor Marcus Aurelius' wife Faustina (an Augusta), by playing on the name of her lover, Tertullus: https://www.google.com/search?q=iam+tibi+dixi+ter+Tullus

You could be slowly executed for such a 'crime' against 'maiestas', so the writing was very indirect yet very satirically pointy, at the same time. That's how Bible prophecy is written too, in the NT.

Whole Church is ANNUALLY mapped out: Christ does it globally, then Luke and Paul map the West, and in the Year of the Four Emperors (which is in the middle of a civil war) when Mark writes, he repackages Christ's text to show the future of the East (Byzantium). All with this same style as the link above, and centering on the emperors/kings so you can keep track of the time ahead.

More on that theme in Mark, will come in future videos. I already did the Paul videos here: https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterggs11

Another correction: at about 21:10, I start explaining why the first autou variant isn't valid but the second one is. BOTH were valid, cuz Mark's making double-12 meters to show equality. AND, the actual last amen legw humin is 7 syllables shorter. BECAUSE, Christ's life was cut short versus the SCHEDULE in Isaiah 53. Clever, huh.

Revised meter is here, but I'm still working on it: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=632&p=3381#p3381

Later videos will go through the resulting changes, which again prove why SYLLABLE COUNTS are vital to both textual criticism and hermeneutics. As a result of excluding both autou, the whole meter pattern became evident as Mark plotting out the future history of the Byzantine Empire. For Mark 13 does for the East, what Ephesians 1:3-14 did for the West.

Luke probably thus covers the West, but I've not yet found his full pattern. I suspect that the total is right, and some of the verse counts are right, but I need to revisit ellisions. Point is, when you get the meter right, it becomes easy to check versus what to us, is now history.

CORRECTION: there are actually seven fewer syllables in Mark 13 than I counted, due to ellisions. But that ends up meaning what I said at 10 minutes re 499, is more nuanced: Mark 13's 499 now occurs at the middle of hupomeinas (endure, be patient during crisis), and tags specifically the START of ginoskwn in Matt 24:14. So HOW to be enduring? 'READER UNDERSTAND'. Precise way to know how to interpret Scripture, huh. So when you're in the middle of the crisis trying to endure, READ, UNDERSTAND.

After all, when you're in crisis, aren't you undergoing a kind of abomination that might desolate you? Get the pun?

All Greek and Roman lit aimed for this type of cleverness. To us, it's arcane. To them, it was a billboard, a blimp with sparkling marquee flying overhead.


How Mark13 tags Matt24 and Luke 21, p4a

Smoking gun proof in Beza (M-05, D) ms that amen legw humin should be in Mark 13:2, plus shoutout to scholars, monks, plug for my fav Bible software, Bibleworks.

Here's the BW9 playlist I made. It's kinda choppy cuz the video and BW don't get along too well. But you get a comprehensive picture of what it offers. Everything from learning how to pronounce the words to the grammar is provided, but you can instead just hover over any word and if you set it up as I did, see the results immediately on screen.

Then go look up the parts of speech and tenses, and in a few months' use you'll have learned more than you'd have learned in a semester in seminary. WORTH THE MONEY to buy it.


How Mark13 tags Matt24 and Luke 21, p6

With focus on vetting and the process, we're still on how syllable counting helps prove which 'variants' are likely Mark's own words. Vital to interp, as well as textual criticism.

IMPORTANT: the 'center' in Matt24 is from v.47-Matt25:12, 'our' 2030 AD. Not merely the 24:47 verse, cuz 'center' means equal occurrences on either side. I didn't notice that error until this past week. My other post here does take it into account in the Matt text (am still reworking Mark 13 for it), so you can download the revised pdf there.

Look: there are SIX occurrences of amen legw humin in Matt24-25. So 'center' has to be a PAIR so that two remain on left and right. Go in verse order. That means the center is 24:47-Matt25:12. Yikes.

I hope I'm dead by then. Would be age 70 by then.

WE ARE IN FOR A MAJOR REFORMATION AGAIN BY 2030. Given how the Christians jettison Bible to drool over Trump, it's kinda easy now to see why the interp against him in 25:11, is valid.

I'm in the middle of vastly improving both the Matt and Mark docs (will later do Luke). Here is where you can always get the latest versions:

Matthew24-25ParsedR6.pdf

Will return to Matt24 later, but since I found new anaphora in Mark, I'm updating Matthew to include them, pending making more videos on Matthew.

These revisions also undergo discussion in frankforum, links will be in the video description.


How Mark13 tags Matt24 and Luke 21, p6

Still on process of proving which words are Mark's vs variants, and whether the meter valid. Vital to interp, as well as textual criticism. Caution: the download docs now are advanced vs this earlier video, as due to the variants I had to change the meters.


How Mark13 tags Matt24 and Luke 21, p9

Sample of Bible satire against Constantine, this time in Mark. This is how I can be sure what I claim in Matt25:11 against DT, is true: it's part of a pattern of HISTORY Bible plots ANNUALLY.

This video will be vastly updated, for now I know Mark is playing out the future of the Byzantine Empire. So now you have prophecy GPS: Eph1 and Luke21 cover the West's future, Mark13 covers East's future, all of them tagging Matt24-25 which covers the whole global future through 3243 AD (which might NOT be the end of Time, but end of the paradigm of What If No Rapture in 'my' Years).

So to interlink all that past for us, is a chore. I just found this handy list of rulers (which the writers track to, since humans measure time by kingships): The Century Cyclopedia of Names: A Pronouncing and Etymological Dictionary of Names in Geography, Biography, Mythology, History, Ethnology, Art, Archaeology, Fiction, Etc., Etc, Volume 6

Page shown is sample, but actually there is a TON of useful info in here, like a catalogue of major events in history since BC. Dates might not be exact as we think they are now, but frankly scholarship in 1918 was pretty good, and in many ways Bible/historical scholarship today is WORSE. So you'll find that FREE DOWNLOAD book a dream, if you're doing the meter.

The meter keys to ruler accession and deaths, in Mark and in Eph1. I can't tell yet if Luke21 and Matt24-25 ever do that. So if you're doing the meter, this is very handy.

Handier still: start of the LIST OF RULERS: The Century Cyclopedia of Names: A Pronouncing and Etymological Dictionary of Names in Geography, Biography, Mythology, History, Ethnology, Art, Archaeology, Fiction, Etc., Etc, Volume 6

Start of the LIST OF EVENTS: The Century Cyclopedia of Names: A Pronouncing and Etymological Dictionary of Names in Geography, Biography, Mythology, History, Ethnology, Art, Archaeology, Fiction, Etc., Etc, Volume 6

Real treasure, saves a lot of time when trying to figure out why Mark13 ties to Luke 21 and Matt24 as he does.


How Mark13 tags Matt24 and Luke 21, p10

Subseries ends here to show Bible's annual satirical prophecy Matt24/Luke21/Mark13 interlock on the posterboy for Rev17: Constantine. That pattern continues for the next 2000 years.

Ergo, I can be sure Matt25:11 is against DT: it's a pattern of HISTORY Bible plots ANNUALLY.

Up next, how Revelation 17 exposes Trump phenomenon as yet another replay of the Constantine-original gambit of uniting Church and State: the Christian groups surrounding Trump is so anti-God they call their platform 'Seven Mountains' (search on it here in Youtube), which is what Rev17 WARNS AGAINST.

Rev is segue to next Mark 13 subseries will pick up at Constantine: line-by-line proof of the meter-to-text antiphonal satire ANNUALLY on history (Byz empire); vital to interp, as well as textual criticism.

So download docs now are advanced vs this earlier video, as due to the variants I had to change the meters a little bit:

Editables are .doc, if you have BW fonts

Convergences where Mark 13 tags sister passages in Matthew 24 and Luke 21, are boxed in the revised docs.

Again, Mark's gospel 'variants' get proven thereby, so the methodology here is useful, even if you disagree with the interp. This is the biggest reason to use syllable counts, to verify Bible text.

CORRECTION: starting about 15mins, I cover how Mark interlinks the METERS of both Matt24 and Luke21 to create a 'balance' to the year Mark writes.

But the video's reconciliation is not the way Mark did it. I had to correct my meter counts for variants I had included that really weren't there, and for variants which really WERE there but I omitted. Net result shows in the next series of videos, but the upshot is that YES Mark plays an interlink game with the same verses as depicted in this video, but the MATH is different. So count the last 11 mins of the video as a preview of coming distractions.

BIBLE IS SO PRECISE ABOUT THE FUTURE BUT OUR ANCESTORS DIDN'T PASS ON THE METER. Aaarrrggh. Not to worry, God foreknew all that, so it's RECOVERABLE and YOU can teach YOUR kids so it won't get lost again.


Rev17 exposes Donald Trump via Mark13 etc tagging 1/6

Seven Mountains is the 'Christian' platform/group backing Trump (search on the term in Youtube, Google), not realizing that Rev17 condemns it. The term in Bible is used for FAKE CHURCH in Rev17, has a long satanic history.. and started under Constantine.

Since that history ends up being the Byzantine Empire which is Mark 13's focus, it helps to introduce Mark 13 with the more familiar, Rev17. Which, even if you didn't know the meter, would alert you to the fact that DT is satanically backed.

For Mark was the last Gospel to write that prophecy. John doesn't cover it in his gospel, but waits until Revelation, to inteerleave. Which he does, tagging simultansously all prior Writ (Matt24/Eph1/Luke21 parts of Peter and Jude and other Pauline stuff).. as this subseries intends to show.

Rev is segue to next Mark 13 subseries will pick up at Constantine: line-by-line proof of the meter-to-text antiphonal satire ANNUALLY on history (Byz empire); vital to interp, as well as textual criticism.

Okay, peeps, here's the frankforum Revelation 17 discussion thread, which includes the videos: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=650

I'll make it available to guests, so you don't have to join, to post. Place is not moderated, so protect your own identity, k?

Watching this Yale course on the Middle Ages, will give you a better understanding of how to read Revelation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC8JcWVRFp8&list=PL77A337915A76F660

Here in Youtube, you can hear the Seven Mountains people talk; in their own mouths they prove they are exactly as Rev17 warns against. Sample searches to peruse: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=seven+mountains+trump

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=seven+mountains+trump+anointed

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=seven+mountains+ted+cruz+anointed

Mind you, I didn't know any of this. I found it out late 2015, while researching the candidates. So now, it's your turn.


Rev17 exposes Donald Trump via Mark13 etc tagging 1/6

How Rev17 predicts Constantine's own Seven Mountains=same 'Christian' manifesto/platform/group backing Trump (see links in p1's Comments), not realizing that Rev17 condemns it. The term in Bible is used for FAKE CHURCH in Rev17, has a long satanic history.. started under Constantine.

Useful backstory links to video content: Paul's satire on the Severan Mothers, with many pan-internet independent links to their history you can view: http://www.brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#y186to195 Bishop's List book review in vimeo: https://vimeo.com/channels/churchfathers/79847850 Same review vids, but in Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db_cnNq1O4I&list=PL5D3F5A2E85CE65CC&index=62


Rev17 exposes Donald Trump via Mark13 etc tagging 3/6

Now, to Daniel 7, to refine how Rev17 predicts Constantine's own Seven Mountains=same 'Christian' manifesto/platform/group backing Trump (see links in p1's Comments), not realizing that Rev17 condemns it. The term in Bible is used for FAKE CHURCH in Rev17, has a long satanic history.. started under Constantine.


Rev17 exposes Donald Trump via Mark13 etc tagging 3/6

ack now to refine how Rev17 predicts Constantine's own Seven Mountains=same 'Christian' manifesto/platform/group backing Trump (see links in p1's Comments), not realizing that Rev17 condemns it. The term in Bible is used for FAKE CHURCH in Rev17, has a long satanic history.. started under Constantine.


How Rev17 tags Mark 13 p1

Appetizer on Rev17 meter cuz its satire is so biting. The harlot posterboys were intro'd in Matt24/Eph1/Luke21/Mark13, the latter being latest, so Rev17 tags Mark13 in first verse. So FAKE CHURCH in Rev17, has a long satanic history.. started under those Chaps, which center on Constantine.

his Wiki page will also be helpful when you add 88 to the syllables in Rev17 to see the AD year referenced by each syllable, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_papacy

Bear in mind that Wiki articles are biased, so learn the bias and then you read out the bias as you use the material. We are all biased; question is to know what the bias is, and make adjustements, since bias generally doesn't produce outright lying.

For example, that page asserts that Christ made Peter head of the Church. That is NOT what the Greek text says in Matt16:18, as has long been known and countered by thousands of scholars. But you don't need the scholars to tell you, just look at the Greek: PETROS means a little chip off the PETRA, and it was not a name for Peter when Christ spoke it. Peter was never even on a pope list until 217ff AD, when Demetrius of Alexandria first got Julianus Africanus to put him on one. All this is covered in what had been a dissertation by Dr. Robert Lee Williams called 'Bishops Lists' which you can buy directly from Gorgias Press or in Amazon. I reviewed that book extensively, here in Youtube and in vimeo, the latter's copy of the videos start here: https://vimeo.com/channels/churchfathers/79847850

That video title is the same in Youtube, so you can start there in Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db_cnNq1O4I&list=PL5D3F5A2E85CE65CC&index=62

Elision references you can find online and freely download:

Classic by Smyth (free downloads of older editions are in Google Books or the paperback is cheap in Amazon): Herbert Weir Smyth, A Greek Grammar for Colleges

Latin elision (same rules were used for Greek at the time Gospels written, roughly): https://www.jstor.org/stable/282939?seq=18#page_scan_tab_contents

So play with the elisions. No hard-set rules on when to make them, just conventions most folks followed. So the elisions you see might end up being changed, or you will want to change them, or.. use 1Jn1:9 and ASK GOD, HE knows what was intended.

If you want, it might be helpful to have an erudite online compilation of the Roman Emperors through the end of the Byzantine Empire, while you map the Rev 17 syllables=years AD (+88 to convert to AD). My fav listing is here: roman-emperors.org/impindex.htm. Univ profs from all over the world contribute articles explaining the reigns so you can read the meter faster and appreciate it better. There are other sites, too.


Mark 13 future-maps Byzantine History 1/18

Mark13, like Matt24/Eph1/Luke21, starts the harlot posterboys at Constantine, then veers east for a biting future commentary on the Byzantine Empire, starting with this video. Again, Bible has always provided line-by-line meter-to-text antiphonal satire ANNUALLY on history; vital to interp, as well as textual criticism. So when the future becomes present, YOU ALREADY ARE PREPARED.

Historical backgrounder by one of the premier ancient Roman historians (free download, book is older than the pub date), The Cambridge Medieval History: The Christian Roman empire and the foundation of the Teutonic kingdoms


Mark 13 future-maps Byzantine History 4/18

Elab re how God designates pivotal time in prophetic history: via anaphora 'nests'.


Mark 13 future-maps Byzantine History 6/18

Precedent for why Trump warned about in Matt25:11. More elab re how God designates pivotal time in prophetic history: via anaphora 'nests', now at Leo IV of Byz, and how Byz then goes very apostate under 'Irene' his widow.

Mark13, like Matt24/Eph1/Luke21, starts harlot posterboys at Constantine, then veers east for a biting future commentary on the Byzantine Empire, starting with this video. Bible has always provided line-by-line meter-to-text antiphonal satire ANNUALLY on history; vital to interp, as well as textual criticism. So when future becomes present, YOU CAN BE PREPARED.


Mark 13 future-maps Byzantine History 7/18

Still on Leo III-Constantine VI, precedent for why Trump warned about in Matt25:11. Rev17's end focuses on them.

More elab re how God designates pivotal time in prophetic history: via anaphora 'nests', now at Leo IV of Byz, and how Byz then goes very apostate under 'Irene' his widow.


Mark 13 future-maps Byzantine History 8/18

Now to Charlemagne-Nikephorus and Mark's sarcastic penchant for truncating rulers to 'kai'. Rev17 will do the same repeatedly, Rev17Meter.pdf

(Precedent for why Trump warned about in Matt25:11.)

For God sarcastically prophesies, designates pivotal time in prophetic history: via anaphora 'nests'.

There's a contemporary report at this time covering post-Nikephorus, here: https://archive.org/details/JohnSkylitzes.ASynopsisOfByzantineHistorytrans.ByJ.Wortley2010

It's written by an iconphile, so is hostile to Michael and Leo, etc. Iconphiles were also anti-semitic, as you'll find out by Chapter 4. You can download the book in pdf text (else it's not searchable). I'm getting it read aloud through Text to Voice in Firefox, but only by using the TEXT file. For the epub, you have to add '.epub' extension or the software cannot read it.


Mark 13 future-maps Byzantine History 12/18

Still on 'dark side' post-Leo V, satire on usurpation, with parallel to today — focus on 860-863AD.

'Homily 10' Speech made by Photius (patriarch of Constantinople) on dedication of a New Church in 864 AD (start at p. 188) shows you why the over-the-top language here in Mark, is prophetically satirical: https://www.scribd.com/doc/130559954/Mango-The-Homilies-of-Photius-Patriarch-of-Constantinople

So in context, the 'thlipsis' was all the fighting that had just been done, the conclusion of peace. (See vid description near top for a link of an 11th century historian recapping this period in Byz history.) 864 corresponds to the 'sin' in 'thlipsin' in Mark 13:24. So God's opinion of this temple isn't too good, huh.

(Re)dedication speech is just after True Easter (around April 8 if you followed BIBLE not stupid religions). Sadly, the temple is to MARY, not Christ, but Christ is mosaic'd on the CEILING of the church (honorable mention). Actually,it's about the temple being rebuilt. Was originally dedicated to Christ (as you'll see in that scribd link).

IRONY: a week or so after the speech, the 'Caesar' Bardas will be violently murdered by Basil to replace as Caesar (heir, the term changed meaning in the 200's AD); then 3 years AFTER this speech, Michael will be hacked to death by that same Basil.

Notice in the speech how the BUILDING is extolled, which of course has total relevance to Mark 13 playing on Luke 21 playing on Matt24. But not the WORD, just the STONES and the BEAUTY of the physical/emotional. God? Well, He doesn't matter.

Thlipsis, indeed.


Mark 13 future-maps Byzantine History 13/18

Still on 'dark side', covering Basil I-ConstVII, satire with parallel to today.

Re-download the Mark13Meter.pdf from the vid desc, cuz I've updated it with a lot of links to external internet materials on this period of history. Mark's far more biting than I knew, when making this video. In particular, read Skylitzes link in the video description (each chapter is devoted to one Byz emperor).

If you can read Greek/Latin (and you can, with Bible Greek software which lets you look up words) , you can download the original text copies in scribd:

Skylitzes: https://www.scribd.com/doc/59443553/John-Skylitzes-Brief-History

Theophanes starts at Romanos II, is nicely bookmarked with the AM (5509=alleged birth of Christ, totally wrong but it was the official usage). https://www.scribd.com/doc/164720121/Theophanes-Chronographia

It's gonna matter, that people in those days had a particular interp of eschatology, namely that Christ would return in year 1000. They misread Rev17 to think that the 1000 year countdown started either at His Birth or death (yeah, one did), and at the end of it He would return (misreading Rev20 as starting at His Birth/Death).

So they invented some 'prophecy' called the 'Last Emperor'. Can't find an English set, but the Greek is here: https://archive.org/details/anecdotagraecob00vasigoog,

Often called Visions of Daniel by scholars, the Byzantine ones are in here, and they are garblings of John's Apocalypse, Daniel, and Matt24-25, Mark 13, etc. They claim there will be a Last Emperor who will subdue the earth so that Christ can come back.


Mark 13 future-maps Byzantine History 18/18 (subseries end)

End subseries on Mark13 for now, using Bible 'anaphora' history turning points you can prove. Next subseries: Rev17's tie to Mark 13.

NB: Skylitzes and Psellos are now linked in the Mark pdf, so pls redownload it.


Witness miracle of Bible text always SEVENING 1/3

Matthew 24-25 is one chapter in the Greek; if you've been following my Matthew 24 methodology series*, you know the meter has often been revised. So too, the explanation. Latest revision is still Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf and doc.

Now the pdf/doc has key navigational features this video covers:

  1. Now you can easily toggle between text and notes.
  2. The notes now are expanded to show the SEVENING DISTANCES between each of the keywords.

Since there are 70 keywords, that's a complex task, and the monks copying all this, didn't know of it. So ask yourself: who would be smart enough to write text like that AND PRESERVE IT for 1000s of years, when the copyists themselves, nor the scholars nor the RCC nor anyone UNTIL NOW.. even knew this sevening existed?

Has to be God, huh. So ask Him and test the material yourself.

So then you'll be less surprised that EVERY BOOK OF THE NEW TESTAMENT TAGS Matt24-25 as a RAPTURE COUNTDOWN. Proving all that, will take years, but so far this series has shown and will next show, five chapters tagging Matt24-25: Eph1, Luke 21, Mark 13, and (next in the series) Rev17. BY SEVENING.

So oh, now we know we have the original words, huh?

*Series link: • Matt24 Meter More docs and downloads are in each of the video descriptions.


Witness miracle of Matt24-25 PRECISE PROPHECY 2/3

Now let's prove why Matt25:11 applies to US, and Trump, for this is a MAP of Time from 30AD, one syllable per Year through 3243 AD.

First, we show the OUTLINE of all history since the Cross, to see what MEANING the keywords provide for the specific PAST. For those same keywords, are in 'our' time of Matt25:11.


Witness miracle of Matt24-25 PRECISE PROPHECY 3/3

How Matt25:11 applies to US, and Trump. Focus in this third 'witness' video is how the anaphora form a precis of all history since the Cross, to see what MEANING the keywords provide for the specific PAST. For those same keywords, are in 'our' time of Matt25:11.


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 1/12

Now let's see the same sophistication as shown in Matt24-25 and Mark 13, in Rev17, how it SEVENS and then uses ANAPHORA KEYWORDS to denote emperor deaths, historical trends.

REVELATION 17 TELLS YOU EXACTLY WHO THE ANTICHRIST IS.. it's CHURCH. More specifically, an attempt to unite Church and State, which is just what Trump's 'Christians' (calling themselves 'Seven Mountains' no less!) are seeking RIGHT NOW.

So let's see how Rev17 charts the FOUR PRIOR TIMES Satan tried to do this same thing.. with biting sarcasm.

Ths same year as the War of Austrian Succession concludes, really from 1747-9, was the FIRST GREAT AWAKENING, headed by Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield. I don't yet know who the third guy was. 1975 (1946 ending meter, covers 1974-6) is Bill Bright, Loren Cunningham, Francis Schaeffer formally birthing SEVEN MOUNTAINS; you can see their testimonies here in Youtube or Google. The Richard Perry article at rightwingwatch.org also has it. In between, are six more, from 1819-21 and 1845-7, but there are so many nutters during those periods, I don't yet know which ones God references for those occurrences of numphios (Matt25:5-6). Am still researching them.

1845 does stand for the FOUNDING of Mormonism at Salt Lake City. I misspoke in the video, Joseph Smith had died in 1844. So is God targeting the founding of Mormonism? Dunno yet.

If you think of anyone during those years 1819-21 or 1845-7 who treated themselves as apostles or prophets, subverting the FINALITY OF THE WORD in favor of prophetic utterances (for that's what Bible traces with these keywords), please let me know?

THIRD GREAT AWAKENING is at 1857 et seq (1827 in meter, always add 30 to get AD). No numphios ref there, tho.


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 2/12 (Aurelius-Diocletian)

Now after M. Aurelius being truncated to mere kai instead of kaiser — let's see more sarcasm thru Diocletian, as shown in Matt24-25 and Mark 13, in Rev17, how it SEVENS and then uses ANAPHORA KEYWORDS to denote emperor deaths, historical trends.

Correction at 0:35 — YES the Mark 13 videos just were uploaded over the past two weeks. So you will be familiar with the sarcastic kai used to kill a kaiser, emperor. Rev17 uses it 8 times, I think, but Matt24-25 used it first. I am still doing Luke to see if he uses it.

I made the Rev17 videos some weeks ago, so that's why Matt and Mark might look different, versus the LATER REVISIONS you can find in the video description. If you want to see how precise and deft and SARCASTIC Bible can be, you'll want to watch all 12 of these videos, and will need to download the docs to follow along better.

Be skeptical, too. This is all original research, and the scholars KNOW NOTHING about the meter, even though they've PUBLISHED METERED TRANSLATIONS of Bible since the Reformation and even before. They never noticed the SEVENING pattern. But you will.


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 3/12 (Diocletian-Constantine)

Now even more BITING sarcasm from Diocletian-Constantine, our FIRST CHURCH HARLOT as shown in Matt24-25 and Mark 13, in Rev17; text SEVENS and then uses ANAPHORA KEYWORDS to denote emperor deaths, historical trends.

Historical backgrounder by one of the premier Roman historians (who whitewashes Constantine versus the actual LAWS passed, The Cambridge Medieval History: The Christian Roman empire and the foundation of the Teutonic kingdoms

Search 'ungodly Jews' to see how anti-semitic Constantine was (page 14, quote), and why we NEVER get Easter right (hint hint, C forbade it be celebrated when Christ really died per John 19, ON PASSOVER).

No wonder Eph1, Matt24, Luke 21, Mark 13 and Rev17 treat C like the ABOMINATION he was.


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 6/12 (Constantine's Legacy)

This is centenary of WWI; Trump is trying to start a war, so we won't see his #russiagate Rev 17 HARLOT traitorism.


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 7/12 (Justinian I)

There was some speculation that Justinian I was the antichrist, by his enemy Procopius; but the longer 'doctrine' taking shape during this time — later to be embraced by the Byzantine Emperors until 1453 but even before that, by Charlemagne and Otto — was the idea that Rome could be EITHER a 'Last Emperor' savior handing over the kingdoms of the world TO Christ (later the Muslims will adopt this idea and call it the Mahdi), or the more-biblical assessment that Rome is the mother of the AntiChrist (still mistaking it for historical Rome, not noticing the TYPOLOGY meaning in Rev17).

Article on all that, which you can download, is here: https://www.academia.edu/3117854/Genesis_and_Function_of_the_Last_Emperor_Myth_in_Byzantine_Eschatology

Discussion thread containing that link and related others, is here: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=661&p=3488#p3488


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 8/12 (Justinian-Mohammed)

Seven nephews, Justinian I had, search here: roman-emperors.org/justinii.htm

Cute double entendre in Rev17:9d, since all of them through their backers, vied for the throne when Justinian I died.


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 9/12 (rise of Islam)

Continued BITING sarcasm on the rise of MOHAMMED as 'the eighth' in Rev17: still Justinian I's Legacy of SECOND CHURCH HARLOT as shown in Matt24-25 and Mark 13, in Rev17; text SEVENS and then uses ANAPHORA KEYWORDS to denote emperor deaths, historical trends.


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 10/12 (rise of Charlemagne)

Really good copy of Theophanes, here: https://archive.org/details/TheChronicleOfTheophanesTrans.ByHarryTurtledove1982


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 11/12 (Charlemagne)

Continued BITING sarcasm, now on Charlemagne: THIRD CHURCH HARLOT as shown in Matt24-25 and Mark 13, in Rev17; text SEVENS and then uses ANAPHORA KEYWORDS to denote emperor deaths, historical trends.


Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour 12/12 (end subseries)

Subseries end, BITING sarcasm, now on Otto: FOURTH CHURCH HARLOT as shown in Matt24-25 and Mark 13, in Rev17; text SEVENS and then uses ANAPHORA KEYWORDS to denote emperor deaths, historical trends.

Rev17-19 is one chapter. Later vids will cover Rev18-19, as the timeline continues.


2 Samuel 23 David's Last Words

How a) David tells you he's age 77 when he dies and Isaiah/Matthew/Luke all play on that, and b) David's DEATHBED TIMED PROPHECY (to be covered in later videos) forecasts Christ is scheduled to die 1000 years after David dies.

Sadly, someone else almost knew all this back in 1749, but he couldn't count: The Last Words of David, Divided According to the Metre. with Notes Critical and Explanatory. by Richard Grey, ...

His syllable count: 2Sam23-1.jpg

Discussion thread: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=664&p=3480#p3480

Three years later, Lowth (earlier in this playlist, • Proof of Meter DEBATE would also miscount the syllables, MISS THE SEVENING and then get laughed at by his peers for claiming Scripture metered.

So kinda important to see how 2Sam23 works, huh. This intro video will be added onto later, but now its purpose is to talk back to Matt24 thru Rev17, so you can see where CHRIST is getting HIS meter.


Revived Rome, Russia, Trump, and Prophecy?

This is a mini-book review. Its import requires explaining. The book: The Modern Cultural Myth of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Palgrave Studies in the History of the Media) Hardcover – January 1, 1786 by Jonathan Theodore (Author)

Apart from the book, it so happens that

Takes 40 minutes to explain those concepts. If you've been following along in the Matt24 playlist, it will be easier to understand.

Relevant playlist vids start here through the end: • Matt25:10-12, prophecy re 1960-2041 A...

ASSOCIATED LINKS

source: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01KDHOELK/ref=oh_aui_d_detailpage_o00_?ie=UTF8&psc=1#customerReviews

brainout
4.0 out of 5 stars Extremely relevant book, bad Kindle navigation
Reviewed in the United States on July 13, 2017
Verified Purchase

EDIT: I keep editing this review as I rethink the book. Even so, I'm FIRM in recommending one buy it, especially if you're pro-Bible (author is not) and believe in pre-Trib Rapture. Very important for understanding our future over the next 50 years. The author didn't know that or intend that, but it's my reason for recommending the book.

This review covers the Kindle edition. I made a 40-minute video to show the book's relevance to our political situation today; it's linked in the Comments.

The author explores why we are so captivated by the Decline and Fall of Rome. Why that portion? Why Rome? Fair question. So the book traces the evidence of our obsession with Rome, and tries to determine from that, our motives. I don't know any other book which has tried to document Rome's psychological hold on us (versus some other geographical area).

Skim the first two chapters of the book, which spend too much time in dissertation-like self-justification and scholar A vs scholar B positions on this or that. To write about Rome, seems to require such pedancy.

Once you get past that, he starts his own thesis, that yes, largely captivated by Rome as Gibbon was, in the 19th-21st centuries we glorified the 'classic' myth of ancient society, especially Greco-Roman, never mind the facts. Those facts, he variantly asserts, were more in line with a conclusion that Rome just diffused owing to fiscal decentralization and local alliances with the ever-increasing barbarians (who were pro-Rome too), and not so much a moral decay, be it Constantine and Christianity, or otherwise.

Then he goes into another spate of pedancy to establish 'myth'. Once you get past that, he again returns to his own analysis, which basically posits that the facts are embellished or transmogrified into a drama or 'story' to teach lessons of life. So factuality suffers, but learning lessons for your own time, does not. Well, unless the repackaging is inapt, which of course in some aspects, occurs. In all events, this 'myth' ends up more reflecting the current folks adhering to it, than any actual past used to create that story, and the power of it becomes abstract, giving warning NOW of avoiding that past THEN. Meaning, 'decline and fall' is the 'myth' that resonates with succeeding generations who want to avoid the same for themselves.

So now think: it then becomes a redemption story if this 'decline and fall' is averted or reversed. We all love a good redemption story, so now it's not hard to see the universal attraction to a REVIVED 'Rome'. Which historically, has been often attempted in many geographical locations.

WHICH, the author begins to cover in Chapter 3. He should get a Pulitzer or something for the writing from that point forward, as he knowingly goes against the sacred kant of Roman historians, to dare to suggest everyone post-Gibbon just drooled over him. Which, is essentially true. What he doesn't say, but you can with five minutes' research: CHRISTIANITY fell lock stock and barrel for the same myth. Bible actually warns of this, often (i.e., Rev18, where the City in question is the IDEA of Rome, never defined as the old Rome of Italy, duh).

Even so, by the time you finish the Conclusion, you ask yourself whether you can think of Rome any other way, DESPITE the clear evidence of being 'sold' by some very thoughtful and well-meaning folks, what amounts to a myth no one questions. Well, maybe they can't think of Rome any other way, either. WHY?

I don't know. Need to go walk around and TRY to think of it some other way. Been studying Roman history 40 years cuz my pastor taught Bible from the original-language texts and I had 4 years of Latin too. Can't understand NT Bible apart from Rome. But if can't understand Rome, then...

Ergo: video explains an unreported phenomenon happening between US and Russian Christians.. a bid to revive Rome, but what IS Rome? Well, 'Rome' is an idea of vanished DOMINATION glory. For once you see how intricate, enduring and vast the SPQR obsession, then think over how Bible predicts a Revived Roman Empire, then connect the dots...

So this book is essential to see those connections.

Now to the horror of Kindle edition for ANDROID. IT HAS NO NAVIGATION. You can make bookmarks but cannot go to them. NO PAGE NUMBERS. NO ABILITY TO GO BACK TO WHERE YOU WERE AFTER SEEING A FOOTNOTE. The bad design of the Kindle for ANDROID edition is Kindle's fault, not the issuer's. So for the bad design, -4 stars. So get it in hardback, tho the Kindle for PC edition now subsumes bookmarks under the unintuitive 'Notebook' icon (which still works, but no where near as well as 'bookmarks' did in earlier Kindle software). On the other hand, other Android apps can read Kindle books; maybe these other apps will navigate well?

Twitter: my @brainouty name plus #ThirdRome and #SevenMountains hashtags, as I've been collecting data on this topic since the first GOP debate where Trump was so weirdly pro-Putin. I didn't know the Matthew 24 material then, but found out about #SevenMountains almost right away, cuz Ted Cruz is my senator, @walid_shoebat warned about #SevenMountains re Cruz, and someone in Youtube warned me as well.

Bear in mind, these are all independent sources. None of them contend the Trump-Russia connection. That is my contention from reading all their stuff, plus the material now furnished in the Matthew 24 playlist showing the prophecy of this Revived Roman Empire being a trend of prophetic history. Which, has unusual relevance for our time right now.

Key issue: WHAT is 'Rome'? That explains the obsession, too. For if you go through the above material (excluding my own), you find out many 'empires' or 'kingdoms' before and after Constantine MOVED 'Rome' to (modern name) Istanbul, have claimed to be the prophesied Rome or her successor. Consistently, and in timing patterns often linked to chiliasm. The fever began right after Christ died, cuz everyone expected His Return by 70 AD or soon after.

My vimeo videos go through that, master list here: https://vimeo.com/brainout/channels/sort:alphabetical/format:thumbnail

I do NOT contend the Rapture is upon us. I DO contend, the psychology of the groups behind Trump and Putin DO think they are bringing about the 2nd Coming, as indeed the Crusaders thought 1000 years ago. Muslims have a similar doctrine, called the arrival of the Mahdi (who is also 'Issa', their name for Jesus Christ).

You can see a psycho-religio-political powder keg forming, right? Maybe not WWIII, but definitely disruptive.

History is about to repeat itself, and the trick is to give you independent materials so you can see how and why, whether or not you believe our findings in Matt24. Cuz you don't actually need that prophecy, to see the historical trends moving toward another crusading denouement. But we spent the last 130+ videos showing that such prophecy exists; so the prophecy interp, is at least worth some added consideration.

Now add this bit of post-video news: PENCE (a #SevenMountains Xtian) meets PRIVATELY with Russian cleric (a #ThirdRome Christian, aka Byzantine, cuz Russia thinks it is the Third Rome):

https://www.google.com/search?q=Pence+meets+Russian+cleric

See, that's why I'm suddenly pushy. I didn't know of this meeting when making the video. But see how the pieces fit, and NO ONE IS INVESTIGATING all this.

Whenever you see a big blank spot in a series of events, that blank spot tells you where to find the evil.

Now add this, which I just found in one of my Twitter lists: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/14/us/politics/putin-trump-conservatives.html

PS The book starts to mention Third Rome in its chapter 3. It's not contending what I contend, but at least you'll know the topic is not fringe.

And here's another article in washingtonpost, about the Christians in US warming to those in Russia, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-republican-right-found-allies-in-russia/2017/04/30/e2d83ff6-29d3-11e7-a616-d7c8a68c1a66_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.0486814dc331

Here's another article on the #TrumpRussia affinity between US Christians and their Russian counterparts, http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/how-the-religious-rights-love-for-lion-of-christianity-putin-is-helping-to-shield-trump/

It's true that RightWingWatch.org has it in, for Christians. But that fact, doesn't make everything they say, a lie. Further, most of what RWW does, is merely RETWEET what #SevenMountains Christians say. THAT is where you need to go, to see for yourself.

Here's another, more deeply-evaluative article by a guy warning of a Coming Dark Age owing to #SevenMountains (I don't know if he is aware of that name), http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/18/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-putin-215387

Same guy wrote a book about all this, and I just got it on Kindle ($13), The End of Europe: Dictators, Demagogues, and the Coming Dark Age Kindle Edition

His book ties unknowingly, to Dr Theodore's. The latter helps you see WHY what's happening and warned by Kirchick, is happening.


End of the world in 2030? DON'T BET ON IT (A/C)

Crapo Seven-Mountains DT backers =#ThirdRome Putin backers want to FORCE Christ's return by REVERSING Revelation 17 and REVIVING Rome. These people are the biggest threat to the world today. They want a NEW CRUSADES based on a HALLUCINATED 1000x2 anniversary upcoming.. now based on Christ's DEATH, since the year 2000 brought nothing (duh, Christ said you CANNOT KNOW, Acts 1).

So this guy is trying to make money claiming 2030 will be the end of the world; he wouldn't know the Bible if it bit him. If you've been watching my Bible meter videos, you know this already. If not, then this video's for you.

The jerk's website touting his book (and yes I did buy it, in case more needs said about what a LIAR he is): https://freestockphotos.com/COMING1/2030SecondComing.htm

More videos will come, but will just show the PUBLIC website above, not the book which his greedy and APOSTATE site says is copyrighted: I don't want to be a jerk like him, and violate that.

BIBLE refutes him on every page. Let's start in Genesis. It provides a lot of dates, so when you add up the Bible's dates, you get a PATTERN that refutes his whole shtick. I did that adding up in 2004, resulting in GeneYrs.xls which you've heard/seen me explain for the last 13 YEARS.

Playlists refuting him (started in 2008, so long before I heard of this guy, who I only heard of TODAY):

Everything I've done on Bible meter in vimeo, HUNDREDS of videos, most especially howgodorchestratestime, see https://vimeo.com/brainout/channels/s...

Matt24 vids, most relevant starting here and for the 90 (!) videos thereafter, LIVE BIBLE TEXT IN GREEK: • Matt25:10-12, prophecy re 1960-2041 A...

This video will be 138 or so in the list.

Purpose of the Rapture doctrine is to focus on GROWING IN GRACE, 2Pet3:18. Purpose of prophecy annually timed, is to know WHAT TO EXPECT IF NO NO NO NO Rapture. Cuz you don't NEED to know what the future is AFTER Rapture, duhhhhhh....


Quantum Bible (QB1): Rev 17, Intro

We're gonna call this subseries, 'Quantum Bible', and this first video in the subseries is an introduction. It's gonna be a really shocking ride. So grab your fav translation of Rev17, cuz I have to use the Greek to show the METER (annual timeline Bible employs since Genesis 1).

We'll again see the same sophistication as shown in Matt24-25, Eph1, Luke 21, and Mark 13, in Rev17, how it SEVENS and then uses ANAPHORA KEYWORDS to denote emperor deaths, historical trends.

Thus the notions based on really shoddy Bible reading here, are refuted: https://freestockphotos.com/COMING1/2030SecondComing.htm

REVELATION 17 TELLS YOU EXACTLY WHO THE ANTICHRIST IS.. it's CHURCH. More specifically, an attempt to unite Church and State, which is just what Trump's 'Christians' (calling themselves 'Seven Mountains' no less!) are seeking RIGHT NOW with Russia's Christians (calling themselves 'ThirdRome'). You can search on those terms in Google and Youtube, to learn what those sects believe.

So let's see how Rev17 charts the PRIOR TIMES Satan tried to do this same thing.. with biting sarcasm.

THERE IS AN ERROR IN VERSE 5 CUM totals, so all text after that and maybe before, has to be fixed. We're working on the error now, and will correct it in later videos.


QB2, Rev 17: Constantine's Harlot Legacy

Here in 2nd video of 'Quantum Bible' subseries, we see Revelation 17 Harlot, as unity of Church and state started under Constantine. Notice how trenchantly God has the angel and John cover that period of what to us now, is history.

Also the future, since history repeats itself. This is Satan's plan.

Matt24-25, Eph1, Luke 21, and Mark 13, in Rev17, quanta syllables SEVEN and then ANAPHORA KEYWORDS denote emperor deaths, historical trends. So you know what time it is, at ANY time.


QB3, Rev 17: Theodosius I's Harlot Legacy

'Quantum Bible' subseries, aftermath of Roman Empire split by Theodosius, Rev17 Harlot unity of Church and state. Notice how trenchantly God has the angel and John cover that period of what to us now, is history.

Also the future, since history repeats itself. This is Satan's plan, CUZ HE DOESN'T KNOW WHEN RAPTURE HAPPENS, EITHER. So he keeps trying to SET UP conditions which he thinks will make him beat God.


QB7a, Rev 17: Zeno (FALL OF ROME, poster boy ends 490)

'Quantum Bible' subseries, still on aftermath of Council of Chalcedon, Rev17 Harlot unity of Church and state. Zeno's reign is the prototype for an ending of a 490. REVERSAL is attempted, here via the 'Henotikon'.

While making this video live, my screen recorder died and only the sound was preserved. I tried to remake it by listening to the sound then moving the cursor to what was referenced. It mostly works out, but the Romulus Augustus link in wiki doesn't show.

7b has the same problem (it was originally one recording session) and the sound is bad, with some lag too. So I changed recorder for Episode 8 onward (8 covers Anastasius, last two clauses in Rev 17:8).

I make an error about the sack of Rome in 455, either here or in videos just prior or just after. Attila was dead by 455, as the video clearly shows. It was the VANDALS who sacked Rome in 455 and I once knew that, but my brain went out when making these videos.

Example source of that fact, is here: The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 1, C.500-c.700

Then, on its page 140 (I'm still reading it), the book notes Attila only THREATENED it in 452. A movie was made of this called 'Attila', as the guy who stopped him was named Aetius, played by Powers Boothe, link here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0259127/ That miniseries is on Comcast, in its series section. If you've got the new X1 box you can just TELL the box 'Attila' and you should find it, or mention the actor's name. My fav actor in that is Reg Rogers, who is always underrated. He plays Valentinian III.


QB7b, Rev 17: Zeno (FALL OF ROME, poster boy ends 490, cont)

'Quantum Bible' subseries, Rev17 Harlot unity of Church and state. Zeno's reign, which ends the 490 from Christ's birth is paradigmal. Here the 490 connection is demo'd, as our own 490s end 2000, 2030, 2100, & 2130 AD.

In 7b, at 5:38 I screwed up by pointing Odovacer's death at 483 AD. It was 10 years later, at the 'ou' (=not, get the pun?)


QB7b, Rev 17: Zeno (FALL OF ROME, poster boy ends 490, cont)

'Quantum Bible' subseries, Rev17 Harlot unity of Church and state. Ruler Anastasius comes next=BORN AGAIN (heh). Notice the wit: 490 ended, so will a new one be BORN? It's a 4-stage rollout of 130 years: our own 490s end 2000, 2030, 2100, & 2130 AD.


QB8b, Rev 17: Zeno's Legacy=Anastasis (end 490, cont.)

CORRECTION: at about 5 mins, I erred to say Leo II came after Zeno. Well, Leo II only lived about 11 months post-coronation. His stepdad, was Anastasius. Ariadne, Leo I's wife, married Anastasius, who rules through 518 AD, the period the text actually covers. So that's why this video's title disagrees with what I said in the video.


QB8e, Rev 17: Anastasius (end 490, cont.)

Before Episode 9, I'd ask you to review the basic rules for how God Orchestrates Time, cuz John's meter here BALANCES based on those rules.

Videos walking you through the rules and the math: https://vimeo.com/channels/howgodorchestratestime

If you'd rather watch in Youtube, start here (but the vimeo vids are better organized and downloadable): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFSvytj1zPs&list=PL40216F6E28F05780&index=25

Worksheet showing the rules from BIBLE ALONE: GeneYrs.xls

Bible verses used to do the worksheet: brainoutFAQ.htm#6a

Also, if you look at cell A2 in the worksheet, you get a precis of the rules.

How that timeline differs from the really bad math of Bible timelines 'out there' so you can see the others' errors (and thus any of my own): TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.pdf (or .doc format)

Ephesians 1 meter is in vimeo, https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterggs10 on the meaning of 'anaphora', and then https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterggs11 on the actual prophetical timeline. Cuz you'll need all that for Episode 9 forward, if you want to get the satire God has the angel/John use to finish Rev 17.

Also, you'll want to read up on Justinian I, who scholars and religionists alike drool over. A negative drooler at the time Justinian lived, Procopius, is online here: https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/e/roman/texts/procopius/anecdota/home.html

When Romans dislike an emperor, they usually invent sexual sins and attribute them to that emperor. Just the same, nothing is ever 100% false. So read Procopius with caution, and notice the parallels to Alex Jones or other yellow journalism today, cuz we are in the same historical trend now.. as then.

You can download all of Procopius' works in translation (w Greek quotes only discernible in pdf) here: https://archive.org/details/procopiuswitheng01procuoft

Secret History is the opposite of the other two works on the Wars (semi-critical else neutral) and Buildings (panegyric, making Justinian look like God). You need all three. The link above is difficult to convert to voice using Firefox Text2Voice add-on. This one, on the Wars, is easier: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/16764/16764-h/16764-h.htm

For a more balanced and easily-readable history on Justinian, read J B Bury, History of the Later Roman Empire, Vol. 2: From the Death of Theodosius I to the Death of Justinian Kindle Edition. A used copy is cheap, cuz this is one of the A-class scholars other Roman historians all quote. Bury doesn't drool as much as Gibbon, and is very readable. My Kindle copy of that book works very well, better than most of my other Kindle books.

You need all this, because we are nearing the end of our own 490 (it ends 2100 or 2130 AD), so the trends TODAY are the same as depicted in Rev17:8, focusing on Anastasius through Justinian.


QB9b, Rev 17: Justinian I REBORN 490

'Quantum Bible' subseries, Rev17 Harlot unity of Church and state. Ruler Justinian I is ANTI-CHRIST prototype for the REBORN 490. Note the wit: 490 'reborn' REVERSES all Anastasius tried to achieve. It is the paradigm of history from this point forward. So Episode 9 aims to refresh your memory re how the 490s, work

Correction: at 2:48 or so I said min was a Greek preposition. I meant 'Hebrew'.


QB9b, Rev 17: Justinian I REBORN 490

'Quantum Bible' subseries, Rev17 Harlot unity of Church and state. How Bible shows Ruler Justinian I is ANTI-CHRIST prototype at REBORN 490. Paradigm of history from then on. 10a covers 518-535AD, as overview.

Revelation 17:9 "This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits. 10 They are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; but when he does come, he must remain for only a little while.

TIS Revelation 17:9 ὧδε ὁ νοῦς ὁ ἔχων σοφίαν. αἱ ἑπτὰ κεφαλαὶ ἑπτὰ ὄρη εἰσίν, ὅπου ἡ γυνὴ κάθηται ἐπ᾽ αὐτῶν. 10 καὶ βασιλεῖς ἑπτά εἰσιν· οἱ πέντε ἔπεσαν, ὁ εἷς ἔστιν, ὁ ἄλλος οὔπω ἦλθεν, καὶ ὅταν ἔλθῃ ὀλίγον αὐτὸν δεῖ μεῖναιι.

See for yourself the EVIL REV 17 HARLOTRY of #SevenMountans sect behind Donald Trump

source: https://www.generals.org/the-seven-mountains

In 1975, Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade and Loren Cunningham, founder of Youth With a Mission(YWAM), developed a God-given, world-changing strategy. Their mandate: Bring Godly change to a nation by reaching its seven spheres, or mountains, of societal influence.

They concluded that in order to truly transform any nation with the Gospel of Jesus Christ, these seven facets of society must be reached: Religion, Family,Education, Government, Media, Arts & Entertainment and Business.

The Reformation Prayer Network’s primary goal is to be a catalyst, through prayer and righteous activism, which will bring change to these areas of societal influence.

1. RELIGION

Every society has some type of belief in a superior being or beings. In the east, religions tend to be polytheistic (many gods) or outright idolatrous (such as Hinduism and Buddhism). Although these religions are thousands of years old, they nonetheless continue to thrive today. In the west, Christianity and Catholicism are predominant, but postmodern views are increasingly being accepted and the concept of God is being rejected. This is especially true in Europe.

The Christian Church is described in the Greek language as the ecclesia. Literally translated, the word ecclesia means “governing body.” Although we don’t condone theocracies, this translation suggests that the Church should have great influence in all other spheres that make up a society. With a plethora of categorized religions around the world, it’s the Church’s responsibility to reach the lost with the love and Gospel of Jesus Christ, and expand the Kingdom in ministerial efforts, both nationally and internationally.

2. FAMILY

In any functional society, the family is the “building block” of the community. Throughout the Bible, you will find familial examples that portray how we ought to live our lives today. God desires that men, women, and children within a family be united as one in His love. After all, He is the ultimate Father (Romans 8:14-17).

The families of the United States have been under constant and prolonged attack. Today, the assailants are fatherlessness, divorce (50% rate in secular and Christian marriages), abuse, homosexual marriage, pornography, and other negative influences have brought great dysfunction to American life. God is calling fathers and mothers (both spiritual and biological) to bring order to the chaos that the enemy has unleashed against families in America. He also wants to bring healing to marriages and relationships within families in order to maintain a moral foundation for children in the future to stand upon.

3. EDUCATION

At one time the education system of America unapologetically incorporated the Bible, prayer to the God of the Bible, and biblical values in every aspect of school life. Not coincidentally, this system produced a people that produced the most powerful and prosperous nation the earth has ever seen.

Now, the children of our nation are inundated with liberal ideologies, atheistic teaching and postmodern principles in our public schools and in most universities (including many Christian institutions). Put simply; they are being indoctrinated with often false, biased and anti-biblical information.

A re-introduction of biblical truth and Bible-centric values is the key to renewal and restoration in America’s failing educational system.

4. GOVERNMENT

Proverbs 14:34 states that, “righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.” Many times, as exemplified in the Old Testament, a nation’s moral standards are dependent on those exhibited by its leaders (or predominant political party). While each individual is responsible for his or her own sins; the fact remains that people are greatly influenced by those moral (or lack thereof) that popular leaders adopt.

The progressive liberal agenda, empowered by well-known men and women in the arts and entertainment industries, have made significant gains in the political arena over the past few decades. In fact, many liberal groups, such as the ACLU, seek to remove anything related to God or Christianity from the governmental and educational systems because of a misapplied interpretation of the phrase, “separation of church and state.” We must see a shift in this arena in order to preserve the Christian heritage that America was founded upon. The goal is to put in place righteous political leaders that will positively affect all aspects of government.

5. MEDIA

The media mountain includes news sources such as radio, TV news stations, newspapers, Internet news and opinion (blog) sites and etc. The media has the potential to sway popular opinion on current issues based upon its reporting, which is not always truthful or accurate. In the 2008 elections, the liberal “elite” media played a vital role, especially in the Presidential race. Their generally supportive and positive reporting greatly influenced the outcome.

There has been a rise in Christian news services, which is needed. However, to bring transformation to the mountain of media, Christians who are gifted for and called into this type of work must be willing to report righteously and truthfully in the secular marketplace.

6. ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT

In this mountain we find some of the most influential forces shaping our society. Music, filmmaking, television, social media, and the performing arts drive the cultural tastes, values and standards of a nation’s citizens, particularly its youth.

With a heavy reliance on the strong appeal of sex, drugs and alcohol, the arts and entertainment industries wield significant influence. The body of Christ needs powerful, righteous men and women who are not afraid to take their God-given talent into the arts and entertainment arenas. People ready to further His purposes, while impacting those who are lost in darkness and would not otherwise be interested in any kind of Christian message in traditional forms.

7. BUSINESS

The ability to literally create wealth through ingenuity, enterprise, creativity and effort and is a God-given gift and a universal impulse. The markets and economic systems that emerge whenever people are free to pursue buying and selling become the lifeblood of a nation. This includes anything from farms to small businesses to large corporations.

Of course this realm is prone to corruption through idolatry, greed and covetousness. In response, the Church must embrace its responsibility to train up those who are called into the marketplace to manage businesses and provide leadership with integrity and honesty. We believe it is the Lord’s will to make his people prosperous and that He desires for His Church to use its wealth to finance the work of Kingdom expansion. Simply put: Prosperity with a purpose.

THEIR WORDS to defend it; see for yourself how they SPIT ON Christ who said John 18:36. Search 'Seven Mountains' here in Youtube or Google, as well. ALL THIS STUFF IS HAPPENING AGAIN but in updated form, as it did during Justinian I, just as predicted in Rev17 playing on the same prediction in Mark 13, and before that Luke 21, and in same year Eph1, and in 30 AD, Matthew 24-25 (our time being Matt 25:10-12, 1960-2041 AD).


QB10f, Rev 17: Justinian I Anti-Christ posterboy

Here's the Putin manifesto video I mentioned in this segment, The fall of an empire—the Lesson of Byzantium

Search on Seven Mountains in Youtube or Google, to hear the same ideas expressed by US 'Christian' backers of Trump.

The Seven Mountains manifesto, is conveniently listed by its proponents, here (first link is most succinct): https://www.google.com/search?q=Seven+Mountains


QB10i, Rev 17: Justinian I Anti-Christ posterboy

Here's the link to the Fasti Romani, official ancient Roman 'yearbook' which was kept over the centuries and here is in type form, indexed and linked. It's a free download. Fasti Romani: The Civil and Literary Chronology of Rome and Constantinople, from the Death of Augustus to the Death of Justin II


QB10j, Rev 17: Justinian I Anti-Christ posterboy

Corrections and extra links:

Cambridge Medieval History seems to disagree about when the plague first hit Constantinople, pegging it to the year prior, The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 1, C.500-c.700

Then again, depends on what fiscal year John uses; but still it's the first or second syllable of SOPHIA.

Another dispute: page 149 of that book treats the defeat of Rome as independent of Justinian's treatment of the western 'pope' (not really a title then); that it's simply because J finally beat the 'Goths'.

Its page 139, however, does argue that due to Justinian, West and East broke up with finality, especially over the Three Chapters from 545-553 (where Justinian basically asserts he's the only voice for the Church).

LOL apparently Justin II, who comes to power in 565 AD, had married his wife SOPHIA in 542, RIGHT WHERE REV17:8 lists the term 'so' of 'sophia'!

Links:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/women/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sophia-c-525-after-600

Also, JB Bury's Later Roman Empire BOTH VOLUMES is online at my fav Thayer site, so you can more easily vet my claims about each of the Emperors. Justinian I is covered starting in Chapter 15.

https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/home.html

If you have Firefox Text2Voice (and please donate, the guy thinks no one likes it but it's the best voice converter 'out there', you can hit Control-A then 'Speak It' icon (or right-click) and listen happily each time. Wonderful voices!


QB11a, Matt24/Luke21/Mark13/Rev17 ANNUAL PROPHECY INTERLOCK

'Quantum Bible' subseries, Rev17 Harlot unity of Church and state. Now, it gets hairy. Each chapter uses others' SYLLABLE COUNTS to interlock TIME of prophecy, kinda like Tic Tac Toe. This video introduces you to each Chapter's focus, cuz its precision is extreme.


BM101 Epi1b, how Matt24:1 'tasted' to readers in AD30

Still Matt24:1, now talking about stuff the Greek, Roman or Jewish reader, would have wryly noticed in this witty verse:

WHEW. So much meaning packed into one verse? And we don't know any of it. Scholars weren't taught it, so they did not teach us.


Bible Meter 101 (BM101), Epi 1a, Matt24:1: meter proves Divine Authorship, intro

Simpler, short approach to understanding Bible Meter, which scholars have known existed, since the Reformation.. but haven't figured out.

This series goes slowly and uses English first; so it will be easier to grasp. You will be able to proof the interp, with real history.

The purpose, is to see the face of God in the text, how much God loves you; but you can't see that, until you know text is TIMED for your benefit.

What benefit? To protect you. To tell you how people in the world are thinking during your time, so you won't be fooled.

So we start with Matthew 24:1 in any Bible you choose. You need the Greek, to know what time the words cover: Matt24-25ParsedR6.pdf


BM101 Epi1d1, How Matt24:1 globally epitomizes, AD30-70 & tags Emperor Deaths

Matt24:1: witness God's biting satire, against arrogant rulers..still on role of ANAPHORA interacting w meter, to give precise interp.

Here in v1, the results are dramatic: God mocks the future deaths of Caligula and Nero, using ιε in ιερου for each. Get the pun? They each die in the middle of the word! So they do not get their apotheosis!

DISTANCE between each ιερου is 28, ÷7, stresses Divine Timing. Anaphora distances always ÷7, see notes in Matt24-25's pdf.

(Paul Luke Mark & John practice the same truncated mocking prophecy style w different keywords.)


BM101 Epi1d2, prove which Matthew 24:1 is original, from meter!

God prophetically mocks the deaths of Caligula and Nero by TIMING the genitive (= belong-to case ending -ou) of Temple=ιερου, such that their deaths occur in the MIDDLE of the word: meaning, they didn't BELONG as gods, tho they told everyone they would.

Greek and Roman playwrights often did this kind of sotto voce joke, to avoid being arrested for insulting the State: maiestas (look it up). Example: ter-ter-tullus is a line in a play, to mock Marcus Aurelius as a cuckold (look it up).

This biting satire by God against rulers is a very common feature in the New Testament; but you can't know, absent the meter. So of course Satan made sure we don't know. Until 2009, when I'd asked GOD about Isa53's meter, knowing nothing.

LESSON: ALWAYS ASK GOD, capisce?

In 2010, I 1st learned Paul used η in θεληματος to tag death yrs of Trajan Macrinus & Diocletian, 3 Emperors whose Wills were undone (haha) by their successors. He metered Eph1:3-14 to Varro=our AD

Paul cuts Constantine's AD337 death in the middle of προηλπικοτας, Eph1:12, to show Constantine died as a firstfruit of Antichrist: see the GGS11 playlist for verse-by-verse meter review.

John tags Eph1:12, in Rev17:5. See my Revelation 17 Sarcasm Tour videos.

Luke21 & Mark13 bite many rulers & Church Fathers, in parallel to Matthew 24.

John in Revelation 17 does it so much, I had to mark it in purple.

See them in my Matt24 playlist • Matt24Meter


Matt12 Matt reconciles Daniel 9

Still on how Matthew reconciles time from Abraham to Millennium, via Christ. Here, focus is on how you can prove with little effort, that Matthew writes in 30AD, because he's using 'years from' Malachi and Nehemiah, VIA the Daniel 9 count, which is 7 years SHORT. Since scholars misaccount Daniel 9 as lunar years, they don't see the shortness; but here in Matthew, anyone even calculating it wrongly, can tell 476 is 7 less than 483. Aha.

Related stuff to download, to follow the video:

MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls to see the Bible timeline Matthew uses for his meter.

File Name: MattMeter12.avi, 02/01/14.


Matt13 Matt reconciles Daniel 9, cont.

Still on how Matthew reconciles time from Abraham to Millennium, via Christ. Here, focus is on how Matthew reconciles to the Temple's Time allotment, i.e., in Daniel 9.

Thus you can prove with little effort, that Matthew writes in 30AD, because he's using 'years from' Malachi and Nehemiah, VIA the Daniel 9 count, which is 7 years SHORT. Since scholars misaccount Daniel 9 as lunar years, they don't see the shortness; but here in Matthew, anyone even calculating it wrongly, can tell 476 is 7 less than 483. Aha.

File Name: MattMeter13.avi, 02/01/14.


Matt14 Matt reconciles Daniel 9, cont.

Still on how Matthew reconciles time from Abraham to Millennium, via Christ. Here, focus continues on how Matthew reconciles to the Temple's Time allotment, i.e., in Daniel 9. Link mentioned at 17:00 or so in the video: brainout.net/branoutFAQ.htm#6a . That has the Bible verses plus reconciliation, so you can track it in Bible.

File Name: MattMeter14.avi, 02/03/14.


Matt15 Matt reconciles Daniel 9, cont.

This video is a slog, sorry. Still on how Matthew reconciles time from Abraham to Millennium, via Christ. Here, focus continues on how Matthew reconciles to the Temple's Time allotment, i.e., in Daniel 9. Link with Bible verses on the timeline: brainout.net/branoutFAQ.htm#6a . Bible verses plus reconciliation, actually; so you can track the timeline for accuracy or errors, via Bible.

Matthew is reconciling Temple time to show that theTemple the Temple depicts, Christ — was scheduled to be born and tie, ALSO based on Temple Time. Temple Time started with the Exodus, but Israel was 40 years late getting into the Land. The Temple was supposed to be ON the Land, the year she left, which was 1010 years after the Flood, already 10 years later than 1000. That extra 10 years, was 'bought' by Joseph maturing, hence Exodus occurred 490 years after he was enslaved. So apparently Jacob's maturation, was 10 years late, hence the transfer of the time grant to Joseph (who also would have had to mature to get it).

So notice: Millennium should have begun 4200 from Adam. Temple should have been in the Land by the end of 2666 from Adam, which for math purposes we call 2667 (Adamic year starts six months prior to Exodus/Abrahamic year). So 2667+1533=4200. Autumnal equinox of that year begins Adamic 4201, but it's still 4200 Abrahamic (which begins six months later, on vernal equinox, Exo 12). So the Temple SHOULD have stood 1533 years (219 sevens). Christ actually dies on the 1470th anniversary of the Exodus (year 4136 from Adam's Fall), leaving a 'gap' in Temple Time, of 63 years (1533-1470). Matthew thus uses '476', as there is a 14 year gap (63-49, the latter being Temple Down time which cannot be made up). So the books balance, with 14 left to play, and that's why everyone expected the Temple to go down 40 years after Church began (i.e., why Magnificat ended with Christ age 56, assuming He wouldn't die early, but He did).

Confused? Yeah, it's complicated. Ask God to work the math in your head, so you can see it. That's what I did.

Even so, it's patent that Matthew writes in 30AD, because he's using 'years from' Malachi and Nehemiah, VIA the Daniel 9 count, which is 7 years SHORT. Since scholars misaccount Daniel 9 as lunar years, they don't see the shortness; but here in Matthew, anyone even calculating it wrongly, can tell 476 is 7 less than 483. Aha.

What's so astonishing, is that Matthew sets the tone for all NT dateline meters. I didn't know he was 'tagged' by everyone else. This is the beginning of the Anno Domini accounting in the NT, which helps us understand what year Christ was born and died, and how to adjust the Roman AUC. See John's Meter for how John plays the same math in his Gospel, 1John, and especially, Revelation. Total reconciliation of Time from Adam, just like Matthew is doing, here.

Related stuff to download, to follow the video:

brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls to see the Bible timeline Matthew uses for his meter.

File Name: MattMeter15.avi, 02/03/14.


Matt16 Matt reconciles Daniel 9, cont.

Still on how Matthew reconciles time from Abraham to Millennium, via Christ. Focus continues on how Matthew reconciles to the Temple's Time allotment, i.e., in Daniel 9. Link with Bible verses on the timeline: brainout.net/branoutFAQ.htm#6a . Bible verses plus reconciliation, actually; so you can track the timeline for accuracy or errors, via Bible.

Matthew is reconciling Temple time to show that theTemple the Temple depicts, Christ — was scheduled to be born and tie, ALSO based on Temple Time. Temple Time started with the Exodus, but Israel was 40 years late getting into the Land. The Temple was supposed to be ON the Land, the year she left, which was 1010 years after the Flood, already 10 years later than 1000. That extra 10 years, was 'bought' by Joseph maturing, hence Exodus occurred 490 years after he was enslaved. So apparently Jacob's maturation, was 10 years late, hence the transfer of the time grant to Joseph (who also would have had to mature to get it).

So notice: Millennium should have begun 4200 from Adam. Temple should have been in the Land by the end of 2666 from Adam, which for math purposes we call 2667 (Adamic year starts six months prior to Exodus/Abrahamic year). So 2667+1533=4200. Autumnal equinox of that year begins Adamic 4201, but it's still 4200 Abrahamic (which begins six months later, on vernal equinox, Exo 12). So the Temple SHOULD have stood 1533 years (219 sevens). Christ actually dies on the 1470th anniversary of the Exodus (year 4136 from Adam's Fall), leaving a 'gap' in Temple Time, of 63 years (1533-1470). Matthew thus uses '476', as there is a 14 year gap (63-49, the latter being Temple Down time which cannot be made up). So the books balance, with 14 left to play, and that's why everyone expected the Temple to go down 40 years after Church began (i.e., why Magnificat ended with Christ age 56, assuming He wouldn't die early, but He did).

MattMeter16.avi 2/1/14.


Matt19 Matt reconciles Daniel 9, cont.

Still on how Matthew's 476 reconciles based on Bible's TIMELINE SHIFTS, focusing now on the scholar error of deeming Daniel's 62 weeks to end at when Christ actually dies, because they don't know the meter, and don't plot the numbers from Genesis forward to SEE these TIMELINE SHIFTS. So Matthew's 476, if anyone bothered to count the syllables, would alert them to the FIT with Daniel 9.. and show how we know Matthew wrote, in 30 AD, a full SEVEN YEARS PRIOR to when Daniel 9's endpoint, because that endpoint was a SCHEDULE.

So by means of the meter, Matthew sets up a Gospel THEME of 'vote now' — just as Israel was to do, in 446 BC and following, just as Moses had predicted, in Psalm 90:16-17. When Matthew writes therefore in the BEGINNING of the 62nd week, the theme of VOTE NOW is obvious, and Israel still has time despite rejecting Him 7 years early. For the Temple, is still standing, with either 50 years left or 40 years left, and yes Church began but Israel can vote to be in Church while the Temple remains. And so too, maybe the rest of the Daniel 9 schedule will still play, with the Trib beginning at the end of the 50 years, or end of the 40 years. THAT was the big issue to believers and unbelievers alike, who got this Gospel in 30 AD.

Hopefully you can see how we and they knew all that, from this video's review of the meter and applicable timeline history in Bible.

Related stuff to download, to follow the video:

brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls to see the Bible timeline Matthew uses for his meter.

File Name: MattMeter19.avi, 2/1/14.


Matt20 Matt reconciles Daniel 9, conclusion

Final video on Matthew's dateline meter, for now. Series will continue sometime later, when the other books' meters are finished, for comparison.

File Name: MattMeter20.avi, 6/4/14.


Matt24:19ff Meter Comment 2

2nd vid on Matt 24:19ff meter. For Masochists only, initial thoughts on meter structure in Matt 24:19ff ongoing thread: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=512

At issue is whether Christ is doing the first NT Church Timeline, precedent for Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14, which is online at Ephesians1REPARSED.htm or Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf.

Master syllabus and summary of Bible Meter found so far from Gen-Rev, fronts the writeup here (excludes Matt24, as that chapter is done by Anonynomenon): LukeDatelineMeters.pdf


Matt24:19ff Comment 11

Now it gets really interesting, how Christ 'tags' Genesis 1, 7, 8, Daniel 9, and Isaiah 53 all simultaneously, by means of the METER He uses, 308: talking in meter like apparently all Scriptural Jews did, else there'd be no point in using it! For that 308 meter for Noah, was well known, being as the LXX had the right Gen7 and 8 dates, but the Hebrew did not, shown here: https://vimeo.com/channels/noahicfloodprecedence


John's Meter

Uploads will resume in 2017, once I've done more research on AD 69. To Sort: go to 'Browse This Channel', then click on 'Videos'. To play all with one click: channel .

John interlocks his dateline meters among his Gospel, then 1John, then Revelation, as a kind of history and time-accounting lesson, to set the theme of his text. This interlocking also served his readers to 'convert' between Adamic years, Christ's Age, the Roman AUC system, and Noahic/ Abrahamic fiscal years. For everyone was drooling over when the Rapture might occur based on Paul's 434 years of what-if-Rapture scenarios, in Ephesians 1:3-14.

So John's dateline meters interlock also with that Ephesians passage. Very shocking, very surprising, very helpful for both textual criticism and hermeneutics. For we see a) WHEN John wrote, and b) HOW he reconciles the differenet fiscal years all the way back to Adam. Helps a lot, to identify what timings Bible uses and why.

And oh my, our 'traditional' 4 BC BirthYear for Christ, turns out to be apt! Long before Dionysius, Bible reconciled BC/AD that way, since the Varronic Roman AUC is padded with four years that never existed. So Bible employs the following conversions: Adamic calendar in Bible minus 3 years equals Christ's age, to align his Birthday with the 1000th anniversary of David's United Kingship: He was born Chanukah, 4103 from Adam's fall, not initial creation, which is undated. Adamic year starts on autumnal equinox, so it's considered the START of 4103, so IN the 3rd week OF the 3rd month = Chanukah. Heh.

So use '4106', to convert to 'our' BC, i.e., subtract that number for any BC date you have, to get equivalent Adamic year. Then, to convert from Christ's age to Roman AUC which NT writers use, subtract 3 from Christ's age. Because, the Roman AUC is overpadded by 4 years, but Christ was born end of Roman year, hence 3. So if you've only got Roman AUC, add 3 years to get His Age. During Christmas week, add another '1'.

See the 'Matt2' video description in this channel, for the links demonstrating the Roman AUC's overstated: a problem known for centuries, but we forget about it, when we look at Bible!


JM1 John's Meter, Intro in John's Meter

John's meter tells you how to reconcile Bible Time from Adam through the Millennium, but he does it in meter. He interlocks his dateline meters in the Gospel, 1John, and Revelation to provide a comprehensive prophecy and history lesson for those Rapture droolers who were disappointed the Millennium didn't come, 7 years after the Temple went Down.

It will be impossible for me to cover all the meaning here, in video, so the initial DRAFT form of the JohnDatelineMeters doc is just lightly reviewed. It will change a lot over the coming months. Yet it's useful even now, as it a) summarizes the doctrine of How God Orchestrates Time (Preface), b) provides a comprehensive, up-to-date set of ALL links to related videos and supporting webpages/documents (first two pages), and c) provides a helpful explanation on how to convert our BC/AD into Bible years; for this is what the ancients also had to do. For us, the BC/AD chronology problem occurred when Dionysius Exiguus chopped off three years from the tally; but was he wrong to do that? Not necessarily: for Varro's Roman auc, pads four years that never existed, and our BC/AD is based first, on Varro. Aha.

Here are the links:

BEWARE: 1John and Revelation 'Meter Import' sections are very rought drafts; I've not even finished listing all the meters in 1John, and the descriptions in Rev are what first came to my mind, when creating the chart. So these two will be much changed. John's Gospel Meter Import section is almost in final form, but I'm sure John is writing the week of the Lord's 81st birthday (just before it occurs), and need to rerun the math to see if I can prove that. I might be wrong. Even so, the math works well if he writes September-December 77 AD. He didn't write, later than that. Nor did he write earlier, as you'll see in the meter descriptions.

The other sections of the document need to be polished, but the essential information is already typed. I don't know how much time I'll have for editing between now and October, but I'll try to edit and polish, every weekend. As I can, I'll make more videos as well, but frankly it's easier to read the document, than to watch any videos I'd make. Enjoy!

File Name: JohnMeter1Intro.avi, 2/25/14.


1. Bible’s Anno Domini Meters 7/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface , or in JohnDatelineMeters.htm#Preface. Substitute doc or pdf if you want those versions.

This likewise dramatic video ends the survey with John, who also tags Mark and everyone else, proving his the last Gospel; he writes far earlier than 'scholars' parrot from ever-inept 'church fathers' who LIE against John every chance they get (see Church Father Hall of SHAME ). 2 and 3 John aren't yet been parsed.. Seriously: just FIRE anyone praising the 'church fathers' and go BIBLE ONLY, de novo and de repente.

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, meters interrelate all these three death dates and two birthdates, to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciles with OT. Its BC/AD converter? The ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but not over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (Davidic deadline) or 4146 (original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one meter 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one meter is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in a serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can know what formulas to 'test'. Dateline meter will often finish within first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, the passage is not merely a dateline, but rather a plan-of-time passage (i.e., Ps90, Dan9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Pet1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm.

It's also good to download a worksheet that plots all the Bible years, so when you see Adamic meters, you what specific BIBLE dates are intended, as the worksheet was created solely from Bible's dates: GeneYrs.xls.

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

That's a lot of material to review; given the accounting import, the time spent should be worthwhile. Whether God wants you to do that, is a private matter between Him and you. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important facts:

1. YES we really do have inerrant and infallible Word of God, as these meters are deliberate; so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people who pretend to read Hebrew and Greek but cannot);

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you drooling Bible debunkers);

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you brats who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish incompetence, especially since those guys can't count to 3 or 14),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who divert Bible study into banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to INTERPRET Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is actually a complex relation-back and -forward CONCORDANCE, so we know CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, money on debates over these five topics, can stop being burnt. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this material, the finding will be disputed, as if a person FINDING a thing, was related to what got FOUND. For what got FOUND, is in Scripture: so ANYONE, degreed or no, can FIND it.

Harsh talk? You bet. For thousands of children from Moses forward learned Bible this way. So why don't we?

LukeDatelineMeters was updated after this video was made, to show ALL meters for ALL clauses, and the JohnDatelineMeters text for the 252 and 364 meters were corrected (still right, but the textual variants they referenced weren't clear, and now are). All were re-uploaded as pdf, doc, AND htm, links are in the video description.


2. JM2 John’s Gospel Dateline Meter Variants / 3. JM3 1John Dateline Meter Variants

Impact of John's Gospel textual variants on the meter, how you can know from the meter, what John actually wrote.

Documents are again revised. Here are the links:

BEWARE: 1John and Revelation 'Meter Import' sections are very rought drafts; I've not even finished listing all the meters in 1John, and the descriptions in Rev are what first came to my mind, when creating the chart. So these two will be much changed. John's Gospel Meter Import section is almost in final form, but I'm sure John is writing the week of the Lord's 81st birthday (just before it occurs), and need to rerun the math to see if I can prove that. I might be wrong. Even so, the math works well if he writes September-December 77 AD. He didn't write, later than that. Nor did he write earlier, as you'll see in the meter descriptions.

The other sections of the document need to be polished, but the essential information is already typed. I don't know how much time I'll have for editing between now and October, but I'll try to edit and polish, every weekend. As I can, I'll make more videos as well, but frankly it's easier to read the document, than to watch any videos I'd make. Enjoy!


4. JM4 Revelation Dateline Meter Variants

Impact of Revelation's textual variants on the meter, how you can know from the meter, what John actually wrote. If you used my earlier Revelation 1.doc or pdf, please stop using it. This video and the links below, correct and supercede, that older version.


5. JM5 Meter Caveats

This video focuses on what elements of the analysis are more trustworthy, and which are very speculative, yet resonable, so you can save time in analysis. Basically, the meters are obvious, very little to dispute. On the other hand, my interpretation of those meters, although reasonable for the most part, would be quite disputable. Talk to God about everything. I sure am, and am very skeptical of whatever I seem to think the meter means, constantly throwing stones at it. Auditing requires such skepticism.

Conversely, so much in the meter's meaning is obvious, given how John clearly plays on Paul, that to just reject it out of hand, is also unwarranted. But again, you'll have to talk to God about that. In all events, it's not about who does the reporting. It's about what the Word actually says.


6. JM6 Gospel Meter Review

This video continues to focus on what elements of the analysis are more trustworthy, and which are very speculative, yet resonable, so you can save time in analysis. Here, I quickly go through my 'interpretation' of the meter in John's Gospel. You'd need to read it for a fuller vetting (links below).

Basically, the meters are obvious, very little to dispute. On the other hand, my interpretation of those meters, although reasonable for the most part, would be quite disputable. Talk to God about everything. I sure am, and am very skeptical of whatever I seem to think the meter means, constantly throwing stones at it. Auditing requires such skepticism.

Conversely, so much in the meter's meaning is obvious, given how John clearly plays on Paul, that to just reject it out of hand, is also unwarranted. But again, you'll have to talk to God about that. In all events, it's not about who does the reporting. It's about what the Word actually says.


7. JM7 1John and Rev Meter Review

This video continues to focus on what elements of the analysis are more trustworthy, and which are very speculative, yet resonable, so you can save time in analysis. Here, I quickly go through my 'interpretation' of the meter in 1John and Rev, to show how baldly the meter 'talks back to' John's Gospel. You'd need to read it for a fuller vetting (links below). In particular, it's clear 1John tags Ephesians 1:5 and following, Paul's complex 'anaphora'; then, Rev piggybacks on the 1 John meter ending at 231 (which was Paul's anaphora meter total). But HOW does Revelation piggyback? Starting at what meter? The 70.. the 108.. or do you add each set of meter numbers (for Paul does that), to get the total years John 'tags' in Paul? I'm not sure yet. So I cover two alternative viable countings, in the last half of this long video. You might find other ideas better.

Basically, the meters are obvious, very little to dispute. On the other hand, my interpretation of those meters, although reasonable for the most part, would be quite disputable. Talk to God about everything. I sure am, and am very skeptical of whatever I seem to think the meter means, constantly throwing stones at it. Auditing requires such skepticism.

Conversely, so much in the meter's meaning is obvious, given how John clearly plays on Paul, that to just reject it out of hand, is also unwarranted. But again, you'll have to talk to God about that. In all events, it's not about who does the reporting. It's about what the Word actually says.


8. JM8 Gospel and 1John Dateline Meter Compared for ‘Fit’

Now we get into the details: how does John play on his own meter? We start by comparing how 1Jn plays on John's Gospel meter. To see the play, one must analyse both the meter DOCTRINAL meaning, and TEXT. For you won't know you've parsed it rightly, if you don't have a puzzle-piece fit between the two. So this is to learn the Doctrine in the Meter, and to Audit what you think that meter is, all at once. Phenomenal stuff. If you have any doubts that God preserved His Word, this auditing will help dispel them. And in the process, alert you how to read BOTH John's Gospel, and 1John. Real shocker, actually.


9. JM9 Gospel and 1John Dateline Meter Compared, cont. / 10. JM10 Gospel and 1John Dateline Meter Compared, cont. / 11. JM11 John’s Gospel, 1John and Revelation Dateline Meter Compared, cont. / 12. JM12 John’s Gospel, 1John and Revelation Dateline Meter Compared, cont.

Still on how John plays on his own meter, comparing how 1Jn plays on John's Gospel meter. To see the play, one must analyse both the meter DOCTRINAL meaning, and TEXT. For you won't know you've parsed it rightly, if you don't have a puzzle-piece fit between the two. So this is to learn the Doctrine in the Meter, and to Audit what you think that meter is, all at once. Phenomenal stuff. If you have any doubts that God preserved His Word, this auditing will help dispel them. And in the process, alert you how to read BOTH John's Gospel, and 1John. Real shocker, actually.


13. JM13 John’s Gospel, 1John and Revelation Dateline Meter Compared, cont.

Still on how John plays on his own meter, focusing now on the 56 and 70, comparing how 1Jn plays on John's Gospel meter, but also.. Revelation. To see the play, one must analyse both the meter DOCTRINAL meaning, and TEXT. For you won't know you've parsed it rightly, if you don't have a puzzle-piece fit between the two. So this is to learn the Doctrine in the Meter, and to Audit what you think that meter is, all at once. Phenomenal stuff. If you have any doubts that God preserved His Word, this auditing will help dispel them. And in the process, alert you how to read John's Gospel, 1John, and now.. Revelation. Rev becomes far easier to understand, as a result.


14. JM14 John’s Gospel, 1John and Revelation Dateline Meter Compared, cont.

Still on how John plays on his own meter, focusing now on the 80's, comparing how 1Jn plays on John's Gospel meter, but also.. Revelation. To see the play, one must analyse both the meter DOCTRINAL meaning, and TEXT. For you won't know you've parsed it rightly, if you don't have a puzzle-piece fit between the two. So this is to learn the Doctrine in the Meter, and to Audit what you think that meter is, all at once. Phenomenal stuff. If you have any doubts that God preserved His Word, this auditing will help dispel them. And in the process, alert you how to read John's Gospel, 1John, and now.. Revelation. Rev becomes far easier to understand, as a result.


15. JM15 John’s Gospel, 1John and Revelation Dateline Meter Compared, end

Finishing up the overview on how John plays on his own meter, focusing now on the 80's, comparing how 1Jn plays on John's Gospel meter, but also.. Revelation. The next video, jm16, will focus on Revelation's meter — and revise the meter — how it interlaces with prior Bible books, since it's the last book of the Bible.

To see the play, one must analyse both the meter DOCTRINAL meaning, and TEXT. For you won't know you've parsed it rightly, if you don't have a puzzle-piece fit between the two. So this is to learn the Doctrine in the Meter, and to Audit what you think that meter is, all at once. Phenomenal stuff. If you have any doubts that God preserved His Word, this auditing will help dispel them. And in the process, alert you how to read John's Gospel, 1John, and now.. Revelation. Rev becomes far easier to understand, as a result.


16. JM16 1John to Ephesians 1, song / 17. JM17 1John to Ephesians 1 song, cont.

How 1John relates to Ephesians 1, showing more of the meter and textual ties between them.


18. JM18 Revelation Meter, Revised

Now we get into John's Revelation Meter. VERY revised, playing on Noah's year in Das Boot, Temple's 'year' of 364 years standing which Isaiah left in ellipsis between Isa53:10-11, Daniel 9's play on that same Year, Paul's play on the Year of Church — ALL of them referencing the same 364 precendented in Noah, which I tried to piece together here: Noahic Flood Precedence for God's Orchestration of Time . Still working on all these ideas and how Bible writers actually use them; but at least here in Rev's meter, you can see the ties are deliberate.


19. JM19 Revelation Meter Revised, cont.

Still on John's revised Revelation Meter, now getting into the submeters, to show how John plays on Noah's year in Das Boot, Temple's 'year' of 364 years standing which Isaiah left in ellipsis between Isa53:10-11, Daniel 9's play on that same Year, Paul's play on the Year of Church — ALL of them referencing the same 364 precendented in Noah, which I tried to piece together here: Noahic Flood Precedence for God's Orchestration of Time . Still working on all these ideas and how Bible writers actually use them; but at least here in Rev's meter, you can see the ties are deliberate.


Bible Dateline Meters

For a more complete listing of all embedded videos, just refer to the Poetic Meter Resource Index.

First 10 videos summarize this rhetorical style: it maps 'How God Orchestrates Time'. Then, videos are per book in ascending date order. Bible writers use dateline meters to:

  1. Telegraph book content and tie prophecy relative to the date of writing, so
  2. The meter creates FROM the date of writing — for the date was already known to those who initially got the letter/book — the meter creates, a GPS of Time: so they could better RELATE time to the text, and thus appreciate God's Grace and Protection.
  3. So retrospectively, we who do not know when those letters were written.. can learn.
  4. The writers also used the dateline meters to point to other Bible books, so the readers could more easily reference what other Scripture to compare, while reading (or remembering) the 'current' letter/book.
  5. Often, within a book, separate dateline meters are used; so the dateline is not merely restricted to the greeting portion of the letter. However, any subsequent meters will tie to the greeting section, and will provide a lot of precise, added information of the same structure as #1-#4, above.

Therefore, the datelines are always numbered in terms of significant Bible-related events past or future, especially as a 'time to Millennium' countdown 'clock'. The doctrines most applicable in light of that countdown which the letter/book will stress, are telegraphed by the dateline meter 'paragraphs'.

These meters are often quite sophisticated, so the links below are for whole channels dedicated to specific dateline meters in key passages. By contrast, the videos here are either the first in the video series linked below, or are here in this channel because there's no need to dedicate another whole channel just for these other books. This style began with Moses, and was in Hebrew, for teaching DOCTRINE. It is distinct from 'stoichometrie' as shown in http://www.stichometrie.de/gliederung.html . So that site has nothing to do with the Bible's own meter style here shown.

Suggest you go through this channel's links IN ORDER for fastest comprehension. It will take well over a year to absorb the material, so ASK GOD if He even wants you to look at this. For the material is addicting, once you get into it. And, there's no 'scholarly' corroboration of the meter, since no one knows it even exists (though scholars have speculated about its existence, for over 300 years). So I know I had to have made mistakes, but there's enough proof from the links below that YES this meter exists and does what is claimed.. the errors won't invalidate the existence and provable NATURE of the meter, but instead any mistakes will become obvious and will better prove how this meter works. Hence my courage, in posting and spending so much time on the subject.

So: presuming God wants you to analyze this, try following this order (which is roughly chronological):

Meter Rules are summarized here, based on the content below: http://www.brainout.net/BibleHebMeterCharacs.htm . You can substitute 'pdf' or 'doc' as the extensions, to download those file versions. That piece doesn't have any Greek or Hebrew fonts in it, and is best read rather than watched. The links below, demonstrate these meters in action.

How God Orchestrates Time, the doctrinal 'math' behind the meter pan-Bible: How God Orchestrates Time

Psalm 90 meter including Dateline, the PRECEDENT for all Bible meter: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter) ; videos include Isaiah 53's and Daniel's meter in context of how they play off Psalm 90's meter, showing how the text and the meter all interrelate. This sets precedence for how NT meter works in Greek (same rules).

Isaiah 53's meter including dateline, from which Matthew and Luke crafted their genealogies: Isaiah 53 Meter of Time: 1st David's Birth to Last David's Scheduled Death

Magnificat Meter (including Dateline, the core of the Magnificat's prophetic nature, and including Zecharias meter, which plays on Mary's): GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . Technically Mary's meter precedes Matthew's, as both she and 6 months later Zecharias, spoke in 5 BC. Matthew will key his meter to Daniel also, thus playing off Mary's.

Matthew's Dateline Meter, proving conclusively that his is the first Gospel (all subsequent NT books play off Matthew's meter): Matthew is Metered! . His meter focuses on Isaiah 53, Daniel, the Magnificat .. baldly.

Eph1:3-14 Anaphoric Meter Structure in Ephesians, including his 'Christ Age 56' dateline, playing baldly off Mary's meter as well as Matthew's: GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14

Prophetic nature of Paul's 'what if the Rapture' meter (after his dateline, which set it all up) — tying to FUTURE Roman and Church history: GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History

James' dateline meter, which is based on Luke's: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis

Luke's dateline meter, which is bifurcated between 'cover letter' dateline to Theophilus, and the actual Gospel dateline (written 7 years earlier): same as James channel starting at Jim7, because Luke builds his entire Gospel around the Magnificat meter.

Peter's Meter including dateline, showing he wraps his text to Ephesians to make a marching song: Peter Meters Time to Paul's Eph 1:3-14

Mark's Dateline meters (just Episode 1d et seq), proving his is the THIRD Gospel, playing off Jude's meter (not Ephesians, as I originally thought): Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong

Hebrews dateline meter, which plays off Peter, Mark, Luke, Ephesians: vimeo.com/brainout/rfg6b

John's Dateline meters in Gospel, 1John, Revelation: John's Meter


Meter Update 3-24-15

Latest status of the meters. Important changes: conversion of all shown dates to Adamic fiscal (autumnal equinox) so you can more easily see the time distance; also, I had to revise Galatians' explanation (meter fine, the 49's explanation was partly wrong, download link below). To read more about the SEVEN 'timeline shifts' Bible uses and I briefly showed, see brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm#TimelineShifts . They are charted in brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance .

Downloads: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf and brainout.net/GalatiansDatelineMeter.pdf . Or, 'htm' for Luke, else 'doc'.

This stuff is important, because it shows vividly how the writers all use an ADAMIC CALENDAR, which long before I even knew these meters existed, I learned solely from the BIBLE's own dates and numbers. Bible's own timeline using ONLY its dates, is here: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it are here: brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a . Worksheet should be intuitive, but I do explain its usage, starting here (through the end of Episode 8): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof) . Noah Flood Precedence channel with the doc and explanation on how we can know Noah's birthday would become Passover: Noahic Flood Precedence for God's Orchestration of Time .

So PassPlot.htm shows the BIBLE's Jewish calendar and how BIBLE tracks and proves His Exact Birth and Death dates, which to this day, we dummies never get right: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm .

File Name: MeterUpdate3-24-15.avi, same date.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 1/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall.

This video introduces the idea, harangues about how obvious Bible's Anno Domni meter would be to anyone COUNTING SYLLABLES PER CLAUSE; then, starts the meter survey with Galatians, the first book written after the first Gospel, which is provably Matthew's. This video ends with James, going in chronological order, through each NT book's meters. They all have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey1-2.avi 3/19/15 concatenated from 1 and 2 of 3/17/15.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 1b/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This 1b corrects last 10 minutes of Part 1 ( vimeo.com/brainout/bibleannodominimetersurvey1 ) to show Romans + Ephesians each use 'Lord's Age at Death +28' as their datelines, just as James will do. For Luke and Paul, tag the Magnificat's ending of Lord Age 56, 40 years prior to Mill.

So these meters all have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation).

That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey1b.avi 3/19/15


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 2/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This video continues the survey with Colossians through Titus, going in chronological order, through each NT book's meters. They all have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey3-6.avi 3/19/15 concatenated from 3-6 of 3/18/15.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 3/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This video continues the survey with 2Timothy, still showing how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey7-2Timwith3b1and2.avi 3/19/15, replacing MeterSurvey7-2Tim.avi 3/18/15.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 4/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This video continues the survey with 1Peter through Jude, still showing how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey8-91Peter-Jude.avi 3/19/15, concatenating MeterSurvey8 and 9 of 3/18/15.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 5/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This video continues the survey with Mark, which like Jude, proves that significant textual variants are the proper text. PROVING MORE THAN EVER THAT HE'S THE THIRD GOSPEL, NOT A QUELLE OR FIRST. All you have to do is READ to know that, even in translation. But here the meter, still showing how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common, proves it even more:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey10Mark.avi 3/18/15.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 6/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This rather dramatic video continues the survey with Hebrews, which builds its outline around the Gospel of Mark, thus proving more than ever that Mark's the THIRD Gospel, not Quelle or first. Dramatic, because it almost SCREAMS of Luke and Mark's authorship post Paul's death.

The Royal Family of God channel has those videos. But here, Hebrews also shows how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, not over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in a serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's not merely a dateline, but a plan-of-time passage (i.e., Ps90, Dan9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Pet1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the import of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey11-12bHebrews.avi 3/20/15.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 7/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface , or in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm#Preface . Substitute doc or pdf if you want those versions.

This likewise dramatic video ends the survey with John, who also tags Mark and everyone else, proving his the last Gospel; he writes far earlier than 'scholars' parrot from ever-inept 'church fathers' who LIE against John every chance they get (see Church Father Hall of SHAME ). 2 and 3 John aren't yet been parsed.. Seriously: just FIRE anyone praising the 'church fathers' and go BIBLE ONLY, de novo and de repente.

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, meters interrelate all these three death dates and two birthdates, to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciles with OT. Its BC/AD converter? The ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but not over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (Davidic deadline) or 4146 (original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one meter 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one meter is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in a serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can know what formulas to 'test'. Dateline meter will often finish within first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, the passage is not merely a dateline, but rather a plan-of-time passage (i.e., Ps90, Dan9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Pet1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It's also good to download a worksheet that plots all the Bible years, so when you see Adamic meters, you what specific BIBLE dates are intended, as the worksheet was created solely from Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

That's a lot of material to review; given the accounting import, the time spent should be worthwhile. Whether God wants you to do that, is a private matter between Him and you. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important facts:

1. YES we really do have inerrant and infallible Word of God, as these meters are deliberate; so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people who pretend to read Hebrew and Greek but cannot);

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you drooling Bible debunkers);

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you brats who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish incompetence, especially since those guys can't count to 3 or 14),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who divert Bible study into banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to INTERPRET Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is actually a complex relation-back and -forward CONCORDANCE, so we know CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, money on debates over these five topics, can stop being burnt. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this material, the finding will be disputed, as if a person FINDING a thing, was related to what got FOUND. For what got FOUND, is in Scripture: so ANYONE, degreed or no, can FIND it.

Harsh talk? You bet. For thousands of children from Moses forward learned Bible this way. So why don't we?

File Name: MeterSurvey13John.avi 3/18/15.


GGS11s15 Magnificat Meter, Revisited

Mary's Magnificat Meter reconciles between the Abrahamic and Davidic deadlines for her newly-announced Son's birth, from the first Chanukah; for she just then knew He'd be born on the 160th anniversary of that first Chanukah. Channel showing the videos on this: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . Doc used in video (latest version): brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or 'doc').

Turns out that all other NT Bible dateline meter formulas key off her reconciliation. Luke in particular, pads her text with a preface 'k'eipen Miryam' to reconcile between the shoulda-been-born Year 4106 From Adam's Fall to the then-known 4103 FAF, which Mary's tallying. But long prior, starting with Galatians, Paul had been doing the same thing, as you can now see in the paulmeter channel ( Pauline Dateline Meters ).

That flummoxed me, so here I go back to Mary's Magnificat to show the proof of Magnificat setting that accounting precedence. For it matters to know WHY all the NT books find some way to date their books based on the Lord's woulda-been or real age. Especially, since to this day 'scholars' debate when He was born, as if that information wasn't baldly disclosed in Scripture. Which as you'll see from the text interacting with the meter (or from the text alone, if you actually READ it carefully) — as you'll see, Bible does baldly and repeatedly state WHEN He was born. For, all Bible dates from Genesis to Rev hub around His Birth and Death, as Messiah is the key to history.

To show that, Mary keys off Daniel, starting 73 years after Daniel's timeline ended at 238 BC (rise of the feet of clay and iron, Rome), so 238+73 later = end 165 BC = start 164 BC = 1st Chanukah. Christ is actually born 160th year after that, shoulda-been born 164th year after that relative to Abraham (Luke's padding, left numbers on screen). So then 40 years of life leaves 56/7 years to Mill (57 really, since He's to die at beginning of year at Passover, on either schedule). So Mary was reconciling equidistantly, the payback on Abraham's 54 year credit at the end, like this: 40 when His Life was scheduled to end +16 +40 remaining coundown to Mill.

If you look at all the other NT dateline meters (except Matthew, who dates his book from Malachi), they all follow her same accounting formulas, back-and-forth. Shocking. This also shows the INTENT of the meter, so again you can tell the meter counts are the result of the writers deliberately padding their text to GET TO those meters. So again you can be very assured that God preserved His Word. Pity the stupid 'quelle' people, the horrible KJVO people, the dumb Mormons and Muslims and atheists who all claim that Bible is corrupted or that we don't have the original text. We do. Provably. Better still, we now have a better tool to sort among the variants, to correct the UBS text, at least for these dateline meters. Most of all, this accounting in Magnificat, shows the origin of all those dateline meter formulas. And perhaps most interesting, is the proof that what you should value about MARY, is her knowledge of doctrine, not the cheap trashy pandered claim by the lying Catholics, about her staying a virgin (a lie invented originally to 'compete' with pagan Roman Vestal Virgins; not at all Scriptural, as she would have SINNED not to have children with her husband). Oh well.

File Name: MaryRevisited, 3/14/15.


GGS11s16 Mary Reconciles to Daniel

To show how Mary picks up where Daniel left off, so you can see the precedent for her reconciliation. I've covered this before, but here the reconciliation is clearer. Thus when the entire NT's dateline meters measure from hers, you can see why.

Websites used in the video, to show importance of 238 BC:

Floralia (which was first instituted in the same year, maybe unrelated but doubtless reason for the year to be memorable as well): penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/calendar/floralia.html

UNRV: unrv.com/provinces/province-chronology.php

Turns out UNRV does have a chronology from 284-238, here: unrv.com/empire/roman-timeline-3rd-century.php

Navies of Rome book: books.google.com/books?id=ccHyOlPK4pIC&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&f=false

Eckstein's book: amazon.com/dp/0520259920/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1AC6BCZ98965A&coliid=IJE4KL97PCS2V

The Daniel chrono chart (below) has another link to that time which is more meaty.

284 BC, the earlier point in Daniel's Track 2 chronology, was a different kind of turning point, a settling with the Gauls: books.google.com/books?id=aEfvR1Qcd0gC&pg=PA349&f=false
You can find the same material elsewhere, but that link is a handy summary.

Here's another handy summary about how 284 BC was a turning point which you can download for free, see the middle left column on the page: books.google.com/books?id=mW8NAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&f=false

They often use Polybius' Histories, here free download in both Greek and English, link being the page which talks about the 284 turning point, books.google.com/books?id=ujMjAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA16#v=twopage&q&f=false

No offense, but the dingdongs who claim a late date for Daniel, really have no clue about anything. For it's impossible for anyone to know the CURRENT EFFECT of history, on the future. So this is clearly Divine Prophecy in METER, for crying out loud. No human is this smart.

Docs used in video:

Mary's Magnificat (latest version): brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf
Daniel: brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf

You really need to read both, and spend a lot of time vetting, as the proof is extensive and complex. Will take months to vet, sorry. The Daniel piece's 'Footnote E' goes through the verses on the kings Daniel covers per syllable=year, recounting them in light of the Kings and Chronicles verses covering them, intertwining those references as he talks. No wonder God had him rule Babylon. Mary KNEW that too, and she's emulating Daniel's prayer style when she talks. No wonder God had her be the mother, as it would be necessary for Christ to be thoroughly versed in Scripture from birth. As you proof both docs, you'll be amazed at both believers' command of Scripture. For which they are both, underpraised. THIS is what is supposed to happen to the believer, total integrated fluency in KNOWING BIBLE.

BTW, you can substitute 'pdf' for 'doc' ('RTF' for Daniel) to instead download the Word doc originals

File Name: DanRevisited123.avi 3/15/15.


Thessalonians (2nd) Meter, 1/3

Part 1 of 3, watch how Paul piggybacks on his own 1 Thess meter with 2 Thess. More proof of how DELIBERATELY this meter works, thereby also proving critics wrong, for a) your Bible really does have God's Word in it, and b) WHAT Paul meant by what he wrote, even to the point of opportunistically using the GREETING to telegraph the doctrinal content of his letter. Heh.

Video emphasis, however, is on HOW you do this meter sleuthing, so you too can do it on any Bible passage you like. And if you like, you can tell me if you found something, find I made an error, etc. :)

Link: brainout.net/2ThessDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

The Ephesians meter channel showing syllable by syllable, how Paul prophetically maps the future of Rome to show how Church determines history: GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . In that channel's videos, I didn't yet know that Paul was using the Lord's SHOULDA BEEN age, and THAT is why his meter exactly aligns with our 'AD', so much that at each eta in each thelematos, an Emperor DIES (Trajan, Macrinus, and Diocletian, respectively. Thelema=will, get the pun).

Magnificat, is a whole vimeo channel, walking you through the Greek (and metered translation), awesome thing, shocks me utterly: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . The doc you'll see onscreen is linked there, but you can click to download, here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or doc).

For the Bible's own timeline, undiluted and not folding in any other ideas or sources — for that's why all our Bible timelines are messed up, people are not SOLELY using Bible — download brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses and audit trail 'behind' the worksheet is at brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: 2ThessMeter1.avi, 3/08/15.


Thessalonians (2nd) Meter, 2/3

Part 2 of 3, continuing on how Paul piggybacks on his own 1 Thess meter with 2 Thess. More proof of how DELIBERATELY this meter works, thereby also proving critics wrong, for a) your Bible really does have God's Word in it, and b) WHAT Paul meant by what he wrote, even to the point of opportunistically using the GREETING to telegraph the doctrinal content of his letter. Heh.

Video emphasis continues on HOW you do this meter sleuthing, so you too can do it on any Bible passage you like. And if you like, you can tell me if you found something, find I made an error, etc. :)

Link: brainout.net/2ThessDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

Magnificat, is a whole vimeo channel, walking you through the Greek (and metered translation), awesome thing, shocks me utterly: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . The doc you'll see onscreen is linked there, but you can click to download, here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or doc).

For the Bible's own timeline, undiluted and not folding in any other ideas or sources — for that's why all our Bible timelines are messed up, people are not SOLELY using Bible — download brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses and audit trail 'behind' the worksheet is at brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: 2ThessMeter2.avi, 3/08/15.


Thessalonians (2nd) Meter, 3/3

Part 3 of 3, conclusion on how Paul piggybacks on his own 1 Thess meter with 2 Thess. More proof of how DELIBERATELY this meter works, thereby also proving critics wrong, for a) your Bible really does have God's Word in it, and b) WHAT Paul meant by what he wrote, even to the point of opportunistically using the GREETING to telegraph the doctrinal content of his letter. Heh.

Link: brainout.net/2ThessDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

Magnificat, is a whole vimeo channel, walking you through the Greek (and metered translation), awesome thing, shocks me utterly: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . The doc you'll see onscreen is linked there, but you can click to download, here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or doc).

For the Bible's own timeline, undiluted and not folding in any other ideas or sources — for that's why all our Bible timelines are messed up, people are not SOLELY using Bible — download brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses and audit trail 'behind' the worksheet is at brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: 2ThessMeter3END.avi, 3/10/15.


1 Corinthians Dateline Meter 2 , CORRECTED METER

Correcting dateline meter on 1 Cor from '91' to '105' and why. 2 Cor's meter was unaffected, but had to change the explanation for both docs.

Download doc here: brainout.net/1CorDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'). For 2 Cor, it's brainout.net/2CorDatelineMeter.pdf

File Name: 1CorFix1-2.avi 3/22/15 concatenated from 1CorFix1 and 2 on 3/21/15.


Romans Meter Sleuthing 1/3

This time, I show how I calculate the meter: here, for Romans. This video starts out with the raw text, formatted but not yet tested for meter. It goes through three (or more, I forget) different putative meter patterns, none of which turn out to be right. So it's useful for seeing the meter methodology process. If you're not interested in that, don't watch.

Part 2 will end up with the right meter, and Part 3 will go through its meaning.

Link: brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: RomansSleuthing123.avi 3/13/15.


Romans Meter Sleuthing 2/3

Part 1 had started with the raw text, formatted but not yet tested for meter. It went through three putative meter patterns. This Part 2 ends up with the right meter, and Part 3 will go through its meaning.

Link: brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: RomansSleuthing4.avi 3/11/15.


Romans Meter Sleuthing 3/3

Part 1 had started with the raw text, formatted but not yet tested for meter. It went through three putative meter patterns. Part 2 ended up with the right meter. This Part 3 goes through its meaning at 21:50 and following; prior, topic was how Romans 1:5 is horribly mistranslated in all the English Bibles I had.

Link: brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: RomansSleuthing5and6.avi 3/13/15.


Romans Meter Precedent, Yes!

Though my previous videos on Romans Meter weren't exactly 'wrong' (starting here: vimeo.com/brainout/romansmeter1 ), the vids weren't right enough. Turns out Romans, not Acts, is the precedent for the 'I write you' sotto-voce meter style John uses. So this video recaps it. You'll need to download the doc again, brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: RomansPrecedent123.avi 3/24/15.


Jim24 Luke1's dateline meter

Now we get into Luke's meter, proper. This video presents the overview on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and introduces the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this begin here at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim24Luke1MeterStart.avi, 1/21/14.


Philemon Meter

This book was written just before Paul got out of jail, as you'll see from the text (verse 18-22). So when was that? The meter tells you, and bluntly: when the Lord was 63 years old. See: they had their own Anno Domini, and it's recorded predictably, but in the meter.

At this point, videos have been posted on all NT dateline meters, so you can see a commonality of formula and especially, the Bible's own Anno Domini which just happens 'yeah right' to correspond to our own. The dateline meter style is panoramically charted for easy big-picture reference, in the first two pages of brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeter.pdf , which also has a comprehensive list of all docs, videos and webpages related to How God Orchestrates Time, that I've done over the past 10+ years. That link is also in the one below.

Link: brainout.net/PhilemonDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: PhilemonMeter1.avi, 3/13/15.


Acts Dateline Meter Revisited 3/4

3rd of 4 videos on the Meter in Acts. The first two videos were methodology sleuthing and explanation; this and the next video presents the 'right' answer. Because, the wrong answers never balance to Bible. And when you find the right answer, it fits beautifully, throughout. For Bible, is self-auditing.

Doc Link: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc.

File Name: ActsRev4-5.avi, 3/15/15, concatenated from Rev4 and Rev 5 made 2/23/15.


Acts Dateline Meter Revisited 4/4

4th of 4 videos on the Dateline Meter in Acts. The first two videos were methodology sleuthing and explanation; this video completes the 'right' answer, with stress on the way the meter deliberately sets the theme of the Book of Appalling Acts of the Awful Apostles. For Luke meters it negatively, to immediate apostasy as bad as Temple Down in Daniel (the 49), followed by 105, usurping Herod granted power by usurping Rome over Israel; in between, the other numbers are factual benchmarks, with 64=4164, when Luke wrote the Gospel (since Acts picks up where his Gospel ended, four years later), and 82 and 89, referring to the very same activity he'll be recording in the Book of Acts, but back then, by pagans: the First Triumvirate.

Idea that Christians will woo and war with each other, just as Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar had done. That Christians will usurp power over other Christians to stand between the believer and Bible, to play God and block God's Word.. just as Herod was placed over Jerusalem by SPQR.

So it's not a pretty theme, and anyone with half a brain can tell the 'Acts' are keystone cops. Funny, if not so tragic. Luke tagged Paul for the fuller answer, which you can watch syllable by year, in GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History or just read the doc online, brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. Or brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf, which is a copy. Really embarrassing ACTS, ever since Christ died!

The wrong answers never balance to Bible. And that's what happened in Acts: everyone including even Paul, goes off-Bible and into the tullies. (Link to one guy's search on etymology of 'tullies': funnyguyontheprowl.blogspot.com/2008/04/740-isle-of-thule.html )

Doc Link: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc.

File Name: ActsRev6.avi, 3/17/15.


Titus Meter

If you don't believe in Trinity, don't watch this BIBLE VIDEO DEMONSTRATING TRINITY METER. Heh. I've never seen so much emphasis on Trinity in a metered passage, as here. Not sure why Paul did it that way, but as you'll see, it's clear that the meter is intended. Which means, you have intentional SCRIPTURE. Which means, our copies are good. Which means, God yes preserved His Word. Each God: Father, Son, Spirit. Triple-heh. It's a little too cute that the addressee in this letter has the same name as a future Emperor whose dad, also a future Emperor, has just been dispatched to Jerusalem...

Titus is the last letter Paul wrote before he was jailed again, and it comes out the very moment or shortly before, when Nero orders Vespasian to go to Jerusalem and quell the rebellion that Florus' taking money from the Temple, had provoked. So here we see prophetical warning about how this event (which maybe wasn't yet known, but would be within weeks of Paul's writing, or was already newly known) — we see how Paul's METER telecasts the 'position' of the event, tagging his own prophecy of it, back in Ephesians.

For here again we see the Bible's own way of accounting Anno Domini, as bald as we saw in the other Pauline books. Every Pauline book uses His Age at x (and at least one will be a formula based on his Actual or originally-planned birth year). So it's real easy to know when a Bible book was written: just count the syllables. As you'll see again here. It's a no-brainer.

Link: brainout.net/TitusDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

The Ephesians meter is relevant, so here's the channel for it: GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . Look at the meter for syllables=AD years 66 and following. If you'd rather just see them in an htm, look at 66-73 here: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#y47to56 .

File Name: TitusMeter1and2.avi, 3/13/15.


RFG5e2-1a Peter's METERED! Update

Turns out Peter's using the same 'I write you' style as Acts, with each CLAUSE's meter, whether sevened or not, being used in a kind of sotto-voce causal date linkage, with one of the clause numbers, being the year he writes. Aha. Sorry I missed this earlier, I'd not seen the style when first making the earlier videos in 2013.

Revised doc has a new title, brainout.net/1PeterMeter.pdf or doc.

File Name: 1PetFix1234.avi 3/22/15.


Jude 6a/6b and 2 Peter's REVISED Meter

Jude Part 6 is subdivided into two parts: this one is a better explanation of 2 Peter's meter versus the prior video, showing how he actually uses ADAMIC YEAR NUMBERS in his meter. Which pattern, Jude tags PER CLAUSE. But Jude doesn't use Adamic year numbers; yet, he expects you to know Peter did, to make puns on Peter's formulas, which Jude actually duplicates. To see Part 6b, click here: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6b

Again, this is clear evidence that the meter is deliberate. I couldn't make this up even if I wanted to. Heck, I didn't even understand it, until redoing the math several times! So if anyone claims the Bible is corrupted or we don't have the original words the writers wrote, or that Bible was written much later.. guess again! The naysayers always prove themselves incompetent, for even a dippy 'brainout' can count syllables and see the provably-Divine, pattern!

Doc Links: you can substitute 'pdf' with 'doc' and edit the (MS Word) docs.

2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, brainout.net/2PeterMeterR2.pdf . The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs more editing for consistency.

Jude: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf . Text after page 2 needs to be edited.

File Name: JudePart6Aon2Peter.avi, 3/17/15.


Jude 6b/6b Dateline Meter 'answer'

This Part 6b 'answers' the meter question, 'when was Jude written?' You'll need to first watch Part 6a to see 2 Peter's meter, which Jude apes: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6a . Else, the 'answer'here, won't make much sense.

Since this book is so misused by the denominations (ALL of them), the meter is of unusual hermeneutical value. Time we got back to the BIBLE and stopped treating it like a political football.

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc' 0. Text after page 2 still needs editing for consistency.

For 2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, brainout.net/2PeterMeterR2.pdf . The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs editing for consistency.

File Name: JudePart6B.avi, redone 3/17/15


RFG6c Revised Hebrews Dateline Meter

Revised Book of Hebrews dateline meter. The ending 133 meter is still the same, but I screwed up the interim parsing when initially done, because back then I didn't recognize the cadence. So this video introduces the corrections, with explanations re variants and parsing methodology.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

Later videos will go through the significance of the meters, and the doc will contain that explanation too. For now, I just introduce some of the connections, not much explaining WHY I know the writer (CLEARLY NOT PAUL) wrote in late 69 or early 70 AD. The Temple was taken down in the final assault which began on Passover and ended on 9th Av, by Titus; this was written before that final assault began, at least by several months, probably the prior fall, so there would be enough time for the letter to circulate. This same close warning was done by Ezekiel for the Diaspora Jews, see his book. And also by Jeremiah, see Jeremiah and Lamentations. So the writer of Hebrews is playing the same God-given role as those two OT prophets.

Vespasian was sent to Jerusalem around 67 AD, so the armies had been surrounding Jerusalem for quite some time before the assault began. They were trying to negotiate a truce with the Jews, to keep Judea a commercial success, and keep invasion costs down. It didn't pan out. You can read Josephus on that, but be aware that Josephus is very bad at numbers: almost all his Bible numbers are perpetually wrong. So use his dates for anything else, also with caution.

File Name: HebDatelineMeterRevPt1.avi, 3/22/14.


RFG6d Hebrews' Dateline uses Temple Fall as Mid Trib analogy

Numeric puns on 'middle'. John will do the same thing in his meter, clearly getting his pattern from Hebrews. So what's the deal with 'middle'? Daniel 9:27. The idea was, everyone expected the Temple to go down, Daniel 9:26, but due to Church, also expected that to herald the Tribulation's beginning. So downfall=desecration, hence a kind of pun about middle dates. So, the writer of Hebrews (not Paul, he was dead, Hebrews 13:23) uses a dateline which is 21 years from latest mid-Trib on the timeline pre-Church, dated also when the Lord's age was in the 'middle' of Age 70 and 77. All three dates: 70, 73, 77.. were plotted as what-if-Raptures by Paul in Ephesians 1:3-14.

Only this time, the Lord being 73: the Temple really does go down. Our year? 70AD. Get the pun?

Revised doc still has the same name as before, but now with commentary on the numbers covered in the video: brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc or
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers) or
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf . All the other links to the other docs, including Ephesians, are in these links.

File Name: RFG6d.avi, 4/12/14.


JM6 Gospel Meter Review

This video continues to focus on what elements of the analysis are more trustworthy, and which are very speculative, yet resonable, so you can save time in analysis. Here, I quickly go through my 'interpretation' of the meter in John's Gospel. You'd need to read it for a fuller vetting (links below).

Basically, the meters are obvious, very little to dispute. On the other hand, my interpretation of those meters, although reasonable for the most part, would be quite disputable. Talk to God about everything. I sure am, and am very skeptical of whatever I seem to think the meter means, constantly throwing stones at it. Auditing requires such skepticism.

Conversely, so much in the meter's meaning is obvious, given how John clearly plays on Paul, that to just reject it out of hand, is also unwarranted. But again, you'll have to talk to God about that. In all events, it's not about who does the reporting. It's about what the Word actually says.

Documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

BEWARE: 1John and Revelation 'Meter Import' sections are very rough drafts; most of the editing in this latest revision are in the sections interpreting the meter. In the other sections, I made a few small revisions to match. For example, now it's clear 1 John was written 4 Chislev, now that I'm sure of how he used his '21'. So Revelation ends up being written 'our' December 88 AD.

File Name: JM6GospMeterReview.avi, 3/02/14.


JM18 Revelation Meter, Revised

Now we get into John's Revelation Meter. VERY revised, playing on Noah's year in Das Boot, Temple's 'year' of 364 years standing which Isaiah left in ellipsis between Isa53:10-11, Daniel 9's play on that same Year, Paul's play on the Year of Church — ALL of them referencing the same 364 precendented in Noah, which I tried to piece together here: Noahic Flood Precedence for God's Orchestration of Time . Still working on all these ideas and how Bible writers actually use them; but at least here in Rev's meter, you can see the ties are deliberate.

Documents below were updated 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

In the other sections, I made a few small revisions to match. For example, now it's clear 1 John was written 4 Chislev, now that I'm sure of how he used his '21'. So Revelation ends up being written 'our' December 88 AD.

File Name: JM18RevRevised1.avi, 3/5/14.


JM19 Revelation Meter Revised, cont.

Still on John's revised Revelation Meter, now getting into the submeters, to show how John plays on Noah's year in Das Boot, Temple's 'year' of 364 years standing which Isaiah left in ellipsis between Isa53:10-11, Daniel 9's play on that same Year, Paul's play on the Year of Church — ALL of them referencing the same 364 precendented in Noah, which I tried to piece together here: Noahic Flood Precedence for God's Orchestration of Time . Still working on all these ideas and how Bible writers actually use them; but at least here in Rev's meter, you can see the ties are deliberate.

Documents below were updated 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

In the other sections, I made a few small revisions to match. For example, now it's clear 1 John was written 4 Chislev, now that I'm sure of how he used his '21'. So Revelation ends up being written 'our' December 88 AD.

File Name: JM19RevRevised2.avi, 3/5/14.


PATU44 Ephesians 1:3-14 Revisited 5/5

For Masochists Only. Audit video subseries revisits whether I explained the dateline '56' of Ephesians rightly: I hadn't. This is 5/5's corrected answer. Download the two-page audit correction, here: brainout.net/EphDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'. The Romans doc is brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf or doc.

Turns out Paul used the 'I write you' meter style in Romans (which was precedent), but had to 'pad' 2 years into the text: BECAUSE he writes in ad 58, so can't tag Mary's 56 without some haha math. This 5/5 shows that haha math (rounding tricks on years Christ did or should have died, '37' and '47'); yet all four videos are useful re technique for sleuthing Bible meters. Took me four hours' videos to figure out Paul's haha. Happily, though, I don't have to redo all my past Ephesians videos nor rewrite the video's 150-page doc, brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf aka Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) !

If you're not already familiar with the meter styles, you'll need some background on the Doctrine no one in Christendom yet knows, HOW GOD ORCHESTRATES TIME (channel on its math, is How God Orchestrates Time ). No one knows that doctrine, because no one's ever plotted Bible's dates using ONLY Bible, so all the Bible timelines 'out there' are at least partially wrong and contradictory. I learned that, the hard way, so went BACK TO THE BIBLE and only used it to construct brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls, using the Gen5 and 7, 11 begats (all in the worksheet and visible), plus verses not much used by anyone else. Verse disclosure and method of constructing the worksheet is in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

You need that worksheet, as the Bible meters measure time in the same way, ADAMIC YEARS. For example, Christ died in 4136 vernal. He was SUPPOSED to die 10 years later, in 4146 vernal. Paul depends on the reader knowing that for his haha math, as the ADAMIC year equivalents are 4136.5 and 4146.5, respectively. Since you can't split a syllable=year, he neatly rounds to get to the shoulda-been age (a meter convention that equals our 'ad') by saying (41)37 and (41)47, in the meter you see onscreen. Heh. But that would mean Christ age 58, not 56, so he backs out the '2' added, to get back to 56, so he can pick up where Mary's Magnificat, left off. Magnificat videos are here: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time .

Thus in Ephesians, Paul reconciles all the way back to Adam. Which I knew, but couldn't figure out how he did it. Until now.

File Name: EphRevisit10.avi, 3/25/15.


Genesis 1 Meter (Remix 3/31/15)

REMIX, DATELINES CHANGED. Genesis 1 meter, real shocker. Genesis proves the provenance of the 364, 560 and most importantly, the 1050 BASE UNIT giving rise to the "Millennium" doctrine. Genesis sets doctrinal precedence pan-Bible, as hopefully everyone knows, so this is very strong proof. Download the pdf here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Related material which now has much more relevance.

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: Gen1Meter1-2.avi, 3/31/15 replacing prior video from 3/26.


Genesis 1 Meter Epi 2: TIE TO ABRAHAM (and hence to 1050)

How Genesis 1 metrically ties to Abraham, a real smoking gun killing all preterism, Replacement theology, non-millennialisms and especially, those who deny pre-Trib Rapture. For the Rapture is designed to RETURN TO the original schedule which starts with, Abram.

To show this, Genesis 1 'times' its meter to begin the sixth day Decree at syllable 766, to 'tag' Abraham. The math is exquisite,just like all the other meter math, especially Daniel 9's — which this video covers. The pdf/doc already shows it, so you can just skip the video, read the doc instead. Proves again the provenance of the 364, 560 and most importantly, the 1050 BASE UNIT giving rise to the "Millennium" doctrine, since God 'balances' Time due to Abraham's maturation. Genesis sets doctrinal precedence pan-Bible, as hopefully everyone knows, so this is very strong proof. Download the pdf here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Related material which now has much more relevance.

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time
Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi2.avi, 4/2/15.


Genesis 1 Meter Epi 3: How Old Earth?

Does the Genesis 1 Meter tell us how old Earth is, or how long Adam existed PRIOR TO his fall? Well, to prove that, two steps are required:

a) Meter counting methodology must be the right one, and
b) Scripture elsewhere must expressly reference the age of Earth or Adam PRE Fall, in its text. Genesis 1 does not provide that support. Nor does Genesis 5, since it starts with Adam's fall: days not numbered until Genesis 3:17, and Hebrew joke in Gen 3:22 calls Adam 'born' (birthing preposition min = out from away from separate from).. when he fell. So for Adam in Genesis 5, the '130' is his years AFTER his fall, not his actual age. Maybe it's metered, I didn't check that.

Without b), then a) is useless. However, in this video's last half, I'll go through a). The first half is the METHODOLOGY you follow, which all the other Bible meters use — maybe because Genesis 1 is precedenting. For example, NT Romans, Acts, and all John's stuff use the same meter methodology as you'll see me use here. So you know how to do it, in case Genesis 1 or some other passage meters the age (ideally, with a smoking gun b) textual support) of either Adam pre-Fall, or of Earth.

Related material which now has much more relevance.
Download the video's doc here, brainout.net/Genesis1Meter.pdf (or doc).

Pattern of equidistant ellipsis is common, but you have to already know the material below, to spot it easily. A quick primer on the pattern, is here (still in draft form): brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf

How God Orchestrates Time channel: How God Orchestrates Time

Time Distance Chart, so you can see how Bible 'times' its events relative to each other: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#TimeDistance (same section is in the pdf or doc versions).

Psalm 90 channel: Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter)

Genesis channel (skip first episode unless you want to see me act like Tom Baker and poorly; worksheet help begins in Episode 8c1): Genesis Time Doctrines (Exegetical Proof)

Worksheet on How God Orchestrates time using ONLY Bible, solar years, easily proven IN Bible and frankly, history: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Verses used to compile it with full audit trail, brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Use of the dateline meter number times seven or times 49 is most simple and flagrant in Magnificat, starting at the 'Chanukah Timeline' link (page 11) here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.pdf . Paul carries that methodology to extremes in his use of 33 sevens, 45 sevens, 78 sevens, and 94 sevens, starting here (pages 127-146 in the pdf): brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#ThirtythreeSevens — it goes on and on and on, and I'm not done 'mapping' it all, yet. Point is, you can see the style in text more easily parsed, so what is the first Bible book to use it? Likely, Genesis. So the same style, is tested in this video.

File Name: Gen1MeterEpi3.avi, 4/2/15.


Pope Myth (aka PopeM)

+ RCC + Church Father Hall of SHAME

Also archived in here are a few FrankForum posts relevant to the Pope Myth / Church Fathers topic.

The lying, lousy, Bible-ignorant Church Fathers will be the theme of this channel. No one who praises these awful people, can competently read Bible.

Wow, that's a strong statement. So it better be backed up with proof, huh. I started doing just that, back in my Youtube 'Pope Myth' playlist, which is housed in PopeMyth.htm. Eventually, ALL those videos will be ported here. Right now, I've already ported some to vimeo, to illustrate Paul's scathing prophetical sarcasm in the GGS 11 series, against those very 'fathers'. Yeah, fathers of apostasy.

But apparently more needs to be shown, so this channel will house live sections from these bilious liars who wouldn't know the Bible if it bit them. So you can understand better, how apostate Christianity is, today.

For if someone praises obvious liars, then that person either a) has no discernment, hence no Holy Spirit (so is carnal, even if saved); or b) never actually READ what those liars wrote, and so is a hypocrite. Take your pick.

We need to clean house in Christianity, or God will clean us out. Cleaning starts by admitting these horrible people of the past, only fathered the lies many still cling to, this day.

Proof from Bible the 'pope' thingy is a myth. For 'petros' means 'chip', versus Petra meaning BEDROCK, so in Greek you'd never confuse the two. OT verses use Petra in contexts solely to mean Christ as Rock of Salvation (or evocative of that meaning). So no confusion, when Christ says Petra: He means Himself. These videos are embedded in my http://www.brainout.net/PopeMyth.htm , which gives you more proof from Bible and Church Father writings, that this 'pope' thingy is INVENTED ex post facto, beginning in the 3rd century AD.

In 1st-century Latin, the words are lapis and scopulum, respectively. So Peter would be called 'Lapis', and Christ would be Scopulum. Again, no confusion between the two.

But a clever 3rd century Latin INVENTION of 'petrus' nicely confuses the two, making it look like 'petram' is but another gender for the same word. Well, if you really know Latin that cheap gambit doesn't work either.

In short, the word is invented to COVER UP the fact that Christ is pointing at HIMSELF, never Peter, when He says 'upon THIS Rock'. And the inventors relied on the readers being lousy at remembering Latin Grammar rules, mixing up genders. So while the smart reader would know that Petram and Petrus CANNOT BE the same word (gender mismatch), the unschooled would just go by sound-alike.

What utter chicanery, chopping Christ's Head off and calling it holy! For 2000 years!

Popism is an invention, just like the Latin word. So this series walks you through all the Bible verses using the term, so you can see for yourself, the invention.

This isn't to say Roman Catholicism has no right to exist; but it is flat lying to base its claim on Matthew 16:18. A lie that will never be admitted.

So they will never be admitted to maturity. Saved maybe, but mature, never, Col 3:25.

Then we take a video trip to a catholic website summarizing key quotes by the so-called 'fathers' on apostolic succession, to show how in their own words, they prove liars. Copious documents by these apostates claiming to have the true faith are provided as links in the video descriptions, so you can read their tripe for yourself. Commentary comparing what THEY say versus Scripture, is also provided. You won't believe it's so bad until you read it for yourself. (I didn't, anyway.)

Next, book review of Robert Lee Williams' 'Bishop Lists', his rewritten dissertation, showing how the so-called list of early popes, came to be invented. The so-called 'church fathers' invented a list of who THEY thought good teachers, to fight other Christians and make Christianity look 'old' to Rome; by Constantine, they came to call this personal-opinion list, hallowed. Ooops.

Playlist ends with 'Rethinking Catholic Claims' subseries, informal commentary on RCC claims versus history and Bible.

You can proof all this yourself. Videos walk you through the source material. Don't take my word for it, DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK.

The 'Calvin's Poison' video also has many source text links, so you can see for yourself how his lie was promulgated, and how RCC doctrines infected Calvinism, and hence most of Christianity even until today.

DO HOMEWORK. Or, be fooled.

The Retarded 'Church Fathers'
brainout | 21 Mar 2017, 21:54

Read their vile twistings of Scriptures and outright lies for yourself, in their own words:

I was looking to see where the meter and text in Mark 13 for particular phrases would be echoed in the mindset or phrasing of the time marked by the meter, and if it were possible to find when Bible mss were disseminated.

Apparently Michael III (842-867) donated many Bibles to one of the churches, but I can't tell for sure, since the term is 'New Testament relics'. So in trying to chase that meaning down, I found this bilious piece of trash by the American Bible Society: Centennial Pamphlets: Ecumenical patriarch of Constantinople : the New Testament among the Greeks

So even today, the same sickness pervades.

The reference to Michael III is in footnote 53, Chapter 9, p.233 of the pdf of a translation of Scylitzes, Full text of "John Skylitzes. A Synopsis Of Byzantine History (trans. By J. Wortley) ( 2010)"

Syriac Bible translation history and related stuff, 523-645 AD
brainout | 24 Jan 2017, 10:36

This link (as a subset of the history of the Syro-Phoenician church) seems unusual, so I thought I'd park it here: Chart of the Syro-Phoenician Church from 525 A.D. till 1724

Jerome's writings/translations in chrono order, w LINKS to them

I just found this, much better than newadvent.org, listing in chrono order when Jerome wrote what, including the translation work or commentary work. Very important for any of our metered timelines, as the Western world would be using his translation (well, mixed with Old Vulgate) for the next 1000 years. Even today, the Vulgate we have is largely his translation. So his spiritual development would matter a bunch to seeing how others were hampered or helped in their studies.

http://www.fourthcentury.com/jerome-chart/

Julius Africanus' writings
brainout | 17 Mar 2017, 20:09

This is the guy who first put Peter on a pope list at the behest of Demetrius of Alexandria, as explained in my videos, here: https://vimeo.com/channels/churchfathers/79847850

This link, is to his 'Chronography', evidence the jerk never could read THE BIBLE which has a full chronology of everything BUT how old the Earth is (cuz Bible doesn't ever bother to say that). Notice how clearly the guy cannot read even the Genesis 5 begats: Sextus Julius Africanus after 221 CE

Desafortunadamente, you can't get his 'Cesti' for free, but you can search on it here, sample search given: Cesti: The Extant Fragments (page 18)


1 PopeM + 36/72, KJVOB : KJV's Matthew 16:18, makes Peter, Pope

How KJV decapitates Christ and puts Peter's head at top. How only the Codex A family (Siniaticus, Alexandrian-related) preserved the right Greek text.

For a better retelling of Codex A's dramatic history than I say in the videos (the way I tell the story might be misleading) — see this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Sinaiticus.

So much for the claim that Textus Receptus is 'less' Catholic!


2 PopeM + 37/72, KJVOB : KJV's Matthew 16:18, makes Peter, Pope

Here's Tischendorf's own account of how he found it: http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/extras/discovery.html

So much for the claim that Textus Receptus is 'less' Catholic! Full playlist on Petra/petros is here: PopeMyth.htm. That webpage has more information about how to prove the pope thingy is a lie invented in the 2nd century AD. The playlist is also here in Youtube, my 'brainout PopeMyth'. The Youtube playlist videos are fewer and longer than those in bliptv, but contain the same material. (Once, bliptv was easy to use and clearer; then it became a nightmare; so I'm porting my bliptv videos here to Youtube.)


3 PopeM Rock is Christ Never Peter

Proof from Bible that 'pope' is an anti-Biblical INVENTION by apostate Christians around the time of Commodus, forward. Pan-Bible petros verses: Ps 103:12; Job 30:6; Obad 1:3; Isa 2:19, 21; 7:19; 57:5; Jer 16:16; 28:25; 30:10; Matt 4:18; 8:14; 10:2; 14:28f; 15:15; 16:16, 18, 22f; 17:1, 4, 24, 26; 18:21; 19:27; 26:33, 35, 37, 40, 58, 69, 73, 75; Mk 3:16; 5:37; 8:29, 32f; 9:2, 5; 10:28; 11:21; 13:3; 14:29, 33, 37, 54, 66f, 70, 72; 16:7f, 20; Lk. 5:8; 6:14; 8:45, 51; 9:20, 28, 32f; 12:41; 18:28; 22:8, 34, 54f, 58, 60ff; 24:12; Jn. 1:40, 42, 44; 6:8, 68; 13:6, 8f, 24, 36f; 18:10f, 15ff, 25ff; 20:2ff, 6; 21:2f, 7, 11, 15, 17, 20f; Acts 1:13, 15; 2:14, 37f; 3:1, 3f, 6, 11f; 4:8, 13, 19; 5:3, 8f, 15, 29; 8:14, 20; 9:32, 34, 38ff; 10:5, 9, 13f, 17ff, 21, 23, 25f, 32, 34, 44ff; 11:2, 4, 7, 13; 12:3, 5ff, 11, 13f, 16, 18; 15:7; Gal. 1:18; 2:7f, 11, 14; 1 Pet. 1:1; 2 Pet. 1:1

The false claim is that Christ means Peter in Matt16:18 when He says 'upon this rock'. Greek word for 'rock' is 'Petra.' So what does 'Petra' mean? So in this video we tour the 104 times Petra is used in the Bible. First 40 minutes walk you though each verse; last 20 minutes provides a review set to music. Oh: all the times Petra is used in the Bible, it only means God, Christ — or some big hunk of rock, cliff, cave (refuge!) DEPICTING Him. Right before your eyes, famous verses like Rock of My Salvation are seen to use the famous Petra.

So Christ uses Petra for HIMSELF in Matt 16:18, just as He uses Son of Man from Dan7:13 to mean Himself. Is Peter the Rock of your salvation? NO. Rather, in the tandem Petros Lie videos, you'll see Peter's name Kephas=Chip=Stone (common names for men even today) — uses Greek diminuitive 'os', so 'petros' always means 'little rock'. As in, Part OF Big Bedrock=Christ — definitely not any head of any church. There's only ONE Head, Christ, 1Cor12. And He surpasses the Body, in 1Cor12:31's clever Greek.

Which Peter knew, since he was alive when RCC today maintains he was made pope. So why didn't Peter inform us of his status? Why did no one treat him as a pope? PopeMyth.htm goes through those issues. But video sticks to the proof that Petra never can mean 'peter'. So Christ doesn't mean Peter when Christ says, 'upon this Rock': He refers to HIMSELF, just as other Petra Bible verses do.

So we see from Bible how apostate Christians invented the lie that Matthew 16:18 makes Peter head of Church. You have to KNOW Greek and Latin to see how bald a lie. Colossians 3:25!

Catholicism began with power-grabbers like that vomitable 'Clement' who wrote the Corinthians at the very time Revelation 17 was penned on Patmos. So are you surprised, someone TRANSLITERATED Petra to create a new Latin word 'Petrus', to make both words in Matthew 16:18 look like one ADJECTIVE? Then REPLACES real 1st-century Latin words like 'lapis' for stone (petros, in Greek, Peter's nickname) and 'scopulum' for bedrock (petra, in Greek, Christ's nickname)? And then put the invented 'petrus' into then-being-written Latin 'Vulgate', too?

As you'll see in the Petros Lie videos, some scribe went through the Greek OT and transliterated PETRA with an invented Latin 'petra' to pretend the latter was a real Latin adjectival substantive. But lol, he did a bad replacing job: the scribe wasn't thorough enough to cover his tracks; he left real Latin words intact in some verses. So you KNOW it's an invented lie in the Vulgate — if you know even high-school Latin and Greek. So Rome has its lying hand in the cookie jar, preserved by its own Vulgate. Which Vulgate lie you'll see live, in the Petros Lie videos.

The Latin lie is very old now. And just as bald, unforgiveable as when invented, relying on people not knowing the Latin words or grammar rules about matching gender. That lie will never be admitted, even as today the lie of Good Friday persists. Christ said THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS. But they cut off his Head in Matthew 16:18, putting Peter's on top, so why not also truncate Christ's Own Death, His Own Words about HOW LONG He was in the Grave?

The 1517 et seq. Redefamation just added popes and Rev17 harlots, Calvin thinking himself foremost among them, claiming that Rev17 was a promise his sect would replace Rome, getting that from reading Daniel 9. Oh yeah, see today's 'apostles', 'special messengers' who 'receive revelations', etc. Infesting Youboob and the world. So 1st century Christianity went into the toilet; so even now, it stays there. The goofball activities Luke wryly recorded in Acts, persist even today. For Christians are human, and love the lie, still.


4 PopeM The Petros Lie aka how to invent a pope from Bible Text!

Of course everyone's a pope nowadays, so what follows is paradigmal for many other sects who manipulate Bible to garner power/authority. Aka, twist it into whatever the salesman wants to sell...

You must be familiar with the grammar role of gender in Greek and Latin nouns versus adjectives, to get the full impact of the deft lie crafted here:

  1. TRANSLITERATE rather than translate Matthew 16:18's Greek PETRA (meaning 'bedrock', used 104 times in Bible, always related to Christ, as shown in the Rock is Christ video) — as if 'petra' were a real Latin word. (It provably wasn't.) Change Greek petros (meaning little rock, chip, stone) into PETRUS. Thus PETRA and PETRUS look like two (adjectival) versions of the same noun.
  2. BACK TRANSLATE the OT into Latin using your newly invented 'petra' as if it was always a Latin word, and thus entrench your new word into the Latin vernacular. Change the real Latin words that SHOULD have been used for the Greek 'petra' like scopulus, saxum, rupes to a Latinized 'petra' when you translate; take advantage of the fact these Latin words are all masculine nouns, but Greek petra is only a feminine noun. Do this back-translating especially when the Greek text uses petra, so it looks like your newly-invented Latinized word has the same meaning.
  3. Use Latinized 'petra' also for all appearances of Greek petros (10, in OT — shown in last 10 minutes of this video), so it will look like petros=petra. Be sure also to use Latinized 'petra' as the (wrong) translation for other Greek small-stone words like lithos and chalixz, so that GREEK petros will look the same as GREEK petra. But ooops — be consistent, because if you slip up and properly translate the Greek nouns with valid Latin words like lapis, saxum, etc. you'll alert the reader to those REAL Latin words, and he'll suspect your invention, given how you HAWK Matthew 16:18. (Vulgate messes up just enough so this gambit is exposed; like the LXX Genesis 5 joker who manipulated siring ages, but then tired out and botched the job!)
  4. By contrast, restrict your invention of Petrus to a capitalized name, and only to the NT — never use it in the Greek sense, lest you alert the reader to recall GREEK petros really means 'chip'. Trust the reader not to recall Greek, and discourage him from learning it so he won't find out. Bandy the Latin translation as 'inspired', so he'll feel he doesn't need the original (like the KJVO, today).
  5. So after a century or so, even lexicographers — especially the Catholic ones — will overlook this Latinized invention and translate the very different Greek words as if they were the same. So the sham takes on a patina of respectability over the centuries; those who catch the lie will know to keep silent or risk trouble.
  6. The ignorant who want the religious lie anyway, thus get to keep it. A lie which was furthered by the following inventions: http://www.staycatholic.com/ecf_peter's_presence_in_rome.htm. Pay very close attention to wording. You can tell the text claiming Peter was in Rome, is ambiguous or planted (not sure by who), esp. since the Bible CONTRADICTS, i.e., end of 1Peter, Galatians 2, Book of Acts. If Peter had gone to Rome, Luke or Paul would have recorded it, duh. And Paul complained everyone deserted him in Rome, and didn't ask for Peter, but for Mark, 2Tim4:11. Pwned!
  7. God, of course, continues to rescue those who want Him rather than religion and its many lies.

Note: this video compiles the original Summer 2008 'Petros Lie' videos in bliptv. You can instead view or download them from the vid desc to the Petros Lie Trailer at the end of this playlist. Those videos are quite short. I left out the bliptv 'lapis' video as there are many more lapis verses than that video shows.

For a fuller proof, search on 'rock', 'rocks', 'stone', 'stones' in any English Bible, and then compare Hebrew, Greek, Latin text.

The goal here is to show how a Bible lie is made. Non-catholic Christian sects play the same games with their own pet doctrines. You can find similar pandering in any Christian sect.

So 1John4:1-6 is vital, lest God punish you for buying a lie, 1 John 1:6,8,10, 5:16.

It's heartbreaking, how Christians never check the Word of God!


4b PopeM Christ is Rock Never Peter (old trailer)

This video is replaced by the original full version now posted in Youtube. View whole series in webpage context and in order: PopeMyth.htm.

Gist: Pan-Bible Proof that Matt16:18's "Rock" ONLY refers to Christ, never Peter. Greek Petra is used 104 times in Bible, and nearly all references are directly or indirectly terms for Messiah. You'll see that yourself, as this video series goes through each such verse.

Companion "Petros Lie" series is also a must-see, as Peter's name comes from "petros", a CHIP, which is a very different word versus Greek PETRA, meaning BEDROCK, MOTHER ROCK — i.e., the rock of the Temple Mount, which used to be the Holy of Holies location of the Ark.

I'm not against the Catholic Church, but when any denomination maligns Christ by egregious misuse of Bible, that should be admitted. Basically, instead of translating the Greek into Latin (Vulgate) they instead TRANSLITERATED the Greek petra, pan-Bible. Latin had other words for cliff, stone: none of which (except rarely, lapis) are used in the Vulgate.

So instead of using an existing Latin word, they instead invented a NEW Latin word bastardized from two very different Greek words. So to make a single LATIN word with both gender endings, AS IF IT WERE THE SAME WORD. Thus one substitutes Christ with Peter, lol! After a hundred years or so, the Latin imposter word will be in common use, and how nice — everyone will forget its origin, caring not at all to check what the REAL Bible says.

In transliteration, the distinction between the two nouns is lost. Clever way to lie, if you don't know Greek. Obvious lie, if you do know.

Christ is thus maligned, His Head cut off: Matt16:18 is the very reason why there has to be a pre-Trib Rapture. Christ had to intervene and invoke His Kata-Melchizedek priesthood to create a new entity He names "Church" (play on synagogue, Greek equivalent) — to saveTime itself. Else Time would have stopped, since the Jews rejected Him. That's why Rapture: all Time would have ended, so our ending can't now be predicted, Hebrews 11:39-40. More about this is in the "How God Orchestrates Time" video: its video description provides links to webpages with Bible backup.

Of course, people won't recognize the real meaning of Matt16:18 if they don't study it. Which they couldn't even do for centuries, since RCC kidnapped Scripture.

So you're faced with an uncomfortable conclusion: either Roman Catholic Church, starting with the so-called 'Church Fathers', continually lies about Matt16:18's meaning; or it continually flunks first-year Greek AND Latin rules on noun gender: for again, Peter's name is a diminuitive, masculine gender; but the "Rock" referred to in the verse, is feminine gender; so "Rock" cannot refer to Peter in either Greek OR Latin; but only to Christ, as the search will amply demonstrate. This search is in the full version of the video, in this PopeMyth playlist on Youtube.


4c PopeM Proving Petros (Pope) Lie (old trailer)

This video is replaced by the full version in HD on how Matthew 16:18 was kept intact, and the Old Latin +Vulgate were 'doctored' to invent a new Latin word to mask the Greek in that verse. So read this description to get downloads and info.

The full version is simply search in Vulgate on petra, and on what should have been the Latin translations for both petra and petros in Greek. Amazing, the results.

Main webpage on this topic, which shows how the Pope thingy was an invention of the 2nd century AD, is in PopeMyth.htm.

Idea is to show how Vulgate cleverly transliterates Greek petra AND petros to mask the difference between those famous since-Homer Greek words, instead of translating them with the Latin equivalents. Latin did have translation equivalents for the Greek words; Vulgate sometimes uses the true Latin equivalents, so you can tell it was deliberate, when they instead TRANSLITERATE occurrences of petra and petros in the Greek, with the invented petrus in Latin. Very bald.

I'm no conspiracy buff, and am not even personally anti-Catholic; anti their false doctrines, yes. I have my own missal from the year I was born, okay? See it live, in my Mary Bloopers video.

Even so, only idiots believe the 'Roman conspiracy' nonsense. Still, Rome has its hand in the cookie jar, masking the truth about what Matthew 16:18 means. Very convenient, let the Latin rules on case endings bastardize the original Greek meaning of petra versus petros in Bible and Greek lit. No kind way to phrase this, sorry.


5 PopeM Apostolic Fathers Of Apostasy: Clement

How did the harlotry of 'apostolic succession' actually begin? As a usurpation gambit. We have a profuse record of it, in the writings of the so-called 'Church fathers' who authored it. As shown previously in the Petros Lie and Rock is Christ videos, they doctored the Vulgate to cover up the real Greek meaning in Matt16:18. But before that, they did something else: claim to be the 'heirs' of the apostles. Cleverly. With dulcet tones. Satan was nice in Matthew 4, too.

How could such a thing happen, when the Bible is adamantly AGAINST this idea, 1Cor15, end of the Gospels, Matt 23, Mal1:6, Ephesians 4:11-16, and esp. Matt16:18? Well, both Jews and Christians expected the Millennium in 94AD, just as predicted since Moses in Psalm 90. Never mind, that as a consequence of Israel rejecting Him, the Lord said He would build Church UPON HIMSELF, Matt 16:18.

In Ephesians 2 Paul thus shows Two Walls, after indexing his Greek to Moses Psalm 90 meter in Ephesians 1:3-14, to show a series of what-if-Rapture happens, since Church is in the Daniel 9:26c time bubble of history, the 62nd week. So Paul's meter also maps to Daniel's.

So when the Millennium didn't come by 94 AD, but John was instead exiled on Patmos, Christians became jaded; thus 1John's warning came true front and center; thus began the usurpers, aka (ahem) the 'Church Fathers'.

Witness beginning in this video, the cold-hearted power grab by so-called Clement of Rome, when John was newly exiled to Patmos or dead. Read his words for yourself, here: https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/1clement-lightfoot.html. Bring Pepto Bismol!

So while 'Clement' is snubbing John (who Clement NEVER MENTIONS in his 'letter' to the Corinthians), God is snubbing 'Clement' — reserving Rome for the nastiest chapter in the Bible, Revelation 17. Or, maybe Clement wrote afterwards. Either way, it's clear from Bible that the so-called 'apostolic succession' is a lie, proven even in the 'fathers' own words. In this video, we focus on Clement.

Subsequent videos will take these 'fathers' in order, showing what God had John predict in Revelation 17, came true. Of course, you should read them yourself. Start here: https://christian.net/pub/resources/christian-history.html#fathers. Download the whole 1600-page library here: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.pdf

Notice how profuse their 'piety', their overstress on glorifying the apostles in order to insinuate THEMSELVES, just like Jude 9-12 warned.

From time immemorial such power grabs have occurred. Kings die, leaders die, usurpers claim to be the rightful heirs, and take over. Happened in Israel, happens in Church; here we have a full history of 'fathers' in their own words, their diarrhetic abuse of Bible, showing us how they did it.

Read them for yourself at either ccel.org or earlychristianwritings.org. If you have BibleWorks 8, use the Resources-then-Backgrounds tab for 'Early Christian Fathers', and start reading.

Bring Pepto-Bismol.

When people TRASH the Word of God, they shouldn't be treated nicely, 2John 9-11, 2Tim3:5-7, Titus 1:12-14, 3:10.

Associated webpages PopeMyth.htm and LvS4a.htm#SyncopTrib. Latter is a historical review of post-Cross fallout leading to these 'fathers'.


6 PopeM Fathers of Apostasy: Ignatius

Note the odd facts/claims of the so-called 'church fathers'

  1. Rev 2:9-10, 88AD: the Lord tells the Smyrnan faithful the devil will throw them into prison 'for 10 days'. He next assures them that if they remain FAITHFUL TO DEATH, they win the crown of life (book of James' theme). So then the UNfaithful wouldn't be arrested and die.. right?
  2. Scholars often deem the 10 days, years.
  3. Ok, then: 10 years later is 107AD. Ignatius, born c.30AD, is 'bishop' of Antioch; Polycarp, born c.65AD, is 'bishop' of where? Smyrna.
  4. Polycarp is reported by modern scholars to have been under the 'blessed Ignatius' (Polycarp's Epistle to Philippians, Chap X) when young. Where? Smyrna!
  5. Polycarp writes, 'alms deliver from death' (ibid). Alms? So why the Cross?
  6. Irenaeus, born c.120 AD, claims to have been under Polycarp in "Against Heresies", Book 3 Chapter 3 point 4. Where? Smyrna!
  7. Of course, Irenaeus there also relates Polycarp's story on how Apostle John (who then must be 100+ years old), somehow got back in Ephesus AFTER Patmos, and was in such spry health but bad temper, he went running from a bath-house upon hearing the heretic Cerinthus just entered it (ibid)! Wow! Almost as good as Hegesippus' yarn on how Apostle (& Lord's half-brother) James galavanted inside the Holy of Holies, UNWASHED (Martyrdom of James, Chap 1)!
  8. Post-John — whom Ignatius never mentions, though John allegedly was his teacher! — Ignatius advertises himself to Trajan as a Christian in order to earn a death sentence by wild beasts, 106 (or 116) AD. So en route to Rome from Antioch, in order to turn himself in and get torn up, he writes at least 7 verbose letters. The one to the Romans is lurid; so they get time to sweat him a triumph, maybe? Not at all like Paul's content. Not at all like Matt 6:1-4!
  9. So notice: both Ignatius and Polycarp have martyrdom stories told of them, at dates WAY BEYOND the 10 years.

So ask yourself: why didn't the devil imprison Ignatius, who instead scampered to Trajan, announced HIMSELF a Christian so to BE martyred? Why didn't the devil imprison Polycarp? Perhaps they are called martyrs since they weren't the Smyrnan faithful of Revelation 2:9-10? Thus to benefit Irenaeus, later 'bishop' of Lyons (southern France and Smyrna were friendly)?

Maybe that's why these 'fathers' didn't like Revelation; it was a political football for centuries, though clearly John's wry dramatic style. Augustine would later allegorize it away.

And lest you exclaim, 'how dare you, brainout!' — ask HOW DARE THEY TRASH GOD's WORD and the apostle John?

So note how Ignatius trashes God's Word, in his own words. Use links here to access Ignatius' letters and my follow-along audio commentary:

Download text of 'Church Fathers', right-click and 'Save..as': https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.txt. Format with your favorite font, then read. Or, ccel charges a small fee to download: change 'txt' to 'pdf'. (If too little RAM, choose the 'online' option to read, but you can't search well: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.toc.html)

Search on 'Note to the Epistles of Ignatius', to go to his letters. In BibleWorks 8, click on Resources, Backgrounds, Schaff: Use double quotes for strings.

Then compare Rev Chapters 1-3, written 10 years prior; for Ignatius and Polycarp were ALIVE then, just as Clement of Rome had been.

Here's my audio reaction and comparison (with corrections). Do a right-click and 'Save..as' to download. (The files won't stream well.)


7a PopeM Fathers of Apostasy: Holy Hegesippus? Pt 1

Meet the dingdong who invented the so-called popelist RCC uses, which was really the guy's OWN OPINION of who were good Christian teachers ('bishops'), in the first century. So: did he himself know Scripture well enough to have an ACCURATE opinion of who was a good teacher? Let's see from HIS OWN MOUTH versus Bible, k?

Egg-on-face, aka how to prove you never read Bible: people praise Hegesippus as a 'Hebrew'! The guy clearly never read the OT and never learned the Mosaic Law, but Schaff praises him, and all Christendom from the early 'Church Fathers' forward praise this guy? So ALL of them never read the OT, either. Wow, that's a nasty claim, huh. Okay, then: let's see the PROOF of that claim, in Schaff's, and Hegesippus own words!

Read those words yourself, https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/hegesippus.html. That's all I'm doing, here. Live, onscreen.

The ccel.org site is notoriously annoying to navigate or search, so here's its own link to Hegesippus: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf08.x.vi.ii.i.html. You have to press PREV or NEXT to keep reading, and the indescipherable red-lines icon at upper left (esconced in grey) is the Table of Contents, which of course never tells you what CHAPTER of a book, but only the title, or only the BOOK number, but never the title. Incompetently-designed website, but at least it's free. From ccel, you can also download the whole thing in txt format (which is rife with typos), but you can then search properly, using Word. Also can download in pdf, from them. Reading online is a pain; be sure you have AdBlock on, since the flashing ads at page bottom will distract you. (You can get AdBlock for Firefox or Chrome.)

How embarrassing, that Christendom praises this guy. Proving, Christians DO NOT READ BIBLE. 1 Clement reeks of Bible quotes inaptly used and mixed with phoenix myths, see for yourself: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ii.ii.i.html. Hegesippus followed 1 Clement. He also followed anti-semitic Justin Martyr's long-winded diatribe couched in nice language, here: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.viii.iv.i.html


7b PopeM Fathers of Apostasy: Holy Hegesippus? Pt 2

Rambling synthesis and conclusions based on 'Bishops List' book and related Apostolic Father writings, see links:

Bishop Lists book: http://books.google.com/books?id=LLW6...

Commentary on that book re Hegesippus: https://triablogue.blogspot.com/2010/03/apostolic-succession-part-5-hegesippus.html

For the 'Fathers' obsession with Jews: sample search on 'Jew': https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.toc.html. This one is typical, claiming AGAINST BIBLE, that Church replaces Jews: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.vi.ii.xiii.html. No wonder they didn't want to accept Revelation.

Hegesippus, from 7a : https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf08.x.vi.ii.i.html or here: https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/hegesippus.html

Irenaeus using Hegesippus and the former's own anti-semitism: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.iv.iv.html and https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.iv.xxii.html and https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.vi.xvi.html. Notice how Irenaeus distorted Scripture in order to snipe at the Jews, in that last link, esp. at the end.

Hippolytus' using 'bishop list' via Africanus to suddenly FAKE Peter at Rome during Claudius, so to oust Origen, is in Williams' book. I can't find anything online. But here's his invented story of Peter in Rome: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iii.iv.xvi.html. Notice how he CHANGES LOCATION vs. Bible. Acts 8 says Peter was in SAMARIA. Justin started that lie, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.vii.xiv.html. So Hippy copies Justin, not Bible.

Hippy is anti-semitic, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iv.ii.ii.html as if Christ said Church replaces Israel, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iv.i.xiv.v.html. Contrast https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iii.vii.xxvi.html. Hippy can't read Daniel, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iv.i.x.ii.html.

Eusebius' stuff: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.toc.html

Download the pdf of the book; it begins on pdf page 112: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.

He continues and even EMBELLISHES the Hegesippus lie, who got it also from 1Clement. Golly, does NO ONE read the OT? Here: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.vii.xxiv.html

Eusebius crafts fake Jewish-related 'succession', https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.viii.iv.html. Use the TOC (upper left red lines on gray) to see context, keep reading his claims of succession. CLICK ON FOOTNOTES to read how his claims mismatch history or Bible. See also pdf p306.

Eusebius on Hegesippus: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.ix.xxii.html, but see also pdf p.293, 304

For his anti-semitism, see pdf pages 135,184, 186, 271-273,278; p220 (he shoots himself in the foot about Claudius), 231 (on James, but p271 he contradicts), 242 +252 (Origen invented the Peter crucified upside-down thingy); his undiscerning acceptance of wild signs told by Josephus, 282-3.

He continues the lie of Peter in Rome, here: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.vii.xv.html

He continues the lie about John, starting pdf p308.


7c PopeM Fathers of Apostasy: Holy Hegesippus? Pt 3

Critical point in this video: APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION in Bible, is based on Greek verb APOSTELLW, which is equivalent to 'power of attorney'. The POA reverts to the GRANTOR on death of the grantee, so there CANNOT be any such thing as apostolic succession UNLESS CHRIST HIMSELF does the DIRECT appointing. Which He did, 1Cor15:1-10. That's why Christ HAS all the keys in Rev 1. The 'succession' has ended, and the GRANTOR (Christ Resurrected) can't die.

Else, continued review of how Irenaeus, then Hippolytus, finally Eusebius 'adopt' Heggy's arbitrary popelist chrono, and how they manipulate it. Rest of video points flow from that, i.e., even if you allege apostolic succession from Abraham based on faith, then the TEST of succession is whether you do what Abraham did, John 8. How you cannot claim succession from Israel, since per Hebrews 5-10 (esp. 7:18), the Mosaic Law was ABROGATED.

Download Church Father writings in pdf: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff?show=worksBy. First 10 volumes 'anf' are Anti-Nicene Fathers (pre-Eusebius). Then for Nicene Fathers, go here and pick from page middle, http://www.ccel.org/fathers.html; for Eusebius Church History only, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201. He talks about Hegesippus in many places, so when you download the pdf, search on 'Hegesippus'.

Bishop Lists book: http://books.google.com/books?id=LLW6...

Commentary on that book re Hegesippus: https://triablogue.blogspot.com/2010/03/apostolic-succession-part-5-hegesippus.html


7d PopeM Fathers of Apostasy: Holy Hegesippus? Pt 4 (end)

Concluding synthesis of Bible,Dr. Williams' 'Bishop Lists' book, and 'church father' claims about apostolic succession. Video focuses on Eusebius' use of the list; he claims 'church' is an unbroken line of faith, founded on Abraham. OK, we can empirically test that: did Eusebius et al do what ABRAHAM DID? What did Abraham do?

Recap, Book Abstract (link: http://books.google.com/books?id=LLW6... )

  1. Williams traces origin of 'apostolic succession'. Begins with LEGAL LANGUAGE evidence. What language would a Greek or Roman use?
  2. Then he checks Bible for that language, finds none. Reviews what's closest, Acts 20, Titus 1, and Luke. No apostolic succession; rather, MISSIONARY succession.
  3. What about 'tradition'? None, first century. He reviews closest practices in Pauline, Jerusalem, Johanine churches.
  4. 'Tradition' first arises in Ignatius, but no apostolic succession language; rather, obeying 'bishops'.
  5. But 1 Clement argues JEWISH succession ideas to rebelling Corinthians who fire their OWN bishops. Clement is big on Church REPLACING Israel. Ooops: Jewish Succession can't match criteria for Church (i.e., Jewish succession based on bloodline, was national). So Clement makes a POLITICAL ploy. (Never mentions newly-exiled John. What a jerk.)
  6. POLITICAL theme basis for alleged continuity of 'bishops'. Oh, but bishop lists don't conform!
  7. First list, Hegesippus Memoirs (Chapter 5), 165+ AD. Only listed via Eusebius, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.ix.xxii.html. Hegesippus chose who IN HIS OPINION, was faithful to Bible. His list is aped by Irenaeus and Epiphanius. No evidence of succession, how decided, or if names were offices. List is also based on a garbled idea of Jewish priesthood, not NT. Or, on Greek 'schools' concepts, not NT. Worse, his list of 'schools', is inferred from (anti-semitic) Justin Marytr's 'Dialogue with Trypho', and Jewish Succession in 1 Clement. (Jesus was wrong tribe for priesthood, Heb 8:4. Ooops.)
  8. Irenaeus' list, next apes Hegesippus, now 170's or so. (https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.iv.iv.html) . Same 1 Clement and Greek 'schools' arguments. Why? Oh, gnostic Valentinians' own list, goes back to apostles! Still, list is not of successor apostles, but teachers deemed loyal, per Irenaeus. (One heretic claims 'back to apostles' vs. another; but Hebrews 7:18 et seq. says OT priesthood is obsolete!)
  9. Julius Africanus' list (https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf06.v.ii.html). 217 AD. Peter-first-pope idea now invented to beat up Origen (now disgraced); dual list of bishops at Rome, Alexandria, oh! Roman 'church' is better, as suddenly Peter is first bishop in Rome, during CLAUDIUS! The very years Paul was supposed to BE in Rome (Rom 15) — Peter apostle to JEWS, never Gentiles, never in Rome per BIBLE. Mark is listed as 1st bishop of Alexandria also during Claudius! How precocious. (Alexandria=Egypt. Where Bible never says either Peter or Mark, went.) Goal: make Origen submit to Roman church. (Oh my.)
  10. Hippolytus' list, 230's AD (https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.ii.html). He 'updates' Africanus (borrows also from Irenaeus) to betray Origen, vanquish Callistus, appeal to Severans. So he's exiled and buddy Pantianus martyred, next (during 7-year warning in Paul's meter, Eph 1:9d); Alexander axed, too. (Hippy or Africanus can't count, eschew learning OT. Prefer to refute Greeks, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iii.i.i.html. So never learn the '6000' any rabbi can explain. But lying against Bible a la 1 Clement is fun. Hippy spawns HIGH PRIEST SUPREMACY: https://www.bombaxo.com/hippolytus.html. By his own rule: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iii.vii.viii.html (page btm). For he was anti-semitic, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iv.ii.ii.html.)
  11. Eusebius' list is last, copies all prior. He constructs an unbroken timeline from Abraham forward, priests of Israel, Church post-Christ, a la CHURCH REPLACES ISRAEL 'doctrine' in 1 Clement. Not Bible. Eusebius' timeline designed to prove Church is old, not new. To silence pagan critics.

Of course, no succession of APOSTLES. (Christ has all keys in Rev 1, talks directly to errant pastors of John's churches, who claim to be apostles but are not, who claim to be Jews but are not, who claim to be conquerors of the people (Nikw-laus), and soon are, in Rev 17. His kingdom is NOT of this world, Church kingdom is founded on Melchizedek, not Israel, as HE is king of Israel; HE, never eligible OT priest, wrong BLOODLINE; Law was set aside, Hebrews 7-10. Peter et al. were apostles to JEWS, Paul sent to Gentiles, to Rome; last appointed apostle. Criterion? SEEING the RISEN CHRIST Who PERSONALLY APPOINTS, 1Cor15:1-10.) Ooops.


1 RCC : Rethink Catholic Claims, WHO DETERMINED BIBLE?

New subseries under PopeMyth (PopeM) playlist. Here and in 2 RCC, series premise is established; namely, the RCC claim that THEY are the authority for Christ, going all the way back to the apostles. Contrasted with history, and especially Bible.

Series will at times be nasty and nice, comparing what Catholicism claims, versus what Bible says. For GOD'S WORD is the authority, and HE personally testifies to each soul, what of His Word is accurately said, per Matt 7, Hebrews 4:12, John 14, many other passages. NO ONE is between you and God, that's the UPGRADED COVENANT we have in Christ, theme of book of Hebrews. And HE is our intercessor, no 'saints', 1John 2. GOD determines the interpretation, not man, 2Pet 1:20-21. God thus tells you, aka rewards you for seeking Him, Heb 11:6.

There were no popes ever in Bible, yet men knew it, and knew God, ever since Adam. Aha.

So where does RCC align, or depart, from Bible? And how did it get what it got? That's what this subseries explores. The other videos in PopeM cover some of the same topics in more depth and from other angles. This subseries will be mostly commentary. Related Church Father writings will be in the video descriptions.

Links relevant here:


2 RCC : WHOSE AUTHORITY?

GOD'S WORD is the authority, and HE personally testifies to each soul, what of His Word is accurately said, per Matt 7, Hebrews 4:12, John 14, 2Pet 1:20-21, many other passages.

So where RCC doesn't align with Bible — i.e., claiming Good Friday accurate, which Bible contradicts in Matt 12:40-41 — then RCC is WRONG, doesn't speak for God. Their claims that the three days are PARTIAL, contradicts GOD's measuring of 'evening, morning, one day' in Genesis 1. Even Eusebius knew that it means THREE 24-hour periods. Ooops. Okay, so it's an RCC mistake, shoulda called it Good Wednesday. Okay, so why doesn't RCC ADMIT the mistake, and move on? Arrogance. That's not from God, either.

So their 'authority' only extends as far as BIBLE matches what you say. No matter who you are. So if you really do have pastoral authority, God will witness to it. Every believer must CHOOSE which authority, Romans 13; God assigns PASTORS who must be ELECTED by the congregations, Eph 4:12-16, 1 Tim and 2 Tim; but ONLY THE SPIRIT makes the 'unity', Ephesians 4:5-7, John 14, 1John2, 4. The Spirit. Not, the Catholic Church, whether RCC or Odox; not the JWs or any other denomination. But, if that's who you elect for your teacher, well — that's the responbility between God and you, thread of Romans 13-15.

For NO ONE is between you and God, that's the UPGRADED COVENANT we have in Christ, theme of book of Hebrews. And HE is our intercessor, no 'saints', 1John 2. GOD determines the interpretation, not man, 2Pet 1:20. God thus tells you, aka rewards you for seeking Him, Heb 11:6.


3 RCC : Anti-Semitism Sells Errant Theology

GIST: as RCC is founded on POLITICAL anti-semitism, it 'legates' a retarded theology, bloody persecution; thus forfeits the HIGHER LEGACY wrought for Church by Christ on Cross, as explained by 'better' (Attic kreittwn) and 'new covenant' (he kaine diatheke) in Book of Hebrews. For, RCC is focused on beating the Jews. Envy denies promises God made to CHRIST, as Israel is HIS Inheritance as well as us: TWO WALLS, Eph2, = TWO COVENANTS. Ours is better, (kreittwn), but jealousy is blind to all that.

So too blind, if need to justify 'old', to win over Jews and pagans. Eusebius crippled Romanism by founding it (wrongly) on claim of 'OLD'. Hebrews, by contrast, stresses our covenant is NEW, does NOTderive from Israel, via rhetorical OT framework of Ps 110, Melchizedek, Jer3:16, 31:31-34. Ooops.

Related links to video:


4 RCC: BIBLE is Authority, not man

Intro to the rest of the RCC subseries, which will next cover selected RCC incompetences at reading Bible. For if they can't read Bible correctly, their claims are shot down. For continuity of a LIE can be old. Everyone who is a Christian, goes back to the apostles' time in some way. But during that time, there were many apostates, viz. the complaints in Paul and 1John, in 2nd half Peter, and in Acts.

There's not a single doctrine espoused today, which is less than 2000 years old. So oldness, doesn't grant validity; pagans deemed oldness proof of truth. But Bible says Truth of a claim alone grants validity, whether old or new. And you can only find that Truth, in the Bible. Not, in men's claims about it. Claims are at best, hearsay. But we have the Source, 1Cor2:16!

So how to know? CHECK THE BIBLE. If the Bible agrees with what someone says, then fine. If not, walk away from the person, just as God warned the Jews back in Jeremiah's day (Jer 25-29). Jeremiah, had to go against his own dad, who was the High Priest (Hilkiah).

So might we. So in the upcoming RCC subseries uploads, we'll look at whether 'papa' has rightly interpreted important Bible doctrines espoused by the Roman Catholic Church.

Now, just because they made whopping mistakes, doesn't mean you should stop being Catholic. Ask GOD what you should do. My complaint against RCC is the same against all denominations: when they make mistakes, they won't admit those mistakes. You'll never see me argue they are heretics, that they aren't Christian, or have no right to exist. I have no right to say those things, only God does. But every Christian sometimes has a duty to report (not punish) anyone espousing doctrines which aren't Bible's. So first, establish before God, whether you have such a duty; do you KNOW enough to give an accurate report? If not, then shut up and pray God handle it. If you ARE supposed to report, then do it and move on. God will handle its processing.

We are not salesmen, but Royal Ambassadors stating Our Ruler's Policy. No one is between the human and God, so we state the case and move on. That's what I'm doing here, because it's now necessary, in conjunction with my 11 GGS series on Diocletian and Constantine; to explain why Paul lambasts the then-future formation of the Catholic Church, in Eph 1:10-12, which is the basis for John's writing about it, in Rev 17.


5 RCC : The Good Friday Lie

If you claim authority as God's Agent on earth, but you LIE against Him, then your authority is forfeit. By your TEACHING fruits we know you, Matthew 7. Lies, are bad fruits.

Mistakes are ok, they don't end authority; perpetuated lies, are not okay. Like, Good Friday. Initially, that was a mistake by some prelate who didn't know Exodus 12. Poor guy didn't know the distinction between regular and high sabbath. So, he didn't know Passover's start and ending days are HIGH 'sabbaths': '14' and '21' are 'sabbaths', no matter on which day-names, they fall.

Poor guy also didn't recognize John 19:31, which says Christ died on the eve of HIGH Sabbath, the REAL Passover, vs. the official Jewish calendar that ran four days fast, that year. So, the Lord could EAT the Passover (Matt. 26:17, 19; Lk. 22:8; Jn. 2:13; 12:1; 13:1; 18:28), yet BE the Passover, 1 Cor 5:7.

So the poor guy mistook the 'sabbath' references on the Lord's Death Date, as 'Friday'. And it's true; Friday at sundown becomes the regular sabbath. But THAT day, was a Wednesday, just as The Lord Told Us, in Matthew 12:40.

Now, over the years since, armies of alleged Catholic 'scholars' have twisted that verse, like they twist Matthew 16:18 to cut the Lord's head off — to claim the 'three days and three nights' the LORD said, are but partial; hence, Friday Saturday and Sunday are all counted. But what about the three nights? There AREN'T three nights between Friday night and Sunday MORNING, when He rose, 'first day of the week', Matt. 28:1; Mk. 16:2, 9; Lk. 24:1; Jn. 20:1, 19. So the truth was, Wednesday — Friday NIGHTS, then Thursday — Saturday DAYS. Just like He said, in Matt 12:40.

He's the Creator, Genesis 1:1. And Genesis 1 defines the 'day' as 'evening, morning, ONE day'. Pre-Israel. So of course Israel adopted that accounting method, David creating a priesthood in 1Chron 24 based on a 24-hour day (so all 24 priestly courses each get 365.25 hours' service a year); but the RCC has to replace anything Jews do.

So the RCC, lies against Christ. For centuries. Note that: instead of admitting the initial mistake, and then say, 'Ooops, we're sorry, it's Good Wednesday', they perpetuate the lie. About the Lord's Own Death Date.

Worse, they also mask the Date's identity as True Passover, for the Jewish 360-day (wrong) calendar hadn't been intercalated that year, so Passover ran Four Days Fast; the Lord thus eating Official (but not real) Passover on the 10th day, the Exo 12 Lamb Set Aside Date. Then Dies, on True Passover. But RCC masks this Jewish Proof Of Prophecy Fulfilled, with 'Good Friday'. So the BIBLE looks bad.

Then RCC also masks Jewish Firstfruits, which starts piggybacked on the last day of Passover week, Numbers 28:26 — as 'Easter'. So you miss the fact HE is Firstfruits (1Cor15:20-23).

In sum, RCC covers up these Jewish holidays; so you also miss the fact official Passover ran Saturday to Saturday, the year He died; but real Passover should have run Wednesday to Wednesday. That's how He could die on real Passover start, yet rise on the first day of the week, yet be 3 days and 3 nights in the Grave. For had the Jewish calendar been right, the math wouldn't work: Passover runs for a WEEK. So you know immediately, that the calendar wasn't intercalated. Bible wouldn't even have to tell you.

Bible's Math is clean (Matt. 16:21; 17:23; 20:19; 26:61,63; 27:64; Mark 8:31, 10:34, 14:58, 15:29; Lk. 9:22, Luke 18:33, 24:7,21, John 2:19-20).

But RCC math is convoluted. They don't calculate Firstfruits renamed 'Easter', rightly. Bible's Exodus 12 = SOLAR YEAR, starts on vernal equinox. Then count 10 days, Set Aside the Lamb. Count four more, Slay the Lamb before sundown, eat it at sundown. Every year. Easy to calculate; ever since Adam, everyone knew vernal equinox. Israel's Birthday is Passover. But RCC instead uses a goofball lunar calculation against Bible, to derive 'Easter'. So the world has been living its lie, ever since.

The very day He paid for our sins, they deny? Isn't it bad enough they cut His Head off in Matthew 16:18, doctor the OT Vulgate to invent Latin 'Petrus', a word which didn't exist when He was here — to make Peter into a Rock? (Greek Petros=chip, never BEDROCK = PETRA = Christ, see my 'Christ is Rock' videos on Bible Greek vs. Latin text.)

Download this description: GoodFridayLie.rtf. More on His Death Day is in PassPlot.htm. Latter also covers His Real Birth Date. That, RCC got right. So why not admit the above mistakes? Anyone with a Bible — which RCC kidnapped for 1000 years, then God rescued it, in the West — anyone with a Bible, can thus know, RCC lies. It Does Not Speak For God.


6a RCC : Catholic Mary Blooper ABCs

How sad, Bible refutes what RCC claims about Mary, ABC ! To wit:

  1. Mary ABSTAINED from sex UNTIL Christ was born, Matthew 1:25. Bible lists her sons, Matt 12:46, 12:49, 13:55, 27:56; Mark 3:31, 16:1; Luke 8:19, 24:10; John 2:12, John 7:3, 7:10; Acts 1:14; Jude 1 (brother of James who wrote book of James), Gal 1:19 (James brother of Christ). NB: the Jews DIDN'T accuse her of adultery over her other kids; but rather claimed Christ was born of her fornication, John 8:41.
    • BibleWorks Lexicons on ews: ewsThayer.jpg and ewsFriBDAG.jpg.
    • She'd sin to NEVER have sex with Joseph, Gen 2:24, 1Cor7:3-5, 1Tim5:14. RCC can't have it both ways: if it's a sin to REFUSE to have kids, Mary is a sinner. Christ could only be KING of the Jews, if his MOTHER had first-rights to be Queen (JEWISH lineage is via the mother). If she only bore Christ, she'd kill the royal Davidic bloodline. 'Catholic fathers' like Hegesippus (7a PopeM Fathers of Apostasy: Holy He...), cited James as the Lord's brother, based on BLOODLINE to Christ, basis for Hegesippus' (first) 'bishop' list! Ooops.
    • Can't have it both ways. Can't say James is Mary's son, ERGO 'apostolic' succession valid from James, as Hegesippus, Irenaeus, Hippolytus, finally Eusebius, all endorsed. Mary's perpetual virginity thus was NOT claimed, until Council of Ephesus in 431AD; that was DEMANDED by Pulcheria, Theodotian's big-sister Regent, for SHE was a virgin! Catholics fought other catholics, over that. Re the fight, see Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#y425to434, read all their underlined links. Ooops.
    • If you claim Joseph divorced, look at Gen 2:24, Mark 10:11. Jesus cites Genesis and Mosaic Law, Matt 5:31-32. RCC condemns divorce, too. But it's ok Mary espouse a divorcee before Jesus is born?
    • Fact: Mary's post-partum virginity was invented to compete with Vestal Virgins of pagan Rome, the highest female class. My Catholic 'Life of Christ' says Mary's story is 'fanciful'. In 1854, Pope Pius IX declared her sinless. See my 'Mary Immaculate Bloopers' video (description has scans of my RCC missal pages in jpg), 6b RCC Mary Immaculate Bloopers. As you'll see at 1:54 in that video, my RCC book says 'Mary herself' kindly 'appeared' at Lourdes in 1858, to acknowledge the Pope's ruling. :)

  2. Mary knew BIBLE, was dispensationalist, as are all Jews. RCC is preterist, violates Bible and insults Mary, denying her Magnificat; it uses Bible Hebrew Meter TO DATE TIME in Greek words, a tradition dating back to Moses' Psalm 90. (I've been proving this live in Bible, since 2008.) The meter style measures Time backward then forward from 'now' to the Millennium Moses prophesied in Psalm 90. Magnificat playlist: b-out Mary's Magnificat Meter of Time.
    • If a brainout can learn it, why didn't RCC? Its 'Fathers' knew Jews expected Christ to come Year 6000, like Hippolytus (https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iv.i.x.ii.html), Photius (via Africanus, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/wace/biodict.h.html?term=hippolytus+romanus), and Augustine (https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.XII.10.html). Ooops.
    • In her METER, she says she's age 35 (a spinster) when she speaks. So we know she instead spent her time studying BIBLE.. like Daniel. Meter runs full circle from her age 35 back to first Chanukah, then forward to her own birth and beyond, tracing history; then, prophetically traces Her Son's Time to Millennium, her own version of Anno Domini (starting Time over, at His Birth). Zecharias and Paul ape her meter; John's Rev 1:1-3, apes Paul's. Ooops.
    • So RCC praises Mary for alleged ABSTENTION, but not for her expertise in BIBLE? RCC doesn't even know her meter, though based ON the 6000 they did know (5250, per Moses) ? Ooops.

  3. Mary COMMITTED sins. 1st, SHE says she's a sinner in Magnificat, Luke 1:47. For more on this, see the Mary Immaculate Bloopers video (link above).
    • 2nd, at Cana wedding, she ORDERS Christ to turn water to wine, John 2:1-4; He calls her 'woman', an epithet of remonstrance. Then does the miracle, so not to shame her.
    • 3rd, she again uses her status to justify INTERRUPTING Him Teaching, Matt 12:46-49 (He rebukes them, v.49), Mark 3:31-35 (He rebukes them, 33-35), Luke 19:19-21 (He rebukes them, v.21 — cf Luke 14:26, taught earlier). Each Gospel writer variantly stresses this event.
    • 4th (understandably), she's upset to see Him hang on the Cross; so He chides her, John 19:26. Christ spoke thus to other women, John 20:15, 8:10 (Pharisees did the same, v.8:4), 4:21; Luke 13:12. Peter did the same in Luke 22:57. We use 'woman' the same way today (stressing noun). See also Luke 11:27-28.
    • Also, RCC won't grasp the Virgin Pregnancy. Spirit-ordered pregnancy is free of sin nature, which is transmitted via ADAM. So for sinless Christ, THE PREGNANCY couldn't occur via man's seed, that's all. Easy to grasp, when you read Romans 5:12. Ooops.

6b RCC Mary Immaculate Bloopers

Answering a challenge. 24-min audio on 6 objections to RCC: MaryImmaculateAddendum.WMA. Related webpage: PopeMyth.htm, which the audio mentions. The audio link is in that webpage, too. (There's a 7th objection, that RCC is anti-semitic and therefore preterist, but I cover that in other videos.)

Upshot: RCC, like every denomination, promulgates anti-Biblical 'doctrines'. But they can be corrected, without ruining the denomination. Hopefully in the 21st century, they will be. I do not advocate demonising RCC or any other denomination. But all of them need to admit past teaching mistakes, and correct them, going forward.

Here, Christ is made DEPENDENT on Mary's alleged sinlessness (directly contradicting Romans 3:23, 5:12, 1Cor15:22, and even Luke 3:23), in order to be called sinless Himself? See: false doctrine always maligns God, and violates common sense.

Someone claimed I was lying about what the RCC says, hence this video. I hereby attest that the following JPGs used in the video are scans of the actual RCC-authored Catholic Library of Devotion in my possession, which one of my Catholic relatives owned and gave me to keep. I put it on the scanner, and hit the button, resulting in the video derived from the following JPGs:

Note: these pages are listed in consecutive order, just as in the book.

PopeMyth.htm has videos and text showing the Bible mistranslation and 3rd-century invention of the Latin word Petrus to falsely claim Peter pope. It's pretty bald and embarrassing.

Anyone claiming his denomination gets all doctrine right is evil. RCC is by no means alone to blame here. Protestants also make their denominations God instead of God. But God puts His Word above His Own Person, Psalm 138:2b. So should we. So anyone NOT doing that, well.. "shun them", Paul warned in 2 Tim 3:5 (see 2Tim2:26-3:7 for full context). John says don't even say 'hello', 2John9-11.

All denominations screw up & misuse Bible. No big deal: just correct the blooper, move on. But they don't correct it, and instead COVER UP their errors or bully.

That's what happened here in RCC: they didn't understand the Virgin Pregnancy, so made up LIES about it, though Bible is very clear that the Virgin Pregnancy occurred because sin is transmitted through the GENES of Adam, Romans 5:12's aorist tense-matching (3x to show it's through ADAM, when HE sinned).

Mary is recorded as sinning several times, and called herself a sinner needing a Savior, Luke 1:47. So she's GREATER than the RCC depicts, due to her FAITH, not her virginity, lol: just imagine the pressure she faced! How intimidated would YOU be to have to raise as a son, the God-Man who'll pay for your sins?

So if only the RCC would correct its mistake, no big deal. But it won't. Then again, no other denomination will admit its errors, either. So yeah, be in a denom if God wants that: but check with Word what it teaches, and correct what's wrong as you learn it, in your head.


7 RCC : Catholics got Christmas RIGHT!

Protties flunk, here. December 25 is CHANUKAH, as I've been documenting since 2004; since 2008, in videos. CENTERPIECE OF HISTORY, this date, all Bible dates hub to it, even as they focus to Passover, when He died. Lord's Birth and death dates are the 'hub' around which God designed TIME. Hebrews 1:3 says as much (always mistranslated, should be THE TIMES or 'ages', not 'worlds').

Key to proving the Chanukah 4BC birthdate, are Exodus 12 (SOLAR YEAR accounting should have been Israel's calendar, but she messed it up); Haggai 2:21-23 (which Mary quotes in her Magnificat, a TIME POEM which uses meter to key off first Chanukah), and the fact that both Passover and Chanukah are Israel INDEPENDENCE days, which you miss if you don't value calendar on SOLAR year.

That's why Matthew uses 'star'=light=angel in Matt 2, why Luke uses angels and light in Luke 2, why Zecharias talks about light to the Gentiles, in his soliloquy — keying off, MARY. Her accounting switches to Christ-Birthday accounting, at her syllable 160. Paul picks up on that, and keys off Mary, dating Eph1:3-14, at Christ's age 56, right before His 57th birthday. Anno Domini!

So if you were gonna pick a Rapture or 2nd Advent Date (and you shouldn't), pick CHRISTMAS aka CHANUKAH for His Arrival. For both Paul and Mary START TIME OVER, at His Birth. Exodus was a birthday present to Moses; so I'd bet money Rapture or 2nd Advent will be a birthday present to Christ. Just a guess.

Excepting the videos on Ephesians and Magnificat, all related webpages and videos are organized under PassPlot.htm#HisBday to show this story. That webpage covers how God orchestrated the Jewish calendar to depict the pattern of WORLD HISTORY, which most Jews and many Dispensationalist pastors, kinda know. But they don't know how vast is the proof of this, in Bible. I wouldn't have known either, except my pastor suddenly separated himself from the common Prottie kant that the Lord was born in the spring, since December would be 'too cold'; look up that silly argument in ISBE, k?

My pastor was getting sick with Alzheimer's in year 2000, when he broke with Prottie 'tradition', so couldn't explain why he switched to December 25. That's why I had to go looking in Bible. He said it was Chanukah 4 BC. Upset the congregation, by his insistence.

Yeah, and now I can furnish proof. In six playlists, and very long webpages documenting it all. Where to start? Depends on what angle you prefer. Suggest you use the above webpage link, reading until your eyes glaze over. It shows the comprehensive design 'fit' of the Jewish holidays, and how they depict the 'year' of human history. That's a parallel to the 'year' Noah spent in the boat, which Paul parallels in four 'quarters' (playing of Zecharias playing off Mary, both using '91' meters).

Once you see the big picture, it will be easier to slog through the dates, Bible verses, etc. provided in the page. AFTER that, the next slogging is through the videos. Depends on whether you want to start with the minutiae, or the big picture.

Big-picture playlists are Psalm 90 Meter of Time and YMH Episode 10. Both playlists are featured (in alpha order) on my channel page.

At the other end, the 10-11 GGS series covers Paul and Mary's Magnificat meter. Many videos, and not yet done; for Paul's meter outlines FUTURE CHURCH HISTORY to the end of the Western Roman Empire, which spawned my RCC videos now, here. Currently, I'm on Diocletian-Constantine, Paul's syllables = AD years, 283-337. Like Mary, Paul uses his own A.D. accounting, which is surprisingly like ours. I can't yet explain why.

Mary's Magnificat meter is a GGS subset, and was spun off into a separate playlist. She specifically TAGS to first Chanukah, playing off Daniel 9. Word docs in the video descriptions, give you her live Bible Greek text (UBS4, BGT, pasted from BibleWorks) — so you can vet it; I walk the viewer through that doc.

Both playlists are on my channel page.

Finally, in the Synoptics series, right now the focus is on Chanukah references in Haggai 2 which tie to Matthew 1-2, and Luke 1-2. That's been ongoing for the last ten weeks. Very little Greek used. So if you prefer translations, maybe start there.

The info is vast, testable, and conclusive. It will overwhelm you.


8 RCC : YES you name your sins — but to Who?

Catholic Church also gets right the idea you must name your sins. Many of the priests will correctly tell you that you do NOT need to name your sins to THEM, but to God. That's 1John1:9, and it's BIBLICAL. The RCC established a Jewish-style 'confessional', rooted in the OT practice of you going to the Levitical priest with an animal or other 'sin offering', at which point you put your hand on the offering, while you named your sins and the priest slayed the animal. See my 1John1:9 playlist for the OT verses demonstrating this.

RCC, obsessed as it is with covering up Judaism, again misunderstood how the naming of sins function, changed post-Cross. 1John1:9 and the (mistranslated) 2 Peter 1:9 tell you that you name the sins to GOD, yourself. For YOU are a priest yourself, 1Pet2:5, 9. Many Catholic priests also will tell you that all believers are themselves priests, so this much is partly understood among the RCC groups. They don't all agree on anything, all the way back to the apostles. So you will get, different answers.

No problem. We have BIBLE to tell us the answers; this time, Bible reinforces the RCC claim that you MUST NAME YOUR SINS; but to God, not them. You cannot understand Bible if you don't do this. Again, see my 1John1:9 playlist for details, here: b-out 1 John 1:9 Vids


9 RCC Catholic Bible Timeline Bloopers

For well over 1000 years, RCC has been unable to tell time. Ironic proof of that just came to me from someone who sent me a link, as shown in the video. Here's the site: https://www.catholicbible101.com/bibletimeline.htm. The site is dedicated to proving WHERE IS THAT IN THE BIBLE as an apologetic of Catholic faith.

Unbeknownst to the sender, I was still reading in Bishop's List by Robert Lee Williams (link: Bishop Lists: Formation of Apostolic Succession of Bishops in Ecclesiastical Crises) how the two guys who invented the Peter-Pope-in-Rome thingy, Julius Africanus and Hippolytus, were also creating the invention to defeat the Rapture people, since it's a result of the JEWISH doctrine (which is in the Bible), about when Messiah would come.

That link also covers the convoluted 'Easter' debates and ending calculations, where the RCC forever gets Easter wrong. BIBLE says, in Exodus 12 + Numbers 28:26, that what we call Easter is Firstfruits — a JEWISH holiday — and it will ALWAYS occur on the 21st day after the vernal equinox. That is, if you use God's calendar, which is only SOLAR (God only accounts by BIRTHDAYS, so only solar), just as Exodus 12 says.

So the video examines both arguments, the website new and the misdating of Adam forward old, by the pope inventors. Examined with what? THE BIBLE. For back in 2004 I crunched the Bible's own numbers, which you can vet, as follows:

Download the worksheet shown in the video, which only uses Bible verses to get the dates (BC/AD conversion is done using RCC's Dionysian system): GeneYrs.xls.

For the supporting Bible verses and the Bible's own methodology of calculation, see brainoutFAQ.htm#6a (#6, covers how Daniel 9 counters my fellow Dispies; 6a is Bible methodology.) Since Bible tracks times by AGE (solar years), I but add them up.

For the Exodus in particular, see Exodate.htm. Related, is PassPlot.htm, as the grand 'year' design.

Ooops. RCC has egg on its face. Again. And will never admit it. So it deserves scant respect for covering up errors, for 2000 years. Mistakes are okay. Covering them up, is not.

PS: the Protties get the timeline wrong too, but back in the late 19th century they got more of it right, than they do now. Why? BECAUSE THEY WERE USING THE BIBLE, but not now.

Truth is, it's tedious to do the number crunching. So people took shortcuts, and instead of using Bible they used MIXED METHODOLOGIES for determining dates, with the result (duh) that their timelines never BALANCE to the Bible (i.;e., in Daniel 9).

But Bible has a full accounting both in explicit text AND in meter, so the latter agrees with the former, and you thus know you balance. Self-auditing! Ooops.


10 RCC How did Catholicism develop?

Semi-neutral video synthesizing the pagan and (misunderstood) Jewish elements of worship which gave rise to what became, Roman Catholicism. It owes its structure to Diocletian, which Constantine aped; it owes its pathos to paganism, specifically the Roman flavor (i.e., statue veneration, perpetual virginity morphs from Vestal Virgins, the most respected pagans in Rome). It owes its ethos to mangled notions of OT Jewish rituals and priesthood; which of course, RCC sought to REPLACE.

And also, to many mistakes in reading Bible; inevitable, when compete-with-the-Jews form of anti-semitism, runs the brain. All this competition morphing started with 1 Clement, got worse with Hegesippus, crystallized under Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen, Hippolytus; and was codified by Augustine and Eusebius. The Mary cult didn't really take off until 431 under Pulcheria, who wanted to promote Mary as 'mother of God' in order to promote herself. Shameful political reason, as always, for every wind-shift in what comes down to us today as 'Catholicism', whether Odox or Roman.

Above all, it was a piecemeal development of immediate opportunism: NOT a 'conspiracy' as so many claim today. Catholicism is too dang competitive and incompetent, to form a sustained, overarching conspiracy, especially over so long a time. Their innate competitivism gave rise to opportunism and a kind of prostituting-agreement to pagan ideas, yes; but no one had enough power to spearhead and manage, some concerted, centuries-long effort — except of course, Satan.

And we are all pawns of Satan, Protties now included. Without 1John1:9 regularly used, we are ALL satanfodder, guaranteed.

Hope you read the Bishop Lists book by Robert Lee Williams, and the Church Father writings. If not, see the other videos' descriptions in my PopeMyth (PopeM) playlist, for the links. Always investigate with SOURCE TEXTS, never take the word of hearsay. The purpose of hearsay is only to ALERT you to topics, never to be trusted on its own. In short, don't trust what 'braniout' says, INVESTIGATE the source texts. Do Your Own Homework, Audit Your Own Beliefs. :)


11 RCC Mass, Monks, and Manuscripts — Thank God!

Thank God for those hard-working monks, the clever design of Mass content, the catechism, etc. In the Dark Ages which admittedly Constantine's new Romanism produced, on the bright side God got the Word out through these three things: Mass, the sacrificing MONKS, and Bible manuscripts.

Moral of the story? God uses anything even remotely like Bible, to good effect. So yeah, RCC/Odox are incompetent, but not 100%, and they did do some really valuable things. My ability to type in English and HAVE a Bible, comes from them. Not, because of Nicaea, which was the nadir of Catholicism, proving the 'bishops' more incompetent than five-year-olds. But instead, due to the way they packaged doctrines for illiterates to remember, the MONKS who slaved away making Bible copies in both East and West — and probably, thus preserved history.

So let's not demonize the RCC. It has many faults, many incompetences, just like the Protties do. So no problem; just admit the mistakes, fix them. We find our broken windows of false doctrine, AUDIT and then FIX them to MATCH what BIBLE says.. and move on. No need to change denoms, just FIX what's wrong within 'yours'.

Meanwhile, God uses EVERYTHING. He makes good on it all!


Psalm 82:1 is Mistranslated!

Videos showing how Psalm 82:1 is mistranslated, directly from the Hebrew and the Greek, with tie-ins to how Christ used this Psalm in John 10:34, which I cover at excruciating length in DDNA.htm.

brainout | 20 Aug 2015, 01:35

There are thousands of mistranslations in every Bible. Some of these are politically-motivated ('womb' verses), others are downright inept. Even so there's a tandem 'tradition' of toadying to old wrong translations, to 'fit in'. As if the masses would be threatened, if you corrected a 500-year old mistake. That's the situation with Psalm 82:1, it seems. Made a playlist of videos on the issue, here. See what you think.

For I wanted to list an example of 'mss versus translations'. Nearly EVERY verse in the Bible is mistranslated. Seriously. This is not news among scholars, but is largely unknown to the hoi pouloi, who are kept in the dark and like it that way. Sad, because the actual text is far more interesting and CLEARER than the snoozy English or other translation. Just as we don't read the EULA, we don't read Bible and live on hearsay. Not good. 🥶


Ps82:1's MISTRANSLATED! Part 1 of 6b

Psalm 82's import gets MISINTERPRETED for centuries, because it's MISTRANSLATED!!! So this first video merely shows the Hebrew text and proves what the real translation ought to be: "Psalm of Asaph. God makes upright/victorious/vindicates/establishes with respect to/for/within the Congregations of God; in THEIR midst, God governs." Wow, very different from every Bible translation you'll see, huh.

Shame on millions of Christians, Jews, Mormons and other folk, who ARGUE over this passage for CENTURIES, yet clearly never even BOTHERED to read it??? GOOGLE on this verse, see how unbelievably incompetent, high-horse and otherwise goofy are all the commentaries!!!!! So let's just admit a centuries-old truth: THEY PRETEND to know Bible, but are provably ignorant and lying. Or are quintessentially stupid. Take your pick. There is no middle ground, as the Hebrew text here, makes crystal clear. It's not an interpretation, to just READ THE WORDS God commissioned, k?

Okay, time to calm down, criticism rant over. Impetus for this video: see the comments to God Deeds 13a9 Throughput Proof: Jews. This video is an outgrowth of Truth Ceeker's observations, which hit me like a lightning bolt when I looked at Psalm 82. There will be other videos. This video also updates the Ye Are Gods face videos which are in Youtube and here in Vimeo. Those older videos were done to explain my brainout.net/DDNA.htm webpage. That content ties here, as future videos will show.

File Name: Ps82.avi 11/12/14.


Ps82:1's MISTRANSLATED! Part 2 of 6b

Continued from Part 1, vimeo.com/brainout/ps82a, showing how the Translation, once corrected, yields a very different translation, "Psalm of Asaph. God establishes/vindicates/makes stand with respect to/for the benefit of the congregations of God; in THEIR midst, God governs." Really easy to see that, especially since the second clause has the SAME SYNTAX as the first clause, with GOD BEING THE SUBJECT OF THE VERB, not the object of b'qerev nor the object of the verb. So all those contending a 'council of gods' in this verse, prove to be incompetent or liars. Take your pick.

BTW, at 7:16 where I start to explain how 'Moroni' means 'My Demon', I now cannot find the lexicon where it showed that 'moron' in Greek means a demon. But you can easily find it meaning 'foolish', or even 'fool' (Greek adjective moros can be used as a substantive), for example in Isaiah 32:6 LXX and 1Cor 1:27. So with the Hebrew 1st person possessive 'i', Moroni comes to mean 'My Fool', so now you see even more, how 'Moroni' had to be a demon, for Joseph Smith couldn't know he was being insulted for not knowing the Greek (Smith took all he wrote from the KJV, which was the only Bible he 'knew'). Ooops.

Also, I'd originally intended the Psalm 82 video to all be one long video, but now have broken it up into six parts, with its own channel, Psalm 82:1 is Mistranslated!

File Name: Ps82b.avi


Ps82:1's MISTRANSLATED! Part 3 of 6b

So now we get deeper into what Psalm 82 means, to test the translation correction of verse 1, in Parts 1 and 2. One very important test of your translation MUST be how that translation fits with the rest of the text. So, this video examines that fit. It becomes really obvious that those claiming 'council of gods' never actually examined the Hebrew of Psalm 82, for the translation claim of 'council of gods' has NO FIT with the Psalm. So what does? Well, turn on the video, see for yourself.

File Name: Ps82c.avi, still 11/12/14.


Ps82:1's MISTRANSLATED! Part 4 of 6b

So now we get into more detail on how to interpret, by means of the text itself, starting with 'Asaph', which is a very clever PROOF that the verse is NOT talking about some 'divine council', but about HARVESTING HUMANS. After that, an overall summary of the meaning of the verse IN CONTEXT, begins here. So clearly the 'scholars' are not doing their job. Their job is thankless, and they are demoralized. Pray for them, because WE NEED COMPETENT SCHOLARS, and God did give them the gift. Pray that they get the right amount of money, time, recognition and whatever else they need to DO their job rightly. Pray especially, that they get the COURAGE to go against the 'herdbound' nature of academia, and CORRECTLY translate and teach, Bible! We need these guys to do their job well, and if we ASK God, He'll make sure it happens, k? Incompetent teachers mean the students don't WANT competent teachers. So ASK HIM and we'll get them to become competent, k?

At the end of this video I comment that I'll combine the next increment with this one. I instead opted not to do that, since the next increment is about 45 minutes. The final Part 6 will be combined and an hour, focusing on a panoramic review of both the meaning of the text, AND proving more thoroughly, how all the translations (including the JPS Tanach!) all follow the OLDE ENGLISH in the Geneva Bible, rather than bother to actually READ the Divinely-inspired original texts. Embarrassing. But this is typical of all the verses in translation. Criminal!

Two related series: in vimeo, howgodorchestrates time channel, How God Orchestrates Time , and brainout.net/DDNA.htm . God is out to MAKE SONS, Isaiah 53:10. Sons of God, via the Son of God, per that very verse. So Christ uses that purpose to REMIND the legalistic Pharisees, in John 10:34. You are SIRED BY GOD therefore, theme of 1 John. Couldn't be more obvious. So no 'divine council', but GOD MAKING SONS PER THE CONTRACT with the SON OF GOD, Isaiah 53:10. Sired in Scripture makes you a functioning son of God, Matthew 4:4. Which, only God can produce and He does, theme of Galatians, Corinthians, Hebrews, John 14:26, etc. So you are to GET Divine Counsel, not some heavenly body the Mormons hallucinate, or that L Ron Hubbard hallucinated, k?

File Name: Ps82d1.avi, 11/12/14.


Ps82:1's MISTRANSLATED! Part 5 of 6b

Continued from Part 4, but here with focus on how VILE are all the translations, PRETENDING to be 'new', but instead, politically-correct vis a vis the Geneva Bible, Douhay-Rheims and finally,the KJV (which itself was following the two earlier and the Bishop's Bible for political reasons). Sigh.

It's okay to spit on the Word of God and lie about what it says, but it's not okay to CORRECT an incompetent centuries-old translation? It's not okay to call out those who insist on repeating the same error, century after century even until now? Is THAT what being holy means, to spit on the Word as it is written?

Reference to proving how history demonstrates Lev26 and Deut 28 live, is at length covered in brainout.net/PassPlot.htm . Main purpose of that page is to show how God timed the Birth and Death of Christ to Chanukah and Passover (to the very day), but to show WHY He did that, I had to go through a lot of other stuff, including the structure of the Priestly courses, the Hebrew calendar (Bible's is VERY different versus modern apostate Judaism), and the holidays Passover (focus on Passion Week and its FOUR days between arrest and crucifixion), Chanukah, and Purim. Because God timed things to then-future Purim, too!

File Name: Ps82d2.avi, still 11/12/14.


Ps82:1's MISTRANSLATED! Part 6a of 6b

Summing up, decided to break the final Part 6 into two subparts, so it's less tiring to watch. Translation proof and then more time is spent proving also how POLITICS not caring about BIBLE, motivated the travesty of mistranslation of verse 1, century after century, no matter WHAT Bible version you pick: do the same examination of all the foreign language versions you can read, same political nonsense is practiced, everyone kowtowing to the King James English rather than CARING ABOUT GOD'S PRESERVED WORDS. Pathetic. As for the evil of King James Onlyism and the fact that the 1611 version's translators WARNED everyone there were errors, peruse my Youtube playlist on it here (esp. the first three videos' descriptions): youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9637CFFCF9F62107

No wonder our world is in trouble, just as Psalm 82 says — we're NOT doing our job!! So you do your job, and keep on trying to learn Bible as GOD WROTE IT and CHRIST LEARNED IT, in the original Hebrew and Greek. On Judgment Day, all these blasted politically-kowtowing scholars will be embarrassed (pray they learn to go back to God's Word BEFORE they die) — and you won't be as embarrassed, for you started to do what Christ did, Matthew 4:4!!

Worst crime for a Christian or Jew, is to NOT do Matt 4:4.

File Name: Ps82e1.avi, 11/18/14.


Ps82:1's MISTRANSLATED! Part 6b of 6b, Conclusion

Summing up continued and Reluctant Conclusion, from 6a. Focus here is on how we might justify a 'gods' translation based not on the Hebrew, but on the LXX since Christ used its duality in John 10:34. And, the implications of such usage for us post-Cross. Hairy stuff that goes missed, because Psalm 82:1 is mistranslated. So no wonder we're not noticing the REAL Spiritual Life God Authored in Christ, Hebrews 12:2!

Satan's not stupid, this passage is all-important to Integration and Throughput in the Spiritual life (see my videos of the same title in the same month). So, this is why it goes on being mistranslated and NO ONE LOOKS AT THE TEXT, century after century. Ouch.

You want proof that God exists and is the God of the Bible? Well.. here ya go.

File Name: Ps82e2.avi, 11/18/14.


Year of the Four Emperors

Bible makes a stink of this year, to show how a believer (here, Paul) influences history. Four Bible books come out as a result of Paul's death (so latest Bible book at that time had been 2 Timothy), in rapid succession: 1 and 2 Peter (count as one book), then Jude, then Mark's Gospel, then the Book of Hebrews. I've been doing videos on this order for several years, starting back in Youtube, but stopped posting in Youtube, back on 11/7/13. So the vimeo collection here, has those old videos, plus all the later ones.

This Channel will be first headed by BOOKS you can read on the topic, then will have the videos on Peter, Jude, Mark, and Hebrews that relate to the topic. The YOUTUBE playlist RFG 5 videos (starting here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lH9XGFxAzeY&list=PL5E39FE2FF6897D30&index=13 ) should be viewed first or last, as they summarize the topic's importance, but the Youtube playlist has errors in it, because in the beginning I wasn't sure of the book order. Still, its videos are short and cutesy (dumbed-down). When it covers the same idea but lists the above Bible books in a different order, just know that the order in this Channel description is the proper one.

You establish the order, via the meter. Each of the books TAGS the ones prior, by means of both meter and text, as is the normal style when meter is used:

PETER tags Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14 METER and text, making an interactive marching song out of Paul's text, Peter adding an antiphonal set of stanzas: idea of two Roman cohorts marching in parallel columns down the same broad Roman Road, one singing the Pauline 'stanza', then 'replied to' by one singing the Petrine 'addition'. It's awesome. In 2 Peter Meter Sleuthing subsection of this channel, we'll see how 1 and 2 Peter tagged 2 Timothy, followed by another subsection (from the timmeter channel) of 2Tim videos, so you can see what Peter was tagging. Sorry this is so complex.

Jude then tags Peter, which all the scholars well know, but they don't know Jude tags Peter in meter.

Mark then tags both, using only the dateline tag, but his text imitates the sarcastic style of Paul, then Peter, then Jude. So we know it comes next.

Book of Hebrews bases its outline on a WEAVING between Book of Mark, whose chapters Hebrews follows, with Peter's and Paul's points woven into the text, interactively 'answering' the points they raise, to elaborate on them. Style is the same as the way Luke wraps to Matthew. So that implies the author of Hebrews is either Mark or Luke. We know it's not Paul, he'd died, per Hebrews 13:23.

This is of mammoth importance in hermeneutics, destroying that horrible lie of a Quelle or the false claim that Mark is the first Gospel. You can prove both claims lies simply by reading the Gospels as Matthew then Luke then Mark then John, even in translation (as I'm trying to show in the Synoptics channel, which demonstrates the surgical writing/wrap technique live onscreen). But the wrapping to Mark by Hebrews helps you see it all more clearly.

Videos are a slog. Be skeptical, as I can't have gotten all this right. But enough is right and shown, so you can vet the material. Bible 'balances' like a checkbook, precisely. So at least you'll see something of the technique it uses, with meter-interacting-with text, so you can do your own testing.

Will take years to complete this, if I even live long enough; and I'm sure I'll have to revise, much. So use 1John1:9 as you examine the material, ask God where I made mistakes or what is really true, and He will show you.


Domitian (1/6) per Roman historians vs Bible satire on him in Year of the Four Emperors

'The Emperor Domitian' by Brian Jones, is the book review backdrop used, to begin testing whether what the Bible satirizes about Domitian, can be demonstrated in actual Roman history. This matters a bunch, for many incompetent 'scholars' claim that Revelation was written in 70 AD and that its text references Nero. Jones admits that claim, but I can't tell whether he agrees with it, nor does that matter. The point is to match up the Bible satire with Domitian, and test my own claims about what that satire means. So that testing, begins here.

So Jones' book is shown in the same snippets you could read yourself online (without having to purchase it), here, Chapter 5, 'Administration', at The Emperor Domitian 1st Edition by Brian W. Jones. You can also read that section sometimes, in Google Books.

Here, I'm renting the horrible Kindle version, which had no Table of Contents and no page numbers (but that's not Kindle's fault — I learned after making this video that it's the publisher not Kindle, who decides whether to omit Tables of Contents and page numbers, so Kindle refunded my rental money). So the view is restricted, so as not to violate copyright. I did read the whole book and will probably buy it in paperback.

The Jones book's Chapter 5 (page 99ff) and snippets later on, are used (hopefully without violating copyright, but if they want me to take down the videos I will) — for the first five Parts. Last part is one hour long, and covers the writing of Cassius Dio, which is in the public domain.

Dio's account, mentioned at 10:30 in this video, is at https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/67*.html. This will be shown (since it's public domain) in 6/6 Domitian (which lasts an hour), to illustrate how the Bible satire on Domitian (syllables=years 81-96) in Eph 1:4-5, 1Peter1:3 (approx. syllables 96-113), 2Peter 1:3, syllables 87-102) prophetically reflects what Dio ended up writing about Domitian.

So too, for Jones' Book, and the comparison with the Pauline and Petrine texts, is done live on screen so you can decide whether my claims are plausible. For I sought to see what Jones had to say about Domitian, which perhaps was reflected in Bible's own satirical prophecies on him (same verses), and of course the same with Dio, in Part 6.

File Name: Domitian1-3.avi, 2/12/15 in 'Domitian' folder.


Titus Meter

If you don't believe in Trinity, don't watch this BIBLE VIDEO DEMONSTRATING TRINITY METER. Heh. I've never seen so much emphasis on Trinity in a metered passage, as here. Not sure why Paul did it that way, but as you'll see, it's clear that the meter is intended. Which means, you have intentional SCRIPTURE. Which means, our copies are good. Which means, God yes preserved His Word. Each God: Father, Son, Spirit. Triple-heh. It's a little too cute that the addressee in this letter has the same name as a future Emperor whose dad, also a future Emperor, has just been dispatched to Jerusalem...

Titus is the last letter Paul wrote before he was jailed again, and it comes out the very moment or shortly before, when Nero orders Vespasian to go to Jerusalem and quell the rebellion that Florus' taking money from the Temple, had provoked. So here we see prophetical warning about how this event (which maybe wasn't yet known, but would be within weeks of Paul's writing, or was already newly known) — we see how Paul's METER telecasts the 'position' of the event, tagging his own prophecy of it, back in Ephesians.

For here again we see the Bible's own way of accounting Anno Domini, as bald as we saw in the other Pauline books. Every Pauline book uses His Age at x (and at least one will be a formula based on his Actual or originally-planned birth year). So it's real easy to know when a Bible book was written: just count the syllables. As you'll see again here. It's a no-brainer.

Link: brainout.net/TitusDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

The Ephesians meter is relevant, so here's the channel for it: GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . Look at the meter for syllables=AD years 66 and following. If you'd rather just see them in an htm, look at 66-73 here: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#y47to56 .

File Name: TitusMeter1and2.avi, 3/13/15.


Jude 3/6b Dateline Meter revised

Third installment on Jude's dateline Meter, highlighting what you can read in the doc, how we know what Bible passages he references. Stress in this video is on how 'contending for the faith' means FIGHTING YOURSELF to learn and live on, Bible doctrine. That ends up being the theme for all later Bible books, which are Mark, Hebrews and John's books. Once you realize that theme, you can see it plainly in all those later books, so Bible's real context, is elucidated.

Further, you can see that the typical Christian interpretation of Jude's 'contending for the faith' as a denominational issue, is completely anti-Biblical. If you're busy contending for your denomination, you're a retard in Christ, having put your denomination, in front of Him, whether it's Hebrew roots, Catholicism, Calvinism, Baptist, 7th-day Adventist, Dispensational, whatever. Bible agrees wholly with NONE of them. We've really gotten off-track, in our Bible reading! Fortunately, God used METER to tell us what the context is we should read, so to better understand what HE caused the writers, to write.

See also the 'royalfamilyofgod' channel, look for 'Jude on Peter' (starting here: Royal Family of God ) to see the content tie. For Jude's meter, plays on Peter and Paul's.

Download the doc in the video, which has the full story (except that the Timothy meter referenced, hasn't yet been uploaded): brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf . It's only 3 pages, because his meter is so bald. Links to all other meter material are in those three pages, too. But don't be fooled by the brevity: it will take you a year or more to go through all the associated material. I've spent most of the past seven years, writing it up and proving its mechanics in videos.

If you heard me talk about Jude's meter prior to the Jude 1 video's posting, almost everything I said about the METER in the past, is wrong. The meaning and dateline was right, but for very different reasons, as these new Jude videos show.

File Name: Jude3.avi, 4/14/14.


Jude 4/6b Dateline Meter Sleuthing and 2 Timothy

This and Part 5 are sleuthing videos, and show Jude's tags on 2 Timothy. So these two videos help show methodology. If you only want the 'answer', skip to Part 6 when it posts (hopefully later today).

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

File Name: JudePt4On2Tim1-2.avi, concatenated 3/15/15 from vids made 2/19/15.


Jude 5/6b Dateline Meter Sleuthing and 2 Timothy

This and Part 4 are sleuthing videos, and show Jude's tags on 2 Timothy. So these two videos help show methodology. If you only want the 'answer', skip to Part 6 when it posts (hopefully later today).

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

File Name: JudePt5On2Tim3-4.avi, concatenated 3/16/15 from vids made 2/19/15.


Jude 6a/6b and 2 Peter's REVISED Meter

Jude Part 6 is subdivided into two parts: this one is a better explanation of 2 Peter's meter versus the prior video, showing how he actually uses ADAMIC YEAR NUMBERS in his meter. Which pattern, Jude tags PER CLAUSE. But Jude doesn't use Adamic year numbers; yet, he expects you to know Peter did, to make puns on Peter's formulas, which Jude actually duplicates. To see Part 6b, click here: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6b

Again, this is clear evidence that the meter is deliberate. I couldn't make this up even if I wanted to. Heck, I didn't even understand it, until redoing the math several times! So if anyone claims the Bible is corrupted or we don't have the original words the writers wrote, or that Bible was written much later.. guess again! The naysayers always prove themselves incompetent, for even a dippy 'brainout' can count syllables and see the provably-Divine, pattern!

Doc Links: you can substitute 'pdf' with 'doc' and edit the (MS Word) docs.

2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, brainout.net/2PeterMeterR2.pdf . The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs more editing for consistency.

Jude: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf . Text after page 2 needs to be edited.

File Name: JudePart6Aon2Peter.avi, 3/17/15.


Jude 6b/6b Dateline Meter 'answer'

This Part 6b 'answers' the meter question, 'when was Jude written?' You'll need to first watch Part 6a to see 2 Peter's meter, which Jude apes: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6a . Else, the 'answer'here, won't make much sense.

Since this book is so misused by the denominations (ALL of them), the meter is of unusual hermeneutical value. Time we got back to the BIBLE and stopped treating it like a political football.

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'. Text after page 2 still needs editing for consistency.

For 2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, brainout.net/2PeterMeterR2.pdf . The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs editing for consistency.

File Name: JudePart6B.avi, redone 3/17/15


Mark1f Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1e. If you're not already familiar with the material, read Mark 1d's video description, for this video continues the same explanation.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter. However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1RevisedMeter.pdf .

File Name: MarkMetered1f.avi, 2/03/14.


Mark1g Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1f. Focus here is on how Mark plays on Mary's meter. If you're not already familiar with the material, read Mark 1d's video description, for this video continues the same explanation.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter. However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1RevisedMeter.pdf .

For the Daniel notes read beginning at 17:01, download brainout.net/Dan11Map.pdf, which are notes taken from listening to the 49th lesson of the Daniel series you can freely get from rbthieme.org .

File Name: MarkMetered1g.avi, 2/03/14.


Mark1h Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1g. Focus here is on how Mark plays on Mary's meter. If you're not already familiar with the material, read Mark 1d's video description, for this video continues the same explanation.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter. However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf .

File Name: MarkMetered1h.avi, 2/03/14.


Mark1i Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1h. This video shows how Mark plays on Isaiah 53 and Matthew, all at once.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter. However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf .

File Name: MarkMetered1i.avi,2/3/14.


Mark1j Mark's Meter Revised, cont.

Continued from Mark1i. Still on how Mark plays to Isaiah 53 and Matthew, all at once. I need to figure out how to explain and rewrite the Word doc about Mark's meter, in light of the other NT books' meter, like Jude and 2 Timothy, which Mark also plays on.

Since Mark's meter is precedented on Luke and Matthew's, you'll need to know their meters. Mark directly tags Luke's meter with Mark's '14', and directly tags Matthew's 427 meter with Mark's ending 56, which is also the same as Luke's first meter.

However, since by tagging Matthew, Mark effectively directs the reader back to the Temple In Trouble period in the 400's BC, the Matthew tag is first. The double 56 that effectively results from tagging Luke's first meter with Mark's last, evokes the imminent Temple Down for the second Temple, which actually happened on a 56+56 schedule from Passover to 9th Av, in 70 AD. To the Day.

But it had not happened YET, when Mark wrote, so if enough folks VOTED well, it could have been delayed or even stopped. So Mark first tagged Luke's 56 with '14', to 'complete' the 'vote' (into a 70). Thus the reader could readily understand: 427+56 in Matthew, took the reader back to the VOTING PERIOD related to Nehemiah (as backdrop to that book); then could more easily identify with the parallel VOTING PERIOD at the time Mark wrote, while Jerusalem is surrounded by armies. Rehearsal for the actual Tribulation, to illustrate it. With real lives at stake.

Of course, in hindsight we could learn that lesson, too. For the real Tribulation, is yet future.

To see Matthew's meter, and how to know it's provably the first Gospel, even by the dateline meter alone: Matthew is Metered! . Associated pdf, used in those videos: brainout.net/MatthewMeterR.pdf ; or .doc.

For Luke: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis , but start with 'Jim7' and then go sequentially. That series is about James' meter, but while doing it I realized he was keying off Luke. Turns out Luke's meter and even his entire gospel outline, is keyed to the meter in the Magnificat. So the 'jim' videos beginning at jim7, go through the Luke meter and outline connection.

Download the Mark Revised doc, showing the 14, 28, 42, 56 meter changes: brainout.net/MarkDatelineMeterR4.pdf . I've NOT yet changed the notes. It will be awhile, before the notes match video content, sorry! A German site presents an intriguing alternative idea of Mark's meter, which is more classical, stichometrie.de/text.html . By contrast, this channel focuses on Bible's OWN meter style, apart from human culture.

For Luke (still being edited, so only the meter shows, no notes): brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf .

File Name: MarkMetered1j.avi,2/3/14.


RFG6c Revised Hebrews Dateline Meter

Revised Book of Hebrews dateline meter. The ending 133 meter is still the same, but I screwed up the interim parsing when initially done, because back then I didn't recognize the cadence. So this video introduces the corrections, with explanations re variants and parsing methodology.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

Later videos will go through the significance of the meters, and the doc will contain that explanation too. For now, I just introduce some of the connections, not much explaining WHY I know the writer (CLEARLY NOT PAUL) wrote in late 69 or early 70 AD. The Temple was taken down in the final assault which began on Passover and ended on 9th Av, by Titus; this was written before that final assault began, at least by several months, probably the prior fall, so there would be enough time for the letter to circulate. This same close warning was done by Ezekiel for the Diaspora Jews, see his book. And also by Jeremiah, see Jeremiah and Lamentations. So the writer of Hebrews is playing the same God-given role as those two OT prophets.

Vespasian was sent to Jerusalem around 67 AD, so the armies had been surrounding Jerusalem for quite some time before the assault began. They were trying to negotiate a truce with the Jews, to keep Judea a commercial success, and keep invasion costs down. It didn't pan out. You can read Josephus on that, but be aware that Josephus is very bad at numbers: almost all his Bible numbers are perpetually wrong. So use his dates for anything else, also with caution.

File Name: HebDatelineMeterRevPt1.avi, 3/22/14.


RFG6c1 Hebrews 1:3 variant di heautou

Short addendum on why di heautou variant fits the text, and should be included as part of the Autograph. Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

File Name: HebDatelineMeterRevPt2.avi, 3/22/14.


RFG6d Hebrews' Dateline uses Temple Fall as Mid Trib analogy

Numeric puns on 'middle'. John will do the same thing in his meter, clearly getting his pattern from Hebrews. So what's the deal with 'middle'? Daniel 9:27. The idea was, everyone expected the Temple to go down, Daniel 9:26, but due to Church, also expected that to herald the Tribulation's beginning. So downfall=desecration, hence a kind of pun about middle dates. So, the writer of Hebrews (not Paul, he was dead, Hebrews 13:23) uses a dateline which is 21 years from latest mid-Trib on the timeline pre-Church, dated also when the Lord's age was in the 'middle' of Age 70 and 77. All three dates: 70, 73, 77.. were plotted as what-if-Raptures by Paul in Ephesians 1:3-14.

Only this time, the Lord being 73: the Temple really does go down. Our year? 70AD. Get the pun?

Revised doc still has the same name as before, but now with commentary on the numbers covered in the video: brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc or
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers) or
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf . All the other links to the other docs, including Ephesians, are in these links.

File Name: RFG6d.avi, 4/12/14.


Vespasian (6/10) Year 67 and Bible books of Titus, 2 Tim

Now looking at the interrelationships between the dates of the Bible books via the meters, and the chronology of the Year of the Four Emperors, focus on where Vespasian was, what he did, when these books were written. For the books all use what was happening then, as the isagogical underpinning for their text. It was supposed to be paradigmal, for Church. Why? Well, let's see what was happening. Here, beginning with Titus and 2 Tim.

Video's doc is my constantly-revised, latest master listing of all webpages, videos, and links on the meter: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm.

The Levick book is used, esp. its pages 27-39, which includes citations for Josephus. Links are
Josephus online: ccel.org/ccel/josephus/complete.iii.iii.xv.html?highlight=josephus,florus#highlight
Levick, pages 27-39 (you can't read it online,link is how to purchase it): amazon.com/Vespasian-Imperial-Biographies-Barbara-Levick/dp/0415166187/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427084615&sr=1-1&keywords=Levick+Vespasian

File Name: Titus&Vespasian.avi 3/22/15.


Vespasian (7/10) Year 68 and Bible books of Peter and Jude

Continued from 6/10, noting interrelationships between Bible book dates via the meters, and the Year of the Four Emperors; with focus on where Vespasian was and what he did, while these books were written. For the books all use what was happening then, as isagogical underpinning for their text. It was supposed to be paradigmal, for Church. Why? AS GOES THE BELIEVER, SO GOES HISTORY. Believers were in civil war with each other or were busiy uniting at the expense of Bible, from the beginning. So now, that infection spread across the polity.

Video's doc is my constantly-revised, latest master listing of all webpages, videos, and links on the meter: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm.

The Levick book is used, esp. its pages 27-39, which includes citations for Josephus. She has a marvelous chronology of the time, on her page 40 (taken from Josephus, and improved). Links are
Josephus online: ccel.org/ccel/josephus/complete.iii.iii.xv.html?highlight=josephus,florus#highlight
Levick, pages 27-39 (you can't read it online,link is how to purchase it): amazon.com/Vespasian-Imperial-Biographies-Barbara-Levick/dp/0415166187/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427084615&sr=1-1&keywords=Levick+Vespasian

File Name: Peter&Vespasian.avi 3/22/15.


Vespasian (8/10) Year 69 and Bible books of Jude, Mark, Hebrews

Continued from 7/10, noting interrelationships between Bible book dates via the meters, and the Year of the Four Emperors; with focus on where Vespasian was and what he did, while these books were written. For the books all use what was happening then, as isagogical underpinning for their text. It was supposed to be paradigmal, for Church. Why? AS GOES THE BELIEVER, SO GOES HISTORY. Believers were in civil war with each other or were busiy uniting at the expense of Bible, from the beginning. So now, that infection spread across the polity.

Video's doc is my constantly-revised, latest master listing of all webpages, videos, and links on the meter: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm.

The Levick book is used, esp. its pages 27-39, which includes citations for Josephus. She has a marvelous chronology of the time, on her page 40 (taken from Josephus, and improved). Links are
Josephus online: ccel.org/ccel/josephus/complete.iii.iii.xv.html?highlight=josephus,florus#highlight
Levick, pages 27-39 (you can't read it online,link is how to purchase it): amazon.com/Vespasian-Imperial-Biographies-Barbara-Levick/dp/0415166187/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427084615&sr=1-1&keywords=Levick+Vespasian

File Name: Jude-Mark-Hebrews-WrapUpVespasian.avi 3/23/15.


Timothy Dateline Meters

How Paul datelines in Timothy, seems to be the precedent for how Peter, Jude, Mark, Hebrews, John all dateline their meters. Especially, John. Is that claim true? If so, it will have mammoth import for textual criticism and hermeneutics, because a) everyone's claiming MUCH LATER BIBLE WRITING DATES than are shown here, and b) the DOCTRINE VIA METER INTERACTION WITH TEXT elucidates much about each letter, which has gone unnoticed for centuries. The ancients used meter to verify their copy accuracy, everyone knows that. But apparently the hoary heads don't account Bible writers to do the same thing, and don't realize the meter method is SEVENED to also give you updated prophecy-location 'maps', cross-reference indicators to other Bible passages, etc. each time. Really handy system, but wow our forefathers stopped teaching it to their kids, so now our eyes will glaze over...

So this channel will explare Paul's dateline technique, which ends up demonstrating how Bible Hebrew (here with Greek text) works. For the big difference in the meter technique in the NT, is that the PER CLAUSE PARSING is used as a formula for defining the date of writing (metered as a formula forward or backward to/from some well-known historical or prophesied event to telescope doctrinal content for current writ) — versus the OT technique of merely using the SEVENED clauses as a formula for the date.

Example: in Psalm 90 (see the Psalm 90 channel, Psalm 90 Meter of Time (Precedent for Bible Hebrew Meter) ), only the accumulated meter totals at their sevening points, are used for dating or ending 'paragraphs'. But in the NT, especially in John, who closes the writing of Canon, EACH CLAUSE in the dateline is used as part of a formula which simultaneously 'tags' what THAT SAME AUTHOR had written prior, as well as'tagging' previous Divine Writ relevant to that author's 'new' content'.

It works like a jigsaw puzzle; when you get the meter right, all the 'pieces' fit. Like balancing your checkbook, and the meaning of each clause becomes astonishingly clear. Like seeing the Face of God, meter interacting with text to provide a GPS of interpretation. Awesome.

So here I'll go through how to detect all that, in Timothy's meter. I actually don't know how it will turn out, until all the testing is done. But when done, either Timothy is the precedent, or some other of Paul's books. We'll see!


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 3/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This video continues the survey with 2Timothy, still showing how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey7-2Timwith3b1and2.avi 3/19/15, replacing MeterSurvey7-2Tim.avi 3/18/15.


Jude 4/6b Dateline Meter Sleuthing and 2 Timothy

This and Part 5 are sleuthing videos, and show Jude's tags on 2 Timothy. So these two videos help show methodology. If you only want the 'answer', skip to Part 6 when it posts (hopefully later today).

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

File Name: JudePt4On2Tim1-2.avi, concatenated 3/15/15 from vids made 2/19/15.


Jude 5/6b Dateline Meter Sleuthing and 2 Timothy

This and Part 4 are sleuthing videos, and show Jude's tags on 2 Timothy. So these two videos help show methodology. If you only want the 'answer', skip to Part 6 when it posts (hopefully later today).

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

File Name: JudePt5On2Tim3-4.avi, concatenated 3/16/15 from vids made 2/19/15.


Luke's Meter

Luke wrote Gospel and Acts, but his dateline meters are used by other authors besides James, so this channel contains all the Luke videos which are also in the James channel, plus Revisited or other videos which show how other books reference his meters. Sorry this is so complicated.

Luke's Gospel outline (flow of topics he covers) is entirely built around Mary's Magnificat. Each benchmark she makes in her meter, he uses as a jumping - off point to craft how he will surgically wrap to both what she said, and to Matthew. For she spoke in 5 BC and as soon as she did, it was regarded as a mini-canon of its own, with Zecharias also replying to her in meter, which Luke also quotes and uses to craft his own Gospel points. You cannot see this without counting the syllables in each of their speeches, and then comparing the meter benchmarks to the flow of Luke's text. So the 'Jim' videos demonstrate that. And James, Mary's son, also patterned his dateline meter for his letter on the Magnificat, as well as keying it to Luke's meter, so that's why initially the Luke meter videos are titled 'Jim'.

But I end up revising the meter considerably for the Gospel and for the 'cover letter' meter to Theophilus (nickname, not necessarily a specific person, means 'lover of God'). Both meters are the same. This will be covered ad hoc as I have time to post the videos, called 'Luke Revisited'. This is really shocking stuff. Proof that when you get it wrong (as I initially did), that if you keep on VETTING, God will correct you and then the actual right answer, will blow you away. Seriously, someone should kill me. I shouldn't be alive and be allowed to see this.

So there are several related channels, in alpha order:

James: James 1-2 Meter and Exegesis

Magnificat Meter: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time

Mark: Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong

Synoptics: Synoptics

But start here, since most of the James channel contains these videos, and the Magnificat Meter channel videos will be clearer (perhaps) after you've seen these. Then go to the Synoptics, which shows how Luke's TEXT surgically 'wraps' to each section of Matthew, proving Matthew is first Gospel; in Synoptics you'll also see how Mark surgically wraps to first Matthew and the Luke; so last, maybe look at the Mark meter videos.

That's a lot of slog, sorry. Pity no one thinks to count the syllables after 2000 years of fighting over Bible book dates!


Jim19 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim18, see Jim7 for vid description. Still on Luke's use of '40', tying the 160th Chanukah anniversary birth of Christ to context of Leviticus 12, Zecharias' prophecy which goes 40 years past the Mill. Focus still on Luke 2, this video, showing how Luke's using Zecharias' 84 and 91 meters to choose what he says next, re Simeon and Anna. Which means, he expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

And James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For I just learned Luke's meter is in TWO parts: the pdf here, is REVISED meter for his real at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; this one, references Matthew's meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James. Still, I must delay videos on Luke's Meter until fleshing out the relationship, further.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim19.avi, 1/18/14.


Jim20 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim19, see Jim7 for vid description. Now we see how the REST of Luke's Gospel tracks to the benchmarks in the Magnificat post-Birth. In this video, focus is on Mary's benchmarking the Lord's age 12 — when both Joseph and she would leave Him behind. So that's the next item in the order of Luke's Gospel! In other words, he's tracking her benchmarks to derive what he says as well as the order of what he says. Wow. Big help to hermeneutics, huh.

Which means, he expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus 7 years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) have its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim20.avi, 1/18/14.


Jim21 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim20, see Jim7 for vid description. Still on how the REST of Luke's Gospel tracks to the benchmarks in the Magnificat post-Birth. In this video, focus is on Mary's benchmarking the Lord's age 30. So that's the next item in the order of Luke's Gospel! In other words, he's tracking her benchmarks to derive what he says as well as the order of what he says. Wow. Big help to hermeneutics, huh.

By the way, at 8:40 or so I say that the 15th year of Tiberius was 29 AD. In 'our' BC/AD system, which Bible writers didn't use, it's 27 AD. This Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference stressed in the video here at 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, he expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus 7 years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim21.avi, 1/18/14.


Jim22 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim21, see Jim7 for vid description. Still on how the REST of Luke's Gospel tracks to the benchmarks in the Magnificat post-Birth. In this video, focus is on Mary's benchmarking the Lord's age 30. So that's the next item in the order of Luke's Gospel! In other words, he's tracking her benchmarks to derive what he says as well as the order of what he says. Wow. Big help to hermeneutics, huh.

By the way, at 8:40 or so I say that the 15th year of Tiberius was 29 AD. In 'our' BC/AD system, which Bible writers didn't use, it's 27 AD. This Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference stressed in the video here at 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, he expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus 7 years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim22.avi, 1/18/14.


Jim23 James' Meter ties to Luke 1:78-79, cont.

Continued from Jim22. Now we come back to why James uses Luke 1:78-79, to craft his own dateline meter. It makes sense to thus argue that James did it that way, to ENDORSE Luke and Paul, given that Paul had just been imprisoned, per James' own dateline. If true as posited, this information would be vital to a) proper dating of the NT books, and b) proper interpretation of James. Again, I'm trying to show something of the value of these dateline meters, to hermeneutics.

Here, the video shows how Luke's own Gospel outline continues all the way to its end, themed upon Zecharias' speech and meter, which was based on Mary's meter; and especially on Luke 1:78-79, which forms the theme for the ending of Luke's Gospel, which 1:78-79, James uses as his meter. Awesome stuff.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: NEW: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this won't begin until Episode 24, and the pdf will be VERY much changed versus what you see now. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus 7 years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim23.avi, 1/20/14.


Jim24 Luke1's dateline meter

Now we get into Luke's meter, proper. This video presents the overview on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and introduces the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this begin here at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim24Luke1MeterStart.avi, 1/21/14.


Jim25 Luke1's dateline meter, cont.

Still on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this began at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim25.avi, 1/21/14.


Jim26 Luke1's dateline meter, cont.

Still on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this began at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim26.avi, 1/21/14.


Jim27 Luke1's dateline meter, cont.

Still on WHY Luke wrote when he did, and the PREAMBLE meter. Later videos will have different conclusions. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this began at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name: Jim27.avi, 1/21/14.


Jim28 Luke1's dateline meter, cont.

End first pass on the Lukan meter. I'll finish doing the meter, later. The latest version of Luke's meter, which posits a very contradictory origin, is in brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The point of the video here, though, is to go through the PROCESS of vetting meter, so you can see some of the variables involved.

The Tiberius issue is explained in brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeter.htm#C . By their own AD accounting (which Luke uses, hence the four-syllable difference in Mary's meter, starting at syllable 175), it would be 29AD for ministry start, and 33 AD for death, since they use HIS AGE as their 'AD'. For us, the 'year' of Him being 29 or 33, is four years earlier, because of our BC/AD changes made by Dionysius Exiguus.

Which means, Luke expects his audience to have memorized that meter and make the associations (else his outline wouldn't resonate with them)! Really clever, really bald, really shocking proof of Luke's Gospel import and outline, which scholars have puzzled over .. for centuries!

James' meter, reflects all that, especially the yet-future demise of Israel due to Bar Kochba. Which was the flipside of history, when Christ was rejected.

Why this wry number play? 'Issue was, would the original '50' pre-Church play, or is it the '40' for the takedown of the Temple by the MILITARY of the invading 'prince'? Especially, since there's now an extra '7' Hanging Chad of Time, since the Last David was killed at age 33, though slated to be 40? So the 69th week now has to play, too. Same '14' problem, just as predicted since Psalm 90's meter...

Preview of coming contractions: brainout.net/Luke1DatelineMeters.pdf . The videos on this began at Episode 24, but the pdf is VERY much changed versus what you see in video. For Luke's meter is in TWO parts: his at-the-time-written dateline, is in verses 1:5-7; but he sent a COPY to Theophilus years later, and that 'cover letter' (verses 1-4) has its own meter.

Meaning is still intact, compared to James.

Other Associated links for this journey:
Prophetic value of Priestly course names: brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#1Chron24 . Pay close attention to the prophetic 'themes' for Sivan (when John born) and Chislev (when Lord born).

brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf copy), Mary's Meter structure.

brainout.net/MagnificatCalendar.xls showing the countdown from Antiochus IV and Chanukah, which Mary 'maps'. Column F is yet incomplete. Dates are shown in 'our' errant BC/AD system, as well as in Roman AUC calendar, which I suspect Mary and Paul use. Still testing that idea.

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (or 'pdf', for the pdf version), page 8, on Psalm 90 sevened-meter structure.

brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (or 'pdf') , Daniel 9:4-19's meter structure, 'ChronoChart' section.

That rtf(pdf) also has extensive notes on his king-mapping with ties to the Chronicles and Kings verses he references.
brainout.net/Isa53Map.pdf Isaiah 53's meter map structure.
brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls Map of Time from Adam forward, so you can better tie real time to Psalm 90's meter map.

brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (or htm) on Ephesians 1 (Pages 2-3 summarize God's Doctrine of Time, pp.4-5 contain all links to all related videos, Word docs and webpages on both the meter and the Doctrine of Time in Bible.) The pdf is brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

File Name Jim28.avi, from 28a and 28b of 1/21/14.


Acts Dateline Meter Revisited 1/4

Four videos on the Meter in Acts. The first two videos are methodology sleuthing and explanation; the last two videos present the 'right' answer, which is different from what you see in the first two videos. Because, often alternative answers precede: but just like Bible doctrine, the wrong answers never balance to Bible. And when you find the right answer, it fits beautifully, throughout. For Bible, is self-auditing.

Doc Link: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc.

File Name: ActsRev1-2.avi, 3/17/15 made from RevUseMe1 and 2 dated 2/23/15.


Acts Dateline Meter Revisited 2/4

2nd of 4 videos on the Meter in Acts. The first two videos are methodology sleuthing and explanation; the last 2 videos present the 'right' answer, which is different from what you see in the first two videos. Because, often alternative answers precede: but just like Bible doctrine, the wrong answers never balance to Bible. And when you find the right answer, it fits beautifully, throughout. For Bible, is self-auditing.

Doc Link: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc.

File Name: ActsRevUseMe3.avi, 2/23/15.


Acts Dateline Meter Revisited 3/4

3rd of 4 videos on the Meter in Acts. The first two videos were methodology sleuthing and explanation; this and the next video presents the 'right' answer. Because, the wrong answers never balance to Bible. And when you find the right answer, it fits beautifully, throughout. For Bible, is self-auditing.

Doc Link: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc.

File Name: ActsRev4-5.avi, 3/15/15, concatenated from Rev4 and Rev 5 made 2/23/15.


Acts Dateline Meter Revisited 4/4

4th of 4 videos on the Dateline Meter in Acts. The first two videos were methodology sleuthing and explanation; this video completes the 'right' answer, with stress on the way the meter deliberately sets the theme of the Book of Appalling Acts of the Awful Apostles. For Luke meters it negatively, to immediate apostasy as bad as Temple Down in Daniel (the 49), followed by 105, usurping Herod granted power by usurping Rome over Israel; in between, the other numbers are factual benchmarks, with 64=4164, when Luke wrote the Gospel (since Acts picks up where his Gospel ended, four years later), and 82 and 89, referring to the very same activity he'll be recording in the Book of Acts, but back then, by pagans: the First Triumvirate.

Idea that Christians will woo and war with each other, just as Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar had done. That Christians will usurp power over other Christians to stand between the believer and Bible, to play God and block God's Word.. just as Herod was placed over Jerusalem by SPQR.

So it's not a pretty theme, and anyone with half a brain can tell the 'Acts' are keystone cops. Funny, if not so tragic. Luke tagged Paul for the fuller answer, which you can watch syllable by year, in GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History or just read the doc online, brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm. Really embarrassing ACTS, ever since Christ died!

The wrong answers never balance to Bible. And that's what happened in Acts: everyone including even Paul, goes off-Bible and into the tullies. (Link to one guy's search on etymology of 'tullies': funnyguyontheprowl.blogspot.com/2008/04/740-isle-of-thule.html )

Doc Link: brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc.

File Name: ActsRev6.avi, 3/17/15.


Daniel 9 Meter

These videos' titles reference other channels' series, but are also collected here. So to see these vids in context of their original siblings, search on the series name.

The Daniel writeup is best read before watching the vids (here DANV4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf), as it's extremely detailled, and shows syllable by year matched to Kings and Chronicles, what text Daniel has in mind when he talks. It was astonishing to me to see how quickly he could match Bible text he newly had in Chronicles, to Kings and then synthesize it, even in metered speaking to God!

In many ways, his is the most sophisticated meter I've yet found. All the NT writers tag him, and he's tagging Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90 repeatedly, as he talks. No wonder he was appointed to run Babylon by first Nebuchadnezzar, and then by Darius the Mede and then by Cyrus himself!


GGS10e9d1 Daniel counts to the Millennium, ACT 3

Intro to Act 3 via Psalm 90, comprehensive review of Moses' Two Time Tracks — for Daniel 9's prayer meter, as well as Daniel 9:24 and 25, TAG Psalm 90 at key syllable junctures to MATCH Time Track 1. Tandem video shows how Paul does it also, in the Psalm 90 playlist, here: youtube.com/watch?v=MxP657KmlAw

Relevant other links:
Video worksheet reconciling Psalm 90 and Book of Judges: brainout.net/Judges.xls . If you need it in pdf, here it is: brainout.net/Judges.pdf

Daniel 9's prayer pdf: brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (use 'pdf' as last three letters if you prefer pdf). It is an exhaustive proof how Daniel counts to the Mill. See also my video '24 Ps90', which shows Daniel 9:24-27, with its own doc/pdf.

PDFs of the full meter pattern in Eph1:3-14, Ps90, and Isa53: brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

Compare to these meter maps of Ps90 and Isa53:

brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.pdf . Trilingual version is brainout.net/Ps90ParsedTrilingual.pdf See also brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.tif or brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.pdf .

brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf and the translation, which is brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc
Isaiah 53's meter map is clearer, here: brainout.net/Isa53Map.jpg .

The video's timeline worksheet: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses supporting it are shown in

brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and brainout.net/Mirroring.htm .

If you're not familiar with Book of Daniel, I did extensive audio links in the vid description to my 10a1 YMH video. Episode 10 of the YMH (Yapping Most High) series is also about Jewish Dispensationalism, and ties to 10 GGS series. Sorry, but the doctrine is long and complex .. and awesome.

File Name: 10e9d1GGS.avi, 1/30/11.


GGS10e9d2 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53

This video is not in Youtube. I forgot to post it there. Continuing from GGS10e9d1 ( in GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14 ), we now go back through Isaiah's meter, in order to better understand Daniel's.

For Daniel's is very complex: he will create a trifurcated timeline. First timeline starts at his own capture and comes full circle to his date of speaking. Second and related third timelines are developed by 'tagging' Isaiah at his syllable 133 = end Isaiah 53:2; playing on how Manasseh despised God; so, he was punished with capture, by Assyria. So, Manasseh was tagged by God in 2Kings 21:10-15 as the reason for the Temple's downfall.

Manasseh's repentance is thus paralleled with Christ: 'ish makovot, w'idua holi', Isa53:3 (translated, 'The HeartBreak Man, knowing lovesick grief').

From there, Daniel goes forward in the future, tying together all the prophecy God gave him since Daniel 2, in order to plot the sequence of the future rise and subsequent fall, of Greece and Rome. That's why Daniel 10-12, exist. They answer Daniel's METERED sequencing, in Daniel 9!

Mary's meter will pick up where Daniel ends, and Paul's meter will pick up where Mary's, ends. Peter's meter wraps around Paul's, to cover the same future Church History period on a tandem subject, the 'temple' of Church, since the OT Temple had its own 490, Daniel 9!

See: Daniel's metered sophistication (and satire!) sets new precedence for the NT meter style, so it's worth learning. We miss so much meaning in Bible, simply because we don't count the syllables and don't trust the Bible enough to actually be RIGHT in its timelines! But, I digress.

In GGS10e9d3 and 4, we'll see something of Daniel's style.

If you want, you can download the docs used in the video.

brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf for the Hebrew 'map'.

Word docs of the metered translation:
2-Page translation of Chapter, landscape mode (has translation upgrade): brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc

3-Page version, portrait mode (pre-upgrade): brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglish.doc

PS: I apologize for annoying Episode names like 'GGS10e9d2'; but the videos were made in 2011, and had many views. Within Youtube, few see the vids, but for some reason I can't fathom, they were picked up elsewhere, and embedded into other websites. So now, past viewers (and websites using these vids) would become confused, if I change the names. File Name: 10e9d2GGSIsaMill.avi, 1/12/11.


GGS10e9d3 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53, cont.

This video continues from GGS10e9d2 in vimeo, and is also not in Youtube. It presumes you're familiar with Daniel.

GIST: Daniel knew Isaiah 53's meter when he was a teenager. When he's 70 years older in Daniel 9, he prays. So he 'tags' his prayer meter to the very syllables = years in Isa53, which depicted Daniel's deportation (cf. Jer52:28, early 607BC, Nebuchadnezzar not yet sole king). From this Daniel crafts a juridical basis, for his bifurcated and metered, prayer. For the 70 years itself, was bifurcated:

* There was a '70', measured from the first deportation, Zech 1:12, 7:5, Jer52:28. The Zechariah 7 people self-righteously petition God, BECAUSE the 70 ended 2 years prior, when 2nd Temple's foundation was laid, see Zech 1 compared to Haggai 2. But they KEPT weeping and fasting afterwards; thus you know they're self-righteous: Temple's demise was fifth month, Jer 52:12. God never ordered them to do that; hence His Sharp Reply, in Jeremiah 7:6.

* There was next, a separate TEMPLE 70, see Jer25:11, 29:10. God's Metered Reply in Dan9:24-27, 'balances' to this 70. Those verses are long misaccounted by Christendom and Judaism, BECAUSE we don't know the meter! So this video covers the background. Next two videos will cover the Daniel 9:24-27, meter. Mary, Paul and Peter will ape his syllable-by-year, satirical meter; so it's worthwhile to learn Daniel 9's style.

For better understanding of those videos,

* Read brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf. It provides (exhausting!) Bible proof how Daniel counts to the Millennium. It shows how Daniel's prayer is structured, how he tracks Isaiah 53's Timeline Meter, and also what Kings and Chronicles verses he's thinking about, as he talks!

* The last video in this channel, 'Ps90 Epi24', shows GOD's meter in Daniel 9:24-27, has its own doc/pdf, brainout.net/Dan924HebParsed.pdf. That meter is introduced at the end of this video.

PDFs of the full meter pattern in Eph1:3-14, Ps90, and Isa53:

Ephesians brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf .

Psalm 90 brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.pdf . Trilingual version is brainout.net/Ps90ParsedTrilingual.pdf .
See also brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.tif or brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.pdf .

Isaiah 53 brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf and the translation, which is brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc
Isaiah 53's meter map brainout.net/Isa53Map.jpg .

Timeline worksheet brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses supporting it are shown in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and brainout.net/Mirroring.htm .

Audios on the whole book of Daniel, Yapping Most High Episode 10a1: use its description, to click on and listen to (or download) the audios: youtube.com/watch?v=rq75pw14HIM&list=PL40216F6E28F05780&index=17 .

File Name: 10e9d3DanMill1.avi, 1/12/11.


GGS10e9d4 Daniel counts to Millennium via Isaiah 53, conclusion

Continued from and concluding, GGS10e9d3 (vimeo.com/brainout/ggs10e9d3 ). This video is not in Youtube. Watch me get egg on my face, for I was VERY LAZY when making this video. I did not WANT Daniel 9:25 to be metered, so at 10:32 in this video, I claim it's not metered. Wrongo! So during the tandem Ps90 Epi24 video (next in this channel), I have to admit I was wrong, and then make even more mistakes during the video, and then have to admit that during the video, since the Holy Spirit keeps warning me that I'm wrong. And I wouldn't listen. Well, not at first.

Aha. Now it's easier to understand why others don't listen, either.

File Name: 10e9d4DanMill2.avi, 1/12/11.


Ps90-24 God Trinity-Meters Double Tribulation in Daniel 9:24-27 in Daniel 9 Meter

24Ps90 is the original of the Youtube upload for 07/17/11 (incl. vid desc, below). It covers Daniel 9's meter.

Watch in HD, fullscreen. God's reply to Daniel plays off Daniel's meter, tagging it and Psalm 90, Isaiah 53 Decree sections, thus resolving WHO decreed the Rebuilding of Jerusalem, and other corrections which have long baffled scholars.

For example, '63' is the number of God's Decree, used by Psalm 90:1-3's meter, and repeated with update — but still at 63 syllables — in Isaiah 53:9+10 OR 10+11. When you see the text, you'll notice in each section God is talking. So too, here: the meter of Daniel 9:24, is 63 syllables. Thus you know Who makes the Rebuild-Jerusalem decree, in Daniel 9:25: God, no human king. A decree which matches real then-future, history.

Bible is self-auditing. If you make a mistake, it won't balance. Scholars can't make Daniel 9 balance, so invent all kinds of wacky justifications, i.e., lunar years, claiming His Entry into Jerusalem rather than the TEXT telling you Crucifixion — completes the 62 weeks. Text says the 62 weeks isn't completed until the TEMPLE goes down. Oh well.

Here, you'll see me also make stupid mistakes and how the Bible's self-auditing process, corrected them — alongside the vibrant John 14:26 'reminder' function — all in one very long video. Very short doc was used for it: brainout.net/Dan924HebParsed.pdf.

Daniel's prayer meter is extensively covered here (now with a new chronology chart): brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF

Master document with all related links, is brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc , for Paul uses God's Meter, to craft Eph1:3-14.

Along the way, you'll see how God via Gabriel, uses Trinity and Hypostatic Meter to convey number-metaphor Doctrines underlying the explicit text. The doctrinal meanings of numbers are well known in theology. So via recourse to meter, one quickly has proof that a) there are TWO tribulational sevens, not one; b) NO human king decrees the rebuilding of Jerusalem, but instead, God; c) how to measure the time listed in the explicit text of Daniel 9:24-27, i.e., there is an interval of 140 years Decreed between Temple Down in 586BC and when Jerusalem is rebuilt; there is a 50 year hiatus between Daniel 9:26 and 9:27; d) the Daniel 9:27 piece is to PAY BACK the too-early maturation of Abraham, and e) HOW LONG it will take for the second Temple to go down. To the very day.

The above two-page Dan924 doc has more spectacular Trinity stuff about the numbers than I knew when making this video. Just learned it now while awaiting the upload.

23hi Ps90 video is still under reconstruction; but meanwhile, this vid helps you see the structure of the former's content.

This video ties to the 10GGS series, starting here: youtube.com/watch?v=BSTag47LY-4&list=PL5D3F5A2E85CE65CC&index=10 . That's a comprehensive review of the interplay of Paul creating a 4-Act 'play' with Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9 (ending with this video in its #24 of the list). The other tie, is to Yapping Most High Episode 10a1 and 10a2, starting here: youtube.com/watch?v=rq75pw14HIM&list=PLB73D9DA02D729857&index=1 .


Jude's Meter

Collection of the Jude videos which are in other channels. Book came out in Year of the Four Emperors, with other Bible books in this sequence: 1 and 2 Peter, then Jude, then Mark's Gospel, then Book of Hebrews. So the videos focus on proving WHEN Jude wrote, as an isagogical hermeneutic in proving WHY and therefore WHAT he wrote. Essentially, he wrote because Peter died; and Peter died, because Paul died, in a general roundup of Christian persecution which wasn't necessarily ordered by Nero, but rather was conducted by local magistrates who sought favor with him, or used him as the excuse for their own policies.

Related channels therefore are:
Timothy Dateline Meters , because a Bible book must 'tag' the latest one, and when Jude wrote, the latest books were 2 Tim and 2 Peter.

Peter Meters Time to Paul's Eph 1:3-14
Year of the Four Emperors
Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong


Jude 1/6b Dateline Meter

Introduction to Jude's dateline Meter. See also the 'royalfamilyofgod' channel, look for 'Jude on Peter' (starting here: Royal Family of God ) to see the content tie. For Jude's meter, plays on Peter and Paul's.

This video merely introduces how meter helps you determine which textual variants really belong to the writer. Jude happens to be an easy test case. Download the doc in the video, which has the full story (except that the Timothy meter referenced, hasn't yet been uploaded): brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf . It's only 3 pages, because his meter is so bald. Links to all other meter material are in those three pages, too. But don't be fooled by the brevity: it will take you a year or more to go through all the associated material. I've spent most of the past seven years, writing it up and proving its mechanics in videos.

If you heard me talk about Jude's meter prior to this video's posting, everything I said about the METER in the past, is wrong. The meaning and dateline was right, but for very different reasons, as this video will show.

File Name: JudeASR1-3.avi, 3/20/14.


Jude 2/6b Dateline Meter, Variant 'ethnesin' impact

To show why I plugged in 'ethnesin' in the Jude 1/6 video (at vimeo.com/brainout/jude1 ), and to show off BW9, here's a demonstration of CNTTS apparatus and live facsimiles of mss in Bibleworks 9. This video is in addition to my other demonstrations in my Youtube Bibleworks playlist, at youtube.com/playlist?list=PL941FC149728AE36D . This video, however, shows the two features which make Bibleworks a must-buy, if you're serious about learning Scripture qua Scripture. I figure you are serious, else you'd not be watching my videos at all. :)

Folks wanted me to do more BW9 videos, but my screen recorder still is glitchy. So this will have to do, for now.

File Name: BW9AppMss.avi, 3/29/14.


Jude 3/6b Dateline Meter revised

Third installment on Jude's dateline Meter, highlighting what you can read in the doc, how we know what Bible passages he references. Stress in this video is on how 'contending for the faith' means FIGHTING YOURSELF to learn and live on, Bible doctrine. That ends up being the theme for all later Bible books, which are Mark, Hebrews and John's books. Once you realize that theme, you can see it plainly in all those later books, so Bible's real context, is elucidated.

Further, you can see that the typical Christian interpretation of Jude's 'contending for the faith' as a denominational issue, is completely anti-Biblical. If you're busy contending for your denomination, you're a retard in Christ, having put your denomination, in front of Him, whether it's Hebrew roots, Catholicism, Calvinism, Baptist, 7th-day Adventist, Dispensational, whatever. Bible agrees wholly with NONE of them. We've really gotten off-track, in our Bible reading! Fortunately, God used METER to tell us what the context is we should read, so to better understand what HE caused the writers, to write.

See also the 'royalfamilyofgod' channel, look for 'Jude on Peter' (starting here: Royal Family of God ) to see the content tie. For Jude's meter, plays on Peter and Paul's.

Download the doc in the video, which has the full story (except that the Timothy meter referenced, hasn't yet been uploaded): brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf . It's only 3 pages, because his meter is so bald. Links to all other meter material are in those three pages, too. But don't be fooled by the brevity: it will take you a year or more to go through all the associated material. I've spent most of the past seven years, writing it up and proving its mechanics in videos.

If you heard me talk about Jude's meter prior to the Jude 1 video's posting, almost everything I said about the METER in the past, is wrong. The meaning and dateline was right, but for very different reasons, as these new Jude videos show.

File Name: Jude3.avi, 4/14/14.


Jude 4/6b Dateline Meter Sleuthing and 2 Timothy

This and Part 5 are sleuthing videos, and show Jude's tags on 2 Timothy. So these two videos help show methodology. If you only want the 'answer', skip to Part 6 when it posts (hopefully later today).

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

File Name: JudePt4On2Tim1-2.avi, concatenated 3/15/15 from vids made 2/19/15.


Jude 5/6b Dateline Meter Sleuthing and 2 Timothy

This and Part 4 are sleuthing videos, and show Jude's tags on 2 Timothy. So these two videos help show methodology. If you only want the 'answer', skip to Part 6 when it posts (hopefully later today).

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'.

File Name: JudePt5On2Tim3-4.avi, concatenated 3/16/15 from vids made 2/19/15.


Jude 6a/6b and 2 Peter's REVISED Meter

Jude Part 6 is subdivided into two parts: this one is a better explanation of 2 Peter's meter versus the prior video, showing how he actually uses ADAMIC YEAR NUMBERS in his meter. Which pattern, Jude tags PER CLAUSE. But Jude doesn't use Adamic year numbers; yet, he expects you to know Peter did, to make puns on Peter's formulas, which Jude actually duplicates. To see Part 6b, click here: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6b

Again, this is clear evidence that the meter is deliberate. I couldn't make this up even if I wanted to. Heck, I didn't even understand it, until redoing the math several times! So if anyone claims the Bible is corrupted or we don't have the original words the writers wrote, or that Bible was written much later.. guess again! The naysayers always prove themselves incompetent, for even a dippy 'brainout' can count syllables and see the provably-Divine, pattern!

Doc Links: you can substitute 'pdf' with 'doc' and edit the (MS Word) docs.

2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, brainout.net/2PeterMeterR2.pdf . The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs more editing for consistency.

Jude: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf . Text after page 2 needs to be edited.

File Name: JudePart6Aon2Peter.avi, 3/17/15.


Jude 6b/6b Dateline Meter 'answer'

This Part 6b 'answers' the meter question, 'when was Jude written?' You'll need to first watch Part 6a to see 2 Peter's meter, which Jude apes: vimeo.com/brainout/jude6a . Else, the 'answer'here, won't make much sense.

Since this book is so misused by the denominations (ALL of them), the meter is of unusual hermeneutical value. Time we got back to the BIBLE and stopped treating it like a political football.

Doc link: brainout.net/Jude1-3DatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'. Text after page 2 still needs editing for consistency.

For 2 Peter: EXPLANATION REVISED, brainout.net/2PeterMeterR2.pdf . The doc still has the old title of 2PeterMeter.doc, but has all the latest revisions, and is the 'original' from which the pdf was made. Text after page 1 still needs editing for consistency.

File Name: JudePart6B.avi, redone 3/17/15

Hebrews Meters

+ Hebrews 11:1 Exegesis

Just after Vespasian took the purple in December 69, Hebrews was written. That's a likely date for when Timothy was released from jail (in honor of the Saturnalia=Chanukah), given the policy of Emperors to pardon past political imprisonments of unpopular Emperors (here, that would be Nero). Either Mark and Luke were released prior, or just prior, or at the same time and Timothy was released just as the Book was completed. In any event, we can prove from the meter WHEN it was written. So this is a spinoff channel from RFG, to isolate the videos solely on the Book of Hebrews.

In the Year of the Four Emperors (which is yet another channel, lol), because Paul was executed, a slew of new Bible books came out to explain why and what would come next: 1 & 2 Peter, Jude, Mark's Gospel and then Book of Hebrews. Since there is so much needless debate about when these books were written, and since so much Bible misunderstanding results from not knowing when, it's important to document the proof of the WHEN. So this channel isolates the Book of Hebrews' dateline meter proof from the other books, but you kinda have to see them all together, to see how that proof really IS, proof.

Sorry this is so complicated. The channels containing videos on the other books which came out in the same Year of the Emperors are:

Peter, summer and fall AD 68: Peter Meters Time to Paul's Eph 1:3-14
Jude, just after Peter, maybe near end of 68: Jude's Meter
Mark, Passover AD 69: Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong
RFG channel (which includes the Peter and Jude videos): Royal Family of God

Year of the Four Emperors' related isagogics: Year of the Four Emperors

Stong implication, then, that either Mark or Luke wrote the Book of Hebrews. Maybe they did it jointly. Style similarities can be contended, especially with the wry sarcasm, but I can't yet prove whether either of them had written it, and of course the topic has been debated for centuries.


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 6/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall. See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

This rather dramatic video continues the survey with Hebrews, which builds its outline around the Gospel of Mark, thus proving more than ever that Mark's the THIRD Gospel, not Quelle or first. Dramatic, because it almost SCREAMS of Luke and Mark's authorship post Paul's death.

The Royal Family of God channel has those videos. But here, Hebrews also shows how all the NT dateline meters, have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, not over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in a serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's not merely a dateline, but a plan-of-time passage (i.e., Ps90, Dan9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Pet1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the import of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a whole lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey11-12bHebrews.avi 3/20/15.


RFG6c Revised Hebrews Dateline Meter

Revised Book of Hebrews dateline meter. The ending 133 meter is still the same, but I screwed up the interim parsing when initially done, because back then I didn't recognize the cadence. So this video introduces the corrections, with explanations re variants and parsing methodology.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

Later videos will go through the significance of the meters, and the doc will contain that explanation too. For now, I just introduce some of the connections, not much explaining WHY I know the writer (CLEARLY NOT PAUL) wrote in late 69 or early 70 AD. The Temple was taken down in the final assault which began on Passover and ended on 9th Av, by Titus; this was written before that final assault began, at least by several months, probably the prior fall, so there would be enough time for the letter to circulate. This same close warning was done by Ezekiel for the Diaspora Jews, see his book. And also by Jeremiah, see Jeremiah and Lamentations. So the writer of Hebrews is playing the same God-given role as those two OT prophets.

Vespasian was sent to Jerusalem around 67 AD, so the armies had been surrounding Jerusalem for quite some time before the assault began. They were trying to negotiate a truce with the Jews, to keep Judea a commercial success, and keep invasion costs down. It didn't pan out. You can read Josephus on that, but be aware that Josephus is very bad at numbers: almost all his Bible numbers are perpetually wrong. So use his dates for anything else, also with caution.

File Name: HebDatelineMeterRevPt1.avi, 3/22/14.


RFG6c1 Hebrews 1:3 variant di heautou

Short addendum on why di heautou variant fits the text, and should be included as part of the Autograph. Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

File Name: HebDatelineMeterRevPt2.avi, 3/22/14.


RFG6c2 Hebrews 'tagged' by John's Gospel

How John's Gospel tags Hebrews, Mark, Jude, Peter, Ephesians, etc. I couldn't combine and re-render the videos, so this one's short.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

File Name: RFG6c2.avi, 3/24/14.


RFG6c3 Hebrews 'tagged' by John's Gospel, cont.

How John's Gospel tags Hebrews, Mark, Jude, Peter, Ephesians, etc. I couldn't combine and re-render the videos, so this one completes the pair on John's Gospel tag. Be sure to note how the text ties, too. Next is further testing via 1John.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

File Name: RFG6c3.avi, 3/24/14.


RFG6c4 Hebrews Tagged By 1John

Now we examine the 'tags' made on Hebrews, by 1 John. Just like with fingerprints, the more 'matches' you have, the more definite the 'tag'.

Revised doc still has the same name, and presently doesn't have any commentary, is only the text shown in video, brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers)
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf

File Name: RFG6c4HebTaggedBy1John.avi, 3/27/14.


RFG6d Hebrews' Dateline uses Temple Fall as Mid Trib analogy

Numeric puns on 'middle'. John will do the same thing in his meter, clearly getting his pattern from Hebrews. So what's the deal with 'middle'? Daniel 9:27. The idea was, everyone expected the Temple to go down, Daniel 9:26, but due to Church, also expected that to herald the Tribulation's beginning. So downfall=desecration, hence a kind of pun about middle dates. So, the writer of Hebrews (not Paul, he was dead, Hebrews 13:23) uses a dateline which is 21 years from latest mid-Trib on the timeline pre-Church, dated also when the Lord's age was in the 'middle' of Age 70 and 77. All three dates: 70, 73, 77.. were plotted as what-if-Raptures by Paul in Ephesians 1:3-14.

Only this time, the Lord being 73: the Temple really does go down. Our year? 70AD. Get the pun?

Revised doc still has the same name as before, but now with commentary on the numbers covered in the video: brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.doc and brainout.net/Heb1v1-4.pdf . Thus you can reparse it as you please, with less effort.

For John, documents below were again revised on 3/08/14. Here are their links:

brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.doc or
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.htm (Greek or tabs won't be aligned, in some browsers) or
brainout.net/JohnDatelineMeters.pdf . All the other links to the other docs, including Ephesians, are in these links.

File Name: RFG6d.avi, 4/12/14.

b-out Hebrews 11:1 Exeg

Used for Heb111.htm webpage, proving how every Bible in every language I can read (i.e., Romance languages), fatally mistranslates Hebrews 11:1. You can download the originals of videos 2-4 in this list, here: http://vimeo.com/album/2589177 .

Word, Not Works! says Hebrews 11:1

Heb 11:1 playlist header video. Every good deed gets its reward. But every GOD deed gets GOD's Reward. Which do you want? Give a cup of water, and surely you will get YOUR reward. But learn and live on Bible, and get HIS Reward, Heb 11:6. For the REAL Evidence is UNSEEN, says Hebrews 11:1. That verse is the subject of this video. WORD not works! GOD's Works, not yours!

The world rewards its works; and all those works will be burned up, 1Cor3 and last half 2 Peter. For God rewards only HIS Works, Heb 11:6, whole book of James. See my James 2 exegesis playlist, which demonstrates how James proves he's writing about 1Cor 3 rewards, NOT about salvation: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=B2D36A5F17A7ABB4. (James wrote his book just before or just after Paul wrote 1Cor, I'm not yet sure who was first. They seem to quote each other, throughout.)

Bible excoriates human works on every page. GOD WORKS, that's the ticket. Trial is about GOD working, or YOU working. Satan wants it to be YOU working, because Satan is MORAL and contends that God should credit creatures for THEIR works — as he tempted Christ to do, in Matt 4. But what did Christ reply? Matt 4:4 — live on THE WORD, not works.

So then you're going sabbatical, spending time you COULD be working, on LEARNING Him. So then GOD is working in you, and rewarding the world due to you learning Him, theme of Leviticus 26.

So WORD, not works, is what does a greater work for the world: that's the theme of the Book of Hebrews, as I'll demonstrate in later RFG series videos.

For the full exegesis of Hebrews 11:1 live onscreen, see the response video attached to this one. Associated webpage with these videos in it: Heb111.htm. Last video in the playlist has a video description with the lexicon citations and a mini-movie showing five of them in BibleWorks (or click here: • Hebrews 11:1 Grammar proves Word not ...).

1/2 Translations Decapitate Christ: Hebrews 11:1 Case Study

Gist: Hebrews 11:1 is mistranslated throughout the centuries; the mistranslations all ignore the Hypostasis=Christ meaning in this verse, thus decapitating Christ and all believers in Him, as this video shows. Who says Satan isn't smart to promote 'translated' God?

This is only one example of many. It's the quickest way to see how God is cut out of translations. Here, THE GOD-MAN, cut out by pious translators the world over, for centuries. So surely they had 'help' to be so uniformly blind, even though choosing the same "hupostasis" nickname, to signify Christ's God-man nature! Joke's on us!

Hebrews 11:1 Grammar proves Word not Works!

Answering critics who don't do their Bible homework. Lexicon citations are in this video description, and here we paint out the grammar; see how easy it is to know what the BIBLE says versus translations. Greek grammar rules tell you how to read and translate the verse. You learn these rules in theological kindergarten, aka first-year seminary. So why do scholars screw up its translation for 500 years? Gotta be, Satan & Co. clouding the 'scholars' whenever they read or translate.

Which is easy to do, since the first thing any competent scholar would notice, is that the verse is mistranslated; so he's faced with the uncomfortable issue of having to expose the translation as WRONG. Scholars don't like to expose past scholars as wrong, and it's understandable why. But should the Word of God be compromised in the process? I say NO.

They say YES, and keep on covering up the meaning, preserving the error century after century. That's how Satan &Co. get away with their clouding. They play on the herdbound. Yet any lexicon showing what 'pistis' means, reveals the translation error! To wit:

Go find someone who has a hardback or computer copy, read it for yourself (very long article tracing etymology). Formal book name is Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (abbreviated TDNT), by Gerhard Kittel. It's regarded as a standard in theological circles. You can download a computer copy at Logos (on sale still for $200? video on it, attached); or you can buy the hardback for $500 at Amazon.

Associated webpage (which contains the Heb 11:1 videos, as well): Heb111.htm. You can download the original HD videos, here: http://vimeo.com/brainout/heb111wordn...

See also my James 2 playlist so you can see the entire book of James has the same theme, Word not Works, because ONLY THE WORD, WORKS! Here: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list...

Word Not Works II

God-level works alone please God; so only GOD can do those works; just as, the Holy Spirit did to the Humanity of Christ on the Cross, bedato yatsdiq Hebrew clause in Isaiah 53:11. Thus God bids us merely BELIEVE in Christ; we are thus saved from hell, saved from our puny nature, saved to God, saved to seeing Him forever. Which makes sense, for how can we puny, do anything of ourselves to please God?

It's a QUALITATIVE, not quantitative, issue. A plant can never do anything of human nature. We can never do anything of GOD nature. Gotta BE God to do that. So only GOD-LEVEL works could save us, and please Him. So Christ has to BE God, and the works be done BY God IN Christ's Humanity. Else, there is no qualifying payment!

So only what God does IN you, qualifies, Col1:25-27, Romans 4, 1Cor3, whole book of James. And HE only uses your belief in WORD, Heb 11:6. No Bible hero is ever praised for his works, but rather his belief. Why? Because God only USES your belief in WORD. And what God uses, makes Divine Good FROM that belief in WORD. His Word. Not, yours.

Any other agent (i.e., you) doing works, can't be Divine, so can't matter: for everyone else, is FINITE so not as good as God, Romans 3:23.

Sin is only part of the problem. We are FINITE, even when in heaven.

See also my James 2 playlist, where I show in the color-coded Greek (but not visible in English), how James makes this very distinction. God did to Abraham's BELIEF IN WORD a work of Divine Quality, and that's why Abraham POST-SALVATION was graduated to Friend of God. POST salvation.

Church believers have a different graduation: crown of life. And to get it, GOD MUST GROW YOU. That's James' theme, just as it was Paul's theme in 1Cor. Both letters were written on the same theme at the same time.

So stop treating your morality as if it did anything for God. Morality is designed to make society work, hold together. Morality keeps your soul from disintegrating into incompetence. Same, for your body. It's like exercise. Stuff you gotta engage in, to have competent function. It's NOT spirituality. For only the Spirit, is spiritual. So only what HE DOES to your head between sins, is spiritual. And if you're not using 1John1:9, He's not doing anything to you, and all your Bible spouting is just hot air.

Cafeeine 2a, intro to Hebrews 11:1, Revisited

To introduce how we must correct translation of Hebrews 11:1, first Google 'subjective' and 'objective' 'genitive'. Video screen shows what results you should get. For Hebrews 11:1 uses Drama Greek, so that use of the genitive, is key to proper translation. As the translators (in all translations!) did NOT pay attention Hebrews 11:1's Greek, but instead copied KJV, we end up with the travesty of Christ being CUT OUT of translation. So the entire point of the chapter, is missed.

Cafeeine 2b-4 will show this fact; but you won't be able to follow how the mistranslation occurred, until you learn something about Bible Greek subjective and objective genitive. So do your research on those genitives, then continue with Cafeeine 2b.

Some links:

Cafeeine 2b, Hebrews 11:1, Revisited Pt 1

Part 1 of 3 on how to prove what Hebrews 11:1 really says, versus the wholly-incorrect translations. The first 'predicate' clause in the verse is shown, in this video. Part 2 will focus on the second predicate clause, and Part 3 will focus on the third predicate clause, and the clever wording placements. So write what's below on paper as shown (except for the --- marks). Predicate clauses are in APPOSITION, to make a three-tier composition, which I call 'tic tac toe'. Writer meters each clause at 7 syllables, Bible-Hebrew-Meter style (21 is a Temple-building number in the OT, for the # of years it took to build Jacob's family, and each of the 2 Temples). This forms the theme of the chapter, which is why it's about the building of believers (Isaiah 53:10 contract), and why Church gets 'better things' (Attic kreittwn), hence Rapture precedes Trib (Heb 11:39-40).

So write the following:

It's about:

Notice on the left, how the words form full ideas VERTICALLY, not merely horizontally. That tic tac toe style of parallelism and apposition was common in ancient languages. Video will cover this in Part 3, but look at it starting in Part 1, on the sheet of paper. Notice the tic tac toe style of parallelism, vertical and horizontal words each convey information more easily absorbed and remembered.

Finally, subjective and objective or even plenary genitives depend on verbal nouns/substantives. Notice how clever, then, to say 'hupostasis' The Assurance, The Reality, The Beingness for The Christ, in the second clause. Since the word is so prominent in Hebrews 1:3 and 3:14 (as you'll see in Pt2), the Greek reader would immediately smile, by the time he gets to Heb 11:1, which begins the most climactic chapter of the epistle. Writer is focusing on the Godness of Christ, in 1:3; on our being part of Christ, in 3:14; hence our beingness, our reality, the substance of our lives, the substance of the Trial for us, is bound up with Him, Heb 11:1. Elegant way to advance the explanation, wouldn't you say?

Cafeeine 5, Hebrews 11:1, Revisited Pt 4

Postscript: So which is it, objective or subjective genitive? Can one tell what the WRITER meant to choose? I think so. This video covers my 'vote'. See what you think. As always, feel free to dispute: please provide substance so I can benefit from your criticism. If you want to call me names, please do. David Berlinski thinks we should be more strident with our insults, and yeah baby I agree with that (produces greater honesty and comraderie, longterm).


Pauline Dateline Meters

This is a 'cousin' channel to the Ephesians meter channels, GGS10 Paul's Meter Of Time Structure in Eph1:3-14 and GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . Here, videos concern the dateline meters of the other NT books of Paul's. Ephesians, by contrast, is a full-fledged prophecy about how BAD Church will become, so it required two added channels just to demonstrate that live in the Bible text. So you won't find that material here. Instead, this channel will contain the pre- and post- prison epistles. Paul did NOT write Hebrews (why anyone hallucinates he did, is beyond me), so its material is in the Hebrews Meters and its main channel, Royal Family of God .

What's most astonishing to me, is that Paul's meter keeps on keying to Mary's meter in the Magnificat, which had to be long known as Canon before Luke put it in 'official' Gospel form. Being female and NOT a libber, I'm not happy about this, but if that's what Paul does, I must report it. Magnificat is in its own channel, GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . So you can proof the results here and there, yourself. If you see an error, let me know?

Sorry this is so complicated, but every Bible book is deliberately 'threaded' to every other one, in a particular sequence.. which the meter, reveals. So here in Paul's Meter channel, we'll see how BALDLY the meter displays WHEN the book was written, WHY it's being written, and HOW each letter ties to its prior kindred. The answers given here are very brief, because you can immediately understand the answers without my explaining them, if you are already familiar with Bible Meter. Which you can become familiar, if you started as per the How God Orchestrates Time channel videos (here: How God Orchestrates Time ).

For a master list of vids, docs, and how to orient to this meter, see LukeDatelineMeters.pdf


Bible's Anno Domini Meters 1/7

Long before we invented 'Anno Domini', Bible used it. This series examines NT Anno Domini Dateline Meter formulas, and how they are all precedented on the OT dating system from both Adam's Fall (not initial creation) and, as a countdown TO a planned Millennial start of 4200 after Adam's Fall.

This video introduces the idea, harangues about how obvious Bible's Anno Domni meter would be to anyone COUNTING SYLLABLES PER CLAUSE; then, starts the meter survey with Galatians, the first book written after the first Gospel, which is provably Matthew's. This video ends with James, going in chronological order, through each NT book's meters. They all have the following in common:

* The Lord's Age is stated BLUNTLY, or as a formula based on His originally planned Death or Birth pre- or post-David. Often, the meters will interrelate all these dates: three death dates and two birthdates, so to track and reconcile them. Bible's Anno Domini reconciliation with the OT, its BC/AD converter, is the ORIGINAL planned Birthdate of 4106. Due to the delay in David's crowning — he was crowned on time, 1050 years after Abraham supermatured at age 100, but wasn't crowned over ALL Israel until 7 years later — Christ had to be born a net 3.5 years earlier (reflecting Temple's late start as well). So He dies in 4136, not 4143 (the Davidic deadline) or 4146 (the original 2100+2046 deadline from Abe's supermaturation). See Preface for orientation, brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.htm#Preface .

That TIMELINE SHIFT is not known in Christendom, but is tracked in Bible, as you'll see here.

* The ADAMIC YEAR of writing is somewhere stated as two ending numbers, much as we use '15' to mean '2015'.

* At least one of the meters 'tags' a past event in secular history, to parallel current time to the 'story' of that past event.

* At least one of the meters is dated in terms of years-to the Trib, Millennium, or a closely-related, forward countdown tracked since the OT.

In short, the meter formulas are predictable. So they are testable. Since often a chapter will have its own dateline meter (esp. in the OT or any other serial book, like Acts, Isaiah and Daniel), then you can more quickly figure out what formula to 'test'. The dateline meter will often finish within the first 1-3 verses of a chapter. If the last sevening is later, it's a plan-of-time passage, not merely a dateline (like Psalm 90, Daniel 9, Eph 1:3-14, 1Peter1:1-12, etc).

Video's Doc used (first two pages): brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeters.pdf or doc or htm. The columns in the htm won't align, so the numbers for the meters look 'wavy'. I'll fix that in the future. The smaller the font size used in your browser, the more the numbers 'straighten'.

It will also be helpful to download the worksheet which plots all the numbers, so when you see me refer to Adamic years, you can tell that the BIBLE's use of those specific years, are actually from BIBLE's own dates; for the worksheet was created solely from, the Bible's dates: brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls .

Verses used to create that worksheet are in brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

It's a lot of material, but given the importance of the accounting, it should be worth anyone's time to actually vet the material. Whether God wants you to do that, is a matter between you and Him. For once you see how bald these meters are, you know several important things:

1. YES we really do have the inerrant and infallible Word of God, because clearly these meters are deliberate so we know we have the real Words God Preserved (take THAT, you scurrilous KJVO people),

2. YES we can know EXACTLY when Bible books were written (take THAT, you scurrilious Bible debunkers),

3. YES we know EXACTLY WHAT BOOKS ARE SCRIPTURE (take THAT, you who claim we needed some dippy Council of Nicaea or other popish nonsense),

4. YES we know EXACTLY how long it was since Adam FELL, and YES the Bible does NOT say how old the earth is, as the issue isn't even relevant (take THAT, you young earthers and others who would divert the topic of Bible study to banalities),

5. YES we know BETTER how to actually INTERPRET the Bible books, since the DATE OF WRITING is turned into a complex relation-back and relation-forward CONCORDANCE with history and other Bible events, so we know the CONTEXT the WRITER INTENDS.

In short, a lot of wasted money on debates over the above five topics, can stop being wasted. Of course, since a lowly brainout simply counted syllables to find this, the finding will be disregarded, disputed, as if the credentials of the person FINDING something was relevant to what was FOUND. But what was FOUND, is in Scripture, so ANYONE, degreed or not, can FIND it.

File Name: MeterSurvey1-2.avi 3/19/15 concatenated from 1 and 2 of 3/17/15.


Thessalonians (2nd) Meter, 1/3

Part 1 of 3, watch how Paul piggybacks on his own 1 Thess meter with 2 Thess. More proof of how DELIBERATELY this meter works, thereby also proving critics wrong, for a) your Bible really does have God's Word in it, and b) WHAT Paul meant by what he wrote, even to the point of opportunistically using the GREETING to telegraph the doctrinal content of his letter. Heh.

Video emphasis, however, is on HOW you do this meter sleuthing, so you too can do it on any Bible passage you like. And if you like, you can tell me if you found something, find I made an error, etc. :)

Link: brainout.net/2ThessDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

The Ephesians meter channel showing syllable by syllable, how Paul prophetically maps the future of Rome to show how Church determines history: GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . In that channel's videos, I didn't yet know that Paul was using the Lord's SHOULDA BEEN age, and THAT is why his meter exactly aligns with our 'AD', so much that at each eta in each thelematos, an Emperor DIES (Trajan, Macrinus, and Diocletian, respectively. Thelema=will, get the pun).

Magnificat, is a whole vimeo channel, walking you through the Greek (and metered translation), awesome thing, shocks me utterly: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . The doc you'll see onscreen is linked there, but you can click to download, here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or doc).

For the Bible's own timeline, undiluted and not folding in any other ideas or sources — for that's why all our Bible timelines are messed up, people are not SOLELY using Bible — download brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses and audit trail 'behind' the worksheet is at brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: 2ThessMeter1.avi, 3/08/15.


Thessalonians (2nd) Meter, 2/3

Part 2 of 3, continuing on how Paul piggybacks on his own 1 Thess meter with 2 Thess. More proof of how DELIBERATELY this meter works, thereby also proving critics wrong, for a) your Bible really does have God's Word in it, and b) WHAT Paul meant by what he wrote, even to the point of opportunistically using the GREETING to telegraph the doctrinal content of his letter. Heh.

Video emphasis continues on HOW you do this meter sleuthing, so you too can do it on any Bible passage you like. And if you like, you can tell me if you found something, find I made an error, etc. :)

Link: brainout.net/2ThessDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

Magnificat, is a whole vimeo channel, walking you through the Greek (and metered translation), awesome thing, shocks me utterly: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . The doc you'll see onscreen is linked there, but you can click to download, here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or doc).

For the Bible's own timeline, undiluted and not folding in any other ideas or sources — for that's why all our Bible timelines are messed up, people are not SOLELY using Bible — download brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses and audit trail 'behind' the worksheet is at brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: 2ThessMeter2.avi, 3/08/15.


Thessalonians (2nd) Meter, 3/3

Part 3 of 3, conclusion on how Paul piggybacks on his own 1 Thess meter with 2 Thess. More proof of how DELIBERATELY this meter works, thereby also proving critics wrong, for a) your Bible really does have God's Word in it, and b) WHAT Paul meant by what he wrote, even to the point of opportunistically using the GREETING to telegraph the doctrinal content of his letter. Heh.

Link: brainout.net/2ThessDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

Magnificat, is a whole vimeo channel, walking you through the Greek (and metered translation), awesome thing, shocks me utterly: GGS11s Magnificat Meter of Time . The doc you'll see onscreen is linked there, but you can click to download, here: brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2R.pdf (or doc).

For the Bible's own timeline, undiluted and not folding in any other ideas or sources — for that's why all our Bible timelines are messed up, people are not SOLELY using Bible — download brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls . Bible verses and audit trail 'behind' the worksheet is at brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

File Name: 2ThessMeter3END.avi, 3/10/15.


1 Corinthians Dateline Meter 2 , CORRECTED METER

Correcting dateline meter on 1 Cor from '91' to '105' and why. 2 Cor's meter was unaffected, but had to change the explanation for both docs.

Download doc here: brainout.net/1CorDatelineMeter.pdf or 'doc'. For 2 Cor, it's brainout.net/2CorDatelineMeter.pdf

File Name: 1CorFix1-2.avi 3/22/15 concatenated from 1CorFix1 and 2 on 3/21/15.


Romans Meter Sleuthing 1/3

This time, I show how I calculate the meter: here, for Romans. This video starts out with the raw text, formatted but not yet tested for meter. It goes through three (or more, I forget) different putative meter patterns, none of which turn out to be right. So it's useful for seeing the meter methodology process. If you're not interested in that, don't watch.

Part 2 will end up with the right meter, and Part 3 will go through its meaning.

Link: brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: RomansSleuthing123.avi 3/13/15.


Romans Meter Sleuthing 2/3

Part 1 had started with the raw text, formatted but not yet tested for meter. It went through three putative meter patterns. This Part 2 ends up with the right meter, and Part 3 will go through its meaning.

Link: brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: RomansSleuthing4.avi 3/11/15.


Romans Meter Sleuthing 3/3

>Part 1 had started with the raw text, formatted but not yet tested for meter. It went through three putative meter patterns. Part 2 ended up with the right meter. This Part 3 goes through its meaning at 21:50 and following; prior, topic was how Romans 1:5 is horribly mistranslated in all the English Bibles I had.

Link: brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: RomansSleuthing5and6.avi 3/13/15.


Romans Meter Precedent, Yes!

Though my previous videos on Romans Meter weren't exactly 'wrong' (starting here: vimeo.com/brainout/romansmeter1 ), the vids weren't right enough. Turns out Romans, not Acts, is the precedent for the 'I write you' sotto-voce meter style John uses. So this video recaps it. You'll need to download the doc again, brainout.net/RomansDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: RomansPrecedent123.avi 3/24/15.


Philemon Meter

This book was written just before Paul got out of jail, as you'll see from the text (verse 18-22). So when was that? The meter tells you, and bluntly: when the Lord was 63 years old. See: they had their own Anno Domini, and it's recorded predictably, but in the meter.

At this point, videos have been posted on all NT dateline meters, so you can see a commonality of formula and especially, the Bible's own Anno Domini which just happens 'yeah right' to correspond to our own. The dateline meter style is panoramically charted for easy big-picture reference, in the first two pages of brainout.net/LukeDatelineMeter.pdf , which also has a comprehensive list of all docs, videos and webpages related to How God Orchestrates Time, that I've done over the past 10+ years. That link is also in the one below.

Link: brainout.net/PhilemonDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

File Name: PhilemonMeter1.avi, 3/13/15.


Titus Meter

If you don't believe in Trinity, don't watch this BIBLE VIDEO DEMONSTRATING TRINITY METER. Heh. I've never seen so much emphasis on Trinity in a metered passage, as here. Not sure why Paul did it that way, but as you'll see, it's clear that the meter is intended. Which means, you have intentional SCRIPTURE. Which means, our copies are good. Which means, God yes preserved His Word. Each God: Father, Son, Spirit. Triple-heh. It's a little too cute that the addressee in this letter has the same name as a future Emperor whose dad, also a future Emperor, has just been dispatched to Jerusalem...

Titus is the last letter Paul wrote before he was jailed again, and it comes out the very moment or shortly before, when Nero orders Vespasian to go to Jerusalem and quell the rebellion that Florus' taking money from the Temple, had provoked. So here we see prophetical warning about how this event (which maybe wasn't yet known, but would be within weeks of Paul's writing, or was already newly known) — we see how Paul's METER telecasts the 'position' of the event, tagging his own prophecy of it, back in Ephesians.

For here again we see the Bible's own way of accounting Anno Domini, as bald as we saw in the other Pauline books. Every Pauline book uses His Age at x (and at least one will be a formula based on his Actual or originally-planned birth year). So it's real easy to know when a Bible book was written: just count the syllables. As you'll see again here. It's a no-brainer.

Link: brainout.net/TitusDatelineMeter.pdf (or 'doc').

The Ephesians meter is relevant, so here's the channel for it: GGS11 Paul Maps Future Church History . Look at the meter for syllables=AD years 66 and following. If you'd rather just see them in an htm, look at 66-73 here: brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.htm#y47to56 .

File Name: TitusMeter1and2.avi, 3/13/15.